Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-08-2019 Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda PacketPage 1 of 2 SARATOGA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING January 8, 2019 8:30 AM REGULAR MEETING Linda Callon Conference Room, City Hall | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 1.Site Visit(s): a.14524 Oak Street b.12239 Titus Ave 2.Call to Order: 3.Roll Call- Alexandra Nugent, Annette Stransky, Dr. Jo Rodgers, Marilyn Marchetti and Rina Shah 4.Oral Communications Any member of the public may address the Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. 5.Approval of December 11, 2018 minutes 6.New Business: a.14524 Oak Street b.12239 Titus Ave c.2019 HPC Workplan (discussion) 7.Staff Comments: a.None 8.Old Business: a.None 9.Commission Items 10.Adjournment In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 868- 1216 or dbretschneider@saratoga.ca.us. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the start of the meeting. Page 2 of 2 Any recommendation made by the Heritage Preservation Commission may be appealed to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be taken by filing with the Secretary of the Heritage Preservation Commission a written notice and filing fee within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Heritage Preservation Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070. Any materials distributed by sta ff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public review at the office of the Director at the time they are distributed to the Heritage Preservation Commission. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Janet Costa, Administrative Assistant, for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission was posted and available for public review on January 3, 2019 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Page 1 of 3 City of Saratoga HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Draft MINUTES Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2018/ 8:30 A.M. Type: Regular Meeting Place: Linda Callon Conference Room - 13777 Fruitvale Avenue 1.Site Visit(s): a.14320 Peach Hill Road b.14630 Big Basin Way (John Henry House) 2.Call to order: Chair Marchetti called the meeting to order at 9:25 AM 3.Roll Call: Present: Chair Marilyn Marchetti, Commissioners, Annette Stransky, Alexandra Nugent, Dr. Jo Rodgers, and Rina Shah Absent: Paula Cappello Staff: Debbie Pedro, Director of Community Development, Nicole Johnson, Planner II, Chris Riordan, Senior Planner and Sandy Baily, Special Projects Manager 4.Oral Communications: None 5.Approval of minutes from November 13, 2018 meeting. Shah/Stransky moved to approve the minutes. Motion passed. Ayes: Shah, Stransky, Nugent, Marchetti, and Rodgers. Noes: None. Absent: Cappello. Abstain: None. 6.New Business: a.14320 Peach Hill Road – HPC considered an application to relocate garage doors from the rear of the house to the front of a house. Nugent/Stransky moved to recommend approval. Motion passed. Ayes: Shah, Stransky, Nugent, Marchetti, and Rodgers. Noes: None. Absent: Cappello. Abstain: None. 14630 Big Basin Way (John Henry House) – Commissioner Marchetti recused herself from the meeting as she lives within 150 feet of the property. Commissioner Rodgers acted as Item 5 Page 2 of 3 Chair. The Commission considered an application to dismantle, reconstruct and relocate the John Henry house on the same property. Christopher Riordan discussed the proposal. Tom Sloan, architect, discussed the history of the project and the vision of the property owner. Stacey De Shazo, Architectural Historian, reviewed the historic evaluation process and the California Register and how it related to the John Henry house. Jill Hunter, member of the public, commended the property owner for being sensitive in designing a project which preserved the integrity of the John Henry house. The HPC discussed the following items: •Potential archeological findings during construction – Staff explained it was part of the CEQA review process and would be addressed as a condition of approval. •Potential visual impact to the John Henry house with the new building – important to draw public attention to the house by providing plaquing. •Exterior materials and colors – It was agreed that there should be a contrast between the John Henry house and the proposed building. Marilyn Marchetti, member of the public, reinforced the concern of archeological findings. Marchetti expressed concern that the size of the proposed building would overshadow the John Henry house and will change the character of the neighborhood. Marchetti commented that the location of the entry of the house should be relocated to Sixth Street. Paul Hernandez, property owner, informed the HPC on the current construction methods compared to the proposed construction. Hernandez agreed that the John Henry house should be turned to face Sixth Street if it could be permitted to do so. De Shazo responded that changing the orientation of the John Henry house would not comply with the Secretary of Interior Standards. If the orientation was changed it would be a “harder sell” to get on the California Register. Her goal is to reduce the amount of impact in getting on the California Register. Shah/Stransky moved to recommend approval with the following conditions: 1.Wood windows with true divided lites shall be used in the John Henry house. 