HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-26-2022 Heritage Preseservation Commission SPECIAL MEETING Agenda PacketPage 1 of 3
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
April 26, 2022
8:30 AM SPECIAL MEETING
Teleconference/Public Participation Information to Mitigate the Spread of
COVID‐19
This meeting will be held entirely by teleconference. All members of the HPC and
staff will only participate via the Zoom platform using the process described below.
The meeting is being conducted pursuant to recent amendments to the
teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act allowing teleconferencing
during a proclaimed state of emergency when local official have recommended social
distancing. The purpose of the amendments is to provide the safest environment for
the public, elected officials, and staff while allowing for continued operation of the
government and public participation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Members of the public can view and participate in Meeting by:
1. Using the Zoom website https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81860425594 or App
(Webinar ID 818 6042 5594) and using the tool to raise their hand in the
Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR
2. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID 818 6042
5594 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when
directed by the Chair.
The public will not be able to participate in the meeting in person.
Methods of viewing the meeting will be listed on the meeting agenda. The public will
not be able to participate in the meeting in person. In accordance with the Americans
with Disabilities Act and the Governor’s Executive Order, if you need assistance to
participate in this meeting due to a disability, please contact the City Clerk at
bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the
meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to
provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety.
Page 2 of 3
1. Site Visit(s)
a. None
2. Call to Order
3. Roll Call- Sharon Boyce-Bender, Marie Lopresto, Rina Shah, and Priya Shastri
4. Oral Communications
Any member of the public may address the Commission about any matter not
on the agenda for this meeting for up to three minutes. Commissioners may
not comment on the matter but may choose to place the topic on a future
agenda.
5. New Business
A. 18485 Montpere Way
6. Staff Comments
7. Old Business
A. 14666 Oak Street (Continued from the April 12, 2022 meeting)
8. Commission Items
9. Adjournment
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person
and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in
this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 868-1216 or
bavrit@saratoga.ca.us Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one
full business day before the start of the meeting.
Any recommendation made by the Heritage Preservation Commission may be
appealed to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date of the decision.
The appeal shall be taken by filing with the Secretary of the Heritage Preservation
Commission a written notice and filing fee within ten (10) days of the date of the
decision.
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff report, and other
materials provided to the Heritage Preservation Commission by City staff in
connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community
Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California
Page 3 of 3
95070. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made
available for public review at the office of the Director at the time, they are distributed
to the Heritage Preservation Commission.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner, for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing
agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission was posted and
available for public review on April 20, 2022 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale
Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us.
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2022
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 7A-14666 Oak Street (continued from 4/12/22)
Congregational Church Parsonage
APPLICATION: HPC22-0003/LNDMRK22-001/MIL22-0001
Property Location: 14666 Oak Street
Property APN: 517-08-047
Property Owner/Applicant: Tommy and Hongyun Suriwong
Background:
The property owner is requesting that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
recommend that the City Council designate the property as a Historic Landmark. If
the HPC recommends that the property should be designated as a Historic
Landmark, the property owner intends to then file a Mills Act application. The
Landmark designation request and the Mills Act application will both be forwarded
to the City Council for final action.
At the April 12th HPC meeting, the commission continued the application and
requested that the owner submit paint examples for the exterior of the home.
Per City Code Section 13-10.040 (E) the HPC’s Powers and Duties states:
Review and comment upon all applications for building, demolition,
grading or tree removal permits involving work to be performed upon
or within a designated historic landmark, heritage lane or historic
district, and all applications for tentative map approval, rezoning,
building site approval, use permit, variance approval, design review or
other approval pertaining to or significantly affecting any heritage
resource. The Commission's comments shall be forwarded to the City
agency or department processing the application within thirty days
3
Page 2 of 2
after receiving the request for such comments.
The HPC does not typically provide recommendations on the exterior paint colors as
it does not require a permit from the City. However, the property owner has provided
paint and roof samples included in attachment 2.
The house retains adequate character-defining architectural design, workmanship
and materials, as well as a historic location and setting, and the property continues
to represent the historical associations and feelings of this residence.
The Congregational Church Parsonage is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources
Inventory, included as a part of HP-88-01. It qualified under Criteria a and b:
a) the property exemplifies and reflects special elements of the cultural, social,
economic, aesthetic, and architectural history of Saratoga; and
b) the property is identified with persons significant in local history.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that:
• The HPC finds that the structure retains a substantial degree of architectural
and structural integrity with respect to the original design, and
• Recommends that the City Council designate the subject property as a historic
landmark and enter into a Mills Act Contract.
Attachments:
1. Paint and roof samples
2. Memo with attachment from the April 12, 2022 HPC Meeting
4
14666 Oak St
Benjamin Moore Heritage Collection HC-8
Exterior Walls
Benjamin Moore AF-5
Window frames, fence, porch posts
Benjamin Moore Heritage Collection HC-175
Porch Floor
5
6
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2022
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 6c-14666 Oak Street
Congregational Church Parsonage
APPLICATION: HPC22-0003/LNDMRK22-001/MIL22-0001
Property Location: 14666 Oak Street
Property APN: 517-08-047
Property Owner/Applicant: Tommy and Hongyun Suriwong
Background:
The property owner is requesting that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
recommend that the City Council designate the property as a Historic Landmark. If
the HPC recommends that the property should be designated as a Historic
Landmark, the property owner intends to then file a Mills Act application. The
Landmark designation request and the Mills Act application will both be forwarded
to the City Council for final action. The Council will first need to determine whether
or not to designate the property as a Historic Landmark. If the landmark status is
approved, the Council will then make a determination regarding the Mills Act
application (as the property is required to have landmark status in order to be
considered under the Mills Act program).
