The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-08-2022 Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda PacketPage 1 of 3 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING March 8, 2022 8:30 AM REGULAR MEETING Teleconference/Public Participation Information to Mitigate the Spread of COVID‐19 This meeting will be held entirely by teleconference. All members of the City Council and staff will only participate via the Zoom platform using the process described below. The meeting is being conducted pursuant to recent amendments to the teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act allowing teleconferencing during a proclaimed state of emergency when local official have recommended social distancing. The purpose of the amendments is to provide the safest environment for the public, elected officials, and staff while allowing for continued operation of the government and public participation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Members of the public can view and participate in Meeting by: 1. Using the Zoom website https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84035279809 or App (Webinar ID 840 3527 9809) and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 2. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID 840 3527 9809 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. The public will not be able to participate in the meeting in person. Methods of viewing the meeting will be listed on the meeting agenda. The public will not be able to participate in the meeting in person. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Governor’s Executive Order, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting due to a disability, please contact the City Clerk at bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety. Page 2 of 3 1. Site Visit(s) a. None 2. Call to Order 3. Roll Call- Sharon Boyce-Bender, Marie Lopresto, Rina Shah, and Priya Shastri 4. Oral Communications Any member of the public may address the Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. 5. Approval of the February 8, 2022 minutes 02-08-2022 Heritage Preservation Commission draft MEETING minutes. 6. New Business a. Annual Certified Local Government (CLG) report Memo Attachment 1- CLG Annual Report 10-1-20--9-30-21 b. HPC Workplan Memo Attachment 1-Draft 2022.2023 HPC Workplan Attachment 2-HPC Joint Meeting_-_Work Plan 2021.2022 c. Blossom Festival Memo d. National Preservation Month Memo Attachment 1- 2022 National Preservation Month Flyer 7. Staff Comments 8. Old Business a. Heritage Orchard Update Memo Attachment 1. Documents from City Orchardist b. Project status worksheet Page 3 of 3 Project Status Worksheet 20220803 9. Commission Items 10. Adjournment In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 868-1216 or bavrit@saratoga.ca.us Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the start of the meeting. Any recommendation made by the Heritage Preservation Commission may be appealed to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be taken by filing with the Secretary of the Heritage Preservation Commission a written notice and filing fee within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff report, and other materials provided to the Heritage Preservation Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public review at the office of the Director at the time, they are distributed to the Heritage Preservation Commission. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner, for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission was posted and available for public review on March 3, 2022 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Page 1 of 2 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES February 8, 2022 8:30 AM REGULAR MEETING 1. Site Visit(s) a. None 2. Call to Order: Chair Shastri called the meeting to order at 8:30 AM. 3. Roll Call Present: Sharon Boyce-Bender, Rina Shah, Priya Shastri Absent: Marie Lopresto Staff: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner 4. Oral Communications Marilyn Marchetti-discussed the windows for the John Henry House. Is speaking with the property owner to provide information on restoring the original windows. Ask the HPC to keep an eye on the John Henry House. Grover House-this building does not look like the original siding was used and the siding is up. 5. Approval of the January 11, 2022 minutes SHAH/BOYCE- BENDER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE JANUARY 11, 2022 MEETING. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BOYCE-BENDER, LOPRESTO, SHAH, AND SHASTRI. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE Commissioner Lopresto joined the meeting at 8:40 AM. 6. New Business a. 20601 Brookwood Lane SHAH/BOYCE-BENDER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR EXTERIOR MODIFICATION WITH THE CONDITIONS THE MATERIALS NOT TO BE RE-USED ON THE HOME BE RECYCLED, THE WINDOWS TO BE 4 Page 2 of 2 REPLACED WILL BE WOOD AND THE REPLACEMENT OF SIDING/MATERIALS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING MATERIALS. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BOYCE-BENDER, LOPRESTO, SHAH, AND SHASTRI. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE 7. Staff Comments a. Heritage Orchard update The Commission received a written report from the City Orchardist about what has been happening in the orchard. • Marilyn Marchetti spoke about the importance of maintaining the orchard and not let housing being proposed on it. • HPC agreed to send a letter to the City Council expressing their concerns. 8. Old Business a. Project status worksheet 9. Commission Items a. The Commission discussed potential upcoming workplan. b. The Commission requested the City Orchardist to attend the March meeting. c. Add blossom festival discussion to next agenda 10. Adjournment Chair Shastri adjourned the meeting at 9:10 AM. Minutes respectfully submitted: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner City of Saratoga 5 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: March 9, 2022 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Item 6a-2020/2021 Certified Local Government (CLG) Report The 1980 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, provided for the establishment of a Certified Local Government Program (CLG) to encourage the direct participation of local governments in the identification, evaluation, registration, and preservation of historic properties within their jurisdictions and promote the integration of local preservation interests and concerns into local planning and decision-making processes. The CLG program is a partnership among local governments, the State of California (OHP), and the National Park Service (NPS) which is responsible for administering the National Historic Preservation Program. The 2020/2021 annual CLG report from Saratoga is due by May 