Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10-1968 Planning Commission Minutes (2) CITY OF SARATOGA PLA~NvF - _ NG COMNISSION I~iTNU.T .... ES TI!~TE: Monday, I0 June 1968, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chanters, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Re%ular Meeting I. ROb~'INE ORG~q!ZATION The meeting was called to order by'Vice-Chairnmn Johnson. A. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Crisp, Johnson, Kasner, Lively, and Metcalf. Absent: Commissioners Nprton and Smith. B. MINUTES Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Lively, that the reaaing of [he minutes of the 27 May 1968 meeting be waived and that they be approved as distributed to the Commission subject to the following changes: page 8. .VI. NEW BUSINESS. .paragraph 1. .line 1. ".cha~ge "General Plan Committee" to'~ubdivision Committee"' page i0. .VIII. B. ORAL. .paragraph 1. .line 1. .change "%~Isch" to '!Welsh"; motion carried unanimously. II. PUBLIC HL!RINGS A. C-I!3 - E. G. Gouveia, Ashley I,~y - Rehuest for Change of"'Z0ning. from "R-I-40,000" (Single Family Residential) to '.'R-I-12,500" (Single .. Family Residential) - Continued from 27 May '1968 \ ' \ The Chairman re-opened the hearingrelative to C-113 at 7:33 P.M." The Secretary stated nothing further had been added to the file. The Secretary read the Staff Report dated 10 June 1968 recommending that C-liB be denied. 'Chairman Johnson, in answer to an inquiry from the applicant, stated that' C-113 will be forwarded to the City Council and another public hearing will be held. No one in the audience wished to comment. Commissioner Crisp ~:38 P.M.) moved seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the public hearing for C-1!3 be closed; motion carried unanimously. Report of i0 june 1968 be adopted and ~%~ . not m.2et the objectives of Section 1.i of Ordinance NS-3 and for the additional reasons stated in said report and that the recommendation for denial be forwarded to the City Council as the action of the Planning Commission; motion carried unanimously. -1- Plannin~ Con~,anission ~,[inutes .- !0 June 1968 - Continued ii. B. C-!14 - George W. Day, Far~.,:ell and Fruitvale Avenues - Request for Chanc~e of Zoning!from '~j~" (Agricultural) to ':R-i-40,000': (Sin~!e Family Resiclentiai) - Continued from 27 May 1968 The hearing relative to C-!14 was resumed at 7:40 P.M. The Secretary stated nothing new had been added to 'the file. No one in the audience wished to comment. The Secretary read the Staff Report dated 10 June 1968 recommending that C-!!4 be approved. At 7:z~3 P.M., Commissioner Kasner moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the public hearing relative to C-114 be closed; motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Lively, that the Staff Report dated I0 June 1968,'.r. ecommending.that C-114 be approved, be adopted,//an~j~'that subject rezoning be recommended for C~j~X_~__v.~!~ to the City Council on the basis that the subject request.'conforms with the 1968 Sara.toga General Plan and meets the requirements of Zoning Ordinance NS-3, Section' 1.1; motion carried unanimously. C. UP-!50 George W. Day, Allendale Avenue - Request for Use Permit to · Allow a Model Home Sales Office Continued from 27 May 1968 The Chairman re-opened the hearing relative to UP-150 at 7:44 P.M. The Secretary stated that the applicant has modified his original application (requesting an Administrative Sales Office) to now request a Model Home Sales Office. The Secretary then read a communication received from _~. Vincent Faso, General Construction Manager, explain- ~n~,' what functions would be conducted in the Model Home Sales Office The Secretary then read the Staff Report dated 10 June 1968 recommending that the request for a Use Permit for a Model Home Sales be granted. sub- ject. to the conditions stated in said report. ?