Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-14-2023 TSC Agenda PacketSaratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 1 of 4 SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA September 14, 2023 AMENDED AGENDA • 09/12/2023 ITEM 6. RESCHEDULE NOVEMBER MEETING, ADDED. LINK TO SHERIFF’S REPORT ADDED. “COMMENTS (09/12/2023)” ADDED TO TSC MATRIX 392. • 09/14/2023 “COMMENTS (09/13/2023)” ADDED TO TSC MATRIX 565. DATE: September 14, 2023 TIME: 6:30 PM – 10:30 PM LOCATION: Patio Room 19655 Allendale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Public Participation Information In accordance with Saratoga City Council’s Remote Public Participation Policy, members of the public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed below or via remote attendance using the Zoom information below. Members of the public can view and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending the meeting in person at the Patio Room at LGS Recreation, located at 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070; OR 2. Accessing the meeting through Zoom • Webinar URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 • Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 • Call In: 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833 (enter the Webinar ID provided above when prompted) Public Comment Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. The amount of time for public comment may be reduced by the Chair or by action of the Traffic Safety Commission. Public Comment will begin with speakers attending in-person first followed by those attending via Zoom. As always, members of the public can send written comments to the Commission prior to the meeting by commenting online at www.saratoga.ca.us/tsc prior to the start of the meeting. These emails will be provided to the members of the Commission and will become part of the official record of the meeting. During the meeting the Chair will explain the process for members of the public to be recognized to offer public comment. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 2 of 4 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Jason Mount (Chair), Robert Eng (Vice Chair), Chi-Kuang Chu, Alec Gulesserian, Stephen Li III. REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on September 7, 2023. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public may address the Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on the agenda. The law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking actions on these items. The Commission may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 07-13-2023 TSC Minutes – Draft 08-22-2023 TSC Special Meeting Minutes - Draft Recommended Action: Approve July 13, 2023 Minutes and August 22, 2023 Minutes VI. SHERIFF'S REPORT TO THE COMMISSION Sheriff’s Report • July-August citation summary and collision statistics • List of Vehicle Codes VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. TSC Matrix 392 – Mendelsohn Ln August Mailing and Responses Comments Comments (09/12/2023) Comments From Previous Agendas Recommended Action: Hear resident feedback and approve plan for construction. 2. TSC Matrix 502 – Ravenwood Dr Plans Comments Comments From Previous Agendas Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 3 of 4 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 3. TSC Matrix 564 – Braemar Dr Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 4. TSC Matrix 565 – Farwell Ave Comments (09/13/2023) Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 5. TSC Matrix 566 – Vickery Ave Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 6. Reschedule November Meeting Recommended Action: Reschedule for either November 2nd or November 16th IX. STAFF AND COMMISSION UPDATES 7. Staff and Commission Updates a. TSC Project Updates b. City Events c. TSC Handbook d. Announcements Recommended Action: Accept updates. X. COMMISSION ITEMS XI. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Emma Burkhalter, Associate Engineer, of the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the City Council was posted and available for review on September 7, 2023 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Traffic Safety Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda, copies of materials distributed to the Traffic Safety Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda, and materials distributed to the Traffic Safety Commission by staff after the posting of the agenda are available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Following removal of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 4 of 4 State and local shelter in place orders these materials will be available for review in the office of the Public Works office at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Draft Minutes – Page 1 of 3 SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES July 13, 2023 I. CALL TO ORDER – 6:30 PM II. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Jason Mount (Chair), Robert Eng (Vice Chair), Alec Gulesserian, Stephen Li ABSENT: Chi-Kuang Chu STAFF PRESENT: Ashley Weiss, Emma Burkhalter, John Cherbone III. REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on July 6, 2023. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public may address the Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on the agenda. The law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking actions on these items. The Commission may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 05-11-2023 TSC MINUTES – Draft Recommended Action: Approve May 11, 2023 Minutes ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. MOTION PASSED (4- 0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. VI. SHERIFF'S REPORT TO THE COMMISSION Sheriff’s Report • May - June citation summary and collision statistics VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. TSC Matrix 502 – Ravenwood Dr Comments Comments (07/10/2023) Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Draft Minutes – Page 2 of 3 Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO DO NOTHING; RESIDENTS SHOULD REQUEST TO BRING ITEM BACK TO COMMISSION IF THEY WANT TO PROCEED WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR A BULB-OUT ON THE NW CORNER OF RAVENWOOD DR AND QUITO RD. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 2. TSC Matrix 537 – De Havilland Dr at Shubert Dr Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO ADD STRIPING AND RED CURB AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 3. TSC Matrix 553 – Marilyn Ln Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED TO DO NOTHING. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 4. TSC Matrix 560 – Dorchester Rd at Plymouth Dr Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. GULESSERIAN/LI MOVED TO INSTALL SHOULDER STRIPING AND CENTERLINE STRIPING PER TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATION AND REQUEST THE RESIDENT ON THE INSIDE CORNER TRIM BACK FOLIAGE PER CITY CODE. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 5. TSC Matrix 562 – Saratoga Ave between Cox Ave and Lawrence Expy Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. LI MOVED TO PROCEED WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATION TO DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR REDESIGNING THE INTERSECTION. STAFF SHOULD REACH OUT TO NEARBY RESIDENTS Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Draft Minutes – Page 3 of 3 WITH THE COMPLETED REDESIGN AND INVITE TO A FUTURE TSC MEETING. MOUNT MADE A FRIENDLY AMENDEMENT TO INTEGRATE THE NEW DESIGN INTO THE FULL SARATOGA STRIPING PLAN AND INVITE RESIDENTS TO A FUTURE TSC MEETING. LI ACCEPTED THE AMENDMENT. MOUNT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. VIII. NEW BUSINESS None. IX. STAFF AND COMMISSION UPDATES 6. Staff and Commission Updates a. TSC Project Updates b. City Events c. TSC Handbook d. Announcements Recommended Action: Accept updates. X. COMMISSION ITEMS Staff to schedule a special meeting to be held in late August to discuss Commission workload and implementation of Speed Hump Process. XI. ADJOURNMENT – 9:15 PM Respectfully Submitted by Emma Burkhalter, Public Works staff for the City of Saratoga Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 1 of 2 SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES August 22, 2023 I. CALL TO ORDER – 6:30 PM II. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Jason Mount (Chair), Robert Eng (Vice Chair), Alec Gulesserian, Stephen Li ABSENT: Chi-Kuang Chu STAFF PRESENT: Franziska Church, Emma Burkhalter, John Cherbone III. REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on August 21, 2023. IV. NEW BUSINESS 1. Discuss Options to Reduce Traffic Safety Commission Workload and Shorten Meetings Recommended Action: Advise City staff on which types of traffic safety requests should be brought to the Traffic Safety Commission. Supplemental Attachment 1 ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED FOR STAFF TO ADDRESS SIGHT DISTANCE CONCERNS, TRAFFIC VIOLATION CONCERNS, AND ANY REQUESTS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL MASTER PLAN WITHOUT TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REVIEW. MOTION PASSED (4-0- 0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 2. Review of Traffic Safety Commission Processes and Procedures Comments Recommended Action: No Action. LI/MOUNT MOVED TO PLAN FOR ONE, ANNUAL, TENTATIVE, SPECIAL MEETING IN FEBRUARY AND TO ASSESS AT THE JANUARY MEETING IF THE FEBRUARY MEETING IS STILL NEEDED. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 2 of 2 MOUNT/GULESSERIAN MOVED FOR STAFF TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF ITEMS ON EACH AGENDA WITH A GOAL OF KEEPING THE MEETING FROM CONTINUING PAST 10 PM. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. V. ADJOURNMENT – 8:35 PM Respectfully Submitted by Emma Burkhalter, Public Works staff for the City of Saratoga Vehicle Code Translations 7/25/23 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 10501 FALSE RPT OF VEH THEFT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10502 OWNR RPT VEH RECOVERY UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 10552 FALSE RPT OF VESSEL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 10650 TOW SERV KEEP WRTN RECORD UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 10650 TOW SERV KEEP SPECIFIC DATA UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 10650 TOW SERV KEEP RECORDS 1YR UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 10650 TOW SERV RECORD VEH DISPO UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 10653 GARAGE RPT BULLET MARKS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 10750 ALTER VIN NUMBERS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10751 BUY/SELL/POSS VEH W/ALTER VIN UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10752 SELL MANUFACTURES VIN/ID # UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Felony 10752 SELL DMV/CHP ID NUMBERS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Felony 10801 OWN/OPERATE CHOP SHOP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Felony 10802 ALTER VIN# TO PREVENT VEH ID UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Felony 10803 BUY/SELL VEH W/ ALTERED VIN# UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Felony 10803 POSS FOR SALE VEH W/ALTER VIN# UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Felony 10851 VEHICLE THEFT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Felony 10851 THEFT OF PD/FD/AMBULANCE VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Felony 1 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 10851.5 THEFT OF BINDER CHAINS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10852 TAMPER WITH VEHICLE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10853 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF TO VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 10854 UNLAWFUL USE OF STORED VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 11.05.020 SAR ORD PARK AFTER HOURS Municipal Code Infraction 11.08.160 RIDING BICYCLE ON SIDEWALK Bicycle Violation Other Infraction 12500 UNLICENSED DRIVER UnknownHazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 12500 DRIVE M/C W/O ENDORSEMENT UnknownHazardB Hazard Infraction 12500 DRIVE VEH OFF/ST PARK W/O LIC UnknownHazardC Hazard Infraction 12500 DRIVE OUT OF CLASS UnknownHazardD Hazard Infraction 12500 OPERATE M/SCOOTER W/O EMISSION UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 12502 FRGN DVR HAVE CURRENT MED CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 12502 FRGN DVR COMPLY W/MED RESTRICT UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 12505 DRIVER CA RES. AND EMPLOY Other Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 12509 INSTRUCTION PERMIT/ ACCOMPANYING OVER UnknownHazardD Hazard Infraction 12509.5 M/C PERMIT DRV NITE/PAS/FRWY UnknownHazardC Hazard Infraction 12511 POSS MORE THAN 1 DL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 12515 MINOR, EMPLOYED FOR DRIVING UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12515 DRIVER UNDER21 OPERATE HAZ VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 12516 SCHOOLBUS DVR UNDER 18YRS UnknownHazard Hazard Infraction 2 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 12517 SCHOOL BUS DVR MUST POSS DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 12517 PUPIL ACTIVITY DRIVER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 12517.5 PARATRANSIT DVR HAVE VALID ID UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12517.5 PARATRANSIT DVR HAVE TRAINING UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 12519 LICENSE, FARM LABOR VEHICLE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 12520 TOW TRUCK DVR HAVE VALID CDL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 12521 TOUR BUS DVR USE SEATBELTS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12521 TOUR BUS DVR RPT ACCIDENTS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 12522 SCHOOL BUS DVR 1ST AID CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12523 YOUTH BUS DVR VALID DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12523 YOUTH BUS DVR DUTIES UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 12523.5 PARATRANSIT DVR VALID DL&CLASS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12523.5 PARATRANSIT DVR DUTIES UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 12523.6 DISABLE DVR VALID DL&CLASS UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 12523.6 DISABLE DVR EMPLOY W/O DL UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 12524 RADIOACTIVE MAT DVR CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12527 AMBULANCE DVR VALID DL&CLASS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 12804.15 DRIVE HOUSE CAR W/O ENDORSEMT UnknownOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 12804.6 TRANSIT BUSDVR VALID DL&CLASS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12804.6 TRNST BUS EMPLYR ALLOW UNL DVR UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 3 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 12814.6 PROVISIONAL DVR FAIL/OBEY RSTR UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 12814.6 PROVISIONAL DRIVE BETWEEN 11PM-5AM B1A Vehicle Code Infraction 12814.6 PROVISIONAL TRANSPORT UNDER Other Non-HazardB1B Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 12815 DRIVERS LICENSE LOST UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12951 DL NOT IN POSSESSION UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 12951 REFUSE TO PRESENT DL TO OFC UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13003 OBTAIN DUP ID W/LOST UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 13003 RETURN DAMAGE ID TO DMV UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 13004 I.D.CARD, FALSE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 I.D.CARD, LENDING UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 I.D.CARD, DISPLAYING ANOTHERS UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 IDCARD PERMIT UNLAWFUL USE UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 DO FORBIDDEN ACT UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 REPRODUCE/POSS OF FACSIMILE ID UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004 UNAUTHORIZED ALTER OF ID UnknownOther Non-HazardG Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13004.1 MAKE/SALE FALSE ID UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 13007 I.D.CARD, CHANGE ADDRESS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 14600 CHANGE OF ADDRESS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 14600 CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM TO OFC UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 14601 DL SUPENDED RECKLESS DRIVING UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 4 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 14601.1 DL SUPENDED FOR OTHER ACTS UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.2 DL SUPENDED FOR DUI/DRUG UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.2 DISOBEY RESTRICTED DL FOR DUI UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.3 DL SUPENDED HABITUAL OFFENDER UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.4 DRIVE W/SUSPEND DL& CAUSE INJ UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.5 DL SUSPENDED/REFUSE CHEM TEST UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14601.5 DRIVE W/ RESTRICTED LICENSE & REFUSE B Vehicle Code Misdemeanor 14603 DISOBEY DL RESTRICTIONS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 14604 LOAN VEH TO UNLIC PERSON Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 14605 UNLIC PARKING LOT ATTENDANT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 14605 EMPLOYER ALLOW UNLIC DRIVER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 14606 EMPLOYER ALLOW O/OF CLASS DVR UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 14606 EMPLOYER DUTIES FOR MED CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 14607 PERMIT UNLIC CHILD TO DRIVE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 14608 RENT VEH TO UNLIC DRIVER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 14610 DISPLAY/POSS FALSE DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 LEND DL TO ANOTHER UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 PRESENT ANOTHERS DL AS OWN UnknownOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 FAIL TO SURRENDER SUSPENED DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA4 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 ALLOW UNLAWFUL USE OF DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA5 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 14610 DO FORBIDDEN ACT UnknownOther Non-HazardA6 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 POSS OF FACSIMILE DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA7 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610 ALTER DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA8 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 14610.1 MAKE/SALE FALSE DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 15250 COM DL NOT IN POSSESION UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 15250 HAZ-MAT ENDORSED DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 15250.6 POSS FIREFIGHT DL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 15275 POSS COM VEH DL&ENDORSEMENT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 15500 MINOR BUY VEH W/O VALID DL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 15501 MINOR BUY VEH W/FALSE DL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 15620 LEAVE CHILD ALONE/RISK HEALTH UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 15620 CHILD ALONE W/ENG RUN OR KEYS UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 16000 RPT ACCIDENT W/IN 10 DAYS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 16002 EMPLOYER RPT ACCIDENT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 16002 PUBLIC TRANSIT DVR RPT ACCID UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 16020 CARRY PROOF OF INS IN VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 16020.3 VANPOOL VEHICLE INSURANCE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 16025 REQ INFO EXCHANGE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 16025 INFO EXCHANGE UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 16028 PRESENT PROOF OF INSURANCE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 6 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 16028 PROOF OF INSURANCE AT ACCIDENT UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 16030 FALSE PROOF OF INSURANCE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 16050.5 REFUSE TO PROVIDE INSURANCE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 16502 COM PASS VEH REQ INSURANCE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 16560 INTER ST CARRIERS COMPLY W/PUC UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 20 FALSE STATEMENT- CHP/DMV PAPERS NoneOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 20001 HIT-RUN INJURY OR DEATH UnknownHazardA Hazard Felony 20002 HIT-RUN PROPERTY DAMAGE UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 20002 HIT-RUN PROPERTY, RUNAWAY VEH UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 20003 PROVIDE INS AT INJURY ACCIDENT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 20003 PROVIDE DL/ID@INJURY ACCIDENT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 21100.3 FAIL TO OBEY TRAFFIC CNTRL PER Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21106 PED CROSS@CROSSWALK Pedestrian ViolationOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21113 TRESPASS PUBLIC/SCHOOL GRNDS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21116 TRESPASS ON A LEVEE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21200 DUI ON BICYCLE Ped or Other Under InfluenceBicycle Violation5 Hazard Misdemeanor 21201 WHEEL BRAKE Other EquipmentBicycle ViolationA Non-Hazard Infraction 21201 HANDLEBAR HEIGHT UnknownBicycle ViolationB Non-Hazard Infraction 21201 RIDER REACH GROUND UnknownBicycle ViolationC Non-Hazard Infraction 21201 HEADLAMP REQ @ DARKNESS LightsBicycle ViolationD Non-Hazard Infraction 7 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21201 BICYCLE WHITE LIGHT LightsBicycle ViolationD1 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code I 21201 RED REFLECTOR LightsBicycle ViolationD2 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21201 WHITE OR YELLOW REFLECTOR (EACH LightsBicycle ViolationD3 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21201 WHITE OR YELLOW REFLECTOR EACH SIDE LightsBicycle ViolationD4 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21201.3 BLUE WARN LIGHT ON BICYCLE LightsBicycle ViolationB Non-Hazard Infraction 21202 BICYCLIST IMPEDE TRAFFIC Impeding TrafficBicycle ViolationA Hazard Infraction 21203 CYCLIST HITCHING A RIDE UnknownBicycle Violation Non-Hazard Infraction 21204 BICYCLE SEAT REQ Other EquipmentBicycle ViolationA Non-Hazard Infraction 21204 PASS SEAT REQ ON BICYCLE Other EquipmentBicycle ViolationB Non-Hazard Infraction 21205 BICYCLIST 1 HAND ON HANDLEBAR UnknownBicycle Violation Non-Hazard Infraction 21207 OPR MTRZD BYCL ON BIKETRAIL UnknownBicycle Violation5 Non-Hazard Infraction 21208 FAIL TO RIDE IN BICYCLE LANE UnknownBicycle ViolationA Non-Hazard Infraction 21209 MOTOR VEH IN BICYCLE LANE UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21209 MOTOR VEH IN BICYCLE LANE; PARK WHERE A1 Vehicle Code Infraction 21209 MOTOR VEH IN BICYCLE LANE; ENTER/LEAVE A2 Vehicle Code Infraction 21209 MOTOR VEH IN BICYCLE LANE; PREPARE FOR A3 Vehicle Code Infraction 21210 BICYCLE OBSTRUCT PED TRAFFIC UnknownBicycle Violation Non-Hazard Infraction 21211 PED IMPEDE BICYCLIST Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationA Non-Hazard Infraction 21211 BICYCLIST IMPEDE BIKEWAY UnknownBicycle ViolationB Non-Hazard Infraction 21212 HELMET REQ UNDER 18 UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 8 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21212 PARENTLIABILE FOR BIKE HELMET FOR MINOR Bicycle ViolationE Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21213 HELMET REQ ON MOTORIZED BICYCLE B Vehicle Code Infraction 21221 DUI ON MTRZD SCOOTER Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard5 Hazard Misdemeanor 21223 MTRZD SCOOTER HEADLIGHT LightsOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 21223 MTRZD SCOOTER REAR REFECT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 21223 MTRZD SCOOTER SIDE REFLECT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Infraction 21226 MTRZD SCOOTER TO LOUD UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21226 MTRZD SCOOTER EXHAUST REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 21226 MTRZD SCOOTER MODIFY EXHAUST Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 21228 MTRZD SCOOTER PASSING UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21228 MTRZD SCOOTER LEFT TURN UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 21229 MTRZD SCOOTER USE BIKE LANE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21229 MTRZD SCOOTER UNSAFE LN CHG UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER BRAKE REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER HWY ACCESS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER HELMET REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER DL REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER NO PASS UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER 1 HAND FREE UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER ON SIDEWALK UnknownOther Non-HazardG Non-Hazard Infraction 9 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21235 MTRZD SCOOTER HANDLEBAR UnknownOther Non-HazardH Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOT OBSTR WALK UnknownOther Non-HazardI Non-Hazard Infraction 21235 MTRZD SCOOT HITCH A RIDE UnknownOther Non-HazardJ Non-Hazard Infraction 21260 LOW SPEED VEH OPERATION UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21367 ROAD CONSTR OBEY FLAGMEN UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 21367 ROAD CONSTR OBEY SIGNS UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 21451 GREEN SIGNAL, FAILURE TO GO Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 21451 GREEN ARROW, FAILURE TO OBEY Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 21451 PEDESTRIAN, GREEN Pedestrian ViolationSigns and SignalsC Hazard Infraction 21453 RED SIGNAL, FAILURE TO STOP Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 21453 RED SIGNAL, RIGHT TURN Auto R/W ViolationSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 21453 RED ARROW, FAILURE TO OBEY Auto R/W ViolationSigns and SignalsC Hazard Infraction 21453 PEDESTRIAN, FAILURE TO STOP Pedestrian ViolationSigns and SignalsD Hazard Infraction 21454 RED LANE INDICATOR Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsC Hazard Infraction 21454 FLASHING YELLOW LANE INDICATOR Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsD Hazard Infraction 21455 RED SIGNAL NOT AT INTERSECTION Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and Signals Hazard Infraction 21456 WALK SYMBOL Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationA Hazard Infraction 21456 WAIT OR DON'T WALK Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationB Hazard Infraction 21456.2 BICYCLIST: OBEY OFFICAL TRAFFIC SIGN Bicycle ViolationA Vehicle Code Infraction 21457 FLASHING RED, FAILURE TO STOP Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 10 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21457 FLASHING YELLOW Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 21460 DOUBLE LINES DRV TO THE LEFT Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21460 SOLID LINE ON RIGHT Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21460.5 TWO-WAY TRAFFIC LEFT TURN LANE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 21461 VEH OBEY TRAFFIC SIGN/SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 21461.5 PED OBEY TRAFFIC SIGN/SIGNAL Pedestrian ViolationSigns and Signals Hazard Infraction 21462 OFFICIAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementSigns and Signals Hazard Infraction 21463 ILLEGAL OPERATION OF SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementSigns and Signals Hazard Infraction 21464 VANDALISM TO TRAFFIC DEVICE Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardA Hazard Felony 21464 SIGNAL CHANGING DEVICE Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Hazard Felony 21464 SIGNAL DEVICE/POSS/SELL/MFR Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardC Hazard Felony 21465 TRAFFIC DEVICES Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 21466.5 BLIND LIGHT/IMPAIR DVR VISION Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21650 FAILURE TO DRIVE ON RIGHT HALF OF ROAD Wrong Side of RoadOther Hazard Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21650 DRIVE ON RIGHT SIDE EXCEPT WHEN PASSING Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21650 DRIVE ON RIGHT SIDE EXCEPT LEFT TURN B Vehicle Code Infraction 21650 WRONG SIDE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION C Vehicle Code Infraction 21650 WRONG SIDE ON A ONE WAY STREET D Vehicle Code Infraction 21650.1 RIDE BICYCLE WRONG WAY Wrong Side of RoadOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21651 DIVIDED HIGHWAY Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 11 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21651 DRV OVER DIVIDED HWY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA1 Hazard Infraction 21651 TURN ON DIVIDED HWY ISL Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA2 Hazard Infraction 21651 DRIVE WRONG WAY ON HIGHWAY Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 21651 WRONG WAY CAUSE INJ/DEATH Wrong Side of RoadOther HazardC Hazard Felony 21652 SERVICE ROAD Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21654 SLOW VEH MULTIPLE LN HWY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21655 RIGHT-HAND LN FOR TRUCKS Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 21655.5 CARPOOL LN OBEY POSTED SIGNS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 21655.9 CARPOOL LANE (ULEV) Other Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21656 SLOW VEHICLE Impeding TrafficOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21657 DRV WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ST Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21658 UNSAFE LANE CHANGE / STRADDLING Unsafe Lane ChangeOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21658 DESIGNATED LANES Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21659 THREE LANE HIGHWAY UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21660 MEETING VEHICLES Wrong Side of RoadOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21661 DECENDING NARROW GRADE Auto R/W ViolationOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21662 MOUNTAIN DRIVING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21662 MOUNTAIN DRIVING SOUND HORN Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21663 DRIVING ON SIDEWALK Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21664 WRONGWAY FRWY ON/OFF RAMP Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 12 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21700 OBSTRUCTING DRIVERS VIEW Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21701 INTERFERING WITH DRIVER Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21702 DVR HRS-PERSON LESS THAN 10 HR Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 21702 DVR HRS-PROP LESS THAN 12 HRS Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Misdemeanor 21703 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY Following Too CloselyOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21704 DISTANCE BETWEEN TRUCKS Following Too CloselyOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21705 CARAVANS/DISTANCE BTWN VEH Following Too CloselyOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21706 DISTANCE BTWN EMERG VEHICLES Following Too CloselyOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21707 EMERGENCY AREA LIMITED ACCESS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21708 DRIVING OVER FIRE HOSES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 21709 DRIVE IN SAFETY ZONE Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21710 COASTING Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21711 ALLOW TOWED VEH TO SWERVE Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21712 UNLAWFUL RIDING DVR ALLOWING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21712 UNLAWFUL RIDING/ PERSON RIDING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21712 UNLAWFUL RIDING/PERSON TRAILER Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardD Hazard Infraction 21712 VEH TOWING PERSON/BIKE ETC. Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardE Hazard Infraction 21712 PASS IN 5TH WHEEL W/O AUDIO UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 21713 LIC REQ TO OPERATE ARMORED CAR UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 21715 PASS VEH EXCEED TOW LIMIT Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 13 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21715 VEH UNDER 4000LBS TOW LIMIT Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21716 OPER GOLF CART 25MPH< SPD AREA Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21717 VEH TURN ACROSS BIKE LANE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 21718 STOP/PARK ON A FREEWAY UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 21720 POCKET BIKE ON ROADWAY UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 21750 FAIL TO PASS SAFELY Improper PassingOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21751 PASSING WITHOUT SAFE CLEARANCE Improper PassingOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21752 DRV LT OF CENTER@CREST/CURVE Improper PassingOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21752 PASS W/IN 100FT BRIDGE/TUNNEL Improper PassingOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 21752 PASS W/IN 100FT RR CROSSING Improper PassingOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 21752 PASS W/IN 100FT INTERSECTION Improper PassingOther HazardD Hazard Infraction 21753 OVERTAKEN VEHICLE MOVE RT Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21754 PASSING ON RIGHT OVERTAKEN MAKING A Vehicle Code Infraction 21755 PASSING ON RIGHT WHEN UNSAFE Improper PassingOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21760 PASS BICYCLE AT UNSAFE DISTANCE B Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21800 UNCNTRL INTERSEC YIELD TO 1ST Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldA Hazard Infraction 21800 UNCNTRL INTERSEC YIELD TO RT Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldB1 Hazard Infraction 21800 CNTRL INTERSEC 4WAY YIELD RT Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldC Hazard Infraction 21800 INOP TRAFFIC SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldD1 Hazard Infraction 21801 LEFT TURNS, FAILURE TO YIELD Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldA Hazard Infraction 14 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21801 FAIL TO YIELD LANE BY LANE Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldB Hazard Infraction 21802 FAILURE TO YIELD / STOP SIGN Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldA Hazard Infraction 21802 FAILURE TO YIELD Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldB Hazard Infraction 21803 YIELD SIGNS Auto R/W ViolationSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 21803 FAILURE TO YIELD Auto R/W ViolationSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 21804 ENTERING OR CROSSING HIGHWAY Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldA Hazard Infraction 21804 FAIL TO YEILD BY VEH Auto R/W ViolationFailure to YieldB Hazard Infraction 21805 EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldB Hazard Infraction 21805 HORSEBACK RIDER Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldC Hazard Infraction 21806 YIELD TO EMERGENCY VEH Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldA1 Hazard Infraction 21806 CARPOOL LANE: YIELD TO EMERGENCY VEH A2 Vehicle Code Infraction 21806 ST CAR YIELD TO EMERGENCY VEH Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldB Non-Hazard Infraction 21806 PED YIELD TO EMERGENCY VEH Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationC Hazard Infraction 21809 LANE CHANGE FOR EMERG VEH A1 Vehicle Code Infraction 21809 SAFELY PASS STATIONARY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21810 YIELD TO TRANSIT BUS Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21950 YIELD TO PED IN CROSSWALKS Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldA Hazard Infraction 21950 PED DUE CARE & SAFETY Pedestrian ViolationFailure to YieldB Hazard Infraction 21950 VEH YIELD TO PED IN CROSSWALK Other Hazardous MovementFailure to YieldC Hazard Infraction 21951 PASS VEH STOPPED FOR PED XWALK Improper PassingOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 15 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 21952 YIELD TO PED ON SIDEWALK Ped R/W ViolationFailure to Yield Hazard Infraction 21953 YIELD IF NOT IN PROTECT XING Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian Violation Hazard Infraction 21954 PEDESTRIANS-YIELD Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationA Hazard Infraction 21955 PEDESTRIANS- JAYWALKING Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian Violation Hazard Infraction 21956 PEDESTRIANS-WALKING ON ROADWAY Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian ViolationA Hazard Infraction 21956 WALKING IN ROADWAY Pedestrian ViolationB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 21957 PEDESTRIANS- HITCHHIKING Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian Violation Hazard Infraction 21959 SKIING ACROSS ROADWAY Pedestrian ViolationPedestrian Violation Hazard Infraction 21960 VIOLATE FRWAY USE RESTRICTION UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 21963 RIGHT OF WAY, BLIND PEDESTRIAN Ped R/W ViolationOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 21964 IMPROPER USE OF WHITE CANE Pedestrian ViolationOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 21966 PEDESTRIANS-IN BICYCLE LANE Pedestrian ViolationOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 21968 MOTORIZED SKATEBOARDS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 21970 BLOCKING XWALK/SIDEWALK UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 22100 IMPROPER RIGHT TURN Improper TurningUnsafe TurningA Hazard Infraction 22100 IMPROPER LEFT TURN Improper TurningUnsafe TurningB Hazard Infraction 22100.5 IMPROPER U-TURN Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 22101 MARKINGS OR SIGNS FOR TURNING Improper TurningUnsafe TurningD Hazard Infraction 22102 U-TURN IN BUSINESS DISTRICT Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 22103 U-TURN RESIDENCE DISTRICT Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 16 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 22104 U-TURN FRONT OF FIRE STATION Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 22105 U-TURN VISION OBSTRUCTED Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 22106 STARTING OR BACKING UNSAFELY Unsafe Starting or BackingOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 22107 UNSAFE TURN/FAIL TO SIGNAL Improper TurningUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 22108 TURNING WITHOUT SIGNALLING Improper TurningOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 22109 STOPPING, NO SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 22110 SIGNAL DEVICE REQUIRED Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 22110 HAND SIGNAL REQUIRED UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 22111 IMPROPER HAND SIGNAL/ LEFT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 22111 IMPROPER HAND SIGNAL/RIGHT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 22111 IMPROPER HAND SIGNAL/STOP UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 22112 SCHOOL BUS SIGNALS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 22348 SPEEDING, EXCESS OF 100 MPH Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedB Hazard Infraction 22348 TOWING TRAILERS USE RT LN Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedC Hazard Infraction 22349 EXCEED MAX SPEED OF 65MPH Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedA Hazard Infraction 22349 2 LN UNDIVIDED HWY 55MPH Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedB Hazard Infraction 22350 UNSAFE SPEED Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 22356 EXCEED 70MPH Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedB Hazard Infraction 22400 IMPEDING TRAFFIC / SLOW SPEED Impeding TrafficOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 22400 BELOW SIGNPOSTED LIMIT Impeding TrafficOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 17 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 22405 UNSAFE SPEED BRIDGE/TUNNEL Unsafe SpeedOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 22406 SPEED/TANK VEH W/OVER 500GAL Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed5 Hazard Infraction 22406 UNSAFE SPEED TRUCK/TRACTOR Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedA Hazard Infraction 22406 UNSAFE SPD 55MPH PASS VEH TOW Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedB Hazard Infraction 22406 UNSAFE SPD SCHOOL BUS W/PUPILS Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedC Hazard Infraction 22406 UNSAFE SPD FARM LABOR W/PASS Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedD Hazard Infraction 22406 UNSAFE SPD VEH W/EXPLOSIVES Unsafe SpeedExcessive SpeedE Hazard Infraction 22407 TRUCK SPEED DOWNGRADE Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 22409 SOLID TIRE VEH WEIGHT RESTR Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Non-Hazard Infraction 22410 SPEED, METAL TIRE Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 22411 MTRZD SCOOTER MAX SPD 15MPH Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 22450 STOP SIGN Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 22451 FAIL TO STOP@RR XING SIGNALS Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsA Hazard Infraction 22451 DRV THRU CLOSED RR GATE/SIGNAL Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 22452 RR XING REQ STOP CERTAIN VEH Traffic Signals and SignsSigns and SignalsB Hazard Infraction 22454 PASS SCHOOL BUS W/RED LIGHTS Traffic Signals and SignsHazardA Hazard Infraction 22456 ICE CREAM TRUCK REQ SIGNS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARK UNLAWFULLY- INTERSECTION Hazardous ParkingParking CitationA Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- CROSSWALK Hazardous ParkingParking CitationB Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- SAFETY ZONE Hazardous ParkingParking CitationC Non-Hazard Infraction 18 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 22500 PARK W/IN 15' F/STATION DRVWY Hazardous ParkingParking CitationD Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING BLOCKING DRIVEWAY Hazardous ParkingParking CitationE Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- SIDEWALK Hazardous ParkingParking CitationF Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING BLOCKING EXCAVATION Hazardous ParkingParking CitationG Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- DOUBLE Hazardous ParkingParking CitationH Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- BUS ZONE Hazardous ParkingParking CitationI Non-Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- TUNNEL Hazardous ParkingParking CitationJ Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- BRIDGE Hazardous ParkingParking CitationK Hazard Infraction 22500 BLOCKING WHEELCHAIR RAMP Hazardous ParkingParking CitationL Hazard Infraction 22500 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- BLOCKING TRANSIT BUS M Vehicle Code Infraction 22500.1 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- FIRE LANE Hazardous ParkingParking Citation Hazard Infraction 22502 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- PARALLEL Hazardous ParkingParking CitationA Hazard Infraction 22502 PARKING UNLAWFULLY ONE WAY ST Hazardous ParkingParking CitationE Hazard Infraction 22504 STOPPING OR PARKING Hazardous ParkingParking CitationA Non-Hazard Infraction 22505 INTERFERING W/ MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC Parking CitationA1 Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 22505 PARKING ON STATE HWY Hazardous ParkingParking CitationB Non-Hazard Infraction 22507.8 PARKING UNLAWFULLY- HANDICAPPED UnknownParking CitationA Non-Hazard Infraction 22507.8 BLOCK HANDICAPPED PARKING UnknownParking CitationB Non-Hazard Infraction 22507.8 PARK HANDICAPPED SPACE LINES UnknownParking CitationC Non-Hazard Infraction 22511.1 ZER0 EMISSION PARKING DECAL UnknownParking CitationA Non-Hazard Infraction 19 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 22511.1 BLOCK 0 EMISSION PARKING SPOT UnknownParking CitationB Non-Hazard Infraction 22511.1 FALSE DISPLAY 0 EMISSION DECAL UnknownParking CitationC Non-Hazard Infraction 22511.56 PRESENT DISABLE PLACARD UnknownParking CitationA Non-Hazard Infraction 22513 SOLICIT TOW SERVICES UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 22513 UNAUTHORIZED TOW FROM SCENE UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 22514 FIRE HYDRANT Hazardous ParkingParking Citation Hazard Infraction 22515 UNATTENDED RUNNING VEH Hazardous ParkingOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 22515 UNATTENDED VEH SET BRAKES Hazardous ParkingOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 22516 LOCKED VEH W/PERSON IN IT UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 22517 OPEN VEH DOORS W/UNSAFE Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 22520 ROADSIDE REST PROHIBITED ACTS UnknownOther Non-Hazard6 Non-Hazard Infraction 22520.5 VENDING ON FREEWAY RT OF WAY UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 22520.5 VENDING ON ANY ROADWAY UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 22520.5 VENDING ON ANY SIDEWALK UnknownOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 22521 PARK W/IN 7 1/2' OF RR TRACK Hazardous ParkingHazard Hazard Infraction 22522 SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP Hazardous ParkingParking Citation Non-Hazard Infraction 22523 ABANDONED VEHICLE ON HWY UnknownParking CitationA Non-Hazard Infraction 22523 ABANDONED VEH/PRIVATE/PUBLIC UnknownParking CitationB Non-Hazard Infraction 22526 BLOCK INTERSECTION Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 22526 BLOCK AT YELLOW TURN SIGNAL Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 20 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 22526 BLOCK RAILROAD XING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 22526 ENTER RAIL CROSSING Other HazardD Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 2261 UNAUTH WEAR CHP/SIMULAR UNIFORM UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 22650 UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 22651.1 TOW COMPANY MUST TAKE BANKCARD UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 22658.1 TOW COMP DUTIES LOCATE OWNER UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 22658.1 TOW COMP DUTIES LEAVE NOTE UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 23103 RECKLESS DRIVING ON HWY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 23103 RECKLESS DRV OFF ST PARKING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 23104 RECKLESS DRIVING CAUSE INJURY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 23104 RECKLESS DRIVING W/PRIOR Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Felony 23109 SPEED CONTEST Other Hazardous MovementExcessive SpeedA Hazard Misdemeanor 23109 SPEED CONTEST AID OR ABET Other Hazardous MovementExcessive SpeedB Hazard Misdemeanor 23109 EXHIBITION OF SPEED Other Hazardous MovementExcessive SpeedC Hazard Misdemeanor 23109 BLOCK HWY/AID SPEED CONSTEST UnknownExcessive SpeedD Hazard Misdemeanor 23110 THROWING SUBSTANCE@VEH Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 23110 THROW OBJECT@VEH CAUSE INJURY UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Felony 23111 LIGHTED SUBSTANCE Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 23112 FAIL TO NTFY OF HAZ MAT SPILL UnknownOther Non-Hazard5A Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 23112 LITTERBUG UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 21 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 23112 DEPOSITING ROCKS, DIRT ON HWY Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 23113 FAILURE TO REMOVE LITER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 23114 SPILLING LOAD UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 23114 AGGREGATE MATERIAL REQUIREMENT UnknownOther HazardB1 Hazard Misdemeanor 23114 AGGREGATE MATERIAL HAULER B2 Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 23114 AGGREGATE MATERIAL HAULER TIRE FLAPS B2B Vehicle Code Infraction 23114 IMPROPER PLACE OF FENDER B2D Vehicle Code Infraction 23114 AGGREGATE MATERIAL COVER REQUIRED E1 Vehicle Code I 23114 AGGREGATE MATERIAL: EXEMPT FROM COVER Other HazardE4 Hazard Vehicle Code I 23115 SPILL FROM RUBBISH VEHICLE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 23116 DRV ALLOW PASSENGER TRUCK BED Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23116 PASSENGER RIDE IN TRUCK BED Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 23117 UNTETHERED ANIMAL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 23120 EYEGLASS OBSTRUCT SIDE VISION Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 23123 USE OF HANDHELD PHONE WHILE DRIVING Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23123.5 ELECTRONIC WIRELESS COMM DEVICE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23124 CELL PHONE UNDER 18YR Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 23125 USE CELL PHONE DRV SCHOOLBUS Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23127 DRV VEH BIKE/HIKE/HORSE PATH UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 23128 OPERATE SNOWMOBILE ON HWY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 22 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 23128 OPER SNOWMOBILE CARELESSLY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 23128 PURSUE DEER ON SNOWMOBILE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 23128 TRESSPASS ON SNOWMOBILE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardD Hazard Infraction 23129 OCCUPIED CAMPER EMERG EXIT Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 23135 MODIFIED MOTORIZED BICYCLE Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 23136 DUI UNDER 21 W/ .01% BA OR MORE Driving Under InfluenceDUIA Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 23140 DUI UNDER 21 W/BA .05 OR MORE Driving Under InfluenceDUIA Hazard Infraction 23152 DUI/ ALCOHOL Driving Under InfluenceDUIA Hazard Misdemeanor 23152 DUI/ BA OF .08 OR MORE Driving Under InfluenceDUIB Hazard Misdemeanor 23152 DUI/ DRUG ADDICT Driving Under InfluenceDUIC Hazard Misdemeanor 23152 DUI/ /DRUGS Driving Under InfluenceDUIE Hazard Vehicle Code Misdemeanor 23152 DUI/ ALCOHOL/DRUGS Driving Under InfluenceDUIF Hazard Vehicle Code Misdemeanor 23152 DUI/ ALCOHOL/DRUGS Driving Under InfluenceDUIG Hazard Vehicle Code Misdemeanor 23153 DUI WITH INJURY Driving Under InfluenceDUIA Hazard Felony 23153 DUI W/INJURY W/BA .08 OR MORE Driving Under InfluenceDUIB Hazard Felony 23153 DUI COM VEH W/INJURY .04 MORE Driving Under InfluenceDUID Hazard Felony 23154 DUI PROBATION OVE .01% BAC Driving Under InfluenceDUIA Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 23220 DRIVER DRINKING WHILE DRIVING UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23221 DRV DRINKING IN VEH ON HWY UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23221 PASSENGER DRINKING IN VEH UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 23 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 23222 ALCOHOL OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 23222 POSS OF MARIJUANA IN VEHICLE (DRIVER) UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 23222 OPEN CONTAINER MARIJUANA UnknownOther Non-HazardB1 Hazard Infraction 23223 DRIVER OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 23223 PASSENGER OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 23224 DRV UNDER 21 POSS ALCOHOL UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 23224 PASS UNDER 21 POSS ALCOHOL UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 23225 R/O ALLOW OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 23225 STORE OPEN CONTAINER W/O TRUNK UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 23225 STORE OPEN CONTAIN OFF HWY VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Infraction 23226 DRIVER POSS OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 23226 PASSENGER OPEN CONTAINER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 23247 LEND VEH W/O INJ/INTERLOCK UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 23247 INJ/INTERLK RESTRT DRV SOLICIT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 23247 INJ/INTERLK AID RESTRICT DRV UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 23247 TAMPER W/INJ/INTERLOCK UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 23247 RESTRICT DRV W/O INJ/INLOCK UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 24002 UNSAFE VEHICLE OR LOAD UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24002 VEH NOT PROPERLY EQUIPPED UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 24002.5 UNSAFE FARM LABOR VEH UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 24 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 24003 UNLAWFUL LIGHTS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24004 UNLAWFUL OPERATION Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 24005 SELL/INSTALL UNLAWFUL EQUIP Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24007 DEALER SELL VEH NOT IN CODE UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 24007 SELL VEH W/O SMOG REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 24008 MODIFIED CLEARENCE TOO LOW Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24008.5 MODIFIED CLEARENCE TOO HIGH Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24009 SALE NEW VEH W/O ID PLATE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24010 RENTAL VEHICLE REQ EQUIP UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24010 RENTAL VEH BE DMV COMPLIANCE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24010 RENTAL AGREEMENT REQ CONTENT UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24012 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24015 MTRZD BICYCLE LIGHT EQUIP REQ LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24015 MTRZD BICYCLE EQUIP/ MUFFLER Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24016 ELECTRIC BICYCLE HELMET REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 24016 ELECTRIC BIKE DRV 16YRS/OLDER Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB4 Hazard Infraction 24018 TRANSIT BUS 2WAY COM REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 2402.6 VIOL FUEL SYS REG/HYDRO GAS UnknownHazardB Hazard Infraction 2402.6 VIOL FUEL SYS REG/NATURAL GAS UnknownHazardC Hazard Infraction 2416 MISUSE AUTH EMERG VEH PERMIT UnknownHazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 25 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 2418 AMBULANCE EQUIP W/ RESUSCITATOR Unknown5 Non-Hazard Infraction 24250 LIGHTS REQ AFTER DARKNESS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 24252 LIGHTS/MAINTAIN WORK ORDER LightsOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24252 PROPER VOLTAGE LightsOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 24252 TWO OR MORE LIGHTS LightsOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 24253 ADEQUATE BATTERY POWER Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24253 ADEQUATE MOTORCYCLE BATTERY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24255 INFRARED VISION SYS REQ Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24255 INFRARED OPERATE W/HEADLIGHS Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 2430.5 TOW TRUCK DRIV CERT/APPLICANT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2430.5 TOW TRUCK DRIV CERT/EMPLOYEE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2430.5 TOW TRUCK DRIV/EMPL LIST UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2430.5 TOW TRUCK DRIV/REMOVE LIST UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2432 TOW TRUCK DRIV/FALSE INFO UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2432 TOW TRUCK DRIV/NOTIFY EMPL UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2436.3 TOW TRUCK/CARRIER ID ON TRUCK UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 2436.3 TOW TRUCK/OPER WITH SUSP ID UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 2436.3 TOW TRUCK/REMOVE ID AFTER SALE UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24400 HEADLAMP 2REQ &PLACEMENT LightsOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24400 HEADLAMPS NOT USED WHEN REQD LightsOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 26 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 24400 HEADLIGHT DURING RAIN Other Non-HazardC2 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 24401 PARKED VEH W/HIGH BEAM ON UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24402 USE OF AUX DRIVING LIGHTS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24402 USE OF AUX PASSING LIGHTS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24403 FOG LAMPS 2 ALLOWED LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24403 FOG LAMPS PLACEMENT LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24403 FOG LAMPS ON MOTORCYCLES LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24404 SPOTLAMPS 2 ALLOWED Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24404 SPOTLAMPS GLARE/APPROACH VEH LightsOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 24404 SPOTLAMPS IMPROPER USE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 24404 SPOTLAMPS DIRECT AT MOVE VEH Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardE Hazard Infraction 24405 FORWARD LAMPS/ 4 MAX Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24406 DIMMER SWITCH/ALLOW SELECTION LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24407 HIGH BEAM/ADJUSTMENT LightsOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 24407 LOW BEAM/ADJUSTMENT LightsOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 24408 BEAM INDICATOR/ REQUIRED LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24408 BEAM INDICATOR/ VISIBLE TO DRV LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24409 FAIL TO DIM APPROACHING VEH Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 24409 FAIL TO DIM PASSING VEH Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 24411 OFF HWY LAMPS COVERED ON HWY LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 24600 TAILLAMPS 1 REQ ON ALL VEH LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24600 TAILLAMPS 2 REQ ALL VEH 1/1/58 LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24600 TAILLAMPS 2 REQ TRUCK/TRACTOR LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24600 TAILLAMPS MOUNTING REQ LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 24600 TAILLAMPS/RED REQ LightsOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 24600 TAILLAMPS HEIGHT REQ LightsOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 24601 LICENSE PLATE LIGHT LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24602 FOG TAILLAMPS/RED 2 ALLOWED LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24602 FOG TAILLAMPS INSTALL REQ LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/1 REQ ALL VEH LightsOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/2 REQ ALL VEH 1/1/58 LightsOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/HEIGHT REQ LightsOther Non-HazardC Hazard Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/MOUNTING REQ LightsOther Non-HazardD Hazard Infraction 24603 RED LIGHT REQUIREDE1 Vehicle Code Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/ACTIVATION REQ LightsOther Non-HazardF Hazard Infraction 24603 STOPLAMPS/SUPPLEMEN TAL LightsOther Non-HazardG Hazard Infraction 24604 PROJECTING LOAD Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 24605 TOW TRUCK REQ PORTABLE LIGHT LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24605 TOWED VEHICLE/REQ LIGHTING Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 24606 BACKUP LAMPS/REQ AFTER 1/1/69 LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 28 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 24606 BACKUP LAMPS/WHITE ONLY LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24606 BACKUP LAMPS/RESTRICTED USE LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24606 BACKUP LAMPS/SUPPLEMENTAL LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 24607 REAR REFLECTORS/RED REQ LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24607 REAR/REFLECTORS/1REQ/ ALL VEH LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24607 REAR/REFLECTORS/2 REQ 1/1/65 LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24607 REAR/REFLECTORS/2REQ MTR TRUCK LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24607 REAR/REFLECTORS/ MOUNT REQ LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 24608 REFLECTOR/PLACEMENT ON TRUCKS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24608 REFLECTOR/PLACEMENT HOUSECAR LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24608 REFLECTOR/MOUNTING REQ LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24608 REFLECTOR / VISIBLITY REQ LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 24609 REFLECTOR/ WHITE/AMBER LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24609 REFLECTOR ON SCHOOLBUS LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24612 WIDE TRAILER REFLECTORS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24615 SLOW VEHICLE EMBLEM Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 24616 AUX REAR LAMPS/2 ALLOWED LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24616 AUX REAR LAMPS/WHITE LIGHT LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24616 AUX REAR LAMPS/IMPROPER USE LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 