HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-16-2005 City Council Agenda PacketAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 16, 2005
OPEN SESSION - 5:30 P.M.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM -13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE
JOINT MEETING WTI'H HISTORICAL FOUNDATION
CLOSED SESSION- 6:30 P.M. -ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM,
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Conference With Leeal Counsel -Existing Litigation: Jones v. Saratoga et al. Santa
Claza County Sup. Court No. 1-03-CV-010545.
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. -CIVIC THEATER/COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
(Pursuant to Gov't. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on
October 28, 2005)
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
Oral Communications on Non-Aaendized Items
Any member of the public will be allowed to address the City Council for up to three (3)
minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the council from
discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff
accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Council Direction to Staff.
Oral Communications -Council Direction to Staff
Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications.
Communications from Boards and Commissions
Report from the Historical Foundation.
Council Direction to Staff
Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Communications from Boards &
Commissions.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The City of Saratoga and the Saratoga Chamber of Commerce preSeritS the AririUal TTCe
Lighting Ceremony and Holiday Open House -Friday, November 25, 2005 Big Basin
Way. The event starts at 5:30 p.m. in Blaney Plaza and continues into to the Village with
will feature extended shopping hours, entertainment, cazoling, and horse-drawn carriage
rides.
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
lA. Commendation Honoring Cynthia Chang
Recommended action:
Present commendation.
1B. Proclamation Celebrating Sazatoga Rotary's 50`h Anniversary
Recommended action:
Present proclamation.
1 C. Proclamation -Declaring the Week of November ZO-26, 2005 "National Family
Week"
Recommended action:
Present proclamation.
1D. Proclamation Declaring the Week of November 13-19, 2005 as "Hunger and
Homelessness Awareness Week"
Recommended action:
Present proclamation.
lE. Commendation Honoring Lon Saavedra
Recommended action:
Present commendation.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains routine items of business. Items in this section will be
acted in one motion, unless removed by the Mayor or a Council member. Any member of
the public may speak to an item on the Consent Calendar at this time, or request the
Mayor remove an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Public Speakers are
limited to three (3) minutes.
2
2A. City Council Meeting -November 2, 2005
Recommended action:
Approve minutes.
2B. Review of Check Register
Recommended action:
Approve check register.
2C. Treasurer's Report for the Month Ended October 2005
Recommended action:
Accept report.
2D. Increase Scope of Work for Citywide Striping Maintenance Contract
Recommended action:
Approve additional striping work with On-Line Striping on the amount of $25,000
and authorize City Manager to execute a contract for the same.
2E. Motor Vehicle (MV) Resolution Prohibiting Parking on Granada Court
Recommended action:
Adopt resolution.
2F. Hakone Gazdens ADA Facilities Upgrade project -Budget Amendment
Recommended action:
Adopt resolution.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Applicants/Appellants and their representatives have a total often minutes maximum for
opening statements. Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three
minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes
maximum for closing statements. Items requested for continuance are subject to
Council's approval at the Council meeting)
Proposed General Plan Amendment and Sale of City-Owned Land for 19848
Prospect Road (Community Development Department File #OS-179)
Recommended action:
1. Adopt resolution approving the proposed General Plan Amendment as
recommended by the Planning Commission; and
2. Adopt resolution-directing staff to proceed with sale of the property.
OLD BUSINESS
None
None
ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS
Mavor Kathleen Kin¢
Association of Bay Area Government
Hakone Foundation Liaison
Santa Claza County Cities Association
Santa Claza County Emergency Prepazedness Council
SASCC
W est V alley Mayors and. Managers Association
Vice Mavor Norman Kline
County Cities Association Leg. Task Force
Library Joint Powers Association
SCC Cities Association-Joint Economic Development Policy Committee (JEDPC)
Valley Transportation Authority PAC
Village AdHoc
Kevin Moran Pazk AdHoc
Councilmember Nick Streit
Recycling & Waste Reduction Commission of SCC
Santa Claza County Valley Water Commission
West Valley Solid Waste Joint Powers Association
West Valley Sanitation District
City/School AdHoc
Councilmember Aileen Kao
Chamber of Commerce
County HCD Policy Committee
Peninsula Division, League of California Cities
Councilmember Ann Waltonsmitb
KSAR Community Access TV Board
Northern Central Flood Control Zone Advisory Board
Sazatoga Historic Foundation
Sister City Liaison
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
OTHER
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
4
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269.
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II)
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
I, Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda
for the meeting of the City Council of the City of Saratoga was posted on November 10,
2005 of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was
available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's
website at www.saratoga.ca.us
Signed this 10`~ day of November 2005 at Saratoga, California.
Cathleen Boyer, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF SARATOGA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR 2005 -2006
12/6 Special Meeting -Council Reorganization
12/7 Regular Meeting -Joint Meeting with Mt. Winery
12/21 Regulaz Meeting
1/4 Regulaz Meeting
1/18 Regulaz Meeting
2/1 Regulaz Meeting
2/15 Regular Meeting
3/1 Regular Meeting
3/15 Regulaz Meeting
...-
~-
• torical F o~ndation
Saratoga His
presentation to
Saratoga C'~ C°uncil
November 16' 2005
f~~~a10GR ["ttS~RtGaL
What is the Saratoga Historical Foundation?
• The Sazatoga Historical Foundation is a SO1C(3) Non-Profit Organization. --
• SHF Membership currently is about 130 families and individuals plus 14 other museums
or historical organizations.
Our Mission Statement
• To stimulate the interest of the public in the history of Sazatoga and its environs.
• To serve as a focus for the community identity by preserving those buildings, documents,
and records that uniquely represent our colorful past.
• To serve as a resource for scholazly, historical reseazch, and to perpetuate the knowledge
of Sazatoga's history through educational programs for our youth.
Our Vision
The Sazatoga Historical Foundation, in partnership with the city of Sazatoga, completes ,,,~,,
the development of the Historic Park, encompassing the "store" Museum, the
McWilliams House, the LibraryBook-Go-Round, and the hillside and garden areas. The
Historic Pazk serves as a gathering place where receptions and other events aze held.
The Museum is a community focus for historic study and research, partnering with local
schools, organizations, and other historical museums.
The Foundation coordinates with other historic sites (Villa Montalvo, Hakone Gazdens,
and the Foothill Club) and organizations (Historic Preservation Commission) to stage
events with a historic focus within the City. Our loyal membership provides financial
support for its programs and administration.
2
Saratoga Historical Foundation Officers and Board Members
Chuck Schoppe -President; Technical Systems Coordinator
Warren Heid -Vice President; Facilities Dtrector
Willis Peck -Vice President; Programs Director; Historian; Past President
Ron Hagelin -Recording Secretary
Mac McCaughey -Treasurer
Clare McBride -Corresponding Secretary
Nancy Anderson -Social Events Director
Louise Cooper -Historian; Past President
Bob Louden - HPC Liaison; Newsletter Editor; Past President
Tom Lowdermilk - HPC Liaison; Calendaz Project Lead
Jack Mallory -Board Development Committee Chair
Yvonne Mendy -Fund Development and Publicity Director
Peggy Schoppe -Membership Director; Exhibits Committee Chair
Jenni Taylor -Volunteer Coordinator; Education Consultant
Consultants, Liaison, Contractors
April Halberstadt, Museum Executive Director
Ann Waltonsmith, Sazatoga City Council Liaison
SHF Jewelry Artist
Ann Johnson
SHF Webmaster
Jeff Johnson
Our Unique and Significant Assets
• The Native Americans in Santa Clara County aze not extinct. A small but important local
tribe exists today and Native Americans walk among us. The Sazatoga Museum has the
only permanent display in Santa Clara County of local Native American artifacts, which
were found in Sazatoga. Our Museum has partnered with the Muwekma Ohlone Tribal
Council to further develop our exhibit.
• The Saratoga Museum has an important collection of material related to Abolitionist John
Brown. (The family moved to Saratoga after his death.) The framed portraits of John
Brown and his wife Mary, drawn by their daughter Sazah Brown, are of national
importance. We have learned that Sarah was an academically trained artist and that other
works of hers aze in collections outside our area.
• The Saratoga Museum has an important collection of Gold Rush era material and pioneer
diaries. These items aze of importance to California historians and to the general public.
Other local Museums do not have permanent displays of historic material. History San
Jose has no permanent displays at all; Los Gatos has a small display of Forbes Mill
history. Campbell has a small part of their material on display and focuses on a single
theme. We really are the best thing azound.
• McWilliams House is one of the oldest frame houses in California.
Grants
We experimented this year, entering in a partnership with the City in applying for grants,
however, this effort has not met with the success that we had hoped. Applications processes took
a great deal of time, research, and effort from Museum personnel with no productive result. We
will not continue in this effort, at this time.
4
Corporate Sponsors and Community Volunteers
Bill Cooper and George Cooper of Cooper-Garrod Winery -Donations of wine at our
events; host annual BBQ; hosted our "A Tasteful Afternoon" event
• Rick Bonetti of Alain Pinel Realty -Sponsored June "Gazdens of Saratoga" tour
• Harry Murray of Intero Realty -Underwrote costs of holiday lighting on both Museum
buildings, and is underwriting publishing costs of "They Called It Sazatoga"
• Volunteers from Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints -design and maintain front
gazden of Museum
• Eagle Scout Volunteer projects, i.e. refmishing display cabinets, laying brick pavers in
outside display area, signage of outdoor exhibit
• Sazatoga High School Advanced Placement History Students - azchive projects
• Saratoga High School California Scholazship Federation Students -docents at Gazdens
Tour
Services and Programs
An outstanding Museum is known for two things: its collection and its programs. Museums in
neazby communities do not have the artifacts that we have in our holdings. While nearby
Museums such as Los Gatos, Campbell, Cupertino and Sunnyvale all have Museum programs,
none of them have the significant collections or the resource materials similaz to the Saratoga
Museum. None of the othei local Museums are committed to accommodating scholars and
researchers.
A critical component of our Strategic Plan is to build both community support and income
through our educational programs. Three local museums, San Jose, Campbell and Los Altos,
offer ongoing programs to students in the elementary grades. All three make a substantial
amount of their income from these programs, which aze usually so full that Sazatoga students
have little opportunity to participate.
The Sazatoga Museum has surveyed these programs and is developing similar educational
experiences for local students using the McWilliams House. Last year we started an outreach
"Traveling Trunk" program designed for the 3rd and 4th grade levels. Almost 300 students
participated in this introductory program. We plan to incorporate the McWilliams House into
this program once the renovation of the House is completed.
We are also currently working with selected high school classes, primarily those in the Advanced
Placement history classes. We served approximately 60 Saratoga High students for over 300
student hours in just two months last spring. We also developed two student interns from
Saratoga High School, one of which continues weekly volunteer service.
5
Events, Presentations and Celebrations
• Museum Open House in participation with Annual Village Open House and tree-lighting
• Gazden Party held at Museum with lazge 110 yeaz-old engine on display
• "Ghosts in the Vineyazd", a historically-based play put on with Skyline Historical Society
• "Collecting Saratoga" a study of collections by Foundation members
• "A Walk to Pacific Congress Springs" by Warren Heid (a standing-room only event!)
• "Pacific Coast Railway" by Bob Ingle (a preview of a PBS production)
• "Hidden Hakone" by Historian Connie Young Yu
• EI Camino Bells and Foundry Display at Mustazd Walk Festival
• "Gazdens of Sazatoga" Tour and Boutique
• "A Tasteful Afternoon" at Cooper-Garrod Winery
• Summer BBQ at Cooper-Garrod Winery
• Annual Docent appreciation dinner party
• Garden Party held at N. Campus with Santa Claza County Model T Club and cazs
SHF Accomplishments
• Fundraising
Our Strategic Plan requires us to begin serious fundraising and we have made substantial
progress in this azea. The Foundation has not done major fundraising before this yeaz.
We held our first signature event, a Garden Tour and Boutique, that we hope will become
as important as the annual Los Gatos Home Tour. We aheady have participants
volunteering to open their gazdens for us next year.
We held awine-tasting fundraiser at the Cooper-Garrod Winery and Ranch, a fundraiser
presentation on Hakone Gardens History at the Foothill Club and we are developing our
Museum gift shop.
Commissioned a line of Sazatoga heritage jewelry
Publish annual Sazatoga Historical Calendaz
• Promotional
Full-page ad in "Relax Homes and Lifestyles" magazine
Numerous articles in local newspapers
Holiday lighting installed on both Museum buildings
Website designed and created, online at: www.saratogahistoy.com
KSAR informational television ad
Mercury News Calendaz listing -being developed
• Educational
New exhibits designed and constructed
Resource Center setup and in neaz-continual use
Sazatoga History Website
"Traveling Trunk" program started in Saratoga Grarntnaz School
Educational partnership with Sazatoga High School
Special historical tours for Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts organizations
• Operational
Strategic Plan and Board Development Documents created and approved
Setup of exhibits in display cases donated by Gilroy Museum
SHF docents received training at History San Jose
Began showcasing McWilliams House decorated interior on special
occasions and for special requests
McWilliams House project plans approved by HPC
Volunteer work parties:
Painting -Museum newly painted inside
I,andscaping/Garden work -seasonal plantings; removal of invasive ivy
Removal of dangerous steel and concrete foundations in outside patio azea
General area and building cleanup
Installation of Resource Center furniture
• Community Outreach
Chamber of Commerce member
Rotary Arts Festival
Building Bridges -Celebrating Diversity
Saratoga Mustard Walk Festival
Saratoga Village Open House
Village Fashion Show Boutique Bazaar
Skyline Historical Society
Partnership formed with Muwekma Ohlone Tribal leaders
Wells Fargo Bank Sazatoga Branch Historical Mural design
Current SHF Projects
"They Called It Sazatoga" book revision and reprint
Historic Walking Tour Guide revision and reprint
Sazah Brown paintings professional restoration and conservation
Museum floor plan redesign
Pennanent exhibits redesign and construction
McWilliams House renovation -through City Administration of County Grant
with Foundation assistance
Documentation of local Chinese and Japanese community {early to present)
Website expansion to include online store, online forum, etc.
SHF Concerns
• Improve landscaping of Historical Park
Make effective use of the hillside azea
• Limited parking spaces in the Historical Park (although there aze 10 spaces across the
street at the fire station, with a thoughtful landscape design there could be more potential
parking spaces next to the Museum within the Pazk)
• Museum cannot get loaned exhibits from other museums because:
o No fire and smoke alarms
o No sprinkler system
o No security system or alarms
• McWilliams House -guaranteed continued use as Museum by City Council resolution
• Museum storage space is full - we cannot accept donations of historical items
Funding issues -memberships, donations, and grants aze our only source of funding
• Enhance the outreach to our Asian citizens for historical documentation and participation.
How Can We Help the City and How Can the City Help Us?
One of Sazatoga's strongest economic assets is her claim to be a "Historic Village". The entire
town is California State Landmazk No. 435. Being a historic destination has paid off
handsomely for other communities across America and we feel it can play a lazger role in
Sazatoga`s economic future.
The Museum sees itself as an important and even critical player in the economic life of the
Saratoga Village and the community. With that goal in mind, we have been restructuring the
Foundation and the Museum to become a much more important community asset.
We recognize that the City operates under severe budget constraints. However, we believe that
some of our most critical short term needs can be met through increasing the Pazk and Recreation
Department maintenance budget rather than through capital programs.
The Historical Pazk that surrounds the Museum, the McWilliams House and the Book-Go-Round
desperately needs refurbishing. The pazk is not large but needs a thoughtful landscaping plan.
We realize that the impending construction work at the McWilliams House will interfere with
maintenance in the near term, but we hope to work with the City to develop this important
economic asset. Community events could then be held in the patio area.
We ask that the City Council support our organization by looking at and seriously considering
our concerns, working with us as partners in the management of this valuable resource, the
buildings and City Park in which they are located. We invite Council and Staff who aze not
members to join our Foundation.
8
Thank You and an Invitation
We thank the members of the City Council for hosting this meeting and giving us the opportunity
to tell you about the Sazatoga Historical Foundation and Museum.
We also want to thank John Cherbone and the people in public works department, as well as
Kevin Meek and the people in Pazk Maintenance who have all been responsive and helpful.
A special thanks to Ann Waltonsmith, our City Council Liaison, who is always responsive and
supportive, participates in our workdays, supports our events, and attends all of our Board
meetings.
We would like to invite the members of the City Council, City Manager, and Staff to the
November ZS~h Saratoga Historical Museum Open House. We also invite you for a private tour
of the Museum and our new exhibits at your convenience.
A Reflection of Our Philosophy
"A community that mushrooms into a city without
consciousness or regard for its historical antecedents too often is a
community without chazacter, a community which, to its thousands
of new inhabitants, has nothing to distinguish it from others in
which they have lived. It is, too often, just another city.
But when the life of a community can be seasoned with
tradition and an awazeness of the contributions of its past citizens,
the benefits extend faz beyond the momentary interest stirred by
the revelation of some particular historical fact.
For then there is identity, a standard to maintain, a stimulus
for further creative effort. Of such ingredients is that most
desirable of municipal traits, Civic Pride."
Willys Peck, 1967
c~sa inoios
9
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM:
ORIGINATING DEPT; ~y Manager's Off~c~ CITY MANAGER: O~
PREPARED BY: V'~ DEPT HEAD:
Cathleen Bover. Citv Clerk DaveA
SUBJECT: Commendation Honoring Cynthia Chang
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present commendation.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached commendation honors Saratoga resident Cynthia Chang for her many contributions
Throughout the City and County.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
,~ N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Posting of the agenda.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Copy of commendation
COMMENDATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
HONORING THE
CYNTHIA CHANG
WHEREAS, Cynthia Chang emigrated from Taiwan in 1975, has been a resident of
Sazatoga for almost 20 yeazs, and is a CPA and MBA; and
WHEREAS, Cynthia is an active Member of the League of Women Voters, Friends of
Saratoga Libraries, Hakone Garden Foundation and other various organizations; and
WHEREAS, Cynthia has served in our local schools as Room Pazent, PTA Executive Board,
Coordinator of Chinese New Year Program at Foothill Elementary School, School Site Council
President, Redwood, 2000, Treasurer of Saratoga Education Foundation, 1995-1998, Treasurer,
Silicon Valley Chinese School Boazd, 1988-1990, Troop Committee Chair, BSA Troop 508, 1999 to
present, Treasurer for both Measure B (High School District) and Measure D (SUSD), and
Fundraiser for SHS McAfee Performing Art Center; and
WHEREAS, Cynthia has been elected as a Trustee of Sazatoga Union School District 1994
1998 and Trustee of the Los Gatos-Sazatoga Joint Union High School District, 1998 to present; and
WHEREAS, Cynthia has served as Treasurer, Chinese Historical & Cultural Project, 1988-
1994, Fundraiser for the Chinese Museum in San Jose Historical Museum donated to City of San
Jose, President of the Organization of Chinese American Women, (OCAW) Silicon Valley Chapter,
1991-1993, Executive Boazd member, , Supporter of Pacific Migration Center at New Brighton
Beach, Santa Cruz, a project of Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks, co-chair of Sazatoga's Building
Bridges, a celebration in our diverse ethnicities, and
WHEREAS, Cynthia has received the following award: Commendation by Office of the
Mayor (Susan Harnmer), City of San Jose to Chinese Historica] & Cultural Project {CHCP)
Executive Board for CHCP's promotion of the history and culture of the Chinese in the Santa Clara
Valley, Continuing Service Awazd, California Congress of Pazents, Teachers and Students, Inc. for
recognition of outstanding service to children and youth. May, 2002 by Redwood PTA, BSA Polaris
Staz Awazd, for outstanding leadership as Troop Committee Chair of Troop 508, November, 2002,
County Supervisor Liz Kniss' Asian American Awazd 2003 in recognition of her many services to
the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saratoga does
hereby proclaim recognition and appreciation of Cynthia Chang for her many years of service to our
community and for her valuable friendship to us all.
WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA on this 16a' day of
November 2005.
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
City of Sazatoga
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM:
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER:
PREPARED BY:
DEPT HEAD:
SUBJECT: Commendation Honoring Saratoga Rotary
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present commendation.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached commendation honors Saratoga Rotary on their 50~' Anniversary. Representatives
from Rotary will be present to accept the commendation.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Posting of the agenda.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Copy of commendation
COMMENDATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
HONORING
SARATOGA ROTARY
WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of Saratoga was incorporated on December 21,
1955, and is therefore now celebrating its SOa` anniversary of giving "Service Above
Self' within our community and internationally; and
WHEREAS, in the city of Saratoga, they have been involved in beautification
by planting over 240 Vees, restoring Wildwood Pazk, installing newspaper kiosks,
purchasing the gateway signs, cleaning Highway 9, creating the Historical Museum
and purchasing park equipment such as scoreboards and playground equipment; and
WHEREAS, club members have enhanced the city, its institutions and its
citizens by presenting "Building Bridges," amulti-cultural festival which embraces
our many organizations and ethnicities; providing support to groups such as Saratoga
Sister City, Hakone Gardens and Montalvo; chairing the Sazatoga parade; donating to
the new library, assisting the Chamber of Commerce with Celebrate Saratoga and the
Witchy Walk; and
WHEREAS, students have benefited from the club's generosity, such as
donating to the Sazatoga High School McAfee Performing Arts Center, sponsoring the
Interact Club, providing representatives at Career Day, supporting the football
program, funding curtains at all schools in the Sazatoga Union School District and
science kits at Saratoga School, awarding scholarships at Saratoga and Prospect High
Schools, and presenting Good Citizenship awards; and
WHEREAS, the Saratoga Rotary Art Show has become a favorite Saratoga
tradition since its inception in 1960 and provides the funds that are dispensed
throughout the community to many worthwhile agencies and causes such as Eastfield
Ming Quong, Hospice of the Valley, Lady of Fatima, HOPE; and
WHEREAS, international projects have included eradicating polio worldwide
through its Polio Plus program; providing desks, school buses, and ambulances for
Mexico; bringing water purification to Africa and medical caze to many countries; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Sazatoga hereby proclaims the recognition and appreciation of the Rotary Club of
Saratoga and its members for its initiative in seeking service projects and for its
contributions of personal participation and monetary funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council offers its congratulations upon
the 50'" anniversary of the Rotary Club of Saratoga.
WITNESS OUR HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA on
this 16T" day of November 2005.
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
Saratoga, California
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
ORIGINATING
AGENDA ITEM:
IC
CITY MANAGER: ~~L%~-~-
PREPARED BY:
DEPT HEAD:
SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring the Week of November 20-26, 2005 as "National
Family Week"
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present proclamation.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached proclamation declares the week of November 20-26, 2005 as "National Family
Week".
Mr. Paul L. Hulme, representing the Saratoga Ministerial Association, will be present to accept
the proclamation.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Posting of the agenda.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A -Letter of Request from Paul L. Hulme
Attachment B - Copy of proclamation
SARATOGA WARD
SARATOGA CALIFORNIA STAKE
October 5, 2005
Ann Sullivan
Cathleen Boyer
City of Saratoga
i3~7 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 9500
1ZE: National Family Week
Dear Ann and Cathleen,
THE CHURCH OF
JESUS CHRIST
OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
o~.-~ llf ~~ =~,
•
•
15~~'S'~3'"a~;~~~'"t
OCT 1 ~ 2005 f
L~ ~}~ U~' J~iflH I ~.iUfS
You two make an awesome team, and it is wonderful to deal with you both
each year at Thanksgiving time.
The President has designated the National Family Week to be celebrated
November 20~ though November 26~, 2005.
On behalf of the Saratoga Ministers Association (SMA), I am again
contacting you to again arrange with the City Council to prepare a
proclamation from the City of Saratoga. The Mayor with then present this
to the Saratoga Ministers Association in a City Council meeting preceding
November 20~.
There were seven of the Ministers that requested a copy of the beautifully
framed Family Week Proclamations that you prepared last year. The same
number this year would be greatly appreciated.
nicer ,
Paul L. Hulme
CITY OF SARATOGA
PROCLAMATION
DECLARING THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 20 -26, 2005
"NATIONAL FAMILY WEEK"
WHEREAS, the family is the foundation upon which our society is structured,
and the family is one of our society's most important units, and
WHEREAS, Saratoga is blessed with a multitude of families - an essential part
of the cultural, social, and spiritual fabric that is Saratoga; and
WHEREAS, Saratoga recognizes that strong families are at the center of strong
communities and that everyone has a role to play in making families successful,
including neighborhood organizations, businesses, nonprofit organizations,
policymakers, and of course, the families themselves; and
WHEREAS, during Thanksgiving week we all should take time to honor the
importance of families, and recognize the special connections that support and
strengthen families year-round; and
WHEREAS, we all should recommit to enhancing and extending all of the
connections that strengthen and enrich families; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Kathleen King, Mayor of the City of Saratoga, do hereby
proclaim November 20-26, 2005 Family Week in the City of Saratoga, and I commit
this observance to the people of Saratoga and encourage all Saratoga citizens to work
to strengthen families in America as individuals and through government and
community-based organizations.
WITNESS OUR HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA on
this 16th day of November 2005.
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
Saratoga, California
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM:
ORIGINATING D(E~`PT~: City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER: ~~~%6r~"'-~"
PREPARED BY: ~`~ DEPT HEAD:
Cathleen Bover. City Clerk Dave Anderson. City Manaep~
SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring the Week of November 13-19, 2005 as "National
Homelessness and Hunger Awareness Week"
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present proclamation.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached proclamation declazes the week of November 13-19, 2005 as "National
Homelessness and Hunger Awazeness Week".
A representative from EHC LifeBuilders will attend the meeting to accept the proclamation.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Posting of the agenda.
~` ATTACHMENTS:
Copy of proclamation.
EHC LifeBuilders
2665 North 1st StreeGSuite 210
San Josh, California 95134
Fax 408.894.9270
Te1408.539.2100
October 26, 2005
City Clerk Cathleen Boyer,CMC
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Deaz City Clerk Boyer,CMC,
I am writing to request that the City Council designate the week of November 13-19, 2005 as Hunger and
Homelessness Awareness Week in the City of Saratoga.
Each year during the week before Thanksgiving, the National Coalition for the Homeless and the National
Student Campaign Against Hunger and Homelessness co-sponsor National Hunger and Homelessness
Awareness Week. EHC LifeBuilders and other community groups are planning educational events
throughout the week and we would greatly appreciate official recognition of this week in the form of a
proclamation by your City.
EHC will coordinate activities with local communit r organizations and churches to organize joint events
that both educate the community about the issues an,; show them how they can help. The highlight of the
week is an event called Celebrations: of Life, Community, and Vision. Celebrations is an uplifting
commemoration of the lives of homeless people who d ~ in the past year as well as an event to honor
volunteers of the Cold Weather Shelter Program whose ompassion and hard work give us hope for a
future without homelessness. This event will be held at 1 ":30 a.m. on Tuesday November I S at EHC's
Boccardo Reception Center. City and county officials wi;' be receiving invitations to this event and we
encourage everyone to join us.
In addition, EHC is co-sponsoring a Faces of Homelessness panel with the Unitarian Universalist
Fellowship of Sunnyvale on Sunday November 13 from 12: Opm-1:45pm. The event will provide an
opportunity to heaz directly from people who have lived wit-1 hunger and who have been homeless.
San Jose Councilmember Ken Yeager will moderate the pam:l.
Enclosed is a sample draft proclamation for Hunger & Homelessness Awareness Week. We'll be in
contact in the next week to fond out the date of your meeting so a representative from EHC can attend for
the formal proclamation presentation.
If you have any questions, please contact Stephanie Schaaf at (408) 539-2136 or
sschaaf@ehclifebuilders.org.
Sincerely,
~ /~~ ~~
arty Du~no it '
President and CEO
it
Co; City Clerk, City Manager, and City Council
infa@ehclifebuilders.org
www.ehdifebuilderzorg
A United Way Agency
_~,;
LIFEBUILDERS
CITY OF SARATOGA
PROCLAMATION
SUPPORTING THE WEEK OF
NOVEMBER 13-19,.2005
"NATIONAL HOMELESSNESS AND HUNGER AWARENESS WEEK"
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara, although one of the most creative and
successful communities, is also faced with a housing crisis that makes homelessness a
reality for thousands of individuals and families each year; and
WHEREAS, each year, one week before Thanksgiving, the National Coalition
for the Homeless and the National Student Campaign Against Hunger and
Homelessness cosponsor Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week; and
WHEREAS, EHC LifeBuilders is participating with numerous agencies in
planning, educational, fundraising and volunteer activities that will raise awareness
about these challenges in Santa Clara County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga is committed to assist the homeless and
hungry with necessary human services, temporary shelter and affordable housing both
directly and through support of nonprofit housing and social service agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, Mayor Kathleen King and the City Council of the City
of Saratoga does hereby proclaim November 13-19, 2005 as
NATIONAL HOMELESSNESS AND HUNGER
AWARENESS WEEK
IN THE CITY OF SARATOGA
And calls upon the residents of the City of Saratoga to be generous in their volunteer
efforts and financial support of programs seeking to end hunger and homelessness.
WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA on
this 16`t' day of November 2005.
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
City of Saratoga
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
ORIGINATING
PREPARED BY:
DEPT HEAD:
SUBJECT: Commendation Honoring Lon Saavedra
.~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present commendation.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached commendation honors Lon Saavedra, Executive Duector/Hakone Gazdens.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Posting of the agenda.
ATTACHMENTS:
AGENDA ITEM:
1~
City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER: ~L ~/-~-~-
Attachment A - Copy of commendation
COMMENDATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
HONORING THE
LONSAAVEDRA
WHEREAS, Lon Saavedra was born in Colorado and his family has lived there for nine
generations. His ancestral heritage is from two American Indian Nations (tTte & Pueblo) and Spain.
He shazes ancestry with Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, author of the first novel in European
Literature: Don Quixote de La Mancha. Lon is the youngest boy out of nine siblings; and
WHEREAS, Lon joined the Hakone Foundation as Executive Director & CEO in 1999; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saavedra previously served as Director for the Western Region for the
Smithsonian Institution's 16th Museum, the National Museum of the American Indian. Before being
appointed to this position, Saavedra served as Director of Corporate & Foundation Relations for the
Stanford University Medical Center. During his yeazs in Washington, D.C., Saavedra served as Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer for United Telecommunications Advertising, a joint venture
between TCI, United Cable & United Artists. In 1985, he also served as Director of the Business
Advisory Council for the Speaker & Majority Leadership of the U.S. Congress. In 1979 and 1980,
Saavedra served as a Desk Officer, for the Western Region, for President Carter while in the White
House; and
WHEREAS, with Lon's efforts, Hakone was selected by the Japanese Embassy to be one of
the official sites in America to host the celebration of the 150th Anniversary of the Treaty of Peace
and Amity successfully negotiated by Commodore Perry; and
WHEREAS, Hakone was only one of twelve important historic sites in the nation selected
by the National Trust for Historic Preservation to be given a "Save America's Treasures" awazd
because of its unique national and international importance as the oldest Japanese Estate Gardens in
the Western Hemisphere; and
WHEREAS, with Lon Saavedra's skill, Hokone hosted Sony Studios filming of Memoirs of
a Geisha during the month of January.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saratoga
does hereby proclaim recognition and appreciation to Lon Saavedra as the Executive Director of
Hakone.
WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA on this 16`" day of
November 2005.
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
City of Saratoga
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager's Office
PREPARED BY:
Cathleen Bo ,City Clerk
SUBJECT: City Council Minutes
AGENDA ITEM:
CITY MANAGER: ~'~~`~-
DEPT HEAD:
Dave Anderson, City Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve minutes.
REPORT SUMMARY:
Approve minutes as submitted for the following City Council Meeting:
Regular Meeting -November 2, 2005
FISCAL IMPACTS:
~'"' N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
Retain minutes for legislative history.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A -Minutes November 2, 2005
MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 2, 2005
The City Council of the City of Saratoga held a Joint Session with the Friends of the r:
Sazatoga Libraries in the Administrative Conference Room, 13777 Fnzitvale Avenue, at
5:30 p.m.
The following Friends of the Sazatoga Libraries were present: President MatCia M8t1Z0,
Bill McDonnal, Mary Jean Fenn, Sharon Pierce, and Tom Blaisdell.
Mr. McDonnal announced that the Friends recently awazded the Saratoga Library a grant
in the amount of $80,000.
Mrs. Fenn reported on the Book-Go-Round's volunteer hours. Mrs. Fenn noted that it
takes approximately 16,000 hours per year to keep the Book-Go-Round functioning.
Mrs. Fenn added that the Book-Go-Round is open 360 days per year.
President Manzo reported that approximately $120-$125k per yeaz raised by the Friends
goes back into the Sazatoga Library. President Manzo noted that one of the goals the
Friends had this yeaz was to find ways to improve the communications amongst the
members. President Manzo stated that one way of communication was their membership
newsletter, which they now publish once a month.
Mrs. Pierce described some of the events the Friends sponsored this yeaz such as:
Saratoga Reads, Building Bridges, Silicon Valley Reads, and Sazatoga's Arthur Hall of
Fame.
,.../
A discussion took place regazding the various activities that the library in the Town of
Los Gatos sponsors such as a panel discussion of local authors.
Further discussion took place regazding the recent incident in the Heritage Orchard
involving crushed gypsum and mud being tracked into the Library.
President Manzo also discussed the library staff's concerns regarding the recently
approved Metro PCS flagpole. President Manzo noted that the staff feels that the
equipment would impact the trash bins. President Manzo noted that as a citizen she is
offended that a private company is using City property for economic gain.
City Manager Anderson noted that staff would discuss this incident with Mr. Novakovich
and Director Pisani.
Councilmember Streit brought up the fact that the City would like the Friends to provide
a sinking fund for building maintenance or the City would have to charge them rent.
Mr. McDonnal responded that last year the Friends offered to give the City $10,000 per
year.
Mayor King directed City Manager Anderson to discuss this offer with the Friends at a
later time.
At 6:30 p.m. Mayor King thanked the Friends of the Saratoga Libraries for attending
tonight's joint meeting
Mayor King called the Special Meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. to discuss the Rotary's SOs'
Anniversary and noted that Reiko Iwanaga, Rotary's President, was present.
President Iwanaga explained that the Rotary's Foundation makes the decisions on how
the funds are spent. President Iwanaga noted that she recently formed a committee to
come up with a gift to the City of Sazatoga for it's SOa' Anniversary.
Councilmember Waltonsmith noted that the Rotary Club has agreed to sponsor the City's
50`s Anniversary Parade.
President Iwanaga concurred with Councihnember Waltonsmith's statement.
Vice Mayor Kline noted that would like to join Rotary in a joint project to construct a
4,000 squaze foot multipurpose room. Vice Mayor Kline noted that the City and the
Rotary could shaze room.
President Iwanaga noted that she would take this information back to the group.
City Manager Anderson noted that on a smaller scale, Director Cherbone has suggested
that Rotary pay to gild the letters on the three entrance signs to the City and add a sign on
Highway 9.
Mayor King called the Regulaz City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Aileen Kao, Nick Streit,
Ann Waltonsmith, Vice Mayor Norman Kline,
Mayor Kathleen King
ABSENT: None
ALSO Dave Anderson, City Manager
PRESENT: Jonathan Wittwer, Assistant City Attorney
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
Michele Braucht, Administrative Services Director
John Livingstone, Community Development Director
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 2
2005
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk, reported that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2,
the agenda fot the meeting of November 2, 2005 was properly posted on October 28,
2005
Z
ORAI. COMMUNICATIONS
The following people requested to speak at tonight's meeting:
Jill Hunter announced that on November 6, 2005 from 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. at the
Foothill Club there would be the first "Village Fashion Show Fundraiser". MTS. Hunter
stated that tickets aze available for $40 and all proceeds benefit the Sazatoga Village
Development Council.
Citizen Ray reported on the clean up efforts on Highway 9.
Brain Robertson stated that in a report to Council on September 21, 2005 Saratoga parks
were listed in order by size. Mr. Robertson pointed out the errors in the ranking order
noting that Congress Springs Park, Heritage Orchazd, and Hakone Gardens were the
largest parks in Sazatoga. Mr. Robertson noted that Kevin Moran Park was the 4`s largest
pazk in Saratoga and requested that everyone stop referring to Kevin Moran Pazk as the
2"a lazgest pazk in Sazatoga. Mr. Robertson noted that the Master Pian was never
formally adopted and would like the documents from the City to prove otherwise.
Sandy Cross questioned the funds paid by the sports user groups to the City, which
helped fund the sand channel work. Ms. Cross noted that according to the City the funds
received from the user groups went towazds maintenance costs. Ms. Cross noted that the
City funds paid $SOk towards this project, which was denied grant funding. Ms. Cross
noted that she feels that City is making special interest groups, especially soccer, a
priority over neighborhood compatibility, roadwork, seniors, beatification of the Village,
etc. Ms. Cross requested that the City limit the sports groups to the limited space
available and look to the local schools as an alternative rather than impacting
neighborhoods.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Mazcia Manzo noted that she was the current President o the Friends of the Saratoga
Libraries. President Manzo noted that the Friends participated in a joint meetin~ with the
City Council eazlier this evening. President Manzo noted that on November 25 the
Book-Go-Round would be holding an open house in conjunction with the holiday tree
lighting event and Village o~en house. President Manzo also noted that the Friends
holiday was on December 7` at the Saratoga Library.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
Vice Mayor Kline thanked the Friends of the Saratoga Library for their hard work and the
recent donation of $80k.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
None
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
lA. COMMENDATION HONORING MR JOHN TAUGHT
Recommended action:
Present commendation.
Mayor King read the proclamation and presented it to Mr.. Tauchi.
1B. COMMENDATION HONORING MONTALVO ARTS CENTER
Recommended action:
Present commendation.
Mayor King read the proclamation and presented it to representatives from
Montalvo Arts Center.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
2A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CIP STUDY SESSION OCTOBER 5, 2005
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve minutes.
Mayor King requested that this item be removed from the Consent Calendaz.
Mayor King requested that the two matrixes be attached to the minutes and make a
note next to the bullet point "Gateway-Relocation of large oak tree from Orchazd
to Fruitvale" that Council would discuss this item when the tree fund returns to
Council.
KING/WALTONSMITH MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES OF OCTOBER
5.2005 AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -COMMUNITY SURVEY KICK-OFF
STUDY SESSION OCTOBER 18, 2005
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve minutes.
Mary Robertson requested to speak on this item.
Mrs. Robertson asked if the survey was being approved at this time.
Mayor King replied that only the minutes from the study session were being
approved this evening.
Mayor King requested that the following direction be added to the conclusion of
the minutes -Direction to the AdHoc to continue working with the consultants
since there no major changes made and when the survey was completed return to
Council.
KING/KLINE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2005
AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED S-0.
2C. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -OCTOBER 19, 2005
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve minutes.
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES OF
OCTOBER 19.2005. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2D. REVIEW OF CHECK REGISTER
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve check register.
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO APPROVE CHECK REGISTER.
MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2E. APPROVE AND ORDER THE REDEMPTION OF ALL OF THE
SARATOGA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY'S OUTSTANDING
SERIES 1993 REVENUE BONDS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution directing NBS Local Government Solutions, to notice the Bond
Trustee on behalf of the Authority to proceed with the Notice of Redemption and to
continue to retain the services of NBS for the administration of the Leonazd Road
Assessment Local Obligations.
RESOLUTION: 05-068 & 069
WALTONSMITH/STREITMQVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING
NBS LOCAL GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, TO NOTICE THE BOND
TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH THE
NOTICE OF REDEMPTION AND TO CONTINUE TO RETAIN THE
MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2F. 14288 CHESTER AVENUE -APPLICATION 06-092 LANDMARK
STATUS AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT -SECOND READING AND
ADOPTION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Grant second reading and adopt ordinance.
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO GRANT SECOND READING AND
ADOPT ORDINANCE. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2G. 14574 HORSESHOE COURT -APPLICATION OS-029 FOR REZONING -
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Grant second reading and adopt ordinance.
ORDINANCE: 237
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO GRANT SECOND READING AND
ADOPT ORDINANCE. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2H. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT -PERSONAL SERVICE BUSINESS IN
CH-1 AND CH-2 ZONING DISTRICTS -SECOND READING AND
ADOPTION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Grant second reading and adopt ordinance.
ORDINANCE: 236
WALTONSMITH/STRETT MOVED TO GRANT SECOND READING AND
ADOPT ORDINANCE. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2I. CONTRACT APPROVALS FOR CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve maintenance contract with Loral Landscaping Inc. and Gachina
Landscape Management.
WALTONSMTTH/STREIT MOVED TO APPROVE MAINTENANCE
MOTION PASSED 5-0,
2J. MOTOR VEHICLE (MV) RESOLUTION PROHIBITING PARKING ON
HERRIMAN
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION: MV- 247
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
PROHIBITING PARKING ON HERRIMAN. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2K. SARATOGA PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT PHASE II -NOTICE OF
COMPLETION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Notice of Completion.
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO
MOTION PASSED 5-0.
2L. VTA OPERATORS' FACILITY PROJECT -NOTICE OF COMPLETION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Notice of Completion.
WALTONSMTTH/STREIT MOVED TO ACCEPT NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE VTA OPERATORS' FACILITY. MOTION
PASSED 5-0.
2M. HAKONE GARDENS ADA FACILITIES UPGRADE PROJECT -AWARD
OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt budget resolution; move to declare Robert A. Bothmann, Inc. to be the lowest
bidder; Approve construction contract in the amount of $239,500; Authorize City
Manger to execute the contract.
WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO ADOPT BUDGET RESOLUTION;
MOVE TO DECLARE ROBERT A. BOTHMANN. INC. TO BE THE
LOWEST BIDDER: APPROVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $239.500: AUTHORIZE CITY MANGER TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACT. MOTION PASSED 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) - F.Y. OS-06 UPDATE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Review CIP proj ect priorities reflecting Council direction from the CIP
Study Sessions held on October 5th and October 18"' and provide direction
to staff.
1. Open the Public Hearing for the F.Y. 05/06 CIP Update.
2. Continue Public Hearing to the December 7, 2005, City Council Meeting
to allow the appropriate review by the Planning Commission prior to final
approval of updated CIP.
John Cherbone, Public Works Director, presented staffreport.
Director Cherbone briefly explained the CIP process and summarized the City
Council direction from the CIP Study Session that was held on October 5, 2005.
Director Cherbone requested that the City Council conduct the public hearing and
continue it to the December 7, 2005 City Council meeting.
Mayor King opened the public hearing and invited public corttments.
Jill Hunter noted she represented the Village Gazdeners and requested that the
Council allow the Gazdeners to continue to plant flowers azound the Memorial
Arch in Blaney Plaza instead of the bushes the City planned to plant,
Citizen Ray requested that the Council reconsider widening Highway 9 and
volunteered to form a citizen committee to approach Caltran.
Mayor King closed the public hearing.
Vice Mayor Kline concun•ed with Ms. Hunter to continue planting the flowers.
Councihnember Waltonsmith agreed that the flowers looked nice and noted that
she supported the CIP projects to go forward.
Vice Mayor Kline noted that widening Highway 9 was a good idea but he didn't
know if the engineering could be done. Vice Mayor Kline noted that he supported
the CIP projects to go forward.
STRETT/WALTONSMITH MOVED TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO
THE DECEMBER 7.2005, CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ALLOW THE
MOTION PASSED 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS
4. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STATUS REPORT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept report and direct staff to follow up on actions that will strengthen the
City's emergency response capabilities and enhance public education efforts.
Dave Anderson, City Manager, presented staff report.
City Manager stated that in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the recent
earthquake in Pakistan all levels of govenunent have been examining the status of
their prepazedness for emergencies. At the October 5, 2005 City Council meeting,
Council placed on a future Council agenda the status of emergency prepazedness
for the City of Saratoga. City Manager Anderson stated that the report before
Council discusses the status of emergency prepazedness in the City of Saratoga at
this time.
City Manager Anderson briefly explained the following areas of the emergency
preparedness status in the City:
• Planning
• Training
• Exercising
• Communications
• Transportation
• Logistic
• Miscellaneous
• CERT
City Manager Anderson requested that the City integrate fast-chhrge natural gas
station into emergency generator system.
City Manager Anderson noted that there would be an emergency response exercise
on Tuesday, November 15"' conducted by the County.
Councihnember Waltonsmith asked if the Council could participate in this
exercise.
City Manager Anderson responded that at this time it would be only City staff but
if the Council wanted to join the exercise it would be fine.
A discussion took place in regazds to the effort to join the City of Campbell on
their radio frequency and the need for the City to obtain a frequency of its own.
Councihnember Waltonsmith requested that staff follow up with emergency
preparedness for animals, advertising the CERT program more, and review the
City code on emergency prepazedness.
Council thanked City Manager Anderson for his report and directed staff to
integrate fast-charge natural gas station into emergency generator system.
NEW BUSINESS
None
ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS
Mayor Kathleen King had no reportable information.
Vice Mayor Norman Kline reported the following information:
Village AdHoc -participated in a tour of the Village
Councilmember Nick Streit reported the following information:
West Valley Sanitation District -settled with the Town of Los Gatos
Councilmember Aileen Kao reported the following information:
Chamber of Commerce -noted that the Chamber's profit from Celebrate Saratoga was
$23k
County HCD Policy Committee - discussed the 96 HUD housing units in San Jose
Councilmember Ann Waltonsmith reported the following information:
KSAR Community Access TV Board -recently reviewed the final contract with the
Director
SazatoQa Historic Foundation -open house on November 25, 2005 from 6-9p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
Councilmember Waltonsmith noted that she recently attend the League's workshop on
"Building Neighborhood Consensus". Councilmember Waltonsmith noted that she
received the recent Loma Prieta newsletter, which contained an article on a survey
conducted on cities that encourage solar energy.
Mayor King noted that the Silicon Valley Children's Hospital is a member of both the
Los Gatos and Saratoga Chamber of Commerce and requested that staff approach the
Chamber to look into developing a package deal for membership.
OTHER
None
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business Mayor King adjourned the meeting 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathleen Boyer, CMC
City Clerk
IO
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
.~..
MEETING DATE: 11/16/2005
ORIGINATING DEPT: Admin Svcs
PREPARED BY:
Les to Fa ' a
AGENDA ITEM: ~~
CITY MANAGER: ~~~~
DEPT HEAD:
Michele BYaucht
SUBJECT: Check Register for 11/03/2005
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council accepts the Check Register for 11/03/2005.
REPORT SUMMARY:
The attached Check Register for 11/03/2005. The checks were released on 11/03/2005. Payroll
checks were released on 10/27/2005.
T e of Checks
Date Starting
Checks # Ending
Check # Total
Checks
Amount
Account Pa able 11/3/2005 100539 100625 86 172,414.97
Pa oll 10/27/2005 31240 31285 45 136,784.78
TOTAL 309,199.75
The prior Check Register for 10/19/2005 ended with check number 100538. Check #100599 for
$217.04 and check #100446 for $16.50 were voided due to incorrect vendor information
submitted. Check #100503 for $71,454.05 was voided per request by department. Check
#100625 was hand issued for $8,202.90 due to time sensitive nature of this request.
Following is a list of checks issued for more than $10,000.00, and a brief description of the
expenditure.
100648 Ca orrici & Larson 001 1040 OS Audit B #2 21,710.25
100651 City ofCampbeIl 260 5015 Solid Waste Fees 36,840.00
100662 Fairbank Maslfii Assoc 001 1005 Voter Survey 12,000.00
100667 Gachina Landsca a Mgt various various Mon Landsca a Svcs 10,501.94
100670 George Bianchi Construction 150 9010 VTA Operator Fac ' 14,552.12
100701 Pacific Gas & Electric various various Monthly Utlities 12,091.39
100712 San Jose Water various various Monthly Water 21,269.67
100713 Sazatoga Comcmmity Access 001 7030 20% Cormact 8,425.30
100713 Saratoga Comm~mity Access 720 7099 Ca ital enditures 15,000.00
FISCAL IIVIPACTS:
The following is a reduction to each of the individual fund cash balance:
Fund # Fund Description A/P Total PR Total Total
001 General 35,561.95 39,008.05 74,570.00
150 Streets & Roads 19,885.10 20,645.65 40,530.75
18o LLA Districts 26,942.56 26,942.56
250 Develo meet Svcs 12,678.06 50,902.24 63,580.30
260 Envirornr~ental 43,372.75 5,282.18 48,654.93
270 Housing & Corrnn -
290 Recreation 15,741.36 17,769.55 33,510.91
291 Teen Services 2,789.57 2,789.57
351 Public Salty 698.77 698.77
352 Infrastruct~se 992.47 387.54 1,380.01
353 Fac>}ity 18.36 18.36
354 Pazk and Tra>Z 802.74 802.74
420 Leonard Road 277.35 277.35
601 Arborist Deposit 443.50 443.50
720 KSAR/CATV 15,000.00 15,000.00
TOTAL 172,414.97 136,784.78 309,199.75
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION:
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Register in the Expenditure Approval List format.
.v QQ
D
h
OI
W gp~Nj
q i S
Ozm
W ~ ~
h
m
N
O
N
T
W
4
D
Y
u
m
Nu
vl O
4n y
O \ 00
min Fm ~
WN Nun
a\ ml
4w o
..
NO
g~
W
K
m [y.
