HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-13-20 Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda PacketPage 1 of 3
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
October 13, 2020
8:30 AM REGULAR MEETING
Participation Information:
This hearing will be entirely by teleconference. All Heritage Preservation Commissioners and
staff will participate via teleconference in compliance with the Governor’s Executive Order
N‐29‐20 suspending certain teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act. The
purpose of this order was to provide the safest environment for the public, elected officials,
and staff while allowing for continued operation of the government and public participation
during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Members of the public can view and participate in Meeting by:
1. Using the Zoom website https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89640573474 or App (Webinar
ID 896 4057 3474) and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when
directed by the Mayor to speak on an agenda item; OR
2. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID 896 4057 3474),
and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by
the Chair.
The public will not be able to participate in the meeting in person.
Methods of viewing the meeting will be listed on the meeting agenda. The meeting is being
conducted in compliance with the Governor’s Executive Order N‐29‐20 suspending certain
teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act. The purpose of this order was to
provide the safest environment for the public, elected officials, and staff while allowing for
continued operation of the government and public participation during the COVID‐19
pandemic. The public will not be able to participate in the meeting in person. In accordance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Governor’s Executive Order, if you need
assistance to participate in this meeting due to a disability, please contact the City Clerk at
debbieb@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting.
The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much
accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety.
Page 2 of 3
1. Site Visit(s)
a. None
2. Call to Order
3. Roll Call- Alexandra Nugent, Annette Stransky, Dr. Jo Rodgers, and Rina Shah
4. Oral Communications
Any member of the public may address the Commission about any matter not
on the agenda for this meeting for up to three minutes. Commissioners may
not comment on the matter but may choose to place the topic on a future
agenda.
5. Approval of the September 8, 2020 minutes
Recommended Action:
Staff Recommends that the HPC review and approved the minutes from the
September 9, 2020 HPC Meeting
6. New Business
a. 20200 Mendelsohn
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed project and
recommend approval of the project.
b. 14524 Oak Street
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed solar panels and
recommend approval of the project.
c. 15320 Peach Hill Road
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed exterior paint color
and recommend approval of the project.
d. 20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Recommended Action:
The HPC adopts the resolution No. HP20-0001 adding the Interurban Stop
to the Heritage Resource Inventory.
7. Staff Comments
Page 3 of 3
a. Special HPC Meeting on October 27, 2020
b. HPC Commissioner Vacancies
8. Old Business
a. Project Status Update
9. Commission Items
10. Adjournment
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a
disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the
City Clerk’s Office at (408) 868-1216 or dbretschneider@saratoga.ca.us. Requests must be made as
early as possible and at least one full business day before the start of the meeting.
Any recommendation made by the Heritage Preservation Commission may be appealed to the
Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be taken by
filing with the Secretary of the Heritage Preservation Commission a written notice and filing fee within
ten (10) days of the date of the decision.
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff report, and other materials provided
to the Heritage Preservation Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda are available at
the office of the Community Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga,
California 95070. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available
for public review at the office of the Director at the time they are distributed to the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner, for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting
of the Heritage Preservation Commission was posted and available for public review on October 8, 2020, at
the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at
www.saratoga.ca.us.
Page 1 of 2
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
September 8, 2020
8:30 AM REGULAR MEETING
1. Site Visit(s)
a. None
2. Call to Order: Chair Nugent called the meeting to order at 8:33 AM
3. Roll Call:
Present: Chair Alexandra Nugent, Vice Chair Rina Shah, Annette Stransky, and
Dr. Jo Rodgers
Absent: None
Staff: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner, Kayla Nakamoto, Administrative Analyst
4. Oral Communications
Member of the public, Marylin Marchetti, mentioned that she sent an email
before the meeting with comments on the Heritage Orchard Master Plan.
5. Approval of the August 11, 2020 minutes
STRANSKY/SHAH MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE AUGUST 11,
2020 MEETING. MOTION PASSED. AYES: NUGENT, SHAH, STRANSKY,
RODGERS. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE
6. New Business
a. None
7. Staff Comments
None
8. Old Business
4
Page 2 of 2
a. Heritage Orchard Master Plan Update
• Heritage Orchard Signs/Website
• Kayla Nakamoto gave a presentation about signs that the
City would like to order for the orchard that would direct
the public to the City’s Heritage Orchard website. The HPC
requested to provide comments on the proposed signs
and have the project revisited by them.
• Final Heritage Orchard Master Plan
• The HPC reviewed the Heritage Orchard Master Plan,
provided comments/edits, received comments from two
members (Marylin Marchetti and John Fitzpatrick) of the
public and asked for the document to be revised.
Chair Nugent left the meeting at 10:10 AM
b. Project Status Update
• None
9. Commission Items
None
10. Adjournment: Vice Chair Shar adjourned the meeting at 10:26 am.
Minutes respectfully submitted:
Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
City of Saratoga
5
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2020
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 6b-14524 Oak Street
Property Location: 14524 Oak Street
Property APN: 517-10-004
Property Owner: Matt and Laura Ableson
Background:
In 1991, the Heritage Preservation Commission added the subject property to
Saratoga’s Heritage Resource Inventory. The two-and-one-half-story house
represents a Shingle-style design from the beginning of the twentieth century,
designed by Wolfe & McKenzie. The house was built in 1906, an addition was added
to the rear in the 1950s/1960s, the house was modified for apartments after 1941
and rehabilitated after mid-2003. At the January 9, 2019 HPC meeting, the HPC
reviewed and recommended approval of 120 square foot addition.
Project Description:
The property owner is requesting approval to install solar panels along the rear of
the residence and on the detached garage.
Permit Criteria:
Pursuant to Section 13-20.070 the Planning Department, on recommendation of the
Heritage Preservation Commission, shall authorize a permit if it is determined that
the following applicable criteria is met:
a. The proposed work is consistent with the purposes and objectives of this Chapter.
b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the designated
historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district.
6
Page 2 of 2
c. In the case of construction of a new building, structure or other improvement
upon or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district,
the exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of the existing landmark, lane or district.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed solar panels and recommend
approval of the project.
Attachments:
1. Evaluation prepared by Design Link dated September 9, 2020
2. DPR
7
96 North 3rd Street, Suite 325
San Jose, CA 95112
CONNECTING PEOPLE + SPACES THROUGH SMART DESIGN
September 9, 2020
Nicole Johnson
Senior Planner
City of Saratoga, Community Development Dept.
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Solar Panel Array Installation Application for 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga CA
Dear Nicole,
After a site visit and careful review of the documents (DPR Primary Record) provided by Matthew Abelson,
homeowner, regarding the proposed solar panel installation on the rooftop of his single‐family home, I am providing
this letter of professional recommendation.
Although Mr. Abelson has not provided a formal proposal for his solar panel array, he walked me though the area
on the roof where he would like to locate the solar panels. With the front of the house being “reference” north, he
is proposing to add the solar panels only on the back‐half / south‐side, area of roof. The roof is unusual in that it has
one, large gable in the front ( a character defining feature) and two smaller, aligned gables in the back. Since Mr.
Abelson’s proposal is only to use the back‐half roof area that is out of the public view, it does not change the building
profile or any of the character defining features of the structure. No part of the back‐half area can be seen from the
public right of way. The reason is because there is a large shed dormer on the east‐side roof and a large cross gable
on the west‐side roof and these features block the view to the rear gables, (refer to figure 1.) As proposed, the solar
panel installation appears to comply with The Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties (SIS) regarding the preservation of roofs and roof materials, in that the solar panel array(s) keep all existing
roof lines intact with only minor, hidden, connection brackets that secure the solar panels to the roof structure itself.
Fig. 1. Google Maps aerial view indicating location of proposed solar arrays:
8
96 North 3rd Street, Suite 325
San Jose, CA 95112
CONNECTING PEOPLE + SPACES THROUGH SMART DESIGN
As a potential backup for additional panels, Mr. Alberson has also proposed solar panels on the east‐side of the gable
roof of the Garage. The Garage is a non‐historic structure (built within he past few years) and the area of roof
proposed for a solar array is also out of the public view. Because the roof line of both structures is not visible from
the public right‐of‐way and the Garage is non‐historic, the primary concern would be any impact to the historic
integrity of the original, 1906 building. There is no compromise to the original 1906 building with the current
proposal. With regard to the installation, the following specific points can be identified as being in alignment with
SIS:
1) SIS Guideline “Identify, Retain and Preserve Historical Materials and Features” (SIS 1995:19); The
existing, historic roof lines will remain intact and the solar array(s) install will not impact the integrity of
the character defining features of the 1906 shingle‐style house design. If need be, the solar panels can be
removed at a later date and therefore the condition of the non‐period material is reversable.
2) SIS guideline “Protect and Maintain Historic Materials and Features” (SIS 1995:19) the building roof
line, roofing materials including; gutters, roof shingles and venting, et.al., will remain as compatible,
historic elements. Please note the roof material was replaced and approved by the City of Saratoga within
the past few years with a shingle style compatible with 1906 era of the home and overall neighborhood.
In conclusion, none of the work related to the solar array install would either remove or replace identified historic
features of the building. To this end, the SIS does make note of the special conditions regarding “Energy Efficiency /
Accessibility Considerations / Health and Safety Code Considerations” (SIS 1995:21) and further clarifies that “(code
compliance) work is assessed for its potential negative impact on the building’s character. For this reason, particular
care must be taken not to obscure, damage, or destroy character‐defining materials or features in the process of
undertaking work to meet code and energy requirements .” The applicant’s proposal meets this specific requirement
and should be approved by the City of Saratoga Community Development Department.
Thank you for your assistance in review of this item and please do not hesitate to contact me with any further
questions or clarifications you may have.
Kind regards,
Stephen G. Polcyn, IIDA, CID, LEED‐AP
Owner | Principal, DesignLink
Preservation Planner & Historic Renovation Consultant
City of San Jose, Historic Landmarks Commissioner
2001‐2005 and 2017‐Current
Cc: Matthew Alberson – Applicant & Homeowner, 14524 Peach Hill Road, Saratoga CA
9
Mount Diablo
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
NRHP Status Code
3of Hanchett House*Resource Name or #
HP-91-01 P1. Other identifier:
*P2. Location:
Santa Clara County*a. County
Cupertino*b. USGS 7.5' Quad 1980 Photorevised .8 S.T .2 W.R
Oak St. c. Address:SaratogaCity 95070Zip
10S d. UTM:(give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mE/mN
southeast side of Oak Street southwest of Saratoga-Los Gatos Road.
e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
(Assigned by recorder):
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.)