2462 RENDER KITCHEN GREASE/RECORDS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 29 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 2462 TRANSPORT KITCHEN GREASE RECORD UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 24800 DRIVE W/ONLY PARKING LIGHTS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 24950 TURN SIGNALS/REQ TOWED TRAILER LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/ANY VEH MAY HAVE LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/PASS/TRUCK LightsOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/SEMITRAILERS LightsOther Non-HazardB2 Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/WIDE SEMITRAILERS LightsOther Non-HazardB3 Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/MOTORCYCLES LightsOther Non-HazardB4 Non-Hazard Infraction 24951 TURN SIGNALS/MINIMUM HEIGHT LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 24952 TURN SIGNALS/CLEARLY VISIBLE LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 24953 TURN SIGNALS/ALLOWED COLORS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 24953 TURN SIGNALS/SIDE MOUNTED LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 24953 TURN SIGNAL/SIDEVIEW MIRROR LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 25.5 FALSE REPRESENT AS DMV EMPLOYEE Unknown Non-Hazard Infraction 25100 CLEARANCE- SIDEMARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25100 CLEARANCE- SIDEMARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25100 CLEARANCE- SIDEMARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25100 CLEARANCE- SIDEMARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 25100 CLEARANCE- SIDEMARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 25102 SIDE LAMPS/PWR&NOT RED LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 30 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 25102.5 SIDE LAMPS/SCHOOLBUSES LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25103 PROJECTING LOAD/WARN LT SIDE LightsOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 25103 PROJECTING LOAD/WARN REAR LightsOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 25104 OVERWIDTH VEH/WARN FLAG REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25105 RUNNINGBOARD LAMPS/GRN/WHITE LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25105 INSIDE DOOR LIGHTS/RED ONLY LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25105 ENTRANCE/EXIT LIGHTS LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25106 FENDER LAMPS/FRONT/WHT/AMBE LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25106 SIDE MARKER/RED W/IN 24" REAR LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25107 CORNERING LAMPS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25108 SIGNAL PILOT INDICATOR LAMPS Non-Hazard Infraction 25109 RUNNING LAMPS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25250 FLASHING LIGHTS PROHIBITED LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25251 DISABLED VEH FLASHING LIGHTS LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25251.2 M/CYCLE MODULATING HEADLAMP LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25252 EMERGENCY VEH LIGHT REQ LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25253 TOW TRUCKS AMBER FLASHING LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25257 FLASHING RED REQ SCHOOL BUS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25257 SCHOOLBUS REQ STOP SIGNAL ARM LightsOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 25257 SCHOOLBUS REQ AMBER WARN LIGHT LightsOther Non-HazardB2 Non-Hazard Infraction 31 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 25268 FLASHING AMBER/IMPROPER USE LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25269 RED WARN LIGHT/EMERG VEH ONLY LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25270 PILOT CAR WARNING LAMPS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25275 WARNING LAMPS- EXTENDED LOADS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25275.5 CRIME CONTROL LIGHTS ON BUSSES LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25278 WARN LIGHTS ON SURVEY VEH LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25279 PRIVATE SECRU VEH WARN LIGHTS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25300 WARN DEV/REQ SUBJECT TO 25100 Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25300 WARN DEV REQ/DISABLE VEH Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25300 WARN DEV REQ/OFF HWY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25300 WARN DEV REQ AFTER DARKNESS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 25301 PUBLIC UTLY VEH WARN DEV/DAY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25301 PUBLIC UTLY VEH WARN DEV/DARK Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25305 FUSEE/IMPROPER USE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25305 FUSEE/RED ONLY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25350 ID/TERMINAL BUS LIGHTS REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25351 MOUNTING/I.D.LAMPS COM VEH LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25351 COLOR/ID LAMP VEH PRIOR 1/1/68 LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25351 COLOR/ID LAMP VEH AFTER 1/1/68 LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25351 ID LAMPS PROHIBIT ON PASS VEH LightsOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 32 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 25400 DIFFUSED LIGHTS/NO RED LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25400 DIFFUSED LIGHT SIZE REQ LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25401 DIFFUSED LIGHT/RESEM/TRFC DEV LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25500 REFLECTORIZING MATERIAL/USE LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25650 MOTORCYCLE HEADLAMPS 1 REQ Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 25650.5 M/CYCLE AUTO HEADLIGHTS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25651 MOTOR DRIVEN CYCLE HEADLAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25651 MTR DRVN CYCLE SINGLE BEAM ADJ LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25803 ALL OTHER VEH/LIGHTS REQ LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25803 ALL OTHER VEH/REFLECTORS REQ LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25803 ALL OTHER VEH/WIDTH OVER 100" LightsOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 25805 FORKLIFT TRUCKS/LIGHT REQ LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 FRONT LIGHTS/REFLECTOR/COLO LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 REAR SIDE MARKER LAMPS LightsOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 FOGLAMPS/COLOR/WHITE TO YELLOW LightsOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 NIGHT VISION ILLUMINATING DEV LightsOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 REAR LIGHTS&REFLECTORS/RE LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 STOPLAMPS /YELLOW ALLOW>1/1/79 LightsOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 TURN SIGNALS/YELLOW TO REAR LightsOther Non-HazardB2 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 FRONT SIDE MARKER LAMP LightsOther Non-HazardB3 Non-Hazard Infraction 33 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 25950 BACKUP LIGHTS/WHITE ONLY LightsOther Non-HazardB4 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 FRONT MOUNTED DBL FACE TURN LightsOther Non-HazardB5 Non-Hazard Infraction 25950 REFLECTORS FOR TRLRS LightsOther Non-HazardB6 Non-Hazard Infraction 25951 BEAM ADJUSTMENT LightsOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 25952 LAMPS, REFLECTORS ON LOAD LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 25952 VEHICLES CARRIED AS A LOAD LightsOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 26100 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT NOT MEETING CHP LightsA Hazard Infraction 26100 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT; UNAPPROVED TYPE B Vehicle Code Infraction 26101 SELL/USE UNAPPRVD LGHTS/DVCE LightsOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26101 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT: USE UNAPPROVED TYPE LightsOther HazardB Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 26301 POWER BRAKES REQD 14,000 LBS + BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26301.5 PASS VHCLE >1/1/78 RQD BRKS BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26302 TRLER >6000# REQD BRKS >1940 BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26302 TRLER >3000# REQD BRKS >1966 BrakesOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26302 TRLER W/AIRBRKS ALLWHLS<1982 BrakesOther Non-HazardC Hazard Infraction 26302 TRLER BRKS = TO TOWING VHCLE BrakesOther Non-HazardD Hazard Infraction 26303 CAMP TRLER>1500# REQD BRKS BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26304 PWER BRKS REQ BRKAWY>1955 BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26304 VHCLE TRLER REQD BRKAWY >1955 BrakesOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26307 BRKS REQD W/FRKLFT WHEN TWNG BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 34 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 26311 BRKS REQD ALL WHLS MTR VHCLS BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26311 MANL FRNT BRKING ONLY BAD WTHR BrakesOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26450 BRKS REQD BOTH MANL AND PWR BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26451 PRKNG BRKS 4 ADQT LOAD & GRDE BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26451 PRKING BRKS NORMAL APPLCTION BrakesOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26451 PRKING BRKS HELD MCHNCL MEANS BrakesOther Non-HazardC Hazard Infraction 26452 BRKS ADQT TO STOP MTR VHCL BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26453 BRKS NOT IN GOOD WRKING ORDR BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26454 SRVC BRK ADQT 4 LOAD AND GRDE BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26454 SRVC BRK STPING DSTNCE RQMNTS BrakesB Hazard Infraction 26456 BRK TEST >25MPH PRHBTTED BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26457 VHCLS 32'@15MPH >SPEED STP <32' BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26458 SNGLE CNTRL PWR BRK REQD BrakesOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 26458.5 ADDNL BRK CNTR REQD ON TRLR Brakes Hazard Infraction 26502 AIRBRK REQ FULL SRVC APPLCTION BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26503 SFTY VLVE PRPLY INSTLLD BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26504 AIR GVNR W/IN CHP REQMNTS BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26505 PRSSRE GAUGE IN GGOD CNDTN BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26506 AIRBRKS REQD WRNING SYSTM BrakesA Hazard Infraction 26506 VISBLE AIRBRK WRNING SYSTM B Hazard Infraction 35 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 26507 CHK VALVE PROPRLY INSTLLED BrakesOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26508 MTR VHCLE REQD EMGNCY BRK BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 26508 COMBO VHCL REQD EMGNCY BRK BrakesOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26508 SRVC & EMGCY SYSTEM INDPNDT BrakesOther Non-HazardE Hazard Infraction 26508 EMGNCY APPLD FRM DRIVER SEAT BrakesOther Non-HazardF Hazard Infraction 26508 SRVC BRK FAILURE- NO DRV VHCL BrakesOther Non-HazardG Hazard Infraction 26508 EMGNCY SYSM NOT EFFCT SRCV BRK BrakesOther Non-HazardH Hazard Infraction 26508 ENGY STRNG DVCE OPRTNG RQMNTS BrakesOther Non-HazardI Hazard Infraction 26508 SPRT AIR TANK EACH AXLE BrakesOther Non-HazardJ Hazard Infraction 26508 STOPPING DISTANCE REQMNTS BrakesOther Non-HazardK Hazard Infraction 26508 OWNER/DRIVER DEMNSTRT OPRATN BrakesOther Non-HazardO Hazard Infraction 26520 VACUUM GAUGE-ACCRT & VSBLE Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 26521 WRNING DVCE , AUDBLE & VSBLE BrakesOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 26522 CHK VLVE BTWN VCM SRCE & RSVE BrakesOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 26700 WINDSHLD REQD PASS VHLE & TRKS BrakesOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 26701 SFTY GLZING MATRL REQD Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 26701 SFTY GLZING MATRL- CMPRS >1968 Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 26701 SFTY GLZING MATRL- CYCLE >1969 Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 26701 PRHBTS RED,BLU, AMBR- GLZING Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 26701 SFTY GLZING WNDS, DRS, INTR Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 36 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 26703 USE OF OTHR THAN SFTY GLZING Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 26703 SFTY GLZING MTRL-OTHR MATRL Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 26705 SELL CYCLE WNDSHLD- W/OUT GLZNG Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 26706 WNDSHLD WPRS REQD ALL VHCLES Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 26706 WNDSHLD WPRS 2-REQD VHCL >1950 Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 26707 WPRS-MNTN GOOD CNDTION&ORDR Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26708 OBSTRCT VIEW- WINDSHIELD Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA1 Hazard Infraction 26708 OBSTRCT VIEW- WINDSHIELD/SIDE Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA2 Hazard Infraction 26708 OBSTRCT VIEW-SNOW/ICE Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA3 Hazard Infraction 26708.2 DRIVE W/ SUNSCREEN Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 26708.5 APPLCTN TRNSPRNT MTRL TO WNDW A Non-Hazard Infraction 26708.5 TINTED SAFETY GLASS Other HazardB Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 26709 REAR VIEW MIRROR REQD-ONE LFT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA1 Hazard Infraction 26709 TWO SIDE VIEW MIRROR RQD Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 26710 DFCTVE WNSHLD-REAR WNDW-48 HRS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26711 SUN VSR REQD BUS OR TROLLY Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 26712 ADQT DFSTR REQD-HIRE PASS VHCL Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27 IMPERSONATING MEMBER OF CHP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 27000 HORN REQ ON VEH Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27000 BACK UP ALARM REQ GARBAGE TRKS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 37 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 27001 USE HORN WHEN NECESSARY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27001 HORN OtherOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 27002 VEH ILLEGALLY EQUIP W/SIREN Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27007 VEH W/OUTSIDE SPKRS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27150 DEFECTIVE MUFFLERS ON HWY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27150 MUFFLERS, DEFECTIVE OFF HWY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27150.1 SELL UNAPPROVED EXHAUST SYS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 27150.3 MODIFY TO WHISTLE TIP EXHAUST Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27150.3 OPERATE VEH W/WHISTLE TIP Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27150.3 BUSINESS INSTALL WHISTLE TIP Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 27150.8 SELL UNAUTH M/CYCLE EXHAUST Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27151 EXHAUST SYSTEMS/AMPLIFY UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27152 EXHAUST PIPES/DIRECTED TO SIDE Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27153 EXHAUST PRODUCTS/EXCESSIVE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/STANDARDS<1/1 /71 UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/DARK#1RINGEL MAN CHART UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/GREATER THAN DARK UnknownOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/STANDARDS >1/1/71 UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/DARK#2RINGEL MAN CHART UnknownOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 27153.5 EXHAUST/GREATER THAN DARK UnknownOther Non-HazardB2 Non-Hazard Infraction 38 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 27154 EXHAUST SYSTEM/PROPER Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27155 FUEL TANK CAP REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27156 GROSS SMOG POLLUTER Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27156 SMOG DEVICE DISCONNECT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27156 SMOG DEVICE ALTER SYSTEM Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 27156 SMOG DEV/OPERATE AFTER NOTICE Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 27158 SMOG CERTIFICATE Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27158.5 SMOG DEV/COMPLY/55-65 VEH ONLY Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27305 SEATBELTS REQ IN FIRE TRUCKS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27315 SEATBELTS REQ/ALL PASSENGER<16 Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD1 Non-Hazard Infraction 27315 PASSENGER<16 REQ SEATBELTS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 27315 OWNER MAINTAIN SEATBELTS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 27317 RE-INSTALL DEPLOYED AIR BAG Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 27317 MODIFIED AIRBAGS Other HazardB Vehicle Code Misdemeanor 27360 CHILD RESTRAINT/PARENT UnknownChild RestraintA Hazard Infraction 27360 CHILD RESTRAINT/DRIVER UnknownChild RestraintB1 Hazard Infraction 27360.5 SEATBELT/CHILD/TEEN/PA RENT REQ UnknownSafety BeltA Hazard Infraction 27360.5 SEATBLET/CHILD/TEEN/DR IVER REQ UnknownSafety BeltB Hazard Infraction 27362 SELL UNAUTH CHILD RESTRAINT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 27362.1 SELL CHILD RSTRT USED IN T/C UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 39 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 27400 HEADSET NOT TO COVER BOTH EARS Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27450 SOLID TIRE THICKNESS Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27452 SOLID TIRE/FLAT SPOTS/SECURE Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27453 DUAL SOLID TIRE DIAMETERS Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27454 PROJECTIONS ON TIRES Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27455 RADIAL TIRE INNER TUBE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27459 TIRE CHAINS/REQUIREMENTS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27459.5 TIRE CHAINS/SELL POOR QUALITY Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27460 4X4 VEH/USE OF CHAIN REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27460.5 SALE REGROOVED TIRE Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27461 USE A REGROOVED TIRE Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 27465 SELL A BALD TIRE UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 27465 USE A BALD TIRE Other EquipmentOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 27465 BALD TIRE: 1/32" TREAD UnknownOther HazardB1 Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 27465 BALD TIRE: 4/32" STERRING AXLE UnknownOther HazardB2 Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 27465 BALD TIRE: 6/32" TREAD SNOW TIRES UnknownOther HazardB3 Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 27600 FENDERS/MUDGUARDS REQUIRED Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27602 TV SCREEN IN VIEW OF DRIVER Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 27603 FORMER SCHOOL BUS/REPAINT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27605 FORMER L/E VEH/REPAINT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 40 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 27606 LIGHT BAR ON NON L/E VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27700 TOW TRUCKS CARRY BROOM Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 27700 TOW TRUCKS CARRY SHOVEL Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA2 Non-Hazard Infraction 27700 TOW TRUCKS CARRY FIRE EXT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA3 Non-Hazard Infraction 27800 M/CYCLE PASSENGER EQUIP Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 27801 MOTORCYCLE SEAT POSITION Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 27801 M/CYCLE HANDLEBAR HEIGHT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 27802 SELL NON DOT HELMET UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 27803 DRIVER M/CYCLE HELMET REQ Other EquipmentOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 27803 PASS M/CYCLE HELMET REQ Other EquipmentOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 27900 LOGO DISPLAY ON VEH FOR HIRE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27901 VEH FOR HIRE LOGO LEGIBLE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27903 HZRD CARGO VEH DISPLAY SIGNS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27904 PILOT CARS/LOGO BOTH SIDES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27904.5 PILOT CAR/OVERSIZE SIGN REQ UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27905 UNAUTH FIRE DPT SIGN ON VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27906 SCHOOL BUS SIGN REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 27906.5 YOUTH BUS SIGN REQ UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27907 TOW TRUCK/ID SIGNS ON VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 27908 TAXICAB/COMPANY NAME ON VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 41 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 27909 VEH CARRY CNG/LNG/LPG MUST ID UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 28 REPOSSESSER NOTIFY POLICE 1 HR UnknownA Non-Hazard Infraction 2800 REFUSE TO OBEY PEACE OFFICER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 2800 REFUSE LAWFUL OUT OF ORDER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 2800.1 EVADE PEACE OFFICER/MOTOR VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 2800.1 EVADE PEACE OFFICER/BICYCLE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 2800.2 EVADE PEACE OFFICER/RECKLESS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Felony 2800.3 EVADE PEACE OFFICER/INJURIES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Felony 28000 REFR VAN/MUST HAVE EMERG EXIT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 2801 FAIL TO OBEY FIREMAN'S ORDER UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 2803 CONTROL OF ILLEGAL SIZE/WEIGHT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 2803 REFUSE/WEIGHT CERT OR BILLING UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 28050 ODOMETER/ALTER TRUE MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 28050.5 OPERATE VEH W/DEFECT ODOMETER UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 28051 ODOMETER DISCONNECT/TURN BACK UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 28051.5 ODOMETER/RESET/TURN BACK/DEV UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 28053 NOTICE ON REPAIR OF ODOMETER UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 28053 REMOVE REPAIR NOTICE O/METER UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 28060 FIRE EXT/REQ IN RV W/COOK/HEAT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 28060 FIRE EXT/SELL RV W/O UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 42 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 28060 OPERATE RV W/O FIRE EXT Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 2807 SCHOOL BUS INSPECTION/CHP CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 2807.1 DISP CHP CERT/VEH TRANS PUPILS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 2807.2 RETAIN RECORD CHP INSPECTION UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 2807.3 YOUTH SCHOOL BUS/DISP CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 28071 BUMPERS/2 REQ/PASS VEH Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 28080 CAMPER REQ/HAVE SIGNAL DEV UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 28080 CAMPER W/PASS REQ TO HAVE DEV UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 28085 THEFT ALARM/SIREN NOT ALLOWED UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 28100 PILOT CAR/RED WARN FLAGS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 28101 PILOT CAR REQ MIN WIDTH 60" UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 28101 PILOT CAR REQ/1STOP/SLOW SIGN UnknownOther Non-HazardB1 Non-Hazard Infraction 28101 PILOT CAR REQ/1ORANGE VEST UnknownOther Non-HazardB2 Non-Hazard Infraction 28101 PILOT CAR REQ/1 RED HAND FLAG UnknownOther Non-HazardB3 Non-Hazard Infraction 28101 PILOT CAR REQ/1 TWO WAY RADIO UnknownOther Non-HazardB4 Non-Hazard Infraction 28102 PILOT CAR VERTICAL MEASURE DEV UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 28103 PILOT CAR MISSING REQ EQUIP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 2813 SUBMIT TO INSPECTION/COMM VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 2813 COM VEH/UNAUTH INSPECT STICKER UnknownOther Non-Hazard5B Hazard Misdemeanor 2814 SUBMIT TO INSPECTION/PASS VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 43 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 2815 SCHOOL CROSS GUARD FAIL OBEY Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 28150 VEH W/RADAR JAMMING DEVICE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 28150 BUY/USE/POSS/RADAR JAMMING DEV UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 28150 POSSESS 4 OR MORE JAMMING DEV UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 2816 UNLAWFUL LOAD/UNLOAD CHILDREN Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 2817 DISOBEY OFC/FUNERAL PROCESSION Other Improper DrivingOther Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 2818 TRAVERS FLARE/CONE PATTERN Other Improper DrivingOther Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 29001 5TH WHL/UPPER/LOWER HALVES SEC Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 29002 5TH WHL WORKING LOCK DEVICE Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 29003 HITCH/COUPLING NOT SECURED Other EquipmentOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 29003 FAULTY DRAWBAR/TONGUE Other EquipmentOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 29003 TOW DOLLY 2 CHAINS REQUIRED Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 29004 TOWED VEH SAFETY CHAIN REQ Other EquipmentOther HazardA1 Hazard Infraction 29004 TOW TRUCK 2 CHAINS REQ Other EquipmentOther HazardA2 Hazard Infraction 29004 VEH TRLR REQ 4 TIEDOWNS Other EquipmentOther HazardA3 Hazard Infraction 29004 SAFETY CONNECT SUFF STRENGHT Other EquipmentOther HazardB Hazard Infraction 29004 CHAIN/CABLE SLACK Other EquipmentOther HazardC Hazard Infraction 29005 DRAWBAR/CABLE LENGTH >15' Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 29006 TOW ON FRWY/RIGID DEVICE Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 29200 LOGS&POLES/PER CHP REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 44 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 29800 LUMBER/ PER CHP REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 30800 BALED HAY/STRAW PER CHP REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 31 FALSE INFO TO PEACE OFFICER UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 HAZ-MAT&WASTE PLACARDS REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 HAZ-MAT VEH USE DIRECT ROUTE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 HAZ-MAT AVOID CONGESTED ROUTE UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 HAZ-MAT VEH PARKED UNATTENDED UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 WASTE HAULER SAFETY PLAN REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31303 HAZ/VEH MAY NOT DEV REQ ROUTE UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31307 HAZ-MAT UNLAWFUL OPERATION UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31309 HAZ MATERIAL COMPLY W/CHP REG UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 31400 WRKMN TRKS REQ SECURED SEATS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 31400 WRKMN TRKS SIDE/END RAILINGS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 31400 WRKMN/TRKS STEPS REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 31401 FARM LABOR VEH REQ CERT IN VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31401 FARM LABOR VEH INSP REQ Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 31401 FARM LBR OPR W/O CURRENT CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 31401 FARM LBR REQ VIOLATE CHP REG UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 31402 FARM LBR VEH UNSAFE CONDITION UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 31403 FARM LBR VEH UNSAFE FOR PASS Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 45 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 31404 FARM LBR OWNER SEATBELTS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 31405 FARM LBR REQ SEATBELTS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 31405 FARM LBR VEH ON HWY SEATBELTS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 31406 FARM LBR/SEATS CMPLY W/FED REG Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 31406 FARM LBR VEH SEATS FED REG Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 31407 FARM LBR SECURE TOOLS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 31408 FARM LBR VEH REQ 2 HEADLIGHTS LightsOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 31500 TRLR AS LOAD/SECURED OTHER VEH Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 31501 LOG DOLLY AS LOAD/SECURED Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 31510 CARGO/METAL PRODUCTS PER CHP Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 31520 CARGO/BALED COTTON PER CHP Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 31530 CARGO/EMPTY WOOD BOX PER CHP Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 31540 CARGO/DET FREIGHT CONTAINERS Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 31560 WASTE TIRES/TRANSPORT W/O UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 31602 TRANSPORT EXPLOSIVES/LIC REQ UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 31602 TRANS EXPLOSIVES/OUTSIDE UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 31602 TRANS EXPLOSIVE/SAFE STOP AREA UnknownOther HazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 31607 INSP REQ BEFORE TRANSPORT UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 31609 RECORD OF INSP/HAVE ON DEMAND UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 31610 EXPL VEH/MAINTAINED BRAKES BrakesOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 46 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 31610 EXPL VEH/MAINTAIN IGN/LIGHTS Other EquipmentOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 31610 EXPL VEH/MAINTAIN TIRES Other EquipmentOther HazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 31610 EXPL VEH/CARRY FIRE EXT Other EquipmentOther HazardD Hazard Misdemeanor 31610 EXPL VEH/NOT CARRY FLAME DEV Other EquipmentOther HazardE Hazard Misdemeanor 31611 EXPL VEH OWNER SUPPLY MAPS Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 31612 EXPL VEH HAVE SHIPPING INSTR UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 31613 EXPL VEH PROHIBITED CARGO UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/FOLLOW ROUTE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/AVOID CONGESTED