PO
°uz
U
I 4
D
m G I Z
Upl
u
m
N O
U
~ oz°~ z
W [[N++
N Z
q ~£ZZI W
N 4li pppp4O N
nm~;~> Z
on[. j
. \ R
m O N
q m
~~o~z°u o
'uai~~ ~ z~kZ l °o
mm.+ m o
Ul>N ~ O
b b mq r r mmgb N tiq In O O m g q q q q O O b m
N N r 0 m O O m r q m O ~ ~ ti m Y1 N q
! ! b 0 P IYNN ~ q
! ! N q~ N b N N q N N r!1 '1 N N
N N ! !
p~ N m C y4 W W O ~ J F
P .• ~M • ..w11 .~ p ~ 'y ..w.11 r.1 W ,.•¢]~ q • in • u~ ,•~ 6 • w y •
o [. ,Waj p 4 F 4 m F .Fi W 4 7 a F F 4 °y ~ X ~~., W 4 ~ ~ q F
z F m m " ~ " ~ " a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°. F ~ M ~ z E°. ~ ~ y ~ ~ E°.
m ma m a a m ~m m r,n m H a m m~ m F a N m
W ~~ ~ ~~o~ ~~ m ~ ~ ~ o a
0 0
U N m M Y m N N y£ Z fn N q gg ~
W C O O 4 C C
N N N '1 'I N N 'i N r.l 'y
p N N 1~ N N N N Yl YI p O O Y1 ry
N W m N eel N q rl N q YI O O m 1(1
N N q
•1 N~ N •InNN N O O p
N ri N '1 'i ri N 1p
I!1 Ill YI N VI N 1!(1 N in N m ~ ry N q
O Nm YINOO 00 o O O O O N
! ! N rl O O b O
O O O O O O O O O
N !I l'l ! ! O O
'I 'I .i n N M O o N .l .4 .i .i o
O OO41N m O O O O q
O 00 O OOryN 00 O O O O ry
! W
N N YI N N N N N Vl N ij Yl 'y N N
O O O O O O O O O N O l~ O O N O
O O O O O O O O Y O ~ O O O
N NN V1N \\NN \N \ N N N ZN N
\ \ \ J ~ \ q m 'L \ R \ \ m \ \
O O ry Q 0 0 0 0 „ m N m b N p
\. \.o ~~ \\\„ aoo \ a~ ~~ ~ w~ s~
.. .. .. K~ ."inw.~ a ~" I
o ao Zo 0000 Oo o m0 410 Oo NO a0
m o 0 00 ~o W o ~tlo
a a m m r1 r1 v' O Z
w o a' s'
++ 5 W F F F U F ~ ~
5 d U N
¢q .] q q > H N U
n mqN qb gppl'1N I~~! FIn Mq Mm W O 00 W m
N F q q C '1 Pi N N N m W ti N F INV o£ rm~l o£ N q n q m £ UO1
O £O00 NO g000o qNN WN e{'N f[N N N 4N W
£o Oo Fooo [Za-goo yo ~a ~o ~o ~o ~o a
O WZ q 4
^>^ ~] rl> r]> £W£ ~ N m
4 4 4 4 ~ ~ k ~ Z R
p a
m
r Q u O m 'I b ! N l~l Ill N m p F N
O .. P O o n r m b N
ONIp ri VI N m N ON ~
m O!m N'1 Nmpl Vl ry'I rn p0 '1N N1~ NO ON Ol0 N
N O n O p O m O N N O rl O O O q
o m om o.q.INq.`~i o.qi ,~-I o.Ni oq °l 00 om o~.
N O rl rl O n .i N O I~ O N O N O q O
N
a
a
~Q]
a
W
W
M
~~
g~
w
x
m
W
0
0
m
0
W
4
0
X
W
Fu
m
a z
0
~o
m
°a~ Fa
Gi N N U
aw ~. q
wN
o~o
Z Q
W
w
x
W i
Z
O
a
W
O
X4
UO
W
5
U
a
z
m
N
N
W OZ
f w
N ~=w5
0 1z}
~au~o>
onF~2
~M ~W
N ['1 1 ~
W ~
a O~ZN
-~~F,g~z
d a V i 7~
N O
m
N in
rv o o f f o 0 0 0 o a o m m o f a m m o m m
m rv o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o f o a f o r m o o m
o N o p p P o o ~ m n r ~ q r ~n u~ e o
m o f m f m o N m voi m M o
r f N N .. n ,+ N ry f f ,.~ n N m m
x
m
u
~ H asp a
z> m fi F o r z [m. [. F z
yqa F ~ ~4. 4 F t F A HF~ ~ F \ F~F ~ F ~ O~o d ~ o~ O i O .] [O~.
.i y F w S F F F U F a F o F m F K F U F F F F E~
w> a a a tt o a g w a .F+ a w a u QQa ,Qsa, gg~ a~ a a4 ami a
z z ~ a °x g R> 3 g a~~> u> a> F~ y~~~
a~ ~a ~ a a ~ 4 ~u o a ~ a a
0 0 0 0 o m o c N o ro 0 0
O C~ £ E U 2 u u x 4 ~ a u m
m m w w a u a a u N a a u
P f o n o ry
r r N N N O O r l0 UI
N N m N M N O N N O M ~p O
N N N f O Y1 m m
N N 1'1 I+i f O f N f N1 N C N
N N N N m M
YI YI YI m m N m N N
1n 1n o 0 1i1 o ui o o r n ~
V b O N N O O N
00 O D O O O O
N N V O
N N O N O O O rI h O O
Oo o m
O O O O N O N N O ry O N ry N
O
U
~o aom o 0 0 o m o m ~
o m o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N F N N N N N \ N N O ry N
~~ 4 ~~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~
o ry 3 m o 0 1p m o m N o e F o 0
O ry N N N O N
U~~ \ \ \ \ ~ \ W\
~N zoN o o zo aN N
N N ~ N N N N N N N ~ N N
00o ao oo 0 o WD o 0 0 o mo ao 0 4
o m o 0 o w a o 0 0 0 0 0 o p
~ tJ O R U
zx$ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~
~mv imw Qry £r ~m f sn >o o imiry wN a
Omm f m (fin Om FM 1n Fm O n f a1o 4ry f
UI N N G N M F[ U N 'i' N W p Q N N N ry N N
W N NO Q ry0 N E p m N fJ N W N U N O N m F N zz N m N U
ao0 200 o mo Co 2°o a0 ao wo po zqo u
as o w3~ Q F 9 a o Z o w .,3.~~ w K o K
q 4 m N ~ m 2 m u a m u U u u U
N
N t'1 O O m VI
N N N O o m O m N m N C b N
[`WW Noo 00 or oN aoe ooN oo ..o r eo n
O O O FJ IJ O f O m O \ NO N O t~ M O O f N m N
O O O N 1(1 O N O f O O O O O VI O 1D O 111
O P 01 O O O O f O N O m O N O N O 1p O 1'r O N O O O ry O
M
(m
Pi
M
F
a
iC
U
b
N U
a
N
ao
O
a~
a~
~N
0
g~
d
W
mO
O
N
m
^iMG~
S
W
K N
N I(1 O O O
0 N O h O O O N O O O O N N O O N O O O O O O
r
p [ N 0
00 O NO O O r r N LI ryNONOrbn O(~IN N O O 00 O
¢
F
M
^
~ ~ O N N O O O N m b O O o O N m b
N Y1 ~'1 N N g M r N O
~
J
^O ~
r
n
C N N O
NMm
N
m
O
O
m
P
~D m
C g q q q m p p O
b q
m T p
S P 1 m N ry N mpObNllmmpCN 1+1 ~ N ry M
d
d rv N .. n n N ~
N N
w
N
M=rpi
Fm
MU
A
~OZ~
4
m
r7
Q W
iG q ~
U^
W
U
m
ti
vrvi O 2 ~
ti £~
~4SZ
a ~z~
\a(J ~ O>
o nE~Z
~ i b
r ~ 4 i >
N
q m
~cc~11op°z°z.>>u.
-WOMiZZZi
C~ ~
N W b
t a ~4az Z o0
H ~[i wn o m w m 4m~z~~i Za oN u [m~+i [p~+Ci
a .]~[.. ~q~£+hb ~ xa~a~ {O{O4.. m 4 ~] [Of~.. rv ~4~.. >>p„i aa~Os~q~s2.>p>ai~UmmUgN [p~. Q ~ Nt/ q
F F ~Yxy' F Y~Q F 3 F g F N F U40NXU~>i>N ~ N C 00 m
(Jj O 2wFF m J.m] Iym1 O om .2 D > O mIIIIII NObNpq~~~~~NCCCCCoq ~b 4.W p
4 O rl Z z ~ G G C M [j a ~ W G O b g N N N q C P m Q S p
N m a~JN Q' UU W O ZZZ N « ~L ~~nq~oNn.~r ry ~y U p¢I NN Z.
O > mq'~y' ~ N V1 > m ~ (~ > m > NNNNrvr'1N NNN N ~ a i L6
o pa pa oo ~~ w ~ m wmmwmn.msmwm
a o aooaaaaooaa as
g q N N N q O O O O O O O O O
w 'a .ai a.ai w~ s a a NNNNNNNNNNN
m m u OPPOOAggooa a zC
N ~O b b b 0 0 N ry N N N N N ry N N N N
"'~ M M g N b b O O O O O O O O O O O
sYNV bb ~ ~ N ~o .e ~ bu~oeeb~o pa ~
I(1 N 1!1 N N N I(1 Y N N N Y1 N V1 N N N 1I1 N M N N
N rv g M ry N M N N N NY N N N N N N N N N p ~ P P
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y V V
N NN1l1N 1l1N N N YINNNI(1N N1l11(1N YI N
O NNrIN ~O N N .y 00000000000 N Nlll
p Ot~IN b o O NONNNO NO NNNN NO
O ry ry N ry O O O rv O O O O O O O O
N M r1 N M N ~y Y Y Y Y Y Y P Y Y Y Y O
~ q b b b
N N N m N ri 1 O ry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~
00 N 000 m YImNNNVIN N111NN q qq
O N N N N O rv O N N N N N N ry NNN N N N N
YI I(1 N N N IM1 N N u
N $ Yl N N N O N N N NO N N Yl N N
M O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O
\ N N N N \ N N N N V1 N N N N N ry N N ry N N N N
o rvrveo rvrv o n o FMNnNnNngNNn N Nn
ryo00oo000000 0o Z
.i oo~ oo ~
N U N ~ .a N N N
0 N N u N N N N N N N ry N N rl M N N N F
Ro Oooo ao o ao 0 y000000 000 0 0 a
n0 0000 00 o ao o gooo0o000000 o rcoo >
U „ P
u 2
0. U
U ~ ~ Q N H O W
.(T~j W £ W N U O
a C 4 T g P P M N N M1( P O N {p~~' m m m m O N N M Y N b C N m P
N a NNN ry N N V N a N j N N M AI N N q NNN 1~1 q N F N N N N ['J+.
U O Q O O O O N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fO
G O O O O M O O Q O Q O O .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O a O O £
NZo W 40 Fo ~o ZO OOOOO0o0oo0 ^o Uoo FCC^,,
E F Vi d q
U U U U ~ S ~ U ~ A
p
N N b O N C p N O ry N O
N N N O N m M N q q N O p rv M V N g O p N C N m O N O N
O N O 1'1 fIl N q O N N O O N O N O g p q q q q q q q q q O O p N
O O NNN N O ry P q q O
op o0 0rni~r~~r~~rr oN oYa
C
wQ
'J
w
w
w
O
w ~z
W N N O^ rv M 00 O OO ,O O O map M q b m O ~m OONO
[eR,r ~; N m r O r 1- O O O q r V O b O O ry M ry
m N 00 N N N O VI O O O m q ~
P H ei q 'V 'i O O F m m rl P b r M N m b r H
~~; V Y C m O m q fl rrry ~-INry
w M t•1 ~ N N
% M M
w
O
O
N
O
N
M
E ~ m O ~ m F 'n IX-I U
0 0 . x.' 9 . . o . w . . . . a . O . R a l2-I w
Fz °~ ~ ~m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ua o ~ F " ~ w ~ ~oz axe
~~ m~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ga~~~~~y~~~~~~~~
m.q, IF.v~ o ao ~ o ~ o ~°p o ~ w ~wpa ~a ~~
~'\ qq o oaooo
4M ~ ~ .pi .. O aM.. ,,n
m •+ O~ H U u E E Y V °n a c1 F E PI p W X a a a
co co u u a V UU m v w susaaaa
w
F O n .I rv .I p m N rv rv b ~ 10 b b
GZGZ C p N O YI Y O N b M ~b'1 m m M M
W~ q 1f1 m YI M q q g r r P f< N
a VINNNb
X N N N m H m 'V N m N N N N M M
w N N N N '1 N N f•1 1.1 H M
f N m yl yl Y1 ~p N N N m II1 II1 w N q JI
[+ ~ 'I •4 VI 1I1 O II1 O r N N ~ N m Y1 O N NO q
y O M O O 1.1
O O I O N ry O p O O O O O O O O N N N
uZ p 00 M N '10
U O O V N I.1 ~ M M M 'i M M I M
•( N Nm O OY1 pO II1 Op 0000000
N I'1 'I O O O OM N OOOOryryN
w VI VI YI N YI N N N N JI 1f1 Y1 N N g q Yf Y1
O O O O O 00 O O p0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O w I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ry
iG /[ I \ \\ ~ N\ \ O\ \\ \ N \ NNNNNN
U w e N NO N NO m N N b m U ry0 \ ON 'L m N M N m m
w 'rC O' O N F N Vl O N N ry w ry O O N ry N ry
U ON 'i U ti M 'I , a\ \ \ \ U\ f o \\ O O O\
Z, >O po 0o hp Xo ."'io 0o Fo 0 0 00000
N w ~O F-00 f40 NO a0 00 ~O O „O ({0000000
ry O' O 3 w w ~N tOi1 b M U W
N OZ I U O a ry N Vf w
a 4 lL O W (a'~ ^] N 4 N - r] U
O N m g > m N w N y w w
~ miK O I q O O n £ q iq N .LN N LAM V yy pv~p Mwbr
- w$ I rym .Na s Fb ul rvrv w In 4ubi r ry„rr r
O I~ x 'j• N F N a N N N Ww N ry N N w N 4 '1 ^ N N 1'1 N r1
\ R I~ C O w N N O O `,r 0 Z O 'S O Z O O 00 O 00 FG O O O N Nry N N N ry
{~ £ ~S [-~ no ry 0000000
Mm~ i ~> QO ,O,pp z°p P•ip ~O a0 wp a ZO rTi
'~~~~> qo o uui w m ~ w 1m w u u
Um Mrv
m miau o~ NON m qui o q o<~ ~a m Po Z4mu
K~ O~ Z N w O m b O O M M M m q q
~QQ K0.0.KKK~''~ I ~Z ! ON ~.1rr Or ry OO qmq C M NM r ~rOggqq
KC f' VI ON q ON q M O H M~ b b b
'(K C N O ,'J a 00 O O O m O~ O N 00 N 00 ~~ O O o o n b n m m n
G U I~~ I O FJ O O O O m O p M YI O M O W O N O N R( Q' N M r1 M
N
m
m
m
P
m N
O
G
m N ry Nry O~ 0 0 m N 0 P O O N N p N » q p P ~ O O O O O O O p Op
K O l~ h O b m g C P m N „ m ry ry ~„-I T ry C O N O O O O O O O O
fe+ ['J~~ F m b rV m N b N N N P I'1 N P R IN- p b N O N N
Mnl i N m YI m m Y1 m q O m m rn N ei ry N N N N O N m
O~ N N 4 P N N -m N ry N N rl p m
a 5d r o .~ ..~ a;
p rl ~
X ~ '~
m
N
O
O
n
\
0
W\
F
m pQ ~ F i~ m~ O 2q U WW ~ O ~ O O O 4 C ~ 2 P ~ ~ ~ x Z O Z Z O m FO
FU i gpu;awua>m~ F F m F wm F Irm F x E F F a F
m ~ ~ OFpw p E m O as Q as Q
aN o «o~~~~A~a~m a ~ g y ~ 44 a ama a m R wa° ~Z NN ~S e°e
a mom ammoa ~d m m m .ew ri E
o~ s~~ F~amm~aXmFU ~ u > x > ~~ ~ uos ~ ~ ~ ~a` ~ as > ~i
a~ "~~ ~oo~~o~~~~o ~ ~ °m~ oaa a ~~ oo ~u
C m I 'I 'I N rl N 'I rl vl O O N N O O O ri r1 P
ml aaaaaaaaaaa u X
m~ aaaaaaaaaau a a u~ m~~4 a arc za ~
W
~O VVNV~D 10 V\D 10 '1 p N I(1 vl NNN OO OO
oN fly ^1 ry 1~1 ^1NMMMnIM< C N NV FNV HN Nri f-
Z 4 N p p d p P< p p p N e1 N 1~ V N p M N rl M b
a N N N UI I(I N I(1 N N N N nl AI M 1!1 N Ill N N
m N ry 1~1 AI N nl N M l'1 l'1 ry b ry ti M p b p N
Y1 N N N N N N N N N l0 N lp b YI N N N N Y1 N N
l[Z+ M •1 eNI M rb1 C N N N N ~0 0 0 0 0 0 O N o N N O
O Z; T N N N N m m N m m q O O p O O O O O
N b b
U O H ry N b l~ N N V g N O O D ei N r{ O O O O
4 N 'i N N 'i N N N N m q „„ 0 00 0 O q P q q
ry N N N N N N N N N ry O O O O N ry N N O
N N N N N N N N VIN N N U N N N N N O N
00 O O O O 00 O O 00 D O O O $ O O O 00 ° m O O O O O O
R m l O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
F l N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N ry ry\\ ~ ry ry ry N N \
UOl ~\b\\b\lp \IpVN '1 'j~m\ HNH mN \\ \\ N
m m N N N N N n N ry N N O N O N N O O O a N O O O O N
x s\\o\\\oooo\. \ ~~ \~ \\.\i mo \.n ~~. o
U moo ooo mo m Fo„ .r .~ u
X ~ N ri r1 N N e1 M N 'i F H w N ~ '1 H 'I 'i ~ r1 '1 N ^I N
O .I
x oooopoooooo .¢o o aoo ooo wo 00 o E.o
m oooopoooooo mo po Foo ooo Oo 00 0o p'o
~ ~ F w i m ^
N O x l 4 N m U M O U N
~d w w
U 3 m y H Z ,+.
a a m
I m a O I Q$ m P O H N l'1 < b VI F p ~ N Qa U o N Q m m p [w+ C m C m 4 V C {m~ m m
N l r~xx l arl~mm00mmmmry mN $~i ~NN '.inNN $n ~Ml~l xCM f(ry X
00 l x~ N N ry N N N N N N N - N rQ' N m N N M Nry N m I'] N ry R N N U'
400000000000 ~0 0 00 >oo0 0 0o I-IOO o
n 4~88ao NOOOOOO0000o ~o ~° ~00 ooo ~o Zoo 000 .~to m
ongaq~qiZ> U pqm 0O, O Z > mm Om QY
r~4~> U U' U (m'~ U OU' fa5 U 1'
{~ N
4 51 0 i 2 U P P m a O T P h a X I n o a a p o o a m m n
w rI ooI .'~.eee~P geee" pm om eN~ ~., pti o rb~ :<o r°, N
c~ ; g~ x l b Vp b N O ry O N O N O
mOF opppp p mpmlplb 00 0 00 s o f ~m o°m oinN o N N o\ o
GWU I mM °.Mi .P~I .yn n.~I .'Inn ~ O.+ ON ~ p mm o 00 0
~> O 'I 4 O N O m m O O O O O O O p Q O p p
N
W
fQ~~
m
k 444
m
N
O
F
w
a
p
X
U
5
FU
N
M
a
o O~
a0 F
O ~ f£a ~F i
am Fay
a .1 1. u
a:1 w
.~ q ,
..
0
°z~
a
X
m
a0
oz
U
U
a
m
~F
UO
m
5
U
2
m
rv o
oz
a a
N
IgwgaO
N I g 5 5
O IZU
~afaf~o°>
om01^
NF 2
.~+ ~ ~ >
NN,
q .. w
~~o,x~
OO
sa.Fl~m~z~
aau~o
NaNmnrPmomomrbrmawNm.lom 'O
Y1N YO~10 OIOpYmYNNrIP YI~1mmPmwlm p1
. .
~ N P M M r r 1'I g m T m m '1 O m~ N V P '1 H Y1 N
m~ m P 1~1 p O H m N M 1p b O b M 1'I rv
ti pNMb'1 N pmN N rlH
'~ "q M m
p
5
N
M
ry YI N N Y1 N rv Vt N Y1 N YI N
N U1 YI N N
N
O O ry
ry
N N
N N N N~~ N N N
ry N O O O O
yl
Uf N O b m b
b
b~
O b
b o
m
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
o
0
~ m N 0
m
0 0 0~~„ O 0 O„ O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O m b p b p q q O O
M .+n
~ am~m m N rv
1'I N N
R S R R% R R R 4 R Y R R R R R R R R R Y YC R
X XaXXkXkXXkkXXXXXkXXXkk
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
mmmwwmmwmmwwwmmmmwwmmwwm
5555555fi 555fifiS55
5fi yyfi5afi
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU6UUUU
O
O [[.. [[..
U
UU~F [[..
a
'
„ ~
mm Vi Vl VlwwwwmywN Vl VlmmwmN W mN
q
'
aa
« U
w qq
q
q
r
~
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUtW
UU q
FF
F
F r.] F
5 [.
~
i
U
F{
F
>»» m
w mN
~c{(rr
i
Z E.
F
1
1- O F O
»>»?>>J»»»>?>
F a F aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa p t
r
iN
F O OO
r
a aa
F mmwwwwmmmwwmmmwwwmmwwwm
aaaa F F
a
O a m a wwmmmwmmmmymmhwwwmmwwNm a 0000 a
pp a S aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa O aP.aa Q m O C
?• z a 5 O O t> O O O O O Off O U O (~ O O O O O [f O O O ~ ~ R 4 4 ~y
O Z
4
a > u > mmmmmmmwmmromwwmmmmwmmww > aaaa W r
i
> w w
> a
a°p~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~a °p ~~~a ~ aa
a
0 u
o
N P Q P Q m T T g m m A T T q m OI T T g q o
P O O o 0
r1 N O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ri N 'i
U ~Z aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa UUUU F U
a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa v a
O O b b b b b b b b b m m b b b V V b
b b b b m O O O O N
1 ~
N Ti"1 /7M nlM nl i'1N 1n MnlM rl !/i MrylMTnl
ri
N ~
O P N a a P p a Y N a P N N P P P
Y P Y a N NI 1'1 r1
111 N N
N
N YI m 1!1 Ifl N m YI m V1 N m N JI N N m
m N I(1 Yl N
M
N N m N N N N N N m m N m N N N
1V
N p
P p
b M M
M
M
M
.+ nnnn n N Nmn n n m b
~
nb m m
N m Ifl N N Y1 m N V1 V1 m Y1 Y1 YI Y1 m N VIN N 1f1 N YI N Y1 m N 111 YI
N O e1 N N o Nor T O N N m V r N a N 10 r m S ri N N Y1 VI N
O Y 000 O pONNNNN NNNNNN Nl~1y o O
OO r.1 O
O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O
NN1'1N NMM (~IMMNr•1 n1MMM NM M V 10V r1
O 'I N 1'1 a Y1 V r O1 O N N N b h N p VI m r m P i4 ry O O O O O
O
00000000'1 '1 '1 e1N'IryrvryNry
NTr1 rvplTm V1
N rv
O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
W ~ N
F
0 Y1 N N V1 II1 N VI V1 N V1 N m N YI VI N N N 1!1 N N /1 VI VI N N /1 N 'N' N
0
0000000
0000
000000000000 0000 po 0
0
0
0
0 0 0 o O o O o° 0 0 o O o 0 0° o O o o ° 0 0 0 O o O
\ \ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a ry N
\ \ \\ ~ \ \\ m \\\\\\\\ m \\
\ \ \
\\ a
0 m
mm m
n on
0 oMO1~ mom ooNnn m ~
N N
o
o
~
~ o
~ ~ ~
~~
n~tin
~~
~
~
~~
~
~
~~
~
n~~ ~~~
~ o
~
+ .
1
,
,
.
,
1
.
1
.
~ .
i a
~
.1 .+ n.In.-1.1MNn.1 .
i .1 .1 .1n.1 .a .r .IN.1 .1 .i .1 O.-r .1 .1 .1 [. .1 .~1
Z Z
0
O 0 °0000000000 000
O 00000000000000000000000 I
-1o0
FOOOO O
O
UO
o
a
w u
a F
O u a
U
~
ry d 5
O F ~
"
w
bC l0 dN Omm O.y Q mmOe+Nma V1 ~Orym00
1-
O O N NOmm .1 S
a
J
N N N N N N N P N N N N
Z N rv a Y a P p a Y p P Y a P P a a p a a Y a Y a a M
m I'1 N nl m m
F N a N
N w N N N ry N N N N N N N ry N N ry ry ry N N N N N
N [[++ N N
N N a N N
F° O
oo
0°0
°
ao a°o °
ooo °
ooo °
ooo°
° O
500 0 Fo do
F0 o
0
o
o
a
a
o
o mo 0 00 0 o ao Oo
u g o
wooo
u wo
a 00
mm
a r
°
u g
z z
.
. 4
'
z
.
.
~~
M.,
~~ °o m
amUga0.051.11-~Xa£20adamFO>3
o °
.1
0~~ 1 m
p0 m.,
1
a N r 0
N r P O 1p Ip m ID Ip In Ip Ip m Ip b b
0
00
00
00
0 0
0 O 0 'i O a m
°° o.+
00
0
000
0
°0000 nnN 00 on
0,1 0o nnm mm~nmN nnrl 0
O a O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O p a P Y O r4 O p
O
g
z
m
U
X
a
h
n
0
r
N
O
G
n
F
O
Y
m
~U
a
0
0
o~
a.N,
apaR \+
a
F~
O
QM y
m 4
m
m
m
]
N
N
M
m
'JC. [[..
~ o m o O m
Om00m V
r ~ ~ ~ N
m O
O O
O O
O ~ O
O O
O o O o O
OONry O
m ~ °
O ~ m
V Oo O
O °
O O
O
F Z
~+ P
~£ i a m n~ e
n a o ~o
Nmmrv.~ m
.r
a o
r
rv o
r
N
m
m O
m op
n ut
n m
r m o
m o m N
a ~
Na.m.rv
~=
o
u~
r
°
r a
r
r a
r
r ro
N r
o
m
.+ O
O
p 4 N n .r .n
r
~
~n ~
.F+N ~
O~ aaaaa
0 000
~a~w~Pi0 C54' K0a'
Ff~fa'r f^f~
N N m N N
z2.t iZ
.. va ra r+ H
apmp maa
WWhCW
~~a~~
~~~~~
uVUUL
aaaaa
.]
4
{{..
O
F
O
g a
0
a
h
w
a
a
a
a
U
a
~
O
F
D
>
m
a
W
m
w
~
°
a
a
R
[[..
O
F
a
~
e$
G
C
r
w
o
o
~
U
a
.
~
O
F
0
> a
0
o
vi
r
a
f~I.
a
a
aI
U
a
..~
4
[[..
O
F
O
~ a
0
a
N
w
a
a
~
~
U
a
,..i
4
O
F
a
8 aaaa
0000
5t0aK ~0~
HNVFih
?rrw
aaaa
wWaM1
aaaw
aa.aaa
O o 0 0
U U U U
aaam
..r~]
4
[[..
U
F
?$a
>
N
m
a
H
u
v
0
U
a
rr..~~
4~
{.
(~
FF
a
&
m
G
y
u
a
~
a
0
F
o
r~
q
[[..
F
m
S
~
~
a
a
u°
~
Y
a
r~
a
F
a
~
a
L
K
m
~
>
°'
o
b
m
4
[~..
F
a
00000
r'1 H .i .4 M
~( .r
N
O o
.y
r
N Nooo
fl r n
m m
N
.1 "111 .1N
NNVINN N
N N
N. O
O
N N rvArNm
NmNV1 ti
N N
M ~
Ilal r
YI
a a a a a
V V N V b
NN VIN YI ~
N N
N O ~ a
V
V1 a a a a
V V V
VIN IfI YI a
b
N N
T
N N N
M
N
~[[++
o Z r
U
U
4 VI VI N N m
°°° O O
d m m b N
000°0
m m m N m
N N N N N
O
m
N O
m
~
.y
o
O o0
O
m
ry
O
m
N VI
O
O
IO
O
rv N N N VI
O o°°
O O°
IO V V b
0000
m m m m
N N N rv N
O
V
O
m
N N
r1
O
o
~ ~
O
"
O N
°
~..~
°a
] m O O ° b
mw~ pooo
YR~ ~~~~~
Uqr
X ~\\~\
V .+NN.+n
Y .-I N H
2 0000000
Uo
m ~ 0 0
r
INiI O Z
~i
c w
.ai u
r £w£ aOr .4rvOaN
yr ~45Zr wnnnnn
00 r Z U a N N ry N ry
\P~Oa9~go~ woa °o oo
NpgE~rZ pN
r !ay 4 ~ ~ ~ ~J
o w
a a~ou o
Md ~O'ZOO~ rvoooor
m~~~~~zr e~,mmma
a S U r j r O aaaa a
N w N N w YI N VI Vl m N N
O O O O 0000 p O O
n o 0 0 ooryp ° 0 0 0
\ N N NN N N N
O N 0000 O ° O N
r No .~ ~ .~ ° .+
n N N N .y r-r .i n N N ,y
O OO 00 O p0 0000 O OO 'j~0 a0
U o 0000 O [N.O MO 00
a h
o z r
a a
~ a w u b F
a [n
wa ]a]a,~'' NO'1 am (uN Na r]N
2a.I O'r .4 NN ata~1 MMIw'1~.1 [-+N QaN '4mjM 2N
i o O N a N M N N a NNN rv N F o M O ] O
ao 0o ao mo moooo ~°
qW .dip x (; Y up rw~ °o a°
Y X ~ Y Y Y rte] r.l ~ a
a ~ o ma o.a Raa m Nry m
n.Ni .N.a oe rry Innrti o aN r. ~°-
Om Oa YINmm aT OIp Nm
N o4 0~ op .N. mP oa om or ow
O a N O O o a o a a p O ry O O O 1~1 O 7
a
z
4
4
u
m
O
m
a
N
°
m
^ N YI
O O
W p n
~ H N
p p
C' 'L N r
Ip q q O ~O q N O ~ ~ ~ ~ O N r N O O H P m m P O OH q
O O O D
M~ ~ N N O qp y N O fO N O D I~FN 1~ Nr1N
O N O O O O 1~m O m M 1~ h D pm A N N t~1wm NryOP
~ m m m O q O l~ h Nr1 N N N„w T m pgw
^ O i N r'1 N M f w ry N N ry N N N I~1 m p p T
aaZ .v .a ~ N
m x
N O
o W
N V
ry
.i
F .a] F ~ O m W
O m • qq Y • ~~~.. ~~~.. ~ a .•] pp • ,'qq~ • N m w a •aa .] mW .•.i vyq>1 m a m
U 6n R ~ pp~ m ~ m m ~ N 4 Q ~ R ~ a 6 [ppR[.. N [pOR[. a m .m. 4 tf > m U
FU O~ m F^ F mm tmp F E F pq a E U F NN F F F fl f~i~p F R~~Mm
J z~ [iZn~ O Z m 0 GO~ a q IQ~Wp O x ~R KS a pm m W WW O m ~ [y E. N lpQµ!~~ 'Z H q O qq U~
O n Y d i qq£ > J ~ o > pWa pp~ > a ~ ,ppmi ; m~ > o o > 4 ~ W t~ p~p > q~ ~ m q4 F
b n MU i J ~ .l as .] a ^ .]o ,o ~~a D~aa~
G~ m~ O O O O O b ~ P P q m q T q0 q
a W I ti N N N O
a. W z m ~ u x uu u a°s°.~ a$oxF
m" N G o ~ w a ~ G m W a w P w m m W G t!
o.
~O r'1 ryN O n eiryN NNNryN
QM (~ 1~ ww m ryN NNrv Ooo00
Ti4 N O O O q N N m N Nam N MN'i r1
nW O N N N N N N M p p p p p
1C /~ O I~1 ~ N N !~ ~ rlNm NNmryN
m '1 n fl '1 ri 1~1 1+1 V N N r4 M ti N rl
N p N N N 111 1~ Y1 N N Y1 N N N N 1!1 N N
O O o O O o N E N O N m O O N
p V N 1'1 O O O N w o 'i
O~ o O o o O O O D o o O O o o O o 0
U z r'1 '1 ri N m W V V '1 nl 1'1 e4 rl N 1'1 r1
U "1 M e( O O O O O 'I H 'I 'I N H e1 ~
F( O O O 00 q N q q 0000 00000
O O O 00 N p O NN N 00 OO N
Q1 N N Ill YI N N N m N N N N N Yf N N N N
r' O m O O O O O 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O
Om~ o a o o rv o Dory oorvoo
\ F 1 ry N m N N N N N N \ ry \ N \ N N N
xal ~\ .\\ G\ \\ \\\\
V a ~ N0 w N O m IO 1'1 "J N o N O N N N N N N N M
m ry yW~ O [U-~ N N O O N O O N ry N O O O O O
U 'i N a N Z O O H V O N '1 'I N O H ti N ti ti'.I .y
x ~ U Wn.+ mn ~ ~ m.~ U.~ .~N.a
Z 00 O O f.'00 O (JO O 00 O aC O00 N00000
ry m O 4 o a o O m 0 ~ O o O o o O O O o F o O O O O
~ n F rxr ~g u
o °z ~ a y ~ z w H H m
d a a~ ^ ~ a r
ti a o ^ 3 f a .n
~ .z. > m F a
Wmo ~ m ..~ amD aP $$ .+ owe N wNnN (/~ NwNm
N £ aa .TiN }'h W mm aF a pN agNNNN
1 ?, '{~ Z a N r~ rl 1 N O N N ^ 1'1 C rl U IO m N N '{ N m'1 H H U' N 1~1 m r1 m
00 1 Z U U N N N0 S N N N m N H 'I ^ N0 N W ry N ry N N N N N N
a zo 0o ao >o >D o ao ^ooo uo
rv a~m0 wo 40 o WOO Wo O 00 Woo 0o Eooooo
on~qG~ ~ z? a a v m m In > w.. .. .zio ~ u
~m4~W m w .+ o o woo x m aN
~~ ~> s z s x '~ ~ za o00 0 o ma w
m. m n rr
^ .T. W O N Y1 OI N p O N N N U
/K f{O i ~TiM ti O 1`O Nl~m b'' 0O q0 hOm pN N0 m00 rm\\~\
a 4' O O 1 ry P 00 Of ry N 1~1 N N 1p O N r OI p N w rf N q
GUN 1 (~>Z~ N H f~ r rl o\ N m N N N O m N N N N
WON ~ Z S O VI O o O ry O ry N O q O m O o q o ~~ o~ q \\ \
WW ~W oDp o0 orvry Don Doo Dow oD O n~ 00.1 Den qq
G G U ~> 1 o a .y O N D ry p m o p D N Ip o woo O O
P
[j p G p
w
w C o C
m N P
w M N N
O
a o
w ~j
N O r H b r1 rl VI 'I O P g C T O O O NO O O P P YI Ifl V V O O O O O. O
M Yf N V p r r Y1 p b 1'1 N 1l1 H M r N p m b O O Ifl N O O
~~[''~LJ ri pry ry M p V 1'1 P b P IA N b b m b m m H O O
G Qi I r P N Y) O N N O O
pl4 H N .... rv ry
%y Y Y
m XK
UU
o wm
zz
N UU
O a aZ Z¢ h .c]
p w 0 0~ r m „ C U [• q [•. ZN yp a K ,~•¢]: a [•. azS {•. [m. • F w Z [•+ >
2 ~ U~ ~9 ((a~7~ ~ O 0.' G K OU G O £Ij O 4 .] S pO C O F O F pO ~ pO \i O W ~p
,aI..~~w o[. i FFOH.]~aU Z,~IP¢~1Oia]iaK a ~Zpm Z ~K~ Z ~% .Z W Z ~ Z ~ .L v~1 pOp ~ pyO1
ON £~W~ U01 p4 ~pp>SF pmp ppm pLp ppFS ~ w > CugqZ > > > pNp > .pw^] > p > a r> pEp >
Gal .ml IF-IU i POwOm~~PPPO~O ^ ~J~ o O J ^ D D
W\ U1 I PPPPOIPPPPPPOIP N 000 O P O O
qH mI o00000000000o H o H
OI Faaaaaaaaaaaa X CUU O ~ U U F U
wH c~aaaaaaaaaaaa a aaa m a a m u
W
O N ry ry N N N N N N N N N N H H "I YI p O p N
I/~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N b ry H p r'1 C N
O m '1 H H H !I N H H H H H H N p YI N N Y1 'I
WWW ppCp pppp pp pp p Nnl nl Y1 in ~n
a ~: ~ N
m m N N N N N N N N N N N m ~~~ ~ M ~ M
w n1M AIM MrN AI I~IMMM N V M N
YI III VI N N N N N N N N YI N YI YI N N YI N Y1 N Y1 N
['+L m 0 0 0 0 0~ m H N ry P n1 M 0 0 0 M b O O O O
V O I O N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O
OZ NnmNnNNnN ~o b~U b b ~
u III IIII MNM M III ~ I Io ~ ~
u o p o o r P~ w le rv p P .I n o 0 o H o
a N O O O H N N N I'1 O P P P O P P O O
ry N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N O O ry N O O
m III N V1 Yl N YI N Y1 I(I Ill Y1 YI Ill III N N YI N N N YI 1(I YI
'a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O 00 O
^ m I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
F I ry N N N N ry ry N N N ry N N ry N N ry \ N N \ N
U (] I \\ \\ \\\ M M M M M M b P\\ b M \ \
P VI NO b ~ Ill
w O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N O N N
'y' \ \\\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ ~ \ \\ \ \ \ H \ H O
u .+,.~,+,-I .I .IrnN„.~N o 000 „ o ao
N M H H H H r1 N H M r1 H Rl N G H
Y U o o > o oU
'y M O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o ~~J!
w K0000000000000 O 000 O O O p.r0 O (-IO
N OF L-I qaa~
N
w
N O Z r m O '1 !~ M P
m u 'a5 4
p a ~y $ (O(-II O
~ f Y W Z ~ Vf P O R N t' 1 p I f l b C 9 P O N ,O Cr H N p 'J p 'yOz N m p w r 1 .~Tgj~
a$ a N M I'1 t~1 M N M t~l r1 r•I M p p O IO N I'1 a m a ry > Vf O h p ~~
'y' V' N IrI IrI nI P rl 1~1 M r1 N N MI N hJ 0 m ri N N w 1'1 a N CSS N a
I'j,U NryryNNNNNNN OOO N H"IN wN aN FN N [~N UNO
ry 'J U O O O O O O O O O O 00 •O O O G O O O (9 O 'Y O O
~~ao 0000000000000 2Z000 0 00 o Mo w0 ao
o n i~> " a N ~ O ~ ~ ~ p
F
\.E~~~ a no w a a a a a a
OOm m QNUtN NIn NN0000m N Ooh N
am m~ou 0000000 o pY o o n rv r4 r o
4~01ZH mmmmmm\mmmmmm\ HU nu\i \~lo o e rvm nr br
4 0 0 I OI ry P H m O b O
d(~„ I (j~y. i O N N N ry ry N N N N N ry ry O a DOO n N m n11n M
'm Z oP\\\\\\\~q\\\ Ou 000 °oP am om Oor o0
aau~>H I oaooooo0000000 00l oHHH oa off ov on 0m o..
7i
W
w
m
O
a
O
O
W
P
m
o¢am
S i
r p p b m N o Nm m N O m N N p m m Ymi o N M rl o m ry e P o O rl N m N~ N rv P m N N r o rl r1 r N
[ r N O N p m N b p O b O N O r b
'J~?Vi m~ 10 N m O m Nm N N r rl N 1+1 V m T O O p N N O1 N r m M T N 1l1 n1 M r Q r p m N O
['['['J^J^J^^F~~~~~~~~ p N m N N m N ti ti N p p N b N N N p N p N p T M N N M m m N m N r p N N
Z~ N M M N N N ti r O p N N p
~ N N N
X
W
N
0
N
W ~ a m a
4 m Imi. 06w a r] N a.] mm~m
^ W • mW a W .]N a v! as a [r~
K m .] > 44i0oGa»mmap W > OKUU a'' G ^O W W K K~KO~m-l rml ~m-l rlm
m W F >a W.¢~]gq4aaa>444c4~(>~~a c4~ 4yZayz vZyh~}~}y~..tt>~> 4W 3m >papoa ~y2zZ R$^~, a~a. a~a
H U ~ a a F 2 Z ?5 R? i C W !~' ~ 4 g O g O O m O>~ N\ i6 ~ J~ O y m ~' ~~> E i u R vgZi gy "' g~ ~ u S i S~
~o° ~~ ao g maaswaa~~~aa~°a ~om~~mm~~mvo~a m~oc°~o~oaaMaQ~~o~~
>ON £„ uu > w R mmmwmuNm war u uc>ummNm>ammmb
wN iFiUi °oa ~°o u ~a~a~aa ~a~~~~a~~°ama ~~a ~~a ~a ~~~°a ~~~~~~°m~~~~a ~~~a a~a~
w~ W i 00 TmmmmPmmmmmmmmammm PTTTmmmm mm 0lm mmm0~ m01N C~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Q N p i vNi d E S£ S w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w iG Y a a X Y X iG a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
y^m w U W W W w E E E E E S I I I£ S S F S F w w w w w w w w W w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
p ppppppppaoopppppppogppppppppppppp p0 ppppappppp
[.i W N m
[j Vf pp o000 0000 0000000 000000000000 0000000000
$ G N II1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N rl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
w N N O p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p Yi p di p p p p< M p p p p p f p
~ ry ry rl rf m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rv rv N N N N N N rv rv N N N N N rv rv N N N N N N
W NN NNNN rl rlNMNrlM rl rl rlN rl nlM rl rl fl rl rl rl nlN rl rl rlMnl rlN rlN nIM AIMM
N N N N N N N N N N N Y1 YI N N N N N N YI N N N N N N N YIN NNNN I(1 N N N Y1 VI Yf N Y1 N
N N O~~ N N N N N YI N YIN N N N Yf YI Ifl O O O O m O O m O O NO r1 N M N m m O 0 N~ h N N r
[~yr 00 bb NNOOOOONNNNNNN NI'INaa art r1 r1 OOOOOON N NNN
~^J O O rv 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N C! N N N N N N N
ox~ nm N NNNnnnmm~mN nnn Nnnnnnn rrn nnnnnnnrinnnnN
p i . viii iii ire ~
U N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N Mo NNNN N N N NNN N N ryo rl l+, M O O O O O N N N N N N
Q m m O O Oo O 00 O O O 00 O O 00 O O 00 O O ON ry O N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N N N N rv rv N N N N N N
~ N N a N N N a N N N N N N NO N NNNNNNN O O O N N N N a NNN YI a N N N YIN O a N
O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
O (d ~ ry ry ry O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N rv NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
X4i ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
U O ~ b N N N N 1!i Y1 1!1 N N N N N N N N N N N N b N N YI N 1!1 N N N N m N N N N N Y1 N N N N N N N N N
W N O rv N rv rv N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rv N N N N rv N N N N N N N N N N
O ~„ O O O O O o ~ D 0 0 0
m ~ H \\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0\ O O O O\\ O O O O`\ O O O O O\ O O O O\\\ O O \\ \\\ O O
U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
'xj~ O O 'j, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o O O O O O O O O O O o O O
m O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
w
N ~ o
o~ a u
~ o z ~ w a
;' ° a F
~$m ao~ aNm 4rmmNmmomnprmaprmaNONmnmmOrvmNmmbNNOtiNNi m.M+NNHO
N ~? 'Wy' Z' m N N 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N~~~ N O O D O O O O O N N N O N N N N O N N
~ Z 5 y O O N O O O O O O O N N N O O O N N O O O N N O O O O O N O O O N N O O O O O O o O O O N O O
\a4~ppp; ry0o ryooooo0000000oooo0aoo0oo00000000000ooooomoooo
Mm~~2 yy
,Ni tij ~ . > ~ 4
`~~ bprvNpNO p~epmNrN mrNbprvpNO mN~pNrNbNNM p
WSJ W ~ OU pNO V i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rl O
0.'(%i O~ QQZ O O p b p N N N m m p p r P N N O N N O P b m P N D P P m b O N O rl r r b~ b O N N M m b
mmm mmmmmN~mp aoe ryNOrm Mr'em
4m Ow} F i Z~ Z i b b N m P N N N m P m m 'N N p N UI N m m m m N m m N m N [V m r r m m N N P m rv rv rv
w (yU ~ > ~ Orr OryNNNNNNNNNNNNrlppbbNNNNNNNNNr pmN1l11l1 V mb\Dm N1I1m V V N
.. A
m
N
m F
m m m N ry 'i r n r O H P T O r Ill YI r O
m fF~ N ti N m Y1 b lO VI r O p p M P m O b N p m m f f ry p N r O O O O
[~Z1 5 l P r'1 0 W m b m m Ol N Vl m m m m O~ p e P'I l'l p o p N ry pP r ~ m O
P N N p N m m rv O ry m H N m N rl N N f p p p p Ill
W~ t m N N M M N rl O f P Yl N N r'I r ry P
m$ Pfln
a rv .i rv
%
m
m
0
0
rv
\
4 lnaxaw 4~u\l Z a zm% Mwa4aa o U m~-I
A a > am I•.~ mmo • {. ~ ZZm a mo. GE} • mMM . O •lG
U N U[~0j 614S} R ~q~¢~ ~ Z F O~mHaZUZ}lnas£°£e£q' p~o azrc ~O z ~ pp
rFmiU > aOCC~S>4 lZa F KK% F ~ F Fri hF~~ V Zm ~v~'in~U F u.ml .ml C O m U
a {Z~. ~ 4Rm.l fIF~U m oo{Lm~ m ~Qyy( {Oq mm.F]am 22m %$m pZ Um $m `rr„~j]4} O 4mU V O 0. 'SJm.
~o oommoml.m m o
'.aN ELII UUmmNCmVI ~ NryU ~ U i VIZO~m%6lmW UmU2 ~ m~aY ~ d > a
W\ N l mm PNOI CI mm0 O Pmmm 000
.Q '1 m l O O O ri O O O O O O rl ri O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O
o ~ aaaaaa as FF U mvl .nmmm W Md%m%X% Oldd U 4
~'mmJ~ aaaaaaaa oc>~F m uuuc~c+c~mmmaaaan mmm m m
!'~ O p p o o f P P o ry N O rl M n M M t`l m N M N
00 00o rr rv o00 00
i( 'i '1 r1 rl M '1 '1 'I b b O Yl rl N ri n M M M rl ri N ei N b V f M YI
m p f f p P P f P Vl Yl l0 f f f f f f P P PPP P Yl N Ill YI YI
a
% ry ry ry ry N N N ry N N ry ~ M M M T N N '1 N N N N N „ N N P N
m M M M M M M M r r N r'1 r1 r'I N N N M M M M M H N V f
YI YI N N Yl 111 YI N Ill Yl Vl N N Yl Yl N N Ill Ill YI N N Y1 YI II1 YI
ry ry b rv r m P m O m P 1!1 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 m m~ m m m m N N 1(1 Yl O
ry ry N N N N n m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O I N N N N N N N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
O Tr I M M M M M M M r r r V 'I r-1 'I '1 'I e'I N N N M n M M M ~ m f
U 11 II I 11111 I I I
U N N V b r m T N 'I 'I O q 'I 'I N N 'I a e1 'I 'I '1 'I 'I 'I N r'I N O O
I(' N NNN rv N I'1 O O N O O O O O O O O O 00 ry N
N N N N N N N N O O r N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N
m YI N N N YI Ill I(1 N N Y1 VI N V1 VI N N N Ill Ill YI VIN N Yl YI 1l1 1l1
D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O
(j (tl I rv O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rv O O O O O O O O O
F~ N N N ry N N N N N N N \ \\ N N N ry N N N N N N N\ N N
%41 \\\\\\\\ >\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \
U O I N Vl V1 m NNN V1 F VI N b N O O O O O r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 b N 0 M N
m N N N N N N N N N N ry O O O O N O O ry
m \\\\\\\o m\\\ \~\\\\ „ \ \
U 0000000 V1000 N'N N'I O'IN
N 'I mN rvI Nri 'iNH NMN'1N'iN N'1 H M
,~{ $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O O O Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
m K O O O O O O O O Ij' O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
~ I ~ X m
O r
N ~ O I U 5 O % 4
N O Z I
m m
a w m .~. o s
mza ~ 4.. olnmbinnm O.+rvm NO mPmo.~IrvoMr.~lryb„m ~mmo UP I+r
§mZ I SONOm'imOO UMmry N OriNryryryNNM'I 'IH N ~(NmT Em Rry
I(1 I j 'jI' N N r'I O H N ry N m 'I M M M rv M I'1 M M M M M M rv t'1 ri N ry O r'I
O I Z U m N N N ry ry N N N Q' N N 'y' NO N N ry N N N N N N N N N W NO N N U ry
o O mOOO0ooo0 ~o ooo 00ooooomoooooo - oo qo 0
\agiO; yo0ooo00o Fo y0o ~OmooOOOOOOOOOO }000 ^o
o~gq~;g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~m
r ~U' 4 I '~ m N N V) Vl V) h
mI 4
m W~ O U b O m ry N N N O N m Nm O P H 'If ti O ti N N N P rv f f O r P r4-I P D
d'~O I Z Pb I Om NOO NYIm n\ mbNNbN PNNf VIN pNr NOm r rv
4 IIIGGG O O l m r N 'I T I'1 m N ,y P b N H rv N N P b N f P 'I
(L } i G 'J Z I M Om r r 'I m P M M i4 O .-I N m Ol P rI T m N n n M O O\
'm~N $Ti 'I N O ryN0 mO~o 0o O~IN'i 'I 'INryNNNN'1 'I 'I Ommm O'I O
LL y U 1 7 ~ I O N N n n b N n ul O Nry .~I O N O P f p f p
oFFFFFFFFFFFFFF OrvNrv oP o0
N
'I O
w
D
w
w
m
r,
i g
m
~~
g~
a
x
w
0
0
N
M
O
r.
F
v
u
w
FU
w
a z
c 0
o
KIr\i Fa
a .. .. u
a\ m
4 .I m
^
O
~~
g~
W
a
m ~
~O
oz
u
u
I q
O
^w
Yq
U^
w
z
u
z
I m
.N+
O O b p M b (~ P O O O O O O N p C O O O F C b b
N VI T m P q C N N n m '1 P Y1 YI N N O O
N N p P P b Ip O ~ q O O p b nl r1 N
N N Ol N N N N N N VIN m '1 ry m b b YI
N N n 'i N b b N 'i
zd H a
m w ~ . ~ . a . o . a w . ~ . w . o
g~Z ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ FiF d a +pm~ i °u ~ °s [i. h d~ [a. m [a. °z [i.
T I F m .WL H y F U F .] F > F K F 4 F py w F Z R F h F ~ F
O O GW w K K qKq Z OCO O K t>a>il d' d SC a C R O qK O m SK F OK „ C
2 5 Z a> m m Z S Z .~ ^ w ~ N Z X Z m q y F~ Z m 2 ^ 2
aw i ~m~~ > ~ > o ~ m ~ ~ > a > u~ > as ~ ~ ~ a
O m P N m O T 01 O ti
4 4~ % x Y% U d U d C1 x Y U U 3 w
N d d d a U w d' U E d d C K w U'
YI b N N N N p N N N N C
T M N ry N N N C V h ~ '1
U1 m Y1 VI YI b M I+1
YI Y1 VI YI N
N N N N N N N p N N N p q ry
p P N M N b lp
N Y1 N m VI N N VI YI YI h YI V1 N
00 000 O YI N O 00 NYI VI
r. '1 N M M O N O O 'I
00 000 O O O N O 00 O O
pp nnm In o
O O N O O O
NN 000 O Y1 O 00 O
NN 0000 O O N (~l O 00 NN N O
N VI
O O
N N
\ \
N Ill
N N
00
O;~ 4
w
C d 'L
m a o ~ ~i
3 s z ' oN
"
.
