Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-14-1965 Planning Commission Minutes (2) SUMMARY OF: MINUTES CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION TIME: Monday, June 14, 1965, 7:30 P. M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitval.e Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting Io ROUTINE ORGANIZATION The meeting was called to order by A. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Crisp,i Kellum, McFall, Norton and O'Rorke. Absent: Commissioners Cowleyl and Wright. B. MINUTES Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the reading of the minutes of May 24, 1965 be waived and that the minutes be approved subject to. the following corrections: 1. Page 4...Item III, B ...... Revise the second paragraph to read as follows: "After discussion, it was requested that Mr. Heiss meet with the Subdivision Committee On the afternoon of June 7, 1965 for further study relative to this application." 2. Pag~ 7...Item VII, A ...... Modify the second paragraph to read as follows: "Commissioner Cowley moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the Design Review Committee Report of April 26, 1965 relative to Design Standards for Subdivision Homes be adopted as the policy of the Commission; motion carried unanimously." 3. Pag~ 7...Item VII, B ...... ~evise to read as follows: "After discussion, Chairman Norton directed that the Secretary request that the applicant 1) obtain written authorization from the State Division of Highways to display the subject ban- ner and 2) file a copy of this authorization with the Planning Department. He then referred this matter to the Design Review Committee for study and directed same continued off the agenda until authorization from the State Division of Highways had been received." Motion carried unanimously. -1- Planning Commission Min~.es - June 14~ '1965 II.. PUBLIC HEARINGS : Chairman Norton declared public hejarings open for the evening at 7:36 PoM. A. C-83 - Hamilton Development Corporation, Pierce Road - Request for Change of Zoning from '~-1-40,000~ (Single Family Residential) to '~-1-40,000 P-C" (Single Family Residential Planned Com- munity) - Continued from May 24~ 1965 " The Secretary briefly reviewed. this application and read 1) a peti- tion opposing the proposed change of zoning signed by 16 residents in the vicinity of the subject p~operty and 2) a letter from the Hamil- ton Development Corporation granting a 45 day extension of time for action on the tentative map filed in conjunction with this application. SCOTT SMITH, Pierce Road, prot'ested the proposed change of zoning on the basis that it would permit. establishment of a stable on the sub- ject property that would be inconsistent with the surrounding area. In answer to a question from ROBERT W~LKER of Surrey Lane, the Com- mission explained that a consultant (Lawrence Lackey of San Francisco) had been engaged by the City tb review and analyze the proposed plan- ned community development. Itz was further explained that because of a lack of experience with this type development, it was felt that it would be worthwhile to enlist lthe services of a specialist and follow the process of analysis step bY step. After further discussion, Chailrman Norton directed C-83 continued until the next regular meeting!. B. q-85 - Loma Serena Development' Company, Inc., Prospect Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agricultural) to "R-l-10,000" (Single Family Residential) - Continued from May.24~ 1965 The Secretar~ briefly reviewedl this application and advised that there were no further additions to the file. Commissioner Crisp ~·.l)~%advisedl that there was a problem to be' worked out in connection with the tentative map filed in conjunction with this application and 2) sugge=sted that, for this reason, C-85 be con- tinued until the ne~ct regular meeting. Chairman Norton so directed. Planning Commission Minutes - June 14, 1965 IIo' Co C-86 - Neil K. Chase, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-I-IO,O00" (Single Family Residential) to '~R-M-3,000" (Multiple Residential):- Continued from May 24~ 1965 The Secretary I) briefly rev{ewed this application 2) advised that the applicant had submitted tentative plans indicating the character of the proposed development and 3) read a comnunication filed by the Board of Governors of "Th~ Saratogan" protesting the proposed change of zoning. The applicant was present and ~again called attention to the fact that the subject property is bordered on three sides by existing apart- ment developments ("The Saratogan" on the south, "Crystal Terrace" (a legal non-conforming use) On the north, and '~Brookside Glen" across the creek to the west). He f~rther stated 1) there is an established need for two and three bedroom apartments in Saratoga 2) deluxe apartments of 1600 to 1900 square feet are proposed 3) no children will be accepted and 4) rental units are planned only if condominium financing cannot be obtained.: ARTHUR WILSON, owner of the adjacent "Crystal Terrace'~ apartment development, spoke in support~of the proposed change of zoning on the basis that it is the best possible use of the land. He expressed con- cern, however, relative to the possibility of construction of a four- story building on the