;;
;
The two-and-one-half-story house represents a Shingle-style design from the beginning of the
twentieth century, designed by prominent local architects Wolfe & McKenzie.
The property was the subject of a 2003 evaluation by Dill Design Group. Those DPR523 forms are
attached to this recording, and provide a detailed survey and evaluation of the property.
Subsequent to that recordation, the house was rehabilitated.
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
HP2. Single family property*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)*P4. Resources Present:
None
Location Map
Sketch Map
Continuation Sheet
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Archaeological Record
District Record
Linear Feature Record
Milling Station Record
Rock Art Record
Artifact Record
Photograph Record
Other (List):
*Attachments:
Archives & Architecture: City of Saratoga Statement of Historic Context, 2009.
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".)
View facing south east, July 2009.
P5b.Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
Historic Prehistoric Both
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:
Laura Fay & Matthew Abelson
14524 Oak St.
Saratoga CA 95070
*P7. Owner and Address:
Archives & Architecture, LLC
PO Box 1332
San Jose, CA 95109
*P8. Recorded By: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
10/26/09*P9. Date Recorded:
Reconnaissance
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
1906, 103 years old.
* Required InformationDPR 523A (1/95)
Not for Publication Unrestricted
1
517-10-004APN#
B.M.
F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz
Date
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page
14524
10
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
3CS*NRHP/CRHR Status Code
Hanchett HouseResource Name (Assigned by recorder)
3of
Hanchette House B1. Historic Name:
14524 Oak St. B2. Common Name:
Single family residential B3. Original Use:Single family residentialB4. Present Use:
Shingle*B5. Architectural Style:
Main House built circa 1906; rear addition 1950s/1960s; modified for apartments after 1941.
Rehabiliated after mid-2003.
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
No Yes Unknown*B7. Moved?n/aDate:n/aOriginal Location:
Two-car garage to rear. A related property to the rear.
*B8. Related Features:
Wolfe & McKenzie B9a. Architect:John Rodoni (probable)b. Builder:
Architecture*B10. Significance: Theme Saratoga VillageArea:
1906Period of Significance:ResidentialProperty Type:(3)Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Hanchett House is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory, included as a part
of HP-88-01. It qualified under criteria c and e:
c) the property embodies distinctive characteristics of the Shingle style, type and period; and
e) the property embodies unique physical characteristics that represent an established and familiar
visual feature of a neighborhood.
The Hanchett House also appears eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources
under Criterion (3), as the house embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Shingle
house-type within Saratoga's City of Homes period, and represents the work of master architects
Wolfe & McKenzie.
DPR 523B (1/95)*Required Information
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes)
Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission, Historic
Resources Inventory form, 1988.
*B12. References:
Listed Heritage ResourceB13. Remarks:
Franklin Maggi*B14. Evaluator:
October 26, 2009*Date of Evaluation:
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
(This space reserved for official comments.)
2
None
Primary #
HRI #
Page
11
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
3of
DPR 523J (1/95)*Required Information
* Map Name:Multiple n.t.s.* Scale:Varies* Date of Map:
Hanchett House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)3
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page
12
DPR 523A * Required information
Page 1 of 9 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
P1. Other Identifier: 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga, CA
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Santa Clara County
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5’ Quad Cupertino, Calif. Date Revised 1980 T 8S ; R 2W ; B.M. Mount Diablo
c. Address 14524 Oak Street City Saratoga Zip 95070
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; 10S 585800 mE/ 4123800 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 517-10-004 and 517-10-005
*P3a Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2. Single family property
*P4 Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession
#)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
Historic Prehistoric Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address)
Leslie Dill/April Halberstadt
Dill Design Group
110 North Santa Cruz
Los Gatos, CA 95030
*P9. Date Recorded: June 3, 2003
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none”.)
*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record
District Record Linear Feature Record Milling State Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List)
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _________________________________________PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial _____________________________________
NRHP Status Code _____________________________
Other Listings _______________________________________________________________
Review Code ___________ Reviewer ______________ Date _______________________
Street Façade from west,
04/22/03
1906 / Deed, Census Records,
and Directories
[Estate of]
Haroldine Hirschfeld
14524 Oak Street
Saratoga, CA 95070
Historical and Architectural Evaluation of two parcels at 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga, by Dill
Design Group, June 3, 2003
Setting
There are three residences on these two adjoining parcels in Saratoga on Oak Street
near Saratoga-Los Gatos Road and Fourth Street in the downtown area. The main house faces Oak
Street; two cottages are located to the rear. Two detached garages are also found on the
site. The site is heavily wooded with mature oaks and other large trees.
Main House
The main house is generally rectangular in plan, but a series of cantilevers and
recesses add complexity to its footprint and form. The distinctive house with Shingle-Style
influences is two-and-one-half stories in height with a partial basement. It is built of wood
frame construction supported on a concrete perimeter footing that is battered and sloped, and
it has internal girders and columns on mudsills. The exterior is clad with painted shingles;
however, the house is covered in vines, so much of the design detailing is concealed.
(Continued on page 3, DPR523L)
13
DPR 523B * Required information
Page 2 of 9 *NRHP Status Code
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
B1. Historic Name: Parsons House
B2. Common Name: None
B3. Original use: Single Family Residential B4. Present Use: Multi-family Residential
*B5. Architectural Style: Shingle Style influences
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
*B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
B9a Architect: Unknown b. Builder: John Rodoni (likely)
*B10. Significance: Theme Architecture and Shelter Area City of Saratoga
Period of Significance Circa 1905 Property Type Residential Applicable Criteria n/a
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) None
*B12. References:
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Leslie A.G. Dill
*Date of Evaluation: June 3, 2003
History of Main Residence
The house on Oak Street, now listed at 14524 Oak Street, appears to have had only three
owners in its nearly 100-year history. It was constructed just after the 1906 earthquake for
Edward Parsons and his family.
Parsons Family (1905 to 1920 or 1921)
Edward W. Parsons acquired his building lot of 150’ x 250’ from a widow named Starr Bruce
in April of 1905. (Book of Deeds 291: Page 438). The Parsons family apparently moved to
California from New York and first appeared in local directories in 1893. Mr. Parsons’s
occupation was listed as nurseryman. The family was living in San Jose on The Alameda. Two
years later, the family moved to a house at 313 South 10th Street, San Jose, near San Jose
Normal School. Soon after 1896, Edward Parsons changed his occupation from nurseryman to
bookkeeper, and worked for Charles D. Blaney and Company in San Jose at 33 West Santa Clara
Street.
A few years later Edward Parsons began work for another title company, San Jose Abstract
Company. His occupation is listed as bookkeeper. He purchased the Saratoga lot in 1905, and
moved his family in when the house was completed in 1906. According the 1910 census,
(Continued on page 4, DPR523L)
(This space reserved for official comments.)
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
(Continued on page 6, DPR523L)
Main House built circa 1906; rear addition 1950s or 1960s from appearance; modified for apartments
after 1941, according to prior resident; roofing changed from wood shingles to corrugated metal,
date unknown.
Two residential cottages, two detached garages
14
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 3 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
(Continued from Page 1, DPR523A, P3a)
The current front of the house (facing northwest toward Oak Street) has a full-width,
moderate-pitch gable end with deeply curved bell-cast eaves. The southwest side (original
front) features a wide, two-story gambrel dormer at the center of the roof. The rear (east)
of the house has a full-width gable with a lower, projecting gabled wing and two one-story
additions. The original gables at the rear have bell-cast eaves. A one-story addition at the
south corner of the house has a modern shed roof sloping to the rear; it has exposed 4x
rafter tails. A one-story enclosed porch addition with a shed roof is attached to the
original rear of the house. The northeast side of the main house has a series of recent
dormers with shed roofs, which surround and partially conceal an original shed-roofed dormer.
The roofing is corrugated galvanized steel. The eaves have curved exposed rafter tails
supporting beaded board sheathing.
The windows include one-over-one double-hung wood windows with traditional sash
proportion, but also include a number of windows with a much smaller upper sash and a much
larger, square lower sash. The windows are trimmed with shaped casings and aprons unless
otherwise noted.
On the street façade (west), the ground floor features a centered pair of entry doors
that are not original. Surrounding the doors is a wrought-iron entry trellis. The transom
above the doors may be original. The southwest half of the first floor has a pair of original
double-hung windows; the northeast half has a series of three, recent fixed windows. Above
the entry doors is a centered pair of double-hung windows at the second floor and a pair of
side-by-side casement windows at the third level with plain trim. The second floor is
cantilevered slightly out from the main floor; it is supported on a series of curved block
brackets and trimmed with beaded board moldings.
The southwest side has a large added wooden staircase and second-story deck for access
to the second-story apartments. Toward the front of the house is a projecting room with two
original windows. The rear half of the original ground floor is recessed to create a covered
patio. There are three original windows and a wide door set into this area. At the rear of
the house is a modern addition with fixed windows facing southwest. Above the roofline on
this side, at the gambreled second story dormer, are a collection of recent doors and windows
in no particular pattern; a single, fixed window is centered in the gable end at the third
floor, sheltered by a cantilevered shed roof with fiberglass corrugated roofing.
The rear (east) façade is obscured by an amassed collection of added decks and rooms.
Original windows light the original main block of the house. The original upper floors are
slightly cantilevered with brackets and trim that match the front elevation. The fenestration
at the original projecting wing included a bay window with side windows and a center doorway
(these are preserved on the interior of the addition). Fixed windows have been added at the
rear one-story enclosed porch addition, and a pair of one-over-one double-hung windows flanks
a fixed picture window at the rear of the south room addition.
The northeast side is also obscured by modern redwood stairs and decks. The main dormer
addition projects to the edge of the roof, but the original dormer was set back behind the
curved eaves. A new dormer pops up to the southeast side of the original dormer. It is built
of corrugated fiberglass roofing. The front half of this side of the house includes a subtle
cantilever of the second-floor wall near the eaves. Original windows are still extant on this
elevation.
Interior of Main House
The interior of the main house has some original features although some modifications
have changed the detailing and spatial relationships of the residence. Such original details
as fireplace mantels, wood wainscoting, door and window trim, and ceiling beams are still
extant on the main floor.
Wooden Detached Garage
The detached garage directly to the east of the house is built of posts and beams with
vertical board siding and a flat roof covered with built-up roofing.
