HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.1 written comm_Redacted
CITY OF SARATOGA
Memorandum
To: Mayor Miller & Members of the Saratoga City Council
From: Debbie Bretschneider, City Clerk
Date: May 20, 2020
Subject: 3.1. Mountain Winery Annexation Project
(Written Communications)
After publication of the agenda packet for the May 20, 2020 City Council Meeting, these written
communications were received for 3.1. Mountain Winery Annexation Project.
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
1331 N. California Blvd.
Fifth Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
T 925 935 9400
F 925 933 4126
www.msrlegal.com
Arthur F. Coon
Direct Dial: 925 941 3233
arthur.coon@msrlegal.com
Offices: Walnut Creek / San Francisco / Newport Beach
May 19, 2020
VIA E-MAIL
Honorable Mayor Miller,
Vice Mayor Bernald,
and City Councilmembers
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 9070
Re: City Council Hearing of May 20, 2020, Agenda Item Nos. 2 and 3: Mountain Winery
Annexation Project (Application ANX 20-0001, ENV 19-003, ZOA20-0001, GPA20-001)
Dear Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers:
As you know, this office represents the Concerned Citizens of Saratoga
(“Concerned Citizens”), an unincorporated association of local residents who are
deeply concerned with and strongly oppose the proposed Mountain Winery
Annexation Project (“Project”). This letter supplements our prior correspondence to
the City by focusing on the Project’s clear inconsistencies with the City’s and
County’s respective general plans. As detailed further below, the Project’s
proposed intensification of urban development at the Project site fundamentally
conflicts with and would thwart the collaborative efforts enshrined in the County and
City General Plans to protect the West Valley Hillside Preservation Area
(“WVHPA”).
By way of brief background, in connection with a public hearing before the City’s
Planning Commission on February 12, 2020, our firm submitted a comment letter to
the Commission highlighting numerous legal and technical flaws in the
Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) prepared for the Project. At that hearing, the
Planning Commission received substantial public comments, all of which
unanimously opposed the Project. After receiving and considering this testimony
along with our letter and other written correspondence on the matter, the Planning
Commission unanimously voted (7 to 0) to recommend that the City not move
forward with the Project. For your ease of reference, please find a copy of that letter
attached hereto as Attachment 1 (“Initial CEQA Comment Letter”).1
1 As noted in the Initial CEQA Comment Letter, it reflected our client’s’s preliminary concerns
regarding the Draft EIR’s numerous technical and legal deficiencies. If the City Council
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 2
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
On March 12, 2020, in anticipation of this item being considered by the City Council,
our office submitted another letter describing in detail numerous inconsistencies
between the Project and the goals and policies of the Local Area Formation
Commission of Santa Clara County (“LAFCO”) and related state LAFCO law, and
highlighting how pursuing the proposed annexation is contrary to applicable LAFCO
law and the local guidelines and policies. For your ease of reference, please find a
copy of that letter attached hereto as Attachment 2 (“LAFCO Inconsistency Letter”).
We strongly reiterate our clients’ opposition to the City moving forward and spending
any additional time or financial resources on the Project — approval of which would
clearly violate CEQA, as well as state LAFCO laws and regulations — as
documented more fully in the Initial CEQA Comment Letter and the LAFCO
Inconsistency Letter.
Moreover, we also believe it is critical to point out that Project approval is also
precluded due to the Project’s numerous inconsistencies with relevant policies of the
City and County general plans. While typically a local agency will be given a fair
degree of deference in making such consistency determinations, the conflicts here
are so stark, glaring, and fundamental that the Planning and Zoning Law prevents
the City from moving forward with the Project.
The City attempts to present the Project as a response to what it claims are the
County’s historically irresponsible land use policies for the subject properties and
further asserts that no “actual” development (certainly not a 300-room hotel) is
proposed. But these assertions cannot be squared with reality and perpetuate a
patently false narrative.
Consistent with the long-held preservation policies and goals for the Project site, the
County’s current land use and zoning designation for the site have allowed a
continued grandfathered operation of the historic Mountain Winery pursuant to the
2000 use permit that legalized its previously unpermitted historic operations and
brought them under regulatory land use controls, while at the same time preventing
unchecked and unsuitable intensified urban development at the site and its sensitive
surroundings. The Project would contravene the City’s and County’s long held
General Plan goals by allowing unsuitable, environmentally damaging, and poorly
thought out intensification of urban uses on a sensitive and protected hillside area.
Furthermore, the notion that annexation would not lead to additional development
(at least anytime soon) is objectively false and misleading. Approval of the proposed
GPA, rezoning and Precise Plan would mean that the property owner would have an
absolute right to develop a 300-room destination resort with no further discretionary
land use approval from the City, subject only to design review. Said another way,
the legal nature of the GPA, rezoning and Precise Plan all but ensure that
decides to move forward with the Project, we will further delineate and document the
extensive inadequacies of both the Draft EIR and the Final EIR for purposes of the
administrative record.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 3
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
substantial urban development can — and will — proceed. To claim otherwise
would be to misunderstand the law and would defy reality.
For these reasons and for those further set out below, the Project should be
terminated because it fundamentally conflicts with the City and the County’s General
Plan goals and policies for the Project site.
I. THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD NOT SUBSTANTIVELY CONSIDER
THIS MATTER AT ALL UNTIL THERE CAN BE MEANINGFUL, IN-
PERSON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS.
As a preliminary matter, it is critical to note the disturbing path the City has
apparently elected to pursue by continuing its substantive consideration of the
Project during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.
Despite state and county-wide emergency orders, the City is still required to comply
with the Brown Act. (Cal. Const. Art. I, § 3(b)(7).) Although Governor Newsom’s
March 17 Executive Order gives municipalities some flexibility in the manner they
can conduct public business such municipalities must:
Adhere as closely as reasonably possible to the provisions of the… Brown
Act, and other applicable local laws regulating the conduct of public
meetings, in order to maximize transparency and provide public access to
their meetings.
(March 17 Executive Order, at pg. 4.)
By rushing the City’s consideration of this highly controversial project while it is
impossible for members of the public to comment and participate in person at a City
meeting or even to fully exercise their associational rights to meet and discuss the
Project among themselves outside of public meetings, the City arguably violates the
spirit of transparency and public participation underlying the Brown Act, under the
circumstances here where there has been a minimum of genuinely meaningful
opportunity for prior public participation. The Project does not pose or address an
emergency, and there is no other factor compelling its hasty consideration; there
thus is no reason why the Council’s consideration of the Project cannot be
continued until after state and County emergency orders are lifted.
We continue to be concerned by the City’s lack of transparency and failure to
adequately ensure public participation in the Project review process. At the outset,
the City chose to obfuscate the true nature of the Project, framing it as merely an
annexation of County land to allow the City to control future land use
there. However, actual project designs and proposed approvals amount to far more
than “annexation” or sound land use policy and would allow for a significant
intensification of development on a sensitive and currently protected site. Notice
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 4
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
procedures followed by the City have also been sub-optimal, with many of our
client’s members only learning about the Project shortly before the Planning
Commission’s February 12, 2020 hearing on the Project.
In response to community concerns regarding the above, the City expressed an
interest in ensuring full public vetting and participation in its review of the Project.
Nonetheless, the City continues effectively to impede meaningful public participation
in its review of the Project by holding this hearing on the Project during the ongoing
COVID-19 crisis. The hearing should be continued to a future date when more
normal and robust public participation in the process can occur.
II. THE PROJECT IS IN FATAL CONFLICT WITH NUMEROUS
RELEVANT GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
A. The Project Site and Its Existing Conservation-Oriented General
Plan And Zoning Designations Are Intended To Protect This
Historic Site And Vicinity From Urban Development.
The Project would involve annexation to the City of two parcels (APNs 503-46-006
and 503-46-007) totaling 358 acres (“Project site”) [with a corresponding expansion
of the City’s Urban Service Area (“USA”) and sphere of influence (“SOI”).2
The Project site consists of the Mountain Winery, which is a historic resource listed
on the National Register of Historic Places and is designated a California Historical
Landmark (#733), surrounding open space and scenic vineyards. Much of the
Project site is characterized by exposed ridgelines visible for a large distance and
from the valley floor below.
As detailed in our March 12, 2020 correspondence, the Project site is located within
the WVHPA. The site’s inclusion in the WVHPA is critical because it reflects the
County’s and the City’s longstanding recognition, in their respective general plans,
that the Project site should be protected from the type of unfettered and massive
urban development that the Project proposes. The WVHPA is the culmination of
more than twenty years of collaborative efforts by the County, the City of Saratoga,
and other West Valley cities to prevent urban development on West Valley Hillside
areas like the Project site. These collective efforts form an integral part of both the
City and County’s General Plan land use goals and policies. Consistent with this
collective objective of maintaining the rural nature of this area, the Project site’s
current general plan and zoning designations are non-urban in nature and reflect the
2 The Project would also involve annexation of the Project Site into the Cupertino Sanitary
District to allow for potential future sanitary sewer service to be provided to the Mountain
Winery and proposed development, and would necessitate a growth accommodating and
growth-inducing expansion of the capacity of that system.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 5
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
goals of, among other things, minimizing visual impacts from development and
preserving the natural landscape.
B. The Project Would Transform The Long-Held
Conservation Vision To Urban Uses If The Council
Approves The Proposed GPA And Re-Zoning.
To enable the annexation and the concomitant expansion of the City’s USA, the
Project would result in reclassification of approximately 176 acres of the Project Site
from its current conservation-focused general plan and zoning designation to a
commercial designation. Specifically, the Project would re-designate the Project site
from a Hillside/Hillside D1 General Plan and zoning designation to a “Regional
Commercial” general plan and zoning designation.
This new designation and related rezoning would allow for an expansive range of
urban uses consisting of “visitor serving commercial uses” including lodging, outdoor
recreation, dining, and restaurants, entertainment, meeting and special event
facilities, and similar commercial uses. The Project would also trigger the need for
the substantial extension of utilities, public services, utilities, and infrastructure to
facilitate such urban development.3
The expansive urban nature of this designation clashes with the Project site’s
current General Plan and zoning designations in both the County and the City, all of
which classify and treat the site as a protected rural and/or conservation use, as well
as LAFCO’s relevant and applicable goals and policies for the protection of hillside
and ridgetop open space such as the Project site. Without exception, these goals
and policies seek to conserve and minimize visual impacts to the scenic attributes of
such lands; limit new uses to non-urban uses that are compatible with the hillsides’
natural appearance; discourage and prevent any urban expansion into the hillsides;
preserve the rural nature of the hillsides by limiting incompatible development; and
requiring any development in hillside areas to undertake visual analyses and
mitigate any significant visual impacts. (See February 22, 2020 letter from Arthur F.
Coon to City Planning Commission, at pp. 8-9, and citations therein.)
As made clear by First Carbon Solutions’ visual simulations of the intensive urban
development that would be authorized by the Project at the Mountain Winery
property, the Project would violate all existing County, City, and LAFCO policies and
would destroy the rural and sensitive nature of the Winery’s current setting. The
Project would also destroy the aesthetic and cultural integrity of the site of a
designated and iconic historic landmark. (See, e.g., Georgetown Preservation
3 The Draft EIR as well as the Precise Plan, along with City correspondence from staff and
certain decision makers, appears to be attempting to minimize and/or ignore the reality that
substantial urban infrastructure and utilities would need to be extended to accommodate the
Project. This not only results in a failure to analyze and disclose potential environmental
impacts, but also underestimates the amount of urban sprawl that would be triggered
through this expansion. The LAFCO Inconsistency Letter provides additional information
and analysis in this regard.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 6
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
Society v. County of El Dorado (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 538 [despite required
compliance with county’s historic design review guidelines, substantial evidence
supported fair argument of significant aesthetic impact requiring EIR analysis of
project to locate commercial building within downtown area of Georgetown, an area
designated as a State Historical Landmark]; Protect Niles v. City of Fremont (2018)
25 Cal.App.5th 1129 [EIR analysis required of aesthetic impacts of mixed-use
residential / retail development to be located in city’s officially designated Niles
Historic Overlay District].)
Like the areas at issue in Georgetown Preservation and Protect Niles, the Mountain
Winery site presents a particularly sensitive context when it comes to analysis of the
aesthetic and cultural impacts of additional urbanized development. This is true not
only because of the site’s protected rural hillside and near-ridgetop location and land
use designations, and its iconic cultural status, but because of its official designation
as a National and State Historic Landmark. The City’s EIR is woefully deficient in its
failures to analyze the impact of the proposed new, massive, and unprecedented
urban development uses on the physical and visual integrity of this particularly
sensitive historic resource and setting. To put it simply, a massive resort hotel and
associated commercial activities on this site, with their attendant 24/7/365 traffic,
noise, light, glare, pollutant, and visual impacts, will utterly and irreversibly destroy
this irreplaceable, iconic, and historic treasure.
Nor will these impacts and their irreversible damage be limited to the Precise Plan’s
73-acre “disturbed area” – which would be bad enough in itself. The Project’s
proposed Regional Commercial zoning designation extends far beyond that area
and would actually allow additional intensive future urban development on an
additional 103 acres of mostly pristine rural habitat in APN 503-46-006.
III. THE PROJECT FUNDAMENTALLY CONFLICTS WITH
NUMEROUS GENERAL PLAN POLICIES THAT GOVERN THE
COUNTY’S LAND USE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS FOR THE
SITE
As detailed below, the Project conflicts with numerous County General Plan policies
related to the Project site, many of which were developed collaboratively by
Saratoga and other West Valley Cities to preserve West Valley hillsides.
The irony of this wholly unnecessary conflict was not lost on the Planning
Commission and other Project opponents, and should not be ignored by City staff
and decision makers. The County has adopted and continues to implement very
protective land use goals and policies which have ensured, to date, that the Project
Site has remained consistent with these conservation- and preservation-oriented
goals. Those protective goals and policies would be subverted and turned on their
head by the City’s proposed Annexation Project. To be clear, it is the City — not the
County — that is seeking to fundamentally undermine all these protections by its
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 7
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
proposal to incorporate urbanizing land use policies into its key planning and
regulatory documents that would thwart and defeat longstanding preservation efforts
for the Project Site, causing harm for decades to come.
This critical point was driven home by the May 18, 2020 letter to the Council
concerning this Project from four well respected environmental preservation groups
deeply concerned with the negative environmental impacts that would result from
the City’s proposed actions. That letter from Green Foothills, the Santa Clara
Audubon Society, the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, and the California Native
Plant Society Santa Clara Valley Chapter, urges the termination of the Project for
numerous reasons. The letter cogently observes that the Mountain Winery site is
far better protected from the adverse impacts of undesirable urban development
under the current regulatory land use regime and jurisdictional boundaries than
under the project:
Mountain Winery, established in the established in the 1950s, was a legal
nonconforming use for decades before being brought into compliance
with County regulations through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in 2000.
That CUP allowed some expansion rights, which are now nearly all
exhausted. Under County regulations very little additional development
would be permitted at the site, which is in the Hillside designation. In
terms of lodging and facilities, a 6-room bed-and-breakfast would be the
most that would be permitted.
It is worth noting that a facility with the Mountain Winery’s current
operations would not be permitted under County regulations for the
Hillside area. Only the fact that Mountain Winery was grandfathered in
enables this facility to operate as it currently does. Although the CUP
allowed some expansion of the Facility, approval of any additional
expansion by the County would require that the County act in conflict with
its own General Plan policies and zoning code. By contrast, the Project, if
approved by the Council will automatically approve a significant
expansion of both type and level of use in the form of a significant number
of overnight lodging accommodations.
(5/18/20 letter at pp. 1-2.)
This analysis hits the nail on the head – the alleged premise of “annexation for
protection” is a patently false narrative with absolutely no factual or legal support.
The best protection for the Mountain Winery site against unlawful and
environmentally harmful urbanization is to reject the Project and leave the Project
site where it currently resides within the County’s boundaries and jurisdiction and
subject to land use regulations that will preclude the type of urban expansion that
would be allowed by the City’s annexation Project.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 8
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
A project that is inconsistent with a jurisdiction’s applicable general plan cannot
be approved as a matter of well-established law. And while local agencies have
considerable discretion in interpreting and balancing conflicting general plan
policies, they do not have discretion to approve projects that plainly conflict with
clear, mandatory, and fundamental general plan policies. (Families Unafraid to
Uphold Rural El Dorado County v. Board of Supervisors (“FUTURE”) (1998) 62
Cal.App.4th 1332, 1341, 1342; Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa
County Board of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 342, 378-381.) A project is
consistent with a general plan policy if it would further, and not obstruct the
attainment of the policy. As described further below, the Project would conflict
with, fail to further, and affirmatively obstruct the attainment of numerous
applicable, mandatory, and fundamental County and City General Plan policies.
A. West Valley Hillsides Preservation Area
The entire Project site is within the County General Plan’s West Valley Hillsides
Preservation Area (“WVHPA”). The establishment of this area “was a collaborative
planning project involving the West Valley cities of Cupertino, Monte Sereno,
Saratoga, Los Gatos and the County.” The County and Cities established the
WVHPA “to protect the scenic appearance of the West Valley Hillsides… most
visible from the valley floor.” (Santa Clara County GP (“SCC GP”) at Q-30.) While
adopting the WVHPA “the cities… agreed to delineate long term growth boundaries
that will serve to minimize further urban encroachment into the hillsides.” In return,
“the County has assured the cities that the development it allows outside their urban
service areas will be appropriate for rural hillside areas and will have minimal visual
impacts when viewed from the valley floor.” (SCC GP at 30.)
The County adopted the following policies as part of the collaborative effort to
preserve the WVHPA:
R-LU 198: “New Development in the West Valley hillsides area should be
located and designed to minimize its visibility from the valley floor.”
R-LU 199: “New land uses within the West Valley hillsides areas should be
limited to non-urban uses that are compatible with the preservation of the
natural appearance of hillsides.”
R-LU 200: “Urban development and extension of urban services should be
limited to those areas most suited for urban development. Further expansion
of the urban area into the West Valley hillsides should be discouraged.”
R-LU 202: “The West Valley Cities should delineate and adopt long term
growth boundaries indicating lands to which they are willing to provide urban
services within approximately the next 20-30 years in order to: a. preserve the
predominantly natural character and natural resources of hillsides by
preventing urban development from encroaching onto them b. Reinforce
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 9
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
fundamental policies concerning the appropriate location of urban
development c. Protect public health and safety by preventing urban
development in hazardous areas.”
The Project directly contravenes all of the above policies. The Project’s proposed
change in the Project site’s land use and zoning designation is specifically to allow
for construction of an expansive regional resort hotel with up to 300 overnight rooms
operating 24/7/365, and other urban regional commercial uses. However, the
Project’s impacts on the WVHPA would not be limited to the 73-acre Precise Plan
Area as a total of 176 acres in the vicinity would be re-designated and rezoned to an
urban Regional Commercial land use and zoning designation. The Project would
extend urban services and development into the very West Valley hillsides where
the County General Plan expressly discourages and seeks to preclude such urban
development. Moreover, the Project would encourage unsuitable urban
development on protected hillside and ridgeline areas surrounding the valley floor.
B. County Non-Urban Land Use and Zoning Designations
The Project would also clearly conflict with the County’s current General Plan and
zoning designations for the Project site.4
The County General Plan designates the Project Site as Hillside (HS). The HS
designation is aimed at resource conservation and allows agricultural type uses,
parks, low-density recreation, natural land, wildlife refuges, and in very limited
circumstances commercial, institutional, and institutional uses that are specially
suited for rural environments. The County also designates the entire Project site
with a Hillside d1 District (HS-d1) designation, with southern portions of parcel 503-
46-006 zoned Hillside d1 District – Scenic Roads (HS-d1-sr). The HS-d1 combining
district:
Is intended to conserve the scenic attributes of those hillside lands most
immediately visible from the valley floor and allows all the uses listed under HS,
including residential. This district is intended to minimize the visual impacts of
structures and grading on the natural topography and landscape.