~ Faso app!icant's representative~ was present aria stated he had no objections to the conditions stated in the subject report. After discussion, Commissioner Kasner m..oved at 7:47 P.M., seconded by Co~nissioner Crisp, to close the hearing for UP-150; motion carried unanimous iy. Commi'ssioner Metcalf moved, seconded by CommissiOner Crisp, .that' the Staff Report of '!0 June 1968 be adopted and the Use Permit e-granted in accordance with .said report and subject o the cond~t~ ns st te therein; motion carried unanimously. D. SI~LL PET ORDINANCE - Pro~6sed Amendment to Ordinance .No. NS-3 Relating to the. Keeping of Cer. tain Birds and Small M~n~mals as Pets in "R:'-Districts - Continued from 27 May 1968 The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:48 P.M. The Secretary 1) stated the City Attorney has corresponded with Commissioner Kasner and 2) read an addendum (Section 8-15.3) reconm~ended by the City Attorney for addition to the original proposed ordinance and a letter submitted by the City Attorney dated 3 June 1968. -2- Planning Connnission Minutes - 10 june 1968 - Continued Ii. D. SMALL PET ORDINANCE - C'O~T!NUED ~. Martin, Prides Crossing Homeox~aers Association, stated I) the Board of Directors voted to support this ordinance since they do not feel the County Ordinance is adequate and 2) the residents of this area have complained that dogs running loose have attacked animals that were on leashes while being walked by their o~ers. The Secretary, in answer to an inquiry from Chairman Johnson, stated that this ordinance will be published in the newspaper if it is adopted by the City Council upon the recon~mendation of the Planning Commission. Chairman Johnson stated that the public should be made aware of what the ordinance contains and it should get sufficient publicity prior to the City Council hearing. Co~missioner Kasner stated that 1) the Planning Commission has held numerous public hearings relative to this matter 2) Notice of these · hearings have been in the newspaper 3) the Health Department has become aware of this' ordinance through publicity 4) he felt there has been sufficient publicity "~":~i's.:-m~-~ter.._a~__~) when it goes before the City Council a'~Notice"shou!d be published, to make the public aware of the forthcoming hearing. The Secretary, in answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Lively, stated that the ordinance has not been published in its present form. Co~nissioner Kasner explained that it would be costly to publish this entire ordinance and it is the responsibility of each interested citizen to attend the meetings in order. to acquaint themselves with the proposed ordinance. The Secretary advised that the Notice of Hearing that is published states that copies of the.proposed ordinance are available at City Hall for anyone' who is interested in obtaining a copy. At 7:50 P.M., Comnissioner Kasner moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the hearing relative to the Small Pet Ordinance be closed; motion carried unanimously. : Commissioner .Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that a Resolution be prepared containing the proposed S~all Pet Ordinance and the addendum (Section 8-15.3), an amendment to Zoning Ordinance NS-3, and that said Resolution be forwarded. to the City Council as the recommendation of the Planning Commission; motion carried with the following vote: AYES NOES Commissioner Crisp : Commissioner Lively Commissioner Johnson % Commissioner Kasner Con~missioner Metcalf E. V-318 - Evelyn O. Geoffroy, Komina Avenue - Reques't for Variance in Connection With Corridor Width-Access Road and Side Yard Setback Requirements The baaring relative to V-318 ~s opened at 8:04 P.M. ~. Warren Heid, architect represen.ting the applicant, stated that 1) new drawings have been submitted 2) the property is restrictive because of the narrow width of the corridor 3) the parcel is located close to the village and 4) the applicant would like to utilize this property in some ~y. -3- P..ianning Corn, mission Minutes - 10 june 1968 - Continued II. E. V-318 - Continued Dr. Barney Rosasc·o, resident of the area, stated 1) he was a neighbor of