The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-10-2024 Planning Commission Agenda packetSaratoga Planning Commission January 10, 2024 Agenda – Page 1 of 3 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 10, 2024 7:00 P.M. - PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Civic Theater | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Public Participation Information In accordance with Saratoga’s Remote Public Participation Policy, members of the public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed below or via remote attendance using the Zoom information below. 1. Accessing the meeting via Zoom • https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82652375945 (Webinar ID 826 5237 5945) • Calling 1.669.900.6833 or 1.408.638.0968; OR 2. Viewing the meeting on Saratoga Community Access Television Channel 15 (Comcast Channel 15, AT&T UVerse Channel 99) and calling the numbers listed above; OR 3. Viewing online at http://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?publish_id=2 and calling the numbers listed above. Written Communication Comments can be submitted in writing at www.saratoga.ca.us/pc. Written communications will be provided to the members of the Planning Commission and included in the Agenda Packet and/or in supplemental meeting materials. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of November 8, 2023. Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting on November 8, 2023. 11-8-2023 DRAFT MINUTES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. This law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications. Saratoga Planning Commission January 10, 2024 Agenda – Page 2 of 3 REPORT ON APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision. 2. PUBLIC HEARING Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of ten (10) minutes maximum for opening statements. All interested persons may appear and be heard during this meeting regarding the items on this agenda. If items on this agenda are challenged in court, members of the public may be limited to raising only issues raised at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to the close of the Public Hearing. Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of five (5) minutes maximum for closing statements. 2.1. The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 2,880 square foot two- story single-family residence with an 800 square foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). One protected tree is proposed for removal. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 24-0001 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Springer Ave 14251-Staff Report Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 24-001 Attachment 2- Arborist Report Attachment 3-Public Comments Attachment 4 - Story Pole Certification Attachment 5- Material Board Attachment 6- Development Plans 2.2. Appeal by a neighbor at 18640 Ravenwood Drive on an administrative decision to approve an application for the removal of one coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) at 18639 Ravenwood Drive (TRP23-0465). Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.24-002 denying the appeal. Staff Report -Ravenwood Dr 18639 Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 24-002 Attachment 2 - Tree Permit Application TRP23-0465 Attachment 3 - Appeal Application APTR23-0003 Supplemental Communications from Applicant 3. DIRECTOR ITEMS 4. COMMISSION ITEMS 5. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF THE AGENDA, DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET, COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT I, Debbie Bretschneider,Temp Administrative Analyst for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission was posted and available for review on January 4, 2024 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Signed this 4th day of January 2024 at Saratoga, California. Saratoga Planning Commission January 10, 2024 Agenda – Page 3 of 3 Debbie Bretschneider, Temp Administrative Analyst. In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Planning Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda, copies of materials distributed to the Planning Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda, and materials distributed to the Planning Commission by staff after the posting of the agenda are available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us or available at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA title II]. DRAFT MINUTES WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 2023 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Chair Brownley called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chair Clinton Brownley, Vice Chair Jojo Choi, Commissioners Paul Anjali Kausar, Ping, Li, Razi Mohiuddin, and Herman Zheng ABSENT: Commissioner Paul Germeraad ALSO PRESENT: Bryan T. Swanson, Community Development Director Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner Cynthia Richardson, Contractor 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 11, 2023. Recommended Action: Approve Minutes of Regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 11, 2023. CHOI/KAUSAR MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 11, 2023 MEETING. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: GERMERAAD. ABSTAIN: NONE. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS: Resident spoke 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2.1 (Continued from August 9, 2023) Application PDR22-0016/ARB22-0080: 19348 Athos Place; (389- 33-010) David Kuoppamaki (Applicant): The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 4,750 square foot two story single-family residence with a height of 25’-3 3/8”. The project will also include a 736 square foot detached accessory dwelling unit with a maximum height of 15’-5”. No protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-20,000 with a General Plan Designation of Low Density Residential (RLD). Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-017 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Public Comment: Jill Quian spoke. Wei Chen spoke. Richard spoke. Kasia Kranz spoke. 19958 resident spoke. 4 Keith Mueller spoke. Patricia spoke. KAUSAR/MOHIUDDIN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 23-017 AS PER STAFF REPORT AND TO ADD FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO MITIGATE THE FRONT BEDROOM WINDOW WITH REQUIREMENT TO PLANTING TREES ALONG PROPERTY LINE. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, KAUSAR, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: LI. ABSENT: GERMERAAD. ABSTAIN: NONE. 2.2 Application PDR23-0013/ARB23-0071: 14510 Quito Grove Court; (397-05-107) Chuck Bommarito (Applicant): The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 6,008 square foot one story single-family residence with a height of 22’-4”. Four protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-40,000 with a General Plan Designation of Very Low Density Residential (RVLD). Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-016 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. MOHIUDDIN/LI MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 23-016 WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN ATTACHMENT 1. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: GERMERAAD. ABSTAIN: NONE. 2.3 Application SUB20-0002/GEO23-0014: 20470 Montalvo Height Drive; (517-18-062) Robert and Kathleen Frederickson (Owner/Applicant): The applicant is requesting tentative map approval for a two- lot subdivision. No protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-40,000 with a General Plan Designation of Very Low Density Residential (RVLD). Staff Contact: Kyle Rathbone (408) 868-1212 or krathbone@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-019 approving the tentative map, subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. CHOI/ KAUSAR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 23-019 WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN ATTACHMENT 1. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: GERMERAAD. ABSTAIN: NONE. 2.4 Application PDR19-0023/ARB19-0039/GEO19-0013/ZOA19-0004/ENV19-0005; 14500 Fruitvale Avenue (397-12-012 & 397-12-019 & 397-40-006); Saratoga Retirement Community Master Plan Update. The applicant is requesting an exception to the requirements for Story Poles pursuant to City Code Sections 15-16.070 and 15-45.075(8)(e) for the Saratoga Retirement Community project due to safety concerns and impairment of the use of the existing structures on the site and to allow for the use of alternative methods, tools or technologies. Contact: Cynthia Richardson, crichardson@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-017 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Public Comment: Robert Bergland spoke. Tsing Barden spoke. 5 Michael Griffen spoke. Rovi Ravikumar spoke. John Day spoke. Barry Lame spoke. KAUSAR/MOHIUDDIN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 23-018 AND TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR A STORY POLE EXCEPTION PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 15- 45.075(E)PER THE MODIFIED STORY POLE PLAN AND THE COMPUTER VISUAL SIMULATION AND BASED ON THE FINDINGS. FURTHER, THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUIRED TO INSTALL STORY POLES ON THE PROPOSED BUILDING B BUT IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL STORY POLES ON THE APPLICANT’S ALTERNATIVE BUILDING D AND THE PROPOSED COTTAGE. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: GERMERAAD. ABSTAIN: NONE. 4. DIRECTOR ITEMS Director Swanson suggested that the December 13, 2023 Planning Commission be cancelled. The Planning Commission approved this suggestion. 5. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Kausar wished Happy Diwali to all who celebrate. 6. ADJOURNMENT BROWNLEY moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:21 p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted: Debbie Bretschneider, Temp Administrative Analyst City of Saratoga 6 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: January 10, 2024 Application: PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 Address/APN: 14251 Springer Ave/503-27-067 Property Owner: Qian Zheng and Wan Zhiling Report Prepared By: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner 7 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave - PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 2,880 square foot two-story single- family residence with an 800 square foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). One protected tree is proposed for removal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 24-0001 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060(a) (1) & (3) approval by the Planning Commission is required as the project is a new multi-story main structure and exceeds 18’ in height. PROJECT DATA Gross/Net Site Area: 7,466 sq. ft. gross/net Average Site Slope: Less than 10% General Plan Designation: M-10 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning: R-1-10,000 (Single Family Residential) Proposed Allowed/Required Site Coverage Residence w/Garage/ADU Driveway/Decks/walkway Total Proposed 2,749 sq. ft. 1,355 sq. ft. 4,104 sq. ft. (54.9%) 4,479 sq. ft. (60%) Floor Area Residence ADU Garage Total Floor Area 2,452 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. 428 sq. ft. 3,680 sq. ft.* 3,680 sq. ft.* Height 26’ 26’ Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: 1st Floor 2nd Floor 25’ 32’ 6’ 11’ 6’ 11’ 25’ 83’ 1st Floor 2nd Floor 25’ 25’ 6’ 11’ 6’ 11’ 25’ 35’ Grading Cut- 85 CY Fill- 10 CY Export- 75 CY No grading limit in the R-1-10,000 zoning district * Includes one-time 800 sq.ft. allowance for ADU per City code Section 15-56.025 (5) (b) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project site is located at 14251 Springer Avenue in the R-10,000 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The 7,466 square foot site is relatively level. The site contains an existing 1,106 square foot single story residence with garage as well as related site improvements. An existing 8 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave - PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Page | 3 6’ tall wood fence along property lines is proposed to remain. Surrounding uses on all sides include a mix of single story and two story single-family homes on similar sized parcels. Project Description The architectural style of the project can best be described as modern. The 1,899 square foot first floor consists of a living room, master bedroom, kitchen, family room, and a two car garage. There is also an 800 square foot attached accessory dwelling unit. The 981 square foot second floor consists of a master bedroom suite and two bedrooms and a bathroom. The applicant has provided a color and materials board. (Attachment 5) Below is a list of the proposed exterior materials. Detail Colors/Materials Exterior Swan White/Stucco Front Door Dark Brown/Wood Roof Grey/Concrete tile Trees The project arborist inventoried a total of six (6) protected trees on the property. One (1) protected olive tree is proposed for removal with this project. This tree is in poor condition and in conflict with the project. A description of the trees to be preserved and the tree protection plan are included in the Arborist Report. (Attachment 2) Landscaping The installation of front yard landscaping is required prior to building permit final inspection. The applicant has obtained WELO clearance during the review process. The project includes a condition of approval that landscaping is to be installed per City Code Section 15-12.095. FINDINGS Design Review The findings required for issuance of Design Review approval pursuant to City Code Section 15- 45.080 are set forth below. a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the building site is relatively level and no grading is required to construct the project. The development is appropriate to the site’s natural constraints with single family homes around it. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak 9 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave - PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Page | 4 trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the City Arborist has made the findings for the removal of one protected tree. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence is one story and has an existing 6’ tall wood fence that is proposed to remain for privacy. No community view sheds are in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and the height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence complies with the maximum height limitation of 26 feet allowable for residential structures; the building has varying architectural forms and exterior materials to break up the appearance of mass, the building setbacks comply with those required for the R-1-10,000 zoning district. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project includes a condition of approval that front yard landscaping is to be installed prior to the building department final inspection. Staff will ensure that this landscaping is complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. The City Code requires that at least 50% of the front setback area be landscaped. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the home is similar in mass with the homes in the neighborhood and will not cast shadows on the adjacent properties which could impair the adjacent property owner’s opportunity to utilize solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. 10 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave - PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Page | 5 h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot as the average slope is less than 10% nor will it affect any significant hillside feature or community viewshed. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence The Community Development Department mailed public notices to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. The applicant reached out to the adjacent neighbors during the review process and provided completed neighbor notification forms. One neighbor has raised concerns about the location of the proposed windows on the second floor. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of a single-family residence and small structures in a residential area. The project, as proposed, is for the construction of a new residence in a suburban, residential area. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-001 2. Arborist Report dated June 14, 2023 3. Public Comments 4. Story Pole Certification 5. Material Board 6. Development Plans 11 RESOLUTION NO: 24-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PDR23-0002 AND ARBORIST REVIEW ARB23-0011 14251 SPRINGER AVE (503-27-067) WHEREAS, on January 17, 2023 an application was submitted by Qian Zheng and Wan Zhiling requesting Design Review approval for a new 2,880 square foot two-story single-family residence with an 800 square foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). One protected tree is proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-10,000 with a General Plan Designation of Medium Density Residential (M-10). WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3(a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of a single- family residence and small structures in a residential area. Section 3: The proposed residence is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design Review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings; Safety Element Site and Drainage Policy 3 which provides that the City shall require that landscaping and site drainage plans be submitted and approved during Design Review for a residence prior to issuance of permits; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The proposed residence is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints; the porch and entry are in scale with other structures in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. 12 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves PDR23- 0002/ARB23-0011 for 14251 Springer Ave (503-27-067) subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 10th day of January 2024 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Clinton Brownley Chair, Planning Commission 13 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 14251 Springer Ave PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 (503-27-067) GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 14 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5. A Building Permit must be issued, and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or the Design Review Approval will expire unless extended in accordance with the City Code. 6. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Development Plans. All proposed changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit for staff approval, a Lighting Plan for the home’s exterior and landscaped areas. Proposed exterior lighting shall be limited to full cut-off & shielded fixtures with downward directed illumination so as not to shine on adjacent properties or public right-of-way. All proposed exterior lighting shall be designed to limit illumination to the site and avoid creating glare impacts to surrounding properties. 8. In order to comply with standards that minimize impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise, construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated in these sections. 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by City staff a Construction Management Plan for the project which includes but is not limited to the following: a. Proposed construction worker parking area. b. Proposed construction hours that are consistent with City Code. c. Proposed construction/delivery vehicle staging or parking areas. d. Proposed traffic control plan with traffic control measures, any street closure, hours for delivery/earth moving or hauling, etc. To the extent possible, any deliveries, earth moving or hauling activities will be scheduled to avoid peak commute hours. e. Proposed construction material staging/storage areas. f. Location of project construction sign outlining permitted construction work hours, name of project contractor and the contact information for both homeowner and contractor. 10. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height requirements provided in City Code Section 15-29. 11. The final landscaping and irrigation plan submitted for Building Permit approval shall demonstrate how the project complies with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall consider the following: a. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that 15 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. b. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. c. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency, and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. d. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. e. Any proposed or required under grounding of utilities shall consider potential damage to roots of protected trees. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection or a bond satisfactory to the Community Development Department valued at 150% of the estimated cost of the installation of such landscaping shall be provided to the City. 12. A locking mailbox approved for use by the U.S. Postal service shall be installed and in compliance with Saratoga Municipal Code section 6-25.030. The mailbox shall be installed prior to final inspection. 13. West Valley Collection & Recycling is the exclusive roll-off and debris box provider for the City of Saratoga. FIRE DEPARTMENT 14. The owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department requirements. ARBORIST 15. All requirements in the City Arborist Approval Letter dated June 14, 2023 are hereby adopted as conditions of approval and shall be implemented as part of the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 16. The owner/applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding drainage, including but not limited to complying with the city approved Stormwater management plan. The project shall retain and/or detain any increase in design flow from the site, that is created by the proposed construction and grading project, such that adjacent down slope properties will not be negatively impacted by any increase in flow. Design must follow the current Santa Clara County Drainage Manual method criteria, as required by the building department. Retention/detention element design must follow the Drainage Manual guidelines, as required by the building department. 17. Applicant / Owner shall obtain an encroachment permit for any and all improvements in any City right-of-way or City easement including all new utilities prior to commencement 16 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 of the work to implement this Design Review. 18. Applicant / Owner shall make the following improvements in the City right-of-way: a. Remove existing driveway approach and replace with new driveway approach per City Standard Detail 205 & 206. See City of Saratoga Standard Details for removal and new installation. New flow line shall conform to existing flow lines and grade. 19. Damages to driveway approach, curb and gutter, public streets, or other public improvements during construction shall be repaired prior to final inspection. 20. All new/upgraded utilities shall be installed underground. 21. Applicant / Owner shall maintain the streets, sidewalks and other right of way as well as adjacent properties, both public and private, in a clean, safe and usable condition. All spills of soil, rock or construction debris shall be removed immediately. 22. The Owner/Applicant shall incorporate adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff (e.g. landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration where possible, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs, such as Bay- Friendly Landscaping). 23. All building and construction related activities shall adhere to New Development and Construction – Best Management Practices as adopted by the City for the purpose of preventing storm water pollution: • Owner shall implement construction site inspection and control to prevent construction site discharges of pollutants into the storm drains per approved Erosion Control Plan. • The City requires the construction sites to maintain year-round effective erosion control, run-on and run-off control, sediment control, good site management, and non-storm water management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to, site grading, building, and finishing of lots) until the site is fully stabilized by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures. • City will conduct inspections to determine compliance and determine the effectiveness of the BMPs in preventing the discharge of construction pollutants into the storm drain. The owner shall be required to timely correct all actual and potential discharges observed. 24. Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans. 25. Prior to the Building final, all Public Works conditions shall be completed per approved plans. 17 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL 26. Complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department. b. Arborist report dated June 14, 2023 c. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. d. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages. 18 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS 14251 Springer Ave PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 (503-27-067) Design Review The findings required for issuance of Design Review approval pursuant to City Code Section 15- 45.080 are set forth below. a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the building site is relatively level and no grading is required to construct the project. The development is appropriate to the site’s natural constraints with single family homes around it. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the City Arborist has made the findings for the removal of one protected tree. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence is one story and has an existing 6’ tall wood fence that is proposed to remain for privacy. No community view sheds are in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and the height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence complies with the maximum height limitation of 26 feet allowable for residential structures; the building has varying architectural forms and exterior materials to break up the appearance of mass, the building setbacks comply with those required for the R-1-10,000 zoning district. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project includes a condition of approval that front yard landscaping is to be installed prior to the building department final inspection. 19 Report to the Planning Commission 14251 Springer Ave-PDR23-0002/ARB23-0011 January 10, 2024 Resolution # 24-001 Page | 4 Staff will ensure that this landscaping is complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. The City Code requires that at least 50% of the front setback area be landscaped. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the home is similar in mass with the homes in the neighborhood and will not cast shadows on the adjacent properties which could impair the adjacent property owner’s opportunity to utilize solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot as the average slope is less than 10% nor will it affect any significant hillside feature or community viewshed. 20 Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 www.saratoga.ca.us/171/trees 408.868.1276 CITY OF SARATOGA ARBORIST APPROVAL Conditions of Approval and Tree Protection Plan Prepared by Christina Fusco, City Arborist Application No. ARB20-0026 Phone: (408) 868-1276 Address: 14251 Springer Ave Email: cfusco@saratoga.ca.us Owner: Zhiling Wan, Zheng Qian APN: 503-27-067 Date: June 14, 2023 PROJECT SCOPE: The applicant has submitted plans to demolish the existing home and build a new two-story home. One tree is requested for removal to construct the project. Four trees were recently removed from the property and require replacement trees under permit numberTRP22-0137 and code violation ATFTR22- 0038. PROJECT DATA IN BRIEF: Tree security deposit – Required - $5,845 Tree protection – Required – See Conditions of Approval and attached map. Tree removals – Tree #3 is approved for removal once building permits have been issued. Replacement trees – Required = $83,270 ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Findings and Tree Information 2 – Tree Removal Criteria 3 – Conditions of Approval 4 – Map Showing Tree Protection 1 of 8 21 14251 Springer Ave Attachment 1 FINDINGS: Tree Removals According to Section 15-50.080 of the City Code, whenever a tree is requested for removal as part of a project, certain findings must be made and specific tree removal criteria met. One olive tree #3 is in conflict with the project and meets the City’s criteria allowing it to be removed and replaced as part of the project, once building division permits have been obtained. Attachment 2 contains the tree removal criteria for reference. Table 1: Summary of Tree Removal Criteria that are met Tree No. Species Criteria met Comments 3 Olive 1, 6, 7, 9 New Construction Based on the information provided, and as conditioned, this project complies with the requirements for the setback of new construction from existing trees under Section 15- 50.120 of the City Code. Tree Preservation Plan Section 15-50.140 of the City Code requires a Tree Preservation Plan for this project. To satisfy this requirement the following shall be copied onto a plan sheet and included in the final sets of plans: 1)The tree information, recommendations and map showing tree protection from the submitted arborist report dated May 8, 2023; 2)The Project Data in Brief and Conditions of Approval from this report dated June 14, 2023 TREE INFORMATION: Project Arborist: Bo Firestone Date of Report: May 8, 2023 Number of protected trees inventoried: 6 Number of protected trees requested for removal: 1 A table summarizing information about each tree is below. Table 2: Tree information from submitted arborist report dated May 8, 2023. 