13, 2022. Please review and provide any comments on the attached report. Attachment: 1. CLG Annual Report 10-1-20--9-30-21 6 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 1 Complete Se Name of CLG City of Saratoga Report Prepared by: Nicole Johnson Date of commission/board review: March 9, 2022 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION I. Enforce Appropriate State or Local Legislation for the Designation and Protection of Historic Properties. A. Preservation Laws 1. What amendments or revisions, if any, are you considering to the certified ordinance? Please forward drafts or proposals. REMINDER: Pursuant to the CLG Agreement, OHP must have the opportunity to review and comment on ordinance changes prior to adoption. Changes that do not meet the CLG requirements could affect certification status. Attached 2. Provide an electronic link to your ordinance or appropriate section(s) of the municipal/zoning code. https://library.municode.com/ca/saratoga/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CH13HEPR B. New Local Landmark Designations (Comprehensive list of properties/districts designated during the reporting. INSTRUCTIONS: This a Word form with expanding text fields and check boxes. It will probably open as Read-Only. Save it to your computer before you begin entering data. This form can be saved and reopened. Because this is a WORD form, it will behave generally like a regular Word document except that the font, size, and color are set by the text field. • Start typing where indicated to provide the requested information. • Click on the check box to mark either yes or no. • To enter more than one item in a particular text box, just insert an extra line (Enter) between the items. Save completed form and email as an attachment to info.calshpo@parks.ca.gov. You can also convert it to a PDF and send as an email attachment. Use the Acrobat tab in WORD and select Create and Attach to Email. You can then attach the required documents to that email. If the attachments are too large (greater than10mb total), you will need to send them in a second or third email. 7 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 2 1. During the reporting period, October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021, what properties/districts have been locally designated? REMINDER: Pursuant to California Government Code § 27288.2, “the county recorder shall record a certified resolution establishing an historical resources designation issued by the State Historical Resources Commission or a local agency, or unit thereof.” 2. What properties/districts have been de-designated this past year? For districts, include the total number of resource contributors? Property Name/Address Date Removed Reason Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. C. Historic Preservation Element/Plan 1. Do you address historic preservation in your general plan? ☐ No ☐ Yes, in a separate historic preservation element. ☒ Yes, it is included in another element. Provide an electronic link to the historic preservation section(s) of the General Plan or to the separate historic preservation element. http://www.saratoga.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/49Pages%2018,19,%2028%20and%2046-48 D. Review Responsibilities 1. Who takes responsibility for design review or Certificates of Appropriateness? ☐ All projects subject to design review go the commission. Property Name/Address Date Designated If a district, number of contributors Date Recorded by County Recorder DeHavilland Drive 19174 9/14/21 TBD Shubert Drive 19277 12/16/20 1/26/21 Saratoga Los Gatos Road 20280 04/7/2021 06/03/2021 8 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 3 ☒ Some projects are reviewed at the staff level without commission review. What is the threshold between staff-only review and full-commission review? The Heritage Preservation Commission reviews and comments upon all applications for building and demolition permits involving work to be performed upon or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district, and all applications for tentative map approval, rezoning, building site approval, use permit, variance approval, design review or other approval pertaining to or significantly affecting any heritage resource or potential heritage resource if older than 50 years. 2. California Environmental Quality Act • What is the role of historic preservation staff and commission in providing input to CEQA documents prepared for or by the local government? Typically the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) reviews a proposed project that involves a historic resource prior to completion of the CEQA document. HPC comments are provided to the environmental consultant who prepares the CEQA document What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing CEQA documents for projects that are proposed within the jurisdiction of the local government? When applicable, CEQA documents are sent to the HPC for their review and comment. 3. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act • What is the role of the staff and commission in providing input to Section 106 documents prepared for or by; the local government? When applicable, Section 106 documents are sent to the HPC for their review and comment There have been no federal related projects involving a Saratoga heritage resource this reporting period • What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing Section 106 documents for projects that are proposed within the jurisdiction of the local government? If a project was subject to Section 106, the HPC would review and provide comments on the matter. II. Establish an Adequate and Qualified Historic Preservation Review Commission by State or Local Legislation. A. Commission Membership Name Professional Discipline Date Appointed Date Term Ends Email Address 9 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 4 Attach resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for all members. 1. If you do not have two qualified professionals on your commission, explain why the professional qualifications not been met and how professional expertise is otherwise being provided. N/A 2. If all positions are not currently filled, why is there a vacancy, and when will the position will be filled? Currently 1 Vacnacy to be filled by April 2022. Alexandra Nugent Retired Educator Saratoga Historical Foundation Nominee 4/2012 12/31/2020 alexandranugent@sbcglobal.ne t Annette Stransky Retired Educator Member at large (interest in Historic Preservation) 4/2012 12/31/2021 rina_u_shah@yahoo.com Dr. Jo Rodgers College Professor Architectural History/Anthropology 12/2016 12/31/2020 jo_rainie@yahoo.com Rina Shah City Planner 1/2011 12/31/2022 rina_u_shah@yahoo.com Priya Shastri WMWARE (Technical Staff) 4/2021 12/21/2024 priya.shastri@gmail.com Marie Lopresto Retired from IBM Sales/Martekting management/product line planning 2/16/2021 12/31/2024 marielopresto6@gmail.com Sharon Boyce-Bender Principal, Boyce & Associates Property Manager 6/2021 12/31/2024 thebender4@gmail.com Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. 