The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-14-2024 TSC Agenda PacketSaratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 1 of 4 SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA March 14, 2024 AMENDED AGENDA • 03/11/2024 SHERIFF’S REPORT LINKED. DATE: March 14, 2024 TIME: 6:30 PM – 10:30 PM LOCATION: Administrative Conference Room 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Public Participation Information In accordance with Saratoga City Council’s Remote Public Participation Policy, members of the public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed below or via remote attendance using the Zoom information below. Members of the public can view and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending the meeting in person at the City Hall Linda Callon Conference Room, located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070; OR 2. Accessing the meeting through Zoom • Webinar URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 • Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 • Call In: 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833 (enter the Webinar ID provided above when prompted) Public Comment Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. The amount of time for public comment may be reduced by the Chair or by action of the Traffic Safety Commission. Public Comment will begin with speakers attending in-person first followed by those attending via Zoom. As always, members of the public can send written comments to the Commission prior to the meeting by commenting online at www.saratoga.ca.us/tsc prior to the start of the meeting. These emails will be provided to the members of the Commission and will become part of the official record of the meeting. During the meeting the Chair will explain the process for members of the public to be recognized to offer public comment. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 2 of 4 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Robert Eng (Chair), Alec Gulesserian (Vice Chair), Chi-Kuang Chu, Stephen Li, Jason Mount III. REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 7, 2024. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public may address the Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on the agenda. The law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking actions on these items. The Commission may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 01-11-2024 TSC MINUTES – Draft Recommended Action: Approve January 11, 2024 Minutes VI. SHERIFF'S REPORT TO THE COMMISSION Sheriff’s Report • January & February 2024 citation summary and collision statistics VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. TSC Matrix 502 – Ravenwood Dr Response Summary Comments from Previous Meetings Recommended Action: Deny request for speed hump(s) and close item. 2. TSC Matrix 531 – Pierce Rd at Houston Ct Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 3. TSC Matrix 565 – Farwell Ave Draft Plans Proposed Area of Influence Recommended Action: Approve the draft speed table plan and proposed area of influence. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 3 of 4 4. TSC Matrix 572 – McCoy Ave Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 5. TSC Matrix 576 – Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd at Kirkmont Dr Comments from Previous Meetings Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 6. TSC Matrix 580 – Cox Ave at Sea Gull Way Quotes Recommended Action: Approve installation. 7. TSC Matrix 581 – Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd at Sea Gull Way Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. 8. TSC Matrix 582 – Prospect Rd at Stelling Rd Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. IX. STAFF AND COMMISSION UPDATES 9. Staff and Commission Updates a. TSC Project Updates b. City Events c. TSC Handbook d. Announcements Recommended Action: Accept updates. X. COMMISSION ITEMS XI. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Emma Burkhalter, Associate Engineer, of the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the City Council was posted and available for review on March 7, 2024 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Agenda – Page 4 of 4 In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Traffic Safety Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda, copies of materials distributed to the Traffic Safety Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda, and materials distributed to the Traffic Safety Commission by staff after the posting of the agenda are available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Following removal of State and local shelter in place orders these materials will be available for review in the office of the Public Works office at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 1 of 4 SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES January 11, 2024 I. CALL TO ORDER – 6:30 PM II. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Robert Eng (Chair), Alec Gulesserian (Vice Chair), Jason Mount, Stephen Li ABSENT: Chi-Kuang Chu STAFF PRESENT: Franziska Church, Emma Burkhalter III. REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on January 4, 2024. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public may address the Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on the agenda. The law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking actions on these items. The Commission may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. Written Communications V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 11-02-2023 TSC MINUTES – Draft Recommended Action: Approve November 2, 2023 Minutes GULESSERIAN/ENG MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. MOTION PASSED (4- 0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. VI. SHERIFF'S REPORT TO THE COMMISSION Sheriff’s Report • October – December 2023 citation summary and collision statistics VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. TSC Matrix 502 – Ravenwood Dr Draft Speed Hump Plans Proposed Area of Influence Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 2 of 4 Comments from Previous Meetings Recommended Action: Approve draft speed hump plans and proposed area of influence. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO APPROVE THE AREA OF INFLUENCE AND PLANS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PLANS WILL BE REVISED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO MEET FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 2. TSC Matrix 556 – Beaumont Ave Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. ENG/MOUNT MOVED TO ADD PERMANENT RADAR FEEDBACK SIGNS AT THE LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 3. TSC Matrix 569 – Star Ridge Ct Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. ENG/MOUNT MOVED TO DO NOTHING. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 4. TSC Matrix 572 – McCoy Ave Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. ENG/LI MOVED TO HAVE TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO REVIST SITE AND REVIEW SIGHT DISTANCE ON MCCOY AVE FROM BERWICK ST AND STAFF TO REVIEW PLANS FOR NEW HOUSE AT CORNER AND REPORT BACK TO THE COMMISSION. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 5. TSC Matrix 574 – Lomita Ave and Vickery Ave Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO INSTALL BOTTS DOTS CENTERLINE ON VICKERY AVE APPROACHING THE LOMITA AVE/VICKERY AVE INTERSECTION. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 3 of 4 MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 6. TSC Matrix 575 – Bucknall Rd between Paseo Olivos and Quito Rd Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO INSTALL SHOULDER STRIPING ON BUCKNALL ROAD. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 7. TSC Matrix 576 – Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd at Kirkmont Dr Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. ENG MOVED TO ADD A RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) TO THE CROSSWALK. Motion failed for lack of a second. Additional discussion took place. MOUNT MOVED TO REMOVE THE EXISTING CROSSWALK. Motion failed for lack of a second. Additional discussion took place. GULESSERIAN/LI MOVED TO POSTPONE ITEM DISCUSSION TO NEXT MEETING IN ORDER TO HEAR FROM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 8. TSC Matrix 578 – Bainter Ave at Ravine Rd Recommended Action: Review the item and make a recommendation. MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO DO NOTHING. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 9. Discuss School Circulation (follow-up from September 14, 2023 meeting) Recommended Action: No action. Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Minutes – Page 4 of 4 IX. STAFF AND COMMISSION UPDATES 10. Staff and Commission Updates a. TSC Project Updates b. City Events c. TSC Handbook d. Announcements Recommended Action: Accept updates. X. COMMISSION ITEMS XI. ADJOURNMENT – 9:30 PM Respectfully Submitted by Emma Burkhalter, Public Works staff for the City of Saratoga Page 1 of 2 #502 Ravenwood Drive Date Received: April 12, 2021 Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Ravenwood Dr. and Quito Rd. Description of traffic safety concern: People speed down Ravenwood and there are little children living there. Also, school traffic uses this road and parents also speed. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Put a speed bump and/or do whatever else can be done to slow the traffic. Previous TSC Action: 7/8/2021: VASANTHA/KANE MOTIONED TO SET UP SPEED RADAR FEEDBACK TRAILER ON RAVENWOOD DR. MOTION PASSED (6-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, CHU, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. AFTAB/COULTER MOTIONED TO 1. COMMUNICATE TO RESIDENTS AND OTHER ROAD USERS THAT THE TSC IS LOOKING AT SPEED BUMP PROCESS AND TO COME BACK ONCE FINALIZED. 2. TSC TO REVISIT AFTER SCHOOL IS OPEN AND COLLECT DATA. MOTION PASSED (6-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. Page 2 of 2 AYES: COULTER, VASANTHA, AFTAB, CHU, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 11/4/2021: AFTAB/KANE MOTIONED TO DEFER TO JANUARY MEETING WHEN DATA WILL HAVE BEEN COLLECTED. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-2) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: COULTER, AFTAB, COSYN, KANE. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: VASANTHA, CHU. 1/13/2022: COULTER/AFTAB MOTIONED TO PUT SPEED TRAILERS OUT ASAP FOR TWO WEEKS AND FOLLOW TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATION TO ADD SHOULDER STRIPING ON THIS SECTION OF RAVENWOOD DRIVE. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: AFTAB, COULTER, CHU, COSYN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. 