the applicant 2) he ~as opposed to this application 3) this would be opening up the back yard of the applicant and other residents in the . neighborhood 4) if this application is approved it will present problems and 5) he. urged the. Planning Cormmission to deny this request. ~k'. P. W. Brubaker, 14725 Aloha Avenue, stated 1) his back yard would be right up to the rear of this property 2) the previous owners brought this same type of application before the Planning 'Commission and it was denied and 3) he was opposed to this request for Variance. The applicant, M~s. Geof~oy, I) stated she did not understand the objections raised by Dr. Rosasco and 2) invited the members of the Planning Commission to visit her property. ~. Brubaker, in answer to an inquiry from Commission Kasner, stated that both he and Dr. Rosasco o~,m. ed ~:IT~,50O-square foot lots. At 8:15 .P.M., Chairman Johnson closed the public hearing for the evening, directed V-318 continued to the next regular m.ee.t.~._n_g, and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for study.~. Con~missioner Crisp, on behalf of the Variance Committee, arranged an appointment with M~. Heid and the applicant for Saturday at 8:00 P.M. on 15 june 1968 for an'on-site inspection of the property. He, also, invited Mr. Brubaker and Dr. Rosasco to attend. F. b?-15! - James R. Davi, Souse Lane - Request for Use Permit to Allow a Convalescent Hospital The hearing relative to UP-15! was opened at 8:17 P.M. The Secretary stated the Notices of Hearing were n~iled and then read a con~nunication from the applicant explaining why the previous Use Permit (UP-104) relative to this matter expired. I,~r. Cuenca,-.~.Sousa Lane, stated he would like more information relative to the road wi~en'~ng"on-~-Sousa_..I~__ne in connection with this project. The Secretary showed the plans, relative to UP-151, to M~. Cuenca. He then asked Mr. Ben White, engineer fo½ the applicant, to explain the road-widening plans to M_~. Cuenca. No one else present wished to comraent. Chairm~n Johnson, at 8:19 PoM., closed the hearing for the evening, directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting, and referred same to the Subdivision Co~nittee for study. G. VISITOR CO~,iERCIAL - ProDosec] New Visitor Commercial Zoning District The hearing ~ras opened at 8:20 P.Mo The SecretarX briefly reviewed this matter and then read .·" communication recieved from ~. Abel M. Carreia, stating that if the change to 'Visitor Con~mercial does not void the present permitted uses on'.his property he has no objection to the proposed change. Commissioner Crisp stated that the City Attorney has not yet put this ordinance into legal form;· therefore, he, with concurrence of the Sub- division Con~nittee, recommends that this matter be continued to such time as this ordinance is ~r~-itten up in legal form by the City Attorney. Chair'man Johnson closed the hearin.g for the evening at 8:30 and directed that the matter be continued to the meeting of June 24, 1968. Pl. anning Comq~!ssion s i0 June .lc'S'~ - e - ,~ 0 Continue ~JCESS/..lqD CON~/~,NE iii, .']YgTLD'ri'.YG SITES AND S'O~'3DiVmZSIONS A, SDR-732 - Franklin Homes Com'pany~ Fourth Street and Saratoga Creek - Building Site Approval - ].. Lot - Con%inued from 27 May 1968 b'h~. David Franklin was 'present and stated that it had been nine to ten months since 'they started working on this site' approval and had done ever3,~hing asked of' them'. He had worked with his architect and at the re- quest of the ~bchitecturai Co~Fmittee had made changes and the plans were approved and the Site Committee ~,:~hich approved~ subject to Flood Control approval~ and after receivinfg w~j- from Flood Control today, he feels a little '~ ' ...... ~ about the matter. He stated that his architect will mzke .whatever changes the Co~mission wants~ but he would appreciat~ a letter from the Commission as to 'what i't wants. He further stated he had ~.zorked with Public Works on design of streets and tried to do everything asked of him~ but said he needs a letter from the Commission specifying what they ~.