2 of 8 22 Wan Residence rev. 5/08/2023 Number Common Name Botanical Name DBH (inches) math. DBH (inches) Height (feet) Spread (feet)Condition Age Species Tolerance 6X DSH* (feet) TPZ mult. Factor Ideal TPZ Radius (ft) Impact Level** Suitability Rating Remove / Preserve Appraisal Result 1 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 21 21 35 40 FAIR MATURE HIGH 11 8 14 LOW MODERATE PRESERVE $4,960 2 Bigleaf Maple Acer macrophyllum 14 14 20 15 POOR MATURE MODERATE 7 12 14 MODERATE LOW PRESERVE $310 3 Olive Olea europaea 12, 7.5 14 30 15 POOR MATURE MODERATE 7 12 14 SEVERE LOW REMOVE (X)$1,260 4 Windmill Palm Trachycarpus fortunei 7 7 20 7 FAIR YOUNG MODERATE 4 8 5 MODERATE MODERATE PRESERVE $220 5 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia est. 14 14 25 25 POOR MATURE HIGH 7 8 9 VERY LOW LOW PRESERVE $1,260 6 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia est. 18 18 55 40 GOOD MATURE HIGH 9 8 12 LOW HIGH PRESERVE $6,200 KEY:TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE***$12,950 #Neighboring / City Street Tree VALUE OF TREES TO REMAIN $11,690 Removal Request REPLACEMENT VALUE $1,260 SECURITY DEPOSIT (50%)$5,845 SEE GLOSSARY FOR DEFINITION OF TERMS TREE INVENTORY - 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA pg. 19 TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT * 6X DSH is the distance from trunkface to transverse rootcut (i.e. trenching past a tree), that results in approximately 25% root loss. More than 25% rootloss is likely to result in the decline and/or instabilty of a tree. The City Arborists commonly uses this number as as the setback they require from excavation work to a tree to be preserved. **ASSUMES STANDARD AND SPECIAL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ARE FOLLOWED. *** I did not include trees in the path of ingress and egress (marked as "very low") in the appraisal total, based on guidance from the City Arborist that these typically do not count towards the deposit. Prepared by Busara Firestone ISA Certified Arborist #WE-8525A Attachment 1 3 of 8 23 14251 Springer Ave Attachment 2 TREE REMOVAL CRITERIA Criteria that permit the removal of a protected tree are listed below. This information is from Article 15-50.080 of the City Code and is applied to any tree requested for removal as part of the project. If findings are made that meet the criteria listed below, the tree(s) may be approved for removal and replacement during construction. (1) The condition of the tree with respect to disease, imminent danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services, and whether the tree is a Dead tree or a Fallen tree. (2) The necessity to remove the tree because of physical damage or threatened damage to improvements or impervious surfaces on the property. (3) The topography of the land and the effect of the tree removal upon erosion, soil retention and the diversion or increased flow of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes. (4) The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect the removal would have upon shade, privacy impact, scenic beauty, property values, erosion control, and the general welfare of residents in the area. (5) The age and number of healthy trees the property is able to support according to good forestry practices. (6) Whether or not there are any alternatives that would allow for retaining or not encroaching on the protected tree. (7) Whether the approval of the request would be contrary to or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. (8) Any other information relevant to the public health, safety, or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50.010 (9) The necessity to remove the tree for economic or other enjoyment of the property when there is no other feasible alternative to the removal. (10) The necessity to remove the tree for installation and efficient operation of solar panels, subject to the requirements that the tree(s) to be removed, shall not be removed until solar panels have been installed and replacement trees planted in conformance with the City Arborist's recommendation. (11) The necessity to remove a tree following the creation of defensible space within 100 feet of a structure located within the Wildland Urban Interface, in accordance with defensible space standards established by CAL FIRE or as determined by Santa Clara County Fire Department, and that risk of increased wildfire cannot reasonably be addressed through maintenance or without tree removal. 4 of 8 24 14251 Springer Ave Attachment 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Owner, Architect, Contractor: It is the responsibility of the owner, architect, and contractor to be familiar with the information in this report and implement the required conditions. 2. Permit: a. Receipt of a Planning or Building permit does not relieve applicant of his responsibilities for protecting trees per City Code Article 15-50 on all construction work. b. No protected tree authorized for removal or encroachment pursuant to this project may be removed or encroached upon until the issuance of the applicable permit from the building division for the approved project. 3. Final Plan Sets: a. Shall include the tree information, protection recommendations, and the map showing tree protection from the arborist report by Bo Firestone dated May 8, 2023 copied onto a plan sheet. b. Shall include the Project Data in Brief and the Conditions of Approval, sections of the City Arborist report dated June 14, 2023. 4. Tree Protection Security Deposit: a. Is required per City Ordinance 15-50.080. b. Shall be $5845 for tree(s) 1, 2, 4-6. c. Shall be obtained by the owner and filed with the Community Development Department before obtaining Building Division permits. d. May be in the form of cash, check, or a bond. e. Shall remain in place for the duration of construction of the project. f. May be released once the project has been completed, inspected and approved by the City Arborist. 5. Tree Protection Fencing: a. Shall be installed as shown on the attached map. b. Shall be shown on the Site Plan. c. Shall be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. d. Shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link fencing mounted on 2-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. e. Shall be posted with signs saying, “TREE PROTECTION FENCE - DO NOT MOVE OR REMOVE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST, CHRISTINA FUSCO (408) 868- 1276”. f. A letter/email shall be provided to the City from the project arborist confirming the correct installation of the tree protection fencing once it has been installed, including photos. This is required prior to obtaining building division permits. g. Tree protection fencing shall remain undisturbed throughout the construction until final inspection. 5 of 8 25 14251 Springer Ave Attachment 3 6. Construction: All construction activities shall be conducted outside tree protection fencing unless permitted as conditioned below. These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching for utility installation, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 7. Work inside fenced areas: a. Requires a field meeting and approval from City Arborist before performing work. b. Requires Project Arborist on site to monitor work. 8. Project Arborist: a. Shall be Bo Firestone unless otherwise approved by the City Arborist. b. Shall visit the site every two weeks during grading, trenching or digging activities and every six weeks thereafter. A letter/email shall be provided to the City after each inspection which documents the work performed around trees, includes photos of the work in progress, and provides information on tree condition during construction. c. Shall supervise any permitted pruning or root pruning of trees on site. Roots of protected trees measuring two inches in diameter or more shall not be cut without prior approval of the Project Arborist. 9. Tree removal: Tree #3 meets the criteria for removal and may be removed once building division permits have been obtained. 10. New trees: a. New trees equal to $83,270 shall be planted as part of the project before final inspection and occupancy of the new home. New trees may be of any species and planted anywhere on the property as long as they do not encroach on retained trees. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. 15 gallon = $350 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 60 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 b. Trees shall be replaced on or off site according to good forestry practices and shall provide equivalent value in terms of aesthetic and environmental quality, size, height, location, appearance and other significant beneficial characteristics of the removed trees. c. Three trees shall be from the City’s List of Natives. Trees on the City’s list of natives include: coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), blue oak (Quercus douglasii), scrub oak (Quercus dumosa), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens.) 11. Damage to protected trees that will be retained: a. Should any protected tree be damaged beyond repair, new trees shall be required to replace the tree. If there is insufficient room to plant the necessary number of new 6 of 8 26 14251 Springer Ave Attachment 3 trees, some of the value for trees may be paid into the City’s Tree Fund. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. b. Water loving plants and lawns are not permitted under oak tree canopies. Only drought tolerant plants that are compatible with oaks are permitted under the outer half of the canopy of oak trees on site. 12. Final inspection: At the end of the project, when the contractor wants to remove tree protection fencing and have the tree protection security deposit released by the city, call City Arborist for a final inspection. Before scheduling a final inspection from the City Arborist, have the project arborist do an inspection, prepare a letter with their findings, and provide that letter to the city for the project file. 7 of 8 27 AƩachment 4 14251 Springer Avenue 8 of 8 28 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Fonn Project Address: /ff-;)5) Seri, NC.b[3 AVG A project Is proposed at the above address. The City asks that you sign this form to Indicate you have had an opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. Your signature Is nm an acceptance of the plans, only an acknowledgement that you have had an opportunity to comment. IMPORTANT NOTE FROM CITY: These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may change as the project moves forward. Archltectural Plans are protected under copyright law. The applicant sho uld allow you to view the plans but is not required to give you a physical copy. Once the application is submitted, you may review a full sized set of plans at City Hall during normal business hours. The applicant should inform you when the plans will be submitted. Please contact the City at 408-868-1222 If you have any questions. This notice Is being provided to all of the adjoining property owners and the property owner(s) across the street from the project address. The City will send an additional notice to adjacent neighbors prior to a decision being made on the project. Date: .(�ht-/ d� NelghborAddress: /t/J,t// SPf?INCE� AV{ Neighbor Contact Info: (phone or emall): --·-·• -This enables the City to contact you if they have any questions Please address any Initial concerns below (attach addltlonal sheets If necessary): Feel free to mall this form directly to the City: City of Saratoga Planning Department; 13777 Frultvale Avenue; Saratoga CA 95070 A/o()e My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposa�I. __ NEIGHBOR S!GNAlURE:. � - Revised February 2014 29 r Qty ot sun:111• Neighbor Mottllc.atson Form 1 A proJ«t s Pl'OOOsed at lhe above address. The City aSScs that you sign this ronn ID lndk.ete you have had an GPPOttunlty to review end c.omment on lhe proposal. Your slQnatun! Is QQt an �ortfle plans, only an ;,cknowlod9enient 1h11t ycu have had an °""°'tuntty to com!Mt'tt IMPORTANT NOTE FROM CUY: T� plans are eae IHINIBY oo,x and may change as the projea move, fotward. Archlt«tural Plans an! protected under cx,c,yr,ght lbw. The •Pell leant sl10111d allow )'(Kl to mtfll tile plans but rs not requlrad to give you a phvslcal c,opy. Once the appllc:iltlan Is submlttlld, you may review a run S!ied sttof plans et City Hall during normal business hours. The eppUcant should inl'otrn � when the plans will be submtted. Please a,ntact the City at 408-868-1222 tfyou have any questions. lhfs notJoe IS l>Clng provided to all of the adjoining property owners and the praperty owner{s) aC7'0S$ lfle street t,om the projett addreS$. Tl'le City wlll send an additional notice to �djaant ne ighbors prior to a decisioo being made on the proJc:<t. Neighbor Name: _M I k;:e 'f\;\ b,'J e'<M. �t-<--r-;\ Date: \ 2, I I b / -z "Z... --\'-\"2.47.,� Neighbor eon.c:t Jnb (pllonc or emell): -'1Ns..,. rlNI QI)' to Q1IOd JIOll /f,,,.,, �ve IIIIY questions Pre.