Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-10-1967 Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued I. B. MINUTES - Continued page 8. '..'paragraph 3.. .line 1.. .delete: "revised" and insert: "new" line 2. '..delete: "and the required parking" page 11.. .paragraph 10.. .line 3.. .add: "recommending denial of the request for modification of conditions"; motion carried unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. UP-120 - Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur, Norton Road - Request for Use Permit for Construction of New Novitiate Facilities - Continued from 27 March 1967 The continued hearing on this request was not resumed at this time since nothing further had been added to the file and there w~s no one present who wished to comment wit~ regard to this application. Commissioner McFall advised .that the applicants and their representative, Mr. Hollis Logue, were still studying the alternate cost estimates for the improve- .. ment of Bohlman Road and recommended 'that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting. Chairman Norton so directed. B. C-105 - George W. Day Construction, Allendale Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-1-40,O00" (Single Family Residential) to "R-i-20,000" (SinKle Family Residential) - Continued from 27 March 1967 The continued hearing on C-105 was not re-opened at this meeting. Commissioner McFall explained that a revised map showing the necessary information needed to prepare a recommendation with regard to this matter would be submitted by the. applicant, before the next regular meeting on '24 April 1967. In view' of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed C-105 continued until the meeting on 24 April 1967. C. C-106 - M.V.S. Company, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agricultural) to "R-M-3,000" (Multiple Residential) - Continued from 27 March 1967. The continued hearing on C-106 was not resumed at this time. Commissioner McFall advised that the Subdivision Committee had met with the applicant and are now awaiting the submission of specific information relative to this matter. There was no one present who wished to comment with regard to this request. · Chairman Norton directed C-106 continued to the next regular meeting on 24 April 1967. ;, Planning Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued II. D. V-291 - John L. Terry, Woodbank Way'- Request for Variance in Connection with Side Yard Setback Requirements - Continued from 27 March 1967 The continued hearing on V-291 was resumed at 7:44 P.M. The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and. stated that a detailed map, show- ing the exact location of the stable and corral and the trees that would be removed if the setback ~equirements were met, had been submitt·ed by · the applicant. Mr. Terry was present but stated that he had no further comment at this time. · · There was no one else present who wished to. speak with regard to this matter. Commissioner Johnson read the report of the Variance Committee relative· to V-291, recommending denial on the basis that "the only possible hard- .. ship incurred would be the removal of two orchard trees of which there are many". Commissioner Johnson advised that the Variance Committee report should be amended to read "two additional trees" in paragraph 3.'. .line 2. Commissioner O'Rorke stated that the City still maintained its present policy with regard·to preserving trees, but in this case thirty (30) odd trees would remain in the orchard surrounding the proposed stable and corral. After discussion, Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner .' McFall, that the public·hearing on V-291 be closed; motion carried un- animously and the hearing was closed at 7:48 P.M. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner Johnson that the Variance Committee Report of 10 April 1967 rela~.ive to V-291, John L. Terry~ be approved, as amended, and that the Variance be denied since the required findings could not be made; motion carried unanimously. E. C-80 - Clarence Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Informal Hearing on Request to Add Additional Uses to the List of Uses. Permitted Under the Conditional Community Commercial Zoning - Continued from 27 March 1967 The continued hearing on C-80 was resumed at 7:49 P.M. .The Secretary briefly reviewed this matter and advised that nothing further had been added to the file. The applicant, Mr. Neale, was present and stated he would prefer to reserve his comments until after the reports relative to this matter had been read. Conmissioner McFall read the Staff Report prepared jointly with the Sub- division Committee, recommending that this request for additional uses be denied and any increase in the existing building square footage or the addition of any new building to the property be disapproved. He then read the report of the Planning Director reviewing Mr. Neale's development from the standpoint of compliance with conditions imposed and plans sub- mitted under his various applications. -3- PlanninS Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued II. E. C-80 - Continued The applicant then made the following comments: 1. The State of California and the County of Santa Clara had issued himan Encroachment Permit for the use of the 35 foot area (located between the embankment and the roadway) for parking.. 2. The State of California and the County of Santa Clara had requested that the landscaping on the property belonging to the State be postponed since there is a drainage in-let located here that would be obstructed by shrubbery. 3. A key shop had been maintained in the old Barn; therefore, the Milerich Key Shop should be considered a legal use. " .. 4~ .The Planning Con~nission was inconsistent in their interpretation and application of the Zoning Ordi- nance, particularly in reference to parking and claimed that he provided more parking than any other business in Saratoga. 5. Many times people park at Neale's Hollow and then walk to the Village to do their shopping or they go to visit tenants in the adjacent apartment build ing. 6.' He had been in contact wi[h a chartered sight-seeing bus service that would make a single stop daily in Saratoga (at Neale's Hollow) during the summer months if the necessary conveniences for a stop-over station could be arranged. 7. Several of the tenants' from the adjacent apartment building drive sports cars and when they are on the. right-of-way going through his property they~ drive at a speed which is unsafe especially for the elderly : customers who shop at the center. 8. The parking spaces referred to in the report were · . ·incorrectly marked at a time when he (Mr. Neale) " was not present and they will be remarked as specified in the report. '. 9.In closing he stated that, he felt, that his requests' were in conformance with the ZoniDg efdinance. p~.agninB. Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 '- Continued II. E~ C-80 - Continued . Chairman Norton explained that 1) certain concessions with respect to parking have had to be made until the formation of the proposed Village Parking District is accomplished 2)' Mr. Neale's parcel is zoned ·Conditional Commercial with limited uses and now it must be maintained as such and 3) the Zoning Ordinance is complicated, but the Planning Commission endeavors to enforce it as fairly as possible. Commissioner O'Rorke suggested that Mr. Neale be given a copy of each of the reports read by Commissioner McFall so that he may '. study them and then return at a later date to discuss the various items mentioned in the report with the Commission.'. Mr. Bob Ewing, member of the Chamber of Commerce and loca'l merchant, was present inquired why the Garcia request (Retail Specialty Shopping Center) was considered and recommended to the City' Council for approval by the Planning Commission··~·'·~.