10 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 5 B. Staff to the Commission/CLG staff 1. Is the staff to your commission the same as your CLG coordinator? ☒ Yes ☐ No If not, who serves as staff? Click or tap here to enter text. 2. If the position(s) is not currently filled, why is there a vacancy? Type here. Attach resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for staff. C. Attendance Record Please complete attendance chart for each commissioner and staff member. Commissions are required to meet four times a year, at a minimum. If you haven’t met at least four times, explain why not. Name/Title Discipline Dept. Affiliation Email Address Nicole Johnson City Planner Community Development njohnson@saratoga.ca.us Commissioner/Staff Oct Nov Dec Jan (canc eled) Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Alexandra Nugent ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Annette Stansky ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Rina Shah ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Dr. Jo Rodgers ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Priya Shastri ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Marie Lopresto ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☐ Sharon Boyce-Bender ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ Type here. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Type here. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ 11 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 6 D. Training Received Indicate what training each commissioner and staff member has received. Remember it is a CLG requirement is that all commissioners and staff to the commission attend at least one training program relevant to your commission each year. It is up to the CLG to determine the relevancy of the training. Commissioner/Staff Name Training Title & Description (including method presentation, e.g., webinar, workshop) Duration of Training Training Provider Date Alexandra Nugent Seven Aspects of Integrity 1 Hr CPF 11/17/20 Annette Starnasky Sites of Conscience, Identifying Cultural Heritage (California Preservation Foundation) 1 Hr CPF 7/21 and 7/27/21 Rinah Shah Where Wright went wrong. (California Preservation Foundation) 1 Hr CPF 3/30/2021 Dr. Jo Rodgers Sites of Conscience, Identifying Cultural Heritage 1 Hr CPF 11/17/20 Priya Shastri Since the 1970s - Part 2: Privately Owned Public Open Space and Postmodernism at the Embarcadero, SF (California Preservation Foundation) Since the 70s - Part 3: "Postwar Public Plazas 1 Hr CPF 5/5/21 5/22/21 Commissioner/Staff Oct Nov Dec Jan (canc eled) Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Type here. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ 12 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 7 California Preservation Foundation) Marie Lopresto Endangered Sites of Diversity (California Preservation Foundation) 1 Hr CPF 2/3/21 Sharon Boyce-Bender Tax Credit Case Example for Historic Preservation. 1 Hr CPF 9/22/21 Nicole Johnson Ghostlore vs Fakelore: Historic Properties, Haunted Reputations, The Hotel Cecil and More! (California Preservation Foundation) Modernist Masters and Methods: A Five-Part Series (California Preservation Foundation) 1 Hr CPF 3/11/21 3/23/20 III. Maintain a System for the Survey and Inventory of Properties that Furthers the Purposes of the National Historic Preservation Act A. Historical Contexts: initiated, researched, or developed in the reporting year (excluding those funded by OHP) NOTE: California CLG procedures require CLGs to submit survey results, including historic contexts, to OHP. (If you have not done so, submit an electronic copy or link if available online with this report.) Context Name Description How it is Being Used Date Submitted to OHP N/A Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. B. New Surveys or Survey Updates (excluding those funded by OHP) 13 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 8 NOTE: The evaluation of a single property is not a survey. Also, material changes to a property that is included in a survey, is not a change to the survey and should not be reported here. How are you using the survey data? Type here. IV. Provide for Adequate Public Participation in the Local Historic Preservation Program A. Public Education What public outreach, training, or publications programs has the CLG undertaken? How were the commissioners and staff involved? Please provide an electronic link to all publications or other products not previously provided to OHP. Item or Event Description Date Harvest Day National Preservation Month The HPC had an informational table at the City’s Harvest Day event and provided historical information to the public. The HPC hosted an event at Villa Montalvo to celebrate National Preservation Month. June 2021 May 2021 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ANNUAL PRODUCTS REPORTS FOR CLGS NOTE: OHP will forward this information to NPS on your behalf.CLG Inventory Program During the reporting period (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2021) how many historic properties did your local government add to the CLG inventory? This is the total number of historic properties and contributors to districts (or your best estimate of Survey Area Context Based- yes/no Level: Reconnaissance or Intensive Acreage # of Properties Surveyed Date Completed Date Submitted to OHP N/A Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. Type here. 14 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 9 the number) added to your inventory from all programs, local, state, and Federal, during the reporting year. These might include National Register, California Register, California Historic Landmarks, locally funded surveys, CLG surveys, and local designations. Program area Number of Properties added Type here. Type here. A. Local Register (i.e., Local Landmarks and Historic Districts) Program 1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020) did you have a local register program to create local landmarks and/or local districts (or a similar list of designations) created by local law? ☐Yes ☒ No 2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been added to your register or designated from October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019? Click or tap here to enter text. C. Local Tax Incentives Program 1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2021) did you have a Local Tax Incentives Program, such as the Mills Act? ☒ Yes ☐ No 2. If the answer is yes, how many properties have been added to this program from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021? Click or tap here to enter text. Name of Program Number of Properties Added During 2020-2021 Total Number of Properties Benefiting From Program Mills Act Two 14 D. Local “bricks and mortar” grants/loan program 1. 