HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 2054 RESOLUTION NO.2054
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SARATOGA REVERSING A DECISION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROV-
ING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A-854
WHEREAS, the applicants, Eugene and Jane Zambetti, have
requested Design Review Approval to construct a single story
family dwelling; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 1983 the Planning Commission held
a public hearing on applicant's request for Design Review Approval
and after said public hearing denied said request; and
WHEREAS, applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's
decision to the City Council pursuant to Section 17.7 of the Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1983 the City Council held a de novo
public hearing and after the closing of said public hearing re-
viewed and considered the applicant's request, staff reports, and
other evidence, both written and oral, presented to the Council
during said public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Saratoga
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. The applicant's appeal from the Planning Commission
is granted and the decision of the Planning Commission is over-
ruled.
2. Design Review for A-854 is hereby approved, per the
findings and conditions of the Staff Report dated February 10,
1983, amended by the City Council on April 6, 1983 to include the
condition that the roof shall be reduced to an 8 in 12 pitch. A
copy of said Staff Report is attached hereto.
This approval was granted at a meeting of the City Council
on April 6, 1983 with an unanimous vote by Councilmembers Callon,
Clevenger, Fanelli, Mallory and Moyles.
The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Saratoga
held on the 20th day of April, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Clevenger, Fanelli, MoylesandMayorProTe~Mallory
NOES: None
ABSENT:Mayor Callon
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
C'iTy~'CL~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
, Amended 4/6/83
DATE: 2/10/83
Commission Meeting: 2/23/83
SUBJECT: A-854, Eugene & Jane Zambetti, 20680 Marion Road
REQUEST: Design Review approval to construct a single story
family dwelling.
OTHER APPROVAL REQUIRED: None
PLANNING DATA:
PARCEL SIZE: 23,120' sq. ft. '
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONING: R-1-12,500 / NOTICING: Notice of this project has
": been sent to surrounding property owners,
posted on site and advertised in the
Saratoga News.
SITE DATA:
SURROUNDING LAND USES: Single family residential
SITE SLOPE: 4% SLOPE AT BUILDING SITE: 2%
NATURAL FEATURES & VEGETATION: The majority of the site is re-
latively level. A drainage swale passes through the rear of the
property. Five (5) oaks and a bay tree are also located in the
rear of the property.
PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS:
HISTORY: This site contains the Judge Foster home which will be
moved to the Village (Parking District #4) to be used as an office
building. This site is the second site to be developed of a two
lot subdivision (SDR-1473).
Report to Planning Commission Page 2
A-854, Eugene Zambetti 2/10/83
GRADING REQUIRED: Minimal grading is required
SETBACKS: Front: 33' Rear: 53' Sides: 10'
HEIGHT: 29'6"
SIZE OF STRUCTURE: 3,368 sq. ft. Garage: 640 sq. ft.
Greenhouse: 210 sq. ft. Total: 4,218 sq. ft.
ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 4,000 sq. ft. This proposal exceeds the
standard allowed by 218 sq. ft.
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 33% proposed, 55% is allowed by ordinance.
COLORS & MATERIALS: Dark grey stucco & brick proposed for the exterior.
roofing materials-heavy shake
SOLAR: good orientation, greenhouse structures are incorporated into
the house design which creates a passive system. The pitch of the
roof will also allow utilization of solar panels.
LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING: A landscaping plan has been provided with this
application. It indicates evergreen shrubs and native ground cover to
be planted to the front and along the sides of the proposed structure.
The rear yard area is to remain as existing. '-
RELATIONSHIP WITH ADJACENT STRUCTURES: Marion Road contains a mixture
of historical structures and one and two story newer structures. The
adjacent dwelling to the right is a two story historical structure and
the site adjacent on the left has approval for a two-story structure.
The proposed structure appears to be compatible with the surrounding
dwellings in terms of both"its country-like design and steep pitched
hip-style shake roof. "'
PRIVACY IMPACTS: The one-story structure as proposed will not impose
any new privacy impacts.
DRIVEWAY & CIRCULATION: An access road is proposed along the northern
property line lea~ing to a side facing garage toward the rear of the
structure.
FINDINGS:
1. Avoid Unreasonable Interference with Views & Privacy
The proposed structure will not impose privacy impacts, as the
structure is one-story in design. Staff noted no impacts to
the viewshed of adjoining properties.
2. Preserve Natural Landscape
The proposed structure although substanitally larger, will be
placed in the same location as the existing structure, on the
relatively level area of the site. The drainage swale and
ordinance sized oaks to the rear of the property will not be
Report to Planning Commission Page 3
A-854, Eugene Zambetti 2/10/83
impacted with this proposal.
3. Minimize Perception of Excessive Bulk & Compatible Bulk & Height
The proposed structure will appear larger than the adjacent
structures at the end of Marion Road. However, staff does not
feel that the bulk of the structure is excessive because there
are other dwellings on Marion Road which appear to be of similar
size and height. In addition, the approved structure on the
adjacent parcel to the left is a two story structure of similar
size and height as the proposed structure.
4. Infills: Compatability, Views, Privacy, & Natural Features
The proposed structure will be compatible in terms of bulk with
the adjacent approved structure to the left and with other
dwellings on Marion Road. The proposed structure will not
obstruct views or impose privacy impacts and does incorporate
the natural features of the site.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve per staff report dated 2/10/83 and Exhibits
"B", "C" & "D" subject to the following conditions:
A. Prior to issuance of building permits:
1. Detailed grading and drainage plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the community Development Department.
2. Any minor modifications to the approved elevations shall
require the review and approval of the Permit Review
Division.
* 3. Roof shall be reduced to an 8 in 12 pitch.
Approved: ~ ~~~ .
Sharon Lest~
Planner
SL/bjc
P.C. Agenda 2/23/83
*amended by City Council 4/6/83.