Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-12-2001 Planning Commission PacketCITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MINUTES DATE: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Garakani, Jackman, Hunter, Kurasch, Roupe, and Zutshi ABSENT: Director Sullivan and Chair Barry STAFF: Planners Knapp and Livingstone PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES -Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of August 22, 2001 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda The lawgenerally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staf f accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staf f. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on September 6, 2001. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PACKET CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communication should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. 1. DR-O1-013, V-O1-013 &z AS-O1-001 (397-43-001 &~ -003) - JAIN, 18630 Allendale; - Request for Design Review approval to construct a new single-story 6,850 square foot residence and sport court. The Variance is to construct the sport court within the side yard setback. Maximum height of the residence would be 26 feet. The 93,175 (net) square foot lot is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (KNAPP) (CONTINUED TO 9/26/01) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 2. DR-O1-017 Fst UP-O1-012 (397-24-86) - PETERSCHMIDT, 18870 Hayfield Court; - Request for Design Review approval to construct a new single-story 2,427 square foot residence with a 720 square foot detached garage for a total of 3,147 square feet. Maximum height of the residence would be 18 feet. The garage would be 15 feet in height. The 60,396 (net) square foot lot (62,746 gross sq. ft.) is located in the R-1-20,000 zoning district. (KNAPP) (APPROVED 6-0) 3. DR-O1-033 (397-18-071) - HULME,14900 Baranga Lane; -Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 6,000 square foot two-story residence with a 2,700 square foot basement, and demolish an existing 4,336 square foot residence. Maximum height of the structure will be 26 feet. The 55,757 square foot parcel is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) (APPROVED 6-0) 4. UP-O1-007 SPRINT, Saratoga Los Gatos Road ~ Farwell Avenue; -Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a wireless communication facility consisting of antennas and equipment cabinets in the Caltrans right-of-way. The site is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) (CONTINUED FROM 8/22/01) (6-0 TO BE CONTINUED TO 10/10/Ol) DIRECTOR ITEMS COMMISSION ITEMS COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT AT 8:45 TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, September 26, 2001 Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION LAND USE AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, September 11, 2001- 3:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Land Use Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. DR-O1-033 - HULME Item 3 14900 Baranga Lane 2. DR-O1-017 &r U~-O1-012 - PETERSCHMIDT Item 2 18870 Hayfield Court LAND USE COMMITTEE The Land Use Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties which are new items on the Planning Commission agenda. The site visits are held Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m. It is not necessary for the applicant to be present, but you are invited to join the Committee at the site visit to answer any questions which may arise. Site visits are generally short (5 to 10 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the public hearing. Please contact staff Tuesday morning for an estimated time of the site visit. • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Garakani, Jackman, Hunter, Kurasch, Roupe, Zutshi and Chair Barry PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES -Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of August 22, 2001 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on manors not on this agrnda The lawgencrallyprohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission dircction to Staff REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on September 6, 2001. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PACKET CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS All interested persons may appeaz and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public heazing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Sazatoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communication should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. 1. DR-O1-013, V-O1-013 Est AS-O1-001 (397-43-001 &r -003) - JAIN, 18630 Allendale; - Request for Design Review approval to construct a new single-story 6,850 square foot residence and sport court. The Variance is to construct the sport court within the side yazd setback. Maximum height of the residence would be 26 feet. The 93,175 (net) squaze foot lot is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (KNAPP) (TO BF CONTINUED TO 9/26/OI) PIANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 2. DR-O1-017 &r UP-O1-012 397-24-86 - PETERSCHMIDT 18870 Ha field Court• - • ( ) y , Request for Design Review approval to construct a new single-story 2,427 square foot residence with a 720 square foot detached garage for a total of 3,147 square feet. Maximum height of the residence would be 18 feet.. The garage would be 15 feet in height. The 60,396 (net) square foot lot (62,746 gross sq. ft.) is located in the R-1-20,000 zoning district. (KNAPP) 3. DR-O1-033- (397-18-071) - HULME,14900 Baranga Lane; -Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 6,000 square foot two-story residence with a 2,700 square foot basement, and demolish an existing 4,336 square foot residence. Maximum height of the structure will be 26 feet. The 55,757 square foot parcel is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) 4. UP-O1-007 SPRINT, Saratoga Los Gatos Road &r Farwell Avenue; -Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a wireless communication facility consisting of antennas and equipment cabinets in the Caltrans right-of-way. The site is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) (CONTINUED FROM 8/22/01) DIRECTOR ITEMS COMMISSION ITEMS COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, September 26, 2001 Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA J.. 1_, MINUTES u U u U SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Barry called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Barry, Hunter, Jackman, Roupe and Zutshi Absent: Commissioners Garakani and Kurasch Staff: Director Tom Sullivan and Associate Planner John Livingstone APPROVAL OF MINUTES -Regular Meeting of August 8, 2001. As there was not a quorum available this evening of those Commissioners that were also in attendance at the August 8, 2001, meeting, approval of the minutes of that meeting was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 12, 2001. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director Tom Sullivan announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this - meeting was properly posted on August 16, 2001. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PACKET Director Sullivan advised that there were two copies of page 8 in the Draft Housing Element. CONSENT CALENDAR • RESOLUTION FOR V-O1-007 (386-18-003) - NGUYEN, 1821 Kosich Drive: Request for Variance approval to construct anew 439 square foot garage in the rear yard setback approximately five feet from the rear property line. The proposed garage will be attached to the existing single-story house. Maximum height of the structure will be 12 feet 11 inches. The 10,788 square foot parcel is located in the R-1-10,000 zoning district. Staff has prepared a resolution with findings approving-this variance. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 2 Request for Variance approval to construct an addition into the required exterior side yard setback. The proposed side yard setback addition would intrude 13 feet into the required 25-foot exterior side yard setback facing Kosich Drive. The 10,788 square foot parcel is located in the R-1-10,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) Staff has prepared a resolution with findings denying this variance Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Jackman, the Consent Calendar was approved. AYES:Barry, Hunter, Jackman, Roupe and Zutshi. NOES: None ABSENT: Garakani and Kurasch ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO. 1 UP-O1-007 -SPRINT, Saratoga-Los Gatos road and Farwell Avenue: Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a wireless communications facility consisting of antennas and equipment cabinets in the Caltrans right-of--way. The site is located in the R-1-40,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) Mr. John Livingstone, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: • Said that the applicant is seeking a Use Permit approval to allow the installation of four antennas. Three of the antennas would become a part of a newly installed light pole and the fourth a small GPS on the exterior. The new antennas would be inside the top of this pole at 23 feet in height and will look like an extension of the light pole and be painted to match. An equipment cabinet will be placed underground. • Stated that as a part of this installation, the applicant will install a new bus stop with two benches. The light fixture will serve two functions, providing a place to install the antennas as well as providing security lighting for the bus stop. • Added that the applicants will landscape the bus stop area in a manner similar to other bus stops located along Saratoga-Los Gatos Road. A built up mound area will be planted with materials including rosemary, California fuscia and other drought tolerant and flowering plants. • Said that this project will help contribute to the aesthetics of the area and will create a deterrent for the illegal dumping that current occurs on this site. • Advised that staff is recommending approval. Chair Barry asked why previous applications have not incorporated underground placement of the equipment cabinets. Mr. John Livingstone answered that the applicant is proposing such an installation because of aesthetics and the fact that it looks better. Chair Barry stated that the Commission was not aware that it was possible and again asked why such a • proposal has not been brought forward in the past. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 3 Director Tom Sullivan advised that the current new staff couldn't answer that question. Commissioner Hunter questioned whether the proposed landscaping mound might be too small. Director Tom Sullivan pointed out that the landscaping mound would actually be 60 feet wide. Commissioner Jackman asked if there would be a pedestrian walkway. Associate Planner Livingstone replied that the existing path would be retained. Commissioner Roupe: 1. Stated that this proposal would establish a precedent. 2. Added that while he is strongly in favor of beautifying the area, this proposal will be the first to include benches and lighting at a bus stop. 3. Continued to state that street lighting may not necessarily be a positive thing and may actually be counter to what the City has done in the past. 4. Cautioned that the Commission must consider long-term ramifications. 5. Said that the Commission has traditionally encouraged placement of antennas on existing facilities such as power poles. 6. Inquired why this applicant is not following the previous practice requiring innocuous installation of these antennas. Chair Barry expressed her agreement with Commission Roupe's comments. Director Sullivan suggested that the proposed findings could be amended to narrow the action, stating that the installation is approved in this manner only because the area is in need of beautification and not to establish a precedent City wide. Commissioner Jackman asked whether there are buses at night on this route. Director Sullivan replied that he was not certain of the specific bus schedule. Commissioner Jackman said that if the bus runs at night, she would support having a light there. Commissioner Roupe pointed out that there are 15 other bus stops along this road, none of which is lighted. Added that he would hate to make lighting of bus stops a determining factor. Associate Planner Livingstone suggested that the light itself could be removed. Commissioner Hunter said that the light could serve as a safety feature. Mr. Ivan T. Young, Sprint Representative: 1. Clarified that the proposal to underground the equipment cabinet is for the aesthetics since this site is on a scenic corridor. • 2. Responded that he cannot say why other providers do not incorporate underground equipment cabinets but said that such installations are more expensive. 3. Said that they would be landscaping an area 22 by 60 feet. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 4 4. Agreed that there are no lights at the other bus stops but that having one would serve a functional benefit in providing safety at night. Commissioner Roupe asked for verification that there is no radiation impact with a traditional installation. Mr. Ivan T. Young replied that Commissioner Roupe is correct. Added that the main objective of this installation is to provide reliable coverage along this route. Commissioner Roupe expressed doubt that coverage would be adversely impacted if the antenna were placed about 30 feet higher. Mr. Mark Neuman, Sprint's Consulting Engineer, stated that there are functional benefits to lower the antenna placement and locating them closer to the road. Mr. Rakesh Sethi, 14930 Farville Avenue, Saratoga: 1. Pointed out that he just learned of this proposed antenna installation near his home two weeks ago. 2. Declared his concern over the safety of his family, including two children, as they live within 50 to 75 feet of this project site. Specifically he is concerned with cancer risks from both farfield and nearfield effects. 3. Identified himself as an engineer and said that he has begun researching the hazards. 4. Advised that there is data in the scientific community that evaluates the impacts of powerful antennas. 5. Added that the need for placement of the equipment underground is simply because the equipment generates 96 decibels of sound. 6. Asked what happens if there is equipment failure or about the potentials of property value impacts since this structure will be an eyesore. 7. Added his concerns over the impacts on groundwater. 8. Questioned the placement of the antennas at 23 feet instead of 100. 9. Asked for the time to build a case against this proposal and declared that he needs access to documents. 10. Said that he himself sells high technology. 11. Opined that the only reason so few of his neighbors are present is because they probably just threw the meeting notification letter into the trash. Chair Barry: • Stated that she is serving her second year on the Commission and that on a number of occasions Commissioners have been concerned about the unknowns over antennas. • Advised that per the counsel of the City Attorney the City has no jurisdiction to prevent the installation of antennas solely on concerns for potential health hazards. Such concerns cannot be a basis for denial. • Suggested that Mr. Sethi provide his research information to the City Attorney. • Pointed out that data will be taken from this site each month after installation. • Opined that this is the wrong location and the antennas are too close. Commissioner Roupe reiterated that Federal law precludes the Commission from denying an antenna • application based solely on health concerns as long as the application meets the standards set for electromagnetic safety. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 5 • Mr. Sethi countered that the lowered height is an aesthetic issue. Commissioner Jackman told Mr. Sethi that she would be interested in reviewing the studies he finds. Commissioner Zutshi asked Mr. Sethi what his recommendation might be for an alternate placement. Mr. Sethi replied that he had ideas. Pointed out that the danger zone is a $.5 radius. Added that there is 50 feet more space available further from residences. Commissioner Roupe restated that the antenna placements have typically been made on power poles and are not intrusive. Mr. Sethi concurred that above 50 to 60 foot level is better but that the proposed 23-foot height is not safe. Commissioner Roupe countered by saying that the existing power poles are not that high but that this height generally suffices. Chair Barry asked the applicant why the 23 foot height was chosen. Mr. Ivan T. Young replied that the placement was made to provide optimal coverage in the Farville, • Fruitvale and Glen Una area. Added that they looked carefully for a good location that offers some setback from the nearest home. Chair Barry again asked for explanation for the 23 foot height. Mr. Ivan T. Young replied that the height was selected to best cover Saratoga-Los Gatos Road and besides they thought that a higher placement would be found to be less aesthetically pleasing. Disagreed with Mr. Sethi's comment that the sound level of the equipment will be 98 decibels. Pointed out that per the report, the sound will be 61 decibels and the equipment is being placed 12 feet below grade within a concrete enclosure so that no sound will be heard. Commissioner Zutshi asked if this is an ideal location or would another location further from residences work just as well. Mr. Ivan T. Young replied that this location is the furthest from any residences. Commissioner Roupe again stated that the City typically opposes lighting on streets except for major intersection areas. This proposal is a precedent setting in installing this streetlight. Pointed out that the City guidelines support retention of a rural atmosphere. Director Sullivan reminded that this streetlight would be situated on a State highway where passengers are getting on and off buses on Highway 9. Commissioner Roupe pointed out that this is not an excessively used bus stop. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 6 Chair Barry pointed out that the General Plan calls out for rural areas without sidewalks and streetlights. Said that there are contradictory reasons why lights are not wanted. Director Sullivan said that without a light, this installation would simply become a monopole. Chair Barry suggested that the applicant be asked to come back with an installation that does not include a light feature. Commissioner Roupe suggested that the applicants find a way to place their antennas on an existing utility pole instead as there are lots of them in the area. Director Sullivan suggested a continuance to September 12`h with the request that the applicant look at existing poles in the area for an alternative installation to that proposed. Commissioner Roupe agreed that this is his general inclination although he hates to lose the beautification of the proposed added landscaping. However, he said it was not necessary to solve both issues at one time. The need for the beautification of this area can be brought to the City in another forum. Commissioner Zutshi pointed out that local residents beautifully landscaped another local area. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Roupe, seconded by Commissioner Jackman, the Commission continued consideration of UP-O1-007 for a Use Permit to construct a wireless communication facility consisting of antennas and equipment cabinets in the Caltrans right-of--way on Saratoga-Los Gatos Road near Farwell Avenue to its meeting on September 12, 2001, with the instructions that the applicant: 1. Look at alternate sites using an existing structure for the placement of its antennas, 2. Explain alternatives to the lowered height and/or 3. Offer creative solutions to a pole without a light. AYES:Barry, Hunter, Jackman, Roupe and Zutshi. NOES: None ABSENT: Garakani and Kurasch ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Hunter expressed her appreciation for the leadership of the more experienced Commissioners in leading this complicated discussion. *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.2 V-O1-010 (517-20-034) - TIMMONS, 20200 Mendolsohn Lane: Request for a Variance approval to construct an approximate eight foot tall sound wall in the front yard setback across the front of the property, where three feet in height is normally required. The site is located in the R-1-20,000 zoning district. (LIVINGSTONE) Mr. John Livingstone, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: Sazatoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 7 • 2. Advised that the applicant is seeking a variance to allow a 6 to 8-foot high fence within the required 30-foot front yard setback area. 3. Said that the Commissioners are required to make three findings m order to approve this variance. 4. Pointed out that staff could not make these findings. There aze no special circumstances since the applicant has the option to locate a fence elsewhere on this property without need of a variance. Added that should this variance be approved, it would be difficult not to approve the same variance for the neighbors. Approval would set a precedent. Staff finds that approval would be the granting of a special privilege. 5. Advised that staff is recommending denial. Mr. John Lien, Applicant: • Said that he has processed several variance applications and believes that the three required findings can be made in this case. • Pointed out that he seazched for a similar road configuration situation and didn't find one and that this property faces onto a highway, which has negative impacts so that sound walls aze warranted. • Said that the sound wall they propose is unobtrusive and that existing four-foot high landscaping will obscure most of it with only about two feet being visible behind the landscaping. The wall will go from eight feet to six feet in height and all existing landscaping will be retained. • Advised that there is already aseven-foot high sound wall directly across Highway 9 from this property. • Said that the issue of street geometry exists that is specific to this property and occurs nowhere else in the City of Sazatoga. • Said that this wall will actually improve the safety of the area and that anoff-street azea will be provided so that cars aze off the street when in the drive before the gate. Commissioner Roupe sought assurance that proper pier and beam foundations will be used to protect mature trees that might be impacted by the construction of this wall. Mr. John Lien said that such protection would occur. Chair Barry opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2 at 8:05 p.m. Ms. Azar Lohrasbpour, 20160 Mendelsohn, Sazatoga: • Identified herself as a neighbor two doors down. • Said that she sympathizes with the neighbor and that the other properties on this street are smaller and closer to Highway 9. • Expressed concern with drainage and the fact that this wall will separate the owners from this problem and therefore reduce their willingness to address it. • Added that such a wall will change the look of this neighborhood, where a number of owners have lately been spending $100,000's to improve their homes. • Said that this home is further from Highway 9 than is the home across Highway 9. • Expressed opposition for this variance and requested denial, suggesting that the applicants install more landscaping to buffer against noise. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 8 Mr. John Lien said that the basis of the variance is orientation toward Highway 9 and reminded that 2/3 of the wall would be hidden by existing landscaping. Pointed out that the ditch and drainage problem is a City problem not this property owners. Chair Barry closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2 at 8:13 p.m. Commissioner Zutshi expressed concern that allowing this variance will require a similar variance. to be granted to everyone on this street. Commissioner Roupe said that he agreed with Mr. Lien that a special circumstance in geometry exists and therefore this approval would not represent a precedent. Pointed out that the property has frontage onto a major thoroughfare that qualifies as a special circumstance. Commissioner Hunter said that she visited the site yesterday and found that no special circumstance exists. Pointed out that the house on Montalvo with aneight-foot wall is right on the road while this home is on a hill with a large front area. Said that she supports staff recommendation for denial. Commissioner Roupe disagreed and said that about one-third of the frontage is along Saratoga-Los Gatos Road so the required finding can be made. Reminded that only about 1/3 of the wall will be visible from the street due to existing mature landscaping. Chair Barry asked what the impact is if there are other options available to the applicant. Director Sullivan replied that this is the crux of the matter. There are other options available. Chair Barry said that it seems that there are real and good alternatives and that staff has identified the issues pretty strongly. Commissioner Roupe asked what staff means by alternatives. Director Sullivan said that consideration must be made if there is some other option available that would not require issuance of a variance. The stated need from the applicant is to buffer noise from Highway 9. Other solutions are possible including the placement of the wall further into the property beyond the required setback. Commissioner Roupe said that this would result in an obstruction in the middle of the lawn and loss of enjoyment of a larger portion of the property. Commissioner Jackman cautioned that there is potential for quite a few more such variance applications in the future in nearby areas such as Pepper Lane. Expressed her concern about hiding houses behind eight-foot sound walls. Chair Barry said that it appears that there are varied opinions amongst the Commission and asked for a motion. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 9 Motion: Commissioner Roupe motioned for approval of a Variance to allow the installation of a six to eight-foot high sound wall on property located at 20200 Mendelsohn Lane. The motion died for lack of a second. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Jackman, seconded by Commissioner Hunter, the Planning Commission denied a Variance request (V-O1-010) to allow construction of an approximately eight-foot tall sound wall in the front yard setback on property located at 20200 Mendelsohn Lane. AYES:Barry, Hunter, Jackman and Zutshi NOES: Roupe ABSENT: Garakani and Kurasch ABSTAIN: None Chair Barry advised that there is a 15-day appeal period before this action is final. *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.3 GPA-O1-001 (CITYWIDE) -GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT: The 2000 Housing Element update is a comprehensive statement by the City of Saratoga of its current and future housing needs and proposed actions to facilitate the provision of housing to meet those needs at all income levels. The purpose of the Housing Element is to identify current and projected housing needs and set forth goals, policies and programs that address those needs. The Housing Element has been prepared to meet the requirements of State law and local housing objectives. (SULLIVAN) Director Tom Sullivan presented the staff report as follows: • Directed the Commissioners attention to the memo provided by Commissioner Kurasch, which highlights her suggestions. Commissioner Kurasch specifically addresses two programs. For Program 1.2, regarding Mixed Uses, she suggests that particular zones or locations be identified. For Program 2.1, regarding Density Bonuses, a State mandated program, she suggests that Inclusionary Housing be incorporated whereby a certain percentage of BMR units are required. • Added that other cities within the West Valley Area do have such Inclusionary Zoning. Typically used is an In-Lieu Fee. • Said that it is the real desire of the Council not to point at a particular property for low-income housing but rather to spread such housing stock through all parts of the community. • Added that development standards will have to be created. • Said that one possibility is the creation of mixed-use projects with a ratio between commercial and residential that keeps a commercial look. • Advised that it is proposed that Quasi/Public Facilities zoning also be available for mixed-use projects and it is suggested that an additional table similar to Table A be developed for the Housing Element as well as an additional map that shows potential housing areas. Mr. Jeff Goldman, Consultant, Parsons: • Said that upon review, they have found that there is a decreasing level of affordability since the last Housing Element was prepared. Included in that group that cannot afford housing are seniors. The Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 10 goals in the current Housing Element were examined and found to be still valid although the magnitude of the problems has increased. • The five areas of concentration include sharing in the region's future housing needs (ABAG); construction of affordable housing; assisting low income households with housing availability; preservation of existing affordable housing; and promoting Fair Housing opportunities. • Pointed out that key programs to achieve those goals include: • Creating aMixed-Use Overlay zone as a key strategy; • Adopting several changes to the Zoning Ordinance to permit more second units; • Implementing a Density Bonus program; • Working with the Saratoga Retirement Community (formerly Oddfellows); • Implementing stronger First Time Homebuyers Program; • Continuing the Rehab Assistance Program; and • Amending the Zoning Code to designate for emergency shelter and transitional housing (also a State requirement) to identify where such services are permitted. Staff is recommending that the Mixed-Use Overlay Zones be so identified. Chair Barry said that increased property assessments for second units may be a roadblock to constructing those units. Director Sullivan said that this issue has been raised at a recent West Valley Mayors and Managers Meeting. It was suggested that perhaps this is something the State can help with. Additionally, it was suggested that cities contact the County Assessor to discuss this detail. Commissioner Roupe advised that he had a number of typographical and editorial corrections and comments but nothing substantive. Chair Barry: • Said that the preservation of existing housing is an important goal. • Pointed out that there have been a large number of requests to demolish adequate to lovely homes to allow for the construction of newer and larger ones. • Asked if there is a precedent to set conditions for such action such as requiring the owner to live for some period of time within a house before permitting its demolition. • Added that this could help to preserve some of the moderate housing stock. Director Sullivan said that a number of cities have sound Housing Preservation Programs. While the City cannot prohibit demolition, it can establish findings necessary to allow demolition. Commissioner Zutshi asked for criteria for the First Time Homebuyers Assistance Programs. Mr. Jeff Goldman: • Said that the criteria are income. • Identified the Income Level categories: • Low to Very Low Income equals no more than 80 percent of the Median County income. • Moderate Income allows up to 120 percent of Median County income. • Mid-Income allows up to 150 percent of the Median County income. • Added that there are limits on the prices and types of homes based on the median housing price in the County. Sazatoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 11 • Suggested that ways of providing such assistance includes: • Silent Second Loans that help bolster the down payment. No repayment is required until the home is sold. • Below Market Rate interest rates. Commissioner Zutshi asked if there is a limit to the percentage of house cost. Mr. Jeff Goldman cautioned that details on such criteria aze not included in the Housing Element and that the City would probably work within existing programs. Director Sullivan agreed that the City's best means of providing such assistance is to help support existing programs. Commissioner Zutshi asked how one qualifies for Rehab funds. Mr. Jeff Goldman replied that the criteria is much the same as for the First Time Homebuyers Program he previously outlined. The applicants are typically of low income. The types of repairs eligible aze for health and safety rather than aesthetic remodeling. There is a cap on the amount available per unit. Commissioner Zutshi asked how residents learn about the availability of Rehab funds. Director Sullivan replied through advertising. Cautioned that there is more demand than money available. Gave the example that current Block Grant Funds aze being used to hook homes up to sewer. Mr. Jeff Goldman informed that there is no one specific azea or concentration within Sazatoga requiring rehab. The need is interspersed within the community. Commissioner Jackman expressed concern about the high cost of assisting with moderate-income housing. Questioned how such assistance can be handled. Director Sullivan pointed out that this is why the Mixed-Use Zoning is proposed so that smaller lot projects can be developed providing more housing units. Said that the Housing Element is as broad and all encompassing as possible. Mr. Jeff Goldman said that with aMixed-Use designation, it would be possible to find afor-profit or non-profit developer to construct these projects. Director Sullivan said that neighboring communities have some mixed-use projects that could become a model. Chair Barry asked Director Sullivan if it would be possible to obtain sketches of the Cupertino mixed- use project. Mr. Jeff Goldman said that there aze a number of good examples of mixed-use developments and it would not be difficult to obtain information. Director Sullivan pointed out that the City of Campbell has some mixed-use projects too. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 12 Chair Barry said that there is lots of interest within the community and it would be helpful to see what , such projects can look like. Mr. Jeff Goldman suggested that the Commissioners look at a web site (bridgehousing.com) to see some positive examples of mixed-use projects. Commissioner Jackman said that a good sales job would have to be done to obtain support for affordable housing. Residents will have to be convinced that such housing stock will not turn their neighborhood into a slum. Pointed out that she could not afford to buy her own house in today's market. Chair Barry opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Ms. Muriel Marr: • Said that she herself obtained some CDBG money a number of years ago. • Advised that she has resided in Saratoga since 1955, living in her third Saratoga home today. • Asked if existing second units will be counted as new housing although they are already occupied • Added that this housing is not new stock. • Suggested that only new second units be counted toward the State goal. • Questioned the definition of remodel versus new construction. It appears that oftentimes only a small wall is retained and that project is still considered a remodel versus a new home. • Supported the retention and preservation of existing housing. • Encouraged the placement of housing above and behind retail. Director Sullivan: • Informed that there will be amnesty for existing second units. Of the 539 units assigned by ABAG, 20 units will come from amnesty for existing second units that will be legalized. • Said that a streamlined permit process, perhaps using an Administrative Hearing will govern new secondary living units. Mr. Jeff Goldman clarified that of the existing second units, the only ones that can be counted against the 539 ABAG allotment are those that were illegal that were legalized. Ms. Muriel Marr cautioned that some of these units are awfully substandard. Director Sullivan clarified that the standard for a remodel versus new construction is that if over 50 percent of the home is demolished, the project is considered to be new construction. Ms. Marge Bunyard: • Declared that the League of Women Voters has urged mixed-use housing for years. • Suggested that the Planning Commission should try to educate the public about low-income housing. • Expressed appreciation for the hard-work done by the Planning Commission. Mr. John Marjory, 12258 Kirkwood Drive, Sarato a: g • Advised that he has resided in Saratoga since 1967. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 13 • • Said that while he likes some of the ideas, he is opposed to the Housing Element. • Said that the Housing Element is a series of requirements rather than guidelines. The goals are unreasonable and unrealistic. • Said that the real issue is density and not low-cost housing. • Cautioned that jobs and overpopulation are creating problems and must be controlled as they add to congestion and pollution. • Said that many areas of concentration in the Housing Element do not apply including use of Housing Fairs and the issue of the homeless. • Questioned what represents "fair share." Director Sullivan replied that fair share is determined by two State agencies, the Department of Finance and the Department of Housing and Community Development. These agencies project growth. ABAG has the State mandate to take the regions and divide the future housing needs into regional shares or allotments. The income groups include very low, low, moderate and above moderate. Commissioner Jackman advised that the methodology is outlined in page 53. Mr. Jeff Goldman pointed out that State Law considers a number of criteria including market demand, employment trends, etc. There is a mathematical formula that is intended over time to adjust the differences between income groups in each community so that they are more even dispersed. Chair Barry advised Mr. Marjory that he is not the only one who is unhappy with the ABAG allotment. Added that the City fought the assigned number but lost that fight with the State. Mr. John Marjory: • Suggested that social engineering is the least democratic thing he has heard, calling it "screwy." • Expressed concern that additional housing will create a need for City services. Director Sullivan advised that Commission that he and Mr. Marjory had met on two occasions to discuss the Housing Element Update. Ms. Marge Bunyard said that she did not find the density to be so high. Director Sullivan pointed out that the units constructed since January 1, 1999, are being counted against this 539 allotment. Therefore, 177 units have already been built. There are 10 permits for artist housing and one caretaker's unit at Villa Montalvo. Chair Barry expressed strong support for senior housing, most of it low-cost. Ms. Marge Ottenberg: • Advised that in 1961, her family constructed her 1,750 square foot house at a cost of $28,000. Today that same house could sell for $2 million. • Added that today she is living on Social Security. • Questioned whether her home is counted as low-income or moderate. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 14 Director Sullivan clarified that Ms. Ottenberg's home is considered existing housing. The focus is on new housing stock not existing. Commissioner Roupe asked if an existing home that is demolished and rebuilt is counted as new. Director Sullivan replied yes. Added that there is a formula that takes into consideration the replacement of existing stock as well as vacancies. Commissioner Roupe expressed concern that four of five applications do not result in net housing additions but rather aze teazdowns and rebuilds. Director Sullivan said that there might be exceptions available. Commissioner Roupe asked if a house remodeling less than 50 percent is counted as new housing stock. Director Sullivan replied no. Commissioner Roupe asked if just one stub was left and the house rebuilt would this house count. Director Sullivan replied yes. Added that the City has no problem meeting the above-moderate income units. Mr. Jeff Goldman said that the distinction is how the City can accommodate ABAG's allotment. That means availability of sites. It is not the City's responsibility to guarantee these units get built but just that the possibility exists that the units can be accommodated through zoning. Director Sullivan added that the City prepares an annual report to the State outlining how each Housing Element goal is being implemented. Ms. Sharon Kelkenberg: • Supported the ABAG allotment. • Added that the provision of affordable housing within a community enhances the quality of everyone's life. • Said that creative planning will be needed and that mixed use is the way to achieve this goal. Chair Barry closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3 at 9:30 p.m. Commissioner Roupe reminded that he has redlined typographical and format errors on his draft. Said that he would have no problem providing this information to staff following the meeting. Asked for more information about Inclusionary Housing, specifically page five, item 29, last pazagraph, whereas projects with more than five units are required to provide affordable housing units. Director Sullivan pointed out that this is a density bonus program. If the developer wants 25 percent density, they must provide some percentage of low cost housing. Mr. Jeff Goldman suggested that this section have some clarifying language added that defines the density bonus provisions. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 15 • Commissioner Jackman: • Said that she will accept the Housing Element as it is although it bothers her to have ABAG telling the City what to do and finds the goals not to be realistic. • Said that the artists' units do not represent real housing and that these units will not improve the low-income housing stock. Director Sullivan pointed out that the artists' units and caretaker's unit are indeed counted as low- income units. Chair Barry reopened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Ms. Muriel Marr suggested that a percentage of new construction costs be charged and allocated to an affordable housing fund. Chair Barry reclosed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Director Sullivan said that this provision is part of the Inclusionary Housing Program in that in-lieu fees can be charged. Mr. Jeff Goldman added that the Inclusionary Housing Program specifies that a percentage of units must be affordable to very low or low-income. An in-lieu fee can be paid instead as an escape clause • to support such housing elsewhere. The actual provisions will depend upon the specific Ordinance adopted. Chair Barry asked how such in-lieu fees would be used. Director Sullivan said that the Inclusionary Housing Program will simply be a statement in the Housing Element. The City will have until July 1, 2001, to develop a specific Ordinance. This Ordinance will be developed between January and July using public hearing process prior to the July deadline. Chair Barry asked why the Inclusionary Housing Program is not in the document. Commissioner Roupe asked staff if there is any reason the City might not want to include it. Mr. Jeff Goldman said that it is not specifically included because no direction, nor specific need, was provided to do so. It was not thought to be a direct necessity to meet the established goals. Commissioner Roupe asked if it is put into the Housing Element, would the City be obligated to pass an Ordinance. Director Sullivan replied no. Said that in the Annual Report to the State, the City would simply provide a reason why it was not accomplished. Mr. Jeff Goldman said that he would further study an Inclusionary Housing Program. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 16 Commissioner Hunter said that she could not support an Inclusionary Housing Program. Suggested that this is a big step and the City should move more slowly on this issue. Chair Barry said that Commissioner Hunter has made a reasonable point. Added that there will be concern in the community. Commissioner Hunter stated that the Housing Element seems to be thorough and spelled out and the City should proceed with it as it is. Director Sullivan clarified that the additions of a map and Quasi-Public Facility zoning for mixed-use projects had already been agreed upon earlier in the hearing. Chair Barry asked if the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance will be sound if not included in the Housing Element. Director Sullivan said that it would not have to be in the Housing Element at the present time but should be added in the future. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Roupe, seconded by Commissioner Hunter, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of GPA-O1-001 to support the General Plan Housing Element Update with the addition of mixed-use projects within Quasi Public zoning districts and a supporting map depicting such zoning areas in the City of Saratoga. AYES:Barry, Hunter, Jackman, Roupe and Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: Garakani and Kurasch ABSTAIN: None Chair Barry thanked staff, the consultant and the audience and advised that this item will be considered by Council. DIRECTOR ITEMS Director Sullivan: • Advised that the City has ordered new microphones for the Commissioners. • Informed that SB910 is now atwo-year bill. • Said that he will be absent for the next meeting on September 12"' and that John Livingstone and Allison Knapp will be assisting the Commission. Chair Barry advised that she too will miss the meeting on September 12th as her son is getting married. She asked Commissioner Jackman to chair that meeting in her place. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Roupe asked staff to conduct some investigation on setbacks for second story additions. Asked that staff return with a recommendation on what is appropriate and objective and whether an Ordinance amendment or policy might be required. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of August 8, 2001 Page 17 Chair Barry advised that Committee assignments will be made as soon as all Planning staff hiring is done. Director Sullivan advised the Commission that with tonight's action on the Housing Element, the Commission has made a big step toward easing the Department's workload. COMMUNICATIONS There were no communication items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Chair Barry adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. to the next regular meeting set for Wednesday, September 12, 2001, to begin at 7 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk • • • City of Saratoga Community Development Department MEMO TO: Planning Commissioners FROM: Kristin Borel DATE: September 6, 2001 RE: 18630 Allendale Avenue, JAIN ITEM 1 This item was scheduled to be heard at .this meeting. Our noticing service, Engineering Data Services, had some problems when transferring the data to their notices, and the square footage for this project was incorrectly stated in the notices that got sent to the neighboring homeowners. The newspaper noticing for this project was correct. I checked with the City Attorney and he felt that due to this error, the project should be re-noticed to the neighborhood, and is therefore scheduled for the next Planning Commission meeting on September 26, 2001. • • • • ITEM 2 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: DR-O1-017 Fst UP-O1-012/18870 Hayfield Court Applicant/Owner: PETERSCHMIDT/KOHLSAAT Staff Planner: Allison Knapp, Contract Planner Date: September 12, 2001 APN: 397-24-86 Department Hea URHAM CT . 1 ~ 8H' CT . \ (\ ~A~ _ SITE /~.i i A \ 4 ;; N ;~ o~ E S ., ~. i, j ~~ 18870 Hayfield Court 000001 LOTS 7, 8 AND 9 Hayfield Court LOT 8 - UP-O1-012 &r DR-O1-017 `CARETAKER RESIDENCE' ~uRNa - _ X s ;~ - 649, ~ .. - ~ ~ ~ - ,pic , .-.~ 'J SITE '' _- = - `Caretaker Residence ~ W .,~ ~ _ . ~ - i SOT 5 ~ _ EL~ G -~'' ~ T.T4 AC (GROSS' r/ ~ - ~ T ~: ~, LOT g ~ti~ °p- _', 3.08 AC (NfT) - Julia Morgan House ~ - . ~ ' 1.44 AC GROSS ~ ~ - ~_ -- - -~ ~ - ~~,~ _ _ _ ~ ~ Vacant - N89.4V .. ~. - . -_ - -- 2.00 ,. - - - `~ .r-. v - -%rr - - . - -' SOG'1 /~ - ivT 6, - -cam ~~ J~ _ .. ?.s8 Ac (cx~osS~ . j~. - - 18870 Hayfield Court- Lot 8 • • 000002 • • ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4/27/01 8/16/01 8/29/01 8/30/01 8/23/01 The applicant has requested Design Review approval to construct a new 2,427 square foot single-story residence and a 720 square foot detached garage for a total of 3,147 square feet on a vacant lot. The maximum height of the residence would be 18 feet and the maximum height of the detached garage would be 15 feet. The site is 60,396 net square feet (62,746 gross square feet) in area and is located within an R-1-20,000 zoning district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting Resolution UP-O1-012 ~ DR-O1-017. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution UP-O1-012 &z DR-O1-017. 2. Heritage Preservation Commission Minutes of May 8, 2001. 3. Subdivision Conditions of Approval SD-97-001, March 25, 2001. 4. Arborist Report dated 05/29/01 ~u 07/17/01. 