North Cottage
At the northeastern corner of the site, behind the adjacent parcel, is a one-story
house with an “L” shaped plan. The main portion of the cottage has a gabled roof from front
to back (southwest to northeast) with exposed rafter tails at the moderate eaves. To the rear
on the southeast side is a very low-sloped shed addition. The structure is clad with
(Continued on page 4, DPR523L)
15
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 4 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
(Continued from Page 3, DPR523L, P3a)
horizontal v-groove siding and rests on a concrete footing. The front door faces southwest;
it is sheltered under a cantilevered shed porch roof supported by angled posts. To the
southeast is a pair of French doors. The original windows were wood sliders with six-lite
sash. Additional fenestration includes aluminum sliders.
Metal Detached Garage
The detached garage directly to the west of the north cottage is clad with corrugated
galvanized steel siding and a painted metal sliding door.
South Cottage
To the south of the main house, separated by woodland-type landscaping and a meandering
path, is a small “L” shaped residence with a low-slope gabled roof. The house has plywood
siding, a shake roof, and a slab foundation. The front door wall is set at an angle in the
corner where the two wings meet. Windows are bronze-anodized aluminum sliders and fixed
units.
(Continued from Page 2, DPR523B, B10)
the family members living at the Oak Street house then included Edward W. Parsons, a 59 year-
old widower and his 31-year old daughter Edith. Mr. Parsons listed his occupation as
bookkeeper in the census records. A search of real estate records shows that Parsons held a
substantial number of properties in trust for various individuals – perhaps as part of his
professional responsibilities.
The Parsons household later included Anna F. Taber, Edward’s 83-year old mother-in-law
and her daughter Cornelia, a single woman of age 53. There were also two women listed on the
census as servants. A search of the death records and the wills filed in Superior Court
reveals that the Taber family moved from New York. Anna Taber wrote a will in 1905, probably
upon her relocation to California, and died in 1911 (Book P of Wills: Page 318-321).
Provisions of the will leave half of her properties to her surviving daughter Cornelia and
the remaining half to her two grandchildren, Edith and Gus Parsons, children of her deceased
daughter Mary. Edith Parsons is mentioned by historian Florence Cunningham as the person who
landscaped the grounds in Blaney Plaza surrounding the Memorial Arch. Blaney Plaza is one of
Saratoga's most prominent landmarks, located in the heart of Saratoga Village at the Saratoga
Crossroads, corner of Saratoga Road and the Saratoga-Los Gatos Road (Highway 9).
The Parsons family was still listed at the Oak Street house in the 1920 census,
although the family composition had changed. Mr. Parsons was by then 70 and listed his
occupation as “retired”. He had remarried, his new wife was named Florence and she was 49
years old, born in England. Two little girls, ages 6 and 7, were also in the household.
The Hanchett Family (1919 to 1941)
The house on Oak Street was purchased by Lorraine J. and Sibyl Hanchett in 1919. Real
estate documents show the seller as T. S. Montgomery acting as a trustee. The purchase
contract was completed in 1921. According to informant Hilda Hanchett Fourman, the youngest
daughter, the Hanchett family had lived in a smaller house nearby before buying the subject
properties. Hilda was born in 1920 and lived in the house before her marriage.
Census records for 1920 show that the Hanchett family was also an extended family with
three generations in the area. They were not listed at the Oak Street house in the 1920
census. In addition to Lorraine and Sibyl there were three children listed in the census,
Barbara (8), Edward (7) and William (5). Mary Hanchett (age 61) is listed as renting a home
next door with her daughter Grace (age 40).
L. J. Hanchett was a cousin to the noted local railroad builder and real estate
developer, Lewis “Lew” Hanchett. Lew Hanchett was a significant Santa Clara figure and is
noted for his involvement in building the Peninsular Railway, the first suburban rail system
in Santa Clara County. He built the Hanchett Park subdivision on The Alameda near downtown
San Jose, primarily to showcase his railway development.
(Continued on page 5, DPR523L)
16
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 5 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
(Continued from Page 4, DPR523L, B10)
Lorraine Hanchett worked in a number of positions for his more prominent cousin, acting
as a sales representative for the Hanchett Park development and later became the Saratoga
stationmaster for the Peninsular Interurban Railroad Company. Lorraine J. Hanchett also
worked as a manager for the Pratt-Low Canning Company until changes in the apricot industry
forced the closure of the canneries in the County. His wife, Sibyl Hanchett, was a noted
music teacher who taught music and piano at San Jose Normal School, now San Jose State. She
also had many private students. In later years the Hanchetts separated, and eventually
divorced. Sibyl remarried, and became Mrs. Marcus Schneller.
The Wurtzbaugh-Hirschfeld Family (1943 to 2003)
After the Hanchett family’s tenure, members of the same family owned the subject
properties for about sixty years. The house and front parcel was purchased from Mrs. Sibyl
Schneller (Hanchett) in the early 1940’s by Harold and Marguerite Wurtsbaugh. The transaction
completed in 1947. (Book 1440 Official Records: P 96). In March of 1950, the parcel at the
rear was sold by Sibyl Schneller to the Wurtsbaughs (1966 Deeds: P587). After the deaths of
Harold and Marguerite Wurtsbaugh, the properties passed to their daughter Haroldina (Dina)
Wurtsbaugh Hirschfeld. Mrs. Hirschfeld owned the properties until her death in 2002.
George Harold Wurtsbaugh was born in Illinois in 1896. His occupation is listed as a
farmer and orchardist. He lived to be 90 and died in 1986. His wife Marguerite survived him
by one year. She was born in 1899, taught at the University of California and passed away in
1987 at the age of 88. Many Saratoga area residents remember the Wurtsbaughs with great
fondness because of their interest in the arts. They reportedly had a passion for gardening
and for respecting the natural environment. Mrs. Hirschfeld had a local reputation as an
artist and sculptor.
John Rodoni
According to a former resident of the subject house, the residence was built by John
Rodoni. Building permits and contract information about early Saratoga homes are not
currently available, so anecdotal information is the best current source. Since it is known
that Rodoni built many of Saratoga’s extant businesses and residences, there is a strong
likelihood that Rodoni was indeed the builder.
John Rodoni was born in Mountain View in 1869. He attended school in Mayfield and in
the Booker School District and then found a job as a teamster, hauling lumber from the
Carmichael mill just over the summit from Saratoga. (Sawyer: P 1563)
John went from being a lumber teamster to being a lumber contractor, providing all the
material for various construction projects. He worked as a teamster and contractor for about
18 years. In 1906, just after the earthquake, he began work as a general contractor,
building and rebuilding many of the buildings in Saratoga Village. He built the Hogg
Building and the brick Saratoga State Bank on Big Basin Way; both these landmarks are still
standing. He also built the telephone office, the local garage (filling station) and the
powerhouse for the Interurban, all of which have been demolished.
Rodoni was also the builder for an early residential development on La Paloma. He is
reported to have built “many of the finest homes in Saratoga, designing and building his own
plans, and also does general contracting, road building and cement and concrete work.”
(Sawyer: P 1563) John Rodoni was about 35 years old when he began his career as a builder.
Significance
The main house that fronts on Oak Street is architecturally significant on a local level. It
is a distinctive example of Shingle Style design, including its form and detailing. The
proportions of the bell-cast eaves, the gambrel dormer, the window sash, and the cantilevered
upper floors are particularly well executed. The style is not common in the area; however,
the house is compatible with its surroundings. Although the interiors have been altered to a
large degree and the exterior has had modifications to accommodate the upper level
apartments, the exterior modifications are generally reversible, and the majority of the
(Continued on page 6, DPR523L)
17
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 6 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
(Continued from Page 5, DPR523L, B10)
house retains its integrity. The house appears eligible for the California Register according
to Criterion 3, architecture significance, and would remain eligible for the Saratoga
Heritage Resource Inventory under criterion c. The modifications to the structure would make
the property ineligible for National Register listing under Criterion C.
The three families associated with the Oak Street house were active in the arts and the
local community; however, the members of the families did not make a contribution to the
history of their community in such a way that would make the house significant historically
based on their association. Only Edith Parsons is mentioned in the Florence Cunningham book
for her efforts in landscaping Saratoga’s Memorial Arch, and the Arch is still extant as a
representation of her contribution. The Oak Street property is not associated with any
significant events or patterns of historical development. Therefore, the property would not
be additionally eligible for the National or California Registers based on its association
with personages or events or patterns, Criteria A, B and 1, 2, respectively, and local
significance is limited to its architectural value.
Outbuildings and Setting
The outbuildings are not significant architecturally, nor are they associated with
significant personages, events or patterns of history. The two cottages and the two detached
garages are therefore not eligible for the National, California, or local registers.
The setting of the two parcels includes many mature trees that may be determined
locally important.
(Continued from Page 2, DPR523B, B12)
Arbuckle, Clyde
1968 Santa Clara County Ranchos. San Jose: Rosicrucian Press
1986 Clyde Arbuckle’s History of San Jose. San Jose: Memorabilia of San Jose
Baker, John
1994 American House Styles. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
Brainard, H. A. (Civil Engineer)
1888 Map of Saratoga
Census Records
United States Federal Census, 1910 and 1920
City Directories
1870 – 1968 City of San Jose (Saratoga is included)
Clarke, Henry
2002 Henry Clarke’s Saratoga Village. Unpublished manuscript in archives of the Saratoga
Museum.
County of Santa Clara
Deeds and Official Records
Official Maps
Probate Records – Superior Court
Book of Wills
School Tax Assessment Records c. 1930
Great Register of Voters
Cunningham, Florence R.
1967 Saratoga’s First Hundred Years. Fresno California. Panorama West Book
Garrod, R. V.
1962 Saratoga Story. Published by the author, Saratoga, California.
Quito Rancho
Plat filed in the County Recorder’s Office, Book A of Patents: Page 112.
18
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 7 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Above: Southwest Elevation--Gambrel Dormer from South, Photo by L. Dill, 04/22/03
Below: Southeast Elevation—Porch Addition from East, Photo by L. Dill, 04/22/03
19
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 8 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Above: South Cottage from North, Photo by L.Dill, 04/22/03
Below: North Cottage from South, Photo by L.Dill, 04/22/03
20
DPR 523L * Required information
Page 9 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 14524 Oak Street, Saratoga
*Recorded by L. Dill and A. Halberstadt *Date 06/03/03 Continuation Update
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Above: Wooden Garage from North, Photo by L.Dill, 04/22/03
Below: Detail of Metal Garage from South, Photo by L.Dill, 04/22/03
21
Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2020
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 6c-15320 Peach Hill Road
Property Location: 15320 Peach Hill Road
Property APN: 517-22-112
Property Owner: Dean Harris
Background:
The Carey House was listed on the Historic Resources Inventory as a part of HP-88-
01. This residence was constructed in 1929. The Monterey Colonial Style stucco
house, was designed by prominent local architect Birge Clark.
