The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-13-1962 Planning Commission Minutes StT~M~y OF I~IXNUTES ..CITY OF SARATOGA FLANNI~ CO~.fiSSION Time: 7:00 P. N., ~onday, August 13, 1962 Place: Fruitvale Schools Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California Type: Regular Meeting .ROUTINE ORGANIZ. ATIO~ The meeting was called to order by Chairman Webster st 7:03 P. I~. Ao Pu0LL CALL Present: C-_'-~..~sioners Anderson, Cowley, Crisp, Glenn and Webster, Absent: C~,,~tssioner Johnson. Connnissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Cu~lssioner Glenn, that the reading of the minutes of the meeting of July 23~. 1962, be waived and that the minutes be approved as prepared and submitted to the C~lssien; metion carried una,~m-usly, PIIBLIC HEARINGS The Chairm-n declared public hearings open for the evening at 7:05 P. A. UP-33 - G~orge Rat~y, Wildx~oed Park - Revie~ of COmpliance with Con- aStio.ns ~s~ablish.ed ~.nd.e.r. U~.e Permit .... .. The public hearing on UP-33 ~as opened at 7:0~ P. M. The Secretary advised that Notices of Hearing had been mailed and six (6) c~n~uni- cartons had been received. He ~urther advised that the subject Use Permit had been suspended on July 12, 1962, for non-compliance with conditions, and that it was the responsibility of =he C~a~ission hold a public hearing, determine whather or not coedi~ionn had been met and, if net, revoke the Use Permit or ~ake other appropriate action. The Secretary read the conditions of the Use Permit and explained the City Council ~odification of condition Mr. Ratty and his attorney, George Hutchinson, were present. It was decided that the conditions in questiDn ~ould be discussed individually and that the usual procedure would be reversed so that the opposition would be heard, then the rebuttal. .Plarn~n~ C~ission IRnut~ - AuguSt 13, 1962 - Continued lI. A. UP-33 - Ceo~e RatLV~ Wtld~ood Park Condition. #8 (Liquor) The Secretary submitted a raffle ticket for one of the recent Wild~ood Park fimctions, one (1) prize of ~hich was a c~se of liquor. lifo Hutchinson stated that several c~.~lain~s had been filed with regard to liquor, so Councilman Glennon had made an inspection the fullowin~ Sunday and would verify tMt no liquor was found on prp~.~ses. He further stated that all parties had been told that liquor ~as net allowed and, to the beet of his knowledge, there had been no violation of this rule, Both Hr, Hutchinson and Ratt-y stated that the ticket was merely for the drawt~ for the case of liquors that the liquor had not been delivered at the park but somewhere else at a later date, lifo Hutchinson stated that he had no objection to the exhibits so Chairman Webster directed that ticket ~[1340 for the function at Wild~ond Park on June 24, 1952; be entered as Exhibit in ~-q~er to a question from the Chairman~ 1~o Hutchinson stated that this ticket wa~ not issued by l~ildwood Park~ but by the people k~no had rented th_~ park° There was ne one else present ~ho vlshed to uoment with re~ard to condition Chair.