,
Iz~ uNN
o 0
\ P (7 i O> ~
lx
on
F F
q
g
.r£C ~ > N
.i U' N ~
a
^ m
4 K O i 2 O O i ~\\
K~Fi[Z^u>ZI oee
d d U I> R I O N N
Yf 1(1 b N VI N 1!1 Yf Y1
O O O O
O O O
N N N N N N U N N N N N N N N .G N
\\\ \ ry \ \ \ \ \ \ U \
N N N N N N O N N N N W N C N
.]\\\\
o I-I\
o \ \\ U\ W\
do Do
d.~.OiN.I }
FN FD
4.I vi
2.I
n
.I OD
.y .I
.IN o
>N
~.OI
M N O a
woo y
y o o o oo mo 00
oo po a F D o D
u
d ~ 4 u Z
r
r
° ° o rc z ry o
u m a
w m m .+
m o d w m
v
H w r
n l m
M q
qq 0 o a y m ~~
Ul
Owbe 4r m~ >n 2 m lv ne~ ~2 ma o i a~
a 'I .i .I > n 4 H m .~I .] N C .I n .] N w .I o
rv
d N N N N O N m
N w a N ~
O
Q O
W O [.
O
F O O
m O M
qq o0o
o Oo o D 50 3o yoo oo Ko ao Y
K U w W O m -
Y
~
£ q
W a Q m N „ F K I
~
O K
r
i y y F p y
y x >
w N F F F ON Jn
2,'L .2z Z
p O
p p P m C N C O Y 1'1 D p nl
C b rl M N F C N N\ Y r'I Ol O
O N N N M N m p N Ol p Yl P< O
< p p p
'1 '1 .4N O p
O I
O\
00 N rI
Oo N N
Om
ONN
o'i O N
00
O
O N ry ry ry o O C Z
D O O O O O N O Ill O H O (~ O H O '1 r1 O p p O 14 O O o
mr
b P
N
w p p
w m..
O pp
y ~ nn
b r
41 O b m m ry m O P m N U1 p `p 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O Om O N p ~ T N m ,p
eQH'G ~ i 00 O m N 0 P 'i VI r1 q p0 O O O O O m0 O m r O p b
O m r nl ry rl p p p O P p b b ry 0 0 O YI 6 m N OI
m A p„ m r p p P p b b O .-I N O p p m g a m 0 0 p m r O m p m U
G O i m H N N N N N m N N N m N N N V O m Y r m
y RFC n N n ry ~n
% m
w N
N
O
N
[. a aaa[a. [a. [a. P
F m F X a F t OF w ~' ~ F U U U o r r
A q •a U w w~ t •tm S m •a Up r U •a WF' WF' WF~(gj+' p WF p p p p r o •a ~ayj •a i i
U ZSW 4 mCFfFq Nf/ U.O]F 4 (A [4. C Eq. W ~/I N t/1 W ~F4 Vl mlF/IN [4~ vm1P q ~y Fq mw
x a O Lq4 xaw %K Ky O>ww O r FO w O NNHravMHHiZiN p moi O as OO•
bu ' H asQ ta4oUUmOZ a o a K% a 0000000000 $?a fro Qma HrF+ aFr
~o F~ ~ w ~zm~~ao~a w R g ig ~ ~~~~~~~a~m '> ~~ > oc ~g
O\ mWI O > UU'aWWWUUU > W > h2 W
a Yl F K ~ p G p 0. p 0 0 O ~~ 4. h.
W.. .+ul ~ a~~~~aa~Q a o~ ~~a~aPo~~~m as
W\ x ~ TEI OAT O. O. O oP0~01 NTTT OV 00 {p.
q•+ O ~ U [9 tpEFXl94gw U EAC UUUUUUU V UU O Q4 [+~
Ww' a £C1WNWwNNH a WW aaaaaaaaaa E$ NN
J W
pFpOv1 o mmooo ~rv o~ooooo00 ~~ 00
24 o n.I~I t~.I+.~.I .Inn n Nln mm~nnm n r ~
am o ppwppppp p n m mwwnmm Imrlnn ~w rvly
% O N m m N ry m N N N V m~ p p P b b b b p p N P P
m .u .~.~,wmm rvp p to .v bwb bb n.mi
N VI Ill Y1111 YIN N V1 VI N YI YI N YI Y1 Ill JI Yl V1 VI N I(1 h YI P C
O O O H Y1 0 N O O Y1 Yl O o NIA Yl yl yl
O NYI Omm Nrl r4 O lom 000000000 '10
O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O b
~2 I .I r ryp p blo to ~n
u .I .I .Ii :I ,iooo :~,i 00000 as o 0
4 m oooooolnq oo mm w
N O O O O O O ry N N N O O ry ry ry ry ry N N N N N O O N b
m Y1 N YI YI N YI IA N N N YI Yl YI Y1 N N Yl N N YI N Yl Yl Yl N YI
''l O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
mw~ o aooooo000 0 00 0000000000 00 00
\ F I N N N N N N N N N N N ry ry N N N N N N N N N N \\ \ N
U Q I \ N N \\ \NNN N I+l \ N \\ \ \\
w ry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ry ry O O
x \ \'IHnn\w\\ OO r~INHN'I n.-I\\.-I OO n\
U m N
a 'I H r1 N r1 N N rl M N N U '1 i4 ei N H N ei H M N nl M N 'I N N
m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O
N w
w
x
N 02 1 vi O S ~
a a a o h
I mran X ~ ~n a °oo ooboomo ~e F~'+a zYOl u'"i Nil Y~'i In u`Oi rrl lmrl °n ~°e wor b..ry
u~ ~ sa'z O.+ a mmmmnmm m m rv mmmmmmmmmmm arvn lvrvm
I 'L U a N N N N N ry ry ry N N o 4 N N G N N N N N N N N N N O N N O O O
o O Oo xooooo000o yZZ Ooo xooooo0000o Uoo
\ 4[~~a0 £0 0000000000 ~o Uoo rlo oooooo0oa oo Ioo
mmO O> s N F E O o
orl lqFqa~ ~ ~ m mom r~I W Oxmou ~ m Y w
.~iU4 ~> > >m 3 3 3 % 0 4
w bb mmmmmm
D w nmm~nn b ~o ut
m pp W I O U T ry ry ry ry~~ N N IO ry H 'i N 'i H N O Q X 0 0
..a 402 rb N ~ ~ ~ ~~ pr.I ~~
Q. 00 I P .~mm mmmm m rv w NelrvmpblOrr prvln p00
m 'n i (j > Z~ O m Op m m ry O 'I 0 O O O O O O 0 r m N N
~m ~ ry Z Z m b O O N N 0 0 m 0 m O ry N
W W U ~ > ~ Ob On.y .y n.~l .a .I .y .I Ov Onm Op pcp<vPpP f Ooo O.~I n
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
AGENDA ITEM:
~` ORIGINATING DEPT: Administrative Svcs
PREPARED BY:
Vivi
CITY MANAGER:
DEPT HEAD:
Michele Braucht
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for the Month Ended October 2005
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council accepts the monthly Treasurer's Report.
REPORT SUMMARY
California government code section 41004 requires that the City Treasurer (the Municipal Code
of the City of Saratoga, Article 2-20, Section 2-20.035, designates the City Manager as the City
Treasurer) submit to the City Clerk and the legislative body a written report and accounting of all
receipts, disbursements, and fund balances.
41004. Regulazly, at least once each month, the city treasurer shall submit to the city
^.-.~ clerk a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances.
He shall file a copy with the legislative body.
Additionally with the passage of Chapter 687, Statutes of 2000 (AB 943 Dutra), effective
January 1, 2001 cities are now required to forwazd copies of their second and fourth quarter
calendaz yeaz investment portfolio reports to the Califomia Debt and Investment Advisory
Commission (CDIAC) within 60 days.
The CDIAC will use the report as an additional opportunity to examine public investment
practices in a more consistent basis than before.
Cities, such as the City of Saratoga, that are 100 percent invested in the Local Agency Investment
Fund (LAIF) aze exempt from the new investment portfolio reporting requirements and aze only
required to send a letter to CDIAC indicating the total and composition of their investments.
This Treasurer's Report will satisfy our reporting requirement to the CDIAC.
The following pages in the attachment provide various financial data and analysis for the City of
Sazatoga's Funds collectively as well as specifically for the City's General (Operating) Fund,
including an attachment from the State Treasurer's Office of Quarterly LAIF rates from the 15`
Quarter of 1977 to present.
FISCAL IMPACTS
None
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION
The City will not be incompliance with Government Code Section 53891 and Section 40804.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
N/A
FOLLOW UP ACTION
N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
A -Cash and Investments by fund
B -Change in total fund balances by fund
C -Cash and Investments by CIP project
D- Change in total fund balances by CIP project
E-Cash and Investments by Lighting and Landscaping District
F- Change in total fund balances by Lighting and Landscaping District
G -Local Agency Investment Fund (LATE) Quarterly Apportionment Rates
CC
cdiac_investments@treasurer.ca.gov (June & December reports only, within 60 calendaz days)
ATTACHMENT A
CASH AND INVESTMENTS BALANCE BY FUND
As of October 31, 2005, the City had $440,778 in cash, $13,334,369 on deposit in LAIF and the
City's bond trustee held $332,306 in the City's name. The bank reconciliations aze completed
thru the month of June 2005. The Council Policy on operating reserve funds adopted on Apri120,
1994, states that: for cash flow purposes, to avoid the necessity of dry period financing, pooled
cash from all funds should not be reduced below $2,000,000. The total pooled cash balance as of
October 31, 2005 is $13,775,147 and exceeds the limit required.
Cash at Comerica Bank
Deposit with LAIF
the touowing table summarizes the Crty's total cash and investment balances by Fund.
Fund T es
Fund Deseri ion Cash iL Investment
Balanes at Oct 2005
General General Fund $ 1,488,969
Designated Reserves:
Tree, Bench, & Plaque Dedication Program $ 650
Petty Cash $ 1,000
City's 50th Anniversary Celebration $ 20,000
Theater Ticket Surcharge $ 42,795
CIP (Refunded from RDA) $ 162,000
Economic Uncertainty $ 1,089,800
Operations ~ $ 2,457,846
Special Revenue Supplemental Lew Enforcement Services Fund $ 100,000
Highway Users Gas Tax $ (56,536)
Landscape and Lighting $ (29,870)
Development Services $ 760,933
Designated Reserve:
Tree Preservation Ortlinence 226 $ 181,654
Enviromental Programs $ 956,330
Development Fees $ 101,756
Community Development Block Grant $ (7,179)
SHARP loan $ 133,101
Recreation Services $ (66,732)
Teen Services $ (13,137)
CD Deposits - Arborist Reviews $ 195,450
PW Deposits -Geology Reviews $ 160,693
PW Deposits -Developer Fae (no interest) $ 115,090
CD Deposits -Planning Deposit after 6/30/05 $ 114,150
PW Deposits -City Surveyor $ 2,484
CD Deposits -Planning Deposit Prior to 7/1/05 $ 694,450
Capital Project Park Development $ 95,842
Library Expansion $ 750,335
Public Safety $ 788,587
Infrastructure $ 2,682,290
Facility $ 184,118
Park'and Trails $ 264,495
Debt Serolce Library Bond $ 224,689
lntemal Service Equipment Replacement $ 50,000
Technology Replacement $ 153,198
Facility Improvement $ 50,000
TrusUAgency Leonard Road $ 32,285
KSAR -Community Access TV $ 74.649
Parking District#3 $ (181,139)
ATTACHMENT B
CHANGES IN TOTAL FUND BALANCE
The following table presents the ending Fund Balances for the City's major fund types at October
31, 2005. This table excludes Trust and Agency funds where the City acts merely as a third party
custodian of an outside party's funds.
Fund
Balance
Incrl~Decrj
10131105
Fund
Transfers
General Fund
Designated Reserves:
Tree, Bench, 8 Plaque Dedication Program
Petty Cash
Citys 50th Anniversary Celebration
Theater Tidret Surcharge
CIP (Refunded ftom RDA)
Ecorromic Uncertainty
Operations
pedal Revenue
Supplemental Law Ertiorcement Services Fund
Highway Users Gas Tax
LandsrapelLighting Fd (to be allocated fo each District)
Development Services
Designated Reserve:
Tree Preservation Ordinance 226
Environmental Programs
Development Fees
CDBG
SHARP Loan
Recreation Services
Teen Services
apital Project
Park Development
Library Expansion
PubNc Safety
Infrastructure
Facility
Park and Trails
Library Band
demat Service Fund
Equipment Replacement
Technology Replacement
1,616,436 152,605 724,333 (1,324,288) 260,100 1,429,185
- 650 - - 650
300 700 - - 1,000
20,000 - - - 20,000
56,169 (13,374) - - 42,795
162,000 - - - 162,000
1,350,000 - - - (260,100) 1,089,900
2,451,846 - - - 2,457,846
- - 100,000 - 100,000
- (57,726) 38,252 (54,368) (73,842;
75,891 (65,250) 8,830 (68,663) (49,191;
342,122 399,162 143,125 (108,447) 775,963
161,654 20,000 - - 181,654
898,656 (29,669) 99,906 (19,097) 949,796
714 - 797 - 1,511
(1,065) (6,114) - - (7,179;
127,298 3,999 1,804 - 133,101
- (59,985) 28,053 (56,977) (88,908;
- (10,984) 3,363 (5,516) (13,137;
74,499 20,700 643 - 95,842
766,144 (10,985} 18,705 (2,796) 771,069
748,686 39,901 - (49) 788,538
3,187,274 242,017 - (6,201) 3,423,090
206,715 (16,596) - (6,018) 184,100
337,899 17,729 - - 355,629
855,319 (1,012,012) 9,504 - (147,190
- - 50,000 - 50,000
128,t98 - 25,000 - 153,198
ATTACHMENT C
CASH AND INVESTMENTS BALANCES BY CTP PROJECT
The following table the details the cash balances for each project to the Public Safety,
Infrastructure, Facility, and Pazk and Trails Capital Improvement Project Funds.
Traffic Calming 176,476 I
Safe Routes to Schools 23,9
ADA Improvements (Hakone) 49,864
Highway 9 Traffic Signal Mod 83,204
Playground Safety 287,799
Harriman Avenue Traffic Signal 5,000
Verde Vista Lane 5,000
Kirkmont Drive Traffic Signal 5,000
Congress Springs Park Safety 15,020
4th SVeet Bridge 100,000
Sobey/Quito Traffic Improvement (94,604)
Norton Rd Fire Access (8,500)
Highway 9/Oak PI Pedestrian Signal (128)
Sara-S'vale/Seagull Traffic Sign 6,604
Quito Road Bridge Replacement 131,894
Total Public Safety $ 788,587
Infrastructure
Lynda Ave Drainage (11,193)
EI Quito Area Curb Replacement 500,000
Village Streetscape Impv-Sidewalks 15,000
Village Streetscape Impv-Landscape 137,098
Storm Drain Upgrades 1,882
Median Repairs(Landscape/brig.) (38,443)
Saratoga Ave. Medianst~Library 150,000
Cox Ave Railroad Crossing Upgrade 327,865
Prospect Avenue Medians 25,000
Blaney Plaza Improvement (18,537)
City Entrance Sign/Monument (8,628)
Blaney Plaza Impv-Construction 17,g68
Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 386,172
Saratoga-Sunnyvale/Gateway 1,667,216
Vessing Road Assessment (617,208
)
EI Ca Grante/Mont Vista Storm Drain 146 097
.
Total Infrastructure $ 2,882,289
Faclllty
WHH Improvements (47)
Theater Roof (3,822)
Civic Center Master Plan (Design) (1,087)
North Campus/Prospect (553)
Animal Control Facility 309,449
Civic Theater Reroof (41,855)
Historical Park Fire Alarm System (882)
Village Fagade Mathching Fund (43,760)
Book Go Round Repairs 33 326
Total Facility $ 184,119
Parks & Trails
EI Quito Improvements 356
Hakone Garden D/VV 194,583
Azule Park 3,578
Heritage Orchard Improvements 15,282
Union Pacific Railroad (Deanza) Trail (17,996)
Kevin Moran Improvements (1,289)
Park/Trail Repairs 954
Foothill School Field Impv (8,528)
San Marcos Open Space Track 17,054
Odd Fellows Trails Dev 60,500
Total Parks & Trails $ 264,495
ATTACHMENT D
FUND BALANCES BY CIP PROJECT
The following table details the fund balances for each project in the Public Safety, Infrastructure,
and Trails
Fund
Balance
TrafFlc Calming 181,624 - -
Safe Routes to Schools 23,956 - _
ADA Improvements (Hakone) (1,175) 50,000 -
Highway 9 Traffic Signal Mod 83,204 - _
Playground Safety 287,7gg _ _
Harriman Avenue Traffic Signal 5,000 - _
Verde Vista Lane 5,000 - (49)
Kirkmont Drive Traffic Signal 5,000 - _
Congress Springs Park Safety 15,020 - _
4th Street Bridge 100,000 - _
Sobey/Quito Traffic Improvement (89,654) - (4,950)
Norton Rd Fire Access (6,500) - _
Highway 9/Oak PI Pedestrian Signal (126) - _
Sara-S'vale/Seagull Traffic Sign 6,604 - (4,109)
Quito Road Bridge Replacement 131,894
Total Public Safety 747,646 50,000 (9,108)
Infrastructure
Lynda Ave Drainage (11,193) - _
EI Quito Area Curb Replacement 500,000 - - _
Village Streetscape Impv-Sidewalks 15,000 741,000 -
Vlllage Streetscape Impv-Landscape 139,474 - (2,376)
Storm Drain Upgrades 49,108 - (47,255)
Median Repairs(Landscspe/l rrig.) (33,069} - (7,657)
Saratoga Ave. Medians(~DLibrary 150,000 - -
Cox Ave Railroad Crossing Upgrade 319,725 - _
Prospect Avenue Medians 25,000 - -
Blaney Plaza Improvement (18,537) - _
City Entrance Sign/Monument (8,628) - _
Blaney Plaza Impv-Construction 17,968 - _
Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 386,172 - _
Saratoga-Sunnyvale/Gateway 1,662,939 - (447,896)
Vessing Road Assessment (152,782) - _
EI Ca Grante/Mont Vista Storm Drain _ 146,097
Total Infrastructure 3,187,273 741,000 (505,184)
Facility
WHH Improvements (47) _ _
Theater Roof (3,822) _ _
Civic Center Master Plan (Design) (1,087) - _
North Campus/Prospect (553) - (18)
Animal Control Facility 309,449 - -
Civic Theater Reroof (41,855) - -
Historical Park Fire Alarm System (882} - -
Village Fapade Mathching Fund (21,164) - (22,596)
~. Book Go Round Repairs (33,326) - -
Total Facility
( 206,715 - (22,615)
Parks 8 Trails
EI Quito Improvements 91,490 - -
Hakone Garden D/W 194,583 - _
Azule Park 2,968 - 610
Heritage Orchard Improvements 15,282 - -
Union Pacific Railroad (Deanza) Trail (35,116) 17,120 -
Kavin Moran Improvements ~ (1,289) _ _
Park/Trail Repairs 854 - -
Foothill School Field Impv (8,528) - -
San Marcos Open Space Track 17,054 - _
Odd Fellows Trails Dev 60,500
Total Parks 8 Trails 337,900 17,120 610
18a 100
91,490
194,583
3,578
15,282
(17,996)
(1,289)
954
(8,528)
17,054
10131/05
Fund
181,624 ~
23,956
48,825
83,204
287,799
5,000 i
4,951
5, 000
15,020
100,000 ',
2,495
(11,193)
500, 000
756,000
137,098
1,852
(40,726)
150,000
319,725
25,000
(16, 537)
(8,628)
17,968
386,172
1,215,044
(152,782)
- u,rco,voa
(47)
(3,822)
(1,087)
(571)
309,449
(41,855)
(882)
(43,760)
(33.3281
ATTACHMENT E
CASH AND INVESTMENTS BALANCES BY LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE DISTRICT_
The following table the details the cash balances for each Dtstnct m the Ltghhng and
Landscaping Fund. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 each Lighting and Landscaping
District is being accounted for and reported as a sepazate fund. Staff is in the process of
reviewing the historical financial transactions of the Lighting and landscaping District and will
distribute the cash balance previous commingled in a single fund to each individual Lighting and
Landscaping District. Therefore, the various District funds currently have negative cash
balances.
Investment
Balance at
~anascaperugnung rd (to be allocated to each District) 77,078
landscape/Lighting District -Manor Dr (1,464)
Landscape/Lighting District - Fredericksburge (2,955)
Landscape/Lighting. District - Greenbriar (5,369)
LandscapelLighting District -Quito (6,395)
Landscape/Lighting District-AZUIe (1,691}
Landscape/Lighting District - Sarehills (1,287)
Landscape/Lighting District -Village Lighting (5,495)
Landscape/Lighting District - McCartysville (2,191)
Landscape/Lighting District-Tricia Woods (957)
Landscape/Lighting District -Arroyo De Saratoga (6,578)
Landscape/Lighting District - Leutar Ct (545}
Landscape/Lighting District -Bonnet Way (2,687)
Landscape/Lighting District - Beauchamps (4,074)
LandscapelLighting District - Sunland Park (5,927)
Landscape/Lighting District -Prides Crossing (22,620)
Landscape/Lighting District -Village Lscape (16,440)
Landscape/Lighting District -Saratoga Legends (1,703)
Landscape/Lighting District - Bellgrove (11,544)
Landscape/Lighting District -Cunningham/Glasgow (922)
Landscape/Lighting District -Kerwin Ranch (1,100}
Landscape/Lighting District -Tollgate (2,04$)
Landscape/Lighting District -Horseshoe (2,5281
ATTACHMENT F
N~U1VL IfALAI\l.L` o a, a a~av+.+~• •-- -- ---'
The following table the details the fund balances for each District in the Lighting and
Landscaping Fund. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 each Lighting and Landscaping
District is being accounted for and reported as a separate fund. Staff is in the process of
reviewing the historical financial transactions of the Lighting and landscaping District and will
distribute the fund balance previous commingled in a single fond to each individual Lighting and
Landscaping District. Therefore, the various District funds currently have negative fund
balances.
Fund f0/31105
Balance Incrl(Deer) Fund
LandscapelLighting Fd (to be allocated to each District) 75,891 275 - 76,166
LandscapelLighGngDistrict-Manor Dr - (1,179) ZOt (664) (1,642
LandsppelLigMingDistrict-Frederidrsburge - {1,675) 46 (1,630) (3,259
LandscapelLightirgDistrict-Greenbrier - (2,487) 297 (3,690) (5,879
LandscapelLigMing District-Quito - (4,138) 3,023 (6,458) (7,573
LandscapelLigtding District-Azule - (2,365) 1,510 (2,458) (3,314
LandscapelLigtding District - Sarahills - (628) - (905) (1,533
LandscapelLigMing District -Village Lighting - (3,697) 3,503 (6,507) (6,701
Landscapell'gMingDistdd-McCartysville - (1,360) - (1,326) (2,686
LandscapelLightingDistrict-TriciaWoods - (611) - (715) (1,32fi
LandscapelLigtrlingDistrict-Arroyo De Saratoga - (3,401) - (3,444) (6,845
LandscapelLigtding District - Leutar Ct - (338) - (342) (68C
LandscapellghtirgDistrict-BonnetWay - (1,584) - (1,976) (3,561
LandscapelLighting District - Beauchamps - (3,285) - (914) (4,200
LandscapelLigtdingDistrict-SuMandPark - (3,132) - (3,536) (6,666
LandscapelLigh6ngDistrict-Prides Crossing - (11,489) - (11,753) (23,242
LandscapelLighBngDistrict-VillageLscape - (10,487) (25) (7,599) (18,111
LandscapelLighting District -Saratoga Legends - (669) - (1,376) (2,046
LandscapelLigMingDistricl-Bellgrove - (8,404) - (9,865) (18,26£
LandscapelLigtdmg District - CnninghamlGlasgow - (530) - (418) (946
LandscapelL'gMing District -Kerwin Ranch - (891) - (606) (1,491
LandscapelLightingDistrict-ToNgate - (1,058) - (1,227) (2,28!
LandscapelLightingDistrict-Horseshoe - (1,561) - (972) (2,533
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works
AGENDA ITEM:
CITY MANAGER: ~~
PREPARED BY: Rick Torres
DEPT HEAD: John Cherbone
SUBJECT: Increase Scope of Work for Citywide Striping Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Approve additional striping work with On-Line Striping in the amount of $25,000 and authorize
the City Manager to execute a contract for the same.
REPORT SUMMARY:
In July of 2005 staff requested bids for striping work on various City streets. Of the three
*- contractors who submitted quotes On-Line Striping Services was the lowest bidder and a contract
was issued to them in an amount not to exceed $25,000. The original scope of work has been
completed and staff would like to contract for additional striping work priox to winter.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Funding for this work is programmed in the Pavement Management Budget.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Additional striping work will not be approved and the work will have to wait until next yeaz.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):
None in addition to the above.
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
Existing contract would be amended and work would proceed as soon as possible.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Nothing additional,
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
.../
2 of Z
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005
ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works
AGENDA ITEM:
CITY MANAGER: E'/ ~^', G:~-=~--
PREPARED BY: ~ ~ ~--- DEPT HEAD:
Kristin Borel John Cherbone
Administrative Analyst Dir *or of Pnhlir Workc
SUBJECT: Motor Vehicle (MV) Resolution Prohibiting Pazking on Granada Court
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to adopt Motor Vehicle Resolution prohibiting parking on a portion of Granada Court.
REPORT SUMMARY:
Recently the City received a request from a resident residing at 20797 Granada Court, to restrict
,~ parking between Yhe~r property and 20775 Granada Court because of insufficient space. City staff
took measurements of the space between the residences and the distance is 18 feet, whereas a
typical pazking space measures 22 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that parking between these
properties be restricted. Both neighbors aze in favor of the parking restrictions.
In order to enforce the new pazking restrictions on Grenada Court, it is necessary that the attached
Motor Vehicle Resolution be adopted by City Council.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Approximately $250 in labor and materials for the City to paint the curb red.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The MV Resolution would not be adopted and pazking would continue.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION{S):
None.
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
The curb will be painted red and the Sheriffs Department will be notified of the new restriction.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Nothing additional.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Motor Vehicle Resolution prohibiting pazking
2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. MV-
RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON GRANADA COURT
The City Council of the City of Sazatoga hereby resolves as follows:
Section I: Based upon an engineering and traffic study, the following parking restrictions
shall be designated on Grenada Court:
NAME OF STREET DESCRIPTION RESTRICTION
Granada Court Between 20797 Grenada No Pazking Anytime
Court and 20775 Grenada
Court
This resolutions shall become effective at such time as the signs and/or markings
installed.
The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Saratoga at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of November, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM:
ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works CITY MANAGER: ~Y/
PREPARED BY: John Cherbone DEPT HEAD: John erbone
SUBJECT: Hakone Gardens ADA Facilities Upgrade Project -Budget Amendment
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Budget Resolution.
REPORT SUMMARY:
At the November 2, 2005, City Council Meeting, Council awazded a contract for the Hakone
Gazdens ADA Facilities Upgrade Project to Robert A. Bothman, Inc. In addition, Council
ti-- approved a budget resolution approving an additional $22,000 to supplement the adopted CIP
project budget of $300,000. It is necessary to adopt a budget resolution appropriating the original
project budget of $300,000 minus expenditures to date (approximately $58,000) into the current
fiscal yeaz appropriations. Attached is a budget resolution which will clean up this issue and
appropriate $242,000 into the project budget for the current fiscal yeaz.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Funding for this work is programmed in the adopted budget for Capital Improvement Projects titled
"Hakone Gazdens ADA Improvements". In order to fully fund the project it is necessary that a
budget resolution be approved in the amount of $242,000 (Attachment 1).
Current Balance Budget Revised Account
Source of Funds
Transfer from RDA Surplus
Hakonce Donation
CDBG • Reimburse Grant
Total Source of Funds
Bud¢et Available Revisions Bud¢et IYUmber
22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 351-0203.622-xxxx
$ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 351-0203-622-xxxx
$ $ 192,000 $ 192,000 35]-0203-622-xxxx
s
zz,ooo s zz,ooo s zaz,ooo s z6a,ooo
Current Balance Budget Revised Account
Use of Funds budget Available Revisions Budeet Number _
I-Iakonce ADA Improvements 22000 $ 22 000 $ 242,000 $ 264,000_ _ 351-0203-622-5241 ,...
S
Total Use of Funds 22,000 S 21,000 S 242,000 $ 264,000
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The budget amendment would not be approved and the project will not move forward.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):
None in addition to the above.
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
The Purchase Order will be issued to the contractor.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Nothing additional.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Budget Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA TO
AMEND THE BUDGET FOR FY2005/2006 TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO PAY FOR
ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT HAKONE GARDENS.
WHEREAS, the City desires to construct ADA improvements at HakOne Gudens and a
contract has been awazded for that purpose, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to appropriate funds from the CIP Fund Balance -Public
Safety (Fund 351) to perform the project,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING IS RESOLVED, by the Council of the
City of Sazatoga:
1. Authorize an increase in the Hakone Gazdens ADA Project revenue budget of $242,000.
2. Authorize an increase in the Hakone Gazdens ADA Project expenditure budget of
$242,000.
3. The City Manager or the Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to make
adjustments to the budget for FY 2005/06 needed to execute this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the above and foregoing resolution was passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the 16th day of November,
2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Kathleen M. King, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: ~_
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development CITY MANAGER: ~~G;''~'-'
PREPARED BY: John F. Livingstone, AICP DEPT HEAD:
Community Dev. Director oho F. Liv~i gstone
SUBJECT: Proposed General Plan Amendment and Sale of City-Owned Land for 19848
Prospect Road (Community Development Department File #OS-179)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt resolution approving the proposed General Plan Amendment as recommended
by the Planning Comrission; and
Adopt resolution directing staff to proceed with sale of the property.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council initiated a proposed subdivision of the City-owned land at 19848 Prospect
Road into 9single-family residential parcels. The site is currently zoned R-1-10,000 and is
comprised of two parcels totaling 2.6 acres. Each of the proposed 9 lots will range from 10,000
square feet to 12,100 squaze feet with road frontage on a public cul-de-sac. The subdivision is
consistent with the zoning but requires the General Plan amendment that is the subject of this
staff report. The City Council has proposed to sell the subject property with final development
of the subdivision being implemented by the buyer.
On October 26, 2005 the Planning Commission approved the project with a 6-0 vote. The
Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project as a whole and
approved the Tentative Subdivision Map conditioned on the City Council approval of the
General Plan Amendment. The Commission recommended approval of the General Plan
Amendment by the City Council and found that the sale of the property for residential use would
conform to the General Plan if the Plan were amended as recommended by the Commission. All
the Commission actions were in the form reflected in the resolutions and Mitigated Negative
Declazation attached to the Planning Commission staff report. (That report is attached together
with all its attachments.)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is located at the northern City limit abutting the City of San Jose and is located
on the south side of Prospect Road. Residential properties aze located to the west, south and east.
The project site was historically in agricultural use and planted in orchards. A church sanctuary
building, a school, and other ancillary buildings were constructed in the 1960's and 1970's. In
2002, the project site was purchased by the City of Sazatoga. Since that time, the administration
building has been used for office uses and meeting space. Details regarding the site are included
in the Mitigated Negative Declaration attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report.
The proposed project involves subdivision of the property into lots approved for 9single-family
homes and sale of the property to a private housing developer. The subdivision and sale of the
property would be followed by demolition of all of the existing buildings on site and subsequent
development of the 9 homes and selected infrastructure. The City Code provides the Planning
Commission with exclusive authority to approve subdivision applications, subject to the right of
appeal to the City Council. The Planning Commission approved the subdivision so no further
action on that aspect of the project is required by the City Council.
For the Planning Commission's subdivision approval to take effect, however, the project requires
a General Plan amendment to change the designation from Quasi-Public Facilities to Medium
Density Single Family (M-10). No zoning amendment is required because the site is already
zoned for residential use at the proposed density.
As proposed, the project contemplates that final development of the subdivision would be
implemented by a private housing developer. This requires the City to sell the property.
Development by the new owner would be subject to all conditions of approval in the subdivision
map and all applicable design guidelines in the City's Zoning Ordinance. As such,
implementation of the proposed Project would be subject to consistency. with the policies and
implementation techniques described in the Residential Design Handbook and subject to design
review and approval pursuant to the Sazatoga Municipal Code. Each proposed new home would
be subject to either the City's Administrative Design Review process or the Planning
Commission design review process.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
Staff determined that the project was subject to environmental review under CEQA.
Accordingly, an Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration were prepazed and
circulated for public review and comment. The Planning Commission approved the Mitigated
Negative Declazation (MND) on October 26, 2005. The City Council must review and consider
the MND in connection with its approval of the General Plan amendment and surplus property
determination. The MND is attached and is discussed in the Planning Commission staff report.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT:
The proposed subdivision would require a General Plan Amendment to change the land
designation from Quasi-Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10). Generally,
local governments may not amend the Land Use and certain other elements of the general plan
more than four times in one calendaz yeaz. There are a few exceptions allowed in instances of
affordable housing, compliance with a court decision, etc. The proposal is the second General
_-,
2 of 5
Plan Amendment request of the calendar yeaz. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with the
State of California's General Plan Guidelines and Government Code Section 65358(b).
The proposed amendment to the General Plan's land use map meets the following General Plan
Goals:
LU.6.1 "Prior to initial approval the decision making body shall consider the
cumulative traffic impacts of single-family residential projects of 4 or
more lots..."
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. A traffic study was conducted
as part of the environmental review and found to have a less than significant
impact.
LU.6.3 The capacity of existing streets shall be recognized prior to tentative
building site or subdivision approval of any project. New development
shall be designed to minimize disntption to the azea caused by an increase
in through or heavy traffic.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. A traffic study was
conducted as part of the environmental review and found to have a less than
significant impact.
LU.8.0 Affirm that the City shall continue to be predominantly a community of
single-family detached residences.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. The proposed project will
replace an existing public use with a residential use consistent with the
current zoning district designation.
There aze twelve Area Plans (A-L) located in the General Plan that aze meant to guide future
development. The subject property is located in Area D. This area is identified as a
predominately single family residential azea. The proposed amendment is consistent would
provide for these types of uses. In addition, the site is currently zoned for single family
residential uses.
For the reasons stated above, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed
General Plan amendment.
APPROVAL OF LAND SALE:
Government Code Section 65402 (a) regulates sales of land owned by local governments. Prior
to the sale of City owned land, it requires that the Planning Commission must report to the City
Council on whether the proposed sale is consistent with the General Plan. The Planning
3 of 5
Commission determined that if the Planning Commission's recommendation on the General Plan
Amendment is adopted by the City Council, the current General Plan designation of Quasi-
Public Facility will be amended to Medium Density Single Family (M-10), which would be
consistent with the existing adjacent residential neighborhood.
The attached resolution declares that the City-owned land at 19848 Prospect Road should be sold
and directs City staff to seek offers from potential buyers of the land. Staff expects to issue a
prospectus to potential buyers in December asking for offers to be submitted in January.
COMMUNITY INPUT:
The City conducted a neighborhood meeting at the North Campus on June 2, 2005. There were
approximately 15 participants. The 9-lot site plan was shown to the attendees and there appeared
to be general acceptance of the design. The City conducted a Study Session with the Planning
Commission at the project location on August 24, 2005. Approximately 5 neighbors attended the
meeting along with the City Arborist. The majority if issues raised by the participants were
discussed in the letters and emails attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report which is
attached to this report. The public had additional opportunity for comment at the Planning
Commission hearing on October 26, 2005 and these comments and the Commission discussion
aze presented in the draft minutes of the Commission hearing which aze attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The net proceeds from the sale of the property will be designated for Council consideration
following sale of the property.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The site would remain designated for quasi public facilities and the subdivision approved by the
Planning Commission would not take effect. The property would not be sold.
ALTERNATIVES:
Deny the proposed project.
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS:
Proceed with sale of the property.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution adopting General Plan Amendment.
2. Resolution calling for sale of land.
3. Planning Commission Staff Report from October 26, 2005 (including all
attachments).
4 of 5
4, Planning Commission Draft Minutes from October 26, 2005.
5 of 5
RESOLUTION NO.
(APPLICATION NO.OS-179)
Grace Subdivision
19848 Prospect Road
A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA GENERAL
PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 386-26-070 and 071 FROM QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES
TO MEDIUM DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY (M-10)
WHEREAS, the City of Sazatoga City Council referred to the City of Sazatoga
Planning Commission an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map and a General Plan
Amendment to change the land use designation of the site listed above from Quasi-Public
Facility to Medium Density Single Family (M-10) and a General Plan Conformity
Determination for Property Disposal to subdivide two parcels totaling 2.6-acres, zoned
R1-10, 000 located at 19848 Prospect Road into nine lots, as more particulazly set forth in
File No. OS-179 of this City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which
time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heazd and to present
evidence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Tentative Subdivision Map and recommended the General Plan Amendment to the
City Council on October 26, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declazation approved by the Planning
Commission found, based on the entire record of this matter, no evidence that the General
Plan amendment, sale of the property, or other aspects of the project, as conditioned by
the Planning Commission, may have a significant effect on the environment;
WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment would change the land use
designation from Quasi-Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10); and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all
interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan amendment is consistent with the General Plan goats
listed in italics below for the reasons specified following each goal.
LU.6.1: Prior to initial approval the decision making body shall consider the
cumulative traffic impacts of single family resddential projects of 4 or
more lots.
1
The proposed amendment meets this goal. A traffic study was conducted as part of the
Initial Study and that study found that the development authorized by the amendment
would have a less than significant impact on traffic.
LU.6.3 The capacity of existing streets shall be recognized prior to tentative
building sire or subdivision approval of any project. New development
shall be designed to minimize disruption to the area caused by an
increase in through or heavy traj~c.
The proposed amendment is consistent with this goal. A traffic study was conducted as
part of the Initial Study and that study found that the development authorized by the
amendment would have a less than significant impact on traffic.
L U.8.0 Aj~rm that the City shall continue to be predominantly a community of
single family detached residences.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. The proposed project will replace an
existing commercial use with a residential use consistent with the current zoning district
designation.
WHEREAS, the General Plan amendment is consistent with the City's zoning
ordinance because the project site is currently zoned for single family residential uses and
the current General Plan designation ofQuasi-Public Facility, when amended to Medium
Density Single Family (M-10), will be consistent with the rest of the residential
neighborhood uses.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby:
1. Finds and determines that it has considered and hereby affirms the Mitigated
Negative Declazation adopted by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2005 and
based thereon finds no evidence that the General Plan amendment, sale of the property, or
other aspects of the project, as conditioned by the Planning Commission, may have a
significant adverse effect on the environment; and
2. Amends the land use map of the Saratoga General Plan to change the designation
of the project site from Quasi-Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10).
PassEn Axv ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga City Council, State of
California, this 16`h day of November by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Kathleen King, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
DIRECTING STAFF TO SEEK OFFERS FOR PURCHASE OF CITY-OWNED
LAND AT 19848 PROSPECT ROAD
WHEREAS, the City of Sazatoga owns land at 19848 Prospect Road consisting of
two pazcels totaling 2.6-acres, zoned R1-10, 000 and for which a tentative subdivision
map has been approved; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that in light of insufficient funds for site
improvements and limited funds available for existing City programs it is not feasible for
the City to effectively utilize the land for public purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to
eliminate the costs of maintenance and upkeep and to secure revenues for other City
programs by selling the above-referenced land; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declazation regarding the sale and other aspects
of the project was approved on October 26, 2005 finding, based on the entire record of
this matter, no evidence that the sale of the property or other aspects of the project, as
conditioned by the Planning Commission, may have a significant effect on the
environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined on October 26, 2005 that sale of
the property would be in conformity with the General Plan if the General Plan land use
map were amended to change the land use designation of the property from Quasi-Public
Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10); and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the recommended General Plan
amendment on November 16, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby:
1. Finds and determines that it has considered and hereby affirms the Mitigated
Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2005 and
based thereon finds no evidence that the sale of the property or other aspects of the
project, as conditioned by the Planning Commission, may have a significant adverse
effect on the environment; and
2. Directs staff to seek offers to purchase the City-owned land at 19848 Prospect
Road.
PnssEn AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga City Council, State of
California, this 16th day of November by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Kathleen King, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
2
PassEn A,vv AnOPTEA by the City of Saratoga City Council, State of
California, this 16`" day of November by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Kathleen King, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk
/f
~ REPORT~TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Map Approval, General Pian Amendment, and General
Plan Conformity Determination
Staff Planner: John F. Livingstone, AICP
Community Development Director
Date: October 26, 2005
APN: 386-26-070 & 071 Department Head:
Application No./LocatioII: #05-1791 ]9848 Prospect Road, "Grace Subdivision"
ApplicanUOwner: City of Saratoga
Type Of Application: Mitigated Negative Declaration, Tentative Subdivision
500 fl Butter ions around 19908 Rospaot Road
19eae Roapect Road
N. .
~~E
S
!I!
n
19848 Prospect Road
I.
Application # OS-179
• . EXECUT1vE SUMMARY
CASE HISTORY
Application 61ed: 5/13/05
Application complete: 10/02/05
Notice published: 10/12/05
Mailing completed: 10/4/05
Posting completed: 10/20/05
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This application proposes to subdivide the site of the former Grace Lutheran Church into
9 single-family residential parcels. The site ie. currently zones R-1-10,000 and is
comprised of two parcels totaling 2.6 acres. Each of the proposed 9 lots will range from
10,000 square feet to 12,100 square feet with road frontage on a public cul-de-sac.
The city proposes to sell the subject property along with an approved tentative
subdivision map for 9 residential lots. Final development of the subdivision would be
implemented by the buyer of the subject property.
Tlris application is presented to the Planning Commission for adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration, and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment,
and Tentative Subdivision Map approval. A General Plan Confomrity Determination by
the Planning Commission is also required for the :Future sale of the subject city owned
ProP~tY•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
2. Adopt a Resolution recommending City Council approval of a General Plan
Amendment, and approving the General Plan Conformity Determination.
3. Adopt a Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map, conditioned upon
City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment.
•
STAFF ANALXSIS
ZONING: R-1-10,000 District
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: QPF -Quasi-Public Facilities
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Single Family
MEASURE G: Not applicable
PARCEL SIZE: 2.63 acres gross
AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average slope of the parcel is approximately 2%
Compliance with Code Requirements
R-1, 20,000 DISTRICT PROPOSED MINIMUM CODE
R.E UIREMENTS
Lor AREA 10,002 sF. ro 21,356 sF,
INTERIOR LOTS 10,000 sF. (INTERtoR LOTS)
12,005 SF. AND 12,119 SF.
CORNER LOTS 12,000 SF. (CORNER LOTS)
FRONT SINGLE STORY 25 FEET 25 FEET
SIDE SINGLE STORY 10 FEET 10 FEEL
REAR SINGLE STORY 25 FEET 25 FEET
(See special requimrKnb fa coma lots)
SIDE (TWO STORY) 15 FEET 1 S FEET
REAR (TWO STORY 35 FEET 35 FEET
NUMBER OF LOTS 9 LOTS 9 LOTS
CUL-DE-SAC PUBLIC STREET -40 FT. PUBLIC STREET WITH 40 FT.
Lor DEPTH 115 Fr. To 127 Fr. 115 FT.
LOT WIDTH S5 FT. TO 105 Ff. 85 FT. INTERIOR LOTS
100 FT. CORNER LOTS
ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
WHICH INCLUDES A TWO CAR
GARAGE 3,200 SQUARE FEET FORA
10,000 SF. LOT, UP TO 3,710
FOR THE 12,119 SF. LOT 3,200 SQUARE FEFf FOR A
10,000 SF. LOT, UP TO 3,710
FOR THE 12,119 SF. LOT
•
• PROJECT DISCUSSION
The project site is located at the northern City limit abutting the City of San Jose and is
located on the south side of Prospect Road. Residential properties are located to the west,
south and east: The project site was historically in agricultural use and planted in
orchards. A church sanctuary building, a school, and other ancillary buildings were
constructed in the 1960's and 1970's. In 2002, the project site was purchased by the City
of Saratoga. Since that time, the administration building has been used for office uses
and meeting space.
The project site contains four buildings, a storage shed, and parlang areas along Prospect
Road and on the southern portion of the site. The buildings are comprised of the
following:
Asingle-story, wood and stucco former school building, approximately .1,900
square feet, located on the northwestern portion of the site.
• A single-story wood frame and stucco administration building, approximately
2,730 square feet, located immediately south of the school building.
• A wood-frame and stucco former church sanctuary building approximately 2,430
square feet, located on the northeastern portion of the site.
• A single-story wood former fellowship hall building, approximately 3,560 square
feet, located south of the Sanctuary.
• • A small playground area located south of the school building.
• A shed located east of the sanctuary building.
The majority of the buildings are vacant except for the storage of furniture. The meeting
hall is occasionally rented and the Sheriff's Department uses one of the offices for report
writing.
The proposed project involves subdivision of the property into lots approved for nine
single-family homes and sale of the property to a private housing developer.. The
subdivision and sale of the property would be followed by demolition of ail of the
existing buildings on site and subsequent development of the nine homes and selected
infrastructure.
The project requires a General Plan amendment to change the designation from tZuasi-
Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10) and City Council approval to
sell the Project site. The site zoning would remain the same.
Final development of the subdivision would be implemented by a housing developer after
the sale of the property. The development. would be subject to all applicable design
guidelines in the City's Zoning Ordinance. As such, implementation of the proposed
Project would be subject to consistency with the policies and implementation techniques
described in the Residential Design Hand book and subject to design review and approval
• pursuant to the Saratoga Municipal Gode. Each proposed new home would be subject to
either the City's Administrative Design Review process or the Planning Commission
design review process.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project consisting of a General Plan Amendment, subdivision of the site
into pine lots, and a General Plan conformity determination is subject to environmental
review under CEQA. An Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration were
prepared and circulated for public review and comment. Two comments were received
and are included in the attached correspondence from members of the public.
The Regional Water Quality Control Board commented that additional aritigation should
be required to ensure compliance with the City's NPDES pemtit. The resolution
approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration implements this suggestion by adding a
new mitigation measure requiring compliance. Conditions of approval 5, 6, 7, and 22
also address this concern.
The Citizens to Create the North Saratoga Community Center (CCNSCC) also filed
comments. This commenter suggested that there is too much land in Saratoga designated
for housing and insufficient land designated for community and recreational facilities.
Because the project site is not used extensively for community purposes and is not used
for any outdoor recreational purposes development with residential uses is not expected
to significantly reduce the resources available for community use. The proposed
subdivision is located in plan area "D" in the General Plan. This area is served by the
following parks: Brookglen, Kevin Moran and Congress springs. •
The CCNSCC also recommended that one of the lots be designated as a mini-pazk. Staff
has determined that the small park would not be as beneficial to the neighborhood and
community as using the park in lieu fees towards improvements to one of the existing
parks. The fees would equal approximately $140,000. A new park would also require
staff time and additions] fees for ongoing maintenance. All of the proposed lots will be a
minimum of 10,000 square feet providing large private open space azeas to each of the
residents. Small pocket parks of 10,000 square feet or less are typically needed for high
density condominium and townhouse projects or apartments where each resident has very
little private yard area. A small pocket park may also attract people from outside the
neighborhood in nearby high density projects seeking an area for outdoor barbeques and
family gatherings. This may create parking problems since pazking will be limited in the
court due to fire department requirements.
The CCNSCC also commented that conversion of the project site to residential uses
would increase traffic problems at existing facilities. Usage of the facility is minimal and
occurs primarily at non-peak hours. Accordingly, reallocation of the current trips to other
locations in the City is not expected to create traffic problems in those azeas.
Based on the analysis in the Initial Study Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declazation for the proposed project.
•
• GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
The proposed subdivision would require a General Plan Amendment to change the land
designation from Quasi•Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10).
Generally, local governments may not amend the Land Use and certain other elements of
the general plan more than four times in one calendar year. There are a few exceptions
allowed in instances of affordable housing, compliance with a court decision, etc. The
proposal is the second General Plan Amendment request of the calendar year. Therefore,
the proposal is in compliance with the State of California's General Plan Guidelines and
Government Code Section 65358(b).
APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN SECTIONS
The proposed amendment to the General Plan's land use map meets the following
General Plan Goals:
LU.6.1 "Prior to initial approval the decision making body shall consider the
cumulative traffic impacts of single-family residential projects of 4 or
more lots ... "
TLe proposed project is consistent wide this goal, A traffic study was
conducted as part of the environmental review and found to Lave a less than
significant impart.
LU.6.3 The capacity of existing streets shall be recognized prior to tentative
building site or subdivision approval of any project. New development
shall be designed to minimize disruption to the area caused by an
increase in through or heavy traffic.
TLe proposed project is consistent with this goal. A traffic study was
conducted as part of the environmental review and found to have a less than
significant impact.
LU.8.0 Affirm that the City shall continue to be predominantly a community of
single-fannily detached residences.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. The proposed project will
replace an existing public use with a residential use consistent with the
current zoning district designation.
There aze twelve Area Plans (A-L) located in the General Plan that are meant to guide
future development. The subject property is located in Area D. This area is identified as
a predominately single family residential azea. In addition, the site is currently zoned for
single family residential uses.
CONFORMITY DETERMINATION
• Government Code Section 65402 (a) regulates sales of land owned by local governments.
Prior to the sale of City owned land, it requires that the Planning Commission must report
Aoolication # OS-179 /~
to the City Council on whether the proposed sale is consistent with the General Plan. The i
current General Plan designation of Quasi-Public Facility will be amended to a Medium
Density Single Family (M-10), which would be consistent with the existing adjacent
residential neighborhood. The attached resolution determines that if the General Plan
amendment is approved by the City Council the sale would conform to the General Plan.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
The project includes Tentative Subdivision Map approval to subdivide two parcels
totaling 2.6 acres into nine single-family residential parcels, each of which would include
a new building site. The lots would range from 10,000 to 12,200 square fed and the
buildable floor area on each lot would range from 3,200 square fed to 3,710 square fed.