In 2018 the HPC recommended approval to the Planning Commission for a two-lot
subdivision of the property, the Planning Commission approved the subdivision in
November 2018 (SUB18-002). In addition, the HPC recommended approval of the
relocation of the existing garage doors that were at the rear of the residence, to the
front of the residence (HPC18-0009). Subsequently, at their June 9, 2020 the HPC
reviewed and recommended approval of solar panels to be placed on the roof
(HPC20-0003).
In addition, at the June 9, 2020 meeting, the HPC recommend to the City Council that
the property be considered as a Landmark.
Project Description:
The homeowner would like to paint the peach house a white color (Kelly Moore
Historic Lifestyles of the West-Snow Globe (Attachment 2 pg. 6)) with a matte black
trim. Historically, the majority of Spanish Colonial or more specifically, Monterey
Colonial – were painted a beige, off‐white, light salmon or bright white. This style of
architecture in the West and Southwest regions of the United States, comprised of
22
Page 2 of 3
stone and stucco exterior with red barrel tile roofs, can originally be found in Spanish
haciendas.
The owner has submitted an historic evaluation which states the proposed painting
scheme will not affect the removal or replacement of identified historic, character
defining features of the home. The base color fits within the original style and this is
also complementary with black wrought iron light fixtures and window frames that
are also original to the house.
With regard to the finish of these paint colors, the following specific points can be
identified as being in alignment with SIS, Standards for Restoration:
1) SIS Guideline “Identify, Retaining and Preserving Masonry Features from the
Restoration Period…”(SIS 1995:122); The existing, historic stucco wall material,
iron window frames and wood trim will remain intact and the proposed paint
scheme will not impact the integrity of the historic, character defining features,
nor will it deviate from already established paint and trim combinations from
the era that it was built.
It is unknown what the original paint color of the home was, however keeping within
the pallet of the Spanish Revival era will insure an integrated period appearance.
In conclusion, the proposed painting scheme will not affect the removal or
replacement of identified historic, character defining features of the home. The
applicant’s proposal meets the specific requirements of the SIS .
Permit Criteria:
Pursuant to Section 13-20.070 the Planning Department, on recommendation of the
Heritage Preservation Commission, shall authorize a permit if it is determined that
the following applicable criteria is met:
a. The proposed work is consistent with the purposes and objectives of this Chapter.
b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the designated
historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district.
c. In the case of construction of a new building, structure or other improvement
upon or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district,
the exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of the existing landmark, lane or district.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed exterior paint color and
recommend approval of the project.
23
Page 3 of 3
Attachments:
1. Evaluation prepared by Design Link dated September 23, 2020
2. Historic Lifestyles of the West Kelly Moore paint colors
3. DPR
24
96 North 3rd Street, Suite 325
San Jose, CA 95112
CONNECTING PEOPLE + SPACES THROUGH SMART DESIGN
September 23, 2020
Nicole Johnson
Senior Planner
City of Saratoga, Community Development Dept.
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Paint Scheme Proposal for 15320 Peach Hill Road, Saratoga CA
Dear Nicole,
After careful review of the site and a detailed discussion with the homeowner, Dean Harris, regarding his desire to
repaint the exterior of his 1930’s Spanish Revival, single‐family home, I am providing this letter of professional
recommendation. Based on my discussion with Mr. Harris, what he is proposing appears to comply with The
Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (SIS) regarding the on‐going “restoration”
of the building and its character defining features.
Regarding the Paint Scheme: The homeowner would like to paint the house with a brighter white, base color and
a matte black trim color. Historically, the majority of Spanish Revival Style homes of this 1910‐1930’s era – also
known as Spanish Colonial or more specifically, Monterey Colonial – were painted a beige, off‐white, light salmon or
bright white. This style of architecture in the West and Southwest regions of the United States, comprised of stone
and stucco exterior with red barrel tile roofs, can originally be found in Spanish haciendas, Tuscan country estates
and similar Mediterranean buildings and structures. The distinguishing feature of Monterey Colonial style homes are
the long, narrow second‐story balconies on the front, back and occasionally the sides of the house. These balconies
are most often constructed of hand carved wood or wrought iron that is reflected both in the interiors and other
details of the house. Original Spanish and Mediterranean color schemes of this era were the unintended result of
the natural adobe color that could vary depending upon the mineral makeup of the local soil of which the adobe
plaster was made. These interior and exterior colors were often white‐washed a bright white as a means to maintain
and clean the adobe plaster over time. The continued use of these colors was reflected in the California Mission,
Spanish Revival and Monterey Colonial style of this era 1915 to the mid‐1930s (refer to Figure 1.)
Fig. 1. Example of California Monterey Colonial Architecture, Los Angeles, CA:
Balconies, posts, beams, and other wood details were typically a dark, sienna color, that took on a black coloration
over time due to the fact that the wood was typically untreated. The homeowners desire to paint the trim a matte
black is in keeping with the color scheme of the original architectural style. It should be noted that wood is currently
painted a dark brown color and is not a natural wood color. Because the Monterey Colonial Style homes of this era
had the choice to paint any number of colors that fit within the pallet of this style, I see no issues in allowing the use
25
96 North 3rd Street, Suite 325
San Jose, CA 95112
CONNECTING PEOPLE + SPACES THROUGH SMART DESIGN
of a bright white base color, that reflects a traditional white‐wash, and a very dark brown / matte black color that
reflects the discoloration of the wood (refer to Figure 2, example of this scheme.) The base color fits within the
original style and this is also complementary with black wrought iron light fixtures and window frames that are also
original to the house.
Fig. 2. Example of a Spanish Revival, Los Angeles Home, Circa ~1930
(White‐Washed Base Color / Black Trim & Red Tile Roof):
With regard to the finish of these paint colors, the following specific points can be identified as being in alignment
with SIS, Standards for Restoration:
1) SIS Guideline “Identify, Retaining and Preserving Masonry Features from the Restoration Period…”(SIS
1995:122); The existing, historic stucco wall material, iron window frames and wood trim will remain intact
and the proposed paint scheme will not impact the integrity of the historic, character defining features,
nor will it deviate from already established paint and trim combinations from the era that it was built. It is
unknown what the original paint color of the home was, however keeping within the pallet of the Spanish
Revival era will insure an integrated period appearance.
In conclusion, the proposed painting scheme will not affect the removal or replacement of identified historic,
character defining features of the home. The applicant’s proposal meets the specific requirements of the SIS and
should be approved by the City of Saratoga Community Development Department.
Thank you for your assistance in review of this item and please do not hesitate to contact me with any further
questions or clarifications you may have.
Kind regards,
Stephen G. Polcyn, IIDA, CID, LEED‐AP
Owner | Principal, DesignLink
Preservation Planner & Historic Renovation Consultant
City of San Jose, Historic Landmarks Commissioner
2001‐2005 and 2017‐Current
Cc: Dean Harris – Applicant & Homeowner, 15320 Peach Hill Road, Saratoga CA
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Mount Diablo
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
NRHP Status Code
4of Carey House*Resource Name or #
HP-88-01 P1. Other identifier:
*P2. Location:
Santa Clara County*a. County
Castle Rock Ridge*b. USGS 7.5' Quad 1973 Photoinspected .8 S.T .2 W.R
Peach Hill Rd. c. Address:SaratogaCity 95070Zip
10S d. UTM:(give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mE/mN
east side of Peach Hill Road south of Piedmont Road.
e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
(Assigned by recorder):
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.)
;;
;
This pink-stucco house, designed by prominent local architect Birge Clark, features a red-tile
roof, a prominent wood balcony, and a partially cantilevered second story, typifying the
Monterey Colonial style. The main massing of the house is comprised of a two-story cross-
gabled form with a one-story wing offset to the side at an oblique angle. A recessed heavy-
timber balcony frames the front entry which consists of a heavy carved wood door set deeply
into a simple recess, giving the impression of very thick walls. To the side of the balcony,
the second story is shallowly cantilevered; the overhang is supported by carved wood beams.
This portion of the central wing has a shallow bay window on the ground floor and a
symmetrical pair of steel casement windows above. The chimney rises at the end of this two-
story section and is made of painted stucco topped by a red tile cap echoing the style of the
house. The house sits on a rise in several acres of landscaped grounds.
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
HP2. Single family property*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)*P4. Resources Present:
None
Location Map
Sketch Map
Continuation Sheet
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Archaeological Record
District Record
Linear Feature Record
Milling Station Record
Rock Art Record
Artifact Record
Photograph Record
Other (List):
*Attachments:
Archives & Architecture: City of Saratoga Statement of Historic Context, 2009.
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".)
View facing northeast, July 2009.
P5b.Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
Historic Prehistoric Both
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:
David John & Teresa Raquel Carey
15320 Peach Hill Rd.
Saratoga CA 95070
*P7. Owner and Address:
Archives & Architecture, LLC
PO Box 1332
San Jose, CA 95109
*P8. Recorded By: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
10/26/09*P9. Date Recorded:
Reconnaissance
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
1929
* Required InformationDPR 523A (1/95)
Not for Publication Unrestricted
1
517-22-112APN#
B.M.
F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz
Date
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page
15320
35
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
2CS*NRHP/CRHR Status Code
Carey HouseResource Name (Assigned by recorder)
4of
Wright House B1. Historic Name:
15320 Peach Hill Rd. B2. Common Name:
Single family residential B3. Original Use:Single family residentialB4. Present Use:
Monterey Colonial*B5. Architectural Style:
Constructed 1929.
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
No Yes Unknown*B7. Moved?n/aDate:n/aOriginal Location:
None known.
*B8. Related Features:
Birge Clark B9a. Architect:Unknownb. Builder:
Architecture*B10. Significance: Theme Glen UnaArea:
1929Period of Significance:ResidentialProperty Type:(3)Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Carey House is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory, included as a part of
HP-88-01. It qualified under Criteria a, c, and d:
a) the property exemplifies and reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, aesthetic,
and architectural history of Saratoga;
c) the property embodies distinctive characteristics of the Monterey Colonial style, type and period; and
d) the property is representative of a notable design by architect Birge Clark.
The Carey House also appears eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources under
Criterion (3), as the house embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Spanish Eclectic
style within Saratoga's City of Homes period, and represents the work of master architect Birge
Clark.