~s~+ in the ...... ~ name of ethics and responsibility to the ~om~nunity~ and that he ~'~u~ know what t~ .... and ..... ~ --~y want what they are going to do. . Chaii?ma.n johnson asked i'f all problems had been solved with Flood Control anS~ Commissioner Crisp stated that they had not been solved but it is u-o to a point now that i% should be shortly. Commissioner Cris-o said ~-~o~ he c uld' ~ ~-~ o not comment as to.' ~ust[ what..the Council or'..Conmnission would do~ but said he felt that P~. Franklin should have' some'ysor%.~--ofi=:~.~fq!) and f~ther said that he did not believe }~L~. Frsmk!in could cite a singl~"'i~'t-an-ce up to the present time where the Commission has held him up. He asked the Secretly if some sort of answer could be given to Iv~. Franklin by the end of the week. The Secre- tary said that it could be done within a couple of ~ys. Nr. Franklin asked that .the letter also sho~j .where this Flood ContrOl ~ainwould be and whether the streets could be narrowed~ in view of this. He f thor -~ ~_ said that in view of the situation~ he is afraid to spend ~y more money on more plans because ever~hing may change~ ~d tb~t is why he needs a letter. The Secretary also mentioned that there is a time limit for the Planning Commission to act since this application expires on june 13th~ and that an extension would be needed by Mr. Fraiilin. The Chairman agreed that~ under the conditions~ this Would be the appro- priate thing ~o do. !;'~~. Franklin said that he had already informed P~. Walker that they are f'!!in~?g for an extension. Chairman johnson directed that. SDE-732 be continued until the next meeting~ s~oject to receipt of a grant of extension of time from Franklin _-o .... from PK~. Franklin. B. .~'~'R ~0 - S. L. Tyler and G. S. Kocher~ Fourth Street -.Building Site ,.~ ....,.-~ . Approval - i Lot - Continued from 27 May 1968 '~e e cretary read a communicati~ received from applicant requesting ..... oe _ that SDR-740 be 'withdrawn. Con~a'nissioner Crisp noted. that normally such requests are .granted without prejudice and that applicant will not have to pay a new filing fee~ and moved that the reouest be Granted and ~-h'~' ' ~ ~ ~ it be withdraYm without preju- dice. .~.~e motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasner ai c~ried unani- mous ly . . i Pi. ann.in~.% C.:,:-.:!',ff..ssi: nutes ~" J:~ne ~ ':',.'-'-{~ - -:'-'J .... .,,-:, , -' Con'b C. ~EDR-71P"-;- - Nei! !(:trkham~ Sobey Ros, d - Building Site Approval - ! Lot - Continued from 07 May' D .... ~ o:~- t +b - Dr. l,.':'i chae! I~. Stepovic}-b Sobey' Road Sffod~ v' ~ ' . - .... ~ .- m~zon APproval 21 'Lots '- Continued from 27 May lc'68 , .,/ Commissione:~- Crisp noted that both SDR-74.4 and SD-746 were .req-qests .for ... continuance . and sinde the additional information reeuested at the pro- ,. . ~ . . vious meeting had ~t been obtained and reco~nended that both of the above items be continued until the next meeting~ 24 June 1968. Chairms.n Johnson so directed. ~. o ~ - Robert C Frazier~ Va~mero Court and Cocciordi Quarry Road - -,.~ ' t.-'O · _ Bui!din~ Site ApproVal - 3 Lots - Continued from 27 Ma7 !968. Commissioner Crisp stated. that the Com~Xssion is still awaiting action of the Flood Control and recommendee;..continuance~ if there is still sufficient time. The Secretary confirmed that there is sufficient t'ime. ~Commissioner Crisp recommended continuance until the meeting of Jme 24-~ " 1968. Chairman Johnson so directed. F. SD-754 - Geo-m~'e W. Day~ FanToil ]~venUe Subgivision Approval 20 Lo~s Continued from 27 May ~,,~.u. Comnissioner CriSp noted that a representative on the goove was present and asked if he had any comments on Recommendations 1 and 2. ~h~ john ~'eff~de~ of George Nolte~ s~id they had reviewed the conditions and have no objections to 1 of the-.reCo~mendations~ and ~hat they are s'"~ !I . ,., ~_ considering 2 Commissioner Cris'p reminded Chairman johnson that those were not co~d~- t'~ons but were the