Utilities
The project site would be served by existing power, water supply mains, and sewer
system mains located within the Prospect Road right-of--way or within existing utility
easements along the east, west, and south sides of the property. Extension lines for water
and sewer would be installed within existing and/or proposed on-site easements. The
City and Santa Clara County West Valley Sanitation District ("District"} will require the
housing developer to prepare a water and sewer improvement plan for approval by
appropriate City and District staff. The housing developer will be responsible for all
applicable fees prior to recordation of the Final Map. The fees will be determined upon
submittal of an approved improvement plan.
Subdivision Regulations
The specific sections of the Subdivision Regulations that ere at issue are identified below:
Street Rights-of--Way
Section 14-25.030(b) of the Subdivision Regulations requires that "Sued rights of way
and improvements thereof shall conform with the minimums as sd forth in Table 1 of
this Chapter except where topography or special conditions make a street of less width
more suitable for the purpose intended, the advisory agency shall have the power to
approve streets of lesser width".
The new public sued on the Project site would consist of a 40-foot wide right-of--way
and 30-foot wide paved street with street parking permitted on one side of the sued from
the planter island to Prospect Road. The street will include markings to the specifications
for the Santa Clara County Fire Department and will conform to Local Government
Standards and the Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6.
Cul-de-sac
Section 14-25.030(d) of the Subdivision Regulations requires that "Cul-de-sac streets
shall have a vehicle turning area within a minimum right-of--way of thirty-two feet. No
cul-de-sac shall be longer than five hundred feet from its intersection with the centerline
of a non cul-de-sac street to the center of the tum-around. The plan depicts a 36 foot
vehicle turning area. The distance from the cul-de-sacs intersection with the centerline of .
Prospect Road is 345 feet.
• Lot and Blocks
Section 14-25.040 of the Subdivision Regulations states that "so far as practical, the side
lot lines of all lots shall run at right angles to the street upon which the lot faces or radial
if the street is curved". The proposed plans comply with this desiga requirement. All lot
lines are at right angles or radial to tht bulb of the cul-de-sac.
TENTATIVE MAP FIlKDINGS
Section 14.20.070{b) of the Subdivision Regulations states "The advisory agency shall
not approve any Tentative Map or building site if it makes any of the following specific
findings:
1. That the proposed map or building site is not consistent with the General Plan and
any applicable specific plan. The Tentative Map proposal is being processed
concurrently with a General Plan Amendment. Upon approval. of the
General Plan amendment by the City Council the proposed map will be
consistent with the Genera! Plan. The resolution of approval will take efYect
only if the General Plan amendment is approved by the City Connell.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision or building site is not
consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The Tentative
• Map proposal is being processed concurrently with a General Plan
Amendment. The resolution of approval will take effeM only if the General
Plan amendment is approved by the City Council.
3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The
project site is relatively fiat and large enough to meet associated zoning
requirements for a rsine-lot subdivision.
4. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The project site is currently zoned R-1-10,000, which allows for medium-
density residential development. A zoning amendment is not required. The
proposal meets the density requirements of the R-1-10000 zoning district.
5. That the design of the subdivision or building site or the proposed improvements
are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared for the proposed project
and analysis indicates that the proposal, as mitigated, will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or building site or type of improvements is
likely to cause serious public health or safety problems. The proposed design is
• not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems and will meet all
subdivision requirements and fire codes.
7. That the design of the subdivision or building site or type or improvements will
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through Ot Use
of property within the proposed subdivision or building site. The proposal will
not conflict with any access easements.
8. That a proposed subdivision of ]and which is subject to a contract executed
pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (The "Williamson
Act") will result in the creation of parcels of insufficient size to sustain their
agricultural .use, except as otherwise provided in Govenunent Code Section
66474.4. The property is not under Williamson Act contract.
9. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision or building site into an
existing community sewer system would result in violation of existing
requirements prescribed by a State Regional Water Quality Control Board
pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the State Water
Code. Construction of 9single-family residential homes will not create
substantial discharge of waste resulting in a violation of the State Water
Code.
Therefore, none of the above Findings are applicable to the proposed project.
Community Input
The City conducted a neighborhood meeting at the North Campus on June 2, 2005.
There were approximately 15 participants. The nine-lot site plan was shown to the
attendees and there appeared to be general acceptance of the design. Since the time of the
neighborhood meeting, staff has increased the number of trees being maintained on the
site as discussed in the attached Arborist Report.
The City conducted a Study session with the Planning Commission at the project location
on August 24, 2005. Approximately 5 neighbors attended the meeting along with the
City Arborist.
The majority of issues raised by the participants are discussed in the attached letters and e-
mails.
CITY ARBORIST
The City Arborist inspected this property on July 12, 2005 and the attached report
addresses tree protection measures required in the course of development of this property.
The azborist indicates that there are approximately fifty-eight trees large enough to be
regulated by the city ordinance. There are 14 different species of trees that aze in varying
states of health. All of the trees not situated in direct conflict with the proposed road or
the new building envelopes and not identified as potentially hazardous are to be
preserved and protected from damage during demolition and construction of the project. •
There aze 13 trees proposed for removal, which ate situated in direct conflict with the
proposed road or building envelopes.
The Arborist values the trees on the property at $143,815.00. This amount represents
the combined, appraised values of trees anticipated for retention ttlroughout the
subdivision phase of development. The City wilt require a bond from the future
developer to ensure protection of the trees that ate on the property. Also replacement
trees will be required at a value which equals the trees being removed. Arborist
reports may be required when proposed development on each lot goes through the
City's design review process.
PARK OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
At the Study Session held in August, the Planning Commission asked Staff to review
the possibility of having one of the lots used for a small neighborhood park. This
issue is discussed above in connection with the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this application and adoption of the attached
Resolutions. Staff recommends the Planning Commission act on the Mitigated
Negative Declazation first, followed by the resolution recommending approval of the
General Plan Amendment and making the Genera] Plan Conformity Determination,
and then the resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. -Page 11
2. Resolution approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration. -Page 117
3. Resolution approving the Tentative Map with conditions. -Page 121
4. Resolution recommending Approval of the General Plan Amendment and
General Plan Conformity Determination. -Page 131
5. Arborist Report. -Page 135
6. Letters from neighbors. -Page 147
7. Noticing, Affidavit, and Labels. -Page 161
8. Mitigation Monitoring Progam. -Page 179
9. Plans -Exhibit A. -Page 194
10.
Application # OS179
`I
Att
achment 1
,~
.,
Tom' gTUD FOR ~ .
1~
TE~AT~ D~SION TOGA
G~'CECT gC1A~ ~ S
A`t 14$AS PR~SpE
AUgust~ Zp05
City of S~tentn~}'~~t
Co~~~ DF~' ~~ 9 0 due
Sarato8~ CA
INITIA! STUDY FOR TENTATIVE MAP FOR ,. "
BRACE suBDIVISION AT 19848 PROSPECT ROAD IN SARATOGA
Introduction
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental ~ualNy Act (CEQl0.) GuideUnes (Tills
14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.j, an Initial Study is a preliminary '
environmental analysis that is used by the lead agency as a basis for detem~ining whether en
EIR, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or a NegatAre Dedaration is required for a project In
accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study contains a project descxiptlon,
description of environmental setting, identification.oianvironmental effects by chedcilst (ar
similar form) explanation of environmental effects,"discussbn of m(tlgatlon for signMlcaM .
environrr-ental effects, evaluatioh of the project's consistency with exi~tir-g, applkabk land use
regulations, and the names of the persons who prepared the study.
Public and Agency Revtew
This Intial Study will be circulated for public and agency review from A~~o to.j~~ 20pti, "
Copies of this document are available for review at the following locations:
Saratoga Planning Offices r
Comments on this Initial Study must be received by Spm on 9 I3o .2005 and seM to:
John F. Livingstone
Community Development Director
City of Sarefoga
Community Deveopment Department
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 85070
Project Approvals Required
List of CNy Approvals Needed:
General Plan Amendment io change site designation from Quasi Public Fadlitfes to Residential
Approval of Tentative Subdivision Map
Approval of Sale of Property
Final SubdNision Map Approval
Grading and Building Permits
List of Other Agency Approvals Needed:
Project Description
Project Location and Existing Land Uses
The project site consists of two parcels {Assessor's Parcel Numbers 386-26-070 and 386-26-
n~Tt totalin4 approximately 2.60 acres in area. The site is located in the northeastern part of
~.
•
•
the City at the northern City limit border ad)acent to the City of San Jose. The site' is located
along Prospect Road and is bordered on the nodh by Prospect Road and on the west, south,
and east by existing residential properties. See Figure 1, Repfonal Map and Vianlry M9p;111!
Blue Hills Elementary School, Azula Park, and Kevln.Moren Park are located within one quartsC
mile and McAuliffe Elementary School is located within one half mile from the proJed site.
The project site was historically in agricutturai use planted in orchards. A church sanctuary
building, a school, and other ancillary buildings were constructed M the 19608 and 19708. In
2002, the project site was purchased by the Cflyof Saratoga ('City").. Since that time; the
'Administration Building has been used for office uses and meeting space. Other buildings at the
project site have remained vacant due to cencems regarding seismic safety and oompllance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The site is designated as t]uasi Public Facilities in the Saratoga General Plan and is zoned R-
1-10,000 in the Saratoga Zoning Ordinance, which alknvs for medium-densfly resideMiel
development. The City of Saratoga, the current owner of th8 property, is currently evaluating
redevelopment of the project site for a residential subdNisbn containing nine single-tam8y
residences. •
Environmental Setting
The proJed site is developed and contains buildings, a parking lot, and related.appurtenanoes.
• The terrain on the site is level with approximate elevation of 280 feet above sea level and
approximate slopes of 1.4%. The closest surface water bodies to the project stte are
Calabazas and Saratoga Creeks, located approximately three-quarters of a mite west and, east
of the project site, respectively (Figure t ). Vegetation at the proJed site constSts of omemental
landscape grasses, trees and other omamentai landscaping.
The site contains 58 trees of a size subject to the City of Saratoga's Tree Ordinance and
Subdivision Ordinance. The trees comprise 14 different spades and are in varying states of
. health.
Existing Project Site
The proJed site contains four buildings, a storage shed, and parking areas along Prospect
Road and on the southern portion of the site. The buildings are comprised of the following:
. A single-story; wood and stucco former school building, approximately 1,900 square fast,
located on the northwestern portion of the site.
• A single story wood frame and stucco administration building, approximately 2,730 square
feet, located immediately south of the school building.
. A wood-frame and stucco former church sanctuary building, approximately 2,430 square
• feet, located on the northeastern portion of the site.
• A single-story wood former fellowship hall building, approximately 3,560 square feet,
located south of the Sanctuary.
~..
• A small playground area is located south Of the school building.
• A shed located east of, the sanctuary building.
All of the buildings are currently vacant except for storage of furniture.
Proposed Project
,,
The proposed project entails subdivision of the property into kKs approved. for nine single-famAy
homes and sale.of the property to a private housing tlevebper. The subdhiiskm and sale d the
property would be followed by demolition of aA of the existing buildings on site and subsequent
development of the nine homes and selected infrastructure. The bts woultl range from•10,000
to 12,200 square feet and the buildable floor area on each lot would range from 3,200 square
feet to 3,540 square feet, depending on lot size and other factors detailed in section i5-45.030 ,
of the Saratoga Municipal Code. See Figure 2, Grace Subdivision Tentative Map. Ths project
would require a General Plan amendment to change the designatbn from Quest PubUc ~~
Facilities to Residential and approval by the City to sell the Project site. The stle toning would
remain the same. The project includes all mitigation measures described in flits 1nHial study.
These will be required as conditions of subdivision approval or as conditions on the sale of the .
property as appropriate.
Access to the site would be via a new public street to be located in the center of the property •
with ingress from and egress to Prospect Road. In accordance with recommendations of the
consulting traffic engineers, the Project would include construction of a new median within the
prospect Road right-of-way to prevent Project traffic from making left fume on~Prospect Road
and a new street Rght on the south side of Prospect Road at the new roadway.
The new public street on the Project site would consist of a 40-foot wide right-of--way and 30-
foot wide paved street with street parking permitted on one side of the sires! from the"planter
island to Prospect Road. The street will include markings to the specifications of the Santa
Clara County Fire Department and will conform to Local Government Standards and Fire
Department Standard Details~and Specifications A-B. ..
Design Guidelines
Final development of Grace Subdivision would be implemented by a housing developer artd^
would be.subject to all applicable design guidelines in the City's Zoning Ordinance. As such,
implementation of the proposed Project would be subject to consistency with the polities and
implementation techniques described in the Resjdentlal Design Handbook and subject to
design review and approval pursuant to the Saratoga Municipal Code.
Utilities
The project site would be served by existing power, water• supply mains, and sewer system
mains located within the Prospect Road right-of-way or within existing utility easements along
the east, west, and south sides of the property. Extension lines for water and sewer would be
installed within existing and/or proposed on-site easements. The City and Santa Clara County
West Valley Sanitation District ("District") will require the housing developer to prepare a water
---„~.~o.,~ „tan ror aooroval by appropriate City and District staff. The housing ~
.. ~ ,.
developer will be responsible for atl applicable fees prbr to recordation of the final'map. The .
tees will be determined upon submittal of an approved improvement plea. ,
n
U
F~gu i •
_,
~r 1pp0 Fee+
o RAF.
n4eQ Prospect Road
The following graphics .are a reduced
version of the full=sized Tentative Map for
~.
the Grace Subdivision. A full-sized
Tentative Map is available from '
the City of Saratoga, Community
Development Department upon request. ~ ~ ~ .
TENTATIVE MAP
GRACE SUBDIVISION `
:p1G . 5~ 1~ ONE N a ,a,O,N~ A Q.~.
fur p ma- a ~' ~ . nto a R~~n w~M""ar tt aR~aow
p M taum p sANUp~ f4R[ a
aN T{IOIRI 780. INI M LOOR 1aL p AAMj. a I.
LEGEND
-..--.~.• .
- N[R TROT[NTr IR[
- - - - cmT, moreen IRt
-.-~-- - roRIR~Nr ~ AIONIRRM IRA[
--a-
A oww InlNln
PINT N%
~.~T OIIN t TRlflpl
Q DRNLg1!'
..Q-•> ~OR/I UTNA'/ Poll
~~ _
r-7~ ~ CILQOOlJ01
-.-.-.-.-
~ rLNtt
MT OMiL R4LT
~ NOOOLD RRJ[I
~ MTLR AI[TLR
.fit IAK lIA'ORANf
' ~
~ MT[R WlK NR
~(. TN[LS TO N R(YpYI
O nltta m RcrgT
K ~srwu eoxcNl[
N MCII p ^YX
q tXM[II IRR
m IAATMNP AR[R 0.fN/ pC
L0K 101 p COIILIKT[
W ORMIMT
RILL. [a6TM6
TL ~ ROR IR[ '
IAV IIOINLOI/TlRR111[N1161L
p Ri011 RIT[
ITl IAIIRRN[
R TAIORCTfI' tlL
TYL ~ TIIRLC NNIfV fMLARNf ,~
NNi TNKAtT/T '
RCP RCTIfTIRC(D CONCIILIE R/[
R-0-V Ralf p SIN'
Y f011ML TLLT
u NAIRTRRP aLSLR
M. 11MN
VCL RIK CI W~NC[ fAHYOR
vv lr~iLR'wRK
~~~r+~ ~~
~~
oNNOe ertr ar'sANOOU .
um rRARrrN[ RAORAL
sANAro~~ a NoTo
iiS ~° ~ aN-N-mI
RARIOG p Wlk R
ramN; mw• N-I-IO.000
RRa-OLto taCl01
°~NOro~im~i `a N-1-IO.ON .
-.auaa
RLru a[RItL
lwiq LLRRDL rrn nun sAntmlaR OIRIIRLT
fAM ACC Mi[R C01MMN-
TR OONRLTI fAMM OAIM OOUNfT TAIL TSOROIgN OgCRL7
ROIRC MVRRV Lp[R11011p11C110N q LIYIMO{YYQ Rgll®
ppOO
11
ORLAi p RGRNOk ~
N
M
L
nq
~M
~
MLR
T
p
N
1101
CLII
YM L
NNI~
1W p RLCND p f11RYLY !~[D TON N[CpO
' M
p/IOt p 11[ R[COIIOG p~fAflG CUM fAIM1Y ~ .
• p 61L-dMRl1 ON MIOU{L ~. IN1 M NON Ia0 df YM(
a RALr i w TRItN r RbC p RLRRSN /ON TARR Ate.
suRKt ASOIOLp CN MAlO LRaI[LK/ll[ COAIfYRRf .
~
coNRluRq CM L RNIrITON RAO I/RlD TtRIROR
~
rz
l
~
~
ru~ 0 OI
A+[ wx
iN~r
i~
Nr>a n -
~
I
~~• aNOal Na NTH
e
n K
'~
r
fs. ao
m.
fICNCNYMR ~ ~
f M
f0111N !OL p TMIOYIKC
AC
OMOfIIL M WT[Igt RIIOPLINI' UI(p Yf[. RTTSRSSALda' 'I
C[MIMIRK p
p
RR:R
~ 'l""-.L. Ra eaRRLO. ts. N-ao-N
Rnr
o
p
`
lam rRlRfw[ ~+olll[
I
I
fR1RPTNC fdlL[ .
0 70' TO' OD' f0' 100' ~~ t~NC• .'
r~
VICINITY MAP
N.TS
Tl a K
N TA V 'Y ~ W ~ ~ ~ '
_ _ _ _ EOIAN d , i. Q
' PROSPECT ROAD 60' R=0-W -' -~
t> ~~.~
S 87_Ol_IS_'jyE_c~_1S OF HEARINGS) ,. _._ _.-_.~.- - -~~ ~--;-
e69.91'
- - - Ly _ E.'sl. ~ N91i /raWn~O1 ~nd^_ ~ _ yW,•t,~.n.~1~~! •_~e~••- ~'.~}~. ,7i - •_ _
O.OrMUI ~ i ~ - I ~, S 1 RLC 1 l~~ill ~ I
.
1
' v'' 1 n ~~•+ r 0 1 .9 ' ~ a
W.ewf
w)
.~.._.
Fence 2' t ' f 1 (.• ~ p
Fenc q'-6; of F 1te . "„a I ~+ ~ t N 1 •~
45 . ~ - -- -- -"P ~- -- ~ ~Y
1 l_ 4 . , , 1 1 ". .
~' ~ (_. ( 1 ~ 1 c 1 ce /8• 'oFf s~ •1
~ • ~ ~ F ' ~ 1 n ~ Esn
' r.,,.. a 1 1 ~ 1 ' It' Pl[
¢wMS ,ec.~s 1 9'-1 1 1 1 IS9i2 ip) -
OT 1 ,,
9f'O cote 811V>a' f siS IF.)D Sf Bu0.ding~ 1 1 1 i
, 1 ni ~• ~'~. y) _ it .oFf si
~;~ 5 -- ~~... st2~ 9 •;
44 ; 1. ~. ~'.'+
I~ ~" 1 1 / 1 5 K TYP.
• ~ ~ ~ 18 g ,; ~ • ee.c np.a.ne.
~ S .. ~ 1~0®t le n ~ 16 oFf siEe C
e- n t , , . 1 ,1 m ~ ~4
1 J 1 1 ^
1 1. 1 Y. '- ~' (r10 , , ~' 1 ~
1 '^' .- New .. ; °~' 1~-. -fo / .._.._.._..
SAPS ~ ._... `~._~ ., n q ~' _.~~
f~ 1 .•~:
~~ .s. 1 19 i ~ ~ . y io .
1 i a ~, x~,
`,~\. \'~ i 1 1 1 i ~ / A ~ E'lfitt ~t ~ ~ ~ °i~', 3, 33
4.3 `,'\~~ ~ 1 \ 1 ~ "`~~1 /i OF ~CU Bul,)dirp ~ sn toot. Q OK
crl. c, , - ~ OCT ~
- r 1 to sr' .b 1 ~ ~'Om sr ~ H
_" ••_-_ -"- i ' 251 c 1 /16 •
"fence to" tF `.
W~ i • A i `~ 1 (1
1~. • L 1 t O I i^
~• i , '• ~\/ 1 f~~ / N 1 N~" 1 A \a •• ~. + r+v40 ~/ /001
~ cote 1 0 J/1 I~,e ) ~ ~' 1 ~ )
1 t 1 ,. , P1.
qrc 1
1 1 1 %'
t0' PUE u t 297 k d 1
~ P i // i ~ T i' 1
5• VE (r 2 1 q l p . 1 1 1
c,:l. ~ N LO 4 .. l:of ~ L T 5 I ~ '~1 ~ L.OTu6 e . _..~~
rolMnced I h 1 11,29 I N!) 1 10 02 N 1 1
N i p ~^~,~~8~'~ay'~\f ~J'~n~,v ~___ _ ~_ r__' Jl1\• 1 _b '6 E t 4216) /~
C]
Il~1iTIAL STUDY ~ ~ . .
CITY OF SARATOGA
1. Project Title:
Application Number OS-179 -Genera] Plan Amendment and Tentative Map for Grace Subdivision at
I9848 Prospect Road in Saretoga, Califamia ,
2. Project Location:
19848 Prospect Rosd im Saratoga, California: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 386-26-070 and 356-26-071:
3. Lead Agency Name and Address; ,
City of Saratoga, Community.Development Department, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 91070.
4. Contact Person & Phone Number:
John Livingstone, Community Devclopmrnt Director, 408-868-1231.
S. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
City of Saratoga
6. General Plan Dcaignation:
Quasi Public Facility
7. Zoning:.
R-1-10,000 Medium-density Residential
8. Description ofYroject:
See attached Project Description.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Reaidential
10. City Approvals Required for Subdivision;
General Plan Amcndnran
Tentative Subdivision Map Approval
Approval of Sale of Property
City Approvals Required for Construction and Development:
Design Approval
Grading and Building Permits
Final Subdivision Map Approval
11.Other Agency Approvals Required:
•
• Iv) Na impact. The Project site is not located near a coastal shore or near any large
body of water therefore hazards from inundat~rl by seiche and tsunami are nat
probable. The site is located on level ground on a valley floor away from S189p
slopes therefore no potential hazards from mudflow exist.
v) No impact. The Project site is located on level ground on a valley floor away
from steep slopes therefore no potential hazards from landslide exist.
v1) Less than s(gn~cant impact. ,According to the 1=1ood Insurance Rate Map (FIRIu~
for the area, most of the City of Saratoga, inducting the proposed Project site, is
located within Zone X, which inductee areas of 500-year flood events, areas Of 100-
year flood events wRh average depth of less than one foot, and areas protected by
levees from 100-year floods. (FIRM, Community Panel No. 060351 0002c, Juy 3,:
1gg7.) These areas are designated as Spedal Flood Hazard Areas and are
considered to pose a moderate or minimal flood hazard during severe storm activity.
The future housing development will be constructed in accordance with the
California Uniform Building Code and will be designed fo ensure that housing pads
are at elevations higher than the roadway so that most of the drainage will flow to
drainage facilities within the roadway. These design features will enaure that
related impacts are minimized and reduced to levels less-than-significarn.
vii) No impact. There are no wildlands adjacent or in close. proximHy'to the Project
• site and the site is not shown to be wtthiri the 'Areas of Extreme Fire Hazards' M the
City's General Plan. Therefore, no Impacts related to wildland fires are expected at
• the site.
b) Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated., Under existing conditions, the
site is developed with the major(ty of the sNe covered with buildings and other
impervious surfaces. The developed areas on eke will be demolished and. most of
the 2.62 acres will be graded and prepared for construction of the new res(dential
subdivision. Grading will result in disturbance of soil and could resuH in exposure of
soil to runoff, potentially causing erosion and sedtmentatlon In the rundf. SoA
stockpiles and exclavated areas would be exposed to runoff and, It not managed
property, the runoff could cause erosion and Increased sedimentation in adjacent
roadside dftdies. '
Mitigation Measure GEO - 2
As required by the City, the housing developer shall submit a grading permit
application to the City Public Works Department for review and approval prior to
initiation of any earthwork at the site. The grading plan shall include Best
Management Practices (BMPs) designed to control drainage from the site and to
minimize the potential for on-site and off-site erosion and sedimentation. The BMPs
shall include, but are not limited to: soft stabilization controls, watering for dust
control, perimeter silt fences, and placement of straw rolls. If grading Is conducted
during the rainy season, the primary BMPs selected shalt focus on erosion
• prevention and sediment control, that !s, keeping sediment on the site.
Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact
associated with construction period erosion to aless-than-significant level.
c) No impart. No unique geologic features OCdUr ot1 the site; therefore (10 reletod
impacts are expected to oxur.
d) Potentially significant unless mitigation Incorporated. According to the preliminary
geotechnical report, the soils underlying'the Project site could settle under statlc
foundation loads resulting in minor settlement of new structures. A property owns[
adjacent to proposed bt number s(x, expressed ooncem regerding potentlal effects
on a retaining waU on his property by Project site grading and conatructlort. The
mitigation measures below incorporate the recommendatbns of the preliminary
geotechnicai report to minimize potential impacts related to unstable sot.
Implementation of these measures reduces potential impede to a less-than-
significant level. See also discussbn In Sectbrt Vl.a.tii of this initial Study.
Mitigation Measure GEO - 3
Prior to issuance of a grading permk, a site-spedfb geotechnical analysts shall be
performed by a qualified geotechnical engineer to develop site specific design
criteria for all residential development and public Improvements on site. The
geotechnical engineer shall assess potential impede to the retaining waM on the
residential property adjacent to proposed lot number six and shall inducts any design
criteria deemed reasonably necessary to protect the integrity of the retaining watt. .,
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce related potential impede to
levels less-than-signfficant.
e) Less than significant impact. According to the preliminary geotechnit~l report, the
expansive potential of the near-surface soils on the site is low; therefore tmpad;
related to expansive soils are corlsldered less than significartL
~ No Impact. The Project does not propose use of septic systems; therefore no
related Impacts are anticipated..
VII. HAZARDS and HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the publk or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or .
disposal of hazardous materials9
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment. through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the likely release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous emissions
or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
e„natances, or waste within one quarter mile of an
, •
PolenWly.
Slpnl6carlt
Polentlaly l1nlaN Last Than
S~icaM Iwspasaa alpnMaM ~~ No
Impact IneorporaMd Impact Impact
X
X
X •
. ".
existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site whidi f5 included on a list of .., X
hazardous materials sites compUed pursuant to
Government t3ode Section 65862.5 and, ea a reBUU, •
would h create a signlflcant hazard to the publk: or the
environmerd?
e) For a project located wihin an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been atlopted, wiU-In 2 urges
of a public arport or pubUc use ekport, would the
project result rn a safety hazard for people residing or
working In the project area?
f) For a project within the v(clntty of a private akatrlp, ~ : X
would the project result In a safety hazard for people •
,reskiing or working In the proJed areal
g) Impale Implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evawatfon plan?
X
h) Expose people or atru¢tures to the risk of loss, krJury or X
death Involving wildland flrea, inGuding where wNdlands
• are adJacent to urbanitsd areas or where resklenoea
are intermixed wRh wfldlands? ,
Discussion:
The potential for hazardous materials impacts at the project site was evaluated in.a Phase 1
environmental site assessment (BASELINE, 2005a). This report is attached as Appendbc C.
The scope of work for the Phase I investigation inducted: a review of historical land uss •.
information, inducting City Planning Depatiment records, aerial photographs, and topo8repttic
maps; a site reconnaissance; interviews with persons familiar with the project aRe; a revbw of
Federal, State, and local regulatory agency files and databases; and, the development of
recommendations for further actions. The Phase I had the folbwing findings:
The project site was used for orchards trom at least 1939 until around 18133, when h was
developed for a church. Additional buildings were constructed in the 1970s. Surrounding areas
were developed for residential land uses between 9956 and 1968. AgricuRural chemicals were
likely applied to the orchards, and there may be a potential for residues of these chemicals to
be present in shallow so11s at the project sift. No other historicai land uses assodated with
hazardous materials likely to affect redevelopment of the project site were identified. ..
No evidence of hazardous materials use, storage, or release was noted at the project
site during the sfte reconnaissance.
• . Two sites within one mile of the project site appeared on Federal, State, and local
agency databases of sites associated with hazardous materials storage, disposal, or release.
Based on available details and locations, neither site identified in the database review would be
likey to affect the project site.
• Review of site history information indicates that most bf the structures at the protect site ~ ;
were constructed prior to 1980, and therefore may contain lead-based paint and/or asbesias-
containing materials. Other hazardous materiaiS, Such as fl'tercury in light SWi1Ch@S 8itd .
thermostats, may be encountered during demolition, and must be handled and disposed of in
axordance with hazardous waste regulations. '
To determine whether agricultural chemical residues may be present at concentrations that
could pose a health risk to construction workers and/,or future residents at the site, a limited soq
investigation was conducted at the project site in June 2005. Four composte shalkwu soq
samples were collected from near-surface soils at the project site and analyzed for
organochlorine pesticides and total lead, arsenic, coPPer, and mercury (metals often found in"
.inorganic pesticides) (BASELINE, 2005b). The analytical results were compared to naturally-~
occurring (background) concentrations of metals in Bay Area sdis and RWQCB enviroramenW
screening level (ESL) for residential land uses. ESLs are conservative risk-based thresholds..
that are useful for screening laboratory data to identfy results that may require additional
investigation. '
Three of the four metals analyzed for (arsenic, copper, and mercury) were detected at
concentrations typical of naturally-occurring concentrations In Bay area soils. •Leiad was
detected at concentrations up to 35 mg/kg, above typical, naturally-occurring concentrations in
Bay Area soils, but below the direct contact residential land-use ESL of 150 mg/kg.
The composite samples contained five insecticide-related cempounds: DDT, DDE (a
.breakdown product of DDT), dieldrin, alpha-chlordane, and gamma-chlordane. Dieldrin was
detected in two of the four samples, at. concentrations of 0.014 mg/kg and O.Og3 mg/kg, wlth
the maximum concentration in one sample above the 0.034 mg/kg residential direct-contact
ESL. Other pesticides detected were ident~ed at concentrations at least an order of
magnflude below the. resldentialdirect-coritact ESIs': Because one sample was above the
applicable ESL, there is a possibility that dieldrin may be present in shalow soils at the project
site at concentrations that could pose a health risk to future residents.
a) Less than significant impact. The project she would be developed with single-family
residences. Residents would be expected to store and use small quantities of
cleaning, landscaping, and other household and vehiGe maintenance chemicals and
dispose of small quantities of household hazardous wastes: No future land uses
likely to involve the use, storage, transportatkxL or disposal of significant quantities
of hazardous materials are proposed for the project site, therefore impacts related to
use and disposal of hazardous materials are expected to be less than significarrk•
b) Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated. Historical land use records
reviewed for the Phase I investigation for the project site indicated that aN protect
site buildings were, constructed prior to 1980, and therefore, could potentialy contain '
lead and/or asbestos. Other common hazardous materials, such as mercury
switches and air conditioning refrigerants, were also noted at the project ske during
a site reconnaissance. pemolition of the project site structures could therefore
expose construction workers and nearby residents and workers to asbestos fibers,
lead-based palm dust, and%or other hazardous materials during demolition activities. •
Based on the shallow soil screening investigation performed at the sfte, there may
be a potential for residues of the organocFilorine-based insecticide dieldrin to be
present in shallow soils at concentrations that could potentially pose a healftt rink to
future residential land users.
Construction of the residential subdivision at the project site wiN require the use and
transport of hazardous materials. These materials will indude fuels, oils, and oBrer
chemicals used during construction activities. Improper use and Uansportation of
hazardous materials could result (n accidental releases or spills, potentially posing
health risks to workers, the public, and environment.
Mitigation Measure tfAZ -1
As a rondifion of approval for permits for demolition or remodeitng of buildings at the
project site, alead-based paint and asbestos-containing malarial survey shall bs
conducted by a certiTied professional. Identiiled kx>se and peeling lead-based pahtt
and asbestos-containing materials shall be abated in accordance with appNcabb
regulations. Federal and State construction worker safety regulations shah be
followed during construction activities where lead and/or asbestos are known dr
suspected to be present. Other common hazardous materials that.may be
encountered during demolition, such as mercury switches and air conditlonlnQ
refrigerants, shall be handled and' disposed of in accordance with Department of
Toxic Substance ,Control (DTSC) hazardous waste regulatkx~s, ,
Mitigation Measure HAZ - 2'
Impiemenfa Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for project .
construction, as specified in Mitigation Measure HYDRO -1. Although the primary
goal of the SWPPP is to protect storm water quaAty, the SWPPP will also serve to
mitigate potential hazardous material releases that mould affect construction
workers, the public, and the environment. No addttionai mitigaton is requited.
Mitigation Measure iiAZ - 3
Prior !o approval of construction permits at the project site, an environmental
investigation shah be performed by a qualified environmental professional to
evaluate the presence of organochlorine pestidde residues in shallow soNs at the
project site. Representative soil samples shall be collected from shalknrv soils (less
than 2 feet below ground surface} across the site. ff pestidde residues are identHied
in shallow soils above screening level human health risk thresholds, the
environmental investigation shall include a human health risk assessment or
prescribe mitigation measures that will ensure that health risks from pestidde
residues in soil are below the risk standards of 1 x 10'° (one in one million excess
cancer risk) for carcinogens and below a• 1.0 hazard index for non-cardnogeris.
Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce this potential impact
to aless-than-sign cant level.
• c) Less than significant impact. See response to initial Study section Vll.b.
d} No impact. The project site is not included on hazardous materials site lists
compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. A review of regulatory
. •,
information performed Tor the Phase I investigation identfflxd two .hazardous ~,
materials sites wthin one mile of the project site; however, neither sfte would be
likely to affect the project sfte based on available details end distance iTOm the '.
project site (BASELINE, 2005x).
e) No impact. The project site is not located within an area demarcated by an airport
land use plan, orwithin two miles of a public or private airport. '
9)
No impact.. See Section VII, e, above.
,~
No impact. The project would not restrict vehicular, pedestrian, or bicycle access
within or in the Jicinfty of the project site, and would therefore not interfere with
emergency response or evacuation. The cur-de-sac roadway proposed withM. the
project site would be required to be constructed in accordance with City
requirements regarding road width, turning radius, and other requirements (City of .
Saratoga Municipal Code, Section 14-25.030, Design Standards and Dedication of
Streets) and would not.restrict emergency vehicle access. '
h) No impact The project site is Located within a completery urbanized portbn of
Saratoga that is not subject to wikiland fire risks.
,i
•
•
VUI, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the proJerx:
a) Violate any water qualfty standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substentlslly deplete proundweter supplies w interfere
substartially wish groundwater recharge such that !hero
would be a net deficit in aquffer volume or a bwerktg of
the local grourdwater labia level N-0:, thetxoduetlon nle of
pre.exletlnp n~+bY wale wwdd drop b a kvsl wMd+ wwk rat
. 61ippOn axbdrp IBnd UsaB w planned Wet for wtNCh psnrNM rwre
bean grantedyi
c) Substantially alter fhe existing drainage pattern of ilia
she w area, inducting through the aheration of the
course of a sUeam w river, In a manner whldi would
result in substanflal erosion w siltation on-site w oR
s(te?'
~.
d) Subatentlally alter the existing drainage pattern of the
sHe w area, IndudHrg through the aRerotbn of the
' course of a stream w river, w substantially increase the
rate w amount of surface runoff In a manner whk~h
would result in flooding on-sRe or ofl-site? ,
e) Create or contribute runoff water whkh would exceed
the capacity of existing w planned atwmwater drainage
systems or provWe substantial addRiona! sources of
polluted runotR
f) Otherwise substantially,degrode water quallgR
g) Place trousing wMhln a 100-year floodpla~t ss mapped
on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary w flood Insuronoe
Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-yearflood hazard area structures
which wtwld Impede or redirect flood flows?
Foter~r
Sl
nalcant
p
PtYy UrlttMa tap Tha•
~
SlpdAtaM MI~tiC11 '• t31pI>Illnttt NO
~
Impact IncaparaW topes Impact
.. X ,
X.
X ,
X
,
' X
X
X
X
Discussion:
No surface waterways traverse the Project silo. The site's runoff currently drains into existing
drainage facilities. ,
a) Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated. The potential for impacts to water
quality through sedimentation and chemical releases is present at most construction
sites. Erosion during grading and site construction can affect the quality of storm water
runoff and impact water quality. Chemicals such as fuels, oils, paints, and solvents,
once released, could be transported to surface waters and/or groundwater in storrrl
-._.,a ,.,,,;rti ~~++irl;n tr,rn violate wafer quality standards. The Proied site is
greater than one acre; therefore construction activities would be regulated under the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Constrtlctlon At~fvNy General
Permit, which would require preparation of a Starm Water Pollutbn Preventlon,Plan .
(SyyppP). Requirements of the SWPPP are discussed under Section VII. Hazards and
Hazardous Materials (b).
Mitigation Measure HYDRO -1
The housing developer shall prepare and, implement a SWPPP. The SWPPP ahaq ,
incorporate current Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction and site operation. •
The SWPPP shall include BMPs for constriction site housekeeping prectices, h'azsrdous
material storage, inspections, maintenance, worker training In pollution prevention '
measures, and containment. of releases to prevent run off into existing storm drains and
sewers. An important component of the storm water quality protector effort is the •
knowledge of the she supervisors and workers. To educate on-site personnel and maintain
awareness of the importance of storm water quality protection, site supervisors shah
conduct regular tailgate meetings to discuss pollution preventton. 'The frequerl~y of the
meetings and required personnel attendance list shall be specHied in the S.VIIPPP.: Although
designed to protect storm water quality, the SWPPP will also serve to minimize the number
and severity of potential hazardous material releases chat could affect construction workers.
• i, ,
Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce impacts to levels less-than-
signHicent.
b) Less than significant tmpad. The Project does not propose to use groundwater
supplies. Domestic water would continue to be supplied to the site by the San Joae
Water Works company. 'The bite is currently developed w(th a substantial. portion of
the site covered in pavement or other Impervious surfaces. The new residential
development would likely result in less. impenrious surface on the sfte and.would
therefore not result in any impacts to groundwater recharge. Therefore, impacts to
groundwater are expected to be less-than-slgnmcaM.
c) Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated. The drainage pattern of the
site would be altered during construction of the sHe so that erosion or siltation could
occur on-and off-site. .
Mitigation Measure GEO - 2 described in Section VI. b. of this Initial Study would reduce
impacts related to erosion prevention and sediment control to less-than-significant levels.
d-e) Less than significant impact. The drainage pattern of the site and the amount of
surface runoff from the site would not be altered in a manner that would substantially.
increase the amount of surface runoff or that would resuk in flooding on- oc off-site.
f) Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated. See response to Section Vlll.a of
this Initial Study. '
Mitigation Measure HYDRO - 1 described in section Vlll,a of this Initial Study would reduce
potential impacts related to water quality to less-than-significant levels.
~.
g-h) No Impact. No structures that would be part of the proposed residentlel su~isiaa
Project wouia be iocaiea within a 1o0~year floodplaln as mapped On any food
' hazard delineation map and no structures would impede or redirect flood flouts.
PoM~Ay
. SIpNAanl
PdeneNy lNiNw L.~N Trnn
SipnNlaM Mtlp~frOn t ~
Ingkt t~waporaYd tmp~ot MripW
• IX, LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the projacC ~ '
e) Physically divide an established wmmunky'r' X
b) Conflict with any applcable land use plan, pdiryy, a ~ X
regulation of an agency with jurisdktion over the project '
(inducting, but not Ifmked• to general plans, spedflc
'plans, local coastal programs, or zoning ordinances)?
c) Conflict with any applicable habket conservation plan or X
' natural communky conservatbn plan? ~ .
' Discussion: ~ '
The Project site has a City of Saratoga General Plan designation of Quasi Public Facilities and
is zoned R-1-10,000 Medium-density Residential. The Project includes a General Plan
amendment to change the site designation from Quasi Public Facilities to Residential. A site
rezone is not required since the site is already zoned for medium-density residential use: The
General Plan amendment would result in consistency across the City's plans and fn a land use
designation compatible with existing surrounding uses. •
a) No Impact. The proposed Project is surrounded by existing, established raskfentiel
subdivisions. The Project site has an existing six-foot high wood fence around the
properly line that would be maintained or replaced in a substantially simNar structure
or structures to serve as a privacy fence between the existing residential sties and
the proposed residential sites. The proposed development would not physicagy
divide the existing communities and therefore no impacts are expected.
b} Less Than Significant impact. The Project site is subject to consistency with the '
City's General Plan and the Area Plan for Area C, Blue Hills ('Area Plan'), The
General Plan amendment to change the site designation from Quasi PubUc Facilities
!o Residential would resuR in consistency wkh the City's General Plan. The Project
would be consistent with the Area Plan, which calls for the area to have. a
. predominantly residential character with medium-density residential uses.
Therefore, with approval of the proposed General Plan, implementation of the
Project would result, in consistency across the City's plans and in a land use
designation compatible with existing surrounding uses and would result in no
• impacts related to conflicts with any applicable plans.
c) No impact. The proposed Project would not conflict wkh any habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan therefore no impacts are anticipated.
SIpnIApM
• i~olens.a UNss usr 7trn
. SgnNfaM Mitlwson sipnino.nt No ,
Impact Incaporsted lmwd Ingo
X. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the regbn and ltte
resklents of the state? ~ ~.
b) Result in the loss of availabilty of alocally-important X
mineral resource recovery srie delineated on a kxxl
general plan, specMk plan w other lend use plan?
Discussion: ~ • ~ ' ' ,
a-b) No Impact. The Project site is underlain by alluvial fan materials comprised of clays; '
silts and sands. See discussion'of site soils in the preliminary.geotechnirial report
attached as Appendix 6. These types of materials are not identified as important
mineral resources on a local, regional, or state level; therefore no impacts to mineral
ti
t
i
d •
c
pa
e
.
resources are an
Potentldy
. SlpnHforK
PMantlalty UnNM LMS TiNn
• SlpniM1aM MltlpiYon SlpnMCrK.
Imprct Intwrpor~Np tnyx+ct do
tmp~d
XI. NOISE
Would the'project result in: ,
a) Exposure of Persons to w generation of noise levels in X
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies? ,
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessNe X
'
groundbome vibration w groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent Increase in ambient notes X
levels in the project vicinity above,levels existing without
the project?
d) A substantial temporary w periodic inwease in ambient X
noise levels in the Project vkinriy above Ieveis existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan w, ~ X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 mties •
of a publk airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project ,
area to excessive noise leveial
For a project wNhin the•vicfntty of a private airstrip,
~ would the project expose people residing or working ~ .
the project area. to excessive noise levels?
Disa~ssion:
The City of Saratoga Noise Qrdinance establishes pofic(es to control unnecessary and
excessive noise in the City. The Ordinance stipulates nolse restrictions for residential areas as
follows: ,
Noise levels for residential zoning districts cennot exceed B dBA above the local
ambient noise level;
ambient noise in residential districts shall not exceed 60 dBA during dayrims
(7:OOam-7:OOpm), 50 dBA during evening hours (7:OOpm-10:OOpm); and 45 dBA
during nighttime (10:OOpm-7:OOam).
See Municipal Code Sections 7-30.020, 7-30.040, 7-30:050.
Noise levels generated by construction activities are exempted from the above-mentioned
standards provided that construction noise levels do not exceed 83 dBA at twenty-five feet from
the source and so long as the noise occure during speed times. Municipal Code Section 7-
30.060 (c) further specffies restrictions for subdivision construction:
• . Subdivision construction may be conducted between 7:30am and 6:OOpm Monday
through Friday; ~ .
No constriction is permited on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays unless speclflcally
exempted by the Public Works Director in the event of an emergency. .
a) Less Than Significant Impact. Once the residential subdivision is constructed, .
typical activity associated with the proposed residential use of the Project site is not
expected to result in exceedanoe of the City's Noise ordinance. Noise levels
associated with future demo6tfon'of existing structures and instruction of the
residential subdivision would be short-term and intermirient rather than continuous.
Therefore, construction noise generated by the proposed Project is not expected to
result (n signrrcant impacts; however, the measures specified below shall be
implemented as part of the project to minimize noise experienced by nearby '
residents during the construction period.
Mitigation Measure NOISE -1
The housing developer shall comply with provisiohs in the City's Noise Ordinance that Ilmtt
Project-related demolition and construction work to between 7:30am and 6:OOpm Monday
through Friday. No construction shall be permitted on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays
unless spec~cally exempted by the Public Works Director in the event of an emergency.
Mitigaiion Measure NOISE - 2
During demolition and construction, all equipment powered by interne! combustion engines
shalt be properly muffled and maintained.
X,
1~i
u
Mitigation Measure N015E - 3
Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be prohibited. Normally, idling for
more than five minutes is considered unnecessary.
Mitigation Measure NOISE - 4
Ali stationary•noise-generating demolition and construction equipment, such as air
compressors, shall be acoustically shielded using standard plywood barriers, noise contrd,
blankets, or other appropriate equipment •
Mitigation Measure NOISE.- 5
The housing developer shall notify in writing the nearby residents within 5lX) feet of the site.
of the construction schedule. '
With these proposed mitigation measures, temporary construction noise impacts to nearby
residents are expected to result in less-than-signHcant impede. , ' -
b) No impact. No sources of groundbome vibration or groundbome noise (e.g.,
proximity to railway lines or wnstruction using pile driving) are anticipated on or near
the Project site. Therefore, impacts related to. groundbome vibration or noise are •
not anticipated. ,
c). No impact. The proposed Project would result to the construction of nine sirtgle-
famlly homes. This residential use is compatible with existing residential uses on
adjacent properties and will not result in substantial permanent ambient nose ~evels-
in the project vicintty. '
d) Less than significant impact, See discussion at Section Xl.a of this Initial Study.
e-f) No impact. The Project site~is not located within an airport land use plan area nor Is .
tt in the vicinity of ahy airstrips; therefore no related impacts are •anticipated.
Potenr~y
s
' rooonu.ry u uw Tfrn
sgnmemt nNtlp~tlon sgnntant
Impact mc«porsra anp.ci
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:.
a) Induce substantial population growth In an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the wnstruction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
_. ~:,..,i.,..o m~hstantial numbers of oeoole. necessitating
X
No
ima.ec
~~
X
the constructbn of replacement housfrlg elsewttere7
Discussion:
a) Less than significant impact. The proposed Project would construct nine resideni~s
and therefore would not Induce substantial population growth in the area either
directly or Indirectly. Related impede are expected to' be less than significant.
trc) No impact. The Project would replace a church and anctllary buildings and would
not affect any existing housing or residenffi. Therefore, no impede related to
• displacement of existing housing tx residents wifl oxur.
PoYMdy
SlpMpo~r~t
• PoMnd~ lkNrs l.rp Tr1Y1
StpnMomt /\Mtlpdpn SlpiYpo4d PIo
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES impsat inoaporsru rnpsct Mrpkt
a) Would the project resuk M substantial adverse physkx3•
impacts assocJeted wkh the provision of new or
physically akered govgqmmental facilkies, the need for
new or physically altered governmental facNkbs, the
• constructbn of whbh could cause signMbant •
environmental impacts, M order to mafnteln acceptabb
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the pubik servkxis:
Fire protection? X
Pollee protectbnT X
SchookT X
ParksT X .
tamer puWb facflkies7 X .
aj Less than significant impact. The Project would not result M substantial adverse
impacts associated with the provision of new or expanded public faGMNes. Ths~
proposed Project can be served with the existing public 'services available within .
exisling levels of service for fire and police protectbn and schools. See the
discussion in Section XIV below regarding parks facilities.
Pamwlb
sknlnant
Potent2aNy tMlrs t.as Ttnn
SfpntrwaM Mitly~tlprl SlpiMwM hb
Irrpsd IncaporaMti tmp~d Irt~sGl
XIV. RECREATION
e) Would the project increase the use of existing X
neighbofiood and regional parka or other recreational
facllkies such that substantial physics! deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
ti~ nnes the project include recreational facilities or require X
the constructbn or expansbn of recreatbnel facilities •
which might have an adverse physicahefftrct on the
envkonment?
a-b) Less than signircant impact. The proposed new development would be partially,
served 'by existing recreational facilfdes, including two nearby parks: Azule Park and
Kevin Moran Park. Use of these facilities by nine new residences is not expected to
result in substantial physical deterioration of the existing parks tx in.the need to
construct or expand park facilities in a way that would result in adverse impat~s to
the env(ronment, However, according to the applicable Area Plan (Blue Hills Area
• C), the area fs short of recreation and open space fadlities..In arxordanoe with
Municipal Code Section 14-25.080 (c), the subsequent development of the P>ioject
site is subject to payment of a fee to the Cfty In lieu of dedicating land. The ariTOUnt •
of this fee shall~be assessed in accordance with the subdivision ordinance. ,
FoN~r
S ,
' Pota~lhgr UnNa UN Tian
' SlpnNfarn FNaalpi Sipniearit ~
ND
XV. TRfWSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC ~ t"O01p04~ ~ 1nipio1 trtpad
Would ttie project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which !s substantial in X '
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the •
street system (Le., result to a substantel Increase b
either the number of vehicle trips, the voksne to •
capacity ratb on roads, or congestion at tntersectlons)7 '
b) Exceed, either IndNidually or cumulatively, a level of X
service standard established by the appropriate local,
regional, or state agency, or county wngestign
management agency for designated roads or
highways? '
cj Result In a change in ak, trefflc patterns, Including either X
an Increase in traffic levels or a change fn bcatbn that
results M substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e,g„ ' K
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., fans equtpment)7
e) ResuR in Inadequate emergency access? X
f) Result in inadequate parking capaciq// X
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X
supporting attemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
•
Discussion:
.~
The potential for traffio-related impacts at the project sKe was evaluated !n a report prepared by
the City's Traffic Engineer, Fehr and Peers. This report iS attached 8S APPendbf d. .
a-b) Less than signHcant impact. The proposed project is estimated to generate a total
of 90 daily car trips with nine of these taking place during either the rrlorrting or
afternoon peak hours. This volume of tretfk: would not subst8ntislly affect the traffic
operations at any of the adjacent signalized intersedbns or roadways. Therefore,
impacts would be less than signifkartL
c) No impact The proposed Projed would not alter ak traffic patterns leading to a
safety risk.