-adclrea Sft lnlllal cmcems below (ltucfl additional sheets If necessery): ,- free to l'llltll tllls l'orm dlNcdy ID tlleQly: ary ar �,atoga Pllnnlhg Departmeat; 13777 Frultva1c Avenue; Sarntoga CA 95070 Revised februlry 2014 30 (LP·51 A project ts proOQStd at the ebove address. lhe City asks that you SO\ ttis form ID lndlate you have had an opportllnlty torcvi&wand comment on the �I. Your stgnature IS OQt an � of the pl.ins, only ;:in ocknowlOdgoment tNt '/OU hav9 Nd on opportunity to comment. lMPORTAHr rmre /IROM cm: 1hese plans ere PSEYMINARY QNLY and may dlanoe as ttie project mCM!S torward. Arc:t11tectural Plans a,e l)f'Olected under copyr�t law. The aPOllcant should allOw YoU to llfewthe plans but Is not required ID give you a l)hyt1cal copy. Once die appUcatlon Is submltlll!d, you may review a full sited tet of ptan, at City Hall during nonnal buSlness hours. The appllaint should Inform you when the plans wlll be submitted. l'telse conta� the aty at .. 08-868-122 2 If you have MIY questions. This notice Is being provided ID all d the ad.Join!� propeity owners and the p,opc,ty ownef'(S) across the street from the Project address. The OtY wftl send an additional notice to adlacent neighbors prior to a decision being made on the project. Ml8hM: Name; ISOB§:t,bA .t Fe, ,·x MM?Kf{O\ISK7' Dato: �-1, �3 N:nfgbherMd�: J!taS-; 'PgLU, Ave,, �AI9\z:A, CA, $¢20 Nlfat;;ba Cofltac:t Woe (pllonl: er trnal): ---------.This..,,_ ti» City to «llltMt you llt/l•r I/ave any questions Please eddcw.,,, lnlllll C7P¥1PffM llllow (attach addtlonal sheets If n«essary): Fat ft'ee IO man ctllS IClrm cllredlY ID IN Cltv: cay al Sal'lltogll Pllnnfng Oepartment: 13777 Ft\lltvale Avenue; Saratoga CA 95070 31 32 2625 Mid dlefield Road #658 • Palo Alto, CA 94306 • Tel: 650 -823 -6466 • Fax: 650 -887 -0321 WEC and Associates, Inc. December 18, 2023 City of Saratoga Building Division 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Subject: Survey Report 14251 Springer Avenue, Saratoga, CA To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to confirm in writing that WEC and Associates, Inc has performed a field survey to check the story pole locations and heights at the subject property based on the plan with revision dated in Dec 11, 2023. We have determined that the story poles substantially conform to the proposed plan. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the services rendered except that our services are performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same or similar locality. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, WEC and Associates, Inc. Yi-Ran Wu, PE., LLS 33 34 PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com A0-TS TITLE SHEET / SITE PLAN ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA DRAWING INDEX: A0-TS TITLE SHEET / SITE PLAN C0 PROPERTY SURVEY C1 GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN C2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C3 UTILITY PLAN C4 DETAILS BMP EROSION CONTROL A01 ARBORIST REPORT A01a ARBORIST REPORT A02 STREETSCAPE / SITE PHOTOS A10 SITE PLAN A21 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A22 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A23 ROOF PLAN A30 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A50 BUILDING SECTIONS / WALL SECTION APN: 503-27-067 ADDRESS: 14251 SPRINGER AVE ZONE: R-1-10000 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: GROUP R3 & U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B, SPRINKLERED STORIES: 2 STORY HISTORIC: NO. NET LOT SIZE: 7,466 SF FRONT SETBACK: 25' ALLOWED FLOOR AREA: 2,400+ 160*(7,466-5000)/1000 = 2,880 SF PROPOSE MAIN RES BUILDING AREA: 1ST FLOOR: 1,899 SF, 2ND FLOOR: 981 SF. TOTAL:2,880 SF ALLOWED LOT COVERAGE: 7,466 x 0.6 = 4,479 SF PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 2,699(BUILDING FOOTPRINT)+498(DRIVEWAY)+ 857(WALKWAY, DECK, PATIO) =4,054 SF CONTACT: OWNER: Zhiling Wan wzl81561915@gmail.com ARCHITECT: Yin Su yinsu2002@gmail.com SURVEY/CIVIL: Ed Wu ed@weceng.com STRUCTURE ENGINEER: DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 1. EV CHARGER 2. FIRE SPRINKLER A residential fire sprinkler system is required in accordance with NFPA 13D and State and Local requirements. 14251 SPRINGER AVE SARATOGA, CA95070 ENERGY CONSULTANT: EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE AND DETACHED GARAGE ARE TO BE DEMOLISHED. PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP A TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH FOUR BEDROOMS AND FOUR BATHROOMS AND ATTACHED GARAGE WITH PRIVATE ACCESS FROM SPRINGER AVE. SEE PROJECT DATA FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. APPLICABLE CODES 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (PART 6 OF TITLE 24) 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (PART 9 OF TITLE 24) 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE SARATOGA MUNICIPAL CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE PROJECT SCOPE: GENERAL NOTES IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND MAKE KNOWN ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING THEIR WORK THESE DRAWINGS AREA INTENDED FOR USE IN A NEGOTIATED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND, THEREFORE, MAY NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAIL OR SPECIFY MATERIAL AND / OR MANUFACTURERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SAMPLES AND OR CUTS AS REQUIRED TO ASSIST OWNER OR HIS AGENT IN MAKING MATERIAL SELECTIONS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTIMATING, THE CONTRACTORS SHALL USE THE MATERIALS SELECTED BY THE OWNER, OR IN ABSENCE OF SAME, HE SHALL PROVIDE AN ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AND SO CONDITION ANY COST ESTIMATE.. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN SUCH ESTIMATE NO GUARANTEE OF QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION IS IMPLIED OR INTENDED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTS, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OR ALL CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFY AND DEFEND THE DESIGNER FROM ANY ACTION INITIATED BY THE INITIAL OWNER OR ANY SUBSEQUENT OWNERS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES, MODIFICATIONS OR SUCH CONDITIONS WHICH MAY BE BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE DESIGNER. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND TRADE STANDARDS WHICH GOVERN EACH PHASE OF WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC), UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE (UMC), NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC), NATIONAL PLUMBING CODE (NPC), AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND LEGISLATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND RECORD THE CONDITIONS OF ALL EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING PAVED AREAS. HE SHALL MAKE KNOWN ALL EXISTING DAMAGED OR DISREPAIRED ITEMS AND CONDITIONS THAT MAY WORSEN DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION. ALL ITEMS IN GOOD CONDITION SHALL BE MAINTAIN IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION AND ANY REPAIR OR DAMAGE WHICH OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY EXAMINE THE SITE AND SATISFY HIMSELF AS OF THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AT THE SITE ALL MEASUREMENTS AFFECTING HIS WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF SAME. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE EXPENSES DUE TO HIS NEGLECT TO EXAMINE OR FAILURE TO DISCOVER CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT HIS WORK. ALL NEW INTERIOR PAINT COLOR, FLOOR, WALLS AND CEILING FINISHES SHALL BE SELECTED BY OWNER AT THE TIME WHEN IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE W ITH THE LATEST ADOPTED CITY STANDARDS. THE STORING OF GOODS AND MATERIALS ON SIDEWALK AND/OR STREET WALL NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS APPLIED AND SECURED A SPECIAL PERMIT WHICH ALLOW SUCH STORAGE TO BE PLACED. Site Management: a. Construction site shall be enclosed by 6’ opaque fence at all times during construction. b. No Construction material, equipment, portable toilets, trash containers, or debris shall be placed in the public right-of-way. c. A trash container shall be maintained on site at all times and debris on site which could otherwise blow away, shall be regularly collected and placed in container. d. All construction debris (wood scraps and other debris, which cannot blow away) shall be piled within the property lines of the project in a neat and safe manner. e. The project shall have a signage viewable from the public street that indicates the hours of construction as: Mon- Fri from 7:30 am to 6 pm, Saturdays from 9am to 5 pm. Prior to any grading, scraping or trenching within/under the canopy of a protected tree, a certified arborist shall be retained to provide supervision and recommendations to minimize possible damage to the tree. The proposed trenching shall then be approved by the City of Saratoga Planning Department prior to commencing digging. All electric lines, communication lines and appurtenances, including all public utility, CATV and telegraph systems, shall be located and installed underground. Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall certify height of building does not exceed 26 feet. The written certification shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to roof sheathing inspection and shall take into account the added height with the installation of the roofing materials and underlayment. Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall certify height of building does not exceed 26 feet. The written certification shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to roof sheathing inspection and shall take into account the added height with the installation of the roofing materials and underlayment. Class A roof covering is required. Cricket or saddle coverings shall be sheet metal or of the same material as the roof covering (CRC 903.2.2). Excavation cuts exceeding 5 feet typically require a DOSH permit. All excavations must conform to applicable OSHA and CAL-OSHA requirements. Contact California Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) for information about required permits. DOSH’s local office: (510) 794-2521 Prior to final inspection for any building or structure, the Geotechnical Engineer or Civil Engineer who prepared the soil investigation shall issue a final report stating the completed pad, foundation, finish grading, and associated site work substantially conform to the approved plans, specifications, and investigation. On the plans specify how the grading slopes so that surface water drains away from the new foundation walls. The grade shall fall a minimum of 6 inches within the first 10 feet (5% or 1:20 slope). Where lot lines, walls, slopes or other physical barriers prohibit 6 inches of fall within 10 feet, drains or swales shall be constructed to ensure drainage away from the structure. Only impervious surfaces such as landings or walks within 10 feet of the building foundation are allowed to be sloped a minimum of 2 percent away from the building. (2019 R401.3) PROJECT DATA ARBORIST: Bo Firestone Trees & Gardens busara@bofirestone.com AN EWAS WILL BE INSTALLED AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. Fire Notes: Early Warning Fire Alarm System Required: Installation of an early warning fire alarm system in accordance with the provisions of this Article is required as a condition for the granting of any building or other permit under Chapter 16 in each of the following cases: 1) All new residential structures classified as "R" occupancies in the most recent version of the California Building Code, commercial structures and community facilities located within the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. 2) Any existing structure classified as an "R" occupancy in the most recent version of the California Building Code, commercial structure or community facility which is expanded by fifty percent or more in floor area and is located within the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Address identification: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These num bers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec. 505.1. Water Supply Requirements: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water-based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2019 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7. 8. Construction Site Fire Safety: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification S1-7. 35 36 37 38 39 Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) Construction projects are required to implement year-round stormwater BMPs. Non-Hazardous Materials Berm and cover stockpiles of sand, dirt or other construction material with tarps when rain is forecast or when they are not in use. Use (but don’t overuse) reclaimed water for dust control. Ensure dust control water doesn’t leave site or discharge to storm drains. Hazardous Materials Label all hazardous materials and hazardous wastes (such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, fuel, oil, and antifreeze) in accordance with City, County, State and Federal regulations. Store hazardous materials and wastes in water tight containers, store in appropriate secondary containment, and cover them at the end of every work day or during wet weather or when rain is forecast. Follow manufacturer’s application instructions for hazardous materials and do not use more than necessary. Do not apply chemicals outdoors when rain is forecast within 24 hours. Arrange for appropriate disposal of all hazardous wastes. Waste Management Cover and maintain dumpsters. Check frequently for leaks. Place dumpsters under roofs or cover with tarps or plastic sheeting secured around the outside of the dumpster. A plastic liner is recommended to prevent leaks. Never clean out a dumpster by hosing it down on the construction site. Place portable toilets away from storm drains. Make sure they are in good working order. Check frequently for leaks. Dispose of all wastes and demolition debris properly. Recycle materials and wastes that can be recycled, including solvents, water- based paints, vehicle fluids, broken asphalt and concrete, wood, and cleared vegetation. Dispose of liquid residues from paints, thinners, solvents, glues, and cleaning fluids as hazardous waste. Keep site free of litter (e.g. lunch items, cigarette butts). Prevent litter from uncovered loads by covering loads that are being transported to and from site. Construction Entrances and Perimeter Establish and maintain effective perimeter controls and stabilize all construction entrances and exits to sufficiently control erosion and sediment discharges from site and