Permitted and conditionally permitted uses under the HS-d1 combining district do
not include hotel or motel type uses.
Again, the County land use and zoning designations for the site seek to limit the
Project site to conservation and agricultural uses that will not have significant
aesthetic, lighting and visual impacts on the ridgeline and hillsides, including as
viewed from the valley below. The Project violates these goals. Moreover, the
Project EIR’s claim that pursuing urban general plan and zoning designations for the
4 Perhaps this may explain, at least in part, why the Mountain Winery did not seek approval
of its grandiose hotel development plans from the County.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 10
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
site, which permit substantial urban growth as a right, would be more protective than
existing County designations is patently false.
C. County General Plan Growth and Development Policies
The Project would also fail to further, conflict with, and obstruct the County General
Plan’s Growth and Development Policies. These growth and development policies
are designed to be consistent with and reinforce the LAFCO policies we discussed
in our March 12, 2020 letter to the City Council. Specifically, the County’s Growth
and Development Policies are aimed at preventing unnecessary urban expansion
and promoting in-fill development in appropriate areas. The County General Plan
notes that:
[a]lthough the potential for urban expansion has lessened somewhat over
time, the strategies and policies discouraging unnecessary expansion are no
less important today for the purposes of preserving open space, avoiding
development in hazardous areas, minimizing the costs of extending urban
services, and promoting compact development within the urban areas.
(County General Plan B-5.)
The County General Plan incorporates the following relevant Growth and
Development Policies:
Policy C-GD 1: Most of the future urban growth of Santa Clara County
should be accommodated within the existing urban areas, through infill
development, rather than through the expansion of the urbanized area into
hillsides and resource areas.
Policy C-GD 2: Urban development shall occur only within the cities’ urban
service areas (USAs) and under city jurisdiction. The County shall not allow
urban development on unincorporated lands outside cities’ urban service
areas.
The Project fails to further, directly conflicts with, and violates and obstructs
implementation of the above policies by promoting urban sprawl and development at
the predominantly rural, hillside Project site.
IV. The Project Conflicts with Several City General Plan Policies
In addition to contradicting County General Plan policies, the Project violates the
City’s own General Plan policies. Consistent with longstanding collaborative efforts
to preserve the WVHPA, these policies seek to constrain the very type of urban
development in rural hillside areas that the Project proposes.
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 11
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
The proposed Project and Precise Plan’s fuzzy and toothless design policies would
utterly fail to control inappropriate urbanized development at the Mountain Winery
because they conflict with, fail to further, and would affirmatively obstruct and defeat
the numerous city general plan policies and goals intended to prevent such harmful
development.
A. Environmental and Resource Protection
Regarding Environmental Resource and Protection, City General Plan Goal LU 6
seeks to “’[p]rotect natural resources and amenities through appropriate land use
and related programs.” (City General Plan, at 23.)
The Project would contradict this goal by promoting urban development in a
sensitive hillside area identified by the County, the City of Saratoga, and Santa
Clara County LAFCO – and the Nation and State - as a historic and culturally
significant and sensitive site, and one warranting protection from new urban
development.
B. Hillside Development
The City General Plan also has a number of goals and policies aimed specifically at
limiting development in the West Valley hillsides area. The City adopted these
policies as part of the collaborative area effort to protect the WVHPA.
For example:
Goal LU 8: The natural beauty of the West Valley hillsides area shall be
maintained and protected for its contribution to the overall quality of life of
current and future generations.
Goal LU 9: Preserve the rural nature of the hills by limiting incompatible
development.
Policy LU 9.1: Limit expansion of urban development in the hillside areas.
Policy LU 9.2: Limit the amount of grading within hillside areas to the
minimum amount needed for dwellings and access.
Goal LU 10: Minimize the visual impacts of hillside development, especially
on ridgetops.
The City’s General Plan outlines the following relevant implementation measure to
achieve these goals:
LU 9.a: Ensure protection of the hillside areas by designating medium
density, multi-family-residential and non-residential land uses in the Land
Use Map in the flatland areas only, where they are considered more
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 12
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
appropriate. Parks in the hillsides may be permitted provided they are
planned in a manner that is compatible with the rural nature of the area.
The Project would clearly violate and thwart the above goals, policies and
implementation measures by allowing for new substantial urban development on the
Project site.
V. Conclusion.
After reviewing relevant County General Plan, and City General Plan policies, it is
clear that a project proposing a new 300 room resort hotel and related amenities
would fail to further, and would violate and obstruct the attainment and
implementation of those policies in a fundamental way, and is neither legal nor
appropriate for the Project site
We are aware that the Project EIR claims the Project is consistent with the above
policies because the Project site is already an “urban” setting. However, this is
simply not the case. Outside of the historic Mountain Winery and limited
appurtenant structures and amenities, some existing, and some to be built or
updated, the Project site primarily consists of vineyards and undeveloped open
space. These limited and grandfathered existing uses are compatible with the
County’s existing HS and HS-d1 land use and zoning designations for the site,
which are aimed at protecting hillside areas from large-scale urban development.
The Project would result in a significant urban intensification and exceedance of
permitted uses in violation of decades of collaborative efforts to preserve West
Valley hillsides and ridgelines. The Council should reject it.
Again, we respectfully request that the Council terminate its pursuit of the Project,
and in accordance with its Planning Commission’s unanimous recommendation,
vote to direct staff not to move forward with the Project in any form.
Very truly yours,
MILLER STARR REGALIA
Arthur. F. Coon
Arthur F. Coon
AFC:tzb/klw
cc: James Lindsay, City Manager
Richard S. Taylor, Esq., City Attorney
Debbie Bretschneider, City Clerk
City of Saratoga Planning Division (
Honorable Mayor Miller, Vice Mayor Bernald, and City Councilmembers
May 19, 2020
Page 13
DNVN-56577\2276740.4
Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer, Santa Clara LAFCO
Dunia Noel, Executive Assistant Officer, Santa Clara LAFCO
)
Nadia L. Costa, Esq. (
Matthew C. Henderson, Esq. )
Travis A. Brooks, Esq. ()
Concerned Citizens of Saratoga
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF SARATOGA
Memorandum
To: Saratoga Planning Commission
From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director
Date: February 12, 2020
Subject: 14831 Pierce Road (ANX20-0001, ENV19-0003, ZOA20-0001, GPA20-001) –
Supplemental Memo 3
The attached public comments for 14831 Pierce Road were provided after the staff report was prepared.
Attachment 1 –Letter from attorney Arthur F. Coon, Miller Starr Regalia, dated February 12, 2020
Page 1 of 14
Attachment 1
Page 2 of 14
Page 3 of 14
Page 4 of 14
Page 5 of 14
Page 6 of 14
Page 7 of 14
Page 8 of 14
Page 9 of 14
Page 10 of 14
Page 11 of 14
Page 12 of 14
Page 13 of 14
Page 14 of 14
ATTACHMENT 2
From:
r;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Friday, May 15, 2020 2:06:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Glenda Aune
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Comment for May 20 Mountain Winery Annexation Public
Hearing (replace comment submitted for March 18 Hearing)
Comments Dear City Council Members,
Please stop the Mountain Winery Annexation.
I learned about the annexation of the Mountain Winery and the
rezoning of Parcel 6 (194 acres) to Regional Commercial in late
January of this year when I received a letter from my neighbors
(not Saratoga!) alerting me to this project including a potential
300 room hotel. Initially, I was only against a hotel of any size.
Now, after weeks of research – talking with the County Planning
Department and LAFCO and reviewing related documents – I am
against the annexation because it will open the door for more
and more urban sprawl in our residential hillsides.
The City says that the annexation of the Mountain Winery will
“finally” limit the development of the property to the currently
disturbed area (74 acres of Parcel 6) while preserving the
remaining hillside (approx. 120 acres of Parcel 6) and will give
Saratoga “control” over future development. These are good
arguments in favor of annexation. The footprint of the developed
area has increased since the 2000 Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
was approved for the property. And in 2000, Saratoga appealed
the approval of the CUP since the City’s inputs for mitigating
noise and traffic were not adequately addressed. And residents
continue to complain today about the noise and traffic from
Mountain Winery concerts and events. However, this annexation
plan does NOT mitigate these basic issues. It makes them
worse.
Annexation equals urbanization. Cities should only annex
properties they plan to urbanize.
If this property is annexed by Saratoga, in two years there will be
nothing – no County input, no LAFCO regulations, no CEQA laws
– to stop a future City Council from renegotiating the Precise
Plan and Joint Development Plan with current or future owners of
the Mountain Winery and allowing expansion of commercial uses
and development of more of this property that will already be
zoned Regional Commercial. And, if LAFCO agrees to change
the USA and SOI for Parcel 7, there will be nothing to stop
Saratoga from annexing this property and approving more and
more commercial uses within our residential hillsides.
Can the City Council guarantee that this will not happen?
There is no guarantee what will or will not happen during the next
twenty-five years, the time period to be covered by a Joint
Development Agreement with the Mountain Winery. In 2002, the
County Board of Supervisors denied the appeals against the
2000 CUP (including Saratoga’s appeal) and stated in their
approval for the permit that development would be confined to
the currently disturbed or developed areas of the property. Sound
familiar? And, while the development has been focused in the
disturbed area – the concert bowl expansion and the parking lot
expansion were included in the 2000 CUP and the 5 new
buildings were replacements for demolished buildings – the
footprint has increased. And, further expansion of the footprint
can happen whether this property is annexed or remains in the
County.
Things can change in the County just like they can change in the
City. However, based on current regulations and policies, I truly
believe that the best way to preserve our Saratoga hillsides is to
the leave the Mountain Winery property in the County where it is
zoned “Hillside.”
• The County is committed to preserving the resources and
character of the “rural” area.
• The County cannot provide sewer which is required for large
scale development. While there are septic tanks and
waste water treatment systems designed for large development
including hotels, the County may not approve these
due to environmental concerns.
• The County will not approve a hotel for this property. The
property is zoned “Hillside” which allows Seasonal Outdoor
Entertainment (i.e., concerts and events) and a 6-unit bed and
breakfast, but not a hotel. And the County will not
rezone this property for commercial uses due to the location
within residential areas and the mountainous terrain.
• The County will only approve a new CUP for uses defined in the
zoning ordinance for Hillside. The Mountain Winery
has built out to the limit of their 2000 CUP with one exception –
they have not built the bungalows that are allowed in
the plan. If the Mountain Winery wants lodging, the County will
approve a 6-unit bed and breakfast per the zoning
ordinance or small bungalows per the Mountain Winery 2000
CUP. While a B&B could be built on a location other than
the currently disturbed area, this would still have less impact on
the environment than a hotel.
Why allow more commercial uses including a hotel of any size in
this residential hillside area? Why allow high density residential
units (also allowed per the Precise Plan) to be built in this low
density residential area? These uses will greatly increase the
traffic, noise, risks from wildfire, and other environmental impacts
for the local residents and the wildlife that live in these hillsides,
and not just during concerts and events but 24 hours a day x 365
days a year
• Pierce Road is the main access road to the Mountain Winery.
The EIR traffic study states that an additional 1,431 daily
trips generated by a hotel will have no significant impact in this
narrow, winding rural road that is already saturated with
traffic. Really? This is an average of 100 additional trips an hour,
assuming most traffic will occur during 12 hours per
day.
• This is a high-fire area, and the risk of wildfire is real especially
during drought periods. During a wildfire, hundreds of
guests of a Mountain Winery hotel may be required to “shelter-in-
place” when the access driveway and Pierce Road
are blocked by emergency vehicles. And, if the guests are
allowed to exit the property, the additional traffic on Pierce
Road and surrounding roads could significantly impact residents
trying to exit the area.
I have lived on Pierce Road for thirty-five (35) years. I love this
area. It is beautiful. And, unlike many of my neighbors, I love the
deer and the rabbits that eat everything in my yard. It is home.
When we first moved to Pierce Road, the traffic was light, and we
saw coyotes at our house a couple of times a year. After the
residential development started off Mount Eden Road, we began
seeing coyotes more and more often, and occasionally we would
see a bobcat. Now, after all the residential development in this
area, the traffic on Pierce Road can be very heavy and loud
throughout the day. Even on a Saturday afternoon, it can be
dangerous to walk across the road to get the mail. During the dry
summer months, coyotes are in our yard almost every day.
Bobcats and foxes come around regularly all year. And, a few
weeks ago we captured a video of what appears to be a
mountain lion on our back patio. Other neighbors have posted
photos on Nextdoor of mountain lions in their yards.
These are signs that we are slowly destroying our hillsides and
the habitats of the wildlife that live here. Yes, the drought has
caused wildlife to expand their territories to find food and water.
And, yes, we have more motion detectors and cameras today to
capture photos and videos of the animals that cross our
properties. But we are invading more and more of the space that
the wildlife call home with our houses, fences, and traffic.
Where does this stop? It stops with us!
Most of us moved to Saratoga for the beauty and quiet rural
atmosphere, an escape from the congested Silicon Valley. And
we need to do whatever we can to stop or at least mitigate the
urban sprawl before our beautiful hillsides are gone forever.
Annexation of the Mountain Winery property, regardless of the
City’s zoning and the Precise Plan, equals more urban sprawl
that we will not be able to stop. There will be nothing to stop
future City Councils from changing the Precise Plan and the Joint
Development Plan with the Mountain Winery.
We need to stop this before it starts!
Annexation is NOT the best way forward to preserve our
hillsides. We should leave this property in the County and zoned
Hillside. Saratoga should work with the County on any proposed
future development or CUP for the Mountain Winery. This will
help ensure that we preserve our hillsides for current and future
residents and the local wildlife rather than opening the door for
more and more urban sprawl.
Respectfully,
Glenda Aune
Email not displaying correctly? .
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Friday, May 15, 2020 9:29:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Mike Seifert
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation
Comments As a nearly 30 year resident of Saratoga, I wish to express my
opposition to the annexation of the Mountain Winery parcels by
the City of Saratoga. I have read the 375 pages of public
comment and I could only find two residents supportive of the
annexation while scores of residents opposed this proposal.
Even the Mayor's long-time neighbors opposed the proposal!
The City Council should listen to its constituents who
overwhelmingly oppose the annexation--for all the many reasons
stated. I would like to believe the Mayor's public statements
saying local City control is better than the County of Santa Clara
but after reading the County Conditional Use Permit, local City
control would likely open up more change/development NOT
prevent it. All the changes that have happened in the last 20
years have been beneficial and closely controlled by the County.
If the City gained control, California SB35 would likely be
activated, and then a future developer would have more say in
development and the City's jurisidiction would be limited. Please
end this process now!
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
er;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 2:37:49 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name KEN CZWORNIAK
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation
Comments I am absolutely against the Mountain Winery Annexation as it will
lead to increased traffic congestion in the Saratoga Village and
nearby areas.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 8:26:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Jasim Ahmad
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery
Comments Council members and Staff
Saratoga City Council needs to Stop the Mountain Winery Land
Annexation. Please enter my objection into the record of the
upcoming meeting on May 20, 2020
Q&A from the City and comments by Peggy Lynne, Bank Mill
Lane, Saratoga
40. Does the City have the power to override Measure A?
Measure A called for the creation of a Hillside Specific Plan,
which the City adopted in 1981 and updated in 1994. The Hillside
Specific Plan does not apply to the Mountain Winery parcel
proposed for annexation as it is located outside the boundaries of
the Specific Plan.
https://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?
view_id=9&clip_id=1068&meta_id=69887
Being that you, the City Council are aware of the intent of
Measure A, you were negligent in not notifying the entire City of
Saratoga, prior to the March 19, 2019 meeting of your intent to
drive forward this Mountain Winery land Annexation. I do not
think you had anybody in the cambers that evening, and had you
notified the entire city prior to that meeting, how many do you
think would have been there?
In that meeting , you promised, that the density of the land use
would not be increased. Then months later, you present a draft ,
which includes, a 300 room Hotel, and other high density uses.
As a City Council you are failing your residential community.
What you have done, appears to be a bait and switch on your
citizens at large.
64. What are the financial impacts on the City of annexation?
The City is currently undertaking a fiscal impact study of the
annexation in preparation for the application to LAFCO. While the
study is not complete, the City is expecting the annexation to
have a modest positive fiscal impact.
I believe, the question was, what is the financial impact on the
City Budget. Where do you see any income from this increased ,
management project. How many more man hours are going to be
needed in the planning and permit departments. How much more
time is going to need to be spent by the Planning Commission
and Traffic Commission on this development ? I’m not even
asking you , at this time, to line item all the money and city
employee man hours you have already spent on this. Why are
you, Howard and Manny, being your terms are up in 2020,
hanging this Annexation on both the new Council Members and
the Citizens of Saratoga, that do not want it.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:51:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Cheriel Jensen
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mt. Winery, for Meeting May 20, 2020, Comments for both items
concerning the Mt. Winery Rezoning, Redesignation and
Annexation
Comments
May 16, 2020
RE: Second letter concerning both items.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
Under the language of SB 35, land with a Resource
Conservation General Plan Designation and Hillside Zoning,
such as the Mt. Winery land now in County jurisdiction, is
excluded from State SB 35 dense housing requirements. As long
as the land remains in a Resource Conservation Designation
with appropriate “Hillside” zoning, this land cannot be considered
for forced housing such as now being facilitated and fast tracked
by our City Council at the Quito Center. These are county
General Plan designations and zoning. Saratoga has nothing
comparable.
Saratoga is now deciding May 20, 2020, whether to continue with
plans to annex this Resource Conservation Hillside, change the
General Plan and Zoning of it to a new zone they invented, RC
which allows a hotel with 300 Rooms, or equivalent
Condominiums, and it then becomes subject to SB 35 where
residential uses and densities can go even higher than 300 units
and there will be nothing we can say about dense residential use
there.
Never mind that it is nestled within in the most extremely high fire
zone, that we already experience rolling blackouts several times
throughout the summer, that we are still overcharged by about
double for water due to water shortages of 5 years ago and less
of our local heavens-sent water will recharge our aquifer due to
the planned hardscape, that this excess runoff will cause
downstream flooding, that we could have another water shortage
as soon as this year and shortages are becoming more and more
frequent, that both roads leading there having been built on
landslides, one of which is constantly active, and the other road
is located on a fault and through a fault zone, that the land has
no safe or guaranteed access in case of fire, utilities such as gas,
electricity and sewage will have to be built on landslides and can
be expected to frequently fail sending raw sewage into our
creeks, releasing gas as a fire hazard, interrupting power as a
added fire hazard, and that if condominiums are built, there is not
even mention of providing classrooms for the children.
This scheme was hatched in secret over a year ago while the
EIR was prepared without proper notice leaving no time for
citizens to comment or insist on full disclosure.
I urge you to stop this plan now before even more money and
time is spent, and your citizens become even more angry at this
irresponsible scheme.
Yours truly,
Cheriel Jensen
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:53:55 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Thomas Lawrence
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery annexation and development proposal
Comments Dear Mayor Miller and City of Saratoga Council Members,
I have two concerns regarding this proposal:
Concern #1: Pierce Road traffic safety:
Pierce Road is shared by cyclists, pedestrians, cars, trucks,
construction vehicles, and busses. From Surrey Lane to Highway
9 the road is very narrow and winding, with blind curves and an
overhanging tree canopy that forces large trucks and busses to
drive in the center of the road to avoid damaging to their vehicles
(in particular, the blind curve where Saratoga Hills and Pierce
intersect).