• d) Less than significant impact. The project does not incorporate design featutes.or •
Incompatible uses that would pose a substantial increase in hazaMs. Tha proposed
' access for the site would be Through a new pubNc street located In the middb of the
' ~ property that would be constructed as part of the project. The' Projed would also '
include a raised median on Prospect Road tv prevent vehicles leaving the Project
site from fuming leftonto Prospect Road. The volume of vt4hides exiting the sits ,
would be small (f.e., few than five vehides during peak hours) and would not cause'
a conflict with opposing traffic. Existing Itghtfng on Prosped Road in the vicinity of '
the site is not adequate to serve the site; therefore, the •treffic evaluatkxl
• recommendation of installing a new street light on the south side of Prosped Road , . .
. at the site entrance has been incorporated into the Project design. Therefore, '
related impacts are expelled to be Less than significant.
e) No impact. Emergency access to the she would be provided through the new publid
street entryway on Prosped Road. The new roadway has bean designed M
accordance with City regulations in accordance with recommendations from the
Santa Clara County Fire Department and would not result in Inadequate emergency
access to the site. Therefore, no impacts are antidpated.
t1 No' impact. Ample parking for the Projed site would be provided through e
combination of parking on each individual lot within the required garages and street
parking on one side of the new street. No impacts are antidpated.
g) No impact. The proposed Projed does not tronfUd with any adopted plans, poltdes .
or programs and no impacts are anttdpated.
voantlNp'
SlpnMarlt
Po~ntlaly unkaa Leat'rtwi
SipnMpM M~Uon SlpnMeaM Pb
Impact Incaporahd Impact bgaQ
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
s) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
applicable Regional Water Quality Control 8oerdT
b) Require or result In the construction of new water or X
wastewater treatment -ac(1Hies or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
signMcent environmental effects? ,
x
L
drainage facilities or expansbn of existing faciltties, the
consWCtbn of which cook! cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the . X
project from exlsUng entklaments and resources, or are
navy or expanded entitlements needed?
•,
e) Result In an adverse Impact to the cepactty of the X
westewater,freatmenTplant whicti serves or may serve
the project ((.e., does the wastewater treatment provider ;
which serves or may serve the project have adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand b
addttbn to the provider's existing commitmenta)7
~ to accommot~date t ef1epro ~s~tid waat~e dish X
needs?
a-f) Less than significant impact. The proposed Project would replace an ~xisting.church
and ancillary buildings with nine residences and would therefore not resuH in a. substantial
Increase in water usage or wastewater nor in the need to expand water supply or wastewater
treatment facilities. Storm water runoff volumes and quality from the site are not expelled to be
significantly different from runoff at the existing site and can be axommodated within Itte
existing level of service. The amount of solid waste generated by the proposed residences wiN
not be signfficantly different from the amount of waste generated by the previous use and
service can be accommodated wtthin at the landfill currently serving the area.
PdaMlraly
SIpnlAant
PoMnaNy .WMr
Sipnlliwnt -rNUp~aon " No
Imp~d Incorppsbd ' Imptad .
)n/II, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the X
queltty of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife •species, cause a tlsh or
wildlNe population to drop below sett-sustaining levels, ;
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rere or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of Califomla history or
prehistory'1
b) Doss the project have impacts that are individually X
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively
conslderable° means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
d t
ff
t
f
b
bl
f
t
he e
s o
pro
a
e
u
ure
ec
current projects, an
projects)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will X
• -~--~~~~ .,a••o.~o nffor}c nn hi iman hainas_
l~
either directly w indirectl~R
a) No Impact. The proposed Project would not signHicantly affect fish or wlldlffe habitat,'
nor would It eliminate examples of Calitomfa h(story or prehistory.
b.c) No Impact. The proposed Project would nd'~pontribute to slgnHicant impede related m
aesthetics, agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geology end
soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, and
mineral resources. The Projedwould increrrientaly, but minimally;.impad air quality, ~'
noise, public services, transportation and circulation, and utilfty services. B~caussof the
size of proposed Project (i.e., only nine residences) and because project-level impede
are reduced toless-than-signiflcent levels, these impacts are not considered
cumulatively sign cant and expelled related impede are considered less than
signHicant.
• .,
.~!_
. References
' City of Saratoga General PIan,1883.
rx,,.,f c~.~~.,.,~ AAurfA~..~ .,_,_
•
Appendices
• ~ '
Appendix A Arbor Resources, 2005, Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed NI[~ LQ<•
• SubdNision at 19848 Prospect Road,, Saratoga, CalNomia, July.
Appendix. ~ Cotton, Shires 8 Associates, 2005, Preliminary. Geotechnical Investigation,
• Prospect Road Subdivision, Saratoga; CalBomia, June.
Appendix C BASELINE, 2005a, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 19848 Prospect .,.
Road, Saratoga; CaBfomia, June. .
Appendix D BASELINE, 2005b, Shallow Soll Agricultural Chemical Screening Investigation,
. 19848 Prospect Roed, Saratoga, California, August
Appendix E Fehr 8 Peers, 2005, Prospect Roed Residential -Traffic Evaluation, fdsy. .
..
•
e4YE~ g'
i
r~
-.~
•
ARBOR RESOURCES
Professional Arborieultural~Gonsulting ~ Tree Care
A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF TAE
PROPOSED NINE LOT•SUBDIVISION AT
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA
PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF SARATOGA
' SITE NAME: NORTH CAMPUS
APN'S #: 386-26-070 & 386-26-071
Submitted to:
Public Works Depardnent
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Prepared by:
David L. Babby, RCA
Registered Consulting Arbortst #399 ,
Certified Arborist #WE-4001A
July 12, 2005
David
,laly /2.2003 ~' i.
Overall 7'i!'ee Conditions
The trees presented in this report been assigned an overall condition rating that eontridets .,
both their physiological health and structural, integrity. The table below summarizes the
' ratings assigned to each tree and reveals that .the trees appear in mostly fair to good
condition.
Tree # 3, 10, 18; 16-22, 24, 28, 30, 4-6,11, 12, 14, 29, 25-27; 1, 2,16, 93.98, 97~, 41,
96, 50, 53, 54, 56, 58 26, 31', 32, 40, 49, 479, 52, 42, 44.4e, 81
55, 57
' Totel 1S 24., 18 ~ •
' % of Totsl 33% 4116• 26li ti
' 7}u Locations
There are {Qtly-three trees located on the subject site and include #1-4, 10.14, 1tS-29, 33-
. 37, 39-41, 44, 46 and 49-9,8. ti
Thera are nine trees situated on neighboring properties and include #30.32, 38, 42, 43, 45, s •
47 and 48.
There are six trees situated within the publicright-of--way along Prospect Road and include
#5-9 and 15.
Plan Review and Site Observations.
The proposed Tentative Map identifies:the removal of the following 13 trees that, to my
understanding, are situated in direct conflict with the proposed road ar building envelopes:
#2, d-g, ]2, 14, ]6, 21-23 and 49-51, Replacements are suggested to mitigate the loss of
. any tree approved for removal. '
My review of the recent Tentative Map reveals that a home could possibly be constructed
on lot 9 in a manner that allows the retention and protection of tree #]ti, a 21.5-inch
diameter Camphor in overa}1 good condition. If possible, I r•~ommend this occurs due to
its size, condition: and relative contnbution to the site. In doing so, I suggest a minimum
setback of 12 feet from its trunk. Plesae. note the tree protection bond amount and
replacement >~ value consider the retention of this tree.
My observations of the ] 0 Eucalyptus trees on site (#1, 33-35, 37, 39-41, 44 and 46) reveal
they are in overall poor structural condition due to being repeatedly being pruned at severe
levels for clearance from the overhead, high-voltage electrical lines. Consequently, their
branches are predisposed to failure and present a significant and potentially imminent risk
to public safety. The only foreseeable way to potentially minimize this risk is'to radically
prune each tree at least once or twice a year and continue doing so throughout their life.
~ ~
U
• ~, Re er+d Consulti Arborist _ 'la 11, ?t70s
David L Babby Y~ n8
' Tree Protection Measures during Site DevelOpmutt
5. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and establis~ted
prior to the demolition and clearing phases. The fencing shall consist of six-foot high
chain link mounted on two-inch diameter; eight-foot tall steel posts driven two fed i~o
the ground every IO to 12 feet. Once establislied, the fence should remain undisturbed
. and be maintained throughout the construction process. ~ Please note 1}ta precise
' location for fencing will be specified during the pt's-construction tneetitig (sa dte
second line item below'j.
6. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities moat be conducted outside the
designated fenced areas and off of uppaved soil beneath the trees' canopiei. These
activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, surface
scraping, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materiak (including
soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parldug.:
7. Before commencing the site demolition and clearing phases, apre-construction meeting
~. shall beheld on site with the Project Manager, Project Superintendent and I. Thcinttmt
• is to specify tree protective fencing locations, limits of grsdirig, staging areas, routes of
• acceas,~ trees approvcH for removal and other items regarding tree impacts and ,
• protection measures.
g. The removal of any brick, hardscape or foundations beneath the canopies of retained
trees, including outside the designated fenced areas, must be performed as #'ollowre: the
surface of the features should be first broken into small pieces with a jackhammer and
manually lifted onto a loader that must remain on undisturbed hardscape and off '
exposed roots. Base rock covering exposed roots should remain intact and used as the
new material. Within one hour, place six inches of coarse wood chips over the newly
exposed area and apply water to keep moist for a two-week period.
' 9. Temporary or permanent drainage features must be designed so water is not discharged .
towards the trunks of retained trees.
!0. Any existing and unused underground pipes and utilities beneath the canopies of
retained trees shall be abandoned.
11. Any trenching or grading approved beneath the trees' canopies shall be manually
performed using shovels.
12. Any existing plants, groundcovcr, trees or shrubs being removed beneath the trees'
canopies shall be manually cut to grade and the roots Left below ground. The stumps
can either be axed away or ground to below grade.
13. Great care must be taken by all personnel and equipment operators to• avoid damaging
the canopies of retained trees.
~l3
•,
:~:
_~ .'
.~
i ' .,.
:,.: ~.
~~`:::
:~::;::
. :.;:
:;`r ~,''
,,~:
~:: .
:~;
;~; :'
.~.•
~••
_~~>
.~~
~i'
'~ ~ _ -
:.~~'
,,;:
'.~ ;
} .~
.. :. y. ; i:. : ~.
•~~~'
`:~: 4
:;;.
i~~':.
;'; .
iC ~. r.
•i . r.
'•.
i '
i
TREE .ciy^+. ::: ; '_{ :: •• .e
..w: 3 .i.. 4 :i i~ i I .'i.i :. 5:
~ppp ~~~~/~ ~'~• a:. }'[Yilrli ~~.r ~ t. 91 i f:a' •
:1~~, "97tEEir• ~jN••~:. i•a ..1~• - I
wllbw-Lafed Peppermint i .
1 ' Euco ntc%o!!t 33 25 40 50% '25% Pear X SI 70
Coar1 Redwood
Se uofa re rvirens 25 70 35 75% 75% Good X 57100
Coert Redwood
~ Ss cola n ienJ 233 85 35 SO% 75% Fah X 54720
Camphor Troe
~
s (Cinnamomumcamphora) 13 25 25 SON. ~ SO%~ Fah X X 51160
Ameriean Swee(8um
6 Lf uldombarJ ro ua 93 25 20 75% 25% Faa X X X S61
Amman Sweetllum ~ ' ~ '
7 (Llquldombararyroci/lua) 10 25 25 75% 23% Fah X X X 5670
Atnerian Sweetgum '
8 (Liguidom6arsryrocipua) 11 25 ' 25 75% 25% Fair X X X S810
~~~
9 (Cinnamomum cc oria 1 I 20 2S . I OOX 50% Fah X X 51 70
10 C nasut macroco~ 22.5 i 45 25 75% 75% 'Good X 57 700
Olive Tree '
11 (Oleae 9.5 .20 20 75% 25% Fah X i~S370
Ohre 71ee
12 (Oleo eu 12 20 25 75% 50% Fav X X 5700
Olive Tree
13 (Oleo euro 17 23 25 10096 SD% Good X 52,040
Camphor Tree
14 Cinnomomum cam ora 13 23 30 75% 50% Fair X 52 180
Monterey Pine
'Ptnurrodlara) 19 25 35 SO% 25% Poor X
REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES
Ion - S I70 74-iixh box - 5410 36•incA boz - 51,310 46•inch boz ~ 53,000 SJ-iach bm - 57,000 72-i~~
TREE IIV1'ENTURY TABLE
~'
••~
~i~
i~
U
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
-
. ~1:~'
:
~~.
:,::
'
:
i
.
.,~_',
1
1
.
: i
.
,•.,
ri ~;,
;_:
,
~~:
,,l,.
.
`
~
. : :. ~ `
:::~
•,.:
.;
°
~':
`
.~
~
`
~~:~:
:
.
~~
~:'
~
~
•
.,
:~~:
.
'
'=
'
.
.
;;:.
•~i
_,
:
'
~'.
:
~'~y:i: i ~. =:'
'
• .~ ,
~
i'i
t
•
'f
:~,
~ :_
:~.
..
.
}
~
:
: ~
~
:::.
.
!
~.
.
::
i t-
:__:
v~ : ~ . ~.
.
•: ~ '
_ ' .:-
:' ~•
Can Redwood ~ X S!
31 uWa (nA.r 23 70 30 30% 73% Ftc X
~ Celifonw Pepper Tree ~ 1S ~ 30 •73% 23% Ftir X - X 53 130
32 Schlnur moUt
Willow-Leafed Peppermint
'~{
Euca us nlchoGl
27
40
33
30%
23%
Poa
X Sl
Willow-Lecfed Peppermint 28, 22,
~
(Euca rv ntchoitf
20.16 9
40
30
30%
23%
Paor
X S3 020
SikerpoBv(3um ~
'
X ~ 5760
35 EueA nrbemor 17.3 20 30 30% 23% Poor .
Chineu PipACMe
10
5
23
33
100%
73%
Good
X ~
~ Pisrfu:iA cAtnsnrtr .
' . Wilbw-LafedPeppermirrt Sl 80
37 Euca ur ntchot(1 28 43 33 30% 25% Poor X
1'lon~ ~
'
14
40
30
30%
23%
Poor
X X 5130
38 Pinu radlert
Wilbw-Leafed Peppermint Sy40
39 Euca ut nic/mJtt 20.3 20 33 30% 25% Poor X
Silver-DoIlvGtun
w
h
23
30
33
73%
23%
Fair
X - 53 00
40 em
(Euca/ Ar
Silver-Do1lvGum.
rAemar
I
16
20
20
30%
23%
Pmr
X '~
tl n
(Euca
MameyPine
3
' 11
23
20
30%
23%
Boor
X X SI00
42 (Pinar rodiara .
Monterey Pine
13
40
33
73%
23%
Fafr
X ~
- ~ X 5180
43 (Pima rodiom
Willow•Lafed Peppcnnint 5820
(Euco us nichoiit 21.3 20 40 30% 23% Poor X
44 .
Marercy Pine
~n:_...-..w:..~t 13 33 33 SO% 23%
TREE VALUES
r..-. reiu O..r.mn Rrod .CmafOea
•. ~ ..
~~
i~
. .. ,
.The attached Appendix comprises an exerpt
of the full report by Cotton Shires and
Associates.. Full copies of the report are
available~upon request from the City ~of
Saratoga, Community Development ~ ~ ;.
Department.
• ~~ ,
COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCTATE$, INC.
`CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
June 9,2005
. .
Ms. Iveta Harvandlc
Associate Engineer
t3T1' OF SARATUGA
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
~.
SUBJECT:. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
RE: Prospect Road Subdivision
Saratoga, Califonda
Dear Ms. Harvancilc: •
We are pleased to submit the following report in which w~e'desrn'be the
findings, conclusions, and recommendations of out preliminary geotechnical
investigation for the planned Prospect Road Subdivision, located of 19848 Prospect
Road in Saratoga, Cal;forma. This investigation was performed in accordance wfth our
email to you dated April i2, 2005.
In this report, we characterize the geotechnicel conditions underlying the
proposed generator, and provide rnnclusions and recommendations regarding
geotechnical hazards, foundation type, site grading, pavement section preparation, and
support of slab-on-grade floors., '
We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to you on this projecrt. If
you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call us.
Sincerely,
COTTON; SHIRES AND ASSOCIA?'ES,1NC.
David T. Schrier
Senior Geotechruca] Engineer ~ ~
GE 2334 ~ ttpy~'
~~
Ted Sayre
Supervising Engineering Geologist
-- -......,,.. _. CEG 1795
•
•
i
4S . Flood Hazard
An evaluation of the potential flood hazard was beyond the scope of our work. We
. assume that the Project Civil Engineer is evaluating the flood potential and, if
necessary, will design specific flood mitigation measures for the site.
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENneTtnlac
S.1 Prof act Geotechnical Feasibility
Based' on our preliminary site geotechnical investigation, we coni^]ude that the '
proposed subdivision and residential development of 'nine lots is geotechnically
feasible. Site development should incorporate the recommendations listed below.
• 5.2 Foundation Design Considerations
The prindpal factor affecting foundation type selection is the antidpafed very stra~ng to
violent shaking from a major earthquake. The residences could be supported on either
a pier and grade beam foundation, or a shallow footing. The major advantage of a pier
and grade beam foundation is that it tends to resist. differential settlement. If the
anticipated magnitudes (determined by a lot specific geotechnical investigation) are not
deemed significant enough to justify the potential cost increases •sssociated with the
pier and grade. beam foundation, then a shallow footing could be used to support the
residences. Lot speafic design criteria should be provided by the Project geoteduvcal
engineer.
5,3 Site Gradin¢
5.3.1 Site Pr~aration -All loose material, vegetation, concrete, asphalt, debris,
the approximately 1 foot of fill material, and other deleterious material should be
. stripped and removed from the areas to be occupied by the generator. This material
should Ue disposed of in a suitable location off-site or stored on-site for later use in
landscaping (if approved for such use by the project landscape architect).
r~
~ ~ ~ ~ .
Excavation should proceed as necessary for planned grades, and Soft and~Ot yielding
materials in the location of the planned generator should beover-excavated 'and
replaced with engineered fill. Areas to be. filled should be scarified to at least an 8-inch
depth, moisture conditioned to at least two percent over optimum moisture content and
should be compacted tout Least 90 percent relative compaction based on ASfM D-i557-
r ~ ~
5.3.2. Compacted Fill -Excavated on-site material is suitable'fo~r reuse as
compacted fill provided it is free of organic material and other debris and rocks greater
than 4 inches in maximum dimension. Imported fill should be free of organic material,
shrnild'contain no material larger than 4 inches and have a plastiaty index of less than ~~
15. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thiclmeas,
moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content, and compacted in lifts to:at
least 95 percent relative compaction beneath structures and pavements, arid• 90 percent •
relative compaction elsewhere.
~, ,
1 5.3.3 Cut Slope Design Basements) -Based on collected geotechnical data, site
grading (excavation) for the below ground generator should be within the capabilities
' of standard excavation equipment (i.e., backhoes and dozers). During~the dry season,
temporary maximum slope inclinations should not exceed 1.75:1 (Fi:V} in alluvium and
fill for construction purposes. We no not antidpate high groundwater. conditions
during construction of basements.
Excavation methods' and safety of basement excavations 'are ultimately the
responsibility of the contractor. All excavations should comply with applicable locat,
State and Federal safety regulations. ,
5.3.4 Utility Trench and Retaining Wall BackfiIl - Utility trenches should be
backfilled with imported material or approved, on-site soil. Bedding materials for pipes
should be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The backfill should
be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Equipment and methods
should be used that are suitable for work in confined areas without damaging trench .
walls, and conduits.
•
Retaining walls should be bac)dilled with materials that meet the requiuements for
,.,..,,,,,rroA Fill. Comnarti~n PovinmPnt anA marhnAa shrnilA hr nsPd that are suitable
~•
for work in confined areas and that will not damage the backdrain pipe, waterproof,
and filter fabric.
5.3.5 Pavement Subgrade Preparation - After general compaction and
compaction of the utility trench backfills, pavement subgrade. surfaces should be
checked for yielding areas by proof-rolling with a loaded water truck air equivalent.
a Any yielding areas should be excavated and replaced with rnmpach~il ffll. Then the
upper 8 inches should be moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content,
_ 7 and compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction
5A Slabs-on-Grade and Concrete Flatwork
n- de and concrete fl ed as ' d
Slabs-o gra atwork subgrades should be, prepay recoaunen ed
in Site Grading, above. Slab-on-grade floors, including the garage, should be directly
underlain by at least 6 inches of clean, free-draining gravel or crushed rock (100 perrent
passing the 3/4-inch sieve; 0-10 percent passing the No. 4 sieve, and 0 percent passing
the No. 200 sieve) except in areas of the basement slab subdrain which should have a
~~ thicker section -(See Basement Subdrairi section below for basement slab subdrain
l design). For damp-proofing of the slab, a layer of Moistop Underslab Vapor Retarder
l ~ should be provided over the capillary break (gravel or crushed rock).
Concrete flatwork (sidewalks, patios, etc.) should, be supported on at least 6 inclu:s of
3 mois4 seas 2 Aggregate Base rock material compacted to a minimum of 9596 relative
compaction. The 6 inches of compacted base rock material should, in turn, be underlain
by compacted fill or firm natural material..
Slabs and flatwork should be steel reinforced with at least No. 4 bars at 18 inches on
centers each way (or greater reinforcement as determined by the Project Structural
Engineer), and provided with crack control joints at maximum 10 feet on centers, both
ways.
5S Retaining Wall Design
The following section provides preliminary recommendations for the retaining walls.
I~
5.5.1 Retaining Walls -Retaining walls t0 support besfDlEitt CUtB C811 bE
supported on a shallow foundation structurally cormected fb the slab-br--grade
foundation Walls free to rotate should.be designed to resist an active lateral fluid
pressure. The active lateral fluid pressures should be increased by for walls that are
restrained from rotation The lateral loads on the retaining wall can be resisted by.
passive pressure for that portion of the foundation embedded at least i-foot below the•
- lowest adjacent grade and a base coeffldent of frictia~n. For seismic loading, e. dynamic
resultant force should be applied to the wall acting at 0,6H up from the bottog- of the
wall.
The retaining walls located adjacent to the planned driveways should also be designed
to resist a minimum traffic surcharge of 100 psf~applied against the top 10 feet of the
retaining wall. ,
5.5.2 Backdfain - Backdrains should be constructed behind all retaining walls.
•Backdrains should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and consist of either Coltrane Class
2 Permeable Material or 3/4-inch x 1/2-inch clean crush drainrock enclosed in Mirafi
140N (or approved equivalent} filter fabric, and should be' extended to within 1 m 1-1/2 ,
feet of the ground surface where an impervious fill and/or asphaltic concrete cap
.should be placed. A minimum 4-inch diameter PVC Schedule 40 perforated drain pipe
should be placed 2 inches off the bottom of the drainrock (perforations down), and
surrounded by a minimum of 4 inches of drainrock.. All backdrairt pipes should be
sloped to drain at a minimum of ]/2 percent and collected in minimum 4-inch diameter
non-perforated Schedule 40 FVC collector pipes which are sloped a minimum of 1
percent and discharged either by gravity duectly to a suitable discharge location, or by a
sump(s) equipped with a pump (if necessary) which in tum flow into the site atbrat
drainage system.
5.6 ,S~~ace Drainagg
We recommend- that all surface drainage be permanently diverted away from the .
planned structures at a minimum 2% grade into an appropriate catch basin/storm drain
system. Al] roof downspouts should be connected to tight line drain pipes- that are
directed, in tum, into an appropriate catch basin/storm drain system.
Where concrete curbs are used to isolate landSCapin~ lA Ot adjacent t0 the pBVeIl1ET1t
areas, we recommend that the curb extend ~ minimum of 6 inches below the base rods
to provide a barrier against the migration of landscape water into the pavement section.
5,Z ~isement Subdrain
Basements should be underlain by a 6-inch thick blanket of clean, free draining crushed
rock or gravel. The blanket subgrade should be cut to drain (hydraulically connected)
to a subdrain which should be ]orated down the center (lengthwise) of the slab-0ri-
grade floor. The subdrain should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated Schedule 90
PVC pipe sloped a minimum of 1/2 percent and placed in a ]2-inch wide, 6- to'1S-Inch
deep trench filled with crushed rock or gravel and a sheet of filter fabric.separating the ,
gravel from the blanket subgrade. There should be 2 to $ inches of drafnrock in the
bottom of the trench, bFlow the pipe. •The subdrain pipes should be collected in 4-inch '
diameter non-perforated Schedule Oft PVC pipes sloped a minimum of 2 percent and
discharged either directly into the storm drain system by gravity outlet, or drained into
a sump(s) equipped with .a pump which in rum flows into the, site storm drainage
system. The retaining wall backdrains should also be collected and drained in a similar
manner as the foundation subdrain, or combined, if preferred. Surface water should
not be discharged into subdrain pipes. .
5,g Rp;amic Desisa
A peak ground acceleration of 0.63g should be anticipated for design purposes. For the
]997 Uniform Building Code (UBC), assume that the site is located within Seismic Zone
No. 9, and use the following values for design: Seismic Cceffidents Ca and C~ of 0.59
and 1.02, respectively; and Na and Nv values of 1.3 and ].6, respectively.
5.9 Pavement DesigO
We anticipate. that the roadway will be paved with, asphaltic concrete over aggregate
base rock. We recommend that an R-Value laboratory test be performed on several .
samples to accurately determine the site R-value for pavement design. The Project Civil
Engineer should determine an appropriate Traffic Index value.
,~
The base rock of the pavement section should be compacted to a minimum of 95% Of
maximum dry unif weight (ASTM D1557,-00), and coriform to the provisions of.Seclion
26 (Caltrans) for 3/4-inch maximum Class 2 Aggregate Base. Asphaltic concrete should
be placed .and compacted in accordance. with the requirements of Section 39 of the
Caltrans Standard Specifications.
5.10 corrosion
We recommend that Corrosion testing be completed at the site and appropriate
rernmmendations provided based on the test results.
5.11 Technical Review .
Supplemental geotechnical design recommendations should be provided by the Project .
Geotechnical Consultiatrt working on the design of the individual residences. This
repor#. and lot spedfic investigations, should be reviewed by the contractor as part of
the bid process. It is strongly rernmmended that no construction be started nor. grading.
undertaken until the final drawings, specifications, and calculations have been
reviewed and approved in writing by the Project Geotechnical Engineer.
5.12 Earthwork Construction Inspection an Testier
Al] excavations should pe inspected by the Project "Geoteduvcal Engineer prior to filling .
or pouring of concrete foundations. Any grading should also be inspected and tested as
appropriate to assure adequate stripping and compaction.
6.0 INVESTIGATION LIMITATInNS
Our services consist of professional opinions grid recommendations made in accordance
with generally accepted engineering geology and geotechnical engineering prinaples
and practices. No warranty, expressed or implied, or merchantability of fitness, is made
or intended in connection with our" work„ by the proposal for consulting or other
services, or by the famishing of oral or written reports or findings.
~~
Any recommendations and~or design criteria presented in this reprnt aie contingent
upon a licensed gebtechnical engineering being retained to review the final drawings'
and specifications, to be consulted when. any questions arise with regard to the
recommendations contained hereiry and to provide testing and inspection services for
earthwork and construction operations. Unantiapated soil and geologit conditions are
commonly encountered during construction which cannot be fully determined from
existing exposures or by limited subsurface investigation. Such conditions may require .
.additional expenditures during construction to obtain a properly constructed project.
Some contingency fund is7ecommended to accommodate these possible extra mate.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or
of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contafned
• herein are called to the attention of the project architect and. engineer and incorporated
• into the pans. Furthermore, it is also the responsibility of the owner, or of his', .,
representative, to ensure that the 'contractor and subcontractors Sairy out such
recommendations in the field.
r
rr
~.:
i
PHASE
SITE ASSESSMENT
JULY 2005
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
Saratoga, Califomie
•
For.
Shuta, Mihaly 8 Weinberger
• San Francisco, Caitfomia
,
Yb3B1-00.
BAS~N~',`
28 July 2005
Y5391-00
Ma. Carmcn Borg
Urban Planner
• Shute, Mr7:aly & Weinberga•
396 Hayes Street .
'San Francisco, CA 94102.
Subject: Phase 1 Environmental Slte Assessment,19848~Prospect Road, Saratoga,
Califorata
Dear Ms. Hong: ~ .
s
Please find enclosed our report.documendng the activities and findings of the Phaie.I
Environmental Site Assessment for the ]9848 Prospect Road project site in'Saratoga, ..
California. if you have any questions or comments, please contact us~at your convenientx.
.• Sincerely, .
y .
r T'ane Nordhdv .
Todd Taylo ,
Environmental Associate Reg Geologist No. 4009
Tf:YN
• Enclosure
Y539I.UplOS.p6l.wpd-7/t8/OS
••
• .PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT ~ •
~IuLY 20Q5 •
' ~ 19848 PROSPECT ROAD '
Saratoga, California
i ,
For.
Shute, Mihaly 8 Weinberger
San Frandsco, CalNomia
Y5391-00
e BASELINE Environmental Consulting
5900 Hollis Street, Snite D • Emeryville, Celifomie 94608
(510) 420.8686
N 1 ,
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS, ~ •'
i~ ':
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................... . v
INTRODUCTION ......................... ................................1
.~
SITE DESCRIPTION ..........................:.........:.....................1 '
.
HISTORICAL LAND USES ............. :....................... .............. 1~ . '
`CURRENT LAND USES/STfE RECONNAISSANCE ........................'.... .. 6
'
~
`REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASE REVIEW .........:.............. . .... ... 9
BUII.DING-RELATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................. . 13 .
CONCLUSIONS .... .:........ ............ ........................x.. ..14
RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... ~......
,,. .. 14 ,
LDvtl'TATIONS .............. ................ .............. ..:...'.
•r ..15
REFERENCES ................................ ........:............... ..75 . .
APPENDICES
(ln Portable Document Format on CD-RO]S~ ,
A: Historical Land Use Resources ~ ,
B: Environmental Database Report
C: Case Closure File and Site Summary for G&K Truc)ring; 20201 Merida Drive
D: Qualifications of Preparas
. FIGURES .
1: Regional Location ...." .....................................'............. ..2
2: Project Site .......... ....... ..................................... ..3
1965 Aerial Photograph ................................................ .
3 ..5
: '
4: Photographs frotq Siu Reco~aissance . .................................... . ~ 7
.
5: Photographs from Site Reconnaissance .................. .................. .. 8
6' Sites on Regulatory Databases Within One Mile of the Project Site ............ . 12
TABLE
1: Regulatory Agency Databases Reviewed ............. ...................... 16
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT
19848 Prospect Rvad, Saratoga, California
This report presents the findings end conclusions of a Phase I environmental site astussgteat for the 19848
prospect Road proj act site in Saratoga, California. This Phase I investigation was undertakmby BASBi.W$
Environmortal Consulting for Shute, Mihaly, and Weinberger in support~of orvironmental review oaf a
proposed redevelopment of the project siu. The scope of work for this Phase I investigation included: a
review of historical land use information, including City Planning Department records, aerial photographs,'
and topographic maps, a site reconnaissance; interviews wit}r persona familiar with the project site; a review'
of Federal, Sute; and local regulatory agorcy files end databases; and, the development ofrecearmordatioos.
for further actions. .
The project site was used for orchards from at ]east ] 939 until around 1963, when it wen developed
for a church. Two church buildings were constructed around 1963, and an additional two puildiags.
wtxe constructed around 1971 cod 1978. Surrounding areas were developed,tor residential land trap
between 1956 and 1968. Agricultural chemicals were h7cely applied to the orchards, And these tmy
be e potortisl for residues of these cbemicala to be presort is shallow soils at thb project site. No
other historical land uses associated with hazardous materials likely to effect redevelopment of tha
project site were idortified.
• The project site contained four single-story buildings and a shed, which were mostly vacant at the time•
of the site reconnaissance. No evidence ofhazardous materials use, storage, or release was noted at
the project site during the siu reconnaissance. Adjoining land uses were residential and did not
appear likely to use, store, or dispose ofsigvificaat quantities ofhazardous'materisla.'
• Two sites within one mile of the project site appear on Fedtra[, State, and local agency databases ad'
-sites associated with hazardous materials storage, disposal, or release. Based oa available detaiht and
locations, neithu site identified in the database review would be 1t7cely to affect the project site.
Review of site history infoanetion indicates that most of the structures at the project site were
constructed prior to 1980, and therefore may contain lead-based paint and/or asbestos-conUinitty
materials. Demolition orrenovation oftbese structures could release lead particles end asbestos 8btxs
into the air, and potentially pose a health risk to construction workers and the goreral public. Other
hazardous materials, such es mucuty in light switches and theratostata, maybe encountered during
dearoiition, and must be handled and disposed of in accordance with hazardous waste nguLtittos.
To determine whether agricultural chemical residues may be ptnsort at concortrations that could pose a
health risk to construction workers and/or future residorts at the siu, a limited soil invesigatim should be
conducted al the project site. Eight composite shallow soil samples should be collected cad walyzed for
organochlorine pesticides and total lead, arsenic, copper, and mercury (metals oRm found is inorganic
pesticides).
Prior to demolition orremodeling ofbuildings at the project site, a lead-based paint and asbestos-containing
material survey should be conducted by a certified professional: Identified loose and peeling lead-based
paintandasbestos-containingmaterialsshouldbeabatedinaccordancewitbepplicableregulationa. Ftderal
and stateconstnution workersaferyregulations should be followed during construction activities when lead
and/or asbestos are known or suspected to be presort. Other common hazardous materiels that may be
encountered during demolition, such asmercuryswitchesand au-conditioningrcfrigerants, should behandled
and disposed of in accordance with California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC7 ba~rdoua
PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
• Saratoga, California
INTRODUCTION
Ibis report presents the Endings and conclusions of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment far
_ the 19848 Prospect Road project site in Saratoga, California This Phase I investigation was,
undertaken by BASELINE Environmental Consulting for Shute, Mr7taly & Weinberger in support
of environmental review of a redevelopment project. The Ciry of Saratoga (City), the curtest owner
oftireproperty,iscurrentlyevaluatingredevelopmentoftheprojectsiteforaresidentielsubdivisioa
containing nine single-family residences. '
The scope of wont for this Phase I investigation included: a review of historical lattd use
information, includingCiry]']anningDeparnnentrecords, aerialphotographa;and topographic maps;
a site reconnaissance; interviews with persons familiar witli'tbe project site; a review of Federal,,
State, and ]Deal regulatory agency files and databases; and, the development ofrecommendations for
further actions. Al] Phase J activities were performed in accordance vyith the "Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Ijroce~s," established by
the American Society for Tasking and Materials (ASTM) in Method E1527-00. ~ ,
LJ
SITE DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of two parcels (APN 383-26-070 and 386-26-07] ), totaling approximately
2.62 acres in area. The project site is bordered to the north by Prospect Road, and.to the west, south,
and east by residential properties (Figures 1 sad 2).
The project site is level and located approximately 280 feet above mean sea ]evel (mal)•(USC3S,
]99l). Based on an environmental investigation conducted approximately one mile east of the
project site, soils near the project site consist of clayey silt to a depth of l S fat below ground
surface (bgs), underlain by gravelly and silty sands to a depth of et least 87.5 feet bgs (ATC
Associates, 200Z). The closest surface water bodies to the project site are Calabazes and Saratoga
~~~ located approximatelythree-quarters ofa mile west and east of tbeproject site, respectively
(Figure 1). During 2004, groundwater was encountered at about 75 to 80 feet bgs in four monitoring.
wells one mile east of the project site (ATC Associates, 2005). The groundwater flow direction was
determined to be towards the north-northeast (ATC Associates, 2005).
HISTORICAL LAND USES
Historical land uses at the project site and adjoining properties were determined by reviewing City
Planning Department records and historical aerial photographs from 1939 through 1998.
Topographic maps from 1902 through ] 991 were also reviewed to identify development patterns in
the project vicinity. Historical Sanborn Fire Insurance maps and city directory abstract information
Fig '~ 1
.~a -rr.....~a_ r.m~re^ ..
~M
.~
n
r1
U
E
c
J~*
~~~
i
~~
B
. „mad
,.
.~
F~guYe i ~~
PR~~CT SITE
~.~ --
_ .~ ~r~st~e~tR°ad
APPTOx~mf~ ~sF~`
o B~
wen not available for the project site. historical land use resources reviewed f0I t~1181flVC8ggahon
are included as Appendix A.
prospect Road was present in its current alignment in ] 902, the date ofthe first available topographic
.map. • A few buildings wen indicated along Prospect Road in the project vicinity, but the map did
not identify land uses. The first available serial photograph, from 1939, showed that the project site
and adjoining parcels wem used for orchards. A small building was preaeat in a clearing in the
northeastern portion of th4 project site, immediately north of the tarrrent sanctuary building. Based•
on the size and. alignment of the building, it may have been a rural residence or an agriculttuai
storage building. No changes at the project site or immediate vicinity were noted on tLe 1948 eeriat
photograph.
By 1956; the adjoining property to the northwest, across Prospect Road, had been cleared. No ot6~
changes were noted at the project site or vicinity. , Oa 5 May 1958, the project site was sold by Steve
, and Mary Vidovicb to the Santa Clara County Church Extension Society of the Methodist Chttrcb.
On 22 April 1963, the Saratoga Planning Commission approved a Uee Permit for fbe projoct site,
allowing the site to be developed with sere-school bw7ding, an office, a church school building, a
. social hall, and a sanctuary building.
The 1965 aerial photograph showed the school, sanctuary, and shed buildings"at the project sitE in
their present locations (Figure 3j.. The southern portion of the project site remained undeveloped.
The small reside»ce/agricultural building identified in earlier aerial photographs remained at the site,
immediately north ofthe sanctuary building (Figure 3). Properties to the north ofUte project site had
been developed with single-familyhomes (Figure 3j. Saraglen Court and Viewridge Drive had bees
constructed west and south of the project site, respectively, but only a few of the current residencq
had been constructed (Figure 3). Orchards remained on the parcel east of the project site (Figure 3).
. The 1968 topographic map indicated that Colby Court had been constructed east of the project site;
tbatmap and subsequent topographic maps identify the entire project site and vicinity es wbaaized
(fully-developed) areas• In 1971, a building permit was approved for the fellowship hall at the
project site, pre 26 April ] 978, the Saratoga Planning Commission approved a new use permit for
the project site, which allowed construction of the administration building at the project site. A
consptrction permit for the building was issued in May 1978.
The 1982 aerial photograph showed the. former residence/agrieultural building had been demolished,
and the project site buildings and grounds were in their citrr~ent configuration. AU adjoining
properties were developed with residences. No changes at the project site or adjoining prapatie8
were noted in the 1993 or 1998 aerial photographs.
In 21102, the project site was purchased by the City of Saratoga. Since that time, the administration
building has bear used for offices and meeting space. With the exception of occasional use for
community meetings, other buildings ai the project site have remained vacant, due t0 concerns
regarding seismic safety and rnmpliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (Lind, 200.
/„
1965 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ~ Figure 3 ,
~~
Legend
.~~ project Siu (approximate boundary)
Approximate /~
No historical land uses associated with hazardous materials WCtC identified for theproject site, wilt
the exception of orchards, which were present at the site and immediate vicinity from at least'1939
until the early 1960s. It is likely that agricultural chemicals such ae pesticides, herbiadea, end
fertilizers were applied to the project site and vicinity during this time. Agricultwal chemical use
was not regulated during this era, and records of the types and amounts of chemicals applied were
not required to be maintained. Some classes of agricultural chemicals used is the pas; such as
organochlorine pesticides (a class of pesticides whicb.includes DDT) and inorganic comprnmde
.(which may contain lead, arsenic, copper, and mercury); can leave residues in shallow eoiht That may ,
persist for decades. If presen; agricultural chemical residues could potentially affect eonstnxtiom
workers and future residents, who would be expected to come into direct contact with shadow soils
at the site. .
CURRENT LAND >;JSES/S1iTE RECONNAISSANCE .
A visual7econnaissance of the project site and adjoining parcels was conducted by a ~BASELINB
geologist on 9 May 2005. Observations grade during the site reconnaissance are detailed, below,
photographs of the project site taken during the site reconnaissance art included on Figures 4 end S.
. project Site ~ .
The project site contained fow buildings, a storage shed, and parking areas along Prospect Road sad
in the southern portion of the site (Figure 2). Vegetation at the project Bite consisted of grass, axs .
and other landscaping. No obvious indicators of hazardous materials releases, such as staining,
odors, orstressed vegetation were identified at theproject site. Nohazardous material storage areas,
or evidence of historical hazardous material storage, were identifled at the project site.
The former school building, in ffie northwestern portion of the site, was s siriglo-atory, wood and
stucco building (Figure 4, Photo ] ). The building was empty at the tithe of the reoonnaissanoa The
interior classrooms in the budding wem finished with wooden ceilings, iricandestxat lighting
Sxtures, and linoleum flooring. A small playground area was located south ofthe school building.
The former sanctuary building, in the northeastern portion of the site, was awood-frame and stnoco
structure (Figure 4, Photo 2). The building was vacant at the time of the reconnaissaaa, except for
storage of chairs and other office furnittue. The building was Swished with plaster walla,
incandescent lighting, flxtttres and concrete floors. An empty shed was located east ofthe sanctuary
building (Figure 2).
The former fellowship hall, asingle-story wood building, was located south of the sanctuary (Figtne
2). The building included a kitcbea and s Iarge open room, and was vacant at the time of the
recormaissaace. The building was finished with incandescent lighting fixtures; c;oaerete floors, and
wood ceilings. Beige, textured material; presumably installed for acoustic purposes, was nosed oa
.the ceiling is the large open room (Figure 5, Photo 3).
_x-
.,.
PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE .Figure 4
I s-
•
19848 Prospect Road .
. un~r~
' PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE, Figure 5
. ruvw ~.rw.uwr..uuauaauauVL OWIQIAg~IOOKiLB DOTZ11WC8[.
19848 Prospect Road
Saratoga, California BASELfNT.
The administrationbuilding, a single storywood frameand attlccobtlildingwesltlcatedilnmediatoly
south of the scbool building (Figure 5, Photo 4). The building,contained chairs and other o~tx
furniture. The building was finished with carpeted doors, incandescent lighting fixture[t; and
acoustical ceiling files. .
The buildings at the project site were heated using nattltai gas. Radiant beat was used is the scbool
building and sanctuary; forced arr beating was used in the fellowship hail and adtniniettati~
building. Only the administration.buiiding was air-conditioned; a oompreasor was present west of
that building.
.Adjoining Parcel.
Adjoining parcels were all used for residences (Figum 2). No evidence of hazardous materials use,
storage, or releases on adjoining properties was noted.
REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASE REVIEW
BASEI.JI+TE contracted with F.DR, Inc., an environmental information service, to scotch Federal,
State, and local regulatory agency databases pertaining to hazardous material use aad releases oa
properties at and near the project site (EDR, 2005). A listing of the databases searobed is provided
in Table 1. The database report is included in Appendix B. Two sites associated with hazardous
materials were identified within a one mile radius of the project site is the database review (Figure
6). The project site was not identified on any oftbe databases. Available Santa Clara Valley Water
District (SCV WD) files for each ofthe sites identified in the dstabasereport were reviewed, and site ~ '
details are presented below.
Site 1-Watson, William and Son - 1649 Daphne Way
This site, located approximately one-eighth, mile north of the site, was listed on the State Cortese list
ofhazardous waste sites, which is a compilation of sites from other regulatory agencies. Howeva~,
no files. for the project site were present in SCVWD Slew, and the site was sot listed on other
component databases of the Cortese list, including the Departrnent of Toxic SubstenCea Control
(DISC) Hazardous Waste end Substantxs Site list (DTSC, 200.On 9 May 2005, a BASBLWB
geologist conducted a drivo-byreconnaissaace ofthe site. The site is asingle-familyresidence, with
no evidence of current or historical land uses associated with hazardous material. Therefor, tie
inclusion of the siu on the Cortese Bst appears to be an error, and this site would sot have the'
potential to affect the project site.
Site 2 - G & K Trucking - 20201 Merida Drive
This site, located approximately one-third mile west of the project site, was listed on the State
Cortese list and leaking underground storage tank lists due to a release from a former underground
petroleum storage tank. The site was also included oa the State fL9ZNET database of sites listed
as generators on hazardous waste manifests. The site was listed as generator on one hazardous waste
manifest consisting of empty containers of 30 gallons or greater volume.
..
~..
•
Table I: REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASES REVIEW$D
19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CaHfor»ia
r ABeaey RNaee
AST Aboveground Petroleum StonBa Tank Faeilida {SLk Water Retwutcet 1 February 100!
Control Bond)
AWP Cei-Sikt list of known berudous wok tiro LrBeted for clearwp (Gl EPA) ~ Fetinutry 1005
BEp Hond Expenditure Plan (Glifomie Department of Hwl~'Servias) 1 ]acttttry 1989
gRg Biennial Reporting System for hazardons wok 8enenton Ng EPA) 1 Docember 200! .
Cal-Sits Csl-Sits liar of ktwwn and pokntiel 6ezatdous wore rite (Cal EPA) ~ Febnteey 2003
CERCLIS Comprcheaeive Enviroameakl Rctpoaa, Compesattoo, aced I.iebONy 13 Febrwry2003
infonastton System (US EPA)
CHMIRS Califomie Hazardous Material ]oeident Report System (O~ce of Emeryeray . 3l Deoegtba1003
Servit~) ..
Cieenan Dry Cltanin8 Faeilitiu (Disc) 29 November 2004
CONSENT SuperlWad (CEACI.A) Consent Deeroa (US Deperttnent of Justice) N Deeembsr 2001
CORRACT3 RCRA Corraelive Action Reporl (US EPA) ~ 1 S December 1001
Cow Correa index of ideatlfwd hnardonr wesk and eubskace sMa 1 Apri12001
DEED Lut of Deed Rettr4ctiow (D7SC) 3 Apri12001
DOD Dep~rtmeat of De~fena Fuilitiu (IISOS) 1 October 1003 .
EMI Emissions lnvenkry Dak (CeNforoie Air Restiurou Board) 31 December 21102
FANS Emergeary Respoasc Notification System (US EPA) 31 December 20W
F7D Facility laveawry Dsubea (Skk Water Ruouroet Control Board) 31 October 1994
F1ND3 Facility laden System NS EPA) 12 January 2003
p7T'g F)FRA/T SCA TnciaB System (US EPA) 13 September 2004
pl)Dg Formerly Used Defeoa Sita NS Army Corps of EnBiaetet) 31 December 2003
HI.ZNE7' Htwrdous Wuk informetioa Systern (Cal EPA) 31 December 2002
Hh4DtS Hezudom Meteridt laformetio6 Repordrt8 System (Department of t 8 November 2004
Tntttporhtion)
LUST Leekia8 UadcrSroand StoreBe Yeak tofarmetioa System (Santa Clem County, 10 Jeauery 2003
R WQCB, sad Skk Water Rewurca Control Board)
MINES Miae Sdety end Hcehb Administration Muter Index i S November 2004
I,,n,Tg Mawiel Licenaia8 Tnekin8 Syrtam (Nncker Regulebry Commiuion) 12 Jeouery 2005
Notify 65 propotitioa 65 Notification Records (Bute Water Resources Control Hoard) 2t pcWbp 1993
NFA No Further Action Determiaatioa Propertiu (D'fSC) 7 Fabwry2005
PiFE Propeniu Needin8 FurtherBvehufion (Disc) 7 Febrwry 2005
pryL Nstionel Priority Lut (Superfund) Ng EPA) 14 Detxmber 2004
NPL LIENS Federal Superfuad'Lit:at (US EPA) is Oetobmr 1991
ODI Opeti Dump Inventory (US EPA) 30 June 1985 ' .
PADS PITH Aetiviry Daubaa System (l73 EPA) 21 November 2001
RpA7'g RCRA Administrative Action Tnckia8 $yatem (US EPA) 17 April 1995
RCRIS Resource Conaervatioa and Recovery Infametion System NS EPA) 13 March 2005
REF Properties Referred m Another RegulsWry Agenry (DISC) 7 Febrwry2005
ROD NPL (Superfund) Records of Decision NS EPA) 10 January 2003 •
erv School Pronertv Evaluation Pro¢ram Sites (DISC) _ _ 7 Febru 2005
i
n f'
Table 1 -continued
~;,
' Agency Release
Aerox ~~ Danbsce (A eo - - Dais
SLIC Spills, Lake, Inveatigstiona, and Cleanups {SWRCB and Sank Clan County) 10 Janttary 2005
SS7'S Section 7I7FRA Tnt:king System (US EPA) 31 Decambm 2003
SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System (Integrated Weatc Management Board)' 14 Marob 2003
(SWJS) '
Toxic Pits Toxic Aits Cleanup Act Sites (Bute Water Resource Control Board) 1 July 1995
~S 7'oxie Chemical Releue Inventory System (U9 EPA) 31 December 2002
TSCA Toxic Subctetuxc Control Act (lIS EPA) ~ 3 t December 2002
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Site NS Department of Energy) ~ 29 Deamber~2004
US ENO Engineering Controls Site List (US EPA) 10 January 2003 ,
CONTROLS
UST Underground Storage Tsnks (Soon Clan County and State Water Raouroa 70 January2003'
Control Board)
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program (DTSC) 7 February 200E
VYD3 Waste Discharge System (Bran WaterReaourow Control Bwrd) ~1'March 2003
WMUDS Weate Manegemeot Unit Danbese System (State Water Raouroes Cootrol 1 April'2000
Board '
Source: EDR, 2005.
ote: See Appendu H for complete environmenal daabue rcpori.
~,
~,
tt
•
Legend
Watson, William and Son
1619 Depluro Way
O GBcK TruckmB
20201 Mcnda ve
~~~ One M~Te Radius
*' project site
oQeSt prnsnect Road
Note:
See text for additional site information.
source: EDR, zoos.
0 7000 Fea
R~,&~t'F
GUI,ATORY DATABASES WITHIN Figure 6
SITES ON RE
n,vr+. MILE OF THE PROJECT SITE
An 27 September 1995, a 7so-gallon underground diesel storage tank and associated piping was
removed from this site. Soils from,the tank excavation contained total petroleum hydrocatbpne
(TPH) as diesel at concentrations of up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), indicating that
a release had occurred iirom the tank (SCVWD, 1997). Two rounds of soil excavation attd
verification testing were performed under SCVWD oversight. Following the second round of soil
excavatioa,verification sampiesconfirmed thatpetroleum-affected soils had been removed from the
tank area. A soil boring was installed in December 1946, to determine if deeper.soiht had been
affected by the release. Soil samples 5om IS to 40 feet bgs were coltectgd and analyzed for: •..