03/09/2023: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK TO THE NEXT TSC MEETING WITH ADDITIONAL INCREMENTAL APPROACH IDEAS AND ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. ENG MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO CREATE A CIP PROJECT FOR SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RAVENWOOD DRIVE. MOTION FAILED, NO SECOND. 07/13/2023: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO DO NOTHING; RESIDENTS SHOULD REQUEST TO BRING ITEM BACK TO COMMISSION IF THEY WANT TO PROCEED WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR A BULB- OUT ON THE NW CORNER OF RAVENWOOD DR AND QUITO RD. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 09/14/2023: ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED TO BEGIN THE RESIDENT-LED SPEED HUMP PROCESS AT STEP R5 (CITY DRAFTS SPEED HUMP PLAN AND AREA OF INFLUENCE). MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 01/11/2024: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO APPROVE THE AREA OF INFLUENCE AND PLANS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PLANS WILL BE REVISED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO MEET FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. From:Daryl Hoot To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot; Subject:RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 05/11/2023 Date:Wednesday, May 10, 2023 11:36:36 AM Attachments:Neighborhood Stats on Traffic Solutions.xlsx CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Brenda and I cannot make the meeting tomorrow night. I assume you would not delay our Ravenwood agenda item. Can you let us know if the committee has any other safety measures to look at? Maybe they will approve speed humps? I attached a spreadsheet that has our neighbors names and the responses from a little over half. Maybe you can just tell the committee that 50% plus people are OK with speed humps with most OK with speed humps and signs placed at property lines. Also, the key to the data is the following (and is in the spreadsheet): 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 6:33 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: [EXT] Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 05/11/2023 External Email Dear Saratoga Community Members, Attached is the agenda for the May 11, 2023 Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) Meeting. You are receiving this agenda because you have reached out to the City with a traffic safety concern and the City has placed your concern item on the May agenda for TSC review. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held both in-person and via Zoom. The in-person meeting will be held at City Hall (13777 Fruitvale Ave) in the Administrative Conference Room. The Zoom meeting information is on the attached agenda and also included below. All meeting attendees will have a maximum of 3 minutes to speak on an agenda item. The Chair of the Commission will explain the Zoom process at the beginning of the meeting. The meeting process includes the Commission Chair introducing the item and asking the traffic engineer to describe the traffic safety issue. The Chair will then ask the public to raise their virtual or physical hand if anyone is interested in speaking on the item. After the public speaks, the TSC will discuss the item and determine a recommendation to improve the traffic safety issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the meeting. Members of the public can observe and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending in-person at 13777 Fruitvale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070. 2. Using the Zoom website at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 or App Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 3. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. Respectfully, Emma Burkhalter, PE Associate Engineer Public Works Department | City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue | Saratoga, CA | 95070 Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Amer Ather and Ayesha Sheikh Debbie Colyar Monica and Eric Roman 0 1 1 1 Steve and Julie Xu 1 1 1 1 Dale and Mette Leuthold 1 1 1 1 Bill and Val Hardy 1 1 1 1 Jagi and Nomita Shahani 1 1 1 Christa and Josh Levine 1 1 1 1 Gun Poespowidjojo and Heather Babcock 1 1 1 Brett and Katherine Dawson Sung and Jei Lei Kirk and Toggi Pollack Drew and Brenda Westcott 1 1 1 Minging and Buchin Chung Steve and Audrey Valen Lucy and Isaac Noble 0 Dave Snider and Anuradha Mayer Prakhar and Lavanya Mehrotra 1 1 1 1 Jeff Lichtman 1 1 1 0 Nitin Kasturi 1 Daryl and Gosia Hoot 1 1 1 1 Ginny and Dave Hoerger 1 1 1 1 Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Jeffand Christine Walker 1 1 0 0 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Christine Cooke Dave and Rita Benton Judy Simpson 1 1 1 1 Joan Havard 1 1 0 0 Bob and Emiko Robertson 1 1 1 Dave and Shelly Cuccias 1 1 1 1 Rob and Brenda Stribling Erica and Enrique Rodriguez 1 Clinton and Anushka Brownley About 32 neighbors on Ravenwood 16 19 17 16 From:Brenda Stribling To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot Subject:Ravenwood Dr Street Striping = Not Agreed Date:Monday, January 9, 2023 11:28:21 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi, I have been referred to you by my neighbor, Daryl Hoot, who has been speaking for the neighbors on Ravenwood Dr, our street, regarding the solutions to speeding of Marshall Lane parents from Quito to Marshall lane in the AMs and PMs and the