The property known as Congregational Church Parsonage was added to the Heritage
Resource Inventory in 1988 (HP-88-01). This residence was built on Oak Street around
1886 for the use of the pastor of the Congregational Church. The church was the first
permanent religious organization in Saratoga, with a charter membership of nine
women and one man.
Typical of a National (Pioneer) design, this symmetrical one-and-one-half-story house
has distinctive balloon-framed proportions, primarily visible in the raised eaves of
the cross gabled roof, the narrow roof span and relatively steep roof pitch, as well as
7
Page 2 of 2
the raised floor. The house is side-gabled with an accent gable centered in the front
elevation. Individually placed double-hung windows flank the centered front door.
The fullwidth front porch may be an original design, with simple wood posts and low
banister. The house may have been relocated to this property, as the first floor height
would commonly have been raised on a pony wall. The window sash has been
replaced.
The house retains adequate character-defining architectural design, workmanship
and materials, as well as a historic location and setting, and the property continues
to represent the historical associations and feelings of this residence.
Congregational Church Parsonage is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources
Inventory, included as a part of HP-88-01. It qualified under Criteria a and b:
a) the property exemplifies and reflects special elements of the cultural, social,
economic, aesthetic, and architectural history of Saratoga; and
b) the property is identified with persons significant in local history.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that:
• The HPC finds that the structure retains a substantial degree of architectural
and structural integrity with respect to the original design, and
• Recommends that the City Council designate the subject property as a historic
landmark and enter into a Mills Act Contract.
Attachments:
1. DPR
8
Mount Diablo
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
NRHP Status Code
4of Congregational Church Parsonage*Resource Name or #
HP-88-01 P1. Other identifier:
*P2. Location:
Santa Clara County*a. County
Cupertino*b. USGS 7.5' Quad 1980 Photorevised .8 S.T .2 W.R
Oak St. c. Address:SaratogaCity 95070Zip
10S d. UTM:(give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mE/mN
southeast side of Oak Street southwest of Komina Avenue.
e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
(Assigned by recorder):
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.)
;;
;
Typical of a National (Pioneer) design, this symmetrical one-and-one-half-story house has
distinctive balloon-framed proportions, primarily visible in the raised eaves of the cross-
gabled roof, the narrow roof span and relatively steep roof pitch, as well as the raised
floor. The house is side-gabled with an accent gable centered in the front elevation. One
double-hung window is centered in this front gable at the upper floor of the front facade. At
the first floor, individually placed double-hung windows flank the centered front door. The
door features a 2-lite transom. The channel-rustic siding and flat-board trim is consistent
with the era; uncommon is the narrow board-and-batten siding in the side gable end. The full-
width front porch may be an original design, with simple wood posts and low banister. The
house may have been relocated to this property, as the first floor height would commonly have
been raised on a pony wall. The window sash has been replaced.
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
HP2. Single family property*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)*P4. Resources Present:
None
Location Map
Sketch Map
Continuation Sheet
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Archaeological Record
District Record
Linear Feature Record
Milling Station Record
Rock Art Record
Artifact Record
Photograph Record
Other (List):
*Attachments:
Archives & Architecture: City of Saratoga Statement of Historic Context, 2009.
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".)
View facing east, July 2009.
P5b.Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
Historic Prehistoric Both
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:
Michael John & Debra Ann Cummins
14666 Oak St.
Saratoga CA 95070
*P7. Owner and Address:
Archives & Architecture, LLC
PO Box 1332
San Jose, CA 95109
*P8. Recorded By: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
10/26/09*P9. Date Recorded:
Reconnaissance
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
c1886, 123 years old.
* Required InformationDPR 523A (1/95)
Not for Publication Unrestricted
1
517-08-047APN#
B.M.
F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz
Date
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page
14666
9
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
3CS*NRHP/CRHR Status Code
Congregational Church ParsonageResource Name (Assigned by recorder)
4of
Congregational Church Parsonage B1. Historic Name:
14666 Oak St. B2. Common Name:
Church Parsonage B3. Original Use:ResidenceB4. Present Use:
National/Greek Revival*B5. Architectural Style:
Constructed circa 1886.
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
No Yes Unknown*B7. Moved?n/aDate:n/aOriginal Location:
Garage
*B8. Related Features:
Unknown B9a. Architect:Unknownb. Builder:
Architecture*B10. Significance: Theme Saratoga VillageArea:
c1886Period of Significance:ResidentialProperty Type:(3)Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
Congregational Church Parsonage is listed on the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory,
included as a part of HP-88-01. It qualified under Criteria a and b:
a) the property exemplifies and reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, aesthetic,
and architectural history of Saratoga; and
b) the property is identified with persons significant in local history.