.petroleum-related compounds; cone of the compounds were.identified above laboratasy reporting
Limits (Soil Tech Engineering, 1997). On 9 July I997, the site wen closed by SCV WD; the closra~e
letter and site summary aro included as Appendix C. `As only soil in the immediate tank vicinity was
affected, this release would not have the potegtia) to affect the project site.
$UILIIING-RELATED. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS'
City Planning Department records, discussed about under Historical Land Uses, indicate that the
buildings at the project site were constructed during the 196+Ds and 1970s. Based on their dates of
construction; the buildings at the project site may contain lead-b'esed paint and/or asbestos-
containing materisIs (ACMs)t Lead oxide and lead chromate were commonly used in paints unh7 , .
1978, when regulations limited the allowable lead content in paint. Therefore, painted surfatxs at
buildings constructed prior to 1978 have thepotential to conteialead-based paint. Federal and State ~,
regulations govern the demolition. of structures where lead or material containing lead arepresent. ,:
During demolition, lead-based paint that is securely adhering to wood or metal may be disposed of
as demolition debris, which is anon-bazardous waste. Loose and peeling paint must be disposed i-f
as a California and/or federal hazardous waste if the concentration of lead exceeds applicable waste
tltresha)ds. State and Federal construction worker health and safety regulations require air
monitoring and other protective measures during demolition activities where lead-based paint is
presort.
Asbestos was commonly used in construction materials until its use was phased out in the 1980s.
Therefore, building materials manufactured prior to the ] 980s have the potential to contain asbestos
fibers, which could be released during demolition activities. At the project site, materials such as
linoleum, sheetroek and joint compound, textured ceiling materiel, and roo:6ng materiels could
potentially contain asbestos. Federal, State, and local requirements govern fire removal of asbestos
or suspected ACMs, including the demolition of structures where asbestos is present. All friable
(crushable by hand) ACMs,'or non-friable ACMs subject to damage, rnttst be abated prior to
demolition in.accordance with applicable requirements, Friable ACM must be disposed of as an
asbestos waste at an approved facility. Non-friable ACM may bedisposed of asnon-hazardous waste
at landfills that will-accept such wastes. Workers conducting asbestos abatement must be trained
in accordance with State and Federal OSHA regulations.
Othercommon sources ofhazardous materials werenoted at theproject site, including light switches
and thermostats (which often contain mercury) and air conditioning equipment (which may contain
Freon or other refrigerants). These materials, though not a potential threat to human health and the
~~
environment in thew Current state, would be classi5ed as hazardous wastes wba- the buildings are
demolished. Proper handing and disposal of Lead, asbestos, and other hazardous materiels would be
the responsibility of the owner of the.project site, who would be considered rho generator of the. ,
hazardous wastes that result from >•emoval of these it~ns. '
CONCLUSIONS
The project site was used for orchards 5nm at least 1939 until around 1963, when it was
developed for a church. Two church buildings were constructed around 1%3, and an
additional two buildings were wnstructed around 1971 and 1978. Surrounding areas were
developed for residential land uses between 1956 and 19b8. Agricultural: chetaicals were
likely applied to the orchards, and there may be a potential for residues of these chemical m
be present in shallow soils at the project site. No other•hiatorical land uses associated with
hazardous materials likely to affect redevelopment of the project site were identified.
• The project site contained four single-story buildings and a shell, which were mostly vacant
et the time of the sift reconnaissance. No evidence of hazardous materials use, storage, or
• release was noted at the project site during the site reconnaissance. Adjoining land uses were
residential and did not appear likely to use, store, or dispose of significant quantities of
hazardous materials.
Two sites within one mile of the project site appear on Federal, State, and local agency
databases ofsites associated with hazardous materials storage, disposal, or release. Based on
.available details and locations; neither site identified in the database review would be likely
Ep affect the project site.
Review of site history information indicates that most of the structures at the project site were
constructed prior to 1980, and therefore may contain lead-based paint and/or asbeaMe-
containingmaterials. Demolition orrenovatioa ofthese structutns could release lead particles
and asbestos fibers into the air, and potentially pose a health risk to construction workers sad
the general public. ~ Offier hazardous materials, such as mercury in light switches and
thermostats, maybe encountered during demolition, and must be handled and disposed of in
acwrdance with hazardous waste regulations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• To determine, whether agricultural chemical residues may be present in project site soils, e
limited soil investigation should be conducted at theproject site in accordance with California
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Interim Guidance for Sampling Former
Agricultural Fields for School Sites (Interim Guidance) (DISC, 2002). Although prepared
specifically for evaluation of school sites, the Interim Guidance is also appropriate for future
residential properties and other sites where children and other sensitive receptors may
potentially come into direct contact with soils affected by agricultural chemical residues.
_ie_ f
Based on the size of the Pbase I project site (2.62 acts), the Interim GUldttnCf 3peClfild
a minimum of eight. composite.samples aLotild be collected from shallow soils and analyzed
for potential organic and inorganic agriculttual chemical residues. For the pmject 81tt,
organochlorine pesticides and the metals lead, arsenic, copper, anti rnercuty should be
analyzed for. As specified in the.Interim Guideage, anydetected organic compounds ormetaL
above naturally-occurring concentrations should be evahtated in a risk assessme~, and
additional remedial action sucL as soils removal may be required, depending on the resuha of
the environmental•investigation and risk assessmeaC '~
Prior to demolition or remodeling of buildings at the project site, a iead-based paint cad
asbestos-containing materiaisurvey sbould be conducted bya certifiedprofessional. Identified
loose and peeling lead-based paint and ACMs should be abated in aceordmce with applicable..
regulations. Federal and state construction worker safety regulations should be followed
during construction activities where lead and/orasbestos areknown orsuspected tobr;preseat,
Older common hazardous materials that may be encountered during det>aolition, such as
mercury switches and air conditioning refrigerants, should be handled anddisposed of in
accordance with DISC hazardous waste regulations. ,
..LIMITATIONS
The services BAS1i1.WE has performed in connection with this study Lave been performed in
accordance with generally accepted principles and practices applicable to the profession at ibis time.
The data presented were obtained from previous environmental investigations, historical land use
information, regulatory agency fifes, an environmental database repaa~t, interviews, .and a site
reconnaissance. We make no other. warranty or representation,. expressed or implied, for the work
is this report. The conclusions presented in this`report are professional opinions based on die
indicated data described in this report. They are intended only for the purpose, site, and pmject
indicated. Opinions and recommendationspresented herein apply~.to site conditions existing at the
time of our study. o .
Changes in the conditions of the subject property can occur with time, because ofnatural processes
or the works of humans, on ibe subject sites or on adjacent properties. Our faihtne to discover
hazardous substances through a reasonable and mutually agreed.upon limited scope-of--work does
not guarantee that bazardous substances do not occur in an area. Similarly, an area which in part is
unaffected by hazardous substances at Ute time of our investigation, may later, due ro natural
phenomena orbttman intervention, become contaminated. Changes in applicable standards can also
occur as the result of legislation or from the broadening of btowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings
of ibis report may be invalidated, wholly or in part, by changes beyond, our control,
L~
_1 S_
REFERENCES
ATC Associates, 2005, Groundwater Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2004, Classic Car Wash
Westgate, 18560 Prospect Road, Saratoga, California, 1 I February.
ATC Associates, 2002, Soil Sampling Report, , Classid;Car Wash Westgate,18560 Prospect Road,
Saratoga, California, 8 November.
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), 2002; Interim Guidance for Sampling?igriculturai'
Fields for School Sites (Second,Revisioa), August 26.~ '
DTSC, 2005, Hazardous waste and Substances Site List,. blip://www.dtsc,ca.gov/databe8e/
Calsites/Cortese List.cSn,
Environmental Data Resources (EDR), 2005, Envirorunental DatabasaReport, Saratoga North
Campus Project, 7 9848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA 95129, Inquiry Number. 1413;723.2x, 4 May.
Lind, Brad, 2005, City of Saratoga Building Official, personal communication with Todd Taylor of
BASELINE, 19 May.
• Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCV WD), 1997, Fuel Leak Site Case Closure - G.K Trucking,
'20201 Merida Drive, San Jose, CA 95070 (Santa Clara County), Case No. 14-084, 9 July.
Soil Tech Engineering,1997,PrelIminary Subsurface Closure Investigation for the Property located
at 20201 Merida Drive in Saratoga, California, January 3.
United States Gbological Survey(USGS);1991, 7.S~minutetopograpl»c map, Cupertino quadrangles
~~_
• .. ~.
APPENDICES .. ` .. -
' (ON CD-ROM IN PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT)
A: HISTORICAL LAND USE RESOURCES
B: ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT
C: CASE CLOSURE FILE AND SITE SUMMARY , .
• FOR G&K TRUCT{ING, 20201 MERIDA DRIVE - ..
D: QUALIFICATIONS OF PREPARERS
nts aV ailab~e ~°n1 unity
AttaG~e atoga' Coxes on xequeSt' .
the C1tY of S Dep~ent up ~ ~ .
Deyel°pn?,en
'~.
.. •.
BASELIN~
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
24 August 2005
Y5391-00.00187
Ms. Carmen Borg .
Urban Planner
Shute; Mihaly Bc Weinberger
396 Hayes Street
San Francisco, t:A 94102
SubjeM: Shallow SoU Screening Inveatlgation,19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CaBforda
.. I
Dear Ms. Bof$: ~ .
• This letter report documents the activities and findings of the shallow sor7 screening-level
investigation for the ]9848 Prospect Road project site in Saratoga, California (Figures ]and 2).
This investigation was conducted by BASELINE for Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger in support of
environmental review for a redevelopment project. The testy of Saratoga (City); the current owns
of the property, is currently evaluating redevelopment of the project site for a residential
• subdivision containing nine single-family residences.
A Phase I site assessment for the project site determined that the site was used for orchm~da from
at Jeast 1939 until around ]963 (BASELINE, 2005). The Phase I ooacluded that agrioultwal
chemicals were likely applied to the orchards, and that these tray be a potential tot residua of
these chemicals to be present im shallow soils at the project site. This.shallow em7 ecxeeaiag
investigation implements the recommendations of the Phase I report and evahuta whether
agricultural chemical iesidues may be present in shallow sor7e at the project site at comcentrstioas
that could pose a health risk tb construction workers and/or future residents at the sits
SITE DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of two parcels (APN 386.26-070 -and 386-26-071), totaling
approximately 2.62 acres. The project site is bordered to the north by Prospect Road, and
to the west, south, and east by residential properties (Figures 1 and 2). The project site is
level and located approximately 280 feet above mean sea level (msl) (USaS,1991).
Y5791.op187.,pt.~pd-B/tMVS
BAS NE.
Ms. cara,ar Borg.
24 August 2005 ,
Page 2
FIELD ACTIVITIES
.pn 17 June 2005, soil samples were collected from near-surface soils at eight loctations af:
the project site by a BASF-LINE registered geologist {Figure 2). Sampling:focations was
chosen by dividing the entire project sites into eight equally-sized areas end plotting a
sampling Location within each area using random numbers from a computer random mtmber
generator. Where the randomly-selected location was inside a building or oa a paved.
surface, the location was moved to the nearest unpaved surface.
After removing say vegetation at the sampling location, a sor7 sample was collected at each
location at the ground surface (0 to 0.5 feet below ground surface) usirlg~ six-inch long by
l.3-inch diameter stainless steel sampling tubes end a slide hammer. After sample
collection, the sample tubes were sealed with Teflon film and'plsatic end caps, labeled, sad
placed in a water ico-cooled container for transport under chain-of-custody procedures to
STL San Francisco, a California-certified analytical laboratory. The samples were •
composited into fow composite samples by the Laboratory. Each of the compomte soil
samples were analyzed for total lead, arsenic, copper, and mercury (metals ofiea found in...
irmrganic pesticides) and organochlorine pesticides. .
The sampling equipment was decontaminated between sampling tocetionq using ep Alconox
solution and deionized water rinse. Kinsale generated during the investigation was allowed
to evaporate natur~Ily. No soil cuttings wen generated during the shallow sor7 sampling.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The analytical results for this investigation are summarized on Table 1. The results wa+e
compared to San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential tend uses (RWQCB, 2005, which
are conservative risk-basal thresholds useful for screening laboratory data to evaluate
potential human hesIth and environmental risks. Excadance of ESLs does•not necessarily.
mean that the site may pose a health risk, but may indicate that additional investigation
and/or remediatioa of a .site may be warranted. Metals wncentrationa were also compared
to 95th perccntilenaturally-occurring (background) concentrations established by Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory for metals in .East Bay sor7s (I.BNL, 2002). Complete
laboratory reports and thechain-of-custody form are included as Attachment A.
Metals. None of the metals were identified at concentrations above residential ESLs
(Table 1). Lead was detected at concentrations up to 35 mg/kg, slightly above the 95th .
----_..,.,.., _..,.,n-en~ros
24 August 2005
Y5391-00.00187
BASELIN~
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
Ms. Carmen Borg
Urban Planter'
Shute, Mihaly & Weinbergetr
396 Hayes Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Subject: Sbsllow Soil Screening Inveattgstlon, 79848 Pro:peel Road, Saratoga, Callforniat
Dear Ma. Borg: '
This letter report documents the activities and findings of the ahaUow soil screening-level
investigation for the 19848 Prospect Road project site in Saratoga, California (Figtrta 1 and 2).
This investigation was ronducted by BASELINE for Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger is support of
environmental review for a redevelopment project The City of Saratoga (City), the current owner
of the pnapearry, is currently evaluating redevelopment of the project site for a resideatid
subdivision containing nine single-family rcsidenca.
A Phase I site assessment for the project site determined that the site was used for orcbmds (rota
at least 1939 until around 1963 (BASELINE, 2005). The Phase I c:oacluded that agriculturai
chemicals wero likely applied to the orchards, and that these stay be a potential for residua of
these chemicals to be preseat'in shallow sot7s at the project site. This shallow soil acreeaittg
investigation irnplemema the rexommendations of the Phase I report sect ewatuatea whether
agricultural cbeavcai residues may be present in shallow sor7s at the project site at coacentratiom
that could prise a health risk to construction workers and/or future residents st the site.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The projext site consists of two parcels (APN 386-26-070 and 386-26.071), totaling
approximately 2.62 acres. The project site is bordered to the north by Prospect Road, sad
to the west, south, and east by residtntiel properties (Figures 1 end 2). The project site ie
]eve] and Located approximately 280 feet above mean sea level (msl) (USC33, 1991).
BASE
Ma Carmen Borg .
24 August 2005
Page 2
FIELD ACTIVITIES '
.pn 17 June 2005, soil samples were collected from near-surface soils at eight )octatioas at
the project site by a BASELINE registered. geologist (Figure 2). SampUng looationa were
chosen by dividing the' entire project site in0o eight equally-sited areas and plotting a
sampling location within each area using random numbers firnn a computer random number
generator. Where the randomly-selected locstiow was inside a building or oa a paved
surface, the location was moved to the nearest unpaved surfaces
~J
After removing any vegetation at the sampling location, a sorb sample was collected aC each .
location at the ground surface (0 to 0.5 feet below ground surface) using, six-iach7ong by
1.5-inch diamtter stainless steel sampling tubes and a side hammer. Ages sample
collection, the sample tubes were sealed with Teflon film and plastic end cape, labeled, end
placed in a water ico-cooled container for transport undei chain-of-custody procedure to
STL San Francisco, a California-certified analytical laboratory. The sempleb wen •
composited into fow composite samples by the laboratory. Each of the composite sor7
samples were analyzed for total lead, arsenic, copper, and mercury (metals often found is
inorganic pesticedes) anti organochlorine pesticides.
The samplia8 equipment was decontaminated between sampling locations using an Al~nox
solution and deionized water rinse. Kinsale generated during the investigation was allowed .
to evaporate naturally. No soil cuttings were generated during the shallow sor7 sampling.
ANA,LYTTCAL RESULTS .
The analytical results for this investigation arc summarized oa Table 1. The results wea+e
compared to Sea Francesco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential land uses (RWQCB, 2005), which
are conservative risk-based thresholds uaefiil for screening laboratory data to evaluate
potential human health and environmental risks. Exceedance of ESLs does•aot aecxssan7y
mean that the site may pose a health risk,,but may indicate that additional investigation
and/or ranediation of a site may be warranted. Metals concentrations were also compared
to 95th percentile naturally-occurring (background) concentrations established by Lawratce
Berkeley National Laboratory for metals in East Bay sor7s (LBNL, 2002). Complete
laboratory reports and thechain-of-custody form are included as Attachment A.
Metals. None of the metals were identiSed at concentrations above residential ESLs
(Table I). Lead was detected at concentrations up to 35 mg/kg, slightly above the 95th
--. ,_.., ~-,.n.an4ios
B"$._INE
Ma: Carmm Borg
24 August 2005
Page 3
percentile naturally-occurring concentration of 27 mg/kg; no other metals were idmtiSet~
above tha 95th percxnd7e concentrations j'I'abla l).
Orgsaochlorlne pesttcldea. The, wmposite samples contained five insecxicido-ielated
compounds above laboratory reporting limits: DDT, DDE (e breakdown product of DD.T).
dieldrin, alpha-chlordane, end gamma-chlordane (Table 1). Dieldrin was detected is two of
the four samples, at concentrations of 0.014 mg/kg and 0.043 mg/kg, above the residmtial
ESL of 0.0023 mg/kg. All other pesticides defected were idmtified at concmtratiorie at hxet
an order of magnitude below the residential ESLa (Table 1). '
The residential ESL for dieldrin is driven by potential water quality impacte•(RWtZCB, •
2005}; to determine if the concentrations of dieldrin in sor7 may pose a health risk to futuro
construction workers and residents through direct contaof with sor7s at the project site, the
• maxvnum concentration of dieldrin at the site was also compared to ESLs established for
direct contact to conatructia~a workers and residential land users. The maximum dieldrin ,
concentration of 0.043 mgAcg from this investigation was lower than the 1.6 mghg
construction worker direct-contact ESL (Table K-3, RWtZCB, 2005), but above the 0.034
mgAcg residential direct-contact ESL (Table iC-1, RWQCB, 200. This suggests that •
concentrations of dieldrin in shallow soil at the project site would not be expected to present
a health risk to future construction workers, but may •have the potential to affect future
residential users at the site.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the fow composite sample results from the shallow soil screening investigation
performed at the site, there may be a potential for residues of the organochtasir~besed
inaectiade dieldrin to be present in shallow soils at concentrations that could potmtlally
affect water quality and/or pose a health risk to future residential land users through dirod
contact with site soils. No other organochlorine pesiadee or metals commonly present in
inorganic pesticides were identified above residential ESLs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Additional sampling should be performed at the project site to firrther define the ezteat of
organoclrlorine pestiade residues in shallow sor7s. Representative soil samples should be
collected from shallow soils (less than 2 feet below ground surface) across tits project site.
• If pesticide residues were identified above screening thresholds for residmtisJ land »sea, a
human health risk assessment (IiliRA) may be required to more accurately assess potential
health risks from pestiade residues at the site. Based on tire findings of the IiHRA,
Y5391.001871p6w'Pe-8~14N3
~• $,AS~ NE
Me, Carm~ Borg •
• 24 August 2005
Page S .
If you have any gvesstions or comments regarding this investigation, please c~ontad ttt at your :
convenience.
Sincerely.
Todd TaylorC~~~ 1tEA ~e ~lordhav
Environmental Aasoc~ate Prmapal
• Reg. Geologist No. 4009 •
TT:YN:1® i ,
Attachments
,..,~ i m i x7 mt.wod•8l14N3
_ ~..'~ ~ T
.. . t
19848 Prospect Road
~~~
R SEL F.
r nrATiON F'1guTC i
SAMPLE LOCATIONS ~ ~ Figure Z
r~
u
Appmxivnfe
y UR4R Prospect Road o"~ '~
73 Fw,
T ~ nc~ ~rr~
Legend
PR-SI ~ SEeuav sou supple Load
abk 1: Summary of Analytical Raulta, Soil
1984>< PrapcM Aopd, Santoea, Glitorui.
All values in m
'
•
Sam le ID PR~41,2
PR-S 3r1
PR-S 3,6
PRS 7,8 RaWmtial
ESL -. Badc~ro~ua
Concmtn
tk22Mehb ethod601@BrJ471A •
. 2.8 2.4 3.9 3. S 1
2+1 20 26 3
as 12 2~ 1
alp o.oss o.lo al 3. r>8'
anochloaine Peaticida ethod 8081A
4'•DDD 41.02 <0.01 <0.01 41.01 2
,4 =DDE 0.028 0.02f 0.034 0. 1
q~_D~• 0.031 0.020 0.024 0.02 1
,4'-Metho cblar 41.02 c0.01 41.01 • <OAI ~ 1
hhio 41.02 41.01 <0.01 <OA] 0.
1 he-BHC 4-.02 <o.ol <0:01 41.01 o.a
I ha-Chlordane <0.02 0.021 <OA1 0.0.1 0
g}>C 41.02 41.01. 41.0 4IA] 0.01
Jordane technical ~ 41.50 q),25 . 41.23 41.23 0.
ally-BHC <0.02 41.01 x0.01 <OAt 0.04
•e~ 41.02 QI.Ol 0.011 0.01! 0.
ndosultan l 41.02 df.01 d1.01 41.01. 0.
ndosulfan II 41.02 41.0] 4).01 41.01 0.
ndosulfan sulfate 41.02 41.01 41.01 41.0 0.
,~ 41.02 <0.01 41.01 4).01 0.00063
ndrin aldeh de 41.02 <O.OI <0.01 41.01 0.00065
• g~ 41.02 ~ <0.01 <0.01 ' 4)AI 0.00063 '
ammo-BHC x0.02 4).Ol <0.01 4)Al 0.01
ammo-Chlordane 41.02 0.020 41.01 0.011 0.
e ~ 41.02 QOAI <0.01 41.01 0.01.
hl~ 'de <0.02 af.01 41.01 ~ <0.01 0.01
~ bane <1.0 <0.30 <0.30 <03 0.00042
Ilta~ ou •ampard nol idaai6ed above 46aatay repordrK OmK ofxs.
ESL ~ Fmkonmerpd SeraawK Laud (RWQCS, 2005. Table A ibr ReaidaaLl Lad Use}
Eaekpoad caocmtraioia for mehla re 93 pawit0a talus eelatiaaed for GaN Bry arm nab (1.BNL, 2002}
as Ibold]. bompaad detested above labaramry limb. .
rs Ind tmkl' oontpowd detaacd above rpidmdai ls'84. '
_. tat appliuNe
NE ~ not ewblitiad
Sampke osre colleetad on 17ltne 2005 6om ahelkw oo0e (0 to 03 foo4 below pound atclbce}
See Figue 2 Pot aampliry ioabas.
See Attadanaa A for kbaaooryrepores and dais of cmtody foray
~ No 95th pcratdile mercury beckpound corkcnuadon was established due W day limitaiaen fa fhe background menlt aatdy (ERNE, 2005}
~.
Walk
I •
u
:.
STL-
Baseline Environmental ,
5900 Hoilis Street, Suite D
Emeryville, CA 94608-2008
Attn.: Bill Scott '~
Project: Y5391-00
Project: 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA
Dear Mr. Scott,
Submiss ion#: 2005-08-0484
•,
June 30, 3005
.
Attached is our report for your samples received on 06/17/2005 14:20
This report has been reviewed and approved for release. Reproduction of this, report
is permitted only in its entirety.
Please note that any unused portion of the samples will be discarded after
08/01/2005 unless you have requested otherwise.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. tf you have any questions,
' please calfine.at (925j 484-1919.
You can also conlact me via email. My email address is: ssidhuQsti-inC.com
Sincerely,
Surinder Sidhu
Project Manager
Submission: 2006-06-0414
•
M@t8~5
Baseline Environmental ~ 1 •
Attn.: Bql Scott ,'
5900 Hollis Street, Suke D ''
EmeryvlNe, GA 84608.20013
Ptwne: (510) 420-8688 Fex: (510) 420-1707 ,
ProJed: Y589i-00 Recehrod:06/17/200514~0
19848 Proeped Road, Saratoga, CA
Sampha Reported
Sam la Name t'3Bt~e'Sa #~
~ ;;`. ,v -.
~
PR-S 1,2
PR-S 8,4 06/17/2005
DtiJ17/1005 ; ', tiol
~. Sol 1 .
2 .
PR-S 5,8 06/17lZ005 Sots . 8
PR-$ 7,8 06/17/2005 SoM 4
y3
.. ~ STL
Metala
Baseline Environmental
. Attn.: BBI Scott
5800 Hollis St ~~
Emeryvitie; CA
' phone: (510) 420.8686 Fax: (5 10) 420-1707
Pro)ect: Y5381.00
1 gg48 Proaped Roed, Saretoga, CA
prepleli 3050B ~ ~:
~4~1~9 ~,~ ~:,` :.
~ Samptedr 06/17~2001a~~ ,j~k~:: 4,,:
.. ~ t(
~
L Y 5.,
.
Com ound Conc.
Arsenic 2.8
Copper 24
15
Lead 0.14
Mercury
DNutlon Ane Fli
1.00 osnanoo5lo:ae
1.00 O6/24@0p510A9 I
1.00 06/24/200510:49
1,00 05/231200512:51
8ubmissbn: 2005-06
ReceNed: O6/17/200514~0
. ~,; STL
Baseline Environmental
Attn.: BI9 Scott
5800 Hollis Street. Suite D
Emeryville, CA 94608.2008
510) 420.8688 fex: (510) 420.1707
Phone: (
project Y5391-00
19848 Prospect.Roed, Saretopa, CA
p , 808 i
~~ i ~'
~',~
~~
.e
r~.~
t,
4~~
~
i
P
R
SatllR~ ~Ri
~ ~+s
~;
/i
y~
~~
~M
iQe
y~,~~~x. ~
• y
~~, $iDlr t"~ ~ <F
r„vv...~ AA
Coppe- 12
Lesd __. 0:09b
8ubmlubti:l'005.06~04M
Metal:
,.
~,
Received: 08/17n00514~0
i T~`y°
i'i ~~i~. a. .
.0 Im9M0
.o m9M9
.0 m9M9
i.oo osnanoo61o:53 . '
1.00 osnanoo51o:s3
1.00 06n31200612:52
oar24/200517:04
~~ ~ ..
' Submiss{co:2006-06
STL .
Metals
II Environmental
Base ne
Attn.:8fp Scott
5800 Hollis Stream 08- ~
Emeryvige, CA
Phone: (510) 420-8688 Fax: (510) 420.1707
ProJed: Y5991-00
19848 Prospect Road, Saretopa, CA
~~
...~,,, ,._ _ 3.9
Arsenic 26
Copper 2U
'Lead 0.18
Mercury
,
Recelved:08/17/20051420 ,
2L 1,_Y ~JOUllOf1 NIO, ..o..
o ~ 1.Oa 08l2an0061o:67
'
.
A mplKp 1.00 O6n4200610:57
.
0 ;,,~ 1.00 Osn4noo51a.57
.
.050 mgIK9 ~ 1.00 08n3/200612:58
•
_/
osnanoo5 n:oa
Submission: 2®05-06-0484
Metals
Baseline Environmental
Attn.: B81 Sett'
5900 Hollis Street, Suite D
' EmeMdNe, CA 94508.2008
Phone: (510) 4218688 Fax: (510) 420-1707
prp~ Y5391-00
18848 Prospect Roed, Saratope, CA
Received: 06/17/2006 14:20 '
n
LJ
~~
cenanoosiroa
STL
Baseline Environmental
Attn.: BIII Scott
5900 Hollis CA 94608-2008
EmeryviNa,
ptwne:(510)420-8888 Fax: (510)420.1707
Project: Y5391-00
19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA
Metals
.'
Submisalon: 2005-06
ReceNed: 06/17/200514:20
}.rv _^.
nd Conc. RL UnR Ana ed
Com a ND O.OtiO ' m9M9 06R3@00512:32
Mercury
,
0.
tlRnanno6 1)06
..~-
•. ~ STiI
Baseline EnvironmerrW
• Attn.: BIII Scott
5000 Hollis Street, Suke D
EmeM'INe, CA 94806.2008
510) 420.8688 Fax: (510) 420-1707
. pho~; (
project: Y5391-00
18848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA
;..~
- ye°! ~~'~
~~~~(y~ w~ 'f..`.W L~~j b ~~
SJ' ~t
Odi~
~•
+
6 r `fix`'.
.
J~
~
` A ^e
jytB•:2005/Q6~ f•
:l
~
Com ound ND
~~ ND
CoPP~
Lead ND
Suymissbn: 2006-08-0/i4
Metals
,,
ReceNed: 06/17!20051420
,
'SE.~w-. a ., ~V. ~.
dy :%F
3i
RL ~ VIN\' Arw
1.0 mgncg os848t>o61o:06
1.o mgncg o68anooa 111:08
1.0 mgMg 0684/200610:08
n
~~
0a/24/200517~4
~m~ STL
Baseline. Environmental
Attn.: 13111 Scott
5900 Hollis Street, Suite D
EmeryviAe, CA 9460&2008
Phone: (510) 420-8686 Fax: (510) 420.1707
Pro)ect: Y5391.00
. 18848 Prospect Road, Saretoge, CA
e+-~ ~?:
~ ;;
L ~ ~~c Y
,Plep(8~ '7~1~~ 3 ,a',x M
~:
1,:i~Or8101~~.0111f~~j~~11~_ .. ...., .. ....f.~..
.'~.:'
Y:t~~:. .
Compou~
bteR.vry
..
• ' Submleefon: •2005-06
.,
ReoeNed: 06/17/20051420
~ conc. ~ ~.y...,...._ • ---- -
L lC C R
0.513 0.520 0.500 702.8 704.0 1A 86-118 20
,
,
•
jD~
Osn,rzao5 n:oa
Metals
STL
i
gasoline Environmental
Attn.: Bill Scott
5900 Hollis Street, Sidle D
EmeMdMe, CA 9460&2008
Phone: (610) 420-8686 Fax: (510) 420-1707
pr~ct: Y5391-00 `
19848 ProspeclRoed,Saratoga,l:A
r ~~B
Pte) ", ~ ~,, 5.
.4, ...
;,t~atos! ~~tro1 an1t, ~ ;
2OPb10612°1-17?-~
yes
,
Lt,~ ?40S1D~~l'k2,-Q~:;'11~r~.' s,aa.,..
Metals
Submiss{on: 2008-08-04M
Received: 08l17/200514~0
r
-- T---. , ..~,.....,..:,,~ i.,,.
~o~
~.~ „~,
,o, ~; STL
SubmNsfon:2005 ~~
Phone. (5
Project: Y5381-00 ~ Recefved:06/17/200514~0
19848 Prospect Road, Saiatoge, CA ,
Samples Reported .
eae
Attrt.: BW Scott.
5800 HoIHa Street, SuMe D
EmeryvlNe, CA 94608-2008 '
• 10)420-8688 Fax•(510)420-1707
lJrganochlorinePestitides Analysis
B Ifne Environmental
~$9n .tEf'1~1.8tt~'
PR-S 1,2
PRS 3,4
PR-S 5,8
PR•S 7,8
owl7noos
OBJ77/2005
l>6/17/2008
Sc1
sd
Sol
Soil
' ,
1
2
3
4
,~i
,o~ ~.
~ . ~ 5TL
Baseline Environmental
Submissbrf: 2006.pg-04a4
Organochlorine Pesticides Analysts
• Attn: 681 Scott
I
I
e, CA 94608-2009•
~~
O
. p~~:(510)420.8886 Fax: (510)420-1707
project: Y5391.00
18848 Prospect Road,
Saratoga, CA
4 F~
~54/8Dp9 ~- :~
pfe~islt ~ ?»'?m
h
.. riaa7~1 ~6IA7/Z00b ~:-
,~4Y'),y;:
~
CA'f f
~ry A~Je.
tna
nA~"
Com ound
~ lI~
ND
AIdrM ND
Diakirin
Endrin aldehyde ND
Endrin ND
ND
Enddn ketone ND
Heptachkx
tachlor epoxkte
He ND
p
4,4'.pDT 31
28
4,4'-DDE ND
4,4'-DDD ND
. EndosuMan I ND
EndosuHan 11 ND
alpha-BFiC ND
beta-BHC
BHC (Lindane)
ma ND
.
gam
deMa.BHC ND
ND
Endosuflan suMate ND
q,4'-MethoxY~br ND
Toxaphene ethnical)
Chbrdane (T ND
alpha-Chbrdane ND
ND
gamma,Chlordane
Surrogate(aJ
6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene
2
q;5 NA
A
,
,
Decachbrobiphenyl(PesV808 N
1)
•
~,
Received: 06/17/2006 14:20
•. ,
,
~ ~'~'
upMp 10.00 06!27/2008 29:54
10.00 08/272006 29:54
,
~ ~ 10.00 o6/27nooa 23:s4 .
D uplKp 10.00 06/27/2008 23:54
D ugA~O 10.00 06/27/2008 29:64
D uplKp .10.00 08/27/2006 29:54
10.00 06/26%2006 20:23
D u91K0 10.00 08/27/2006 29:54 .
0 uf~g 10.00 06/2712006'29:64
0 upl
Kp 10.00 06/2712006 29:64
0 ,
u~ 10.00 06/2712006 29:64
0 uplKp 10.00 08127/2006 23:64
0 uglKp 10.00 08/2712006 23:54
0 uf~g 10.00 08/27@006 29:64
0 uglKg 10.00 08/2712006 23:64
0 uglKg 10.00 06!27@008 23:84,
0 uplKp 10.00 08/27/2006 23:64
000 ugllCg 10.00 OBr17/2006 23:64
~ ugIKO 10.00 (16/27/2006 23:64
0 ug1K0 10.00 06127/2006 29.:64
0 uglKg 10.00 08/2712006 23:54
0-125 9L 10.00 06/27/2006 23:54. .
6-142 96 10.00 0612712005 23:54
~ p3
,,:~,
..'
SrTT ~ ~ Submlasion:20G~-0B
1 Organochlorine Pesticides Analysts
• Baseline Environmental
Adn.: Bid Scott ' .
5900 Hollis Street, Sude D
EmeryviNe, CA 94609.2008
Phone: (510) 420.8689 Fax: (510) 420.1707 '
Project: Y5391-00
• 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA
• Com ound Conc. RL
AIdrM . ND 10
Diekirin ND 10
Endrin aldehyde ~ ND 10
Endrin MD 10
• Endrin ketone ND 10
Heptachbr ND 10
Heptechkx epoxide ND 10
' 4,4'-DDT 20 10
4,4'-DDE 26 10
4,4'-DDD ND 10
Endosutfan 1 ND 10
Endosuttan II ND 10
.alpha-BHC ND 10
beta-BHC ND 10
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ~ ND 10
deNa-BHC ND 10
EndosuHan sulfate ND 10
4,4'-Methoxychlor ND 10
Tozephene ND 500
Chordane (Technical) ND 250
alpha-Chlordane 21. 10
gamma-Chlordane 20 10'
Surrogate(s)
2,4,5,6-Tetrachbro-m-xylene 98.4 50-12b
Decachbrobiphenyl (Pest/8081) 66.5 6-142
Recehred: O6J17/200514:20
ug/Kg 5.00 Oti282008 00:28
ugllCg 5.00 0~28200b 00:26 . .
ugACg 5.00 08/28/2008 00:28
uglKg 5.00 06/28/2008 00:25
uglKg 5.00 08/2612008 00:25 '
ug/Kp 5.00 06/28/2005 00:28
uglKg 5.00 06/282008 00:25
uglKg 5.00 06/288005 20:84
ug/Kg 5.00 08/281200500:25
ug1Kg 5.00 06282006 00:26
uglKg 5.00 08282006 00:25
ugACg 5.00 08282008 00:25
ugMg 5.00 06282006 00:26
ug/Kg 5.00 06282005 00:25 .
ug/Kg 5.00 06282006 00:26
ugACg 5.00 08282008 00:25
ugACg 5.00 06/282005 00:26
ugMg 5.00 06282005 OO:2b ,
ug/Kg 5.00 06282005 00.26
ugllCg 5.00 08282008 00:2b
ug/Kg 5.00 08282005 00:28
ug/ICg 5.00 06282005 00:26
% 5.00 06282005 00:25
% 5..00 06282006 00:28
`~
f ~'7
oa/sonoob trot
~a ~ STL
Baseline Environmental
Attr~.: Bill Soon
Organochlorine Pesticide: Anatysis
~,
Submiss{on:2005-08•~ ~•
5900 Hollis Street, Sufte D •'~,
Emeryvile, CA X608-2008
Phone: (510) 420.8886 Fax: (510) 420.1707 Received: OBN7I200614~0 ~'
Project: Y5391-00 ,
19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga. CA ,
355018681. ~ w
Pne~ .:~, ' ~' : 1'f
.~`
y 3 E
, ~, : ,. , '.,~, F ~,
,
~{~s 'PR-B t.y~+
4
`lfY^ ~9~.
'i. 1
~ S' ~.am .
~:1 .
y~~
~~ Vgf~~~,y. ~ K~ ~ e $?y. w a Prb Lz
~jyjy
'
Com nd ~~ ~, '. UnN
10 uyACp Dilution
5.00 Ana
p81281200b 00:66
Awn ND
14 10 u61F~p 5.00 06/28/2005 00:56
Dieldrin ND 10 uglKp 5.00 06/288006 00:56
Endrin aldehyde ND 10 ugMp 5.00 08@8@006 00:56
• Endrin Np 10 uglKg 5.00 08/2612005 00:68
Endrin ketone ND 10 ugllCO ~ • 5.00 06126/2005 00:58
.Heptachlor ~ 10. uyKg 5.00 061281200500:66
Heptachlor epoxide 10 uplKp b.00 08128/2006 21:25
4,4'-0DT 24
10 uplKp 5.00 0812812006 OO:BB
4'-DDE
4 ~
10 ~ uglKg 5.00 061280005 00:66
,
4'-0DD
4 Np
10 upllCp 5.00 08/2812006 00:66
,
Endosulfan I ND
10 uplKp 5.00 06/28/2006 00:68
Endosulfan II ND
10 ugJlCg 5.00 0812812006 00:58
eipha-BHC ~ ND
10 u91Kg 5.00 08/28/2006 00:66
,
beta.BHC ND
p 10 ug11Cp 5.00 08/28/2006 00:68
gamma-BHC (Lindens) . N
10 u~ 5.00 .08128/200600:68
.
dells-BHC Np u~
10 5.00 '08/28/2006 00:66
Endosulfan sulfate ND
. 10 uglKp 5.00 06/28/2006 00:66
4'-McOwxychlor
4 ND
~ ~g 5.00 06/28@006 00:68
,
Toxephene Np 5:00 08/28/Z006 OO:bB
Chordane (Technicaq ND
10 0 0 6.00 06/288006 00:58
alpha-Chordane .
10 uglKg 5.00 08080 00:66
gamma-Chlordane Np
Surro9sM(+)
Tetrachb-o'm-xylene
6
92.1 50-12b 'K 5.00
5,00 06/28/200b 00:58
06128/2005 00:56
-
2,4,5,
~..,.e..tiv,robiohenyl (PesU8081) 50.7 8.142 %
,,
~ ~o~
rxvaorzooa,7o,
STL
Baseline Environmental
Attn.: Bill Sett
Submissbn:2005-08
Organochlorlne Pesticldtis Analysis
5900 Hollis Street, Sufte D
Emeryville, CA 94608-2008 ~,
Phone: (510) A20-8686 Fax: (510) 420-1707
•Pro)ed:.Y5391-00 Received: 08N7/Z0051420
19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA .
;.:
Dfeldrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin
Endrin ketone
Heptachbr
: Heptachbr epoxide
4,4'-0DT
4,4'•DDE
4;4'-0DD;
Endosulfan I
Endosutfan II
. alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
delta-BHC
EndosuMan sulfate
4,4'-Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
• Chlordane (Technicap
alphs-Chkxdana
gamma-Chlordane
Sunogate(aj
2,4,5,6-Tetrechloro'm-xylene
Decachbrobiphenyl (PesU8081)
ND
43 10
10 u9rrW •
uglKg • ...,..,
6.00 ....._...__~ _ .._.
06882006 0127
ND 10 ugllCg 5.00 06@8/2005 01:27'
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 0688/2005 0127
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 06/28/2006 01:27
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 06/28!2005 0127
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 05/28/2005 0127
29 ~ 10 uglKg b.00 06282005 21:56
34 10 uglKg 5.00 08!282006 0127
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 088af2005 01:27
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 08288006 0127
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 06888006 0127
ND 10 ugACg 6.00 06/288006 0127
ND 10 ugMg 6.00 06288005 01:27
ND 10 uglKg 5.00 08888006 0127
ND 10 uplKg . 5.00 08888005 0127
ND. 10 uplKg 5.00 08888006 0127
ND 10 uglKg b.00 08888006 0127
ND 500 uglKg 5.00 06888006 01:27.
'
ND 50 uplKg 5.00 06888006 0127
16 10 ug/Kp 5.00 06288006 0127
14 10 uglKg 5.00 05888005 01:27
103
3 50.125 % 5.00 06888005 01:27
.
58.5 6.142 % 5.00 06288005 01:27
()
oanonoos tv:ot
~: ~ ~ STL
Baseline Environmental
Orsanochlorine Pesticides Analysis
Submles)o~: 20pti-06-04a4
. Atbf.i BI8 Scot!
5900 HoINa Street, Suke D
Emeryvltie, CA 8460&2008
Phone: (510) 4208686 Fax: (510) 420-1707
Protect: Y5391-00
. 18848 Proeped Road, Saratoga, CA
,~
T~~
'~ fi` .
n
U
..~,,., ~
Dieldrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrln
Endrin ketone
Heptachbr
Heptachbr epoxide
4,4'-DDT
4,4'-0DE
4,4'-DDD
Endosuflant
EndoauBan II
alphe-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC (LMdane)
delta$HC
EndosuHan suHate
4,4'-Mefhoxychbr
Toxsphene
Chbrdene (Technical)
alpha-Chbrdene
gamma-Chbrdane
Surrogalea(a)
2,4,5,6-Tetrachicro-m-xylene
Recehred: 06/17/200614'10
ND 2.o uglKg osn7noo6 2221
ND 2.0 up/Kg 06/27/2006 21:21
ND 2.0 uyKg 06/27/2005 22,21
ND 2.0, uglKg 08/27/20052221
ND 2.0 ugJKg 08/27/2006 2221
ND 2.0 ugACg 06/Z7/2005 2221
ND 2.0 uglKg 06/27120062221
ND 2.0 ug/Kg .'08127/2008 22:21
ND 2.0 ugACg 06/27/200ti 22x:1
ND 2.0 ugR(g 08127120052221
ND 2.0 uplKg 08/27/2006 2221
ND 2.0 .' ugACg 061'27/2006 2271
ND 2.0 ugACg 08/27/2005 2221
ND 2.0 ugllCg . 08/27!2008 2221
ND 2.0 ugAlp 08/27/2008 2221
ND 2.0 ugACg 06/27/2005 2221
ND 2.0 uglKg 0627/2006 2221
ND 2.0 u91K9 08/27/2008 22:21 .
ND 100 ug11Cg 06127/2005 2221
ND 50 ug/ICp 06/27/200&22:21
ND 2,0 uglKg 06/27/20052221
ND 2.0 uglKp 06/27/2005:2221
77.f ~46-142 I % I 06/27/2005 22:21
,
,
~~7
STI~
Organochlorine Pesticides Analysis
Baseline Environmental
AtEn.: Bitl Scott
5900 Hollis Street, SuRe 0
Emeryvi0e, CA 94808-2008
Phone: (b10) 42D-0686 Faz: (510) 420.1707
Project Y5391-00
19848 Prospect Roed, Seretoga, CA
~
~ Conc.: F.xp.ConC. Recow % RPD CM.LhnKe 7
~ LCS LC LCS R
gaMn 12.4 12.1 18.8 74.7 72.8 2.4 97-136 96
p~~ln 11.7 11.1 18.8 70.6 88A S.2 58.198 95
ErdAi~ 11.8 11.9 18.8 71.1 88.1 4.9 88-134 98
Heptachlor 12.8 121 18.8 T6.9 72.9 4.0 4019B 96
4,4•-DDT 11.8 11.1 18.8 89.8 88.9 4A 6792 .96
psmme-BHC (Undene) 12.9 11.8 18.8 74.1 71.1 4.1 97-197 96
Surro9atuf+l
2,4,5,8•Tatrachloro-nrxYlena 92.8 91.9 50 85.2 82.7 50126 .0
~
peeachloroWphsrryl 98.8 97.9 60 79.8 74.8 4&142 0
~, . .
Stipmiasbn: 2005.p8-0484~
.,
ReceNed:06N7/200b 14:20
r~
,
•
JVU
Submissbn:2005-06-0484 •
i ~ STL ~ •
Organochlorine Pestlcides AnalyalE
BaseBne Environmental
Atln.:881 Scott
6900 Hillis Street, SuRe D
Erne~~, CA 94608-2008
phone: (510) 420-8688 Fetc (510) 420-1707
project: Y5391-00
• 19848 Prospect. Road. Saratope, CA
J
.~- ~~
'f, vK
,. u+, 3i
M6'U'7z 5p1ke i tJ18~11NSI)'~ ' ~. ,~
,~, , ;
2pp510B10113+D011
i~.' t~~
Mgp~ 2005/OtU28-01194~~ r 1
~, u
l:ompot~ MO MSD gem
AItlrN 19.9 ~ 79.8 ~ rD
Dleld~h 473 MA 49.1
F~ 163 tao ~
~~~ 193 192 ND
+~.,~ 91.1 943 29A
pemme-BHC (LM~dene) 1~.7 193 ND
SmropesN+1
2,4,6.6Tetrsc-Jor°'m'xyMe 61.7. 62.9
.._~.wwNdnhenvl 903 292
.,
ReceNed: OBI17/2005 14:20
183 012 01A 2A 97-190 96
76.6 28.7 103 &/3 66196 96 t16 M6,R1
76.6 09A 00.1 83 '. 86.191 96
163 013 793 2A 46190 96
163 203. 923 19.1 66192 96 M6 M6
163 09A 61A 1a 87-197 96
so toga ta.b 66126 0
60 BOA 463 46112 0
~ D ~1
06/30/2005 17;01
• ~ STL ~ s~emtaale~~:?~~.~~
Organochiorine Pesticides Analysis
• Baseline Environmental ••
• attn.: BIA Scoott •
5900 Ho1Ns Street, SuNe D .
Emeryville, CA 9460&2008
Phone:(510)4208686 Fax: (510)420.1707 ~ ,
ProJed: Y5391-00 Received: OBJ17/20051420
18848 Prospect Road, Seretope, CA
Analyals' Fqp ,
S2
Surrogate(s) dluted ouL
Result Flep ~ •
MS
MS/MSD spike recoveries were below acceptance Nrrdls. '
Sae blank spike (LCS). •~
R1 "
Analyte RPD was out of t]C NmNs. ~ '
~• g~i.;Sa11 Fra~i~~bco.;
yy~~'~ +'~~ 11
SUb~fi'isstpi9 ~l;$Q0$•:''E.~: 'x/-,.:- , ` .
rr e
• ti~
. comsar t' . s~f.sF c~cmwr ,u~D. au~.e~
~: -, ~.
1f cwrsoey owls k4mst:on:sMpplnq contaUisyt~l'egpl(~'
's n.otursWdy
a = . rof so;.fgd~:~d;NAen iR11~q~,~~.:PMa t~~ ~ t
r ~-tim,npl..~oaest~anvn.~i~ta~asngaasn.a
Gheimofeustodgaereaa~Ms~mplefebpl~',',
~_:
f in:propdrtbn~fntrlk?`
7 mpb eontainsa.iniastD
•! S~fki~ntsamplr-volurns•tb-7ndicated.~it`i
,s Itp semploa seee~4d'wltfdn 1+?1dhlBlt'
' CoWrilrmprrrpff:.
_l ne wriw~"r.rRwYe •~
•-~!
RtrroyAyf~l'rri '. ! "'rriwr "
r _ ~, ww `r ,a:
::.•: ~ -xes....
• ,~
_ , .,
. ,: ~r,,,~i; fh
~'•~~::~ ~ r r
r r
Pro)ett Mantper. (InifNk) Dote: 7 J03 C)iewrl;tontaeted: Yer Nr
s~,mmary of~'diECUSSion.`'.
•~ ~. .
~.
U ~' c
z ~ .~
a
:~R
~.
~.
~ ~~
6
J
O ~
~
~%~
'~' t
7 /"~
W vc:n .2 h tj' \\ '~
~'
r
X %:
11- '-^_'"~ i ~
1
r
•,.
,
i
FEHR ~t PEFRS
ttArsrrttA9M tOrfrUAln
MEMORANDUM
per; May 24, 2006
To: !vets Hanranctk, City of Saratoga
From; Sohreb Rashid, P.E.
SubJect:• Prospect Road Residential -Traffic Evaluation
ross.Na
Fehr & Peery has completed a traf5c end street IigMirr& evaluation Oi the proposed aingle-
famiy residential subdivision located at 19848 Prospect Road. Buildings that origirragy: :.
comprised a church with andllary support facllafes currently occupy the sib. tiawev~, the
existing s9e is uraccupied and does no! enerate any traffic. This.memorandum summarizes
our traffic ar-d street lighting evaluaton of the project.
~.
PRWECT DESCRIPTION ~
The proposed project includes a total of nine single-fatuity homes on approximately !0,000- I
to 12,600-square foot iota as shown on the Apri12005 site plan provided by City staff. A(x:eas
is proposed to be provided via a new public street intersection kx.ated 85 feet'weat of the.
Clerkspur Lane intersection based on centerline-to-canterlk-e distance. A 3.0-foot curbdo-
curbwidth street with a turnaround at the south end will provide on-site circulation. GNen ttse
' rets4tivay low vdume of treffic, the new public street will operate more like a private dmre and
the subsequent Vaffic evaluation considers this fed.
TRAFFIC EVALUATION
The proposed project is estimated to generate a metal of 90 daft' trips and 9 peak hour trips
during either the AM or PM peak hours. This volume of traffic woukf rwt substaniisifiy affect
the Vaffic operations from a capaaty.sterdpoint e< any Of the adjacent signalized Or
unsignalized intersections. Accordingly, the traffic evaluation k6 focused on she aoceas and
on-eke arculation.
Site Access
Existing site access is provided via one-way driveways boated on the west (inbound) and
east (outbound) sides of the property. A separate eastbound left-tutu lane is provided at
Clarkspur Lane and a hvo-way left-tutu exists to the west. A painted median is striped east of
Clarkspur Lane that requires vehides to make a U-tutu at Scully Avenue to access
residences on-the north side of Prospect east of Clarkspur Lane.