tracking off site. Sweep or vacuum any street tracking immediately and secure sediment source to prevent further tracking. Never hose down streets to clean up tracking. Materials & Waste Management Equipment Management & Spill Control Maintenance and Parking Designate an area of the construction site, well away from streams or storm drain inlets and fitted with appropriate BMPs, for auto and equipment parking, and storage. Perform major maintenance, repair jobs, and vehicle and equipment washing off site. If refueling or vehicle maintenance must be done onsite, work in a bermed area away from storm drains and over a drip pan or drop cloths big enough to collect fluids. Recycle or dispose of fluids as hazardous waste. If vehicle or equipment cleaning must be done onsite, clean with water only in a bermed area that will not allow rinse water to run into gutters, streets, storm drains, or surface waters. Do not clean vehicle or equipment onsite using soaps, solvents, degreasers, or steam cleaning equipment, and do not use diesel oil to lubricate equipment or parts onsite. Spill Prevention and Control Keep spill cleanup materials (e.g., rags, absorbents and cat litter) available at the construction site at all times. Maintain all vehicles and heavy equipment. Inspect frequently for and repair leaks. Use drip pans to catch leaks until repairs are made. Clean up leaks, drips and other spills immediately and dispose of cleanup materials properly. Use dry cleanup methods whenever possible (absorbent materials, cat litter and/or rags). Sweep up spilled dry materials immediately. Never attempt to “wash them away” with water, or bury them. Clean up spills on dirt areas by digging up and properly disposing of contaminated soil. Report significant spills to the appropriate local spill response agencies immediately. If the spill poses a significant hazrd to human health and safety, property or the environment, you must report it to the State Office of Emergency Services. (800) 852-7550 (24 hours). Earthmoving Grading and Earthwork Schedule grading and excavation work during dry weather. Stabilize all denuded areas, install and maintain temporary erosion controls (such as erosion control fabric or bonded fiber matrix) until vegetation is established. Remove existing vegetation only when absolutely necessary, plant temporary vegetation for erosion control on slopes or where construction is not immediately planned. Prevent sediment from migrating offsite and protect storm drain inlets, drainage courses and streams by installing and maintaining appropriate BMPs (i.e. silt fences, gravel bags, fiber rolls, temporary swales, etc.). Keep excavated soil on site and transfer it to dump trucks on site, not in the streets. Contaminated Soils If any of the following conditions are observed, test for contamination and contact the Regional Water Quality Control Board: Unusual soil conditions, discoloration, - or odor. Abandoned underground tanks. - Abandoned wells - Buried barrels, debris, or trash. - If the above conditions are observed, document any signs of potential contamination and clearly mark them so they are not distrurbed by construction activities. Landscaping Protect stockpiled landscaping materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps all year-round. Stack bagged material on pallets and under cover. Discontinue application of any erodible landscape material within 2 days before a forecast rain event or during wet weather. Paving Avoid paving and seal coating in wet weather or when rain is forecast, to prevent materials that have not cured from contacting stormwater runoff. Cover storm drain inlets and manholes when applying seal coat, slurry seal, fog seal, or similar materials. Collect and recycle or properly dispose of excess abrasive gravel or sand. Do NOT sweep or wash it into gutters. Sawcutting & Asphalt/Concrete Removal Protect storm drain inlets during saw cutting. If saw cut slurry enters a catch basin, clean it up immediately. Shovel or vacuum saw cut slurry deposits and remove from the site. When making saw cuts, use as little water as possible. Sweep up, and properly dispose of all residues. Concrete Management Store both dry and wet materials under cover, protected from rainfall and runoff and away from storm drains or waterways. Store materials off the ground, on pallets. Protect dry materials from wind. Wash down exposed aggregate concrete only when the wash water can (1) flow onto a dirt area; (2) drain onto a bermed surface from which it can be pumped and disposed of properly; or (3) block any storm drain inlets and vacuum washwater from the gutter. If possible, sweep first. Wash out concrete equipment/trucks offsite or in a designated washout area onsite, where the water will flow into a temporary waste pit, and make sure wash water does not leach into the underlying soil. (See CASQA Construction BMP Handbook for properly designed concrete washouts.) Dewatering Discharges of groundwater or captured runoff from dewatering operations must be properly managed and disposed. When possible, send dewatering discharge to landscaped area or sanitary sewer. If discharging to the sanitary sewer, call your local wastewater treatment plant. Divert run-on water from offsite away from all disturbed areas. When dewatering, notify and obtain approval from the local municipality before discharging water to a street gutter or storm drain. Filtration or diversion through a basin, tank, or sediment trap may be required. In areas of known or suspected contamination, call your local agency to determine whether the ground water must be tested. Pumped groundwater may need to be collected and hauled off-site for treatment and proper disposal. Painting Cleanup and Removal Never clean brushes or rinse paint containers into a street, gutter, storm drain, or stream. For water-based paints, paint out brushes to the extent possible, and rinse into a drain that goes to the sanitary sewer. Never pour paint down a storm drain. For oil-based paints, paint out brushes to the extent possible and clean with thinner or solvent in a proper container. Filter and reuse thinners and solvents. Dispose of excess liquids as hazardous waste. Sweep up or collect paint chips and dust from non-hazardous dry stripping and sand blasting into plastic drop cloths and dispose of as trash. Chemical paint stripping residue and chips and dust from marine paints or paints containing lead, mercury, or tributyltin must be disposed of as hazardous waste. Lead based paint removal requires a state- certified contractor. Painting & Paint RemovalConcrete Management and Dewatering Paving/Asphalt Work Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day!40 PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com A0.1 ARBORIST REPORT ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 41 PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com A0.1a ARBORIST REPORT ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 42 PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com 1/8" = 1'-0" A0.2 STREETSCAPE / SITE PHOTOS ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/8" = 1'-0"1 STREETSCAPE 14251 SPRINGER AVE14261 SPRINGER AVE 14241 SPRINGER AVE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 2 3 4 5 6 43 NNS.70°22'00"E. 150.00'S.70°22'00"E. 150.00'N .1 4 °1 0 '0 0 "E . 5 0 .0 0 ' N .1 4 °1 0 '0 0 "E . 5 0 .0 0 'EM&GMJPPG&EWVWMWMFHS P R I N G E R A V E N U E ( 4 0 ' R /W )TBMEL=100.00ADADCBSSCO(E) WINDOW AT2ND FLOOR (TYP.)(E) WINDOW AT2ND FLOOR (TYP.)(E) WINDOW AT2ND FLOOR (TYP.)S.70°22'00"E. 150.00'L O T 1 2AREA = 7,466±SQ.FT.S.70°22'00"E. 150.00'N .1 4 °1 0 '0 0 "E . 5 0 .0 0 ' N .1 4 °1 0 '0 0 "E . 5 0 .0 0 '14251 SPRINGER AVENUEEXISTING HOUSEFF = 100.05±RIDGE=112.78±14241 SPRINGER AVENUEEXISTING HOUSERIDGE=118.0±EXISTING GARAGEEM&GMJPPG&EWVWMWMFHS P R I N G E R A V E N U E ( 4 0 ' R /W )TBMEL=100.00ADADCBSSCO13"TREE30"TREE6"TREEGROVE OF TREESSHRUB7"PALMDECKDECKSTONE WALLRETAINING WALL83"RWD5"TREE 4"TREE5"TREE19"OAKTALL CONC. CURB3"TREE1"TREEMAIL BOXRETAINING WALLTW103.12BW102.54TW103.47BW102.55TW103.33BW102.41TW103.14BW102.21TW103.18BW102.18TW103.23BW100.69TW103.25BW100.28TW102.32BW100.09TW98.86BW96.84TW98.97BW96.33TW99.06BW96.47TW99.14BW96.63TW99.25BW96.52TW99.30TW99.47TW101.02BW99.45TW100.91BW99.37TW101.38BW99.49TW101.29BW99.93TW101.80BW101.08TC100.04FL99.74TC100.77FL99.76TC100.16FL99.39TC99.90FL99.066"TREEDRIVEWAY(E) WINDOW AT2ND FLOOR (TYP.)NNS.70°22'00"E. 150.00'L O T 1 2AREA = 7,466±SQ.FT.S.70°22'00"E. 150.00'N .1 4 °1 0 '0 0 "E . 5 0 .0 0 'JPPG&EWVWMWMFHS P R I N G E R A V E N U E ( 4 0 ' R /W )TBMEL=100.00ADADCBSSCO(E) WINDOW AT2ND FLOOR (TYP.) REQ AND PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK 6' - 0"20' - 0"4' - 6"3' - 6"GARAGE FF = 100.5 M.BEDROOM 10' - 0" ADU 800 SF F.F. 102.0 25' - 0"5' - 0" 16' - 11" WH LIVING KITCHEN 3' - 0" 18' - 6" FAMILY 16' - 11"25' - 0"(N)RETAINING WALL MAIN RES FF = 102.0 SIDE SETBACK 6' - 0" TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR DETAILS) LEGEND: #1 TREE #2 TREE #4 TREE 25' - 0"30' - 0"(N)AC (N)AC (E)RETAINING WALL IS TO REMAIN TW 101.38 BW 99.38 TW 100.91 BW 99.50 TW 103.25 BW 100.28 TW 103.25 BW 100.69 (N) 320 AMP ELEC PANEL (N) UNDERGROUND SERVICE (N)DRIVEWAY AND GUTTER (E)DECK TO REMAIN 419 SF LANDING LANDING 22' - 1" 18' - 6" (N)DRIVEWAY AND GUTTER FRONT PATIO 60SF WALKWAY 30SF 11' - 0" 11' - 0" UPPER FLOOR BOUNDARY (E)DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE TO BE REMOVED MAIN RES FF = 102.0 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR DETAILS) LEGEND: #1 TREE #2 TREE #3 TREE TO BE REMOVED #4 TREE (E)GARAGE TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE 0' - 0" The structure crossing the property line are to be removed. The deck crossing the property line is to be removed. GARAGE FF = 100.5 WH LIVING (N)AC (N)AC BW 99.50 (N)DRIVEWAY AND GUTTER 14' - 0"20' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"A 25' - 0" 30' - 0" FIRE TRUCK TURNING RADIUS CENTER OF THE STREET 5 % MAX SLOPE WITHIN TURNAROUND 75' - 0"25' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"FIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND NO PARKING SIGN (N)ASPHALT DRIVEWAY (E)FENCE PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com 1/8" = 1'-0" A1.0 SITE PLAN ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED Site Note: Site average slope :1.7% See details on C1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SITE PLAN - EXISTING/ DEMO Trees equal to $82,010 will be required to be planted as a condition of approval for the project including 3 trees from the City's list of natives for tree permit TRP22-0137 and code violation ATFTR22-0038. 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FIRE TRUCK RADIUS 44 UP FLOOR PLAN NOTES: FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES GARAGE NOTES 1. GARAGE SEPARATION SHALL BE PER C.R.C. R302.6, AS FOLLOWS: A. THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LIVING AREA AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY A MINIMUM OF 1/2-INCH GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE. B. GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY A MINIMUM OF 5/8-INCH TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. C. GARAGE TO DWELLING UNIT DOOR SHALL BE A SOLID WOOD DOOR, A MINIMUM OF 1 3/8" THICK AND SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING. D. DUCTS IN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND DUCTS PENETRATING THE SEPARATION WALLS OR CEILINGS, SHALL BE 0.019-INCH SHEET STEEL AND SHALL HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO THE GARAGE. 2. WATER HEATER A. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR FOR WATER HEATER PER C.P.C. SECTION 507. B. PROVIDE 18" HIGH WOOD FRAMED PLATFORM & SEISMIC BRACING FOR WATER HEATER, PER C.P.C. SECTION 508.2. SEE SHEET 2/AD2 FOR INSTALLATION. C. PROVIDE COMBINATION TEMPERATURE & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE & A DRAIN OF GALVANIZED STEEL OR HARD-DRAWN COPPER TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BLDG. W/ END OF PIPE NOT MORE THAN 2' OR LESS THAN 6" ABOVE GRADE, POINTING DOWNWARD, TERMINAL END BEING UNTHREADED AS PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.3 & 608.5 D. PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARD PER PLAN PER C.M.C. SECTION 307.1. - S.S.D. STAIR NOTES I. RISER = 6.72" TREAD = 10" 2. HANDRAIL AT WALL @ +36" ABOVE TREAD NOSING PER C.B.C. 1009.12 & C.R.C. R311.7.7, SEE 3/AD.4. 3. HANDRAIL/GUARD AT OPEN SIDE @ +42" ABOVE TREAD N0SING OR A.F.F. @ INTERMEDIATE LANDING ONLY. 4. ALL WALLS AND SOFFITS OF ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE WITH A MINIMUM OF 1/2” GYPSUM BOARD PER C.RC. R302.7 GLAZING NOTES 3050 FX - OPERATION HEIGHT (FT'-IN”) l.e.5’-0” WIDTH (FT'-IN") I.e. 3'-0” OPERATION ABBREVIATIONS FX = FIXED CS = CASEMENT SH = SINGLE HUNG AW= AWNING SL = SLIDER HP = HOPPER DH =DOUBLE HUNG XOX = XOX SLIDER I. ALL GLAZIN6 IS DUAL PANE INSULATING GLASS. 2. WINDOW MARKED WITH A E SHALL BE VERIFIED TO MEET EGRESS BY THE MANUFACTURER 9. GLAZING MARKED WITH A T SHALL BE 3/16” THICK TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS 4. HEADER HEIGHT: 1st FLOOR = 8’-0” U.O.N. 2nd FLOOR = 8'-0" U.O.N. DOOR NOTES 3080 SC - OPERATION OR TYPE HEIGHT (FT'-IN”) l.e.5’-0” WIDTH (FT'-IN") I.e. 3'-0” OPERATION OR TYPE ABBREVIATIONS SC= SOLID CORE HM = HOLLOW METAL FR = FRENCH PR = PAIR PKT = POGKET SGD = SLIDING GLASS DOOR I. ALL DOORS ARE HOLLOW CORE, U.O.N. 2. DOOR SIZE INDICATED IS THE ROUGH OPENING-VERIFY ROUGH OPENING- REQUIREMENTS W/ DOOR MFR. 3. DOORS THAT APPEAR TO BE CENTERED ARE INTENDED TO BE CENTERED, U.O.N. . 4. MINIMUM DOOR JAMB IS 4” FROM ADJACENT ROUGH FRAMING TO ROUGH OPENING, U.O.N. 5. WHEN DOORS ARE LOCATED, THEY ARE LOCATED FROM THE ADJACENT ROUGH FRAMING TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROUGH OPENING, U.O.N. 6. ALL DOOR GLAZING IS DUAL PANE INSULATING GLASS. 7. DOORS MARKED WITH A T SHALL HAVE 3/16" THICK TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS. SYMBOL LEGEND: DS DOWNSPOUT F.O.S.FACE OF STUD F.O.C.FACE OF CONCRETE CENTERLINE FAU FORCED AIR UNIT 22" X 30" ATTIC ACCESS PANEL ABOVE SOLAR TUBE AS NOTED. WH TANKLESS WATER HEATER, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 1' - 3"1' - 3"2' - 0" CLEAR SPACE IN FRONT OF WATER CLOSET PER CPC 407.5 UNDER-FLOOR SPACE VENTILATION: 1. UNDER-FLOOR VENTILATION PER CRC SECTION R408.1 2. GROUND SURFACE TO BE COVERED BY CLASS 1 VAPOR RETARDER MATERIAL. 