result of some requests of eole !S~t ..... p p at the meeting~ , that one concerned underground utilities and the other~ riding trails -- not momentarily conditioned. Chairman johnson mentioned that it would be a matter for the Council Conmissioner Crisp advised that it was for consideration by the ~mer~ and does not concern the Council. The Chairman asked the Secretary if he planned to discuss this with the '.." Council. The Secretary said tha.t~ actual!y~ it is not a requirement~ but is optional with the developer. Comj:nissioner Crisp 'moved~ seconded by Commissioner Kasner~ that the- Bn~d~.g Site Committee Report of 10 june 1968~ relative to SD-754 be a6~opt~d .and that ti~ tentative mzp (ExMbit "A"~ filed 17 May 1968~ be _pi~'6ved s'~oject to the c~ditimns set forth in said' report; motion carried unanimously G. SDR-755 - Rosemarie Rdbe~tson~ Piedmont Road - Building Site Approval - i Lot, Commissioner Crisp stated that the time limit had expired on this~ but that this is a renewal of a portion on the adjacent house. ~e point involved -6- --.~ ............o ......::.ss:uon }s i0 june ~ Contiz h?.- sa~d is the ap.4'.roval of %he i'~jea.!th Department on s,~.Dtic tan],:s ~nP th.ay have as~':.~ _. ~ ~ a~,~t:rovs.l condi'bR. oned upon Health Department approval. i,l-:s o -:~ober'tson s'bai;ed 'ths. t she 'was not interested in se].iin&:.' the property :Ls sa.].abLe -- that t!'~:[s 'w'on~'t ~'o'on~r unless s~, wants to build ~;-~, ..... ' ' ~':"' .....said ' Co:nmmssmoner z n that she has 12 years to comply and then she cou]_d ask for an extens:Lon. ~n'~'m~ SSiO,~,~-~ L~vel y said .... ~" .............. u~u she had not had an answer on the septic tanks fz'om +~ Health ~ --~ Department. i,i-s. i:{obertson said that it is in an area where they could move the house 'oack~ i'f nece.ssary~ but inasmuch as she is not planning to build~ she just wants to Mnow what she would have to do before the Planning Com- mission would approve it. Commissioner Crisp moved.~ seconded by Commissioner Kasner~ that t~ Bui]-d~n~Site Committee Report of iO June i968~ relative to SDR-755, be ,-s(cZooted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed !7 ~,~ay 1968) be'approved subject to the condit. ions set forth in said report; motion c~arried unanimous].y. e~- ..... ~ :~ o ~ ~mz'azo?:a A. venue - ~um~a~ne~ Site ~.pprova! ~ Lot - , .... ~ .......... Z ..... - _ Commissioner Crisp noted ~chat the house'would be restricted to -pole house t~'pe construction~ other~,zise a si-be development plan sho~_ng the ex'cent of any fZi! or excavation ~.zou!d have been required. · Chairman johnson asked where it is located and was told it is next door to i',~s. Cunningham's house. Secre't~y ~,Talker reported that all improvements have been made and that he is not sure sfoout the Offers of Dedication~ because of a law suit with Robert B{orS;an~ a former o~,mer of the property. 'i~he SeC-~eta-~v stated that the applicant was not present but has no · objections to the conditions. Cou~missioner Crisp moved~ seconded by Commissioner Kasner~ that the Buiidin~ Site Committee Report oi' i0 June ! 68 9 ~reiative to SDR-756~ '~e ~""'~"Z"~d.aR~~ '~"'~a"' the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 31 ~.,iay 1 68) e ._ ~ c to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. i. p. - D. ~ PaDera, ".'.~onta].vo Lane Buildin~-~ Site A'oDroval - ~ Lot SDiX-7"'7 .... Cor.~n'nissioner Crisp stated ishat Public T~orks wants to inspect the street~ ~-n,~ thai:. this is a-sateel in the nature of seven 1-acre lots under one .o~me~. ~j ~ has been discussed with the Subdivision Comnitte& reg~ding requirement of improvement of the entire property. It is a subdivision of' 7 lots, %,;,ith one owner~ P.~. Arata. Co:,':~:iss!oner Kasner recommended continuance until the next meetiHg, await- in[~ Health Department report and inspection by Public ~iorks Department. Chaisrm~an jokmson so directed. '-7- ·" ":': :~."' "[-'--_z- 'V7~.: .- .....=.__.=~. ........ P] ~ninf- ComrrT..a, sion P~tes iO J~:lne' n c;68 Con'ti iV. DESIGN T~n'r~,r ".. "k · . 