(Continued on page 4, DPR523L)
DPR 523B (1/95)*Required Information
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes)
Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission, Historic
Resources Inventory form, 1988.
*B12. References:
Listed Heritage ResourceB13. Remarks:
Franklin Maggi*B14. Evaluator:
October 26, 2009*Date of Evaluation:
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
(This space reserved for official comments.)
2
None
Primary #
HRI #
Page
36
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
4of
DPR 523J (1/95)*Required Information
* Map Name:Multiple n.t.s.* Scale:Varies* Date of Map:
Carey House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)3
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page
37
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
4of
DPR 523L (1/95)*Required Information
(Continued from page 2, DPR523b, B10)
Historical Background
This residence was constructed in 1929 for a cost of $36,000. It was designed by architect
Birge Clark. It appears that in 1930 the house was owned by the Wright family who apparenty
owned the residence until 1962, when it was sold to the Behel family. The Wright family
ownership was not confirmed as a part of this recording. In 1983, the house was purchased by
John and Teresa Carey.
Architectural Context
Palo Alto native, Birge Clark (1893-1989) attended Stanford where his father, Arthur B. Clark,
headed the Art Department. After acquiring an architecture degree from Columbia University,
Clark entered World War I, in which he was awarded a Silver Star. Returning from the war, Clark
opened an office in Palo Alto where he was the only architect in the city between 1922 and
1930. He designed a large number of projects during this time in the greater Palo Alto area,
including 98 private residences and over 200 total buildings over the 5 decades of his
professional career. Clark is regarded as having designed virtually all of Palo Alto’s
commercial and civic buildings during the 1920’s and the 1930’s, and the overwhelming majority
of those had been modeled in the “Spanish Eclectic” or “Early California” style with which his
name is synonymous. Some of the most notable projects include the university houses on the
Stanford campus (39 in all) and the President Hotel on University Avenue.
Integrity
The house retains its architectural design, workmanship and materials, as well as a compatible
setting and original location, and the property continues to embody the historical associations
and feelings of this residence.
* Recorded By F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz
Carey House*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)
Continuation Update10/26/2009* Date
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 4
38
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2020
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 6a-20200 Mendelsohn
Property Location: 20200 Mendelsohn
Property APN: 517-20-0034
Property Owner: Kevin L & Lori Y Timmons
Background:
The subject property is listed on the Heritage Resource Inventory. The home was
constructed c. 1921. The immediate focal point is the grand entry stair with Talavera
type tile covering the Risers and red quarry style tile on the stair tread leading to the
entry. The original entry is at the top of the stairs in the asymmetrical plan of the
original building. The front façade is divided with a projecting gable wing on the south
end of the original building. Next to that is a projecting entry element with a parapet
much like the Mission San Luis Rey de Franca and a similar shape door at the rear of
the element. The center of the facade is flat with 2 sets of French louvered doors
covering a set of multi-pane doors. Narrow windows complete the aesthetic of a thick
adobe of stone wall. At the north end a small projection extends onto the terrace and
this is the end of the original building.Additions were done in 2003 and in
2011(HPC11-0002).
Project Description:
The owner is proposing to rebuild the rear covered patio, interior remodel of the
kitchen and family room, create a turret roof over where the current kitchen is
located. The turret roof will not be taller than the ridge of the historic portion of the
house. Per the evaluation prepared by Urban Programmers, the proposed project
does not interfere historical significance of the original building and do not proposed
a change in the design or workmanship of the c. 1921 building.
39
Page 2 of 2
Permit Criteria:
Pursuant to Section 13-20.070 the Planning Department, on recommendation of the
Heritage Preservation Commission, shall authorize a permit if it is determined that
the following applicable criteria is met:
a. The proposed work is consistent with the purposes and objectives of this Chapter.
b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the designated
historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district.
c. In the case of construction of a new building, structure or other improvement
upon or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district,
the exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of the existing landmark, lane or district.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HPC review the proposed project and recommend
approval of the project.
Attachments:
1. Evaluation prepared by Urban Programmers dated August 31, 2020
2. Site Development Plans
40
Susan Walsh, AICP
Historic Preservation Officer
City of San Jose
200 E. Santa Clara Street
San Jose CA
Re: 196 N. 3rd Street, San Jose CA
Dear Ms. Walsh,
The referenced property, also known as the former Scottish Rite Temple or the San
Jose Athletic Club is listed in the National Register, and is a historic resource as defied
by CEQA.
The City of San Jose has asked if the rehabilitation be consistent with the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Urban programmers was contacted by T.
Corona, on behalf the owner to provide a third party professional review of the
rehabilitation plans for consistency with the “Standards.”
The rehabilitation work that is proposed is to a front open area in front of the historic
building and not to the historic building.
Background: The Scottish Rite Bodies had this building, their second Temple in San
Jose, was designed by Carl Warner who specialized in Masonic architecture in
Northern California. The building was constructed in 1924, completed and dedicated in
1925. The Neo-Classic designed building exhibits a continuity of architectural design
within the St. James Square Historic District in its columns and ornate detailing – some
in Egyptian motifs. The front façade is a symmetrical temple design with a broad stair
in the center beginning at the edge of the sidewalk and raising to the first story, and
projecting portico with 6 fluted Ionic columns. Both sides of the building recess from the
portico and are mirror images of design with evenly spaced windows on the two upper
floors and mirror elements on the ground level. Elaborately framed niches are behind
tall base structures with Sphinx statues on the top. Further exhibiting the symmetrical
design, on each side of the stairs are tall winged Sphinx sculptures with basins on the
top representing torches. The building had an auditorium that could seat 1,400 and the
largest stage in San Jose, a large kitchen, meeting rooms and a basement that was
finished and used as a second or informal hall. By the 1960s the Scottish Rite Bodies
were looking for a more convenient location, purchasing acreage and eventually
constructing a new Temple in the Willow Glen area, In 1980, the historic building was
sold and rehabilitated at a cost of $6,000,000, opening in 1981, as the San Jose
Athletic Club. This rehabilitation altered the symmetrical design of the front landscaping
by introducing a sectioned ramp on the south side of the property that extends the
width of the property on that side accessing the basement from the street. Boxwood,
oleander and small bushes were planted against the face of the building and along the
ramp. The north side landscaping remained with a patch of lawn and low boxwood
hedges in front of the building. During the 1980 rehabilitation, pine trees were planted
along the north side of the building. Left untrimmed for many years these began to
damage the building and were removed.
Bonnie Bamburg, Principal with Urban Programmers, made a site inspection and
photographed the existing conditions. This review considers the architectural plans
prepared by Studio 528, dated 4/21/2021. We looked at the configuration of the existing
Nicole Johnson
Saratoga Planning Department
Saratoga City Hall
1377 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Evaluation of Remodeling and Addition for 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, Saratoga
Dear Ms. Johnson:
The property at 20200 Mendelsohn Lane is listed in the Saratoga Heritage Resources
Inventory; however, neither a full description nor a statement of significance was included.
Urban Programmers was asked by the owners, Kevin. and Lori Timmons, to analyze a
proposed remodel and addition to the rear of the house for conformance with the Secretary
of the Interior’s Standards. The proposed work is located on an addition that was
constructed several years ago (2003, 2011). The building was constructed in the Spanish
Colonial Revival style, also known as Spanish Eclectic Style. From visual observation, it
appears to have been one story in an “L” shape. This original section of the building remains
and has a high degree of integrity.
The house was constructed c. 1921 at the midpoint of the historic era City of Homes (1905-
1941) as described in the Saratoga Historic Context Statement. At this time, research has
not identified the original owner. According to a persistent rumor, the house was
constructed for a close friend of Senator Phelan. When the public records and libraries
reopen, additional research will be conducted to establish the original owner and determine
if there was any connection to Senator Phelan. A Primary Survey (DPR-A) for the property
will be provided.
In 2003 and 2011, alteration and expansion plans were approved to add an east wing to the
rear, a large garage and guest quarters to the front, and extensive landscaping
improvements that accentuated the change in grade with a dramatic stairway.
The proposed alterations do not interfere with the exterior of the original building and do
not propose a change in the design or workmanship of the c.1921 building, nor would they
result in the loss of historic material or original design features.
August 31, 2020
41
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
2
building along with the proposed alteration and addition, and compared that to the
previous alteration plans and the original building (as much as was known). The proposed
alteration and addition were then compared to The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
Rehabilitation.1
Figure 1 A2.0 Floor Plan. A red line shows the outline of the historic portions of the house and the
proposed exterior areas of demolition and change. The proposed changes are in the rear of the building,
part of the 2011 addition, and outside the historic envelope.
1 The “Standards” were used as the criteria because the property is listed in the Saratoga Heritage Resources
Inventory. It is the policy of the City of Saratoga to use this standard for buildings listed in the Heritage Resource
Inventory.
42
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
3
Figure A.2 .1 Floor Plan Source: Studio 528, dated 4/21/2021.
The area of exterior work is shown beyond the envelope of the historic portions of the house (outside
the red lines). No change is proposed for the front facade of the historic building.
Area of proposed
work,
43
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
4
Photograph 1 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, CA
The left and center section is the c. 1921 historic house. The addition on the right and landscaping was
completed in 2011.
44
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
5
Photograph 2 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, Saratoga, CA
View: Rear addition, the 2011 addition is the area proposed to be remodeled. Landscaping and fountain
are c. 2011.
45
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
6
Photograph 3 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, Saratoga, CA
View: Addition constructed in 2011 that is part of the proposed alteration plan.
46
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
7
Photograph 2 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, Saratoga, CA
View: Rear of the c. 1921 historic building. The historic portions of the house are to be retained and
protected. The historic house is not part of the proposed plan. The windows and French doors were
repaired in 2011 and are to remain.
47
8
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
Considerations:
The proposed alterations and addendum submitted by Studio 528 describe work to be done
in areas that were part of the 2003 or 2011 additions. The original house is not part of the
proposed work.
Typically, the guidance would be to differentiate the new work from the historic building.
In this case, the additions and alterations previously completed follow the Mission Revival
Style. The additions are relatively new construction, and the proposed work will be
compatible and discernible to the trained eye.
Conclusion:
The alterations and addition to the house would meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
Rehabilitation, Standards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Standard 3 provides guidance so that historic
buildings will be recognized as distinct from any additions or alterations. This is met when viewed by a
professional with experience in identifying historic buildings but may not be as clear to the untrained
public. Since the previous additions and alterations have continued and embellished on the Spanish
Eclectic Style, it is appropriate for the current alterations to follow the same quality of materials and
design. This will comply with Standard 3. The alterations also appear to meet the Standards 9 & 10 for
an addition. The building will retain a variation of the Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival style,
showing different times it was enlarged or altered.