Cars and trucks regularly ignore the double yellow lines in areas
of limited visibility to pass slower moving cyclists and
pedestrians.
My wife and I have been Saratoga residents for 45 years, living
in the hillsides on Via Regina. We have been very fortunate.
Despite a number of near misses, we have only been hit head on
once on this area of Pierce Road ... by an oncoming car going
too fast, losing control, and crossing into our west bound lane.
We escaped injury. The driver of the car that hit us was not as
lucky.
The traffic volume counts commonly used in EIR's do not capture
the volume of vehicles driving in the center of the road or the
near misses from cars passing cyclists in areas of limited
visibility. Pierce Road traffic safety has suffered from benign
neglect by both the County and City for years, and any action by
the City increasing traffic, and the volume of unsafe driving in this
section of Pierce Road, would be unconscionable.
Concern #2: Ongoing noise and light pollution for all adjacent
hillside residents in the area:
The goals and policies in the City's Hillside Specific Plan include:
"Land use regulations shall be consistent with the preservation of
the irreplaceable natural environment of the Measure "A" area."
"Access shall be compatible with preservation of rural character
and reduced density of development."
"Impacts on the overall natural environment shall be minimized in
order to preserve the rural character .. "
"Land use in the western hillside area should be limited to
agricultural and residential uses and appurtenances thereto ..."
The Mountain Winery currently creates both noise and light
pollution for the adjacent area that is inconsistent with the above
goals, but, thankfully, it occurs mainly during the show season
and is short lived.
Allowing a hotel and condominiums to be constructed on the
Mountain Winery ridge contradicts these goals. It will make noise
and light pollution ongoing, and it will degrade the environment
for all area residents.
The City Planning Commission has already studied and rejected
this annexation and development proposal. I urge all of you to
also reject it.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
o
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 2:14:15 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Dipak Basu
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Public Hearing on Mountain Winery annexation project May 20,
2020 at 7 pm
Comments We are residents of Saratoga, living right across from the Winery
on Vintage Lane. We wish to register the following:
1. We support the effort to stop the annexation process while
everyone is in a shelter-in-place status. Some reasons for this: -
Not everyone has access to Zoom technology to
videoconference. - Technology problems lead to difficulty hearing
and understanding speakers on occasion. - A critical part of the
process is not possible - people can't have discussions at cafes,
restaurants, social gatherings, or even at homes. We need to be
sure everyone has a chance to participate at a public hearing on
a matter so vital.
2. The Mountain Winery annexation is a controversial proposal,
and the Planning Commission voted 7-0 against it. We attended
and spoke at the Planning Commission’s Feb 12, where all
residents were unanimously against the annexation because of
the included rezoning for the 300-room hotel.
3. As next-door neighbors of the Winery, we are against the
project because of:
a. Greatly increased fire hazard
b. Impaired egress via Pierce Road, which is our only exit, in the
event of a natural disaster
c. Greatly increased traffic on Pierce Road. It was proven at the
Feb 12 meeting, the traffic study done as part of EIR was during
a very low traffic time
d. Serious safety and environment of rezoning the hillside to
commercial
e. Even though we live 50 yards from the Winery’s main gate we
were not informed of the project and joint City Council and
Planning Commission meetings until January 2020
f. We were part of a 2000-strong change.org petition to reject the
project
g. Potential for significant decrease in property values
We request you to put a stop to the annexation and the 300-room
hotel project.
Sincerely
Dipak and Radha Basu.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 3:28:24 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name MAJID GHAFGHAICHI
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject MOUNTIN WINERY ANNEXATION PROJECT
Comments I live in 1 Damon Ln Saratoga, and Pierce Rd. is our main
access Rd. I am completely against this annexation of Mountine
Winery. If cancelling this project will force the City to pay back
the funds Mountain Winery contributed to this project it is OK to
refund them rather than proceed with this annexation. All
residents of City of Saratoga will remember the City Council
Members courage to correct this ill construed project.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 6:23:28 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Thomas Howell
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mt. Winery Annexation
Comments If I were to propose building a 50-story skyscraper in my back
yard, would the City of Saratoga commission an environmental
impact study and consider changing the zoning to allow it? I don't
think so. Yet we have been hearing for months, turning into years
that such consideration is being given to annexing the Mountain
Winery property to the city of Saratoga for the purpose of building
a large hotel! This is an equally preposterous proposal.
Numerous objections have been raised by citizens of Saratoga.
Pierce Road cannot safely handle today's traffic, much less the
increase that would come with this development. The winery is
located in an area of high fire danger and low access to fire
protection. Many of its neighbors have had fire insurance
dropped due to being located in the "wildland-urban interface",
and the winery's danger is more extreme than any of ours.
Utilities such as water and sewer lines would have to be added.
How and where? I hope the costs and environmental impact of
those are taken into consideration. The list goes on and on. I
have seen dozens of articles and letters opposing this
development and not a single word in its favor except from the
developers and their team. I saw that council members Kumar
and Zhao voted against spending more money on this project.
Who is in favor? When will we hear a single reason to do this
project from a voice not controlled by the developer? What
reasons could possibly be given? Will we otherwise be forced by
the state to knock down rows of mansions to build high density
housing? Why is this proposal not being given the quick burial it
deserves? A recent letter from the developers' lawyer demands
that money be returned if the City Council "changes its mind".
When did the Council make up its mind, and why has any money
changed hands at this early stage of decision making? I think the
taxpayers of Saratoga deserve some clear answers.
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:08:30 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Sherman Fan
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation Project -
Comments Silicon Valley is short of lodging spaces. Saratoga is in the heart
of Silicon Valley. If we can help relieve the lodging issue without
too much adverse impact on the environment, I'm for it. A 300-
room hotel will contribute to tax revenue and also enliven city
economy. Added traffic will be quite limited comparing with
existing concert traffic. We live on Pierce Road and we are not
bothered by the concert traffic.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 7:46:31 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Coleen and Joe Wagner
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery
Comments Mayor and City Council of Saratoga,
RE: Mountain Winery Annexation
Dear Mayor and Council members,
We want the City Council to accept the Planning Commission’s
recommendation to terminate the annexation project.
A new Regional Commercial zoning for the Mountain Winery is
proposed, a mixed use commercial zoning which opens up the
property to SB35 development. There are 4 bills currently in
process, one is in the Senate and three others in the Assembly,
that will give developers even more control and cities less control
over development than what is currently included in SB35. The
State is intent on taking away a city’s power to regulate their own
growth.
If the purpose of the annexation is for the city to have more
control over development then the zoning change completely
negates that. Not only is SB35 development possible but
development from future legislation is assured. The idea that a
company whose very existence is all about developing major
venues would come in and control their development if they don’t
have to is laughable. The outcome of this is a foregone
conclusion, the hillside will be developed to maximize profit.
The citizens of Saratoga voted overwhelmingly for Measure A
and it is being ignored because according to Debbie Pedro,
Saratoga Community Development Director, Measure A doesn’t
apply because the Mountain Winery is not part of Saratoga. This
is circular logic. Measure A most certainly applies if you want to
bring the Mountain Winery into Saratoga.
In the City Council meeting on March 20, 2019 it was said that no
changes were anticipated for a change in intensity or use with
the annexation, however when the Precise Plan came out,
zoning for 300 rooms of lodging was included as well as a
business center, recreational facilities including spas and a pool,
a restaurant, and a parking garage. Where did these items come
from? This sounds like development of a major venue and not
the controlled growth that the City Council has been selling.
Under no conditions can this annexation project go any further.
The Planning Commission listened to the facts and made a
thoughtful and considered decision that benefits the city and its
citizens. We are not interested in a decision that benefits
developers over our city. We want the City Council to accept the
Planning Commission’s recommendation to terminate the
annexation project.
Coleen and Joe Wagner
Saratoga residents of 30 years
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Fwd: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 9:56:32 AM
Attachments:im
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nancy Lietzke
Date: May 16, 2020 at 9:12:43 AM PDT
To: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>, Mary-Lynne Bernald <mlbernald@saratoga.ca.us>, Rishi Kumar <rkumar@saratoga.ca.us>, Manny Cappello <mcappello@saratoga.ca.us>,
"yzaho@saratoga.ca.us" <yzaho@saratoga.ca.us>, Debbie Pedro <dpedro@saratoga.ca.us>, "rSubject: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council members and City Attorney,
We are writing to request the City Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendation to terminate the Mt. Winery Annexation project.
At this time amid the shelter in place and social distancing, there is not the ability for all Saratoga residents to be heard publicly. And Zoom is not the answer to the problem. Many residents
are not able to use it. And those who do know how to dial in are not able to gain access to your meeting. Even some of your own Council members have experienced difficulties with zoom.
If discussions are going to continue regarding the Annexation, it needs to be in a public setting where residents can attend and speak publicly to the City Council and other residents. For now
with the current Shelter in Place order, that is not possible. But when that order is lifted, a public forum to consider that would accommodate many, many Saratoga residents would be the
Saratoga High Football stadium. It would also provide ample continued opportunity for social distancing. Annexation is a large important issue and needs a large meeting site.
The recent letter (see below) written by Bill Hirshman to the City Council is absolutely damning!!! Whether true or not, it gives the impression that the Council in theory (head nod) had
agreed months ago to the Annexation. It is a threatening letter meant to push the Annexation forward with no regards for the concerns of other residents. The amount of profits to be reaped by
the CMLLC with an Annexation and rezoning begs the question why the City Council ever shared in the EIR costs to begin with???
At the March 20, 2019 meeting https://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1068&meta_id=69887 an update regarding the Annexation was given by Debbie Pedro. Discussion
ensued and Mr. Miller you made the following comments.
“I think we should be clear that the intent is so that the Mt. Winery is under the City perview. We are not annexing them to turn it into a rock 24 hour rock venue or you know a 36 hole golf
course or high rise condo development. We are annexing them so that we have jurisdiction. We are not annexing them to change. But I think that we should very much try to engage with the
public input process as part of the seque and we will get comments and we will have to respond to those comments that will add time to the process. However it is far much better than trying
to say we don’t need to get much public input and short circuit it.”
Two comments stand out:
“We are not annexing them to change." If that was true, how did a 300 room hotel get added to the Annexation language 7 months later in the Precise Plan dated October, 2019?
“But I think we should very much try to engage with the public input process as part of the seque and we will get comments and we will have to respond to those comments that will add time
to the process.” If public input from the beginning is what you wanted, why was there such a lack of transparency and public notification?
We would appreciate you addressing our concerns in the upcoming May 20, 2020 Council meeting.
Regards,
Nancy and David Lietzke
Mt. Eden Estates
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 11:36:46 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Robert Schwartz
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation Public Discourse - Politicization
And Personal Attacks Must Stop
Comments It is obviously essential that our city (and community) discuss
and debate the pros and cons of the proposed Mountain Winery
Annexation Project. No doubt, there will be valuable and
continued lively debate on all sides of this important issue. What
is also essential is that Saratoga as a community conduct itself
with care, honesty, integrity, and compassion. The Annexation
Project will ultimately either progress or not, but what will live on
in our community forever is who we are as people, what we
model for our children, and how we treat each other. The
discussion of this potential project has devolved into a rancorous
argument replete with false statements, misdirection, personal
attacks, shameful politicization and I, for one, am embarrassed
for our 155-year-old town. I thought Saratoga was above the sort
of narrow-minded, divisive, shameless politics that have recently
become the norm at the national level. I am 100% in support of a
vigorous, fact-based, mutually respectful debate but I am
sickened by the false statements being made by various angry
factions and the use of innuendo, manipulation, fear mongering,
and personal attacks. I do not think it is ever appropriate for one
side to insinuate that anyone on the other side is compromised or
has nefarious secret motives because they disagree with that
side’s view. This is simply wrong and will impact our ability to
have a rational discussion in our city going forward.
I have known the owners of the Mountain Winery since they
acquired it in 1998. I know them to be honest, smart, generous,
and honorable people who have always done what they
promised to do and not do what they promised not to do. I have
lived just 3000 feet below the Mountain Winery for 23 years (22
of them with the current owners making decisions as our
neighbors). They and their families are members of the Saratoga
community and I find it offensive that other members of our
community are wrongfully attacking them personally. They did
not request to have their property annexed and they are just
trying to be reasonable, fair, and honest in their dealings with the
city as the city seeks to annex their property. We can and should
debate the merits of the proposed plan to annex the Mountain
Winery property but attacking the owners and questioning their
motives in how they make decisions is repugnant, unfounded,
and counterproductive. We should all agree to stop that
immediately.
I have known our Mayor, Howard Miller for over twenty years in
the schools, at AYSO, in City Government, and as Mayor. I have
zero doubt that Howard is a man of utmost integrity, and that he
has contributed to the prosperity and quality of life in Saratoga
selflessly for decades. For anyone to insinuate that Howard is
somehow “compromised” because he is interested in fact-based
discourse on the possible benefits and conditions involved in the
Mountain Winery Annexation Project is just evil and probably
libelous. If someone, if anyone, has any real factual evidence to
demonstrate that Howard is discharging his duties with any
thought other than what is best for Saratoga then please provide
that so that legal action may be taken. If the only evidence
proffered is that he might disagree with your point of view, then it
is immoral and disgustingly manipulative to cast aspersions
about Howard Miller’s character simply for that reason. Shame
on anyone trying to advance their point of view on the
controversial project by attacking the integrity of a community
member with decades of civic service from which we benefit
every day. To the people doing that – how dare you?
We as a community should have zero tolerance for such
personal attacks and politicization. If you have points to make
about why you think the annexation should or should not happen
then please make them and please argue passionately. If your
passion extends to a baseless personal attack on any member of
our community, then stop yourself. Remember what you were
taught about being a good person and a member of a
community. Stick to the facts (real facts) and do not lower
yourself and our community into the abys of false argumentation
based on dragging good people who always try to do the right
thing into the mud. Saratoga, we are better than this. Stop it. Just
stop it.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 12:41:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Robert Schwartz
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation Public Discourse - A Neighbor's
Perspective
Comments We live at the corner of Damon Lane and Mount Eden which is
~3000 ft (as the crow flies) from the Mountain Winery. We moved
here 23 years ago and continue to be very happy that we live in
Saratoga. I am posting this because I think that a vocal subset of
Saratoga residents have been attacking the very idea of the city’s
potential annexation of the Mountain Winery and I do not believe
their no growth, no change view represents the entirety of this
city’s opinion. As a close neighbor of the Mountain Winery, it
certainly does not represent my family’s opinion. I am certain that
there are at least an equal number of Saratoga citizens that are
supportive (and appreciative) of our city’s desire to responsibly
improve and grow into the future. The potential annexation, done
responsibly (as I’d expect the city would, especially with the level
of scrutiny and oversight that will come from engaged citizens),
will help Saratoga in many ways and my family and my friends
are thoroughly supportive of the city trying to find a way forward
that works for all sides.
Below are what I believe are the key items to think about:
1) I have met the Mountain Winery ownership and management
(20+years) and I know them
to be responsible people (and residents of Saratoga). We have
been part of the Winery Neighborhood
Outreach they continuously drive, and they have never done
anything they promised not to do, and they have always done
everything they promised to do. These are good people and are
nothing like the descriptions I have heard from the citizens
commenting at City meetings. They are also residents of
Saratoga and care about this city just like we all do. The idea of
the Mountain Winery annexation is coming from the City of
Saratoga and the time is appropriate. If this cannot be negotiated
now, I believe it never will be.
2) We knew what the Mountain Winery was when we moved in
(1997) and have been delighted
how the venue and its offerings have developed over the 22
years since the new owners took over.
We believe it enhances our Saratoga experience and makes
Saratoga a more attractive place to
live and visit because of what they have done. We believe the
presence of the Mountain Winery and its evolution has enhanced
our lives and the value of our home. Listening to people who do
not live anywhere near the venue talk about the impact on
homeowners that live nearby baffles me.
3) I am convinced that this annexation and the potential for long
term responsible development of the Mountain Winery would
have benefits for the City of Saratoga, its residents, the
neighbors, and the venue itself. It would be better for the City of
Saratoga to be intimately involved in what is approved in terms of
future development via annexation than be a bystander to
whatever the Mountain Winery negotiates with the County. No
doubt everyone involved should be responsible and thoughtful
but I (and many residents that I know) believe it is time for
Saratoga to think about careful progress and stop the “no change
no matter what” thinking that has stifled the city under the guise
of “maintaining the special nature of Saratoga”. This is not an
either/or situation. As with most change and progress it is more
nuanced than that. There is plenty that is special about Saratoga,
but there is nothing special about a dying downtown area, limited
financial capability to maintain our streets, and no resources to
make meaningful investments in Saratoga’s aging infrastructure.
Change is hard but responsible, thoughtful change is life’s blood
to a community.
4) I have no doubt that the city will evaluate the environmental
impact of any development at the Mountain Winery and negotiate
an envelope for future changes that benefit the residents and the
city while fully mitigating any potential negative impacts. I have
no doubt that the owners of the Mountain Winery will continue to
be the engaged, responsible members of the community they
have always been. I think the city should keep doing what they
have been doing on this: engage the owners, seek outside
advice, seek the community’s input, and then negotiate
something that works for all parties if possible. Let us find a way
forward that works rather than wrap ourselves in the cozy blanket
of doing nothing because of fear of change. Doing nothing is
doing something. It’s going backwards as the world moves
forward. I’m not advocating for a 300 room hotel. I am advocating
for finding what we as a community will support rather than fold
our arms and say that there should be no change at all. The 300
room mantra of the naysayers has no basis whatsoever. It was
an arbitrary number (a maximum) to use in the EIR. I am
confident that a limit on size/scope could be negotiated (far less
than 300 rooms). Why would we miss the opportunity to have
that discussion?
5) Saratoga and its residents would receive tremendous benefits
from the annexation handled in this way. Meaningfully increased
revenues (I have heard it is at least $2million per year of
incremental city revenues that could be spent in useful ways in
Saratoga), a revitalized downtown area (I understand from
restaurant owners that as much as 40% of the down town
restaurants business takes place during
the Mountain Winery season), a wonderful centerpiece in a
potential evolution of Saratoga as a nature/wine/vineyard-themed
beautiful lifestyle gem in Silicon Valley, jobs associated with the
venue, and increased home values for everyone in the city. In
short, this is an opportunity for progress. Let’s do it and let’s do it
like the thoughtful community we are. In these uncertain times
we cannot afford not to try.
6) Of course, we should grow and evolve responsibly. The
number of rooms in a possible (not even planned yet) high end
hotel should be carefully negotiated, traffic must be carefully
planned and monitored, water, power, appearance must all be
carefully planned and curated to make any potential project a
positive for Saratoga. That is obvious and I think that is what the
City is exploring. I’m interested if the annexation could enable
improvements on Pierce Road where tree encroachment causes
powerline and interference issues and cyclists ride on a narrow
hill at their peril. Is it possible to make any improvements to
Pierce as part of this?
7) The idea of annexing the Mountain Winery with no possible
changes at the Mountain Winery in the future is just silly since it
would benefit Saratoga but offer no benefit to the Mountain
Winery. Why would they do that? Doing nothing is stagnation.