'k -~-,::, 5 - .L;ranlclin Homes~ Fourth Street and Saratoga Creek - Preliminary ~zes~ ~n Revie~.z -- Apa:r'tment o-~,. ~ :~.. C /-i-2 d from 27 ~o o e - oz ~ nu.e Nay 1968 Commissioner !Catnet stated that the Committee did not meet on June 4th because that ~.zas a ho!'iday~ and no action had been taken with regard to F':'?.nklin !-iox~es and' further tha't any approval depends upon action on SDR_732 · ~ recommended continuance until the next meeting, j'~e 24 1968 Chairman johnson so directed.. . Dem~sev~ B~ o. Basin Wa~ - Final Design Review - Shopping- Cen'ber iden'Ei:F:[ cation Si;.~:n The Assistant Planner reported that applicant proposed repZag~ment-~,b~ Cen%er's identification sign~ but that the one proposed was much too !ar~:e. Co~m~issioner Kasner recommended continuance to June 24, 1968. Chairman Johnson so directed. A-238 - Youth Ce~.er~ Fruitvale Avenue - Final Design Review - Revised Parkin~ Plan " m~ ~ ;.n~ siftant Planner reported that they met with the Council Com~Zttee today and that they understand it is to be re~ewe'd by the Design Renew Committee. Com-aissioner Kasner recommended. this matter be continued until the meeting of june 24, .!968.. Chairman johnson so. directed. ;V. CITY ~OUNCIL N~]PORT Conm~issior~er Lively gave a brief sumn'~ry of items re~'ewed by the City ~ 1o rA Council at its meeting of 29 May No~ as follows: C-!ii~ set for he~ing on july 3; C-!i2~ Denied the change from R-1 to R-3; The bond '~1~"~ t%e ' for ~.~ c .... of .. Ascension was not released because developer must do ~a-~'!.;~n;; area ~o ~ al~d landscaping. Another matter was a check list for underground uti]_ities designed to prevent undue opening of streets for sewers a.nd the like. Commissioner Crisp asked 'if there is any reason for not con%inu~nS the Pendergraft matter by t}~ ~ Council ~nd Comnnissioner Li~ely said there was r~o reason since N'P. Peniergraft's attorney had appeared and asked for a continuance. is- ~T p, - .......... None Vii!aa'e Merchants AssocSa%ion~ SiS Basi~ Wa,~ Reoues% %o Er'ec% Off- St:~'ec-% Parkin..S Direetiona! SiB:ns The S'ssis%a~% Planner presented'%h%s ma%%er %o %he whole Com~ss~o~ ~oP review ~ Cha:Lr~s~.n ~oh~son wantea ~o ~:aow if there was any p~%~cu~ap reaso~ whX the coloP should be variea~ s~nce we are us~na bro~ with lOainous wh~%e~ and wan%e6 %o know whX i% shoul6 ~ot be kep% un~Fo~ w~%h ouP s%ree% sia~s. The Asses%an% PlanneP sa~d %hat '%he ves~ce i~ coloPs had no% occ~re6 %o him. ;~- Pianni. nF: Com:'..Ls:~ion afi',e.s - 10 june i.965 - Continue .-- " L'!o:n':"~ ss~ oner ""~ '~'~-~ said he ~ ~ ~l-~{~ 'Lhe 'unic,,ue desi~i~n. Assi-.+~ pn ~.n~e~ Bonfi/~"l~o when ~skea how 'm~l'= ar a~ t~t 'up to 3-feet is al!o~.~ed ~or Qumto sign, said .it was o"'/'--st. re.~t pa. rkin~. , "........ Commissioner Kasner su~:gesfed it be ap'oroved~ based on the ~ a d colors b~'~· used. The Secretary said that the Planning Cormr~ission could issue the permit if they ~.rant 'to accept it on this basis. P~. Bonfiglio read the -staff report recommending approval of the s~oject resuest~ subject tO Exhibits "~" and "B" and subject to a) Sign Permits issued. only for the eight (8) locations sho~ on Exhibit "B"; and b) any future signs and new locations must first obtain approval and a sign permit from the Planning Comznission. Commissioner ~sner said he understood this to mean that there will be 8 signs ~- 16, back to back -- ~d that they ~e to be sufficiently staggered. He asked whether any of these signs indicated restricted parking and ~ras told that they are all open to the public. Commissioner Kasner asked if ~y of these were for "n o ly Bank of America o ~K~ ~fi~ether anyone could ar~ in any of .these sDaces~ ani was assurei by the Secretary ~ha~ anyone can use any of ~hem. Chairman johnson said' ~hat he would have no obSec~ion ~o more ~han ei~t siQns~ if needed. Cc. mnissioner Kasner move~ modification -- ~ha't staniari stree% si~ colo~s be uset. Con'missioner Lively seeonde~ and the motion c~rie~ unanimously. V!i! ,,.,:....