Congregational Church Parsonage also appears eligible for the California Register of Historical
Resources under Criterion (3), as the house embodies the distinctive characteristics of the the
early National/Greek Revival house-type from Saratoga's period of Horticultural Development.
(Continued on page 4, DPR523L)
DPR 523B (1/95)*Required Information
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes)
Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission, Historic
Resources Inventory form, 1988.
*B12. References:
Listed Heritage ResourceB13. Remarks:
Franklin Maggi*B14. Evaluator:
October 26, 2009*Date of Evaluation:
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
(This space reserved for official comments.)
2
HP2. Single family property
Primary #
HRI #
Page
10
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
4of
DPR 523J (1/95)*Required Information
* Map Name:Multiple n.t.s.* Scale:Varies* Date of Map:
Congregational Church Parsonage*Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)3
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page
11
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
4of
DPR 523L (1/95)*Required Information
(Continued from page 2, DPR523b, B10)
Historical Background
This residence was built on Oak Street about 1886 for the use of the pastor of the
Congregational Church. The church was the first permanent religious organization in Saratoga,
with a charter membership of nine women and one man. The first service was on June 2, 1872.
Since there was no Congregational Church in San Jose at that time, Reverend E. M. Betts, pastor
of the new school at First Presbyterian Church in San Jose, held the inaugural services. The
resident pastor, Reverend William Merritt, was appointed in 1875 and it was for his need that
this parsonage was constructed near the church. It has been used continuously as a residence
and maintains the basic appearance with some remodeling through the years.
Integrity
Although altered with replacement window sash, the house retains adequate character-defining
architectural design, workmanship and materials, as well as a historic location and setting
within Saratoga Village, and the property continues to represent the historical associations
and feelings of this residence.
* Recorded By F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz
Congregational Church *Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder)
Continuation Update10/26/2009* Date
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 4
12
Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2022
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Item 5A-18485 Montpere Way
APPLICATION: HPC22-0003
Property Location: 18485 Montpere Way
Property APN: 389-26-027
Property Owner/Applicant: Donald and Gail Randolph
Background:
The subject property was listed on the Heritage Resource Inventory as a heritage
resource in 2019 (HP19-009). The wood clad home is a single story structure designed
by the award winning firm of Anshen & Allen. The style is considered California
Modern. Many of the design elements in this home very much resemble an Eichler
home.
The project proposal includes replacing a non-original bathroom window along the
side of the residence, with a new smaller window glazed with tempered glass as
required by the Health and Safety Code. The replacement window is slightly smaller
and higher than the existing and appears to be more like the original style.
The applicant is also proposing to provide an egress window for a bedroom on the
side of the building. The rear façade is a series of vertical windows This work will
replace reframe the windows and glaze the two fixed frames with clear tempered
glass. The center will be replaced with a vertical, operable, casement window to
provide egress, as required in the health and safety code. Various shed additions that
are not part of the original design are proposed to be removed and not
reconstructed.
13
Page 2 of 3
The applicant provided an evaluation of the proposed work prepared by Urban
Programmers which states that the proposed work does not diminish the
architectural quality of the building or change the architectural character of the
building. The proposed work is in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the HPC consider the applicant’s request for the exterior
modifications and recommended approval of the project.
14
Page 3 of 3
Attachments:
1. Evaluation prepared by Urban Programmers dated April 8, 2022
2. Development plans
15
Susan Walsh, AICP Historic Preservation Officer
City of San Jose
200 E. Santa Clara Street
San Jose CA
Re: 196 N. 3rd Street, San Jose CA
Dear Ms. Walsh,
The referenced property, also known as the former Scottish Rite Temple or the San
Jose Athletic Club is listed in the National Register, and is a historic resource as defied
by CEQA.
The City of San Jose has asked if the rehabilitation be consistent with the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Urban programmers was contacted by T.
Corona, on behalf the owner to provide a third party professional review of the
rehabilitation plans for consistency with the “Standards.”
The rehabilitation work that is proposed is to a front open area in front of the historic
building and not to the historic building.
Background: The Scottish Rite Bodies had this building, their second Temple in San
Jose, was designed by Carl Warner who specialized in Masonic architecture in
Northern California. The building was constructed in 1924, completed and dedicated in
1925. The Neo-Classic designed building exhibits a continuity of architectural design
within the St. James Square Historic District in its columns and ornate detailing – some
in Egyptian motifs. The front façade is a symmetrical temple design with a broad stair
in the center beginning at the edge of the sidewalk and raising to the first story, and
projecting portico with 6 fluted Ionic columns. Both sides of the building recess from the
portico and are mirror images of design with evenly spaced windows on the two upper
floors and mirror elements on the ground level. Elaborately framed niches are behind
tall base structures with Sphinx statues on the top. Further exhibiting the symmetrical
design, on each side of the stairs are tall winged Sphinx sculptures with basins on the
top representing torches. The building had an auditorium that could seat 1,400 and the
largest stage in San Jose, a large kitchen, meeting rooms and a basement that was
finished and used as a second or informal hall. By the 1960s the Scottish Rite Bodies
were looking for a more convenient location, purchasing acreage and eventually
constructing a new Temple in the Willow Glen area, In 1980, the historic building was
sold and rehabilitated at a cost of $6,000,000, opening in 1981, as the San Jose
Athletic Club. This rehabilitation altered the symmetrical design of the front landscaping
by introducing a sectioned ramp on the south side of the property that extends the
width of the property on that side accessing the basement from the street. Boxwood,
oleander and small bushes were planted against the face of the building and along the
ramp. The north side landscaping remained with a patch of lawn and low boxwood
hedges in front of the building. During the 1980 rehabilitation, pine trees were planted
along the north side of the building. Left untrimmed for many years these began to
damage the building and were removed.
