The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-26-1967 Planning Commission Minutes (2) SD~RY OF' MINUTES · · · ·, CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION -Ti:,~: b!onday, 28 june 1967, 7:30 P.M. P~CE: City Council Chambers,·Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California· "I~PE': Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANiZATiON · ·. · The meeting·was called to Order by Acting Chairman O'Rorke at 7:30 P.M .... · · ..A. ROLL CALL ..'. .' · .. -..~ . . . Present: Commissioners Crisp, McFall,'O'Rorke, and Smith. Absent: COmmissioners Johnson, Kasner, and Norton. B. MIN~E'ES Co..mmissioner McFall moved, ·seconded by Commissioner Smith, that the reading of the minutes of the 12 June 1967 meeting be waived and that they be approved after changing page 4. .item F. ·.paragraph 6.. .line 2.'..to r'ead 26 June 1967 instead of 22 JUne 1967. "' · II~. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-7! - ~Y~zr InveStment Company, Walnut Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-I-12.5OD" (Single Family Residential) to "R-M-3,000" (Multi- Residential) - Continued from 12 June 1967 · " The Chairman re-opened the continued hearing· on C-71 at 7:34'P.M. The SeCretary briefly reviewed this· application and ·stated that the applicant met with the Sub-" division Committee and Flood Control Department to work out the problems with regard to the present proposal and' as a result 'of that meeting i~ ~ recommended that C-71 be continued to allow the applicant time to revise the'plans with the cooperation, o'f the Flood Control. Commissioner McFall Suggested ~hat C-71 be removed from the agenda ·until such time as ·the·applicant is prepared to have the Planning Commission take· some .... action on this request. .. Commissioner Crisp recommended that'C-71 be removed from the agenda until .... '['i 24 July 1967. ' William 'Teeple, 14120.Alta Vista, stated he was opposed to this application and felt·that it should be re-published at the time it comes up for hearing again since it has been scheduled· for hearing before and then postponed .... . ~. Bas'tianelli, owner Brookside Glen Apartments, stated 1) he wa's ·opposed to any·further extension since the applicant no longer had possession of any of the property in question·and 2) he concurred with Mr. Teeple that a Notice should·· be published at the time C-71 is again scheduled for hearing'. " : Co'a~issioner McFall pointed out'that the Flood Control Department had agreed to re'-. survey the Flood Control requirements and, depending·on the·results of this survey,...'.'-. the applicant·will withdraw.'his present proposal or·re-apply with something .. completely new. ." After discuSsion,.Chairman O'Rorke directed·this matter continued to"24. July 1967 and·the hearing was closed at 7:40 P.M'. .. " .':..".. '~' .. ..... · ... · .'. .. · . .. .,! .... .Plannin~ Con~mission Minutes of 26'June 1967 - Continued .. .'. I........ II...B. UP~133 -'Atlantic Richfield 'Compa~y'~ Cox Avenue and Paseo Presada - ..~ .' ..'. Request for Use Permit for Service Station Facility on the z Northwest Corner of Intersection of Cox and Paseo Presada · ' ~.' 'Continued from 12 June 1967 ....... ' The continued hearing on UP-133 was resumed at 7':41'P.M. 'The Secretary · stated'nothing further had been added to the file'. ..' .' . ..... ..'~.."Malpas was present to represent the applicant' and stated that by moving "'.' '.... the station from.oneside of the Street to the other the safety hazard would.. ' .. Be greatly.reduced. ".' .~ ~. Lester Prinz, ~esident of thearea, stated 1) he represented fourteen .. (14) people'who lived in the area 2)' he lived directly across the street ... ..'..' from the proposed service station 3)' he objected. to the station because . ... he felt it would be hazardous for children walking by and for shoppers ' '=" walking to the Quito Shopping Center. He further stated that 1) the .~'.'. 'proposed location of the'station would crea~ difficulties in getting 'in and .out of his driveway and 2) he objected to the lights which would be left on · ...!.. all night at the station. · . ~. WarbUrton., operator of the Richfield Station, pointed out that 1) children wOUld be ~lking by the station no matter which side of the street it'was " located 2) the' station will close by 9:00 P.M. each evening (Quito Shopping Center regulation) just as it has done for'the past'fifteen (15) years 3) the' " Quito Shopping Center will also'have .their lights. on at night and 4) .the new station will have one neonsignand one night light;inside~.the station on,after.' they close at 9:~0 P.M. Conunissioner McFall then read' the.report of the Subdivision Committee recommend-.'