~.~- .................... Dr.Abra.ms sffbmitted two letters requesting extension '1) requesting exten- sion of .0-43~ Medical Village of Saratoga for one year from the current expiration date for 'both zoning and subdivision approval~ and 2) requesting ex'~ension of C-I06~ MoVoSo Company (a~artments) for one year. The Secretary stated that since these matters are somewhat complex~ he would recommend that they be referred to the Subdivision Committee for clarification with 'the City Attorney ~ and a report at the next meeting. Chairman johnson directed tb-at the matter be' continued to' the' next-' ~.i~eetj_n[~ and. referred same tc -,the S~Yodivision Committee for study c~d report. B o ORAl, GUESTS Chs:i.rman Joi'-,nson acknowled~]ed ~ith pleasuave the presence of Councilman ~v~e-~. ~: ..... Ottenberg~ League of Women Vo'tors~ Dr. Abrams and Dr. S'turla. He also %banked i',t~s. Ruth O%~ens of the Good Government Group~ for the coffee served at recess. iX. ADJCURNb,T'-.NT The Chairman declared the meeting adjourned. at 9:45 P.M. Saratoga Planning~ Commission CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TIME: Monday, 10 June 1968, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTIME ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL· B. MINUTES II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-113 - E. G. Couveia, Ashley W~y - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-I-40,000!' (Single Family Residential) to "R-1-12,500" (Single Fami!~ Residential) - Continued from 27 May 1968 B. C-114 - George W. Day, Farwell and Fruitvale Avenues - Request for Change of Zoning from "A'~ (Agricultural) to ~R-1-40,O00" (Single Family Residential) -Ccntinued from 27.~y 1968 C. UP-150- George W. Day, Allendale Avenue - Request for Use Permit to Allow a Model Home Sales Office - Continued.from 27 May 1968 D. SMALL PET ORDINANCE - Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. NS-3 Relating to the Keeping of Certain Birds and Small' Mammals as Pets in "R" Districts - Continued from 27 May 1968· E. V-318 - Evelyn O. Goeffroy, Komina Avenue - Request for Variance in Connection With Corridor Width-Access Road and Side Yard Setback Requirements F. UP-151- James R. Davi, Sousa Lane - Request for Use Permit to Allow a Convalescent Hospital ~ G. VISITOR COMMERCIAL ~ Proposed New Visitor Co,mmercial Zonin~ District III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-732 - Franklin Homes Company, Fourth Street and Saratoga Creek - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 27 May 1968 B. SDR-740 - S. L. Tyler and G. S. Kocher, Fourth .Street - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 27 May 1968 C. SDR-744 - Neil Kirkham, Sobey Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 27 May 1968 D. SD-746 - Dr.. Michael L. Stepovich, Sobey Road - Subdivision Approval - 21 Lots - Continued from 27 May 1968 E. SDR-753 - Robert C. Frazier, Vaquero Court and Cocciordi Quarry Road - Building Site Approval - 3 Lots - Continued from 27 May 1968 F. SD-754 - George W. Day, Farwell Avenue - Subdivision Approval - 20 Lots - Continued from 27 May 1968 G. SDR-755 - Rosemarie Robertson, Piedmont Road - Building Site ApproVal - 1 Lot SDR-756 - M. E. Norman, Saratoga Avenue - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot -1- Planning Conunission. Agenda - 10 June 1968 - Con~,inued~ III. BtFiLDING SITES AND SIIBDIVISIONS - COlqTIIQIJED .I. SDR-757 - D. R. Papera, ~iontalvo I~ne - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-273 - Franklin Homes, Fourth Street and Saratoga Creek - Preliminary Design Review - Apartment Complex - Continued from 27 Ha,y 1968 B. A.-286 - A. A. Dempsey, Big Basin Way - Final Des fan Review - .Shopp.in~ Center Identification Sign C. A-23_8 - Youth Center, Fruitvale Avenue - Final Design Revie~ - Ravfsed P-grkfn~ Plan V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSI}~ESS VILL~GF- ~fERCtL~\~S ASSOCIATION - Off Street Parkin~ Directfonal Signs VIII. CO~{UNICATIONS A. ~{ITTEN B. ORAL IX. ADJOURNFIENT J -2-