20uring the reporting period (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2021) did you have a local government historic preservation grant and/or loan program for rehabilitating/restoring historic properties? ☐Yes ☒No 2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021? Type here. 15 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 10 Name of Program Number of Properties that have Benefited Type here. Type here. E. Design Review/Local Regulatory Program 1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2021) did your local government have a historic preservation regulatory law(s) (e.g., an ordinance) authorizing Commission and/or staff review of local government projects or impacts on historic properties? ☐ Yes ☒ No 2. If the answer is yes, how many historic properties did your local government review for compliance with your local government’s historic preservation regulatory law(s) from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021? Type here. F. Local Property Acquisition Program 1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2020--September 30, 2021) did you have a local program to acquire (or help to acquire) historic properties in whole or in part through purchase, donation, or other means? ☐Yes ☒ No 2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021 Type here. Name of Program Number of Properties that have Benefited Type here. Type here. IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM CLG REQUIREMENTS, OHP IS INTERESTED IN YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THE RECENT CAMP TRAINING • Did anyone from your local government participate in the free CAMP training opportunities in Fall 2021? No • If yes, which training session(s) did you find the most informative and useful? 16 Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) 11 • Whether or not you were able to take advantageof any of the CAMP trainings in 2021, would you like to see OHP to provide free additional CAMPs in the future? Yes XII Attachments (electronic) ☒ Resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for all commission members/alternatives and staff ☒ Minutes from commission meetings ☒ Drafts of proposed changes to the ordinance ☐ Drafts of proposed changes to the General Plan ☒ Public outreach publications Email to: info.calshpo@parks.ca.gov 17 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: March 8, 2022 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Item 6b-2022/2023 Workplan March 28, 2022 has been selected as the date for the City Council Special Meeting with the Heritage Preservation Commission, Library Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Public Art Commission and Traffic Safety Commission to discuss Commission Work Plans. The meeting will be conducted by Zoom and is scheduled to begin at 6:00 p.m. Each Commission will have 30 minutes to provide the Work Plan and answer questions. HPC is schduled to meet with Council at 6:00 p.m, however, this time may change a regular agenda will be sent out the week before the meeting. Each Commission will be given 30 minutes with the City Council. It is not required to attend the entire evening, although you are welcome to do so. The HPC needs to spcificlly discuss/consider the budget request and number of POI markers for the workplan. Attachment: 1. Draft 2022/2023 HPC workplan 2. 2021/2022 approved HPC workplan 18 Page 1 of 2 Heritage Resource Inventory. Continue their duty as commissioners to recommend and work with property owners to add eligible properties to the Heritage Resource Inventory. This fiscal year, the HPC has so far added two (2) sites to the Heritage Resource Inventory and one (1) Heritage Tree. There are currently nine (9) sites for consideration to be included on the Inventory. Continuing Education. The City of Saratoga is a Certified Local Government (CLG) recognized by the State of California Office of Preservation (OHP). The CLG requires that all commissioners receive annual training in Historic Preservation. Saratoga Avenue (Heritage Lane) Inventory. Review, update, video documentation and inventory of all the homes, fences and trees along the portion of Saratoga Avenue that is designated as Heritage Lane, for the potential addition to the City’s Heritage Resource Inventory. Public Outreach. Continue to participate in City events such as the Blossom Festival, Arbor Day, Historic Preservation Month, the State of the City, and provide information about the City’s historic preservation efforts at these events. Collaborate with the City’s Public Information Officer in utilizing social media platforms and add helpful links and documents and informational videos to the HPC webpage. Such items would include, but not limited to, advantages of putting structures and trees on the Inventory, reaching out to property owners on the Heritage Resource Inventory about applying for Landmark status, the Mills Act program, informational signage for the Heritage Orchard, and pride in our historic community. Plaques/Point of Interest Markers. To properly recognize heritage resources and properties of special interest in our City, the HPC would like to continue recommending to Council special sites that warrant Point of Interest Markers (POI). The City, at the recommendation of the HPC, there are currently five POI markers being prepared for installation. The HPC is requesting funding for X number of markers for the 2022/23 FY. Notable Accomplishments During fiscal year 2021/2022, the HPC placed two properties on the Heritage Resource inventory, one heritage tree designation, established three landmark properties, and participated in the Housing Element update. The HPC reviewed seven development applications for work to be performed upon a heritage resource. In addition, HPC members attended several online webinars focusing on historic preservation. 