2.A different shade of roof color shall be used for the John Henry house and the proposed building. Motion passed. Ayes: Shah, Stransky, Nugent, and Rodgers. Noes: None. Absent: Cappello. Abstain: None. Recused: Marchetti. Marchetti returned to the meeting. 7.Staff Comments: a.None Page 3 of 3 8.Old Business: a.Project status update – no discussion 9.Commission Items a.Commissioner Marchetti discussed ideas to thank Commissioner Cappello. A potluck was recommended. b.The Commission was reminded that the transition of the City Council was this Thursday. c.Commission requested to work on items at their January meeting to discuss at the joint meeting with the City Council. 10.Adjournment Chair Marchetti adjourned the meeting at 10:59 A.M. Minutes respectfully submitted: Nicole Johnson, Planner II City of Saratoga Page 1 of 1 Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 M E M O R A N D U M MEETING DATE: January 9, 2019 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Sandy L. Baily, Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: HPC 18-0011 – Addition – 14524 Oak Street Property Location: 14524 Oak Street Property APN: 517-10-004 Project Owner: Matt and Laura Abelson Background: In 1991, the Heritage Preservation Commission added the subject property to Saratoga’s Heritage Resource Inventory. The two-and-one-half-story house represents a Shingle-style design from the beginning of the twentieth century, designed by Wolfe & McKenzie. The house was built in 1906, an addition was added to the rear in the 1950s/1960s, the house was modified for apartments after 1941 and rehabilitated after mid-2003. Project Description: The property owner is requesting approval to add 120 square feet to the first floor of the southwest side of the house. The addition will fill in an area directly under an existing balcony. Two windows and a single pane door will be removed and a new three section door is proposed. New exterior siding and wood trim will match existing, Permit Criteria: The Planning Department, on recommendation of the Heritage Preservation Commission, shall authorize a permit if it is determined that the following applicable criteria is met: a.The proposed work is consistent with the purposes and objectives of Chapter 13 of the Municipal Code. b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the historic resource. Attachments: 1.DPR Form – Hanchett House 2.Site Development Plans Item 6a Mount Diablo State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD NRHP Status Code 3of Hanchett House*Resource Name or # HP-91-01 P1. Other identifier: *P2. Location: Santa Clara County*a. County Cupertino*b. USGS 7.5' Quad 1980 Photorevised .8 S.T .2 W.R Oak St. c. Address:SaratogaCity 95070Zip 10S d. UTM:(give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mE/mN southeast side of Oak Street southwest of Saratoga-Los Gatos Road. e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) (Assigned by recorder): and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.) ;; ; The two-and-one-half-story house represents a Shingle-style design from the beginning of the twentieth century, designed by prominent local architects Wolfe & McKenzie. The property was the subject of a 2003 evaluation by Dill Design Group. Those DPR523 forms are attached to this recording, and provide a detailed survey and evaluation of the property. Subsequent to that recordation, the house was rehabilitated. *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) HP2. Single family property*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)*P4. Resources Present: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List): *Attachments: Archives & Architecture: City of Saratoga Statement of Historic Context, 2009. *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) View facing south east, July 2009. P5b.Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Historic Prehistoric Both *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: Laura Fay & Matthew Abelson 14524 Oak St. Saratoga CA 95070 *P7. Owner and Address: Archives & Architecture, LLC PO Box 1332 San Jose, CA 95109 *P8. Recorded By: (Name, affiliation, and address) 10/26/09*P9. Date Recorded: Reconnaissance *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) 1906, 103 years old. * Required InformationDPR 523A (1/95) Not for Publication Unrestricted 1 517-10-004APN# B.M. F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz Date Primary # HRI # Trinomial Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 14524 Attachment 1 State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD 3CS*NRHP/CRHR Status Code Hanchett HouseResource Name (Assigned by recorder) 3of Hanchette House B1. Historic Name: 14524 Oak St. B2. Common Name: Single family residential B3. Original Use:Single family residentialB4. Present Use: Shingle*B5. Architectural Style: Main House built circa 1906; rear addition 1950s/1960s; modified for apartments after 1941. Rehabiliated after mid-2003. *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) No Yes Unknown*B7. Moved?n/aDate:n/aOriginal