AREA Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/LOAD/UNLOAD REQ Hazardous ParkingOther HazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/LOAD CONTAIN VEH BODY Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardD Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/LOAD ENCLOSED Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardE Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/PASS FIRE IF SAFE Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardF Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/UNATTENDED Hazardous ParkingOther HazardG Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 EXPL VEH/NO OPEN FLAME Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardH Hazard Misdemeanor 31614 PASS/BUS VEH NOT TRANS EXPL Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardI Hazard Misdemeanor 32000 HAZ/EXPL VEH DISPLAY LIC UnknownOther Non-Hazard5A Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32001 HAZ-MAT VEH PROPER EQUIP UnknownOther Non-HazardC1 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32001 HAZ-MAT VEH SHIPMENT LAWS UnknownOther Non-HazardC2 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32001 HAZ-MAT VEH REQ VALID TRAN LIC UnknownOther Non-HazardC3 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 47 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 32001 HAZ-MAT VEH 2WAY COMM DEV Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardC4 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32001 HAZ-MAT VEH LOCKED CARGO BODY UnknownOther Non-HazardC5 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32002 HAZ-MAT LIC KEEP IN VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32002 HAZ-MAT LIC REQ FOR VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32050 HAZ-MAT ROUTE NOTIFIY CHP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32052 HAZ-MAT TRANSPORT TIME LIMIT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32052 HAZ-MAT CARRIER CHG IN PLANS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32103 INHAL HAZ/CARRIER PROVIDE MAPS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32104 INHAL HAZ/USE UNAUTH HWY UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32104 INHAL HAZ/STOP OTHER THAN SAFE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32105 INHAL HAZ/AVOID POPULATED AREA UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32105 INHAL HAZ/PARK UNATTENDED UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32105 INHAL HAZ/PRFRM DESIGNATE INSP UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32105 INHAL HAZ/MAINTAIN INSP RECORD UnknownOther Non-HazardE1 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32105C INHAL HAZ/PERFORM PRE INSP UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 32106 INHAL HAZ/MAINTAIN BRAKES UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 32106 INHAL MAT/ MAINTAIN STEERING UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 32106 INHAL MAT/MAINTAIN TIRES UnknownOther HazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 32106(d) INHAL MAT/MAINTAIN FIRE EXT UnknownOther HazardD Hazard Misdemeanor 32107 INHAL MAT/BREATH&COM EQUIP UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 48 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 33000 RADIOACTIVE LOAD/TRANS CHP REG Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 34501 WHLCHR LFT SAFETY CERT TO CHP UnknownOther Non-Hazard1 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 EMPLOYER NOTIFY CHP OF RECORDS UnknownOther Non-Hazard10 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 MTR CARRIER/SUBMIT FEES&APPLC UnknownOther Non-Hazard12E Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34501 MTR CARRIER OPER/W/O APPLCN UnknownOther Non-Hazard12F Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34501 MTR CARRIER OPER W/O INSP UnknownOther Non-Hazard12G Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34501 MTR CARRIER FAIL APPLY RE-INSP UnknownOther Non-Hazard12H Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34501 FAIL TO INSP PARATRANSIT VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard17A Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 FAIL/DOCUMENT PARATRANSIT INSP UnknownOther Non-Hazard17B Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 MTR CARRIER NTFY CHP/STAFF CHG UnknownOther Non-Hazard18 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 DRIVING TIME LIMITS UnknownOther Non-Hazard2B1 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 CARRIER REQ DRV TO EXCEED TIME UnknownOther Non-Hazard2B2 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 AG DRV/HOURS&DUTY STATUS UnknownOther Non-Hazard2C1 Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 CARRIER REQ DRV EXC MAX TIME UnknownOther Non-Hazard3A Non-Hazard Infraction 34501 BUS INSP REQ BY CHP UnknownOther HazardE Hazard Misdemeanor 34501.8 PARATRANSIT/DISABLE REQ INSP UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 34505 MTR CARRIER FAIL KEEP RECORD UnknownOther Non-Hazard10 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34505 TOUR BUS REQ INSP/ 45 DAYS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 34505 TOUR BUS NOT OPER W/DEFECTS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 34505 TOUR BUS KEEP INSP REC 1YR UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 49 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 34505.5 MTR CARRIER INSP VEH 90DAY UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34505.5 MTR CARRIER/REPAIR DEFECTS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34505.5 MTR CARRIER KEEP RECORDS 2YR UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAILURE TO COMPLY W/DRV HOURS UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAILURE TO COMPLY W/HAZ MAT UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAIL TO COMPLY/SCHOOLBUS UnknownOther HazardC Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAILTO COMPLY/YOUTH BUS EQUIP UnknownOther HazardD Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAIL TO COMPLY/TOUR BUS EQUIP UnknownOther HazardE Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 FAIL TO COMPLY/COMM VEH EQUIP UnknownOther HazardF Hazard Misdemeanor 34506 EQUIP/MAINT/OPER/ PUPIL BUS UnknownOther HazardG Hazard Misdemeanor 34506.3 FAILURE TO COMPLY W/VEH INSP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 34507 FAIL TO DISPLAY PUC/ICC ID# UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.5 MTR CARRIER MUST APPLY FOR ID# UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.5 MTR CARRIER/FAIL DISPLAY ID# UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.5 ID# MUST BE LEGIBLE FROM 50' UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.5 OUT OF BUSIN ID# MUST REMOVED UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.6 BUS CARRIER ID# GET FROM CHP UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 34507.6 BUS CARRIER ID# PROPER DISPLAY UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 34509 VANPOOL VEH/FIRE EXT REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 34509 VANPOOL VEH/FIRST AID KIT REQ UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 50 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 34509 VANPOOL VEH/INSP&MAINTAINED UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 34509 VANPOOL VEH/INSP DOC 1YR UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 34509 VANPOOL VEH/PROPER ID UnknownOther Non-HazardE Non-Hazard Infraction 34510 VEH TRANS HAZ MAT/CARRY DOC UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Infraction 34516 REFER/TRUCK PROHIBITED USE UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 34520 MTR CARRIER&DRV COMPLY W/DRUG UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34520 MTR CARRIER/SUPPLY DRUG REC UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34520 TESTER MAIL POS RESULTS TO CHP UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34520 DRV/DUTY PRIOR TO DRUG SCREEN UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34520.3 SCHOOL DRVS DRUG TESTING REQ UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 34520.5 PARATRANS OWNR/BE IN DRUG PROG UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 34520.5 PARATRANSIT/ PULL NOTICE PROG UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 34620 MTR PROP OPR W/O DMV PERMIT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34620 CONTRACT MTR PROP W/O CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34623 MTR PROP PERMIT/SUSPEND UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34623 MTR PROP OPR W/SUSPN PERMIT UnknownOther Non-HazardG Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34623 MTR PROP OPR W/SUSPN PERMIT UnknownOther Non-HazardH Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 34660 MTR PROP CONTINUE OPER W/SUS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35100 LIMITATIONS ON WIDTH Other Hazardous MovementOther HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 35100.5 COTTON MOVER WIDTH 130 INCHES Non-Hazard Infraction 51 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 35101 WIDTH 108" OUTSDE PNEUMTC TRS Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35102 LOOSE AG PRODCTS 120 " UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35103 MAX WIDTH 6" BEYONG SIDEWALL A Non-Hazard Infraction 35104 MOBLE OR CNSTR EQUIP EXCD 120" UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35106 BUS AND MTR COACH MAX 120" A Non-Hazard Infraction 35106 SPCFD BUS & MTR COACH MAX 104" B Non-Hazard Infraction 35109 REQD DVCES 10" SIDE 120" WIDE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35110 PROJCTING EQPMNT 3" SIDE Unknown Non-Hazard Infraction 35111 PRJCTNG LOAD LEFT OR 6" RGHT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35250 HEIGHT OF VEHICLE >14' Other Hazardous MovementOther Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35251 BOOM OR MAST SECURED BY CHAIN Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 35252 PILOT CAR VRTCLE MESRE DEVICE Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 35252 PILOT CAR 20 MPH BELOW POSTED C Non-Hazard Infraction 35400 SINGLE VEHICLE LEGNTH 40' UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 35400 SCHBUS IN MOTN W/EXTNDED X-ARM B6 Non-Hazard Infraction 35400 PRPLY MNTED BIKE ON FRNT OF BUS E Non-Hazard Infraction 35401 COMBOS 65' ,EXCEPTIONS UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 35401 COMBOS 75' ,EXCEPTIONS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 35401.8 COMBOS 75' ,EXCEPTIONS BIOMASS UnknownA Non-Hazard Infraction 35401.8 AG TRLR 75' IN SPECFD COUNTIES B Non-Hazard Infraction 52 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 35406 LOAD FRNT NOT OVER 3 MONTHS OtherOther HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 35408 FRNT BUMPR NOT EXTND > 2FEET OtherOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35410 PRJCTIONS TO REAR < 2/3 WHL BASE UnknownOther Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35411 OVERALL LENGTH LIMITS 75' UnknownOther HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 35411 LOAD INSIDE WHEN LEGNTH 75' UnknownOther HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 35550 AXL WGHT 20,000#-10,500- 12,500 UnknownOther HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35550 WHEEL LOAD LMTS MOLD ON TIRES C1 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35550 WHEEL LMTS TIRE MKRS WIDTH C2 Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35551 EXCD ALLWBLE WGHT CONSECT AXL Other Improper DrivingOther HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35551.5 WEIGHT Other Improper DrivingOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35552 EXCEED WEIGHT TRANSPRT LOGS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35554 AXL WGHT EXCD 20,500# ON BUS Other Improper DrivingOther Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35600 SOLID TRE WGHT NOT EXCD 600# Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35601 METAL TRE WGHT NOT EXCD 500# Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35655 EXCD LOAD ON STATE HWY UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 35753 EXCD WGHT LIMIT ON BRIDGE UnknownOther HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35783 CRRY DSPLY SPCL PERMIT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35783.5 REMVE OR COVER WRNING SIGNS OtherOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 35784 VIOLATING TERMS OF PERMIT Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35784 XTRA LGLE LOAD NOT PRSCB RTE OtherOther HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 53 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 35784.5 XTRA LGLE LOAD NO PERMIT A Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35785 SNGL SAW LOG 15MPH BRDGE 25HWY B Hazard Misdemeanor 35786 TRK BSTR UNIT IN VIOLTN OF PRMT B Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35789 HSE MVER NOTIFY R.R. 36 HRS PRIOR Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35790 OVRWDTH HOME REQD PERMIT G Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35790 VIOLATING TERMS OF PERMIT Other Hazardous MovementOther Non-HazardH Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 35790.1 TRNSPTR MAKE DOCMNTATION W/PD N Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 36102 BALE WAGON TRIP DISTANCE LMTS B Non-Hazard Infraction 36400 LIFT CARRIER 35MPH SPD LIMIT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 36508 DISPLAY SLOW VEH EMBLEM UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 36510 IMPL HUSBANDRY-REQ STOP DIST UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 36600 IMPL HUSBANDRY- TRANSPRT REG OtherOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 36600 IMPL HUSBANDRY- TRANSPRT REG OtherOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 36605 TRLRS-LIFT CARRY WITDH LIMITS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 36606 BALE WAGON LOAD WIDTH A Non-Hazard Infraction 38010 VHCLS NOT RGSTRD NEED ID PLTE OtherOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 38020 OFF-HWY VHCLE REQD IDENTITY UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 38026.5 PRHBT OFF-HWY VHCLE ON HWY Other Non-HazardB Hazard Infraction 38027 MVE OFFHWY VHCLE- NON-MCHN Hazard Infraction 38060 OFFHWY-CHNGE OF ADDRESS Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 54 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 38060 OFFHWY-CHNGE ADDRESS CERT B Non-Hazard Infraction 38085 IDNTFCTN CERT W/VHCLE Not StatedOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 38090 ID CERT OR PLATE,STLN,LST,MUTL UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 38095 CERT OF OWNSHP,STLN,LST,MUTL Non-Hazard Infraction 38170 ID PLTE DISPLY REQD UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 38170 ID PLATE SECURE AND VISBLE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 38170 ID PLATE PROPERLY DISPLAYED UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 38200 TRNFR OWNRSHP-DLR NOTFY DMV A Non-Hazard Infraction 38200 UNLCNSD DLR OFFHWY- NTFY DMV B Non-Hazard Infraction 38205 TRNFR OWNRSHP-NOTFY DMV Other Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 38300 FAIL OBEY SIGN, SGNL, TRFC CNTRL UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 38301 UNLWFL TO VIOLATE SPCL REGS Other Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 38302 UNLWFL TO ERECT SIGN, SGNL, T/C Hazard Infraction 38304 UNABLE TO REACH VEH. CNTRLS UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 38305 OFFHWY-PRIMA FACIA SPD LIMIT UnknownExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 38310 SPD LIMIT W/IN 50' PEOPLE/ANMLS Unsafe SpeedExcessive Speed Hazard Infraction 38312 UNSAFE START Unsafe Starting or BackingOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 38314 UNSAFE TURNING MOVEMENT UnknownUnsafe Turning Hazard Infraction 38316 RKLS DRVING, WLLFL WNTON DSRGD UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 38317 RKLS DRVING, CAUSE INJRY UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 55 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 38318 THROW SBSTNCE AT OFF HWY MTR UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 38318 THRW SUBSTNCE W/INTNT GBI UnknownOther HazardB Hazard Felony 38318.5 RMVE ALTER TRL DNGR DIRCT MRKR UnknownOther HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 38318.5 INTNT GBI-ERCT ROPE,CHAIN ECT.. B Hazard Felony 38319 ILLGL TO OPRT VEH- HARM ENVRN UnknownOther Non-Hazard Hazard Misdemeanor 38320 LITTERBUGGING UnknownOther Non-HazardA Hazard Misdemeanor 38320 ILLEGAL DUMPING UnknownOther Non-HazardB Hazard Misdemeanor 38330 UNSAFE VEH. CONDITION UnknownOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 38335 ONE HEADLMP REQD DURNG DRKNES Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 38345 ONE RED TLLMP REQD DRNG DRKNES LightsOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 38355 SRVC BRK REQD OFFHWY VHCLE BrakesOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 38365 ADQT MFFLR REQD OFFHWY VEH BrakesOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 38366 SPRK ARRESTER REQD Other EquipmentOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 38370 OFFR/SELLNG NEW OFFHWY REQ NSE Non-Hazard Infraction 38370 NOISE LIMITSH1 Hazard Infraction 38375 OFFHWY VEH. EQUIP W/ SIREN A Non-Hazard Infraction 38375 USE OF SIREN OFFHWY VEH B Non-Hazard Infraction 38380 ADDTNL EQUIP REQD Non-Hazard Infraction 38390 ILLGL OPERTN W/OUT EMMSN CNTRL Other EquipmentOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 38391 SELL/OFR VHCL W/NO EMMSN CNTRL Non-Hazard Infraction 56 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 38393 OPRT VEH AFTR NOTFY NO SMOG Non-Hazard Infraction 38503 OPRT ALLTRN VEH. PUBLIC <15YO Other Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 38504 OPRT ALLTRN VEH. PUBLIC <14YO OtherOther Non-Hazard Hazard Infraction 38505 ALLTRN-NO HELMET PUBLIC LAND Other EquipmentOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 38506 ALLTRN-CARRY PASS. PUBLIC LAND OtherOther Hazard Hazard Infraction 39002 OPRT BICYCLE W/LICENSE Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 39002 TMPR BCYCL LCNSE, REG, SERL # Bicycle ViolationB Non-Hazard Infraction 39006 BCYCLE RTLR PRVD BIKE ID INFO A Non-Hazard Infraction 39007 SELL BIKE >1976 NO ID# ON FRM OtherBicycle Violation Non-Hazard Infraction 39008 NTFY W/IN 10DAYS ADRSS CHNG Non-Hazard Infraction 39008 NTFY LICNSE AGNCY W/IN 10 DYS A Non-Hazard Infraction 39008 OWNR TRNFR LCNSE W/10 DAYS B Non-Hazard Infraction 39009 LCNSE INDICIA,REGSTRTION B Non-Hazard Infraction 4000 VEHICLE ON HWY, UNREGISTERED UnknownOther Non-HazardA1 Non-Hazard Infraction 4000 VEH ON HWY,VIOL AIR POLLUTION UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 4000.4 UNREGISTERED CA BASED VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 4000.6 DECLARED WEIGHT FOR ALL UNITS A Vehicle Code I 4000.6 COM VEH EXCEED DECLARED GVW UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 4000.7 SLVG VEH REBLDR CHP INSP RPT Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40001 DRCTING VEHCLE UNLAWFLLY OtherOther Non-HazardA Hazard Infraction 57 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 40001 PRMT OPPRTN VEH- UNRGSTRD OtherOther Non-HazardB1 Hazard Infraction 40001 PRMT OPPRTN VEH-NOT EQPT OtherOther Non-HazardB2 Hazard Infraction 40001 PRMT OPPRTN VEH- SIZE,LOAD, REQ OtherOther Non-HazardB3 Hazard Infraction 40001 PRMT OPPRTN VEH-NO ADMIN REGS OtherOther Non-HazardB4 Non-Hazard Infraction 40001 NOT COMPLIANCE W/SMOG DEVICE OtherOther Non-HazardB5 Non-Hazard Infraction 40005 FAILRE DISPSE OF CITATN Non-Hazard Infraction 4001 FAIL REG/DISPLAY EXEMPT PLATES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4004 FOREIGN COM VEH TEMP PERMIT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 40504 FALSE SIGNATURE ON CITATION Not StatedOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40505 TRFC OFCR FAIL INCLD COURT INFO Non-Hazard Infraction 40508 FAILURE TO APPEAR Not StatedOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40508 FAILURE TO PAY FINE B Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40508 FAILURE TO CMPLY W/COURT ORDER C Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40519 FAILURE TO APPEAR- WRTN NOTICE B Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 40616 FAIL TO CORRECT VILATION Not StatedOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4152.5 REG FRGN VEH W/IN 20 DAYS EXP UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4159 CHANGE ADRS NOTIFY DMV 10 DAYS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4160 CHANGEADRS ON REGISTRATION UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4161 NTFY DMV W/IN 10 DAY MOTOR CHG UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 42005 FAIL TO ATTND TRFFC SCHOOL E Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 58 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 4454 REG CARD, NOT IN VEHICLE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 4455 FRGN COM VEH HAVE TEMP PERMIT UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4457 REPL PLATE/TAB/CERT LOST/ILLEG UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4458 LOST/STOLEN PLATE- NTFY POLICE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4459 REPL OWNER CERT- LOST/ILLEGIBLE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 4461 ALLOW IMPROPER USE OF REG UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4461 IMPROPER USE OF HANDI PLACARD UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4461 USE CANX/REVOKED HANDI PLACARD UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4461 PARK DISABLE W/O HANDI PERSON UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4462 PRESENT REG TO OFC FOR EXAM UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 4462 PRESENT WRONG REG FOR VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 4462 UNLAWFUL POSS OF REG/ID CARD UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4462.5 DISPLAY FALSE EVIDENCE OF REG UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4463 FALSE EVIDENCE OF REG W/INTENT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Felony 4463 FORGES A DISABLE PLACARD UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4463 DISPLAYS FORGE DISABLE PLACARD UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4463 DISABLE PERSON LEND PLACARD UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4463.5 MANUFACTURE FACSIMILE PLATES UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 4464 ALTERED LICENSE PLATES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5011 I.D.PLATE NOT DISPLAYED UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 59 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 5011 PARTY-LIMO DISPLAY SPL PLATES UnknownOther Non-Hazard5 Non-Hazard Infraction 5017 I.D.PLATE (DMV ISSUED) UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5017 TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP D Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 5018 CHG OWNER OF EQUIP W/IN 10 DAY UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5030 MOTORBICYCLE DISPLAY SPL PLATE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5032 OPERATE MOTORBICYCLE W/O UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5035 WRONG PLATE ON MOTORBICYCLE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5037 MTRBCYL SOLD<7-1-81 W/O PLATE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5037 MTRBCYL SOLD>7-1-81 W/O PLATE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 5109 NOTIFY DMV TRANS ENVIRO PLATES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5200 LICENSE PLATES, FRONT & REAR UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5200 LICENSE PLATE: WHEN 1 ISSUED OtherOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard I 5201 LIC PLATE SECURELY ATTACHED UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5201 LICENSE PLATE COVER OtherOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 5201 OBSTRUCT PLATE OtherOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 5201 OBSTRUCT PLATED Vehicle Code Infraction 5201.1 LICENSE PLATE OBSCUREA Vehicle Code Infraction 5201.1 OBSCURED LICENSE PLATE B Vehicle Code Infraction 5201.1 ALTER PLATE BY ERASING OR PAINTING Other HazardC Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 5202 DISPLAY PLATES WHEN ISSUED UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 60 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 5204 CURRENT MON/YR TABS ON PLATE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5206 DISPLAY PARTIAL YR REG UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5302 DISPLAY NAME/TRDMARK ON VEH UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 5352 CURRENT REG REQ ON TRL COACH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5500 GIVE REG DMV PRIOR DISMANTLE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5506 SALVAGE INSP BY CHP PRIOR SALE UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5604 DEALER NOTIFY BUYER INSURE VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5753 COM DEALER REQ GIVE REG BUYER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5753 OWNR CERT W/IN 15 DAYS PAYMNT UnknownOther Non-HazardC1 Non-Hazard Infraction 5753 OWNR CERT LESSEE AFTER PAYMNT UnknownOther Non-HazardC2 Non-Hazard Infraction 5753 OWNR CERT SIGN TO RELEASE INST UnknownOther Non-HazardD Non-Hazard Infraction 5753 LIC DEALER SHALL RELEASE INFO UnknownOther Non-HazardF Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5900 OWNR NOTIFY DMV OF TRANSFER UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 5900 OWNR NOTIFY DMV OF MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 5900 PERSN POSS NOFY DMV OF MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 5901 TRNFR OF OWNR,DEALER NOFY DMV UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5901 DEALER NOTIFY DMV OF MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5901 PERSN POSS NOFY DMV OF MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 5902 NOFY DMV OF TRNFR W/IN 10 DAY UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 5906.5 TRNFR OF VEH,NOFY DMV MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 61 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree 5906.5 PERSN POSS NOFY DMV OF MILEAGE UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 6700.3 FILE NONRES COMMUTER INDICIA UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 6700.4 DISPLAY COMMUTER INDICIA UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 6855 FOREIGN VEH OPER W/O CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Infraction 6855 FRGN VEH OPER BEYOND LIMTS UnknownOther Non-HazardB Non-Hazard Infraction 6855 FRGN VEH REFUSE TO SHOW CERT UnknownOther Non-HazardC Non-Hazard Infraction 8057 KEEP FLEET RECORD FOR 3 YEARS UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 8802 RETURN REG WHEN CANX UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 8803 DEALER/SALES RTN LIC WHEN CANX UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 8804 CA RES PAY REG FEES FOR VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Misdemeanor 9102.5 CONTRACT BUS/ DISPLAY PERMIT UnknownOther Non-Hazard5 Non-Hazard Infraction 9400 WEIGHT FEES FOR COM VEH UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 9400.1 WEIGHT FEES FOR COM VEH A1 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 9400.1 DISPLAY GVW DECALS UnknownOther Non-HazardF4 Non-Hazard Infraction 9400.1 DISPLAY CORRECT DECAL OtherOther Non-HazardF5 Non-Hazard Vehicle Code Infraction 9406 ALTER/ADDITIONS TO WEIGHT FEES UnknownOther Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Infraction 9554.2 REGISTERED COMMERICAL VEHICLE Vehicle Code Infraction 9-60.040 RIDING ON SIDEWALK Bicycle ViolationE Municipal Code Infraction B14-33.2A1 PARKING AFTER HRS Other I BP 25620 OPEN CONTAINER PUBLIC PARK OR PLACE Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard B&P Infraction 62 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree HS 11350 POSS OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 11352 TRANSPORTATION OF CONT SUB A H&S Misdemeanor HS 11357 POSS OF CONCENTRATED Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 11357 LESS THAN OUNCE MARIJUANA Other HazardB Hazard H&S Infraction HS 11357 POSS OF MORE THAN 8GRAMS OF B2 H&S Misdemeanor HS 11359 POSS OF MARIJUANA FOR SALE B H&S Misdemeanor HS 11360 TRANSPORTATION OF MARIJUANA SALE A2 H&S Misdemeanor HS 11362.3 POSS OF OPEN CONTAINER OF MARIJ IN OtherOther HazardA4 Hazard H&S Infraction HS 11362.3 DRIVER SMOKE OR INGEST MARIJ IN VEH A7 H&S Infraction HS 11362.3 PASSENGER SMOKE OR INGEST MARIJ IN VEH A8 H&S Infraction HS 11364 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 11364.1 METHAMPHETAMINE PIPEA H&S Misdemeanor HS 11375 POSS FOR SALEB1 H&S Misdemeanor HS 11375 POSS OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE W/O B2 Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 11377 POSS OF METHAPHETAMINE OtherOther Non-HazardA Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 11550 UNDER INFLUENCE OF CONT SUB Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard H&S Misdemeanor HS 118948 SMOKING IN VEH W/ MINOR Other HazardA Non-Hazard H&S Infraction LAH 12-1.0 NO BIKES IN BYRNE PRESERVE Bicycle ViolationH Non-Hazard Municipal Code Infraction PC 20170 BB GUN IN VEHICLEA1 Hazard Penal Code Infraction PC 21510 SWITCHBLADEA Penal Code Misdemeanor 63 Vehicle Code Description Collision CategoryCitation CategorySubsect.Hazard Cat.Class Degree PC 22610 STUN GUNA Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 25400 CARRYING A CONCEALED FIREARM LightsOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 25850 CARRYING A LOADED FIREARM A Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 374.4 LITTERINGA PC 417.4 BRANDISH IMITATION FIREARM Other Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 466 POSS OF BURLARY TOOLS Other Hazard Non-Hazard Penal Code I PC 485 MISAPPROPROPRIATION OF FOUND PROPERTY Other Non-Hazard Non-Hazard Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 496 POSS OF STOLEN PROPERTY OtherOther Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 496A POSS STOLEN PROPERTYA Penal Code Misdemeanor PC 594.2 POSS OF VANDALISM TOOLS Other Non-HazardA Non-Hazard Penal Code Misdemeanor 64 Page 1 of 2 #392 Mendelsohn Ln Date Received: 2017 Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Mendelsohn Ln Description of traffic safety concern: Speeding on Mendelsohn Ln. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Request for speed bumps. TSC Action: 5/11/17: COMMISSIONER CHOI MOTIONS TO RESTRIPE MENDELSOHN AS NEEDED. COMMISSIONER COULTER GAVE SECOND MOTION. (5-0-0) COMMISSIONER COULTER GAVE MOTION TO REVISIT PLACING SPEED BUMPS ON MENDELSOHN. COMMISSIONER HARRIS GAVE SECOND MOTION. (5-0-0) 9/12/19: COMMISSIONER MCINTYRE MOTIONED TO REEVALUATE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURE THROUGH MENDELSOHN CORRIDOR WITH FOCUS AT THE CORNER. COMMISSIONER KANE GAVE SECOND MOTION. APPROVED 6-0-0 (COMMISSIONER COSYN ABSENT) COMMISSIONER MCINTYRE MOTIONED TO INSTALL 25 MPH INPAVEMENT SIGNS AT EACH END OF MENDELSOHN LANE. Page 2 of 2 MOTIONED FAILED. COMMISSIONER MCINTYRE MOTIONED TO SEND LETTERS TO MENDELSOHN RESIDENTS WITH PROPOSED TRAFFIC PLAN. COMMISSIONER FITZSIMMONS GAVE SECOND MOTION. 