Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-14-1971 Planning Commission Minutes (2) CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TIME: Monday, 14 June 1971, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070 TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lively at 7:30 P.M. Ao ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Fagan, Kraus, Lively, Marshall, Martin, and Smith. Absent: Commissioner Metcalf. B. MINUTES Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by commissioner Kraus, that the reading of the minutes of the 24 May 1971 meeting be waived and they be approved as distributed with the following changes: page 8.. .under VIII. A. C-139. .paragraph 1.. .line 3.. .change '~-1-10,000" to '~-1-15,000"; page 8.. .under VIII. B. Miljevich.. .~aragraph 1.. .line 2.. ."[d~ ......... · .~e~r'd~"'~f[~ ~ ~'o'~ t~t~'C'i~'y"Co~iT"'b'~I'W~'en the words "Officer" and '~elative";' motion carried unanimously'. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-137 - Alfred F. Dunms, Inc., Prospect Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-10,000" (Single-Family Residential) to '~-1-10,000" "P-C" (Single-Family Residentall Planned Community) - Continued from 2~ May 197 1 The hearing was reopened at 7:38 P.M. The Secretary stated that the applicant has submitted aa~evised map showing minor changes from the map previously presented to the Planning Commission. Mr. Charles J. Schneider, engineer for the applicant, stated that he and his client have had several meetings with the Subdivision Committee and the Public Works engineer and have now resolved any problems and differences. Mr. Art Grafe, 12121 Saraglen Drive, stated that 1) he is directly affected by the change of zoning since he lives in the area 2) he and his neighbors petitioned the City several weeks ago to have a survey made to confirm the dimensions of the property 3) according to the Tax Assessor's figures the size of the property is 6.23 acres 4) he is anxious to determine the total number of buildings proposed for this property and the size of the actual individual lots 5) it appears some'lots will be approximately 5,200 square feet in size and he is worried that this will cause degradation of his property j!.>6) the Planning Commission has historically stuck by the Zoning Ordinance in the past and he urges that this policy be continued and l) if the property does consist of 6.23 acres then the total square footage available would be 271,378.80 and out of that the following will have to be deducted: 60 X 275 = 16,500 square feet - For Prospect Road Improvements 27% X 500 = 13,750 square feet - First Section Santa Clara County Flood Control Easement 35 X 361 = 12,635 square=feet - Santa Clara County Flood Control Easement 600 X 37 = 22,200 square feet - Road Construction Within the Tract 155 X 37 = 5,735 squarelfeet - Road Construction Within the Tract 70,820 square'feet - Total deductions 271,378.80 - Gross Acreage Available : ... -70,820.00 - Total Deductions ..... 200,558.80 - Net Acreage Available -1- Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971 - Continued II. A. C-137 - Continued Mr. Grafe went on to say that 1) he is opposed to the proposed individual lot sizes since i~ will result in an increased density in the area 2) a total of sixteen (16) houses<fOr "~h..~'property woOld not be as objectionable.3) the plan'..c. urrent,ly~lunder conSid- eration by the Planning Commission was not ' br~ought: to the attention of the residents of the area and ..,4) he did attempt to 'm~et with the Subdivision Committee, but was unable to a~range an appbintment. Chairman Lively stated that 1) the developer and the owner of the property have tried to put forth a plan ~hat' is feasible and the Subdivision Committee has attempted to emanate the differences noted by Mr. Grafe 2) obviously the nearest resident 'to the subject develop- ment is 75-feet awa]~]; so, there is some seperation and 3) Mr. Grafe has had eight (8) weeks to arrange an appointment with the Subdivision Committee; however, the matte. r will be continued another two (2) weeks only in order to allow Hr. Grafe time to review the plans with the Sub- division Committee. Co~iSSioner Harshall stated :he objected to a continuance since he feels Mr. Grafe has had ample opportunity to state his cae and if Mr. Grafess figures are used ::twenty (20) houses could go on the property instead of nineteen ':(19) as proposed by the applicant. The Secretary stated there is no real difference in the figures only in the application of same. Commissioner Smith stated th&t' 1) the applicant~s figures and Mr. Grafe*s figures are the same 'and the revised map does not contain any .new calculations and 2) ~this is a "P-C' (Planned-Community) Development and many lots ca~ be under 10,000 square feet in size and the subdivi~ion-:~.