19 Page 2 of 2 Budget Request The Heritage Preservation Commission would like to request a budget allocation of $10,930 for 2022/23. Request Requested Allocation Five new point of interest markers (wall mounted plaques, plaques on redwood posts/boulders and installation) $7,930 Training & Membership (California Preservation Foundation) $2,500 Preservation Month activities in May: (poster, speaker, photo display-note photo display can be used year- after-year, etc.) $500 Total $10,930 Commission Membership: Name Term Ending Eligible for Reappointment Priya Shastri (Chair) 12/31/2021 Yes Marie Lopresto (Vice Chair) 12/31/2024 Yes Rina Shah 12/31/2022 No Sharon Boyce-Bender 12/31/2023 Yes Vacant 20 CITY OF SARATOGA Memorandum To: Mayor Zhao & Members of the Saratoga City Council From: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner Date: March 30, 2021 Subject: Heritage Preservation Commission Work Plan On March 9, 2021, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) held their regularly scheduled meeting and discussed their upcoming 2021/22 fiscal year (FY) work plan. Heritage Resource Inventory. Continue their duty as commissioners to recommend and work with property owners to add eligible properties to the Heritage Resource Inventory. This fiscal year, the HPC has so far added two (2) sites to the Heritage Resource Inventory. There are currently 16 sites for consideration to be included on the Inventory. Continuing Education. The City of Saratoga is a Certified Local Government (CLG) recognized by the State of California Office of Preservation (OHP). The CLG requires that all commissioners receive annual training in Historic Preservation. Saratoga Avenue (Heritage Lane) Inventory. Review, update, video documentation and inventory of all the homes, fences and trees along the portion of Saratoga Avenue that is designated as Heritage Lane, for the potential addition to the City’s Heritage Resource Inventory. Public Outreach. Continue to participate in City events such as the Blossom Festival, Arbor Day, Historic Preservation Month, the State of the City, and provide information about the City’s historic preservation efforts at these events. Collaborate with the City’s Public Information Officer in utilizing social media platforms and add helpful links and documents and informational videos to the HPC webpage. Such items would include, but not limited to, advantages of putting structures and trees on the Inventory, reaching out to property owners on the Heritage Resource Inventory about applying for Landmark status, the Mills Act program, informational signage for the Heritage Orchard, and pride in our historic community. Plaques/Point of Interest Markers. To properly recognize heritage resources and properties of special interest in our City, the HPC would like to continue recommending to Council special sites that warrant Point of Interest Markers (POI). The City, at the recommendation of the HPC, has installed four (4) POI markers in 2019 and are currently working on the language for the 2020/21 POI’s to present to the Council in the upcoming months. The HPC is requesting funding for five markers for the 2021/22 FY. 21 Notable Accomplishments During fiscal year 2020/2021, the HPC worked with Orchardist Matthew Sutton to finalize the Heritage Orchard Master Plan that was approved by City Council in December 2020. In addition to placing two properties on the Heritage Resource inventory and establishing two landmark properties, the HPC reviewed five development applications for work to be performed upon a heritage resource. In addition, HPC members attended several online webinars focusing on historic preservation. Budget Request The Heritage Preservation Commission would like to request a budget allocation of $10,930 for 2021/22. Request Requested Allocation Five new point of interest markers (wall mounted plaques, plaques on redwood posts/boulders and installation) $7,930 Training & Membership (California Preservation Foundation) $2,500 Preservation Month activities in May: (poster, speaker, photo display-note photo display can be used year-after-year, etc.) $500 Total $10,930 Commission Membership: Name Term Ending Eligible for Reappointment Rina Shah (Chair) 12/31/2022 No Annette Stransky (Vice Chair 12/31/2021 No Marie Lopresto 12/31/2024 Yes Vacant - - Vacant - - Roles & Responsibilities - City Code Section 13-10.040: The Heritage Commission shall be advisory only to the City Council, the Planning Commission and the agencies and departments of the City and shall establish liaison and work in conjunction with such authorities to implement the purposes of this Chapter. The Heritage Commission shall have the following powers and duties: a) Conduct, or cause to be conducted, a comprehensive survey of properties within the boundaries of the City for the purpose of establishing the Heritage Resource Inventory. To qualify for inclusion in the Heritage Resource Inventory, a property must satisfy any one or more of the criteria listed in Section 13-15.010 of this Chapter. The Inventory shall be publicized and periodically updated, and a copy thereof shall be kept on file in the Planning Department. b) Recommend to the City Council specific proposals for designation as a historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district. 22 c) Recommend to the appropriate City agencies or departments projects and action programs for the recognition, conservation, enhancement and use of the City's heritage resources, including standards to be followed with respect to any applications for permits to construct, change, alter, remodel, remove or otherwise affect such resources. d) Review and comment upon existing or proposed ordinances, plans or policies of the City as they relate to heritage resources. e) Review and comment upon all applications for building, demolition, grading or tree removal permits involving work to be performed upon or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district, and all applications for tentative map approval, rezoning, building site approval, use permit, variance approval, design review or other approval pertaining to or significantly affecting any heritage resource. The Commission’s comments shall be forwarded to the City agency or department processing the application within thirty days after receiving the request for such comments. f) Investigate and report to the City Council on the availability of federal, state, county, local or private funding sources or programs for the rehabilitation and preservation of heritage resources. g) Cooperate with county, state and federal governments and with private organizations in the pursuit of the objectives of heritage conservation. h) Upon the request of a property owner or occupant and at the discretion of the Heritage Commission, render advice and guidance on the conservation, rehabilitation, alteration, decoration, landscaping or maintenance of any heritage resource; such voluntary advice and guidance shall not impose any regulation or control over any property. i) Participate in, promote and conduct public information and educational programs pertaining to heritage resources. j) Perform such other functions as may be delegated to it by resolution or motion of the City Council. 