~- Webster directed the finding that there ~as no evidence in support uf the ~om~laint that liquor ~as bein~ consigned on the pe~k premises, that althau~h the ~icket ba~ been submitted~ i~ was not positive proof. Condit~n ~l ~ench~) The Secretary stated that ~he park ha~ operated without a fence previous to July 15, 1962, but since that time a six (6) foot board fence had been erected on the north boundary of the property, ~hich abuts the Hercar property° lit, Hutchinson verified the Secretaryss stateanent regardix~ the amount of fencix~ that had been erected~ and advised that materials had been ordered for the fence alon~ Dro John, toni, property but that Dr, Johnston did not wont the fence built° He sta~ed that Mercer seen~l to be the only person in the area who really wanted a fence, Plarmin~ C~ssion.lttnutes - August 13~ 1962 - Continued II, A, UP-33 - George Katie Wildwood Park The Secretary read a letter from ltr, Johnson statt-~,~ that he ~ould prefer that no fence be built between his property and that of Wild%xxMt Parks sin~e there was an existinS vlre fence alon~ this property line %nhich ms overgrown %rlth blackberry brambles. The Secretary advlseds in answer to a question from the that the existinS fence did not cureply ~rlth the condition since was not a cyclone fence and was net six (6) feet in height. He further advised that the portion of the property uext to the cot- rages x~as fenceds but not in compliance %rith the type fence re- quired by the conditions and that the fence along the creek had not been provided. Mr~ Hutchinson stated that at the time of the. appeal to the City Council he was not aware~ and did not think the Council kn~w, ~hat the p~u~erty alon~ ~he top of Wildx~ Park belonged to Mr~ Ratty, He said he felt this was quite a buffer for the parks ,ha that nothin~ larSer than a small dog could Set through this area. Hutchinson verified that there was no fence alon~ the creek nor alon~ Fourth Street. MRS. H= A. MEI~/IEals Sprinter l~nds stated that the fencin~ required by the Cu~ssion had not been erected. H. A. MRCERs Sprir~er Roads etated that the fencin~ had net been dono in compl{--ce w~th the conditions but there was a fence on his property which had been placed across the ri~ht-of-way on his side. MRS. EVE SYMON, Sprinter Avenue, stated that the only fence 1ahich had been erected was the portion near the Mercer property. MRS. 14AE ELLIOTT, Sprinter Avenues stated that condition ~l had not been fully complied withs since the only fence erected was the one on the boundary of the Mercer property. The C~.....~ssion accepted as Exhibits "2" and "3" two (2) photo~rapha submitted by Mr. Ratt-y showin8 the board fence erected alon~ the Mercer property (147 feet). There was no one else present who %fished to connnent with regard to the fence. Cou~issioner Glenn n=~ved, seconded by C~Issioner Crisp, that the Commission adopt the findin~ from the evidence submitted that con- dition ~l reSardin~ fencin~ had net been complied with; motion car- ried unan{-~nely. Plvmlnln~ Cu.--lsston Minutes - Au/~ugl: 13s 1962 - Cont:inued llo Ao UP-~3 - George R~tWs Wildrod Park C~ndi~ion S ~ Sec~e~ ~ a le~er ~m ~elv~ ~ Bi$ Basin ~ay~ ~S~nZ the ~ise ~ ~ild~ P~ks a letter opposi~ ~ ~iae Hiss N~ Cal~ll, ~lvin ~, ~s, ~lvin ~, ~ss ~e ~s Pa~er Cal~ll, ~s, Vera V~r ~ ~s, Pa~ric~ aM a le~er ~r~ ~s, ~el B~as s~ctn~ ~ ~Mre ~d be~ lit~ tie or ~ t~r~C in ~ ~eraC~n of ~ild~ P~k ~er Use Pe~ No, 33, ~N ~s BiS Basin Way~ s~a~ tMt ha lives a~u~ 1/~ of a ~le f~ the p~k ~ ~s tMc ~%,lifi~ion is be~ ~ ~use of ~he "fe~-ba~". ~ ~ s~ ~ ~he ~1 ~s ~or ~he ~lffi~ion ~e f~m 12 ~n ~ a~t 5:00 P, H. on S~ys, ~35 ~ L~ ~s B~ ~s~ Way, s~a~ tM~ as a ~ea~r she ~s ~ral~d ~ ~erienc~ ~ so~ n~lifi~ion ~ ~s i~ is bel~ ~ a~ ~d~ P~k. In ~ ~o a question ~. ~i~s ~ss ~ s~ ~ she ~ only h~ the plifi~Cion ~or ~he pas~ ~ee S~ss since she ~ only ~ ~e ar~ for ~hree (3) ~, ~ ELX.V~s Spr~nger ~ue, s~ ~ she ~s a ~eech ~ voice mJ~ ~ ~ ~ b~s~ ~E 12 y~rs, ~ ~ ~li~l~t~n ~ she heard i~, ~ ~ s~e i~ ~s ~ Used a~ ~tld~ ~T ~ Spri~e~ Av~e, s~at~ ~ a p~lic address sys~ ~s bei~ us~ a~ ~d~od P~k ~use he ~ h~ th~ ~11~ ~he ~ers for the raffle, In ~ to a ~sc~n fr~ ~, ~i~ns he s~ ~ he h~ h~ this on S,~y, ~ 1962, ~ tMc ~ lives a~ l~s~ 1,~0 ~ee~ ~, PR'~ ~, B~ Basin ~ay, s~aC~ ~M~ he ~ h~ a l~- ~er fr~ ~il~ Park as la~e ~ ~30 ~ 10z~ o~clo~ the Wen~n~ O~ June 2~, 1962, ~h~ ~i~ Co s~y for ~ild~ P~ks ~ s~ ~M~ he felt ~i~e s~e it ~. ~ ~x~.L~ Bi~ Basin ~ays s~a~ t~ s~ ~uld ~ ~he n~lifi~ s~ h~ aC 9z~ P, ~ on J~ 2~, 1952, ~S ~a ~s B~ ~sin ~ay, sCa~ ~ rest o~ ~he voices ~ ~re ~i~ ~lified ~re ~i~ a ~orei~ l~,~es which ~d ~i~Ce ~ ~ey ~re ~ ~ ~ p~k since met the pic~cs wre forei~ Plarm/nR Coe~{es~on HimaCes - August 13a 1962 - Con~l--ed TT, A, UP-33 - George Rattv. Wildnood Park lea, EVE S~lON, Springer Avenue, stated that she agreed with the previous test~-~ that she had L,000 hours in radio and would s~ear that amplification was bein~ used at Wildwood Park. She further stated that the noise ~as loudest on June 24, 1962o lit, Ratty, in answer to questions from Mro Hutchinsons stated 1) that they have no ~m. lification system at the park 2) that there was one in May of this year bet it had been removed 3) no loud- speakers are be"_.-~ used 4) only the electric ~uitars are usi~ po~er and ~hey cannot be played without it 5) at one picnic they had no other nmsic so a small phonograph and records were used 6) a six (6) piece orchestra played until 8 P, lt. at the Spanish picnic on June 24, 1962 7) only one picnic was held in July (July 29th) and that an orchestra v/th electric guitar and elec- tric harmonica was used and 8) that he does not hire the music but Rives instructions to these usiDg the park about the thinSs that are I4r, Hutcb~--on categorically denied that an orchestra played until 9:00 P, }lo on J,,, 2A, 1962o Mr, Patty stated that he was present and there was no ~-?.lifica~ tion of sound on the dates Qentioned. Convn{ssioner Crisp suggested that the wrd "/=~pliftcation" be defined as to its full meaniu~ i~ this discussion. liT. Ratty stated that the M, C. had no microphone and the b~_-a had us plificntion, ned cate~orically denied amplification of any kind, MELVIN HAYNEs Big Basin Ways stated that a 15 minute speech had been amplified because he had heard it 1/4 of a mile away. There was no one else present who wished to comment with reSard to condition Ct~e~lssiousr Crisp moved, secoeded by Ct...