. · ing. that'the requested Use Permit be granted. ~. Prinz stated he did not feel that adequate.screening Could.be provided and again emphasized his objections. .. C0nnnissioner Crisp'moved,.seconded by Commissioner McFall that the'public hearing on. UP-133 be closed; motion'carried unanimously and'the hearing wa.s closedat 7:52 P.M. '.' ... It was moved by Commissioner McFali,. seconded"by CommiSsioner Crisp that the Subdivision Committee Report of 26 June 1967 in connection with UP.-133 be v "' approved and that the Use Permit be granted as described in said report sub- "'~" " ject to the conditions stated therein; motion carried .unanimously ..... C'~' 'UP'l134 - FranCes D. Haden, Pierce Road - Request for Use Permit for the Keep, · .. ing.'of One (1) HOrse - Continued from 12 June 1967 At the recommendation of Chairman O'Rorke this matter was postponed so that" '. ~. V~297 could be discussed prior to taking any action on UP-134.' " .D. V1297 - Frances D. Haden, Pierce Road - RequeSt for Variance in COnnection "" · ..=... with Property Line Setback Requirements Continued from 12 ~une'1967 " .'..'..... The p~blic hearing on V-297 waS' re-opened at'7:54 P..M. The Secretary sta~ed" nothing new had been added to.the file. " ~'. NOrton, Carniei' Court,'stated that 1) the.distance between'the applic'ant's · .' property line and. his property line was only fifteen (15) feet 2) the distance . from the applicant"s property line to the Norton's.~pool was twelve.(12) feet' ... ~'' · .. and 3) he ~s opposed to this' Variance. .. Planning Commission Minutes of 26 June 1967 '- Continued .ii. D. V-297 - ContinUed ~'. Carl Geer,.Ashley Court, stated' that he was curiouS'about why two horses had been allowed on the adjacent.Wilson property.' The Secretary explained that these horses were there illegally and tie Wilson's have been requested to remove them and have been informed that a Use Permit is necessary for the'keeping of horses. '." " At the.request of Chairman O'Rorke Commissioner Crisp read the report of the Variance Committee recommending that this request for Variance be denied' since the findingSrequired by Ordinance NS-3,.Section 17.6 of Article 17 cannot be made. It was. moVed by. Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner McFall and ca'rried unanimously to close .the public hearing on V-297 at 8:00 P.M. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Variance. :' Committee Report of 26 June 1967 relative to V-297 be approved and that the' request for Variance in connection with property.line setback.requirements be denied in accordance with said report; motion carried unanimously. .. C. UP-134 - Frances D. Haden, Pierce Road - Request for Use Permit for the Keeping of One (1) Horse Continued from 12 June 1967 Chairman O'Rorke recommenc~d the continued hearing on UP-134 at 8:02 P.M. The. Secretary stated nothing further' had been added to the file. · · Mr. Norton, 'Carniel Court,.pointed out'that the horses that were on the Wilson property for a brief time caused odor, flies and dust and indicated that this is the type of thing that occurs .when small lots back into 'acre.lots where horses are permitted ~. Thomas,' CarnieI Court,.stated he was opposed to this application'for the .samereasons as those stated by Mr. Norton. ~. Wiley, resident of the area, objected to the proposed Use Permit and suggested that Mr. Haden take advantage of the short term care offered by some veterinary firms. · ' Mr.'Haden was presen~ a'nd stated that the flies would still be present since the orchard trees attract as many or more flies than a horse. Commissioner Crisp recommended that this matter be continued since the inform-. ..... ation required by Ordinance NS-3 was not available. 'Commissioner Smith advised that at the last meeting it had been directed' that all things discussed and considered for the Variance would be considered'part. .of the Use Permit application; therefore, it would seem that if one is denied they should both be denied or the Use Permit.plans should be revised to meet the O~dinancerequirements. The Secretary stated that it 'was'necessary for the Commission to act on the 'Use Permit as it now stood or the applicant could request that the application for the Use Permit be withdrawn. ~. Haden, in answer to an inquiry from Chairman O'Ror'ke,'Stated that he did .' 