- when Mr. Neale is not able to get additional uses for his development. Chairman Norton explained that it was the intent of. the Planning Commission to.upgrade the entire· area where the Garcia property is located since it is .one..of the entrances to the Cit~whereas, Mr. Neale's property is bordering a residential area'. He further explained that when an application is being studied the Planning Commission must consider what affect it would have on the City as a whole rather than the advantages that would be gained· by an individual. Mr. Bastianelli, owner of Brookside Glen Apartments adjacent to Neale's Hollow, was present·and stated he was not opposed to the applicant'.s proposal as long as it does not affect the County easement and his right- of-way. Commissioner Smith inquired of the applicant how, if ·he remarked his pa~king spaces to the widths required, would he be. able to realize the same number parking spaces. Mr. Neale. explained that an area in the rear of his property has never been landscaped or black topped and by'using this he could supply any additional space needed for parking. 'He then requested that this matter be continued to the meeting on 8 May 1967 to allow him time to consider all points men- tioned in the reports. In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton (8:28 P.M.) directed C-80 continued to the meeting on 8 May 1967. Planning Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued II. F. Ordinance NS-3.15 - Proposed Amendment to Ordinance NS-3, which Amendment would add Certain Provisions to Section 14.7 Relating to Exceptions to Side Yard Requirements, and Amending Section 14.3 in Relation to Non-Conforming Sites by Reason of Widt~ - Continued from 27 March 1967 The continued hearing on this proposed amendment (Ordinance NS-3.15) was re-opened at 8:29 P.M.' The.Secretary stated there was nothing new in the file. Chairman Norton briefly reviewed this proposed ordinance. There was no one. in the audience who wished to comment with regard to this matter. Commissioner McFall stated that it was his recommendation, with full concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, that this matter be taken off the agenda and that all further action with regard to same be terminated. At 8:30 P.M. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by.CommiSsioner Kasner,' that the public hearing for/"this proposed amendment .be closed;!motion carried unanimously. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded' by Commissioner Kasner, that the proceed~.'.,':~.~ ings'.on/',thiS:~.; proposed amendment be abandoned and that the Planning Department be directed to interpret the zoning laws as stated in the Zoning Ordinance and as instructed by the City Attorney with regard to the items mentioned in subject .amendment; motion carried unanimously. G.' UP-130 - R. B. Beers, Sobey Road - Request for Use Permit=for the Keeping of One (1) Horse The public hearing on UP-130 was opened at 8:36 P.M. The.Secretary advised ..... that Notices of Hearing had been mailed and read a communication from Mr. & Mrs. Brookman filed in support of this application. Commissioner O'Rorke 'stated that the applicant had notified him that he could not be in attendance at this meeting. : There'was no one else present who wished. to comment with regard to this matter. Chairman Norton (8:39 P.M.) directed UP-130 continued to the next regular meet- ing and.referred same to the Subdivision Committee for study and a report at that time. H. V-292 - Rayne Soft Water, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Request for Variance.in Connection with Sign Location The public hearing on V-292 was opened at 8:40 P.M. The Secretary advised that Notices of Hearing had been mailed and no written communications had been received'.' He then briefly reviewed this application. The applicant was present to further explain the need for the requested Variance. There was no one else present who wished to comment with regard to this matter. 'After discussion, Chairman Norton (8:30 P.M.) directed V~292 continued until the next regular meeting and referred the matter.to the Variance Committee for study and a report at that time. -6- · Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued II. H.. V-292 - Continued Commissioner Crisp, on behalf of the Variance Committee, made an appointment with the applicant for an on-site inspection at 8:30 A.M., Saturday, 15 April 1967. I. C-71'- Maranar Investment Company, Walnut Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-1-12,500" (Single Family Residential) to "R-M-3,000 P-C" .(Multi-Residential Planned Community) The public hearing on C-71 was opened at 8:43 P.M. The Secretary stated that a Notice of Hearing had been published and briefly reviewed this application. He then read communications from Mrs. Mary Ruth Owens of Victor Place, Arthur L..Cooley, M.D. of Squirrel Hollow Lane and Pray and Elbrecht, attorneys for Mr. Ba~tianelli, filed in opposition to this Change of Zoning. Mr. Herbert Resner was present to represent the applicant and stated: 1) A smilar application was before the Commission about two (2) years ago.and was considered impractical. by the applicant due to the required construction of retaining walls at a cost of '$135.,000. The new plans show the buildings set back from the creek so-that retaining walls will' · '. not be essential. 2) The previous approved request had been for R-M-5,000 PC ·Zoning and allowed for the ..... I- construction· of 34 Units. The new request is for R-M-3,000 PC Zoning with the construc- tion of 66 units, but using less land by having five to six family units per structure rather than the three previously approved. The reason for the new request is that the 34 units with R-M-5,000 PC.is economically unfeasible. 3) In any event when Flood Control improvements get under way on Saratoga Creek a conc'rete channel placed down the creek will eliminate ..if ... · the necessity of expensive retaining walls. - · ... 4) The applicant has a Resolution that permits him ...-. · ' right-of-way over Mr Bastianelli's property .' "' (Brookside Glen Apartments). · ' ... 5) One of the previous owners of the Maxmar property, Mr. Lee, had exchanged one right-of-way for another · as explained in the memorandum of 7 October 1964. 6) The development is still designed for occupancy by people past ftf..t.y (50) years of age. The general opinion zseems to be that this type of development is needed in Saratoga and the best loca- tion would be near the downtown area, but the"people objecting seem to feel (and understandably so) it should not impose on anyone's privacy. 8)The rentals on these units will be approximately $250.00 depending upon the size of the unit. 9) 'These unit's are built together, but will be maintained as separate structures. -7 -Z Planning COmmission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued · II I. C-71 - Continued · Commissioner McFall stated that this plan does not conform with t~e present Planned Community Ordinance. The· Secretary advised that hd had'discussed this matter with the City Attorney and had been advised that to avoid complications with regard to the Planned Community Ordinance this application could be changed· to strict Multiple Zoning. Mr. H. J. Oberhaus of Alta Vista Avenue was present and stated that even if the problem with regard to'Arbelec~e Lane is resolved the increase in traffic, with these additional units, will still present problems. Mr. Bastianelli, Brookside Glen Apartments, stated that the right-of-way agreement worked out with Mr. Stern (former owner of Brookside Glen Apart- ments)·was not legal. He then stated that since the applicant for a Change of Zoning must be the owner/·and· since this particular property had been repossessed by the Dollar Savings and Loan Company how was it possible ' for Mr. Resner to file this application. .. c. Mr. Resner explained that he had a contract with the Dollar Savings and. Loan Company by which they owned the larger portion of this property and he '(Mr. Resner) maintained ownership of the two smaller parcels. Mr. Clarence Neale, local merchant, was present and stated that 1) this .., · type of community is needed in Saratoga 2) this development would enhance -the appearance of the entire