6-0-0 (COMMISSIONER COSYN ABSENT) COMMISSIONER AFTAB MOTIONED TO DIRECT ENGINEER TO DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING MEAUSRES FOR THE CORNER. (RESCINDED MOTION) 3/12/20: COMMISSIONER COULTER MOVED TO ADOPT TRAFFIC ENGINEER PLAN AND TO ADD REFLECTORS. COMMISSIONER MCINTYRE GAVE SECOND MOTION. APPROVED (4 YES, 0 NOS, 0 ABSTENSION, 2 ABSENT, 1 VACANCY) 1/14/21: KANE/VASANTHA MOTIONED TO ACCEPT THE REPORT. MOTION PASSED BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, CHOI, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 7/8/21: AFTAB/VASANTHA MOTIONED FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO MEASURE SPEEDS ON MENDELSOHN LN AGAIN ONCE SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT AND TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION COMMISSION VASANTHA’S RECOMMENDATION TO TAKE SPEEDS AT POINT IN THE ROAD WHERE CARS HAVE BEEN RECORDED BY RESIDENT’S SECURITY CAMERA. MOTION PASSED (5-0-1-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 12/1/22: MOUNT/AFTAB MOTIONED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CITY-LED SPEED HUMP PROCESS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: AFTAB, CHU, ENG, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 03/09/23: ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AREA OF INFLUENCE AND DRAFT PLANS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. Staff Action: Plans prepared by Fehr & Peers in August 2020. Plans fully implemented in November 2021. Staff sent out notices to the Area of Influence homes on 03/21/2023 with a response deadline of 04/20/2023. Staff sent out notices to the Area of Influence and Rancho Bella Vista homes on 07/28/2023 with a response deadline of 08/24/2023. Incorporated October 22, 1956 CITY OF SARATOGA 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 868-1200 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Belal Aftab Kookie Fitzsimmons Chuck Page Tina Walia Yan Zhao Dear Resident, The City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission was asked to review a traffic safety concern on Mendelsohn Lane and provide a solution for the speeding that was occurring. The traffic engineer found that the 85th percentile speeds on Mendelsohn Lane were 36.1 MPH east of the curve and 38.4 MPH north of the curve, which is still in excess of 10 MPH above the posted speed limit, even after the installation of preliminary traffic calming measures. A map of the measured 85th percentile speeds is attached. Since the measured speeds represents an unsafe level of speeding, the Commission has recommended the installation of two speed humps, which are expected to reduce the 85th percentile speed at each location by over 10%, bringing the 85th percentile speed to a more acceptable level. The attached plan shows the two speed humps that are proposed, along with any pavement markings, striping, and/or signage that will be installed concurrently. As part of the speed hump process, the Commission has requested additional feedback from residents in the Area of Influence and on Rancho Bella Vista. In addition to comments about the proposed speed humps, the Commission would also like to hear your thoughts on chokers as a potential alternative speed control measure: Chokers (image attached) consist of a short segment of three sets of raised curbs, one along each edge line of the road and one along the centerline. These curbs physically narrow the roadway and vehicles are forced to slow to proceed through them. Chokers typically reduce speeds by up to 10%. Please provide your comments in writing on or before Thursday, August 24, 2023. The Traffic Safety Commission will perform an additional review of the proposed plans at their next regular meeting on Thursday, September 14, 2023, at 6:30 PM. Due to the extent of the speeding on Mendelsohn Lane, only input from residents within the Area of Influence and Rancho Bella Vista is being considered at this time. A map of the approved Area of Influence is also attached to this letter. Written concerns may be emailed to eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us, delivered in person to City Hall, or mailed to: Traffic Safety Commission Attn: Emma Burkhalter 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 by August 24, 2023. Written concerns must include your name(s), street address, mailing address (if different), and contact information. All other comments may be submitted via the methods above and/or given verbally at the September 14th meeting. If you have any questions about this letter or the Commission, please contact Traffic Safety Commission Liaison, Emma Burkhalter, at (408) 868-1274 or by email at eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us. More information about the Commission can be found at www.saratoga.ca.us/tsc. Sincerely, Public Works Department City of Saratoga Enclosures Speed Hump Example: Choker Example: 14820 20067 20045 15100 15160 20150 20171 14900 20017 20161 20101 20115 14671 20151 20191 15121 15305 15081 20176 15050 14698 14760 14870 15277 20100 14691 14911 20130 15195 15195 20224 20200 20170 20160 14628 19831 14695 20141 19870 20022 14770 15230 20141 19761 20161 14744 19980 14651 15111 20121 15020 14860 20150 15139 14903 15315 20040 19765 19920 15140 14890 19921 15091 20200 15172 14800 19720 19733 19853 14835 19915 15041 19921 20238 19897 19896 15180 20180 19916 19852 14661 19950 15168 14691 20183 1974014681 14930 2014014821 19700 19935 14721 20107 14860 20077 1521115255 20140 15211 20252 20252 15221 20120 14701 14720 15150 14850 20131 15060 20061 20170 14945 14855 14672 15177 19891 20141 20181 14655 19875 14766 20087 20120 14840 20076 19730 14920 15000 20017 14810 20150 14740 15307 14690 19874 14781 19770 14700 15177 14725 20190 14720 14890 20201 14768 20231 15101 20015 15180 20125 20171 14582 19908 14900 20152 20090 15141 20191 19731 20100 14850 20261 14670 15185 14918 15195 14866 20121 14880 20040 20000 20190 15050 19861 15181 14650 15181 20110 20097 20021 19990 19892 14635 14870 14606 15235 20080 14780 20130 15199 15090 15166 14675 15097 15041 19931 14702 14861 15200 15100 20127 19911 15052 20018 20011 PIEDMONT RDBONNIEBRAE LNTHREE OAKS WAY PEACHHILL RD SAR A T O G A L O S G A T O S R D SA R A T O G A L O S G A T O S R D SA R A T O G A L O S G A T O S R DMONTALVORDHORSESHOE DRPEPPER LNHUME DR FARWELL CTN HORSESHOE DRBE L L A V I S WINN RDMONTALVO RDMENDELSOHN LN MENDELSOHN LN THREE OAKS CTVILLA MONTAL V O E XI T R D RANCHOBELLA VISWILDC A T R D BONNIE BRAE WAY HILL AVE FARWELL AVEFARWELL AVEPARK DR PARK DR Matrix #392 - Area of Influence March 9, 2023 2013020230 Bonnie Brae WayINSTALL ADVANCE WARNING MARKINGSFOR SPEED HUMPSMendelsohn LnMendelsohn LnPiedm o n t Rd INSTALL ADVANCE WARNING MARKINGSFOR SPEED HUMPSMendelsohn LnBonnie Brae WayRancho Bella VistaPiedm o n t Rd Mendelsohn LnMendelsohn LaneTraffic Calming PlanCity of SaratogaFigure 1CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLYLEGENDPROPOSED SPEED HUMPN.T.S. Mendelsohn LaneTraffic Calming PlanCity of SaratogaFigure 2CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLYSPEED HUMP ADVANCE WARNING MARKINGS DETAIL2 FT8 FT10 FT12 FT14 FT16 FT18 FT20 FT100 FT8 FT7 FT6 FT5 FT4 FT3 FT2 FT1 FT12" WHITE PAVEMENT MARKINGSLEADING EDGE OF SPEED HUMPSPEED TABLE DETAILCENTER OF ROADWAYCENTER OF TRAVEL LANE12" WHITE12"6 FT1.6 FT3 14 INPLAN VIEWSECTION B-B3 FT(MAX)4 FT4 FTSECTION A-ABBAA 1.6 FT10 FTPARABOLICFLAT3 14 IN 32.8 mph (460 vehicles) ► ◄ 36.1 mph (260 vehicles) ▲ 38.4mph (220 vehicles) ▼ 34.2 mph (160 vehicles) From:Ilaria Keogh To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:traffic calming measures on Mendelsohn Date:Saturday, August 5, 2023 12:06:32 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Commissioners, I received the letter and docs the other day and I do not understand why Rancho Bella Vista residents now get to have a say. Can someone explain the reasoning behind this? If you are going to expand the area of influence then you have to include all of Mendelsohn and the adjacent streets of Bonnie Brae (both), Hill, and Piedmont. So, I hope you will reconsider the area of influence so that it is more of a fair and equitable process that doesn’t give special preference to those who loudly and aggressively express their opposition, especially when they are not directly affected by the the speeding problem and can easily avoid any traffic calming measure that is not to their liking (simply take a right out of RBV and voilà!). I am writing in support of any and all traffic measures that will slow down vehicles on Mendelsohn, I trust that the traffic engineers can use their expertise and knowledge to solve this problem in the most appropriate way. My house is at the curve and my family and I are directly affected by speeders on a daily basis, along with all the walkers, runners and bikers who enjoy our beautiful neighborhood. We will be happy with either traffic measure the City decides to implement, because as your letter states that “the measured speeds represent an unsafe level of speeding”, so doing nothing would be irresponsible. Thank you, Ilaria Keogh From:Hassan Jalalian To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Mendelsohn Ln Speed Bump Position Date:Monday, August 7, 2023 3:15:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Emma, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to formally express my opposition to the installation of any type of speed bumps in our neighborhood (Mendelsohn). As a resident and member of the community, I have spent significant time and effort providing concerns both in writing and in person, including attending the last TSC meeting. However, I feel that our concerns were not adequately acknowledged or discussed during the meeting. This lack of recognition has left me feeling unheard and concerned about the decision-making process. I strongly believe that speed bumps are not the most effective solution to address traffic-related issues in our neighborhood. If there is an issue! Additionally, I have repeatedly requested information about the budget available in the City of Saratoga to address various community needs (Ex. New asphalt on Mendelsohn Ln and Rancho Bella Vista, Street lighting) , but unfortunately, I have not received any response to my inquiries. I want to emphasize that my opposition to speed bumps is rooted in my genuine concern for the well-being of our community. I believe that the City can focus on other key issues as stated above that not only ensures the safety of our residents but also preserves the character of our neighborhood. I kindly request that my position be formally recorded and considered in any future discussions or decisions related to TSA. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to further engagement and collaboration with the community and local authorities to find an amicable resolution. Sincerely, Hassan Jalalian From:Rosemary Adamson To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Adamson MD, David; Tom Lerone; Dan; Peter Rutti; Eva Miranda Subject:RE: TSC Residential Speed Hump Process Date:Tuesday, August 8, 2023 5:40:01 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. August 8, 2023 > Dear Emma, > > I am writing in response to the request for input on the subject of speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane. > > We do not want to see speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane. My husband and I are residents on Rancho Bella Vista, the only cul-de-sac off Mendelsohn Lane. Our street is one of many that join with Mendelsohn Lane en-route to Highway 9 (Saratoga-Sunnyvale road), a main route to connect with Freeways. Mendelsohn Lane is in fact, the only egress for many residents in the Montalvo area. It is a very important escape route and route for emergency vehicles to get to Highway 9 and on to where they need to go. Speed bumps would hamper their response time and delay important actions. We believe that it is not the solution to a perceived problem by one resident on the street. > > The neighborhood is delighted with your response to a request last year to repair and improve Mendelsohn Lane for safer pedestrian walkways, wider passage for vehicles and clear markings and night lighting on the roadway. It is an important street for the Montalvo neighborhood. We all agree that this improves the ability for emergency response vehicles to move with ease along this route. The importance of this street in terms of safe passage in any emergency requires the least complications for their safe journey out of the Montalvo neighborhood. > > I hope that you will consider this important aspect when discussing your plan. It is important that the whole neighborhood be given an opportunity to weigh in on this issue. > > Sincerely, > > David and Rosemary Adamson, > > Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey From: Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 4:48 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Mendelsohn Traffic/Safety Issue CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Ms. Burkhalter, I am a resident at and understand a Traffic Commission meeting is being held this week to discuss adding speed bumps on Mendelsohn to hopefully slow traffic. I just want to share that I completely support this initiative after living here for 27 years and witnessing first hand how dangerous the speeds have become up and down our street. It has concerned me for several years, but is now a major issue and definitely in need of intervention. Please note that I offer my full support and thank you in advance for your assistance in keeping our neighborhood safe and sound. Thank you so much, Nancy Tkalcevic From:Tom Lerone To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daniel MIranda; Eva Miranda; David Adamson; Rosemary Adamson; Peter Rutti; Pete+Chris Rutti; Hassan Jalalian; Charles Aring; Christine Lerone Subject:Mendelsohn speed hump response Date:Saturday, August 19, 2023 5:01:29 PM Attachments:TSC meeting notes 91219.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, This is in response to your request for feedback on the Traffic Safety Commission proposal to install speed humps, or an alternative of Chokers, on Mendelsohn. We are opposed to installing speed humps or Chokers on Mendelsohn. In response to your April letter requesting feedback on the same speed hump proposal, I provided the attached notes from a 9/12/19 TSC meeting laying out reasons why we do not believe physical speed barriers on Mendelsohn are needed or desirable. Since 2019 the city has made excellent safety improvements on Mendelsohn. These included adding signage in both directions around the curve; adding hash marks and bumps narrowing the lane and expanding the shoulder buffer heading up and around the curve; completing centerline and shoulder striping along Mendelsohn; widening the uphill lane by several feet in the Los Gatos direction to address a pedestrian concern and improve traffic flow; repairing and resurfacing the sidewalk from Rancho Bella Vista to Saratoga Los Gatos Road; and adding handicapped access at the Mendelsohn-Rancho Bella Vista corners. All of these improvements have enhanced safety and made Mendelsohn safer than it has ever been. My notes from the 2019 meeting were primarily focused on the negative impacts to residents, e.g., having to navigate bumps on a daily basis; altering the character of our neighborhood; potentially decreasing property values; and having a negative effect on quality of life. One area I did mention was slowing down emergency vehicles. In light of recent events and further study on the issue of emergency response, I think this may be a key factor in deciding if speed barriers on residential streets, in particular those in high fire risk areas, improve or worsen safety. Any delays in arrival of emergency vehicles and ability of residents to evacuate quickly could adversely impact outcomes in an emergency. There are a number of adjoining streets which need to traverse Mendelsohn so timely access for emergency personnel to connect with those streets is essential. We have lived on Rancho Bella Vista since 1980 and are not aware of a single instance of cars colliding or any pedestrian accident on Mendelsohn. For all of the above reasons we believe speed humps should again be rejected as was the case in 2013, 2017 and 2019. In terms of the decision process we believe that all affected residents should be surveyed, and provide Yes or No responses, so the TSC has better input from the community on speed From:Margie Montgomery To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Mendelshon Lane Speeding Date:Monday, August 21, 2023 8:58:46 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Emma, Thank you for speaking with me on the phone last week. As per your request, I am emailing you my concerns. I have lived at the corner of Mendalsohn Lane for 32 years. I have seen it all... the racing, the speeding, the running aground on my property, the slamming of breaks to make the turn, almost running me down watering my plants. The "putting it thru the gears" after they leave "their" neighborhood. Your own research shows how unsafe the driving habits are on Mendelsohn. I think it is incumbent for your office to protect those of us who's homes are directly on Mendelshon. I am sorry, Rancho Bella Vista should not have a vote. If you include them then you have a whole lot of others to include.... They are not Directly affected. If we don't slow down the cars, I fear the worst. None of us want a dangerous situation right outside our neighborhood door. I hope you keep the vote to those who really experience the problem, and install the speed Humps. Sincerely, Marjorie Montgomery Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Safety on Mendelsohn Lane Dear Commissioners, I have lived at for over 27 years; our home is adjacent to the proposed location of a speed hump. I strongly encourage you to address the dangerous conditions on Mendelsohn Lane that the City has identified and install either speed humps or chokers as soon as possible. Many of our neighbors have been attempting to find a solution to the increasing incidence of speeding since 2017. In 2019, we went door to door asking residents on Mendelsohn if they would support speed humps. Only 4 out of the 22 we talked to had opposition. (One of those has since changed her mind.) After the most recent study was completed, we were told that since the measurement revealed a traffic safely concern, this was no longer a question for neighbors to weigh in on. I am confused why we are once again soliciting opinions. I walk Mendelsohn from end to end usually four times a day, so I can anecdotally confirm the results of your study. People speed - a lot. The striping of the road helped keep cars off the sidewalk at the bend in the road, but it did not go far enough. There are several vocal neighbors in opposition to the traffic safety measures. I do not know why the Area of Influence was expanded to Rancho Bella Vista (or for that matter any home north of Bonnie Brae) since those residents would have a shorter, more direct route to highway 9 that does not involve going over a speed hump. Residents on other neighboring streets, such as Piedmont, will experience a much greater impact. Those concerned about damage to their cars caused by speed humps must plan to drive well over the posted speed limit; I drive a sedan and have never experienced damage going over a speed hump. As to your question about speed humps vs. chokers, I have no personal experience with chokers so would trust your experience as to which would be most effective to reduce speeding. Just please do the right thing to keep our neighborhood safe and finally take action. Catherine Thermond Date: August 23, 2023 To: Traffic Safety Commission (TSC), City of Saratoga RE: Speed Bump/Choker Proposal for Mendelsohn Lane I am writing in regards the Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) plan to install speed bumps or chokers on Mendelsohn Lane as proposed in the recent letter sent by the Public Works Department, City of Saratoga. I am opposed to the plan to install speed bumps or chokers, as it creates a greater safety issue for residents. In particular: As Mendelsohn Lane is in the Very High Fire Hazard Zone (1), there should be fewer, not more road barriers that increase Fire Department response times for residents. In the event of a fire, Mendelsohn Lane is the only ingress/egress road for the Fire Department and residents on Piedmont Road, Madrone Hill Road, Rancho Bella Vista and Villa Montalvo Arts Center (one way exit only for staff and visitors). It is my hope the City of Saratoga will apply best practices learning from other communities to improve overall resident safety (Traffic Calming Fact Sheet (2)) and reduce risks. Given the well documented fire danger throughout California, the difficulty firefighters face responding to and controlling fires in Very High Fire Hazard areas and Santa Clara County’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (Annex 6, S-FC8.1 Strategic Goal: To improve road systems), I am requesting: 1. A moratorium be placed on any new speed bumps in Saratoga's Very High Fire Hazard Zones until the Fire Department can independently assess the impact of speed bumps on emergency response routes in these zones. Please Note: "Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps, 1997, states humps should never be placed on emergency response routes.” Cities, such as Berkeley California , Boulder Colorado, and Portland Oregon have placed moratoriums on speed bumps due to safety issues. 2. If the Fire Department assessment finds any increase in response times due to speed bumps, then a permanent exemption be created to the TSC Speed Bump process to prohibit speed bumps from all Very High Fire Hazard Zones and emergency response routes necessary to reach those areas. Please see the attached, Problems Associated with Traffic Calming (3) which documents research conducted by many organizations and cities across the US, including in Berkeley, Sunnyvale and Roseville CA. They found that installing speed bumps/chokers increases fire department and ambulance response times, which will cost resident lives. 3. Similar to the TSC’s Safe Routes to School plan, discussed in the August 22nd TSC Meeting, the TSC should take a holistic view of the impact of speed bumps on resident and fire emergency response routes throughout the City of Saratoga. Given the recent fires in Maui and 2017, 2018 and 2020 California fires all resulting in double digit loss of life with people caught trying to flee in their cars, it is paramount the TSC not evaluate speed bumps as one-off single decisions, but evaluate the total impact of adding speed bumps along critical emergency routes. Finally, I am asking for my neighbor’s safety and my family’s safety, do not install any speed bumps or chokers on Mendelsohn Lane or in any other Very High Fire Hazard Zones. Respectfully Submitted, Eva Miranda (cross street Mendelsohn), Resident since 1996 Attachments: (1) Saratoga Fire District Map of Fire Hazard Zones: Very High Fire Hazard Zone (2) National Motorists Association Traffic Calming Fact Sheet: Traffic Calming Fact Sheet (3) National Motorists Association Article: Problems Associated with Traffic Calming Member Supported Driver Advocacy ome ʫ ssues ʫ Tra!ic Calming ʫ Problems Associa ed Wi h Tra!ic Calming Problems Associated With Tra!ic Calming RESOURCES:  NMA Tra!ic Calming Fact Sheet ( PDF ) Free to down oad, pr nt & d str bute By Kathleen Calongne Tra !c calm ng dev ces, such as speed humps and tra!c c rcles are spread ng to commun t es across the Un ted States, w thout regard to the r r sks. The U.S. Department of Transportat on (USDOT) has avo ded the exam nat on of the problems assoc ated w th ntent onally mpos ng vert cal and hor zontal deflect on on veh cles and veh cle passengers, n order to encourage the prol ferat on of dev ces on c ty streets. Deflect on dev ces bu lt to slow passenger veh cles, create even greater delays to emergency response veh cles. The longer wheel-base, st ! suspens on, h gh veh cle we ght, as well as the sens t ve equ pment and njured v ct ms transported by these veh cles, requ res dr vers to slow almost to a stop to negot ate the dev ces safely. An uneth cal attempt has been made to s lence the object ons of rescue personnel to delays to emergency response by deflect on dev ces. F re ch efs, as c ty appo ntees, fear profess onal retr but on and o"en w ll not vo ce concern unt l the level of r sk becomes ntolerable. Emergency calls are not the rare events some members of transportat on and c ty sta! would l ke to bel eve. The C ty of Houston, Texas for example, responds to an average of 150,000 emergency med cal calls and 100,000 f re calls per year. There s an average of 250,000 deaths from sudden card ac arrest (SCA) alone each year n the Un ted States. Amer can Heart Assoc at on (AHA) stat st cs nd cate that 90% of these nc dents occur outs de of the hosp tal env ronment. By compar son, there are approx mately 5,000 pedestr an deaths per year n the Un ted States. Few of these occur on local ne ghborhood streets. A ten-year study of pedestr an deaths by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Serv ces, 1982 – 1992 found 35% of pedestr an v ct ms were ntox cated. Nat onal H ghway Tra!c Safety Adm n strat on (NHTSA) stat st cs, Safety Facts 2000, found s m lar results w th ntox cat on on the part of 31% of pedestr an v ct ms. AHA stat st cs for SCA, show surv vab l ty s d rectly related to the response t mes of c t es. For example, an AHA study n 1996 showed that Seattle w th a response t me of less than 7 m nutes saved 30% of ts SCA v ct ms. New York, w th an average response t me of 12 m nutes saved only 2%. Wh le delay from nd v dual dev ces s somet mes measured, the cumulat ve e!ect of series of devices s o"en gnored. Ser es of dev ces turn seconds of delay nto m nutes, as veh cles fa l to rega n cru s ng speed between the dev ces. Calm ng dev ces mpose permanent, 24-hour delays to emergency response, unl ke tra!c congest on wh ch occurs per od cally. A study conducted by the f re department of Aust n, Texas, 1997, showed an ncrease n the travel t me of ambulances of up to 100% transport ng v ct ms. Members of c ty counc ls and transportat on d v s ons o"en portray delay to emergency response by calm ng dev ces as s mply a tradeo! for ncreased safety from speed ng cars. They avo d mak ng the analys s wh ch shows wh ch r sk s greater. Ronald Bowman, a sc ent st n Boulder, Colorado developed an analys s to compare these r sks. The results show that even m nor delay to emergency response by calm ng dev ces mposes far greater r sk on the commun ty than veh cles, speed ng or not. The result of Bowman’s analys s, showed a r sk factor of 85 – 1 from an add t onal one m nute of delay (pred cted to result from the nstallat on of all the dev ces proposed for the C ty of Boulder at the t me) before one l fe m ght be saved by the dev ces — f t can be shown that the dev ces do save l ves. Bowman’s analys s, based on the curve of surv vab l ty for v ct ms of card ac arrest and severe trauma (AHA) has been ver f ed by a profess onal mathemat c an. The Bowman analys s was appl ed to the C ty of Aust n, Texas by Ass stant F re Ch ef, Les Bunte, w th s m lar results. The results of these analyses show that deflect on dev ces are a tradeo! of the percept on of ncreased safety from speed ng veh cles for the real r sk to c t zen surv vab l ty from delay to emergency response. Wh le the Inst tute of Transportat on Eng neers’ (ITE) Gu del nes for the Des gn and Appl cat on of Speed Humps, 1997, states humps should never be placed on emergency response routes, humps and phys cal dev ces of all k nds have been nstalled on cr t cal emergency response routes n c t es where these projects ex st. The prol ferat on of dev ces has resulted n temporary or permanent morator ums on dev ces n c t es such as Berkeley Cal forn a, Boulder Colorado, Portland Ma ne and Portland Oregon. People w th d sab l t es compla n of last ng pa n and njury caused by travel ng over deflect on dev ces n veh cles. S gn f cant test mony about the phys cal and psycholog cal barr er deflect on dev ces make to access to publ c r ghts-of-way has been g ven to the U.S. Access Board n Wash ngton D.C. Calm ng dev ces have been nstalled on streets to d v de commun t es along rac al and soc oeconom c l nes. The U.S. Department of Hous ng and Development (HUD) dent f ed gates nstalled as part of a tra!c calm ng project n Houston, Texas as d scr m natory, order ng them removed. Gates were replaced w th speed humps to create a s m lar, though less obv ous, barr er between ne ghborhoods. Wh le calm ng dev ces are bu lt on the prem se they w ll reduce acc dents, a comprehens ve study comm ss oned by the ITE and the Federal H ghway Adm n strat on (FHWA) on tra!c calm ng projects n the Un ted States concludes: “Tra!ic calming in the U.S. is largely restricted to low volume residential streets. Collisions occur infrequently on such streets to begin with, and any systematic change in collision rates tends to get lost in the random variation from year to year. This limits our confidence in drawing inferences about safety impacts of tra!ic calming.” (Tra!ic Calming: State of the Practice, Reid Ewing, 1999, P. 123) The USDOT def nes tra!c calm ng dev ces as geometr c des gn features of the roadway, rather than tra!c control dev ces. The USDOT recommends standards for the des gn and warrants for the use of dev ces that are approved tra!c control dev ces n the Manual on Un form Tra!c Control Dev ces (MUTCD). The def n t on of tra!c calm ng dev ces as geometr c des gn features of the road has allowed dev ces to prol ferate on c ty streets as a dec s on of local governments. An ncrease n acc dents has occurred a"er some nstallat ons. Exper mental speed humps placed on a street at a school n Portland, Ma ne reg stered an ncrease n acc dents of 35%. Acc dents ncreased 100% a"er the nstallat on of an exper mental tra!c c rcle n Boulder, Colorado. However, the c rcle n Boulder and the humps n Portland rema n on the street today. People across the Un ted States are oppos ng the nstallat on of deflect on dev ces on c ty streets that damage veh cles, njure veh cle passengers, ncrease pollut on and gas consumpt on and delay emergency response. I have researched tra!c calm ng projects s nce 1996, and have comp led my research nto a 400-page report on the “Problems Assoc ated w th Tra!c Calm ng Dev ces.” ————————————————————————————————————– These were the resources used for th s art cle: ARTICLES Reuben Castenada and Steven Gray, “Maryland Boy, 13, D es n F re at Fr end’s Sleepover,” THE WASHINGTON POST, June 15, 1998 (F ref ghter Stottlemeyer descends nto basement to rescue ch ld as flashover occurs forc ng h s ex t from the home.) Jen Chaney, “Fatal f re renews speed hump debate,” GAITHERSBERG GAZETTE, July 8, 1998 (Impact of