front o~ the property. Commissioner Crisp explained ~hat Ordinance NS-3, Section 5.8, would limit the height of the proposed building to 30 feet. Mr. Chase and his designer, Mr. Ayers, then presented colored slides showing the 1) subject property 2) surrounding area and 3) pro- posed development, together with a colored rendering of the proposed development. During this presentation, Mr. Ayers advised 1) all of the existing trees would be p~eserved 2) the proposed setbacks are greater than those required b~ the Ordinance 3) the proposed site coverage is less than permitted by the Ordinance and 4) two covered parking spaces are proposed for each unit in addition to open parking for guests. After further discussion, Commissioner Crisp advised that it was the recommendation of the SubdiviSion Committee that this matter be con- tinued until the plans had been reviewed by the Design Review Committee. On the basis of the foregoingi Chairman Norton, with concurrence of the Commission, directed C-86, Nell K. Chase~ continued until the meeting on July.12, 1965. -3~ Planning Commission Minutes - June 14, 1965 II. D. UP-80 - Church of the Ascension, Prospect Avenue - Request for Use Permit for Church and School - Continued from May 24~ 1965 The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and advised that nothing further had been added. to the file. There was not. zone present who ~ished to comment with regard to this matter. : Commissioner Crisp read the report of the Subdivision Committee relative to this application, 'reconm~ending that same be approved. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner McFall that the public hearing on UP-80 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:21 P. M. Commissioner Kellum moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Subdivision Connnittee Report of June 8, 1965 relative to UP-80, Church of the Ascension, be approved and that the Use Permit be granted subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. E. UP%8! - Bryce W. Baker, Cox A~enue - Request for Use Permit for Nursery School - Continued from May 24~ 1965 The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and advised that no written communications had been received. The applicant was present but 'stated that he had no further comment at this time. Commissioner Crisp read the report of the Subdivision Committee relative to this matter, recommending approval of same. Commissioner O'Rorke suggested that the term "living quarters" (used in the last sentehce of paragraph 3 of said report) be changed to "single family residence:'. Commissioner Crisp, with concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, directed that the Secretary modify the report as suggested by Com- missioner O'Rorke. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner McFall that the hearing on UP-81 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the Chairman declared the lhearing closed at 8:27 P. M. Planning Commission Minutes -.june 14~ '1965 II. E. UP-8! - B. ryce w. Baker Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, that the Subdivision Connnittee Report of June 8, 1965 relative to UP-8!, Bryce W, Baker, be approved a~ modified and that the Use Permit be granted subject to the condit{ons specified in said report; motion carried unanimously. : F. VT257 - Claire C. Goodwin, Suilivan Way - Request for Variance in connection with Required Front and Side Yard Setbacks - Continued from May 24~..!965 The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and read a letter from J. L. Atkinson, adjacent%property owner, supporting this re- quest.for a variance. , Mr. Goodwin was present but slated that he had no further comnent at this time. Commissioner O'Rorke read the'report of the Variance Committee rela- tive to this application, recommending approval subject to certain conditions. After discussion Commissioner .Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the public hearing on V-257 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the Chairman closed the hearing at 8:37 P. M. Commissioner O'Rorke moved, s~conded by Commissioner Crisp, that the report of the Variance Committee of June 8, 1965 relative to V-257, Claire C. Goodwin, be approved and that the Variance be granted sub- ject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. : G. V-258 - Clay V. Brown, Canyon.View Drive - Request for Variance in connection with Required Front Yard Setback - Continued from May 24, 1965 The Secretary briefly'reviewed this application and advised that nothing further had been added to the file. There was no one present who wished to comment with regard to this matter. Commissioner O'Rorke read thelreport of the Variance Committee rela- tive to V-258, recommending approval of same. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner Kellum that the public hearing on V-258 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:41 P. M. Plannin~ Commission Minutes - June 14, 196~ II. G. V'258 - Clay V. Brown Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the Variance Committee Report~of June 8, 1965 relative to V-258, Clay V. Broom, be approved and that the Variance be granted as requested; motion carried unanimously. H. UP-82 - Crest Development Company, Prospect Avenue - Request for Use Permit for Node1 Home Sales Office The public hearing on UP-82 was opened at 8:41P. M. The Secre- tary advised that Notices of Hearing had been mailed and there were no written communications on file. The applicant's representative explained that Crest Development Company 1) planned to build on the remaining 19 lots in the Blos- som View Subdivision and 2) desired to utilize the proposed home on Lot 7 as anode1 Home Sales Office. The Secretary read a Staff Report recommending approval of this request. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner Kellum that the public hearing on UP-82 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:45 P. M. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, that UP-82, Crest Development Company, application for Use Permit for Model Home Sales Office, be granted in accordance with the Staff Report of June 14, 1965 relative to this matter; motion carried unanimously. Chairman Norton declared public hearings closed for the evening at 7:47 P. M. RECESS AND KECONVENE ' III. SUBDIVISIONS AND BUILDING SITES A. SD- 567 - Loma Serena DeVelopment Company, Prospect Road - Subdivi- sion - 55 Lots - Continued fromMay 24, 1965 ..... Commissioner Crisp advised 1). the Subdivision Committee had found the tentative map for SD-567 quite satisfactory 2) there was a question, however, as to whether access could be obtained across the Plannin~ Comission Minutes - June 14, ~965 Ili. A. SD- 567 - Loma Setend' Development Cqn~any railroad track to the property beyond 3) the Director of Public Works had an appointment with 'representatives of Southern Pacific to try to find a solution to this matter and 4) in view of this, it was the recon=nendation of the Subdivision Committee that this application be continued until the next regular meeting. Chairman Norton so directed. B. SD- 569 - Hamilton Development Corporation, Pierce Road - Subdivi- sion - 65.Lots - Continued fromMay 24, 1965 Commissioner Crisp recommended that this application be continued until the meetin~ on June 28, '1965 in view of 1) review and ana- lysis of the proposed planned con~nunity development by Lawrence Lackey and 2) the 45 day extension of time for action on this ten- tative map (see discussion relative to C-83). Chairman Norton so directed. C. SDR-573.- Donald R. McCormack~ Farwell Avenue - Building Site Appro- val - 2 Lots The applicant was not present. Commissioner Crisp moved, sec6nded by Commissioner Kellum, that the Building Site Committee Report of June 14, 1965, relative to SDR-573, Donald R. McCormack, be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed May 27, 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. D. SDK-574 - John Kirkpatrick, Pike Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Crisp advised that the subject application had been con-. ditioned but that the Health Department had disapproved the site for septic tank development. The applicant and his engineer were present and requested that this matter be continued to allow adequate time for them to confer with the Health Department. On the basis of this request, Chairman Norton directed SDR-574 con- tinued until the meeting on June 28, 1965. -7- .P..lannin~ Commission Minutes - June 14~ 1965 III. E. SDR-575 - Bryce W. Baker~ Cox'Avenue - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot The applicant was present andSexpressed satisfaction with the pro- posed conditions of approval.~ The Commission called Mr. Baker's attention to an error on the ten- tatlye map with respect to the location of the easement for the Church, and requested that it be .relocated so that it actually abutted the Church property. Mr. Baker agreed to comply with this request. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner McFall that the Building Site Committee Report of June 14, 1965 relative to SDR-575, Bryce W. Baker, be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhi- bit 'A", filed June 4, 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motSon carried unanimously. F. SDR-576 - Walter Hileman, Madtone Hill Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Crisp advised that conditions had been prepared for this application but the Health Department had withheld a decision rela- tive to septic tank development until percolation tests had been run. In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed SDR-576 continued until the meeting on June 28,=1965. G. SDR-577 - Mijo Corporation, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot ~ On behalf of the Building Site Connnittee, Commissioner Crisp expressed concern with respect to the great amount of fill and large pieces of concrete bulldozed into the creek by the applicant. He explained, how- ever, that the Staff had contacted the applica~e withregard to this matter and that the situation'would be corrected. Mr. Menard, architect for the'applicant, further explained that the fill and concrete had been dumped into the creek by accident while the applicant was trying to stabilize the bank and that his client would correct the situation. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, that the Building Site Committee Report of June 14, 1965 relative to SDR-577, Mijo Corporation, be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed June 4, 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. -8- Planning Commission H~nutes - June 14= 1965 II1. H. SDR-578 - Edwin P. Gerth, Lomita Avenue - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The applicant was not present, Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Colmnissioner McFall, that the Building Site Committee Report of June 14, 1965 relative to SDR-578, Edwin P. Gerth, be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit '~", filed June 4, 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-172 - Dura Style Homes, Inc~, Cox Avenue - Final Design Review - Additional Model - Continued fromMay 24, 1965 After a brief review of this application, Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, that final design review be granted in connection with the additional model submitted under A-172 as shown on Exhibits "B-2" and "F"; motion carried unanimously. B. A-180 - Montessori School, Norton Road - Final Design Review - Pre-School Commissioner O'Rorke advised Chat the Committee had reviewed the plans for the proposed school.and had found them satisfactory. After discussion CommissionerO'Rorke moved seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that final design approval be granted in connection with A-180, Montessori School, on the basis of Exhibits "A", "B" and "C"; motion carried unanimously. C. A-181 - Morris Lou~hran, Bi~ Basin Way - Final Design Review - Sign Commissioner O'Rorke advised that the Committee had reviewed the plans for the proposed sign and that same met all requirements of Ordinance MS-3, Section 10. It was moved by Commissioner 0'Rorke and seconded by Commissioner Crisp that final design approval be granted A-181, Morris Loughran, for the sign shown on Bxhibits "A" and 'J"; motion carried unanimously. D. A-182 - Bryce W. Baker, Cox A~enue - Final Design Review - Nursery School After a brief discussion of this application, Commissioner O'Rbrke moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that A-182, Bryce W. Baker, be granted final design approval for the Nursery School as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B"; motion Carried unanimously. -9- . Plannin~ Commission Minutes - June 14~'1965 IV. D. A-182 - Bryce W. Baker In answer to a comment by Commissioner OtRorke that the proposed building would lend itself well to conversion into apartment units, Mr. Baker assured the Commission 1) he was well aware of . the "R-I" zoning on the subject property 2) although the building might lend itself well to such a conversion, it was completely unintentional and 3) the design was the result of combining necessity with an attempt to retain the aesthetic quality of the building. E. ~-183 - Crest Development Company, Prospect Avenue - Final Design Review - Blossom View Subdivision Homes Commissioner O'Rorke advised that the Committee had reviewed the plans submitted in connection.with A-183 and that they met all re- quirements of the Ordinance. After discussion Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that final design approval be granted A-183, Crest Develop- ment Company, for the subdivision homes as shown on Exhibits "A" through "H"; motion carried unanimously. F. A-184 - Mijo Corporation, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Preliminary Design Review - Commercial Buildin~ Commissioner O'Rorke recommended that A-184 be continued for further study by the Desig, n Review Committee in view of 1) the situation at the site (see.discussion re SDR-577) and 2) absence of two members of the Committee when the plans were previously reviewed. On the basis of this recommendation, Chairman Norton directed A-184 continued until the meeting on June 28, 1965. G. SS-41 - Prospect Hills Subdivision, Prospect Road - Final Design Review - Identification Sign Commissioner O'Rorke advised that the proposed sign met all require- ments of the Ordinance. After discussion,' it was moved by Commissioner O'Rorke and seconded by Commissioner McFall, that final design approval be granted SS-41, Prospect Hills SubdiviSion, in accord with Exhibit "A"; motion car- ried unanimously. V. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Commnissioner McFall gave a brief report on action taken by the City Coun- cil at the meeting on June 2, 1965, with emphasis on. items of particular interest to the Commission.. Plannin~ Commission Minutes - June 14~.1965 Chairman Norton extended a welcome to Mrs. Parker of the Good Government Group and Mrs. Ottenberg of the League of Women Voters, and expressed appreciation for the coffee served by Mrs. Parker during intermission. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Ordinance NS-3.10 Commissioner Kellum explained control parking and storage on private property~ and advised that such an ordinance had been drifted by the City Attorney and was under study by the General Plan Committee. - At the suggestioa of Commissione~r-'eK~lums Chairman Norton directed that the Secretary set a public hearing on the proposed ordinance for the meeting on July 12~ 1965 ~nd requested that the General Plan Com- mittee submit its report at that time. B. Areas Subdivided Prior to Incdrporation Chairman Norton raised a question relative to the advisability of amending the Ordinance to accqmodate sections of the City that were subdivided under County restrictions (prior to incorporation). After a brief discussion~ theiChairman requested that this matter be discussed with the City Attorney and that the Staff make a study rela- tive to this possible need. VII. OLD BUSINESS : A. SDR-565 - Robert F. Planes Douglas Lane - Request for Reconsideration - Continued fromMay 2~ 1965 The Secretary advised that Mr.. Plane had requested that this matter be continued since additional time was needed to try to work out the problems involved with the subject property. On the basis Of this request~ 'Chairman Norton directed SDR-565 con- tinued until the meeting on June 28~ 1965. B. SDR-421 - Dr. M. A. Broemser~ .Saratoga Hills Koad - Request for Exten- sion - Continued fr0mMa~ 24~ 1965 After a brief discussion~ Commissioner Crisp moved~ seconded by Com- missioner McFa11~ that an extension be granted in connection with SDR-~21.for a period of six m6nths from June 10~ 1965s subject to the following additional condition~ "Provide underground utilfties from nearest pole." Motion carried unanimously. Plannin~ Con~nission Minutes - June 14, 1965 VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN B. ORAL .. Pon Propert.y - Miller and Prospect Avenues Commissioner McFall advised that a brochure referred to as "The Strawberry Patch" was being circulated in support of a proposed shopping center on the northeast corner of'the.intersection of Miller and Prospect Avenues (Pon property). He recalled that such a proposal had been submitted to the City of San Jose pre- viously, that residents in the area had opposed same and that the proposal was eventually defeated. He explained that a door- to-door campaign was now under way to try to change the attitude toward locating a shopping center at this intersection, and 'that they hoped to gain the suppor~ of groups such as the West Valley Homeowners Association. He observed that because of its proxi- mity to Saratoga, this proposed development was a matter of con- cern and that, no doubt, morewould be heard about it later. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Norton declared the meeting adjourned at 10:25 P. M. Respectfully submitted, r, Secretary Saratoga Planning Commission V -12- CITY OF 'SARATOGA PLANErINC.. CONNISSION ~CE...NDA TI~.~,. Nonday, June 14, 1965, ?.~30 Po M,. PLACE: 'City Council Chambers, Frui'."vale 'Avenue, Saratoga, California T~r~E: Regular I~eetiug 1, ROD.T.I~PS ORCANIZATION A, ROLL CALL Bo MINUTES' Ao Co8__3 - Hamiltpn De.v~_lopment CorporatiOn, Pierce R__o.ad - Request for Change of Zoning from '~1-40,000" (Single Family Residential) to "R-I-40,000 P-C" (Single" Family Residential Plarmed Community) - Continued from Nay 24, 1965 B, .C-85 - Loma Serena Development-:..Company, Inc., ProspeCt .Roa_d. - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agricultural) to '~{-1-10,000". (Single Family' Residential) - Continued from May 24, 1965 C, C~86' - Nell K. Chase~. Sat.aroma A.venu..Je - Request for Change of Zoning from T~{-1-10,000" (Single Family Residential) to '~{oM-3,000" exultiple Residential) - Continued: from May 24, 1965 D, .UP-8.0 - Church of_the Asc__e._nsion~ Prospect Av..e. pue - Request for Use Permit for Church and School - Continued from ~.L~y 24, 1965 E, '~P~81 - Br~ce Wo Bak..e...r.a. Cox Avenue - Request for Use Permit for Nursery School - Continued from May 24, 1965 F, V-25___/7 - Clatre...Co Coo.dwin~ $.Ul.liv.an Way - Request for Variance in connec-= tion with Required Front and Side Yard Setbacks - Continued from· May 24, 1965 G, V-2.58 - Clay V. Brown, Canygn View Dri7e - Request for Variance in connec? tion with Required Front· Yard Setback - Continued from X~ay 24, 1965 H, I~P.-..82 - ~Crest DevelOpment. Comp..an~,. Prospect Avenue - Request for Use Permit for Model Home Sales Office lII, S]/BDIVIS lONS~ AND BUI.L. DING SI~ES A, _S._~- 56? - Loma S.erena Devel.qpment C. ompany, P~rgspect Road - Subdivision 55 Lots - Continued from ~y. '24, 1965 B, SD- 56..____29 - Ha. milton Deve!.opment. CO=porationA Pierce Road - Subdivision - 65 Lots '- Continued from ~y 24, 1965 C, SDR-57___._33.- D.Onald R._Mc~Cormack, Fa.rwell. Avenue - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots' D, .S_DR-5.?4 - ~Jghn Ki~kp.atrick.,. Pike' Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot E, ~SDR-575 - BrVce W: Baker, Cox Avenue - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot F, SDR-576 -' Walter Hileman~ Madtone Hill Road - Building Site Approval 1 Lot Approval - I T.ot H, SDR-578 - ~dwin ?. Certh, Lomita;Avenue Building Site Approval - 1 Lot IV. DE_.z~.I~_P~-.VI A. A~.179 Additional l,!odel ~ Continued ffc, m May 24~ 1965 B, A-180 - Mon~esm~r'{ Scho,~l. NoTion Road - Final Design Review - Pre-School C. ~,~!~.~ ~ M~}~!~,~,'u~_~~~ B~sin W__ 9Z ' Final Design Review - Sign D. A~182 -~~ak~~.Avenue - Final Design Review- Nursery School E. A~I~ Blossom View Subdivision ~omes A-18/+ - Mi~ CoFErati~~~S'unn~e E.oad - Prel~inazy Desig~ Review- Co~ercial Building O. Identification Sign V. C%~ CO~CIL REPORT VII. OLD B'SSI~SS A. SDR-'565 - Robert F. Plan~ttRlas Lane - Request for ReconsideraEioa - Continued from May 24, 1965 B, SDR-42~ - D_~.~J._ A. B~oemser, S~a Hills Roa~ - Request for Extension - Continued from May 24. 1965 A. I'~I~TEN B, O~L . Ix.