23 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: March 9, 2022 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Item 6c-2022 Blossom Festival HPC is cordially invited to participate in the 2022 Blossom Festival in Saratoga. The Festival takes place Saturday, April 9 from 10-4 PM. Antique cars, art, crafts, live music and more will be part of the Eighth Annual Blossom Festival held at the Heritage Orchard and Saratoga Civic Center (13777 Fruitvale Avenue in Saratoga, CA). The event is free and open to the public. Activities include a wide range of music, entertainment, paintings, Saratoga historical characters, artists, local organizations and artisans. Gourmet food trucks will also be part of the fun. Children’s activity tables, petting zoo, and more are planned. The Girl Scouts are handing out flowers to visitors commemorating the historic festival. First produced in 1900, this historic event ran successfully for 41 years. Come help celebrate this tradition. Produced by the Saratoga Historical Foundation and sponsored by the city of Saratoga. Just provide your own table and canopy. In the past HPC members have taken shifts to cover the entire festival. 24 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: March 9, 2022 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Item 6d-National Preservation Month May is National Preservation Month. The HPC should consider ideas to partcipate. Attachments: 1. Flyer from Santa Clara County 25   To all who are interested in historical preservation in Santa Clara County:    My name is Bill Hare, District 3 Commissioner on the Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission, as well as President of the Milpitas Historical Society.     May is National Preservation Month. The National Trust for Historic Preservation created this yearly celebration highlighting local preservation efforts nearly half a century ago. In many other parts of the country, the month of May is marked with historical tours, preservation award ceremonies, photo/art contests, and other festivities to bring awareness to the need for historic preservation.    It is time to bring these traditions to Santa Clara County, while at the same time educating our residents about the importance of historic preservation before any more of our historically- signiﬁcant structures and sites are lost forever!    The Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission, Preservation Action Council of San Jose, San Jose Historic Landmarks Commission, California Pioneers of Santa Clara County, and History San Jose are partnering together as the new Santa Clara County Preservation Alliance! We are now planning an event to honor the efforts of historical preservation projects in every corner of Santa Clara County.     In order to fully represent the efforts in every corner of our county, we are hoping community historical and preservation/conservation entities as well as preservation-minded individuals will join with us so we can all spread the excitement about local history as well as show the urgency of preserving local historical landmarks.    These are some of the plans/ideas so far:  * A National Historic Preservation Month celebration will be held at History San Jose at 7PM   on May 21, 2022. The event will be held outside, with live historical music, a big screen   for presentations, and more! You, of course, can help us with ideas for the “more” part. *An awards ceremony during the May 21 event, to honor those individuals and groups who have made a signiﬁcant difference in preservation efforts all over Santa Clara County. Nominations for these awards will come from (and be presented by) the participating groups such as yours. Again, it is your participation that will help us make this a successful countywide event.  *Other possibilities include a Photo and Art contest and exhibition, history tours given by docents of various societies around the county, an online space where we can all share ideas and take pride in the history of the entire county, and more!    We are interested in hearing any other ideas from the local historical entities, as well as any experience any group has had in conjunction with National Historic Preservation Month in years past. We hope you can join us in this endeavor!    Please contact me via email (bill@billhare.tv) or phone (408) 262-1776 to let me know if you would be interested in becoming a part of this!  26 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: March 9, 2022 TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Item 8a-Heritage Orchard Update At the February 8, 2022 meeting, the HPC requrested that the City Orchardist attend the March HPC Meeting. The orchardist will be providing a verbal update and has provided the attached documents. Attachments: 1. Documents from the City Orchardist 27 From:Matthew Sutton To:Nicole Johnson Cc:Darrin Petzer Subject:Re: March 8th HPC Meeting Date:Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:49:39 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Sounds good. Can you forward this message so that everyone can understand? Let me know if this isn’t clear… Oak Root Fungus (ORF) treatment has begun. While there is no way to eradicate this soil based pathogen, there are ways to mitigate the spread and slow the killing of the trees. This multi pronged approach that we are following (based off of consultation with the soils lab and other professionals in the industry) goes as follows: -Root crown excavation- COMPLETE- this is the process of using an air spade (video I sent to you) to excavate the soil right around the root crown. By doing this, we are buying time for the existing trees. The way the ORF spreads is by infecting roots and then following those roots up to the crown (point where the trunk and first roots meet) and then kills the tree. By keeping the root crown exposed to air and dry, it will keep the ORF from infecting that tissue. ORF needs moisture to spread and infect. -Irrigation splitters- COMPLETE- we installed splitters on all the new irrigation heads so that water does not splash on the trunks of the trees. Also will be adjusting our irrigation schedule to allow a longer dry down between waterings. -Tree planting- Winter 2023- We were all set with doing the big 400 tree plant out last month (as we had ordered the trees back in July 21’), but when we got the lab test results (in Oct 21’) we had to change course. There are very few rootstocks that are resistant to the ORF, and there are none that are immune. We canceled our order for this year as the trees we had on order were on similar rootstocks that are currently in the orchard and NOT resistant to ORF. We contracted with the nursery to grow us new trees on a ORF resistant rootstock. This resistant rootstock is not very common, so the trees were not available to purchase this year with such short notice. IN general, orchardists need to put in their tree order before June, for the following winter plant out. Unfortunately, the existing trees in the orchard were not selected for this resistance, so we will see tree death over the years caused by ORF. To stay ahead of the curve and make sure we have replacements for any of the existing trees that fall to ORF, we ordered an extra 100 trees that we will plant in the back 40 of the orchard as a ‘holding nursery’. This way each winter we will have trees on hand to replace/replant any that have died. I can answer more questions about this plan at the meeting. Thanks! 