safety of those families and children who both live on the street and walk to school daily. I, my husband and daughter have lived on Ravenwood Dr for 22 years. I have seen some speeding and mostly not. We live at - 3 houses from the Quito corner, where cars might start to speed up after turning the corner. As it can be problem, we do feel that the wide majority of school families do NOT speed, so there is SOME, but not a lot of speeding, as the city has found. In today's sensitive world, we do understand the fear of something like what occurred not far away in SJ a few years back (last year?) happening wherein a child's death is due to a speeding car. We do understand Saratoga's preference to not install speed bumps, as much as that might help. What we do not understand is the thought that striping the road on both sides will be a solution. It is our feeling that this will be a more dangerous proposal than leaving the street as it is. Please consider NOT striping the street. Striping the street will produce 3 results: 1. The street will appear to be a busy street that handles a lot of traffic at all times and will provide the drivers a feeling of moving at a quick pace - the opposite of what is intended. 2. The striping will provide the drivers a feeling of 'safe haven' to drive at a pace that is still unsafe, however also leaving them with the feeling that pedestrians are now safe from their speeding as they should be within the sides of the street opposite the striped lines. 3. The pedestrians most at risk = very young children who do not understand the limits of the "implied" flat barrier will not be protected truly from the cars on the street. The stripe is s psychological 'barrier' at most and young children's impulses do not factor into that - it is simply unsafe and not a smart choice. Please consider these points. We had a young daughter at one time and would not consider the striping a safe solution. We would worry more if she were told that a stripe would save her. Please. Please consider the smartest choice. Thank you, Brenda and Rob Stribling 1 = Yes; 0 = No; blank = no response yet Speed humps OK?Speed humps OK? Option A (March 2023)Option A (May 2023) Amer Ather and Ayesha Sheikh Debbie Colyar 1 1 1 I cannot have a speedbump by the oak tree, because that plowing to get the speedbump in will disturb the growt and it is a heritage tree, so I have to protect it for the city. Any disturbance isn’t good for the roots of that tree, but if speedbump could be put before the tree or after the tree that would be acceptable. I’m so close to Quito that I doubt there would be a speed bump that close anyway so I think the problem solved. Good luck and thank you for all your work on this project. Monica and Eric Roman 0 1 1 1 Steve and Julie Xu 1 1 1 1 Dale and Mette Leuthold 1 1 1 1 Bill and Val Hardy 1 1 1 1 Jagi and Nomita Shahani 1 1 1 Christa and Josh Levine 1 1 1 1 Gun Poespowidjojo and Heather Babcock 1 1 1 Brett and Katherine Dawson 1 1 1 Sung and Jei Lei Kirk and Toggi Pollack Drew and Brenda Westcott 1 1 1 Minging and Buchin Chung Steve and Audrey Valen Lucy and Isaac Noble 0 Dave Snider and Anuradha Mayer Prakhar and Lavanya Mehrotra 1 1 1 1 Jeff Lichtman 1 1 1 0 Nitin Kasturi 1 Daryl and Gosia Hoot 1 1 1 1 Ginny and Dave Hoerger 1 1 1 1 Christine Cooke Dave and Rita Benton 1 0 1 Judy Simpson 1 1 1 1 Joan Havard 1 1 0 0 Are you OK with having a speed hump in front of your property (on your property line) Are you OK with a sign in front of your house warning of a speed hump coming up (on your property line)? Jeffand Christine Walker 1 1 0 0 Bob and Emiko Robertson 1 1 1 Dave and Shelly Cuccias 1 1 1 1 Rob and Brenda Stribling Erica and Enrique Rodriguez 1 1 1 1 We would prefer that the speed bump not be in front of our property Clinton and Anushka Brownley About 32 neighbors on Ravenwood 16 23 20 20 From:Daryl Hoot To:Emma Burkhalter Cc:Daryl Hoot Subject:RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 Date:Sunday, August 27, 2023 2:38:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, Yes- please add Ravenwood to the agenda in September. I will be there. Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 5:45 PM To: Daryl Hoot Subject: [EXT] RE: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 External Email Hi Daryl, We can put your request on the September meeting in three weeks (9/14/23), as long as someone from your street can be there to represent the item. Otherwise, it will need to wait until the January meeting, since the November meeting is already pretty busy. Thanks, Emma From: Daryl Hoot Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 11:04 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Cc: Daryl Hoot Subject: FW: Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Emma, First I would like to thank you for your help and support in getting our street (Ravenwood) safe. I talked to some neighbors and people are not in favor of the bulb out since they are concerned that drivers will speed after turning and the problem is still there. At this point everyone seems good with speed humps. What can I do to get these? School just started so I am anxious to get these in place if we can. Thanks Daryl From: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 5:32 PM To: Emma Burkhalter <eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: [EXT] Traffic Safety Commission Meeting 07/13/2023 External Email Dear Saratoga Community Members, Attached is the agenda for the July 13, 2023 Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) Meeting. You are receiving this agenda because you have reached out to the City with a traffic safety concern and the City has placed your concern item on the July agenda for TSC review. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held both in-person and via Zoom. The in-person meeting will be held at City Hall (13777 Fruitvale Ave) in the Administrative Conference Room. The Zoom meeting information is on the attached agenda and also included below. All meeting attendees will have a maximum of 3 minutes to speak on an agenda item. The Chair of the Commission will explain the Zoom process at the beginning of the meeting. The meeting process includes the Commission Chair introducing the item and asking the traffic engineer to describe the traffic safety issue. The Chair will then ask the public to raise their virtual or physical hand if anyone is interested in speaking on the item. After the public speaks, the TSC will discuss the item and determine a recommendation to improve the traffic safety issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the meeting. Members of the public can observe and participate in the meeting by: 1. Attending in-person at 13777 Fruitvale Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070. 2. Using the Zoom website at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247 or App Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and using the tool to raise their hand in the Zoom platform when directed by the Chair to speak on an agenda item; OR 3. Calling 1.408.638.0968 or 1.669.900.6833, entering the Webinar ID: 870 5651 5247 and pressing *9 to raise their hand to speak on an agenda item when directed by the Chair. Respectfully, Emma Burkhalter, PE Associate Engineer Public Works Department | City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue | Saratoga, CA | 95070 Ph: (408) 868-1274 | eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us Tell us how we did! Complete the City of Saratoga Customer Service Survey SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Emma Burkhalter, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: TSC Matrix 502 – Resident Survey Results RECOMMENDED ACTION: Deny request for speed hump(s) and close item. BACKGROUND: On February 1, 2024, City Staff mailed surveys to the 27 homes within the Commission- approved Area of Influence for the proposed speed tables on Ravenwood Drive. This mailing included the attached cover letter to explain the traffic safety concern, the survey itself, and a map showing the proposed location of the speed hump. By the deadline provided, 25 of the 27 surveys were returned, representing a 92% response rate. According to the Speed Hump Process, moving to the next step in the resident-led column requires a 100% response rate with 80% of respondents voting YES, and speed hump adjacent properties able to veto. At this time, the results of the survey are 18 YES (72%) and 7 NO (28%), with three of the four speed hump adjacent properties (18567, 18558, 1507, and 18510 Ravenwood Dr) having responded NO. It is therefore recommended that the Commission deny the request for speed tables and close the item. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A – Example Survey and Cover Letter Attachment B – Results Map Incorporated October 22, 1956 CITY OF SARATOGA 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 868-1200 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Belal Aftab Kookie Fitzsimmons Chuck Page Tina Walia Yan Zhao Current Resident Dear Resident, The City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission was asked to review Ravenwood Drive and provide a solution for the speeding that was occurring. The Commission recommended the installation of two (2) speed tables, contingent on the approval of the residents in the determined Area of Influence. You are receiving this letter and survey because you are within the determined Area of Influence for the speed tables. The proposed locations of the speed tables are shown on both the included survey and the included speed table plan, which also shows the proposed striping and signage which will accompany the new speed tables. Please complete and return the survey by February 29, 2024 using the pre-stamped envelope. The results of the survey will be presented at the next Traffic Safety Commission meeting, on March 14, 2024 beginning at 6:30 pm, held both in person at 13777 Fruitvale Ave, Saratoga and virtually on Zoom. The Zoom information will be located on the first page of the meeting agenda, which will be posted a week before the meeting at www.saratoga.ca.us/agendacenter. If you have any questions about the survey or the Commission, please contact the Traffic Safety Commission Liaison, Emma Burkhalter, at (408) 868-1274 or by email eburkhalter@saratoga.ca.us. Sincerely, Public Works Department City of Saratoga Enclosures Incorporated October 22, 1956 CITY OF SARATOGA 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 868-1200 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Belal Aftab Kookie Fitzsimmons Chuck Page Tina Walia Yan Zhao Please complete and return the survey below by February 29, 2024 using the pre- stamped envelope. 1. Name: ______________________________________________________ Address: Phone #: ______________________________________________________ Email: ______________________________________________________ Please circle Yes or No to the question below. 