HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-13-2025 TSC Agenda PacketCity Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda November 13, 2025
Page 1 of 3
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
November 13, 2025
6:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
AMENDED AGENDA
11/10/2025 SHERIFF’S REPORT LINKED, COMMENT ADDED TO 5. TSC MATRIX 626, AND
SPEED SURVEY MEMO LINKED.
11/13/2025 COMMENT ADDED TO 7. SPEED SURVEY.
Public Participation Information
In accordance with Saratoga City Council’s Remote Public Participation Policy, members of the
public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed below or via remote
attendance using the Zoom information below. In the event remote participation technology is
unexpectedly unavailable, the meeting will proceed in person without remote participation.
Members of the public can view and participate in the meeting by:
1. Attending the meeting in person in the Linda Callon Conference Room located at 13777
Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga CA 95070; OR
2. Accessing the meeting through Zoom
* Webinar URL https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87056515247
* Webinar ID 870 5651 5247
* Calling 1.669.900.6833 or 1.408.638.0968
Written Communication
Comments can be submitted in writing at www.saratoga.ca.us/tsc. Written communications will
be provided to the members of the Commission and included in the Agenda Packet and/or in
supplemental meeting materials.
Public Comment
Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. The amount of
time for public comment may be reduced by the Chair.
City Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda November 13, 2025
Page 2 of 3
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
REPORT ON POSTING OF THE AGENDA
The agenda for this meeting was properly post on November 6, 2025.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Any member of the public may address the committee on matters not on the Agenda. The law
generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the
Commission may instruct staff accordingly.
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Traffic Safety Commission Minutes
Recommended Action:
Review and approve the minutes for the August 28, 2025, Traffic Safety Commission
Regular Meeting.
2. Sheriff’s Report to the Commission
August and September 2025 Citation Summary and Collision Statistics
Matrix Item Data
Recommended Action:
No action required.
3. TSC Matrix 623 – Glen Brae Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
4. TSC Matrix 624 – Braemar Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
5. TSC Matrix 626 – Herriman Ave at Saratoga Ave
Comment
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
6. TSC Matrix 627 – (North) Brookglen Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
7. Speed Survey
Comment
City Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda November 13, 2025
Page 3 of 3
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
8. Election of New Chair and Vice Chair
9. Announcements
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF THE AGENDA, DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET,
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
I, Emma Burkhalter, Associate Engineer for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing
agenda for the meeting of the Traffic Safety Commission was posted and available for public
review on November 6, 2025, at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070,
and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us.
Signed this 6th day of November 2025 at Saratoga, California.
Emma Burkhalter, Associate Engineer
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials
provided to the Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda, copies of materials
distributed to the Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda, and materials
distributed to the Commission by staff after the posting of the agenda are available on the City
website at www.saratoga.ca.us and are available for review in the office of the City Clerk at
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Governor’s Executive Order, if
you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at
bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or call 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will
use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as
possible while also maintaining public safety. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA title II]
City Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda August 28, 2025
Page 1 of 3
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
DRAFT MINUTES
August 28, 2025
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Alec Gulesserian (Chair), Stephen Li (Vice Chair), Robert Eng, Jason Mount
ABSENT: Dory Albert
STAFF PRESENT: Ashley Weiss, Dawn Malla, Emma Burkhalter, John Cherbone
REPORT ON POSTING OF THE AGENDA
The agenda for this meeting was properly post on August 21, 2025.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Any member of the public may address the committee on matters not on the Agenda. The law
generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the
Commission may instruct staff accordingly.
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Traffic Safety Commission Minutes
Recommended Action:
Review and approve the minutes for the July 10, 2025, Traffic Safety Commission Regular
Meeting.
ENG/GULESSERIAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 10, 2025 MINUTES. MOTION PASSED (4-
0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI, ENG, MOUNT, GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: ALBERT.
2. Sheriff’s Report to the Commission
June and July 2025 Citation Summary and Collision Statistics
Matrix Item Data
Recommended Action:
No action required.
3. Safe Routes to School Working Group Update
City Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda August 28, 2025
Page 2 of 3
Recommended Action:
No action required.
4. TSC Matrix 612 – Padero Ave and Pierce Rd
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
NO ACTION.
5. TSC Matrix 615 – Scotland Dr and Cumberland Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
ENG/MOUNT MOVED TO INSTALL “STOP AHEAD” SIGNAGE, REFRESH CENTERLINE
STRIPING, REQUEST TARGETED ENFORCEMENT, AND TRIM VEGETATION. MOTION PASSED
(4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI, ENG, MOUNT, GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: ALBERT.
6. TSC Matrix 617 – Quito Rd at Ravenwood Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
ENG/MOUNT MOVED TO INSTALL YIELD MARKINGS ON QUITO ROAD, INSTALL STRIPED
MEDIAN ON NORTHSIDE QUITO ROAD, INSTALL ASPHALT BERM, REQUEST DIRECTED
ENFORCEMENT AT CROSSWALK, ADD CROSSING FLAGS, AND INVESTIGATE TREATMENT TO
REMOVE “DOUBLE THREAT” OF VEHICLES PASSING ON RIGHT. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1)
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI, ENG, MOUNT, GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN:
NONE. ABSENT: ALBERT.
7. TSC Matrix 619 – Quito Rd between Pollard Rd and Old Adobe Rd
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
MOUNT/ENG MOVED TO INSTALL RADAR FEEDBACK SIGNS AT LOCATIONS
RECOMMENDED BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND REPLACE EXISTING UNDERSIZED SPEED LIMIT
SIGN. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI, ENG, MOUNT,
GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: ALBERT.
8. TSC Matrix 620 – Saratoga Ave at Fruitvale Ave
City Council Traffic Safety Commission Agenda August 28, 2025
Page 3 of 3
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
ENG/LI MOVED TO INSTALL MORE ADVANCED NOTICE SIGNAGE AS RECOMMENDED BY
THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI,
ENG, MOUNT, GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: ALBERT.
9. TSC Matrix 622 – Fruitvale Ave at Valle Vista Dr
Recommended Action:
Review the item and make a recommendation.
LI/ENG MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO INVESTIGATE INSTALLING CROSSWALK AND INSTALL
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. IF CROSSWALK CANNOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION, BRING
ITEM BACK TO COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW. MOTION PASSED (4-0-0-1) BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LI, ENG, MOUNT, GULESSERIAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
ABSENT: ALBERT.
10. September Safe Driving Campaign Drafts
Recommended Action:
Approve the draft postcards.
11. Announcements
ADJOURNMENT – 9:21 PM
Respectfully Submitted by
Emma Burkhalter, Public Works staff for the City of Saratoga
Page 1 of 2
#623 Glen Brae Dr
Date Received: August 21, 2025
Requesting Resident: George Mednick
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
Glen Brae and Scotland
Description of traffic safety
concern:
I am the lead for the Glen Brae Neighborhood Watch program. There is
constant speeing along Glen Brae between Cox Avenue and Beaumont Drive.
Many cars exceed 45 mph routinely. It is a serious hazzard. I noticed two
radar speed indication units on Lanark Lane today. Lanark Lane experiences
less than 1/30 th of the traffic that Glen Brae does. It seems these units serve
little useful purpose on Lanark Lane. They would be much more impactful if
deployed on Glen Brae.
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
Deploy speed indicator units on Glen Brae between Cox and Scotland. The
installation of permanent radar speed indicators would be even better. They
are available on Amazon for $1,000 each. They are common in European
cities.
Date Received: October 16, 2025
Requesting Resident: Michael Whalen
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
Glen Brae Drive between Scotland and Beaumont
Page 2 of 2
Description of traffic safety
concern:
Excessive speeding on Glen Brae Dr - many are going over 40 MPH. It's
particularly bad in the school time rush in the AM and PM and late at night.
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
Speed humps are necessary to stop this dangerous speeding. Not one, but at
least two along this stretch. They are also needed on Beaumont, Braemar and
Scotland. Cars today are just too quick and fast. City should also install photo
radar cameras to issue automatic tickets
Date Received: October 22, 2025
Requesting Resident: Sita V
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
Glen Brae and Via Monte rd
Description of traffic safety
concern:
Some cars are driving fast on Glen Brae during early morning school drop
off's. When my boys to cross the road the car made a rolling stop and
immediately realized kids biking and immediatly did a hard stop which scared
my kids. This is quite dangerous for all the kids going on Glen brae.. at the
beginning of the year 3 more kids near my lane used to bike to school, now
they no longer go because of the risks.. Biking in Saratoga must be
encouraged - helps kids stay healthy, avoids traffic congestion and a greener
way!
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
1) biking lane to show that they cant cross that line will be very helpful! 2)
Enforcing speed limits in internal small roads
Page 1 of 1
#624 Braemar Dr
Date Received: September 30, 2025
Requesting Resident: Ajit Mayya
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
Scotland Dr / Braemar Dr intersection
Description of traffic safety
concern:
No road divider on Braemar Drive at the junction with Scotland Drive.
Without this divider, many cars westbound on Scotland tend to turn left on to
Braemar at high speed without slowing down and veering into the lane of the
traffic going north on Braemar.
Another location that would benefit from such dividers is where Braemar Dr
intersects Howen Drive since drivers tend to round the corner in both
directions at high speed.
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
At both location, put a divider similar to what is present at the Crestbrook Dr
/ Braemar Dr. intersection.
Page 1 of 1
#626 Herriman Ave at Saratoga Ave
Date Received: October 12, 2025
Requesting Resident: Peichun Chao
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
Herriman Ave at Saratoga Ave
Description of traffic safety
concern:
My son almost got run over by a car as he was crossing Herimon Avenue. My
son rode a bike to school on October 10th. The cross guard helped him to
cross Saratoga Avenue, but my son kept on crossing Herimon Avenue alone
since he had to ride to Argonuat Elementary School. A car coming from the
Saratoga Downtown direction made an immediate left turn and almost ran
over my son. Luckily, there was another diver who spotted the situation,
honked, and stopped the possible incident. So many students who ride bikes
have to cross Saratoga Avenue and then immediately cross Heriman Avenue
every weekday. Isn't it crucial for us as grown ups to give them a safer
enviroment to go to school?
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
We can place Stop signs on the Saratoga Avenue and Herimon Avenue cross
sections to force drivers to stop before making a turn. Or, we can ask the
cross guard to help students to not only cross Saratoga Avenue, but also
Herimon Avenue. Perhaps we should do both, because some drivers speed up
as they see the cross guard is ready to get students across the street.
From:noreply@civicplus.com
To:Britt Avrit; Leslie Arroyo; Emma Burkhalter
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Traffic Safety Commission Comments Form
Date:Friday, November 7, 2025 7:43:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments
or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Traffic Safety Commission Comments Form
Your Name Coleen Wagner
Phone Number
Email Address
Is this comment about
an existing item under
review by the Traffic
Safety Commission?
Yes
Traffic Matrix Number
(if known)
#626
Street Name(s)Herriman Ave at Saratoga Ave
Comments I've been advocating for a light at this intersection for years and
gotten nowhere. The intersection needs a light. A stop sign is just
going to back up traffic and make parents more liable to roll right
through. I've seen high school kids playing chicken with the traffic
on Saratoga. It's just an accident waiting to happen.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Page 1 of 1
#627 (North) Brookglen Dr
Date Received: October 27, 2025
Requesting Resident: Teri Sanislo
Street name and cross street(s)
where the traffic safety concern
is occurring:
North Brookglen Dr
Description of traffic safety
concern:
Speeding, particularly on the S-curve, on Brookglen Dr, north of Prospect Rd.
Suggestions to address the
traffic safety concern:
Radar feedback signs and/or speed bumps.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 1
Draft Memo
Date: November 10, 2025
To: John Cherbone, Emma Burkhalter, City of Saratoga & Deputy Chad Biscardi, Santa Clara
County Office of the Sheriff
From: Chris Abeel, Dawn Malla, and Ashley Weiss, P.E., Fehr & Peers
Subject: City of Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update
Introduction
This memorandum presents the 2025 speed survey analysis results for the City of Saratoga,
California. This study determines appropriate posted speed limits on various study segments within
the City limits based on the laws and regulations defined in the California Vehicle Code (CVC)
Division 11, Chapter 7. It also reflects changes introduced by new state legislation such as Assembly
Bill (AB) 43 which was implemented since the last speed survey was conducted in 2020 and has
modified the ways city governments can set speed limits on local roadways.
The purpose of this study is to determine the appropriate speed limits for radar enforcement on City
roadways. Each study segment was evaluated by comparing the existing posted speed limit to the
measured 85th-percentile speed. The 85th-percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85
percent of free-flowing vehicles are observed under typical conditions and is used statewide as the
primary engineering basis for setting radar-enforceable speed limits.1 The resulting analysis provides
recommendations on whether each existing speed limit remains appropriate or should be adjusted.
The remainder of this memorandum is divided into the following five sections.
• Section 1: Existing Roadway Network describes existing speed limits, lane configurations, and
crash data for the analyzed study segments.
• Section 2: Average Daily Traffic Volumes presents the study segments’ average daily
traffic volumes.
• Section 3: Speed Survey Analysis describes the speed survey and data analysis methodology.
• Section 4: Speed Limit Reduction Justification illustrates the justification behind reducing the
speed limit on insufficient study segments.
• Section 5: Final Recommendations summarizes the recommended study segments speed limit
changes and outlines the supporting rationale for implementation.