area and 3) he felt this would attract desirable citizens. Mrs. Dorothy Hilbrecth, ViCtor Place, was present and stated she did not like the idea of having this sort of development almost in her back yard. Mr. Wilbur Worden of Squirrel Hollow Lane, was present and stated that he did not·object to the previous application, but felt that this plan would be·completely unacceptable.. · ·After discussion, Chairman Norton (9:15 P.M.) directed C-71 continued to the next regular meeting and referred the matter to the Subdivision Committee for study. J. UP-128 - John L. Terry, Woodbank Way - Request for Use Permit for the Keeping of One (1) Horse - Continued from 27 March 1967 The public 'hearing on UP-128 was resumed at 9:16 P.M. The Secretary .... briefly reviewed this application and advised that nothing further had. been added·to the file. The applicant was present but stated that he-had no further comment at this time. There.was no one else present who wished to comment with regard to this application. The Secretary then read the Staff Report pertaining to UP-128, recommending that the Use Permit be granted subject to compliance with all applicable provisions·of Ordinance NS-3 Section 16.6. ' :" -8- PlanninB Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued II. J.'. UP-i28 - Continued Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the public hearing on UP-128 be closed; motion carried unanimously and· the hearing was closed at 9:18 P.M. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the Staff · Report of 10 April 1967 relative to UP-128 be approved and that the Use Permit be granted subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of Ordinance NS-3, Section 16.6; motion carried unanimously. RECESS AND RECONVENE III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-674 - West' Valley Baptist C~urch, Allendale and Fruitvale Avenues - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 27 March 1967 Commissioner McFall advised that the new plan had not been made available · .' .to the Subdivision Committee in time for study prior to this meeting and recommended that this matter be continued. Chairman Norton so directed. B. SD-684 - C. T. Lindsa7~ Inc.~ Cox Avenue - Subdivision - 54 Lots Mr. Jim Kaiser, engineer fromMacKay and Somps~ was present to represent the applicant and expressed satisfaction with proposed conditions of approval. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the Subdivision Committee Report of 27 March 1967 relative to SD-684 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 27 March 1967) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. C. SDR-685 -.Dr. Michael D. Kowitz,'Pike Road - Buildins Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner McFall advised that the Subdivision Committee was not yet prepared to make a'recommendation in connection with this application and suggested that · "" same be continued until the meeting of 24 April 1967. On this basis, Chairman Norton directed SDR-685 continued to the next regular meeting. D. SD-686 - Starlite Homes, Pierce Road - Subdivision - 69 Lots Mr. Jim Kaiser, MacKay and Somps, was present to represent the applicant and questioned Conditions 10 (pertaining to topsoil on all cut and fill areas), 14 (relative to final approval of Lots 46 to 67) and 15 (concerning revision of alignment of West Valley Drive). He then suggested that 1) since the grade on this property was quite level Condition 10 be amended to read "as specified by·soils engineer" 2) Condition 14 should be amended to read "No final approval of final map on Lots 46 to 67" and' 3) Condition 15 should not be. included,since this condition has alreadybeen met. PlanninS Commissions,..' Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued III~·'.'.D, SD-686 - Continued On this basis, Chairman Norton directed that Condition 10 be amended to read "as approved by Director of Public Works" and recommended that Condi- tion. 14 be amended to read as suggested by Mr. Kaiser. He further stated that since"Condition 15 had already been complied with there is no reason to remove it from the report. Commissioner McFall inquired of the applicant if there were any plans to develop any facilities other than the ones shown on the map. Mr..McInerny, President of Starlite Homes, was present and stated they planned no facilities other than the ones shown on the map. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Smith, that the Subdivision Committee Report of 10'April·1967 relative to SD-686 be adopted, as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 27 March 1967) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said· report; motion carried unanimously. IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-246 - Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Allendale Avenue - Final Design Review - Church BuildinMs Commissioner O'Rorke briefly reviewed this application and then requested that the Secretary give a report on the status of this application, The Secretary advised· that this application had not been granted pre'liminary · design approval but all the plans required for final approval had been submitte~ by the applicant's representatives. Mr. A1 Hansen, Dolphin Drive, was. present and 1) stated that he had not been notified that this matter would be considered for final approval at this meet-' ing and 2) requested that this matter be continued to allow him ample time to study the proposed·plans. In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed this'umtter continued to the next regular meeting on 24 April 1967. V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Commissioner Kasner gave a brief report. on discussion and action at the City Council meeting on 5 April 1967 and noted that the high light of the evening was the appointment of Mr. James R. Huff to the position of City Clerk-Administrator.. VI. NEW BUSINESS A.. C-86 - Neil K. Chases Saratoga Avenue - Request for Extension The Secretary read a communication from Mr. P. L. Merrick, current property owner, requesting an extension of time in connection with C-86. Commissioner Crisp advised that this was a parcel zoned Conditionally for· apartments and stated that there could. be.problems relating to the road with ... regard to adequate ingress and egress. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the Planning Commission-.'..' recommend to the City Council that an extension be granted in connection with C-86 for a period of one year from present date of expiration'; motion carried unanimously. · . .' Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued VI. NEW BUSINESS · B. C-83 - Starlite Homes (formerly Hamilton Development), Pierce Road - Request for Extension .. The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and then read a communication requesting.an extension of one (1) year in connection with C-83. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that.an extension be granted in connec- tion with C-83 for a period of one'=year from present date of expiration; motion carried unanimously. C. SDR-678 - Dr. John E. Cox, Jack's Road - Request for Modification of Conditions Commissioner McFall advised that the applicant'.s representative had met with the Subdivision Committee to discuss the required improvement of the access road reiative to SDR-678 and had requested that this matter be continued to allow him to work out an alternate plan with the Director, of Public Works. Mr. G. C. McKinney, present to represent the applicant, stated that 1) this is a private driveway rather than a public street 2) there is only a 20' .easement to work with on one side and a slope off into the canyon on the other side 3) the present driveway about occupies the remaining space and 4) the 'amount of the inspection seems to be excessive. In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed SDR-678 continued to the next regular meeting on 24 April 1967. D. SD-607 - Douglas P. Hines, Pierce Road - Request for Extension .. The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and stated that this was the' applicant's first request for extension with regard to SD'607 and recommended that the extension be granted for one (1)'year. :. .' Commissioner'McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Smithi that an extension of one (1) year be granted in connection with SD-607; motion carried unanimously. VII. OLD BUSINESS A....SDR-670 - Douglas Hines, Sobey Road'- Request for Modification of Conditions - Continued from 27 March 1967 Commissioner McFall explained that this request has been continue~ for=.