Doing the wrong thing is destructive. Doing the progressive thing
responsibly will benefit us all. My family, and many residents I
know (who like us are neighbors of the Mountain Winery) are
thoroughly supportive of the City of Saratoga moving forward on
this thoughtfully and responsibly. Please don’t let a vocal group
of stagnancy advocates lead you to believe that residents close
to the Mountain Winery or of Saratoga in general monolithically
oppose this idea. We instead want you as stewards of our city to
negotiate with the Mountain Winery to see if there is a set of
limits that might work for everyone.
8) I think some well-meaning citizens have mounted a PR
campaign 100% based on resisting a “300 Room Hotel Project”
at the Mountain Winery and positioning it all as if the idea of
Annexation is some sort of gift to the owners. It just isn’t, it is a
negotiation between the parties to see if there is a possible
mutually beneficial outcome that can be arranged. Further, some
community members have launched personal attacks on anyone
supportive of trying to negotiate annexation of the Mountain
Winery. That is simply disgusting and beneath our community on
an ethical basis. My expectation is that the city and the owners
are and will behave like rational, responsible parties to a
negotiation. Neither side will agree to something that makes no
sense for their constituency and this is all a process of discovery
to see if there is common ground. It’s disheartening that a subset
of my fellow members of the Saratoga Community are trying to
polarize the discussion unnecessarily. Let’s talk about what we
might (might) agree is feasible rather than drawing a divisive “no
change” separation of the community.
Since the public is seized on the idea of a 300 room hotel (this
number is a maximum worst case scenario to bound the EIR) I
guess there is no way forward without addressing that number
now. I think there is about zero chance a 300 room hotel would
make business sense in this location. But if the agreement is 30
years then the owners would probably want to have the biggest
envelope possible (I know I would). So either there needs to be
more flexibility (reviews at different points in time to change the
limit), or the limit needs to be reduced up front, or a combination
of the two variables. Obviously, regardless of any annexation
agreement, the City would retain the ability to address any
changes needed as a result of changes in the knowledge we
have now (water, power, safety, fire, whatever).
I really doubt the developers/owners want to build a 300 room
hotel. Assuming the timing/flexibility issues are cast in concrete
by law/rules then I guess it’s a narrow negotiation around two
uestions. First, should there be any hotel provision (y/n)? If “yes”,
then, second, what is the maximum size? I think community
members would be foolish to take the position of “no hotel of any
size, ever” for reasons I already described and I also think the
owners would be foolish (and I do not think they are) to accept
annexation with a provision of “no hotel ever”. So assuming the
teapot of Saratoga can agree that “maybe a future hotel” is a
viable starting place then the negotiation gets simpler and is just
about the 300 room number.
There are 261 rooms at Ritz Carlton Half Moon Bay. There are
121 rooms at Rosewood Sand Hill Road. There are 45 rooms at
Rosewood Coredevalle. There are 47 rooms at Saratoga Inn,
115 Rooms at Toll Hose Los Gatos, and 72 rooms at Hotel Los
Gatos. There are generally not 300 rooms at any hotel in the
area (looking at more residential/resort properties not
convention/business properties). So I think
that if the EIR makes a 300 room hotel feasible from and
environmental perspective (an obvious
requirement based on an extreme number), then I think 300 is
not a number that any rational business person would seek to
approve. A negotiation will yield a lower number I am sure. As a
neighbor of the Mountain Winery I’d be supportive and excited
about the idea of a resort property (Four Seasons, Rosewood,
Ritz Carlton, or equivalent) on top of the hill with a room limit of
100-200 rooms max. 150 rooms maximum looks like a solid
compromise to me but I’m sure others will have very different
views. My point is why don’t we discuss what number would work
as an upper bound rather than just dig our heals in and say “0”.
Personally, we’d be very excited if there were some residences
for elderly people included. It is my view
that the area is woefully short of upper end wealthy senior living
options and perhaps this location could add some senior high-
end housing as well? My father ended up moving from Saratoga
to Los Angeles (where my sister lives) because he could not find
a solution for upper end senior independent living. He’s turning
90 this year, still drives, but has a full-time helper, etc. He would
have stayed in Saratoga near me/grandkids, but we just could
not solve that particular problem. I think there is massive demand
here (for either residents or parents of residents). I know that is
far afield, but I thought I would mention it.
I hope my note isn’t too long and that some of it proves useful.
Please keep this dialogue moving to
see if there can be common ground. I trust that the City is being
diligent and putting the interests of
all of us in primary place. I also believe the owners are rational
and very moral people. We should be
able to find a compromise if the community members would let
the process find its natural balanced
conclusion rather than polarize the discussion into uninformed
argumentation.
This should be a discussion about what growth? and how? rather
than about “no growth, no change, no facts”. The city doesn’t
want a 300-room hotel and I bet the owners don’t either. Why
don’t we see what limit would work for both parties if possible?
This is a now or never situation I can’t imagine it makes sense
not to try to make it work for all sides. In a post COVID-19 world,
with City revenues at a deficit, with a fantastic venue amenable
to a discussion about annexation, with $2M revenues and
countless jobs on the line, I believe it would be irresponsible of
the City not to try to hammer out a mutually acceptable deal with
the Mountain Winery.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 1:46:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Mehran Aminzadeh
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation
Comments I live on Orchard Meadow off by Mt. Eden which is 1.2 miles from
Pierce road. My wife and I build our house on Orchard Meadow
Drive 22 years ago (in 1998) and love the City and our
community.
We have strong concerns about annexation of Mountain winery
and expansion of commercial facility and 300 room hotel. The
following are a list of our concerns about this project and hope
the City of Saratoga and Santa Clara County make the right
decision and disapprove this plan for the following reasons:
1. Pierce road is a narrow and winding country road and it simply
does not have the capacity and safety requirements to
accommodate having a 300 room hotel on top of the hills. We
have teenage children who drive to school on Pierce road and
worry about the safety of our teenagers particularly when there
are commercial vehicles or other drivers who are not familiar with
the narrow winding roads.
2. There are no bike lanes and no shoulders on Pierce road and
there are plenty of bikers on these roads and residents have
learned to drive safely and slow down when observing bikers and
occasional jugers on the road. There is a very HIGH RISK of
accidents and fatalities if the traffic increase on Pierce road. If the
City or County is unable to widen Pierce road and add bike lane
or side walk then they should reject the annexation and
expansion of any commercial use for Mountain winery.
3. Expansion of the facilities at Mountain winery has several
negative consequences such as increased chance or fire and
flooding for nearby residents and residents down the hill.
4. There are negative environmental consequences for such a
massive expansion such as pollution and negative impact on
wildlife.
5. Our community is a safe community and the residents in
Saratoga would like to keep it that way. Increase traffic will have
negative impact on safety and security of residents living in the
nearby vicinity.
6. Property values will be negatively impacted if a 300 room hotel
or condo is approved.
Hopefully the City Council considers the concerns of its citizens
and tax papers and reject the proposal for the annexation and
expansion at Mountain winery.
Thank you,
Mehran Aminzadeh
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 4:46:17 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Jin Kim
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Annexation to open a hotel
Comments I do strongly oppose the annexation, preserving water resources,
Fire prevention, landslide prevention, prevent heavy traffic to
occur, etc.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Sunday, May 17, 2020 5:09:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Raymond Persico
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation and Development
Comments I urge the Council not to proceed with annexation of the Mountain
Winery property. The proposed hotel and further development of
this property will have significant negative environmental impacts
in the area surrounding the Mountain Winery property, as well as
reduced quality of life for the residents in this area.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 5:46:50 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Henry Coles
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Subject Annexation
Comments Dear City Council, Please vote to end annexation efforts related
to the Winery. The increased traffic on the local road network will
further reduce the safety for pedestrians and cyclists. -Henry
Coles
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 7:58:14 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Donald Dasher
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mt Winery Annexation
Comments To The Council,
As a citizen of Saratoga, I am strongly opposed to the annexation
of Mt Winery property. Some of the reasons are that it is nestled
within an extremely high fire zone, that Saratoga is already
experience rolling blackouts several times throughout the
summer, that Saratoga is still overcharged by about double for
water due to water shortages of 5 years ago and less of rain
water will recharge our aquifer due to the planned hardscape,
that this excess runoff will cause downstream flooding, that we
could have another water shortage as soon as this year and
shortages are becoming more and more frequent, that both
roads leading there having been built on landslides, one of which
is constantly active, and the other road is located on a fault and
through a fault zone, that the land has no safe or guaranteed
access in case of fire, utilities such as gas, electricity and
sewage will have to be built on landslides and can be expected
to frequently fail sending raw sewage into our creeks, releasing
gas as a fire hazard, interrupting power as a added fire hazard,
and that if condominiums are built, there is not even mention of
providing classrooms for the children.
Thank you,
Don Dasher
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 10:13:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name David Leitzell
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mt. Winery Annexation
Comments I am against this annexation and want the project stopped. This
is the most deceitful proposal I have seen. Every meeting and all
communications I have seen from Saratoga residents are against
it. It have provisions, such as the 300 room hotel, that seems to
have been added after the fact by an unknown entity;. The
planning commission has recommenced it be cancelled. Yet it is
still under consideration by the city council. If this is not cancelled
you will experience the wrath of the voters at the next election
cycle. You were elected to represent the will and best interest of
the voters. CANCEL THIS PROPOSAL
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 10:15:08 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name David Reis
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation
Comments Saratoga City Council
It appears to me this whole issue of the Mountain Winery
Annexation needs a reset. In the public realm there is a lot being
said, but with little understanding and rumors are becoming
“facts”. For one, the Mountain Winery is not owned by a Big Bad
Corporation: The Mountain Winery is owned by two families, and
has been for over twenty years. Both families are an active part
of our community. There is no Big Bad Corporation. Secondly,
although annexation ordinarily is viewed by the public in a
positive light, in this case “annexation” has become synonymous
with 300 Room Hotel. And that just isn’t accurate. The City
(Saratoga) has been interested in annexing the Mountain Winery
for over a decade, and there are obvious reasons why:
Benefits of Annexation:
• Increase Revenue- 2 to 3 Million dollars in tax revenue per year
(a welcome addition these days).
• Upgrade Ingress and Egress to the area.
• Contain Future Development - Take control of any future
Mountain Winery development away from the County of Santa
Clara and put that control in the hands of the ones most
impacted…Saratogans.
The City’s motivation is clear, but what would be the incentive for
the Mountain Winery to voluntarily submit to Saratoga’s “rule”
without some kind of agreement in place. And why would anyone
agree up front to No Growth for the next thirty years. That is
unreasonable. If the Mountain Winery remains under the control
of Santa Clara County, then Saratoga has little or no say in the
future development of an important property that has become
part of our community fabric.
Elephant in the Room- Lodging:
A 300 Room Hotel was never requested by the owners. To my
knowledge, there are currently no plans to build any hotel in the
foreseeable future. The number 300 came from the application
for Annexation submitted by the City of Saratoga, not the owners.
The intentionally high number of 300 was chosen for the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to ensure that the Report
was sufficiently stringent to uncover any potential issues. The
Mountain Winery had no control over what was included that
application.
For a venue of that size, with artist and visitors coming in from all
over the country, it seems very reasonable that there be lodging
on the Mountain Winery’s property. The issue would ultimately be
how much lodging the City could “tolerate”. I’m not informed
enough to speak to that issue, but that issue should be at the
heart of this debate…not the credibility of our elected officials or
the property owners.
I am personally supportive of the Annexation. If we, Saratoga, do
nothing, it would be a sorely missed opportunity to gain some
control over the future of a significant historical property in our
own backyard. I would encourage you to make every effort to
work it out!
Thank you,
Dave Reis
Former Saratoga Planning Commissioner
Email not displaying correctly? .
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain Winery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 12:04:06 PM
From: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 12:03 PM
To:
Cc: Manny Cappello <mcappello@saratoga.ca.us>; Mary-Lynne Bernald
<mlbernald@saratoga.ca.us>; Rishi Kumar <rkumar@saratoga.ca.us>; Yan Zhao
<yzhao@saratoga.ca.us>; James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Mountain Winery
Good to hear from you Stan!
As a former council member you know, to change (or end) a project directed by the council, the
council has to take action! That can only be done in a noticed council meeting! May 20th will be the
first chance for you and others to hear what the council member think after reviewing the EIR, 2
planning commissions and numerous public comments.
Thanks!
Howard...
On May 16, 2020, at 2:28 PM, wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
Ample evidence has been presented to conclude that a 300 room hotel on the Mountain
Winery property would have a negative effect on the surrounding neighborhood, and the
city generally, in terms of traffic congestion and public safety. To get a better idea of the
scale: the Claremont Hotel in the Berkeley hills , visible from many points in the Bay Area,
has 276 rooms. At this point in the process, there has been almost universal opposition to
annexation of the Mountain Winery by Saratoga residents.
So why are we still having this discussion? We are led to believe that if Saratoga annexes
this site, the city will have more control over future use and development. That might be the
case if the city wasn't giving away the whole store at the get-go. What meaningful leverage
does the city really have when it agrees to a 300 room on the site? Clearly, this argument
is bogus.
Two forces appear to be driving this effort. First, there may be a desire of some city
councilmembers to have a legacy when they leave office. If you can't have your name on a
public building or park, then why not go down in history as the moving force to develop a
major destination resort in your city? Second, there is the ongoing institutional agenda to
secure existing staff positions and generate new ones. These two forces have been in play
in cities since the beginning of time. Neither is in the interest of residents who live in
Saratoga.
Should annexation move forward, it is not unreasonable to expect costly lawsuits on the
environmental issues of the annexation plan. The city cannot afford this, especially in light
of the national health crisis and anticipated economic depression to follow. Individual
councilmembers who insist on furthering the annexation of the Mountain Winery also need
to understand that they will face the consequences of their actions, up to and including
removal from office by recall.
Regardless of the neighborhood in which they live, Saratoga residents have paid a huge
premium to purchase homes here. We all clearly understand that once a precedent is set
in one neighborhood, it is easy for a city council to move on to the next one. Our quality of
life is diminished, not in one cataclysmic explosion, but incrementally, until we're no
different than the rest of the valley.
Stop spending taxpayer money on further studies and mitigation schemes. I strongly urge
the City Council on May 20 to simply vote to withdraw the application for annexation
of the Mountain Winery.
Thank you.
Stan Bogosian
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
To:;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 12:18:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name John Linney
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mtn Winery annexation
Comments As a Saratoga resident I strongly oppose the current proposal to
annex the Mountain Winery with associated rezoning. This
proposal is inconsistent with the city mission and the
infrastructure to support.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Cc:
Subject:FW: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 12:38:43 PM
From: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Nancy Lietzke >
Cc: Mary-Lynne Bernald <mlbernald@saratoga.ca.us>; Rishi Kumar <rkumar@saratoga.ca.us>;
Manny Cappello <mcappello@saratoga.ca.us>; yzaho@saratoga.ca.us; Debbie Pedro
<dpedro@saratoga.ca.us>;
Subject: Re: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
Good news Nancy, people can also call into and participate in the meeting on the telephone. More
residents have access to a phone than have transportation to attend a council meetings. Saratoga
like other agencies are experience greater participating in the on-line platform than the in-person
platform. We know that the extensive public out reach is working, because we have received more
public feedback on this project than any other project since Kevin Moran Park in the early 2000’s.
The council did in fact decide to investigate an annexation almost 2 years ago. We mutually agreed
with the owners to proceed with that investigation and the cost sharing agreement. An investigation
does not assume that this is decided. The process was done in a series of public meetings with
public participation. Including meetings after the Mach meeting you referenced. This is a long
process including lots of opportunity for public input.
On May 20th, for the first time in 9 months, the council will get to consider the current situation in
light of the draft EIR, the two planning commission hearings and public comments. Two years after
we started, we know a lot more now. So I hope that you would look forward to actually hearing
from your council members on this important topic rather that to live in a world of speculation an
assumptions! Don't presuppose an outcome!
Thanks!
Howard Miller
Mayor or Saratoga
On May 16, 2020, at 9:12 AM, Nancy Lietzke > wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council members and City Attorney,
We are writing to request the City Council accept the Planning Commission's
recommendation to terminate the Mt. Winery Annexation project.
At this time amid the shelter in place and social distancing, there is not the ability for all
Saratoga residents to be heard publicly. And Zoom is not the answer to the problem.
Many residents are not able to use it. And those who do know how to dial in are not
able to gain access to your meeting. Even some of your own Council members have
experienced difficulties with zoom. If discussions are going to continue regarding the
Annexation, it needs to be in a public setting where residents can attend and speak
publicly to the City Council and other residents. For now with the current Shelter in
Place order, that is not possible. But when that order is lifted, a public forum to
consider that would accommodate many, many Saratoga residents would be the
Saratoga High Football stadium. It would also provide ample continued opportunity
for social distancing. Annexation is a large important issue and needs a large meeting
site.
The recent letter (see below) written by Bill Hirshman to the City Council is absolutely
damning!!! Whether true or not, it gives the impression that the Council in theory
(head nod) had agreed months ago to the Annexation. It is a threatening letter meant
to push the Annexation forward with no regards for the concerns of other residents.
The amount of profits to be reaped by the CMLLC with an Annexation and rezoning
begs the question why the City Council ever shared in the EIR costs to begin with???
<image.png>
At the March 20, 2019 meeting https://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?
view_id=9&clip_id=1068&meta_id=69887 an update regarding the Annexation was
given by Debbie Pedro. Discussion ensued and Mr. Miller you made the following
comments.
“I think we should be clear that the intent is so that the Mt. Winery is under the City
perview. We are not annexing them to turn it into a rock 24 hour rock venue or you
know a 36 hole golf course or high rise condo development. We are annexing them so
that we have jurisdiction. We are not annexing them to change. But I think that we
should very much try to engage with the public input process as part of the seque and
we will get comments and we will have to respond to those comments that will add
time to the process. However it is far much better than trying to say we don’t need to
get much public input and short circuit it.”
Two comments stand out:
“We are not annexing them to change." If that was true, how did a 300 room hotel
get added to the Annexation language 7 months later in the Precise Plan dated
October, 2019?
“But I think we should very much try to engage with the public input process as part of
the seque and we will get comments and we will have to respond to those comments
that will add time to the process.” If public input from the beginning is what you
wanted, why was there such a lack of transparency and public notification?
We would appreciate you addressing our concerns in the upcoming May 20, 2020
Council meeting.
Regards,
Nancy and David Lietzke
Mt. Eden Estates
From:
Subject:Statement against Resolution 20-002 and request for information.
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 1:41:48 PM
Attachments:MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOUNTAN WINERY ANNEXATION PROJECT 3.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially
from unknown senders.
Debbie,
Attached is a communication I sent to the City Council members. I did not know if you were copied. So here is a copy.
Ken
May 17, 2020
Dear Saratoga City Council Members,
This is a letter requesting the termination of Resolution No. 20-002, The Mountain Winery Annexation Project.
As you are aware, on February 12th 2020, the Saratoga Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City
Council not move forward with the Mountain Winery Annexation Project.
MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOUNTAN WINERY
ANNEXATION PROJECT. MOTION PASSED. AYES: AHUJA, ALMALECH, FITZSIMMONS, KAUSAR, MOHIUDDIN,
PASTUSZKA, WALIA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/590055/021220_Minutes_Draft.pdf DRAFT MINUTES WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING (which have been confirmed).
As you are aware, at that meeting over 60 residents spoke against the project at the February 12th Planning Commission
meeting and no one supported it. In addition, hundreds (est.) of Saratoga residents attended the meeting to express their
opposition to resolution.
As you are aware, several hundred communications have been sent to the city and Council members against proceeding with
the annexation.
As you are likely aware, local social media, such as Nextdoor, indicates that Saratoga residents are united in opposition to the
annexation project.