"Rehabilitation" is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through
repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those
portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and
cultural values. The Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation projects in a reasonable
manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility.”2
1.A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal
change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
The property retains the historic single-family use.
2.The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic
materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
The historic design and character of the 1921 single-family house is retained in the proposed plan. The proposed plans do not include the removal of historic features.
2https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm
48
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
9
Interior spaces will be reconfigured to provide a more modern kitchen and space utilization. It appears this part of the interior was previously altered.
3.Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that
create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or
architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
The rehabilitation plan may include decorative elements, tiles, and hewn timber as part of the alteration in the rear of the house. These are materials already included in the previous alterations and are compatible while visually different from the historic materials of the original building.
4.Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in
their own right shall be retained and preserved.
The historic house has additions that more than double the size of the original building. These additions and alterations have been constructed in a style and using some decorative materials that contribute to the overall pleasant appearance of the house and property. However, the 2011 additions do not constitute historically significant changes.
5.Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that
characterize a property shall be preserved.
The historic portion of the current house, particularly the front, will retain the existing finishes and show the craftsmanship of the original construction.
6.Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in
design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of
missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
The proposed alterations are in areas of the 2011 construction. There are no deteriorated material issues.
7.Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials
shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the
gentlest means possible.
No harsh chemicals or sandblasting are part of this rehabilitation.
8.Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If
such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
Very limited excavation is necessary. No archeological materials were previously uncovered in the area close to the building site. Should archeological materials be uncovered, City, County, and State law must be followed.
9.New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic
materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and
49
20200 Mendelsohn Lane
August 31, 2020
10
shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
The proposed alterations are to occur in areas that were constructed in 2011. The compatible design of the 2003 and 2011 alterations and additions will be continued.
10.New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner
that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment would be unimpaired.
The rear addition, part of the proposed alterations, is attached to the building on the historic rear wall. Removing the previous addition or the proposed alterations would not result in further damage to the integrity of the historic portion of the building.
We find the proposed addition and alterations proposed for the rear of the house meet the intent of
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The proposed project does not create an
adverse change in the environment. At this time, the complete history of the property is not known. The
extensive architectural changes and additions diminish the integrity of the original building and site.
Without more information, the property does not appear to qualify as a CEQA Historic Resource. This is
further described in the Primary Survey DPR 523 A.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this review of the addition and alterations
proposed for 20200 Mendelsohn Lane, Saratoga, California.
Sincerely,
BONNIE L. BAMBURG
Principal Consultant
50
TIMMONS RESIDENCE
INTERIOR REMODEL CONSISTING OF 1,155 SQ.FT., RECONSTRUCT ROOF OVER PREVIOUS ADDITION
CONSISTING OF 831 SQ. FT. NO ADDITIONAL FLOOR AREA IS PROPOSAED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT.
3 COVERED AND 2 UNCOVERED (E) TO REMAIN
(E) TO REMAIN
6,040 SQ. FT. + 600 SQ. FT. ADU = 6,640 SQ. FT.
45% (18,876 SQ. FT.)
51720034
GROSS: 41,947.64 SQ.FT.
AVG. SLOPE: 8%
TYPE V-B
20200 MENDELSOHN
SARATOGA, CA 95070
LOT COVERAGE PERMITTTED:
CODE NOTE:
LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED:
PARKING (PROVIDED):
F.A.R. PERMITTED:
PARCEL NUMBER:
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:
LOT AREA:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
BUILDING INFORMATION SUMMARY
CONTACTS
KEVIN & LORI TIMMONS
20200 MENDELSOHN LN
SARATOGA, CA 95070
OWNER:
DEMOLITION FLOOR PLANA2.0
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
FLOOR PLAN
ROOF PLAN
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A3.2
A3.4
A3.3
A2.2
A3.1
A3.0
A2.1
DRAWING INDEX
SITE PLAN
TITLE SHEET
BUILDING DESIGN
AA1
A1.0
N.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
S
I
T
E
PARCEL MAPR-1-20,000ZONING DESIGNATION:
R-3/U
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
FLOOR AREA
FIRST FLOOR
EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL CHANGE
SECOND FLOOR
GARAGE
ENCLOSED PORCH
A.D.U.
TOTAL
(E) TO REMAIN -
SITE COVERAGE
FOOTPRINT OF HOME
SQUARE FOOTAGE
DRIVEWAY
WALKWAYS/ DECKS
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
POOL
TOTAL
(E)
% OF NET LOT SIZE
SETBACKS
FRONT
REQUIRED
30'-0"
PROPOSED
(E)
(E)
HEIGHT
LOWEST ELEVATION POINT
(AT THE BUILDINGS EDGE FROM NATURAL GRADE)
HIGHEST ELEVATION POINT
(AT THE BUILDINGS EDGE FROM NATURAL GRADE)
AVERAGE ELEVATION POINT
(BASED ON HIGHEST AND LOWEST POINTS ABOVE)
TOP MOST ELEVATION POINT
(MEASURED FROM AVERAGE POINT TO THE TOP MOST
POINT OF THE ROOF.)
553.00
(E) TO REMAIN
EXTERIOR WALLS
TOTAL EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS
NEW EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
-
EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED -
-
THESE PLANS CONFORM TO THE 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL, MECHANICAL,
PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND ENERGY CODE. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TO
CONFORM TO 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (I.E., IRC, IBC, UMC, UPC, AND NEC)
AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ARCHITECT:
STUDIO 528 ART & ARCHITECTURE, INC.
MICHAEL TINSLEY, ARCHITECT
4159 PEARSON CT.
CAPITOLA, CA. 95010
PH: (408) 705-6763
mike@studio528inc.com.com
CONSULTING HISTORIAN:
SITE
T1
COVER
SHEET
BONNIE BAMBURG
URBAN PROGRAMMERS
10710 RIDGEVIEW AVE.
SAN JOSE, CA 95127
(408) 254-7171
bbamburg@usa.net
(E) TO REMAINF.A.R. PROPOSED:
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA3.5
LEFT SIDE 15'-0"(E)
35'-0"REAR
RIGHT SIDE 15'-0"(E)
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TI
N
S
LEYJ NLEAH
CIMEXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
"LETTER OF FINDINGS"
PROVIDED BY URBAN PROGRAMMERS
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(E) TO REMAIN
(E) TO REMAIN
(E) TO REMAIN
(E) TO REMAIN
(E) TO REMAIN
557.00
(E) TO REMAIN
557.00
(E) TO REMAIN
529.50
(E) TO REMAIN
51
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
A1.0
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"N
AREAS OF WORK
52
1
GUEST
BEDROOM
101
GUEST
BATH
103
W.I.C.
102
STOR.
104
PDR.
105
FAMILY
ROOM
106
BREAKFAST
107
KITCHEN
109
OFFICE
108
LIVING
ROOM
109
ENTRY
110
DINING
ROOM
111
STOR.
112
STOR.
113
STOR.
114
BEDROOM
115
PDR.
116
BEDROOM
117
2
3
4
5
BEDROOM
118
HALL
119
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM1.DEMOLITION PLAN IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY
COORDINATE DEMOLITION & REMOVAL WITH NOTES & DIMENSIONS INDICATING THE EXTENT &
NATURE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THESE DOCUMENTS
DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES
GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURELY SHORING IN PLACE ALL OVERHEAD
STRUCTURES PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF ANY SUPPORTING STRUCTURES.
2.
CAP OFF ALL PLUMBING, GAS, AND ELECTRICAL LINES AS REQUIRED3.
(E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN
(E) CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED
LEGEND
SHEET NOTES
(E) VANITY AND BOWL TO BE RELOCATED. SEE A2.11
2 (E) PATIO SLAB TO BE REMOVED. PREP. FOR NEW FLOOR, SEE A2.1
3 (E) MECH. CLOSET TO BE REMOVED. (N) F.A.U. AND WATER HEATER TO BE LOCATED IN ATTIC.
PREP. AREA FOR (N) CONSTRUCTION, SEE A2.1
4 (E) COLUMNS TO BE REMOVED. PREP FOR (N) COLUMNS AND ARCHES
5 (E) CEILING AND ROOF TO BE REMOVED. PREP. AREA FOR (N) CONSTRUCTION
AREAS OF WORK
EXISTING / DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"KEY PLAN N.T.S.
A2.0
EXISTING
DEMOLITION
FLOOR PLAN
N
53
CHINA CABINET
CEILING
@9'-8"
DOME
Ø11'-0"
WINDOW
4'-0"
QUEEN BED
NEW MECH. CHASE TO
EQUIP IN ATTIC
FZR.REF.OVENS
SINK
SINK
SOFFIT
@9'-0"MIRROR
SKYLT.
ABV.
SKYLT.
ABV.
12"Ø
SUNTUNNEL
12"Ø
SUNTUNNEL
12"Ø
SUNTUNNEL19'-10"11'-0"
3'-6"7'-714"2'-6"2'-6"7'-712"10'-71
2"
BEDROOM
101
BATH
102 VEST.
103
KITCHEN
104 FAMILY
ROOM
105
PANTRY
106
PDR.
107
LIVING
ROOM
108
DOME
109
ENTRY
110
DINING
ROOM
111
HALL
112
BEDROOM
113
BATH
114
BEDROOM
115
BEDROOM
116
HALL
117
DW
SINK
4'-0"4'-71
2"
4'-01
2"4'-0"4'-01
2"
3'-61
2"4'-8"3'-312"7'-1134"3'-312"8"13'-1014"1'-71
2"8'-81
4"1'-71
2"
2'-31
4"8'-0"
103
4"
1'-5"
9'-23
4"6'-2"
R6'-9"
R5'-6"
6'-41
4"6'-434"2'-0"5'-312"10'-71
2"3'-91
2"
1'-11
2"4'-114"4'-434"1'-5"
DW
DINING
ROOM
105
CHINA CABINETCHINA CABINET
SOFFIT
@9'-0"CEILING
@9'-0"
CEILING
@9'-0"
CEILING
@9'-0"
CLG.
@9'-0"
CEILING
@10'-0"
CEILING
@10'-0"
SOFFIT
@8'-0"
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
A2.1
FLOOR PLAN
FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"
AREAS OF WORK
KEY PLAN N.T.S.