'not desire to withdraw his application for UP-134. CommisSioner Crisp.moved, seconded by Commissioner' McFall, to close. the public hearing on UP-134 at '8:11 P.M.; motion carried unanimousty~.i/'~ .. Plannin~ Commission Minutes of' 26 June 1967 - Continued " . ..." Con~issioner McFall moved',.seconded'by Commissioner "Crisp.., that the request .for Use 'Permit UP-134.be denied since the findings required by Ordinance NS-3, " Section 16 could not be made; motion ·carried unanimously. .. E. Vi'298 - Raymond Pa~ton,.Squirrel Hollow Lane - Request for Variance in Connec- tion with Front Yard·Setback Requirements·- Continued from 12 June 1967· The continued hearing on V-298 was re-opened at 8:12 P.M. %~ms. Paxton was present to explain the exhibits submitted· by her·at this time·. ..j..7 .... ~s. Paxton explained that 1) the·Setback ·starts from 7 feet behind the'curb ..' 2) ~en the'request for Variance was.originally submitted it'was thought that the public utility easement was 10 feet·but they have since found that it is " "'~' only 7 feet·; therefore, they would like to. amend their application to request........~. a 20 foot front yard setback. ' ..... No one ·else present wished to comment. Commissioner McFall advised that the above mentioned change has been fully considered by the Variance Committee. He then read the Variance Committee Report of 26 June'1967 recommending that V-298 be denied. It was mo~ed by Commissioner. Crisp,'-seconded by Commissioner Smith, that'the Variance Committee Report of 26 June 1967 relative to V-298 beadopted and that·the request for Variance in connection with front yard setback require- ments be denied for the reasons mentioned in said report; motion carried unanimously.· .. -. 'F. Pi~.YHOUSE (DRAMATIC THEATER) - B. ~'. Gaieb, Saratoga-sunnyvale Road and Seagull ... · . I~y - Informal Hearing on Request to Add Play'- house (Dramatic Theater) to the List of Uses .. Permitted under the "C N" (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District· The informal'hearing'was opened at 8:22 P.M. The Secretary stated that. a '. Notice of Hearing had been published and then read a communication submitted '.'...... by th~ applicant's representative, Mr. Menard, requesting.the additional use.. ' .' ."i' Fi-. Menard, architect for the applicant, was present and stated that 1). not "~'... many of the shops in the Azule Cro'ssing Center would do business in the evening········ and 2) parking should·be no problem since the plans include an ample amount'. "..'." · "' ' r In answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Crisp,· both Mr. Menard and Mr. Caleb agreed that a Conditional Use would be as satisfactory·to them as a Permitted .. ...'i. Commissioner. McFall advised that since this is a new use i'n the City of " Saratoga a'Condi.tional'Use would, ~erhaps,.be more satisfactory from the City.'s ... standpoint.· . .... . ...'.. In view of the foregoing,· Chairman O'Rorke (8:29 P.M.) directed this matter · continued to the next regular meeting and ·referred same to the Subdivision .. Com.mittee for study and a report at that time·. ...,. · .i "". ' ." · Plannin~ Commission Minutes of 26 June 1967 - Continued· · 'II.. 'G. 'UP-!35.'- Beatrice. T.'.Broun,. VeSsing Road - Request for.USe Permit for the · ,'..=... KeepinS of One (1) HOrse.. · ·~ Co~niSsioner O'Rorke opened the hearing on UP-135 at 8:30 P.M. The Secretary briefly reviewed·this fi.le and stated that the Notices of Hearing had been mailed. · ...."' "}~. Broun was present to answer any questions the Commission might·want to ask.. .. .Dr. Robert MCCoy, Vessing Road, stated that 1) he disagreed with theopeoplet' who objected to UP-134 earlier in the evening and 2) he endorsed approval '· of both UP-I34 and UP-135. · .· After discussion, Chairman O'Rorke·(8:33 P.M.) directed 'this matter continued.". z· to the meeting of···10 July'·1967 and referred same to the· Subdivision Committee. for. study. · · Commissioner MCFail made an appointment with Mr.·Broun for Monday, 3 July .1967, for an on-site inspect{on of the property... RECESS AND RECOF~ENE III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A.