As you are aware, line one of the Preamble of City of Saratoga Code of Ethics and Values states:
The proper operation of democratic government requires that decision-makers be
independent, impartial, and accountable to the people they serve. (emphasis added)
https://www.saratoga.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/585/Saratoga-City-Council-Code-of-Ethics-PDF?bidId=
The residents of Saratoga have spoken and they are against the annexation, as am I.
As you are aware, Neelima Palacherla, LAFCO Executive Officer, informed Debbie Pedro of the Saratoga Community
Development Department on December 16th of 2019, that the annexation plan is in conflict with County General Plan Policies.
Quoting paragraph LA-5 on page 2 of 2 of the letter: “… further urban development and intensification of existing uses is not
consistent with County General Plan Policies for the West Valley Hillsides Preservation Area. The proposed project will result in
more urban development in an area identified as not suited for further urban development.” The response by the city ignored
the increased urbanization being proposed. https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/512191/Attachment_9_a_Mountain_Winery_FEIR_FINAL_01152020.pdf
It is clear that neither the residents of Saratoga nor county officials want increased urbanization of the west valley hillsides
which is what the Precise Plan authorizes.
For example: the Mountain Winery Precise Plan states: “The new land use designation, zoning and Precise Plan would allow
existing onsite uses to continue, while also allowing for up to three hundred (300) units of overnight lodging accommodations
referred to as a “Lodging” use. The Lodging use may take any number of forms. Among the various arrangements that could be
possible subject to the development standards and design guidelines in this Plan are a traditional single building hotel with
lodging units located on multiple floors or a multiple building hotel with lodging units in buildings separately sited. Lodging units
may be separately platted and titled condominiums, located on one or more additionally subdivided lots, and marketed and sold
to buyers for overnight use through a management program operated by the hotel, with total lodging unit count limited to 300.
https://www.saratoga.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/2231/Mountain-Winery-Precise-Plan-PDF “
For example: the Maximum Building Coverage Development Standard (B1) authorizes 610,000 square feet of enclosed
building footprint. (calculation: 14 acres times 43,650 square feet per acre). Design review seems to be waived for single story
buildings in the implementation section: “Design Review approvals by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission shall be
required for the development of future guest lodging any proposed new buildings or structures exceeding 18’ in height”, thus
not required under 18 feet. B2 Maximum Building Height authorizes 3 stories up to 45 feet high. Theoretically, this could
authorize up to 1.83 million square feet of usable enclosed space. (calculation: foot print of 610,000 square feet times 3 floors)
Further, the Development Agreement Terms provides the owner of the property 25 years to build out the property and only be
subject to post annexation regulations it agrees to. This one agreement will stop both the Planning Commission, City Council
and City of Saratoga from imposing new regulations concerning the use of the property if the owner does not agree.
These provisions above will violate much of Saratoga’s Values Statement for which I provided a few examples below.
https://www.saratoga.ca.us/274/Mission-Values-Statement .
Saratoga is a Community...
Where the common good prevails; not the good of a single company focused on maximizing the value of its investment
Where the natural beauty of the city and its hillsides are preserved; not damaged by authorizing hundreds of thousands of
square feet of building development
Where government is inclusive and values community involvement; not a city staff which refuses to answer who proposed
various sections of the Precise Plan like the 300 unit hotel/condominium project and huge building footprint authorization
Where a small town, picturesque, residential atmosphere is retained; not a city where a single developer can create a massive
development damaging both property values and quality of life for the local residents
Where neighbors work together for the common good; the community is working together to stop the annexation project and
Precise Plan for the common good of Saratoga and its citizens
Where leadership reflects community goals; the community is against the annexation project and Precise Plan, your vote will
inform us if your leadership reflect the community goals
As you can see, the annexation and Precise Plan as proposed is in opposition to the values of Saratoga and the desires of its
residents. As our representatives you should vote against Resolution 20-002.
I am also concerned by the correspondence from William Hirschman of Chateau Masson, dated May 14th, which implies that
the council has informed the owner(s)/managers of Chateau Masson that the Council is in favor of the resolution. Chateau
Masson stated that they wanted funds returned which they provided to supplement the cost of the EIR because “…no reason
other than the council having changed their minds.” I do not recall seeing minutes stating City Council members had told the
owners of Chateau that they were in favor of Resolution 20-002. If side meetings have occurred there is potential that violations
of the Brown Act have occurred. Violation of Section 54952 if a quorum existed or Sections 54952.2(c)(1) and 54952.2(b) if
serial meetings occurred. These details will be sorted out during the discovery process should this resolution proceed to court.
I was shocked to read that “ CMLLC (Chateau Masson) feels strongly that there is no basis for the Council to not proceed…”.
Clearly the owners of Chateau Masson do not believe their neighbors or members of the Saratoga community views should be
taken into consideration. That adversarial attitude makes the Development Agreement Terms covering 25 years even more
dangerous to enter into.
During the past few months you have learned the breadth and depth of the citizens desire to reject Resolution 20-002 (the
annexation and adoption of the Precise Plan). Citizens have bonded together to make sure our concerns are voiced and hired
attorneys to ensure, if ignored, there will be a future opportunity in court to stop this poorly constructed proposal.
In conclusion, please terminate Resolution 20-002. Also, I request that I be informed of who requested the 300 room
hotel/condominium project and 610,000 square feet of footprint of enclosed building be added to the Precise Plan.
Thank you for your time.
Ken Schulz
May 17, 2020
Dear Saratoga City Council Members,
This is a letter requesting the termination of Resolution No. 20-002, The Mountain Winery Annexation
Project.
As you are aware, on February 12th 2020, the Saratoga Planning Commission unanimously
recommended that the City Council not move forward with the Mountain Winery Annexation Project.
MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THE
MOUNTAN WINERY ANNEXATION PROJECT. MOTION PASSED. AYES: AHUJA, ALMALECH,
FITZSIMMONS, KAUSAR, MOHIUDDIN, PASTUSZKA, WALIA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE. https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/590055/021220_Minutes_Draft.pdf
DRAFT MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2020 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING (which have been confirmed).
As you are aware, at that meeting over 60 residents spoke against the project at the February 12th
Planning Commission meeting and no one supported it. In addition, hundreds (est.) of Saratoga
residents attended the meeting to express their opposition to resolution.
As you are aware, several hundred communications have been sent to the city and Council members
against proceeding with the annexation.
As you are likely aware, local social media, such as Nextdoor, indicates that Saratoga residents are
united in opposition to the annexation project.
As you are aware, line one of the Preamble of City of Saratoga Code of Ethics and Values states:
The proper operation of democratic government requires that decision-makers be
independent, impartial, and accountable to the people they serve. (emphasis added)
https://www.saratoga.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/585/Saratoga-City-Council-Code-of-Ethics-
PDF?bidId=
The residents of Saratoga have spoken and they are against the annexation, as am I.
As you are aware, Neelima Palacherla, LAFCO Executive Officer, informed Debbie Pedro of the Saratoga
Community Development Department on December 16th of 2019, that the annexation plan is in conflict
with County General Plan Policies. Quoting paragraph LA-5 on page 2 of 2 of the letter: “… further urban
development and intensification of existing uses is not consistent with County General Plan Policies for
the West Valley Hillsides Preservation Area. The proposed project will result in more urban development
in an area identified as not suited for further urban development.” The response by the city ignored the
increased urbanization being proposed. https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/512191/Attachment_9_a_Mountain_Winery_
FEIR_FINAL_01152020.pdf
It is clear that neither the residents of Saratoga nor county officials want increased urbanization of the
west valley hillsides which is what the Precise Plan authorizes.
For example: the Mountain Winery Precise Plan states: “The new land use designation, zoning and
Precise Plan would allow existing onsite uses to continue, while also allowing for up to three hundred
(300) units of overnight lodging accommodations referred to as a “Lodging” use. The Lodging use may
take any number of forms. Among the various arrangements that could be possible subject to the
development standards and design guidelines in this Plan are a traditional single building hotel with
lodging units located on multiple floors or a multiple building hotel with lodging units in buildings
separately sited. Lodging units may be separately platted and titled condominiums, located on one or
more additionally subdivided lots, and marketed and sold to buyers for overnight use through a
management program operated by the hotel, with total lodging unit count limited to 300.
https://www.saratoga.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/2231/Mountain-Winery-Precise-Plan-PDF “
For example: the Maximum Building Coverage Development Standard (B1) authorizes 610,000 square
feet of enclosed building footprint. (calculation: 14 acres times 43,650 square feet per acre). Design
review seems to be waived for single story buildings in the implementation section: “Design Review
approvals by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission shall be required for the development of future
guest lodging any proposed new buildings or structures exceeding 18’ in height”, thus not required
under 18 feet. B2 Maximum Building Height authorizes 3 stories up to 45 feet high. Theoretically, this
could authorize up to 1.83 million square feet of usable enclosed space. (calculation: foot print of
610,000 square feet times 3 floors)
Further, the Development Agreement Terms provides the owner of the property 25 years to build out
the property and only be subject to post annexation regulations it agrees to. This one agreement will
stop both the Planning Commission, City Council and City of Saratoga from imposing new regulations
concerning the use of the property if the owner does not agree.
These provisions above will violate much of Saratoga’s Values Statement for which I provided a few
examples below. https://www.saratoga.ca.us/274/Mission-Values-Statement .
Saratoga is a Community...
Where the common good prevails; not the good of a single company focused on maximizing the value of
its investment
Where the natural beauty of the city and its hillsides are preserved; not damaged by authorizing
hundreds of thousands of square feet of building development
Where government is inclusive and values community involvement; not a city staff which refuses to
answer who proposed various sections of the Precise Plan like the 300 unit hotel/condominium project
and huge building footprint authorization
Where a small town, picturesque, residential atmosphere is retained; not a city where a single developer
can create a massive development damaging both property values and quality of life for the local
residents
Where neighbors work together for the common good; the community is working together to stop the
annexation project and Precise Plan for the common good of Saratoga and its citizens
Where leadership reflects community goals; the community is against the annexation project and
Precise Plan, your vote will inform us if your leadership reflect the community goals
As you can see, the annexation and Precise Plan as proposed is in opposition to the values of Saratoga
and the desires of its residents. As our representatives you should vote against Resolution 20-002.
I am also concerned by the correspondence from William Hirschman of Chateau Masson, dated May
14th, which implies that the council has informed the owner(s)/managers of Chateau Masson that the
Council is in favor of the resolution. Chateau Masson stated that they wanted funds returned which they
provided to supplement the cost of the EIR because “…no reason other than the council having changed
their minds.” I do not recall seeing minutes stating City Council members had told the owners of
Chateau that they were in favor of Resolution 20-002. If side meetings have occurred there is potential
that violations of the Brown Act have occurred. Violation of Section 54952 if a quorum existed or
Sections 54952.2(c)(1) and 54952.2(b) if serial meetings occurred. These details will be sorted out
during the discovery process should this resolution proceed to court.
I was shocked to read that “ CMLLC (Chateau Masson) feels strongly that there is no basis for the Council
to not proceed…”. Clearly the owners of Chateau Masson do not believe their neighbors or members of
the Saratoga community views should be taken into consideration. That adversarial attitude makes the
Development Agreement Terms covering 25 years even more dangerous to enter into.
During the past few months you have learned the breadth and depth of the citizens desire to reject
Resolution 20-002 (the annexation and adoption of the Precise Plan). Citizens have bonded together to
make sure our concerns are voiced and hired attorneys to ensure, if ignored, there will be a future
opportunity in court to stop this poorly constructed proposal.
In conclusion, please terminate Resolution 20-002. Also, I request that I be informed of who requested
the 300 room hotel/condominium project and 610,000 square feet of footprint of enclosed building be
added to the Precise Plan.
Thank you for your time.
Ken Schulz
From:
To:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:07:58 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Alicia Moore
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Stop Hillside Re-zoning, Winery Annexation and Fiduciary
Mismanagement of City Funds
Comments City Council Members:
Over 1900 Saratogans signed a petition to stop the current re-
zoning of the unincorporated hillside that includes the Mountain
Winery. Over 60 people attended the last in person publicly held
City Council meeting and spoke up against the project. The
Planning Commission voted 7-0 to abandon the proposed
project.
Even if the stated objective of the Mayor are true (that the City
simply wants to exercise control over the future development of
the property), this proposal contrary to meet that objective. By
changing the zoning designation, the City will open the door to
aggressive commercialization, and loss of control over the
development. Under this proposed course, the City will have, at
best, some limited design review. Rather than reserving the
question and control of whether the land will be commercialized,
the City will be reduced to contemplating the nature of the
doorknobs and other finishes. Not a wise or fair trade against the
current controls.
Furthermore, even if the exchange were in any way objectively
worthy, the time to give up the leverage of zoning is when there
is a proposed design to evaluate. The City's proposal to give
away such valuable (and once given away, inalienable) rights
before knowing exactly what is in trade, is ill-advised at best,
untimely, and fiduciarily irresponsible at worst. The problems with
the process and its substantive lack of notice, lack of
transparency, and lack of reasonable due process will expose
the City to inevitable litigation, costing taxpayer money to defend
against, with the ultimate result of increasing the waste
occasioned by this unpopular proposal, should the City force this
project to proceed at this time. This project is directly in
contravention of Measure A, which received overwhelming
support of Saratoga citizens. At minimum, should the City
Council desire to proceed in contravention of express voter
wishes, it should put the matter to a vote in November.
Please do your duty to represent your constituents, who
overwhelmingly oppose this ill-conceived and poorly executed
plan to enable gross over-commercialization of our rural and
beatific hillside, and cancel this project immediately!
Alicia Moore
Saratoga
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Cc:
Subject:RE: Please terminate the proposed Mountain Winery Annexation/Rezoning
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:14:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
City Council Members:
Over 1900 Saratogans signed a petition to stop the current re-zoning of the unincorporated hillside
that includes the Mountain Winery. Over 60 people attended the last in person publicly held City
Council meeting and spoke up against the project. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to abandon
the proposed project.
Even if the stated objective of the Mayor are true (that the City simply wants to exercise control over
the future development of the property), this proposal is contrary to meet that objective. By
changing the zoning designation, the City will open the door to aggressive commercialization, and
loss of control over the development. Under this proposed course, the City will have, at best, some
limited design review. Rather than reserving the question and control of whether the land will be
commercialized, the City will be reduced to contemplating the nature of the doorknobs and other
finishes. Not a wise or fair trade against the current controls.
Furthermore, even if the exchange were in any way objectively worthy, the time to give up the
leverage of zoning is when there is a proposed design to evaluate. The City's proposal to give away
such valuable (and once given away, inalienable) rights before knowing exactly what is in trade, is ill-
advised at best, untimely, and fiduciarily irresponsible at worst. The problems with the process and
its substantive lack of notice, lack of transparency, and lack of reasonable due process will expose
the City to inevitable litigation, costing taxpayer money to defend against, and with the ultimate
result of increasing the waste occasioned by this unpopular proposal, should the City force this
project to proceed at this time. This project is directly in contravention of Measure A, which
received overwhelming support of Saratoga citizens. At minimum, should the City Council desire to
proceed in contravention of express voter wishes, it should put the matter to a vote in November.
Please do your duty to represent your constituents, who overwhelmingly oppose this ill-conceived
and poorly executed plan to enable gross over-commercialization of our rural and beatific hillside,
and cancel this project immediately!
Alicia Moore
Saratoga
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain WInery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:08 PM
From: Dave House <>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:18 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain WInery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House <
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:24 PM
To: Howard Miller
Subject: Mountain WInery
Howard,
I hope you are healthy and safe. I look forward when I can welcome you back to the House Family
Vineyards Tasting Room!
As you well know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Please call me.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Subject:FW: The Mountain WInery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:14 PM
From: Dave House <
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:17 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: The Mountain WInery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House >
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:32 PM
To: Rishi Kumar <r
Subject: The Mountain WInery
Rishi,
I have supported you in your campaigns in the past and continue to support you. Although we agree on
most items, I fear we may disagree on the annexation of the Mountain Winery. I want you to understand
and consider my position on this issue.
As you know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Please call me.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain WInery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:20 PM
From: Dave House >
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:16 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain WInery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM
To: Yan Zhao
Subject: Mountain WInery
Yan,
I hope you and your family are healthy and safe.
As you know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Please call me.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain WInery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:26 PM
From: Dave House >
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:16 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain WInery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House >
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:25 PM
To: Mary-Lynne Bernard
Subject: Mountain WInery
Mary-Lynne,
I hope you and your family are healthy and safe.
As you well know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Please call me.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain Winery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:32 PM
From: Dave House >
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:16 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain Winery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House <>
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:26 PM
To: Manny Cappello
Subject: Mountain Winery
Manny,
I hope you are healthy and safe.
As you well know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Subject:FW: Mountain WInery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:37:42 PM
From: Dave House <
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:15 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain WInery
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
James,
I am forwarding to you the emails I sent to all five Council Members yesterday.
Dave House
From: Dave House <
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 4:25 PM
To: Mary-Lynne Bernard <
Subject: Mountain WInery
Mary-Lynne,
I hope you and your family are healthy and safe.
As you well know, I am a long-time resident of Saratoga, having lived here since 1978, and a longtime
supporter of our City; a donor to several community organizations including Montalvo, Hakone, the
Saratoga Senior Center, the Prospect Community Campus, the Parker Ranch Trail, etc. and a Saratoga
small business owner.
I am also one of four equal owners of the Mountain Winery.
As you also know, on Wednesday evening the Council will address the annexation of that property into the
City.
My position; the Mountain Winery property will be developed, and taxes paid, during the next 25
years under County or City control. The question is; will the City or the County control that
development and collect the taxes generated by the Mountain Winery?
Over the past 20 years the County of Santa Clara has repeatedly permitted development at the Mountain
Winery as reported on pages 1 & 2 of the Saratoga Staff Report https://legistarweb-
production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/594961/Mountain_Winery_Staff_Report_051420.pdf
In 2006 the County permitted 1) the replacement of the 1,700 seat concert bowl with a new 2,500
seat concert bowl, 2) the removal of the old wooden addition of the Winery Building and
replacement with a new, larger addition including a full commercial kitchen, event restrooms, a VIP
room, VIP restrooms, performer green rooms, a performer kitchen and a performer dining room, 3)
the removal of the old deck on the valley side of the Chateau Building and the construction of a new,
larger deck with restrooms below, 4) the construction next to the Chateau Building of a large
commercial kitchen with an entertainment deck above.
In 2018 the County approved the addition of six new additions including 1) a three-story building
with offices, retail and event space, 2) a Bar and Tasting room, 3) an event building, 4) a storage
building 5) a ticket office and 6) an outdoor garden terrace. Following the completion of the 2019
concert season construction started on two buildings in the Plaza, the office/retail/events building
and the Bar/Tasting Room.
From past actions it is clear that the County will continue to allow development on the Mountain
Winery property and collect the sales a property taxes from the Mountain Winery.
As an owner of the Mountain Winery, I don’t really care if we are annexed or not. We will develop
the property in either case.
As a resident of Saratoga, I am very much in favor of annexation. The Mountain Winery is part of
Saratoga, in some ways it is the spirit of Saratoga. It drives much needed business to our downtown
area. It utilizes Saratoga roads and services. The taxes paid by the Mountain Winery should to go to
improving Saratoga. I want the Mountain Winery to work with my hometown of Saratoga in planning
our joint future together.
Please call me.