1 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). California Manual for Setting Speed Limits. Division of
Safety Programs, March 2023. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/safety-
programs/documents/202503-ca-manual-setting-speed-limits-a11y.pdf
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 2
Study Segments
The last citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) was conducted in 2020, establishing speed
limits that remain valid for radar enforcement for up to seven years (year 2027), or up to fourteen
years (year 2034) if a registered traffic engineer certifies that roadway and traffic conditions have not
significantly changed, per CVC §40802.
As roadway segment characteristics change, the City may elect to update the E&TS for each affected
segment to better align with the updated characteristics of the roadway. Under the City’s authority
and consistent with recent updates to the CVC, the validity of the following segments from the 2020
survey are being extended through 2034 per AB 43 and are therefore not re-evaluated as part of this
study:
• ID 1: Allendale Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue and Portos Drive (35 MPH)
• ID 2: Allendale Avenue from Portos Drive to Chester Avenue (35 MPH)
• ID 3: Allendale Avenue from Chester Avenue to Quito Road (25 MPH)
• ID 4: Arroyo De Arguello from Comer Drive to Via Roncole (25 MPH)
• ID 5: Beaumont Avenue from Herriman Avenue to Glen Brae Drive (25 MPH)
• ID 6: Braemar Drive from Howen Drive to Scotland Drive (25 MPH)
• ID 7: Bucknall Road from Saratoga Avenue to Quito Road (25 MPH)
• ID 29: Quito Road from Pollard Road to Allendale Avenue (30 MPH)
• ID 38: Quito Road from Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road (30 MPH)
• ID 39: Quito Road from Bicknell Road to Pollard Road (25 MPH)
• ID 40: Quito Road from Pollard Road to Allendale Avenue (35 MPH)
• ID 41: Quito Road from Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way (35 MPH)
• ID 43: Sarahills Drive from Verde Vista to Pierce Road (25 MPH)
This 2025 update focuses on specific roadway segments that require re-evaluation due to changes in
roadway characteristics, traffic operations, or applicability of new legislation such as AB 43. The
analysis evaluated the operations of the 27 study segments listed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 3
Table 1: Speed Study Segments
ID # Street Name Segment Limits
8 Chester Avenue Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road
13 Farwell Avenue Fruitvale Avenue to Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
15 Fruitvale Avenue Burgundy Way to Allendale Avenue
16 Fruitvale Avenue Allendale Avenue to Saratoga Avenue
17 Glen Brae Drive Scotland Drive to Cox Avenue
18 Herriman Avenue Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga Avenue
19 Miller Avenue Prospect Road to Cox Avenue
20 Pierce Road Highway 9 to Mt. Eden Road
21 Pierce Road Mt. Eden Road to Surrey Lane
22 Pierce Road Surrey Lane to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
23 Prospect Road Stelling Road to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
24 Prospect Road Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Miller Avenue
25 Prospect Road Miller Avenue to Lawrence Expressway
26 Prospect Road Lawrence Expressway to Easterly City Limit
27 Quito Road Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road
28 Quito Road Bicknell Road to Pollard Road
30 Quito Road Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way
31 Quito Road Yorkton Way to Cox Avenue
32 Saratoga Avenue Big Basin Way to Seagraves Way
33 Saratoga Avenue Seagraves Way to Westerly Shadow Oaks Way
34 Saratoga Avenue Westerly Shadow Oaks Way to Fruitvale Avenue
35 Saratoga Avenue Fruitvale Avenue to SR 85 Overcrossing
36 Saratoga Avenue Vineyard Lane to Cox Avenue
37 Saratoga Avenue Cox Avenue to Lawrence Expressway City Limit
42 Scotland Drive Saratoga Avenue to Cumberland Drive
441 Sobey Road Northerly Quito Road to Sobey Meadows Court
451 Sobey Road Sobey Meadows Court to Southerly Quito Road
Notes:
1. Sobey Road’s study segment was originally a singular ID from Northerly Quito Road to Southerly Quito Road,
but for the purposes of the 2025 E&TS, the segment was split into two to account for the varying roadway
conditions along Sobey Road.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Study Segments
FIGURE 1
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits Study Segments
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 5
Regulatory Setting
AB 43, enacted in 2021, expanded local authority to set lower, context-sensitive speed limits. While
the California MUTCD (CA MUTCD) previously allowed engineers to consider factors such as land
use, crash history, and pedestrian or bicycle activity, AB 43 codified those considerations into statue
and granted agencies explicit authority to reduce speed limits based on them. The CA MUTCD and
CVC have since been updated to reflect these provisions. AB 43 introduced several key changes to
how speed limits can be established.
Key Tools Introduced by AB 43
• Updated Rounding Rules: When applying the 85th percentile rule, agencies may round down
instead of up or apply an additional 5-mph reduction if the speed was rounded down.
• 5-mph Reduction with Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS): Agencies may lower speed limits by
an additional 5 mph when justified by high pedestrian/bicycle activity (e.g., near schools, parks,
transit hubs, or within the vicinity of pedestrian or bicycle facilities) or on roadways designated as
Safety Corridors (segments with the highest concentration of serious crashes).
• Retain/Restore Provisions: Agencies may retain or reinstate a prior E&TS-based limit by
ordinance if roadway conditions are unchanged, subject to a 5-mph cap below the
current posting.
Interaction with Existing California Vehicle Code
Framework
Under the CVC §22352, prima facie limits 2 remain 15 mph in alleys, crossings, and constrained
intersections, and 25 mph in business/residential districts, school zones, and senior centers. Any
posted limits above or below these thresholds must be justified by an E&TS, now with added
flexibility under AB 43.
Methodology for Setting or Modifying Speed
Limits
To ensure enforceability and compliance with AB 43, CVC, and the CA MUTCD, jurisdictions should
apply the following measures:
1. Confirm Survey Validity – E&TS is valid for up to 14 years, provided roadway conditions are
unchanged.
2 Under California law, “prima facie speed limits” are the default speed limits established in California Vehicle
Code § 22352. These limits apply “unless changes as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when
signs have been erected giving notice thereof.” Subsection (a) establishes a 15 mph limit in specific conditions,
such as approaching a railway crossing, an intersection with limited visibility, or driving on an alley. Subsection
(b) sets a 25 mph limit on highways within business activity districts, and when approaching or passing school
grounds or senior-center facilities under defined conditions. These limits are considered prima facie unlawful if
exceeded, unless the driver demonstrates compliance with the basic speed law (see § 22351). California
Legislative Information. California Vehicle Code § 22352 (2022).
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH§ionNum=22352
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 6
2. Determine 85th Percentile Speed – Use the lower directional value to set the basis when the
roadway is divided. Use the combined directional value to set the basis when the roadway is
not divided.
3. Round the 85th Percentile Speed – Round the 85th Percentile Speed to the nearest 5-mph
increment. Then round down by 5-mph.
4. Apply Reductions as Available – Round down by an additional 5-mph when justified by high
pedestrian/bicycle activity or on roadways designed as a Safety Corridor, subject to the 12.4-
mph maximum deviation below the 85th percentile.
5. Adopt by Ordinance and Document – Summarize justification in an engineering memo, enact
by ordinance, and post signage consistent with MUTCD.
6. Enforce with Warning Period – Where limits are reduced without a new survey (e.g., BADs),
agencies must provide a 30-day warning citation period.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 7
Existing Roadway Network
The study roadway network within the City of Saratoga is presented on Figure 1. Prospect Road and
Saratoga Avenue are major arterial roadways serving the highest traffic volumes and have higher
travel speeds. Other streets in the survey include Chester Avenue, Farwell Avenue, Fruitvale Avenue,
Glen Brae Drive, Herriman Avenue, Miller Avenue, Pierce Road, Quito Road, Scotland Drive, and
Sobey Road. All these roadways are described in detail below. Figure 2 presents the posted speed
limits on the study roadway network.
Chester Avenue is a two-lane north-south collector street. Chester Avenue extends from Sobey Road
to Allendale Avenue and has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Chester Avenue is evaluated for one
segment: Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road. There are no schools that front this segment.
Farwell Avenue is a two-lane collector that provides a connection between Los Gatos-Saratoga Road
and Fruitvale Avenue and includes a sharp bend near its midpoint. The posted speed limit on Farwell
Avenue is 25 mph. There are no schools that front this segment.
Fruitvale Avenue is a minor north-south arterial street linking Saratoga Avenue to Saratoga-Los
Gatos Road (Highway 9). This street features four lanes from Saratoga Avenue near the library to
Burgundy Way. South of this location, Fruitvale Avenue narrows to two lanes. Fruitvale Avenue is
divided by a raised median between San Marcos Road and Saratoga Avenue. The corridor is shared
by Redwood Middle School and West Valley College, resulting in steady pedestrian, bicycle, and
vehicular activity associated with student travel. The posted speed limit on Fruitvale Avenue is 35
mph. Fruitvale Avenue is divided into two roadway segments for the purpose of this speed survey:
Burgundy Way to Allendale Avenue and Allendale Avenue to Saratoga Avenue.
Glen Brae Drive is a two-lane street that extends south from Cox Avenue, turns west near its
intersection with Scotland Drive, and terminates just east of Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. The study
segment analyzed in this report is between Cox Avenue and Scotland Drive and is a local collector
with a posted speed limit of 25 mph.
Herriman Avenue is an east-west, two-lane collector with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Herriman
Avenue is located between Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road and Saratoga Avenue, and provides the primary
access to Saratoga High School near its western terminus at Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. Saratoga High
School fronts this corridor, contributing to high pedestrian and bicycle activity during school hours.
There is a raised crosswalk and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) at the intersection of
Herriman Avenue and Lexington Court.
Miller Avenue is a two-lane collector with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Miller Avenue is located
between Prospect Road and Cox Avenue. There are no schools that front Miller Avenue within the
City of Saratoga.
Pierce Road is a north-south local collector street that extends from Congress Springs Road
(Highway 9) to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. The posted speed limit is 25 mph between Highway 9 and
Surrey Lane and increases to 30 mph north of Surrey Lane before its terminus at Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road. This roadway traverses hilly terrain and provides access to numerous local and collector streets
in the western hills. Based on roadway design and current posted speed limits, Pierce Road is broken
into three roadway segments for the purpose of this speed survey: Highway 9 to Mount Eden Road,
Mount Eden Road to Surrey Lane, and Surry Lane to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. Four speed humps are
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 8
located on Pierce Road between Surrey Lane and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to minimize vehicle
speeds and provide an improved pedestrian and bicycling environment. There are no schools that
front this segment.
Prospect Road is a two- to four-lane major arterial that extends east-west between Stevens Creek
County Park and Saratoga Avenue. Prospect Road is divided by a raised median from Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Role to Saratoga Avenue. The posted speed limit varies from 30 to 40 mph from east of
Stelling Road to west of Lawrence Expressway. Most of Prospect Road forms the boundary between
Saratoga and the cities of San José and Cupertino. Christa McAuliffe Elementary School and Prospect
High School front this corridor, generating frequent pedestrian and bicycle activity during school
hours. Based on roadway design and current posted speed limits, Prospect Road is divided into four
roadway segments for the purpose of this speed survey:
• Stelling Road to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
• Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Miller Avenue
• Miller Avenue to Lawrence Expressway
• Lawrence Expressway to Eastern City Limits
Quito Road is a two- to four-lane street that extends north-south from Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
(Highway 9) to Saratoga Avenue. The posted speed limit on Quito Road varies between 25 mph and
35 mph. The speed limit is 30 mph between the southerly City limits and Bicknell Road, 25 mph
between Bicknell Road and Pollard Road, and 35 mph north of Allendale Avenue. North of Highway
85, Quito Road is designated as a major arterial, while south of Highway 85 the street is designated
as a minor arterial. Generally, Quito Road is the eastern City limit with the adjacent communities of
Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Campbell, and San José. Based on roadway design and current posted
speed limits, Quito Road is divided into four roadway segments for the purpose of this speed survey:
• Southerly City Limits to Bicknell Road
• Bicknell Road to Pollard Road 3
• Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way
• Yorkton Way to Cox Avenue
Saratoga Avenue is a major arterial street that extends from Saratoga-Los Gatos Road (Highway 9) to
Quito Road and beyond into the cities of San José and Santa Clara. The Saratoga Avenue study
section is from Highway 9 to the northern City limits near Kosich Drive. Between Highway 9 and SR
85 Overcrossing, Saratoga Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. North of SR 85 Overcrossing,
the speed limit increases to 40 mph through the remainder of the corridor to the City limit near
Lawrence Expressway. RRFBs are installed at the intersection of Saratoga Avenue and Herriman
Avenue and the intersection of Saratoga Avenue and Crestbrook Drive. Sacred Heart School, Saint
Andrew’s Episcopal School, and the Saratoga Public Library front this roadway in addition to several
other schools in the area that utilize this roadway. Based on roadway design and current posted
speed limits, Saratoga Avenue is divided into six segments for the purpose of this speed survey:
• Big Basin Way to Seagraves Way
• Seagraves Way to Westerly Shadow Oaks Way
• Westerly Shadow Oaks Way to Fruitvale Avenue
• Fruitvale Avenue to SR 85 overcrossing
3 The Quito Road segment between Pollard Road and Allendale Avenue was not included in this E&TS and it’s
current speed limit has been extended per AB 43.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 9
• SR 85 overcrossing to Cox Avenue
• Cox Avenue to Quito Road
Scotland Drive is a two-lane collector street that extends east-west between Saratoga Avenue and
Cumberland Drive. The posted speed limit on Scotland Drive is 25 mph. No schools front this
roadway; however, it is heavily utilized for pick-up and drop-off due to the Saratoga Creek trail
crossing.