~.!ssioner AnderSon, that the Co~nuissien adopt a findin8 that substantial evidence shows a violation of corsiition ~5 with regard to loud-speakars and fication of sound; motion carried Urm~tr~uSly° Nr. Hutchinson requested that this matter be referred to a mittee for discussion and clarification of conditions. chali~aen Webster reserved decision on this request for the present time. The Secretary advised that a petition with 19 signatures ap~t an- other with ll siSnatures protestin~ the Wildwood Park opmration ,mast Ir-33 had been filed° Plenn4u~ C~4esion Minutes ~ Au~.ust 1.3, l~G2 -,Cont4~,,~4 lI, A, U~-3~ - George Rattys l~ildvood Pa~k ~, B~ ~s BiS Basin ~ s~C~ ~ on different occasions p~ple ~ve ~m onto he~ p~pz~y f~om ~he park per~o~d %~yi~ acts', then re~u~ed ~o ~e park, Also, she s~aC~ C~ ~e~e ~ys f~ ~he park ~hr~ s~ones on S,,~ys A~t 12, 1962s a~ left o~y rhea she thr~ten~ to call the police, ~. ~t~i~n ~ressed the ~inion t~t "~e ~le thi~' ~s a ~n~ira~ o~ t~ people ~ w~t~ ~lld~ Park close. ~ther sCaC~ ~ the properC~ ~d been ~Id a~ ~he park ~uld s~n ~ ~ o~ ~isCence, a~ ~ile ~ls might pl~se the p~le, he ~elt it ~s ~air bemuse ~. ~ ~ ~rl~ to act in ~o~ faith ~Ch the H, A, ~, Spri~er ~d~ s~ced C~t he had C~en phoco~aphs o~ his street ~ p~e that ~rs ~re bei~ park~ on the street, In ~ to a quesc~ ~r~ the C~i~, he scat~ CMt he d~ ~C ~w ~ether or ~C Fourth Street ~s be~ us~ for ~, ~Cchi~ s~C~ C~C it wuld be a fl~cial Mrdship for ~. ~tCy ~ ~e to ~r~ the ~i~nc~l ~ of this p~perCy ~or the n~ f~ ~nChs until the sale ~d clos~ escr~ ~vi~ an i~ ~ the property. ~S F~ ~ ~S ~. ~ E~ Spri~er Ave~e, scat~ tM~ on June 2~, 1962~ there was a pt~ic ~ich ~s suppos~ to ~ve clos~ at buC the ~sic ~s still playi~ at 9:~ P, ~ She stat~ ~uld s~ a d~u~ ouC. ~e msic ceas~ a little a~ter Nr. ~Cchi~ou sCaC~ Cha~ co the beeC o~ his k~wl~Ce, this ~IEN BO~ET, ~ildw~ ~ay, sCaC~ C~t he ~d been aC Wild~d Fark for 2~ y~rs ~ they al~ys se~ ~ Mve C~uble ~Ch the ~e ~usee, the s~ p~ple. ~ ~ess~ the ~inion t~t the park ~s a S~ place for Saraco~, C~C the people ~ld be to ~ec a~Cher l~e ic~ ~ t~t iC ~ld be a ~sc~e for ic ~ close. ~. ~ct~ s~t~ c~c ff there ~re ~re c~ 2~0 ~rs, arranSe- ~ts ~re ~e ~th ~. ~n Co use ~e loc ac~ss the street, ~ ~id It ~ been neces~ Co use it only three (3) t~s this y~, since ~ (2) l~Se pi~ics ~ be~ ~ell~. ~ scat~ C~C ~ (2) pers~ were ~toy~ ~or larSe picots ~ one (1) for ~11~ pi~ics to help park the cars, a~ chaC although ~e~ enCer~ on F~Ch Street, the ~s wre ~t p&rk~ on the street. If ~e pck~ loC is ~ill~, ~e ~ri~t d~ecCs Co ~ o~ loC, PlanninE C~.~.lsalon Mixtures - August 12, 1962 - Continued lI. A. UP-33 - George Ratty~ ~/ild~a3od Park Nr. Batty again stated that he was on the prer~ises durin~ these affairs and other than the three (3) evenings they had permission to be open late. the po~er was cut at sundown and the people bed moved out by 8:30 P. 1~. He htrther stated that no police or sheriff had come to the park on the date mentioneds that he ~;as at the park until about 9:30 P. N.,-then had retired to his apartment which is no more th~- ten feet from the park. He stated that the artists from the Horse~s Houth and other places come to the park as late as 11 o%lock, that they are sometines drink~n~p and noisy, and that has been necessary at times for him to go do~ and ask them to leave, Cun~tssioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, that the public hearing on UP-33 be closed; motion carried .mnv4~usly and Chairrnnn Webster declared the public hearing closed at 9:23 Chairran ~ebster informed the Cou~ission that there ~ere three (3) courses of action open: 1) revoke the Use Permit 2) medley the Use Permit or 3) continue suspension tmtil all conditions had been mete · here ~zas a motion by Cou~lssioner Anderson, seconded by Cummissioner Crisp, that a findinE be adopted. based on the evidence, that the Use Permit has been and is being violated in several respects to a significant degree. Roll call vote: Ayes: C~lssioners Anderson. Crisp and Iqebster. Noes: Cornm~esioners Covley and Glenn. Absent: Counissiouer Johnson; l~otion carried. Co~nission~r Anderson moved, seconded by Co~missioner Glenn. that the Co..