-~? some time to'allow the applicant time to meet with the Director of Public Works and work out an alternate plan with regard to drainage and after doing so the Director of Public Works still recommends that this condition be imposed. The applicant was present and stated that he did not'disagree with the Director of Public Works that this drainage was needed, but felt that he was being burdened with'a.problem that should'be shared with.the other property owners in the area who would benefit. 'Commissioner Crisp stated t~is requirement was in accord with the procedure 'followed in similar cases. The Secretary stated that Mr. Hines would be reimbursed for 75% of his cost out of the Storm Drainage Fund and .then read the Staff Report of 27 March 1967 recommending, with concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, to the City Council that this request for modification of condition be denied. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Staff Report of 27 March 1967 relative to SD,R-670, be approved and that the subject request be denied and same be recommended to the City Council for disapproval.; '-11- Plannin~ Commission Minutes - i0 April 1967 - Continued VII. A. SDR-670 - Continued A Roll Call vote was taken with the following result: AYES NOES Commissioner Crisp Commissioner Johnson Commissioner McFall Commissioner Kasner Chairman Norton Commissioner Smith with Commissioner O'Rorke abstaining, stating that he 'was a business associate of Mr. Hines and the motion did not carry..'. In view of the foregoing, Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, that the. City Council be informed that the Planning Commission had split on the vote regarding the recommendation of this request and were of '. the opinion that th'e City Council should resolve the matter; motion carried unanimously. B. SD-478 - Claude T. Lindsay, Cox Road - Request for Extension The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and recommended that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting. " Chaiman Norton so directed. : C. HORSE ORDINANCE Commissioner McFall advised that the Subdivision Cormnittee had reviewed the latest revision'with regard to the Horse Ordinance and would be ready to make a recommendation after 1) consulting with the City Attorney and 2) meeting for a study'session to discuss the proposed ordinance. D. GENERAL PLAN REVIEW ' Commissioner McFall advised that the Kosich representatives had submitted · another proposal, which will be on the agenda for 24 April 196~ similar to the one proposed earlier. He then stated that the applicant, at a meeting with the Subdivision Committee, had been informed that 1) enthusiasm for this type of plan was lacking and 2) the General Plan was under review and the City Council would probably refer' subject request to the General Plan Committee for further study. CommisSioner McFall further stated that he had discussed!this matter with' . .;. the consultant, Mr. Livingston, and had inquired if this particular problem could be acted upon independently of the other matter being considered. Chairman Norton explained that it would not be proper to ask advance consideration of any special application. Commissioner Kasner advised that om solution might be to accelerate the 'review of the General Plan. Commissioner Johnson stated that by the next regular meeting the General .Plan Committee may possibly have some recommendation regarding a General .. Plan Review Program. Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 10 April 1967 - Continued VIII~ COMMUNICATIONS 'A. WRITTEN SDR-629 - Robert J. Dickson, Jr.,~ Reid Lane - Request for Extension The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and then read a communication requesting' an extension of one (1) year. in connection with SDR-629. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that an extension of one (1) year be granted in connection with SDR-629; motion carried unan imou s 1 y. B. ORAL 1. MEETING ROOM · Commissioner O'Rorke stated that since the Staff Coffee Room is used so frequently for Committee meetings where the public is invited the room· should be made more attractive by refurbishing and refurnishing to make the room suitable for this~ type of use. 2. GUESTS The Chairman acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Councilman 'Robbins, Mesdames Parker and Stark of the Good Government Group, and Mrs. Ottenberg of League of Women Voters.· He, also, expressed apprecia- '. tion to Mrs. Parker for the coffee served at recess. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Norton' declared the meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Stanley M. Walker, Secretary Saratoga Planning Comm'ission Ci3:Y OF SAI~,ATOGA PLANNING COPR~iISSION AGENDA TIME: Monday, 10 April 1967, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL B. MINUTES II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. UP-120 - Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur, Norton Road - Request for Use Permit for Construction of New Novitiate Facilities - Continued from 27 March 1967 B. C-105 - George W. Day Construction, Allendale Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-i-40,000'; (Single Family Residential) to ~'R-1-20,0OO" (Single Family Residential) - Continued from 27 March 1967 C. C-106 - M.V.S. Company, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from '~A" (Agricultural) to "R-M-3,000" (Multiple Residential) - Continued from 27 March 1967 D. V-291 - John L. Terry, Woodbank Way - Request for Variance in Connection with Side Yard Setback Requirements - Continued from 27 March 1967 E. C-80 - Clarence Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Informal Hearing on Request to Add Additional Uses to the List of Uses Permitted Under the Conditional Community Commercial Zoning - Continued from 27 M~rch 1967 F. Ordinance NS-3.15 - Proposed Amendment to Ordinance NS-3, which A~endment would add Certain Provisions to Section 14.7 Relating to Excep- tions to Side Yard Requirements, and Amending Section 14.3 in Relation to Non-Conforming Sites by Reason of Width G. UP-130 - R. B. Beers, Sobey ROad - Request for Use Permit for the Keeping of One (1) Horse H. V-292 - Rayne Soft Water, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - R~q~est for Variance in Connection witk Sign Location I. C-71 - Maxmar Investment Co.,'Walnut Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-1-12,500" (Single Family Residential) to "R-M-3,000 P-C" (Multi-Residential Planned Coxmnunity) J. UP-128 - John L. Terry, Woodbank Way - Request for Use Permit for the Xeeoin~ of One (l) Horse - Continued from 27 March 1967 III. BUILDING SITES ~ND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-674 - West Valley Baptist Church, Allendale & Fruitvale Avenues - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 27 March 1967 B. SD-684 - C. T. Lindsay, Inc~ Cox Avenue - Subdivision - 54 Lots C. SDR-685 - Dr. Michael D. Kow~tz, Pike Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot D. SD-686 - Starlite Homes~ Pierge Road - Subdivision - 69 Lots IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-246 - Church of Jesus Christ of I~atter Day Saints, Allendale Avenue - Final Design Review - Church Buildin~ -1- ,..:;.'f Planning Commission A,~e~da 10 April 1967 - Continued V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT VI. NEW BUSINESS A. C-8.