Sobey Road is a two-lane collector that loops on the west side of Quito Road. Sobey Road connects
with Quito Road at the north end near Allendale Avenue and at the south end near the southerly city
limits. A portion of the roadway is fronted by Marshall Lane Elementary School, contributing to
increased pedestrian and bicycle activity during school hours. The posted speed limit on Sobey Road
is 30 mph. Based on roadway characteristics, Sobey Road is divided into two segments for the
purpose of this speed survey:
• Northerly Quito Road to Sobey Meadows Court
• Sobeys Meadow Court to Southerly Quito Road
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Figure 3 graphically presents average daily traffic (ADT) for the 27 study roadway segments.
All but three of the roadway segments analyzed in this report serve fewer than 25,000 ADT. The
following three roadway segments in the City serve between 25,000 and 31,000 ADT:
• Saratoga Avenue between Fruitvale Avenue and SR 85 Overcrossing (25,800ADT)
• Saratoga Avenue between SR 85 Overcrossing and Cox Avenue (31,000 ADT)
• Saratoga Avenue between Cox Avenue and Lawerence Expressway City Limit (26,200 ADT)
Saratoga Avenue is a major arterial in the City of Saratoga and provides direct access to State Route
85, the downtown village, and many local schools; therefore, higher volumes on this roadway
are expected.
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Existing Speed Limits
FIGURE 2
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits 25 mph
30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Average Daily Traffic Volumes (Bi-Directional)
FIGURE 3
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits Average Daily Traffic Volumes (Bi-Directional)
500 - 1,750 vpd
1,750 - 6,000 vpd
6,000 - 12,000 vpd
12,000 - 18,000 vpd
18,000 - 31,000 vpd
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 12
Speed Survey Analysis
This section presents the survey data, followed by an analysis of each segment. The key measure for
analysis is the 85th percentile or critical speed of a roadway segment. Special attention is paid to
roadway segments where the 85th percentile speed exceeds the existing posted speed limit by 12.5
miles per hour (mph) or greater, because this difference may indicate that the current limit no longer
reflects prevailing traffic conditions and could affect the enforceability of the speed limit under state
law.
Appendix A contains the summary matrix for all 27 roadway segments analyzed for the 2025
Saratoga Speed Survey. Table 2 summarizes the 2025 speed survey results for the 27 study
segments, including existing posted speed limits, measured 85th-percentile speeds by direction, and
corresponding crash history and rates used to evaluate whether current speed limits remain
appropriate for radar enforcement.
Data Collection
Speed surveys were conducted at the 27 segments in the City of Saratoga from June 26 through
June 27, 2025. Some roadways, such as Fruitvale Avenue, Prospect Road, Quito Road, and Saratoga
Avenue, are divided into multiple segments to account for variations in posted speeds, traffic
volumes, and roadway characteristics. Average daily traffic was measured using automated
equipment. Travel speeds at high-volume locations were collected with radar and with continuous
counters at lower-volume segments where the segments are considered in free flow conditions.4 To
supplement these field measurements, five years of collision records from January 2020 to
December 2024 were obtained from UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS),
which compiles geocoded crash data from the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS). Figure 4
summarizes the observed 85th percentile speeds for each study segment. This data provided the
basis for evaluating posted limits and determining whether adjustments are warranted.
Crash Data
The crash history analysis focused on collisions in which speed was identified as the primary
contributing factor. Across the five-year window, multiple study segments experienced recurrent
speed-related crashes, with higher concentrations on wider roadways and corridors carrying higher
traffic volumes. Saratoga Avenue overall demonstrates higher concentrations of crashes over the
surveyed period, for example segment ID 37 from Cox Avenue to Lawrence Expressway City Limit
reporting 13 crashes, 5 of which were speed-related. Table 2 summarizes the speed survey results
including crashes by segment, and Figure 5 illustrates the spatial distribution of speed-related
crashes. These findings provide important context for the speed survey results by highlighting
segments where existing speed limits may not adequately address safety risks.
4 The 85th percentile speed should be determined based on vehicles that are in free flow conditions where a
driver’s speed is not influenced by anything other than the roadway geometry. Higher volume roadways may
have periods of congestion; therefore radar speeds were collected to ensure that only vehicles in free flow are
captured. Lower volume roadways have minimal to no congestion rendering a continuous counter sufficient.
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
NB/EB: 36
SB/WB: 36
NB/EB: 45
SB/WB: 40
NB/EB: 39
SB/WB: 38
NB/EB: 35
SB/WB: 34
NB/EB: 45
SB/WB: 42
NB/EB: 38
SB/WB: 39
NB/EB: 43
SB/WB: 41
NB/EB: 37
SB/WB: 37
NB/EB: 38
SB/WB: 38
NB/EB: 39
SB/WB: 41
NB/EB: 40
SB/WB: 37
NB/EB: 46
SB/WB: 47
NB/EB: 35
SB/WB: 34
NB/EB: 29.9
SB/WB: 28.2
NB/EB: 38
SB/WB: 37
NB/EB: 33
SB/WB: 36
NB/EB: 30.2
SB/WB: 29.6
NB/EB: 40
SB/WB: 42
NB/EB: 34
SB/WB: 36
NB/EB: 33.3
SB/WB: 33
NB/EB: 33
SB/WB: 32
NB/EB: 37
SB/WB: 36
NB/EB: 45
SB/WB: 45
NB/EB: 43
SB/WB: 44
NB/EB: 33
SB/WB: 35
NB/EB: 37
SB/WB: 35.5 NB/EB: 32
SB/WB: 32.8
9
9
17
85
85
Observed 85th Percentile Speed
FIGURE 4
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits
Observed 85th Percentile Speed (mph)
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Location of Speed-Related Crashes
FIGURE 5
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits
Study Segments
Crashes on Study Segments:
Unsafe Speeds
All Crashes
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 15
Table 2: Summary of Speed Survey Results
Study Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
85th
Percentile
NB/EB1
85th
Percentile
SB/WB2
Crashes
Speed-
Related
Crashes3
Segment
Crash
Rate5
Average
Statewide
Crash
Rate4
8. Chester Avenue from Allendale Avenue to
Ten Acres Road 25 29.9 28.2 0 0 0.00 1.68
13. Farwell Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue to
Saratoga-Los Gatos Road 25 30.2 29.6 1 1 1.76 1.68
15. Fruitvale Avenue from Burgundy Way to
Allendale Avenue 35 40.0 42.0 1 0 0.10 0.96
16. Fruitvale Avenue from Allendale Avenue
to Saratoga Avenue 35 39.0 38.0 1 0 0.15 0.96
17. Glen Brae Dr from Scotland Dr to Cox
Avenue 25 33.3 33.0 0 0 0.00 1.68
18. Herriman Avenue from Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga Avenue 25 33.0 36.0 2 1 0.69 1.68
19. Miller Avenue from Prospect Road to
Cox Avenue 25 33.0 32.0 0 0 0.00 1.68
20. Pierce Road from Highway 9 to Mt. Eden
Road 25 37.0 35.5 3 2 1.65 1.46
21. Pierce Road from Mt. Eden Road to
Surrey Lane 25 33.0 35.0 7 2 1.32 1.34
22. Pierce Road from Surrey Lane to
Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road 30 34.0 36.0 4 3 0.74 1.33
23. Prospect Road from Stelling Road to
Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road 30 37.0 37.0 1 1 0.18 1.68
24. Prospect Road from Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road to Miller Avenue 40 45.0 45.0 3 1 0.11 0.96
25. Prospect Road from Miller Avenue to
Lawrence Expressway 40 43.0 44.0 10 3 0.32 0.96
26. Prospect Road from Lawrence
Expressway to Easterly City limit 35 36.0 36.0 2 0 0.47 0.96
27. Quito Road from Southerly City limit to
Bicknell Road 30 38.0 37.0 2 0 0.34 1.68
28. Quito Road from Bicknell Road to
Pollard Road 25 37.0 36.0 2 0 0.21 1.68
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 16
Study Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
85th
Percentile
NB/EB1
85th
Percentile
SB/WB2
Crashes
Speed-
Related
Crashes3
Segment
Crash
Rate5
Average
Statewide
Crash
Rate4
30. Quito Road from Allendale Avenue to
Yorkton Way 30 38.0 38.0 5 1 0.59 1.68
31. Quito Road from Yorkton Way to Cox
Avenue 35 39.0 41.0 2 0 0.14 1.68
32. Saratoga Avenue from Big Basin to
Seagraves Way 35 38.0 39.0 3 2 0.41 1.68
33. Saratoga Avenue from Seagraves Way
to Shadow Oaks Way 35 43.0 41.0 6 2 1.45 1.68
34. Saratoga Avenue from Shadow Oaks
Way to Fruitvale Avenue 35 40.0 37.0 5 3 0.29 1.68
35. Saratoga Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue
to SR 85 Overcrossing 35 45.0 42.0 8 4 0.46 0.94
36. Saratoga Avenue from SR 85
Overcrossing to Cox Avenue 40 45.0 40.0 6 5 0.37 0.94
37. Saratoga Avenue from Cox Avenue to
Lawrence Expressway City Limit 40 46.0 47.0 13 5 0.50 0.94
42. Scotland Drive from Saratoga Avenue to
Cumberland Drive 25 32.0 32.8 0 0 0 1.68
44. Sobey Road from Northerly Quito Road
to Sobey Meadows Court 30 35.0 34.0 0 0 0 1.68
45. Sobey Road from Sobey Meadows Court
to Southerly Quito Road 30 35.0 34.0 0 0 0 1.68
Notes:
1. NB = Northbound, EB = Eastbound.
2. SB= Southbound, WB = Westbound.
3. Speed-related crashes are crashes reported over the 5-year survey period in which drivers are assessed to be driving above the posted speed limit.
4. Segment Crash Rate was determined using Caltrans Basic average crash rates from 2024 applicable to the road geometry of each study roadway segment.
California Department of Transportation (November 15, 2024). Basic average crash rate table for highways. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/2022-crash-data-on-
state-highway-system/f163ab22-7ab1-4a8b-b277-6bfef7fe4dd4
5. Average statewide collision rate (accident/million miles) is based on crash data for the years 2019 through 2024. Crash rates of existing road segments are
used to predict the average rates on new roads, or to compare rates on other roads of the same type. This rate is based on all crash types, not just speed-related
crashes. Bolded values indicate segments where the statewide crash rate exceeds the segment crash rate.
Source: Caltrans, 2024. Fehr & Peers, 2025.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 17
Speed Limit Adjustments
The recent changes in California law, previously mentioned in Regulatory Setting, provide new
flexibility to lower speed limits based on context-sensitive safety factors. The law permits additional
reductions of up to 5 mph where a segment qualifies as a “Safety Corridor” or is in an area with high
pedestrian or bicycle activity. High activity areas were defined as segments within 1,320 feet (one-
quarter mile) of schools, senior centers, or other significant pedestrian generators, such as pedestrian
facilities, bicycle facilities, or transit stops.
Figure 6 maps the distribution of bicycle and pedestrian generating land-uses across Saratoga.
Figure 7 shows sidewalk coverage within 1,320 feet of the study segments, indicating areas where
pedestrians are likely to walk and are considered a facility that generates concentrations of
pedestrians by CA MUTCD Guidelines 5. Similarly, Figure 8 shows where bicycle facilities are present,
highlighting corridors that already support or attract riders. Segments located near pedestrian or
bicycle facilities were treated as eligible for additional reductions to reflect the increased potential for
multimodal activity.
In Saratoga, most study segments qualified for these allowances. Twenty-two segments were within
1,320 feet of a pedestrian or bicycle generator, and three of these were also identified as Safety
Corridors in the City’s 2022 Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). Segments meeting these criteria were
considered eligible for a 5-mph reduction beyond updated 85th percentile rounding per AB 43.
Where applicable, reductions were recommended to improve safety for vulnerable users and address
documented crash patterns. For example, Saratoga Avenue between SR 85 Overcrossing and Cox
Avenue, designated as a Safety Corridor, experienced multiple speed-related collisions in recent
years, justifying a lower enforceable posting.
AB 43’s provisions also resolved all previously “invalid” speed limits in the study area. These were
segments where the posted speeds did not align with the previous findings of the 2020 Speed
Survey, making them unenforceable under the CVC §627. By applying the updated rounding
allowances and recognizing the presence of nearby bicycle and pedestrian generators, each of these
postings is now supported by this updated E&TS. Specifically, the following segments can all be
validated at their existing posted speeds:
• Chester Avenue (Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road),
• Glen Brae Drive (Scotland Drive to Cox Avenue),
• Herriman Avenue (Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga Avenue),
• Miller Avenue (Prospect Road to Cox Avenue),
• Quito Road (Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road)
• Quito Road (Bicknell Road to Pollard Road), and
• Scotland Drive (Saratoga Avenue to Cumberland Drive).