Nicole Johnson
Saratoga Planning Department
Saratoga City Hall
1377 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga CA 95070
RE: Evaluation of Remodeling at 18485 Montpere Avenue
Dear Ms. Johnson,
Urban Programmers was asked by the owner to analyze a proposed remodel to correct health and safety
code discrepancies prior to a sale of the property. The proposed work is to reframe one window on the
rear of the building and a bathroom window replacement on the front façade, removal of sheds and
repair of the garage. The house is within a cluster subdivision and does not face onto the street but has
a side wall closest to the Montpere. The entrance is down a walkway and is not visible from the public
way due to mature trees and large bushes.
The subject property is 18485 Montpere Avenue, is recorded in Track 1324, Permont Track, Book 50
page 20-21, lot 24 and is listed in the Saratoga Heritage Resources Inventory for its rendition of Mid
Century architecture, and is one of the Mid-century homes on the block that comprise a small Mid-
century district..
The house was constructed as part of a subdivision of similar Mid-century houses in 1955at the end of
the era of Encroaching Suburbanization 1941-1955 and the beginning of the era of Incorporation (1956- )
as described in the Saratoga Historical Context Statement.
“Saratoga’s population at incorporation was reported in the plan to be about 11,000 residents, a
reported increase of 7,500 people in the six years following the 1950 census. The official 1950
census appears to have used different boundaries and even fewer residents were listed in
Saratoga in 1950: 1,329. By 1970 the official population had expanded to 26,810; the city
increased only about another 3,000 residents over the next thirty years. The population was
concentrated in the mid-1950s in Saratoga Village and the newly developing Quito Road area.”1
Due to the nature of the remodeling work- code compliance- research was not undertaken to determine
the early ownership of the property. A review of building permits did not show any permitted work on
the exterior of the building. Although sheds were constructed against the building It does not appear any
alterations have been made to the building itself. The proposed remodel was compared to the Secretary
of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings.1 .
April 8, 2022
16
Figure 1 Aerial photograph map showing the location and orientation of the house at 18485 Montpere
Way.
The remodel plans include replacing a non-original bathroom window with a new smaller windows
glazed with tempered glass as required by the Health and Safety Code. The replacement window is
slightly smaller and higher than the existing and appears to be more like the original style.
The second area of rehabilitation is to provide an egress window for a bedroom on the SW corner of the
(rear side) of the building. The rear façade is a series of vertical windows This work will replace reframe
the windows and glaze the two fixed frames with clear tempered glass. The center will be replaced with
a vertical , operable. casement window to provide egress, as required in the health and safety code.
Various shed additions that are not part of the original design are proposed to be removed and not
reconstructed. All other changes are interior to one bathroom. The proposed work does not diminish
the architectural quality of the building or change the architectural character of the building. The
proposed work is in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of
Historic Buildings.
17
Figure 1 18485 Montpere Ave. Proposed alteration to the existing building listed in the Saratoga
Historical Resources Inventory. Area of work is shown in the red box.
Drawing source: Signature Home Design Sheet A2
Figure 2 18485 Montpere Proposed facade alterations: Signature Home Design, Wilbert
Givargiz Sheet A.3
Framing and glazing
to replace a non-
original bathroom
window.
Egress
Window
18485
Montpiere
Front façade
facing
Montpiere
18
This photograph shows the non-original
bathroom window to be replaced.
The replacement window will match the trim of
the original windows. A new egress panel will
be installed below the window. This will match
the existing wall.
The replacement window should match other
bathroom windows in the building. The siding
should be replaced with like and kind siding to
match the existing.
A smaller replacement window with wood trim
and siding to match the original will comply
with the “Standards.”
19
Above, the three windows are to have new frames that match the existing and will have
clear tempered panes in the two on the left. The right window will be replaced with a
single casement window following the existing design. The casement window will allow
emergency egress.
The above drawing is the one submitted for review.
To comply with the “Standards” all materials will be the same as exist with the exception
of the casement window. All trim will be repaired or replaced in kind. The overall shape of
the windows will not change.
20
Photograph of the rear of the house showing the 3 windows on the left are the ones to be reframed and
reglazed.
21
Photograph showing the 3 windows to be reframed and reglazed to allow the right section to become a
casement style, operable. For egress.
General Repair and maintenance.