-~ssien sodire and ratify suspension o~ the Use Permit and direct that no Eurther use be made of the prp~_ses for purposes for ~hich the permit ~as requested until such time as the Cu.~lssion revokes the suspension on satisfactory evidence ehnt all conditions of the Use Petenit have been ~ully co;plied rlth. Ball call vote: Ayes: C~u~uissioners Anderson. Cooley. Crisp, Glenn ~/ebster. Noes: None. Absent: C~amiesioner Johnson.. Hotion car- tied unan4~nusly. Again 14r~ Hutchinson asked that this matter be referred to a corn- efttee or the Staff for discussion and clarification, since he ~me still confused. Chatr~n ~ebeter designated the Subdivision Com- mittee as the comntttee to discuss with Idro Hutchinson any questions he had concern~n~ ~his matter. Pl. anni.r~ C~lssion I4inutes - August 13s 1962 - Continued .U~-~. - Brown & Kauf~mann, Inc,j Prides Cross~n~ - Use Pe~t for ~el ~ Sales O~fice . ~e public h~ri~ on ~-~0.~as open~ at 9:3~ P, ~ ~e Secr~ ~a~ advis~ ~haC ~o~lces of ~i~ ~d been mil~ a~ ~ ~i~- ten co~tious ~d been ff~ed, ~ss~ner Cri~ ~vis~ fiha~ ~he subjec~ reques~ was in ac~rd with ~di~ce NS-3-1s Section 2, a~ tMt the c~ttee re~ meM~ approval of the Use S~e there ~s ~ one else pre~en~ ~h0 ~sh~ to ~e~ ~th re- ~rd to this totter, CM~n ~ebster d~rect~ the public he~i~ clos~ on U~-~ at 9z35 P. ~, C~iss~r CrOp ~ed, seco~ by ~lss~r Cle~, t~t Secti~ 2, ~or a period o~ one (1) y~; V-219 - State o~ Califon~ - ~quest ~or Variance in co~ection ~i~h Site Wid~ of loC locat~ Lo.~ ~tos ~ad= ~eM~lso~ h~ a~ ~rses~e Drive ~e public h~ on V-219 ~as opted at 9:3~ P. ~. ~e Se~ tary ~vis~ t~t Notices of ~ri~ Md been miled and r~d ~itt~ ~mt~t~n filed by J~es A. S~erson a~ ~y ~.~':~- x.~s ~ o~ present to represent the State of Califonia in ~ ROEDEK, 14690 ~rs~e Drive, stated tMt he ~uld not ~n~ a ~.~.~ ::~'.=1 use allow~ on this lot, but ~ ~ objection to resi- C~[;r.~:~.~:~ar Cri~ ~vis~ that this lot was creat~ by the diver- s~n e~ ~h3 or~i~l Saratoga-~s Gatos ~ad ~, si~e the uece~ ~ fiM~s ~uld be rode, it was the re~mendation of the Var~e C~ttee tMt this ~equest be ~ranted, ~ere ns ~ o~ else present ~o ~ish~ ~o ~ ~th regard to this mt~er, w CMi~n Webster decl~ the public heari~ clos~ on V-219 at 9:45 P. ~, There nsa ~tion ~ ~lssioner Crib, sew~ by ~isstoner Gl~n, that V-219, S~te of Califor~a, ~pli~tion ~or Var~nce on site ~dth o~ a lot louted at intersect~n of Sarato~a-~e Catos ~, ~el~ ~ ~d ~rses~e Drive, be ~ranted; ~tion P.l.annix~ C~.lssion Minutes - August 13, 1962 - Contixnmd II. D. V.-22.0. - Glen W. StinneCts Canyen View Drive - Request for Variance in co~nect. ion with F.~ont Y~rd Se~-b~ The public heariu~ on V-220 was opened at 9:48 P. M. The Secre- tary advised that Notices of Hearin~ had been mailed and there were Do Written c~!