The proposed project access is a new public street located in the middle of the property and
would be only B5 feet west of the existing Prospect Roed/Clarkspur Lane intersedan. From
a dreulation standpoint, driveways or public streets should be boated directly opposite one
another tx should be offse! by at least 120 feet, especially in the case where a two-way l~ft-
• -- -.....wPC left-turn access.
•
~~ '
Nale Harvarrdk
tdeY 24, 2t>a5 f E'11 R, ~t I' 1: E R5
Paps 2 d 2 ~....... w~~N ~....,~.,,~
The 85-foot distance between the new street and Ciarkspur Lane would not aNow installation
d a two-way left lane because opposing left tumt; would not have adequate distance to
decelerate and move into the tum lane, Thus, a raised median should be installed on
Pmspsd Road to prevent vehicles from turning left into the eke ftom westbound Prospect
Road. To enter the site from the westbourxi direc8or-, vehicles would Proceed Pest tlts
median, enter. the two-way left-tum lane, make a U-tum, and tum right imp the sits (see
attached figure). Vehicles exiting the eke and destined for westbound Prospect Roai! would
have to cross the two eastbound through lanes and make a U-tum from the lefl~uun podaet
at Clarkspur Lane. While this is not an ideal layout, the volume d exiting vehicles mekkp ttrie
movement wik be small (i e., less than five in the peak hour) and these vehicles would not
confpd with any opposing traffic:
pn-sfte CJrculaHon
The proposed 30-foot street wNl provide adequate width for traffic dreuletion.~ Wkh the low
traffic volume, parking could be permiked on both sides of the street wkhout causing.any
major circulation issues, ff two cars were parked directly oppoake each other, ifrsn
approximately 18 feel of pavement would remain for lwo-way dreulatkx-. TtYs layout may
• require one vehicle to waft while the opposing vehicle passes. However, this configuratbn
wiA imk travel speeds and is recommended for this eke. Saratoga f=frs Disirid end Sarka
Clara County Sheriff Department staff should review the eke plan prior to final approvals.
STREET LIGHTING EVALUATION
Existing lighting on Prospect Road in the vidnity of the eke and Clerkspur Lane is provided
try two 100 W~ HPS lights on the rarth side of Prospect No lights are boated on the south
side of Prospect Road et this location. Althoughthe IigMirrg could be improved by increasing
the wattage d the existing lights, we do rot bedeve k would be adequate for the south side d
the sweet. Prospect Road is relatively wide and several mature trees along the south aide
would likely bock IigM on the sidewalk and future street approach.
We recommend installing an elecxrolier near the new street wkh a 100 Watt HPS luminafro.
The new light could be powered by Ikree on an existing utRky pole on the south aids d
Prospect Road. An overhead secondary itne appears to be kx~ted on the ulflky gds on the
west side d the church property. PGbE w11 have to install a secondary line for the new ,
residences H ra dher service point exists.
~~
a~
t~~
c,,$3'.P3d ~ o3ds01~
~~; II ~ ~
~ ~ ~.
~~
1 ~ '
_„ i
1
~- ." 1
~~~~~
4
~ptf i~
,.
~•
Attachment 2
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SARATOGA
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
IN CONNECTION WITH:
Grace Subdivision
19848 Prospect Road
(APPLICATION NO.OS-179)
I. The City of Saratoga is considering the Grace Subdivision Project consisting of a
proposed General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on an
approximately 2.6 acre site from Quasi-Public Facility to Medium Density Single Family
(M-10), a proposed General Plan Conformity Determination for Property Disposal, and a
proposed Tentative Subdivision Map (collectively refen•ed to hereinafter as the "Project")
as more particularly set forth in File No. OS-179 of this City;
II. An Initial Study (IS), attached herein, was prepared for the Project pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources
Code sections 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code. Regulations
sections 15000 et seq.).
III. The IS identified potentially significant adverse effects on the environment from the
proposed project but found that revisions in the Project made by or agreed to by the
applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no
significant effects would occur.
IV. The IS and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (HIND) were
circulated for public review from August 30, 2005 through September 30, 2005.
V. The City received one comment addressing potentially adverse environmental impacts
not covered by the IS, but found that when further revisions were made to the Project,
these effects would be avoided or mitigated to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur.
VI. On October 26, 2005 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on the adequacy of the MND (including the IS) at which oral and written comments and a
staff recommendation for approval of the MND were presented to the Planning
• Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information in the
IS and MND, administrative record, and Staff Reports for completeness and compliance
with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and City CEQA requirements.
VI. Tf1EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
1. Notice of all hearings on the MND was given as required by law and the actions
were conducted pursuant to CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and local City
requirements; and
2. All Interested Parties desiring to comment on the MND were given the
opportunity to submit oral and written comments on the adequacy of the MND
prior to this action by the Planning Commission; and
3. All comments raised during the public cornment period and at the public hearings
on the MATD were responded to adequately; and
4. The MND is hereby amended to include the following additional mitigation
measure:
Mitigation Measure Hydro-2
All drainage plans and all disposition of on-site storm water in
connection with any improvements on the site shall be consistent with
the requirements of the Santa Clara Valley Urban RunoffPollution
Prevention Program (NPDES) as defined in Article 15-1>6 of the Zoning
Code. Tn order to ensure compliance with the program, grading plans
shall incorporate appropriate source control and site design measures
that minimize storm water pollutant discharges to the maximum extent
possible.
This change does not raise any new issues about the significant effects of the
project on the environment; and
. - ' '- - ~- .eA ell of }l,a
7. Based on the entire record of this matter, there is no evidence that the Project as .
revised may have a significant effect on the environment; and
8. The documents constituting the record of proceedings upon which this decision is
based are located in the City of Saratoga Deparkment of Community Development
and are maintained by the Director of that Department.
VII. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby adopts the
Mitigated Negative Declazation and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
dated October 18, 2005 and attached to the staffreport accompanying this Resolution.
VIII. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby directs the
Community Development Director to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures
as identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga, State
of California, this 26th day of October, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
• Attachment 3
RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO.
APPLICATION NO.OS-179
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
GRACE SUBDIVISION
TENTATIVE MAP
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the Advisory Agency under the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the Subdivision Ordinance of the City
of Saratoga for Tentative Subdivision Map approval to subdivide two parcels totaling 2.6
acres, zoned R]-]0,000 located at 19848 Prospect Road into 9 lots, or as more
particularly set forth in File No. OS-179 of this City; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Agency has recommended that the City Council approve
a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the project site from
Quasi-Public Facilities (QPF) to Medium Density Single Family (M-.10); and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Agency held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which
time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence; and •
WHEREAS, the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map has been evaluated pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the. Advisory Agency has
determined that the project, including the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map will have
no significant effect (no substantial adverse impact) on the environment.
WHEREAS, having considered all public testimony, written comments, application
materials, and materials presented by staff, the Advisory Agency has determined that,
subject to the conditions below, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to
support said application for Tentative Map Approval. State law precludes approval. of a
tentative subdivision map if any of the Advisory Agency makes any of the findings listed
below. For the reasons specified in bold text, none of these findings is applicable to the
proposed Tentative Subdivision Map:
That the proposed map or building site is not consistent with the General Plan and
any applicable specific plan. The Proposed Tentative Subdivision Msp is
being processed concurrently with a General Plan Amendment. Upon
approval of the whole of the action the proposed map will be consistent with
the General Plan.
• 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision or building site is not
consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The Proposed
Tentative subdivision Map is being processed concurrently with a General
Plan Amendment. Upon approval of the whole of the action, the proposed
map will be consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The
project site is relatively flat and large enough to meet associated zoning
requirements fors 9 lot subdivision.
4. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The project site is currently zoned R-1-10,000, which allows for medium-
density residential development. A zoning amendment is not required. The
proposal meets the density requirements of the R-1-10,000 zoning district.
5. That the design of the subdivision or building site or the proposed improvements
are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Stady and
Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared for the proposed project
' The analysis indicates that the proposal, as mitigated, will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or building site or type of improvements is
likely to cause serious public health or safety problems. The proposed design is
not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems and will meet all
subdivision requirements and fire codes.
7. That the design of the subdivision or building site or type or improvements will
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use
of property within the proposed subdivision or building site. The proposal will
not conflict with any access easements.
8. That a proposed subdivision of land which is subject to a contract executed
pursuant to the California land Conservation Act of 1965 (The "Williamson
Act's will result in the creation of parcels of insufficient size to sustain their
agricultural use, except as otherwise provided in Government Code Section
66474.4. The property is not under Williamson Act contract
9. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision or building site into an
existing community sewer system would result in violation of existing
requirements prescribed by a State Regional Water Quality Control Board
pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the State Water
Code, The future development of 9 residential units will not create
. substantial discharge of waste resulting in a violation of the State Water
Code.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: that the Tentative Subdivision Map for the •
hereinafter described subdivision, marked Exhibit "A" in the file described above, is
hereby approved by the Platuvng Commission subject to the fOllOwillg COIId1ti011S.
COMMUNITY DE VELOPMENT
1. This approval shall take effect on the effective date of a general plan amendment
re-designating the General Plan land use designation of the project site to Medium
Density Single Family (M-10).
2. All subdivision improvements and other development on the site shall comply
with the mitigation measures set forth in the October 18, 2005 Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted by the Planning Commission oa
October 26, 2005 and included in the above referenced project file.
3. All site improvements shall be located and constructed as shown on Exlu'bit "A"
incorporated herein by this reference. Any modifications of the approved plans
are subject to the review of the Community Development Director and the Public
Works Director. Any modifications to the approved plans shall be submitted in
writing to the Planning Division with a proposed set of plans highlighting all
changes with a cloud.
4. The following shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division
for the building and grading permit plan check review process:
5. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a
separate plan page.
6. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor.
7. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to
foundation inspection by the City, the RCE or LI.S of record shall provide a
written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans."
8. No fence or wall shall exceed six feet in height and no fence or wall located
within any required front yard shall exceed three feet in height with the exception
of fencing 20 mitigate noise in accordance with section 15-29.030.
9. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on-
site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best
Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on-site due to
topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on
the plan.
•
• 10. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the DIrector of
the Commuity Development Department prior to issuance of any grading permit.
Landscape plans shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff
promote surface infiltration and min;mize use of fertilizers and pesticides that Can
contribute to water pollution.
I I. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water
runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas
brat provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions
and prolong exposure to water shall be specified.
12. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the
landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area
13. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as
soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds,
rainfall, air movement, patterns of Iand use, ecological consistency and plant
interactions to ensure successful establishment.
14. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated
into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible.
• 15. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the
responsibility of the property owner.
16. Five (5) ft. chain link tree protective fencing shall be shown on the site plan with
a note "to remain in place throughout construction." The fencing shall be
inspected by staffprior to issuance of a Building Permit.
17. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or
private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance
protected trees on the site,
PUBLIC WORKS
18. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City Engineer for examination, the owner
shall cause the property to be surveyed by a Licensed Land Surveyor or an
authorized Civil Engineer. The submitted map shall show the existence of a
monument at all external property comer locations, either found or set. The
submitted map shall also show monuments set at each new comer location, angle
point, or as directed by the City Engineer, all in conformity with the Subdivision
Map Act and the Professional Land Surveyors Act.
~~
19. The owner shall submit four (4) copies of a Final Map in substantial conformance •
with the approved Tentative Map, along with the additional documents tequired by
Section 14-40.020 of the Municipal Code, to the City Engineer for exaznination.
The Final Map shall contain al] of the information required in Section 14-40.030 of
the Municipal Code and shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. One copy of map checking calculations.
b. Preliminary Title Report for the property dated within
i. ninety (90) days of the date of submittal for the Final Map.
c. One copy of each map referenced on the Final Map.
d. One copy of each document/deed referenced on the Final Map.
e. One copy of any other map, document, deed, easement or other resource
that will facilitate the examination process as requested by the City
Engineer.
20. The owner shall pay a Map Checking fee, as determined by the City Engineer, at the
time of submittal of the Final Map for examination.
21. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governments! •
entities must be met.
22. Interior monuments shall be set at each lot comer either prior to recordation of the
Final Map or some later date to be specified on the Final Map. If the owner chooses
to defer the setting of interior monuments to a specified later date, then sufficient
security as determined by the City Engineer shall be furnished prior to Final Map
approval, to guarantee the setting of interior monuments.
23. The owner shall provide Irrevocable Offers of Dedication for all required easements
and/or rights-of--way. on the Final Map, in substantial conformance with the
approved Tentative Map, prior to Final Map approval.
24. The owner shall submit engineered improvement plans to the City Engineer in
conformance with the approved Tentative Map and in accordance with tine design
and improvement requirements of Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. The
improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the
appropriate officials from other public agencies having jurisdictional authority,
including public and private utility providers, prior to approval of the Final Map.
The following specific conditions shall be included on the improvement plans:
C~
J
• 25. The street median shall be designed on Prospect Road as shown on the Tentative
Map, Prior to commencement of any work owner shall obtain an Encroachment
Permit from the City of San Jose if any portion of the median is proposefl within the
City of San Jose. All median Improvement Plans Shall b0 SUbII]IttCd t0 Ule Clry Of
San Jose Public Works Departrnent for review. All conditions required by the City
of San Jose shall be incorporated into Improvement Plans prior to Final Map
approval. The conditions shall be fulfilled prior to final subdivision map approval or
as required by the City of San Jose, whichever comes sooner.
26. A Street light shall be installed on Prospect Road as shown on the Tentative Map.
27. The median in the new street shown on the Tentative Map shall be designed to
save the three existing trees as shown on the Tentative Map.
28. The owner shall pay a Subdivision Improvement Plan Checking fee, as determined
by the Public Works Director, at the time Improvement Plans are submitted for
review.
29. The applicant shall comply with requirements of Provision C.3 of National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit for Santa Clara-Basin. Best Management
Practices for site design and storm water treahnent must be designed per approved
numeric sizing criteria. Certification of the Engineered Stormwater Management
• Plan shall be required. Owners of properties with treatment BMP's will be required
to certify on-going operation and maintenance on an annual basis.
30. The owner shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City in accordance
with Section 14-60.010 of the Municipal Code prior to Final Map approval.
31. The owner shall famish Improvement Securities in accordance with Section 14-
60.020 of the Municipal Code in the manner and amounts determined by the Public
Works Director prior to Final Map approval. '
32. The owner shall fiunish a written indemnity agreement and proof of insurance
coverage, in accordance with Section 14-05.055 of the Municipal Code, prior to
Final Map approval.
33. Prior to Final Map approval, the owner shall famish the City Engineer with
satisfactory written commitments from all public and private utility providers
serving the subdivision guaranteeing the completion of all required utility
improvements to serve the subdivision.
34. The owner shall secure all necessary permits from the City and any other public
agencies, including public and private utility providers, prior to commencement of
subdivision improvement construction. Copies of permits other than those issued by
. the City shall be provided to City Engineer.
-~.
35. The owner shall pay the applicable Park in lieu fee prior to Final Map approval.
36. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the applicant shall file a Notice of Intent
(NOn with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain coverage tuldel
the State General Construction Activity NPDES Permit. Satisfactory evidence of
the filing of the NOI shall be famished to the City Engineer. The applicant shall
comply with all provisions and conditions of the State Permit, including
preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP). Copies of the SWPPP shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to
Final Map Approval and maintained on site at all times during construction of the
subdivision improvements.
37. All building and construction related activities shall adhere to New Development
and Construction -Best Management Practices as adopted by the City for the
purpose of preventing storm water pollution.
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
38. Fire Apasratus (Eneinel Access Roads Reouired: Provide access roadways
with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20-feet,
vertical clearance of 13-feet 6-inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36-
feet outside and 23-feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall
conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-l. •
39. F7re Department (Enainel Roadway Turn-around Reouired: Provide an
approved fire department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of
36-feet outside and 23-feet inside. Installations shall conform to Fire Department
Standard Details and Specification sheet A-1. Cul-De-Sac Diameters shall be no
less than 72-feet. Cul-De-Sac radius must be widened to 36-feet.
40. Fire Lane Markin¢ Reouired: Provide marking for all roadways within the
project. Mazkings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall
also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard
Details and Specifications A-6.
41. Parkin¢ Alone Roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not
be obstructed in any manner and, pazking shall not be allowed along roadways
less than 28 feet in width, Parking maybe permitted along one side of roadways
28-35 feet in width. For -roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, pazking will be
allowed on both sides of the roadway. Roadway widths shall be measured curb
face to cwb face, with pazking space based on an 8ft width.
•
• CITY AItgORiST
42. All recommendations in the City Arborist's Reports dated July 12, 2005 shall be
followed and incorporated into the plans. This includes, but is not limited to all
items listed in that report as "Recommendations" (beginning on page 3~, Tetl',11~1011
of tree #16 on lot 9 as discussed on page 2, and posting of the tree protection bond
for trees to be retained as discussed on page 3.
43. Development of individual residences will not occur as part of this approval and
further design review is required in accordance with the City Code. All
residential site development plans muss conform with the 7uly 12, 2005 Arborist
Report and may require additional review to ensure that adequate trce protection
occurs.
44. Replacement trees will be required at a value, which equals the value of trees that
have been removed. Based on the proposed Tentative Map this amount equals
$29,770.00; however, this amount is subject to change is the event that an
individual house design is able to further avoid significant trees.. Exact value shall
be determined at the design review approval stage.
45. All replacement trees shall be a minimum 24"box in size.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State
• of California, this 26a' day of October by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
This approval is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall
have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and
• Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the
approved tenns and conditions on behalf of the owner and any of owner's successors or
assigns and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within
the time frames approved by the City Planning Commission.
Property Owner or Authorized Agent
Date
u
L J
RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. •
APPLICATION NO.OS-179
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANMNG COMMISSION
Grace Subdivision
19848 Prospect Road
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION
WHEREAS, the City of Sazatoga City Council referred Ito the City of Saratoga
Planning Commission an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map and a General Plan
Amendment to change the land use designation of the site listed above from Quasi-Public
Facility to Medium Density Single Family (M-10) and a General Plan Conformity
Determination for Property Disposal to subdivide two parcels totaling 2.6-acres, zoned
RI-]0, OOO located at 19848 Prospect Road into nine lots, as more particularly set forth in
File.No. OS-179 of this City; and
WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment would change the land use
designation from Quasi-Public Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10); and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65402 {a) regulates government disposition •
of real property, mandating that prior to disposing of property the Planning Commission
must report on the conformity of that action with the jurisdiction's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which
time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment and subdivision have been evaluated
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City has
determined that the project, including the proposed General Plan Amendment and
conformity determination will have no significant effect (no substantial adverse impact)
on We environment; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application for Approval, and the following findings have been determined:
With respect to General Plan goals:
LU.6.1: Prior to initial approval the decision making body shall consider the
cumulative traffic impacts ofsingle-family residential projects of 4 or
more lots.
•
• The proposed project meets this goal. A traffic study was conducted as part of the lnitial
Study and that study found the project to have a less than significant impact on traffic.
LU.6.3 The capacity of existing streets shall be recognized prior to tentative
building site or subdivision approval of any project. New development
shall be designed to minimize disruption to the area caused by an
increase in through or heavy traffic.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal. A traffic study was conducted as part
of the Initial Study and found the project to have a less than significant impact on traffic.
LU.8.0 Affirm that the City shall continue to be predominantlya community of
single-family detached residences.
The proposed project is consistent with this goal, The proposed project will replace an
existing commercial use with a residential use consistent with the current zoning district
designation.
With respect to the City's Zoning Ordinance, the project site is currently zoned for single
family residential uses; The current General Plan designation of Quasi-Public Facility,
when amended to Medium Density Single Family (M-10), will be consistent with the
• surrounding residential neighborhood uses.
With respect to Government Code Section 65402(a) regarding government disposition of
real property and mandating that prior to disposing of property the Planning Commission
must report on the conformity of the disposal with the jurisdiction's General Plan: The
proposed sale of the land for residential development will conform with the General Plan
if the Plan is amended by the City Council as recommended by this resolution.
Now Therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: that the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval
by the City Council of a General Plan Amendment amending the land use map of the
Saratoga General Plan to change the designation of the project site from Quasi-Public
Facilities to Medium Density Single Family (M-10); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that the Planning Commission fords the proposed
disposition of the property to be in conformity with the General Plan if the General Plan
is amended as described above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the (..'lty Of Saratoga Planning COmmISSIOn, State Of
California, this 26s' day of October, 2005, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
• NOES:
ABSENT:
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
•
•
Atta~hm
ent 5
ARBOR RESOURCES
Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care .
A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE
PROPOSED NINE LOT SUBDIVISION AT
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA
PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF SARATOGA
SITE NAME: NORTH CAMPUS
APN'S #: 388-26-070 8 386-28-071
Submitted to:
Public Works Department
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Prepared by:
David L. Babby, RCA
Registered ConsultingArborist #399
Cert~edArborrst #WE-4001A
July 12,2005 •
P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 Email: arborresourcesQacomcast.net
nti„~p• fi50.654.335 ] • Fax: 650.240.0777 Licensed Contractor #796763
David L. Bobby, Re ' tared Consulting Arborist July /1,1005
• INTRODUCTION
The City of Saratoga Public Works Department has requested I review the potentid t1'ee
impacts associated with the proposed nine lot subdivision of the property owned by the
City of Saratoga at 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga (named the "North Campus"). This
report presents my findings and recommendations.
The plan reviewed for this report includes the Tentative Map prepared by the City of
Saratoga, dated July 5, 2005. The trees' locations and numbers are presented on an
attached copy. For identification purposes, round, metallic tags containing engraved
numbers corresponding to trees within this report were attached to each accessible trunk.
FINDINGS
Tree Count and Campositron
Fifty-eight trees of Ordinance-size were inventoried for this report. They comprise a total
of 14 species and their name, numbers, counts and total percentages are presented below.
Please note specific data compiled for each tree is presented on the attached table.
• American Sweetgum 6-8 3 5%
Calffomia Pepper Tree 32 1 2%
Camphor Tree 5, 9, 14, 16-18, 20, 23, 25, 17 29%
28, 29, 53-55, 57
Chinese Pistache 26, 27, 36, 56, 58 5 9%
Coast Redwood 3, 4, 19, 30, 31 5 9%
Italian Stone Pine 47 1 2%
Mexican Fan Palm 24 1 2%
Monterey Cypress 10, 48 2 3%
Monterey Pine 15, 38, 42, 43, 45 5 9%
Oliva Tree 2, 11-13, 49, 50 6 10%
Prunus sp. 52 1 2%
Silver-Dollar Gum 35, 40, 41 3 5%
Willow-Leafed Peppermint 1, 33-35, 37, 39-41,44, 46 7 12%
White Alder 51 1 2%
TOTA! 58 100%
• 'Trees presented in this report have trunk diameters large rnough to be regulated by the t}ty pa the Tree
Ordinance as well as the Subdivision Ordinance.
City of Saratoga Property (North CampusJ, /9848 Prospect Road, Saratoga Page 1 ors
-- ~~ .-__ o..A/;.. LV .4o r7annrlm¢nt
David L. Bobby, Registered Consultin Arlrorisr July 12,1005
Overall Tree Conditions
The trees presented in this report been assigned an overall condition rating that considers
both their physiological health and structural integrity. The table below summarizes the
ratings assigned to each tree and reveals that the trees appear in mostly fair to good
condition.
Tree # 3, 10, 13, 18-22, 24, 28, 30, 4-9, 11, 12, 14, 23, 25-27
38, 50, 53, 54, 56, 58
29, 31, 32, 40, 43, 47-49, 52,
55, 57
Total 19
X of Total 33%
24
41%
1, 2, 15, 33-35, 37-39, 41,
42, 44.46, 51
15
26%
Tree Locations
There are forty-three trees located on the subject site and include #1-4, 10-14, 16-29, 33-
37, 39-41, 44, 46 and 49-58.
There are nine trees situated on neighboring properdies and include #30-32, 38, 42, 43, 45,
47 and 48.
There are six trees situated within the public right-of--way along Prospect Road and include
#5-9 and 15.
Plan Review and Site Observations
The proposed Tentative Map identifies the removal of the following 13 trees that, to my
understanding, are situated in direct conflict with the proposed road or building envelopes:
#2, 6-8r ]2, 14, 16, 21-23 and 49-51. Replacements are suggested to mitigate the loss of
any tree approved for removal.
My review of the recent Tentative Map reveals that a home could possibly be constructed
on lot 9 in a manner that allows the retention and protection of tree #16, a 21.5-inch
diameter Camphor in overall good condition. If possible, I recommend this occurs due to
its size, condition and relative contribution to the site. In doing so, I suggest a minimum
setback of 12 feet from its trunk. Please note the tree protection bond amount and
replacement tree value consider the retention of this tree.
My observations of the 10 Eucalyptus trees on site (#1, 33-35, 37, 39-41, 44 and 46) reveal
they are in overall poor structural condition due to being repeatedly being pruned at severe
levels for clearance from the overhead, high-voltage electrical lines. Consequently, their
branches are predisposed to failure and present a signifcant and potentially imminent risk
to public safety. The only foreseeable way to potentially minimize this risk is to radically
prune each tree at least once or twice a year and continue doing so throughout their life.
•
•
City oJSaratoga Property (North Campus), 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga Page 1 oJ5
Davtd L. Babby, R ' tered Consulting Arborist duly' 11, 2005
• However, by doing so, branches originating from the cut areas can increasingly grow at
more rapid rates each time cuts are made (thus increasing maintenance requirements).
Based on the above information, I find the Eucalyptus trees on site are highly inappropriate
and unsuitable for being located near homes on residential properties. As such, I anticipate
their removal will be requested by the owners of the future lots.
Tree Protection Bond
Based on the proposed Tentative Map, the tree protection bond amount required for this
project is detemrined to be $143.815. This amount represents the combined, appraised
values of trees anticipated for retention throughout the subdivision phase of development
and is calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9°i Edition, published
by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations presented below are intended to serve as guidelines for mitigating
the foreseeable impacts to inventoried trees. They are intended to aid in the planning
process and function as a blueprint for establishing more specific measures as the project
progresses. Should plans be revised, the recommendations may require modification.
. Design Guidelines
1. The numbers of 55 thru 58 should be assigned to the trees presented on the plan.
2. All site development plans, whether for the subdivision or development of individual
lots, should be reviewed by the City for tree impacts, Recommendations should be
provided to protect trees planned for retention.
3. All grading and trenching (such as for drainage, utilities and services) should be
designed outside from beneath the canopies of retained trees. I should be consulted in
the event this is not possible.
4. The following additional recommendations should be incorporated into the landscape
design:
a. Any trenching for irrigation or lighting beneath the trees' canopies should be
designed in a radial direction to the trunks and established no closer than five times
the diameter of the nearest trunk.
b. Irrigation should not spray within five feet from the trees' trunks.
c. Stones, mulch or other landscape features should be at least one-foot from the
trunks of retained trees and not be in contact with the trunks of new trees.
d. Tilling beneath the canopies should be avoided.
e. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies must
be placed on top of existing soil grade {vertical stakes can be used to achieve this).
~ Trees idenii6ed on the plan to remain include #l, 3-S, 9-11, 13, 15-20, 24-48 and 52-58.
City ojSaratoga Property (North CampusJ, 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga Page 3 Of S
City of Saratoga Public Works Department
DaviJL. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 12,1005
Tree Protection Measures during Site Development •
5. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached rasp and established
prior to the demolition and clearing phases. The fencing shall consist Of six-foot high
chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, eight-foot tall steel posts driven two feet into
the ground every 10 to 12 feet. Once established, the fence should remain undisturbed
and be maintained throughout the construction process. Please note the precise
location for fencing will be specified during the pre-construction meeting (see the
second line item below).
6. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the
designated fenced areas and off of unpaved soil beneath the trees' canopies. These
activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, surface
scraping, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including
soil fill), and equipment/vehicleoperotion and parking.
7. Before commencing the site demolition and clearing phases, apre-construction meeting
shall be held on site with the Project Manager, Project Superintendent and I. The intent
is to specify tree protective fencing locations, limits of grading, staging areas, mutes of
access, trees approved for removal and other items regarding tree impacts and
protection measures.
8. The removal of any brick, hardscape or foundations beneath the canopies of retained
trees, including outside the designated fenced areas, must be performed as follows: the •
surface of the features should be first broken into small pieces with a jackhammer and
manually lifted onto. a loader that must remain on undisturbed hardscape and off
exposed mots. Base rock covering exposed mots should remain intact and used as the
new material. Within one hour, place six inches of coarse wood chips over the newly
exposed area and apply water to keep moist for atwo-week period.
9. Temporary or permanent drainage features must be designed so water is not discharged
towards the trunks of retained trees.
10. Any existing and unused underground pipes and utilities beneath the canopies of
retained trees shall be abandoned.
11. Any trenching or grading approved beneath the trees' canopies shall be manually
performed using shovels.
12. Any existing plants, groundcover, trees or shrubs being removed beneaffi the trees'
canopies shall be manually cut to grade and the mots left below ground. The stumps
can either be axed away or ground to below grade.
13. Great care must be taken by all personae] and equipment operators to avoid damaging
the canopies of retained trees.
•
Ciry ojSaratoga Property (North CampusJ, 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga Page 4
.-.~. _r o__.,.,,,.,. public Wnrkc 7)enartment
David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 11, 1005
• 14. Herbicides and pesticides should not be applied beneath the trees' canopies. Where
used on site, they must be labeled for safe use near trees.
15. Every three to four weeks throughout site development, supplemental water should be
supplied to each tree on the subject site during the months of May thru October. I
suggest an application rate of ] 0 gallons of water per every inch of trunk diameter. For
the Coast Redwoods, I recommend the same amount of water is supplied to them
beyond the site being developed, during the aforementioned months and time intervals.
16. Prior to demolition, asix-inch layer of coarse wood chips from a tree company should
be manually spread on unpaved soil beneath the canopies of the Coast Redwoods. The
wood chips should not be in contact with the trees' trunks.
17. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited
beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Ia
addition, fuel should not be stored nor shall any refueling or maintenance of equipment
occur within 100 feet of the trees' trunks (unless on the street).
18. Any tree pruning or removal must be performed under supervision of an International
Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards.
Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained at http:/fwww.isa-
arbor.com.
19. Mitigation for the loss of trees approved For removal shall include the installation of
new trees equal to their combined, appraised value. Based on proposed Tentative Map,
this amount equals $29.770. Given the size of the property and amount of retained
trees, I recommend the replacements consist of the following trees: four of 48-inch box
size and seven of 36-inch box size. Acceptable replacement species include Quercus
agrfolia, Quercus lobata, Quercus kelloggii, Quercus douglasii, Quercus dutriosa,
Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoia
sempervirens. The proposed location and sizes of new trees should be shown on the
landscape plans and be at least 15 feet apart and 15 feet outside from the canopy edges
of retained trees. They must be installed prior to final inspection and, as necessary for
support, be double-staked with rubber tree ties, Automatic irrigation must be supplied
to each tree and be a drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a
sleeve.
Attachments: Tree Inventory Table
Site Map (copy of the Tentative Map)
City of Saratoga Property (North Campus), 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga Page S of S
~:,.. ,.~ e,,.~~non Public Works Department
Olive Tree
(Okaeuropaea)
13
25
20
25%
50%
Poor
X
Coast Redwood
Sequoia sempervfrens)
25
70
35
75%
75%
Good
X
Coast Redwood
Sesuoia sempervire»s)
25 5
BS
35
50%
75%
Fafr
X '
-
Camphor Tree
innamomum camphors)
13
25
25
50%
50%
Fav
X
-
American Sweetgum
'quufambar sryrac~ua) 9 5 25 20 75% 25% Fav
X
X
American Sweetgam
quWarnbarsryraeiJlua)
10
25
23
75%
25%
Fair
X
X
American Sweetgum
quidambarsryrac~ua) 11 25 25 75% 25% Fair X X
Camphor Tree
innemomumcemphora)
11
20
25
100%
SO%
Fav
X
-
Monterey Cypress
u~ressus macrocarpa)
22 5
45
25
75%
75%
Good
X
Olive Tree
(ply ~p~a) 9 5 20 20 75% 25% Fev X
Olive Tree X X
(Oleo europaea) 12 20 25 75% 50% Fav
Olive Tree
(Oleaeuropaea) 17 23 25 100°/ 50°/n Good X - -
Camphor Tree
nnamomum camphors) 13 25 30 75% 50% Fair X
Monterey Pine .
(Pfnus radiate) 19 25 35 50°/ 25% Poor X - -
X
REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES
5- allon - S 120 24inch box -5420 36-inch box - S 1,320 48-i~h box - SS,000 31-mch boz - 37,000 72-irch boz ~ 513,000
5270
•
Site: 19418 ProspecfRata4 S°rofoga
Preporedj°r:Ciry°jSarotoge Cammaniry Development Depmi ,-`A 7gLt005 _
r
'=`~ .".
r.•,
Camphor Tree
tnamomum camphora)
Camphor Tree
mnamomum camphors)
Camphor T~
rnnamomumeamphora)
21 5
12
10
30
35
35
30
30
25
100%
75%
100%
75%
75%
50%
Good
Good
Good
X
X
X 58,900
52,490
S 1420
Coact Redwood
)
49 5
115
70
50%
100%
Good
X 527,800
casuom semperarens
Camphor Tree
mnamomum camPhora)
22
40
40
100%
50%
Good
X 57,700
Camphor Tree
mnamomum eamphora)
24
45
40
100%
50%
Good
X 59,200
Camphor Tree
mnamomum camphors)
22
45
50
100%
50%
Good X S7 700
Camphor Tree
mnamomum rnmphora)
18 5
40
55
75%
50%
Fav X 54,380
Mexican Fan Palm
Waahingtoma robusta)
19
25
10
100%
100'/o
Good
X 5525
Camphor Tree
)
h
11 5
30
30
75%
50%
Fair
X 51,600
ora
mnamomum camp
Chinese Pistache
10 5
30
30
75%
50°i6
Fav
X 51,340
(Plstacta chmenard)
Chinese Pistaehe
12 5
35
35
75%
50%
Ferc
X 51,890
(Prstacra chrnensir)
Campfior Tree
mnamomum camphors)
12 5
35
35
75%
75%
Good _ _
X S2 60
Camphor Tree
)
h
21 S
35
40
75°/
50%
Fair
X 55,500
ors
mnamomum camp
Coasl Redwood
n__.._:~.a...,e'„irenel
19
75
25
100%
75°/R Good X X 54,000
• I 15 ga8on 5120 24'ch lnRt-5420 36inch box~S1.320 18-in
Sln: ]9ddd Prorped Road, SoraroBa
Preparcdjor: City ofSarcroga Commwwlty Deve/opmrn(Depam 1af4
_ .. .._..:~, R..AM1v. RCA
mv2aos
;~;
..., ..
a:.~
I 37
I 41
x
X
a
REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES
I S- Ilon - 3120 2Linch box -5420 36iuh box - 51,320 48-inch box - S3 000 32-inch box - 57000 71-inch box - SIS 000
Sla: 19d4d Protpea Road, Saratoga
Preparedfor:Cly ofSaromga Community Development Depart 3014
mv2oos ~
walo`v-Lwcea Peppermint
(6ucalyptus nichotit )
IWian Stone Pine
(Pious pines )
Montwey Cypress
(C4,,.s; ~ macrotarpa~
Oliva Tree
tOtea europaea)
Olive Tttx
(Oka europaea )
White Alder
25 I 20 I 25 I SO% I zs% 1 roor I a i
32 35 40 75% 25% Fair X i
22 30. 35 75% 25% Fav - X
17 25 35 SO% 75% Fav X
14.5 30 35 75% 75% Good X
IS ~25 35 25% 75% Poor X -
11 30 25 75% 50% Fav X
23 35 60 100% 50% Good X
~4.5 35 SO 100% 50% Good X
11 25 25 50% 50% Fav X -
12 25 30 100% SO°/a Good X
11 25 30 75% 50% Fav X
1.5 25 35 100% 75% Good X
Camphor Tree
aamomum epmQ
Camphor Tree
aamomum camplf
Cangihor Tree
wmom~ Ph
Chinese Piatache
aistack chinensit
Camphor Tree
aamomum cam
Chinese Pistache
REPLACEMENT 7REE VAI.IJE9
15 Icon ~ 5120 24inch box ~ 5420 36inch box - S 1,320 4B-inch box - SS 000 52-inch box - 57 000 72-inch box - S13
Site: 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga
_ ~r__.
;-
r:,: ~ -- - ~,
~
;g;
' ~ ~ ~' i
i
~1a t o
~
;, a~ C°
'
/ ~ 1 5-
Ins g
~
1 "
i-
~ MK
~
y~tewix `
I Kp
ne v'te: '-11 ' OT 1
~ i '
'
p E>.lst
a• .. .s/'ti!}' f s+S, 112,139 SF Buiiany
~
~~ l cp ~ 1[].
...~
C ~ P4
~'
~+• w
s •
~
+ ~ ~ _
i
i l r
.a ~
~
'~
1
1
Y
_
b
` I ~ i ~
, ~
~
e on t~
'
~ S
r
,
~
~ 1 _~
i+
1
t - -i t]Ft~l ~ ;
e pw v..< .F Ce y./
9' ~~.f f
~~
~~
1 _ ~i ~, I!dttRP D~
1:1' FgoC
{YI
1 ~ 1 r<
b{ :~3E,2 a
[,~. ~ ~ ~,
~ ~' RDADW~
~
i 1 _ : _ PUE T[
~
I V' •ryI
oaa~11 1
1
.'
~_ _ 1
1 . ~ ~
1
1 S
- 3/4'1 '~
1 ,.; 4(Hi''~ EY
e
SF i~ ~
>i • G i
t ~ e
t N
1 q
~•~ ~ ~
.. 1 __ •. • -.i~~T- r ~~ __--.__~c• _r.~ - 111 1
~' ~~ ~ 1 1 30':0• f i ~ u a' . E+tat. i
' ~ v ~ 1 , ~ { + + t~ tl ~~ I a ~'i ~ { ypregs I
NN t • ~ ;, I 11
i f1 1 1i ~ ~~S I ~ ~ ~ ~~ /
. \a, 'c - 11 1 i A BL/ild+ng`t rre. 29•
,~~ f dir. .56 ' ~ DF iCU B I ~ , ~' i
., ,a, . ~ A
•, \,~ i2 t ~ ~ ~~• , 36` t ~ t t Wnc
''~ ~ f , ~ .571 'i 1 '~\ ' i
Erisl~ M`Fl.,~ . 0 1 i ~ P f ^ . 1 t ~ e? r' . _ ~ ~ C.
- -- i ~~~ 58\`~ 1 t 251 c }i/lti~ltn-~
,~ ~, ,. ~.1 -rd ~
~~ , ~ ~\}IL ~t ~~ ~ may` rs
.'i oj5 ~ ~ / ~ q•dl 1a--ya __~~~-' ~;y t ~ '~. `~ t+ ~~3 f
~ ~ ~ ~ N flO~ ~ 1 p ~ 1 ~~ \ w• ~ E.At. o:
;'-n /1 c gi a r. ~•io 1 // ~ t i i 1,
' rco; i ~~ V r~ i K div.. , , i / t' ..: n, c t r ~ r
;.. CVIC I ( 3+`•`_G7 ~ ~ /, / ! ! / • I, I 4~T T / jFT, • ~/~ // // ~ ~I rn "`~~~
w cF__.rt~FNi ~ ~ LOT'4 . ;;~~~ !1 L ' T 5 0; ;YY';~ ; I LOT 6 ~ -
". ~ Ir!I? , 71,29 °a , wl.' 7 !D S~ in , ''- , ' 11.356 SF
[.,cr,,wcr.'vc 1.~l~ 1 ~N { ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . tDE Y, +tc.~.
~ a ;'~' 1/ o ,site ~ \ •~ •~ ~ ~ o \ , '~ i > >5'.n
T. ti' nC._ ~\ r/,1~ O. I,~d \..~-. ~~~~ _.\,~ ~ \\A c ~ ~ N.T.S.
Attachment 6
~~~ ~5
a
..•---
`fa~ ~~ ~
n~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~M~
~~
~-'~
aQdYl ,
~F¢ a
~~/
~~~
Members of Saratoga City Council July 21, 2005
Members of Saratoga Planning Commission
Deaz Council Members and Commissioners,
We have recently sent a letter to Tohn Livingstone expressing
our concern with the development of the North Campus. (See
enclosed copy of letter, and map of proposed development, with
trees and privacy screening.) Mr. Livingstone verbally stated to us .
that the city has little control over plantings which do not fall
within the parameters of the city code. For example, what is to
• preclude the removal of the English Laurel and 3. smaller Camphot
trees not on the arborist's list, but bordering our property? These
plantings currently provide screening for us and would also serve
as such for the new neighbors.
It is our feeling that the conditions for approval in the
development of this property could be set so that the privacy
screen and camphor trees are not removed.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincere
_~~~ ~
~~
William C. Ford
Norma L.Ford
19905 Viewridge Dr.
Saratoga, CA 252-3017
John Livingstone July 7, 2005
City of Saratoga
John,
Regarding the North Campus sale and development, the
following are some of our concerns:
In as much as the three eucalyptus trees bordering our
property are scheduled to be removed, we certainly hope that other
screening which borders our fence line will be retained. Although
three Camphor trees, 22 inches in circumference, eleven English
Laurel, a Dodonaea, and Privets, do not appear on the tree
inventory list or proposed map, it is our hope that they will be
retained. This will give us and the new residents a privacy screen,
as well as a continuation of an aesthetic feature and bird sanctuary
to which we have become accustomed. Starting at the South West
corner of the project and extending northward, our property
borders the western aspect of the North Campus for 140 feet.
Enclosed is a map of same with the locations of the above
mentioned trees and shrubs. We also like the fence.which was
installed by the city two years ago, and we hope it will remain.
Our other concern is the increased grade elevation of the
North Campus, in contrast to surrounding properties. As any two
story design would be an intrusion to our privacy, we hope that
single story construction will be required. One would hope that
3,200 sq. ft. single story homes, on 10,000 + to 11,000 + sq.foot
lots, with a basement option up to the same dimension would be
more than adequate.
Sipcer y,
i liam and a Ford
19905 Viewridge Drive •
Saratoga, CA ph 252-3017
untitled
Ref. The North carepus
we object to the sale of this property.
Warren .and Etta Palmer
20069 Chateau Drive, Saratoga
o ~~~IY~ D
uu OCT 4 2005
C17Y OF SAAATOGA
°rMUNCfY DEVELDPMEN''
Page 1
Prom: Linda Yelavich [LindaY~cupertlno.orgj
Sent: Friday, September 80, 2005 4:06 PM
70: John Livingstone
Subject Kevin Moran Park/Non'h Campus
Dear Mr. Livingston:
I was at my parents house who still live in Saratoga. When I visit I st311 enjoy reading
the Saratoga News to keep up on the community. Lately I have been reading a lot about
Kevin Moran Park and the possibility of changing it from a residential park to a soccer
cosrplex, much to the dieatisfaction of several neighbors who reside near the park. I have
also read quite a bit about the North Campus and how it has become a financial drain oa
the city thus the decision to sell it to a developer for nine residences. Ualese the
information I have read is incorrect, it seems that the main reason the city would like to
se12 the North Campus ie because it would be too costly to renovate to todaye standards.
I am not sure where the city plane on obtaining the money to make Kevin Moran Park into a
soccer complex but it cannot be inexpensive. t9hat about taking that money and leveling the
buildings at the North Campus and turning that into a soccer complex, The land is level;
there ie already an existing parking lot plus lots of additional parking along Prospect
Rd. It is in a more open area and not infringing upon a residential area. The land would
continue to be used for community purposes and if the demand for soccer were to decreaec
in the future the city would still own .the land to develop into a senior center or
community center or later sell for development.
It would satisfy the people who need soccer space. It would please the neighbors living
near Kevin Moran Park to know their park would remain residential and the North Campus
would become a park for community use. The city would not have to keep up any buildings
other than maybe a restroom or two and the money that was going to be used to convert
Kevin Moran Park could go into the North Campus renovation.
I may be missing something here but it seems it would keep more people happy. Could the
soccer organizations help with the upkeep coats of a soccer complex?
Sincerely,
Linda Yelavich
1677 Blaney Ave.
San Jose, CA
PS: I grew up in Saratoga and attended Foothill Elementary School, Redwood Junior High,
(now Redwood Middle School), and graduated from Saratoga HIgh. My heart remains in
Saratoga even though S can not afford to live there.
/~~~
~(~`.""
~..u `~
~~
.~ ... s
Grp ~ ~Q~~-~
~/"- -
w-
~ ~
fie- n ~~_ ,~
~~'°
Q ~~~~~~D
SEP 9 0 2445
`Cl~~ ~~~p~'r
L~hu,~'~'%~'L~'~~ S
~~
~i _ _„
~'y
`7U %ft/"
~- ry
~~°~I ~.z,3Z°G
~,~',
ZVIARLENE QUAYLE DUP'P'IN •
$1441 CeNYOF Vow Da.
Bw7twmoG~. Cezaoaicu 96070 ,
I have been part of a committce working oa saving the property on
19848 Prospect Itd (Grace United Methodist Church) for public usc.
The property was purchased by the City Council from the church
with that urtention and ethically it should remain in public hands.
I strongly disapprove of the changing of the city's general plan on this
property from Public to a Residential designation.
Our city has such limited building space for public meetings and
everts. This property serves a vital role in providing that venue.
The property can serve seniors, community organisations,
as well as our youth with a place that adds to the quality of
life in Saratoga:
I ask that you do not change the general plan designation.
`~i-
~~
Page 1 of 1
John Livingstone
From: The Williamsons [zurtz~comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 200v 3:13 PM
To: John Livingstone
SubJect: North Campus
Deer John,
We'd like to go on record as opposing changing the city's general plan from publk: to residential designatlon and
creating nine-lot subdivision out of this dry land. The land should be saved for the pubik:.
Unda and James Williamson
Issol on orbit nr
Saratoga, CA 95070
September 28. loos
John Livingston
Community Development
13777 Fm»tvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95071)
Dear Mr. Livingston,
~~~i~~ ~•
29 D
SEP 2005
crnr of snan~rocn
`' MMUNIiY DEVELOPAO?NI'
Tonight, in the Saratoga News, them was an article that said you would be taking citiz~ inp1R on
the North Campus as kng as it arrives by Sept 30.
Two days is really not sufficient time, and maybe that was the plan, but I care enough about this
issue to make a special trip to drop this off tomorrow on my way to work.
I am still in disbelief that the City would sell this property. It is a special properly with useful
buildings, beautiful trees, PINY of P~k& u~Y . 8~ location and other attribute. I
belong to the Saratoga Historical Society, and vwe have met thane quite a few times for various
fuodioffi.
I believe that if it was frxed up a littlq there would be interest to rent it for functions and bsiog •
money to the city. You may even be able to get volunteers and donations to fix it up. It.wonkl
also be a good facility for senior functions that have outgrown their present space. But more
importantly, land and buildings such as this are nearly mrattainebk in Saratoga. Lf this is
devekped, that is the end of it. Where would we ever got another piece of lend with building.,
trees, parking, and such easy access. We certainly would not buy it for the price that was paid fa
this pereel.
I believe that we should focus on retaining more of the tax dollars paid to maintain the
inSastructure of our city. I know our Governor supports keeping more of the tax dollars in kcal
coffers, and this would bean excellem time for Saratoga to lobby the effort. It is really criminal
that we aU pay so much and retain so little. I also wonder if them are grants avar7abk to
accomplish some of our projeda. .
It is also criminal to se11 this property for such a tiny short term gala, and such eo enormous long
term loss.
Please be far sighted. Sense ofcommunity, doing dre right thing, and maintaitring class'and style
in our surroundings are what make Saratoga so very special.
Thank youl
Sincerely
7Nacey Lee
Page 1 of 1
John Livingstone
From: Michael Lu [michael_s Iu~yahoo.COrt1]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 20054;23 PM
To: John Livingstone
Subject: Please keep North Campus"as public use property
Dear Mr. Livingstone:
I strongly OPPOSE the city council's idea to rezone 2.6 acres of city property located at 19848 Prospect
Road between Scully and Blaney (It is the former Grace United Methodist Church property and has been
referred to as the North Campus) from Public to Residential with an approved subdivision for nine
residential lots. I strongly resent the city council's idea to create a nine lot subdivision out of this city
land.
I believe that the city of Saratoga should keep its rural city nature, instead of becoming like the city of
C~rpertino. As an citizen who are concerned about the future of Saratoga, I am very
concerned at the loss of this city property especially knowing that the city is 98 per cent
developed and this may be the last large property that could be used as community center. Retaining the
properly for community use keeps ow options open, rather than toeing the land to nine more houses
forever.
I believe what the city should do is reign in its soaring budget: The budget has been out of control in
the past few years. Selling property is not a advisable solution.
Michael Lu
12484 De Sanka Avenue
Saratoga
Yahoo! for Good
Clink here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
D~
uU EP 2 ~ 2005
S
CIfY OF $ARATOGA
"'!MIfNTf 1' DEVELOPMEN^'
September 24, 2005
John Livingston, Director
Community Developmeitt
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Mi. Livingston:
'This letter is in regard to the North Campus (former Grace United Methodist
Church) property. I wish to protest the proposed change from Public use to
Residential use for this property.
I am concerned about the loss of this property for use by the residents of Saratoga
and surrounding communities. Since we have so link property left that csa be
used by the community, I feel this would be a real loss to our citizens.
Therefore, please do not tum this property into more homes and lose our
community spirit. Please hear our concmnl
Sincerely vows.
Louise Chamberlin
12909 Foothiil Lane
Saratoga, CA 95070
Citizens to Create the North Saratoga Community Center
• Preserving the Future for the Youth, Teens, Seniors, and Community Groups
12258 Kirkdale Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070
408 252 7447, Mal]ory58@aol.com,Fax 408 252 8599
September 25, 2005
Mr. John Livingstone
Community Development Director
City of Saratoga
13777. FruiNale Avenue
Saratoga, Ca 95070
Dear Mr.. Livingstone
o ~~~~y~ ~
uu SEP 2 7 2005
CITY OF SARATpGA
^"~MUNITY pgVF1.OPt~17'
On behaff of the citizens' committee to create the North Community Center, I am responding to
the City's request for a response to the Negative Declaration on the proposed rezoning of the city
land from Public Use to nine residential homes at 99848 Prospect Road that is referred to as the
North Campus.