5. Plans, Exhibit 'A" 000003 File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012;18870Ha~eld Court • STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1-20,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential -Low Density (RLD) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 60,396 net square feet. AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Two (2%) at building site and overall site average at five (5%) percent. GRADING REQUIRED: Total cut and fill proposed is 1,250 cubic yards. Of the tota1,1,160 cubic yards of cut to a maximum depth of six feet would be required. Ninety cubic yards of fill to a maximum depth of one foot is also required in order_to construct the proposed project. All excess materials would be off-hauled from the site. Environmental Determination: The proposed project consisting of construction of a new single-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines (Article 19, Title 14, Chapter 3 California Code of Regulations). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and consists of constructing one single-family residence and associated out buildings. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The colors and materials proposed will match the existing, under rehabilitation, Julia Morgan House on the adjacent lot. - The materials include a wood shingle roof, light cream stucco, forest green window trim and white doors. Color and material samples will be available at the public hearing. (This Area Intentionally Left Blank) • P:~PlanningiAllison~Staff ReportsU-IayfieldSRl.doc O OO o O • File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012; 18870Ha~e1d Court Pro osal Code Re uirements P q Lot Coverage: Maximum Allowable 22%1 60% Structures 3,470 sq. ft. Driveway &r Parking 9,689 sq. ft. TOTAL (Impervious 13,159 sq. ft. Surface) Floor Area: First Floor 2,427sq. ft. Maximum Allowable Garage 720 sq. ft. (Basement) (0) TOTAL 3,147 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. Setbacks: M inimum Requirement Front (house) 16T-0" 64 ft. Front (fence) 64'-0" 64 ft. Rear (house) 85'-2" 80 ft. Rear (garage) 28'-8" 6 ft.2 Left Side (exterior) 23'-T' 20 ft. Left Side (exterior-garage) 30'-0" 20 ft. Right Side (interior) 22'-2" 15.5 ft. Right Side (interior- 3T-10" 15.5 ft. garage) Height: Maximum Allowable Residence 18 ft. 18ft. 3 Detached Garage 15 15ft. a '21.8 percent rounded to 22 percent. Z An accessory structure is defined as a conditional use (see15-80.030 (d)(1) and as such pursuant to Code Section 15-55.030 a variation from the rear setback standards may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to the use permit process and provided that the requisite findings can be made. ' The subdivision review and approval process limits the maximum height on this lot (Lot 8) to 18 feet. a The Planning Commission may grant up to 15 feet if the use permit findings can be made. P:~PlanningWlison~StaffReportsU-IayficldSRl.doc OOOOO~ File No. DR-01-017&z' Up-01-012;18870Hayfield Court PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant has requested Design Review approval to construct a nev~~ 2,427 square foot single-story residence and a 720 square foot detached garage for a total of 3,147 square feet on a vacant lot. The maximum height of the residence would be 18 feet and the maximum height of the detached garage would be 15 feet. The site is 60,396 net square feet (62,746 gross square feet) in area and islocatedwithin an R-1-20,000 zoning district. Background The site was part of a subdivision that was approved by the City on March 25,1998 (SD-97- 001). The 19-acre site, which includes the historically significant Julia Morgan House, was subdivided into 151ots. The lots that are most germane to this application are Lots 7, 8 and 9 (see sheet C-1 of the application materials). Lot 9 contains the Julia Morgan House and a cottage that was required to be relocated to that site as a part of the subdivision approval. The Julia Morgan House is being renovated. Lot 7 is vacant (the owner has future plans for a garage on this lot) and Lot 8, also vacant, is the subject of this application. The subdivision approval limits the height of a structure on Lot 8 to 18 feet maximum. The conditions also require design review approval (see attached conditions. The applicant has indicated that they have discussed the plans for the proposed house with the neighborhood and have heard of no objections. Both the ulia Mor an House renovation and the "Caretaker House" ro osed for Lot 8 J g P P underwent review by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) on May 8, 2001. The HPC found that the architecture proposed for the Caretaker House closely matches the Julia Morgan House (see attached minutes). The architect, Mr. Kohlsaat, indicated that the roof pitch of the proposed residence matches that of the Julia Morgan House. Other details including the type of architecture, materials proposed, the use of covered porches and fenestration also echo the detailing of the Julia Morgan House. The use permit is being requested in order to allow for a detached garage, a 15-foot roof height on the detached garage and to permit the detached garage to be within a portion of the required rear yard setback. The roof height is being requested in order to maintain the same roof pitch of the Caretaker Residence and the Julia Morgan House. Detaching the garage maintains the historical context of the site plan, as it was typical to have detached garages in the earlier part of the last century. Conditional Use Permit Through the Use Permit process an accessory structure may be within the required rear and side setback or increased in height beyond the eight-foot height limit. According to Section 15-55.070 of the Zoning Ordinance the Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit if the following findings can be made: a. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the ob'ectives of the P:\PlanningW lison\Staff Repotts\HayfieldSRl.doc c OOOOOV File No. DR-01-017F¢' Up-01-012;18870 Hayfield Court Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and c. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Evaluation of Findings The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed location of the garage, 28'-8" from the rear setback provides ample circulation and maneuvering area that is separated from the adjacent rear property which is a cul-d-sac. The proposed side setbacks are in excess of that required by code. The exterior side setback proposed is 30 feet, where 20 feet is required. The left side setback proposed is 3T-10" where 15.5' is required. As a point of reference, many older detached garages in the City are within six to 0 feet from the rear property line. The triangular shape of the lot, the private driveway easement in from Douglass Lane that serves the site and Lot 9, and the location of Hayfield Court, which is within the front setback of Lot 8, all necessitate the placement of the Caretaker Residence and detached garage farther to the rear of the lot. The easements and roadways necessitate that all the built structures are pushed further to the rear of the lot. To illustrate this point, the proposed front setback of the residence is 167 feet, which is 103 feet in excess of that required by Code. The garage is proposed to be setback 249 feet from the front property line. The proposed height of the garage, l5 feet, is necessary in order to match the roof pitch of the Julia Morgan House and the Caretaker Residence. The matching roof pitch is one of the elements that contribute to the architectural integrity and compatibility of the Caretaker Residence and its accessory structure to that of the Julia Morgan House. Detaching the garage from the main structure promotes the historical context of the site plan which is in- keeping with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance, Heritage Preservation Ordinance and General Plan in that the preservation of historic resources is encouraged. The General Plan "Cultural Resources" Section of the Conservation Element identifies historic and archaeological resources as a valuable resource, a legacy that is entrusted to the community for proper development. Construction of a structure that maintains and promotes the historical context of the Julia Morgan House Residence was conducted by the HPC as required by City Ordinance and the HPC found the structures to be symbiotic. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to-the public health, safety or welfare, nor be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. No changes in land use are proposed. The P:~PlanningWlison~StaffRcports~FiayfiddSRl.doc OQOOO / File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012;18870Hayfield Covrt construction is required to conform to the Uniform Building Code. No health and safety impacts would occur as a result of the garage being placed within the rear setback. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the ~'oning Ordinance. The proposed garage would comply with or exceed the front and side setback requirements. The proposed location of the garage contributes to the architectural compatibility of the Caretaker Residence in that is designed as an accessory structure, which is in context with structures of the Julia Morgan era and design. Design Review As stated above, the Caretaker House is designed to match the architecture of the Julia Morgan House. A black iron fence is also proposed to integrate the site with the Julia Morgan House. The fence is not placed within the front setback area and as proposed is open and historic in nature. The proposed height conforms to the subdivision condition of approval. Height is measured, as defined by Ordinance (15-06.340), as the vertical distance from the highest point of a structure to the immediately adjacent natural grade not created by fill. The project as proposed would measure 18 feet from existing natural grade as defined by Ordinance. The proposed project implements the following Residential Design Guidelines policies. • Policy 1, Technique #4 "Minimize Building Height". The proposed structure is 18 feet in height, the maximum allowed by the subdivision approval. The neighborhood is a mix of one- and two-story residences. The building, as proposed, would be shorter in height that other structures in the area. • Policy 1, Technique #3, "Else Materials and Color to Reduce Bulh", which suggests softening elevations by using different materials on different levels, the use of natural color and materials on the lower portions and foundations of a house and the use of materials that create horizontal proportions and Technique #6, "Lase Architectural Features to Breah LIp Massing". The project proposes cedar shingles layered with a random wave pattern, to promote the historical context of the site and building. Forest green trim with white windows and doors are proposed. Cream-colored stucco walls are proposed. The building would be single-story. The use of soft colors, dormer windows, ahipped-roof and limited floor area (3,147 sq. ft. total where 6,000 sq. ft. could be permitted) all serve to keep the building massing and bulk non-existent. • Policy 1, Technique #5, "Design Structure to Fit with Existing Neighborhood". The proposed project is a Julia Morgan style, which conforms to the neighborhood and the history of the site. The materials, colors, roof pitch and fenestration all echo the architecture of the adjacent Julia Morgan House. The detached-garage is in keeping with the way homes and garages were designed and constructed 50 years plus ago. P:~Plannin~Allison~StaHReports~I-3ayfieldSRl doc OOO^ ~~ File No. DR-01-017F¢ Up-01-012;18870 Hayfield Court The use of covered porches and the roof pitch of the garage and Caretakers House match that of the Julia Morgan House. The sole reason that a use permit is being sought to allow the garage a 15 foot height and to be detached, is in order to match the architecture and site design of the Julia Morgan House. The City Arborist, the Public Works Department and the Saratoga Fire District have reviewed the application. Comments from the Ciry Arborist, the Public Works Department and the Saratoga Fire District are included as conditions of approval. Parking The Saratoga Ciry Code requires each residence to have at least two enclosed parking spaces within a garage. The residence will have a detached 720 sq. ft. two-car garage. Additional site parking could be provided in the driveway to the garage which would accommodate two cars, and the driveway turnout to the house, which could also accommodate two cars. Grading The proposed project would require 1,250 cubic yards of cut and fill. Of the total, 1,160 cubic yards of cut to a maximum depth of six feet would be required. Ninety cubic yards of fill to a maximum depth of one foot is also required in order to construct the proposed • project. All excess materials would be off-hauled from the site. The Public Works Department is requiring that a grading permit be reviewed and approved. Geotechnical Review The subject site is comprised of Sun soil, which is classified as an "Area of Relatively Stable Ground". The slope of the site is an average of five percent. Therefore additional geotechnical review was not required. The Ciry Engineer has determined that the standard conditions of approval are sufficient and that a grading permit shall be required. Trees Three Oak trees (two 12-inch Oaks and one 15-inch Oak) would be removed to construct the project and two Oak trees (eight-inch Oak and 10-inch Oak) would be relocated on the site. A 12-inch Oak and aneight-inch Oak would be replaced on the site from the adjacent site. The first arborists report (dated 5/29/01) expressed many concerns regarding the placement of temporary storage of boxed trees on the site. Staff and the applicant met on the site and the Ciry Arborist detailed his concerns to the applicant and their landscape architect. Revisions were made in the storage and placements of trees, the watering system proposed and the placement of trees and roads as well as tree fencing. The changes were reviewed by the Ciry Arborist and found adequate as noted by Mr. Cotes via the August 17 transmittal letter (attached). The approved plan is included in the application submittals. The tree protection requirements shall be as indicated on Sheet L-2 of the project drawings. P:~PlanningWlison~Staff Reports~I-IayfiddSRl.doc OOOOOQ File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012;18870Hayfield Court Fireplaces The plans indicate that two fireplaces and two chimneys are proposed in the new residence. Sheet A-3 states that the fireplace in the master bedroom shall be gas and the living room would be wood burning with a gas starter. Correspondence No correspondence was received on this application at the date that the staff report was distributed to the Planning Commission. Conclusion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code. The residence does not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape to the extent feasible, and will minim~e the perception of bulk so that it is compatible with the neighborhood. The proposal further satisfies all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks except as requested, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting Resolution UP-Ol- 012 and DR-O1-017 . • • P:~PlanningiAllison\StaH Reports~i-I ayfieldSRl.doc oOOO~O Attachment 1 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. UP-01012 &~ DR-O1-017 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETERSCHMIDT; 18870 Hayfield Court WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Use Permit and Design Review approval for the construction of a new 3,147 square foot residence and garage on a 60,396 net square foot (62,746 gross square foot) parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heazd and to present evidence; and Whereas the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Article 19, Title 14, Chapter 3 California Code of Regulations). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one single M family home and associated out buildings; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application, and the following findings have been determined: • The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed location of the garage, 28'-8" from the rear setback provides ample circulation and maneuvering area that is separated from the adjacent reaz property which is a cul-d-sac. The proposed side setbacks are in excess of that required by code. The exterior side setback proposed is 30 feet, where 20 feet is required. The left side setback proposed is 3T-10" where 15.5' is required. As a point of reference, many older detached gazages in the City aze within six to 0 feet from the reaz property line. The triangular shape of the lot, the private driveway easement in from Douglass Lane that serves the site and Lot 9, and the location of Hayfield Court, which is within the front setback of Lot 8, all necessitate the placement of the Caretaker Residence and detached gazage farther to the reaz of the lot. The easements and roadways necessitate that all the built structures are pushed further to the rear of the lot. To illustrate this point, the proposed front setback of the residence is 167 feet, which is 103 feet in excess of that required by Code. The garage is proposed to • be setback 249 feet from the front property line. 000011 File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-OIZ;18870Hayfield Court The proposed height of the garage, l5 feet, is necessary in order to match the roof pitch of the Julia Morgan House and the Caretaker Residence. The matching roof pitch is one of the elements that contribute to the architectural integrity and compatibility of the Caretaker Residence and its accessory structure to that of the Julia Morgan House. Detaching the garage from the main structure promotes the historical context of the site plan which is in-keeping with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance, Heritage Preservation Ordinance and General Plan in that the preservation of historic resources is encouraged. The General Plan "Cultural Resources" Section of the Conservation Element. The element identifies historic and archaeological resources as a valuable resource, a legacy, entrusted to the community for proper development. Construction of a structure that maintains and promotes the historical context of the Julia Morgan House implements this goal. Review of the renovation of the Julia Morgan House and the caretaker residence was conducted by the HPC as required by City Ordinance and found to be symbiotic. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor be materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity in that no changes inland use are proposed. The construction is required to conform to the Uniform Building Code. No health and safety impacts would occur as a result of the garage being placed within the rear setback. That the ro osed conditional use will com 1 with each of the a licable P P P Y PP provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in that the proposed garage would comply with or exceed the front and side setback requirements. The proposed location of the garage contributes to the architectural compatibility of the Caretaker Residence in that is designed as an accessory structure, which is in context with structures of the Julia Morgan era and design. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: The height, elevations and placement on the site of the proposed residence, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhood; and (ii) community view sheds, will avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy, in the proposed structure is 18 feet in height, the maximum allowed by the subdivision approval. The neighborhood is a mix of one- and two-story residences. The building, as proposed, would be shorter in height that other structures in the area. The project proposes cedar shingles layered with a random wave pattern, to promote the historical context of the site and building. Forest green trim with white windows and doors are proposed. Cream-colored stucco walls are proposed. The building would be single-story. The use of soft colors, dormer windows, a hipped-roof and limited floor area (3,147 sq. ft. total where 6,000 sq. ft. could be permitted) all serve to keep the building massing and bulk non-existent. P:~Plannin~Allison~StafE RepoctsU-IayfieldSRl.d« 000012 File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012;18870Hayfield Court • The natural landsca e will be reserved insofar as racticable b desi ' P P P y ~g structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped azeas in that three Oak trees (two 12-inch Oaks and one 15-inch Oak) would be removed to construct the project and two Oak trees (eight-inch Oak and 10-inch Oak) would be relocated on the site. Additionally, a 12-inch Oak and aneight-inch Oak would be replaced on the site from the adjacent site. The grading proposed would not alter the terrain as seen from adjacent and neighboring properties or from public right-of-ways and the site would remain at an average of a five percent slope. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots, and to the surrounding region, will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the natural environment, in that the proposed project is Julia Morgan in style, which conforms to the neighborhood and the history of the site. The materials, colors, roof pitch and fenestration all echo the architecture of the Julia Morgan House on the adjacent lot. The detached-garage is in keeping with the way homes and garages were designed and constructed 50 years plus ago. The use of covered porches and the roof pitch of the gazage and Caretakers House match that of the Julia Morgan House. ^ The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with (i) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (i) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties; nor (ii) unreasonably impair the ability of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy in that the proposed residence is 18 feet in height and minimal in size and bulk and would not block light and air to adjacent properties. ^ The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates current grading and erosion control standazds used by the City in the construction requires aCity- issued building permit. Appropriate grading and erosion control methods will be required as a part of that permit. ^ The proposed residence will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Guidelines and as required by Section 15- 45.055. In particular the project conforms that Policy 1, Technique #'s 3, 4, 5 and 6 Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, azchitectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application of P:~Planning~Allison~StaHReportsU3ayfie1dSRl.doc 000013 File No. DR-01-017 Up-01-012;18870Hayfield Court PETERSCHMIDT for Use Permit and Design Review approval be and the same is hereby • granted subject to the following conditions: A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", incorporated by reference. 2. Prior to submittal for Building permits, the following shall be submitted to the Planning Division staff in order to issue a Zoning Clearance: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page and containing the following revisions: i. The plans indicate that there will be one wood burning and one gas-burning fireplace. As noted, a maximum of one wood-burning fireplace shall be permitted. ii. All the recommendations of the City Arborist shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. iii. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor. • iv. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the RCE or LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 3. No Ordinance-size tree shall be removed without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit. 4. FENCING REGULATIONS - No fence or wall shall exceed six feet in height and no fence or wall located within any required front yard shall exceed three feet in height. 5. No structure shall be permitted in any easement excepting that the entry gate and iron fence maybe placed along the access easement as shown in Exhibit A. 6. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on- site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction -Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on-site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. B. CITY ARBORIST 7. All recommendations in the City Arborist's Report dated 05/29/01 and 7/17/01 shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. This includes, but is not limited to: P ~PlanningWlison~Staff Reports~I-IayfieldSRl.doc 000014 File No. DR-01-017~z' Up-01-012;18870Haj~eld Court a. The Arborist Report shall be incorporated, as a separate plan page, to the construction plan set and the grading plan set and all applicable measures noted on the site and grading plans. b. Five (5) ft. chain link tree protective fencing shall be shown on the site plan as recommended by the Arborist with a note "to remain in place throughout construction." The fencing shall be inspected by staff prior to issuance of a Building Permit. c. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. d. A three to four inch layer of tree chips shall be installed in all areas beneath the canopy of trees before actual demolition begins. 8. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit to the Ciry, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security in the amount of $14,168 pursuant to the report and recommendation by the City Arborist to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees on the subject site. 9. Prior to Final Occupancy approval, the City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. Upon a favorable site inspection by the . Arborist and, any replacement trees having been planted, the bond shall be released. 10. Any future landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Arborist's recommendations. C. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 11. The roof covering shall be fire retardant, Uniform Building Code Class "A" prepared or built-up roofing. (Reference Uniform Fire Code Appendix 3, City of Saratoga Code 16-20:210). 12. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed in the newly constructed garage (2 heads per stall), workshops, or storage areas, which are not, constructed as habitable space. To insure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. The designer/architect shall contact the San Jose Water Company to determine the size of service and meter needed to meet fire suppression and domestic requirements. (City of Saratoga Code 16-15.090[I]). 13. All driveways shall have a 14-foot minimum width plus one-foot shoulders. Slopes from 11 to 15% shall be surfaced using 2.5" of A.C. or better on a 6" aggregate base from a public street to the proposed dwelling. Slopes from 15-17% shall be surfaced using a 4" PCC concrete rough surfaced on a 4" aggregate base from a public street • to the proposed dwelling. Driveway curves shall have a minimum inside radius of 21 feet. P ~Planning~Allison\StaffReports~HayfieldSRl.doc ^ OOO~~ File No. DR-01-017crsi' Up-01-012;18870Ha~e1d Court 14. All fire hydrants shall be located within 500 feet from the residence and deliver no less than 1,000 gallons/minute of water for a sustained. period of two (2) hours. (City of Saratoga Code 14-30:040[C]. The developer shall install one fire hydrant that meets the fire districts specifications. The hydrant shall be installed and accepted prior to construction of any building. 15. Construct a turn around at the proposed dwelling site having a 33-foot outside radius. Other approved types must meet the requirements of the fire district. Details shall be shown on the building plans and approved by the fire district. 16. Provide a parking area for two emergency vehicles at the dwelling site or as required by the fire district. Details shall be shown on the building plans. 17. Security gate width shall not be less than 14 feet. Gate shall be controlled by a remote digital transmitter. Details shall be shown on the building plans. D. Public Works 18. Encroachment permit shall be issued for the new driveway approach and curb and gutter along the public portion of Douglas Lane. 19. Grading permit review and approval shall be required. E. CITY ATTORNEY 20. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with Ciry's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 21. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the Ciry could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 24 months or approval will exp>se. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • • P \PlanningWlison~StaHRepocts\HayfieldSRl.doc OOOO~V File No. DR-01-0176x' Up-01-012;188701Yayfield Court PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of September 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent • Date P:~I'IanningW lison~StaHReporcs~HayfieldSRl.doc o oO o ~~ • THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 000018 • • Attachment 2 • Ci of Sarato a tY S HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Date: Tuesday, May 8, 9:00 a.m. Place: Warner Hutton House, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Type: Regular Meeting I. Routine Organization A. Roll Call Present: Grens, Hunter, King, Koepernik, Peck, Wyman Absent: Peepari Staff: Heather Bradley Guests: Gretchen Mair, Noel Cross, John Turchen, Gary Kohlsaat B. Approval of minutes from 4/ 10/O1 and 4/ 17/01 nutes were approved 6-0 C. Posting of the Agenda Pursuant to Government Code Section 94954.2, the agenda was posted on Thursday April 5, 2001 E. Oral Communications Mr. John Tui~chen of RRM Design Group, Fire Station architects, showed the Commission a revised color board for the station as they had requested at the last meeting. It included the samples for the base, decorative tiles for the tower and roof tiles as well as stucco colors. Commissioners Hunter and Grens expressed concerns with the metal railings that were shown on the color board. The previous color board that was shown had wood lattice railing Commissioners Hunter and Grens feel the previous example was more of a Mission style rather than a Spanish style. Commissioner Wyman moves approval of the color board. Approved 4-0-2 (Grens and Hunter abstain) Written Communications/FYI - Heritage Tree Ordinance article Invitation to Sunnyvale Heritage Orchard dedication Invitation to Campbell tea and walking tour Invitation to workshop Finding and Keeping Members CPF quarterly II. Old Business None III. New Business 000019 A. 19221 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road -The Tibbett House - UP-O1-006. uest to demolish an existin ~ g cabana/green house attached to the main residence and construct a detached cabana and additions off the rear of the residence. Staff notes correspondence received from the architect on the site visit. Commissioner Wyman comments on the beauty of the house and property and says the additions will add to the beauty. The commissioners agree. Commissioner Peck says he was surprised to see how beautiful the property was as you can't see much fcbm the road. Commissioner Koepernik feels it is necessary to allow the height exception to build the cabana to 14 ', i feet in order to match the original architectural detail of the house. Commissioner Peck further comments that the structure is not visible and shouldn't be a concern to the neighbors. Commissioner Wyman moves appibval. Approved 6-0. B. 18888 Hayfield Ct. -The Hayfield House -Progress update on restoration of the main residence and request for renovation approval for Guest House. Gary Kohlsaat, project architect passes photos of the house before the remodeling work began. Commissioner Peck asks if the owners have been in touch with the previous owners. Mr. Kohlsaat says yes to some extent. They would like to invite some of them back when the work is finished. Commissioner Peck says he didn't realize the condition the house was in until they saw the state of the guesthouse. Commissioner Wyman says she appreciates the level of detail and care that has gone into this renovation. Commissioner Koepernik says that the Commission should have been informed prior to the start of work, but he also appreciates the care that is going into the renovation. He would like the Commission to visit the property one more time before it is finished and would like to see the progress of the guesthouse renovation when the stucco is removed. Mr. Kohlsaat suggests this can be done together sometime in the next few months. Mr. Kohlsaat states that they have been careful to save all of the materals so they can compare them to the new materials they are using. The Commission also states that they are very impressed with the amount of landscaping and the quality and size of the trees that will be going in. Commissioner Koepernik moves to approve the guesthouse renovation. Approved 6-0. C. 18870 Hayfield Ct. - DR-01-017. Request for design Review approval to construct a new single family home for use as a caretaker's residence for the Hayfield House. The Commissioners are happy with the design of the caretaker's residence and are happy to see the style and details so closely match the main residence. Mr. Kohlsaat states that he is using the same roof pitch as the main house and will have to lower the structure into the lot in order to avoid the height limit. He feels it is necessary to match the main house. Other details will also match including the front porch and windows. The thinks this will be a welcome change from the other new homes in this subdivision. Commissioner King moves approval. Approved 6-0. D. Heritage Orchard Restoration Project -This item will be discussed at a Special Meeting on Tuesday May 15~h with Linda Gates and John Cherbone IV. Items Initiated by the Commission A. Discussion of Mission Statement Ideas. The Commission discusses the Mission Statements proposed by Commissioner Hunter and King. Commissioner Wyman agrees to take a closer look at the ideas and rewrite them. Staff is directed to put some type of brochure together. Commissioner Hunter asks staff to make nametags for the Commissioners to wear to the reception for Tom Sullivan and possibly for meetings as well. x00020 e Commission would also like to present plaques in recognition of homeowner who have done an excellent iob modeling their heritage home. Possibilities are discussed. V. Items Initiated by the Secretary A. None VI. Adjournment 9:00 a.m. 'I7zesday May 15, 2001 (Special Meeting) -Warner Hutton House Respectfully Submitted by, Heather Bradley (Acting H Secretary) • 000021 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 000022 • • Attachment 3 • RESOLUTION NO. SD-97-001 & V-98-002 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE MAP Pine Brothers / Spaich; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Douglass Ln. WHEREAS, application has been made to the Advisory Agency under the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and under the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Saratoga, for Vesting Tentative Map approval to subdivide an approximately 19 acre site into fifteen individual lots ranging in net size from 21,780 sq. ft. to 3.08 acres, all as more particularly set forth in File No. SD-97-012 of this City; and WHEREAS, application has also been made to the Advisory Agency for Variance approval to allow the total proposed building area for Lot 9 to exceed the 7,320 sq. ft. maximum permitted by Zoning Ordinance fora 3.08 acre parcel, all as more particularly set forth in File No. V-98-002 of this City and the following findings have been made: ^ That because of special circumstances applicable to the history of the property, strict enforcement of the specified regulations would cause undo hardship and deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district, in that the preservation of the Julia Morgan designed main residence and guest cottage, both Saratoga Heritage Resource Inventory structures, benefits the greater community. Approving the Variance request will only allow these two existing historic resources to remain. ^ That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district, in that similar consideration has been, and would be, given for other property owners who were requesting to retain buildings historically significant to Saratoga. ^ That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Initial Study has been prepared for this project which concludes that the net increase of eleven new single family homes on this property will not cause any significant and/or unavoidable impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for the project at the March 25, 1998 public hearing; and WHEREAS, this Advisory Agency hereby finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the Saratoga General Plan and with all specific plans relating thereto, and the proposed subdivision and land use is compatible with the objectives, policies and general land use and programs specified in such General Plan, reference to the staffreport dated February 25, 1998 being hereby made for further particulars; and WHEREAS, none of the conditions set forth in Government Code Sections 66474 (a) - (g) and 66474.6 exist with respect to said subdivision, and tentative approval should be granted in accord with conditions as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted duly noticed public hearings at which • time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Vesting Tentative Map for the hereinafter described subdivision, which map is dated Mazch 19, 1998 and marked Exhibit "A", "B" and "C". in the herein above referned file, be and the same is hereby conditionally approved. The conditions of said approval are as follows: 000023 File No. SD-97-001 & V-98-002; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Douglass Ln. Community Development Division 1. Future development on all lots shall require Design Review approval. The site development ,plan reviewed by the Planning Commission shall be used for future yard orientation determinations. Building setbacks shall be either per the site development plan or then current Zoning Ordinance requirements, whichever are greater. The architectural style of the new homes shall be consistent with the architectural plans approved per Exhibit "C". 2. Future homes shall be sited and designed to minimize the amount of pad grading necessary 3. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be required for each new home application. These plans shall be consistent with the model landscape plan approved per Exhibit "B" and shall be installed prior to issuance of Final Inspection of each new home. 4. Design review approval shall only be granted upon finding that the proposed structures are compatible in terms of scale and design with the existing adjacent residences, that they are in conformance with the City's Residential Design Guidelines and that all of the necessary Design Review findings can be made. 5. Lots 1, 2, 3, 8, 10, and 15 shall be limited to single story structures not to exceed 18 feet in height. These restrictions shall expire upon issuance of Final Inspection of each new home. Future additions and/or redevelopment shall be governed by then current Zoning Ordinance requirements and private Covenant, Condition and Restriction agreements. 6. No ordinance protected trees shall be removed without obtaining a tree removal permit, with the exception of those trees shown to be removed on the Vesting Tentative Map marked Exhibit "A" to accommodate subdivision improvements. 7. Subdivision improvement construction hours shall be restricted between 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except in the event of an emergency which imperils public safety. The Public Works Director may grant an exemption upon his/her determination of an emergency. No such construction work shall be permitted on legal holidays. 8. All requirements for tree protection as recommended by the City Arborist shall apply throughout subdivision improvements construction. 9. Subdivision improvement plans shall include all common area landscaping approved per Exhibits "A" and "B". All required landscaping shall be maintained by the new homeowners via a maintenance agreement to be prepared by the applicants and recorded against each new lot prior to Final Map approval. 10. All public and private improvements required for the project shall be completed and accepted for construction by the Director of Public Works, Community Development Director, and/or the appropriate officials from other public agencies, including public and private utility providers, pnor to Final Inspection of any pemvtted homes on any of the lots. 11. The cottage structure shall be relocated to Lot 9 prior to commencement of any on-site construction activity. 12. The Vesting Tentative Map Exhibit "B" shall be modified to eliminate the gated entrances at both La Paloma Ave. and Douglass Ln. prior to Final Map approval. 000024 • File No. SD-97-0O1 & V-98-002; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Douglass Ln. 13. The A Bement Re ardin S aich Pro'ect, attached to this Resolution and incorporated by re erence, as been ent mto y e neighbors and the applicants. The following provisions of this Agreement shall constitute specific conditions of project approval, enforceable by the City: a. Onsite construction trailers shall be sited neaz the project center away from existing neighborhood residents. All construction equipment, vehicles, and vehicles of workers, contractors, and subcontractors will be pazked onsite. b. Dust and erosion control will be maximized on-site and streets in the adjacent neighborhoods shall be maintained in a manner to avoid the accumulation of mud and dirt in the streets. Adequate litter and debris control shall be provided in the surrounding neighborhoods and streets. c. There shall be no street lights installed within the subdivision The items of this Agreement that address construction period activity shall be enforceable by the signatories during construction, with the City's cooperation and assistance. The remainder of this Agreement that addresses long term property maintenance issues shall be recorded as Code, Covenant and Restriction (CC&R) items against each new lot. Enforcement of these restrictions would be the responsibility of the future property owners and the signatories of the Agreement. Any amendments to the CC&R's would require Planning Commission approval. 14. The Final Map shall- note that the two cul-de-sac private roads, the emergency vehicle connection/pedestrian pathway and the Wildcat Creek pathway all incorporate public pedestrian easements, allowing for public pedestrian access through the development and along the pathways shown per the Vesting Tentative Map mazked Exhibit "A". Engineering Division 15. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City Engineer for examination, the owner (applicant) shall cause the property to be surveyed by a Licensed Land Surveyor or an authorized Civil Engineer. The submitted map shall show the existence of a monument at all external property corner locations, either found or set. The submitted map shall also show monuments set at each new comer location, angle point, or as directed by the City Engineer, all in conformity with the Subdivision Map Act and the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 16. The owner (applicant) shall submit four (4) copies of a Final Map in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map, along with the additional documents required by Section 14-40.020 of the Municipal Code, to the City Engineer for examination. The Final Map shall contain all of the information required in Section 14-40.030 of the Municipal Code and shall be accompanied by the following items: a. One copy of map checking calculations. b. Preliminary Title Report for the property dated within ninety (90) days of the date of submittal for the Final Map. c. One copy of each map referenced on the Final Map. d. One copy of each document/deed referenced on the Final Map. X00025 File No. SD-97-001 & V-9&002; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Douglass Lo. e. One copy of any other map, document, deed, easement or other resource that will facilitate the examination process as requested by the City Engineer. 17. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Map Checking fee, as determined by the City Engineer, at the time of submittal of the Final Map for examination. 18. Interior monuments shall be set at each lot corner either prior to recordation of the Final Map or some later date to be specified on the Final Map. If the owner (applicant) chooses to defer the setting of interior monuments to a specified later date, then sufficient security as determined by the City Engineer shall be furnished prior to Final Map approval, to guarantee the setting of interior monuments. 19. The owner (applicant) shall provide Irrevocable Offers of Dedication for all required easements and/or rights-of--way on the Final Map, in substantial conformance with the approved Vesting Tentative Map, prior to Final Map approval. 20. The owner (applicant) shall submit engineered improvement plans to the City Engineer in conformance with the approved Tentative Map and in accordance with the design and improvement requirements of Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. The improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the appropriate officials from other public agencies having jurisdictional authority, including public and private utility providers, prior to approval of the Final Map. The plans shall include improvements for the Durham Court storm drain outfall to W' Creek. ildcat 21. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Subdivision Improvement Plan Checking fee, as determined by the City Engineer, at the time Improvement Plans are submitted for review. 22. The owner (applicant) shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City in accordance with Section 14-60.010 of the Municipal Code prior to Final Map approval. 23. The owner (applicant) shall famish Improvement Securities in accordance with Section 14- 60.020 of the Municipal Code in the manner and amounts determined by the Public Works Director prior to Final Map approval. 24. The owner (applicant) shall furnish a written indemnity agreement and proof of insurance coverage, in accordance with Section 14-05.050 of the Municipal Code, prior to Final Map approval. 25. Prior to Final Map approval, the owner (applicant) shall famish the City Engineer with satisfactory written commitments from all public and private utility providers serving the subdivision guaranteeing the completion of all required utility improvements to serve the subdivision. 26. The owner (applicant) shall secure all necessary permits from the City and any other public agencies, including public and private utility providers, prior to commencement of subdivi- sion improvement construction. Copies of permits other than those issued by the City shall be provided to City Engineer. 27. The owner (applicant) shall pay the applicable Park and Recreation fee prior to Final Map approval. 000026 • File No. SD-97-001 & V-98-002; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Donglass Ln. 28. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain coverage under the State General Construction Activity NPDES Pemut. Satisfactory evidence of the filing of the NOI shall be fiunished to the City Engineer. The applicant shall comply with all provisions and conditions of the State Permit, including preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Copies of the SWPPP shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to Final Map Approval and maintained on site at all times during construction of the subdivision improvements. 29. All building and construction related activities shall adhere to New Development and Construction -Best Management Practices as adopted by the City for the purpose of preventing storm water pollution. 30. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall review and approve all geotechnical aspect of the final Tentative Map and related plans to ensure that the consultant's recommendations have been properly incorporated. 31. The results of the plan shall be summarized in a letter by the Project Geotechnical Engineer and submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. 32. The geotechnical consultants shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project demolition and construction Structures h ld b d li h d . s ou e emo s e and areas of loose debris should be removed prior to site construction. Geotechmcal field inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to: site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, grading inspection, fill compaction testing, roadway pavement section preparation, and excavations for foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project on an As-Built Map and Cross Sections and described in a letter(s) or report(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to finalization of the subdivision improvements. 33. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical consultant's review of the project prior to Final Map approval. 