~!!uRications On file. Mr. n,a Nrso Sttnuett were present, together with their arthitect9 to discuss this request with the Cc~m4ssiono There was ,n one else present ~no wished to comment with re~ard to this matter. Co-~,{ssioner Crisp stated that the Variance C~-..,.4ttee felt it would be unfair to both the applicant and the City to make a decision on this matter without further information. He suggested, therefore, that this application be continued until the next meetir~ and thats in the meantime, the applicant submit the additional drawings re- quested by the Committee. On the basis of this suggestion, Chairman ~qebster directed V-220 continued until the maetin~ on August 27, 1952, and requested that the applicant submit the additional material prior to that meeting. The Chairman declared public hearix~s closed for the eveninB at 10:10 Po M., subject to V-220 bein~ continued until the meetix~ on August 27, 1962. Cl~airman ~4ebster welcomed Councilman Harb,~n to the meeting. IIl. SUBDIVIS.~?~B AND BUILDING SITES A. SDR-368 - B~--aard Oil Company, SararoBs-Los taros Road - Buildix~ Site Approval - 1 Lot C~lssioner Anderson, because of his fo~..~r connection with Stan- dard Oil C~any, disqualified b~,,~elf from participatix4~ in the discussion and votinB in this nmtter and vacated his chair until action bad been taken on this application, Bill Schultess was present to represent the applicant and expressed satisfaction with the proposed conditions of approval. Co~lesioner Crisp moved, seconded by. (:--?...~esioner Glenn, that the tentative m~. for SDR-368 (Exhibit '~", filed July 18, 1962)~ Stan- dard Oil C~any, 1 lot on Saratoga-Los Catos Road, be epproved subject to the conditions contained in the Buildin~ Site Co..aittee Report dated AuBust 13, 1962; u~tion carried una~m-usly. RECESS F~OM 10:15 P. M. DIT~IL 10:20 P. M. -9- ~ Pl~rmir~ Co~ts~q~ Minutes - August 131 1952 - Continued Illo B. SDR-3~9 --H° A. Hezcer, Sprir~er Avenue - Bu~ldin~ Site Approval 3 Lots Mro Mercer was present, together with his engineer, Louis Rapperry of Merk Them-__- & Company. After readin~ the proposed conditions of approval, Mro Rapperry, on behalf of Mro Mercers requested that the subject application be ~ithdra~n. On behalf of the C,R~alssion~ Chairman Webster granted this request and no action was taken. C. SDR-370 - R. D° l{ildebrandt, Bohlma~n Road - BulldinE Site Approval 1 Lot Co~issioner Anderson advised that this matter was under study and that it was the recon~nendation of the Building Site C~Ittee that SDR-370 be continued until the next regular meeting. On the basis of this reco~ndation, Chairman Webster directed SDR-370 continued until the meetin~ on August 27, 1962. De SDR-371 - H. J. Sternerr E1 quito ~/ay - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The applicant ~as present and~ after rendin~ the proposed condi- tions of approval, s~ated that he was not sure he could comply with condition IX., D. He explained that his ri~ht-of-~ay was only feet ~lde at present, but that he ~ould check ~o see if he could acquire an additional 5 feet. l~ere was a motion by Co~nissioner Anderson~ seconded by sioner Crispl that the ten~ative map for SDR-371 (Exhibit "A"~ £iled August 3, 1952), H° J. Sterner, one lot on E1 quito Way, be approved subject to the conditions contained in the Buildin~ Site Committee Report dated August 13, 1962; motion carried unanimously° IV. DESXGN REVIE~ A. A-87 - California Steel But/dinSs, lnc.~ Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road .F. iusl Approval - Warehouse Buildin~ Ce.-,~{ssione= Glenn moved, seconded by Comnissionar Cowley. that A-87, Cali~ornia Steel Buildings, lnc,, he granted final design approval of the warehouse buildin~ as shoxm on Exhibit 'A-I', ~iled July 30, 1952; motion carried unanimously,. -10- Pl~nnin~ Ccmnission Minutes - August 13t 1962 - Contimmd IV. Be A-88 - Standard Oil C~any, Saratoga-Los Ca~os Road - Preliminary A~.proval - Service Station Cv~-..~ssioner Andersen abs~ained from takin~ part in the discussion and votin~ in this matter because of his former connection Standard Oil C~anyo Commissioner Glenn stated that the Design Reviev C~..-.~ttee felt that the plans, as submitted, were mot in keepin~ with the objec- tives of Sara~o~ao The C~ttee expressed a desire for a more rustic design, ~m~lar to the S~mdard Oil Station in After discussion, Chairnt~n Webster directed A-88 continued until the meetin~ on AU~us~ 27, 1962, ~o a~low ~e applicant su~ficien~ time ~o prel~are and submi~ revised ~ BUSINESS VIe OLD BUSINESS Paul Ferrati - Chau~e of Zoning fran '~E:~o~" to '~A" in Sanfia Clara C~m~ - Continued from Jul~ 23~ 1952 The Secretary read a report fi~m the Subdivision Committee pertainin~ ~o this maCeere C~issioner Cris~ moved, seconded by Con~aissioner Glenn, that the Can- mission adopt a resolution opposin~ the requested chan~e of zonin~ ~or the reasons stated in the C~m~tcee P-eport, the precise werdin~ to be drafted by the Secretary of the Co~nission, and that this resolution be transmit~ed to the Santa Clara County Plan~n~ C~n,tssion; motion car- tied U~t~4~mUSl~° VII, COt~JNICATIONS A. ~I~ 1. A-83 - Creative Workshop, Oak Street - R~quest for Extension of Use of Fi~,~u's Hall The Secretary read a comnn,~ication from ~lr. Annstron~ of the Creative Workshop o~ Los Altos requestin~ that their use of the Fir~n~'s Hail be extended for a period o~ one (1) year. ~Ir° Armstron~ ~ms present ~o discuss this matter further wi~h the Conw~esion° Chairm~n Webster directed this matter continued until ~he meetin~ on August 2~, lg62, and re£erred the co~nunica~ion ~o the Design Review C~ittee for study and a ropor~ at this meeting. -11- Plannin~ .Cu-~.4ssion Minutes - Au~us~ 13, 1962 - Continued A. ' 2. SDR-307 - ~m. C. A~ Ca~lson~ Pike Road .- Request for Exto--ion ~he Secretary read a letter from M~. Carlson reques~tn_~ a 30 day extension in connection with his buildiu~ site approval. C~.,-,,issioner Anderson moved. eeconded by Cc~mtssioner Crisps · hata 30 da~ extension be ~ranted in connection with SDR-307; motion carried unanimously. 3o SDR-304 -Dias and roll, Sarato~-Sunnyvale Road - Bequest for Extension The Secretary read a letter from Mr. Dies requestin~ an exten- sion of 50 days in connection with-his buildir% site approval. ~lssioner Anderson moved, secoaded by C~mm~esioner Glenn, that a 50 day extension be gran=ed in connection with SDIt-304; motion carried unanimously. CHAXiiNAN WEBSter DECLARED ~E MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:25 P. I~. Respectfully submitted, tan ey o a er, Secretary Saratoga Plann{n~ C~...~ssion V -12-