Dave House
Saratoga, CA 95070
From:
Cc:
Subject:Comments of environmental groups on Mountain Winery Annexation Project
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 3:39:29 PM
Attachments:MountainWinery_joint_enviro_letter_5.18.20.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please find attached the comments of Green Foothills, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, Sierra Club Loma Prieta
Chapter, and California Native Plant Society Santa Clara Valley Chapter concerning the Mountain Winery Annexation
Project.
Please contact me with any questions on this matter. Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
photo Alice Kaufman (Pronouns: She/Her/Hers)
Legislative Advocacy Director
Green Foothills | | greenfoothills.org
Curious about our new name and logo? Read "We Are Now Green Foothills".
May 18, 2020
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Ave.
Saratoga, CA 95070
via email to Saratoga City Clerk and Councilmembers
Re: Mountain Winery Annexation Project
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
This represents the comments of Green Foothills, the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society , the Sierra Club Loma
Prieta Chapter, and the California Native Plant Society Santa Clara Valley Chapter with regard to the proposed
Mountain Winery Annexation Project. Our organizations represent thousands of members in the region, including
in the City of Saratoga. We have a strong interest in preserving the open space, wildlife, and native plant h abitat
in the Santa Cruz Mountains, and in ensuring that inappropriate urban growth is kept out of the rural areas of
Santa Clara County and does not threaten vulnerable habitats and landscapes.
The Mountain Winery Annexation Project (Project) should be terminated by the City Council, as was
unanimously recommended by the Planning Commission on February 12. Revising the Precise Plan to reduce the
number of rooms contemplated, as suggested in the Staff Report, would not prohibit future development of up to
300 rooms of overnight accommodations. Because the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed the impacts
of up to 300 rooms, and because the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment do not place any limit on
the level of development allowed in the Regio nal Commercial district, the door would be open for some future
Council to approve an amendment to the Precise Plan to allow additional rooms to be constructed. The Council
should refuse to certify the Final EIR and terminate the Project.
The Mountain Winery site, located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and on a narrow, winding road that
restricts emergency access and evacuation in case of wildfire, is no place for a hotel of any size. Construction of a
hotel, and the new water tank and sewer connections that would be needed to support it, would impact the
surrounding native plant species and wildlife, including sensitive species such as dusky -footed woodrat, and
would encourage further growth in this undeveloped foothills area.
The Project would not only create unacceptable impacts to the surrounding landscape and wildlife habitat, it is in
direct conflict with the well-established state policies of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) with
regard to annexation and sprawl, and the policies of the Santa Clara County General Plan with regard to
appropriate land uses in the West Valley Hillside Area.
History of Mountain Winery and County Regulation
Mountain Winery, established in the 1950’s, was a legal nonconforming use for decades before being brought into
compliance with County regulations through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in 2000. That CUP allowed some
expansion rights, which are now nearly all exhausted. Under County regulations, very little additional
May 18, 2020
Page 2 of 4
development would be permitted at the site, which is in the Hillside designation. In terms of lodging facilities, a
6-room bed-and-breakfast would be the most that would be permitted.
It is worth noting that a facility with Mountain Winery’s current operations would not be permitted under County
regulations for the Hillside area. Only the fact that Mountain Winery was grandfathered in enables this facility to
operate as it currently does. Altho ugh the CUP allowed some expansion of the facility, approval of any additional
expansion by the County would require that the County act in conflict with its own General Plan policies and
zoning code. By contrast, the Project, if approved by Council, will automatically approve a significant expansion
of both type and level of use in the form of a significant number of overnight lodging accommodations.
Revising the Precise Plan Will Not Eliminate the Project’s Unacceptable Impacts
As noted above, the Project EIR analyzed the potential impacts of a 300 -room hotel. Regardless of any revisions
the Council might make to the Precise Plan, if the Council certifies the Final EIR and LAFCO approves the
adjustments to the Urban Service Area (USA) and Sphere of Influe nce (SOI), some future Council could then use
the certified EIR as the basis for a hotel expansion down the road. Over the many years our organizations have
been advocating on behalf of the environment, we have seen examples of development projects being p ut forward
with claims that EIRs from as much as 20 years prior provided adequate analysis of environmental impacts, or
with claims that brief (and not publicly noticed) Addendums were sufficient to bring the obsolete analysis up to
date.
In addition, if the Council were to adopt the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, the
door would be opened to extensive future development not just within the 73 acres covered by the Precise Plan,
but throughout all 176 acres of mostly pristine habitat (including coast live oak woodland, grassland, chaparral,
and based on topography, very likely riparian and/or wetland habitat) in parcel 503 -46-006. Granted, any
expansion of use beyond what was analyzed in the Project EIR would require additional environm ental impact
analysis, but the major hurdles of expanding the USA and SOI, and changing the General Plan and Zoning
designations from Hillside to Regional Commercial, would have been passed. The extremely broad definition of
allowable uses in the General Plan Amendment and the fact that no restrictions are placed on the extent of
development that can be approved in the Regional Commercial district means that even the 300 -room limit
contained in the Precise Plan as currently drafted would not be the limit of potential expansion of use on these 176
acres. Anything from additional hotel rooms to additional restaurants, convention centers, or other entertainment
venues could be contemplated as long as an amendment to the Precise Plan was approved.
New Hotels Should Not Be Built In Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones
In the past few years, the risk of loss of life and property from seasonal wildfires in the wildland -urban interface
(WUI) has become increasingly clear. The Camp Fire that killed 85 people and destr oyed much of the town of
Paradise, the Tubbs Fire that killed 22 people and destroyed more than 2,000 homes in Santa Rosa, and many
other wildfires have made it evident that building new structures, especially large gathering places, in the WUI
should be undertaken with great caution. In this case, where the proposed site is in a Very High Fire Hazard
Severity Zone and the access to the site is along a narrow, winding road with numerous residences along that
same route, the risk is not worth it. We must not forget that the town of Paradise had detailed evacuation plans,
had conducted emergency drills with residents, and had a warning system in place. None of these were sufficient
to avert the disaster of the Camp Fire. Since then, the wisdom of continuing to build any new development in
areas prone to wildfires has been increasingly questioned.
The EIR concludes that the addition of overnight guests at the Project site would not significantly impact
evacuation procedures, because hotel guests would “merge” with existing residents on local roads. The addition of
potentially hundreds of hotel guests to the number of existing residents all trying to evacuate at the same time
cannot be considered insignificant. Moreover, by introducing overnight visitors at Mountain Winery, the Project
May 18, 2020
Page 3 of 4
would create impacts that would exist 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, rather than primarily during concerts as is
currently the case.
The Project Conflicts With LAFCO and County Policy
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act established stat ewide policies against sprawl of urban uses into rural areas, and
promoting preservation of open space and agricultural land. LAFCOs have authority over decisions regarding
expansion of USAs and SOIs in order to carry out these policies and ensure the effi cient provision of government
services.
The Project conflicts with the fundamental principles at the core of LAFCO’s mission. LAFCO policies require
that cities locate urban uses in infill areas rather than annexing land to put urban uses there, unless the infill area is
fully built out with no vacant land for such uses. Nothing in the Project documents suggests that it would be
impossible for a hotel to be located within the infill area of the City of Saratoga. LAFCO policies also state that
USA expansions that include open space land should protect that open space, e.g. through an easement, an open
space preserve designation, or acquisition of the open space by a public agency dedicated to preserving open
space. The Project does not do this; in fact, the P roject specifically rezones 176 acres of what is currently Hillside
land with very few allowable uses to Regional Commercial land where a myriad of highly intensive uses would
be permitted.
The Project also conflicts with long-standing County policy. In 1994, the four West Valley cities (Saratoga,
Cupertino, Los Gatos, and Monte Sereno) collaborated with the County of Santa Clara on the West Valley
Hillsides Joint Planning Review process. The principles resulting from this collaboration are enshrined in th e
County General Plan’s West Valley Hillsides Preservation Area, which includes among its basic foundational
strategies: “Limit expansion of urban development into hillside areas.” This principle has also been embodied in
the City of Saratoga’s General Plan as Policy LU-9.1 (“Limit expansion of urban development in the hillside
areas”) and Goal LU-9 (“Preserve the rural nature of the hills by limiting incompatible development”).
Other West Valley Hillsides Preservation Area policies with which the Project conflicts include:
Policy R-LU 200: Urban development and extension of urban services should be limited to those areas
most suited for urban development. Further expansion of the urban area into the West Valley hillsides
should be discouraged.
Policy R-LU 202: Delineate and adopt long term growth boundaries indicating lands to which they are
willing to provide urban services within approximately the next 20 -30 years in order to:
a. Preserve the predominantly natural character and natural resources of hillsides by preventing
urban development from encroaching into them
b. Reinforce fundamental policies concerning the appropriate location of urban development
c. Protect public health and safety by preventing urban development in hazardous areas.
Furthermore, the Project is in conflict not merely with the West Valley Hillside Preservation Area policies, but
with the fundamental principles of the entire County General Plan. County planning policy revolves around the
concept that the rural unincorporated areas should be protected against urban development and their rural
character maintained. The fact that the Mountain Winery, due to its grandfathered status, stands as an exception to
these policies means that this site, of all places in the rural unincorporated ar ea, should not be further developed
and intensified in terms of use.
May 18, 2020
Page 4 of 4
In sum, the Project is an inappropriate use for its location; it would cause unacceptable environmental, land use,
and public safety impacts; and revising the Precise Plan to reduce the n umber of hotel rooms will not cure the
defects of the Project. The Council should terminate the Project and refuse to certify the Final EIR.
Sincerely,
Alice Kaufman, Legislative Advocacy Director
Green Foothills
Katja Irvin, Conservation Committee Co-Chair
Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter
Shani Kleinhaus, Environmental Advocate
Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society
Linda Ruthruff, Conservation Chair
California Native Plant Society, Santa Clara Valley Chapter
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 4:16:08 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name David Aune
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject May 20, 2020 Council Meeting - No on Mountain Winery
Annexation
Comments May 18, 2020
Dear Saratoga City Council Members,
Please preserve, defend, and care for the soul and character of
Saratoga. Please VOTE NO ON ANNEXATION, rezoning, and
expanded urban use.
Please listen to the citizens, listen to your own hearts, do what
you know is right and good. Please STOP THIS ANNEXATION
EFFORT NOW.
Please redirect your efforts to PROTECT SARATOGA HILLSIDE
AREAS by working closely with the County of Santa Clara
Planning and Development to prevent urban development.
Follow the spirit and wisdom of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the Santa Clara Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) to preserve our hillsides.
Please carefully CONSIDER THE GREAT RISKS AND
DANGERS that can be avoided and VOTE NO ON
ANNEXATION. These reasons are outlined in the following letter
I sent to the council on March 11, 2020.
Sincerely,
David Aune
-----------------------------------------------------------
March 11,2020
City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070
Email: Debbie Bretschneider (debbieb@saratoga.ca.us)
RE: My comments for the City Council Public Hearing on the
Mountain Winery Annexation Project to be held on March 18,
2020
Dear City Council members,
Do not annex the Mountain Winery property. Please vote to
terminate the annexation project currently underway. There are
no terms under which the City of Saratoga should Annex the
Mountain winery because:
• annexation requires rezoning
• and, rezoning leads to expanded urban use
• and, expanded urban use leads to loss of control and many
negative intended and unintended consequences
If you truly want to do what is best for the residents of Saratoga,
stop annexation now.
I have lived in my home on Pierce Road for over thirty-five (35)
years. My experience is that Saratoga is a Community...
• Where the natural beauty of the city and its hillsides are
preserved
• Where a small town, picturesque, residential atmosphere is
retained
The best way to preserve our hillsides is to the leave the
Mountain Winery property in the County and zoned Hillside-d1 as
it is now. And, please work closely and collaboratively with the
county to preserve the character of Saratoga.
• The County is committed to preserving the resources and
character of the rural and hillside areas per the Santa Clara
County General Plan.
• The County will not approve a hotel; the County will only allow a
6-unit bed and breakfast or a bungalow for this property.
• The County cannot provide the sewer and water required for
large scale development.
• State regulations such as SB35 and RHNA (Regional Housing
Needs Allocation) do not apply to the County.
• Leaving the Mountain Winery property in the County controls
additional uses much better that annexation by the City of
Saratoga.
Annexation of the Mountain Winery property is wrong because
the expanded urban uses will cause:
• Increased fire danger in a "Very-High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone."
• Increased traffic on narrow rural roads
• Increased traffic accidents
• Increased noise, lights, traffic on top of our hillsides 24x7x365
• Impacts on wildlife, further driving them from their homes
• Increased environmental such as air pollution and watershed
disturbance
• Annexation by the City of Saratoga expands the “Urban Service
Area” of Saratoga and makes it possible for commercial and
residential development under SB35 and RHNA.
• Annexation by the City of Saratoga actually reduces our control
of the Mountain Winery property and creates many unintended
consequences that cannot be reversed.
Terminating the annexation project is the best solution to
preserve our hillsides. We should leave this property in the
County and zoned Hillside-d1. And Saratoga should provide
comments on any proposed development in the future. This will
help ensure that we preserve our hillsides for our current and
future residents and wildlife rather than opening the door for
more and more urban sprawl and less and less control for what
happens on our hillsides.
Do not annex the Mountain Winery property. Thank you for
listening to my concerns.
Sincerely,
Dave Aune
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 4:54:46 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Lori Burns
Phone Number
Subject Stop - Mtn Winery annexation / zoning/ expansion
Comments Councilmembers --
I hope that you will unanimously vote to maintain the integrity of
our hillsides. The annexation and zoning changes to
accommodate Mtn Winery expansion is irresponsible. These
hillsides have been protected through the county hillside
designation. Opening the door to additional commercial
development or allowing additional expansion of that venue will
irrevocably harm the character, safety and environment of
Saratoga. The Planning Commission recommended to NOT
approve these changes. I hope you will vote to protect and
preserve the hillside designation by accepting their
recommendation.
Regards,
Lori Burns
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Fwd: Terminate the process to annex the Mountain Winery
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 9:13:05 PM
From: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 8:06:17 PM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: Fwd: Terminate the process to annex the Mountain Winery
Begin forwarded message:
From: Beth Kingsley <>
Subject: Terminate the process to annex the Mountain Winery
Date: May 18, 2020 at 5:51:08 PM PDT
To: "
email originated from outside your organization. Exercise
caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown
senders.
Dear City Council,
I am a concerned citizen of Saratoga as it relates to the current Mountain Winery
annexation process. I, like many, have previously voiced my opinion on this
matter via email. I strongly oppose the annexation of the Mountain Winery and
the addition of a possible 300 room hotel. As a resident of Mount Eden Estates,
my family travels Pierce road at least 3 to 6 times daily (during non COVID
times) and I am concerned this hotel could bring a lot more traffic to Pierce Road
from drivers that do not know the road. This increase in inexperienced Pierce
Road drivers will be a safety concern for our neighborhood. Many new drivers to
Pierce Road drive really slow and cross the line around curves, which can cause
accidents. There are many bikers on Pierce Road and this could pose a big safety
concern for them as well. I am really concerned about the truck traffic this could
create during construction as well as trucks that may service the hotel once it is
built. I can't tell you how many times I have met a truck on a curve and had to
stop quickly or pull to the side to avoid an accident. As many have stated, this
hotel could also add to the already existing fire hazard in the area. If there were a
big fire in this area, the increase in traffic from hotel guests coming down from
the Mountain Winery could really impact the resident's ability to get out safely. I
read some of the traffic study done in June of 2019 and do not feel this was a
representative study of the impact a 300 room hotel could have on our traffic. It
seems you are just trying to push this item through without doing proper studies.
Why? It makes no sense for the City of Saratoga to have a 300 room hotel on a
steep hillside that could lead to many safety concerns for our citizens.
In summary, I feel this is not a well thought out proposal and think the
project needs to be terminated at the May 20th City Council Meeting. By
terminating the project now, you will save future costs that will arise over the
ongoing battle with the citizens of Saratoga over this project. I urge you to
terminate the project now!
Sincerely,
Beth Kingsley
From:
Subject:Fwd: Mt. Winery Annexation
Date:Monday, May 18, 2020 9:13:50 PM
From: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 8:03:37 PM
To: Rina Shah
Cc: Mary-Lynne Bernald James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Mt. Winery Annexation
I know how you feel. It has been 9 months since the citizens have been able to even hear what
the council is even thinking. That has allowed nothing but fear and uncertainty to spread! In
those 9 months, we have gotten an EIR, 2 planning commission hearing and a fair amount of
public feedback both for and against. BUT the messages communicated by some are about
fear and distrust. And now we have someone making money off of this fear! We were
supposed to discuss this in February. That got delayed with the extra planning commission
hearing. Then further delayed with the virus. In all that time things have really festered. That
is not right.
I will make the same points again on Wednesday about the project. It was never about a 300
room hotel. That was a limit for an EIR. Nothing proposed would have impacted any view or
undisturbed open space. In January, the Planning commission was supposed to in concert with
the public determinate what, if anything would be acceptable for Saratoga to gain control of
Mt Winery. Instead it has become completely political rather than what people want in their
hearts. This was supposed to be a values discussion, not a numbers discussion.
I loved your hotel pictures. My model was this: http://www.timbercoveresort.com/ No where
near 300 rooms, but quaint and more compatible with a non-urban environment. But this
vision was never discussed because we never got to that point in the process.
Since the property is already is and has been commercial for over 60 years I am never really
sure what people mean by "rezoning". If they mean remove it from a process where 4 county
planning commissioners in one meeting can change the rules, to where it would require a
minimum of 3 public meeting in Saratoga (1 planning and 2 council) to change rules, then I
then that is better, right? Commercial is commercial regardless of it being misnamed. The
question is what actual limits we would want on this property. The zoning would match that
regardless of the name. And to ever change those limits would require an extensive public
process right here in Saratoga!
Anyway, I appreciate your thoughtful response. I agree with you 100% that living in fear and
uncertainty is Not good. And despite the efforts to draw this out even longer for political gain,
I am hopeful that the citizens can hear from their council, for the first time in 9 months, what
we really think! Hang in there for just a few more days and things will become a Lot clearer.
Again, Thank you for taking the time to communicate with us!
Howard...
On May 18, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Shah Rina > wrote:
Respected Mayor Miller and Vice Mayor Bernald:
I am going to submit the attached letter to the staff, but I wanted to let you know
that my family and I are really opposed to the Mt. Winery annexation with
rezoning to allow a 300-room hotel. Please reconsider this application and relieve
us of the constant fear and tension that we have felt ever since City staff
announced this proposal. There are so many reasons to avoid this wrong decision
from occurring. I don't think the staff or the City realizes what a burden it will
become for the future Saratoga residents. I have recommended approval of three
of the four hotels (attached images) in Downtown San Jose and know how much
it takes to even allow a 50 room hotel. It entails traffic, parking, aesthetics, noise
and other environmental issues which are not suitable for our hillsides. We have
invested in this area to have views, peace and quiet and really work hard to pay
the property taxes, etc. But all that motivation to live in this area vanished when it
was announced that the Council is considering commercial uses and rezoning of
open space in our hillside. Annexation is one thing, but rezoning to allow
commercial uses will really bring the area and the neighborhood down and
deteriorate even further with constant traffic and noise monitoring issues.
Please reconsider this proposal and prevent this from becoming a reality and a
nightmare!
Thanks,
Rina Shah
Saratogan
<Letter to Saratoga City Council to stop Annexation and Rezoning of Mt.
