Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 2698 RESOLUTION NO. 2698 RESOLUTION OF THI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAI~TOGA UPHOLDING A DECISION OF THE PL~d~NING COI~ISSION WHEREAS, Larry Birenbaum and Jan Birenbaum, the applicants, have applied to the City of Saratoga for tentative building site approval and design review approval to construct a new single family residence upon an existing lot of record located at 20052 Sunset Drive, such applications being identified as SD-88-019 and DR-90-050, and WHEREAS, on August 22, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga conducted a public hearing on said applications, and following the conclusion thereof, the Planning Commission approved the applications, and WHEREAS, Alan Giberson and Meg Giberson have appealed the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, and WHEREAS, on October 17, 1990, December 5, 1990, and December 19, 1990, the City Council conducted a de novo public hearing on the appeal, at which time any person interested in the matter was given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the staff reports, minutes of proceedings conducted by the Planning Commission relating to said applications, and the written and oral evidence presented to the City Council in support of and in opposition to the appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Saratoga as follows: 1. The appeal from the Planning Commission is hereby denied and the decision of the Planning Commission is affirmed, subject to the following modifications: (a) The home and swimming pool shall be relocated as shown on the revised site plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. Although such relocations will increase the quantity of cut and fill for the project, the increased grading is justified as part of a mitigation measure to reduce the visual impact of the home and avoid placement of the swimming pool at a location having an average slope in excess of 30%. (b) Any retaining wall having a height in excess of 3 feet shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director and shall be screened by landscaping, as directed or approved by the Planning Director. 2. With the modifications specified above, the City Council is able to make all of the findings required for granting tentative building site approval and design review approval, for the same reasons as set forth in the Staff Report to the City Council dated October 17, 1990, and Resolutions No. SD-88-019 and DR'90- 050, adopted by the Planning Commission on August 22, 1990, and 'said Staff Report and Resolutions are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. 3. Except as modified herein, all of the conditions of approval as contained in Resolution No. SD-88-019 and Resolution No. DR- 90-050, adopted by the Planning Commission on August 22, 1990, shall remain in full force and effect. 4. In recognition of the desire by the City Council that no additional properties be allowed to utilize the private easement from Sunset Drive as a regular means of access, the applicants shall sign an agreement with the City wherein the applicants shall promise: (a) Not to grant an access easement over their property to any other person, without such easement having first been approved by the Saratoga City Council; and (b) Not to assign or otherwise transfer to any other person the right to use the private easement from Sunset Drive as a means of access, without prior approval of such assignment having been granted by the Saratoga City Council and by each of the owners of the properties identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 510-26-001, commonly known as 19930 Sunset Drive, and Assessor's Parcel Number 510-26-005, commonly known as 15561 Glen Una Drive. Such agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Santa Clara County Recorder and shall constitute a restrictive covenant running with the land. 5. In the event the City approves an extension of Sunset Drive which provides access to City standards for the subject property, the subject property shall take access from such extended street if at that time the City Council determines that such access is most appropriate, and use of the private easement as a means of access shall be discontinued. This requirement shall be incorporated into the agreement to be executed and recorded by the applicants pursuant to paragraph 4 above and shall similarly constitute a covenant running with the land. The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Saratoga City Council at a meeting held on the 19th day of December, 1990, by 'the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Anderson, Clevenger, Kohler, and Monia NOES: Mayor Stutzman ABSENT: None ~ Mayor ~ ATTEST: Deputy City