Location: Two-car garage to rear. A related property to the rear. *B8. Related Features: Wolfe & McKenzie B9a. Architect:John Rodoni (probable)b. Builder: Architecture*B10. Significance: Theme Saratoga VillageArea: 1906Period of Significance:ResidentialProperty Type:(3)Applicable Criteria: (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The Hanchett House is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory, included as a part of HP-88-01. It qualified under criteria c and e: c) the property embodies distinctive characteristics of the Shingle style, type and period; and e) the property embodies unique physical characteristics that represent an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood. The Hanchett House also appears eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion (3), as the house embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Shingle house-type within Saratoga's City of Homes period, and represents the work of master architects Wolfe & McKenzie. DPR 523B (1/95)*Required Information B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission, Historic Resources Inventory form, 1988. *B12. References: Listed Heritage ResourceB13. Remarks: Franklin Maggi*B14. Evaluator: October 26, 2009*Date of Evaluation: (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) (This space reserved for official comments.) 2 None Primary # HRI # Page State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION LOCATION MAP 3of DPR 523J (1/95)*Required Information * Map Name:Multiple n.t.s.* Scale:Varies* Date of Map: Hanchett House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)3 Primary # HRI # Trinomial Page Attachment 2 Page 1 of 2 Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 M E M O R A N D U M MEETING DATE: January 8, 2019 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Sandy L. Baily, Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: HPC 18-0010 – Addition and Remodel – 12239 Titus Avenue Property Location: 12239 Titus Avenue Property APN: 386-28-002 Project Owner: James Chow Background: In 1988, the Heritage Preservation Commission added the subject property to Saratoga’s Heritage Resource Inventory. According to historical records, the house was built in the 1880’s. County records indicate that the house was built in 1936. Most likely a major addition/alteration was done in 1936 and the County classified the house as “new”. The DPR for the property notes that “there is reportedly a nineteenth-century National-style farmhouse encapsulated in this house, but the current design more closely represents an early-twentieth-century design”. City records indicate that it was originally a simple rectangle with only three rooms, and that there have been many additions over time. Due to the numerous expansions, the DPR notes that in regard to integrity, “the expansions have altered the historic setting and design and that only some of the historic associations and feelings are preserved in the property”. Project Description: The property owner is requesting approval to add 907 square feet to the rear of the house. The addition will extend to the south side setback and therefore, a portion of the addition will be visible from the street. The plans indicate that wood windows are proposed. The house currently has several different window designs and the proposed windows will create better consistency in the design and number of lites. The DPR notes that a major architectural feature of the house is a bay window on the north side of the house which was reportedly added in the 1900’s. No changes are proposed to the bay window. The existing roof ridge is 20 feet four inches. The roof ridge of the addition will be 17 feet ten inches. Permit Criteria: The Planning Department, on recommendation of the Heritage Preservation Commission, shall authorize a permit if it is determined that the following applicable criteria is met: a.The proposed work is consistent with the purposes and objectives of Chapter 13 of the Municipal Code. b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the historic resource. Attachments: 1.DPR Form – Anderson House Item 6b Page 2 of 2 2.Site Development Plans Mount Diablo State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD NRHP Status Code 4of Andersen House*Resource Name or # HP-88-01 P1. Other identifier: *P2. Location: Santa Clara County*a. County Cupertino*b. USGS 7.5' Quad 1980 Photorevised .7 S.T .1 W.R Titus Ave. c. Address:SaratogaCity 95070Zip 10S d. UTM:(give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mE/mN west side of Titus Avenue north of Brookview Drive. e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) (Assigned by recorder): and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.) ;; ; There is reportedly a nineteenth-century National-style farmhouse encapsulated in this house, but the current design more closely represents an early-twentieth-century design. City records indicate that it was originally a simple rectangle with only three rooms, and that there have been many additions over time. The house is low to grade and topped by a moderately sloped hipped roof. Centered in the front gable is a 12-lite gabled attic dormer, typical of Neoclassical designs