__~6 - Nell K. Chase, SGratoga 4vepue - Rel~est for Extension B. CT~3 - Starlite Homes (formerly. Hamilton Development), Pierce Road - Request for ,.Extension C. SDR-678 - Dr. JohnE. Cox, Jack's Road - Request for Modification of Conditions D. SD-607 - DouBles P. Hines} Pierce Road - Request for Extension VII. OLD BUSINESS A. SDR-670 - Douglas Hines, Sobey Road - Request for Modification of Conditions - Continued from 27 March 1967 B. SD-478 - Claude T. Lindsa7~ Cox Road - Request for Extension VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN B. OPAL IX. ADJOURNMENT ~. SLrM~-'~RY OF MINUTES CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COb~4ISSION TIME: Monday, 27 March 1967, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL Present:Commissioners Crisp, Johnson, Kasner, McFal~,,Norton, O'Rorke and Smith. Absent: None. B. MINUTES Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, that the reading of the minutes of 13 March 1967 be waived and that the minutes be approved subject to the following change: page 14.. .paragraph 4.. .'line 2.. '.delete: "Mesdames Owen and Sims" and insert: "Mrs. Owen and Mr. Sims" motion carried unanimously. C. NEW CObglISSIONER Chairman Norton introduced and' extended a welcome to newly appointed Commissioner Charles H. Smith. He observed that Mr. Smith, a retired professional engineer, was a long time resident of Saratoga and it was fortunate for the City as well as.the Planning Commission that the City Council appointed him. D. COMMISSIONER KELLUM Chairman Norton read a rough draft of a letter, written on behalf of the Planning Commission to Commissioner Kellum, expressing appreciation for services rendered and observing that he would be missed byall. After discussion, Chairman Norton, with concurrence of the Planning Commission, directed the Secretar~ to type the letter in final form for signature by the Chairman. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. UP-120 - Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur, Norton Road - Request for Use Permit for Construction of New Novitiate Facilities - Continued from 13 March 1967 The continued hearing on UP-120 w-as not re-opened at this time since nothing further had been added to the file and there was no one present who wished to comment with regard to same. Planning Conmission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continu'ed II. A. UP-120 - Continued Con~nissioner McFall stated that 1) the Subdivision Committee had met on two (2) different occasions with the applicant'.s representative, Mr. Hollis Logue, the Planning Committee of the City Council, and the Director of Public Works to discuss alternate cost estimates' for the improvement of Bohlman Road and 2) he would like to request that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting. Chairm~n Norton so directed. B. UP-125 - Donald McConnell, Prospect Road - Request for'Use Permit for Car Wash with C~soline Sales - Continued from 13 March 1967 The continued' hearing on UP-125 was resumed at 7:37 P.M. The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and advised that a letter had been submitted by the owners of the subject property stating that the Lozano Use Permit was now void since the property has beep leased to Mr. D. H. McConnell. The applicant was present but stated he had no further comments at this.time. There ~s no one else present who wished to speak with regard to this matter. The Secretary read the Staff Report relative to this matter, recommending approval of this.application subject to the conditions stated in said report. After discussion, Commissioner McFa.ll moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the public hearing on UP-125 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 7:37 P.M. it was moved by Commissioner' McFall and seconded by Commissioner Smith, that the Staff Report of 27 March 1967 relative to UP-125, Donald McConnell, be approved and that the Use permit be granted subject to conditions listed in report; motion carried unanimously. C. UP-126 - Brown &Kauffmann, Inc., Ingrid Court and Eric Drive -'Request for Use Permit for Model Home Sales Office - Continued from 13 March 1967 The continued hearing on UP-126 was. re-opened at 7:42 P.M. The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and stated there ~as nothing new in the file. Bill Driscoll, present to represent the applicant, stated 1) it was difficult to sell the homes in this particular unit since it was quite a distance from any main thoroughfare and 2) the proposed model home sales offices would be in direct route to the new unit. The Secretary read the Staff Report of 27 March'1967 recommending approval of UP-126 for a period not to exceed four (4) months. At 7:46 PoM. Commissioner Kasner moved, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, that the public hearing on UP-126 be closed; motion carried unanimously. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the Staff Report of 27 ~rch 1967 relative to UP-126, Brown & Kauffmann, be approved in accordance with said report; motion carried unanimously. Planning Commission Minutes - 27 ldarch 1967 - Continued II. D. b~-127 - Cene C. Euthenuth, Palomino Way - Request for Use 'Permit for the Keeping.....of Two (2) Horses - Continued from 13 March 1967 The public hearing on UP-127 w~s re-opened at 7:48 P.M.' The Secretary briefly reviewed this matter and advised that nothing further had been added to the There was no one in the audience who wished to comment with regard to this matter. Commissioner Crisp read the report of the Subd+vision Committee relative to UP-127, recommending approval of same. The applicant, Mr. Buthenuth, -~as present and stated that the setback require- ments specified in the Subdivision Report have been complied with in accordance with the Ordinance. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded 'by Commissioner Johnson, that the hearing on UP-127 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 7:52 P.M. it was moved by Commissioner McFall and seconded by Commissioner Smith that the Subdivision Committee Report of 27 March 1967 relative to UP'127, Gene C. Buthenuth, be approved and that the Use Permit be granted for one (1) horse in accordance with said report; motion carried unanimously. E. UP-128 - john L. Terry, Woodbank Way - Request for Use Permit for the Keeping of One (1) Horse The public hearing on UP-128 was opened at 7.:54 P.Mo The Secretary advised that Notices of Hearing had been mailed and read a communication from Mrs. Walter W. Powers of Woodbank Way. filed in support of this application. Mr. Terry was present and stated that 1) the proposed stable would require a Variance (applied for under File No. V-291) to meet the setback requirements of the Ordinance'and 2) the corral would be no problem since it would be within the setback limitations as shown on Exhibit "A". There was no one else present who wished to comment with regard to this matter.' Commissioner McFall requested that the applicant submit a more detailed map showing exactly what was pr. gpOsed.'with regard to construction and location of the stable and corral. Commissioner Crisp, on'.behalf of the Variance committee, made an appointment with Fz. Terry for an on-site inspection at 9:00 A.M., Saturday, 1 April.1967 in connection with subject application (UP-128) and V-291 scheduled later on the agenda. Chairman Norton (7:58 P.M.) directed UP-128 continued to the next regular meeting and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for study and a report at that time. -3- Plannin$ Comnission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued IIo F° UP-129 - George W. Day Construction, Glen Brae Drive - Request for Use Permit for Model Home Sales Office The public hearing on UP-129 ~s opened at 7:59 P.M. The Secretary 1) advised that Notices of Hearing had been mailed 2) briefly reviewed this application and 3) read a con~nunication from Dr. &Firs. Patterson of Via Grande Drive stating their objections to this application with particular emphasis on the uncared for fountain at the entrance to the Arroyo de Saratoga Subdivision. The Secretary explained that the. City is in the process of arranging maintenance for this entrance way.. ME. Ed Kolstad was present to represent th~ applicant but stated he had no further co~ent at this time. The Secretary read the Staff' Report relative to this request, recommending approval of same. Commissioner Kasner moved seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the public , hearing on UP-129 be closed; motion carried and the hearing was closed at 8:03 P.Mo Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Smith, that the Staff Report of 27 }~rch 1967 relative to. UP-129 be approved and'that .the request for a Use Permit be granted accordingly; motion carried unanimously. G.. C-105 - George W.. Day Construction, Allendale Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-I-40,000" (Single Family Residential) to "R-I-20,000" (Single Family'Residential).