2. Should the City install two Speed Tables at the proposed locations shown in the image on the back of this survey (at approximately 18567/18558 and 18507/18510 Ravenwood Dr)? YES NO Thank you for completing this survey! W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)W84(CA)185461855581857018582185941860618620186271863918615186031859118579185671855518543186571864018654HUMPHUMP INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST 50 FTIN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPINSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST 50 FTIN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPW17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)W84(CA)184701850018510185221853418531185191850718495184831847118490HUMPHUMP INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST 50 FTIN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPINSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST 50 FTIN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPRavenwood DriveSpeed Hump ConceptFigure 11:50CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.1:50RAVENWOOD DRMATCHLINE - SEE BELOW LEFT MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT City of SaratogaRAVENWOOD DRQUITO RD MARILYN LNLEGENDP52P26(' 6P((' H8MPP52P26(' 6,*1W84(CA)W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)(;,67,1* 6,*1 #531 Pierce Rd at Houston Ct Date Received: May 11, 2022 Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Pierce road /Houston Court Description of traffic safety concern: A couple of years ago, myself and many of my neighbors were successful in having speed warning signs installed in an attempt to slow down traffic on Pierce Road. Unfortunately, this has done little to slow the traffic. Not only has traffic increased, but so has the speed of these cars. We have to get our mail across the street, and it is dangerous during certain times of the day to attempt to cross. I have never seen a patrol car on the street to ticket these drivers, so speeding is not curtailed. What, if anything, is the traffic division willing to do to prevent a serious accident from happening on this stretch of Pierce Road from the corner of Houston Court to Surrey Lane? This straight- away section is where all the cars pick up speed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: install a speed strip and leave it on site for two weeks to monitor the traffic speed.... INSTALL SPEED BUMPS TO SLOW TRAFFIC !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Previous TSC Action: 8/9/2022: MOUNT/ENG MOTIONED FOR STAFF TO TAKE SPEEDS WHEN SCHOOL IS IN SESSION, WINERIES ARE HAVING EVENTS, AND SPEED HUMP AT BELLA VINA HAS BEEN INSTALLED THEN BRING BACK TO TSC. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-0) BY VERBAL ROLL CALL. AYES: AFTAB, CHU, ENG, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. Page 1 of 2 #565 Farwell Ave Date Received: June 29, 2023 Requesting Resident: Marilyn Danny Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Farwell Ave Description of traffic safety concern: Speed has greatly increased in the last year! Farwell is a popular street for runners, walkers, bikers, skaters, etc. It's also a major cut-through from Saratoga-Los Gatos Road to Fruitvale Avenue... Definitely worse when school is in session! John Cherbone suggested we fill out this form to begin a study of our situation, although it should have been done before the end of the school year! Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Radar speed feedback sign in place... & probably time to consider something like speed bumps? Other ideas? Page 2 of 2 TSC Action: 9/14/23: MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO ADD STREET TO RADAR FEEDBACK TRAILER ROTATION AND CAPTURE NEW SPEED DATA WITH THE TRAILERS IN PLACE. IF THE 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED IS REDUCED BY MORE THAN 3 MPH, INSTALL PERMANENT RADAR FEEDBACK SIGNS WITHOUT FURTHER DIRECTION FROM TSC. OTHERWISE, BRING BACK TO TSC FOR REVIEW. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0- 1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. 11/2/24: ENG/LI MOVED TO HAVE STAFF ASK RESIDENT IF SHE WANTS TO PROCEED WITH RESIDENT-LED SPEED HUMP PROCESS OR STRIPING PLAN (EDGELINE STRIPING). STAFF TO BRING APPLICABLE CONCEPTUAL PLAN BACK TO FUTURE MEETING. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. HUMPHUMP 19551195711960719600HUMPHUMP 1963919691Farwell AvenueSpeed Hump ConceptualCity of SaratogaFigure 11:50CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.1:50MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE LEFT MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW RIGHTMATCHLINE - SEE FIGURE 2LEGENDPROPOSED SPEED H8MPPROPOSED SI*NW84(CA)W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)W84(CA)INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST50 FT IN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPW17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST50 FT IN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPW17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)FARWELL AVENUEFARWELL AVENUELIVE OAK LN EL PUENTE WAY FRUITVALE AVENUE HUMP14810HUMP 14850HUMPHUMP 14911Figure 2CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.1:501:50Farwell AvenueSpeed Hump ConceptualCity of SaratogaMATCHLINE - SEE FIGURE 1MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW LEFT MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT W84(CA)W17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST50 FT IN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPFARWELL AVENUEFARWELL AVENUEWILD OAKWAYFARWELL CTINSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST50 FT IN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMPW17-1W13-1P (15 MPH)INSTALL HUMP MARKINGS AT LEAST50 FT IN ADVANCE OF SPEED HUMP Figure 3CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.Farwell AvenueSpeed Hump ConceptualCity of SaratogaSPEED TABLE DETAILCENTER OF ROADWAYCENTER OF TRAVEL LANE12" WHITE12"6 FT1.6 FT3 INPLAN VIEWSECTION B-B3 FT(MAX)7 FT7 FTSECTION A-ABBAA 1.6 FT10 FTPARABOLICFLAT3 IN 1968014551 14566 1 4 5 5 2 1455514553 19752145741980014545 1960014903 19781 2001814605 20040200171960814581 14584 1957120015197311960719740148601487014760 14740 14915 20077199351 4 7 6 6 14835 14595 147801969114608 1961614866 14755 1485520161200211487019612197011976114945196391487014860 14775 14850201712 0 1 4 0 1 4 8 5 0199081457814586197002002214562 14601 2 0 1 5 1 20131 14825 14601 19551148611991514930 14900 14995 2 0 1 2 1 14628 14600 19575201701955014836200611477219950 14847 14721 14810 20017200111483514855 2 0 1 4 1 14750 1 4 9 0 014890 1955714880 195251975314920 14765 14890 14911 200671993114875 14918 1 4 5 8 2 14788 1991114701 14760 14651 2004514590 14603 14575 14805 148151979514681 2 0 1 5 0 1999014570 195201456814765 14711 14720 14725 1473714700 195212013014781 14751 14770196701998014691 14606 1 9 4 9 3 194501943814707 1939719468149501949319498148 0014968 148671948814761 14803 14708 1945014928 14943 14665 1 9 4 9 8 1946114865 149901 9 4 7 5 14901 1499314946 1499114842 14967 14911 14961 14899 1 9 4 7 2 14835 194611 4 8 0 1 14833 19466 19486WILD OAK WAYTHREE O A K S C T RIESLING CT RANCHO BELLA VISN HORSESH OE DRLIVE OAK LNHORSESHOE DRH O R S E S H O E C T HORSESHOE CT HAUN CTGRANITE CTFARWELL CT EL PUENTE WAYCRISP AVEBURGUNDY WAYBELLA VISB E L L A V I S BARANGA LNANDREW CTWildcat CreekVasona CreekProposed Area of Influence Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Override 1 City Limits Creeks Parcels 3/7/2024, 4:26:40 PM 0 410 820205 ft 0 120 24060 m 1:5,500 City of Saratoga Esri, USGS | County of Santa Clara; Sanborn Map Company | Page 1 of 2 #572 McCoy Ave Date Received: August 16, 2023 Requesting Resident: Vassilios and/or Connie Chrysoglou Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: McCoy and Berwick Description of traffic safety concern: No speed bump with all other speed bumps too far apart which enables cars to speed down McCoy Ave. Blind spot on McCoy and Berwick due to the allowance of a house that is being built almost up to the street on McCoy Ave and huge trucks being parked there causing a huge blind spot. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Add a few more speed bumps or make it a four way stop on that section. Page 2 of 2 Previous TSC Action: 1/11/24: ENG/LI MOVED TO HAVE TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO REVIST SITE AND REVIEW SIGHT DISTANCE ON MCCOY AVE FROM BERWICK ST AND STAFF TO REVIEW PLANS FOR NEW HOUSE AT CORNER AND REPORT BACK TO THE COMMISSION. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. Page 1 of 2 #576 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd at Kirkmont Dr Date Received: September 15, 2023 Requesting Resident: Chandran Cheriyan Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd. & Kirkmont Dr. Description of traffic safety concern: There is a pedestrian crossing on Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd.near the Kirkmont Dr. intersection. This is a very busy street with cars going thro’ at very high speeds. It’s also an area with a fatal accident just waiting to take place. Drivers don’t pay much attention to the crossing. I live in the area and if I need to cross the street, I feel safer getting in my car and driving, instead of walking across. There are many children in the area as well. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: I suggest the city install flashing embedded lights that come on as soon as a pedestrian steps on to the crossing - as exist on other sreets in the city ex. Saratoga Ave. & Herriman Ave. Page 2 of 2 Previous TSC Action: 1/11/24: GULESSERIAN/LI MOVED TO POSTPONE ITEM DISCUSSION TO NEXT MEETING IN ORDER TO HEAR FROM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0- 1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ENG, GULESSERIAN, LI, MOUNT. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: CHU. From:Rick Torres To:"Aaron Ells" Cc:Emma Burkhalter; Macedonio Nunez Subject:RE: Suggestion for crosswalk at Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd and Kirkmont Dr Date:Thursday, January 4, 2024 10:44:28 AM Hi Aaron, I Will refer you to the liaison to the traffic safety committee for this request. I have CC’d them on this Email. Thanks rick Torres City of Saratoga From: Aaron Ells Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 10:05 AM To: Rick Torres <rtorres@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: Suggestion for crosswalk at Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd and Kirkmont Dr CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Rick, My name is Aaron Ells and I live locally and use Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road fairly often. I wanted to make a suggestion