Winery.pdf>
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:35:40 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Hiok Hion Ng
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation project
Comments Dear City Councillors,
There have been many issues raised regarding the Mountain
Winery Annexation project. I live in the neighborhood and have
attended meetings regarding this. The Planning Comission has
voted 7-0 against going forward with the plan as is. I'm surpirsed
that the council has not affirmed the Planning Comission
recommendation after all this time. If there have been errors by
the Planning Comission in making their conclusions, please
highlight those clearly so that residents can understand them.
Otherwise please highlight the reasons the Council has
continued to keep this issue on the agenda despite the
overwhelming opposition to the development plan for a 300 room
hotel. Please do the right thing for the residents and reject the
plan and project at the next meeting. Thank you.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:04:11 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Joshua Williams
joshua williams
san Jose 95116
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:04:27 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Linda Omaley
Morgan Hill 95037
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:04:52 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Janette Rosales
Campbell 95008
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:04:52 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nina Bell
Palo Alto 94306
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:05:10 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Lemmer
Palo Alto 94306
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:06:26 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Richard Craig
SAN JOSE 95124
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:08:05 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Bob and Carol Sippel
We support Saratoga through the arts, the annual car show and food establishements
Bob and Carol Sippel
SAN JOSE 95126
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:08:08 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Hetterly
Palo Alto 94303
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:12:40 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Margaret Christine Robinett
San Jose 95117
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:12:41 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Choudhury
Moraga 94556
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:13:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Stacy Levy
San jose 95117
From:
the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:15:48 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Tanya Diamond
Los Gatos 95033
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:22:05 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Margaret Petkiewicz
San Jose 95125
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:26:20 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Mark Bishop
San Jose 95112
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:28:19 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nabeel Al-Shamma
Mountain View 94040
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:28:37 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely, Mr. John Redstrom
john redstrom
sunnyvale 94089
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:40:01 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Niki Lamb
San Jose 95120
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:42:06 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Doria Summa
Doria Summa
Palo Alto 94306
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:45:05 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Guy Zahller
Aptos 95003
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:49:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Karla
Karla Jurvetson
Los Altos 94022
From:
Cc:
Re: Agenda Item 3.1 for 5-20-2020 City Council Meeting.
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:32:38 PM
Attachments:Agenda Item 3.1 5-20-2020Mtg.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Council Members:
I am resending this message with the correct caption. Thank-you
Hobart Birmingham
Dear Council Members:
Attached are JoAnne and my comments on the annexation proposal, Item 3.1 on the Agenda for the
May 20th meeting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Hobart Birmingham
From: JoAnne Marie Birmingham
Date: Monday, May 18, 2020 at 2:47 PM
To: Howard Miller <hmiller@saratoga.ca.us>, "rkumar@saratoga.ca.us"
<rkumar@saratoga.ca.us>, "mcappello@saratoga.ca.us" <mcappello@saratoga.ca.us>,
"yzhao@saratoga.ca.us" <yzhao@saratoga.ca.us>, Debbie Bretschneider
<debbieb@saratoga.ca.us>, Mary-Lynne Bernald <mlbernald@saratoga.ca.us>
Cc: Hobart Birmingham
Subject: Agenda Item 0 for 5-20-2020 City Council Meeting.
Dear Saratoga City Council Members,
Attached is a letter from my husband and me regarding Agenda Item O for the May 20, 2020 City
Council Meeting. Please give this your serious consideration.
Sincerely,
JoAnne and Hobart Birmingham
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:10:20 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Pierce Lynne
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Annexation of Mt. Winery Property and Hotel
Comments I join the citizens of Saratoga who are against the Annexation of
Winery property and changes in zoning allowing building of retail
and high density dwellings in our foothills. As a group I believe
we have the ability to educate the majority of Saratoga voters to
understand the consequences this action will have on the future
of Saratoga. The councils covert behavior and unjustified
process execution will be brought to light. The negative impact of
this action upon the community at large to benefit of the few and
the remote will be highlighted in our opposition.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:03:43 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Anita Spiro
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Subject In favor of Mountain Winery annexation
Comments Dear Council Members,
I am writing in support of the Mountain Winery Annexation. Here
is how I think the council should vote:
#1 proceed with the hearing (ie, do not cancel due to
coronavirus) and
#2 continue with the annexation process.
First, please understand that I am writing to you from the position
of a long time resident of Saratoga and the Mount Eden
neighborhood. I live in the hills not far from the Mountain Winery,
and any development would directly impact me. I am already
affected by the throngs of cars which go up and down Pierce
Road to attend concerts, so I know well what I speak about. Do I
like the cars? Not that much, but I love the venue and all it offers
to our city. I also care deeply about the neighborhood, my safety
and the safety of others on Pierce Road and I know that the
owners of the Mountain Winery consider safety first. Finally, I
care deeply about the betterment of our city and know that we
must continue to improve its appeal.
We all know that the Mountain Winery is the number 1
destination in Saratoga. And our economy depends on it a lot.
Ask restaurant owners in town where they get their business
from, and they will likely tell you that it gets a huge boost on
Mountain Winery concert days. You can imagine my dismay
when I found out not too long along that the tax revenue from the
Mountain Winery currently does not benefit our city. That
revenue could pay to build a continuous Class II bicycle lane
along the entire length of Pierce road. It could help fund street
repairs to just make the ride smoother. It can help fund senior
programs and maybe even public transportation to get kids to
school efficiently. And if the City of Saratoga annexed the land, it
would have some control over what gets built there over the
years. Maybe we could end up with a little open space or a
destination for retirees, or maybe the owners would build a lovely
retreat on the top of the world with a meditation venue and day
spa! But in all seriousness, maybe millions in revenue could just
improve street safety. How many bicyclist accidents do we have
to have on Pierce Road before we fix it?
Please move ahead and help city residents, understand that
annexation is not the same as approving a 300 room hotel.
Further, help residents understand that if we do not proceed we
are giving up so much:
#1 We throw away the thousands of dollars already spent --
those are our tax dollars wasted.
#2 We will probably be obligated to repay $100,000 of expenses
to Mountain Winery for reneging on the expectation that the city
would pursue this process in good faith, and even that probably
won’t happen until after we incur extra thousands in legal fees.
#3 We completely lose any future revenue opportunity (Yes, we
kick a gift horse in the mouth) and
#4 We lose any control over or say in future development at the
Mountain Winery.
As for the issue of the number of hotel rooms, I am sure
Mountain Winery owners have done careful research as to how
many rooms could work well on that property and know the
minimum needed in order to establish a stable business for
themselves and our city. I don’t know what that number is, but if
300 rooms causes too much resistance, just pick a lower number
and negotiate towards an agreement that means ‘success’ for all
concerned. Simple!
Thank you for considering my comments,
Anita Spiro
Saratoga, CA 95070
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:32:26 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Anthony & Sue Atwell
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Annexation of Mountain Winery property
Comments I have read the Saratoga City Council Handbook. I am of the
opinion that the council has not been forthcoming with its
answers to all the questions raised at the Feb.12 meeting by
citizens concerned with the annexation on the basis of
evacuation of citizens, hotel staff and hotel guests in the case of
fire and the quality of Pierce RD and Hwy 9 to handle heavy
traffic out of the area and INTO the area by fire trucks (to avoid a
Paradise, CA disaster in evacuation). Furthermore, I am unsure
of ANY great advantages to the city to the annexation except for
added tax money to the city coffers. An open discussion of the
pros and cons of annexation have not been addressed by the
Council. In fact the Council has not answered the many concerns
of the citizen brought up in the February meeting with the
Committee. In this regard, the Council seems to be out of line
with the stated intent in the to keep Saratoga "rural" City Council
Handbook. It raises a question of ethics of the Council members
in keeping the public in the dark about why this issue seems to
be an imperative to the Council. It IS imperative to the CITIZENS
and the large turnout in the Feb. meeting should have been an
indication of their concern. Will it take a recall petition to get a
response from the Council? Will the public have to wait until an
election to oust the current Council who is unresponsive to the
community's concerns? It sounds as though the Council is not
concerned when it spends another $12,000 to examine this
"deal". Did you ever watch the speakers' public remarks from that
Feb.meeting?
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Re: Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:19:56 PM
This you for the eMail.
There is much confusion about this project! Local government does not work like you see on TV. Decisions can only be made
in publicly noticed meeting. The council had not had a public meeting since the planning commission made their
recommendations. So there was No way for the council to consider or even "affirm the planning commission recommendation"!
So please don't be surprised that we are having a meeting. That is just how government is supposed to work!
Thanks for writing!
Howard Miller
Mayor of Saratoga
On May 19, 2020, at 1:35 wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or
clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Hiok Hion Ng
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Subject Mountain Winery Annexation project
Comments Dear City Councillors,
There have been many issues raised regarding the Mountain
Winery Annexation project. I live in the neighborhood and have
attended meetings regarding this. The Planning Comission has
voted 7-0 against going forward with the plan as is. I'm surpirsed
that the council has not affirmed the Planning Comission
recommendation after all this time. If there have been errors by
the Planning Comission in making their conclusions, please
highlight those clearly so that residents can understand them.
Otherwise please highlight the reasons the Council has
continued to keep this issue on the agenda despite the
overwhelming opposition to the development plan for a 300
room hotel. Please do the right thing for the residents and reject
the plan and project at the next meeting. Thank you.
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:09:47 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Martin Rossip
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject Mt. Winery: Yes, I support annexation.
Comments Dear Esteemed Council Members:
I am a long-time Saratoga homeowner and live on Mt Eden Rd
close to Pierce. My property is less than 1800 ft away from the
Mountain Winery. I strongly support continuing the annexation
process. (Please note this is NOT the same as saying I support
approval of a 300 room hotel.) I believe annexation - with some
modifications to the precise plan - has important benefits for
Saratoga which are worth discussing. So what are these
benefits?
The main benefit I see is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fund
safety improvements for Pierce Rd. This is an ideal scenario for
funding via revenue-anticipation bond perhaps with occupancy
taxes earmarked for repayment, or a better method could be to
use the Community Facilities District mechanism (Mello-Roos)
which has the advantage of fine-tuning the allocation of
payments in any ratio between the developer and the
surrounding neighborhood, both of which would benefit
enormously. Also, the Winery owns the land along Pierce south
of Teerlink all the way to Hwy 9 and I am confident the owners
would be amenable to discussing dedicating part of that parcel
for road widening. Virtually every letter from neighbors opposing
annexation mentions hazards of driving on Pierce Rd. My
neighbors are all correct! The entire length of Pierce Rd from
Saratoga Sunnyvale to Hwy 9 is, in my opinion, highly
dangerous. It is too narrow, has no or minimal shoulders, no bike
lanes, no guard rails near ravines and is unevenly paved. Higher
(or lower) traffic volume will not affect these structural hazards.
Pierce Rd would be dangerous with or without the Winery and
needs to be fixed regardless of annexation. In fact, Pierce Rd is
probably the biggest depressor of property values and biggest
negative feature of every home in this area. But it does not have
to stay that way. Now imagine a widened Pierce Rd, perhaps
with nice wide bike lanes, perhaps with sidewalks in some
places, perhaps with a 2 foot painted separator in the middle of
the road separating drivers from oncoming vehicles. Imagine
being able to pull over anywhere you need to and not block
traffic. Imagine having your mailbox on your side of the street.
Imagine being able to take a leisurely stroll along Pierce with
your kid or your dog without fearing sudden death. It would be
expensive, but could easily be funded using the methods above.
This annexation may be our only chance to get it paid for, make
our properties worth more, and most importantly make our daily
lives safer.
The 2nd benefit I see is having a say in what gets built. This is
more important than I think most of us realize. Right now, we
have no say whatsoever. The reality is the County approves
virtually every project that submits correctly completed
paperwork. Denials of projects by the County are exceedingly
rare. And there is virtually no recourse: Saratogans who objected
to a prior expansion of the winery sued the County in 2001 and
lost in Superior Court. At least here we have elected officials who
care about what we think and are trying to balance the issues to
do the right thing.
In addition to having no voice with the County, there is also no
transparency with the County. Here’s an example: Most
Saratogans would be surprised to learn that the county recently
approved a large project on the parcel right next to the Winery.
APN 503-44-019. They approved a whopping 80,958sf of new
construction, including a 59,626 sf main building (60 ft tall!), the
removal of hundreds (255) old-growth trees, a 16,906sf animal
“breeding facility” along with a permit to operate an animal
crematorium, presumably needed to burn up all the animals that
are expected to die there. I’m painting a dark picture of this
project, but my only point is that it was approved without any of
us even knowing about it. If there’s no annexation, development
at the Winery will continue in one form or another under County
control but Saratoga will be out of the loop.
Other benefits to Saratoga include public access to the site with
it’s stupendous views and open space, ongoing tax revenue for
the city, and eventual access to the Juan Bautista trail with
easements on the property already granted. What a fantastic
thought to be able to go to the winery anyday, sit outside at a
not-300-room hotel, have lunch, enjoy the view, do a deal, visit
the spa, etc. I personally believe that a modest sized luxury hotel
- with the road improvements mentioned - will benefit all of us.
It’s also important to understand that development will happen
there whether we like it or not, and it’s naive to believe that 430
acres in Silicon Valley will stay empty if we do nothing. Far better
to stay engaged and work out something desirable to
Saratogans.
So what exactly would be desirable to Saratogans? I think we all
agree that a 300-room hotel would not be desirable. I can also
say that the current precise plan is woefully lacking in benefits to
Saratogans and sorely needs renegotiation. As a point of
reference, annexation was considered previously in 1993 when
the winery consisted of 630 acres and was under different
ownership. The basic proposal at that time was: City grants
zoning to allow 11 single family residences, 36 clustered homes,
a 2000 seat amphitheater and a 100-150 room hotel; and in
exchange, the Winery would give the City land for a new
firehouse on Pierce, land for a new 350-acre public park with
park maintenance paid by the winery, and give the city some
revenue from concert ticket sales. My takeaway from that initial
proposal is a 100-150 room hotel was felt by those owners at that
time to be appropriately-sized and financially viable. But
wait...where is our park? Where is our fire station? They’ve never
been proposed. But I would happily trade both for a safer Pierce
Rd. So in my opinion, what we still need in the Precise Plan are:
1. Agreement on Pierce Rd right-of-way dedications 2. Cost data
and agreement on a method to pay for safety improvements
along all of Pierce; 3. Agreement on the maximum number of
rooms. 4. A clause that adds deflectors on the parking lot
floodlights (so they don’t glare downhill towards all of Saratoga)
would be a nice touch and much appreciated.
As a way to broach a negotiation with those who oppose lodging
of any kind, It may be helpful to point out that the Winery is
already entitled to 6 units under the current Use Permit. So I
would ask those opposed if they would be willing to accept 7
units of lodging, just one additional unit, in exchange for all the
other benefits. I think they would. So if that’s the case, then there
has to be some number of rooms between 7 and 299 that would
be acceptable to Saratogans and also make sense for the
Winery owners.
On the separate issue of postponing this matter until live council
meetings resume, I urge you to NOT postpone. We need more
discussion on this, not less. If you shut down discussion until
some indeterminate time in the future, the widespread
misunderstandings will be prolonged and everyone who joined
the meeting tonight to speak on this issue will feel stifled which
only leads to anger and frustration. Let everyone speak. And
then let everyone speak again at the next meeting and the next
until everyone feels they have been heard. There is too much
misinformation around that needs conversation in order to work
it’s way out of the debate. So again, I’m asking you to vote to not
postpone, and to vote to continue the annexation process.
Finally, I want to offer some words of encouragement to all our
Council Members. Be strong. Don’t give up yet. I know other
residents who understand why annexation is a smart move. They
are reluctant to speak up because as you’ve probably noticed,
people become irrational and angry at them for expressing a
different opinion. We know you only have the best interests of the
city as your goal. The Council was right to initiate this process,
but if you give up too soon, the $265,000 already committed will
be wasted. This is a long process and requires a lot of outreach
to be sure the whole community understands the issues. That’s
the only way to make a wise decision. Please don’t quit now.
Thank you,
Martin Rossip
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Cc:
Subject:FW: Mountain Winery and the Conservation Center for Wildlife Care
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:28:02 AM
Mayor Miller & City Council Members,
I’m forwarding this message on as requested. Santa Clara County approved a wild animal center to
be operated by the Peninsula Humane Society & SPCA just up Hwy 9 from the Mountain Winery a
few years back.
Take care,
James
From: William Hirschman
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:50 AM
To: James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Mountain Winery and the Conservation Center for Wildlife Care
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
I am forwarding this is letter from the president of the Humane Society who the Winery has
been working with going on two years now to help facilitate their development. I believe his
letter demonstrates the Winery’s commitment to the community and wildlife as well as the
development that is taking place in the County in and about the Saratoga community. I would
appreciate if the council could be made aware of our efforts.
Bill Hirschman
From: Ken White >
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:21 AM
To: ''
Subject: Mountain Winery and the Conservation Center for Wildlife Care
Bill, let me take this moment to acknowledge and to thank you for Mountain Winery’s cooperation
as the Peninsula Humane Society & SPCA moves forward with developing the neighboring site as the
Conservation Center for Wildlife Care. As you know, the Center is currently under construction and
will soon bring an entirely new level of hands-on wildlife rehabilitation services to the community.
The three key programs are:
hospitalization and eventual release back to native habitat for thousands of injured and
orphaned native wildlife;
in collaboration with Federal and State wildlife regulatory agencies, breeding of rare and
endangered species as a hedge against extinction;
education programs about wildlife and habitat conservation.
In addition to a truly state-of-the-art animal hospital designed specifically around the needs of native
wildlife, the Center also includes more than three dozen outdoor hillside habitat enclosures where
the animals will complete their rehabilitation post-hospitalization and prior to release. The specific
purpose of these enclosures is to allow the birds and mammals the opportunity to develop and
demonstrate natural behaviors, observed by hidden cameras, to assure wildlife professional staff
that their “patients” are prepared to make it on their own. We are confident that Mountain Winery’s
current programs as well as its proposed development will not have any adverse effects on that
wildlife.
This exciting nonprofit Center is literally a game-changer for Bay Area wildlife. We are glad to have
such a collaborative neighbor as we bring this long-awaited dream to reality.
Sincerely,
Ken
Ken White, President
Peninsula Humane Society & SPCA
1450 Rollins Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
www.PHS-SPCA.org
From:
Cc:
Subject:FW: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:50:47 AM
From: Mohini Balakrishnan [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:46 AM
To: Howard Miller; Mary-Lynne Bernald; Rishi Kumar; Manny Cappello; yzaho@saratoga.ca.us; Debbie
Pedro;
Subject: Re: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council members and City Attorney,
We are writing to request the City Council accept the Planning
Commission's recommendation to terminate the Mt. Winery Annexation
project.
We are extremely disappointed that the council has scheduled this meeting during
SIP.
This limits residents from being able to attend the meeting and communicate their
thoughts on the Mountain winery project. We have already experienced the
limitations of technology and zoom meetings in earlier meetings.
We truly hope the council will represent the residents by supporting their strong,
vocal and written objections, and agree with planning commission
recommendations in rejecting the Mountain winery annexation and the hotel
proposal.
As longtime residents of Saratoga, we have always felt that the city
representatives have been open and transparent in their agenda. Unfortunately,
this has not been the case here. We feel that there is a hidden agenda and that the
voices of residents of Saratoga, most affected by this annexation, are not being
allowed to be heard.
We fail to understand the urgency of the city council members, mayor and
officials to rush this process through when there has been significant and voluble
push back from residents.