- Continued from 13 F~rch 1967 'The continued hearing on C-105 was re-opened at 8:04 P.M. The Secretary briefly reviewed this request and read communications from 1) Fir. &Firs. A.L. Fansen of Dolphin Drive and 2) Floyd W. Davis, representing Daniel Roberrs and James W. Kramer both of Harleigh Drive, filed in support of the subject application. Fir. Nestor Barrett, Planning Consultant, was present to.represent the applicant but stated that he had no further comment at this time. Commissioner McFall stated that this matter was being studied by the Subdivision Committee and requested the subject application be continued to the next regular meeting. On the basis of this request, Chairman Norton (8":'11 P.M.) directed C-105 continued to the next regular meeting on 10 April .1967 and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for study and a report at that time. H'~i. C-!06 - M.V.S. Company, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "A~' (Agricultural) to "R-M-3,000 P-C" (Multiple Residential Planned Co~munity) The public hearing on C-106 was opened at 8:12 P.M. The Secretary advised 'that a Notice of Hearing had been published and briefly reviewed the subject request. He then read communications from Mr. & F~s. Gerth Dickens and Fir. Robert D. Heffelfinger filed in .opposition to this application.and related a phone message received from Firs. F~y Gober, Douglas Lane, in ~avor of the proposed change of zoning. Chairms. n Norton explained that this application was not inconsistent~"since the original General Plan called for Multiple Zoning in this area.. -4- Planning Co~n~ission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued iio H. C-!06 - Continued Dr. Abr~ms, present to represent the M.VoS. Company, stated that usually a number of things are considered when a request for Change of Zoning is requested and then listed 'the following as some points he felt should be considered: 1) The great need in the community for this type of development as indicated by .'numerous letters filed in the Saratoga Green file submitted previously by the applicant. 2) The subject property is'located across the street from Paul M~sson Winery, near a free~y and railroad track and abutting a Professional Development. 3) The proposed development would be within walking. distance of a library and shopping center. 4) The land in this area is being rapidly developed and when the need for this type of development becomes serious there will be no place to go " except.'.: into the back yards. 5) With older adults living in this area there would not be the additional cost of $350.00 per year, per child~ " in tax money which would be the case if this land were to be developed with single family residential homes. 6)The appearance of this development can be as appealing as that of the Medical Village. 7) ~he people ~no have expressed an interest in this develOp- ment are the type that would be an asset to the City of Saratoga such as widows who have lived in the community for many years and are now being forced to move elsewhere. Dr. McHa!e, former School Board Member, ~s present and stated that this type of development would relieve the school tax burden and'would in this way benefit the schools, the City and the expensive home buyer. ~. &Mrs. John Core, Det~villand Drive, were present and stated that 1) this. property ~s not located in the Saratoga or Los Gatos School District but t~s situated in the Campbell Union School District 2) their home is a one story single family residence and a lot of their living is done in the back yard which would be near the.proposed development and 3) a one. story structure would be more acceptable than a two story buiM ingo M~s. Raise Kocher and F~. Clarence Neale, shop owners in the Village, were present and spoke in favor of the proposed request. Fir. Latham, present to represent the Saratoga Park District Home Owners Associa- tion, stated 1) Dr~ Abrams had discussed this matter with the Association 2) the home o~ners in this district are located on the outskirts of Saratoga and approval of this request would be another encroachment on their area and 3) a high density development of this type is not warranted in this district. !~ ..Bob Menzer, President of the Saratoga Park District Home Owners Association, was present and stated that 1) he felt consideration of this request should be postponed until after the General Plan Review 2) the Association is not convinced that this development would be beneficial to this section and 4) since this pro- perty was at one time zoned Multiple and then changed again indicates some uncertainty. -5- Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued II. H. C-106 - COntinued Chairman Norton advised that a good number of people in the co~,m~unity were ready to retire and some consideration should be given to providing them -with a home in Saratoga. Mr. Menzer then stated he was not Opposed to the plan but would like additional time to study this matter. After further discussion, Chairman Norton (8:42 P.M.). directed (C-106), M.V.S. Company, continued Until the next regular meeting and referred same to the Sub- division Committee for further study. I. C-107 - Saratoga Foothills Development, Cox Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (A~ricultural) to "R-1-12,500" (Single· Family Residential) The public hearing on C-107 was opened at 8:43 P.M. The Secretary advised that· a Notice of Hearing had been publis.hed and there·were no written communications on file. He then briefly reviewed the subject application. There was no one present who wished to comment with r~gard to this request. The Secretary then read a Staff Report recommending, with concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, approval of the subject application. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner JOhnson, that the public hearing on C-107 be closed; motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:46'P.M. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded· by Commissioner Smith, that the Staff Report of 27 March 1967 relative to C-107,. recommending approval, be approved and trans- mitted to the Ci.ty Council as the recommendation of the Commission; motion carried unanimously. J. 'V-291 - John L. Terry, Woodbank Way - Request for Variance in connection with Side Yard Setback Requirements The public hearing on V-291 was opened at 8:48 P.M. The Secretary advised that-l) Notices of Hearing had been published 2)." briefly reviewe~ this application and 3) read a statement of reason filed by the applicant. The applicant, Mr. Terry, was present but stated he had no further comment at .. this time. There was no one else present who wished to speak with regard to this matter. Chairman Norton (8:50 P.M.) referred this matter to the S Committee for study and a report and directed same continued until the next regular meeting. K. C-80 - Clarence Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Informal Hearing on Request to add Additional Uses to the List of Uses Permitted Under the Conditional Communit7 Commercial Zonin~ The informal hearing on this matter was opened at 8:51 P.M. The Secretary advised that a notice had been published and briefly reviewed the subject request. He then read a communication submitted (along with pictures) by John M. Bastianelli stating his objections to the proposed request. -6- PlanninS Commission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued II. K. C-80 - Continued The Secretary explained that he had discussed with Mr. McInerney, Santa Clara County Public Works Department, the subject property Mr. Bastianelli referred to in his letter and he was told by Mr. McInerny that Mr. Neale was negotiating to purchase this property and that he .