The house and garage show differed maintenance and some wood rot. There were not specific plans for
this work other than in general terms to paint the exterior and repair wood windowsills. The cleaning
of the building should follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for the repair of
exterior wood ( https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm). Only gentle
methods should be used to clean the building, no sandblasting or high-pressure water. All surface
materials, primer and paint or stain should come from one manufacturer and the instructions for use
should be followed. If wood pieces are severely deteriorated the replacement must match the wood in
type and style.
Removing earth build up around the house and garage is mandatory for the preservation of the wood
buildings.
22
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Budlings.
"Rehabilitation" is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through
repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those
portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and
cultural values. The Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation projects in a reasonable
manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility.”2
1.A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimalchange to the
defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
18485 Montpere Way will remain a single-family residence, the historic use.
2.The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or
alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
The proposed work includes replacing a non-original bathroom window on the front facade. The proposed
change does not remove historic materials but requires matching historic siding. The second exterior
change is to create an egress window/door on the rear of the house. This will require removing the
original wood framing and glazing -historic materials - and replacing them with timbered glass and a
casement style to allow the code required egress from a bedroom. Because the 3 window, vertical
pattern is retained the change does not destroy the design character of the building. General repair and
maintenance, will require repairs to siding and trim that must be done with siding that matches the
original. Window frames should match the original wood framing and details.
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false
sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other
buildings, shall not be undertaken.
The proposed changes do not create conjectural features or include architectural elements from another
period or building.
4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right
shall be retained and preserved.
Changes that have occurred prior to this rehabilitation have not been significant in the history of the
building.
5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a
property shall be preserved.
The proposed project retains the majority of the historic materials and design. The alterations are code
required for life safety and must be designed to retain the overall contemporary design of the house. New
materials should match the existing in the type, style and size of the original.
6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and
other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by
documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
The wood siding shows differed maintenance and is shown to painted. This does not show the method
for cleaning and the products for primer and paint/stain which must be appropriate to the existing
23
coating. Areas that may require repair or replacement should be done with materials that match the
original wood siding and trim in material, style and quality.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be
used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
No chemical or physical treatments that would damage the historic materials may be used
8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources
must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
Limited ground disturbance is part of the proposal. It is very unlikely that archeological resources are
present.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic
materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and
shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
The 3 vertical windows on the rear facade are to be reframed using either the original or like materials.
This creates a minor loss of historic materials. Retaining the same height and width of the original
windows will preserve the architectural design on the rear of the building.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be
unimpaired.
The proposal does not include new additions. The reframing of the rear 3 windows and the bathroom
window will use like and kind materials. Should it be desired, the , the wood frame building could be
returned to the original design without destroying the integrity of the building.
We find the alterations proposed for the bathroom window on the front of the house, creating an
egress window on the rear and general maintenance and repair would meet the intent of The Secretary
of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The proposed project, as we understand from the
documents submitted, does not create an adverse change in the environment.
Specific design drawings or cut sheets from the manufacturer’s should be submitted for Staff review and
approval prior to issuing a construction permit.
We strongly recommend that the designer and contractor review the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards and Guidelines (https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm).
Although this building was not constructed by Eichler Homes, there is quite a bit of information on the
internet for Eichler homes that describe the best practices methods for repairing Mid-century siding and
trim.
Sincerely,
Bonnie Bamburg
24
CC: John Frolli Historic Architect.
25
N3068SC3068FX3068FX6830RS3068FX3068FX3068FX3068FX3068FX30683068FX3068FX266824681068246815682668
2668
2568 3030RS3030RS40111RS3030RS3030RS30683430RS3430RS3430RS3430RS3828RS26682668 5068
4268
26687268
17280
EP
13'-5"
15'-1"30'-3"13'25'-11"19'-10"2'-4"3'
25'-2"
2'-7"2'-2"3'5'-4"3'2'2'-2"36'8'-6"62'-2"12'-7"12'-7"
25'-2"
2'-7"8'-2"18'-2"4'-11"2'-3"11'-4"5'-3"2'10'-1"62'-2"15'-9"
9'-1"33'-7"30'-10"23'-8"
6'-9"
8'-2" X 1'-10"
12'-3" X 14'-10"
11'-11" X 9'-5"
8'-7" X 5'-0"
8'-7" X 11'-0"
19'-6" X 7'-9"
LAUNDRY
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHENDINING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
(E) ELECT. PANEL
100 AMP
(E)
G.M.
(E) POOL
PROPERTY LINE: 66'PROPERTY LINE: 180.49'PROPERTY LINE: 135'P R O P E R T Y L I N E : 3 9 .7 5 '
P R O P E R T Y L I N E : 7 1 .2 7 '
(E) GARAGE
360 SQ FT (E) F.P.A1
REVISION TABLE
NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
SCALE:
DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:
DATE:
4/16/2022
PROJECT DATA:
ZONING: R-1-10,000
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB
APN: 38926027
OCCUPANCY: R3/U
LOT SIZE: 10,885 S.F.
EXISTING LIVING AREA: 1,333 S.F.
EXISTING GARAGE AREA: 360 S.F.
SCOPE OF WORK:
- BATHROOM REMODELING.
