Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-12-1957 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF SARATOGA PLAN;~ii~]G COMF.'ISSIOK TIME: r.iovember 12, 1957, 7:30 P. M. PLACE: Richards Hall, Federated Chu_~cb_, Sarato~j~a, California ~iPE: Regular l'Zeeting I RODTiNE ORGANIZATION '~ ROLL CALL Present: Anderson, Bennebt, Crisp, Hig~iDs, Pase~ta, Webster Abs out: None ~,:INUTES Commissioner Hlg~ins moved that the minutes be apprcved as receD;ed. Carried unanimously. Ii NE~'i 3USI!,~SS " N~,'j ZC';,TT~,TG PETITIONS None B. VARIANCES f~i~ USE ~ERY~i'~S None III PDBLIC !-~EARINGS - F:~0 P. M. A. REZONING 1. C-lO - Rates, Ralph ~he Secretary explained the his bory of past zoming Zn this area and action taken to date o~ th~s c~se. Mr. Rates, the applicenb, cited the feelim~ of the neighbors in favor of the residemtial zomimg applied C-10 Estes, Ralph for. Commissioner Crisp stated thab the application seemed to him to be spot-zemimg is view of -~- acre zones to the south and west of the property. Mrs. Lo~is Memdelsohm, Mendelsohn Terrace, Saratoga, stated her feeling bhat the quarter s. cre lobs being applied for were sot lm keepin~ with ~he rural nature of Saratoga. George Kocher, 1~1~9 Big Basin Way, Saratoga, stated thab since no master plam existed, gramring of this -1- application would be setting a pattern for smaller lot sizes. jules Duo,.1906 West San Carlos, San Jose, speaking for the applicant stated that other formers in the area were in favor of one-quarter acre lots and that the high cost of development made it impossible to subdkvide larger lots. Duc requested e continuance until the next Fleeting to get more facts and supporting opinions. Commissioner i~iggh]s moved that the matter be taken under advisement. Ed Bean, Monte Serene, requested clarification on whether the Commission would. accept further evidence in the case if the matter was ta. ken under advisement. He further expressed his feeling ~hat such evidence would be inadmissable. Wibh the consent of his second, Commissioner Higgins withdrew his earlj. er motion. Commissioner Webster moved that the petition be denied. Carrie~ unanimously. ADjOL~NHEiqT OF PUBLIC HEARING - 8:05 P. M. iV C~qMiT~EE ?~EPORT$ A- tRCHiTECTURAL ~qD SITE CONTROL 1. Report on proposed Civic Center Site Commissioner Higglns read a report on the proposed Civic Center site. The repert was in the form of a Civic letter to the City Council, recommending purchase of Center Site the site. After discassion ef bhe report by the Co.mmissioners Mr. Bean asked the Commission if they were approving the purchase as a good invesbment regardless of its ultimate use. -2- Commissioner Crisp stated that iF the site could not ultimately be used ~s a Civic Center the property was a good investment. Leo Deprie, 1 Park Place, Saratoga, asked why the Cia3r should pay ~?,D00.00 an acre when he knew of property for mle in the area for ;~5,500.00 per acre. Commissioner Crisp stated that the Commission con- sidered the price reasonable and a ~ood investment. i,ir. Bean asked if the Commission had given any con- sideration to possible location of a Jail at the Civic Center site. Commissioner Higgins stated ti~a~ the Commission had studied the problem in s genersl way add hadn't con- sidered specific use of the side for a jail. Commissioner Crisp explained that the Grand Jury report recently submitted endorsed the idea of a central jail for San~;a Clara County, located in San jose. Commissioner Crisp moved that the report be adopted as read. Votin~ as follows: For: Anderson, Bennett, Crisp, Hlggins, Pssetts. Against: None. Not Voting: Webster. Commissioner Webster stated that he was not opposed to the report but wished to refrain from voting. B. SDBDIViSiONS 1. SD #50 - Saratoga Glen Woods The Secretary read bhe conditions of approval for SD #~0 this subdivision? as recommended by the County Sub- Saratoga Glen Woods divisZon Committee at its meetknE of ljovember 5, 1957. Mr. Kaemmerling, engineer for the developer, discussed proposed sewer installations with the Commissioners. Commissioner Crisp moved that the tentative map be approved subject to the conditions set at the Sub- division Committee meeting of November 5- Carried unanimously. 2. SD #51 - Ploeser (Longson) After studyin~i the map of the proposed subdivision SD ~51 Ploeser Commissioner Higgins moved that the matter be held (Longson) over until the nsxt meeting. Carried unanimously. 3. SD #52 - Armstrong (Longson) After inspection of the tentative map Commissioner SD Armstron_~ Crisp moved that this matter be held over until the (Lon son'Y next meeting. Carried unanimously. Commissioner Pasetta moved that the meeting be adjourned. Carried unanimously. Time 8:40 P.M. Present 12 2 Press