3. FREE AREA REQUIRED IS 1 SF PER 150 SF OF UNDER-FLOOR AREA. UNDER-FLOOR SPACE AREA : 1,632 SF NET VENTILATION AREA REQUIRED PER Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 16.52.130(c)(3) SEE CALCULATION AND VENT LOCATIONS ON S1.1 4x12 HEAT REGISTER AT CEILING WALL LEGEND: 2X6 WD. STUD EXTERIOR WALL 2X4 WD. STUD WALL 2X6 WD STUD GARAGE SEPARATION WALL w/ NOT LESS THAN 5/8- INCH TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. 2X WD. STUD PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 2X6 WD. STUD INTERIOR WALL 2X6 WD. STUD INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL 800 SF A 4' - 5"34' - 6"20' - 10" 823 SF B 273 SF C 375 SF D 428 SF G 36' - 2"22' - 1" 5 5 E AD AD B B C C 1 1 4 4 2 2 3 3 F F D D 1 A5.0 20' - 0"3' - 11" 4' - 7" 5' - 4"4' - 6"17' - 1"6' - 7"14' - 8"5' - 0"36' - 2"16' - 2"3' - 6"37' - 9" 1.5 1.5 4.5 4.5 16' - 5"14' - 3"9' - 3"5' - 5"6' - 7"4' - 0"5' - 8"GARAGE M.BEDROOM 4' - 0" 10' - 0" A A 22' - 1" ADU 800 SF LIVING KITCHEN FAMILY BATH#1 LAUNDRY WH 2 A5.0 3' - 6"3' - 6"5' - 7"BATH#2 9' - 0"5' - 8"10' - 0"2' - 4"9' - 8" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 4"7' - 11"3' - 10"9' - 8"12' - 6"8' - 1"17' - 8"ADU BEDROOM ADU KITCHEN BATH 4' - 10" 4' - 10"6' - 6"PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com As indicated A2.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/8" = 1'-0" GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA CALC GROUND FLOOR AREA: A (ADU): 36.2 x 22.08 = 800 B: 11.5 x 11.9 = 823 C: 11 x 8.6 = 273 D: 11 x 12.1 = 375 G: 11.6 x 22.5 = 428 TOTAL LIVING AREA:823+273+375=1,471 SF GARAGE: 428 SF ADU: 800 SF TOTAL GROUND FLOOR : 2,699 SF 1/4" = 1'-0"1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SK 45 FLOOR PLAN NOTES: FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES GARAGE NOTES 1. GARAGE SEPARATION SHALL BE PER C.R.C. R302.6, AS FOLLOWS: A. THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LIVING AREA AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY A MINIMUM OF 1/2-INCH GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE. B. GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY A MINIMUM OF 5/8-INCH TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. C. GARAGE TO DWELLING UNIT DOOR SHALL BE A SOLID WOOD DOOR, A MINIMUM OF 1 3/8" THICK AND SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING. D. DUCTS IN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND DUCTS PENETRATING THE SEPARATION WALLS OR CEILINGS, SHALL BE 0.019-INCH SHEET STEEL AND SHALL HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO THE GARAGE. 2. WATER HEATER A. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR FOR WATER HEATER PER C.P.C. SECTION 507. B. PROVIDE 18" HIGH WOOD FRAMED PLATFORM & SEISMIC BRACING FOR WATER HEATER, PER C.P.C. SECTION 508.2. SEE SHEET 2/AD2 FOR INSTALLATION. C. PROVIDE COMBINATION TEMPERATURE & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE & A DRAIN OF GALVANIZED STEEL OR HARD-DRAWN COPPER TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BLDG. W/ END OF PIPE NOT MORE THAN 2' OR LESS THAN 6" ABOVE GRADE, POINTING DOWNWARD, TERMINAL END BEING UNTHREADED AS PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.3 & 608.5 D. PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARD PER PLAN PER C.M.C. SECTION 307.1. - S.S.D. STAIR NOTES I. RISER = 6.72" TREAD = 10" 2. HANDRAIL AT WALL @ +36" ABOVE TREAD NOSING PER C.B.C. 1009.12 & C.R.C. R311.7.7, SEE 3/AD.4. 3. HANDRAIL/GUARD AT OPEN SIDE @ +42" ABOVE TREAD N0SING OR A.F.F. @ INTERMEDIATE LANDING ONLY. 4. ALL WALLS AND SOFFITS OF ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE WITH A MINIMUM OF 1/2” GYPSUM BOARD PER C.RC. R302.7 GLAZING NOTES 3050 FX - OPERATION HEIGHT (FT'-IN”) l.e.5’-0” WIDTH (FT'-IN") I.e. 3'-0” OPERATION ABBREVIATIONS FX = FIXED CS = CASEMENT SH = SINGLE HUNG AW= AWNING SL = SLIDER HP = HOPPER DH =DOUBLE HUNG XOX = XOX SLIDER I. ALL GLAZIN6 IS DUAL PANE INSULATING GLASS. 2. WINDOW MARKED WITH A E SHALL BE VERIFIED TO MEET EGRESS BY THE MANUFACTURER 9. GLAZING MARKED WITH A T SHALL BE 3/16” THICK TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS 4. HEADER HEIGHT: 1st FLOOR = 8’-0” U.O.N. 2nd FLOOR = 8'-0" U.O.N. DOOR NOTES 3080 SC - OPERATION OR TYPE HEIGHT (FT'-IN”) l.e.5’-0” WIDTH (FT'-IN") I.e. 3'-0” OPERATION OR TYPE ABBREVIATIONS SC= SOLID CORE HM = HOLLOW METAL FR = FRENCH PR = PAIR PKT = POGKET SGD = SLIDING GLASS DOOR I. ALL DOORS ARE HOLLOW CORE, U.O.N. 2. DOOR SIZE INDICATED IS THE ROUGH OPENING-VERIFY ROUGH OPENING- REQUIREMENTS W/ DOOR MFR. 3. DOORS THAT APPEAR TO BE CENTERED ARE INTENDED TO BE CENTERED, U.O.N. . 4. MINIMUM DOOR JAMB IS 4” FROM ADJACENT ROUGH FRAMING TO ROUGH OPENING, U.O.N. 5. WHEN DOORS ARE LOCATED, THEY ARE LOCATED FROM THE ADJACENT ROUGH FRAMING TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROUGH OPENING, U.O.N. 6. ALL DOOR GLAZING IS DUAL PANE INSULATING GLASS. 7. DOORS MARKED WITH A T SHALL HAVE 3/16" THICK TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS. SYMBOL LEGEND: DS DOWNSPOUT F.O.S.FACE OF STUD F.O.C.FACE OF CONCRETE CENTERLINE FAU FORCED AIR UNIT 22" X 30" ATTIC ACCESS PANEL ABOVE SOLAR TUBE AS NOTED. WH TANKLESS WATER HEATER, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 1' - 3"1' - 3"2' - 0" CLEAR SPACE IN FRONT OF WATER CLOSET PER CPC 407.5 UNDER-FLOOR SPACE VENTILATION: 1. UNDER-FLOOR VENTILATION PER CRC SECTION R408.1 2. GROUND SURFACE TO BE COVERED BY CLASS 1 VAPOR RETARDER MATERIAL. 3. FREE AREA REQUIRED IS 1 SF PER 150 SF OF UNDER-FLOOR AREA. UNDER-FLOOR SPACE AREA : 1,632 SF NET VENTILATION AREA REQUIRED PER Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 16.52.130(c)(3) SEE CALCULATION AND VENT LOCATIONS ON S1.1 4x12 HEAT REGISTER AT CEILING WALL LEGEND: 2X6 WD. STUD EXTERIOR WALL 2X4 WD. STUD WALL 2X6 WD STUD GARAGE SEPARATION WALL w/ NOT LESS THAN 5/8- INCH TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. 2X WD. STUD PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 2X6 WD. STUD INTERIOR WALL 2X6 WD. STUD INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL 27' - 9 1/2" 981 SF A35' - 6"2' - 0"5 5 E E B B C C 1 1 4 4 2 2 3 3 F F D D 1 A5.0 1.5 1.5 4.5 4.513' - 4"5' - 0" 5' - 0"6' - 6"13' - 1"12' - 0"12' - 0" 8' - 0"5' - 0"15' - 3" 10' - 11" BEDROOM M.BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH #2 BATH #3 2 A5.0 2' - 0"1' - 6" 3' - 3" PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com As indicated A2.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/8" = 1'-0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN AREA CALC SECOND FLOOR AREA:981 SF 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SK 46 ATTIC VENTILATION CALCS:CRC806.2 EXCEPTION UPPER ROOF AREA (1114SF) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 1114/300=3.71S.F. (534 S.I.) VENTILATION PROVIDED: (3) UPPER O'HAGIN VENT @ 97.5 S.I+ (3) LOWER O'HAGIN VENT @ 97.5 S.I. = 585 S.I.3 585 S.I. PROVIDED > 534 S.I. REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION NOTES I. PROVIDE ROOF/ATTIC VENTILATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. SECTION R806. 2. PROVIDE VENTILATION OPENINGS FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE OF ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES, WHERE CElLING OCCUR AT UNDERSIDE OF ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS, WHERE SHOWN OR WHERE NOT SHOWN, TO ACHIEVE FULL CODE COMPLIANT GROSS VENTILATION. 3. THE TOTAL NET FREE VENTILATING AREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/150 OF THE AREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED EXCEPT THAT REDUCTION OF THE TOTAL AREA TO 1/300 IS PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT AT LEAST 50 PERCENT AND NOT MORE THAN 80 PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATION AREA IS PROVIDED BY VENTILATORS LOCATED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE SPACE TO BE VENTILATED AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS WITH THE BALANCE OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED BY EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS. 4. PROTECT VENTILATING OPENINGS AGAINST ENTRANCE OF RAIN AND/OR SNOW. 5. BLOCKING AND BRIDGING SHALL BE ARRANGED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH AIR MOVEMENT. 6. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF AIR SPACE BETWEEN INSULATION AND ROOF SHEATHING. 7. PROVIDE CORROSION-RESISTANT WIRE CLOTH SCREENING, HARDWARE CLOTH, PERFORATED VINYL OR SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH OPENINGS OF 1/8" MINIMUM AND 1/4" MAXIMUM, FOR ALL EXTERIOR OPENING INTO ATTIC. SPACE. 8. UPPER VENTILATION: PROVIDE UPPER VENTILATION WITH GABLE VENTS AND/OR O'HAGIN VENTS, AS SHOWN IN ROOF PLAN AND CALCULATIONS BELOW. 9. LOWER VENTILATION: PROVIDE LOWER VENTILATION WITH SCREEN VENTS AND/OR O'HAGIN VENTS, AS SHOWN IN ROOF PLAN, CALCULATIONS AND NOTES BELOW. A. SCREEN VENTS: AREA: 29 SQ. IN. PER VENT FOR RAFTERS/TRUSSES @ 16" o.c, OR 46 SQ. IN. PER VENT FOR RAFTERSITRU55E5 @24" o.c.; (VERIFY NET VENTILATING AREA WITH VENT MFR. & RECALCULATE VENTILATION AS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE). NOTE: RECALCULATE VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE IF RAFTER / TRUSS BLOCKS ARE USED IN PLACE OF SCREEN VENTS. RAFTER / TRUSS BLOCKS: (3) 2" DIA. HOLES. AREA = 9.42 SQ. IN. PER BLOCK SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR RESTRICTIONS DUE TO SHEAR WALL REQUIREMENTS, IF ANY. 10. RADIANT BARRIER SHALL BE PROVIDED AS INDICATED IN THE ENERGY COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATlON. ROOF NOTES: LOWER ROOF AREA I (246 SF) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 246/300= 0.82S.F. (118S.I.) VENTILATION PROVIDED: (1) UPPER O'HAGIN VENT @ 97.5 S.I. + (1) ROOF EAVE VENT @ 46 S.I. = 143.5 S.I. 143.5 S.I. PROVIDED > 118 S.I. REQUIRED LOWER ROOF AREA 3 (435 SF) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 435/300= 1.45S.F. (208S.I.) VENTILATION PROVIDED: (1) UPPER O'HAGIN VENT @ 97.5 S.I. + (3) ROOF EAVE VENT @ 46 S.I. = 235.5 S.I. 235.5 S.I. PROVIDED > 208 S.I. REQUIRED LOWER ROOF AREA 2 (52 SF) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 52/150= 0.35S.F. (50S.I.) VENTILATION PROVIDED: (2) ROOF EAVE VENT @ 46 S.I. =92 S.I. 92S.I. PROVIDED > 50 REQUIRED LOWER ROOF AREA 4 (238 SF) VENTILATION REQUIRED: 238/300= 0.79S.F. (114S.I.) VENTILATION PROVIDED: (1) UPPER O'HAGIN VENT @ 97.5 S.I. + (1) ROOF EAVE VENT @ 46 S.I. = 143.5 S.I. 143.5 S.I. PROVIDED > 114 S.I. REQUIRED 0 8'12'16'4' GRAPHIC SCALE LOWER ROOF ATTIC AREA1 LOWER ROOF ATTIC AREA3 LOWER ROOF ATTIC AREA 2HIPHIPRIDGEVALLEYVALLEYRIDGEHIPHIPHIPRIDGE2 A5.0 4" / 1'-0" 4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0" 4" / 1'-0" 4" / 1'-0" PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com As indicated A2.3 ROOF PLAN ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN 500 SF ROOF AREA DEDICATED TO FUTURE PV PANELS 500 SF ROOF AREA DEDICATED TO FUTURE PV PANELS 2 3D MASSING 47 Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" H.D. 17' -9" 6' - 0 1/2" .H.D. 8' -1" 12 4 12 412 4 12 4 8' - 6"9' - 1"UNCOVERED LANDING 6' - 0" PROPERTY LINE A3.0 10 A3.0 10 A3.0 9 2 A5.0 25' - 7"A3.0 9 A3.0 10 Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" 12 4 Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" H.D. 17' -9" .H.D. 8' -1" 12 4 12 4 SILL HEIGHT3' - 6"SILL HEIGHT4' - 0"25' - 7"Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" H.D. 17' -9" .H.D. 8' -1" 12 4 12 4 LEFT AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE =6.58' - 6"9' - 1"SILL HEIGHT2' - 10"2' - 0"1' - 6"25' - 7"2 A5.0 Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" 12 4 G.S.M. GUTTER 12 4 12 4 Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" H.D. 17' -9" .H.D. 8' -1"SILL HEIGHT3' - 0"25' - 7"PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com 1/4" = 1'-0" A3.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION 1 NOTE: GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING DAYLIGHT PLANE SHALL BE AN AVERAGE OF THE GRADE AT THE MIDPOINT OF THE BUILDING AND GRADE AT THE CLOSEST POINT ON THE ADJACENT LOT. 4 2 3 ELEVATION KEY NOTES: 1. 50 YEARS CLASS "A" CONCRETE FLAT TILE ROOFING O/ #30 FELT O/ 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING. DARK GRAY CONCRETE FLAT ROOF TILE STAGGERED AT THE EDGE. CLEAR FASCIA BOARD AT THE RAKE EDGE. NO TILE LAP OVER THE RAKES. 2.STEEL TROWEL SMOOTH TEXTURE THREE COAT STUCCO EXTERIOR WALL FINISH. COLOR TO MATCH THE NEUTRAL COLORED HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 3. 4" SMOOTH SURFACE FIBER CEMENT TRIM @ WINDOW SILL. 4. 4" SMOOTH SURFACE FIBER CEMENT TRIM AROUND WINDOW/DOOR. 5. 14.5"x14.5" UNDER FLOOR FLOODING VENT. 6.STUCCO BASED STONE VENEER COLUMN AND WALL BASE 7.WEEP SCREED BEHIND STONE VENEER. A MIN OF 26 GA. CORROSION - RESISTANT WEEP SCREED W/ A MIN VERTICAL ATTACHMENT FLAGE OF FOUNDATION PLATE LINE ON ALL EXTERIOR STUD WALLS W/STUCCO. THE SCREED SHALL BE PLACED A MIN OF 6" ABOVE THE EARTH OR 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS AND SHALL BE OF A TYPE WHICH WILL ALLOW TRAPPED WATER TO DRAIN TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. 8.ALL THE WINDOWS TO HAVE DARK COLOR (ESPRESSO OR SIMILAR) WINDOW FRAME AND EXTERIOR APPLIED MUTIN BARS. 9. GLAZED WOOD PANEL ENTRY DOOR. 10. WOOD PANEL GARAGE DOOR. GARAGE DOOR SHALL BE MATCHING IN MATERIAL, FINISH, AND COLOR, AS ENTRY DOOR WITH A STAINED OR SOLID STAINED/PAINTED WOOD FINISH DARKER OR SIMILARLY CONTRASTING WITH THE STUCCO AS SUGGESTED BY THE ELEVATION.. 5 9 10 8 6 11 ROOF EAVE DETAIL . NOTE: NO MORE THAN 5 INCHES OF EXPOSED FOUNDATION SHALL BE VISIBLE FROM GRADE. ANY VISIBLE FOUNDATION WALL ON THE FRONT ELEVATION SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE COLOR OF THE ADJACENT MATERIAL 9 RECESSED WINDOW HEAD , TYP 10 RECESSED WINDOW SILL (JAMB SIM) - TYP WINDOW RECESS FINISH MATERIAL TO MATCH THE EXTERIOR WALL FINISH WINDOW RECESS FINISH MATERIAL TO MATCH THE EXTERIOR WALL FINISH 7 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION 48 Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" 5 Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" 1 423 .H.D. 8' -1" 12 4 TYP. (10.6) (BFE 10.5) 6' - 0" 12 4 PROPERTY LINE SLOPED CEILING W/RIGID INSULATION THREE COAT STUCCO WALL WALL INSULATION 1/2" ROOF SHEATHING ROOF INSULATION COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF 9' - 1"1.5 4.52 A5.0 6' - 0"25' - 7"ATTIC Ground Level (102.0) 0' -0" 2nd level 10' -1" T.O.P. 18' -7" TOP 9' -1" EADBC Grade level (100.65) -1' -4" F .H.D. 8' -1" D1 A5.0 A 12 4 9' - 1"10' - 1"12 4 WALL INSULATION COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF ATTIC ADU FAMILY KITCHEN LIVING 2' - 0"ATTIC PROJECT PROJECT NO. SCALE TITLE 2015 DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.NREN. 6/30/15 NO. C34281L TATSEECI TRN AOCF IL OF AIENIY ADES U TI S HCR C07/05/2023PLANNING SUBMITTAL ZHILING WAN (OWNER) Address: 14251 Springer Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070 Email: wzl81561915@gmail.com 1/4" = 1'-0" A5.0 BUILDING SECTIONS ZHAO RESIDENCE Project Number NOTE: SEE TITLE 24 FOR INSULATION R VALUE. 