(Mr. Neale) had a permit that did not prohibit him from parking along this strip. Mr. Neale advised that 1) Mro Bastianelli did not purchase his apartment property until July, 1966 2) he was aware at the time of purchase that the strip of land in question was to be used for parking and 3) 'the acquisition of the subject property would be negotiated in good order. The Secretary· then read the list of additional uses requested by Mr. Neale. The applicant explained that since some vacancies would be available in his shopping center on l'May 1967 he would lik~ additional uses to make rental of same more feasible. After further discussion, Chairman Norton (9.{02'P..M.) directed C-80 continued to the.next regular meet. ing and referred same·to the Subdivision Committee for study and a report at that time. L. ORDINANCE NS-3.15 -·Proposed Amendment to Ordinance NS-3, which Amendment would add Certain Provisions to Section 14.7 Relating to Exceptions to Side Yard Requirements', and Amending Section 14.3 in Relation to Non-Conforming sites by Reason of Width "- The public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. NS-3.15 was opened at 9:03 P.M. The Secretary advised that a Notice of Hearing had been published and there were no written communications in the file. Chairman Norton briefly explained the context of the firat section of this proposed Ordinance. Mr. Sam Hernandez was present and stated he was in favor of the subject Ordinance. " Commissioner Crisp advised that he would submit a written statement at the'''~' next regular meeting listing his objections to the Ordinance under discussion. Commissioner Kasner stated that he w~s opposed to this Ordinance and would comment further at the meeting of 10 April 1967. The SeCretary read the second part of the subject Ordinance and explained that this portion of the Ordinance was necessary to the main body of same and related specifically to non-conforming sites as. to width. At this time Chairman Norton brought up the sdbject of the amendment concerning Conditional Zoning and stated that he had understood that this would be included with the-.. amendment relating to two stories. The Secretary recommended that the amendment for Conditional Zoning be made a separate ordinance. After further discussion, Chairman Norton (9:13 P.M.) directed this matter continued to the next regular meeting. -7- Planning Commission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued RECESS AND RECONVENE III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-669 - Frank Pringle, Canyon View Drive -.Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 13 March 1967 The applicant was present and expressed satisfaction with the proposed conditions of approval. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the Building Site Committee Report of 27 Marc. h 1967 relative to SDR-669 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 6 February 1967) be approved in accordance with the site development plan (Exhibit "B", filed 24 March 1967) subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. B. SDR-674 - West Valley Baptist Church, Allendale & Fruitvale Avenues - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 13 March 1967 Commissioner McFall advised that a revised plan, regarding the improvement of Fruitvale Avenue and the required parking, had been submitted to the representatives of the church by the Director of Public Works and then requested that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting to allow the applicant time to study the subject plan and discuss same with the Subdivision Committee. On this basis, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued to the next ' regular. meeting and referred it to the Subdivision Committee for further study. C. SDR-683 - George W. Day Construction, Quito Road - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots : Mr. Ed Kolstad was present to represent the applicant and expressed satisfaction with the proposed conditions of approval.~ Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Co=aissioner Crisp, that the Building Site Committee Report of 27 March 1967 relative to SDR-683 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 20 March'1967) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. 'A-241 - Prospect High School, Prospect Avenue - Final Design Review - High School Buildin~ - Continued from 13 March 1967 Commissioner O'Rorke advised that 1) the Design Review Committee had met to review this-matter 2) the landscape and color maps that were needed to grant final design approval had not been submitted 3) the applicant has been notified in writing concerning the subject maps and 4) this matter should be continued off the agenda until this information is received. The Secretary stated that the applicant was in conflict with the City Council regarding objections to the Building Site Committee Report. .. On this basis, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued off the agenda until the necessary .material. is submitted for ·review. " Planning Commission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued IV. B. A-242 - Rayne Soft Water, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Final Design Review - Identification SiSn - Continued from 13 March 1967 Commissioner O'Rorke .1) briefly reviewed this application 2) stated the appli- cant would be required to get a Variance for the proposed sign.and 3) recom~...:.~.~..'~ mended that A-242 be removed from the agenda. Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that A-242 be removed from the agenda and further proceedings be terminated; motion carried unanimously. C. A-243 - C. T. Lindsay, Inc., Cox Avenue - Final DeSi'gn Review - Identification Sign - Continued from 13 March 1967 Commissioner O'Rorke 1) briefly reviewed this application 2) stated that while the signs themselves conformed with the Ordinance the Design Review Committee concluded that they should be treated as four separate items 3) explained that the identification sign shown on Exhibit "A" was already up and should be removed since it sets a dangerous precedent as far as having signs so far from the subdivision presently being developed. Commissioner Kasner explained that the sign is located on a subdivision the applicant developed previously and not on the one in progress. After discussion, Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner that Final Design approval be granted the signs shown on Exhibits"B" and "C" of file A-243 and that the sign shown on Exhibit "A" of'file A-243 be denied; motion carried unanimously. D. A-244 - Richard Bragunier, Cox Avenue - Final Design Review - Quito Home Decoratin~ Center - 13 March 1967 Commissioner O'Rorke advised that the 'Committee had reviewed the plans for the' proposed sign and recommended approval of same as shown on Exhibit "B". Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that Final Design approval be granted ~.:'i+..-~ for this sign as shown on Exhibit "B"; motion carried unanimously. E. A-247 - BrOwn & Kauffmann, Northampton Drive - Final Design Review - Subdivision Homes (Tract 3738) Unit #7 Commissioner O,Rorke briefly reviewed this application and stated that 1) there were sixty-two (62) lots in this subdivision and 2) the applicant plans to construct sixteen (16) homes, four (4) of which will be model homes, and the remaining twelve (12) will be'homes sold in advance of construction. After discussion, Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that Final Design approval be granted in connection with A-247, Brown & .Kauffmann,. as shown on Exhibit "A" and subject to the following conditions; 1. Approval is limited to sixteen (16) houses to be located on Northampton Drive, Dover Court and Newport Court. 