In addition, several corridors are recommended for reductions from their currently posted limits. For
each location, the 85th-percentile speed determines the rounded base limit under CVC §22358.6,
with an additional 5 mph reduction applied where AB 43 and CVC §22358.7 criteria are met due to
nearby bicycle and pedestrian generators or a designated Safety Corridor, as shown in Figure 6. The
5 California Department of Transportation. (2025). California manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets
and highways, 2014 edition, revision 9 (p. 136, Chapter 2B). https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-
media/programs/safety-programs/documents/ca-mutcd/rev9/2025-camutcd-2014-rev9-all.pdf
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 18
most common outcomes from this survey are 35-to-30-mph and 40-to-35-mph reductions,
reflecting corridors with steady multimodal activity and proximity to schools, parks, or community
destinations. This includes segments of Fruitvale Avenue, Prospect Road, Quito Road, and Saratoga
Avenue, where sidewalks, bike lanes, and transit stops create conditions warranting lower limits for
safety and consistency with adjacent jurisdictions. Sobey Road between Northerly Quito Road and
Sobey Meadows Court is recommended for a further reduction from 30 mph to 25 mph due to the
presence of Marshall Lane Elementary School which qualifies as a bicycle and pedestrian activity
generator.
In the case of the two segments on Pierce Road, ID 20 from Highway 9 to Mt. Eden Road and ID 21
from Mt. Eden Road to Surrey Lane, the segments are recommended for increases from 25 to 30
mph to support enforceability as their measured 85th-percentile speeds support a 30-mph limit and
no additional reductions apply. Pierce Road between Highway 9 and Mt. Eden Road has a current
posted speed limit of 25 mph. This limit was unable to be validated with this current E&TS. Therefore,
to ensure consistency with other recommendations along Pierce Road, it is recommended that the
speed limit increase from 25 mph to 30 mph. This outcome ensures that every segment is
enforceable while also advancing the City’s goals of promoting safer travel conditions near schools
and other pedestrian activity centers.
Overall, the application of AB 43 allows the City of Saratoga to retain or establish enforceable lower
speed limits across the roadway network. The recommendations reduce speeds on corridors with
high pedestrian and bicycle activity or a history of crashes, while ensuring nearly all posted speed
limits can now be legally enforced.
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Bike/Ped Generators near Study Segments
FIGURE 6
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits
1,320 ft Radius
Study Segments
Study Segments near a Generator
Senior Living Facilities
Child Day Care Centers
Retirement Communities
Afterschool Programs
Elementary and Secondary Schools
Junior Colleges
VTA Bus Stop
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Existing Pedestrian Facilities near Study Segments
FIGURE 7
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits
Sidewalks
Study Segments
Segment with Sidewalks
Segment without Sidewalks
ID 16ID 26
ID 36ID 44ID35
ID 32ID33ID 23
ID 30ID 31ID 34
ID 42 ID 37ID 8ID 27ID 18
ID 13 ID 15ID 2 2
ID 17ID 19ID 28ID 24 ID 25
ID21ID20ID 45Mount
E
d
e
n
R
d
Pollard Rd
B i g B a s in W y
McCoy Ave
Cox Ave
A l l e n d a le Ave
Prospect Rd
PierceRdSaratoga-SunnyvaleRdMiller AveSaratoga AveFruitvale AveQuito RdS
arato
g
a-L
os
G
atos
R
d Glen Brae DrS c o tland Dr
Saratoga AveFarwell Ave
Sobey RdChester A v e
Quito RdPr o s pe ct Rd
Fruitvale AveHerriman Ave
9
9
17
85
85
Existing Bicycle Facilities near Study Segments
FIGURE 8
0 1 2
Miles
City of Saratoga Limits Bicycle Facilities
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Study Segments
Segment with Bicycle Facilities
Segment without Bicycle Facilities
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 22
Final Speed Limits
Based on the 2025 E&TS results and the criteria described above, several changes to posted speed
limits are recommended. Table 3 summarizes the proposed speed limits for each of the roadway
segments included in the 2025 E&TS, including existing and recommended limits and the rationale
for each change. Segments that qualify for AB 43 reductions due to the presence of bicycle and
pedestrian generators/facilities or Safety Corridor status are recommended for lower speed limits to
improve safety and reflect existing travel conditions. Segments with invalid speed limits under the
2020 Speed Survey are either now validated with this current speed survey or recommended for a
5mph increase to be enforceable under state law. All other study segments were found to have
appropriate and legally valid limits under current conditions. For completeness, Table 3 also includes
the final speed limits that are carried over from the 2020 E&TS.
Overall, the 2025 recommended speed limits will produce a more consistent and context-sensitive
speed environment throughout the City. Most adjustments involve reductions of 5 mph along
corridors such as Fruitvale Avenue, Quito Road, Prospect Road, and Saratoga Avenue, which have
high levels of pedestrian or bicycle activity. These reductions can enhance safety, reduce crash
severity, and support the City’s Vision Zero and Complete Streets objectives. A small number of
speed limit increases are proposed only to ensure legal compliance and do not represent substantive
changes to operating conditions.
Adopting these recommendations will align all posted speed limits with the findings of the
Engineering & Traffic Survey, maintain enforceability, and promote safer travel speeds across
Saratoga. Once reviewed and approved by City staff, the updated speed limits should be adopted by
ordinance and implemented through revised signage.
The E&TS Sheets for the City of Saratoga’s 2025 Speed Survey update are included in Appendix B.
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 23
Table 3: Recommended Speed Limit Changes
ID# Roadway Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Rounded
85th
Percentile
Speed1
Justification
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)1
1 Allendale
Avenue
Fruitvale Avenue to
Portos Drive 35 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
2 Allendale
Avenue
Portos Drive to
Chester Avenue 35 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
3 Allendale
Avenue
Chester Avenue to
Quito Road 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
4 Arroyo De
Arguello
Comer Drive to Via
Roncole 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
5 Beaumont
Avenue
Herriman Avenue to
Glasgow Drive 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
6 Bohlman
Road
Southerly City Limit
to Sixth Street 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
7 Braemar
Drive
Howen Drive to
Scotland Drive 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
8 Chester
Avenue
Allendale Avenue to
Ten Acres Road 25* 30
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 30mph
which can then be rounded down to 25mph.
This speed limit is now valid.
25
9 Chester
Avenue
Ten Acres Road to
Sobey Road 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
10 Cox Avenue
Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road to the Union
Pacific Railroad
(UPRR) Crossing
35 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
11 Cox Avenue
Union Pacific
Railroad (UPRR)
Crossing to Saratoga
Avenue
35 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
12 Cox Avenue Saratoga Avenue to
Paseo Presada 25 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
13 Farwell
Avenue
Fruitvale Avenue to
Saratoga-Los Gatos
Road
25 30 The 85th percentile speed rounds to 30mph
which can then be rounded down to 25mph. 25
14 Fruitvale
Avenue
Saratoga-Los Gatos
Road to Burgundy
Way
35 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
15 Fruitvale
Avenue
Burgundy Way to
Allendale Avenue 35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
16 Fruitvale
Avenue
Allendale Avenue to
Saratoga Avenue 35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
17 Glen Brae
Drive
Scotland Drive to
Cox Avenue 25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
25
18 Herriman
Avenue
Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road to Saratoga
Avenue
25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
25
19 Miller
Avenue
Prospect Road to
Cox Avenue 25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
25
20 Pierce Road Highway 9 to Mt.
Eden Road 25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
No further reductions apply. Recommend
changing speed limit to 30mph.
30
21 Pierce Road Mt. Eden Road to
Surrey Lane 25 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
No further reductions apply. Recommend
changing speed limit to 30mph.
30
22 Pierce Road
Surrey Lane to
Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road
30 35 The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph. 30
23 Prospect
Road
Stelling Road to
Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road
35 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
This aligns with the City of Cupertino’s E&TS.
30
24 Prospect
Road
Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road to Miller
Avenue
40 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 45mph
which can then be rounded down to 40mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 35 mph. This aligns with the
City of San Jose’s E&TS.
35
25 Prospect
Road
Miller Avenue to
Lawrence
Expressway
40 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 45mph
which can then be rounded down to 40mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
35
Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Update | 24
ID# Roadway Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Rounded
85th
Percentile
Speed1
Justification
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)1
recommending 35 mph. This aligns with the
City of San Jose’s E&TS.
26 Prospect
Road
Lawrence
Expressway to
Easterly City Limit
35 35 The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph. 35
27 Quito Road Southerly City Limit
to Bicknell Road 30* 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
30
28 Quito Road Bicknell Road to
Pollard Road 25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
25
29 Quito Road Pollard Road to
Allendale Avenue 30 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
30 Quito Road Allendale Avenue to
Yorkton Way 35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
31 Quito Road Yorkton Way to Cox
Avenue 35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
32 Saratoga
Avenue
Big Basin Way to
Seagraves Way 35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
33 Saratoga
Avenue
Seagraves Way to
Westerly Shadow
Oaks Way
35 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
34 Saratoga
Avenue
Westerly Shadow
Oaks Way to
Fruitvale Avenue
35 40
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 40mph
which can then be rounded down to 35mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 30 mph.
30
35 Saratoga
Avenue
Fruitvale Avenue to
SR 85 Overcrossing 35 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 45mph
which can then be rounded down to 40mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 35 mph.
35
36 Saratoga
Avenue
SR 85 Overcrossing
to Cox Avenue 40 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 45mph
which can then be rounded down to 40mph.
This Safety Corridor allows a 5mph reduction
under AB 43, recommending 35 mph.
35
37 Saratoga
Avenue
Cox Ave to Lawrence
Expressway City
Limit
40 45
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 45mph
which can then be rounded down to 40mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 35 mph.
35
38
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road
Saratoga Avenue to
Verde Vista Lane 40 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
39
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road
Verde Vista Lane to
Blauer Drive 40 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
40
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road
Blauer Drive to Union
Pacific Railroad 40 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
41
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road
Union Pacific
Railroad to Prospect
Road
40 Based on 2020 Speed Survey3
42 Scotland
Drive
Saratoga Avenue to
Cumberland Drive 25* 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph. This speed limit is
now valid.
25
44 Sobey Road
Northerly Quito Road
to Sobey Meadows
Court
30 35
The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph.
Proximity to bike and pedestrian generators
allows a 5mph reduction under AB 43,
recommending 25 mph.
25
45 Sobey Road
Sobey Meadows
Court to Southerly
Quito Road
30 35 The 85th percentile speed rounds to 35mph
which can then be rounded down to 30mph. 30
Notes:
* – Invalid speed limits are unenforceable speed limits from the previous speed survey in 2020.
1 – Represents the highest 85th percentile speed for the segment after rounding to the nearest 5-mph increment before any rounding reductions.
2 – Green values are recommended speed limits that are lower than the existing posted speed limit. Orange values are recommended speed limits that are
higher than the existing posted speed limit.
3 – Refers to segments not studied in this 2025 update, and final speed limit is based on 2020 E&TS.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025
S
Appendix A: 2025 City of
Saratoga Speed Survey
Summary
Table A 1: City of Saratoga 2025 Speed Survey Summary
ID Roadway Segment
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Date
Collected
Road
Width
(ft.)
Segment
Length
(mi)
Number
of
Lanes
NB/EB
Average
Speed
(mph)
NB/EB
85th
Percentile
NB/EB
Difference
from
Posted
Speed
NB/EB
10 Mile
Pace
Speed
NB/EB
Percent
within
Pace
NB/EB
Daily
Volumes
(average)
NB/EB
Total
Vehicles
Observed
(speed)
SB/WB
Average
Speed
(mph)
SB/WB
85th
Percentile
SB/WB
Difference
from
Posted
Speed
SB/WB
10 Mile
Pace
Speed
SB/WB
Percent
within
Pace
SB/WB
Daily
Volumes
(average)
SB/WB
Total
Vehicles
Observed
(speed)
Bi-
Directional
Total
Volumes
8
Chester
Avenue
Allendale
Avenue to Ten
Acres Road 25
June 25-
June 26,
2025 25 0.55 2 24.9 29.9 4.9 20-29 73 434 434 24.0 28.2 3.2 19-28 70.1 424 424 858
13
Farwell
Avenue
Fruitvale
Avenue to
Saratoga-Los
Gatos Road 25
Monday,
June 23,
2025 26 0.63 2 24.1 30.2 5.2 18-27 78 246 246 24.2 29.6 4.6 17-26 76.2 247 247 493
15
Fruitvale
Avenue
Burgundy Way
to Allendale
Avenue 35
Monday,
June 23,
2025 80 0.79 4 36.9 40.0 5.0 32-41 84 3834 100 37.6 42.0 7.0 33-42 77.0 3387 100 7,221
16
Fruitvale
Avenue
Allendale
Avenue to
Saratoga
Avenue 35
Thursday,
June 26,
2025 80 0.31 4 34.0 39.0 4.0 30-39 81 6283 100 34.0 38.0 3.0 30-39 77.0 5479 100 11,762
17
Glen
Brae
Drive
Scotland Drive
to Cox
Avenue 25
June 25-
June 26,
2025 40 0.81 2 29.2 33.3 8.3 25-34 79 576 576 28.3 33.0 8.0 24-33 74.5 617.5 617.5 1,193.5
18
Herriman
Avenue
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road to
Saratoga
Avenue 25
Monday,
June 30,
2025 39 0.64 2 29.1 33.0 8.0 24-33 81 1179 100 32.0 36.0 11.0 27-36 77.0 1296 100 2,475
19
Miller
Avenue
Prospect
Road to Cox
Avenue 25
Tuesday,
July 1, 2025 39 0.90 2 28.8 33.0 8.0 24-33 77 876 100 29.0 32.0 7.0 24-33 85.0 855 100 1,731
20
Pierce
Road
Highway 9 to
Mt. Eden Road 25
June 25-
June 26,
2025 22 1.02 2 29.6 37.0 12.0 24-33 59 440 440 29.1 35.5 10.5 24-33 63.8 539 539 979
21
Pierce
Road
Mt. Eden Road
to Surrey Lane 25
Monday,
June 30,
2025 21 1.03 2 29.6 33.0 8.0 24-33 81 1399 100 29.0 35.0 10.0 24-33 72.0 1431 100 2,830
22
Pierce
Road
Surrey Lane to
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road 30
Monday,
June 30,
2025 27 0.79 2 30.1 34.0 4.0 25-34 81 1847 100 32.0 36.0 6.0 27-36 81.0 1901 100 3,748
23
Prospect
Road
Stelling Road
to Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road 35
Tuesday,
June 24,
2025 72 0.42 2 33.5 37.0 2.0 28-37 80 4101 100 32.0 37.0 2.0 29-38 88.0 3176 100 7,277
24
Prospect
Road
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale
Road to Miller
Avenue 40
Tuesday,
June 24,
2025 100 0.95 4 40.8 45.0 5.0 36-45 80 8189 100 40.0 45.0 5.0 34-43 76.0 7563 100 15,752
25
Prospect
Road
Miller Avenue
to Lawrence
Expressway 40
Tuesday,
July 1, 2025 86 0.96 4 38.3 43.0 3.0 35-44 74 9423 100 39.0 44.0 4.0 36-45 79.0 8280 100 17,703
26
Prospect
Road
Lawrence
Expressway to
Easterly City
Limit 35
Tuesday,
July 1, 2025 98 0.15 4 31.6 36.0 1.0 26-35 73 10253 100 30.0 36.0 1.0 27-36 77.0 5131 100 15,384
ID Roadway Segment
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Date
Collected
Road
Width
(ft.)