Balu and Mohini Balakrishnan Villa Oaks Lane, Albar Court and Maria Ln
Saratoga
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:FW: 5-20-2020 Council Meeting
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:35:52 AM
From: Jon Kwong [mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:10 AM
To: Howard Miller; Mary-Lynne Bernald; Rishi Kumar; Manny Cappello; Yan Zhao
Cc: Debbie Pedro; Jon Kwong
Subject: 5-20-2020 Council Meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
5-19-2020
Honorable Mayor Miller, Council Members,
Please listen to the outcry of the citizens of Saratoga, and put an end to the Mountain Winery property
annexation and rezoning effort.
Failing that, please postpone any action, big or small, to advance same annexation/rezoning, until such
time when the City can hold face-to-face public hearings.
In the second Planning Public Hearing in January this year with the annexation/rezoning on the agenda,
around 200 citizens attended, filling up City Hall; and about a quarter of the attendees spoke, the
overwhelming majority of whom spoke passionately against the annexation/rezoning.
The Planning Commission's response was swift and decisive, voting unanimously against the
annexation/rezoning.
Every indication showed that many more than 200 attendees would be expected at the Council Public
Hearing.
That is, until COVID-19 struck.
However, in the Council Zoom meeting in early May, less than 10% of 200 citizens were able to attend.
Many citizens could not join due to technical difficulties.
(Even Council Members demonstrated some technical difficulty during the Zoom)
It's painfully obvious that Zoom does not constitute a public hearing, as Zoom can be contrived,
controlled, manipulated; and so many citizens wishing to connect and interact with the Council are shut
out, denied their equal protection under the law.
The City prides itself in its transparency, and willingness to listen to its constituents, please follow through
and make decisions, which the citizens have shown a vested interest in and which potentially, adversely
impact their lives , face-to-face with its citizens and not behind cameras that shut so many of them out.
Thank you for listening.
Jon Kwong
Saratoga Heights
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:FW: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:35:34 AM
From: Comcast [mailto ]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:35 AM
To: Howard Miller; Mary-Lynne Bernald; Rishi Kumar; Manny Cappello; yzaho@saratoga.ca.us; Debbie
Pedro; rtaylor@smulaw.com
Subject: Re: May 20th City Council Meeting - Annexation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Council members, Mayor and city attorney,
Council members and City Attorney,
We are writing to request the City Council accept the Planning Commission's
recommendation to terminate the Mt. Winery Annexation project.
We are extremely disappointed that the council has scheduled this meeting during
SIP.
This limits residents from being able to attend the meeting and communicate their
thoughts on the Mountain winery project. We have already experienced the
limitations of technology and zoom meetings in earlier meetings.
We truly hope the council will represent the residents by supporting their strong,
vocal and written objections, and agree with planning commission
recommendations in rejecting the Mountain winery annexation and the hotel
proposal.
As longtime residents of Saratoga, we have always felt that the city
representatives have been open and transparent in their agenda. Unfortunately,
this has not been the case here. We feel that there is a hidden agenda and that the
voices of residents of Saratoga, most affected by this annexation, are not being
allowed to be heard.
We fail to understand the urgency of the city council members, mayor and
officials to rush this process through when there has been significant and voluble
push back from residents.
Thank you,
Balu and Mohini Balakrishnan
Villa oaks lane
Mt. Eden Estates
On May 16, 2020, at 9:12 AM, Nancy Lietzke > wrote:
At this time amid the shelter in place and social distancing, there is not the ability
for all Saratoga residents to be heard publicly. And Zoom is not the answer to
the problem. Many residents are not able to use it. And those who do know how
to dial in are not able to gain access to your meeting. Even some of your own
Council members have experienced difficulties with zoom. If discussions are
going to continue regarding the Annexation, it needs to be in a public setting
where residents can attend and speak publicly to the City Council and other
residents. For now with the current Shelter in Place order, that is not possible.
But when that order is lifted, a public forum to consider that would accommodate
many, many Saratoga residents would be the Saratoga High Football stadium.
It would also provide ample continued opportunity for social distancing.
Annexation is a large important issue and needs a large meeting site.
The recent letter (see below) written by Bill Hirshman to the City Council is
absolutely damning!!! Whether true or not, it gives the impression that the
Council in theory (head nod) had agreed months ago to the Annexation. It is a
threatening letter meant to push the Annexation forward with no regards for the
concerns of other residents. The amount of profits to be reaped by the CMLLC
with an Annexation and rezoning begs the question why the City Council ever
shared in the EIR costs to begin with???
<image.png>
At the March 20, 2019 meeting https://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?
view_id=9&clip_id=1068&meta_id=69887 an update regarding the Annexation was
given by Debbie Pedro. Discussion ensued and Mr. Miller you made the following
comments.
“I think we should be clear that the intent is so that the Mt. Winery is under the
City perview. We are not annexing them to turn it into a rock 24 hour rock venue
or you know a 36 hole golf course or high rise condo development. We are
annexing them so that we have jurisdiction. We are not annexing them to change.
But I think that we should very much try to engage with the public input process
as part of the seque and we will get comments and we will have to respond to
those comments that will add time to the process. However it is far much better
than trying to say we don’t need to get much public input and short circuit it.”
Two comments stand out:
“We are not annexing them to change." If that was true, how did a 300 room
hotel get added to the Annexation language 7 months later in the Precise
Plan dated October, 2019?
“But I think we should very much try to engage with the public input process as
part of the seque and we will get comments and we will have to respond to those
comments that will add time to the process.” If public input from the
beginning is what you wanted, why was there such a lack of transparency
and public notification?
We would appreciate you addressing our concerns in the upcoming May 20, 2020
Council meeting.
Regards,
Nancy and David Lietzke
Mt. Eden Estates
From:
;
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:18:55 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Council Comments Form
Your Name Jon Kwong
Phone Number
Email Address
Subject 5-20-2020 Council Meeting
Comments 5-19-2020
Honorable Mayor Miller, Council Members,
Please listen to the outcry of the citizens of Saratoga, and put an
end to the Mountain Winery property annexation and rezoning
effort.
Failing that, please postpone any action, big or small, to advance
same annexation/rezoning, until such time when the City can
hold face-to-face public hearings.
In the second Planning Public Hearing in January this year with
the annexation/rezoning on the agenda, around 200 citizens
attended, filling up City Hall; and about a quarter of the attendees
spoke, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke passionately
against the annexation/rezoning.
The Planning Commission's response was swift and decisive,
voting unanimously against the annexation/rezoning.
Every indication showed that many more than 200 attendees
would be expected at the Council Public Hearing.
That is, until COVID-19 struck.
However, in the Council Zoom meeting in early May, less than
10% of 200 citizens were able to attend.
Many citizens could not join due to technical difficulties.
(Even Council Members demonstrated some technical difficulty
during the Zoom)
It's painfully obvious that Zoom does not constitute a public
hearing, as Zoom can be contrived, controlled, manipulated; and
so many citizens wishing to connect and interact with the Council
are shut out, denied their equal protection under the law.
The City prides itself in its transparency, and willingness to listen
to its constituents, please follow through and make decisions,
which the citizens have shown a vested interest in and which
potentially, adversely impact their lives , face-to-face with its
citizens and not behind cameras that shut so many of them out.
Thank you for listening.
Jon Kwong
Saratoga Heights
Email not displaying correctly?
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:50:37 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. I have attended many required events at
the Mountain Winery in the course of my professional life, and I always felt nervous having so
many people in such a high fire zone. A hotel in this zone puts human lives at risk. Moreover,
it squanders Saratoga's beauty and wildlife in the name of greed. As a Santa Clara County
native, I love the Saratoga foothills and my heart breaks to think of a hotel displacing them.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Erin Redfern
Erin Redfern
San Jose 95117
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:59:04 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Linda James
Linda James
Aptos 95003
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:00:27 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
I grew up in West San Jose and have lived in and enjoyed the Santa Cruz mountains all my
life. The potential traffic and environmental impact of a hotel on the proposed site concerns
me. Additionally, the roads are not equipped to handle such flow in normal circumstances, let
alone should a fire break out.
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please preserve the charm and beauty of this region. Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Leah Quenelle
Morgan Hill 95037-4809
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:11:01 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Even though I am not a resident of Saratoga I have learned that everything we do in the Bay
Area affects all of the Bay Area. Development on our bay lands and in foothill areas like the
one in this project no longer makes sense. I appreciate that the owners of the land want to
maximize their business opportunity. I would like to see them think with a world view and
create something truly unique that benefits them and the planet. There are many organizations
around - at Stanford, Rocky Mountain institute to name a couple that could help them do that.
Please vote to terminate this current project.
Sincerely,
Virginia Van Kuran
Palo Alto 94303
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:12:15 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of
any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well as the impacts of the
traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby community, make
this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Although I live in an adjoining county - fires, endangered species and native wildlife do not
necessarily remain within these drawn boundaries. Please realize that this project if approved
will adverse affect out of district inhabitants as well.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Holly Thomas
Holly Thomas
Santa Cruz 95062
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:13:06 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
John Miller
John Miller
Los Gatos, 95033
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:13:38 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kristine Karnos
Kristine Karnos
San jose 95124
From:
r
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:19:15 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Christine Nagel
San Jose 95126
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:22:31 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
It behooves you to adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and
vote to terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone is no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk,
as well as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and
the nearby community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
As such, you are obliged to vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Jordan Hashemi-Briskin
Palo Alto 94306
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:29:36 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Susan Steinbrecher
Mountain view 94043
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:31:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Stepheny McGraw
Palo Alto 94303
From:
eider
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:32:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Shannon McEntee
Shannon McEntee
Palo Alto 94306
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:42:56 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
joann smith
san jose 95120
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:49:21 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kristin Lundin
Kristin Lundin
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:51:06 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Bill
Bill Leikam
Mountain View 94040
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:52:04 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Katy Fitzgerald
Katy Fitzgerald
San Jose 95128
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:52:31 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. Anyone leaving downtown Saratoga and
driving up to the Mountain Winery easily recognizes the dangers of this proposal, in terms of
wildfire risk, traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is no place for a hotel of any size. This
project is really inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nancy Westcott, resident of Santa Clara County
Nancy Westcott
Palo Alto 94303
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:54:36 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
John Cremin
Sunnyvale 94085
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:55:01 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Pat Lang
Los Altos Hills 94022
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:58:09 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Vicki Alexander
San Jose 95124
From:
the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:58:37 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Trish & Jim Mulvey
trish mulvey
Palo Alto 94303
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:00:58 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Betsy Tanner
San jose 95128
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:02:05 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Council members,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Sarah
Sarah Weiske
Saratoga 95071
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:06:56 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
J. Winters
Jennie Winters
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:07:42 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Ramon Mendoza
Ramon Mendoza
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:11:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Michele Voelker
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:11:53 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Craig Britton
Craig Britton
Los Altos 94022
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:24:45 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. In addition to the concerns about noise,
traffic, high fire zone I firmly believe that our present circumstances should give us pause in
such ventures. It might seem like we need to rush out and jump start some new businesses
immediately, but this just isn't the right tack.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Bacon
Boulder Creek, CA 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:25:13 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
David Cook
David Cook
San Jose 95135
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:27:34 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Ryan Oropeza
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:28:03 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Moore
Sunnyvale 94086-8960
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:36:17 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Paul Segall
Palo Alto 94306
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:36:27 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Cristine Ballinger
BOULDER CREEK 95006-9213
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:39:49 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Carlos Vasquez
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:41:29 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Bert Greenberg
San Jose 95135
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:42:45 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
SUSAN B WELSH
SUSAN WELSH
BOULDER CREEK 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:44:07 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Victoria Kojola
Victoia Kojola
Cupertino 95014
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:45:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Edward Reed
Edward Reed
Sunnyvale 94087
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:49:33 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Tarlow
Kathleen Tarlow
Palo Alto 94301
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 9:56:56 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Cecille O'Brien
San Jose 95129
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:00:06 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Council members,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Julie Wallof
Julie Wallof
San Jose 95130
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:02:16 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Joanie Murphy
San Jose 95123
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:07:17 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Rochelle Davies
Boulder Creek 95006
From:PeteKlein
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:07:24 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
I am concerned about the proposed development of the Winery property on Pierce Road. This
is a more rural area of our county, a place where bicyclists, horses, wild turkeys, and residents
currently co-exist. When there is a concert at the winery there is considerable traffic and the
road condition is poor. The proposed development will bring much heavier volume and type
of traffic both during construction and especially afterwards from drivers who are not familiar
with the road. All of this will be hazardous for cyclists especially who regularly use this route
to access Big Basin Way, Mt Eden and Stevens Canyon. One of the members of Almaden
Cycle and Touring Club (which has 1000 members in our county) was severely injured on
Pierce road several years ago by a reckless driver and can no longer ride.
Why does Saratoga need a big development like this? Especially one that will severely disturb
one of the more pristine areas of our county. With large construction and delivery vehicles
using the roads, we are in store for more serious collisions
We also have a duty to preserve nature around us.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Pete Klein
CUPERTINO 95014
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:07:57 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nancy Hay
Los Altos 94022
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:14:28 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
We ask you if the project - which might be multi millions - is going to pay for itself. It's
expensive.
Will a second road need to be created or the current road widened, both on side of a mountain?
The winery is on a narrow road already and it sits on a cliff. This would tie up the
neighborhood for a long time and be precarious to workers on the construction crew.
Hauling in materials on a single road or flying them in to an area with small space to land
seems precarious too.
Do you really need to obliterate the great scenic view that some come for? It is disappointing
to think that the city/county is yet contemplating another building project to block the
landscape and now to the West.
California is earthquake prone and this is on a mountain.
Is this project feasible or would it be better somewhere else?
Sincerely,
Carolyn Straub and Steve McHenry
Green Foothills members
Carolyn Straub
San Jose 95111
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:23:51 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Lucinda Lawson
Lucinda Rea-Lawson
Morgan Hill 95037
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:27:04 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Lynley Boudreaux
Lynley Boudreaux
SAN JOSE 95123
From:
eider
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:27:09 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Andria Ventura
San Jose 95125
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:35:58 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Jeanine Peek
Santa Clara 95050
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:43:40 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Deborah St Julien
San Jose 95136
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:54:37 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
I am a huge fan of the Mountain Winery...it is one of my favorite convert venues. The
expansion to the site to allow more guest to visit is great. This hotel idea is not a good one.
The road is already a challenge and ingress and egress is a nightmare at best...every time there
is a show. A hotel would make this a regular occurance, damage the environment, and risk all
of this. I could see a small retreat (like Seaside), but a full blown hotel (even a small one)
should be abandoned. And the idea to annex it after they used the county to do certain things
(maybe not allowed by a city) and to now go to the city since the county won't allow it is
kinda sleazy and not in the spirit of a regional view.
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Kirk Vartan
Kirk Vartan
San Jose 95117
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:11:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Alice Anne Martineau
Mountain View 94041
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:11:45 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Christine Zack
Campbell 95008
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:12:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size. The wildfire risk, as well as the impacts of the traffic, lights,
noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby community, make this project
completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Jason Schwabe
Saratoga 95070
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:16:39 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Miguel Vargad
San jose 95128
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:23:30 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Mary Martin
San Jose 95135
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:28:09 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Aside from the above, this hillsides are part of our heritage. They should be preserved for
future generations to enjoy as we did. Once they are gone, they will be gone forever.
Please vote to terminate this project. Allow our children to enjoy the views of a once proud
valley and community.
Sincerely,
Mark Grzan
Former Vice Mayor, City Councilmember
City of Morgan Hill
Mark Grzan
MORGAN HILL 95037
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:34:55 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Pat Marriott
Los Altos 94024
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:36:49 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Very truly yours,
Valerie D. Face
Valerie Face
Santa Clara 95050
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:40:03 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Brian Carr
San Jose 95124
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:49:23 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
I spent nearly 30 years living in the Saratoga/Monte Sereno area and my extended family
continues to frequent Saratoga's downtown, Saratoga Federated Church, and the area's parks
and hiking trails. Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission
and vote to terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard
Severity Zone is no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The
wildfire risk, as well as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local
habitat and the nearby community, make this project completely inappropriate for this
location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Robin Shepherd
Robin Shepherd
Morgan Hill 95037
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:28:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Martha Schwarz, fire area resident and Mountain Winery appreciator
martha schwarz
Palo Alto 94304
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:33:48 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Also, as a commuter of Highway 9, the traffic a hotel would bring to this area is completely
unacceptable for that of a two lane highway. I can't imagine people not familiar with the area
trying to navigate their way on Pierce Road, nonetheless trying to evacuate during an
emergency.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Suzette T. Crouch
Suzette Crouch
Boulder Creek 95006
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:35:15 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Carol Ruth
STANFORD 94305
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:42:36 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nancy Martin
Palo Alto 94303-4827
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:45:57 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Mary Maher
Milptas 95035
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:49:41 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
I am a member of San Jose RACES and participate regularly in County emergency response
drills. I am very concerned about this inappropriate development in the Santa Cruz Mountains
that would put hotel guests, employees and emergency responders at great risk in the fire
season. A hotel is an entirely different enterprise from an outdoor concert venue.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Barbara Canup
San Jose 95139
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:50:06 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Patricia Blevins
San Jose 95118-1808
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:07:50 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Lisa Giovanazzi
Morgan Hill 95037
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:10:11 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Thomas Ferrito
Los Gatos 95030-6115
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:14:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Theresa Sherman
Theresa Sherman
San Jose 95117
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:16:25 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Peggy Hennessee
Peggy Hennessee
Los Altos 94022
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:22:33 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
James Haskell
Morgan Hill 95037
From:
ider
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:42:11 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Thomas Carlino
San Jose 95117
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:04:31 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location. Though I don’t live
in Saratoga, I do reside near by in the West Valley area at the Border of SanJose and
Campbell. I grew up in this area and I’m now in my 60’s, I’ve seen the area go from lovely
orchards to creeping urban sprawl
This is why, as a community need to protect the remaining open space before it is desecrated
by developers.
Please do the right thing and Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Paulette Rinck
Paulette Rinck
San Jose 95130
From:
the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:12:06 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Robert Jacobsen
Robert Jacobsen
Los Altos 94024
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:20:07 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Nancy Schlegel
Los Altos 94024
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:23:29 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Anna Stepanova
Santa Clara 95051
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:25:53 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Alicia De Toro, Ed. D.
Alicia De Toro
San Jose 95118
From:
To:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:05:07 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Although Mountain Winery is one of my all-time concert venues, I think adding a hotel in this
area would be irresponsible - and disrespectful to the nearby communities (the ones that have
built this beautiful community).
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please, please, please vote to terminate this project - our peninsula is already getting too dense
with all of this high-density development.
Sincerely,
Shane Tapp
Shane Tapp
San Mateo 94403
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:16:19 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Allan Campbell
San Jose 95132
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:17:42 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Chris MacIntosh
Menlo Park 94026
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:40:07 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Devon Campbell
Marina 93933
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:45:20 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Susan LeClair
Susan LeClair
Campbell 95008
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:45:37 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Janice Carr
Janice Carr
Los Altos 94024
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:15:30 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Judith Butts
Mountain View 94040-3653
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:20:28 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Craige & Jan Edgerton
San Jose 95138
From:
Subject:Tell the Saratoga City Council Not to Approve Giant Hotel in the Hillsides
Date:Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:39:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor Miller and Councilmembers,
Please adopt the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission and vote to
terminate the Mountain Winery annexation project. A Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is
no place for a hotel of any size, let alone a massive 300-room hotel. The wildfire risk, as well
as the impacts of the traffic, lights, noise and human activity to the local habitat and the nearby
community, make this project completely inappropriate for this location.
Please vote to terminate this project.
Sincerely,
Laurie Graham
South San Francisco 94080