- REPLACING (E) WINDOW IN BATHROOM.
- REPLACING THREE (E) WINDOW IN BEDROOM 1.
- PAINT EXTERIOR WALLS (OWNER'S CHOICE).
BATHROOM REMODELING
18485 MONTPERE WAY
SARATOGA, CA 95070
VICINITY MAP
PARCEL MAP
BUILDING CODES:
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY
2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE,
2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
1/6" =
1'
PROVISIONS:
AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE, ALL
DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES
THERETO FURNISHED SIGNATURE HOME
DESIGN GROUP ARE TO BE USED ONLY FOR
THIS PROJECT AND ARE NOT TO BE USED ON
ANY OTHER PROJECT. CHANGES TO THE
DRAWINGS MAY ONLY BE MADE BY SHD
GROUP, ANY SUBMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF SIGNATURE HOME DESIGN GROUP WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A VIOLATION OF SIGNATURE
HOME DESIGN GROUP COPYRIGHT OR
ANOTHER RESERVED RIGHTS.
CONDITION OF ISSUANCE:
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AS AN
ENGINEERING PROGRESS CHECK OR FOR THE
USE OF THE BUILDING OFFICIALS. THESE
PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETELY
REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
DEPT. THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO
REVISION UNTIL THE BUILDING DEPT. ANY
BIDS MADE OR CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED
BASED ON THOSE MAKING THE BID OR
PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION.
GENERAL NOTES:
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT
CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE ARE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS,
MEASUREMENTS, ELEVATIONS AND
CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR SUCCESSFUL
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT AT ONCE
ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OMISSIONS AND
APPARENT DISCREPANCIES TO THE
DESIGNER, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME APPROPRIATE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK PERFORMED
INVOLVING A KNOWN ERROR,
INCONSISTENCY OR OMISSION IN THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
OWNER(S):
STRUCTURAL/CIVIL ENGINEER:
GAIL RANDOLPH
18485 MONTPERE WAY,
SARATOGA, CA 95070
GAILMRANDOLPH@GMAIL.COM
CONTACT# (408) 218 1214
DRAWING INDEX:
A1 SITE PLAN
A2 EXISTING & PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
A3 ELEVATIONS
WILBERT GIVARGIZ
5751 RIBCHESTER CT, SAN JOSE CA, 95123
OFFICE@SHDSANJOSE.COM-(408) 854 2488
26
(E) WALL
(E) WALL TO
BE REMOVED
(N) WALL TO
BE INSTALLED246815683060FX3060FX3060FX2568
2668
26682668
6830TC28680968FX3430FX3430FX3430FX3430FX3030FX3060FX3060FX3060FX3060FX3060FX30683060FX3060FX2668 5068
2668246810684268
26687268 2328SH2328SH3030FX3030FX3030FX3030FXEP
19'-10"2'-4"3'
25'-2"
2'-11"8'-1"18'-3"4'-10"2'-4"11'-3"5'-4"1'-11"10'-1"62'-1"12'-7"12'-11"
25'-6"2'3'1'-3"3'1'-3"3'2'2'-2"36'8'-5"62'-1"2'-7"
19'-6" X 7'-9"4'-8" X 7'-9"
8'-6" X 1'-10"
8'-7" X 11'-0"
8'-7" X 5'-0"
11'-11" X 9'-5"
12'-7" X 14'-10"
5'-1" X 2'-0"
LAUNDRY BATH
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
(E) F.P.KITCHENDINING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
(E) ELECT. PANEL
100 AMP
(E)
G.M.
(E) WINDOW TO
BE REPLACED
(E) WINDOWS TO
BE REPLACED
246815683060SC3060FX3060FX2568
2668
26682668
6830TC28680968FX3430FX3430FX3430FX3430FX3030FX3060FX3060FX3060FX3060FX3060FX30683060FX3060FX2668 5068
2668246810684268
26687268 3030FX3030LV3030FX3030FX3030FX3030LV3030FXEP
19'-10"2'-4"3'
25'-2"
2'-11"8'-1"18'-3"4'-10"2'-4"11'-3"5'-4"1'-11"10'-1"62'-1"12'-7"12'-11"
25'-6"2'3'1'-3"3'1'-3"3'2'2'-2"36'8'-5"62'-1"2'-7"
1'-4"1'-3"
19'-6" X 7'-9"4'-8" X 7'-9"
8'-6" X 1'-10"
8'-7" X 11'-0"
8'-7" X 5'-0"
11'-11" X 9'-5"
12'-7" X 14'-10"
5'-1" X 2'-0"
LAUNDRY BATH
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
(E) F.P.KITCHENDINING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
(E) ELECT. PANEL
100 AMP
(E)
G.M.
(N) TEMP. GLASS
WINDOW TO
MATCH (E) WINDOW.