Segment
Length
(mi)
Number
of
Lanes
NB/EB
Average
Speed
(mph)
NB/EB
85th
Percentile
NB/EB
Difference
from
Posted
Speed
NB/EB
10 Mile
Pace
Speed
NB/EB
Percent
within
Pace
NB/EB
Daily
Volumes
(average)
NB/EB
Total
Vehicles
Observed
(speed)
SB/WB
Average
Speed
(mph)
SB/WB
85th
Percentile
SB/WB
Difference
from
Posted
Speed
SB/WB
10 Mile
Pace
Speed
SB/WB
Percent
within
Pace
SB/WB
Daily
Volumes
(average)
SB/WB
Total
Vehicles
Observed
(speed)
Bi-
Directional
Total
Volumes
27
Quito
Road
Southerly City
Limit to
Bicknell Road 30
Monday,
June 23,
2025 22 0.60 2 34.7 38.0 8.0 30-39 79 2737 100 33.0 37.0 7.0 29-38 80.0 2670 100 5,407
28
Quito
Road
Bicknell Road
to Pollard
Road 25
Monday,
June 23,
2025 22 0.90 2 33.3 37.0 12.0 29-38 83 2997 100 33.0 36.0 11.0 27-36 79.0 2886 100 5,883
30
Quito
Road
Allendale
Avenue to
Yorkton Way 35
Tuesday,
June 24,
2025 61 0.44 2 34.2 38.0 3.0 30-39 83 5351 100 35.0 38.0 3.0 30-39 85.0 5279 100 10,630
31
Quito
Road
Yorkton Way
to Cox
Avenue 35
Tuesday,
June 24,
2025 65 0.48 2 35.7 39.0 4.0 32-41 85 8131 100 37.0 41.0 6.0 33-42 82.0 8161 100 16,292
32
Saratoga
Avenue
Big Basin Way
to Seagraves
Way 35
Monday,
June 23,
2025 44 0.39 2 34.2 38.0 3.0 29-38 78 5310 100 36.0 39.0 4.0 32-41 84.0 4891 100 10,201
33
Saratoga
Avenue
Seagraves
Way to
Westerly
Shadow Oaks
Way 35
Monday,
June 23,
2025 65 0.21 2 38.9 43.0 8.0 33-42 78 5191 100 37.0 41.0 6.0 33-42 85.0 5586 100 10,777
34
Saratoga
Avenue
Westerly
Shadow Oaks
Way to
Fruitvale
Avenue 35
Tuesday,
June 24,
2025 37 0.70 2 36.7 40.0 5.0 31-40 81 6984 100 33.0 37.0 2.0 30-39 83.0 6734 100 13,718
35
Saratoga
Avenue
Fruitvale
Avenue to SR
85
Overcrossing 35
Tuesday,
July 1, 2025 87 0.37 4 39.8 45.0 10.0 36-45 67 13425 100 37.0 42.0 7.0 34-43 77.0 12360 100 25,785
36
Saratoga
Avenue
Vineyard Lane
to Cox
Avenue 40
Tuesday,
July 1, 2025 68 0.29 4 39.4 45.0 5.0 33-42 69 15674 100 36.0 40.0 0.0 30-39 71.0 15297 100 30,971
37
Saratoga
Avenue
Cox Ave to
Lawrence
Expressway
City Limit 40
Wednesday,
September
3, 2025 66 0.53 4 42.0 46.0 6.0 37-46 72 13493 100 41.0 47.0 7.0 36-45 71.0 12695 100 26,188
42
Scotland
Drive
Saratoga
Avenue to
Cumberland
Drive 25
June 25-
June 26,
2025 39 0.51 2 28.0 32.0 7.0 23-32 76 1682 1682 29.0 32.8 7.8 24-33 80.0 1347 1347 3,029
44
Sobey
Road
Northerly
Quito Road to
Sobey
Meadows
Court 30
June 25-
June 26,
2025 25 1.68 2 30.0 35.0 5.0 25-34 69 329 329 28.0 34.0 4.0 24-33 68.3 334 334 663
45
Sobey
Road
Sobey
Meadows
Court to
Southerly
Quito Road 30
June 25-
June 26,
2025 25 1.68 2 30.0 35.0 5.0 25-34 69 329 329 28.0 34.0 4.0 24-33 68.3 334 334 663
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
Table A 2: TIMS Analysis and Caltrans Crash Rate Analysis
ID Roadway Segment # of Crashes
(01/01/2020-12/31/2024)1
# of Speed Related Crashes
(01/01/2020-12/31/2024)1
City of Saratoga –
Roadway Segment Crash Rate2 Rate Group3 Base Rate by Place Type3
8 Chester Avenue Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road 0 0 0.00 4 1.68
13 Farwell Avenue Fruitvale Avenue to Saratoga-Los Gatos Road 1 1 1.75 7 1.68
15 Fruitvale Avenue Burgundy Way to Allendale Avenue 1 0 0.10 23 0.96
16 Fruitvale Avenue Allendale Avenue to Saratoga Avenue 1 0 0.15 23 0.96
17 Glen Brae Drive Scotland Drive to Cox Avenue 0 0 0.00 7 1.68
18 Herriman Avenue Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga Avenue 2 1 0.70 7 1.68
19 Miller Avenue Prospect Road to Cox Avenue 0 0 0.00 7 1.68
20 Pierce Road Highway 9 to Mt. Eden Road 3 2 1.65 3 1.46
21 Pierce Road Mt. Eden Road to Surrey Lane 7 2 1.32 3 1.34
22 Pierce Road Surrey Lane to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road 4 3 0.74 3 1.33
23 Prospect Road Stelling Road to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road 1 1 0.18 7 1.68
24 Prospect Road Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Miller Avenue 3 1 0.11 23 0.96
25 Prospect Road Miller Avenue to Lawrence Expressway 10 3 0.32 23 0.96
26 Prospect Road Lawrence Expressway to Easterly City Limit 2 0 0.48 23 0.96
27 Quito Road Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road 2 0 0.34 7 1.68
28 Quito Road Bicknell Road to Pollard Road 2 0 0.21 7 1.68
30 Quito Road Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way 5 1 0.59 7 1.68
31 Quito Road Yorkton Way to Cox Avenue 2 0 0.14 7 1.68
32 Saratoga Avenue Big Basin Way to Seagraves Way 3 2 0.42 7 1.68
33 Saratoga Avenue Seagraves Way to Westerly Shadow Oaks Way 6 2 1.47 7 1.68
34 Saratoga Avenue Westerly Shadow Oaks Way to Fruitvale Avenue 5 3 0.28 7 1.68
35 Saratoga Avenue Fruitvale Avenue to SR 85 Overcrossing 8 4 0.46 35 0.94
36 Saratoga Avenue Vineyard Lane to Cox Avenue 6 5 0.37 35 0.94
37 Saratoga Avenue Cox Ave to Lawrence Expressway City Limit 13 5 0.51 35 0.94
42 Scotland Drive Saratoga Avenue to Cumberland Drive 0 0 0.00 7 1.68
44 Sobey Road Northerly Quito Road to Sobey Meadows Court 0 0 0.00 7 1.68
45 Sobey Road Sobey Meadows Court to Southerly Quito Road 0 0 0.00 7 1.68
Notes: 1- Five-year span of Crash data within the City of Saratoga pulled from TIMs and SWITRS 2 – City of Saratoga’s crash rate was determined by multiplying the total number of crashes per million vehicle miles, averaged over the analysis period of 5 years.
3 – Rate Group and Base rate by Place Type sourced from Caltrans Basic Average Crash Rates (2024), which estimates the basic average crash rate of a roadway segment based on the surrounding environment, design speed, and roadway geometry.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
Table A 3: 85th Percentile Speed Analysis
ID Roadway Segment
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Valid
Speed
Limit?
NB/EB 85th
Percentile
SB/WB
85th
Percentile
Bi-Directional
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding
highest 85th to
nearest 5 mph
increment
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round
down
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
Bike/Ped
Reduction
valid?
Bike/Ped
Reduction
Safety
Corridor?
Final
Reduced
Speed
(mph)
Reduced
Speed within
Legal Limit?
(>12.4 mph)
Validation
after Speed
Survey
Recommended
Speed Limit
8 Chester
Avenue
Allendale Avenue
to Ten Acres Road 25 NO 29.9 28.2 29.9-28.2 30 25 25 0 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
13 Farwell
Avenue
Fruitvale Avenue
to Saratoga-Los
Gatos Road
25 YES 30.2 29.6 30.2-29.6 30 25 25 0 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
15 Fruitvale
Avenue
Burgundy Way to
Allendale Avenue 35 YES 40.0 42.0 40.0-42.0 40 40 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
16 Fruitvale
Avenue
Allendale Avenue
to Saratoga
Avenue
35 YES 39.0 38.0 39.0-38.0 40 35 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
17 Glen Brae
Drive
Scotland Drive to
Cox Avenue 25 NO 33.3 33.0 33.3-33.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
18 Herriman
Avenue
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road to
Saratoga Avenue
25 NO 33.0 36.0 33.0-36.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
19 Miller
Avenue
Prospect Road to
Cox Avenue 25 NO 33.0 32.0 33.0-32.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
20 Pierce
Road
Highway 9 to Mt.
Eden Road 25 NO 37.0 35.5 37.0-35.5 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 30
21 Pierce
Road
Mt. Eden Road to
Surrey Lane 25 YES 33.0 35.0 33.0-35.0 35 30 30 0 30 0 30 YES INVALID 30
22 Pierce
Road
Surrey Lane to
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road
30 YES 34.0 36.0 34.0-36.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 30
23 Prospect
Road
Stelling Road to
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road
35 YES 37.0 37.0 37.0-37.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 30
24 Prospect
Road
Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road to
Miller Avenue
40 YES 45.0 45.0 45.0-45.0 45 40 40 1 35 0 35 YES VALID 35
25 Prospect
Road
Miller Avenue to
Lawrence
Expressway
40 YES 43.0 44.0 43.0-44.0 45 40 40 1 35 1 35 YES VALID 35
26 Prospect
Road
Lawrence
Expressway to
Easterly City Limit
35 YES 36.0 36.0 36.0-36.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 35
27 Quito
Road
Southerly City
Limit to Bicknell
Road
30 NO 38.0 37.0 38.0-37.0 40 35 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
28 Quito
Road
Bicknell Road to
Pollard Road 25 NO 37.0 36.0 37.0-36.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
30 Quito
Road
Allendale Avenue
to Yorkton Way 35 YES 38.0 38.0 38.0-38.0 40 35 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
31 Quito
Road
Yorkton Way to
Cox Avenue 35 YES 39.0 41.0 39.0-41.0 40 35 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
32 Saratoga
Avenue
Big Basin Way to
Seagraves Way 35 YES 38.0 39.0 38.0-39.0 40 35 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
ID Roadway Segment
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Valid
Speed
Limit?
NB/EB 85th
Percentile
SB/WB
85th
Percentile
Bi-Directional
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding
highest 85th to
nearest 5 mph
increment
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round
down
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
Bike/Ped
Reduction
valid?
Bike/Ped
Reduction
Safety
Corridor?
Final
Reduced
Speed
(mph)
Reduced
Speed within
Legal Limit?