2 DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF STUDS, OR CONCRETE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
PROVIDE MIN. 3'-0" LANDINGS OUTSIDE ALL EXTERIOR DOORS PER C.B.C. LANDINGS SHALL BE NOT
MORE THAN 7-3/4" BELOW INSIDE FINISHED FLOORS AT IN-SWING DOORS, AND 1-1/2" OUTSWING
DOORS
3.
OPENINGS AROUND GAS VENTS, DUCTS, PIPES, CHIMNEYS, AND FIREPLACES SHALL BE
FIRE-BLOCKED WITH NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS PER C.B.C.
4.
OPENINGS AROUND GAS VENTS, DUCTS, PIPES, CHIMNEYS, AND FIREPLACES SHALL BE
FIRE-BLOCKED WITH NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS PER C.B.C.
5.
TUB / SHOWER WALLS TO HAVE A SMOOTH, NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE OVER A MOISTURE
RESISTANT UNDERLAYMENT TO HEIGHT OF 70" ABOVE THE DRAIN INLET, PER C.B.C.
6.
PROVIDE FULLY TEMPERED, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS FOR TUB / SHOWER ENCLOSURE.7.
ALL INTERIOR FINISHES, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES, AND EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED AND
APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
8.
1.COORDINATION: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND EACH SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY
RELATED WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF
THIS OFFICE, OR THE OWNER.
SHEET NOTES
1 PROVIDE 5
8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. ON WALLS AND OTHER ELEMENTS THAT SUPPORT THE HORIZONTAL
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION THAT ARE NOT DIRECTLY IN CONTACT w/ THE DWELLING PORTION OF
THE BUILDING. PROVIDE 5
8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD. ON CEILINGS AND SUPPORTING MEMBERS (BEAMS,
COLUMNS, BEARING WALLS) WHERE LIVING AREAS ARE ABOVE.
2 DOOR & FRAME ASSEMBLY SHALL BE RATED 20 MIN. AND SELF CLOSING FOR INSTALLATION IN
1 HR. WALL CONSTRUCTION
3
4
5
(N) 18"x30" CRAWL SPACE ACCESS BELOW, FULLY WEATHERSTRIPPED
6
(N) 22"x30" ATTIC ACCESS ABOVE, FULLY WEATHERSTRIPPED
7
8
TEMP. GLASS ENCLOSURE w/ MIN. 22" MIN. OPENING: 1024 SQ. IN. (MIN) INTERIOR CAPABLE OF
ENCOMPASSING A 30" DIA. CIRCLE.
FLOOR MOUNTED TUB VALVES AND FAUCET
CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION BETWEEN BEDROOM 3 & BATH 4
HALF-WALL w/ SHOWER CONTROLS
9 1x WRAP AROUND STRUCTURAL BEAM
10 4x6 DECORATIVE BEAM
11 PROVIDE PLUMBING STUBOUTS FOR FUTURE PLUMBING FIXTURES
N
54
SKYLT.
ABV.
SHADED INDICATES NEW ROOF
NEW TRELLIS
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
A2.2
ROOF PLAN
ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"N
55
1
2
3
4
11'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
11'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
1
2
3
4
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.0
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
2
EXISTING REAR ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"1
SHEET NOTES
1 (E) CLAY TILE ROOF
2 (E) WOOD TRIM
3 (E) CEMENT PLASTER WALL FINISH
4 (E) FINISH GRADE
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
56
12'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
1
2
3
4
EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION - COURTYARD
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.1
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
4
EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
SHEET NOTES
1 (E) CLAY TILE ROOF
2 (E) WOOD TRIM
3 (E) CEMENT PLASTER WALL FINISH
4 (E) FINISH GRADE
57
1
2
3
4
12'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
9'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
1
2
3
4
EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION - COURTYARD
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.2
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
4
EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"5
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
SHEET NOTES
1 (E) CLAY TILE ROOF
2 (E) WOOD TRIM
3 (E) CEMENT PLASTER WALL FINISH
4 (E) FINISH GRADE
58
11'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
11'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-0"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
1
3
2
4
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION (TO REMAIN)
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.3
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
2
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"1
SHEET NOTES
1 (N) CLAY TILE ROOF, MATCH (E)
2 (N) CEMENT PLASTER, MATCH (E)
3 (N) WOOD TRELLIS
4 (N) PLASTER COLUMN
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
59
12'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
9'-10.5"
(E) DBL. PLT
(537.21') 0'-0"
(E) FIN.FLR
(535')
1
2
EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION - COURTYARD (TO REMAIN)
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.4
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
4
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
SHEET NOTES
1 (N) CLAY TILE ROOF, MATCH (E)
2 (N) WOOD WINDOW, MATCH (E)
60
1
3
2
1
EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION - COURTYARD
1/4" = 1'-0"
A3.5
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
4
EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"5
A.P.N. 51720034
9/8/2020
HISTORIC
SUBMITTAL
SET
SHEET TITLE:
SCALE: AS NOTED
ISSUE DATE:
20200 MENDELSOHN LN.
SARATOGA, CA. 95070
THE
TIMMONS
RESIDENCE
PROPOSED REMODEL:
REVISIONDATENO.
4159 Pearson Court
Capitola, Cailfornia 95010
408/705.6763
www.studio528inc.com
C-30944
HO
C AFO L FIE O NT
A IR ATS TCE
TIHCRADESNECIL
1 12-3
REN.10 -
TIN
S
LEYJ NLEAHCIM
SHEET NOTES
1 (N) CLAY TILE ROOF, MATCH (E)
2 (N) WOOD TRELLIS
3 (N) SLIDING DOOR BY NANAWALL
61
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2020
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 6d-20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Property Location: 20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Property APN: 517-10-013
Property Owner/Applicant: City of Saratoga/Saratoga Historical Foundation
Background:
The applicant is requesting that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) add the
Interurban Stop (also called a passenger shelter) to the Heritage Resource Inventory.
The Interurban Stop was located on Saratoga-Los Gatos Road, milepost 13.9
between Saratoga and Los Gatos. The shelter was located near the Nippon Mura
Inn, a popular resort. Most passenger shelters were simple wood frames with a roof
about 6' x 10' and made from local redwood. The Nippon Mura passenger stop was
very ornate and built around 1903 or 1904. The latticework imitated some of the
Nippon Mura cottages. The shelter was painted white. It is believed this century-old
passenger shelter is the only one still standing in Northern California and possibly all
of California.
When the Interurban Rail closed in 1934-- the rails were torn up or paved over in
some instances. The passenger shelters were removed.
In the instance of the Nippon Mura Inn shelter, a fellow in San Jose took it home and
used it for storage. He met Historian Willys Peck, a railroad aficionado and gave the
shelter to him.
The Peck family donated the Interurban shelter in 2019 to the Saratoga Historical
Foundation. The structure was relocated to Historic Park, where it could be properly
62
Page 2 of 2
sanded, checked for dry rot and for missing or damaged wood replaced and the roof
was replaced. Restoration was completed after 3 months in February 2020.
Staff Recommendation:
The HPC adopts the resolution No. HP20-0001 adding the Interurban Stop to the
Heritage Resource Inventory.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. HP20-0001
2. HRI Designation Form
63
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION No. HP20-0001
RESOLUTION OF THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA FOR APPLICATION HPC20-0002
TO UPDATE THE HERITAGE RESOURCE INVENTORY BY INCLUDING THE
INTERURBAN STOP LOCATED AT 20450 SARATOGA-LOS GATOS ROAD
WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission was established by the City Council
in 1982 to assist with and encourage the preservation of Saratoga’s heritage resources, and
WHEREAS, one of the Commission’s primary duties, as established in Section
13.10.040(a) of the City Code is to update the Heritage Resource Inventory, and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2020, the Heritage Preservation Commission held a duly
noticed public meeting on the subject matter, and considered evidence presented by a Heritage
Preservation Commissioner, City staff, the property owner, and other interested parties.
NOW THEREFORE, the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Saratoga
hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:
Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 2: The Heritage Preservation Commission has determined that criteria (a) and (b) as
established by Section 13.15.010 of Saratoga’s Municipal Code, have been met to include the Interurban
Stop located at 20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road in the Heritage Resource Inventory as follows:
• It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic,
engineering or architectural history of the City, the County, the State or the nation;
• It is identified with persons or events significant in local, county, state or national history;
Section 3: The Heritage Preservation Commission hereby approves HPC20-0002 to
include the Interurban Stop at 20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road on the Heritage Resource
Inventory.
64
Page 2 of 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Saratoga
on this 13th day of October 13 by the following vote:
AYES:,
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Alexandra Nugent, Chair, Heritage
Preservation Commission
Attest:
Nicole Johnson, Secretary, Heritage Preservation
65
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
HERITAGE RESOURCE DESI G NATION FORM
Property Address /APN 1: 20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road, Saratoga 517-10-015
Form completed by (name): Commissioner Annette Stransky
Site Visit completed (date):January 1, 2020
x Site/Structure recommended for Heritage Resource Inventory (please check if applicable)
□ Site/Structure recommended for Historic Landmark designation (please check if applicable)
□ Owner interested in Mills Act designation (please check if applicable)
CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: Saratoga Historical Foundation
Owner Contact Information: PO Box 172, Saratoga, CA 95071 408-867-4311
Has the current owner been notified of the nomination?_yes, SHF board voted 2/7/2020
Has the current owner been informed of the HPC process affecting a historic resource? Yes
Does the current owner have any objection to the nomination?__No_________________________
Description: The Interurban Stop (also called a passenger shelter) was located on Saratoga-Los
Gatos Road, milepost 13.9 between Saratoga and Los Gatos. The shelter was located near the
Nippon Mura Inn, a popular resort. Most passenger shelters were simple wood frames with a roof
about 6' x 10' and made from local redwood. The Nippon Mura passenger stop was very ornate
and built around 1903 or 1904. The latticework imitated some of the Nippon Mura cottages. The
shelter was painted white.
No photos exist of the Nippon Mura passenger shelter on-site. The original sign was lost. The one
shown in the photo below matches the shelter at Springer of the same vintage. It is believed this
century-old passenger shelter is the only one still standing in Northern California and possibly all
of California.
When the Interurban Rail closed in 1934-- the rails were torn up or paved over in some instances.
The passenger shelters were removed.
In the instance of the Nippon Mura Inn shelter, a fellow in San Jose took it home and used it for
1 Assessor Parcel Number
66
2
storage. He met Historian Willys Peck, a railroad aficianado and gave the shelter to him.
Peck had built a miniature train after the original C P Huntington train in his backyard. The C.