34. The owner (applicant) shall pay $20,000 dollars towards the future overlay of Douglass Lane and for the future slurry seal of La Paloma Ave. prior to Final Map approval. Utility and Public Safety Providers 35. Sanitary sewer service for all parcels shall be required per the requirements of the West Valley Sanitation District. 36. Domestic water shall be supplied by San Jose Water Company. 37. The owner (applicant) shall install additional fire hydrants as detemlined by the Saratoga Fire District. General Liability 38. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses incurred by the City or 0~002~ File No. SD-97-001 & V-9&002; 20325 La Paloma Ave. & 14315 Douglass Ln. held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 39. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is unpossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 1. Conditions must be completed within 24 months or approval will expire. Section 2. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 3. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 25th day of March, 1998 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bernald, Kaplan, Pfurakanu, Pierce, and Chair Patrick NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Martlage ABSENT: Commissioner Siegfried ~~ Chair, ~ g Commission ATTEST: a n etary, Plamm~g Commission C7 000028 BARRIE D. Cam. ATE and ASSOCIATES Horticultural Consultants 408-353-1052 Fax 408-353-1238 23535 Summit Road, Los Gatos, CA 95033 Attachment 4 TREE PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS AT THE PETERSCHMIDT RESIDENCE 15670 HAYFIELD COURT SARATOGA Prepared at the Request of Planning Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 Site Visit by: Barrie D. Coate Certified Arborist May 21, 2001 Job #02-01-108 Plan Received 4-30-01 Plan Due 5-29-01 • 0~00~ I'REIi PI2I~:SERVATIUN RECOMh. )A7~IONS AT THE PE'rERSCMvf[DT I2F.SIDFNCF. I ~~,70 I IAYP[I:I,D COIJR'I~. SARAT(KiA Assignment We were asked to inspect the trees on the site at the Peterschmidt residence on Hayfield Court to predict the relationship between tree health and proposed construction. The site plan which we used to prepare this evaluation was prepared Gary Kohlsaat, Architect and dated 4-20-0 l . The plan offered here represents only a small part of a very large lot and represents the area occupied by the caretakers cottage and the surrounding grounds. There has been and apparently will continue to be a vast amount of construction equipment activity on this site on both this portion of the property as well as the main portion of the property. Summary Of the twenty-eight trees which might be affected by construction activity which are large enough to be controlled by city ordinance, five of them are off the property on the adjacent road frontage but have canopies suspended over this project area. The only tree on site which I found protected by a fence is tree # l a very large valley oak. Numerous areas have been cleared with a tractor to make them level enough to store nursery stock. There are vast numbers of extremely large boxed tree specimens stored on the property and unfortunately many of them stored beneath the canopy of existing trees on site. Note that many of the trees which have already been transplanted into boxes have lost soil to as much as 12-inches below the tops of root balls, leaving a significant proportion of the root ball exposed to the dry air. If these trees are to be considered significant to the city, this must be corrected immediately now that hot weather has arrived. Smaller nursery stock from l gallons to 24-inch boxes is seen stored beneath the canopies of these trees as well. There i s evidence of tractor travel beneath the canopy of many of these trees and some trenching is seen as well. Discussion As an example tree # 19, a coast live oak has about forty 15-gallon English laurels stored on a tarp beneath its canopy. Of course, these plants are being watered on a regular basis with drip hose. It would be inaccurate to say that all of the water which is used for the nursery stock and goes though the boxes into the soil is bad for the trees, but on the other hand, where that PR1iPARf~a BY: BARRIE D. COA1'1, CONSUL"CIN(i AR130RIS1' MAY 21.2001 000030 '1'Rli}i PRESERVATION RECOMM.__ .ilA7lONS AT 1'HE PETERSCMvIIDT RESIDENC}: 7 LiG70 IiAYF1EI.D COl1RT. SARA'I'O(iA water must be applied frequently to water hungry species such as Japanese maples enough to leave water standing on the soil that poses a serious potential for initiating oak root fungus, Armillaria mellea whose affect would not begin to appear forasmuch as 8 to l 0 years but would nonetheless be directly related to this current activity. For now, the irrigation water is probably not as serious a problem as the grading that took place in order to level this area sufficiently to use this area for this purpose. An additional 400 square foot area is used for storage of one-gallon plants, which are being hand watered as well. This area required leveling in preparation for this use as well. All of this activity will have damaged or removed some of the absorbing root systems of the existing trees. Landscape Plan The landscape architect on this site has used a broad range of plants, which favor an Oregon/Washington climate and are marginal for this area. The irrigation programming and the amount of turf and irrigation equipment that accompanies this kind of plant often requires more frequent irrigation than is tolerated by the native oaks. This results in destructive effects on the native trees. For this reason, I suggest that the landscape plans be carefully inspected by our office to be sure that irrigation equipment, irrigation main line, and lateral line installation locations and placement of turf be reviewed so that landscape design is not responsible for damage to remaining existing trees. Transplanting Many of the 8-10 inch trunk oaks on site are being transplanted, apparently for use elsewhere on site. These are being transplanted by the ball and burlap process and those ball and burlapped root balls installed in large boxes. If these trees are to be used for "credit" to compensate for trees which have been removed from this site, the health of these boxed trees should be inspected occasionally during the summer to be certain that they are being properly maintained because they would eventually serve as credit against otherwise still present trees. Coast live oaks which are allowed to dry out in boxes will become highly susceptible to oak bark beetle (Pseudopithiphorus agrifoliae) and since recovery of trees thus infested is difficult at best or impossible at worst this may become a very important point. ~~ PREPARED BY: BARRIE D. COATE, CONSULTING ARBORIST MAY 21.2W I 000031 'T'REE PRESERVATION RECOMMi:..DATIONS AT THEi PETERSC}IMIDT' RESIDENCE 1~67U FIAYFIF:LDCOURT'. SARAT(KiA Unauthorized Road Trees #22-26 forms an informal row of coast live oaks some of which I understand ma_y be transplanted. I suggest that this be done only during the dormant season between November 15 and January 15, because coast live oak transplanted at other times often suffer gradual decline after they have been finally replanted in the ground. There is total of twenty coast live oaks of various diameters in these two rows and even though we labeled many of them, approximately half of them are too small to be protected by city ordinance. Nonetheless, these trees combine to create an important screen between this portion of the property and homes to the north. A road has been installed between and north of these trees which has compacted the soil over a large proportion of their root systems. Note that many of the young coast live oaks on the property are lightly to heavily infested with Aerhorn scale. These trees should be treated to eradicate that insect since it would be one more drain on an already stressed group of trees. Tree #18 has an entire shed and irrigation assembly facility beneath its canopy. Recommendations 1. I recommend that any containers which are beneath the canopies of trees which are to be preserved be moved immediately to some area beyond tree canopies. 2. Chainlink fences 5 feet tall, installed on 2-inch angle iron posts driven at least 2 feet in the ground are installed at the driplines of all canopies. 3. That a 3 to 4 inch layer of coarse tree chips from a tree company tree chipper be installed in all areas inside the fences and beneath the canopies. The importance of making these corrections accelerates with each day of high heat since the effects on absorbing root tips of both the compaction and the excess irrigation that is occurring in some places will accelerate with the increase of temperature: 4. At the risk of causing serious disruption of an actively progressing project, I suggest that at the very least the contractor be told that they must move much of this nursery stock and put fences beneath the canopies as would normally be specified in a job like this or in worst case the job be shut down. The latter decision would be very disturbing to a lot of people I am certain, but the offenses against the standard tree protection procedures to which these trees are PREPARED BY: BARRIE D. COATF., CONSULTING ARBORIST MAY 21, 2001 000032 TREK PRF.S}iRVAT10N RECOMM,...JATIONS AT THE PF.TERSCHMIDT RESIDENCE 4 I ~G70 HAYPIGLD CO[JRT. SARAT(XiA subjected makes this a very serious subject which needs to be attended to immediately before even hotter weather arrives and even more serious affects are seen from these activities. 5. Rather than recommend any fines at this point I suggest that the owner be asked to provide a 50% deposit to cover the value of the trees that are currently affected by the construction activity toward the goal of certifying that the recommended con-ections will be made immediately. 6. I suggest a 30% bond for trees #22-26, #5-11 to assure that fences will be installed at their driplines and be retained throughout construction. That bond would be $6,003. This means that the driveway which has been installed between trees #5-7 and #8-12 must be removed. This should be treated by ripping the compacted surface to 1 inch deep, laying a 3 to 4-inch layer of coarse tree chips on the newly ripped soil and installing a fence to protect this entire area from use by wheeled equipment. A temporary road may be left between trees #26 and tree #5 for access to the large containers in that area. 7. I recommend a 50% bond for trees #2, 3, 4, l7, 18, and 19 to assure that the trees will be moved, the fences installed and the chips installed as prescribed. Note that there are large quantities of nursery stock installed beneath the canopy of tree # 17 which must certainly all be moved. The value of those trees is $16,329. The bond would be $8,165. It should be made clear to the applicant that the bond is designed to assure erection and maintenance of the fences. It should also be required that any trees of 10 inch diameter at 2 feet above ground which are transplanted must be alive and healthy at least 2 seasons after replanting or be replaced in kind. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ •~~~~ Ba oate Enclosures: Tree Data Accumulation Charts Map U PRIiPARI;D BY: BARRIE D. COATE, CONSULTING ARBORIST MAY 21, 2W I 400033 Job Title: Peterschmidt Job Address: 15670 Hayfield Court Job #02-01-108 Srzi ins 0 W Measurem ents Con dition Pru nin Cablln Needs Pest/Dissas s Problems Recom mend . BARRIE D COATS , ~ ~ ~ ~ i i o ! i ~ ~ i i ; ~ e I I ' o ' " I S` . and ASSOCIATES _ ~ i ~ W ! ~ I w ; ~ ~ z 4 ! H I ~ ; "~ ~ w ~ ; I i ~ ~ i ~ w ~ I i ~ o ~f NOB13531052 ~ u i ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ # , ~ ~ U ~ ~, v ~ ~ 235355ussiRad t w F, i . i (® I ,,; ~ w ~ ~ z ~ z ug z ? O u~i z ' ~ ~ ' w ~ O °w ~ i ~ ~ o '~? z ~ ~ i o ~ a ~ g w ~ ~ ~ z c a uec~IN,u 95000 ~ ~ I , o: ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W i i o_ = f o I o w ~ ~ ~ w W ~ ~ ~ I~ I ~ I~ x ~ C o z z z ~z ~~ m i z H v ~3 ° IcOi Y ~ 3 N ~' : ~ ~ x~ ~ I i x x ~ I W ~~ xI ~ I x F- ~ j x O z ~ 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O O W ~ m ~ i n w W I i Qa ~ Q~ ~Q W y °w v ~ # Plant Name Ke m,~ , m m W D. F O R ~ K ( K W i l x 2 ~ i LL7 ~~ O O W W W y j y o ~ i o I e o x ~n x ~n ~ x . c~ c~ ~ 11 rJ z c~ a ~ c f- o: o: z z oC oc 1 Vall Oak 54.0 x i 51 50 80 1 1 2 '' i i ' QUe/CU3lobafa i i ~ i , ~ ~ i . in 2289 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 61,805 X sp. Gass 100% _ $81,805 X cond. 100% _ $ 61,805 X loc. 80% _ $ 49,444 Total Value 2 Coast Live Oak 10.0 ~ x t 10.0 i 111 i 25 1 22 1 2 3 ~ ~ ~ t i ~ ~ i ~ i i Que~us a ri/olia , I I i t I i i I I ' { ' I I s . in 117 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 3,159 X sp. Gass 1009'0 = $3,159 X cond. 90% _ $ 2,843 X loc. 70°k = $ 1,990 Total Value 3 Coast Live Oak 12.0 ~ ; i 14 ~ 30 12 1 1{ 2 i ~ i ! i i i I i I i i i I II I ' ~ i i i ' I i '' i i i i . in 113 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 3,052 X sp. class 1009'0 $3,052 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,052 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,138 Total Value 4 Coast Live Oak 14.0 ~ 18 ' 30 ~ 20 I 2 1 ; 3 ~ I ! ~ ; I I I i i i I i t i i I I , . In 154 X S271sq. in. _ $ 4,154 X sp. Gass 1009'0 = $4,154 X cond. 90°k = $ 3,739 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,817 Total Value 5 Coast Live Oak 11.0 { x 11.0 i 16 25 25 1 ~ 1 ; 2 , ~ i ~ ~ i f ~ ' , ~ I i i i ' i . in 142 X S271sq. in. = E 3,834 X sp. lass 100% _ $3,834 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,834 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,884 Total Value 6 Coast Live Oak 10.0 x 8.0 8.0 14 i 25 25 1 ~ 1 2 I i i ; , ~ ~ ~ I _ t ; . in 129 X $27/sq. in. = S 3,483 X sp. Bass 100% _ $3,483 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,483 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,438 Total Value REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES 5-gal = 53b 15-gal = 5120 24"box = 0 36"box = 51,320 48" 52"box = 57000 72"box ,000 1 =BEST, 5 - ORST lof5• ob Ti~Peterschmidt ob Address:156~a field Court ob #02108 J J y J 5/21/01 Msasunmsrns Condition Prunlnp/CablinA Neads Psst/Dissass Problems Recom mend . ARRIE D. COATS and ASSOCIATES , ~ ~ ; ; i i i i ; I ; ! I I ' : ~ ~ ! I ~ ; ! i i ' o ; ! .- ~ ! ~ v; ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! I I ; 7 ; i i i i i i I I ; ; ; ~ ~ ! ~ .n I I z ; !~ ~ ; ~ ; ° ' ; I i I ~ I vi i ' N I i i `-' ' ~ ~ ! ; I o ; -- ~ ~ W w ; w ! ; ; x m ~ ; ; ~ ; ~ I i I ~ i I ; ; ` o 7 = u~ ' ' ' I W i i i ~, ~ i ,~ i Z i = i (7 i ' ' W i i ~ ~ i N! i '~ i O I h ! ' ~ ,~ ! ~! W ~ }} F- I+w113~'i~JZ ~~ ; ; ! ~` I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I~! O 2 Z i (~' ~ o ~ z! ! O; z ! 3 1 w I x ~ ~ ~ ~ U o t o l ~ l ; ! t~ Ot ~ ~ ~ w 7i539fussiRad ~ ~ ~ N ! w ~ ~ F- ; I I~ i i ~ I ~ ~- ~ Q ~ ~~ 'q I w I~ x Z , ug z I ~- y o° I Q ! `~ ! z ! w I~ w w ~_ ,~? I z< I x x 3;° I v I g ~~ I w!~ ~ ~~ x! o LM CtM G 990.90 ~ ~n ~ ~ a ~ ~ z q~ ~ ~ _.~' ° ! ;~ w a v ~ F m ~ ~ z~ o ~ O ~ ~ ~ I ~ I O ~ w~ o; o 0 Q ~ w w s ly I ~ Iw ~ W I° ~ = ~ I ; x~ o m ! i ; I I z! z z z~ ~h z 3 ~ 3 3 ° t l ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ 3 ,,~ I ~ ~ I -- I I i x I J x I x I~ ; u ~'~ Q~Q !° I° I ' Z ~ ~ ! ! l 0 ~ I z ~ I U'~' ~ _~ m,~ v w I z ~~ O, O W ! W I q! o c i W ! W o () Key # Plant Name m~~ m o m ~ o~ o l o t o w a x rn W i~ O i x l rn I v I x x l x I m i x w I~ x O O I v I v I x ~ v! n. ~ N i b ~ ~++ O O ? -- o~ I o: I x ! w i w z l z w rc W ~ 7 coast uve oak 10.0 , ~ j 12 ~ 20 ~ 18 1 i 1 2 I I ~ ~ = , I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' ! ! I E ! ! ! ~ ! ! ! ! I ; ! ! ! ; . in 78.5 XS27lsq. in. _ $ 2,120 X sp. doss 100% _ $2,120 Xoond. 100% _ $ 2,120 X loc. 70% _ $ 1,484 Total Value 8 Coast Live Oak 11.0 ~ x 9.0 ? ; 15 130 15 2 2 4 ! I ! ! ! _ I I ~ ! i I ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! t _ i ! i ! ! . in 127 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 3,429 X sp. doss 100% _ $3,429 X cond. 75% _ $ 2,572 X loc. 70% _ $ 1,800 Total Value 9 Coast Live Oak 12.0 ; I 13 125 115 1 1 1 1 2 1 I ( I = ! I ~ I I ; ! I I ~ I i ~ I ~ . in 113 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 3,052 X sp. Gass 100% _ $3,052 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,052 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,138 Total Value 10 Coast Live Oak 10.0 ~ ! ! 12 125 ! 21 1 ! 1 ~ 2 I i 1 ! i ! ! ! ~ ! ' I ; I I ~ ~ i ! ! i ! ! I ( . in 78.5 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 2,120 X sp. doss 100% _ $2,120 X cond. 100% _ $ 2,120 X loc. 70% _ $ 1,484 Total Value 11 Coast Live Oak 11.0! ! i I 13 ~ 25 ' 18 1 { 2 i 3 ~ ! ~ ! ~ ! ! I I i = ; ! ! ~ ! i ; ~ f j I ! I ; _ . in 95 X $27/sq. in. = S 2,565 X sp. Gass 100% _ $2,565 X cond. 90% _ $ 2,308 X loc. 70% _ $ 1,618 Total Value 12 Coast Live Oak 12.0 = 13 25 25 1 ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I ~ ~ ~ ! ! I I ; i I ~ ; _ ! ! I ! ; i I ! I . in 113 X S27/sq. in. _ $ 3,052 X sp. doss 100% _ $3,052 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,052 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,136 Total Value 0 0 O REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES W 5-gal = 536 15-gal = 5120 " ~ 24 bOX =5420 36"bOX = 61,320 48"box =55,000 52"box = 57,000 72"box = 515,000 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST Page 2 of 5 Job Title: Peterschmidt Job Address: 15670 Hayfield Court Job #02-01-108 ~i~~ im Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs PestlDisease Problems Recommend . v+ ; I , BARRIE D COATS ~ and ASSOCIATES I I ` ~ ~ i i i , , i ~ ~ ; ~ i , ~ ~ ' i ' ' i I I ~ i~ i i ~ " ~ i I ~ ' ~ ~ i i i I , Z ~ ! ° ; ~ I ' ~ i i ' , ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ " : ' v I i v i i i W I w , W , i , ' ~' ' ~ ; ~ ` `~ ~ I ~ i J ~ ? ~ W ~ ~ w H081353~1052 23535fuaallad ~ ~ ~ , g W ~ LL ~ ! ~ ~ ~ w I I ~ F- I i~ z ~ ? I z ~ I c~ z I Z O; z a ~ ~ 5 ; o ; I 13 I W I to ~W ~ - ° 1 ; ~? I ~ ~ 1 0 ° I ~_ ~ ~ ~ g Ig 3 ~ ~ ; W ~~~ w i~ ~ lMGabe,G 95030 v~i I ~ ~ I ~, ~; o: z l ~ ~ j -+ x l w I~ U ~ W l w ~ a ~ i ~ I O J I J w O I '-' Q l x I z w ~ > ; i y i , w i H I ' ~ F ~- ~ ~ H x ' O I , , , t i 0 ; ~ ; I , , Z = Z , Z , Z I ; z I , , ~ ~ , fA , c7 Z ~ 0 ~ I N ~ K , , ~ ' 0 , O i U ~ w ~ ~ ; W ; ~ J < , 1 , , i~~ i , i SS W i Q x i W ~ U F QJ i 7 I~ , ~ i G Z 1 Q: , ~ 3, 3 i~ i~ O 1 0 i O' 0 , W I ~ U i J 1~ I m i Z ~ U F- ~ U ~ ~ , Y , U i W i 0' Z i ~' ~~ W Q ~~ w ~' 0 , , V) , W ~ ~ G~ ~ ~ W W ; U Key * Plant Name m i 7 i m i , o ~ o m i S o; o W i a x; w LL] ; F- x v~ 1 0 I v x D: I x ; ~' 1 K v v v U I w l< I : ~ I l N I 0: l ug l K O~ O ? , W I W I W ~ ~ o v a ~ I o ~~ o: z z z 13 Coast Live Oak 23.01 x ~ 18.0 ~ ' 1 25 ' ~ ~ 40 142 ~ 1~ 1 ~ 2~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I I i I ~ 1 i { ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ i I I I . in 542 X $27/s q. in. _ $ 14,634 X sp. Gass 100% _ $14,634 X cond. 100% _ $ 14,634 X Ix. 70% _ $ 10,244 Total Value 14 Coast Live Oak 11.0 ; 12 ; , 30 1, 20 2 I 1 I 3 ~ ~ I ~ I ' I ; 1 I I I I I I ~ ; I I I I I ~ I ~ I I ' 1 1 ' , i i . in 95 X $27/s q. in. _ $ 2,565 X sp . Gass 100% _ $2,565 X cond. 90% _ $ 2,308 X loc. 70°h = $ 1,616 Total Value 15 Chilean P , 15.0; x ~ 13.0; 12.0' 20 125 ~ 25 , I I I 1 1 I ~ 2 1 I I I ~ , ~ I I chinus de endens , , , ~ I I ; i I 1 i , , , , , . in 300 X $27/s q. in. _ $ 8,100 X sp . Gass 50% _ $4,050 X cond. 100% _ $ 4,050 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,835 Total Value 16 Chilean P 13.0 ~ x ~ 10.0 ~ ~ 21 ~ ~ 25 130 ~ 1 1 I I 2 I I 1 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ i I I I , , I I I I I I I I I I I , i ~ ~ 1 1 . in 172 X $27Is q. in. _ $ 4,644 X sp. doss 50°~ _ $2,322 X cond. 100% _ $ 2,322 X loc. 70°k = $ 1,625 Total Value 17 Coast Live Oak 12.0' x' 10.01 I I 117 130 135 1 1 1 1 2 1 I I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I i I I , 1 I { I ~ ~ I I 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I I ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 S ' , ~ I . in 153 X $27/s q. in. _ $ 4,118 X sp. Gass 100% _ $4,118 X cond. 100% _ $ 4,118 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,882 18 Coast Live Oak 10.0 ; x 8.0 ; 12 130 135 1 1 1 2 1 I I I I I I I ~ I I ; _ ' ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ; I I I I , , I I , . in 101 X $27/s q. in. _ $ 2,719 X sp. Bass 100% _ $2,719 X cond. 100% _ $ 2,719 X loc. 70°k = $ 1,903 Total Value O REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES W 5-ga1= $36 15-gal = $120 24"box = $420 36"boz = S1,320 48"box 52"box = 57,000 72"box - 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST P~of 5 ob Titl~"Peterschmidt J ob Address:1567~a field Court J y ob #0208 J 5/2uo1 MessunmerKs Condition PruninelCeblinsl Needs PesNDbeass Problems R ecom mend . ARRIE D COATS , , I l , l ~ : l ~ i I i ~ I l l l O ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ l , _ , , • ~ i , , i , , , , , i , I , i , , , , I , , I ,~ , ... , , , p , , , , ~ W ~ W i , J nd ASSOCIATES , , , , , , , , , , , , ,~ ~ , i , , i , , ~ , ' ~ , Z , , , ; , , F , , i O , , , ' ~ ~ ' _ ' ~ , W , , , , , , , , d' , fA , y , , , , , g : ' ~ ' ~ ~ , , I ~ o NOA)35~t052 , l = l i W I ~ f l ,~ l z i v ~ ~ ? l 0 ~~ I l W l i 2 U' , p O }} t :~ I n i~ l 0 l y U p ~ l ... W ~ ~ M W zi535sueitad !! ~ , i W i ~ , i N I ;® , i , ~ i v~ ~ ;w , ~ ~ i Z ~ z , Z , , Z , , , ~ i= i f" i y i p i p i I IN Iaa lz lW l Q ~ , , , , , ~ i Z i v i Q i~ i~ l3 lp lv lg lg ~ W = ~ J F l C z L«G~ts,U 95030 > N= I S o: l ~ j l z ~ 4 ~ U l m l~ j d i W i Z l a ~ l 0 I O ~ W~ O O a; ~ W W y W t iF. I ~ p x ~~ ~ t p I l I l z z ~,~ni z z O ? m~ o: p F;~ ~3 i Y i V i V 3 N l a uJ l M ~ = 1 J p = ~ ~ i = ~ C9 I ~ l ; U ~a j ~ Z I ! s i ~ ~ ~ I O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ i j ~ W ~ W ~ ~ ~ j ~ O ~ O y W ~ W ~ V ~ Ke X Plant Name m ~ m p m p p a W i LLl I H l O II d ~= 0: ~~~~ W ~ l : i i C K~ ~ K~ O~ O ? l p i l : l : W W W rc a! y p x w x rn v x o v O v v v a a 1- o o z z 19 C t Live Oak 15.0 x 14.0 17 ~ 43 ~ 45 1 i 1 2 l ~ ~ l j ~ j , 1 i J I l . in 254 X S27/sq. in. = S 6,858 X sp. doss 100% = 58,858 X cond. 100% = S 6,858 X loc. 70% = Z 4,801 Total Value 20 Coast Live Oak 25.0 , l l 26 40 40 1 1 2 ~ l l = ~ I ~ l i 1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ l l ~ ~ ~ i I l ~ , . in 491 X S27/sq. in. = S 13,247 X sp. doss 100% = 513,247 X cond. 100% = S 13,247 X loc. 70% = S 9,273 Total Value 21 Coast Live Oak 13.0 ~ 16 35 25 1 = 1 i 2 i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . in 133 X S27/sq. in. = S 3,582 X sp. Gass 100% _ $3,582 X cond. 100% _ $ 3,582 X loc. 70% _ $ 2,507 Total Value 22 Coast Live Oak 11.0 ~ 12 ~ 18 ~ 20 1 ~ 1 2 ~ ~ j 1 ~ ' ~ l ', I . in 95 X 527/sq. in. = S 2,565 X sp. Gass 100% _ $2,565 X cond. 100% = S 2,585 X loc. 70% = S 1,795 Total Value 23 Coast Live Oak 10.0 11 ~ 15 ~ 15 1 2 = 3 ~ I I ~ ~ l` . in 78.5 X S27/sq. in. = S 2,120 X sp. doss 100% = 52,120 X cond. 90% = S 1,908 X loc. 70% 3 1,335 Total Value 24 Coast Live Oak 9.0 l 10 15 = 20 1 ~ 1 ~ 2 l ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i , l i ~ l l l ~ l l ~ l I l , . in 83.6 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 1,717 X sp. Gass 100% _ $1,717 Xcond. 100% = S 1,717 X loc. 70% = 3 1,202 Total Value 0 0 0 W REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES 5-gal =536 15-gal = 5120 24"box =5420 36"box = 51,320 48"box =55,000 52"box = 57,000 72"box = 515,000 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST Page 4 of 5 Job Title: Peterschmidt Job Address: 15670 Hayfield Court Job #02-O1-108 5 O1 0 W Measurements Condition PruninSl/Cablinp Needs PesUDiseasa Problems Recommend . ARRIE D COATS i i I I ~ I I i I I ~ ~ i i i l l ~ I ~ ~ I i ~ I I ~ i i i i i i i l l l i ! I i i~ i ~ i i~ l I v l~ I . i i i i ~ , i o i i i i i i ~ i v i i i W i I J and ASSOCIATES i i i I i I W i I ' ~ N i ' I , ~ ~ i ' Z' i H i I I ' ° ` ~ ~ ~ ~ i w i y i i ' d' , h 44 ~ ~ ~ i i s ' ' , ~ I ~ _ ~ 14011)353.1052 I I I I i I w I w i I I ! ; ! I~ I Z I ~ F ~ c7 ~ i U I i # ? i z i~ 1 0 I w i^ z O l~ w l ~ m i i ~ i I N S i ~ I v { o i^ I ,. ~ ~ ~ m i ~ I w I w I d I m oC 23535fusal8ad w i ~ ~~ ~ i i u, i w I~ 1 ~ u~ I? ~ u~i i N t o w w i ~ '~; i Z i^ i a m! m 3 O g g w i F O m O_ lw Gdw CA 99D30 I I i Y i i I m i w i i I m I z I ~ ~^~ ~ v i i~ i ga ~ x W l w l i¢ U~ F~ K~ Q: ~ z ~ i i i i i i a U X 1 1 0 I I 1 -- ~ O i w ~ y'~ ~ I^ i U'~ Q i 1 w w ~ i LL i~ J ~ to i i 1 1 I i F I w g x i ~' ~ x , t~ F I U I ^ m Z Z I Z Z ~ ~ fA i 3 3 3 I~ ~ Z F i U i~ i Y i U I U O N i (A i =' m ^ m x i J i x i x m g ' S i W C? I m w l a ^ Q I~ j z uJ I O ~ O i i O i 0 1 0; 0 i~ l m ; m m m m w ¢ z ^ m i w I I z i~ _~ w l w l~ ~^; O O ~ O O i ^ I^ I O w l w l U w w w ~ Key # Plant Name I l ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ x I y ~ i i x ~ w v ~ x I I i i i f U ~ v ~ U ~ U o: ~ v a i m Z I m I ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ I o: a: I I z z ~ rc W a: 25 Coast Live Oak 8.0 I x i I 112 1 15 120 1 1 2 1 3 1 I I ~ ~ I I i I I i ~ i i i s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ i I i 4 . in 50.2 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 1,356 X sp. Gass 100% _ $1,356 X cond. 90% _ $ 1,221 X loc. 70% _ $ 855 26 Coast Live Oak 8.0 1 x 7.0 j I 11 15 j 18 1 2 3 ) I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i . in 69.5 X $27/sq. in. _ $ 1,877 X sp. Gass 100% _ $1,877 X cond. 90% _ $ 1,689 X loc. 70% _ $ 1,182 Total Value 27 i i I I " I I l i ~ ~ ~ ~ I I i ~ I ~ i i i I I i I I i i I I i l l) I i I _ I I I) I I I I i i ' . in 0 X $27/sq. in. _ $ - X sp. Gass = $0 X cond. _ $ X loc. _ $ - REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES 5-gal =536 15-gal = S12U 24"box =5420 36"box = 51,320 48"box _ 52"box = 57,000 72"box - 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST P~of 5 . • • Barrie D. Coate Tree Pre vation Recommrndations at the fr Associates ~`b6) 353-1052 Parnschmidt Residence, 15670 Hayfield Coun 23535 Summit Road Los Gatos, CA 95033 Prepared for: ~- S'O / HORTICUL Gty of Sarato -- TURAL CONSULTANT Ba' COmmunirv Planning Dept. CONSULTING ARBORIST Date: Ma 21, 2001 ~~' ~^ ~ Scale: ma r4 reduced ~~ ~' Tree numbers cones ob #oz-O1-108 '~o`~=J'-°~- All dimensions and tree ocations~tton charts. _ ° ~ _ o~ ~ are aPPmximate. ~ ~ ~ - ~~~ 9 =-~8 - b. t~ ~,; I ,.