(>12.4 mph)
Validation
after Speed
Survey
Recommended
Speed Limit
33 Saratoga
Avenue
Seagraves Way to
Westerly Shadow
Oaks Way
35 YES 43.0 41.0 43.0-41.0 45 40 40 1 35 0 35 YES VALID 30
34 Saratoga
Avenue
Westerly Shadow
Oaks Way to
Fruitvale Avenue
35 YES 40.0 37.0 40.0-37.0 40 40 35 1 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
35 Saratoga
Avenue
Fruitvale Avenue
to SR 85
Overcrossing
35 YES 45.0 42.0 45.0-42.0 45 40 40 1 35 1 35 YES VALID 35
36 Saratoga
Avenue
Vineyard Lane to
Cox Avenue 40 YES 45.0 40.0 45.0-40.0 45 40 40 1 35 1 35 YES VALID 35
37 Saratoga
Avenue
Cox Ave to
Lawrence
Expressway City
Limit
40 YES 46.0 47.0 46.0-47.0 45 45 40 1 35 0 35 YES VALID 35
42 Scotland
Drive
Saratoga Avenue
to Glen Brae Drive 25 NO 32.0 32.8 32.0-32.8 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
44 Sobey
Road
Northerly Quito
Road to Southerly
Quito Road
30 YES 35.0 34.0 35.0-34.0 35 30 30 1 25 0 25 YES VALID 25
45 Sobey
Road
Sobey Meadows
Court to Southerly
Quito Road
30 YES 35.0 34.0 35.0-34.0 35 30 30 0 30 0 30 YES VALID 30
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
S
Appendix B: 2025 City of
Saratoga Speed Survey
E&TS Sheets
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 8 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
25 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 434 424
0.55 miles¹ 434 424
Northbound Southbound
24.9 mph 24 mph
29.9 mph 28.2 mph
20-29 mph 19-28 mph
73.48% 70.08%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping.
-No sidewalks
-No bike facilities present
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 4.9 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 3.2 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 30 mph that may be
rounded down by 5 mph to 25 mph per CVC §22358.6. Chester Avenue is a narrow, 25-foot-wide residential street with no separate sidewalks or paths for
pedestrians or bicyclists. No crashes, speed-related or otherwise, have been reported along this segment of Chester Avenue during the five-year analysis
period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to
establish the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City maintain the existing 25 mph
speed limit.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Chester Avenue from Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road.
Chester Avenue
Number of Lanes
Allendale Avenue to Ten Acres Road
June 25-June 26, 2025
Data Summary 8.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 13 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
26 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound/Eastbound Southbound/Westbound
25 mph 246 247
0.63 miles¹ 246 247
Northbound/Eastbound Southbound/Westbound
24.1 mph 24.2 mph
30.2 mph 29.6 mph
18-27 mph 17-26 mph
77.7% 76.1%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 1 1.76 1.68
Speed Related 1 1.76 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Approx. Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping.
-No sidewalks
-No bike facilities present
In the northbound/eastbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5.2 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the southbound/westbound
direction, it was 4.6 mph above. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 30 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 25 mph per CVC
§22358.6. Farwell Avenue is a narrow, 0.6-mile-long local road that bends at ninety degrees at its midpoint. The segment lacks sidewalks and bicycle lanes, requiring
pedestrians and cyclists to share the roadway with vehicles. One speed-related collision was reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to establish the
speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City maintain the existing 25 mph speed limit.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be supported by a
valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an E&TS as a survey of
highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds, accident records, and
roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the nearest 5
mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th
percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding
up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding, the local authority may apply an
additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility generating high concentrations of
bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Farwell Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue to Saratoga-Los Gatos Road.
Farwell Avenue
Number of Lanes
Fruitvale Avenue to Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
June 23, 2025
Data Summary 13.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 15 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
80 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.79 miles¹ 3,834 3,387
Northbound Southbound
36.9 mph 37.6 mph
40 mph 42 mph
32-41 mph 33-42 mph
84% 77%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 1 0.10 0.96
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential neighborhood
-Large, raised median
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic during school
hours
-Sidewalk on one side
-Class III bicycle designation
-Redwood Middle School on the west side of Fruitvale
Avenue
-West Valley College, Saratoga Retirement Community
on the east side of Fruitvale Avenue
-VTA bus stops to the north
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted 35 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 7 mph
above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 40 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6.
Additionally, Redwood Middle School and West Valley College are located along this segment of Fruitvale Avenue and generate significant pedestrian and
bicycle activity throughout the day. One collision was reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period, though not speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as
Redwood Middle School, West Valley College, and Saratoga Retirement Community. The segment also has sidewalk on one side. This justifies an additional
5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians" definition. We recommend reducing the
speed limit to 30 mph.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is 25 mph when approaching or passing a school building or the grounds
while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Fruitvale Avenue from Burgundy Way to Allendale Avenue.
Fruitvale Avenue
Number of Lanes
Burgundy Way to Allendale Avenue
June 23, 2025
Data Summary 15.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 16 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
80 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.31 miles¹ 6,283 5,479
Northbound Southbound
34 mph 34 mph
39 mph 38 mph
30-39 mph 30-39 mph
81% 77%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 1 0.15 0.96
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
June 26, 2025
Segment Length
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Fruitvale Avenue from Allendale Avenue to Saratoga Avenue.
Fruitvale Avenue
Number of Lanes
Allendale Avenue to Saratoga Avenue
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class III bicycle designation
-Several schools, transit stops, and the public library
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic during school
hours
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
-Residential neighborhood
-Large, raised median
Percent in Pace
Safety Corridor?
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted 35 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 3 mph
above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 40 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6.
Additionally, Redwood Middle School, Public Library, Saint Andrews School and several VTA bus stops are located along this segment of Fruitvale Avenue
and generate pedestrian and bicycle activity throughout the day. One collision was reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period, though
not speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as
Redwood Middle School, Public Library, Saint Andrews School, and transit stops. The segment also has sidewalk on both sides. This justifies an additional 5
mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians" definition. We recommend reducing the
speed limit to 30 mph.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building
or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
Data Summary 16.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 17 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
40 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 576 618
0.81 miles¹ 576 618
Northbound Southbound
29.2 mph 28.3 mph
33.3 mph 33 mph
25-34 mph 24-33 mph
78.65% 74.49%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
June 25-June 26, 2025
Segment Length
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Glen Brae Drive from Scotland Drive to Cox Avenue.
Glen Brae Drive
Number of Lanes
Scotland Drive to Cox Avenue
-Sidewalks present on both sides
-No bike facilities present
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Railroad and trail crossing 85th Percentile
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8.3 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 8
mph above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6.
Additionally, the segment has sidewalks on both sides intermittently, but lacks bike facilities, requiring cyclists to share the roadway with vehicles. No crashes,
speed-related or otherwise, have been reported along this segment of Glen Brae Drive during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the presence of pedestrian facilities
along this segment justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians"
definition. It is recommended that the City maintain the existing 25 mph speed limit.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
No Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
NumberCrash History:
Data Summary 17.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 18 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
39 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
25 mph 100 100
0.64 miles¹ 1,179 1,296
Eastbound Westbound
29.1 mph 32 mph
33 mph 36 mph
24-33 mph 27-36 mph
81% 77%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 2 0.69 1.68
Speed Related 1 0.35 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic during school
hours
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Sidewalk on the south side and portion of sidewalk on
the northside
-Class II bike lanes present
-Saratoga High School on the south side of Herriman
Avenue
-Several VTA bus stops
In the eastbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the westbound direction, it was 11 mph
above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Two
crashes were reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period, one of which was speed-related. The segment has sidewalks on both sides as
well as a Class II bike facility. It is also within the 1,320 ft radius of Saratoga High School in south, making the segment eligible for a bike/ped reduction.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as
Saratoga High School and sidewalks and Class II bicycle facilities. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that
generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians" definition. We recommend maintaining the speed limit at 25 mph.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building
or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Herriman Avenue from Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga Avenue.
Herriman Avenue
Number of Lanes
Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Saratoga
Avenue
June 30, 2025
Data Summary 18.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 19 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
39 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 100 100
0.9 miles¹ 876 855
Northbound Southbound
28.8 mph 29 mph
33 mph 32 mph
24-33 mph 24-33 mph
77% 85%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Some portions with sidewalks
-No bicycle facilities
-Christa McAuliffe Elementary to the east
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 7 mph
above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. No
crashes, speed-related or otherwise, have been reported along this segment of Miller Avenue during the five-year analysis period. Some portions of the
segment have sidewalks, however it lacks bike facilities, requiring cyclists and at times pedestrians to share the road with vehicles. It is also within the 1,320 ft
radius of Christa McAuliffe Elementary School to the east.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as
Christa McAuliffe Elementary School and sidewalk facilities. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that generates high
concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians" definition. We recommend maintaining the speed limit at 25 mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Miller Avenue from Prospect Road to Cox Avenue.
Miller Avenue
Number of Lanes
Prospect Road to Cox Avenue
July 1, 2025
Data Summary 19.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 20 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
22 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 440 539
1.02 miles¹ 440 539
Northbound Southbound
29.6 mph 29.1 mph
37 mph 35.5 mph
24-33 mph 24-33 mph
59% 63.8%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 3 1.65 1.46
Speed Related 2 1.10 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Rural, mountainous road with some residential
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Pedestrian and bicycles share road with vehicles
-Many sharp and narrow turns
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping, poor
sightlines
N/A
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 12 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 10.5
mph above. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. This
segment does not include pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities and three collisions were reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period,
two of which were speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to
establish the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City increase the existing 25 mph
speed limit to 30 mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Pierce Road from Highway 9 to Mt. Eden Road.
Pierce Road
Number of Lanes
Highway 9 to Mt. Eden Road
June 25-June 26, 2025
Data Summary 20.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 21 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
21 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 100 100
1.03 miles¹ 1,399 1,431
Northbound Southbound
29.6 mph 29 mph
33 mph 35 mph
24-33 mph 24-33 mph
81% 72%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 7 1.32 1.34
Speed Related 2 0.38 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
June 30, 2025
Segment Length
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be supported
by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an E&TS as a
survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds, accident records,
and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the nearest
5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the
85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require
rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding, the local authority
may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility generating high
concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Pierce Road from Mt. Eden Road to Surrey Lane.
Pierce Road
Number of Lanes
Mt. Eden Road to Surrey Lane
N/A
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Pedestrian and bicycles share road with vehicles
-Many sharp and narrow turns
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping, poor
sightlines
85th Percentile
-Rural, mountainous road with some residential
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8 mph above the posted 25 mph limit, while in the southbound direction, it was 10 mph
above. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Pierce Road is a
narrow, 1.03-mile-long local mountainous road with many windy turns. The segment lacks sidewalks and bicycle lanes, requiring pedestrians and cyclists to share
the roadway with vehicles. Seven crashes were reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period, two of which were speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to establish
the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City increase the existing 25 mph speed limit to 30
mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
No Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
NumberCrash History:
Data Summary 21.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 22 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
27 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
30 mph 100 100
0.79 miles¹ 1,847 1,901
Eastbound Westbound
30.1 mph 32 mph
34 mph 36 mph
25-34 mph 27-36 mph
81% 81%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 4 0.74 1.33
Speed Related 3 0.56 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Segment Length
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
-Residential Neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Percent in Pace
10 mph Pace
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Current Speed Data:
Number
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Safety Corridor?
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Speed humps are present
-No sidewalks
-Class III bike facility
-Within 1,320 ft of VTA bus stops
In the eastbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted 30 mph limit, while in the westbound direction, it was 6 mph
above. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. This segment
has a Class III bike facility and is within 1,320 ft of VTA bus stops which generate significant pedestrian and bicycle activity throughout the day. Pierce Road is
a narrow, 0.79-mile-long local foothill road. Four collisions were reported along this segment during the five-year analysis period, three of which were speed-
related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to
establish the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City maintain the existing 30 mph
speed limit.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
No
Crash History:
50th Percentile
Description of Surrounding Area:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Summary and Justification:
85th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Pierce Road from Surrey Lane to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road.
Pierce Road
Number of Lanes
Surrey Lane to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
June 30, 2025
Data Summary 22.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 23 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
72 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
35 mph 100 100
0.42 miles¹ 4,101 3,176
Eastbound Westbound
33.5 mph 32 mph
37 mph 37 mph
28-37 mph 29-38 mph
80% 88%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 1 0.18 1.68
Speed Related 1 0.18 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the eastbound and westbound directions, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 2 mph above the posted 35 mph limit. These speeds rounded to the
nearest 5 mph increment would result in 35 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Prospect Road has one travel lane in each
direction with a two-way left-turn lane to facilitate turns into and out of residential driveways. One collision was reported along this segment during the five-year
analysis period, which was classified as speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to
establish the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City reduce the speed limit to 30
mph, consistent with the City of Cupertino's E&TS.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
30 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway with two-way left-turn lane
-Two preschools are present along this roadway segment
-The roadway is split between the cities of Saratoga and Cupertino
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class II buffered bike lanes present
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Prospect Road from Stelling Road to Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road.
Prospect Road
Number of Lanes
Stelling Road to Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Road
June 24, 2025
Data Summary 23.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 24 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
100 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
40 mph 100 100
0.95 miles¹ 8,189 7,563
Eastbound Westbound
40.8 mph 40 mph
45 mph 45 mph
36-45 mph 34-43 mph
80% 76%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 3 0.11 0.96
Speed Related 1 0.04 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Prospect Road from Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Miller Avenue.