First, we are deeply concerned that you are viewing this change as a "one-off", isolated
consideration of land use for a specific location. It is much more appropriate to view this in the
context of use of TOTAL SARATOGA COMMUNITY property. ALL citizens of Saratoga are affected
by the proposed elimination of the last large property that can be used for community purposes.
Land Use Planning
The statement states the proposed changes are consistent with the existing housing in this
area and therefore there are no impacts. We disagree as this implies there are no problems when
there is over zoning for housing and under zoning for other community facilities. This imbalance
needs to be reconsidered.
Public Services
This site is physically separated from the residential houses nearby and faces on a main road
and with no nearby parks. If this project is approved as planed one of the lots in the front should be
used as a mini park/ open space forthe residents and for a positive City appearance along Prospect
Road, a major thoroughfare.
Recreation
We disagree there is not a significant impact on recreation. All of Saratoga has a shortage of
recreation/community center facilities and there are no facilities in the north and east especially from
Pierce Road and Cox to Prospect. There are only neighborhood parks in this area and they are not
as suitable for a community center as the Prospect Road site. Please consider:
1. The city officials have stated publicly there has been a shortage of recreationaUcommunity
. facilities in Saratoga for many years and the needs are increasing.
2. There are no recreation/community center facilities in the north and east sections of Saratoga.
The City's Negative Declaration, itself, states that areas near the proposed development are short of
3. The payment of a fee to the City in lieu of dedicating land for recreatioNcommunity center will •
not alleviate the need for recreatioNcommunity center on other projects.
Transportation and Traffic '
This Prospect Road site is on a main thoroughfare that Can eaSlly handle 8tt IttCf@8ti@ If11',fa~IC.
However, by not using the site as a community center, it will dramatically increase the future use at
the Saratoga Civic Center on Allendale and aggravate these problems at the existing facilities. The
existing facilities are located on a dead-end street and surrounded by West Valley College, a middle
school, Post Office, Library, City Government Offices, and two nearby churches. Traffic, parking and
transportation there are already serious problems.
The Prospect site with its extensive parking would also reduce the parking and the traffic
problems at the Civic Center.
General
Please note that this is the last major city property that can be used for public purposes outside
of building on city parks. To rezone this property for more housing does not meet the long range
planning needs of the city. On this basis we ask that you deny this negative impact due to the issues
clted.
Next, we ask the City Council to immediately conduct an assessment of currenYand long range
community land needs of all types and prepare a Strategic Community Facility plan for the City
consisting of a citizens' committee and a professional city planning consultant.
Please seriously consider these points in your deliberations before you proceed.
Sin ely
J ck MalloryIory, C
cc Please distribute copies to the Planning Commissioners
`,
Attachment 7
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES
STATE OF CALIFORMA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, ~f' d (LS! ~ ~?~im%~fi ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am
a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of
Saratoga Ciry Council on the ~ f~ day of ~C'~ULX / , 2005,
that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a
NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon
prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: •
(See list attached hereto and made part hereof)
that said persons aze the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of
Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b} of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Sazatoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most
recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being
owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the
application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States
Mail to the addresses shown above.
~,~~~ ~ ~i~~ i
Signed
4 ~
City of Saratoga
Community Development Depaztment
13777 Fnxitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
408-868-1222
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Saratoga's PIanning Commission announces the following public hearing on
Wednesday, the 26~" day of October 2005, at 7:00 p.m.
Located in the City theater at 13777 Fnritvale Avenue, Sazatoga, CA 95070. Details are
available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, between the hours of 7:30
a.m. and 12:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. City Hall is closed every other Friday.
Please check the City web site at www.saratoga ca u for the City's work schedule.
APPLICATION # 05-179 (386-26-070 & 071) CITY OF SARATOGA, 19848 Prospect
Road; -The Applicant is requesting a Tentative Map Subdivision, General PIan
Amendment from a Quasi Public Facility to Medium Density Residential, General Plan
. Conformity Determination for Property Disposal; and Mitigated Negative Declazation,
to demolish the existing church facility and replace it with 9 single family residential
lots.
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you
challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in courk,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public
Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's
information packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a
week before the meeting. Please provide any comments or concerns in writing to the
Planning Department to the attention of the staff planner indicated below.
This notice has been sent to all owners of properly within 500 feet of the project that is the
subject of this notice. The City uses the officsal roll produced by the County Assessoz's
office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of -bate
information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being
delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your
neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to
provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your
Community has as much information as possible concerning this project.
John F. Livingstone, AICP
Community Development Director
' ;
37312001.
, ; 373 12002
~ ~ 37312009
~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Chatie8 8 S
1027 Jeoqueliee way ', 092 a leas alA
San lore. CA 93129-2826 Sae Jose. CA 93138-2100
,~ ~ ; San Jose, CA 93129-3804
i.
~~
373 12 004. ~ ' 373 12 O13 37312 017
Chia-Ming t.'hang Ryszard .~ Stephanie Janowski ; ~ Ellen Oh~aty
16411 Chukspur Ia ~ 6546 Bibel Ave 6330 Bibei Ave
Sae Jase, CA 93129-3804 ' ~ : San Jose, CA 95129-3801 • ; ~ Son Jose, CA 93129-3801
' ;, ,
~:
373 12 020
~ 373 12 036 ~.
; : 373 iZ 037
Bhupieder dt (9~ema Ahsjs ~ Glen 7.ai ; ' Joseph $ Young Puk
6514 Bibel Avs '' ~~ h'Y ~ 6470 Ivy La
Sm Jose, CA 95129-3801 + ~ San)oee. CA 93129-3900 , ; San Josq, CA 93129-3900
~.
373 12 Oq 373 12044 '.: 373 12043
Sagjay &. Nagavarapu Ushs Pujare Jianhua Huang ; ; Itatph @ Elaine Chamber
6449 Prospect Rd ;' 647] Prospect lid 6493 Prospect ltd
San Joss, CA 93129-3840 ! . San Jose, CA 93129-3840
i,
~~ : ; San Jaee, CA 93129-3840
'i
i
379 12047. ~~
~ 373 12 048 ,.
; . 373 12049
~.L,~ J,oJe~ ~ Norma Buford
' Cbarlec & Margunt'ISoE
6313 Prospxt ltd :: 6537 Proapxt Itd ; ' 6545 Proepax lid
Sae Jose, CA 95129-3841 • : Sae Jose, CA 93129-3841
i !. ' San Jose, CA 93129-3841
,'
379 12 03D ' ~ 373 12 031 ~ 373 12 052
Stephen S K 8c Malieda Chan ~ ! ~ ZonB do Sun Qi Ling ' ~ Min-Qmn Tai
6367 Prospsdltd ~ 6574IvyLa 6562 IvyLn
Sm lose, CA 93129-3841 ! ' San Jose, CA 93129-3837
i• , ~ Sae Jose, CA 95129-3837
~
373 12 053 373 1Z 054 r , 373 12 033
Avraham R Dahlia Perahia ~ i Sam Lung i Manrop Hahn
6548 Ivy I.e ': 6338 Ivy Le ~ ~ 1?904 SE 43W Le
Sm Jose, CA 93129-3837 ~ San Jose, CA 95129-3837
:~ Hellavne, WA 98006-203E
;.
373 l2 036 ~ 373 12 037 ~ ~ 373 12 038
Jiangxu 8 Sim 7Cian XiseB I ; ; Hui-C6en Kuo 1 i I Hueichian ~ Chen Naesiag Huang
6523 Ivy Le ~ ~ 6537Ivy Ln ; , 6349 IvyLa
Sae Jose, CA 93129 San Jose. CA 95129-3838 ; ! San Jwe, CA 95129-3838
j
~,
,.
373 12 039 i ; ~ 373 12060
~
Li
H ~ 373 13 036
. ~
~a y ;
-
wa Lin Hung~.in Hsu .
6563 Ivy Ln ' ~ 65731vy La
~ ' i 1665 Ardmv+ood lh
Sae Jose, CA 95129-3838 ! i San Jose, CA 95129-3838
;; ~ San Jaeq CA 95129-3856
373 13 037 373 l3 038 ~ ! 379 13 039
Gary & Sandra Schce~'eld ~ ; Chong Hu ~ ~ ; William & Cluistine Munson
•^• - 1L07 A...i-..........iT-
•
i
r ~ i
i
i
: ~
~„ +.3 ~ ~ 373 13 041 ~ 373 13 042
~d~ I3a[t Jim Wang i Jemet D02ier , '
210 La Agra a ' 7510 De Fa Dt ~ 180 ~ ~
Hill, CA 93037-5634 i Cupertino, CA 95014.4307 ~ La Alton, CA 94022-2821
373 13 043 ~ 373 13 044 ~ 373 13 067
`
Kem~B Rang Willrelm .t Jvfazieaoe Gtotheer : Su lvling Lam
1632 Atdeawoed Dr . ~ ' 1644 Ardmwood Dr ~ 1629 Daphne Dt
Sm Jose, CA 93129-3855 San ~ CA 95129-3835 : ~ San Jae, CA 93129-3813
~;
373 13 068
' ' 373 13069 .~
~ • 373 13 070
per, py~4fen ~ William & Sonja Watson h ~ Li-Jm & Chun-Jaen Tx~
361 La®amd a
13 ~ 1649 Daphne Dr : ~ 6690 Ivy I.n
.
Saratoga, CA 93070-3414 ~ San Jose, CA 93129-3813 ~ 3en Jae, CA 93129-3839
~:
373 13 071 373 13 072 ~ ~ 373 13 073
William Kaffi ; Andrew Hsiang ~ Richsid do Helm Baiby
6670IvyI.n ; ' 6650Ivy Ln ~ 66301vy Ln
• San Jae, CA 95129-3839 i San Jose, CA 93129-3839 San Jose, CA 93129-3839
:
~'
373 13 074 ~ ' 373 13 073 ~ , 373 13 076
Tolvaoan ` . Kai Yau ~ Dennis Rent
h,J,yo ' 1669 ClarkapurLn ~ ~ 6631 Prospect Rd
Jose, CA 93129-3839 : ' San Jose, CA 95129-3805 ~ San Jose, CA 93129-3842
~.
~.
373 13 077 ~ ; 373 13 078 373 13 079
William ~ Lynn Rothwein ~ Vew & Smiths Varrm ; Ragjie Joffi
6645 Prospect ltd ~ 6661 Prospect Rd ~ 6673 Prospect Rd
San Jose, CA 93129-3842 ; ; San Jose, CA 93129-3842
~; San Jae, CA 93129-3842
37313 080 ; 373 13 081 373 13 082
Han~o do Wang Xiaond Tang ~ . Miranda Amitava Choudhmi
6691 Prospect Rd ~ . 206 Thomas Dt 6697 Prospect Rd
Sao Jose, CA 93129-3842 ~ Los Gatos, CA 95032-4038 San Jose, CA 95129-3842
373 14 001
' ' 373 14 002 i.
; 373 14 053
,
y ~ ; Brian & Amanda Aberg Simm & Tsai Hwie Chen
1638 Daphne Dt 1628 Dapffie Dr ; 1639 CJarkaptvl:a
San lax, CA 95129-3812 ; ~ San Jose, CA 95129-3812 ; San Jae, CA 93129-3805
373 l4 034 ;' , 386 26 001 386 26 002
When Soo & Eun Sim Kaog Glenford Deena Jr. ; Kelvin & Susan Kiev
7 p Lu ' ' 2265 EI Camino Real #3 ; 12031 Saragkn Dr
~
Jae, CA 95129-3805 `: Sams Clara, CA 95050-4064
; Saratoga, CA 95070-3218
;
386 26 003 386 26 004 38626 005
- - ^----- Louis TsenR i John & Jia-Ning Chen
386 26006. 38626007
~ , 38626008
B1ane & Barbara Eiataberg Haft' & Phyllis Cornbleet ~ . Sugimoto James.
12091 Saraglm Dr 12105 Saragleal Dr ; 12121 Satagiaa Dr
Saratoga, CA 93070-3218 ; Sawtoga, CA 95070
, ; SataWga, CA 95070-3220
i'
386 26.009
~ 38626 010 ,
,
' ; 38626 031
Ahwed & .Sseoa Masood Richard dt Sonya D Sa
, Sungsun & Diane CLoi
12135 Saraglm Dr i 12151 Saraglen Dt
` ~ ~
12180 Saragleai Dr
Saratoga, CA 950'70.3220 ;
Saratoga, CA 93070.3220 Saratoga
CA 95070.3221
,
,:
38626 032
! 386 26 033 !
' 38626034
Robert t3vawd & Wang Xwzhen Xn ~ Nansea D'Ss ~ . RiahAtd ~ , ~,
12130 Saraglen lh ~ ' 12149 Saraglcn Dr ~
, , 12120 Saraglea Dr.
Saratoga, CA 95070-3221 + :.Saratoga, CA 93070-3220
;i '• Saratoga, CA 95070
r
386 26033 38626 036 ' , 38626 037
Stm & Barbara Stewart ~ : Steve B Pratt p~ Laeb
12100 Sarnglm Dr ' 19920 Vewridge Dt ; . 19910 Viewridge Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070-3221 Saratoga, CA 93070.3238 Sarawga, GA 95070.3238
,
!• i.
386 2b 038 ! 38626039
~ ; ~ 38626040
Jni-Nwag & Ma I~Ctisog Wang ~ Y R & Lillian Kada Girardot
12121 Viewnalc Dr ~ 12141 Viewoalr Dr ; ~ 12161 Viewoalr Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070.3232 ~ ' Saratoga, CA 95070.3232 ; ~ Saratoga, CA 95070-3232
,
,
,
38626 J,141
38616042 .
,
~ 38626 048
Eugana dt June Ltvitre ! Stephen & Rose Horvath ~ ~ 7avad Khakbaz
12201 Yrawodc Dr ; 259 Belvue Dr ~ 19840 Oakhevem Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070-3234 ~ Loa Gatos, CA 95032-5003 ! Saratoga, CA 450-3214
~.
38626049 ,
~ 386 Z6 050
386 26 OSl
Jonsthw & Suzanne Owens ~ Richard Ik Elizabeth Machado Shan Kang 1~m
19830 Oaldraven Dr ~ 19831 Oakhaven Dr ~ 19845 Oakhaven Dt
Saratoga, CA 93070.3214 ~ Saratoga, GA 95070.3213
~:
, ~ Saratoga, CA 93070-3213
386 26 052 ~ , 386 26 053 ; ~ 38626 054
Antho>ry Hei Leung Husog ' . Willis & Liliaua McCarthy ! . Mervin do Susan Cohn
12150 Viewoalc Dr ~ 12120 Yewoak Dr 19840 Vewridgc lk
Saratoga, CA 95070-3233. Saratoga, CA 95070-3233 ~ ; Saratoga, CA 95070-3203
r~ it
386 26 OSS ' ; 386 26 056 ; ; 386 26 057
[ra & Susan Kaye , ' Haien•Jywan & Htw lhr Fen Ko ; ! Graham Mostya
19830 Yewridge Dr ; 19831 Yewridge Dr ~ ' 19845 vewridge Dr
iaratoga, CA 95070-3205
Saratoga, CA 95070-3236 !.;
~ Saratoga, CA 95070-3236
,
86 26 058 386 26 059 386 26 060
,
- - William & Norma Ford Maria Continillo
386 26062 ' ~ 386 26063
26061 •
~ Sermioxo Gina Ha ritos ~ ; ; ~' A Dmmmond Dae Carboni ~ ~ lobs !k 1Satlileea Hslet>)iaa
19921 Viewrid)9a 1)r
7 ; ' 12070 Saraglw Dt
CA 95070-3226
' ~ I Satetoga i 12044 Saraglan Ct
~ Saratoga, CA 95070.3217
Saratoga, C.A 95070-323 ,
~~
i
386 26064 ' ; : 386 26063 ~ 38626066
Sam do Mine OcM Ram Baps ~ Chandraa<kha i4 Syjetba Bodapati
19920 Saragian Ct ; ~ 19910 Saraglra Ct i ' 19900 Saragien Ct
Saratoga, CA 95070~7217 ; i Saratoga, CA 93070-3217
~
•
;' ' Saratoga, CA 95070.3217
~~
~:
386 26067. ~
~ 386 26 068
~ ~
~ 38626 069
Dennis Lydett. Bernard & F.liabeth Sievers ~ . Raymo~ Taffy
19911 Saragbn Ct ~ 1992] Sataglea Ct i . 12010 Ssragka Dr
SaratogaA, CA 93070-3217 ~ Saratoga, CA 93070.3217
' ~ i Saratoga, CA '95070,7219
~
~
~. ;
~.
386 26.07'0 386 37001 ~ 386 37002
CITY ~ SAItATOCiA ~ Yao Cheug ~ lames & Marsha PatDarfoa
13777 Fmitvale Ave 19771 Colby Ct i 19783 Co16y Ct
Sarat~4 CA 93070-5151
SaraWga, CA 95070-3202 !
Sam, CA 93070-3202
386 37003
~ 386 37004 . i
~ ' 386 37 005
IC>wo ~ ; Lung Wen dt Sin Las Wars
93 Cagry Ct' 19807 Colby Ct ~ 19819 Colby Ct
CA 95070-3202 ; ~ ' Saratoga, CA 95070.3202 ~ ' Saratoga, CA 95070-3202
~.
~;
i
386 37006 ~ 386 37007 ; , 386 37 008
David Qt Bernadette Wyandt
Roger & Mary 1?iaaca ~ Altos do Carmen Andertori
19827 Colby Ct 19828 Colby Ct ! 14816 Colby a
Saratoga, CA 93070.3202 Saratoga, CA 93070-3202
~: ~ , Saratoga, CA 95070-3202
.'
386 37009 '" 386 37 010 386 37 011
Lay 8 Pasat Chm " C L & xeiw Loa ~ Liagrdong g Ding Ymg Shsw
3 Ling-yi st arLane a ~ 19826 viewriage nr ~ : 197s6 Corny Ct
T~ ; : Saratoga, CA 93070-3236 ~ ` Saratoga, CA 93070-3202
386 37 012 ~ : 386 37 013 386 37 014
Louie k Herniae Degive ~ : Griffith d: Lois Bmvm ; Klein Kao
19774 Colby Ct 19773 vemidge Dr ' ; 19785 Viewridge Dr
Saratog4 CA 93070-3202 ~ ' Saratoga, CA 93070.3236
i ! . Saratoga, CA 95070-3236
`
386 37 OIS 386 37 016 386 37 017
7Lomas 8 Katherine Maier ! , Robert & Bonnie Lind ~ . CLuug~io & Cheo~iuii Faa
•
29797 ve~idge ~ 19809 Yewridge Dr ; ~ 19813 vevaidge Dr
CA 93070.3236 Saratoga, CA 93070-3236
' Saratoga, CA 95070-3236
~.
386 37 018 ` 386 37 OI9 ~ 386 37 020
-- ~ - ' T~rlen T.ntt ~ $Tlfia 8t F18a$ $Oel-$hln $llin$
386 37021
Watna Uclrimoto
19808 vewridge Dr
Saratoga. CA 93070-3205
386 37 024
Kuang Yn Wang
19772 Viewridge Dr
Saratoga, CA 93070-3205
386 37027
Dean 8 Lucille Amonelli
19799 OakLavea Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070-3213
386 37030
Pamela Parloer
19823 Oakbaven Dr
Saratoga, CA 93070
386 37 033
lu 8c Janet Sbm
14638 Aloba Ave
Saratoga, CA 950706004
386 48021
SCVWD
Saratoga, CA 93070
i
~,
I
I
it
,,
i
~.
i
~.
~;
~,.
~~
f
~:
~:
i
i
i
i
is
I!
1
I
I'
1'
I
I
386 37 022
Cluing C T 8t Mel-Ping Lnen
197% Viewridge Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070.3205
386 37 025
wea Chuag 1.iou
19776 oaktavea Dr
Saratoga, CA 93070-3213
386 37 028
Guy & Naary Robby
19803 Oakhaven Dt
Saratoga, CA 93070-3213
386 37 031
Terry Teruo R Yoko Linda Matsumoto
19826 Oakbaven Dt
Saratoga, CA 95070-3214
386 37 034
Susaa Lofebaaker
l97% C+akbaven Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070-3214
386 37 023 .
1Normav'1 o~nt$a~~my~y1
~ ~ Saratoga, CA 4507U-3203
;` 386 37 026
Alfred It Marlene Kara
~' 19787 OakLaven ~
Saratoga, CA 93070-3213
i.
'.. 386 37 029
` ~~~~
19817 C+akbaven Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070213
386 37032
Pec 4S~tY76~4
APo, AE 09468-0764
386 37 033
George a~ Frances Sadrioe
19784 Oakbaven Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070-3214
~i
i
'~
i
~i
i•
i'
i
li
I~
~ .
i
1
I
Fns Printltg
~ ' t~~
~"~
a ~ ~ stso•
w i
12 001 ' "37312002
I
t
t
! 1
6585 Ptapect Rd . la
65
~
s.o ]o.e. CA 95129-3&11 ~ San lose, CA 95129-3831
I t.
37312 004 i 37312 015
p~/`t I "Occupeot At
1640 ~ 16546 Babel Ave
Sao Jae. CA 95129.3804 j !', Sea Jose, G 95129-3801
;I
3 3
n
At j 1,
e
~
~
651413ibe1 Ave 6492Ivy Ia
l
San Jae. G 95129-3801 ~ .i ; Sm
ase, G 95129-3900
is
37312043 ~ ~ 37312 044
OocoPaat At . ' i At
6449 Ro9~ RA. i 6471 Prospect Rd
San Jae, G 95129.3840 ! I San Jose, G 95129-3840
it
..
373 12047
I I; 37312048
~
p~p~.~ I . Oavpmt At
' 16337 Prospect JW
San Jose„ GA 95129-384L I ~ ~ Sm lase, G 95129-3841
li
~
37312050 I
~ ~ 37312 OS1
~
~ i'OxupmtAt
~ p~~ R6 ~' 6574Ivy Is
San Jose, G 95129.3841 ll i Sea Jana, G 95129-3837
i'
373 12053 ,i,
' 1 373 12 034
At ~. I : pccupsat At
6348Ivy Ts
San lose, CA 95129-3837 ~ 6538 Jvylu
~ I San Jose, G 95129-3837
i,
373 12 056 ~ 37312 057
'
I
~ 'I !l
kcupamAt
5525Ivy Im (No tddl) ' ~ .6537Ivy Ln
ieo Jose, G 95129.3838 Sea losq G 95129-3838
li
17312 039 i.
I, 1373 ]2060
j
~~ qt I !(kcupent At
J`,1, l,n j ! '6575 Ivy Ld
osq GA 95129-3838 ~ j Sea Jose, CA 95129-3838
~
~ i a nv~ I .
j ~ 373 13 038
,
www.awryaom
t-eoo~~o-nvaar
® AVERY std
' ` 37312003
! Oavpmt At
' 1648 Clatl~apar Ln
','I San Jose, CA 93129.3804
I
_. I .
~ 37312 017
iIAZ
i 6530 Btbe1 Ave
! Sm Joaq G 95129.3801
~I
~' 373 12 037
At
6470Ivr Ln
!' San ]oae, G 93129-3900
i
~ 373 12045
' I ~
- i ~ 6493 Pmepax ltd
i'Saa lae, G 95129-3840
'!
.'.i .
'~ ! 373 12049
At
.65455 P+wpat Rd
I~Sm Joae, G 95129-3841
I'
I'
~ 373 12 052 ~.
~ I,tAt
i .6562Ivy Is
Sao Jane, G 95129-3837
i!
! .
X373 12 OSS
i . •Oxvpa~ At
I' i 6524 Jvy Ia .
j ~ San Jose, G 95129-3837
. I .
~ 373 12 058
!Ocaup.ut At
i '6549Ivy Is
`+'SanJose,G 95129-3838
~i:
i 373 13 036
!~
! 11665 Atdenwood Ih
j I ;San Jaee, G 95129-3856
!
'373 13 039
. Jam and Smttdpa Free Ptintlttp ! ~~
~'~ wwwswtXoom ~ ~ AbERY® 51f0~
1:60p~iO-AVERY ~
llsa Awt7r~ TfMP1ATE 5160 I ,
..
Y ~ I ~ 37313 041 !
37313 042
~ ;
37313 040 • Oavpant ~ ,
, I O A(
d Dr
d I , 1672 Atdenwood Dr i ~ ~ 1664 Atdenwood ]k
et-woo
1678Ar
5m Jose, CA 96129-3855 ~ I j San ]oae, CA 95129-3855
I~ !, ~ ! $en Jae, CA 95129.3855
, I;
I ,,~_
373 13 043 ~' I' 373 13 044 i ; 373 13 067
Ili
I i
!
e
165Atdeawood Dr
Sao Jose, CA 95129-3855 I 1644644 Atdwwood Dr
I
I ~ ;Sao Joee, CA 95129-3835 f
~ 1629 Daphn
Dr
' i ~ ~ Sao Jose. t:A 95129-3813
573 13 068
' ~ 373 13 069
Occapmt At i
~ ~ , 373 13 070
~ At .
~
1639 Daphne Dr
San Jose, (:A 95129-3813 ~: i ; 1649 Daphne Dr
I {San Josq CA 95129-3813
~;~ j , 6ti9
I ; ! Sao Joan, CA 93129.3839 .
.1:
', i,.. i
{73
l ~
3 '
3
~
am At ; `
p~t At Oavpa~ At
I ,
i670Ivy Ia 1 ! 6650Ivy La
I ~ !' 6630Ivy Js
ion Joee, CA 95129-3839 ~ San Jose, Crer 95129-3839
' ! I ~ Sm Jose, l.A 95129-3839
.
itl L I
17313074 •,I
~ i
13 -.f
~ i ~ 13713 07
~ .
~~ ~
i I ~
~ I'
.610 Ivy La'
ran Jose; CA 95129-3839 I :1669 Clarkapur Ia
I I ~ San Jox, CA 95129-3803 I ~ .6631 Prospect Itd
~ _ 1 San Jose, G 93129-3842
.~'I !.
~ lg 0~ !
f
1.373 13078 '!~
1373 13 079
,
~1 ~ r!
~
b45 Prospeot Rd Proapect Rd
! ! ~ fi66 I ~ 6673 PtoapecK
Rd
ran Jose, CA 96129-3842 ~ ! Sm Jose, C,A 95129-3842
~I, I'San Jaae, CA 93129-3842
I
.
7313 060 i :373 ]308] .I
~ ~ 373 13 062
,!~ ,i ~
~1 Ptospa.-t Rd i ' .6695 Piospxt Rd ;6697 Piotpectltd
as Joaq GA 95129-3842 ! l ;San lose, CA 95129-3842
:, ~ San Jose, GA 93129-3842
73 14001
~ i 373 14002 1
1:373 14 053
At
~ I Occapaat At
1
~ I 'Occapaot At
'
638 Daphne Dr ; :' 1628 Daphne Dr 1639 Clerkapur Ln
' 1
®lose, CA 96129-3812 I, i San Joa:, CA 95129-3812 I San Josq C~1 95129-3805
I.
~3 14 054 ,I
f 1 386 26 001
I !
~ 386 26 002
I
ccupant At
147 ~~~ ~ Occupant At
'
; IZOI I Saraglen Dr Occupant At
' ]2037 Saraglea Dr
m Jose, C.9 95129-3805 , 'Saratoga, CA 95070-3218
I' ;Saratoga, C.4 95070.3218
i.
.
.
I ~ zsF ~~ rvu i 386 26 005
lam and Smetdya fne ptitttlnp
lha Awry TEMPLATE 5160
26.006
At
12091 SeraBlcuDr•
Sara~+. cw 9so7a321a
3862690!
OAt.
12135 Sara8lm Dlr
Seraooga, G 93070-3220
38626 033
H.
12130 Saraglem Dr
Saratoga,.Cfi 93070-3221
386 26 033
~ ...
12100 Saraglm Dlr
Saratoga, CA 93070-3221
38626038
At
1 V3ewoek Th
Saratoga, G 93070.3232
386 26041
12201 Vrawoak Dr
Saraoga, CA 93070-3234
38626049
19830 Osl~svanI>s
5antoga,l:/, 95070.3214
386 26032
12]50 Viewoelt Ih
Saratoga, CA 95070.3233
186 26035
)ccupentAt
0 V~cwridge I>r
CA 95070.3203
oc nc nc4
~ t>' wvvw.awrycam ! ~ gNERY® 61608
~~'
I-
7-BOO~iO-AVERY ~
~ 386 26007 ;' 386 26 008 '
~ ~I Occupant At ~ ~ ~ ~ At
' ;12105 Saraglen Ih (No Mal) ; .12121 Seraglm Ik
~';suatoge, CA 9507a3220
III .I Saratoga, CA 9S01a32~
';
-,I-
~ 1386 26 O10 .I.
~ 38626 031
I ; :Occupant At
At
112151 Saregkn Dr > 1.12
Sarsglen Dr
' I ;'Sa*eto84 CA 93070.3220 . ; Saratoga, CA 93070.3221
}i~ +IJ
.~
''38626033
~ ~
;38626034
~
Ocxupant At ~ ' iOccvpam At '
~ 12140 Saragkn Dr
jSaratoga, CA 93070-3221 12120 Saraglm Dr (No Mail
; + ;Saratoga, CA 93070.3221 .
,; ~~
.~L.
386 26 036
•i _I
!
386 26
, : ~ ;
037
~1+t ' r !Occupant At
I ! 19920 Viewridge Ik i I ;19910 Viewridge Dr
;'Saratog4CA 93070.323E
)!.~ ISeretoBa,CA 93070-3238
I
q
I' ~ !386 26 039
I' ~
' ' '38626 040
I
Occupe~ At ii ~
~
~ I s 12I4I Viewoak Dr "121 16 Viawroak Dr
I ~Seretoga, CA 93070.3232
l
~ i ~Serawga, G 95070.3232
~,
f
f
:; i i,I
' I
1386 26042 ~ 386 26048
'
(I'OccupaotAt ;~
OccvpantAt
12221 Viewoak Dt I ~ 19840 Oakl~evm Ik
'Saratoga, CA 95070.3234
I. ~ Saratoga, CA 95070-3214
!I
-I
I'386 26050 ' •.;•
~~ ! X386 26 031
~ ! 'Occupant At ; ~ 'Occupmt At
j 19831 Oal,haven Dr ' 119843 Oaldiavan Dr
~ jSaratoga, C 9 93070.3213
II! ~ ;Saratoga, CA 93070-3213 .
!_
(~ 1386 26 053
i 386 26 034
? . Iccupant At ; Occupe~ At
I ~ 12120 Viewoak De : ~ ;19840 Viewridge Dt
' I ;Saratoga, CA 45070.3233
~ , Saatoga, C.4 95070-3205
, ~ i
. .
~ 386 26 056 ! 386 26 057
i~Occupant At ! ' .Occupnt At
(j 119831 Viewridge Dr : ~ 79845 Vrewridge Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070.3236 '• Saratoga, CA 95070.3236
I
i
386 26 059 +,
386 26060 ~
.imptwsbe arrybgrrrege et +! s~a9e nP~ .~ ~-eoo-~an~ ~ ®AVERYm 5x~
N yeberlt 51ti0~
386 26 Oda. - ; ' 386 26 062 ~: 386 26063
~'
19921 Viewndge Dr
~ ;120 0712osarag~ nr At
1204412044Saragleu a
sratoya, c.~, 9507x3237 ', saratoge, CA 95070.3226
i', Saratu~>t, CA 9501x3217
386 26064 • . 386 26065 386 26 066
~' .: ~ Ocupant At ; ; Occupaffi At
!9920 Saragkm Ct
3217
A
95070 :..19910 Seraglm Ct
Sarato
a
CA 9507x3217 19900 Saraglem Ct
? Sar
W
CA 9507x3217
.
-
Saratoga, C g
,
~ ga,
a
586 26067 ~ ; 38626068 ~ 386 26 069
.
Ct ~
199Suaglen 19areglen Ct ! 120Ssregbn Dr
Saratoga, CA 9507x3217
.. ' Saretoga, CA 9507x3217
i' ! Saratoga, CA 9507x3219 .
+~, '
186 26 07ti ! ' 386 37001 ! . i 386 37002
~ ~ Oxupmt At
~ ; ;19771 C
lb
Ct Oxupa~ At
i
'
19783 C
lb
C
19Proapect Rd o
y .
:
o
y
t
Saratoga, CA 9307x3229 .:Saratoga, CA 9507x3202 ! Saratoga, CA 95070.3202
;:
I
186 37003 ; 356 37004 386 37 005
~ '
,97y5 Amy a ,
191by Ct 19BColby Ck
Saratogy GA 9307p.3202 ~ Saratoga, CA 95070.3202
~:; ~ Saratoga, CA 9307x3202
;,;(
X86 37006 ~ j 386 37007 t. ~ 386 37 008
~ '' Oceupant At ; : Occupant At
.9827 ColbyCt 19828 Colby Ct ;19816 Colby (x
ieratoga, CA 9507x3202. i,~ ;Saratoga, CA 95070.3202
i ~ :Saratoga, CA 9307x3202
;g6 37009 ~ 386 37 010 ~ • ;386 37 011
yt ' !
Ct
9Co 19Iby Ct
' llby Ct
~uatoga, CA 9507x3202 Saratoga, CA 9507x3202 ! 'Saratoga, CA 9307x3202
:i
~i
. Ij.
86 37 013 i ! 386 37 013 .386 37 014
{~~,~ ~ ' Ocnrpaat At ; Occupeot At
9774 Corny Ct ;19773 Viewridge Ih
' ; ' 19785 Viewridge Dr
aratog; CA 9507x3202 ~ :Saratoga, CA 9507x3236
is
' ,Saratoga, CA 9507x3236
~ .
66 37 015 .
~ .
-'38637 016
, j386 37 017
At ~ Occupant At ~ ' Occupant At
'
,7797 Viewridge Dr ~ 19809 Viewfidge ]h ' 19813 Viswritlge Ih
~
aratoga, CA 9507x3236
Saratoga, CA 9507x3236
;~. •
,Saratoga, CA 9507x3236
+~ ea m o ~ X386 37 019 ~ :386 37 020 -
~.
,~~ ~~tipourrage et 8 sEcMge rapids 1-800-GQ~AVERY '
Utpbaz N gr,bark 5160
® AVERY s~so•
,~,~ ~.,1
~' ""~ 386 37022
~
!
0 i3B6 37 023
19808 Vieaaidge Dt ViewridQe Dr
19
796 ' , lievv~idse Dr
Saratoga, CA 95070.3205 `Saratoga, CA 95070-3205
~i iSareu~a, CA 95070.3205
i
486 37024 386 37 023 . , , ;386 37026
,qt , ; Occupmt At Ocwpeat At
19772 Viewridge I>r ~ ~ 19775 Oakhsvea ]k ~ ;19787 OalcLevm Dr.
>ra+~4 CA 93070.3205 ' ~ Saratoga, GA 93070.3213
' : ; Sareage, CA 93070.3213
186 37027 . ~~;
~
386 37028
i 386 37029
> ~ ~ ! Occvpmt At ! 'Occvprmt At
,9799 OakLevesa Dt ' 19805 Oakhaven lk 19817 Oeldtavm 1)r
;areroga, CA 93070.3213 ~ ;Saratoga, CA 95070-3213
~ i ;Saratoga, CA 95070.3213
'
i
;
.:! r
;
,
.86 37 0(30 ~ ' ;386 37 031 ' X386 37032
9823 Oakhevea Dr (No Metz) ~ , ~ 19826 OelcLevea I;r ` ~ 19814 Oalduvm 1)r
lara0oge, CA 95070-3213 i ' !Saratoga, CA 93070-3214 Saratoga, CA 93070-3214
i:~
$6 37 033 386 37034
~ ~ .386 37 035
,tu ; Occulrmt At
I : ; . !Oacup~t At
~g j~~~ ' 197% OekLrvea Dr ~ X19784 OakLevm Dr
CA 95070-3214 ; ! iS~ga, ~+ 95070-3214 ~ ;Saratoga, CA 93070.3214
l~. ~~~
8648021 '"i '
At
i
I
m Addraa~ ~~ ;
CA ~~
~; '
.i
~,
i
;
~:
;;i
i
,I.
''
~i
' I
;'
i
~~ I ~,
~,
~,~
I,
;
A!~ cc~~r~s -7rans>Mrt~t( c<s
.~ , -
Santa clam Valley transportation
Authority
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134.1906
ATTN: Julie Render
California Dept. of Transportation
P.O. Box 23660
Oakland, CA 94623-0660
ante Clara County Fire Dept.
4700 Winchester Blvd
.os Gatos, CA 95030
vest Valley Sanitation District
JO East Sunnyvale Avenue
:amplxll, CA 95008
ante Clara Valley Water District
750 Almaden Expressway
an Jose, CA 95ll8
SCC Dept. of Envimnmemtal Health Pacific Gas and Electric
P.O. Box 26070 San Jose Iand Rights Office
San Jose, CA 95159-6070 lll Ahnadea Blvd, Room 814
ATTN: Kurt Fisher, REHS San Jose, CA 95115
Sati Jose Water Company
1221 South Bascom Avenue
San Jose, CA 95128
Cupertino Union School District
10301 Vista Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
~ aeybourrage et 8 s~haga raPfde
~np~rlt 5760
of Campbell
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95006
~~ www.everyoom
~~ 7-8006aAVmt1'
Ciry of.San Jose
Plan Implementatloh Aivision
200 E. Santa Clara Street
SanJose,CA 95113.1905
® ANERY® st6a+
Giry a~f Cupertino
Sheriil`s Office
160ll S. De Anza Blvd.
Gupa~dno, CA 95014
~N~tt?R~sz~~D pfd--'~~r~s Ltis-~'
Marty Oakley
3esign Build William Bean
21388 Sarahills Road Mein Levi
Shoreline Commercial Real
!0840 Beauchamps Lane Saratoga, CA 95070 Estatel?O Box 3748
;aratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga, CA 95070
~orina•Del Pozzo Lea Ann Hernandez Leona Fogg
tOEM Corporation Coldwell Banker 19466 Burgundy Way
650 Lafayette Street 12029 Saratoga-Sunayyale Saratoga, CA 95070
;ants Clara, CA 95050 Saratoga, CA 95070
>cott Sheldon Reberta Savage Backer Navid
?reauer Commercial Inc. Village Square Realty Navico, Inc..
300 Oliver Road, Suite 300 515 N. Santa Cruz Avenue 20480 $lauer Drive, Suite A
~airlield, CA 94534 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Saratoga, GA 95070
Cerence Szewczyk Salim Sagarchi Charles Butterfield.
CS /Civil Engineering S.E.I. Butterfield Real Estate
.776 Technology Drive 495 E. Browkaw Road, #F 2470 Winchester Blvd, Suite A
inn Jose, CA 95110 San Jose, CA 95ll2 Campbell, CA 95008
Andrew Barnes Tim Nieuwsma
.4377 Oldwood Road SYIIeT83'
~aratoga, CA 95070 900 E. Hamilton, Suite 100
Campbell, CA 95008
r~
U
~~ Cu~p~' ~-~'~ u5r
.,
Clare McBride Louis Plegive Fran. Colletti
5 E. Brokaw Rd., #F 19774 Colby Ct. 12185 Terrence Ave.
~an Jose, CA 95113 Saratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga,. CA 95070
Dave & Beinie Wyandt Gene Golobic Norman & Marlene Siegler
19827 Colby Ct. 12336 Terrence Ave. 20743 Seaton Ave.
Saratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga, CA 95070
Terry Martin Bill Sheridan Pam Khoo
45 E. Main St., #B 19766 Elisa Ave. 19807 Colby Ct.
Los Gatos, CA 95030 .Saratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga, CA 95070
Bill & Norma Ford Joann & Roger Piazza Jack Tolvanen
19905 Viewridge Dr. Colby Ct. 6610 Ivy Ln.
Saratoga, CA 95070 Saratoga, CA 95070 San Jose, CA 95129
Matt Lavender Kaustuv Basu Barry Wilbanks
1650 Lafayette St. 245 Almendra Avenue 800 El Camino Real, 3'~ Floor
~nta Clara, CA 95050 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Menlo Park, CA 94025
0
JnnaRd Smudpa F++~ Prlntfnp
u.. nwrye ~MPtorE s~~
ative American Heritage Corrunissio
!5 Capitol Mall, Room #364
icramcnto, CA 95814
TTN: Rob Wood
qa Rodriguez
O. Box 14ll
ilinas, CA 93902
Amah/MutsunTribalBand
Irene Zwierlein, Chair
789 Canada Rd
Woodside, CA 94062
! s! Nrww.ave
~ 7
n ~. ~ Amah Mutsun Tribal Band
,Valentin Lopez, Chairperson
3095 Eastern Avenue
I I ' Sacramento, CA 95821
.~.
j ! ; Trim Marine Ruano Family
'Ramona Garibay, Representative
'':36423 Peugeot Place
~ j Newazk, CA 94560
i~.
I
~I! Muwekma Indian Trib
Rosemary Cambra, Ch
P.O. Box 360791
!'' Milpitas, CA 95036
i:"
~',
i~
i:i
~~i
.'~'.
~,: ,
ill
I'.
II~
it
I
.,
i i
lii
I'~
I,~
t;
~ .
~i
~i:
~!i
I'
~I~
~~.
~,
I
~,.
. ,,.
~~
I'
~,.
Ili
-Bpp.GO-AVERY
rycom ' ~ AVERY
~ ! ~ Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
i ~ 'Costanoan
~ I Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson
' { P.O. Box 28
~ ! Hollister, CA 95024
.!.
~ The Ohlone Indian Tribe
I ! : Andrew A. Galvan
! ~ i P.O. Box 3152
~ ~ Mission San Jose, CA 94539
i.
~~
®s+~
•
L
-.
n
• Attachment 8
b
0
~~~
o ~~~~o
~ o ~ ~' "'~
7d
.~
r~ C~
C1 ~
'}'' ~~"'
~~~~
0
`° ~, g ° ~
('~ to ~ w Qi~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~' ~ p r.
~.~ ~ ~, ~N- ~a 9• • `~ '~ ~. a ~a £o ~ ~ ~
~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~• ~~5~ ~ ~p
r ~ '~
n
5~~• ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~b
~s ~ ~ ~ s ~
o~~ ~~~ ~~e~.~ o
a. ~ a ~~ .~
q o~.~o ~ ~ ~~~
W ~o ~~ C ~ A ~ q~g ~ ~~~ Qi~ ~~ N
~ ~ ~~.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~~ ~ $ ~~~ ~~
r ~' r: f ~
.~
~~'~-~ ~a~~ ~~
~~~ ~;~ ~~~ ~ ~o~~~
~ ~ ~ ~~py ~ ~G~p ~ ~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .fie p~ ~ ~ C, p9 ~pyQ~. P~
~« •t ~ C Oti ~y 7~ V P•
~~ m
O w • w 'C •y. w,,, O • C~ • • r
iS~p o o A. w
~. ~ E ~. `(o' F ~ Pq ~y ~ R ~' p ~gi ~ w A gQ ~ n ~ ~ F7 ~ ~ ... c~ o
'~ 0~j° ~'i ~ V p, ~p '`<C rpm S" ~ m S• ~ ~Q~gQ ~ '~5g ~ ~y~q ~"•' ~ ~ ~ (pia q^~$
~~nn ~' QQ QQ.. a
ro ~ ~ g ~• H H ~&7~r ow
~ ~
w ~. ~
~.w ~ .. ~
~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ r ~.~~ ~. ~ ~
~• ~~ ~
.J. M ~ ,N„ p ~i
~G O ~~ O ~ O p~ ~,~ ~ 1
~~ ~~~
~ ~ O
A "~
.{pips v P' n nH f! v •ly Q' v
~
~
G
~ ~ ~ O ~~
N ~,
~
~ ~ I
~
~9 ~~
~
~
6 ~
...
° ~ .,
°
a a s
•
C ,~ o ry b •,,°°..
.9y~d..~
v
4
ti
a a ~ Ms
I
~~~°
~~
~;
~~
~<
n `{ N p
q ~,
,, 0 9
~ ~ .~ M ~ /
~,
~ s ~ ~- s
o ~~ ga~° ~
M
~~ ~~~
a ~ ~ ~~ ~~
~~ .~e
~~~ °
~~~ N ~,
~~ ~
~~ ~ M
b°+ QFQ RR" o~ 5~e ~
[q A ~ v fA0
wry
~ rt N ~ ~
~~
a .,
S• ~°+
~.
~~~
o ~~~~~~
~~ ~ y ~ ~ O
Pn' u .~ ~ ~ ~ O 9~ PCf C
~ ~ y.q ~ ~ ~ ~•
ao o. ~ ~ c K, a' fn
M
~. ~~
C d
a
A
eo 6+ ~ ~i ..
p ~7' b o ~ R. ?•
222555
~, g ~• ~
. ~~s°p~ M~~~ c 5
..
~x ~~b
~~.
°e ~x
p "~
~~6 ~~v ~.
~ ~
n ~ ~S.a~
..
S.' M ~ w
ro~~, ~'$~
~~~~~'~
a
~. P
~j- v
~qp ~• ~, o ~p
00 ~,~ C.p~ ~•.. a•
d a' F'n
M ~ C
O °1
a
~~~~8~ ~
~ ~~~.~~~
.~~~,~
~~~~~~~~
~~'~ ~ ~~
~~x
a ~5n ~"o
o F .+
~ ~' ~ ~
~Pi'B'b w
~'~~o
r. `,
~. ~ -
~~;
~°~~~
~,
s
~. a
~ ~- ~ n
~~~~~~ ~n~~~; ~~~~~n ~~
s~ ~ ~ -erg a
~.
~ ~~ ~ ~~. $ ~ o ~
~ ~~~ ~
e~'~~
~$
a ~°,
;~
r
as
F A
a s
e a'
~~
rn
0
~ ~~~ ~w ~ ~~~ ~ ~ fi~,s~s m ~~~~~
D? jiN 7 ~ f~A? ~ Y rn' ~~
~w~~~~$~~d~ ~~~~~~ ~p~~
~~
~. y ~ ~ ~
~o
~~ ~~~' "
V
r ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ,~
~~.~ ~~~,
~~ ~~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~
~~
~~
~~ °~~
,b 41 ni4~ ~ N~~ ~.~
`~ ~ w
~~ ~ ~
ov 5
~l~
V V
~~
-_ m mJl
~~~~~~~
~a ~~
~ ~.e~
i~~
A
O
d
dog ~~
m ~. „ „ C'
c'3 ~ ~' ~CS+ G ~ r ~
~ ~ ~Oa M
V•
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~
.~
~~. ~ ~,~~
~~~ ~~~
~, ~ a.
o~~ o~ ~~~
M ~ q q,
Ck ~A~~~ p O i~•~~ ~~Om
~ ~ O~ ~ ~.gm~.
~~.
.. ~ ~:
~~ ~~ ~ ~
~~~~.
~ ~~rt ~~a~
W
n
O ~,
a~
~ ~.~ ~ ~
a
ti
~~~
aaab~~
o ~~~ ~~.
~.~ ~ Y O
~' ~ ~ ~ 1~
~ ~~
qg~r
51
yCy M^
M ~ $ F
O ~
~~
~ ~~ ~.~
~.
~~ m
.~i
~~~~ s
~~
., c.... ~ ~. ~ b c. ..
g~~~ ~~~~~~~s~~~~~ ~c.~~ac~~ ~~ ~~
~n o ro m ro n _
S ~ w ~ ~~..,0 moo, 06'~ ~ dEc~
~ R' ~s ~ ~~ ~~ q
~x ~x ^a
° ~~ ~~~
,~ ~' ~~ ~p
C O C
C ~
w
D ~~n ~ y 'd
< ~ ss ~ ~~,•~° .dam ro~ ~ro
g .. ~$ °~ m S i g m
~g c.•~
S ~ ~~
..
A ~~ ~~~ $~
~
~ ~~' s~~
~
~
s
sM
V, ~ y
y~ ~~bg'~
v
y ~ "" ~ "
I
.~~ ~~~~
i ~ °°b~~
~: ~ ~ ~ ~.
y ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i
~ '
'd ~ ;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C
~ °° ~ °~ ~ ~
w F' `" ,
s s~
~ ~ ~
~~' ~~~~
~~ ro~
~ ~~~
~~~~
..
O ~ ~i C $Af ~yy
J ~ ~ ti
w S
~°
~~~c~ ~$~~~.~g~~
~g~cn~ ~~~~~•~~~
k~
m ~~~~ ~
w~~
~ '~ ° -`
~ ~,~~~~:
m ~~~~#
~ ~~.~
~~
~.
n
n
Sao
. ~ ~,,
~~
~ ~.
:~~
,~
~,
~~
a~
"~ ~~.
b
m
b 1
~~
~~~
~'•
8
y 'ate p.4QP~,~~~ ~p ~.
y Y ~ O ~ to ~ 7K~~~bb
O
~~
~ ~
gyp, ~ ~ $ ~ _~-~--
e_~ ~
a o
q
~ ~~
d
O
ti
d
Yo ~~ a
~~ ~x~~~ ~~ g'
~ ~~~~~~
~~~~ $~~~
~~
~~
~~~
~~
~:~ ~.~ .
a w ~
~,
~o
.~
~i
a ~~ ~ ~~
w ~ ~ ~.
k~~~~~~~~~ A .$
~ ~~~
b_
~~ ~~~
.~
~~
.~ ro
~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
..
~° ~
~~~ ~
~ yp A
~~ ~~~
~g "
~~~~. o
~~
~--
s. ~'
w4tS °„
.~ ~~
a
N
d
~ ~
~ ~ w A a F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O .
'-..
~ C
c. a ~ ° c. o #• ~ o
~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~k ~~•5 ~
~'4 ~ (gyp e
^'
ffOdd ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ ~~ ZO m ... oe o f0
~, ~.~~ Ox ~
L" ~ ~ ~
W~ O P~
M Mp
fA~
~ c
g
{/~ OQ A
~. ~ W
~ N
a.
g' ~
~ ~° `<
x ~x dx ~x ~~'~~
'~ ~ ~s '~
~
A
s~~~o~ ~ ~~~~ssa-°-'~-~- ~~a e~ ~
s , ,~ .. ~,
CO 5'cae aCtl c c a~ ~•g.aa7 "o ~ 9•~'°'by ~ a~ ~C~C+f ~d
fff~~~7
~~ de~
7
o S p
d~ ~ ~ pp p
b~ P
~ ~
A~
a
,
,y m ~
y ~
m
y
~+ r
.
+ O
. ~
N
w
m
~_
o~
.+
~'
7
C!
d
N
O
a
gi
Attachment 9