· SDR-697 - L.. R. Guist, Belnap Road - BuildinS Site Approval 1 Lot Mr. Quirk was present to represent the applicant and expressed satisfaction · ·· with ·the proposed cOnditiOns of approval. · ·· Commissioner McFall moved, seconded' by Commissioner Crisp', that the Building .... Site 'Committe~ Report of 26 June 1967 relative to SDR-697 be adopted and that. · · · ·the tentative mad (Exhibit "A" filed 15 June 1967) be approved s~bject to the condition~ set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. B~ SDRi698 - E~neSt G. Chil~on, I~rdell Road - Building Site Approval - 3 Lots The applicant and his representative (Mr. Wolff) were present and stated that' they objected to Condition II-A pertaining to the improvement of Wardell Road since they would not be using same'because of a private right-of-way. Commissioner McFall declared that the. Subdivision Committee discussed the proposed conditions with the Director of Public Works; therefore, it would ·be necessary to consult with him.before the report could be amended in any way. · Chairman O'Rorke explained, to the applicant,. that the proposed conditions of approval could be'accepted by him as stated in the Building Site. Committee Report.subject to arequest for reConsideration at a later date. After. further discussion the applicant stated he would accept the proposed conditions with the understanding that he could'submit a request for reconsider- atiOn of Condition·II-A. Cormissioner McFall moved, seconded by C0mmi~sioner Crisp, that the ~uilding Site Committee·Report of 26 June 1967 relative to SDR-698 be adopted and that · ·· the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 16 June 1967) be·approved subject to the c0nditions··set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. Plannin~ Commission Min'utes of 26 June 1967 - Continued III.' C. SDR-699 - Paul E. Fiddes~ Three Oaks Way - Building Site Approval.-t Lot. · " There was no one present to represent the applicant. ' · . '..' The Secretar'y stated that these conditions were basically the, same as the ." '."... ~ ones agreed to by the' applicant inl his previous application. .. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Con~missioner Crisp, that the Building Site Committee. Report of 26 June 1967 relative to SDR-699 be'adopted and that the tentative. map (Exhibit "A", 'filed 16 June 1967) be approved subject to · .the' conditions set for, th in said report; motion 'carried unanimously. 'D.. SDR-700 Frances B. Anderson, Big: BaSin.Way and Fourth Street · · . '. Site Approval - 1 Lot Con~nissioner McFall, at the. request of the applicant, recommended that this matter be continued since the .parking district (pertinent to this matter) has not yet been .approved. Chairman O'Rorke so directed. · E. SDR-'701 - George R". Thayer, Pierce Road - Build inS Site Approval - 4'Lots .' Con~nissioner. McFalt recommended that this matter be continued since .. revisions were necessary .on '.the map submitted. :' Chairman O'Rorke so directed. iV.' DESIGN REVIEW A'. A-204 - Robert' Green, Big. Basin Way - Final Design Review - ConverSion of .Apartment Building to Conunerciat Buildins Continued from 12 June 1967 The Secretary read the Staff Report of 26 June 1967 recommending that this. matter be continued of'f. the agenda to await the approval of the proposed : park ing · d is tr i c t. '.. Chairman O'Rorke so directed. B. A-253 - L. B. Nelson, Prospect Road - Preliminary Design Reivew - Car Wash - c0ntinue'd from 12 june 1967 Tb.e. Secretary read the Staff Report of 26 June 1967 stating that the applicant. .... would' like a decision at this time as to '.~fnich lay-out' the Commission would · · prefer. " .. Jerry Guri'ey was present to represent the applicant and to answer qdestions.' Commissioner Smith moved, seconded' by Commissioner McFall~ that Preliminary "' Design Approval be 'granted in connection with A-253, L. B. Nelson (Car Wash) · . as sho~m on Exhibits' "A" and "B"; motion carried unanimously. C. A-254 -. B. T. Galeb, SeagUll Way and Highway 85 - Final Design Review - Commercial Buildin5 Continued from 12 June 1967 The staff Report of 26 june 1967 was read by the Secretary. and it was recommended that this matter be continued off the agenda until re-instatement. by the Staff. and until Item II-F (page 4 of these minutes) is resolved. Chairman O"Rorke' sO directed. , -6.