(N) FIXED
GLASS WINDOW TO
BE INSTALLED
(N) EGRESS SINGLE
CASEMENT
WINDOW TO BE
INSTALLED
A2
REVISION TABLE
NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
SCALE:
DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:
DATE:
4/16/2022
PROVISIONS:
AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE, ALL
DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES
THERETO FURNISHED SIGNATURE HOME
DESIGN GROUP ARE TO BE USED ONLY FOR
THIS PROJECT AND ARE NOT TO BE USED ON
ANY OTHER PROJECT. CHANGES TO THE
DRAWINGS MAY ONLY BE MADE BY SHD
GROUP, ANY SUBMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF SIGNATURE HOME DESIGN GROUP WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A VIOLATION OF SIGNATURE
HOME DESIGN GROUP COPYRIGHT OR
ANOTHER RESERVED RIGHTS.
CONDITION OF ISSUANCE:
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AS AN
ENGINEERING PROGRESS CHECK OR FOR THE
USE OF THE BUILDING OFFICIALS. THESE
PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETELY
REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
DEPT. THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO
REVISION UNTIL THE BUILDING DEPT. ANY
BIDS MADE OR CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED
BASED ON THOSE MAKING THE BID OR
PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION.
GENERAL NOTES:
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT
CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE ARE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS,
MEASUREMENTS, ELEVATIONS AND
CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR SUCCESSFUL
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT AT ONCE
ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OMISSIONS AND
APPARENT DISCREPANCIES TO THE
DESIGNER, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME APPROPRIATE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK PERFORMED
INVOLVING A KNOWN ERROR,
INCONSISTENCY OR OMISSION IN THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
OWNER(S):
STRUCTURAL/CIVIL ENGINEER:
GAIL RANDOLPH
18485 MONTPERE WAY,
SARATOGA, CA 95070
GAILMRANDOLPH@GMAIL.COM
CONTACT# (408) 218 1214
WILBERT GIVARGIZ
5751 RIBCHESTER CT, SAN JOSE CA, 95123
OFFICE@SHDSANJOSE.COM-(408) 854 2488
EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0"
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0"
ELECTRICAL NOTES:
1.HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTION IS REQUIRED IN EACH BEDROOM. COMBINATION SMOKE AND CARBON
MONOXIDE ALARM IS REQUIRED OUTSIDE EACH BEDROOM AND EACH FLOOR. WHEN MORE THAN ONE ALARM
IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN INDIVIDUAL SWELLING UNIT, THE ALARMS SHALL BE
INTERCONNECTED IN SUCH MANNER THAT THE ACTIVATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE
ALARMS PER CRC R314.5 AND R315.1.3.
2.ALL NEW AND REPLACED DUPLEX RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LISTED "TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES". 2019
CEC ART. 406.12.
3.PER ART. 210.12 AND 210.8 CEC 2019: ARC FAULT (AFCI) REQUIRED IN FAMILY ROOM, DINING ROOM, PARLORS,
LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, SUN ROOMS, REC ROOMS, CLOSETS, AND HALLWAYS AND LIGHTING. GROUND
FAULT (GFCI) IS REQUIRED IN BATH ROOMS, GARAGES, ACCESSORY AREAS, EXTERIOR, CRAWLSPACES,
BASEMENTS, DISHWASHERS, AND DISPOSALS. COMBINATIONS AFCI/GFCI IS REQUIRED IN KITCHEN, AND
LAUNDRY AREAS.
4.ALL NEW LIGHTING SHALL BE HIGH EFFICACY COMPLIANT TO ENABLE 150.0AC EC. SCREW BASED
PERMANENTLY INSTALLED LIGHT FIXTURES MUST CONTAIN SCREW BASED JA8 (JOINT APPENDIX 8)
COMPLIANT LAPS. JA8 COMPLIANT LIGHT SOURCES IN CEILING RECESSED DOWNLIGHT AND LED'S ARE TO BE
CONTROLLED BY VACANCY SENSORS OR DIMMERS. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY
PHOTOCELL AND MOTION PER ENERGY 110.9.
5.TWO 20 AMP SMALL APPLIANCES BRANCH CIRCUIT SHALL BE PROVIDE FOR ALL RECEPTACLES IN THE
KITCHEN, DINING, PANTRY, OR OTHER SIMILAR AREAS.
6.A DEDICATED 20 AMP BRANCH CIRCUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SUPPLY BATHROOM RECEPTACLES OUTLETS.
7.UNDER CABINET LIGHTING SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY SEPARATE SWITCHING.
8.GFCI PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES, RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6 FEET
OF A SINK (INCLUDING BELOW COUNTER AND BEHIND AN APPLIANCE), AND FOR RECEPTACLES SUPPLYING
DISHWASHERS. THE RESET BUTTON FOR GFCI RECEPTACLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE
LOCATION (I.E. NOT BEHIND AN APPLIANCE).
9.ALL OUTLETS AND DEVICES (I.E. RECEPTACLES, LIGHTING, HOODS, ETC.) IN THE KITCHEN SHALL BE AFCI
PROTECTED AND TAMPER-RESISTANT (TR).
10.RECEPTACLES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL COUNTERTOP AREAS WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 12 INCHES.
11.COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT NO POINT ALONG THE WALL IS MORE THAN 24
INCHES FROM A RECEPTACLE.
12.COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 20 INCHES ABOVE THE COUNTERTOP.