~ ~ T _J~ ,~ _-~- - 1 ,.~ ;~ _ J - ~ i ~ -~ BARRIE D. COATS AND gSSOCIATES Horticultural Consultants 0408) 353.1052 23535 Summit Rd. Los GatosBCA 95033 L end ~~p Line of Tree Canopy - - - - - -Protective Fencing a ~ ~ r.,-~-,--..-,-.:-.,,~., ~ ~ 3 e . - Q- -~ 25 ~ 24 22>+ ' ~, %,~.' ~ \ ~,~ s ~ - ~ pe. ~~ ~ iJ Y / ,~~ X014 ~ ~;~ ~ , ,/ ,,; : ~ ~~ ,~ls =; i/ _ i' ~ ~ ~ ;i ,. ~r 16 .~ >. _ F ~/ ,, ., r ~~17 ;~' ,~,. ,.~~ 18 ~ `~ i S-- ;` ~/0 O~VJ~ r . / j.~ / \ \~ •- 21 i~ ~, r~ 000039 FROM Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE N0. 408 3531238 Jul. 17 2001 11:28AM P1 BARRIE D. ~OATT Af~ID ASSOCfATf:S Natrevmeal Conwltants PNO1~E (4USj 353-1052 GAX (4.Ogj-353.1238 23535 Sum~dr Rogd, los Gates, CA 95053 ~ A x g~ per,-. T0: ( N Fax ~:_ 'KJC7 `'~ 7"o-s~ you: e~+a ~. cam aT~: ~''`-J ~! - ~cP uuNe~R oR Pis COMMENTS: c ~c~~a~` `~~e~O ;~ ~ ~ rC ~ ~~u c A -~-~ e~ ~~ ~_o ~ 000040 • • • s ~', s ~ r ti i +~ s, ~, ~~ 1~~ I ~ r i~ 1 ' ~ ;`'- ~ P ~~ • a i , .' ;,( ) ~ )~ : 4 ~ 4;,,~~~~ ~_` ~. ~4 ~ a t} ~~~ ~1 ~1~ ~~7, ~ ,~ ,I ) L~~-~ Ala! ~~~' ~~`'`~~~~~ r - ~ _ `.~~ ~~_ti_ a sT> ~ '' ~~qq ?. ~ •'. .W , , ... ~. .'~,'~, ~<< s {~ ,, ~~ ~ ~~1~I~~~n J 1 1 - 1}. , ~ M C,ri J , d'~~~ ~~r,~, ~r~,,,, : ~ J~ ,~ ~ ~~'E t x *" ~~ i ,Y`t l 1 f "'>' ~ n f.~ , '-~ ,7~' id~~~ ~ _I I ., ~ ~ r, 'I ;, , ,i~ ~ ~~ ' k ~ ~ I ~~. ~ , Y i t ~ ~`~~~ t ~~t ) } - ~ ~~~ '~ I ~ ~ ~_ ~ ti ~~~ .i ~, it l' i~l C K, ~~. i. r V Kt 22 ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ,~ ~ I .~~ ji ~ ~ 1. ~'~~ ill:, ~I .I i ~ ~ j ~~ ~ ;,~- ~ - - ~ s. ~, s, ,~. - r ~- _. ~~1 ~ ~_ - Ha field Caretaker's House ~ ~~~o~~ ~ AUG 0 7 2001 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VICINITY MAP PROJECT WFORMATION CONSULTANT LIST INDEX ^ OWNERS'. DAVID ~ RO%ANNE PkTERSCHMIDT I>6'ropPacxwu,ROAD ARCHITECT: AI. COYERSHEEf SARA700A.G GARY KOHLSAAT, ARCHITECT A2. SITE PLAN I ¢ .Eaar~M ianabieals PROIER ADDRESS: 18510 HAYFlFAD COL7tT P.O.BOK 1300 LOS GATOS, CA 93031 CI. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN sARntnaA,cn 7EL,1/08)3952353 LI. L2. TREE PLANTING PLAN A.P.N.: 7m~Iaaa L7. TREE PLANTING PIriN CONT. ~~ ~ SS[EAREn: CTVH. ENGINEERS: INC. GIL7IAMA KULL L4. LANDSCAPING DETAILS GROSS 6v+s sQ Pt. NET Eo.w6 sQ.Pr. , 4880 STEYENS CRffK BLVD. Al. FLOOR PLANS ~° a °t ~ p Ri SUf1E20S A4. HOUSE ELEVATIONS } ~ Q _ ZONDiG. SANJOSE,CA 95)29 A3. HOUSE ELEVATIONS Y ~ SLOPE AT BLDG SIIE 24 TEL. (108) 6154001 A6. GARAGE ELEVATIONS 6 ~ AtlFAAGE SLOPE 0P 5fIE: S^ A7. SECffONS `7L ° 5LF AUCHAEL A TEBB DESIGNS A8 ROOF PLANS 1 tlm~.~. ~ 73BARBEELANE SA '''`D A RESmERCe :.+n sP ALAMO, CA ~ 1, imAL~s jID sP. TFl,. (923) 831A916 ~ 11 `~ , PROPOSED SIRIKTURF.4 1.1705E f.14 mDRNEW'AYdPARKDiG ~ ~ ~ SF. Ita4 Al H d" ~u ~ w 4 x~~ ~~ `" ` y, U A ~ a r~ Q _? V I a u ~ W I- o~ a `~ 0 a ~ ~ f= x Q~ ~~ ~ U Q Q W ~' r 00 DATE a >c c SCAIE' 49 S~OJ: 10B ND 1 • ~ • .~ / ~ y' ~,,~ ~, ~// ' ,, ~ ~y /~ ~ ~;; ~/ ~~ ~,~ \~ ~ ~~~ .:~~ \ ~ ,'~r ~ __ '~, ~-_ \~ ~ ~ , ~opSF ~ ,\ ~~ ~~~~, i '~ <x,a ~I• ~5 i ~ {1, ~ml l ~ ~ A ~~ ~R 1 ~ a ~~~~~;A zz m ~ ~ ~ m ~ A j~{n~~ SSS ~ ~ ~ E ~ v U U ~A a ~ ~~T o ~ (~. ~ ' ~; > (s ~ ~ o ^' u ~'ORry j., ~~^Y \ ~ \ ^,~ ~ A i s~y 4\ / Rp ~70~ ,~ r~titi ~(©in k / r x ~~ O ~, ~~`'~ ~~' \ , \ \ ~-THE CARETAKERS HOUSE FOR i I ~, A R Y K O H L S A A 'j' I _ o ~ 4 HAYFIELD HOUSE j a ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 18870 HAYFIELD COURT SARATOGA, CA. ~ .A R CF(H I T E C T 4 ~ • • • ~~ r s1Yr awfra aA1Aw tr xaL. wL AeeD sRNxs taen aro, swn M5 sAx .nsr. cA 9sln (~7 ms-4nc oxxfR ruxan u.L 2 M[ [Nmaw Assuws rro Rrmwsren nr x roxo M Aa WALY a M a9cx rovuwm WMw. J LWnxcrcrt Aaau MAr ram wA<L ASTIrYf sat MO twuR MsMM9BLrrr rw .oe 9rt rwdR[MS dAwc M cWR¢ a caxsrRUL av a M( PRGrcr .Nauowc vR rv a Au P[RSas A4D PMP(Rrr. MA r MY MWYrYDArs 1N4L APar cwnn+;WSrAxo tar Br L9NRO ro NDRYAL IrawwL xouRS Aa mxr M ttwlRACroas 91AU arfxD. M¢Ywr Ann NaD M olw[R, M rxaN[a AND M Gn a vRANU NAaIfEss a AxY AAq 4( Luelun M4 a 4LraD. M aMw[cmw wM M MRrwfrAxa a IxWx a nAS PiGRCr. rxaPrlc rm uABLrrv ARl9uL rRar M sat MaanKr a Mr Ow'EP, M rnnMfR a M Gn a swA raA + CONmICILR SNA4 CCYPLr WM M Ra[5 AxD Ma/AnwS a M STAR [aISIRUCrpv 5Ar(rr OadRS 5 ALL CCNS rMrLrA]N 4A RAxµS AHD M(MW5 SMALL Cawlr wM M w[WAN¢S SMGrICA1KNT AND SrANON05 a M bn a SARA rOGA t SEAR a C/1.pORWA ¢PNMNIa rRANSPOPIAmW Axr 1991 AS APPLKANf. A rxsrwc unln[5 AN lRfanwouw rAa/rRS mauRO AM rw ,wcxYAaw arc n rs M carraecra+z a[vWSwx~n ro KRRY M LaArpx wD aaM wm M AwxsnAn A¢NG[s grMN M owrca xw M mr nw ,~ rArivaR usxas Mv~Oxsealn MAt M' unon[s Axc t,.ANawalwn rACnlrrcs NOILARS wLL Ix Mr onulKS Axo waRLRWrN fAa~lpT fNLOw RMO. CW arACia SN4l CCH!ACI wxxcxaAO 9e4cc AaPr (usq ,o LWAR w umfnrs (ew) an-2eaD VMOP N SrARML COVSaWLrON Y CdIRACrIP SMALL PoSt al M SrR, [ANR¢NLl RLEMwrf[ NUY9[RS rw PWLK 9dM"S AYat Axa, WxKr MU nM aaARn[CxrS R M COVrPAC RM 9141 PROMr ALL LrOIiS, 9p5. BARRKADfS rLApRN a OMR aN¢S nCaSSARr N PROM1[ Fa MRxK Lrrn, Ax0 M ACawOAHll wM MNA AND 91LLI APMr CPVIM'UOIIYV Ax9 Nor L1WRD r0 ArpRML NOwS 9 4i AIM SMAIA CO`ROALI N M MOMMYRNrS a' A M PR0.[Cr ShcS MMKf B M Gn a suA roc.+ srAND4N p ANS E SMarCAtpxS c ^ sxro sorrnrArrws 0 Sh 9RCYYI mNS F L4IFAN5 SMCrICAMMS ArLr 1991 rD Mxwrrto News a rnAOwc AR[ r n +Y ro b a PY uarpAY Mxmw rRrWr 1t ER09M CW ma ARASlwES SM4L K W MAa BY OLIOBCa r5r AS OMCRD w M rttt0 Br M Gn CNGNE[RWL MSMCRA L^Y x025 4: w1.Rx CN MK Pl,+x SNkL R PEArpnLFO w SRnI CaM'dwAxCf wM M 1 orr a sNArWA sr,wwAao PL,4AS Axo srcanc+rwxs 2 P4RrvAM~mrrsr 4p MCaxNNOAOm MC. oARO~Eis~sAx~RFer uKwPCRARO rxro M9 MAxs J [nxmACrov 5Nµ( HOnrv SOxT ING9YCR Ar (KN) NSI-bJ2r, Ar L(ASr N HOURS PRKx ro Mr nut a aAOxfc oPrRAmws Au cNAdM: Iron 9+AU Br GBSfRKD BY M 50L5 [NDNCER. UNNffRKO ANn wAPni0K0 IAAWVL NDRe W r BI MaxR[D t0 R[ M4JM0 ANU MP;ACFO ux¢R (NSER+A ON A MCW mACIdiS rTMWW9Rf la YAIONNL fA6hxL TIP[(rS SVAAgMpxL tMOttAM Arq OMfA uswOKKN15 wM A 9100TH mM9NOV M RAM1L, WRBS W IrERS, 90rwµX5 C9A~ [N. AAn r0 AIaD ANY ABaw? a APPA.R(NI fWN¢S w wAD[S CR Ca0S5 SI CP[S lOx mots aR x1rARdus mfaRWs T M[ fxax[R AsWY[s No MsroxsrNUn rm rw4 rxAO[ a coNa[rt uK[ss raYS AM LxELxrD PRae ro ParRmc L. CWIAACrPR 9UL( M+oNa AOLWAR OUSr ANO fROSKW CCNta0. AS MWMCO BY M Gn a SARArOGA HO roiA&[ W RR MAr Br US[D i0R MY CONSMUCMx µRNMS M CLNMALraI 91A1L 4AMY4N M SIREER SYXN4NS Ax0 µl OMR PYBLN RA91t~p-MAY.N A aCM, S4L Inn USA&r dwn OON µL WnfS p SCx, RLKN, a ¢BRS SN4L & MYOKn fp04 M PUBLK CMR'0 PRa'FRff WRM4 LCMS rRl1LRW ANO UPON L'04R.r IKW a M eRatct. r LON nUCNR 9NIL MWKALL fxISn1L SmLnNM3 [XCf-i IxOSE SNOMY N MY4x IACW M 9rt Pattw rn $!Mr a pA0w0 SmWPwG SNµL BEN A aPM S4RIGEIA/ 10 vRSrY M 9x15 [NYJNfFR Ann YAr BE SICNrO r09 PARR US IN IMOSCAM AREAS B Mf MMOD rOr (gPACNW a !x( SNµI 6F ACCURpNG f0 M( MCWIrcMARC 5 a M[ saa MRAr PMPAem ra Mrs PRaECr. M ua a awnKrs, M M Wwr.4[NrS a M SdtS MPwr 9+µL PMVM OMA ME MAxT 410 HORS S1pw1 NIRECM 9 Inl 9rALL ff PIAC[0 W lRm HOr EAYElOwG B' M aPM AMp SN4L Bf COWACRO r0 A! L(Atr 90R MUIrw CYNPACmM AS MOINRO Br M Sa.S fMAN!(R StRIrCNRµ rxt Sx4L BC COrA°ACRO N 9TH COIWACRW. My tAMTRRO nI WRRI4 91AfI Bf AIPMKO BY M SIXS fANwwZR PRXK r0 allL aLrKMn N M 9rF t0. M CCMIRACIpR 4r4t I[RwY M La'A lpNS a M fA151ML URKRfRaMD UmrMS ALL faARWS SxOr1 M M MM'S AM APPRWNAR AAV AM 9rOw rOR p[xfA4 YdLNLYAPOV Qtr BAW¢ ro UnrtlrS a PtPaN.R'S $Yµf Z M OW aACNPY a[9YYISIBLrn LWIRACNR 91ALL CaLFAti LMOERLRarM YRNaS AIfRI (USAJ N Nd1RT PMOR N S(Mi a awn - (d00) err aNa ro rEwrY E.NTiwn umrtt LaAmws n. 4L a1ALWL n ¢Nrcr ro a¢RVAnaI Br Man MM91t[( sxAU xorwr M Gtt a sARArow Ar unsr N xdws BEraR srNr a Mr caAdxG t2 APPIgVµ a aA5 PLW AeMRT aAY N M [YU VAIxY1 ftA¢MNr ANO CnNPACmr a NARRN fMM W RNNS. MS AIRIOYµ ODET x0f CCNCR ANY pxMrS a [NRY 10 GPRN M9lK PR(p[Rn Lw M PMYAR PMPERn a OMRS rJ camemN sxAU rosr M tw<Mxxcr rtuwxx xlxeEws, ra M ra[oAw AaAla9 caMn DYGxrrRZ mKx, wArza avMrlRxt Pcu. P4nc xu c+B[ rY. Iwa[MNWND YRNC( ufar ru sA7. to CMaACNa 9+41 ApAJS* [NSDNC Um1rcs N Kw GAOC AS R[WMO rOv M COYSRNCad a rw LnKNArt ProNa nAmc-RARO IAIS M M PAKD AMAS iT COVwACtpR 9rW ARRIIKt A Pr-dA[wb 9R 1l(Im1G rM M( 5[45 fApR[(M.n M9;Crq~Rpar pwl, Ai (4y ~~[rpQ Ld rAtr M Gh ~B µt CONSRNLipM 40Nn3 9/4l AaxP[ r0 KN aKLCPY[xr AND C(wSRlLe n[w BC51 YAxAaKNi eAA[nR5 AS AWYRO Br M Crh rOq M eL9MH5 a PMKMrML StpAY kRR P0.lOmN t Ar ryµ PApM" C3r'RACrOR 9kl PROYa A wN4LM 05iMLT 6 DK (5, R[r u No lr; MRax- 9m Aur nroY nrtax 4l~ Doers 9.4L x cavrcrrD ro A aoxo ar.MAa snm .wD M.usr +r bACY a GAB wN A BLNwfR BOr BQ rnwcmr xors m[E nrortcaa r[rlau sx4L r Msr+urn ro M vRSrACmw a M Nwrsr Asn 9wf mw M ftrt PAavwr casmKBax ar SNEn J ra MNMR rrxuw LA.rs 4o A usr a o+owlANa Prortcrto mrrs 1 nn CONTwuCxdr (giNwxr a RwvAR Kwa[S 9x41 eAn w B[ SNalO wMx M Oat° LI[ a Mr ORMMa rNgRCRO RK[ W M SR 15 O~.uA ~ G~z. ¢-- ; ~. 1"~-~~ / y. i (7 ~ '~ ~ / /i r \ ~ ~v / v f~ / \\\ } / N,... Nr~.:N ~... vARrs s ro ~o ARA vARRS 0r'ro f' tl¢IES 1- Sw4F SHALL /AMA r0 9YL1 FLOW OKR RDLLm Wass rrwl s' a BAa a aNm AS A RBPORARr ER090N LYRIrRW YEASUM. .MC $NAL rRM IO' a CLAiB rM AIR YE 91 uNm PfRYM.MI LAWSCAPNG 5 N+S rµl[D 1 SNALLS SR(PEa MAN SN 9(µL 8C EYAEO rM AIR K9; -E~ar-+ w9 ALE vor rD scut // \- PROJECT OATA - LOT 8 TRACT 9704 EzsrRLC LYLD usE. vAGNr aNOVGSm LAAp usE. SNfOtE rALir RE90Dln4 ASSESSORS Pa NO Ar-2A-lb NRWFSS IBB10 XAHEIB LOIFi DRMAG NI - 20 LO7 9S 127N 5! GRO55 BO.S76 Sr MCr a IfF E411 rNONDSiD SnU1CTRSS YAN ROOK 2.127 ¢ C4rAQ: 720 4 BsusAOUS CD\gNR: 17,111 4 (20i COYFRAQ) SLOB ~ BLDG 9R. 7i A1G9EPE a LGI: St ar IIkO c+ rLL 90 CY Wx aL: B rEEr WA ELL: I rEFr x01[S I. ALL EAR55 YARflAtS 91ALL % REY0IED rROY 9R 114 dSPOSEB a Ai Ax NtOMOxm PSPOSLL 9R. fRDNR ED4x RNYY F% ~ l.r ~ <„~ N _ ~ < ~~ NN ~ ~ ~ x ~ 4xr ~ ~ ~.~ _ 14 `~ ~ P ~ 1ixu A . , ~AN ~ L..~_ _ ~~~r x \ / ~ I ~ ~ I _ VICINITY MAP___ NOi TU SCAL A,3BREVIA TIONS AB AG¢fCGAR BASE M MOMLRIf s• 90M AC ASPNALI CdICRCR CR CAONq SCO SfRER tlfMW/ AO AMA al4N NPr NNRI OdNi 50 SRNY d+AN CB USLN BASw MY MKRI EIEYAnW NILE S7PPY GRAN EASEYCNr ( CCNRRLINE w ,qwr umrrr vat ss 54vrAar SFMCR d 0/N mro MLtr gMKIMY v L1NfAR tar YM YMWUL ssr IB Wwr4rr uxcR EASfN[Nr rOP a BAM( EIECr FlE[iRIC4 YM YAAMaf rC 2i a CLttB CP FOR a PAKYCNr OG Wr90E CAME R 70f a 9BM Euc EururoLVS McE PsE we[rc sERYxr usENExr rw ra a wAu rx, EINSBIAG PH mrYxn ondxur w v4LrYWrrER rc nxsN atADE Pwt vASnl[Nr w NARR M fYNSN MOdR RLP R(IRrpp[{p p7NC. ryPE NV WARR v4K M rNE N)dUNt R/N RNYf1 a WY LEGEND PRCPCRrY LINE ~'-~ PRCPOSEp LONCR[R PAKAYNr n ~y PROa05E0 9ANIiARY $EAFN k ¢EANWt - ~5 ~~ PR[WJSFD SAMiARY SCNER tr YANHWE - - --- r~ --Q CxISM/G SANITARY SEVER t NANIKKf ~~: ~. ~ PRa05E0 SRWII d14N tr CAra BASIN .-_. __ _ m _ __-0 C.NS ZINC SRx2Y PRAM tr CA7LX BASM - B-- w- PROPOSCp NARK YAW (BY OBRRT) ------ Y-- CJrBRNC NARR YAN -.--.- C1flsnxcrtNatNE - -- a - CArsrNC Ear a PAKYCNr K Ensnxc MRE m RE MYOKn ri~ EA151MG IIRC XYdEANt ~P,.P ENSmrG ,KINI POLE Nwv EnsnxL wARR vuK ~ A< .- fNS7ING 9'01 CIEVAIIWY AO YiBI @. FSFM S 1 u ~ w ~~` H hx ' ~~O M ,gym. QY rWl • Y 0 ~ 4 G ~ m$" ++ ~ I 31n fjjt o c In o i Qa L Y v O ~ U ~ < ~ ~ o F ~ J y 1J1 W W V F F ~ Q TQ W I Q a ~ ~ ~ W Q Z Q J a W V Q Z AYE Q W O J d Z Q MQ V _- sa~-__. -. C~1 -- ~ -- OB/20/OtR IO.N 0016( E \2000\OOl6r\ OOtRIfD] Dr _ DURHAM '~~ i ~~UFifi KEYMAP_ NOT TO SCALE t • cn ANrcaLx,n ~„~,,,,,,,,, ~ Plant List Aew W s+a• _ _ w..awa uE. Acu --- •. 5w.(7M~_ HIV NIe Id a8Y BOTANICAL NAMB COMMON NAME 8I'B r r ec ~ I ° I ////1y/~ \t~ ) ~ - ;; " ~~~ /~ y~y ~% ~. ~~I / / / / ~v>xG ~~ . i ,IVY j / / 7A ~ .-1 fil,v.- ~ '~ / ` ~ ~SDG` \ !. ~AaE ~. , i ~ 1 6"Ial/~ 6 / / ~ n'vAl \ ,r C ~ ~~ E!' OAG\ I I 1 ,Ei ~~. ~. ~" ~~ ~, ~ , ~.,>,~~ e ~`' ~ ~i ~ .~ 1 \ \ i 1 1 :,\ I ~ ,. , ~ ~ ~ -e~cc - I I I G (f ` f wi_ -?' -x w 1-- -~ --~fs vF ,~ ~ ~' , ~~a \_ 1 1 i~\ ~` .-. __-._ HE ER WC DR __"_. I 1 f y r _ `vyI I ~_ L~ \rl r ~\=/}~6\// art-- L' k~o .~ rew _ /1 ~/~ ., n ~~ l'Sr 12~ - -k~~. ~`Ar J IG~ 1 ~~ `~~- y t. ~' *.~. D.t PD rL~ AaAyf -_ GCw(\~ 1 ~ ~, 1 UtA -l µ ~ ~ +1 t '. ~n nt __. _ -"- 0 ~` ~. it ~ ., ~ .~~ ~o ~ j e ~ o~ ~ ~ L t ar ~/ ~ (raal ~ ` ( 1 -- , ~-~ ~ _ ~ r ~ .~ ---w cA i `~ u AiE Aa _.tl=~~ -- ~~ ~ ~ ~ r~~~ . x \ s. w ' w. Ai i .r ~1~ ~ ~d[ 1 ~~ ~' ~l - ~ _~E , , ~, ~ ,~ ~ mu 1rp .c ~ ra ~ ~ i 'br r ~'~ ~ r rroeu ewR - o r _.~ ~ ~ ~, ~ , --_--__ rs..r- _ / .r. J ~ lG Yf ~ ~ f' `.\ 4. . ~z~ _; SR LtitiKtl%4/fl <J --AR CL `" _„ N -E5 2 iGU:( a/M1U[G AFL(q 1L 1MLR \ ~ 3 \]c~ -+rn ~D~o. ~. ~C ~ACW -SA GR -rts i~0y / -RM [(. --- -rc I. -- GlG4 _~ ; ,~F~ L All ---~nG _ _._- __~atY ~, \. a ~~ ~~, G~r~~ ,,,, e,~~ ~~ mMM lSC F' a "a .] U ~~ a~ '^~ Vl ~~~~..(( i.+ `V U o u c~ 0 ~ Q x~~ ^~ ~ ~U y B ~~~ B.b.~ 6,,s4~ ~r L-1 • Tree Planting New Tr»sa~• •. ~ ,„ ~~ ~-- , Ac~ ~~ Irtby'yppMln' InnohV ~'/ ]1'hm 11 /`. /~ ,~' y RM p ertltU MwYN/ew I/Innwn ! _ \ ~ ~` retq,mrt is Ir eo. ;~~J" ~ I^l o1L /jelur F.r~FoDk GN Urx oAk- 8"2 cDl 5 J ~ I ~ti/ ~\ • ~ -r ~ ._ ~ I / •I~ II•p.K ~~~v`~ [hyRlivh WteS ka uU.~mWklm 2-iRCh~nM/~a^venM kttifa~ v i ~ ~ ' 1 ~e vowam"wdhdawe •,pnrenlaie~ ~ '~ ! nee cMryMk ,.:~ \ ~ • ~ I:'OH". ~~ ~ uee rFiM1fianeirtecanP"Y 1 •~ ~~~ r R IG ¢y inul4d m JI uns Wade Et k+AO mdbcrcth the<NOpes <\ \i\. .~ /~,,, ~ ~ ~ ,.~. ~~.~. .~~, i,e.,~ j ~ ---- _ xc teeor cwAHarn • v t` i RI - env~di \\~. -`\ ~ Irwxe as 9fiftwt5 / ~ ~ ', j %~ ~ S~ '~~~~ 1 I ~ v .-,• ' - ( ~ 111 ~~ ~ ~ ~1DIA'!" -_. ~ ,- ~ ~ I` ~ys'j' ~ . r en ~ a ~ t .;~,. ~ '~~ 6' i PIMaGM10 ~ 1t- ul~u ~ I V L, ~ x runneD ~ / (?~ it^ae / ~ i.~ ~ !. ~ !off ~~~ \\\\)) ~ ~ ~ •~ $ \ rn J ~ ~ ~ I ~ i yruw ~ E/+h AFS+Iy/' ' /V 111 \ \ '1I 1p ~'UIY,iJN/ f~'Ri 1 e•~a,...nu )w IA ~ ~ f; ~ P ~ 1 v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~' ~:, ~ \ ~ rv i v ,~ I z ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ 1 ba'f) ~ ~r ~ ~ ~l i ~ ~ lwr, '~ I !( MI 1 ~ ~ ~ t " I ..IgD ~ ~~ I f-' ! -L„ ~ ~ ~~ , d , . ~ • ~ le^o« r ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~1 rew.9 ~tµ ~ ~'~ ..,~ ~ i ~ r_v_~ ~ ~(h ~ ~ ~ u-iii 1. > ~ ~ i I ~ ~ti ~ A roec9~ ~~ / ~ - /1J ~I t~~ox On, \~ ! _ __ _ ` ~P. (1~~~ ` _ / //%,, j ~ I 1 j f 1 Pe, Y Af ~ ~ ~ ~ ' RAAA<I ~ ^ ~ I I _ ~\ r/. \ I 1 (+'7"nAt ~l~ i 1 ~ , j R i' 1 ~'~~ ~ ~ I -~~ ~ ~~ ~ {~.•_ ~ ~ ~R ~ IAA ~ it (v_G I lnr) DRn cv~Ry I ~ • !•o"t / ---~ ' ' i ~i •ku 1 /- /\` ~ t ^~ Ru 1 1 \ J :CHi FCfMEA81f GfCiJN/yCp I 1 1 A ~` I I ~ .J. ' '-~' \ ~~~~~ ~/~`~ _ ~ ~ ~~Y '~ ~ - -_ _ 1 I!vfeAU.eebM Oi ~uMb I h ~ 1~ } ,\ ~ ~11'eert ®Iw/1Rf( ~ •©,rat / i/ rNCitM!el:q' / •}t ~r01R I •®2.a~~ j ~ Il I I~~ • 1 ,~ • •(~~,~te.tl•a er •® \ II ~ ~ ,(U of :u ~ • e:a. ~. oe .ra. CJ a~ae 1 ) ~ f - - -- ---- ---- -- ----- - - - ---- - ~,~vt- - -- - -- w•wrv~ er 6 !bl S•p•o~ ~0~ F~3~3 /I~^ ~U~yy S~ H a, U ~U 0 rb d xa bb~ f~ eV U m x ax BaooA ~~,» ... ~ -z t i i Iob Tpk rylssbwidl lob Addmn 15670 N~eld Cwn I , I i it woo caln I 'I i~ i p I, ~ I ~xswaru i il! ~I~~! ~'~'~~p I~ it !~ ~ ~~~ I Il~~j6 lad ~ IfI~ `~~~ill EI ~~! aii ~~i ~I~' ~ ~ ~I~~~,~~~li ~I~~~I - ~1 'I° ui ~-- _ :_.~ t_ .b ~ ~ .. I I ^J i j . 1 L 1.- .yT,~ ___ S V'J` _ L _T~ 15H - I I ~' ' I _ .__ I -- -- _1 ~VI~ y e^_ 5 ~. s ~ ~- - - °~ ~ y I 1 - t ~•sw Isln~:'ror.. •w •nro5 ~.,. ~.w.,.,~ R1n• AY ..n. r.l....a.~dl lob Adtrew: 15670N ){ Id Coup Jab IP7J1-IM I'"'•-~ I.I, inl.. rY.nub®dl lab AddrnY l%7f FlryfleW Cwnl Isb /m-0I.701 wsu.can rA90UV8 I ~ ! ; i i I! ~ I i ~ jb ~1! ! ! ~21a 7 ggyy 3 ' ~ i i i l~~II ~ ~~~ ~i~ 1 I CI~ Y i ~ ~ j ~ 9 1 I ' ~~~III I uo~,~,.,I Io "ur " n , li i ~L i , i j al 1 ~ ' - ' .~- --t- _- . - J _- i_. I _1 I - •Yr+ 1i'- sn I I I I i I I I .u-r- - ^mu 1L ~z_Yn ___. t~ -1 w - I~ ___. i I,_~_ __~L L ~ - .__ ~. mnl_ Ib~ _ _ Y.Y __L -~- -' -_ _ ~ 1 ~' _.5- i 1'Yy .~"_ 'S. - ~L'_-~ -__t m alYYlr.n,,l~;, ~u15 was! ~V~>i rvW•us I usi s•wcYs I .wv rM•YJID yeIMS Y'Y •AAY •S •A~ y. f ra•mm ~~60E-0I~IOB Job Tlllr. aelelVhmldl )bAdJ en IKA H;yf ld looY fob 107-0I~101 I I I ' ' umlo.Tan i I 'r ; rwa B I '' ~ ~~! 16 ~~ 1 19i ~B ! ! - t ~ ( p Iroe i Il S~ 1t I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~C ~ id I I ' I i a ! f ~ 1 } } t f { }} $ 55 5 I §§ /5 $ 9 p S y RI T'Y ~,1 f i7.~ F 1.~''.6 ~~, 'a, ~ I:~~I: li ~ i ~ 1~,¥~'9 ~ ~ ~ EIJ i - -- ~ '- ~x -vi ~ -ila ~ sw __ ~~~ 111 ~> - a .__.. ~ L' ~. i L x . 1_i _ 1rA J- I o~ _ . . 1. -_ _ gums _ !Y.'r It m _ I ~ t a _.. ~ ; ~ ; I ~' ~~ ~~ ~:L FYI ~. fylMlt~nlYYl~'lllet I ~fsl.5 wvn51 Iw•fYl Ytw•nvv •YlY Y r,A IgxYf fil~•IIf.YY ~ .....~_._.__.._..~ I.1. ane~...~IL'A H.MeIdCmY ~°d 00IAI~10a sp•0 Y,F•YH 5•Ypi.f•waat Yy•W .Y~v vr•Y,~ ry lYf T6.•YS~ 1iMmlo.can rAUa ns i ~ I ;, a I.r i { '~, i ~i ,! ~I ~! ; i6 ;; ~ - '~ ~ i~ t I iy ~li5 3 ~ g ~ ~I~i~ Ili ! S 118 a~9i 1 ~ i~~ ' i p i9 ~ ~ ~ ~ !'~ ~ ff $ I ~~ ! r i~~ !'I $ a ~ ! t l ! ~ l,~ ! l ~I 1 ~ - ~I _ •mu _ z 1 ~_ _ • Lr-~. r~ I _ _ s ~ 1~~._ L~_ ~ ~ ~ 1L~. _ I _.__._ ~ _ ._.~I__ 1 :. ~_~L~. i 1 J1. _ 1..1_.._. ~ xannAruwcaswArwY mn III ]001__ rbYaArsrlvwwsr x16 v e lmiw 11 v- i -"~~,,pp Tm nmEm<anyondn mluYia WY. ~ ___i v - {- All dmmspo YIE YY borax y 4 Ye ~ppro~.lre ~ .~: ~~f' ~ z ~ 1 - 1y.. ~ d 9~~ '~-- 2a T21.I gi~10 ~r ~~~ ~ 251, r h~ ~• \ ~~ ~~ ~'~ ~. 6 S i f`~h t 7 T ~' ) ~ _y~' s/ I I\ - ~ - tc y~ • ;1~ I 1 ~` I ~Na ra lJ ~~~ 1 fi-- ., fl ~~l, f a ~`I ISk1Y +- - ~ b ILrS a : a~ l1 • I J~ ~. I 27 IY°181; .~> X14 ,r ~~~ I~~. ~ ~~ r ~~~\ ; ' F1 ti MIII11r ran xv ASSOCUns r 1•„~~ j, , 111. 1 1:.. F 6 ati +, ~ - 7J fl5s ~ clw,r, fa ,, ~/ ~. •tir r ,I ~_.. Fa10w.~Y twgY4, pIk ~- l _ ~, I ~.. - r '' _ 4., ,.a.m.,~w. `_--M~LCn6A< .V.o. w z~ W A o~ ~d~ H~~! ~~~ a ~~ ccW,, 0u'S ha V, V W rrJ•[ IbM 1a 0 .A x ~~ ~b ~~~ ~~b ~ ax B'/OCI You YYrr .,xl _ gO3K .Axr 1 ~--r pw polo o~xt Y,wl; s/ ~ x axMa, .axrtxmeA w,<~x.~ r NA~ n• '.1 ~ u,~u v .~sxx 1I tea,.. r,,.y ..wAt[_ - da ywt A•r ~~ ~ atn Ar. ' ' n4 ,o ww..~w. ..r-.. er.~x. ~ ,~;a~ c „, en, is vA+m.xeoea~~ .n,ul,:.mlxs ak• $NR~B PLA NiIN~i Plant Li9t mill. q'LYM~f HireDUiGO hLblC• Ix..~ m [x,yxnwlAta Ri~Mefen-n/'M"hA'/r • aesN.E 4YI imexnew q,nwR I Are CMIYON NAY6 9178 COYMBNT9 ~ Ac RV Ater ru6rxm ledw ~ AD u hwa 5brw L7wd' W tithe Nile I dwtee Nw 16xn All &' Arttwl 'ewwdd Car BrnildC aniw 1 kx,dwh en ht tdennt k q Ar Eeri, A'N Mxf 6 en dam Coq C xaAvtil' t ,dxne WCA Cwren'CwwiwB,q+' xA4ehn fidlew 1 d8n 6wdlwu'F'rxdri' ~ S ~ 9xnm ~ RND Ewdlenia' ufewlkllie 6 nh do.An kw.e a m.w. rou xew Nexlwad7k'Sdk D'On' 1 lie xlt Nr NmwrcdA) YeRw~' ~ 1 n0. INrN YY PA H A' m m I I Ix. dam 4eA wd n w t. v ' nvA R lahire 6 mkrvs mu Avnw lwuxxnaw, '~hxrel 6 kn Ym bxn NAmxn,a'JaM Fdxnrdr' helun burhlhwn 6 v ' Atkm, r.lmee v15u Vihwxuw ' rldwlhn dMnnum rxN,xxie 6 I 61oed kxwx ~ Doxn Y AM Walxwia rn. ~ ~iT ' .. '-. ~.. ~I . ~~. I t ~ -- nrr. ~I~ ~ ~. n._ _~y -rn rA AAFr' A' Aefi' j' StKEEf PU+N711J45 -••~ ~~ / :j r __ ~---_-- ~__~i. ut..rx.l n... fCIF0gC11gA IRON FeIYL wTl rWC /iLLxACS n`2f' GVL~xIAI. D. ~UU. Np[LAH FOR IWVCICLp NoJN; ~~ „~,,~, E_ ~~ ~,ne,. , q PEDEntIMI D ~; Da~~ ~ ( ; I ~ ` ,.~! ~.w w~~ Rclw I I 'Y ~ .., 9~ '~ y W'+G+6 PeC ___ .1 /f~[1A i^'NM w rc„r. wuw -ryr- :~~. °- - - d e ~' :Ni b I it ~ e a•rue 1 xa~ <wre.,c fti,. t~r~ A A to +svrPw n IA'.r pw mencoAmw n pwl e N IeAw veww ,~ nwper+zxc g iPal G4TE 1'•i' _ _ wr.rw.nrwr..s.uA L) I - - ~ x..>un....e ec~ Nww.+me AwA x»Iw: rrnw ,,. i r ,:•.,~~ Nu ~w, I ; ~ o x r ~. <weun iM0 r - i Mi.. _.. xd cxwti ve.nu~~ .~ Ne.r-.w.ae ~ wu I I, _~-I IW ~~jl ~, tREIYt ~:RAp -Iri- 7 ~ SNRp~F•ej~Y'f'- I [(8s- ~ ~ ~, ~ RLObLI'A4Mel fl p 1 I ~ -- N'~ /IER u L CGwMN :EvYio d•.r ~ -K.w-~ws rxe.lr sew fwVrl ~ A • r r =~a~wa.ito1 1 ~~. I ~" wn.exl v~`G"~`.~', i9E1i34.dlxrlxa 1 Glxb Wel 1.7eneA 9 1'.:Yr F ul. xNrJ m pwu 9 ~m~ tiO 1 mwrtk bolmp M1 .u 8 7!'xll'rvrcleu An.rtAf ~dK -„.~ ., z~ ~s wg A3 ~U~ O F~~ 61 `. I I~ M rr~j ~~.I F~ ~y ~i ~~a ~' ' Cd Q~ a 0 0 U o xb~ /~ 4.1 V,r~ ~{/ /~ x W Ax~Ax~ `v x nelrwr e•do,e I~ ~ ~ L-f wwnn 'li, • • • I in n ~~~ i ~~ !~ ~ ~' a° ;~,~ ~ i ,~ i ~ / ~ .~ \ o' , ~ -< ~~ S~ ;.~ / b~~6 !Z'1 ~ ~ ~ THE CARETAKERS HOUSE FOR ~ ~ GARY K O H L S A A T' ~ ~ ~ T~ ~, HAYFIELD HOUSE I A R C H I T E C T ~ o ~W: ~ ~ ~; ~ 18870 HAYFIELD COURT SARATOGA, CA. 7Q4 I 10-4' T -_. xensloes • • • I~ 1 _~- =.E l d90 /E_ -1 - ~~ J- R..7E '_. -`1_ - ~~^ e~lV llv ~f U ~ ~ 7~ _ _.-_ ECORd G tRpaN: u~:ER JW,~LV 01+d`Lu SY WR pE LY. CV rdK EXi9':nG GR,:,^E ~~ I I yT1 ' I s- I'S'T''~j T'TT+"~"' r ' f "1I. l I 1. i, c~~ _~ ~ - -~- WE RC d59 "9 ~ ~, }.l` i ~9 2 L Ea5 R RE © .fa ~L' b W'.E5 C Ea L SNP '-.^I~a 111:1 17 LDx 6.IE. ~"R'0 I.' ~ C't,1 L I.r 1 4j~{ ~ "d'LN "~i RC50.~LE ~. ~~~ ~.i;1 i ' r ~ ~` , any, ~ ~, L~, I I ~ i I II ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ d~ I _. -..-_..._. ~ r-_-_~. 1 _ 7r: Ca0W O~,x~7 -" ELJE Ed~0'0'L•L.: hS.GRd^<(gG'~N'G~ ' E G~._~',JO~ ~ FRd•c 1n00:;5 •• ° ~ ~ ~pJ.p~ ~ vccooJm ca f=ccEH7auD) }p rdiGl 9^LLO d C F ~ ~' ~u a w s x~~ o~- ux a~~ V ~ I E ~.. J r=, - _ ~ f ~~I'1 L ~ ; ~ t, r,r,,- 'T 1 - i i~ J t:. ~'. FRONT (NORTH)ELEVATION ,o~~ i - o0 Q V[EW _-- -- --- _ LNE'g .18'JJE EXSnuG Ga::E ___ I ; 15 Y7r. ~'` ~ 1T t 17 1 1 J 1 '' f l I }[ .. )~L~ 1 .Y L IP [r I1 J R. ) 1 f y , t ~~~' i ~ Lt 1'+ ~ n ~1.. ~* ''''`' ~Y ail ~~ n Si l~ I f ~ I''~~Li~ ~r~i JI ~ I r~' ~} ,r rf -s. ~, .'ri t,~,~'?r r Iri, ~~ ~ I tI ~ 4 Lkul t>i r ir~~ ,n ~I~~I IC LI 7z Q I~ I I r I i 'T ~ I,~' c a I ~ ~ r U ~ ~ I I ~ t, i~ ~'~ C'~4' .zT~r +I~ ~` ' r ,1~~ ~'t It ~~ *i ~ -~I ''`% ~ f~l ~' 1t tl tr '~ '`t ~ ' 1 t a I ~` 1' t' ) I i I LI 5 ~~ `.~>~ -t~ I~ _~ a err i4~ J 7 ~ J1it ~_t',r ~ ..~ ,_ ~ , ~ ~ ~.: ~ H ~;~} ;*~~1J~LC~~r ai~'r t~`~ ~,~ LT~i r~~ ~?'~'~~T~-'T}--i!~ aw L _ _ _...__ ...... ._ - Iy Q _. I "~ I II'~il! '' I z x IIIp -------- - ~ F ~. ~ A ~ _ - - - - _ ~ I EYE'NG w F~1 p _ ~ a ': --- _ ~I p. '~~.~~__ ~@ llf_` _ Wo ~~ LEFT (EAST) ELEVATION ~ sca~E rc.~q m Fxa ,~ ~ x VIEW b _ I o C G ao ^~ ~~ .:~~ x~~~~ ~~G SHEET A4 ~E ur7sxlrs ~- ~JJ ~J C~' Q r~1 ++ 76 G4 CCRRC&CH ~ V i lE919'd.~i GJ"~E` //~--- ir.E IB d9G'/E „dPSIE vEti'iG ~ -E/i5'rG Gid'JE ~ W C'6 4H.10 SE -- - - ~ - _ h~ - C_A56dgGFG95~J'0.E1 JLi~iL I Y I 1 i 1 1 f ~ 1- ~ L 1 7L 1-- FLI 7 n.EiS.RE!„n EG GEDSR -___ ~ fl _ !~ ~ I ~ ~1 # I t ~,J IJ 11 1 + "1 I l i ~.. I ( (II, t. ,l i 4 +- ..III L I -f ~ I t.~. I'. I 1 C Is~l, y 6~`1G'..5 ^VER Cd. 9NEE!WER L f fC 7.. Y 'lll ti I~ yy 1 ! y I -~ I Y I f Jf L fr f i 7 .1 GDX },~.QruhG•Pd"JET •G / ~~ ~ ~ -I l f I 7 C i ( ~ ~ ~ rI I O~ ~-+ -dra man RE'JDEFCE ~.~~ 17 - ~', ~~ j~~ Y. 'ri' ~}r i!.~t~ ~, it I ( ~! uI ~~ I ~ ~ ~ fir[ Il t~'i~ l i it t~~i` t y i ~ x z 5 (~ ~, t r J `~ }t ri~l t ~~ Il I ~ I nlI '41 t LIn I~ *' I; ~ r1 dX1 CCpOEe GJ'IE~b ~ J Y 1 I,+W ~ 1 I I :: L lT I I ,f -i~ . ~ U LrarG~7an4E5DEnCE-, _ i r 4- J -', _,, ~7 1-, I I.-. t ~ ~. ~/ a ' i ._ iX7 GRC4 GV 7Y7 ~___ _ _ ~ ._~ _~'-. _._ ( __ .. D Cy ...iE ..R:JC '_ EA i'_6dMG'0"d"CN 1 ~ J DER fCC _ V dtr ~J' ~'_ ~ - ~~ I I I W wE JEt.tl~ 0~~ 1..• F115.. GRdDE~ I ' I~ _ _ _ ~I I~~ _ _~- _ - - _ _ - - _ 1~.~I C = - _ _ _ .. ~I 'Et~S'oG Gfi.pE DPb.EG1.__J.GOJ ~ =w1~croDa,~^'= i I- - - ~ - - - -1 ~ r -' I _ -- ~ F4NH aw.ve 3LGdt 4i,ti^.CG G`i E4 r.~r~E~~' "~R ~ REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION 0rd'Cu 5^JCCO d" Ex~rrG~d~~.osE ~ 9C4L~V4•i-G VlrnEyW V iD a _ - LME IE d00JB ' ~ - _ _ EY~6iIgG GncDE EY6'FG GIIdGE -\ ~ ~ I _ _ _ ~--- -------- I RIGHT (WEST) ELEVATION ~,tL= t,e.!.p call VIEW p ~ - Ol~ a u ow I~~ io0 ~' =x rn A F ~W o !-+ U ~ L4 Q U~ W FxQ x 0 r a Do DAIS 2CC SCME d5S9A 101 V0. SHEET AS ~E pevsslDlss • • • ': CDx 5uE3".MY ~P:: 'EIIN 50 - -'- I~ _I ~r7 f~ I C1 X1111. ~ ~~~ (<I-~ ~- !'STG"'aM RE97ENCE ~ I c 15 IC E r.l { , t I ~ ~,~ Il" r t( ~ ll - ~ ~ r" i 7 ~ 1 II ~ . I ~ 1 ,111 1 . T I] , ~ 1_` l Ir C ~ lJ ~ v 4° Y .YIB'M!i GR.6x . 