for one crosswalk. The crosswalk is located next to Kirkmont Drive. I think it would be prudent to add lights or something for when a pedestrian is crossing. I've seen pedestrians run into trouble crossing with drivers not realizing there is a crosswalk there until there's a person in the middle of the road. I think it may be the only crossing on that street without a traffic light of some sort with it. Anyway, I'm sure this is already on your radar, but just wanted to provide the suggestion. Thanks, Aaron Ells Page 1 of 1 #580 Cox Ave at Sea Gull Way Date Received: December 11, 2023 Requesting Resident: Priya Shastri Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Cox Ave and Seagull Way Description of traffic safety concern: There are a lot of pedestrians crossing the cross walk at the intersection of Cox Ave and Seagull way. At night it is difficult to see the people crossing. I request that we add the lighted traffic pole at the intersection, so that pedestrians can click the button and the light allows the pedestrians to cross the cross walk safely without causing accident concern. It is important to keep the pedestrians safe from vehicles on cox Ave. Also pedestrians on their evening walks need to be safe. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Please install a lighted traffic signal for pedestrian crossing which predestrians can click and when it is flashing cross the crosswalk. Previous staff action: Received two quotes for RRFB installation at this location. ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC12/21/20231 Ligthed Crosswalks - Cox Ave and Sea Gull Way ItemDescriptionUnit Quantity Unit Price TotalCox Ave and Sea Gull Way 1Furnish and Install Solar Powered Wireless Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, (two installed back to back), W11-2 and W16-7p sign on one side of post, and pedestrian push button (CALTRANS TYPE B) on modified Type 1-B Post with 1-B Post Foundation Standard. See Detail A. Misc. dirt excavation for foundation. Remove existing sign pole and replace it with Type 1-B Post with 1-B Post Foundation. EA 2 12,247.50$ 24,495.00$ 2 Traffic ControlLS 1 500.00$ 500.00$ $24,995.00 N003 DATE:TO: Macedonio Nunez FROM: Nick Quejado COMPANY: City of Saratoga PHONE:510-862-2939 PHONE:408-868-1218 EMAIL: nick.quejado@bear-electrical.com EMAIL: mnunez@saratoga.ca.us BID/ PROJECT: ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL 1 EA 2 17,115.00$ 34,230.00$ 2 LS 1 2,050.00$ 2,050.00$ 36,280.00$ INCLUSIONS: ●Per email dated 12/21/23 ●Furnish and install Solar Powered Wireless Flashing Beacons ●Furnish and install conductors as needed ●Sidewalk and asphalt removal and replacement ●Traffic Control for our work ●Off haul spoils ●Assumes one mobilization. Additional mob costs are $3,500.00 EXCLUSIONS: ●Staking and layout ●Testing and inspection fees ●Permits and bonds ●Portable Changeable Message Signs ●Regulatory signs and striping ●On-site facilities for restroom/handwashing ●Handling of any hazardous materials and dust control ●Overtime/Weekend work ●Private locating for utilities not marked by USA Saratoga Flashing Crosswalk - Cox Ave and Sea Gull Way DESCRIPTION Solar Powered Wireless Flashing Beacons Traffic Control REVISED Contractors License No. 982079 A – General Engineering C-10 Electrical DIR # 1000002158 PROPOSAL January 11, 2024 1252 State St, PO Box 924, Alviso, CA 95002-0924 Tel: 408-449-5178 Fax 408-449-5147 ESTIMATE No. Cell: (510) 862-2939 Please feel free to contact Nick Quejado for any questions regarding this quote. TOTAL: Page 1 of 1 #581 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd at Sea Gull Way Date Received: December 8, 2023 Requesting Resident: Simon Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd and Seagull Way Description of traffic safety concern: Could you please add a pedestrian walking sign and traffic signal light on the south side of the intersection between Saratoga Sunnyvale Road and Sea Gull Way? Right now the three sides all have pedestrian walking sign and traffic signal light, but the south side doesn't have. For pedestrian and biker who use the Union Pacific Trail and need to cross Saratoga Sunnyvale Road, they have to go through three pedestrian walking signal in order to do that. By adding the pedestrian walking signal in the south side, they will only need to go through one pedestrian walking signal, cutting the time by 2/3. I see quite a lot of people cross Saratoga Sunnyvale Road through Union Pacific trail without going through the traffic light, which is not safe. By adding this pedestrian walking signal, we will see more people cross the road through the traffic light. Thank you. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Add pedestrian walking sign and traffic signal light. Page 1 of 1 #582 Prospect Rd at Stelling Rd Date Received: December 16, 2023 Requesting Resident: Harminder Narula Street name and cross street(s) where the traffic safety concern is occurring: Prospect Rd near S. Stelling Description of traffic safety concern: Most vehicles driving south on S.Stelling make a fast rollover stop and most vehicles driving west on Prospect Road just past the railroad do not slow at the curve at the yield sign. Both these makes it a safety hazard for us to drive out or into our driveway. Suggestions to address the traffic safety concern: Please consider placing traffic lights. Above is also safety concern for pedestrians and bicyclists.