28 Matthew Sutton Founder/President Orchard Keepers Inc. 831-566-2947 matthew@orchardkeepers.com 29 2/25/2022 Oak Root Fungus (ORF) Report Saratoga Historic Orchard Summary Orchard Keepers began caring for the Saratoga Historic Orchard in Spring of 2020. At that time the orchard presented approximately 400 vacancies where fruit trees had died over the prior years. Since then, another (approximately) 20-25 trees have died, bringing the total up to around 425 open spots for trees. Tree death in commercial fruit orchards is a relatively common occurrence, that said, since we are new to the orchard we have not been privy to ‘why’ these 400 trees died over time. Or why they weren’t replanted. In the Spring of 2021, we (Orchard Keepers) ordered over 400 trees to replant the orchard. In the fruit growing industry, the common practice is for the orchardist to order their trees as early in the growing season as possible with the vision to plant them out the subsequent winter. These ordered trees were slated for a plant out in late ‘21 or Jan ‘22. All trees are 1 year trees that are delivered as ‘bare root’ in the dormancy of winter. In September of ‘21, we observed 3 healthy trees fail (die) in a number of weeks with no obvious signs of distress, and with the neighboring trees doing just fine. We took samples of the tissue and sent them to the lab for diagnostics. See attachment. Unfortunately, the results showed that Armallaria (Oak Root Fungus- ORF) was present and the culprit of the trees’ death. (See below for more info on the disease). Seeing that there is no way to completely eradicate ORF, we consulted with the lab and other soil pathogen professionals to put together a plan to help mitigate the spread of the pathogen and to prolong the life of the trees. (See below for step by step plan). One of the main ways to combat this disease is to plant new trees that are on a resistant rootstock. Currently there are no Prunus (the genus of plums and apricots) rootstocks that are immune, and very few that are resistant to ORF. 30 The trees that we had ordered in the Spring ‘21 were not on a resistant rootstock (as we did not know of the presence of ORF). After learning of the diagnosis, we proceeded to test more tissue in the orchard to see how widespread the pathogen was. Unfortunately, in other samples we took (of decaying wood), ORF was present. We canceled our tree order (since these trees would surely succumb to the ORF in a matter of 5-10 years after planting) and put in a new order for 500 trees grafted onto a resistant rootstock. These new trees will be grown this year (2022) and then we will plant them out in January of ‘23. We tried to source trees on this resistant rootstock for planting now, but all were sold out. We are confident that waiting this year for the right tree to plant will allow for decades of enjoyment for each tree. For clarity’s sake– there is no ‘cure’ for having ORF in the soil. All of the various mitigation efforts we are employing now and through this year are each 10%-20% solutions. By using many different techniques we are hoping to prolong the life of the existing trees, and give the new trees (to be planted in January) a great shot at a healthy life. Oak Root Fungus- what is it? ●Soil-borne pathogen that preys upon plant roots, eventually following the smaller feeder roots back to the root crown of the plant, and kills the plant. ●Can it be eradicated? There are no chemicals-, organic or synthetic, that will completely eradicate the disease. ●It can be present in the soil for decades. It is likely the cause of much of the tree death in the orchard over the last 50 years. Its host is living and decaying plant roots, which presents the problem. ●ORF preys upon plants as well as trees. It is not specific to who or what it attacks. ●This disease is responsible for millions of dollars in losses to the fruit growing industry every year. ●Since there is no chemical control, most of the research is in breeding resistant rootstocks. ●When ORF is present, what are the best ways to mitigate the advancement? Keeping the root crown exposed and dry, planting resistant rootstock, not planting plants that are susceptible to the disease, implementing best irrigation practices so that the soil is never too wet, digging out as many roots as possible and quickly when a tree does die from ORF. 31 Mitigation Efforts at the Saratoga Orchard ●As mentioned above, we postponed the big replant so that we could get the best planting rootstock available. Planting will commence in January ‘23. We also see the writing on the wall in terms of the nature of this disease, so we ordered an extra 80 trees. We will grow these trees in the ‘back 40’ of the orchard, so that as more trees do fail from this disease, we will have replacements that will be better suited for this growing environment. As we remove dead trees, we are removing as much of the old/decaying roots as possible, as this is one of the places the ORF lives. ●Root crown excavations– this is the process of using an air spade (compressed air) to excavate the soil right around the root crown. By doing this, we are buying time for the existing trees. The way the ORF spreads is by infecting roots and then following those roots up to the root crown (point where the trunk and first roots meet) and then kills the tree. By keeping the root crown exposed to air and dry, it will keep the ORF from infecting that tissue. ORF needs moisture to spread and infect. This process is COMPLETE. ●Irrigation splitters– we installed splitters on all the new irrigation heads so that water does not splash on the trunks of the trees. This will allow the trunks/root crowns to stay dry and hopefully free of disease. We will be adjusting our irrigation schedule to allow a longer dry down between waterings during the growing season. The irrigation splitter install is COMPLETE. ●Remove trees that are dead or dying from the orchard– when we first started work at the orchard in 2020, we removed close to 100 dead trees from the orchard. In retrospect, these dead/decaying trees were acting as vectors for this pathogen to proliferate, as ORF attacks both living and dead tissue. COMPLETE ●Cover cropping– planting a diversity of cover crops builds a strong diversity of soil microbiology which provides checks and balances against pathogenic organisms. ONGOING ●Reduced tillage– reduced soil disturbance to allow for soil microbiology to rehabilitate. Excessive tillage and bare soils do not contribute to the health of soil microorganisms. ONGOING While there is no cure-all for the ORF, we are confident that these mitigation efforts will 32 promote the health and longevity of the orchard for many years to come. There will be more trees that die due to this pathogen, but now that we have a positive id for what has been killing trees over all these years, we have a clear view of what we can do to promote health and plant new trees that won’t suffer the same fate as their predecessors. 