- "' ................................................... .._..._? ..................... Plannin~ Corm~ission· Minutes of 26 June· 1967·- Continued iV. ·D. A-256 -· Dr. john Oliver, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Final Design Review - · ·· Identification Sign - Continued from 12 June 1967 The Secretary read the Staff Report of 26 June 1967 stating that the · ·· applicant has submitted a revised §ign and recommending approval of same subject to the sign'for the· carpets and linoleum being withheld. Co~raissioner Smith'moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp that Fina'l .. .. """' · . Design Rev'iew approval be granted' in connection with A-256, Dr. John "' .. Oilvet (identificatiOn Sign) as shown on Exhibit '~" subject to the .. sign for the "carpets".belng withheld until a request has been sub- .. mitted and approved for "carpets and linoleum'shops" as either a permitted or'conditional use in the C-S Zoning District; motion ;. .'. carried unanimously.' "". '. .. E. A-.257 - Professional Village of. Saratoga, Saratoga Avenue and McFarland ..' .. Avenue - Preliminary Design Review for Professional Building - '.' · Continued from 12 June 1967 The Staff Report of Z6 June 1967. i(read by the Secretary) recommended that A-z57 be'continued off.the agenda.until the'resolution of the conditions '1~:' '- of Change of Zoning (C.43) can be resolved. Chairman O'Rorke so directed. F. A-258 ~ Frances B. Anderson, Big Basin Way and Fourth Street - Preliminary'. """ p. esign'Review - Restaurant .... "." .". The Secretary read the Staff Report of 26 June 1967 recommending, with .- '.. concurrence of the applicant'S"representative, Mr. Warren Held, that " this'matter be continued to the next regular meeting to await theCity.. .. Council decision on the proposed parking district. .'. '.. .. .... :.. .... Chairman O'Rorke So'.directed~ .". ...' DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS At this time the Secretary requested that the Staff be given the perogative ,'. to determine whether or not an application for Design Review should be placed on the agenda for action by the commission. This determination to be made on the basis of whether the plans and .information submitted are adequate. Chai:~mn'O'Rorke agreed that this would be a.=.good idea and suggested that.it .. be taken up at a time when a ~ull Commission is present. ......... ~: .......... : .........:... V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT ' Con~missioner Crisp gave a report on discussion and action at the City Council ' meeting of'21 June 1967, with emphasis .on items of particular interest to ~the · . Commission. ' Vi. N~]W BUSib~ZSS .. 'A.. SD-694- George W. Day, Via Monte Drive and Saratoga Avenue - Request for " Reconsideration of Conditions · Tne Secretary read a letter submitted by Mr. Kaiser of MacKay and Somps ' .... requesting a reconsideration of conditions. / The SeCretary explained' that Mr. Kaiser would not be present at this'meeting since he planned to meet with'the Subdivision Committee ~o discuss this matter. 'Chainnan'O'Rorke'directed this matter continued ~o ~he'next regular. meeting' .. and referred same to [he'SUbdivision Committee'for study and. report. "' -7- P!annin~ Co~mnission Minutes of 26 June· 1967 - Continued SDR-5 . - Kirkpatrick, Pike Road Request for Extension VI. B. _ 74. JohnM. - · The Secretary 1) read a letter from the applicant requesting an extension· 2) .·advised that SDR-574 was not eligible for an extension since one had·· been'previous'ly granted and 3) recommended that this request be denied. .... It was moved by COmmissioner CriSp:,· seconded by. Commissioner smith, that the ":. request for extension in connection with SDR-574 be denied; motioncarried "" .unanimously. · ~END~NT TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE · .' The 'chairman asked of t~e' Secretary about the status of the proposed .. '.. ". ".~' amendment to the"Subdivision Ordinance referred to the Commission by ...... the City Council and the Secretary. reported that it would be brought up " · .. at the next regular meeting on 10 July 1967.. .. VII. OLd'BUSINESS "' Frank Druding'Request '. .'. .' ~e Secretary reviewed the action taken by the City Conncii in regard to the 'Frank Druding request for excess property and stated that after the Council. :'- referred it back to.the Planning Commission a letter was forwarded to Flood .' · ..... Control to find out if they had any objections to Mr~ Druding.taking possession. ."'