1 IC 11. I I .~ Ut . rl ~ T.7 1 7 ll. 1(~ I , , f~/ 4~~ t 9~ ,~5,1 I -~'~EE.Jax+s ~= ~ ~ I_' ~ l'!I ` ~~' + ~~ , 1 ~ ,11~ 4't ~ +Y5 CC°PER GJ'"ERE ~ I __ 1 .11 ~~ 1'~. .I. I II--a ~ rt~ x: CRLV~On~Yxi n I,;. - I f I ' ~ 'f ~1 ~ II k ~ yV_91. :,.. ..'C.. a0 E I I ~ I ~ III .' I ~ ; ~` ~ l ~ ~ K, i k E^b".G GR4DE _~ yL,.d+Sr.iCCLO/ER i I ~Lr'd GE`LGOL ~ ~ it f ~- - ~- - - - - Exli'IVGYdxIC:E=_ I i ~' 'I f ~ 'II ~~--FNEN GRdDE ~- ~_. _I. _! _ 1~_ LEFT ELEVATION VIEW ~J ~~~ - { -~ C'_WE 0.'RCLEaESE'A.E'. Il 1 1 ! C !iT y 4 rl $T ~ J~ ~ 2!4YERE RE!REd c^.. LEDda EHWi~_E90V9!(,4P E~+EE'OVER II '7 I ':1,'[ "- I L J 'r I I l,! I(`'~T'' ' LT i :7 C7X SIF_d`NVG-°d-ER'.'0 rd•[,~YdM REEIDE~.CE C II Ir III `~ nl ~\ t l .l >'~ 1741 I {l I yt I i - ~ ~ ~ ~ I f;. L I t I .1 `I 1 .._ I I I V L 7 1 7f1 ~ ~ I ' ll` I rlli:i I, ~~3xr CCP°ER GJi'ER6 r0 "d'C+7d~REs7E~LE .. 7.-__ __. __ ., E1F_9dV7'C n:.'Cu Iv A3E I _~~~ DCA.E G! 4 DIL'CLD .l-. _--- - - ~ ~ scodrs-uccoovER 7 _6"ERE 6_DG.Pd°ER _ r^v Yd'W 5*~~CLCd' EYErNG ^dv~ cc RIGHT ELEVATION ~aviEw FwC41 atADl - C1.s5 ~ lCC' 45^E"0.E`" Il I-4 R~~RE RJ~._C SR r 1 i, ,1.] %+VG ELVER CF SEE OVER I I l l~ I ~ . 1 Ili 1 I' ~' 1 T~t _ Dos.E G_tiED /b:'D '! .~_.l.. i. C -~R_ST :Cc CR J L~:x: I ~ e4v. -c ~d-L. ~ -b.sE i LG` ERE B_Y °/'ER rL'4'L. E'.CC.. d' Ex3'R9 ":n.+CSE FRONT ELEVATION +~,qLc. l,d d-O 4 V[EW I i L____..____ _____________________..__J REAR ELEVATION 9GALE I/4 d-C' V[EW F ~~ Q U W O, x~x ~ J r~ ~ d ! V ` Q U a aw ~~ a y~ 6 ~Q y =x r~N F QA ~ ~~ 0 0 w ~x~ Q x, of mi 0o i I --~ Dd7E :L C SCAI F. 4! 9•LW 10B YD sNEeT A6 c ms soar. ~+e!E- d eRgFR 4•Sp CEDdR SNnG.EE OVRL S~T„JEa 6 "L0.R DE ~• D0.0.EG'.d'ED+GLC ^'/E C'JpOER G: ' aE '„ M.rC+"Gh RE: JEtiCE 7x' cRO+,~ o, m: Ed ~'Y' ^.D rc -1'c.+ "d%::C~EE }LLQ* 9'J000 Or'a T~: L1Gw E~JLCC d' Ex5rhG `N NONE RCYLil0Y5 5 0.^ •~--=s-=---- '''` .~ ~ ~ `~ ,r"~ I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ LIVING I~ ;, ~~ ~ ~ Roos .- ~~ f -~`~ - ~~ - - - _ r `` --- .~..e: /, LSE 19 +BC/E EYiBffW (Ad7E ----~ ~~ i ~ ni ik'. ~ Ex~,.,GGR.J= SECTION A SG4_- I%a.i-C e. ear o*~tiG GR.:~ li I 1 A _G .. V~:_.: SF~'TION B 5GALE~-<•I-0 ", ~ \~~ ~~, ~ __---- ~ ° ~ -;hG,v~GR~7E ~EG•453 _ _ - _ _ - - - - _ I~ _ •e6~Da ^~ fi5~: G4:J'_ V'Ir- SECTION C (GARAGE) SCCLE i ~= •i-0 ISM ~ .- sE se~:~E Ex STGGRLJE E~~,GR<>E _G!~ES'5_~ =n'i~ GRtpE D ~~L~~~~ AUG 14 2001 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L ' F Q U ~ a w x F ~ 0~., xx< ~~ r~ Q a 1J V Q a w F" ~ ~~ a I ]p ~' =x ~ A ~ i~ ~~°; ~~ ~ ~ i ~x x ~ I Here. ~~o-c ~~ w~~ ~,x~ :xeet A7 ,~ -'"::M5~GR4JE :Yb""`.GGR~E { SECTION D (GARAGEI • • • ~_ P l) I, i .III ~~ j ~~ ~ U' I 'U U wl m N ___. ._..___. ._ _, I - __.____-.. _ _. _. ____..____ I ~ ~- - -- -T---~, ~ ( ~~ I, i ~ \ ~ 4 , ~, 4 _ ~ 9/17 / 9/17 ~, 9/12 I I ~~ / 9/12 ~ j~~~ ~~ 9/17 ~~ 9/17 ~~ ~ ~-- - - --- ~--- -- -- - - - -- - - -- - - - ~ I \ ~. ~~ ~ C/f~, V ~o I -- - / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~` ~ ~~ .~ I j -~ ~ ~~ ~'- - -~ ~~~ U -------~--~_ ~ ;u ~ ;' ~~ ~, ~ ~ i% 1 ~~ _~ _~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i ~ i sti~~~ , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~mm~ \I ji A ~' 1~1 9/17 II 9/p .a~~~C~ ~i >~Ag ', (V FOb Ito m; ~~~;~ AF ~ .°a ~ a 9/17 9/17 A ~ ~~ ~ ~ m °i~ A `m j ----- ----' - 1 -----~ -._______ __ _. -T. __._ -__ _.____~-_- __.____. _.--_ 11~ r m l) 4m tUT P^:~~~ r~ j tk i~~ „ado ,~~ 7U@ ,..,~!~~ i 1i t. i~ nF np V~n ~u~. V p em„A, n e °~ ~~ .un ',~~j~~'! ~n U '0 ~~~ THE CARETAKERS HOUSE FOR ~~, A R Y K O H L S A A 'I~ ~ m~~, I HAYFIELD HOUSE A R c H[ T E c T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 RA70 HAYFIELD COURT SARATOGA, CA. ~ ITEM 3 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: I Date: I APN: 14900 Baranga Lane/DR-O1-033 FRED LUMINOSO/PAUL L. HULME John F. Livingstone, Associate Planner September 12, 2001 397-18-071 Department • • 000001 14900 Baranga Lane EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7/25/01 8/07/01 8/3U01 8/3U01 8/3U01 The applicant has requested Design Review approval to construct a new 5,998 squaze foot, two-story residence with a 2,760 squaze foot basement. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing two-story 4,336 squaze foot home. The maximum height of the residence would be 26 feet. The site is 55,757 square feet and is located within an R-1- 40,000 zoning district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting Resolution DR-Ol- 033. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution DR-O1-033, with conditions 2. City Arborist Report 3. Plans, Exhibit "A' • • • ~000~~ File No. DR-01-033;14900 Baranga Lane STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1-40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential -Very Low Density MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 55,757 sq. ft. AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 12.77% GRADING REQUIRED: Total cubic yards of cut would be 1,710 to a maximum depth of 10.25 feet. Of this, 920 cubic yards would be for the construction of the basement. Total fill would be 102 cubic yards. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of construction of a new single-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and consists of constructing one single-family residence. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The proposed exterior finishes will be a combination of stucco, limestone veneer and a slate looking roof. The limestone will act to anchor the base of the building and break up the mass of the facade. The stucco will be painted an earth tone tan color "Rocky Coast". The entry and garage doors are proposed to be painted a lighter tone than the facade of the building. Color and material samples will be available at the public hearing. Proposal Code Requirements Lot Coverage: Maximum Allowable 23% 35% Building Footprint 5,325 sq. ft. Driveway/Parking 5,905 sq. ft. Terrace and Walkways 1,650 sq. ft. TOTAL (Impervious Surface) 12,880 sq. ft. 19,514 sq. ft. Floor Area: Maximum Allowable First Floor 4,667 sq. ft. Second Floor 627 sq. ft. P:V'lanning\John L\Bannga Ln 14900 SRdoc 000003 File No. DR-01-033;14900 Baranga Lane Garage 702 sq. ft. (Basement) (2,760) sq. ft. TOTAL 5,998 sq. ft. 6,140 sq. ft. Setbacks: Minimum Requirement Front 62 ft. 30 ft. Rear 182 ft. 20 ft. Left Side (exterior) 39 ft. 25 ft. Right Side (interior) 21 ft. 20 ft. Height: Maximum Allowable Residence 26 ft. 26 ft. Detached Garage N/A 12 ft. PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review The applicant has requested Design Review approval to construct a new 5,998 square foot, two-story residence with a 2,760 square foot basement. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing two-story 4,336 square foot home. The maximum height of the residence would be 26 feet. The site is 55,757 square feet and is located within an R-1- 40,000 zoning district. The neighborhood is a mix of one and two story residences with varying architectural styles, including some Ranch, Mediterranean and Traditional. There are some newer residences on the block mixed with an older housing stock. The building heights range from approximately 16 feet to 26 feet. The existing 4,336 square foot house. has a 1,431 square foot second story. The proposed residence will only have a 627 square foot second story. The reason this area is considered a second story is due to the underground garage below. If the earth in front of the garage doors did not have to be removed to provide access for vehicles, the home would be considered a single story house. The proposed project implements the following Residential Design Guidelines policies. • Policy 1,"Minimi.Ze Perception of Bulh" The project meets this policy in that the proposed house will have a minimal second floor, thus reducing the bulk of the building. The proposed house will also have varying hip and gable roof lines with bay windows and stone chimneys that will break up the elevation of the building. Articulation is also provided by the use of arched windows and heavy corbel accents. • • • P:\Planning\John L\Bacanga Ln 14900 SRdoc 000004 File No. DR-01-033;14900Baranga Lane • Policy 2, "Integrate Structures with the Environment" The proposed house meets this policy in that the house is surrounded by mature landscaping which will be maintained as part of the proposed landscape plan. The applicant is proposing to use natural stone materials for the facade and a fire free faux slate roof. The remainder of the building will be stucco with an earth tone color. Policy 3, "Avoid Interference with Privacy" The project will protect the privacy of the adjacent properties by maintaining the existing mature trees that surround the site and by orienting the main entrance towards Three Oaks Way where a setback of over 62 feet is provided from the property line. • Policy 4, "Preserve Views and Access to Views" The proposed house is not in a view corridor and will not have an averse affect on any of the neighbors view. The closest neighbor on the east side of the proposed residence sits at a higher elevation and the proposed residence would not block their view of the hills. • Policy 5, "Design for Energy Efficiency" The project meets this policy in that the location of the proposed house has not altered the solar access of adjacent properties. The house will also meet the State Energy Guidelines through the use of wall insulation, areas of thermal mass, and high-energy efficiency heating and cooling appliances. The City Arborist,,the Public Works Department and the Fire Deparanent have reviewed • the application. Comments from the City Arborist and the Fire Department are included as conditions of approval. Parking The Saratoga City Code requires each residence to have at least two enclosed parking spaces within a garage. The residence would have an attached 704 sq. ft. three-car garage. Grading Total cubic yards of cut would be 1,710 to a maximum depth of 10.25 feet. Of this, 920 cubic yards would be for the construction of the basement. Total fill would be 102 cubic yards. Trees The applicant is proposing to remove two protected trees. One of the trees is a Eucalyptus and is in very poor health, and the other tree is a Pine and has a major structural defect. There are 12 protected trees on the property. None of these trees are close enough to the existing house to be damaged during the demolition. The City Arborist report dated April 3, 2001 (attached) contains recommendations for the protection of existing trees on the site. The arborist's recommendations shall be conditions of project approval. A certificate of deposit of $629 is also required as a condition of project approval. P \Planning\John L\BanngaLn 14900SR.doc OO ^ OO~ File No. DR-01-033;14900Baranga Lane Fireplaces The plans indicate that four fireplaces and four chimneys are proposed in the new residence. There will be one wood-burning fireplace in the family room and the other three, located in the library, living room and master bedroom, area gas burning only. The conditions of approval stipulate that only one fireplace maybe wood burning. Correspondence No correspondence was received on this application at the date that the staff report was distributed to the Planning Commission. Conclusion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code. The residence does not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape to the extent feasible, and will minimize the perception of bulk so that it is compatible with the neighborhood. The proposal further satisfies all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting Resolution DR-OI- 033. • P:~Planning~John L~BarangaLn 14900SRdoc c OOOOOV Attachment 1 • APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. DR-O1-033 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAUL L. HULME; 14900 BARANGA LANE WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval for the construction of a new 5,998 square foot residence on a 55,757 square foot parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and Whereas the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application Eor Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: The height, elevations and placement on the site of the proposed residence, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhood; and (ii) community view sheds, will avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy, in that the proposed house will have a minimal second floor, thus reducing the bulk of the building. The proposed house will also have varying hip and gable roof lines with bay windows and stone chimneys that will break up the elevation of the building. Articulation is also provided by the use of arched windows and heavy corbel accents. The natural landscape will be preserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minim~ing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas in that only two trees are being removed as a result of construction and minimal grading will be performed due to the flat area where the proposed house will be located. The majority of the grading proposed is necessary to construct the basement, which would not alter the terrain as seen from adjacent and neighboring properties or from public right-of-ways. • The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots, and to the surrounding region, will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the natural environment, in that the building is softened by the use of 0~~0~~ different materials on the building facade. The varied roofline and the use of different materials and chimneys break up the mass of the building. The proposed house is also surrounded by mature trees that the natural stone materials and earth-tone exterior color will blend in with, minunizing the perception of the structures bulk. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bullz and height with (i) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (i) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties; nor (ii) unreasonably impair the ability of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy in that the structure's design incorporates elements and materials which minimize the perception of bulk and integrate the residence into the surrounding environment. The main entrance to the structure will face Three Oaks Way and will be set back over 62 feet from the property line adjacent to this street. • The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates current grading and erosion control standards used by the Ciry in that the construction requires a Ciry-issued building and grading permit. Appropriate grading and erosion control methods shall be required as a part of that permit. The proposed residence will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Guidelines and as required by Section 15-45.055 and discussed in the attached staff report. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application of Paul L. Hulme for Design Review approval be and the same is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped August 20, 2001, incorporated by reference. 2. The following shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building permit plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page and containing the following revisions: i. A maximum of one wood-burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning. ii. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor. ~000~8 • iii. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the RCE or LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 3. The final landscape plan submitted during the building permit plan check review will need to meet all of the requirements outlined in Section 15-47 of the Ciry Zoning Ordinance. 4. The final design details for the proposed pilasters shall be shown as a detail on the submitted plans for building permit review. The final design shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director. 5. FENCING REGULATIONS - No fence or wall shall exceed six feet in height and no fence or wall located within any required front yard shall exceed three feet in height. Any existing feces or walls not meeting the zoning ordinance standards shall be removed prior to the project being final. 6. No structure shall be permitted in any easement. 7. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on-site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on-site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. PUBLIC WORKS 8. The applicant or its designated representative shall apply for and secure a grading permit. CITY ARBORIST 9. All recommendations in the City Arborist's Report date stamped Apri110, 2001 shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. This includes, but is not limited to: a. The Arborist Report shall be incorporated, as a separate plan page, to the construction plan set and the grading plan set and all applicable measures noted on the site and grading plans. b. Five (5) ft. chain link tree protective fencing shall be shown on the site plan as recommended by the Arborist with a note 'to remain in place throughout construction." The fencing shall be inspected by staff prior to issuance of a Building Permit. c. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 000009 10. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security in the amount recommended by the City Arborist to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees on the subject site. 11. Prior to Final Occupancy approval, the City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. Upon a favorable site inspection by the Arborist and, any replacement trees having been planted, the bond shall be released. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 12. The roof covering shall be fire retardant, Uniform Building Code Class "A" prepared or built-up roofing. (Reference Uniform Fire Code Appendix 3, City of Saratoga Code 16- 20:210). 13. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed in the newly constructed garage (2 heads per stall), workshops, or storage areas, which are not, constructed as habitable space. To insure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. The designer/architect shall contact the San Jose Water Company to determine the size of service and meter needed to meet fire suppression and domestic requirements. (City of Saratoga Code 16-15.090[I]). Automatic sprinklers are also required for the residential dwelling (including the square footage of the basement). Documentation of the proposed installation and all calculations shall be submitted to the fire district for approval. A four head calculated sprinkler system is required. The sprinkler shall be installed by a licensed contractor. 14. Provide an Early Warning Fire Alarm System throughout all portions of the structure, installed per City of Saratoga standards. CITY ATTORNEY 15. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 16. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this Ciry per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 24 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. . 000010 Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of September 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • 00001 u T~IIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • (1(ln(l12 ' BARRIE D. C .TE AND ASSOCIATES Attachment 2 Horticultural Consultants i (408) 353-1052 Fax (408) 353-1238 23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033 AN~ ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TREES AND PROPOSED DEMOLTfION AND CONSTRUCTION AT THE HULME PROPERTY ON 14900 BARANGA LANE Prepared at the Request of Community Planning Dept. City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 Site Visit by: Barrie D. Coate Apri13, 2001 Job #03-01-074 Plan Recd: 3-22-01 Plan Due: 4-6-0 l APR 1 0 2001 cn"Y or snkn r~~cn 000013 AN ANALYSIS OF THE REL. MISHII' BETWEEN TREES AND PROPOSED DEN TION AND 1 CONSTRUCTION AT THE HULME PROPERTY ON 149A0 BARANGA LANE Assignment Mr. Connolly asked me to inspect the property at 14900 Baranga Lane to determine relationship between trees on the property and potential damage to them by demolition of the existing house, or construction of the proposed house. The plan used as reference was prepared by Harry Balicka of the International Design Group, dated 2-2-01. Summary There are only twelve trees large enough in diameter to be controlled by city ordinance on the property and most of those are of little value. The inventory includes four silver dollar eucalyptus (Eucalyptus polyanthemos); one F,ucalyptus microtheca; one canary island pine; two Aleppo pines (Pinus halepensis); one very poorly shaped Blackwood acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) and one poor olive tree. None of these trees are close enough to the existing house to be damaged by demolition. Two of them, trees #] and #7 are close enough to potentially be damaged by construction activity, but in both cases, those are both relatively poor trees of little value. Discussion Tree # l a Eucalyptus microtheca, is in very poor health due to the severe infestation of red gum lerp psyllid, and tree #7 an Aleppo pine, has amajor co-dominant leader, a structural defect at approximately 10 feet above grade. This trees health is reasonably good, but it certainly must have a cable between the two parts to prevent it from splitting apart. The rest of the trees are so far from any apparent activity that I cannot imagine damage to them occurring. The only tree on the property which has any significant value is the one canary island pine (Pinus canariensis), and that is far from any activity. The value of trees # 1 and #7 totals 53,143. I suggest a bond for 20% of that value be asked which equals 5629. If tree #7 is removed, its value is 52,216 which is equivalent to one 36-inch boxed and two 24-inch boxed native trees. Acceptable native tree replacements are: Coast live oak - Quercus agrifolia Valley oak - Quercus lobata Big leaf maple - Acer macrophyllum PREPARED BY: HARRIS D. COATS. CONSULTING ARBORrST APRIL 3, 2A0 ~ nnnn~ ' AN ANALYSIS OF THE REI.r NSHIP BETWEEN TREES AND PROPOSED DEN. fION AND ~ CONSTRUCTION AT "' THE HULME PROPERTY ON UIf00 BARANGA LANE • California buck e - Aesculus call ornica ey .f Coast Redwood -Sequoia sempervirens Recommendations 1. Install fence(s) of S feet tall, chainlink material on iron posts driven 18 inches into the ground before demolition begins. Fence locations are shown on the enclosed plan. Respectfully submitted, L1 ~ Cam, Barrie D. Coate ,6•~ Enclosures: Tree Data Charts Glossary of Terms Map BDC/sl • L~ PREPARED BY: BARRDr D. COATS. CONSULTING ARBORIST APRIL 3, 2N1 000O3.S BARRIE D. C. .TE AND ASSOCIATES Horticultural Consultants (408) 353-1052 Fax (408) 353-1238 23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033 GLOSSARY Co~lominaut (stems, branches) equal in size and relative importance, usually associated with either the trunks or stems, or scaffold limbs (branches) in the crown. Crown -The portion of a tree above the trunk including the branches and foliage. Cultivar - A named plant selection from which identical or nearly identical plants can be produced, usually by vegetative propagation or cloning: I)ecurrent - A term used to describe a mature tree crown composed of branches lacking a central leader resulting in around-headed tree. Ezcurrent - A term used to describe a tree crown in which a strong central leader is present to the top of a tree with lateral branches that progessively decrease in length upward from the base. Girdling root - A root that partially or entirely encircles the trunk and/or large buttress roots, which could restrict growth and downward movement of photosynthates. Included bark -Bark which is entrapped in narrow-angled attachments of two or more stems, branches, or a stem and branch(es). Such attachments are weakly attached and subject to splitting out. iKiuked root - A taproot or a major root(s) which is sharply bent and can cause plant instability and reduction of movement of water, nutrients, and photosynthates. Root collar -The flared, lower portion of the base of a tree where the roots and stem merge. Also referred to as the "root crown". Leader -The main stem or trunk that forms the apex of the tree. Stem -The axis (trunk of a central leader tree) of a plant on which branches are attached. Temporary brancLes - A small branch on the trunk or between scaffold branches retained to shade, nourish, and protect the trunk of small young trees. These branches are kept small and gradually removed as the trunk develops. DeSuitiou of Woodsy Parts Truuk -The main stem of a tree between the ground and the lowest scaffold branch. Scaffold brancbes - In decurrent trees, the branches that form the main structure of the crown. Limb - A major structural part. Branch - A smaller part, attached to a limb or scaffold branch. Branchlet - A small part, attached to a branch. Twig -Avery small part attached to a branchlet. Leaf -The main photosynthetic organ of most plants. 