33 Customer Code: Invoice Date: Invoice No.: Summary of Lab Tests and Results 10/19/2021 Period Covered: October 2021 Orchard Keepers Matthew Sutton 831-566-2947 matthew@orchardkeepers.com Code No. of samples Date of receipt TCD lab # Sample ID Material & analyses Results Charges 1 10/08/21 21100822 Apricot: Saratoga Plant: pathogens Roots are positive for Armillaria root rot (Armillaria mellea). Other pathogens (such as Phytophthora) are not detected. TOTAL 34 Customer Code: Invoice Date: Invoice No.: Summary of Lab Tests and Results 11/30/2021 Period Covered: November 2021 Orchard Keepers Matthew Sutton, 831-566-2947 matthew@orchardkeepers.com Darrin Petzer darrin@orchardkeepers.com Code No. of samples Date of receipt TCD lab # Sample ID Material & analyses Results Charges 1 11/23/21 21112305 Prune/plum: zone 5 Plant: pathogens In this sample, one root piece is positive for Armillaria root rot (Armillaria mellea). Some other roots show discoloration and decay but Phytophthora or other pathogens are not detected. TOTAL 35 Project Status Worksheet APN/Location Address Staff/Commissioner Assigned Status 503 24 087 3rd Street 20640 TBD Owner working on obtaining documents 397 23 040 Lutheria Way 14321 Lopresto/Shastri 397 22 040 Orchard Road 20290 TBD 503 48 045 Congress Springs Rd 22000 (Quarry)Shah Loading Structure 503 23 008 Marion Rd 20602 Boyce-Bender 517 20 019 Montalvo Road 14900 TBD 389 26 021 Montpere Way 18530 Boyce-Bender 397 31 003 Saratoga Ave 14285 Lopresto 397 31 004 Saratoga Ave 14301 Lopresto 397 16 055 14120 Shadow Oaks - Tree 397 42 002 14250 Douglas Lane Memorial Park 517 12 036 14766 Oak St- Madronia Cemetery 397 30 053 13650 Saratoga Ave-Heritage Orchard April 9 (10 AM-4 PM) TBD TBD Harvest Day 2022 TBD May 2022 Ongoing Ongoing Johnson TBD Johnson HPC Recommendation to CC. CC meeting date TBD Staff Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Community Outreach via Social Media Training Balance Saratoga Ave Heritage Lane Inventory Village Inventory Heritage Lane Ord. Amendment Heritage Resource Inventory Ord. Amendment Grover House Development Update Events Budget Other Blossom Festival 2022 State of the City 2022 Arbor Day 2022 Preservation Month 2022 Approved $11,600.00 $4,803.00 Potential Heritage Resource Inventory Candidates Other Historic Landmarks Point of Interest Markers (POI) Heritage Plaques/Signage Page 1 of 2 3/2/2022 36 Historic Resource Inventory Year/Fiscal Year Notes Added Montpere Way 18500 2015 Shubert Dr 19277 2017-2018 Lutheria Way Entrance Posts 14200 & 14221 Lutheria Way 2018-2019 Saratoga Av 13601 (St Andrew's)2018-2019 DeHavilland Drive 19461 2019-2020 Entrance Planter DeHavilland Drive 19152 2019-2020 Entrance Planter DeHavviland Drive 19174 2021-2022 Eichler Home Park Place 20390 2019-2020 Saratoga Federated Church Bell Shubert Drive 19201 2019-2020 Entrance Planter Shubert Drive 19401 2019-2020 Entrance Planter Montpere Way 18485 2019-2020 Home Orchard Road 20331 2019-2020 Peck House Saratoga-Los Gatos Road 20450 2020-2021 Historical Park Saratoga-Los Gatos Road 20450 2020-2021 Interurban Stop Discontinued Allendale 19365 2017 Owner did not want house on Inventory Orchard Road 20328 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. On January 2, 2019, staff was informed that the property Orchard Road 20350 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. Owner has contacted City and is hesitant about being put Elva Ave - Russian Church 14220 2019 (Stransky)Letter sent for 45 day comment period. Period up on January 14th. Church responded that they do not want to be included DeHavilland 19222 2021(Lopresto/Shastri)Let sent for 45 day comment period. Period ended 11/8/2021. No response from the owner. DeHavilland 19223 2021 (Lopresto/Shastri)Let sent for 45 day comment period. Period ended 11/8/2021. No response from the owner. Saratoga Ave 13650 (Library)2021 (Stransky)Hold Saratoga Ave 13718 (Sacred Heart)2021 (Lopresto)(Owner Requested to Hold Saratoga-Los Gatos Road 20318 2021 (Stransky)Owner Requested to Hold La Palmoa Ave 20295 2021 (Stransky)Owner Requested to Hold DeHavilland 19246 2022 (Lopresto/Shastri)Let sent for 45 day comment period. Period ended 01/17/22. No response from the owner. Landmarks Added Peach Hill Road 15320 2020-2021 Landmark and Mills Act Carey House Orchard Road 20331 2019-2020 Landmark and Mills Act Peck House Shubert Dr 19277 2020-2021 Landmark and Mills Act Kenji Matsuda House Discontinued Bella Vista 20021 2014 Lack of owner consent Big Basin Way 14501-14503 2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design Fruitvale 14251 2014 Lack of owner consent Big Basin Way 14519 2014 Lack of owner consent 1Big Basin Way (20640 Third St) 4413-14415 2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design Big Basin Way 14495 2014 Lack of owner consent plus not eligible as it lacks sufficient integrity to its original design Pierce Rd 14754 2014 Lack of owner consent Old Grandview Ranch 2015 Owner did not want house as a landmark Heritage Tree Inventory Added Palm Trees - Yerba Santa Court 2017-2018 Point of Interest Markers Installed Theater of the Glade Site Point of Interest Marker 2017-2018 Saratoga Ave/Saratoga-Los Gatos Road Blossom Festival Point of Interest Marker 2017-2018 Saratoga Ave/Saratoga-Los Gatos Road Ohlone Indians 2019/2020 Wildwood Park Saloons 2019/2020 within the road right of way adjacent to 14535 Big Basin Way Saratoga Paper Mill 2019/2020 within the road right of way adjacent to 14650 Big Basin Way Caledonia Pasteboard Mill 2019/2020 Wildwood Park Approved Big Basin Way near the Buy and Save Market McCartysville Big Basin Way where Bank of America is located-the parking lot is where Immigrating to CA Quito Road El Quito Olive Farm Saratoga-Los Gatos Road Glen Una Ranch Big Basin Way and Third St Saratoga Vitaphone Other Village Design Guidelines 2019 City Council meeting scheduled Approved by CC 8/21/19 Memorial Arch 2019/2020 Completed February 2020 Completed Feb 2020 Heritage Orchard Master Plan Update 2020/2021 City Council Approved by CC 12/02/20 Publications Heritage Tree Guidebook 2017 FAQ's Historic Preservation 2017 FAQ's Heritage Trees 2017 FAQ's Mills Act 2017-2018 FAQ's Landmarks 2017-2018 Training Federal Fiscal Year Webinar CA Modern Architecture 2017/2018 Webinar Identifying and Treating Historic Wood 2018/2019 Webinar Examples in Sourcing and Repairing California's Historic 2018/2019 Deep Dive into the Secretory of Interior Standards 2019/2020 2/20/2020-Shah, Nugent & Johnson Eichler Home Tour 2019/2020 37