2. Approval is. subject to all provisions of Ordinance NS-3.7. 3.' Applicant shall adjust setbacks to stagger the homes a minimum of five (5) fee~ at the front to prevent a row-like appearance. -9-· Plannin5 Commission Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued IV. E. .A-247 - Continued 4. Lots 3,4,7, and 6 will be built with curbed driveways that do not run directly into the street. motion carried unanimously. F." A-248 - Donald McConnell, Prospect' Road -'Preliminary Design Review - Automatic C~ar Wash with Gasoline Sales Commissioner O'Rorke briefly reviewed this application then moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that preliminary d~sign approval be granted A-248, Donald McConnell, for the proposed car wash as shown on ExhiBit "A"; motion carried unanimously. G. SS-52 - Desmond Johnson, Quito and Twin Creeks - Final Design Review - Subdivision Identification Sign After a' brief discussion, Commissioner O'Rorke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that final design approval be granted SS-52, Desmond Johnson, for the' proposed Identification Sign in accordance with Exhibit "A"; motion carried unanimously. "'..'- V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Commissioner Johnson stated that [he minutes of the last City Council meeting had been distributed and noted that the following items were of particular interest 'the Commission: ". 1) The Mayor's letter to Commissioner Kellum, who resigned from the Planning Commission, complimenting him on the fine. job he did while serving on the Commission. 2) The Oath of Office taken by Mr. Charles H. Smith who will fill the position left vacant by Commissioner .~ Kellum on the Planning Commission. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS At this 'time Chairman Norton made the following revisions with regard to Committee assignments: SUBDIVISION COb~MITTEE' DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Commissioner McFall, Chairman Commissioner O'Rorke, Chairman Commissioner Crisp Commissioner Kasner 'Commissioner Smith Commissioner Smith VARIANCE COMMITTEE GENERAL PLAN COMMITTEE Commissioner Crisp, Chairman Commissioner Johnson, Chairman Commissioner Johnson Commissioner McFall Commissioner Kasner Commissioner O'Rorke VI. NEW BUSINESS A. C-81 - Paul Masson~ Inc.~ Sarat. o~a Avenue - Request for Extension The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and then read .a communication filed by the applicant requesting a two year extension. -10- Planning Commission Minutes 27 Mardh 1967 - Continued VI. A. C-81 - Continued Chairman Norton at the request of Commissioner'O'Rorke directed the Secretary to remind the applicant of the required landscaped strip (trees and shrubs) along the entire eastern boundary of the applicant's property from the rail~ road tracks to McFarland Avenue which must be underway prior to issuance of a Building Permit. The Secretary then read the Staff Report relative to this request recommending, with concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, approvaI of same. After further discussion, Co.~.ssioner McFall moved, secoBded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the Staff Report of 27 March 1~67 relative to this matter·be approved and that this request for extension be recommended by the Planning Commissione~ to the City Council for approval; motion carried unanimously. B. SDR-680 - Donald Ljepava~ Debbie Lane - Request for Modification of ConditionsL~·. Commissioner McFall read the report of the Subdivision Committee with regard to this matter, recommending that th~ applicant's request for modification and waiver of conditions be denied. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the Subdivision Committee Report of 27 March 1967 relative to SDR-680, Donald Ljepava, recommend- ing denial, be approved and transmitted to the City Council as the recommendation of the Commission; motion carried unanimously. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. SDR-673 - Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Allendale Avenue - Request for Modification of Conditions - Continued from 13 March 1967 The Secretary briefly reviewed this request and stated that the Director of Public · Works had studied the proposed modification and had expressed satisfaction of same. The Secretary then read the Staff Report relative to this request.. recommending, with concurrence of the Subdivision Committee, approval of subject request. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Staff Report of 27 March 1967 recommending approval, be adopted and transmitted to City Council as the recommendation of the Planning Commission; motion carried unanimously. B. SDR-665 - Westhope Presbyterian Church, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Modification of Conditions - Continued from 13 March 1967 Commissioner McFall 1) briefly reviewed this application 2) informed Mr. George Heiser, who'was present to represent the applicant, that a bond could be posted for the proposed sidewalk and 3) read the report of the Subdivision Committee' recommending denial of subject request. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the Subdivision Committee Report of 27 March 1967 relative to SDR-665, Westhope Presbyterian Church, be approved and transmitted to the City Council as the recommendation of the Commissioner; motion carried unanimously. C. SDR-670 - Douglas Hines~ Sobey Road - Request for Modification of Conditions The Secretary 1) briefly reviewed this application 2) stated..that a Staff Report had been prepared and 3) advised that the applicant had requested that this matter be continued since he could not be present at this meeting. On this basis, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued to the next regular meeting on 10 April 1967. -11~ Planning Commission,:'=.' Minutes - 27 March 1967 - Continued VIII. COMMUNICATIONS ..' A. 'W~ITTEN · "( "'; 1) The Secretary read a letter submitted by Peninsula Savings and Loan '-' '.]. requesting an extension on property formerly controlled by Mr. Claude .. T. Lindsay.. ..... "."' . · . "' After a brief discussion, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued... ..... to the next regular meeting on 10 April 1967 and referred same to the ..'. Subdivision.Committee for study. · '.'.' " = 2) The Secretary read. a conmmnication rec&ived from Marneet Jones requesting '.. that she be permitted to operate a Self Improvement & Grooming School in the Big Tree Shopping Center on Frospect Road. - After a brief discussion, Chairnmn Norton directed this matter continued.' .'. · . ". and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for further study. ' .... .. Chairman Norton acknowledge~ with pleasure, the presence of Mesdames Stark ..... .- ' ~' and Parker and Messrs. Wilberding and Dove. of the Good Government Group, ~.- . Mrs. Dully of the League of Women Voters, Mrs. Joan Walker wife of the .'.' .. ,"..' i. Planning C~n,,,,,ission Secretary and Mr, George Heiser the representative of '.' : · .." ! .... the Westhope Presbyterian Church and expressed regret that a mo-mher of the ' ' "'" ""' City Council was not in attendance at this meeting, He, .also, expressed -. '.: .""' ~!' ...." appreciation to the Good Governement Group for the coffee'served at recess, '..". : . . · · - · . t . . ' -" '? '~" ':"' IX, ADJOURN~NT : - ':'! ' "' ..'" " .. . ........ :. ...:[ ...' ..- .'· · . · '. . .:f. · .. :. . . ..... .. ', .: ~. · '.. . ..: .:.. · ..,... ........'. · " " ' """ ' "' ' ' ': '~ ' '~~alk ' ] "' ..... ., .-'! ...., ... .....,. ;:.. ~ .... · ' ......, er · . ... .: . . · [..~ .: ,. ...... . .. ,....... .. .:.. ; . .. :.. . '. -..... :;.... .... '. .. ...: ... .... ". .. ".: i' ..: j "' '.' .:. '.:.' .'"" ... ': :''~'.'~: '.." I"": .'" f~"'...~ ""' ' '.'.." . '. ""' . . j: .. '. '.' '~ ~', f! Z '~.: .' .f' . '. ..; '.'.:...-..".:.... .'. .' .'.~'...':..' ....... '."'.:"..; ....'... '..~ :'.... .: · ' .. · . .'- . · . ' ,., . · . '.. · '.- ;- .: '~... ... · .. . . . . . ·. . · .. .. [