P. Huntington was originally purchased by
Central Pacific Railroad (CP) in 1863. CP used
the locomotive beginning on April 15, 1864,
during construction of the western portion of
the First Transcontinental Railroad in North
America.
Southern Pacific (SP) purchased C. P.
nHuntington from CP on February 5, 1871, gave
I it their number 1, and used it in light service in
Northern California. It seems fitting a native
Californian and train aficionado would have a
miniature train of such historic claim in his
bbackyard.
Friends of the Pecks would be treated to a ride
a on the train around the Peck backyard. He had
a a miniature town with a printshop, blacksmith
shop and the Interurban passenger shelter that could be viewed along the route.
The Peck family donated the Interurban shelter in 2019 to the Saratoga Historical Foundation.
Restoration
The photo on the left shows how the
structure looked in the Peck's backyard.
The shelter was moved off-site where it
could be properly sanded, checked for
dry rot and for missing or damaged wood
replaced. The roof was replaced.
A restoration professional provided
advice.
The structure was painted. And a pro-
fessional sign painted and placed on it.
Restoration was completed after 3 months
in February, 2020.
67
3
. DESIGNATION CRITERIA – Please check off the qualifying criteria below.
The site or structure qualifies for designation because it meets at least one of the following
criteria (two for Historic Landmark designation):
x□ a) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, political,
aesthetic, engineering or architectural history of the City, the County, the State or the
nation; or
x□ b) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, county, state or national
history; or
□ c) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, or
is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials; or
□ d) It is representative of the notable design or craft of a builder, designer, or architect; or
□ e) It embodies or contributes to unique physical characteristics representing an established
and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or district within the City; or
□ f) It represents a significant concentration or continuity of site, buildings, structures or
objects, unified by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical or natural development;
or
□ g) It embodies or contributes to a unique natural setting or environment constituting a distinct
area or district within the City having special character or special historical, architectural
or aesthetic interest or value.
AND for Historic Landmark designation:
□ It retains a substantial degree of architectural and structural integrity with respect to the
original design.
___________________________________________________
History of the Peninsula Interurban
The Peninsular Interurban was part of a technological
breakthrough across the US in the early 1900s. At that time
paved roads were uncommon and cars were still a twinkle in
Henry Ford's eye. Steam railroads did not service many of the
small towns so the Interurban provided a source of convenient,
economical transportation.\
This structure stood on Austin Way near the Nippon Mura Inn
from 1904-1934. It is the last standing shelter from a railroad
that served the South Bay.
The Peninsular Interurban connected all the major cities of the
South Bay using light rail and was powered by electricity. The
sleek, red cars ran every hour during the day and every two hours in the evening. The clanging
68
4
of the trolley's bell lured passengers to travel in comfort at 30-45 miles per hour. The cost to
ride from Saratoga to San Jose was 35 cents.
Prior to this, travel was by horse and buggy which would take at least an hour to reach San Jose
from Saratoga. In the spring, 65-mile long Blossom Tours brought people to Santa Clara Valley
to see nine million blossoming trees for just $1.00. The Interurban was also used to haul oil,
fruit, gravel and other cargo.
The Peninsular Railway cars stopped adjacent to the Southern Pacific depots in the South Bay.
The railroad had only one depot of its own, and that was in Saratoga at Blaney Plaza. As
roadways began to be paved, and cars became less expensive, ridership began to decline. Since
80% of the revenue for the Peninsular Interurban depended on passengers, management began
to shut down the operation. Electric operation ended on the Saratoga line in March of 1933.
_____________________________________________________________________________
69
5
History of the Nippon Mura
The Nippon Mura Inn was built in 1901 by Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Morris a couple who had
lived for many years in Yokahama, Japan. They moved to Saratoga and decided to build an inn
using authentic Japanese-style architecture. Many lovely Japanese artifacts could be found in
the main lodge. The lodge and a village-like grouping of cottages and stables were built on 32
acres of land. Beautiful gardens of chrysanthemums provided a lovely backdrop. During the
prohibition era it was rumored a drink or two could be had.
The Inn was prosperous until 1941 when it was sold and became known as Little Hamlet. It
was sold again in 1962 when the La Hacienda Inn was built. La Hacienda Inn was then sold
and became Jack Rose Libations in 2013. The land was annexed from Los Gatos to Monte
Sereno. Jack Rose was torn down in 2018 to make room for housing. No vestige of the Nippon
Mura Inn exists today.
70
6
Resources
Henry Bender, "SP Trainline," and"Southern Pacific Lines Standard-Design Depots"
Western Railway Museum, Allan Fisher
Florence Cunningham, "Saratoga's First Hundred Years"
Paul Trimble, "Interurban Railways of the Bay Area"
AP Hill and History San Jose "Scenes Along the
Line of San Jose & Los Gatos Interurban Railroad"
Willys Peck, "Stereopticon"
Mardi Bennett, "Images of Long Ago"
Charles McCaleb, "Tracks, Tires and Wires"
Edward Kelley with Peggy Conaway, "Railroads of Los Gatos"
George M. Hilton & John F. Due, "The Electric Interurban
Railways in America"
71
Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2020
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 7b-HPC Commissioner Vacancies
The City is currently accepting applications for two HPC vacancies. Applications are
due November 27, 2020. The City Council Interviews will be December 2, 2020.
Interested parties may apply online or download the application and submit to the
City Clerk.
72
Project Status Worksheet
Heritage Resource Inventory Candidates
Staff/Commissioner
Assigned Status
14625 Big Basin Way Stransky
14285 Saratoga Av Rodgers
18495 Montpere Way Marchetti
13650 Saratoga Av (Library)Stransky Hold
13716 Saratoga Av Sacred Heart Rodgers
19246 DeHavilland Nugent
19222 DeHavilland Nugent
19223 DeHavilland Nugent
20520 Marion Rd Shah
20602 Marion Rd Shah
20996-21398 Congress Springs Rd (Quarry)Nugent Loading Structure
18530 Montpere Way Rodgers
14301 Saratoga Av Rodgers
Commissioner sent letter in 2017 to property owner. No response. Draft historic survey submitted May 2019. Due to
length of time since previous correspondence, letter will be prepared by staff to send to property owner to commence a
new 45 day review.
14321 Lutheria Way Stransky
20290 Orchard Road Stransky
14104 Oak St Stransky
14791 Oak St
20318 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road Stransky Owner in support of being on the inventory. Additional research needed
14404 Quito Rd Stransky
14900 Montalvo Road Stransky
20450 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road Stransky 10/13/20 HPC meeting
20295 La Paloma Ave Stransky Stransky is working with the owner to conduct property research.
Other
14120 Shadow Oaks - Tree Stransky
14250 Douglas Stransky
Historic Landmarks
Point of Interest Markers (POI)
Urban Railroad
Heritage Plaques/Signage
Memorial Park
Madronia Cemetery
Heritage Orchard
Events
Blossom Festival 2021
State of the City 2021
Arbor Day 2020
Preservation Month 2021 May 2021
Budget
Approved 11,600.00
Balance 11,600.00
Page 1 of 3 10/1/2020
73
Project Status Worksheet
Other
Heritage Orchard Master Plan Update In progress
Saratoga Ave Heritage Lane Inventory
Village Inventory
Heritage Lane Ord. Amendment Johnson Staff is working with City Attorney to prepare amendments per CC direction
Heritage Resource Inventory Ord. Amendment Johnson Staff is working with City Attorney to prepare amendments per CC direction
Grover House Development Update Staff Ongoing
Training Ongoing
Page 2 of 3 10/1/2020
74
Historic Resource Inventory Year/Fiscal Year Notes
Added
18500 Montpere Way 2015
19277 Shubert Dr 2017-2018
Lutheria Way Entrance Posts 14200 & 14221 Lutheria Way 2018-2019
13601 Saratoga Av St Andrew's 2018-2019
19461 DeHavilland Drive 2019-2020 Entrance Planter
19152 DeHavilland Drive 2019-2020 Entrance Planter
20390 Park Place 2019-2020 Saratoga Federated Church Bell
19201 Shubert Drive 2019-2020 Entrance Planter
19401 Shubert Drive 2019-2020 Entrance Planter
18485 Montpere Way 2019-2020 Home
20331 Orchard Road 2019-2020 Peck House
Discontinued
19365 Allendale 2017 Owner did not want house on Inventory
20328 Orchard Road 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. On January 2, 2019, staff was informed that the
20350 Orchard Road 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. Owner has contacted City and is hesitant about being
14220 Elva Ave - Russian Church 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. Church responded that they do not want to be included
Landmarks
Added
15320 Peach Hill Road 2020-2021 Landmark and Mills Act Carey House
20331 Orchard Road 2019-2020 Landmark and Mills Act Peck House
Discontinued
20021 Bella Vista 2014 Lack of owner consent
14501-14503 Big Basin Way 2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design
14251 Fruitvale 2014 Lack of owner consent
14519 Big Basin Way 2014 Lack of owner consent
14413-14415 Big Basin Way (20640 Third St)2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design
14495 Big Basin Way 2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design
14754 Pierce Rd 2014 Lack of owner consent
Old Grandview Ranch 2015 Owner did not want house as a landmark
Heritage Tree Inventory
Added
Palm Trees - Yerba Santa Court 2017-2018
Point of Interest Markers
Installed
Theater of the Glade Site Point of Interest Marker 2017-2018 Saratoga Ave/Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Blossom Festival Point of Interest Marker 2017-2018 Saratoga Ave/Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Approved
Ohlone Indians 2019/2020 Wildwood Park
Saloons 2019/2020 within the road right of way adjacent to 14535 Big Basin Way
Saratoga Paper Mill 2019/2020 within the road right of way adjacent to 14650 Big Basin Way
Caledonia Pasteboard Mill 2019/2020 Wildwood Park
Other
Village Design Guidelines 2019 City Council meeting scheduled Approved by CC 8/21/19
Memorial Arch 2019/2020 Completed February 2020 Completed Feb 2020
Publications
Heritage Tree Guidebook 2017
FAQ's Historic Preservation 2017
FAQ's Heritage Trees 2017
FAQ's Mills Act 2017-2018
FAQ's Landmarks 2017-2018
Training Federal Fiscal Year
Webinar CA Modern Architecture 2017/2018
Webinar Identifying and Treating Historic Wood 2018/2019
Webinar Examples in Sourcing and Repairing California's Historic 2018/2019
Deep Dive into the Secretory of Interior Standards 2019/2020 2/20/2020-Shah, Nugent & Johnson
Eichler Home Tour 2019/2020
75