."' of this 'property. Flood Control"s answer was passed on to M~, Druding.and his · '.... .................... reply is anticipated shortly. .. ..' . . 'VIii. CO~.Ib~ICATIONS ' ' " A. ~ITTEN .. " 1.. REQUESTS OF'MEDICAL AND PROFESSIONAL VILLAGE """"""""" The. Secretary read two communications (one received .from the Medical Village of Saratoga and the other from the Profession Village.of Saratoga). requesting modification of conditions.of Change.of ~oning. .'. 'Commissioner.Crisp advised that,' he'felt, a public hearing should be.held with regard to this matter. Chairman O'Rorke directed that an informal hearing be scheduled for. the · " meeting of 10 July'1967 with regard to'the above mentioned items. " 2. · INYITAT ION ...' · . . ....z ' The Secretary read the invitation received from the Youth Center inviting all members of the Commission tO the Ground Breaking'ceremony. " B. Oi~L. .. Chairn~n O'Rorke acknowledged, with pleasure the presence of Councilman Burry, ~s. Stark of the Good Government Group, Mrs. Duffy of the League of Women Voters. He·also·, expressed appreciation .to Mrs. Stark for the coffee served at recess. '. T_X. ADjO'URI;~]~.!T The Chairman declared the meeting' adjourned at 9:02 P.M. Respectfully submitted · . ~ . .. , Secretary Saratoga Planning Commission ... '. j . : ... -8!. .. ': : . ..... ~ .. .... .. . .... CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TIME: Monday, 26 June 1967, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL B. MINUTES II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-71 - Maxmar Investment Company, Walnut Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-1-12,500" (Single Family Residential) to "R-M-3,000" (Multi-Residential) - Continued from 12 3une 1967 B. UP-133 - Atlantic Richfield Company, Cox Avenue and Paseo Presada - Request for Use Permit for Service Station Facility on the Northwest Corner of Intersect.~on of Cox and Paseo Presada ~qntin~ from 12 June...l~7. ... C. UP-134 Frances D. Haden, Pierce Road ~ Request for UsePermit for the Keepin%.of One (1} HOrse - Continued from 12 June 1967 D. V-297 - Frances D. 1{aden, Pierce. Road , Request for Variance in Connection with Property'Line Setback Requirements - Continued from 12 June 1967 E. V-298 Raymond Paxton, Squirrel Hollow Lane - Request for Variance in Connection with Front Yard Setback Requirements F, ~.H_0.~S~_f~._R~._~%!_C__T_.H....F~..~_..ERI - B. T. Galeb, Saratoga-Sunnyv"~',~ Road and Seagull Way - Request to Add Play- house (Dramatic Theater) to the List of Uses Permitted under the "C-N" (Neighbor- hood Commercial) Zonin~ D~strict G. UP-135 - Beatrice T. Broun, Vessing Road - Request for Use Permit for the Keeping of One (1) Horse ~ III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-697 - L. R. Guist, Belnap Road'- Building Site Approval - 1 Lot B. SDR-698 - Ernest G. Chilton, Wardell Road - Building Site Approval - 3 Lots C. SDR-699 - Paul E. Fiddes, Three Oaks Way - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot D. SDR.-700 - Frances B. Anderson, Big Basin Way and Fourth Street - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot E. SDR-701 - George R. Thayer, Pierce Road - Building Site Approval - 4 Lots -1- Plannin~ Commission Agenda .,_~. June 1967 - Continued IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-204 - Robert Green, Big Basin Way - Final Design Review - Conversion of Apartment Building to Commercial Building - Continued from 12 June 1967 B. A-253 - L. B. Nelson, Prospect Road - Preliminary Design Review - Car Wash - Continued from 12 June 1967 C. A--254 - B. T. Caleb, Seagull Way and Highway 85 - Final Design Review - Commercial Building - Continued from 12 June 1967 D. A-256 - Dr. John Oliver, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Final Design Review - Identification Sign - Continued from 12 June 1967 E. A-257 - Professional Village of Saratoga, Saratoga Avenue and McFarland Avenue - Preliminary Design Review for Professional Building - Continued from 12 June 1967 F. A-258 - Frances B. Anderson, Big Basin Way and Fourth Street - Preliminary Design Review - Restaurant V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT VI. NEW BUSINESS A. SD-I4 - George W. Day, Via Monte Drive and Saratoga Avenue - Request for Reconsideration of Conditions B. SDR-674 - John M. Kirkpatriqk, Pike Road - Request for Extension. VII. OLD BUSINESS : VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN B. ORAL IX. ADJOURNMENT