delay caused by humps on street on rescue of ch ld.) Dw ght Dan els, “Enc n tas protesters’ parked veh cles h nder lay ng of speed bumps,” THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, Aug. 13, 1998 Ed tor al, “Meet ng a r standards Ma ne’s obl gat on too,” PORTLAND PRESS HERALD, October 17, 1997 (Rul ng of EPA) Ed tor al, “Street F ghts,” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, July 12, 1994 (Closures foster exclus v ty rather than commun ty.) Dan Feldste n, “Brown has 911 gate removed,” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, August 18, 1998 (“Closure den es emergency access.”) Dan Feldste n, “Subd v s on struggles w th great barr er r ",” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, February 22, 1999 Kr sten Green,”It’s ne ghbor vs. ne ghbor over Santee speed bumps,” THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, March 7, 2000 Kr sten Green, “D sabled woman w ns f ght to remove speed bumps on her street,” THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, May 12, 2000 Jean-Mart n Kuntscher, “Speed bumps cause ten t mes more a r pollut on,” ALLIANCE INTERNATIONALE DE TOURISME, FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE L’AUTOMOBILE, September 6, 1994 L sa Marshall, “C rcles called hazards,” THE DAILY CAMERA, December 12, 1996 Paul Marston, “Humps ncrease exhaust fumes,” UK NEWS, ELECTRONIC TELEGRAPH, January 14, 1998 Bruce N chols, “Houston h ts the brakes on speed-humps,” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, (“Deterrent for dr vers ra ses worr es about pol ce, f re response.”) August 1, 1999 Amy Re nholds, “Wh tt er attempts med at on… Ne ghbors square o! on tra!c ssue” THE DAILY CAMERA, January 21, 1997 Amy Re nholds, “Sl p-sl d ng away at P ne St. tra!c c rcle”, THE COLORADO DAILY, November 20, 1996 Jud th Scherr, “Berkeley’s bumpy battle,” BERKELEY DAILY PLANET, March 27, 2000 (Berkeley Comm ss on on D sab l ty takes stand aga nst humps.) Mark Shanahan, “Federal government pulls funds from tra!c-slow ng exper ment,” PORTLAND PRESS HERALD, August 18, 1998 Matt Schwartz, “HUD labels D an Street gate d scr m natory, asks removal,” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, October 15, 1998 Joanne B. Walker, “Speed bumps, tables meet legal obstacle,” ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, August 1998 (Judge Bennett rules n favor of 2 c t zens who have f led su t aga nst c ty for plac ng dev ces on streets used for tra!c control wh ch are not approved tra!c control dev ces n the Manual on Un form Tra!c Control Dev ces.) John W ll ams, “Street Warfare” (Intersect on seal ng br ngs rac sm calls.) THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, July 10, 1994 John W ll ams, “Probe of b as and street clos ngs looks at use of federal money,” THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE, December 16, 1994 REPORTS / PAPERS Access ble R ghts-of-Way: S dewalks, street cross ngs, other pedestr an fac l t es, U.S. Arch tectural and Transportat on Barr ers Compl ance Board, U.S. Access Board, November 1999. “All Veh cle VOC and NOX Em ss on Factors by Speed, Summer and W nter,” graph prov ded by Ron Severence, Ma ne Department of Env ronmental Protect on, 1997 An Analys s of Leadersh p, Pol t cs and Eth cs n the Stevens Avenue Tra!c Calm ng Project, Part III, Eth cs n the Stevens Avenue Project” by Scott Landry, Scot Mattox, Sara & Celeste V gor, May 14, 1998 (Graduate paper for Musk e Inst tute at Un vers ty of Ma ne Law School) Boulder F re Department Master Plan, Kev n Kle n for C ty of Boulder CO, 1996 Bu ld ng a True Commun ty F nal Report, Publ c R ghts-of-Way Access Adv sory Comm ttee, U.S. Access Board, January 10, 2001 Deaths Expected from Delayed Emergency Response Due to Ne ghborhood Tra!c M t gat on, Ronald R. Bowman, Apr l 3, 1997 An Evaluat on of the Speed Hump Program n the C ty of Berkeley, October 1997 (Damage to veh cles, mpact on ambulance and f re serv ces and people w th d sab l t es.) Gu del nes for the Des gn and Appl cat on of Speed Humps, Inst tute of Transportat on Eng neers, 1997 The Impacts of Tra!c Calm ng Measures on Veh cle Exhaust Em ss ons, Un ted K ngdom,Transport Research Laboratory Report 482, PG Boulter, AJ H ckman “Motor-Veh cle-Related Deaths Involv ng Intox cated Pedestr ans” – Un ted States, 1982-1992,” Morb d ty and Mortal ty Weekly Report, Vol. 43 / No. 14 911 Emergency Gate Rev ew, F re Ch ef Les Tyra, C ty of Houston F re Department, November 17, 1998 Poss ble Ne ghborhood Tra!c Calm ng Methods, Report to c ty counc l of Sunnyvale, CA, February 4, 1997 (Potent al l ab l ty.) Speed Hump/UC Plan Presentat on Outl ne, dra" report, Susan Sanderson, Transportat on Planner, C ty of Berkeley, (Emergency response concerns from prol ferat on of speed humps. Humps not the tool felt they were.) 1995. Sudden Card ac Arrest, The Amer can Heart Assoc at on, 1996 A Survey of Tra!c Calm ng Pract ces n the Un ted States, Inst tute of Urban and Reg onal Development by Asha We nste n and El zabeth Deak n, Un vers ty of Cal forn a at Berkeley, March 1998, (Confl ct n ne ghborhoods.) Stevens Avenue Tra!c Calm ng Project, DeLuca-Ho!man Assoc ates Inc., May 27, 1998, Portland, Ma ne (Increased acc dents and pollut on from tra!c calm ng project.) Tra !c Calm ng: State of the Pract ce, Re d Ew ng, ITE/FHWA, 1999 Tra !c Calm ng and veh cle em ss ons: A l terature rev ew, Transport Research Laboratory Report 307, Un ted K ngdom, P. G. Boulter and D. C. Webster, 1997 FEDERAL DOCUMENTS Amer cans w th D sab l t es Act, T tle II, State and Local Government, Just ce regulat ons, 28 CFR, 35.151, “New construct on and alterat ons.” Clean A r Act, EPA, T tle 1, Part A, A r Qual ty and Em ss on L m ts, Sec. 113 Federal L m ts Manual on Un form Tra!c Control Dev ces, M llenn um Ed t on, USDOT/FHWA, 2000 Tra !c Safety Facts 2000, Nat onal H ghway Tra!c Safety Adm n strat on, USDOT TIME TRIALS “An Analys s of Speed Hump E!ects on Response T mes,” C ty of Aust n, TX F re Department, January 20, 1999 “The E!ects of Speed Humps and Tra!c C rcles on Respond ng F re-Rescue Apparatus n Montgomery County, Maryland,” Montgomery County F re and Rescue Comm ss on, August 1997 The Influence of Tra!c Calm ng Dev ces on F re Veh cle Travel T mes,” Portland Bureau of F re, Rescue and Emergency Serv ce, January 1996 Memorandum from Nels Taht , Adm n strat ve Analyst, C ty of Rosev lle, CA F re Department (T me tr als on streets w th ser es of speed humps), June 4, 1991 LETTERS Letter from Earl Noe, “I have d sabled your car… because you have so l ttle regard for laws,” THE BOULDER PLANET, October 9-15, 1996 (Opponent of dev ces has t res slashed.) Letter from Karen Cra g, Cha r, Comm ss on on D sab l ty, Berkeley CA to Berkeley Mayor and C ty Counc l, November 10, 1998 (Problems of the d sabled w th vert cal deflect on dev ces.) Letter from Spec al Trans t of Boulder, CO to Boulder C ty Counc l, Apr l 3, 1997 (Problems of d sabled r ders w th vert cal and hor zontal deflect on dev ces.) Letter from Steven Ben ngo, D v s on Transportat on Planner, USDOT, to Comm ss oner John Melrose, Ma ne DOT, August 13, 1998, (Resc nds funds for Portland’s tra!c calm ng project because of ncreased em ss ons.) LEGAL DOCUMENTS © 2023 Na o a Mo or s s Assoc a o ss es S a e by S a e Reso rces B og Co ac o Pr vacy Po cy A!dav t of Settlement for Permanent D sab l ty for f re f ghter, George Gosbee, Montgomery County, MD, 1998 (Settlement of $ 3,000 per month for l fe for njury susta ned when h t speed hump travel ng to scene of emergency.) Appellant’s Br ef n, Slager v. Duncan and Montgomery County MD to U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth C rcu t (Unpubl shed op n on, sets no precedent by rules of the court.) F nal Judgment, Twel"h C rcu t Court of the State of Flor da, June 29, 1998 (Judge Robert B. Bennet rules n favor of W ndom and Hartenst ne of Sarasota, FL) Op n on of Attorney General, State of Maryland, No. 86-021, Apr l 2, 1986 (Potent al l ab l ty.) Op n on of Thomas R. Powell, Sen or Ass stant C ty Attorney, The C ty of W ch ta, KS Apr l 1, 1986 (Potent al l ab l ty.) OTHER Hous ng D scr m nat on Compla nt, f led by Calv n Hummer, Pres dent, Meadow Walk Town Home Assoc at on, Houston TX, May 28, 1997 “The Other P ne Intersect ons,” Ronald Bowman, 1996 (Graph show ng ncrease n acc dents at ntersect ons w th tra!c c rcles on P ne St., Boulder CO.) Program Appl cat on for CMAQ (Congest on M t gat on and A r Qual ty) funds from C ty of Portland, July 1994. (C ty agrees to remove temporary measures f CMAQ determ nes em ss ons are not lowered by project.) VIDEO “Tra!c Calm ng Dev ces,” 1996, Portland Bureau of F re, Rescue and Emergency Serv ces, 55 SW Ash St., Portland, OR 97204 Get In Touch:  (800) 882 2785  ma@mo or s s org Join: Become A Member Connect:   Search: Prepared by the National Motorists Association (www.motorists.org) Traffic Calming Fact Sheet The term “traffic calming” is simply a device to put a favorable spin on tactics used to obstruct, divert and slow traffic. Although proponents usually couch their complaints in terms like “speeders” and “reckless drivers,” the true irritant for “traffic calming” advocates is “heavy” traffic. Their desired objective is to divert traffic to other streets outside their neighborhood. The devices employed to accomplish this diversion of traffic include stop signs, speed humps and bumps, lane narrowing obstructions, and absurdly low speed limits. Increased traffic on residential streets is often caused by misguided and ill-informed management of the main arterials and collector streets. These streets are designed to carry most of the traffic, keeping it off of residential streets. The solution to this problem is not to further obstruct traffic flow by pushing the problem into someone else’s neighbor-hood. The real solution is to upgrade and improve the traffic handling capabilities of main thoroughfares. This means implementing physical improvements, as well as raising speed limits and synchronizing traffic controls to accommodate actual vehicle speeds. If main streets provide convenient access between home, work and shopping destinations, motorists will use them, versus alternate routes through residential neighborhoods. There are several specific reasons why traffic calming should be avoided: 1) Traffic obstruction devices can increase response time for emergency vehicles. When seconds matter, having to slow to pass over speed bumps and humps or navigate narrow roadways can mean the difference between life and death, or the loss of one’s home. The fact that some of these devices can seriously damage emergency vehicles and other vehicles along the roadway is also a concern. 2) Traffic obstruction devices can increase congestion on other streets and create problems in other neighbor-hoods. If traffic obstruction devices divert traffic to other streets, they may compound congestion problems that already exist in those areas. If not successful in diverting traffic to other streets, traffic obstruction devices will compound congestion problems on the streets on which they are installed. 3. Traffic obstruction devices will increase vehicle wear and tear, air pollution, and noise. Braking and accelerating in response to speed bumps, speed humps, stop signs, and traffic signals increases fuel con-sumption and emissions. This can contradict other efforts to reduce emissions and contribute to a community becoming or remaining a “non-attainment” air quality zone, thereby being subjected to federal mandates and restrictions. 4. Traffic obstruction devices can increase street maintenance costs. Speed bumps and humps impede plowing and street cleaning equipment. Removable devices may soon be available, al-though they will require additional labor to install and remove them. Municipalities must maintain and repair stop signs and traffic signals, at taxpayer expense, of course. 5. Traffic obstruction devices increase a community’s liability for accidents attributed to such devices. 6. Traffic obstruction devices may cause physical discomfort, even pain, for disabled persons or persons with physical ailments. Being jolted or jostled by speed bumps and humps can be painful for persons with injuries or painful illnesses. 7. Traffic obstruction devices create neighborhood friction. Not all persons (not even most persons) on a given street will appreciate having to run an obstacle course every time they drive to or from home. Some traffic obstruction opponents blow their horns or yell verbal insults when having to slow or stop for speed bumps or humps. Frequently, the response to unnecessary stop signs is to ignore them. To: City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commitee (TSC) Members Fr: Daniel Miranda (homeowner at since 1994) Date: August 24, 2023 Re: Concerns with City Led Speed Hump Process and the proposed Speed Humps/Chockers for Mendelsohn Lane Atn: Jason Mount (Chair) Robert Eng (Vice Chair) Chi-Kuang Chu Alec Gulesserian Stephen Li Emma Burkhalter (TSC Liaison) I have atended and par�cipated in both the Regular TSC mee�ng on 5/23/2023, and the Special TSC mee�ng on 8/22/2023 that was posted and conducted with barely 24-hour no�ce to the public. I will not be able to atend the next scheduled mee�ng on 9/14/2023, when it is an�cipated that the TSC will perform a review and poten�ally approve the construc�on of speed hump/chokers on Mendelsohn Lane. However, I respec�ully request that the Commitee considers my opposi�on to the City-Led Speed Hump process you are employing and the proposed installa�on of speed humps/chokers on Mendelsohn Lane, for the mul�ple reasons summarized below. To begin with, I feel it is cri�cal that the TSC adhere to and honor its exclusive mission, as established by the Saratoga City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 05-032 – MISSION The exclusive mission of the Traffic Safety Commission shall be to investigate, review, and analyze issues, and make recommendations to the City Council and City staff regarding traffic safety. The Commission shall work to increase awareness of, and attention to, the traffic safety needs of the community by improving communications and involvement between the community, and the City government on services, needs and programs. Unfortunately, in an email response to me from Emma Burkhalter dated 8/14/2023, and again verbally at the Special TSC mee�ng, we are told that none of the items listed below, or anything else is considered or even looked at, if 85th Percen�le Speeds are at least 10mph above the posted speed limit in Emma’s own view and that of an outsourced Traffic Engineer. So again, in the true spirit of the TSC Mission, I respec�ully ask and resubmit my concerns listed below for formal considera�on by the TSC: 1. A cri�cal por�on of the TSC flow chart is pasted below. It calls for you to use the 85th percen�le speeds (plural as in all) to determine if this is to be either a Resident-Led or City-Led Process. Four (4) speed data points were calculated as illustrated on the speed map provided by TSC, shown below. Two (2) above 35 mph and two (2) below 35 mph. The weighted average of all data points collected together is below 35 mph. Specifically, in total at the 85th percen�le: 620 vehicles were below 35 mph 480 vehicles were above 35 mph. The data points and the math all indicate that this should be a Resident-led process, unless you are somehow jus�fying a City-led direc�ve by elimina�ng and not coun�ng over half of the data points collected and published. 2. You answer that TSC did not consider, the 2020 Speed Survey, published on your website which does not list Mendelsohn as one of the many areas studied in Saratoga, to ensure that TSC is in line with where the study says City resources should be spent. Again, you exclude any objec�ve published data that is not convenient to your singular objec�ve of spending money to add speed humps on Mendelsohn. 3. You answer that TSC did consider unanimous opposi�on by all residents present at the May 11th TSC mee�ng. However, we are all surprised and disappointed that you reneged on the commitment we thought we all heard that the TSC would conduct a survey of all residents in the expanded area of influence (similar to the prior TSC survey conducted a few years ago when this issue last came up and was squashed by a majority of residents in opposi�on). 4. You answer that TSC does not consider speeding cita�ons issued or accidents occurred, unless speeding data alone is not enough to warrant entering the speed bump process. However, your Speed Hump Process flowchart does state that you must adhere to the City funding process. Your TSC published, City of Saratoga Speed Hump Priori�za�on Process via this online link and pasted below, states that Speed related collisions in the last 3 years, is in fact a “Priori�za�on Element”, which you cannot ignore. So why not look at cita�ons and accidents from the start, unless again you're not interested in hearing other priori�es that don’t support your preconceived no�on to promote speed humps regardless? 5. Mendelsohn Lane, is an important gateway street between the Saratoga Fire House and the Very Highest Fire Zone in the city of Saratoga. Response travel �me by Fire and Emergency services are super cri�cal and depend on main access roads like Mendelsohn Lane. Evacua�ons and escape routes by passenger vehicles from residents living in the High Fire Zone, depend on Mendelsohn Lane for quick passage. All employees or visitors at Villa Montalvo use Mendelsohn as the only exit road. It seems hard to jus�fy the safety tradeoff being proposed by adding speed humps or chockers anywhere on Mendelsohn Lane. Trying to even consider it without any input from Saratoga Fire is neglect and dangerous for all. These are just a handful of the many other considera�ons that are being consciously excluded from the TSC’s City-Led process. The mo�on under considera�on by TSC is guided solely and exclusively by their interpreta�on, calcula�on, and data collec�on and manipula�on under the City-Led 85th Percen�le Speeds self- imposed process. Essen�ally, this is a blatant case of trying to use the persuasive power of sta�s�cs to bolster a weak argument, or lack of any other argument presented in favor at any TSC mee�ng that I have atended thus far. I’ll end by asking each TSC member if they would reasonably do any of the following in their own personal lives. • Allow a surgeon to perform life-altering surgery based on a single test result that did not include all the data collected, even though you feel fine and have had no symptoms over the last 30 years. OR • Fly on a plane with a pilot who could stare at only one gauge on the cockpit instrument panel and not even look around or listen to ground control or anything else. If you hesitate to answer yes to either of the above, surely you cannot say Aye in favor of any mo�on to approve speed humps or chokers on Mendelsohn Lane. Sincerely, Daniel Miranda From:Ilaria Keogh To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:John Cherbone Subject:Re: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 05/11/2023 Date:Wednesday, May 17, 2023 9:59:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Emma, I was unable to attend the meeting as I moving my daughter out of her college dorm that evening, but I am told the usual neighbors showed up in full force against the speed bumps. It feels like groundhog day! Every couple of years, Mendelsohn residents ask for the bumps, we are told about a process, we follow it and then these same people are able to stop it. Being that there are new TSC members every few years, they do not know the history and I wonder if they truly take the time to understand the issue or if they just listen to a loud minority. Last time I was told all I needed to do was to collect a majority of signatures, remember? I did! But then they were able to stop it. Now we have a traffic study that proves high speeds and it seems that they can stop this too...I would like to find out what kind of power these people have? Why is their minority wish more important than ours and our safety? Interestingly most of these people are not affected by the speed nor the humps, yet, they feel like they can keep controlling the TSC like they have been doing for years, simply because they don’t want the bumps! It’s unbelievable really. The Rancho Bella Vista residents are particularly ridiculous when they say they don’t want to take a right instead of left to avoid the bumps…seriously?! Was the TSC told that these people don’t even live near the bumps?! I am constantly amazed by the inefficiency of the city’s processes for this! I am the one who lives on the dangerous corner, I am the one (and my husband and teens) who have to be very careful when pulling out of our driveway. I have dozens of video clips of speeders from my security camera - I hate to say it, but I have been meticulously collecting them (along with my correspondence with the TSC) to prove the city’s negligence in dealing with this issue in case of an accident. My car also was crashed into a few years ago when parked - a mix of speed, reckless driving, wide road, no street lights…it was $5K in damages. Please share the clips below with the new TSC members. Thanks, ilaria Some sample clips: verbally at the May 11th meeting and via email on May 28th, that determines the 85th percentile speed of 34.8 MPH on Mendelsohn, taking into account all the measurements taken by the Traffic Engineer, and therefore making this a Resident-led Speed Hump Process? 2. Did the TSC consider, the 2020 Speed Survey, published on your website which does not list Mendelsohn as one of the many areas studied in Saratoga, to ensure the TSC is in line with where the study says City resources should be spent? 3. Did the TSC consider, that no one present at the May 11th meeting stood up and spoke in favor of speed humps, while 4 or 5 residents stood up in protest of the speed bumps on Mendelsohn? Or are you tossing out those concerns and asking them to be resubmitted redundantly at the next meeting. 4. Did The TSC consider, the number of speeding citations issued on Mendelsohn? I requested this at the last meeting but don’t remember getting a straight answer. Kindly provide us with number of speeding citations issued on a monthly basis for the last three years? I do remember something about a fatal accident being mentioned by someone on your team. Can you provide the specifics on that event as well? 5. I have a travel conflict and cannot attend the next meeting scheduled for September 14th. I understand that several of my neighbors in the area of influence also cannot attend. We respectfully ask that the Mendelsohn Speed Hump issue be removed from the next meeting agenda and rescheduled to a future date to give all concerned the opportunity to potentially be present. Thanks in advance for your prompt attention to these questions. Sincerely, Daniel Miranda attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma. Following up your email yesterday, I'm forwarding my May 28 email which makes several references to the "survey" you were preparing in follow up to the May 13 TSC meeting. Surveys were discussed at the meeting, and in my other emails and phone communications with you, so were very disappointed to see a survey wasn't included. I added John Cherbone to the distribution as he was included in your email yesterday. All of those copied on this email, and many others, already sent written communications spelling out opposition to speed humps or other additional speed control measures in response to your April letter so resending those should not be necessary. We were very surprised at the May 13 meeting that there was no acknowledgment by TSC members of the input they received, so it wasn't clear if they were familiar with our submissions. The only discussion at the meeting was when we verbally covered our reasons for opposition, and no one spoke in favor. Attached to this forwarded email is a 2013 survey done for Rancho Bella Vista residents. We could initiate a similar survey now but think the city should survey everyone in the expanded Area of Influence. We also request that the Mendelsohn issue be removed from the next meeting agenda as many in the Area of Influence will not be able to attend due to travel conflicts, and taking into account time to get any survey feedback. One final point, as discussed before, is the speed hump issue should not be considered a City-led process in accordance with the TSC policy as the average of measured 85th percentile speeds on Mendelsohn, weighted for associated vehicle counts, is less than 10 mph over the posted speed limit. Thank you and the TSC for your consideration. Tom Tom Lerone On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 4:00 PM Tom Lerone <t > wrote: Hi Emma, Following up our recent discussion, a couple follow up questions/suggestions: As discussed, I believe my calculation of the 85th percentile speed of 34.8 MPH on Mendelsohn, taking into account all the measurements taken by the Traffic Engineer, is correct and therefore this would become a Resident-led Speed Hump Process. I know you said my email was forwarded to the TSC but do you think it would be useful for me to send a note to the TSC using the "share your thoughts and feedback" link on the TSC website? I think this question on the relevant speed hump process should be addressed prior to the July TSC meeting. Regarding the survey letter you'll be drafting, there should be a separate Yes or No question regarding whether residents are for or against Speed humps. Attached is the survey form the city sent in 2013. Similar survey responses will be necessary to determine the resident support level for installing speed humps. You said the letter may also discuss alternative speed control approaches so not sure if that would be just for information purposes if speed humps are not installed or if you'll be asking for written resident feedback? In either event I don't think we should confuse residents on the primary purpose of the survey which is to determine if they support moving ahead with speed humps. Thanks Tom Tom Lerone On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:20 PM Tom Lerone wrote: Hi Emma, When I got home from the TSC meeting last night, I did a spreadsheet to calculate the Mendelsohn average 85th percentile speed taking into account the number of cars measured, as discussed at the meeting. Attached is the Excel spreadsheet file and a pdf which shows the average speed of 34.8 MPH or 9.8 MPH over the limit so Mendelsohn can not be treated as a City-Led process. Per the Speed Hump Process Mendelsohn would be subject to the Resident-led process. Since some residents were in favor of speed bumps in 2019 - before the traffic calming measures - it probably is a good idea to send out surveys. As approved at the meeting the area of influence should be expanded to at least include Rancho Bella Vista residents. I expect this will put the issue of speed bumps on Mendelsohn to bed permanently! Please confirm receipt of this email and when you have notified all TSC members and the Traffic Engineer of the change in process. I can also provide the same information to the TSC via the feedback option on their website. Regards, Tom Tom Lerone <Speed Hump Process.pdf> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 6:03 PM To: Thomas Lerone Cc: christine Lerone James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>; Leslie Arroyo <larroyo@saratoga.ca.us>; Crystal Bothelio <cbothelio@saratoga.ca.us>; Lauren Blom <lpettipiece@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Re: Mendelsohn speed hump issue Dear Christine and Tom, Thank you for your email. I understand your frustration and realize that this may not be the entire neighborhood’s sentiment. Staff has confirmed for me that the City Traffic Engineer found that the 85th percentile speeds on segments of Mendelsohn Lane are still 10 miles per hour above the posted speed limit, even after the installation of preliminary traffic calming measures. Therefore, the Traffic Safety Commission and staff are using the City-Led Speed Hump Process (attached). Taking a weighted average is not part of the Speed Hump Process. We are at the step in the process where the City sends out the proposed plan to the Area of Influence for comments and the Commission will hear any concerns at their September 14 meeting. Please note that Commission decisions can be appealed to the City Council if desired. I hope this helps clarify things a bit more! Sincerely, Kookie From: Thomas Lerone Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 10:16 AM To: Kookie Fitzsimmons <kookie@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: christine Lerone Subject: Mendelsohn speed hump issue CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Kookie, I was hoping you could give us some guidance on an issue that has been plaguing our neighborhood for the past 10 years regarding speed humps on Mendelsohn Lane. Proposals were rejected in 2013, 2017 and 2019, only to be raised again this April. Most of our neighbors are still strongly opposed to speed humps, which seem to be driven by one neighbor, but it keeps coming back on the TSC agenda regardless of numerous written submissions in opposition, showing up to and speaking at meetings and many communications with Emma Burkhalter which were to be passed onto the TSC. The city recently made modifications to the street which seem to be very effective and we feel strongly that enough has been done to avert any traffic issues on this very quiet road. One key point to note is the TSC considers this latest proposal to be a City-led process and therefore said they will not survey residents; however we believe it should be a Resident-led process in accordance with the TSC Residential Speed Hump Process as the weighted average of measured 85th percentile speeds on Mendelsohn is below 10 mph over the speed limit. We had a meeting with many like minded neighbors Sunday night and were asked to contact you in this regard. Any guidance you could provide would be much appreciated! Thank you. Christine and Tom Lerone From:noreply@civicplus.com To:M. Leah Cabute; Emma Burkhalter Subject:Online Form Submittal: Traffic Safety Concern Form Date:Monday, August 14, 2023 2:51:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Traffic Safety Concern Form Directions Please include complete responses for each question to help the City determine the specific traffic safety issue occurring, the location of the issue, and how best to reach you. After reviewing your submission, City staff will reach out to you regarding next steps. First Name Peter Last Name Rutti Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Address Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Mendelsohn Lane Description of traffic safety concern: Strongly opposed to putting speed humps on this street to restrict speed for many reasons...air pollution, noise pollution, safety factors for residents ie fire, health safety etc. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: use other traffic calming measures....consider using sheriff to monitor at very intermittent times and issue tickets for the infrequent speeders rather than punishing the entire neighborhood with humps on a full time basis. I am unaware of any accidents on this road or deaths or injuries in the 35 years that I have lived here. If humps were installed and accidents began to occur as they often do with this technique...the city could see a large increase in litigation related to these humps. Think of better ways to spend our $$$. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. From:Kookie Fitzsimmons To:evamiranda; Suwanna.kerdkaew@sccfd.org Cc:twhitley@saratogafire.org; ckao@saratogafire.org; ezambetti@saratogafire.org; ekraule@saratogafire.org; James Lindsay; Leslie Arroyo; Crystal Bothelio; Emma Burkhalter; John Cherbone Subject:Re: Concerns about Speed Bumps in Very High Fire Hazard Zones Date:Tuesday, August 15, 2023 12:44:15 PM Dear Eva, Thank you for providing this information and sharing your concerns. The Traffic Safety Commission has been carefully reviewing this issue and will be making a decision at their September 14 meeting. Your comments, with the attachments, will be provided to them as part of the meeting materials. Please note that Commission decisions can be appealed to the City Council if desired. Sincerely, Kookie Fitzsimmons, Mayor City of Saratoga From: evamiranda Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 12:37 PM To: Suwanna.kerdkaew@sccfd.org <Suwanna.kerdkaew@sccfd.org>; Kookie Fitzsimmons <kookie@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: twhitley@saratogafire.org <twhitley@saratogafire.org>; ckao@saratogafire.org <ckao@saratogafire.org>; ezambetti@saratogafire.org <ezambetti@saratogafire.org>; ekraule@saratogafire.org <ekraule@saratogafire.org> Subject: Concerns about Speed Bumps in Very High Fire Hazard Zones CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Attention: Suwanna Kerdkaew, Fire Chief and Kookie Fitzsimmons, Mayor of Saratoga I am writing in regards to a letter sent by the Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission (attached). I am opposed to the Saratoga City plan to install speed bumps or chokers on Mendelsohn Lane as proposed in the letter, as it creates a greater safety issue for the City of Saratoga and its residents, in particular: Mendelsohn Lane is in the Very High Fire Hazard Zone, there should be fewer, not more road barriers that inhibit the Fire Departments ability to reach the residents in our area. Given the well documented fire danger throughout California and the difficulty firefighters face controlling fires in Very High Fire Hazard areas, I am requesting: 1. Create an exemption to the Saratoga City plans / process to prohibit speed bumps from all Very High Fire Hazard Zones and roads necessary to reach those areas. Please see the attached, Problems Associated with Traffic Calming which documents the research from many other US communities. Installing speed bumps/chokers will increase fire department and ambulance response times, which can costs lives of residents. It also inhibits residents ability to escape from fire danger. From:Venkat Ratnam To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Re: Installation of speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane ... Date:Thursday, September 7, 2023 11:22:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, I am writing to request that the city install speed bumps on Mendelsohn Ln. Mendelsohn Ln is the only way our family has access to Saratoga-Los Gatos Road. My wife and I use Mendelsohn Ln several times on a given day and we have always seen people speeding and driving much faster than the speed limit. This is extremely unsafe for drivers that use it regularly as well as for people that regularly walk on that road. Please remember we don't have sidewalks on some sections of that road (on both ends). I have seen many times how some pedestrians get scared and move to a side when they see a vehicle speeding. There is a long and straight stretch of that road that is used by some drivers almost like a racetrack. You can also see where the road curves and that's where you see some drivers speeding and coming out of nowhere. This is more so with people that don't live in the vicinity or those that live in the vicinity but are in some kind of rush. Installing speed bumps just reminds people to slow down regardless of whether they are an occasional or regular user of the road. Lot of people (that don't reside here) that want to use Hill Ave or Bonne Brae Way to access Villa Montalvo also use Mendelsohn Lane. The only criteria that the city should use to install speedbumps is to determine whether people are speeding. You have already established that drivers speed on that road. The city should install speedbumps at the earliest. Thank you! Regards, Sreela and Venkat Venkataratnam Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Emma Burkhalter Date: September 7, 2023 at 6:49:17 PM PDT To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 09/14/2023 Dear Saratoga Community Members, Attached is the agenda for the September 14, 2023 Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) Meeting. You are receiving this agenda because you have reached out to the City with a traffic safety concern and the City has placed your concern item on the September agenda for TSC review. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held both in-person and via Zoom. The in-person meeting will be held at LGS Recreation (19655 Allendale Ave) in the Patio Room. The Zoom meeting information is on the attached agenda and also included below. All meeting attendees will have a maximum of 3 minutes to speak on an agenda item. The Chair of the Commission will explain the Zoom process at the beginning of the meeting. The meeting process includes the Commission Chair introducing the item and asking the traffic engineer to describe the traffic safety issue. The Chair will then ask the public to raise their virtual or physical hand if anyone is interested in speaking on the item. After the public speaks, the TSC will discuss the item and determine a recommendation to improve the traffic safety issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the meeting. Members of the public can observe and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending in-person at 19655 Allendale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070. 2. Using the Zoom website at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 or App Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 3. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. Respectfully, Emma Burkhalter, PE Associate Engineer Public Works Department | City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue | Saratoga, CA | 95070 Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey From:Henry Coles To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Ilaria Keogh; Catherine Thermond Subject:Mendelsohn Speed Humps Date:Monday, September 11, 2023 5:28:35 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Please forward to the TSC for the upcoming meeting on 9/14. Dear Saratoga TSC, I ride my bike on Mendelsohn on a regular basis on my way to Peach Hill Road. Regarding the speed hump plan for Mendelsohn Lane I have the following observations and a suggestion. The data shows that Mendelsohn has a significant safety issue with the 85th percentile speed of 10MPH or more above the speed limit. This puts the situation in the special safety-issue-case of the solution being City-driven. Speed humps have been installed and are effective on many streets in Saratoga including: Allendale, Chester, Pierce, Elva, Herriman and now Reid Lane. I'm in favor of the TSC approving the speed hump plan for Mendelsohn. Also, thank you for your work to get the speed humps installed on Reid Lane. As far as I can tell they are very effective, and I feel much safer when I'm riding my bike or walking on the street. The noise seems also reduced. No longer do we have noise from cars traveling at high speeds. In my opinion, the value of my property on Reid has increased because of the recent speed hump addition. Thank you for your consideration. -Henry Coles 1 TO: City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Committee RE: Speed humps on Mendelsohn Lane DATE: September 12, 2023 Sir/Madam: We are writing as residents of Saratoga, CA, where we have lived for 26 years. We oppose the proposed installation of speed humps on Mendelsohn Lane for multiple reasons, listed below. In addition, we fully support the communications you have received from others in our community who are opposed to speed humps on Mendelsohn. 1. There is no safety need for speed humps on Mendelsohn Lane a. We are not aware of any accidents on Mendelsohn Lane b. We are not aware of any speeding tickets or efforts to catch speeders and hand out tickets c. Mendelsohn Lane is not on the Saratoga Speed Survey of 2020 d. The recent speed survey, when calculated using all the data, shows an average speed of less than 10 mph over the limit when calculated using the average of the 85th percentile speed over the two measurements taken in both directions. 2. Speed humps will decrease the safety of Saratoga residents a. Our neighborhood is in a very high fire safety zone; speed humps will slow the egress of the many people who live in this very high fire safety zone, increasing the risk of loss of life b. Speed humps will slow the response of fire and other emergency responders should a fire occur and result in an increased risk of loss of life and property c. An increased number of burglaries besets our area. Speed humps will slow police response, resulting in an increased risk of injury to people and property loss. 3. Speed humps don’t work. Please see https://ww2.motorists.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/05/traffic-calming-fact-sheet.pdf which shows that speed humps don’t work because they a. Increase the response time for emergency vehicles b. Increase congestion on other streets c. Increase vehicle wear and tear, air pollution, and noise d. Increase street maintenance costs e. Increase a community’s liabilities for accidents attributed to such devices f. Can cause discomfort and pain for disabled persons or those with physical ailments g. Create neighborhood friction. 4. Speed humps on Mendelsohn are a poor economic decision for Saratoga because they a. Cost a lot of money to install b. Increase street maintenance costs c. Damage fire, police, and other city vehicles. 5. The vast majority of residents in the affected area do not want speed humps 2 a. A 2013 survey confirmed that residents did not want the proposed speed humps b. Many residents have spoken against and written opposing speed humps. c. In addition to the multiple letters received opposing speed humps on Mendelsohn, a recently-signed list of 8 additional families opposed to speed humps has been submitted, making well over a dozen families in the immediate area of the proposed speed humps who have voiced strong opposition to speed humps or other road installations. 6. The process of coming to this decision has been seriously flawed a. The calculations to demonstrate that this is a city-led process appear to be incorrect, using selected data for the calculations, not the entire data set. This appears to be “cherry-picking” of the data to obtain a pre-determined result and to prevent this from being a Resident-led process. At the meeting attended August 7th, the process and methodology could not be clearly explained despite a request to know what the methodology was. The process and confirmation that the process is standardized for all speed hump calculations, and that this methodology represents the standard approach in California should be available to Saratoga residents who are affected by proposed speed humps. b. Requests for a survey of those affected have been denied, despite the stated mission of the Traffic Safety Committee: “…by improving communications and involvement between the community, and the City government on services, needs, and programs.” c. The absence of fire department participation in traffic safety decisions that affect the safety of Saratoga residents is curious and would seem entirely inappropriate and likely to increase the risk of harm to persons and property. This is especially so since this area is designated a very high fire hazard area. d. The absence of police department participation in traffic safety decisions that affect the safety of Saratoga residents is additionally curious and would seem entirely inappropriate and likely to increase the risk of harm to persons and property, especially given the increased criminal activity in our neighborhood. e. How is it that a committee dedicated to safety and is also concerned about traffic has not consulted with police and fire experts regarding the trade-offs of speed bumps with increasing risk to people and property by delayed response times? f. The decision not to delay this item on the September meeting agenda because most affected residents could not attend that meeting, despite specific requests for a delay is inexplicable. g. The calling of an emergency meeting on very short notice for August 22, 2023, to discuss limiting the Area of Influence (AOI) significantly so as to disenfranchise Saratoga residents affected by this decision was curious and inconsistent with the committee’s stated mission to include Saratoga residents affected by their actions. 3 7. After attending the special meeting of the Traffic Safety Committee on August 22, 2023, many additional questions arise: a. Why has this issue come up 4 times in the last 10 years? We are only aware of one person living in the area who wants speed humps, and for reasons others don’t find compelling. Who else wants speed humps on Mendelsohn, and why? How have they influenced the TSC staff to bring this item up multiple times? b. If the speed used is not the average of the four 85th percentile speeds that were obtained from recordings of travel in each direction at two different places, then what is the method that is used? It is not transparent either on the website or how it was explained at the TSC meeting. It is clear that a number of those at the meeting did not understand the 85th percentile and how the calculations were performed. In an email, we were told that the two highest speeds were used and at the meeting only the single highest 85th percentile speed was used. What is the standard methodology used in California? In Saratoga? If so, why—this seems like cherry-picking the data. And is this method used every time in every situation or are the data analyzed differently in different situations? Why was this method used for Mendelsohn Lane? How can we access the actual raw data to ensure that the calculations were done correctly, especially when we have received different answers of how the calculations were performed? c. It was evident that an individual at the meeting knew a lot about speed humps and was a strong proponent of speed humps. How did he know that 62% of the TSC agenda items were about speed? How did he know that, “the calculations are always correct?” He told us that he knew that one person on Mendelsohn Lane who wanted a speed hump so she could back her car out of her driveway easier. It is difficult to understand how this person has standing since he is clearly not in the Area of Influence. Yet he suggested at the meeting that the TSC should consider reducing the percentage of people in favor of speed humps so that even a large majority of people opposing would not have their wishes followed. And he even wanted to make it more difficult for a property owner having the speed hump at his property line being to veto the speed hump. Yet this person proposing the increased use of speed humps lives miles away from Mendelsohn Lane and has been promoting speed humps for 30 years. Is one person with no elected or appointed status determining the speed hump policy for Saratoga? The committee should provide an explanation of how and why any individual completely unaffected by proposed speed humps appears to have so much influence over committee actions and decisions. d. It was evident from the discussion and from communications and interactions between this individual and the Saratoga staff and TSC members that longstanding relationships were in place. What are the relationships between this individual not in the Area of Influence with the consultant engineer for Saratoga, with the Saratoga staff, and with the TSC? Disclosures of these relationships are essential to avoid the current appearance of potentially multiple conflicts of interest. The relationship(s) are opaque yet of much concern regarding potential undue influence. e. The above point is emphasized by the fact that an email from this individual to the Saratoga staff added an agenda item to the meeting at 3:49 pm on Monday, September 21. The public notice of the meeting came out at 5:07 pm, just over an hour later. Who 4 requested this special meeting? How did this individual know there would be a special meeting if the agenda were not yet public? What type of relationship with the City of Saratoga enabled him to put an item on the agenda of a meeting that had not yet been announced? What is the role of the Chair in setting the agenda? f. Given the mission of the TSC to improve communications and involvement with the community, how is it that a 25-hour notice of a meeting is sufficient? g. The traffic engineer consultant stated that in addition to the speeds obtained, other factors had to be taken into consideration in making a recommendation and that some situations were nuanced. In this letter, there are noted many factors that make it clear that a more holistic approach would result in a decision not to install speed humps. In the Mendelsohn Lane situation, since the speed involved is possibly only slightly over the 10 mph at the 85 percentile, why are these many other compelling factors not being considered? h. How is it that the consultant engineer, Saratoga staff, and TSC do not take into account published information about the disadvantages of speed humps in their metrics or discussions? i. At the May meeting the impression was made that a survey would be done. Understanding as we do now the “nuance” and “other factors” that are taken into account by the consultant engineer, why was a survey not done? j. Who performs the economic analysis of the best way to spend our tax dollars when speed humps are expensive and create ongoing costs of road maintenance, and repairs to Saratoga vehicles, not to mention the increased wear and tear on the vehicles traversing the speed bumps daily? And what about other needs in the Saratoga budget that need more funding? For all the above reasons, this current proposal to install speed humps on Mendelsohn Lane is being challenged by Saratoga residents who are being affected. Besides the legitimate arguments against these speed humps, there appears to all of us that there are continued serious attempts to pre-determine the outcome of this process, and this is very disturbing. Sincerely David and Rosemary Adamson From:Kelly Moran To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:In favor of speed bumps Date:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:35:14 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, I am writing to request that the city install speed bumps on Mendelsohn Ln. Mendelsohn Ln is the only way our family has access to Piedmont Road. My family and I (husband, 9 and 5 yr old) use Mendelsohn Ln several times a day and we always see people speeding and driving much faster than the speed limit. This is extremely unsafe for drivers that use it regularly as well as for people that regularly walk on that road. We ride bikes, walk, jog several times a week. There is a long and straight stretch of that road that is used by some drivers almost like a racetrack. You can also see where the road curves and that's where you see some drivers speeding and coming out of nowhere. This is more so with people that don't live in the vicinity or those that live in the vicinity but are in some kind of rush. Installing speed bumps just reminds people to slow down regardless of whether they are an occasional or regular user of the road. Lot of people (that don't reside here) that want to use Hill Ave or Bonne Brae Way to access Villa Montalvo also use Mendelsohn Lane. The only criteria that the city should use to install speedbumps is to determine whether people are speeding. You have already established that drivers speed on that road. The city should install speedbumps at the earliest. Thank you! Kelly From:Lingling Sun To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Speed bump on Mendelsohn Lane Date:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:54:27 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.Dear Traffic Safety Commission, I am writing to ask that you approve the plans to install speed bumps on Mendelsohn. As your traffic studies have continued to show, year after year, speeding is a problem on Mendelsohn.With 3 kids, I have been driving on Mendelsohn many times a day for many and have seen just howdangerous it can be - for cars and also people walking. Speed bumps work everywhere else in Saratoga and I don’t understand why we cannot have themhere, so we can all be safer. Thank you! Lingling From:Sarvesh Jagannivas To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Speed bumps on Mendelsohn Date:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:09:55 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Ms Emma: I live on Bonnie Brae Way. With regards to your upcoming consideration of the question of speed bumps on Mendelsohn - I am very much in support. Regards, Sarvesh Jagannivas From:Dan Lankford To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Speed Bumps on Mendelsohn Date:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:26:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Just a quick note to express our STRONG support for speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane! A number of different approaches have been tried, but we still get cars exceeding 40 MPH (and sometimes more!) on Mendelsohn. Speed bumps similar to the two on Austin Way would be a great idea. Thanks! Dan Lankford & Linda Crosta From:Shie-rei Huang To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Mendelson Lane Date:Monday, April 3, 2023 7:42:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, This is Shierei Huang, owner of . If I have a vote, I would vote against adding speed bumps on Mendelson Lane. This lane is short and drivers naturally have to slow down when entering or exiting this lane from and to Saratoga -Los Gatos Rd. Speeding on this Lane generally is not a problem. Most people know to slow down on this short and curlly residential street. A driver who speeds most likely is intentional. Speed humps will not stop such drivers. They also may drive high clearance vehicles or trucks, which they are not bothers by the speed humps. On the contrary, they may enjoy going over humps in high speed. . As a resident in this neighborhood, I also have concerns about the car noises due to all drivers having to stop and accelerate at bumps Thanks, -Shierei From:James Lindsay To:John Cherbone; Emma Burkhalter Cc:Crystal Bothelio Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form Date:Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:57:27 PM     From: noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com>  Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:40 PM To: Chuck Page <cpage@saratoga.ca.us>; Yan Zhao <yzhao@saratoga.ca.us>; Belal Aftab <baftab@saratoga.ca.us>; Tina Walia <twalia@saratoga.ca.us>; Kookie Fitzsimmons <kookie@saratoga.ca.us>; James Lindsay <jlindsay@saratoga.ca.us>; Britt Avrit <bavrit@saratoga.ca.us>; Crystal Bothelio <cbothelio@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Council Comments Form   CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Council Comments Form Your Name Mark Weisler Phone Number Email Address Subject Speed Bumps on Mendelsohn Lane Comments Dear Council, It has come to my attention that the Saratoga government is considering speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane. I am opposed to the idea for reasons given below. First of all let me somewhat qualify myself by saying that I am a commercial rated pilot, former motorcycle racer, and motorist for many decades so I have a pretty good ability to estimate vehicle speed. I've lived on Hill Avenue for decades and the route to my home is via Mendelsohn Lane so I feel I have standing in this matter. I need to use Mendelsohn to get to my home. Indeed, we have a problem with speeding on residential streets but not just on Mendelsohn. [1] I am in favor of enforcing speed laws, especially in residential areas. I believe radar technologies offer a superior way to enforce these laws. Photo radar is much less expensive to enforce than sworn officers and is more objective. Speed bumps: * Unnecessarily cause wear and damage to vehicle suspension and tires. * Compromise safety as cars, motorcycles, and bicyclists maneuver over the bumps or try to avoid them, maybe even encroaching on sidewalks and pedestrians. * Punish every single driver, including law abiding ones, every time they bounce over a speed bump. * Unnecessarily cause air pollution. It is well known that a steady speed produces less pollution than during acceleration. By imposing speed bumps government would be causing more, and unnecessary, pollution as a vehicle accelerates after slowing for a speed bump. This is against everything Saratoga City Council and the California government stand for. * Increase fuel consumption as vehicles accelerate after slowing for a bump. * Are uncomfortable and may distract drivers from their main task of driving. * Contribute to noise pollution as well as air pollution. * Shift traffic to nearby streets. For example, the speed bumps on Three Oaks Way have shifted discretionary traffic to Farwell making the residents of Farwell exposed to more than their "fair share" of vehicle traffic. * Would harm my property value. I don't like that. The timing of this issue is interesting considering that we have had for some time a young man I allege was living at driving a Porsche at somewhat high speeds on Mendelsohn Lane, Montalvo Road, and other streets during day and night hours. I tried to take video of his speeding but was never quick enough to do so. I'm sure his lawlessness generated some complaints. But the house in which he lived was sold in March of this year and the Porsche is no longer here. It would be quite an irony to put in speed bumps now that a contributor to the residential speeding problem is no longer in our neighborhood. It does not appear that the City of Saratoga government has given serious consideration to photo radar or other ways of enforcing speed laws and explained their decision making process to the residents of Saratoga. Photo radar speed detection and forwarding of excessive speed events to law enforcement is well established in other areas and has been for decades. Saratoga should use radar to enforce speeding laws rather than atavistic speed bumps. [1] A few days ago, while walking on Piedmont with friends who witnessed the event, a small BMW sedan sped down the street at a speed of at least 55 mph. Piedmont has no shoulders and no sidewalks. Again, this illustrates that the speeding problem is not limited to Mendelsohn. Very sincerely, Mark Weisler, Email Subscription Field not completed. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.   From:Venkat Ratnam To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Proposed speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane .. Date:Tuesday, April 11, 2023 3:45:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Ms. Burkhalter, I received a letter from the City of Saratoga about the proposed two speed bumps on Mendelsohn Lane and since I am within the area of influence. A map was not attached to the letter. As a result, I don't know where the speedbumps are going to be installed. Please email it to me. The most dangerous part is where Mendelsohn curves (where Bonnie Brae Lane meets it). You need to have a speed bump installed on either side of the curve. That's where people speed the most. In addition, there should be one each on both ends of Mendelsohn. Additionally, the road is very bad where Mendelsohn curves and where Bonnie Brae Lane meets. Lot of trucks make it through that curve and the condition of the road is very bad. It needs to be paved. Thanks! Venkat Venkataratnam Walking East toward Hwy 9 / Three Oaks Way In addition, there is flashing cross walk at the end of Mendelsohn near Hwy 9 / Three Oaks Way, but it does not connect to any sidewalk path on Mendelsohn Lane. As a side note, the From:Dana Evan To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Mendelsohn Rd Speed Bump Proposal Date:Tuesday, April 18, 2023 10:33:36 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Good morning Emma, Thank you for sending your recent letter regarding this proposal. I am supportive but would suggest two speed bumps on Mendelsohn- one after the intersection of Piedmont between that location and the curve where the Bonnie Brae/Hill intersection is and then another half way down the straight section of Mendelsohn before the Hwy 9 intersection. Thank you, Dana Evan Saratoga Sent from my iPhone From:Tom Lerone To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Re: Speed hump follow up Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:41:01 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Thanks for the information and look forward to getting info on how and where speeds were measured. In looking at the Residential Speed Hump Process and your April letter, a few observations: A key measurement point (item V) is whether 85th percentile speeds are at least 10 MPH above the posted speed limit. If no, it becomes a resident-led speed hump process, if yes, it becomes a city-led speed hump process. The resident-led process requires the city to send out a survey to residents in an Area of Influence (item R7) and receive responses to the survey showing at least 80% approval including 100% from bump-adjacent properties (item R8). The city-led process only requires the TSC to hear concerns at a TSC meeting. Your April letter referenced speeds upwards of 36 MPH or 11 MPH above the limit. Even assuming the measurements were done correctly, with only a one mile per hour variance to the process limit it would seem appropriate to conduct a survey with a similar approval requirement before proceeding. (the closing paragraph of your April letter made reference to a survey but that may have been an oversight). From a safety standpoint, Mendesohn is safer now than ever before following the city investment in excellent traffic calming measures completed in November 2021, which addressed safety on the curved section of the street, addition of signage, centerline and shoulder striping, widened lane widths on the Los Gatos direction section, as well as pedestrian and handicapped sidewalk improvements. All of the reasons bumps were not approved in 2013, 2017 and 2019 are still valid. As long time residents we are not aware of a single Mendelsohn accident involving cars or pedestrians. Regards, Tom Tom Lerone From:Dan Lankford To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Speed Bumps on Mendelsohn Ln Date:Friday, May 5, 2023 2:09:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, This subject has been discussed multiple times in the past, and there have been a few modifications to the lane markings on Mendelsohn in an attempt to slow traffic. In spite of previous efforts there continues to be a substantial number of drivers that ignore the 25mph speed limit. Some cars appear to be traveling over 45 MPH or more. I STRONGLY support speed bumps on Mendelsohn ln. Thanks! Dan Lankford From: To:Emma Burkhalter Subject:Mendelsohn Traffic/Safety Issue Date:Saturday, May 6, 2023 4:48:17 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Dear Ms. Burkhalter, I am a resident at and understand a Traffic Commission meeting is being held this week to discuss adding speed bumps on Mendelsohn to hopefully slow traffic. I just want to share that I completely support this initiative after living here for 27 years and witnessing first hand how dangerous the speeds have become up and down our street. It has concerned me for several years, but is now a major issue and definitely in need of intervention. Please note that I offer my full support and thank you in advance for your assistance in keeping our neighborhood safe and sound. Thank you so much, Nancy Tkalcevic putting bumps in the road. ·         Studies show adding speed impediments to residential areas decrease property values and have a negative effect on quality of life. ·         Adding barriers and related signage would make a nice rural area look like a dangerous speed zone, while inconveniencing and annoying residents on a daily basis.   ·         We are not aware of a single instance of anyone being injured by a car or any moving car collisions on Mendelsohn.   ·         Cars going over bumps and then accelerating creates noises, reduces fuel efficiency and contributes to increased air pollution.   ·         Speed bumps slow down emergency vehicles.   ·         Cars sometimes swerve outside the lane to avoid speed bumps, endangering pedestrians.   ·         The first Mendelsohn entrance coming from Los Gatos is the clearest marked and safest entrance. Residents may decide to use the second entrance to avoid going over bumps, but that entrance is not well marked and with a sharp turn and blind spot turning onto Mendelsohn so would create a safety issue.   ·         The issue of speed bumps was rejected twice, in 2013 and 2017, and there have been no noticeable changes in traffic volumes or speed levels since then.   We also have issues with how feedback on this issue was handled: ·         When first raised by the city in 2013 the city sent residents a Mendelsohn Speed Bump Survey to be completed and sent back confidentially to the city.   ·         The 2013 survey was only sent to residents living directly on Mendelsohn and not on Rancho Bella Vista, which can only be accessed via Mendelsohn.   ·         When the issue was again raised in 2017, residents were notified and had an opportunity to respond to the city, which led to a second decision not to proceed with speed bumps.   ·         The August 15 notification that the issue was being revisited made reference to a petition from Mendelsohn residents. We were not asked to sign a petition and understand others living on Mendelsohn were not either.   ·         Getting feedback by a selective door-to-door solicitation can be awkward and intimidating and the city should use the same approach as earlier by requesting confidential feedback.   We understand there are concerns, especially with respect to the sharp turn where Mendelsohn changes direction.  An alternative solution could involve adding clear signage depicting a sharp upcoming turn with appropriate reduced speed notice.     Christine & Tom Lerone   From: nancyt0111@aol.com Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 11:27 AM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Speet tables on Mendelsohn  Dear Mainini, I am a resident at and recently received your notice of the Traffic SafetyCommittee Mtg being held on September 12th. Thank you so much for keeping us updated and your kindattention. I'm afraid I will not be able to attend the meeting, but as a Mendelsohn resident, thought itimportant to voice that I am opposed to this proposal. I have spoken with neighbors and we are hopefulthat there might be a better solution for the issue than these speed tables. Thank you again so very much,Nancy Tkalcevic     SUPPORT From: Catherine Thermond <> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 12:57 PM To: 'ilaria.keogh@gmail.com' ; Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: John Cherbone <jcherbone@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Re: Mendeslsohn Speed tables Hi all, My apologies for this late reply but my dad passed away unexpectedly in mid-August and I have been overwhelmed with things to do. I have a conflict with the Traffic Safety meeting; I am tied up until at least 7:30 or 8:00pm. How long do the meetings usually run? Where is this item on the agenda? If possible, I will try to come late or at least write a letter before then. It seems like there is no opposition to the speed bump that is proposed between my house and the Pott house. At least that would slow the traffic on our end of the road. I am curious why there are only 2 bumps proposed on Mendelsohn given that there are 3 on Three Oaks and Mendelsohn is almost twice as long as Three Oaks. The general area where the second bump has been proposed will do almost nothing to slow down traffic on the opposite end of Mendelsohn from me. If there were a third bump, putting one close to Ilaria would make sense and the third could go near the other end where there was less opposition. I do not understand how a few neighbors in opposition to the bumps get to override valid safety concerns. We have been in our home over 23 years and although there have always been people who speed, it has gotten worse over time. I walk Mendelsohn usually twice a day and I can tell you that almost no one drives the posted limit. Speeds of 40+ mph are not uncommon. It is not limited to construction traffic or Montalvo traffic; there are neighbors (at least one who is in opposition to the bumps) who accelerate to the corner. Last month, I was almost hit crossing from Mendelsohn at Ilaria's to Hill. The pick up came around "dead man's curve" as the neighbors tell me it used to be called, at about 35 mph. I hollered "slow down" and he stopped the truck to yell at me. He said he was only going 30 -35 and I just got scared. Get over it. I told him the speed limit was 25 and he reiterated that he was hardly over it at all. The road is just an accident waiting to happen, especially on the curve where pedestrians can't see the traffic coming. And as we know from Ilaria's experience, sometimes the traffic is coming so fast that it hits parked cars on the turn. Something needs to be done and soon. Cathie From: Lingling Sun Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 3:57 PM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: Ilaria Keogh ; Owen Subject: Re: TSC Meeting on proposed speed tables on Mendelsohn Lane Hi, I cannot go to the meeting. I am a home owner on I want to give my full support to Ilaria regarding to add speeding bump. Regards, Lingling From: Hilary Rodoni Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 1:13 PM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: RE: TSC Meeting on proposed speed tables on Mendelsohn Lane I will not be able to attend due to a prior engagement. I fully support having the speed bumps on Mendelsohn. Having them closer to the Hwy9 intersection would be better as it would slow folks down as they enter Mendelsohn Thank you Hilary Rodoni From: Margie Montgomery Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 12:21 PM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us>; Ilaria Keogh Subject: Speed bumps on Mendelshon Dear Mainini, I have lived at the curve on Mendelshon for 28 years. I am in total support of speed bumps on Mendelshon. When the many neighborhoods filter onto Mendelshon, the drivers speed up because they believe they have left "their" neighborhood and race to get where they are going. Being at the curve , I hear all the squealing tires making the curve too fast. People are totally racing down the street, it seems mostly in the evening. I think the speed bumps you have installed in other neighborhoods are safe to go over at the lower speeds, and they will help protect our children and neighbors on our part of the road. This reminds me of when a stop sign was installed at the base of Hill Ave. Once that was installed, I no longer saw near 'head on collisions' because of people crossing over into the other lane at the blind corner. The same simple solution is needed here now. I feel the speed bumps are needed to better protect our families. Those very people that are speeding thru our neighbor I feel would not tolerate it front of their homes. We can't either. Sincerely, Margie Montgomery OPPOSED From: Peter Rutti Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 4:20 PM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Speed tables Dear Mainini, This letter is a followup to our conversation yesterday regarding speed tables on Mendelsohn Lane. We've been on Mendelsohn for 30 years and from our experience and observation speeders are few and far between so we don't see a need for the City to spend tax dollars on speed tables. We are not in favor of speed tables with related signs on Mendelsohn Lane and certainly would not want them near us since they would devalue our property, increase noise, pollution and other road hazards. There are other traffic calming solutions that are far more effective than speed tables. We are disappointed that from the inception we were not included nor made aware of the speed table issue by the petitioner which leaves those of us on Mendelsohn who find speed tables unnecessary at a disadvantage. We sincerely hope the City of Saratoga will recognize there is no need for this proposed expenditure. Very truly yours, Peter and Christine Rutti p.s. Please confirm receipt of this email, thank you. From: Tom Lerone Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:34 PM To: Mainini Cabute <mcabute@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Re: Mendelsohn Lane Speed tables Ms Cabute, We were extremely surprised and upset to see the issue of speed barriers on Mendelsohn Lane being raised for a third time following decisions not to proceed in 2013 and 2017 (the latter documented in your email to me dated October 10, 2017). Attached is my letter and the petition signed by all residents of Rancho Bella Vista in opposition to the original proposal. Mendelsohn Lane loops around to Los Gato-Saratoga Road so is not a thoroughfare or cut-through street, so has limited traffic and is mostly used by local residents and service personnel. Adding speed impediments and related signage would be an eyesore and make a nice rural area look like a dangerous speed zone, while unnecessarily inconveniencing and annoying residents on a daily basis. The change in ambiance could also decrease property values. On a safety note, the first Mendelsohn entrance coming from Los Gatos has clear signage with the yellow pedestrian signs and a generous median divide to slow down before turning left onto Mendelsohn, so is the obvious preferred choice coming from that direction. Residents may decide instead to go out of their way to avoid going over speed bumps by taking the Mendelsohn entrance on the Saratoga side. That entrance and staging area is not well marked and is a hairpin turn which is already dangerous as there is a blind spot turning onto Mendelsohn, so increasing traffic at that end is a bad idea. Your letter also references traffic engineer evaluation of traffic volumes and speeds, was this a reference to earlier studies or new information since the 2017 decision? We haven't noticed any recent testing taking place or an increase in traffic volumes, which remain very light. We did an unscientific count of cars on Mendelsohn last Friday between 5:00 and 6:00 and there were a total of 28 cars (12 going Saratoga direction, 16 going Los Gatos direction), or less than one car every two minutes. None of the cars seemed to be speeding. My home office and some side rooms face Mendelsohn and it is a rare occurrence to see a car speeding by. I think most residents who would be affected were unaware that this issue had been reopened. Given the prior objections and decisions not to proceed, a more appropriate process would involve notifying residents in the area that the issue was again being revisited and asking for feedback. I'm not aware than any other of the residents on our street were made aware. Look forward to your response and next steps. Sincerely, Christine & Tom Lerone Page 1 of 2 #502 Ravenwood Drive Date Received: April 12, 2021 Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Ravenwood Dr. and Quito Rd. Description of traffic safety concern: People speed down Ravenwood and there are little children living there. Also, school traffic uses this road and parents also speed. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Put a speed bump and/or do whatever else can be done to slow the traffic. Previous TSC Action: 7/8/2021: VASANTHA/KANE MOTIONED TO SET UP SPEED RADAR FEEDBACK TRAILER ON RAVENWOOD DR. MOTION PASSED (6-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, CHU, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. AFTAB/COULTER MOTIONED TO 1. COMMUNICATE TO RESIDENTS AND OTHER ROAD USERS THAT THE TSC IS LOOKING AT SPEED BUMP PROCESS AND TO COME BACK ONCE FINALIZED. 2. TSC TO REVISIT AFTER SCHOOL IS OPEN AND COLLECT DATA. MOTION PASSED (6-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. Page 2 of 2 AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, CHU, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 11/4/2021: AFTAB/KANE MOTIONED TO DEFER TO JANUARY MEETING WHEN DATA WILL HAVE BEEN COLLECTED. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-2) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, AFTAB, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: VASANTHA, CHU. 1/13/2022: COULTER/AFTAB MOTIONED TO PUT SPEED TRAILERS OUT ASAP FOR TWO WEEKS AND FOLLOW TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATION TO ADD SHOULDER STRIPING ON THIS SECTION OF RAVENWOOD DRIVE. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: AFTAB, COULTER, CHU, COSYN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 03/09/2023: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK TO THE NEXT TSC MEETING WITH ADDITIONAL INCREMENTAL APPROACH IDEAS AND ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. ENG MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO CREATE A CIP PROJECT FOR SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RAVENWOOD DRIVE. MOTION FAILED, NO SECOND. 07/13/2023: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO DO NOTHING; RESIDENTS SHOULD REQUEST TO BRING ITEM BACK TO COMMISSION IF THEY WANT TO PROCEED WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR A BULB- OUT ON THE NW CORNER OF RAVENWOOD DR AND QUITO RD. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 23'50'50'8'8'Ravenwood DriveParking LanesFigure 11:90CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.PAINT SOLID WHITE LINE TOADD 8' SHOULDERPAINT DASH WHITELINE (50' MIN.)8' MIN. SHOULDERS WITH23' BETWEEN SHOULDERS50' CENTERLINE50' CENTERLINE From:Daryl Hoot To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot Subject:RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 Date:Sunday, August 27, 2023 2:38:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Yes- please add Ravenwood to the agenda in September. I will be there. Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 5:45 PM To: Daryl Hoot Subject: [EXT] RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 External Email Hi Daryl, We can put your request on the September meeting in three weeks (9/14/23), as long as someone from your street can be there to represent the item. Otherwise, it will need to wait until the January meeting, since the November meeting is already pretty busy. Thanks, Emma From: Daryl Hoot Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 11:04 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: Daryl Hoot Subject: FW: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, First I would like to thank you for your help and support in getting our street (Ravenwood) safe. I talked to some neighbors and people are not in favor of the bulb out since they are concerned that drivers will speed after turning and the problem is still there. At this point everyone seems good with speed humps. What can I do to get these? School just started so I am anxious to get these in place if we can. Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 5:32 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: [EXT] Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 External Email Dear Saratoga Community Members, Attached is the agenda for the July 13, 2023 Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) Meeting. You are receiving this agenda because you have reached out to the City with a traffic safety concern and the City has placed your concern item on the July agenda for TSC review. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held both in-person and via Zoom. The in-person meeting will be held at City Hall (13777 Fruitvale Ave) in the Administrative Conference Room. The Zoom meeting information is on the attached agenda and also included below. All meeting attendees will have a maximum of 3 minutes to speak on an agenda item. The Chair of the Commission will explain the Zoom process at the beginning of the meeting. The meeting process includes the Commission Chair introducing the item and asking the traffic engineer to describe the traffic safety issue. The Chair will then ask the public to raise their virtual or physical hand if anyone is interested in speaking on the item. After the public speaks, the TSC will discuss the item and determine a recommendation to improve the traffic safety issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the meeting. Members of the public can observe and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending in-person at 13777 Fruitvale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070. 2. Using the Zoom website at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 or App Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 3. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. Respectfully, Emma Burkhalter, PE Associate Engineer Public Works Department | City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue | Saratoga, CA | 95070 Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey From:Daryl Hoot To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot; Subject:RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 05/11/2023 Date:Wednesday, May 10, 2023 11:36:36 AM Attachments:Neighborhood Stats on Traffic Solutions.xlsx CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Brenda and I cannot make the meeting tomorrow night. I assume you would not delay our Ravenwood agenda item. Can you let us know if the committee has any other safety measures to look at? Maybe they will approve speed humps? I attached a spreadsheet that has our neighbors names and the responses from a little over half. Maybe you can just tell the committee that 50% plus people are OK with speed humps with most OK with speed humps and signs placed at property lines. Also, the key to the data is the following (and is in the spreadsheet): 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 6:33 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: [EXT] Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 05/11/2023 External Email Dear Saratoga Community Members, Attached is the agenda for the May 11, 2023 Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) Meeting. You are receiving this agenda because you have reached out to the City with a traffic safety concern and the City has placed your concern item on the May agenda for TSC review. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held both in-person and via Zoom. The in-person meeting will be held at City Hall (13777 Fruitvale Ave) in the Administrative Conference Room. The Zoom meeting information is on the attached agenda and also included below. All meeting attendees will have a maximum of 3 minutes to speak on an agenda item. The Chair of the Commission will explain the Zoom process at the beginning of the meeting. The meeting process includes the Commission Chair introducing the item and asking the traffic engineer to describe the traffic safety issue. The Chair will then ask the public to raise their virtual or physical hand if anyone is interested in speaking on the item. After the public speaks, the TSC will discuss the item and determine a recommendation to improve the traffic safety issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the meeting. Members of the public can observe and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending in-person at 13777 Fruitvale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070. 2. Using the Zoom website at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 or App Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 3. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. Respectfully, Emma Burkhalter, PE Associate Engineer Public Works Department | City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue | Saratoga, CA | 95070 Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Amer Ather and Ayesha Sheikh Debbie Colyar Monica and Eric Roman 0 1 1 1 Steve and Julie Xu 1 1 1 1 Dale and Mette Leuthold 1 1 1 1 Bill and Val Hardy 1 1 1 1 Jagi and Nomita Shahani 1 1 1 Christa and Josh Levine 1 1 1 1 Gun Poespowidjojo and Heather Babcock 1 1 1 Brett and Katherine Dawson Sung and Jei Lei Kirk and Toggi Pollack Drew and Brenda Westcott 1 1 1 Minging and Buchin Chung Steve and Audrey Valen Lucy and Isaac Noble 0 Dave Snider and Anuradha Mayer Prakhar and Lavanya Mehrotra 1 1 1 1 Jeff Lichtman 1 1 1 0 Nitin Kasturi 1 Daryl and Gosia Hoot 1 1 1 1 Ginny and Dave Hoerger 1 1 1 1 Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Jeffand Christine Walker 1 1 0 0 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Christine Cooke Dave and Rita Benton Judy Simpson 1 1 1 1 Joan Havard 1 1 0 0 Bob and Emiko Robertson 1 1 1 Dave and Shelly Cuccias 1 1 1 1 Rob and Brenda Stribling Erica and Enrique Rodriguez 1 Clinton and Anushka Brownley About 32 neighbors on Ravenwood 16 19 17 16 From:Brenda Stribling To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot Subject:Ravenwood Dr Street Striping = Not Agreed Date:Monday, January 9, 2023 11:28:21 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi, I have been referred to you by my neighbor, Daryl Hoot, who has been speaking for the neighbors on Ravenwood Dr, our street, regarding the solutions to speeding of Marshall Lane parents from Quito to Marshall lane in the AMs and PMs and the safety of those families and children who both live on the street and walk to school daily. I, my husband and daughter have lived on Ravenwood Dr for 22 years. I have seen some speeding and mostly not. We live at - 3 houses from the Quito corner, where cars might start to speed up after turning the corner. As it can be problem, we do feel that the wide majority of school families do NOT speed, so there is SOME, but not a lot of speeding, as the city has found. In today's sensitive world, we do understand the fear of something like what occurred not far away in SJ a few years back (last year?) happening wherein a child's death is due to a speeding car. We do understand Saratoga's preference to not install speed bumps, as much as that might help. What we do not understand is the thought that striping the road on both sides will be a solution. It is our feeling that this will be a more dangerous proposal than leaving the street as it is. Please consider NOT striping the street. Striping the street will produce 3 results: 1. The street will appear to be a busy street that handles a lot of traffic at all times and will provide the drivers a feeling of moving at a quick pace - the opposite of what is intended. 2. The striping will provide the drivers a feeling of 'safe haven' to drive at a pace that is still unsafe, however also leaving them with the feeling that pedestrians are now safe from their speeding as they should be within the sides of the street opposite the striped lines. 3. The pedestrians most at risk = very young children who do not understand the limits of the "implied" flat barrier will not be protected truly from the cars on the street. The stripe is s psychological 'barrier' at most and young children's impulses do not factor into that - it is simply unsafe and not a smart choice. Please consider these points. We had a young daughter at one time and would not consider the striping a safe solution. We would worry more if she were told that a stripe would save her. Please. Please consider the smartest choice. Thank you, Brenda and Rob Stribling 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Amer Ather and Ayesha Sheikh Debbie Colyar 1 1 1 I cannot have a speedbump by the oak tree, because that plowing to get the speedbump in will disturb the growt and it is a heritage tree, so I have to protect it for the city. Any disturbance isn’t good for the roots of that tree, but if speedbump could be put before the tree or after the tree that would be acceptable. I’m so close to Quito that I doubt there would be a speed bump that close anyway so I think the problem solved. Good luck and thank you for all your work on this project. Monica and Eric Roman 0 1 1 1 Steve and Julie Xu 1 1 1 1 Dale and Mette Leuthold 1 1 1 1 Bill and Val Hardy 1 1 1 1 Jagi and Nomita Shahani 1 1 1 Christa and Josh Levine 1 1 1 1 Gun Poespowidjojo and Heather Babcock 1 1 1 Brett and Katherine Dawson 1 1 1 Sung and Jei Lei Kirk and Toggi Pollack Drew and Brenda Westcott 1 1 1 Minging and Buchin Chung Steve and Audrey Valen Lucy and Isaac Noble 0 Dave Snider and Anuradha Mayer Prakhar and Lavanya Mehrotra 1 1 1 1 Jeff Lichtman 1 1 1 0 Nitin Kasturi 1 Daryl and Gosia Hoot 1 1 1 1 Ginny and Dave Hoerger 1 1 1 1 Christine Cooke Dave and Rita Benton 1 0 1 Judy Simpson 1 1 1 1 Joan Havard 1 1 0 0 Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Jeffand Christine Walker 1 1 0 0 Bob and Emiko Robertson 1 1 1 Dave and Shelly Cuccias 1 1 1 1 Rob and Brenda Stribling Erica and Enrique Rodriguez 1 1 1 1 We would prefer that the speed bump not be in front of our property Clinton and Anushka Brownley About 32 neighbors on Ravenwood 16 23 20 20 Page 1 of 1 #564 Braemar Dr Date Received: June 28, 2023 Requesting Resident: Zongjun Qi Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Braemar Dr Description of traffic safety concern: I have been seeing cars racing through Braemar Drive a lot. This creates big dangers for pedestrians esp. now in summer a lot of neighbors choose to take walks after dinner. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Install a few bumps on the road. Page 1 of 1 #565 Farwell Ave Date Received: June 29, 2023 Requesting Resident: Marilyn Danny Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Farwell Ave Description of traffic safety concern: Speed has greatly increased in the last year! Farwell is a popular street for runners, walkers, bikers, skaters, etc. It's also a major cut-through from Saratoga-Los Gatos Road to Fruitvale Avenue... Definitely worse when school is in session! John Cherbone suggested we fill out this form to begin a study of our situation, although it should have been done before the end of the school year! Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Radar speed feedback sign in place... & probably time to consider something like speed bumps? Other ideas? From:noreply@civicplus.com To:Britt Avrit; Crystal Bothelio; Emma Burkhalter Subject:Online Form Submittal: Traffic Safety Commission Comments Form Date:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 12:58:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Traffic Safety Commission Comments Form Your Name Hari Pillai Phone Number Email Address Is this comment about an existing item under review by the Traffic Safety Commission? Yes Traffic Matrix Number (if known) 565 Street Name(s)Farwell Avenue Comments I'm not in support of speed bumps for a number of reasons including that a) the 2020 traffic study indicated leaving the 25mph limit in place b) speed bumps are a problem for older cars with lower clearance that do not have lifters c) we should try intermediate measures first like enforcement and speed readers (like Saratoga-Los Gatos near downtown). I have not seen any Sheriff speed enforcement action on Farwell in many years and I would like to see this corrected before we spoil the rural nature of the area with more signs and visual pollution. Lets address enforcement. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Page 1 of 2 #566 Vickery Ave Date Received: June 30, 2023 Requesting Resident: Jacob Shen Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Vickery Avenue between Lomina Avenue and Highway 9 Description of traffic safety concern: Vickery Avenue slopes down from the Lomita Avenue junction and then takes two 90-degree turns at 14768 Vickery Ave and at 14740 Vickery Ave, before reaching Highway 9. At all times of the day we see vehicles of all sorts speeding in Vickery on both directions. And, often, we see vehicles negotiated the two 90-degree turns in high speed. I spoke to the Sheriff's department. They said they will only send patrols to monitor the street traffic if I can give me a two hour time window. That's not going to help. Our neighborhood have young children. Many of them walk to school, sometimes without their parents. It's dangerous for them. I personally almost had 2 head-on collisions in front of my house on due to the speeding vehicles moving toward the center of the street when attempting a high-speed maneuver at the corner. Page 2 of 2 Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Either speed bumps along Vickery Avenue or something that can bring the vehicle speed down to 25MPH or less will help a lot.