NOTE:
WATER EFFICIENT PLUMBING FIXTURES (CALGREEN 301.1.1)
ALL EXISTING NON-COMPLIANT PLUMBING FIXTURES (BASED ON WATER EFFICIENCY)
THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE SHALL BE UPGRADED. THE FOLLOWING TABLE SHOWS THE FIXTURES
THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO BE NON-COMPLIANT AND THE TYPE OF WATER-CONSERVING PLUMBING
FIXTURE THAT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLACE OF NON-COMPLIANT FIXTURES:
MECHANICAL NOTES:
1 .BATHROOMS REQUIRE 50 CFM MINIMUM HUMIDITY CONTROLLED EXHAUST FANS ( BY FAN OR
SWITCH) PER R405.6. AND BE SWITCHED SEPARATELY FROM LIGHTING SYSTEMS.
2. KITCHEN HOOD VENT TO HAVE DAMPER AND BE DUCTED TO THE EXTERIOR WITH SMOOTH WALL
SHEET METAL PER MFG'S INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. EXHAUST FAN MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM
OF 100 CFM. (PER CEC 150).
3. TERMINATION OF THE BATHROOM AIR DUCTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM ANY OPENINGS
INTO THE BUILDING. CMC 502.2.1.
1.8
PLUMBING NOTES:
1 . SHOWER STALL SHALL BE 1024 SQUARE INCHES MINIMUM AND CAPABLE OF ENCOMPASSING A
30" DIAMETER CIRCLE. CPC 408.6.
2 . SHOWERHEAD & CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE SIDEWALL OF THE SHOWER
COMPARTMENT SO THAT THE SHOWERHEAD DOES NOT DISCHARGE DIRECTLY AT THE ENTRANCE
TO THE COMPARTMENT PER CPC 408.9.
3 . SHOWER DOORS SHALL OPEN SO AS TO MAINTAIN NOT LESS THAN 22 INCHES UNOBSTRUCTED
OPENING FOR EGRESS. CPC 408.5.
ENERY BUILDING NOTE:
1 . IN THE BATHROOMS AT LEAST ONE LUMINAIRE TO BE CONTROLLED BY A VACANCY SENSOR, PLEASE SPECIFY.
CENC 150(K)(2)(J).
2 . THE HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRES (NEW LIGHTING) TO BE SEPARATELY SWITCHED FROM ANY EXISTING LOW
EFFICACY LUMINAIRES PER CENC 150(K)(2)(A).
27
Grade Level
0.0'
Ceiling
7.1'86"Highest Ridge
11.3'49"Grade Level
0.0'
Ceiling
7.1'7'-1"Highest Ridge
11.3'4'-2"Grade Level
0.0'
Ceiling
7.1'86"Highest Ridge
11.3'49"Grade Level
0.0'
Ceiling
7.1'7'-1"Highest Ridge
11.3'4'-2"A3
REVISION TABLE
NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
SCALE:
DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:
DATE:
4/16/2022
PROVISIONS:
AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE, ALL
DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES
THERETO FURNISHED SIGNATURE HOME
DESIGN GROUP ARE TO BE USED ONLY FOR
THIS PROJECT AND ARE NOT TO BE USED ON
ANY OTHER PROJECT. CHANGES TO THE
DRAWINGS MAY ONLY BE MADE BY SHD
GROUP, ANY SUBMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF SIGNATURE HOME DESIGN GROUP WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A VIOLATION OF SIGNATURE
HOME DESIGN GROUP COPYRIGHT OR
ANOTHER RESERVED RIGHTS.
CONDITION OF ISSUANCE:
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AS AN
ENGINEERING PROGRESS CHECK OR FOR THE
USE OF THE BUILDING OFFICIALS. THESE
PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETELY
REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
DEPT. THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO
REVISION UNTIL THE BUILDING DEPT. ANY
BIDS MADE OR CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED
BASED ON THOSE MAKING THE BID OR
PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION.
GENERAL NOTES:
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT
CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE ARE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS,
MEASUREMENTS, ELEVATIONS AND
CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR SUCCESSFUL
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT AT ONCE
ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OMISSIONS AND
APPARENT DISCREPANCIES TO THE
DESIGNER, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME APPROPRIATE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK PERFORMED
INVOLVING A KNOWN ERROR,
INCONSISTENCY OR OMISSION IN THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
OWNER(S):
STRUCTURAL/CIVIL ENGINEER:
GAIL RANDOLPH
18485 MONTPERE WAY,
SARATOGA, CA 95070
GAILMRANDOLPH@GMAIL.COM
CONTACT# (408) 218 1214
WILBERT GIVARGIZ
5751 RIBCHESTER CT, SAN JOSE CA, 95123
OFFICE@SHDSANJOSE.COM-(408) 854 2488
EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION
PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION
PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION
(N) TEMP. GLASS
WINDOW TO
MATCH (E) WINDOW.
(N) SIDING & TRIM
TO MATCH EXISTING
(N) FIXED
GLASS WINDOW TO
BE INSTALLED
(N) EGRESS SINGLE
CASEMENT
WINDOW TO BE
INSTALLED
(N) BLIND EGRESS
PANEL
28