000016 Job _.c~ulme Job Address: ls.~aran a Lane ob #0...,~4 g J 301 Mss sunm erMs Con ditbn Pru nlnal Cabli Nee ds PestlD bees e Pro blems R ecom mend . ' BARRIE D COATE ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ! vl '? . and ASSOCIATES ~ s N ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ > ~ js}1052 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ I i ~~~j LL N ~ I ~ ~ W ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o p ~ o Z ~ ~ 4> ~ ~ o ~ ~ W ~ C trCfet,G l5Cl0 in ~? Q: z ~ ~ s x 1 w ~ = w ~ ; pO ~l V V F- ~' 2 x ~ ~ V t O o ~ 3 ~ 3 O W ~ F- V V 3 Y N N j~j m ~ ~ ~ ~ W d J6 W O ~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~ J Z K y W W pc Z ~ ~ f' o W O W O Key ~ Plant Name o ~ o 0 o x rn x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W O ~ ~ ~ ~ a: o. o ~ x x z z 1 Euca a mlaofhsa 18.0 19 45 25 3 1 4 3 . In 254 X S27/sq. In. = S 8,887 X sp. daas 30% 62,080 X cond. 75% = s 1,545 X loc. 60% = S 927 ToW Value 2 Can Island Pine 14.0 18 40 15 1 1 2 Plnus cana-lsnsis . In 154 X S27lsq. In. = S 4,154 X ap. dasa = SO X cond. = S X Ioc. = Z Total Value 3 Glant uoie 7,0 x 8.0 7.0 , 22 15 25 1 4 5 S uoladendron entea , ~ . In 38.5 X S271sq. In. = i 1,039 X sp. dasa = SO X cond. = S X loc. E Total Value 4 Sllver Dopes Gum 20.0 ~ + 22 35 35 1 2 3 Euca ua enthemoa . In 314 X S27lsq. In. = S 8,478 X sp. dasa 30 X cond. = s X loc. = S ToW Value 5 SNver Dollar Cum 13.0 15 40 20 2 2 4 t f . In 133 X S27/sq. In, = s 3,582 X ap. dasa = SO X cond. s X loc. • S Total Value 6 Ollve 8.0 x 8.0 8.0 18 15 20 1 3 4 ~ Oleo suro asa j ~ . in 28.3 X S27laq. in. = i 783 X sp. dasa = s0 X cond. = S X loc. = S - Total Value REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES 5-gal = 636 15-gal = 6120 24"box =6420 36"box = 61,320 48"box = sS,000 S2"box = 67,000 72"box = 615,000 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST Paf~e 1 of 2 job _ itle: Hulme job Address: , _~00 Baranga Lane job #l-., -J1-074 Msa sursm ente Con dition Pr unin /Cablin g Nss ds Psst/ Dlseas e Pro blems Rscom msnd 1 . i I t I t BARRIE D. COATS I j _ I I ~ ~ ` I ~ v' ~ ~ I ' and ASSOCIATES l I w o iA 4 = ~ ~ ~ , ~ O ~ ~ I "' ~ x ~ ~ (106) 3531052 h ri- ~ _ ~ ~ ~ w 3 O t ~ ~ " rn ° W i W soles sesar Itasd ~ N ® N v W ~ ~ H ~ Z ? ° y z m 4 c W 4 'n Z ~ > ~ ~ I ~ ~ W d F c I a l p Let Cetnt, U 9lm0 of ~ ~ ~ Z ~ _ a W ~ o. ~ O C ~ w ~ < ~ Z I F- ~ ~ V t O v 2 - - 2 o: d 2 ~ z W ~ H U 3 Y U .~ U y N t it ~ s x m -~ O x m x m ~ _ 52 0: ~ ~ z p p ~ O O '~ ~ W 9 w ~ Key 1< Plant Name o ~ o 0 o W x 0. rn x f- O Q: ~ K K ~ ~ ~ N z ~ O I~ ~ ~ ~ z W y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a o c 7 AI Pine 22.0 25 45 30 1 1 2 Pious hsls nsis ~ . In 380 X 5271aq. In. = s 10,258 X sp. Gass 30% 13,078 X cond. 90% s 2,770 X loc. 80% = s 2 218 Total Value 8 Sliver Ddlar Gum 19.0 21 50 30 1 2 3 l ' . In 283 X s271sq. in. ^ s 7,851 X ep. G8s8 s0 X cou d. _ s x lac. s Total Value 9 Silver Ddlar Gum 13.0 ( 14 35 20 2 2 ~ 4 ! I ~ i . In 133 X 627/sq. in. ^ S 3,582 X sp. class ^ SO X cond. _ s X loc. ^ s Total Value 10 Blackwood Acacia 18.0 ! ! 18 30 15 1 3 4 1 Acacia ms/snox loo I ~ !i II ~ ` 1 I . in 201 X 327/sq. In. ^ 3 5,428 X sp. Gass SO X cond. ^ S X loc. _ s Total Value 11 Ale o Pine 15.0 ~ 18 40 25 1 2 3 ' ' = i . in 177 X 3271sq. In. ^ 5 4,789 X sp. class SO X cond. = S X loc. - _ Total Value 12 Black Pine 11.0 I 112 25 125 1 1 2 I , Plnus fhunbs lens I` I i s I I , . in 95 X 127/eq. in. = s 2,585 X sp. Gass = SO X cond. = S X loc. ^ s - Total Value ~ O REPLACEMENT TREE VALUES O 5-gal = S36 15-gal = 6120 24"box =5420 36"box = 61,320 ~ 48"box = 52"box = 57,000 ~ 72"box =~ 1 =BEST, 5 =WORST Pa~f 2 • • [7 r ~ -d 33~ !>A °x w ~ On~ 3N~ ^S, ~~ O A CI ~ _ ~~ R >n C EI~O ~ i gs °7= ~i~ ~ ~ // r~ N y N T I I I /~'F ~~ ~ 1 ~~ / ~ X/~ b_ .e~ c ~ / / ~I / ~ /` y "' N 8 S ~ ~ ~ I ;- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ /~ ~ ~g~l~i~- ~ ~ ~ A // ~ f ~~~~ ~/ ~ i/ r ~i °~ ,~ /~ ~ ~ -. ~,- / ~/~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ,~~ . ~ r ~_~ ~ i ,f '~'~o s I.c4t I I~ MJ. ~~ i i/11 .. ii -~~/~~ U II- ~I 1II ~I // ~ ^i ~. i 00003,9 • THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 000020 • • • • • 1 I' I \ )I I 11 I \ )1I ~ z c I 1 Q 1~ PI n ` oI1'L'- ~ ~ .cui ~ . r 7R• o \ ; ~ SETBACH ~ ~ -_ T2 °T ~ S N ) \ \ '~ I J \\~I o _ ~ \ \ z I \~ ~ `~~'\ T ~s \\ ~ T ~ 4 \ \ ~ ~~'\ ~1 ~__e~ 1 I F . \V,', SNPV g5 'GE CP .`C\ \~ ~ \ C.. \~\ ~fj ~\ \ 0 ~~ ~ ~:?,~ _ ~0~0 ~ T 0 V ~ ~ ~ , ., ~, ~\ ~~ ~~ A ~~~~ ~ ~~ \ ~ \ti •\~ A \ ~,\^O Cg42 ~,, ~ ~ 9 • ,~ CAR BELOW \\ ~ ~ A\~ sHCwN'DA D FA ~ \o ~~~~.\\ t ~ e ., \ V ~(E) 18' EU jTOBE- REMOVED A ~~, ~ 6'0' MA%. ~ TERRACE RETAINING \ VV \ ~ WALL TYP. ~ 'I ~ ~ ^\ ~~ 2 .. ~ MOTOFI~ , SITE NOTES: I. UNITS Of GRADING SHOULD BE CONFlNED TO THOSE AREAS NECESSARY fOR THE SUBJECT PgOJECT; I.E., AS MUCH A$ THE VEGETATED LANDSCAPE NOT ASSOCIATED PATH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHWLD BE LEF1 A$ UNOISNRBEO AS POSSIBLE. 2. 6 RAIN IS IN THE FORECAST, ALL E%POSED SOIL SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY PROiECkO WITH SiRAw MULCH, EROSION NEiRNG, AND 570CKPILES COVEREp VAiH PUSDC SHEERNC. THESE ITEMS SHOULD BE REPT ON HAND Ai ALL DMES DURING CONSTRUCTON 1. CUT AND FILL MATERIALS SHOULD BQj BE SiOCNPILEO WHERE THEY MAY WASH ON.O ADJ(NNINC PROPERRES ANO ROADWAYS. ANY IMPORTED OR NADVE MATERIALS pEMAINING AFTER COMPLERON OF THE JOB SHg1L0 BE HAULED OFFSITE. 1. RE-SfGETA?E ANO PRO1ECi All DISNRBEO SqL PRIOR TO OCTOBER 15. THE APPROPRIATE GRASS/ LEGUME SEED MI%E5, JUTE AND/ OR EROSION NETTING. AND STRAW MULCH SHWLD BE USED FIR TEMPORARY COVER. PERMANENT VEGETATION SHOULD INCLUDE NAIVE AND DRWGHT RESSTANT KANTS. 5. IPRICADON AC1i`A?IES Ai 1HE SITE SHCULD AiWAY$ BE PONE IN h CONiROLLEp AND REASGNABLE MANNER. PUNTER AREAS SHOULD NOT BE SITED ADJACENT i0 WALLS: OTHERWISE. MEASURES SHOULD BE iMPIFMENTED i0 CONTAIN IRRIGATION WATER ANO PREVENT 17 fRCM SEEPING IN70 WALLS AND UNDER FpiNOATICNS. 6. RAIN GUTTERS SHOUIp BE INSULLED ON ALL ROOF DOWNEAVES wNICH CONNECT i0 PERIMETER STORM pRAN LINES. 7. SEE SEPARATE CRApING KAN FOR AODIiIONAI INFgtMAiION .. ~ '. ~ R7 f-,` ~~ ~ ~ S~UgS 1 \ \ W ~ ~ ¢/~~~ Q,_ ~ .~~ (~a \ ~U~`lh~.~ ~ti \ \ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~' N I 4EW 6" 0' ~ ?~I D STONE PiLPSiE~?$ \ J ~ I~ y ~ ~z I I 0~ j ~J sa. ~ ~~ ny~ 4' ll ~ COB LE STONE it C~ 7e I 0 DRIVf WAY V~ I 30 O' l9 Q, 0 Q 0 I IR $ETa Aft iIL1 IT E L/ *~e I ~ ~ \ NEW Ic LANDSCAPED LAWN W/ ' 'RRIGAnON ` ~~ J A ~ iT o" I ~. ~~ f,~ ~ r '0 0js tl \ A ~ \. / \~ o, ~ aE)REMOPYED TO\ SITE LEGEND ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ E%IS~. 1c' cDNrouR ~ ~~ ~ I \ \ ~ i I, E%sT 2' coNia.IR ` NEW SON7a1R _ _ _ ... - - .. _ ~ ~ Y PRCPEP.7Y LINE CENIERUNE E%:SDNC EDGE OF aAVEME\' FENCE LINE ~- r. 5'-D' iE~NCE .C REMAI\' ~-EDGE CF RCAC BARANGq LAIsE SITE PLAN -EDGE GF RGAD Y Y Q w Q I PRO.~ECi SITE 1 PLANNING INFO. . Pao.ECT scDPE DEMOUg1 EgS71NG TMO STORY HOME AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 2-STORY SINGLE FAMIEY DWELUND MITH AN ATTACHED CM ACE • A.P.N. 391-IB-071 • PRO,A:LT WWRESS: 11900 BAAANGA LANE SARAiOGA, CA. 95070 • 20NE: R-t-10 • E%ISRNG USE: 1336 y, iWC1 STDAr HOME • lDi 9ZC: 55,757 y (1.28 ACRE) . uLOWABI.F FLDDR AKA 6.u0 SF • 4A% BLDG. HT 16'-0' . aulLDwc cut's: BUILDING FOOiPRINi E%ISiING PROPOSD A A IB y 701 tat. FIOCR 2,157 y I,fi67 y 2nd. f'.OOR 1,131 y 627 y BASEMENT (memo) - y 2760 y TCiu LS36 y 5,996 y E%ISRNG IMPERNOUS COVERAGE 8,065 S OR H.SS (DRIyf;WAr, WALKS $ PATIOS) • l01 COVERAGE f,AtG'5.. BUILDING FOOIPRM? 6,525 y MPERNOUS COVERAGE 7,555 y 1J.6E (DRIVEWAY, WALKS h PATIOS) 70T0.L. 12,880 y OR 23E MAA1MUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWABLE 19.515 y OR JSE ^ CRAOMC. CUi DRIVEWAY @ MOTOR COURT 710 CY . E%CAVA710N: MAIN RESIDENCE 569 CY GARAGE 221 .,Y BASEMENT 920 CY 107AL: 1,710 CY • TREE KMOYAL: 2 . TOPOGRAPHY; GENTLY SLOPING • AVG. ROPE 12.772 OR 16.00E REDUCTION S= 0.00229aIa l A I....LONTOUR INTERVAL L.-.. TOiu LENGTH y CONTOURS A... AREA (IN ACRES) 5....AYERAGE SLOPE S = OA0229 * 1' . ] 568' ~ t 2 775 . 718 •PflOAC COMPLIANCE. I. 199? UBC.UMC 2. '.99d NEC J rlnE 2. ~ ~~~o~~ ~ AUG 2 7 2001 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1a a;- qtr r~::. _~~_~~ zt -„ n tt(( E t;l ~~ :~~„~~~ itotlg°t~1~~lE~ 1E`Be'~t IZatpL i a u i i i C s a < SnE Pu> 7,-7 m o_- RE+4d.5 J ~ 0 ~ 'i f0i 3 E IZ~O - F I , FWQ QOJ -- Z ~ -_ up F ~ • =Q < IQZ °: OW~ a'a ~~ ~- A1.0 STONE 0 MOTOR COURT b' W II I /~ /7 ~~ P4c L•3' N C10t7: CICY E B3 es VICINITY MAP • • • yaG:Cc3ytleaae,~icaa,Cu,v~mu.~., ', I v - S iy ,a tl d4 ma iTin ~a rla ela4A44q~4h4~4h44 444 h4 i~ I~ I ~'~ 1 I / ~^ se !~~I m qe~ °h@4.h4N4ah4~yy4a> 4hA k® li~Q , ~ I ~ ~~ ~ v `~~ ~ r ';~~r«~~aaH;zK~~ea y~~~eaK~~x~' ~~ ~ ~~ . . a ~ :'.env;r.r.;+~~~:r.~xr,~uxv:x~cM+lv;~xxr',, ~ u o„I i _~ Z r r\m/}j I11 r Z ~` ~' / ~ , J ~ _.~- --' ~--~ !~ f ~- .~ ,,; ti ~ ---- ~ ~ - - _ .-- - - ----- _ r ~ -- - - --- ~. - - --'--- -- - I -_- - -_- - --- ~ ------- _- ----- - - t _- ~ . ._6. __ _,,._e. ---- F.. a._ ~ ~ _-_ ._e. :, 1._e. i ~--- i o ~ \ -___ _ o - ~ o a ~ ~ _ , a g y o m m p I __~ ~ .. _ _ .~ _ _ o _ - '" f { I ` - ~ u 4 y 4 ~ -- - i' e• Y- Y -- ae' . ~ y ~ _. -._.. . .,~~.... I /// _ ~ • f'~ _ I I ~ y a > - _ _._ ___ I I R ,~ _ I_-6_ - -+--~ )'-e' ~S'-0' _-_ ~ Y'-o' ~_-_-_ _o a'_6 ~, 1 6 I /„ ~Ul ~ -__ I I -... _ II I R ~ , J,_o I _ 'R ~ m I .. ~ Cl 1 _. -- - II _ I ~ { L _, r-e. ooo``` wVJ . . ._ _ p ~, ~ ~ ~ ,._ I ~-~. i g c' Iy R I p I ~ I I I I Z 1 1 ~ { i9 . . . ~ . . . - I 1 I I I ~ _e J _o _ _ ~ R a._e- e _~ e _o e._s. s. e. n. _-__ -3 -___ _ - _ ~.. _ . w _ _ ' o 4 R ~~ ._. ~~ e._e. e._o - ~._3. e• i o' a_a a __ - .. _ ,,. _. ... _. a m Il I - 76-e• ~ _._.._ -__ _._ __ I .:,, l -~ ~ o- --- - _ Y a• I ' . - -. _ (/z''~ ' i i ~ ~-'-t - _ _ ~~ IJ ~e' 7 '-e' I Yi i I I 1 I ~ mi~ ,. _71'-e' -__- i 4 4 'K ?-4 o _~o i e '~' a _ ______ -_ _ - - ~r __ ,~ , a -- --- --J --- ~ . \-- _ ___- ) I° ' Z ~ ; - - ~ : p ~ 1~ - _ l` -- °`0• --~ ~ `~ .J'-o• °e•-o• --=710-- J --RF=•- - m D N.,~ I~ i p m m '_ ..~ I a ,.' a ~.__ I ~ :m p ci w -- -_ ~ ~ '~ ~ l-r~ . •r ~ ---~- r-° - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ • ~ ~~ ~ m~ ' ~~~' ~~~ Ir~r 1. I I ' ~ ~ a _ I _ ~- I, ~ , -_- ~, ~~ ~~~~ J O H N ~. M A T T H A M s / ®E~ /5 U Pf<OP05Eh HFW H[:1DEylE f'~)R "a ea, x~".~r .~~ rY I rD di INTERNATIONAL OES10N GROUP ~ c ~.a -~'•P o ~ ~. z ~ -- J U N A. >! 1 L L A N O. .1•~_ -11)(I(I 1i ~111N(A 1 ~IvE ~ ~ aua r rn i I c~, u o u z r . v r v. c ~ r i c c u o v c a a. a s o I° ~ ~'~~ M d ' ~~'.. ~. len) a.a-IZa~ {•. ce.,i) a•a-i190 [-u • ~ ~. ~,;aa~u<o~„ I ~ SARATOCA, CA. ~~~a ""w,v.r • • • , ~r p~Gl ;I .im u~z a,'g it I k • . _ r 0 m r m m r ~ _°- ----- - -- - -- " ~° ---- _ - - ------- ---- 8-e----- --- - -"-e--- - --- ---- _._ - -------- o-- --------- i -- -- I a • ~ . ~ 1 - I --- o ~ ~ i - - - ~ C ~ ~m ~ , ~ ~ _ Za O ~ DD ~s 0 T ~ y q ~ y 1 ~ N ~~ ~ -~- - _ tf -~~ --- m I 1 I i ~ --- - - "'~ ro Z I m _ ~ --- ~ m ~ ~ • _ N ~ ;~ D Cl m • N ~ ~ > Yo ~ - rr L ~,, .. ~. __ _, 1 ----------~ I~( . ' ~ ~ i ~ 1 _---.. ~ ~ . -- a~ i ~ m~ ~i 1 ` ~ ~ rZ m _: a ,, I - -- _ ' . ---- -~- ~ ~' 0 `x 71 - ( m 10 0 .~ _._--_______--_-._ !-0- _ _ 5 0___-._.___-_-. -- --- -----I- e 6e -o- ---~--- Dal ~~~~ J O H N ~. M A T T M A M 9 INTERNATIONAL OESION GROUP ~' [~' ~ `jN ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ i'1>~!f'~~=,F I~ SIC Y~ kL ;Jf~L~i'~.c .r~lr rwr w ~. "°°"11~" ~'~...: + N ' ( S O O ~Z ~~•~ ~ W J U N A. ® I L L A N O , •' i ~ r ra.,~,. ,.,~.1~ II ~l I l ia~ G I N O U S F A v F ~+ l i F i G N O V C C 9] 9 5 0 `P (e1i) a+e-rl6i iAV (B1r 6A4 IxY~ C Y A 1. ~r rIyOUM.~rn ~- ~ SARn70Ga Ca ~~~ Y w~sY~ , er • • • 1 ~\ T~. _ ~_, '~\ ~- ~~, E~ l -~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ` \ ~ 1 . ---.- --. -_ - - - --- -~ E- r- Y^ ,. / // ~~' ~.------- - - - - _~_ _ i / ---~ i ., ~~- T 1-~/" / Il / 0 i r D .z ~~, ~~ J O H N C. M A T T H A M 3 ~' ~ ~~ ~~'~ .~ I ~.. .':k' I. fi I.1 ,i :~, ~ ~f~ rr.nsw.w .~v~~ ,.~ _ ~ ~ D f'~ INTERNATIONAL. OESION GROUP ~ C j '~ ~ ~~ ~;~ ~~' N ~ ' " J U N A. 8 1 L L A N O. ~.1.~- ' m .. 1'I~)~~~) I{:`IZ.-\\GA L:1hH: '• °' ' - - I - - _. tr A ` G I V I i I o ' ~ ftl5i) 6~6~i'[Oi fA• Itlfll <. -i7Y ~ U ~.~~.~y0•a •.,m I ~ ~ ~ SARA 70l~A, CA ~• .any ,~ ~ ° ~. • 1 7,a. C".'~M\EY 5nA',_ 9E A M:A C~ z a' A9o,E ~e eooF ~Otn'E7 ~a~C' MEA5JeE7 aCPiZOArAL:Y 'YI, ss~ ~~j C s„~ yeil~Il~~j~A~ t~~~~Fs~;i;,}d~ ~~~~j~~~~~~~ Fii,f FaQ~~ ;E; e '~~ee ~ e~ ''i~ae F 9F isai,'~~~~~149~, ;ibde9.o %e7,e i 7. z` i a e, G • SOUTH ELEVATION ________ ~~ % I ~~ _ -'. a,~\ / --+_+ : ~ W -- ~---°-_ -- _ --- V ~ ~ ~- -~T' EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND ' _ V '4_'A $~A'E ROOF - --~'RE$ iC MEE' IG6C ~ -- - SO'6 OR ECOk.. h>'s„~^.CA 'C MEE' CLASS 'A ~~_ ~ Ii1 ~,RE RAE S A4DAR; R C ~ ORp~,NAACE n ~J ~ .r ~ l.' FA!;% 44ES1CNE 7.4 ANC $CRRO'JNC C' AY CR 6% RAFTER 9ES4$, CORBE:S atC >'r,S ~~ n 4%6 RAF ^'R $ILL- __ .__ ____- L WCCC $eGTiERS. ti ~_ _ QQ 4EeAE C.AO - WOCC N+'+~OWS ANG E%'ERCR ~a ~' 1 pOpR$ -EAGLE OR EO:+.. __ _ .{ u CORKER CJ?iERS, CCA~S%C~'$ ANO ,~oGER30%E5. CYiG ~'.OR„ON'a. 9AN; NORTH ELEVATION ~ C c~LnJac ;:oNE v~N~a ~~ etr:cmoas s.m oe- e-m ~EnS C~+S L 23S___ ~, PLi'1SCE~_IL ~~ i 'S ~ L E IZ~ FAQ _ QOJ ~Q, - WQ /FQ 2 \ _ LZ2 OW] 7 Z 1 ~~ _ _- ~,~~,c A3,0 • • • 1 y _.-~._.._ ._ .. !f t ,~ _ .r f i-.4`.- Il' _ ~~ - - ~ ~~-~ _ _ - V ~ I III- - "" _:_ 1 f,, _- __~_~ -_ ', ~I f __ f I _- ~ y _` _-` - - - - - - - i-~- ! t - 1 ~ I -_ - - j= ~ i - __ - ~~ ~ ~ - ` ^. I ~~ !(~ -- I t_.~~ _. z, -- - ~--n ~ ~ 1,~ ``~ EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND EAUX SU1E ACOF - ?RGREE TO MEET ICBO 5075 OR ECUAI. INSiALIADON i0 MEET CLASS 'A' FIRE RATED STANDARCS DER CTY ORDINANCE OO ExTEgiOR STONE VENEER. OO ExTERiOR SPJCCO. (/ FAL'% LIMESTONE TRIM AND SURROUND. ~; ax OP 6X RAFTER BEAUS. CORBELS AND S1LL5. (/' +X6 RAFTER SILL. WOOD SNUTTEgS. METAL CLAD -WOOD x"'IOOWS AND c'x~ER10R DOORS -EAGLE OA ECU<~. v COPPER GCTTERS, DOWNSFCUiS AND LEADERBO%E5. EAST ELEVATION C 2%iD HDRrONTAL DANo ice. a~ ^~ . - _ -- ~__-~ ---~- ~ Z ----- ~ = ~~ ~ __ - - _~ _-..- ~__ __- _ __-_ j o - - ~~ - --- - _. - , J-; -_ -_ -- - - - j ~ - - ., - ;. . __--_ ~ - ~~ -~;~ n. WEST ELEVATION ----------- ------ -- - -- -- --- ------- -------- _i l~:~l~~i@° ~~~ * ~~r'~j~sl~p 1j4~~99A';~~C~3~'v 1•@€ ~l~~$~1~il~ lq~e%~t~tgi~i~ 7 .~e "i'fEtlab~bb~"F~9:! 76~P~'f~ ~~~E~p, iFs6a~s[~~441a~S~i ~, ~a _~ L j ELE~.XtioNs ccs ~` - ~ Q ~ 'd n 9 IDi ~~ ~ ~ Q0~ _- ~Za - WQ > FQ IQ _ IQt DW] ~Z~ ,~_' ~~~~ „ A3.1 • • • Y, J O H N E. M A T T H A M B ~'~ ~'J ["~ I~'N I ~ ~ ~i f:~. r.i :: "f~'~ r ~w~niamn w_wro rw4 ~~~~ D ~! ~ INTERNATIONAL OESION OROUP '~ J U N A. S 1 L L A N O. m_I_m. Q ~ __._ _.. _ .. ~ I ~i ~ 3e I = ~ ~ v I I ~ I I:)(~I) I1:1I;A~lrr~ I.(~~i'. "+ ~`~'~rm¢°iO wwa ~is'w sWe~aMw s r_~ i G ~~ 1 ~~ ~ V F • v C V~ .- ~ ~ w r, v( 9 1 9 J ~ ~~ ~ t• , ~ I I it $AkA IUts A, (: A. r°w~o ~ ~ouus l-w w ~50 ~nwVOac"~^` (E)~1 6+6 ~16~ Infix t+n ~ r. • • • ~; N ~r ~, M O Z O 0 W I~ m m IY U" m 0 Z I' 4r' m Q y 3 om I T o~ I i 'a~ " `~. D I D I I .. < ri ri ~ I i ~~ I] I ~ I n u' _ 1- ' _. _ t e~, •__._ ' "' ;" ~ Su ~ °l it k 1.._. I ~~ ~~ J O H N E. M A T T H A M~ S ~~ ~• G E~ ~~• ~ i t ~. ~ ~. ~. r- ~ ~ D r'. ~ INTERNATIONAL OESION GROUP A ~ r ~~ I J U N A. S I L L A N O. a.l. a. ~ 4 i I ~ ~ ~ ~ _' i y C 1~1:1(I(1 Ii,11Z:~~C.1 L:15F: ~ rIM :! v` of 1~:0 r r r~ ~ . u r. ~ ,I~111 A.fi `1'161 '9]- r..M1 r, C u r iVPrr~: ~ SARA TCIGA, CA n r r eat rwn • F.ART}IWl1Rk QGAS fITl4:~ YIN.iNFE I%fl't FUN RFStIN VI} '~i'(i1 11\I'I 1-DF~ II,ISFMl~1 Etl 1\'lili r\ N.IC UFVIII IN'S iFFI s V1N.I,l1E fH (~.T FgiIIAINF6i1 'I!fY ,- .,- NAY DF'Pill ]kFi Imo[\y+\4, _ \-' ~.__ ~ VJLI NE JF FILL IM1flMkY1Al1 r:1. 1' • r . I ~ ~V NIUI DFRN !flMl' •• •. ..:~ •~. - ' ~\ •~ _ SCALE I'•20' \ `. ~ ~~r. ~~. ,1 - _.. l ~ ~ ~ 8 F."' ~\ ,\ `: ;. ,... _ \~ \~ ~~a ~~;~ ~~ 1~ .. ',. ,w +~' IF ~.. , .~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ Vii' , Y_,,' ~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~_ '~ \ ,~, aa\\ ~~ UP I EV Ia. .. ~ ,.,~k~' \ >F° ~. k LrS1Lih CF .VV'G.FS Y r \ ~ .' \ - .. .~'~ .. ~ >A..E wCP " s ................. q .., 1 _ D ~ .,.. - ' ____ _ _ __ -.--- BARANGA LANE i'9 ~ .? :~ ' " ` _ ~ WESTFALL ENGINEERS, INC. -".. ~ ~ ..__ - -.--- -~- r ~,. _. H'IOC B4R.4~GA LAST. SARATOGA, CA 9i0;U ...- ~ ---- ~ t 4 ~ ~ ,_ ., P Il ~ - ~ I .. - ys. s r ' --_~_~ 1 ' -_... _ _. _ _.._-.- p2Q _._- - .--. -- •--~-- ----- __ i i 6~0 _ __ ------- - - _ _ _ m _ _- -- i ~ ~ ~ ... - --.. _ _ :.. .. . 420. - - _ -~-~~ ,`-F~-'---' ___ _ . -.__ 6E6TIG77_a -..~ VERTICAL SCALE: 1 loch = 20 feet HORIZONTAL SCALE: I loch 20 feet •, - ~Spltd Llm Pea pone Gre un! UFA::\':'. c:L..r r_G.: aNc • ALI, i::L :PA::Nf iNA'_:. 9E 'biER':EC B'~' 'XE FPO.:-e.~. Ei:L EIY'LNEEF. .VI. ?EE: Eh As AE!'Ei XAF" T^ ^6fP.RM:N6 ,;ENEPAi '_fE1P[IANr°- Y;?4 11E PE::-MFNCATiCNi .L -iE ~%E:TE:!1Nt a: PEP:RT PPEPAREC Bl LATE: 'NF. SJI: rte'".:I V-e9P SPA'. 9E r'".v i.^EC^Ai I.FAcT ie IWl1A~ iPI^A ^. 'HF. C:PMJI^YEM ~F BHA"M::. • AL:. TAEF.R. FE!,rES, xc i 4:: Y i:E!.:ANEGUi Ff;RFt.:2 :~ B:i iXA:! BE aFM'VrJ F£:11 :4~:::.RFA ': ~EE PM6C. • AL:. EI:i":`:~ Fl~LS '.:AT U": :YT NAVE BEPY '?-WFAC?E~ PAOP6Ri! X[TN!N E';!:C:X~% AAF.L ':fi NJAEi:APE AlG M.'T EE PEMENE: AN: RECWPA'':'EJ • A:.L in;AN::.A:.:.Y _CM1:AY:n:A~: i... EX11.L BE fiTREPPE^ '^ CEF" OF ABJLR ::NJll~ AY: Re4:}E F?:Y.~Th'E ;F~..y.:. g'AFA[E :.RWeN:.3 t^!N^ATC:N. ,. n. C'JPA: °. _... .. FA'IENENT ARF ?G 3c PwAI~E.. NE :'v J:'.YwEE NA~.~J:i'FFA'E E%::.iE: Bt' 6T0.ILP:N::FA:,i BE ..vEJ :~F~i:'in:i:E' •, A -.FFTN `; >a^•' 6:Y :rl:'NE6 ~F UN:::. "ie iJA?RAE :E FREE ~? FU'E. YLY!r:~:K=, .iA _'.!IER LYEVEN FEA^JPfii MX: =: Mi:' :h'N:d:: ','X: F: RY d':::':M"-':N, P.YC !VE' 9:,LE: :,TrT::.:T .+ :M:Er'pM ;ry SYT.9E .VP FREE ri'M':wP'%E "..:Ci. • lVE A: PA'::'E: E::L MA-ER:::" ~ _: 3E PJ.: E: :A LAVERS N~: F':PEF -''~: A :N.'AEi -> :ehY:'w:~E.:: A'F. 'd•p::Nf, PAT -. u,C.i T:'.N FA:X LA1'EA :::t:L BE ETEEA: E'TV",L ,l ~ AHA:.: BE T.NCR:C:XLV 9:A:E :A..C C~. "li. '1E iiREA_"^1', '. c•-.. '. _Y.P'YY:`: JF MA'FR:A_ c_.. . A: F'v:';E^ :.P -c -A !: Pi.R..: SE: Y:' :VECU:i v?- iW1:~.:.EN :IhiNRe :Ni'Xii IN .: L.E"E-naJ0.1'JIEi .PF.A'. ER '!ipJi ^ :A'-.'~ i NAME.'FF 'v:'ti N! M: _ :.x :5 PF iEM' :AP'EF 'FaV : E :%Ci!i5J v;N:ML:.:F :: :V:N =~cf :M.}iP-E: ~RNCN E:(PVIi:'%E Fl:: SHA:.: 3a. _ _ a_.za-a A:.L cN:Ra-E ~~s.•y..;: "'~"T, `.ATEE E• - <cAFE ,'aces -:F:A!< a^~raAai E,A ..._ `~'LEUCrnz; PA- P ., c_.,.. _.. >. Ts ic_ •--:: a :c>EE :F.EAr,F '°a:. e', axz:. BE cEYr_ u:: a_s.-aeE.:r. -NE X:_~::E A-'r x:_ .., E r. ts:'a! _:... .... ,. A-r.: a-. r_F.._. ~„ s;.: _.E- ,__ -_ - - - - _. 6NT:: .- a-. .. .._ w,E\\' •:IE Y'.:i:T:AE ;'.N:Er :F ".E F:.: +A'ER;A: :F APCr.'E TNA' ARE:: F:S: E`.' TAE v.':: cX',C~?ro. PAE F:~:. vATFR:A. SKAL:. BE AERA:E^. 3: 6:A::f~; CF _'"'XEP :PA':6PA_TPY ME ~:•' :'NF:::4F. -...__ .'~N ..:W '. .~r.'vF -1 A . a ... ;;!R'Y~: ^.-.E RA:N''::E1 :n .-NE ::"E 6XAi._ 3E vA:Ma:NL 5. a; ". El'EN" aE':.YE;R 'J:EE ?:M: FP ': ]TEA A0.::I.Y: M: CP'NERT:RS A:!^ P _ ~.. -r ...• r.V_E _r i"Pn'v 2.LE BARR:>A ~1' v4 [v^'.FA\; \AiY„i V- a._E 9Aic:6Ai ` 3E EET4 Y:NE: IN :AE E.-.~ .Y r,.: E}:: aLEF.. • • A;.L :A. r: A?E1: ~.,._. 3F AEP' ::EAe rF :E_..~. .,_e. Av'. M..ll A_. -...mss. E. .,~.PZA PP..P :~ Y~fBEF :.. i -~-> -- ,~ WESTFALL ENGINEERSrINC. v..- .e.. :n.v.Y, .F A::?CUE:i ALa:c_. . 'ed . rs Le.nre et art~o any .Aral, og AAp appi:ea only t the e , ary igIS of a.~try e:teer puci rp:.~ N -t r r , Apvro~a. >! r.,rp:a- ' ,PP.c ,. of anY ingroveeent, P:opo,ed ;.. ~e,ne.~eA .' ,~e approY,: er the reepot.m:•. 1-• ~ttt laee'u:. fx [ke .eeponsib:lit% o! fh• Pern,:t<• o: ,gen: .c ti!y. !o _ el: ueder9taund lec:: it:ee. e Pe.~ .4en •:u t: e,ietain tee ,t ,a . ocserrP':L': r r(gn;,o wy . a<..~ s,hye A!I ey.: of s ock o Pafebr~:, cil. , 1 ,clv ovret prtger~Y fur:cg - - ,-] vPCn of ;A, ProJec A:1 ,d;s - .._•=nar: k +a:ota:naJ in a -.eao, sa.. ~:ngrse ce Pert,ned :n such s ., hxe o'y th U e P. r • ,a:` e n tee e o n:t• ~•.: r:wae A W d g C t d h. JoYF , .ne .•e~ t . - - Er.4:neere, :Y SdI 2t; _ ec Has designed thro pr; - 1.. tl . - 1,E 'he - .__ - r,FCrt. :- :cymx-l. Papatya br - • __ [•d r. f ~_ . , .,,' - ~.] t ... GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 14900 BARANGA LANEP SARATOGA '~, / N 90'00'00" E 117.44' 7 0 / ~ - - - --- - L r-- - = - - - ~ - - - - - - a / ~ / / ~f~ / / o" / ~ c" ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ -~ s ~ m- O yL / ~, ~ ~ i ,/ ~ ~ ,~• 1 ~ ~, 1~/ / ~VJ ,.~ ~~ r ~, ~ i / L.,~~ ~~ j / /, ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~0~~' s~°~~~ J ~ r f% ~ ~ ~ -- ~~ '~' ~ ~ >N `~ ~ l ~ / ~ ~ `~ ~ r'~, ~' ~ `, ° w'' T _,,- `\ ~' ~~. ^ _ d~ l i/ • _ _ 1_~ ~ ~. i1 ~ i~.,~ O~i ~ n ~~~ «n r1'; ~ '~I ~,~ ,: J ~~ ~ , •w -- r- _' ~ _:% / ~ _~_~ 3~Y ~; '~; I ~ ~~ ~ m ~' - ~ -~ ~,_-~ _ -may = - ~ ~- n ~ ~ ~~ ~~e € ~ _ -:~' ,- ~ = , `CFO ~ ,=~ = ., o ~ % ~° ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ Z ~ ~ _ ,rtF/ 'V~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~a~F~ F 14 ~ o.~~ \ i,~ ~~~ 4 ~~ ~r ,; ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. C,l •\ ~ - - ~ ~l~ -/.r/ ~\ ~ - ~ ~ .'6 ~ ~~ . .~~v , ~/ f'' ` ~^ v~ /~ ~ ~ // PPPWPPPPPPPMrPNPPPNNPPV'NMPP?Pd NPpt°PPN1'PNN ~ v ~ti _ , ~~ ~ gg ~ _ ~ ~ ~ -1 ri --- ! ~ JaL~I 1+~J~$`f ~+EE ,1-~x~,,{r ~np ~ ~Pr , ~ j 7 ~ - - - - -- -- -- - - - ~ - - -- r -c m ~• I Fi~EE OAKS UJAY r ~ ~ ~ c=am D T I _.__.._ _ ~ ~ y F~ ~ ~ o r ~ > ~ O O o ~ n s~' „~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ N r ~ Z ~, ~ ~ ' ~ o . Proposed Residence ~ ~ o ~, a ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ = 9 ~ 14900 Baraoga Leac 8aretoga. CA 950T0 -Z s A ~ r ~ ~ _ OO Y A !.. r 4 dr t 1.- '~. J; „aWW'$4~1!~..rwJJ:.aL~i,W...~.srua~~~'~Ya~utiu'uV,'~..;._.='d~uW:'~ ;~.:,. __xx.w_:~ eiEU.~La:1r¢'ie .1.. .1 r, ~,K 1.,yn. x:P+' .3 t:::~.~uu!i.. ~n,a., ~~1y;u~.L _ ~~:i __ a _ ~1„v _...~..... ITEM 4 City of Saratoga Community Dcvdopment Department MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: John F. Livingstone, Associate Planner DATE: September 12, 2001 RE: UP-O1-007, SPRINT PCS, Saratoga-Los Gatos Road and Farwell BACKGROUND On August 22, 2001 the applicant submitted a request to approve a Conditional Use Permit to install three antennas within a proposed light pole and one GPS antenna on the exterior of the pole. The new light pole would be 23 feet in height including the antennas that would be mounted on the top six feet of the pole. An associated equipment cabinet is proposed to be located behind the pole. As part of the project, the applicant is proposing to construct a new bus stop with two benches. Alight fixture will be mounted on the pole for the antennas, thus giving the pole a dual purpose. The equipment cabinet will be hidden below grade and behind a retaining wall designating the bus stop area. The applicant will also provide landscaping to the • area. • At the August meeting the Planning Commission raised concerns about the proposed light pole and asked the applicant to review other options and locations for the proposed pole. The project was continued to the September 11, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has requested that the project be continued to the next available Planning Commission meeting (see attached letter from applicant). The next available agenda will be October 24, 2001. 000001 08/30/Y001 TSLT 09:16 FA% 925 901 1001 RILEY & ASSOC. RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. 2420 Camino Ramon, Saito 380 San Ramon, California 94583 (97.5) 901-1001 Facsimile (925) 901-1011 August 30, 2001 Via Overnight Mail Mr. John Livingston City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: File UP-01-007: Saratoga-Los Gratos Road and Y+arwell Avaruc Ivir. Livingston: Richard Connor Riley Bc Associates, L.L.C. represents Sprint PCS in the zoning approval process for a conditional use pcrarit for the proposed Sprint PCS facility refezence above. Sprint PCS respectfully requests that the hearing scheduled for September 12, 2001 for the above referenced site be continued to the next available Planning Commission Calendar. Sprint PCS requires additional time to work with yow staff and the members of the community to redesign the proposal site. I do apologia for any inconvenience I may have causal Please do net hesitate to call me at the number listed if you have any questions or require nay additional documents. Thaati you. Sincerely, RI ARA CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIAT'fiS L.L.C. Ivan M. 'oe lp 002 • • • 00002