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDIN SECTION I. 1/4" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION II 49 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 18639 Ravenwood Drive Meeting Date: January 10, 2024 Application: APTR23-0003; TRP23-0465 Address/APN: 18639 Ravenwood Drive APN 397-43-032 Property Owner/Appellants: Kimeh Builders/ Drew Westcott Report Prepared By: Christina Fusco, City Arborist 50 Report to the Planning Commission 18639 Ravenwood Drive – Application APTR23-0003; TRP23-0465 January 10, 2024 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A neighbor at 18640 Ravenwood Drive has appealed (APTR23-0003) an administrative decision to approve an application for the removal of one coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) at 18639 Ravenwood Drive (TRP23-0465). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No.24-002 denying the appeal. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-50.100, review by the Planning Commission is required for an appeal of an administrative decision. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND APPEAL DESCRIPTION Site Description The property is a single-story home. The coast redwood tree grows in the front yard. Background and Reason for Appeal On May 22, 2022, the arborist report for the home addition (TEC22-0066/ARB22-0043) at 18639 Ravenwood Drive was written. The redwood tree was assigned a heath rating of poor and appraised at $15,500. The arborist report speculated that the tree would not survive the replacement of the driveway in its current condition and should be removed. On November 4, 2022, the project for the home addition (TEC22-0066/ARB22-0043) was approved. The applicant submitted the plan set with the retention of the existing driveway and tree. On September 19, 2023, the owner applied for a tree permit (TRP23-0465) to remove the redwood. On October 20, 2023, the final arborist inspection for the new home project took place. The driveway had been removed and replaced without any tree protection measures. There was no evident damage to the garage at the time as the garage floor had recently been resurfaced. On October 23, 2023, the applicant submitted a letter from the engineer detailing the damage to the garage foundation. The City intended to approve the removal. Root pruning is not a viable option due to the impacts the tree has already sustained. On November 27, 2023, notices were mailed to neighboring residence within 150 feet of the applicant property. On December 7, 2023, Drew Westcott, the owner of 18640 Ravenwood Drive, filed an appeal of the approval (APTR23-0003.) The reason for the appeal is that the tree is a prominent neighborhood landmark, and its retention should have been addressed before construction. See the attached letter. 1 of 3 51 Report to the Planning Commission 18639 Ravenwood Drive – Application APTR23-0003; TRP23-0465 January 10, 2024 Page | 3 FINDINGS The findings required for tree removal pursuant to City Code Section 15-50.080 are set forth below. The applicant has met the burden of proof to support making one or more of those required findings: (1)The condition of the tree with respect to disease, imminent danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services, and whether the tree is a Dead tree or a Fallen tree. This finding can be made. The tree was found to be in fair health, was not interfering with utilities but was not sufficiently far from the building foundations. (2)The necessity to remove the tree because of physical damage or threatened damage to improvements or impervious surfaces on the property. This finding can be made. A letter has been submitted to the City from GPM Engineers detailing the damage to the garage foundation. (3)The topography of the land and the effect of the tree removal upon erosion, soil retention and the diversion or increased flow of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes. This finding is not applicable because the property is considered flat and erosion control is not a concern. (4)The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect the removal would have upon shade, privacy impact, scenic beauty, property values, erosion control, and the general welfare of residents in the area. This finding cannot be made. The redwood tree is a prominent landmark in the neighborhood. (5)The age and number of healthy trees the property is able to support according to good forestry practices. This finding cannot be made. The redwood tree is not crowded by other trees and the property can accommodate this tree. (6)Whether or not there are any alternatives that would allow for retaining or not encroaching on the protected tree. This finding can be made because there are no alternatives to the removal of the tree. Root pruning is not a viable option. The redwood is unlikely to survive further root damage. (7)Whether the approval of the request would be contrary to or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. 2 of 3 52 Report to the Planning Commission 18639 Ravenwood Drive – Application APTR23-0003; TRP23-0465 January 10, 2024 Page | 4 This finding can be made. The general purpose of the Article permits the removal of trees that are causing damage to a structure. (8)Any other information relevant to the public health, safety, or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50.010. This finding cannot be made as the trees do not affect public safety. (9)The necessity to remove the tree for economic or other enjoyment of the property when there is no other feasible alternative to the removal. This finding can be made. The tree has sustained cumulative damage from the construction projects and cannot sustain additional root pruning. (10)The necessity to remove the tree for installation and efficient operation of solar panels, subject to the requirements that the tree(s) to be removed shall not be removed until solar panels have been installed and replacement trees planted in conformance with the City Arborist's recommendation. This finding is not applicable as new solar panels are not affected. (11)The necessity to remove a tree following the creation of defensible space within 100 feet of a structure located within the Wildland Urban Interface Area as defined in section 16- 20.150 of this Code, in accordance with defensible space standards established by CAL FIRE or as determined by Santa Clara County Fire Department, and that risk of increased wildfire cannot reasonably be addressed through maintenance or without tree removal. This finding is not applicable since the subject property is not located in the Wildland Urban Interface. (12)Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) or blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) located within the Wildland Urban Interface Area as defined in section 16-20.150 of this Code. This finding is not applicable since the subject property is not located in the Wildland Urban Interface. ATTACHMENTS 1.Resolution 24-002 denying the appeal 2.Appeal application and supporting letter APTR23-0003 3.Tree removal permit application and supporting letter TRP19-0465 3 of 3 53 RESOLUTION NO: 24-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING APPEAL APTR23-0003 AND APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION TRP23-0465 AT 18639 RAVENWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an appeal of an Administrative Decision approving a request to remove one coast redwood tree at 18639 Ravenwood Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and WHEREAS, the goal of the City is to balance the rights and privileges of property owners for the use of their land with criteria for establishing and sustaining an urban forest, including the establishment of basic standards and criteria for the removal and replacement of trees; and WHEREAS, after considering all of the criteria for the application of a Tree Removal Permit set forth in Section 15-50.080, the Planning Commission finds that overall, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for the Tree Removal Permit for one coast redwood tree. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The administrative decision is consistent with the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Element Policy: Arbor Resources Element: Support appropriate management for sustaining the health and increasing the extent of arbor resources in the City. The specific vision is to increase overall tree cover, tree health and consequent tree benefits in an equitable, cost beneficial and sustainable manner. To further protect and enhance the City’s arbor resources built on the City’s Tree Regulations, the City should continue its support of tree protection programs. The coast redwood tree was requested for removal through the City’s process to remove protected trees as set forth in the Tree Regulations. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for tree removal and the appeal and found that the request to remove the coast redwood tree meets the criteria in the City Code, overall. 54 18639 Ravenwood Drive Application #: APTR23-0003/TRP23-0465 Resolution No. 24-002 Page | 2 Section 3: The administrative decision is consistent with the Saratoga City Code Section 15-50.080 in that the tree has been found to be damaging structures on a neighboring property. Criteria 2, 6, and 7 have been met. How each criterion has or has not been met is detailed below. (1) The condition of the tree with respect to disease, imminent danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services, and whether the tree is a Dead tree or a Fallen tree. This finding can be made. The tree was found to be in poor health, was not interfering with utilities and was not sufficiently far from the building foundations. (2) The necessity to remove the tree because of physical damage or threatened damage to improvements or impervious surfaces on the property. This finding can be made. A letter has been submitted to the City from GPM Engineers detailing the damage to the garage foundation. (3) The topography of the land and the effect of the tree removal upon erosion, soil retention and the diversion or increased flow of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes. This finding is not applicable because the property is considered flat and erosion control is not a concern. (4) The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect the removal would have upon shade, privacy impact, scenic beauty, property values, erosion control, and the general welfare of residents in the area. This finding cannot be made. The redwood tree is a prominent landmark in the neighborhood. (5) The age and number of healthy trees the property is able to support according to good forestry practices. This finding cannot be made. The redwood tree is not crowded by other trees and the property can accommodate this tree. (6) Whether or not there are any alternatives that would allow for retaining or not encroaching on the protected tree. This finding can be made because there are no alternatives to the removal of the tree. Root pruning is not a viable option. The redwood is unlikely to survive further root damage. (7) Whether the approval of the request would be contrary to or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. This finding can be made. The general purpose of the Article permits the removal of trees that are causing damage to a structure. (8) Any other information relevant to the public health, safety, or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50.010. This finding cannot be made as the tree does not affect public safety. (9) The necessity to remove the tree for economic or other enjoyment of the property when there is no other feasible alternative to the removal. This finding can be made. The tree has sustained cumulative damage from the construction projects and cannot sustain additional root pruning. 55 18639 Ravenwood Drive Application #: APTR23-0003/TRP23-0465 Resolution No. 24-002 Page | 3 (10) The necessity to remove the tree for installation and efficient operation of solar panels, subject to the requirements that the tree(s) to be removed shall not be removed until solar panels have been installed and replacement trees planted in conformance with the City Arborist's recommendation. This finding is not applicable as solar panels are not affected. (11) The necessity to remove a tree following the creation of defensible space within 100 feet of a structure located within the Wildland Urban Interface Area as defined in section 16- 20.150 of this Code, in accordance with defensible space standards established by CAL FIRE or as determined by Santa Clara County Fire Department, and that risk of increased wildfire cannot reasonably be addressed through maintenance or without tree removal. This finding is not applicable since the subject property is not located in the Wildland Urban Interface. (12) Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) or blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) located within the Wildland Urban Interface Area as defined in section 16-20.150 of this Code. This finding is not applicable since the subject property is not located in the Wildland Urban Interface. Section 4: Unless appealed to the City Council pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby denies APTR23-0003, approving TRP23-0465 for the removal and replacement of one coast redwood, located at 18639 Ravenwood Drive. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 10th day of January 2024 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Clinton Brownley Chair, Planning Commission 56 57 58 10/23/2023 Building Inspections City of Saratoga Project:18639 RAVENWOOD DR., SARATOGA, CA Re:Garage footing close to root zone Gentlemen: This is to confirm that we reviewed the following: 1- Tree within 10ft from garage footings 2- Multiple cracks appear at top of the curb which is consistent with uplift pressure applied to bottom of footings by roots. Conclusions: Presence of tree roots under footings represent medium and long term source of deformations and stress that could cause significant structural damage. We recommend that tree to be removed to avoid significant future damage. Reviewed items meet structural requirements. Please do not hesitate to contact us regarding above findings. Sincerely, Mohamed S. Genidy, PhD, PE 59 60 61 From:Christina Fusco To:Frances Reed Subject:FW: 18639 Ravenwood Drive Saratoga Date:Thursday, January 4, 2024 7:05:48 AM Attachments:Report 2510 Valikhani Revised 2506.pdf tree close to garage.pdf Hello Debbie, The applicant would like the email below and attachments to be shared with the commissioners. Regards, Christina Fusco Arborist City of Saratoga | CDD 13777 Fruitvale Avenue │ Saratoga, CA 95070 408.868.1276 │ cfusco@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey From: Narges Valikhani <nargesvalikhani@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 4:04 PM To: Christina Fusco <cfusco@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: Bryan Swanson <bswanson@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: 18639 Ravenwood Drive Saratoga CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Christina, We would like to make sure the commissioners have the attached report and letter. We would like the commissioners to see the arborist report recommending removal from the beginning. It seems like the neighbor doesn’t have the correct understanding of the project and reason for the removal. It was not clearly explained in the notice. Below are the responses to his notes on the appeal. We would like to share this with the commissioners as well. - The request to remove this tree has nothing to do with the "site improvements" per his note. We are not in the business to remove trees for design or site improvements unless it’s required. The tree is damaging the foundation and it is vital to remove it. The oak tree in the front is not damaging the house from what we know. If there is an issue with the oak tree, we can look into it. However to be very clear, it is not our intention to remove trees. - The redwood tree was noted to be removed from the beginning. The garage structure, foundation/slab are original and not new per his note. You can confirm this via the photos on the 62 report. The neighbor thinks we built this home close to the tree but that is not true. This was always an issue and we were hoping the damage wouldn’t happen again. Unfortunately that is not the case and it needs to be removal to prevent further damage. - We completely disagree that we are developers motivated solely by profit. We love Saratoga and work hard to create lovely homes for future families. Many people know and respect us in the city especially in Quito Village. They are so happy with our work and dedication throughout the construction process. You can speak to the city staff and inspectors about our work as well. - We have planted over 17 trees at Ravenwood. We will be planting a larger California native tree in its replacement. It will be closer to the street so it doesn’t impact the house directly. We will be there January 9th on site to show the commissioners and answer any questions. Thank you, Narges 63 Ann Northrup, M.S. Garden and Landscape Diagnostics Plant Pathologist, ISA Certified Arborist WE-1613A 1669 Hyde Dr. Los Gatos, CA 95032 phone: (408) 220 4438 plantdoctor@icloud.com August 24, 2022 report # 2510 8 pages Arborist Report including Tree Appraisals - 18639 Ravenwood Drive, Saratoga CA sent via email to project manager Narges Valikhani at Redefine Real Estate nargesvalikhani@aol.com Page 1 serves as the summary sheet for the report Name of owner/address of project: Narges Valikhani Redefine Real Estate Project Arborist: Ann Northrup (WE 1613-A) phone: 408 220 4438 email: annnorthrup@sbcglobal.net Plans reviewed: Site Plan for Residential Addition - Nadia Pichko dated 3/11/2022 Brief description of work: Construction of an addition to existing home This Arborist report is to be copied onto a plan sheet, titled "Tree preservation", and become part of the final plan set. The property owner, contractors and architect are all responsible for knowing the information included in this Arborist’s report and adhering to the conditions provided. number of trees in inventory 3 number of trees requested for removal 0 Replacement trees required?no value of new trees required 0 total value of trees to be retained $66100 recommended 25% security deposit for trees to be preserved $16525 64 report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 2 Three trees are located on the site map Trees to be preserved tree condition appraised value (trunk formula method) recommended security deposit (25% of appraised value) Tree #1 (Coast Live Oak)fair $7200 Tree #2 (Redwood)poor $15500 Tree #3 (Coast Live Oak)good $43400 $66100 $16525 #1 #2 #3 65 report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 3 Trees # 1 - 2 descriptions Tree #1: Coast Live Oak Overall health (presently) is fair based on density and color of foliage canopy. Trunk health is poor however, exhibiting symptoms of possible bark canker infection which could result in canopy decline. The tree's location is problematic, having power lines tightly threaded through the branches. Many branches have already been removed, most likely due to conflict with power lines. Tree #2 : Coast Redwood Although the tree has a nice conical shape, it's foliage is sparse throughout. Most likely, the soil in this exposed location has not been adequately moist for several years, which would account for the sparse foliage. With current irrigation restrictions in place as well as the many recent years of drought, it is unlikely this redwood could regain good health. The reconstruction of the driveway here will contribute to additional stress on this tree. I expect that it will soon be a good candidate for removal and perhaps should be considered for removal now. Tree #3: Coast Live Oak Overall health and structure is good. A very nice specimen. Evaluation of proposed work: The Tree Protection Fencing must be placed at the largest radius from the trunks of the protected trees as possible and still allow construction to take place. Pier style foundation is recommended for the foundation of the addition in order to minimize impact on the root system of tree 3 due to the proximity of the building to the tree. Hand digging must be done for the pier supports and must be done under the supervision of the Project Arborist so that management decisions can be made when/ if sizable tree roots are encountered. Similarly, during the removal of any of the hardscape within one of the tree protection zones, the project arborist must be present to supervise. The Arborist will document the activity during these processes and provide a letter of progress, with photos, to the City Arborist. Tree Protection plan Construction of the addition is set back far enough from each protected tree to provide adequate protection of the trees with mitigation (pier supported foundation for the addition, fencing around each protected tree and onsite presence of the project arborist during soil disturbance within the tree protection zones). Tree 1: Fencing will be placed at the edge of the tree canopy abutting the road. If the hardscape is to be removed, the project arborist must be onsite up until the time that the hardscape has been demolished and removed, to observe root structure and mitigate impact to the underlying roots. Photos will be taken by the arborist, and a letter will be submitted to the City reporting on the activity. Tree 2: Fencing will be placed at a radius of 4' from edge of trunk flare (to accommodate the replacement of the asphalt driveway). At the time of asphalt removal, the project arborist must be onsite until the completion and removal of asphalt, to observe root structure and mitigate impact to the roots. Photos will be taken by the arborist, and a letter will be submitted to the City reporting on the activity. Tree 3: Fencing will be irregular in shape (a radius of approximately 4'-5' from trunk on the side nearest the addition, and a radius of 10' everywhere else that it can be). At the time when holes are dug for the placement of pier structures, the project arborist must be onsite until soil disturbance is completed, to observe root structure and mitigate impact to the roots. Photos will be taken by the arborist, and a letter will be submitted to the City reporting on the activity. 66 report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 4 As required by the city arborist, required mitigation and protection measures apply as follows (City Code 15-50.120): 1. Fencing will consist of six-foot high chain link mounted on eight foot tall, 2 inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 ft apart. 2. Signs must be posted on the fencing displaying the following statement: "TREE PROTECTION FENCE - DO NOT MOVE OR REMOVE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST - Christina Fusco 408 868-1276" report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 4 3. The City requires that the tree protection fencing be installed before any equipment comes on site and must be inspected by the City Arborist before issuance of building permits 4. Tree protection fencing is required to remain in place throughout construction. Photographs of inventoried trees: #1 67 report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 5 #2 #3 68 Tree appraisal worksheet (trunk formula method) #1 Coast Live Oak #2 Redwood #3 Coast Live Oak Trunk Area #1 Trunk Circumference (inches) 64"144"94" and 65" #2 Trunk Diameter (inches) (#1 / 3.14) 20.38"45.86"40.25" Saratoga City Code deﬁnition of DBH (diameter at breast height) for multi-trunked trees. Add 1/2 the diameter of all smaller trunks to the full diameter of the largest trunk DBH = 29.9" + ½ of 20.7 = 40.25" #3 Trunk Area (sq. in) (#22 / 4) x 3.14 326.1 1651.0 1271.8 Basic Tree Cost #4 Replacement Tree Size (trunk cross sectional area in sq. in) 3.80 4.75 3.80 #5 Trunk Area Increase (#3 - #4) 322.3 1646.2 1268.0 #6 Unit Tree Cost (per sq. in) 45.46 36.36 45.46 #7 Installed Tree Cost ($) 518 518 518 #8 Basic Tree Cost (#5 x #6) + #7 15170.4 60374.0 58159.9 Location #9 Site Rating 0.9 0.9 0.9 #10 Contribution Rating 0.7 0.3 0.9 #11 Placement Rating 0.5 0.5 0.7 #12 Avg Location Rating 0.7 0.57 0.83 Species #13 Published Value 0.9 0.7 0.9 69 Should any of these trees be damaged beyond repair as a result of the construction project, replacement of the damaged tree is required. Replacements can be multiples of smaller trees to collectively equal the total appraised value of the existing trees. The replacement tree(s) can be planted on site or the specified amount of money can be submitted to a fund for tree planting elsewhere in the City of Saratoga. The replacement tree should reflect the nature of the tree being replaced. The front yard or back yard of this residential property could support the required replacement tree plantings should that be necessary. #14 Modiﬁcation value -0.1 #15 Avg Species Rating 0.9 0.6 0.9 Condition #16 Root structure 4 4 4 #17 Root Health 4 3 4 #18 Root subtotal 8 7 8 #19 Trunk Structure 3 4 4 #20 Trunk Health 2 3 4 #21 Trunk subtotal 5 7 8 #22 Scaffold branches - structure 3 4 4 #23 scaffold branches - health 2 2 4 #24 scaffold branches subtotal 5 6 8 #25 Branches and twigs health 3 2 4 #26 Foliage and/or buds health 3 2 4 26a branch/foliage health subtotal 6 4 8 #27 total subtotal points 24 24 32 #28 condition rating (#27 / 32) 0.75 0.75 1 Appraised value #29 Appraised cost (#8 x #12 x #15 x #28) 7168.0 15486 43445 if over $5000, round to nearest $100 7200 15500 43400 if less than $5000, round to the nearest $10 #1 Coast Live Oak #2 Redwood #3 Coast Live Oak 70 report # 2510 August 24, 2022, pg 8 The combined appraised value of the trees to be preserved is $66,100. 25% of this combined appraised value ($16,525) must be submitted to the City along with the application to be held until completion of the project. If the city arborist deems the trees to have been sufficiently unharmed by construction, the deposit money will be released back to the owner. For ease of calculating the use of funds for replacement trees, these replacement values have been assigned to specific sizes of trees as follows: 15 gallon: $350 48" boxed: $5000 24" boxed: $500 60" boxed: $7,000 36" boxed: $1,500 72" boxed: $15,000 There are no solar panels being installed. Supervision by the Project Arborist is required at any time when soil is disrupted within the protected zone of the tree (defined as 5 feet beyond the canopy of a protected tree). No trenching will take place within the Tree protection zones of any of the trees noted in this report, but as mentioned above, the arborist must supervise the digging of the pier support holes and the removal of hardscape. Pruning of branches of a preserved tree must be supervised by an ISA Certified Arborist/Project Arborist as required by the City Tree ordinance. It is expected that some branches of Tree #3 will need to be pruned back to make space for the home addition. This Arborist report, once copied onto a plan sheet, labeled as the "Tree Preservation plan", and included in the final set of plans for the project, serves as a Tree Preservation Plan (City Code 15-50.140). The proposed construction plan preserves the maximum number of protected trees possible, given the constraints of the property. Final inspection by the City Arborist is required at the end of the project. Replacement trees (if necessary, in the event the protected tree is damaged during construction) should be planted at that time. An approval of this request would not be contrary to, or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. There is no other relevant information to provide, pertaining to the public health, safety or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50-010. Ann Northrup 71 10/23/2023 Building Inspections City of Saratoga Project:18639 RAVENWOOD DR., SARATOGA, CA Re:Garage footing close to root zone Gentlemen: This is to confirm that we reviewed the following: 1- Tree within 10ft from garage footings 2- Multiple cracks appear at top of the curb which is consistent with uplift pressure applied to bottom of footings by roots. Conclusions: Presence of tree roots under footings represent medium and long term source of deformations and stress that could cause significant structural damage. We recommend that tree to be removed to avoid significant future damage. Reviewed items meet structural requirements. Please do not hesitate to contact us regarding above findings. Sincerely, Mohamed S. Genidy, PhD, PE 72