Prospect Road
Number of Lanes
Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Miller
Avenue
June 24, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class II buffered bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops provided
-Congregation Beth David, Church of the Ascension,
Saratoga Prospect Center, and retail establishments are all
present
35 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the eastbound and westbound directions, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted 40 mph limit. These speeds rounded to the
nearest 5 mph increment would result in 45 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 40 mph per CVC §22358.6. However, there are many community uses
along Prospect Road that generate significant pedestrian and bicycle activity throughout the day. Three collisions were reported along this segment during the
five-year analysis period, one of which was classified as speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as
Congregation Beth David, Church of the Ascension, Saratoga Prospect Center (event center), and Park Saratoga shopping center, in addition to sidewalks and
bicycle facilities along Prospect Road. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 "land or facility that generates high concentrations of
bicyclists or pedestrians" definition. We recommend reducing the speed limit to 35 mph, consistent with the City of San Jose's E&TS.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Single-family residential fronts the north side of the roadway (City of San Jose)
-South side of the roadway has sporadic driveways for community facilities
-The divided roadway is split between the cities of Saratoga and San Jose
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 24.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 25 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
86 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
40 mph 100 100
0.96 miles¹ 9,423 8,280
Eastbound Westbound
38.3 mph 39 mph
43 mph 44 mph
35-44 mph 36-45 mph
74% 79%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 10 0.32 0.96
Speed Related 3 0.10 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Yes, Prospect Road from Lawerence Expressway to
Lyle Drive was identified as Safety Corridor in the City of
Saratoga's Local Road Safety Plan (2022)
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the eastbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 3 mph above the posted 40 mph limit, while in the westbound direction, it was 4 mph
above. These speeds rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment would result in 45 mph that may be rounded down by 5 mph to 40 mph per CVC §22358.6.
However, Christa McAuliffe Elementary School, Prospect High School, Villa Fontana Retirement Community and Westgate Villa Assisted Living are located
within 1,320 ft of this segment and generate significant pedestrian and bicycle activity throughout the day. Ten collisions were reported along this segment
during the five-year analysis period, three of which were classified as speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, CVC §22358.7(a)(1), AB 43, and CA MUTCD guidance, the
City has the authority to apply a 5 mph reduction from the 85th-percentile speed where a roadway segment is designated as a Safety Corridor. Given the
Safety Corridor designation, crash history, and proximity to multiple community land uses, it is recommended that the City lower the posted speed limit to 35
mph, consistent with the City of San José’s Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS).
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
35 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Single-family residential fronts the north side of the roadway (City of San Jose)
-South side of the roadway has sporadic driveways for community facilities
-The divided roadway is split between the cities of Saratoga and San Jose
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-Sidewalk on both sides and several VTA bus stops
-Class II buffered bike lanes present
-Christa McAuliffe Elementary School and Prospect High
School on the south side of Prospect Road
-Villa Fontana Retirement Community and Westgate Villa
Assisted Living on the north side
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Prospect Road from Miller Avenue to Lawrence Expressway.
Prospect Road
Number of Lanes
Miller Avenue to Lawrence Expressway
July 1, 2025
Data Summary 25.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 26 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
98 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
35 mph 100 100
0.15 miles¹ 10,253 5,131
Eastbound Westbound
31.6 mph 30 mph
36 mph 36 mph
26-35 mph 27-36 mph
73% 77%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 2 0.47 0.96
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be supported
by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an E&TS as a
survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds, accident records,
and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the nearest
5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the
85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would
require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding, the local
authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility generating
high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Prospect Road from Lawrence Expressway to Easterly City Limit.
Prospect Road
Number of Lanes
Lawrence Expressway to Easterly City
Limit
July 1, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-None
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building or
the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-Sidewalks on both sides
-Class II buffered bike lanes present
-Villa Fontana Retirement Community, Westgate Villa
Assisted Living, and Prospect High School
-VTA bus stops
35 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the eastbound and westbound directions, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 1 mph above the posted 35 mph limit. These speeds rounded to the
nearest 5 mph increment would result in 35 mph, the current posted speed limit. This is a short roadway segment and to maintain consistency along the Prospect
Road/Campbell Road corridor, we recommend maintaining the posted speed of 35 mph.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Commercial area with a mix of uses
-The divided roadway is split between the cities of Saratoga and San Jose
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 26.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 27 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
22 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
30 mph 100 100
0.6 miles¹ 2,737 2,670
Northbound Southbound
34.7 mph 33 mph
38 mph 37 mph
30-39 mph 29-38 mph
79% 80%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 2 0.34 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 7 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 40 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. This segment of Quito Road includes designated Class III bicycle facility along its length, supporting active
transportation and multimodal travel. Two crashes were reported along this segment of Quito Road during the five-year analysis period, none of which were
classified as speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320 feet of Class III bicycle facilities. This justifies an additional
5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. It is recommended that the City
maintain the existing 30 mph speed limit.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
30 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-No sidewalks
-Class III bike facilities present
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding,
the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility
generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Quito Road from Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road.
Quito Road
Number of Lanes
Southerly City Limit to Bicknell Road
June 23, 2025
Data Summary 27.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 28 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
22 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
25 mph 100 100
0.9 miles¹ 2,997 2,886
Northbound Southbound
33.3 mph 33 mph
37 mph 36 mph
29-38 mph 27-36 mph
83% 79%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 2 0.21 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding,
the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility
generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Quito Road from Bicknell Road to Pollard Road.
Quito Road
Number of Lanes
Bicknell Road to Pollard Road
June 23, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Heavy bicycle and pedestrian corridor during school
hours
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building or
the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-Marshall Lane Elementary School is located west of
Quito Road near Pollard Road
-Class III bike facilities along this segment
-Sidewalk on some portion of the segment
25 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 12 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 11 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Marshall Lane Elementary School is located within approximately 1,320 feet west of this segment near Pollard
Road, contributing to bicycle and pedestrian activity in the area. This segment also includes designated Class III bicycle facilities that support active
transportation use. Quito Road at this segment is narrow and windy resulting in the posted 25 mph speed limit. Two crashes were reported along this segment of
Quito Road during the five-year analysis period, none of which were speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within 1,320
feet of Marshall Lane Elementary School and includes established Class III bicycle facilities supporting bicycle activity. This justifies an additional 5 mph
reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. It is recommended that the City maintain
the posted 25 mph speed limit along this segment of Quito Road.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Residential neighborhood
-Windy roadway
-Undivided Roadway
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 28.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 30 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
61 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.44 miles¹ 5,351 5,279
Northbound Southbound
34.2 mph 35 mph
38 mph 38 mph
30-39 mph 30-39 mph
83% 85%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 5 0.59 1.68
Speed Related 1 0.12 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Quito Road from Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way.
Quito Road
Number of Lanes
Allendale Avenue to Yorkton Way
June 24, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Bridge overcrossing where the road narrows
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-Sidewalk on both sides north of SR 85
-No continuous sidewalks south of SR 85
-Class II bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops
-Westmont High School and Southwest YMCA
30 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
The 85th percentile speeds were measured at 3 mph above the posted speed limit in both directions. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a
limit of 40 mph that may be reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. This corridor includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities as well as VTA bus stops
that support regular multimodal travel and access. Five crashes were reported along this segment of roadway during the five-year analysis period, one of
which was speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment includes bicycle and pedestrian generators, such as Westmont High
School and the popular Southwest YMCA, and nearby transit facilities that support multimodal activity. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC
§22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. Therefore, it is recommended that the City lower the posted
speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
-Crosses railroad tracks
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 30.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 31 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
65 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.48 miles¹ 8,131 8,161
Northbound Southbound
35.7 mph 37 mph
39 mph 41 mph
32-41 mph 33-42 mph
85% 82%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 2 0.14 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 6 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 40 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. This segment of Quito Road includes bike lanes, sidewalks, and VTA bus stops that support significant
multimodal activity. Two crashes were reported along this segment of Quito Road during the five-year analysis period, none of which were speed-related.
In accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment includes bicycle and pedestrian generators and nearby transit activity
that support multimodal travel. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists
or pedestrians” definition. Therefore, it is recommended that the City lower the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
30 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided roadway
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class II bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Quito Road from Yorkton Way to Cox Avenue.
Quito Road
Number of Lanes
Yorkton Way to Cox Avenue
June 24, 2025
Data Summary 31.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 32 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
44 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.39 miles¹ 5,310 4,891
Northbound Southbound
34.2 mph 36 mph
38 mph 39 mph
29-38 mph 32-41 mph
78% 84%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 3 0.41 1.68
Speed Related 2 0.28 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 3 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 40 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. The corridor also includes designated Class II bicycle lanes and VTA bus stops that support regular
multimodal activity. Three crashes were reported along this segment of Saratoga Avenue during the five-year analysis period, two of which were speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD guidance, this segment has Class II
bicycle lanes and bus stops that support multimodal uses. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high
concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. Therefore, it is recommended that the City lower the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
30 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Commercial area on the southern end of the roadway
-Residential on the northern end of the roadway
-A preschool is present along this segment
-Undivided roadway
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-No continuous sidewalk on both sides
-Class II buffered bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from Big Basin Way to Seagraves Way.
Saratoga Avenue
Number of Lanes
Big Basin Way to Seagraves Way
June 23, 2025
Data Summary 32.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 33 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
65 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.21 miles¹ 5,191 5,586
Northbound Southbound
38.9 mph 37 mph
43 mph 41 mph
33-42 mph 33-42 mph
78% 85%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 6 1.45 1.68
Speed Related 2 0.48 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Summary and Justification:
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 8 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 6 mph above the posted speed limit. The average 85th percentile speed of both directions if 7 mph over the posted speed
limit (42 mph). Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 40 mph that may be reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. Saratoga
Avenue provides direct access to downtown Saratoga and includes sidewalks, Class II bike lanes, and VTA bus stops that support frequent pedestrian, bicycle,
and transit activity. Residents on the west side of the street must also cross mid-block to access the east-side path connecting to City facilities such as the
Library and Community Center. Six crashes were reported along this segment of Saratoga Avenue during the five-year analysis period, two of which were
speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within
1,320 feet of multiple bicycle and pedestrian generators, including Redwood Middle School and Class II bicycle facilities. This justifies an additional 5 mph
reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. Therefore, it is recommended that the
City lower the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
No Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
-Sidewalk on the south side
-Class II bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops along this segment
-Residential on the south side of Saratoga Avenue
-Preschool is present along this roadway
-Undivided Roadway
Safety Corridor?Crash History:Number Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Posted Speed Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Current Speed Data:
-The roadway widens for this segment only.
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
50th Percentile
85th Percentile
10 mph Pace
Percent in Pace
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from Seagraves Way to Westerly Shadow Oaks Way.
Saratoga Avenue Seagraves Way to Westerly Shadow Oaks
Way
Number of Lanes June 23, 2025
Data Summary 33.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 34 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
37 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.7 miles¹ 6,984 6,734
Northbound Southbound
36.7 mph 33 mph
40 mph 37 mph
31-40 mph 30-39 mph
81% 83%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 5 0.29 1.68
Speed Related 3 0.17 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding,
the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility
generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from Westerly Shadow Oaks Way to Fruitvale Avenue.
Saratoga Avenue
Number of Lanes
Westerly Shadow Oaks Way to Fruitvale
Avenue
June 24, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building
or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-No continuous sidewalks
-Class II bike lanes present
-Saint Andrew's Episcopal School and Sacred Heart
School
-Saratoga Library, Sacred Heart Catholic Church, and St.
Jude Syro Malankara Catholic Mission
30 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 2 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 40 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph per CVC §22358.6. This segment of Saratoga Avenue includes a several schools and community uses, sidewalk along the south
side, Class II bike lanes, and VTA bus stops that generate regular multimodal activity. Five crashes were reported along this segment of Saratoga Avenue
during the five-year analysis period, three of which were speed-related.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within
1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators, including, but not limited to, Saint Andrew’s Episcopal School. This justifies an additional 5 mph
reduction per CVC §22358.7 “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition. Therefore, it is recommended that the
City lower the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided Roadway
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 34.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 35 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
87 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
35 mph 100 100
0.37 miles¹ 13,425 12,360
Northbound Southbound
39.8 mph 37 mph
45 mph 42 mph
36-45 mph 34-43 mph
67% 77%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 8 0.46 0.94
Speed Related 4 0.23 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Yes, Saratoga Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue to Dagmar
Drive was identified as Safety Corridor in the City of
Saratoga's Local Road Safety Plan (2022)
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 10 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 7 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 45 mph that may be reduced
by 5 mph to 40 mph per CVC §22358.6. Saratoga Avenue is divided into segments north and south of the State Route 85 interchange. This segment is designated
as a Safety Corridor in the City of Saratoga’s Local Road Safety Plan (2022) and four speed-related crashes were reported along this segment during the five-
year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD guidance, the City has the authority to
apply a 5 mph reduction from the 85th-percentile speed where a segment is designated as a Safety Corridor under CVC §22358.7(a)(1). Given the Safety
Corridor designation, existing roadway conditions, crash history, and the City’s intent to maintain a uniform speed environment south of the SR 85 interchange, it
is recommended that the City maintain the current 35 mph speed limit along this segment of Saratoga Avenue.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building or
the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
35 mph
Safety Corridor?
-The SR 85 interchange is located to immediately to the east of this roadway segment.
-There are scattered residential driveways along Saratoga Avenue.
-Average daily traffic volumes (ADT) on this segment are some of the highest of the studied
segments, exceeding 25,000 vehicles per day (vpd)
-Divided Roadway
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-Sidewalk present on both sides of the street
-Class II bike lanes
-VTA bus stops
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping or not
anticipated due to the nature of the roadway
-One southbound lane continues on Saratoga Avenue and
one southbound lane turns onto Fruitvale Avenue
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be supported
by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an E&TS as a
survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds, accident records,
and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the nearest
5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the
85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require
rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After rounding, the local authority may
apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a land/facility generating high
concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from Fruitvale Avenue to SR 85 Overcrossing.