of the early twentieth century. The front of the house has two offset 16/1 single-hung windows wood windows. The off-center front door is flanked by shutters and is reached by a low brick stoop. A major architectural feature of this house is the bay window on the north side, which was reportedly added in the early 1900's. The central window in the bay is identical to the two windows in the front of the house. The original tank house is at the rear. *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) HP2. Single family property*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)*P4. Resources Present: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List): *Attachments: Archives & Architecture: City of Saratoga Statement of Historic Context, 2009. *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) View facing northwest, July 2009. P5b.Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Historic Prehistoric Both *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: John Drexler PO Box 2226 Cupertino CA 95015 *P7. Owner and Address: Archives & Architecture, LLC PO Box 1332 San Jose, CA 95109 *P8. Recorded By: (Name, affiliation, and address) 10/26/09*P9. Date Recorded: Reconnaissance *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Circa late 1880’s, 120 years old. * Required InformationDPR 523A (1/95) Not for Publication Unrestricted 1 386-28-002APN# B.M. F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz Date Primary # HRI # Trinomial Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 12239 Attachment 1 State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD 5S3*NRHP/CRHR Status Code Andersen HouseResource Name (Assigned by recorder) 4of Andersen House B1. Historic Name: 12239 Titus Ave. B2. Common Name: Single family residential B3. Original Use:Single family residentialB4. Present Use: National (Pioneer)*B5. Architectural Style: Constructed circa 1880s. Remodeled either circa 1910 or in recent times. Three bedrooms and two bathrooms have been added as well as an enclosed rear porch. *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) No Yes Unknown*B7. Moved?n/aDate:n/aOriginal Location: Tankhouse, garage *B8. Related Features: Unknown B9a. Architect:Unknownb. Builder: Architecture and Shelter*B10. Significance: Theme Triangle NorthArea: c1880sPeriod of Significance:ResidentialProperty Type:NoneApplicable Criteria: (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The Andersen House is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory, included as a part of HP-88-01. It qualified under Criteria a and c: a) the property exemplifies and reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, aesthetic, and architectural history of Saratoga; and c) the property embodies distinctive characteristics of the Craftsman style, type and period. The Andersen House may be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion (3), assuming that the authenticity of the present design can be confirmed to the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, as the house appears to embody the distinctive characteristics of the National style house-type from Saratoga's period of Horticultural Development. (Continued on page 4, DPR523L) DPR 523B (1/95)*Required Information B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission, Historic Resources Inventory form, 1988. *B12. References: Listed Heritage ResourceB13. Remarks: Franklin Maggi*B14. Evaluator: October 26, 2009*Date of Evaluation: (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) (This space reserved for official comments.) 2 None Primary # HRI # Page State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION LOCATION MAP 4of DPR 523J (1/95)*Required Information * Map Name:Multiple n.t.s.* Scale:Varies* Date of Map: Andersen House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)3 Primary # HRI # Trinomial Page State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET 4of DPR 523L (1/95)*Required Information (Continued from page 2, DPR523b, B10) Historical Background This apparent farmhouse was built in the 1880's by James and Christina Andersen who emigrated from Denmark. Their children were all born and raised in the house. The Andersens owned ten acres and could see through their orchard to Saratoga Creek to the east. James was a farmer and raised prunes and few apricots. Their neighbors to the north were the Hansens (Mrs. Hansen was Christina's sister). Hansen School is now located there. Mr. and Mrs. Andersen lived in the house until the 1940's when they moved to San Mateo to live with their daughter, Alice. Integrity The present house appears to encapsulate much of the original architectural design, workmanship and materials; however, the house has been expanded over time, altering the historic setting and design, and only some of the historic associations and feelings are preserved in this property. It is not known whether the present style of the house is an overlay in the circa 1910 period, or if it was done in recent times. * Recorded By F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz Andersen House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) Continuation Update10/26/2009* Date Primary # HRI # Trinomial Page 4 Attachment 2