Saratoga Avenue
Number of Lanes
Fruitvale Avenue to SR 85 Overcrossing
July 1, 2025
Data Summary 35.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 36 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
68 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
40 mph 100 100
0.29 miles¹ 15,674 15,297
Northbound Southbound
39.4 mph 36 mph
45 mph 40 mph
33-42 mph 30-39 mph
69% 71%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 6 0.37 0.94
Speed Related 5 0.31 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from SR 85 Overcrossing to Cox Avenue.
Saratoga Avenue
Number of Lanes
SR 85 Overcrossing to Cox Avenue
July 1, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
N/A
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class II bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops along this segment
-Challenger School and Saratoga French Cultural
preschool are to the east of this segment
35 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed matched the posted limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 45 mph that may be reduced by 5 mph to 40 mph per
CVC §22358.6. This segment of Saratoga Avenue is designated as a safety corridor and has experienced five speed-related crashes during the five-year
analysis period. The corridor includes pedestrian facilities, multiple driveway access points, and significant traffic volumes that warrant additional caution.
Commercial facilities are located on the eastern end of this segment near Cox Avenue, and access to surrounding neighborhoods is provided via two
signalized intersections. Nearby bicycle and pedestrian generators such as Challenger School and the Saratoga French Cultural Preschool also contribute to
increased multimodal activity along this segment.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD guidance, the City has the authority
to apply a 5 mph reduction from the 85th-percentile speed where a segment is designated as a "Safety Corridor" under CVC §22358.7(a)(1). Given the Safety
Corridor designation, it is recommended that the City lower the posted speed limit from 40 mph to 35 mph.
Percent in Pace
Yes, Saratoga Avenue from Vineyard Lane to Cox
Avenue was identified as Safety Corridor in the City of
Saratoga's Local Road Safety Plan (2022)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Commercial facilities are located on the eastern end of this roadway segment closest to Cox
Avenue.
-Access to the surrounding neighborhoods is provided via two signalized intersections.
-Average daily traffic volumes (ADT) on this segment are some of the highest of the studied
segments, exceeding 30,000 vehicles per day (vpd)
-Divided Roadway
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 36.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 37 Segment Limits:
4 Date:
66 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
40 mph 100 100
0.54 miles¹ 13,493 12,695
Northbound Southbound
42 mph 41 mph
46 mph 47 mph
37-46 mph 36-45 mph
72% 71%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 13 0.50 0.94
Speed Related 5 0.19 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
No
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 6 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at approximately 7 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 45 mph
that may be reduced by 5 mph to 40 mph per CVC §22358.6. Saratoga Avenue includes sidewalks on both sides, Class II bike lanes, and VTA bus stops that
generate consistent multimodal activity. Nearby schools and community uses, including Challenger School, Action Day Schools, and the Saratoga French
Cultural Preschool to the east. Five speed-related crashes were reported along this segment of Saratoga Avenue during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within
1,320 feet of several bicycle and pedestrian generators such as Challenger School, Action Day Schools, and the Saratoga French Cultural Preschool. This
justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7, which defines qualifying areas as “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or
pedestrians.” Therefore, it is recommended that the City lower the posted speed limit from 40 mph to 35 mph to enhance safety and maintain a consistent
speed profile along the corridor.
Notes: 1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Summary and Justification:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Crash History:
10 mph Pace
85th Percentile
35 mph
Safety Corridor?
-Residential neighborhood
-Average daily traffic volumes (ADT) on this segment are some of the highest of the studied
segments, exceeding 26,000 vehicles per day (vpd)
-Divided Roadway
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
-Sidewalk on both sides
-Class II bike lanes present
-VTA bus stops along this segment
-Challenger School, Action Day Schools, and Saratoga
French Cultural preschool are to the east of this
segment
Number
Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Percent in Pace
Total Vehicles Observed during speed surveyPosted Speed
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping.
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Saratoga Avenue from Cox Avenue to Lawrence Expressway City Limit.
Saratoga Avenue
Number of Lanes
Cox Avenue to Lawrence Expressway City
Limit
September 3, 2025
Data Summary 37.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 42 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
39 feet Traffic Volumes:Eastbound Westbound
25 mph 1,682 1,347
0.51 miles¹ 1,682 1,347
Eastbound Westbound
28 mph 29 mph
32 mph 32.8 mph
23-32 mph 24-33 mph
76% 80%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Roadway Width
Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
10 mph Pace
Posted Speed
Segment Length
85th Percentile
50th Percentile
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Scotland Drive from Saratoga Avenue to Cumberland Drive.
Scotland Drive
Number of Lanes
Saratoga Avenue to Cumberland Drive
June 25-June 26, 2025
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Current Speed Data:
NumberCrash History:
Conditions Not Readily Apparent:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Lots of students use Scotland Drive to get to and from
school
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building
or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Description of Surrounding Area:
-No sidewalks
-No bicycle facilities present
-Saint Andrew's Episcopal Church to the south
-Argonaut Elementary School to the west
25 mph
Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the eastbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 7 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the westbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 7.8 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Scotland Drive is a narrow residential street that lacks sidewalks and bicycle facilities, requiring pedestrians
and cyclists to share the roadway with vehicles. Scotland Drive is also identified as a Safe Route to School. Saint Andrew’s Episcopal Church is located to the
south, and Argonaut Elementary School lies to the west, generating local pedestrian and school-related activity. No speed-related crashes were reported
along this segment of Scotland Drive during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within
1,320 feet of multiple pedestrian generators, including Saint Andrew’s Episcopal Church and Argonaut Elementary School. This justifies an additional 5 mph
reduction per CVC §22358.7, which defines qualifying areas as “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians.” Therefore, it is
recommended that the City maintain the existing 25 mph speed limit.
Percent in Pace
No
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:
Summary and Justification:
-Residential neighborhood
-Undivided Roadway
Recommended Speed Limit:
Safety Corridor?
Data Summary 42.
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 44 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
25 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
30 mph 329 334
1.68 miles¹ 329 334
Northbound Southbound
30 mph 28 mph
35 mph 34 mph
25-34 mph 24-33 mph
68.6% 68.3%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
Summary and Justification:
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Sobey Road is a narrow, winding residential street with a roadway width varying between 20 and 40 feet.
Sidewalks are provided only along portions of the corridor, and no bicycle facilities are present. The segment fronts Marshall Lane Elementary School. No
speed-related crashes were reported along this segment of Sobey Road during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, this roadway segment is within
1,320 feet of a bicycle and pedestrian generator, Marshall Lane Elementary School. This justifies an additional 5 mph reduction per CVC §22358.7, which
defines qualifying areas as “land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians.” Therefore, it is recommended that the City lower the
posted speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school building
or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
Recommended Speed Limit:25 mph
-No bike facilities present
-Sidewalks on some portion of the segment
-Marshall Lane Elementary fronts this segment,
including an on-site afterschool program
-Residential neighborhood
-Narrow residential street
-Undivided Road
Safety Corridor?Crash History:Number Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
No Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Posted Speed Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Current Speed Data:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Heavy bicycle traffic
50th Percentile
85th Percentile
10 mph Pace
Percent in Pace
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile
speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c). After
rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is adjacent to a
land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Sobey Road from Northerly Quito Road to Sobey Meadows Court.
Sobey Road Northerly Quito Road to Sobey Meadows
Court
Number of Lanes June 25-June 26, 2025
Data Summary 44
DRAFT
City of Saratoga
2025 Speed Survey Analysis
Roadway Name: Segment #: 44 Segment Limits:
2 Date:
25 feet Traffic Volumes:Northbound Southbound
30 mph 329 334
1.68 miles¹ 329 334
Northbound Southbound
30 mph 28 mph
35 mph 34 mph
25-34 mph 24-33 mph
68.6% 68.3%
City of Saratoga State Wide Average
Total Crashes 0 0.00 1.68
Speed Related 0 0.00 n/a
Signature Date
Ashley C Brooks, PE85675
The CVC §40802 regime requires that when a speed zone is enforced by radar or other electronic device on a non-local road, the posted limit must be
supported by a valid engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) or else the limit may constitute a “speed-trap” and be unenforceable. The CVC §627 defines an
E&TS as a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods determined by Caltrans, and must include prevailing speeds,
accident records, and roadside/traffic conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The baseline method for setting a speed limit is to measure the 85th percentile speed and round it to the nearest 5 mph increment. For cases in which the
nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph
increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §627 and §22358.6(b). For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th
percentile speed would require rounding up, then the speed may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment per CVC §627 and §22358.6(c).
After rounding, the local authority may apply an additional 5 mph reduction under CVC §22358.7 if the segment is designated a “Safety Corridor” or is
adjacent to a land/facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists/pedestrians.
Below are the results for the speed survey analysis conducted along Sobey Road from Sobey Meadows Court to Southerly Quito Road.
Sobey Road Sobey Meadows Court to Southerly Quito
Road
Number of Lanes June 25-June 26, 2025
Bicycle and Pedestrian Generators:Description of Surrounding Area:
Roadway Width
Posted Speed Total Vehicles Observed during speed survey
Segment Length Average Daily Traffic (vehicles)
Conditions Not Readily Apparent: Current Speed Data:
-Some driveways are hidden behind landscaping
-Heavy bicycle traffic
50th Percentile
85th Percentile
10 mph Pace
Percent in Pace
-No bike facilities present
-No sidewalks
-Residential neighborhood
-Windy local road
-Undivided Road
Safety Corridor?Crash History:Number Rate (acc/mil vehicle miles)
In the northbound direction, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 5 mph above the posted speed limit, while in the southbound direction, the 85th
percentile speed was measured at 4 mph above the posted speed limit. Rounding to the nearest 5 mph increment results in a limit of 35 mph that may be
reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph per CVC §22358.6. Sobey Road is a narrow, winding residential street with a roadway width varying between 20 and 40 feet.
The corridor lacks continuous sidewalks and bicycle facilities, requiring pedestrians and cyclists to share the roadway with vehicles. No speed-related
crashes were reported along this segment of Sobey Road during the five-year analysis period.
Based on the segment characteristics described above and in accordance with CVC Section 627, AB 43, and CA MUTCD, the City has the authority to
establish the speed limit at 5 mph below the limit determined by the observed 85th percentile. It is recommended that the City maintain the existing 30 mph
speed limit.
Notes: This roadway segment is close to one or multiple schools. The speed limit is twenty-five miles per hour when approaching or passing a school
building or the grounds while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
1 - Rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Is licensed by the Board for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors
No Crash Data Collected from 01/01/20 to 12/31/24
Recommended Speed Limit:30 mph
Summary and Justification:
Data Summary 45
DRAFT
From:Glenn Hendricks
To:Emma Burkhalter
Cc:John Cherbone
Subject:Question on Traffic Commission - Nov 13
Date:Wednesday, November 12, 2025 11:30:33 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when
opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hello Emma,
I just reviewed the Traffic Commission agenda for Nov 13th.
I do plan on attending the meeting. (Can this email be provided to the Traffic
Commission before the meeting?)
Specifically, the Speed Survey.
If I am reading this correctly, the report seems to suggest that the Pierce Road
Segments 21 and 22 should have their Speed Limits increased from 25 to 30 MPH. It
appears the rationale for this is, the fact cars are not currently obeying the speed limit.
So, we are going to raise the limit because drivers are not following the law.
Am I reading this correctly?
On page 18, there is a statement that says "while ensuring nearly all posted speed limits can now be
legally enforced." Does this mean we can't currently enforce the current 25 MPH limit on
Pierce Road?
On page 18, it indicate Segment 21 speed data could not be validated, yet the
consultant is recommending to raise the speed limit. How does that make sense?
Again on page 18, the recommendation to raise the sped limit on Pierce Road ends
with "This outcome ensures that every segment is enforceable while also advancing the City’s goals of promoting
safer travel conditions near schools and other pedestrian activity centers." How does raising the Speed
Limit on Pierce Road promote safer travel conditions?
How much enforcement will be targeted at this road?
as a Los Angeles Times editorial pointed out in 2020, the 85th percentile rule has
largely resulted in speed limits going up.
“The mandate means that if cities want to enforce the speed limit on a street where
drivers routinely put the pedal to the metal, they often have to raise it to a level where
most of that behavior would be legal,
This appears to be a strictly "speed" data driven recommendation. It ignores the
"Crash" data. By quick math, it appears that 20% of the crashes listed in this report
for the City, occur on this one road.
It seems to ignore the fact there are no bicycle or pedestrian facilities on this road.
(Figure 8 on page 21 indicates there are bicycles facilities on Segment 22. I don't
think this is correct. Can someone please explain what Bicycle facilities exist here?)
Just saying the segment has a Class III bike facility does not mean any roadway
changes have been made to increase bike safety.
How does raising the Speed Limit improve bike safety, if/when there is a crash with a
car? Isn't "differential speed" the biggest factor in the severity of injuries?
The road is listed as only 22 feet wide. Do we realize there are many Builders
Remedy projects projected for this area. This will increase the number of large
vehicles on this road.
This recommendation appears to ignore the practical reality of driving on this road.
Doesn't raising the speed limit on Pierce Road, go against all the work that has
historically been done to reduce speed on the road? Like four speed bumps and a
radar speed indicator?
What is the "definition of success", if we raise the speed limit on Pierce Road? How
will we know, if we did a good thing?
Have residents that live on or access their properties via Pierce Road been notified of
this potential change?
Glenn Hendricks