~ill contain open-space to compensate for the smaller lots. Commissioner Kraus stated tha"t he would be willing to continued the matter and meet with Mr. Grafe; however, there is no real reason to do so. Commissioner Marshall stated he would withdraw his objection to a continuance of this matter ifa Hr. Grafe agrees to walk the subject property and look back towards the existing Blue Hills Subdivision. Mr. Schn~..ider stated that 1) 'according to the applicantss figures a total acreage of 5.77 is av.ailable 2) he did not jr-eel' there is sufficient disagreement to warrant a continuance of the matter and 3) the figures indicate twenty (20) lots could be allowed and only nineteen (19) are proposed. Mr. Bob Mathot, developer, stated that 1) it was sometime ago that Mr. Grafe first stated that he did not have an opportunity to look at the map and requested a continuance 2) the changes made on the current revised map are very minor and 3) he believes Mr. Grafe*s request for another continuance is simply a ploy to further delay the matter. Commissioner Kraus stated that~ he feels a further continuance is · unfair to the developer and it. should be"~n~-amount ~ha~ ~[~'l'h~'~'i~'O Connission take action at the ~next meeting. The Secretary arranged with Mr. Grafe for a meeting with the Subdivision Committee for Thursday, 17 June 1971 at 3:30 P.M. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 8:06 P.M., directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred same to the Subdivision Con~ittee. -2- Planning Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971 - Continued II. B. C-139 - Malachy J. Moran, Salratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-i-20,000" (Single-Family Residential) to "R-l-15~000" (Sin~lei-Family Residential) Chairman Lively opened the h'earing relative to C-13~'~'t'8Y0'6 P.M. The Secretary Stated the Not%ices of Hearing were mailed. Commissioner Smith stated the map submitted by the'applicant is not adequate; therefore, C-139 should be continued to allow time for the applicant to prepare a revised map. The Secretary explained that! the revised map should indicate only the portion of the applicant!'S property that will be involved in the requested ~hange of 'zoning. Mr. Moran, applicant, statedi that 1) the topography and physical condition of the property afZfect the development and usage 2) the "R-l-15,000" (Single-Family Residential) zoning would permit a land use compatible with the conditions existing on the property 3) the subject zoning would not increase the density of any undeveloped land in the neighborhood andi4) the requested zoning would provide a logi~al~'.transition from the "R-i-20,000" (Single-Family Residential) on Saratoga Avenue to the "R~i-10,000" (Single-Family Residential) zoning on Lannoy Court. Mr. Joe Zerboni, 19951Lannoy Court, inquired ff~the correspondence and petitions filed relative' to the applican~i's previous change of zoning are still pertinent t~ the current request. Chairman Lively stated that he is not in favor of a blanket reinstatement of all correspondence that w~s filed in connection with the former change of zoning request-~sin~e that does not seem fair to the applicant. Commissioner Smith recommended that all the correspondence be brought up to date by the individuals involved to apply to the "R-l-15,'~O'O"' request. Commissioner Kraus agreed that the correspondence should be updated. Mr. Alan Margulls, 19961Lan~oy Court, stated that 1) he is opposed to the proposed change of zoning since it is contrary to the General Plan and would increase the density in the area and 2) he does not feel the applicant should be'allowed to continue to revise his request because eventually the opposition may tire of protesting and the appli- cant will 'oBtain~approval of: a zoning not in accord with the General Plan. Mr. Moran stated that 1) he'has tried to be objective about the development of this property'2) if he brought in a proposal for "R-1-19,999" square foot lots there would still be some opposition 3) the lot sizes proposed are still larger thant the homes on Lannoy Court'and 4) with the proposed "R-l-15,000" zoni~g~there will be only one (1) more house in the area than if the zoning shown on the General Plan were applied. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 8:32 P.M., directed C-139 continued to ~he next regular meeting and referred same to the Subdivision Committee. Planning Commission Minutes -.14 June !1971 - Continued II. C. C-145 - B. T. Galeb, Ted Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-10,000" (Single,Family Residential) to "R-M-5,000" (M~lti- Family Residential) ~ Continued from 24 May 1971 Chairman Lively reopened the 'hearing relative to C-145 at 8:33 P.M. The Secretary stated nothing.new had been added to the file. Mr. Richard Foust, architect,' was present and stated 1) he did have a preliminary plan he would like to submit 2) the Subdivision Committee did visit the site and 3) the p~eliminary map shows enlarged lot~sizes of approximately 20,000 square feet in each lot with a total of five (5) lots with four (4) lots of four (4) units and one (1) lot of six (6) units. Commissioner Smith stated that the preliminary studies should be submitted to the Subdivision 'Committee prior to a presentation to the Planning Commission. Mr. Raymond Sheets, 12444 Ted Avenue, stated he and other residents of the area are interested i~ review the plans.referred to by Mr. Foust. Commissioner Smit~ stated that 1) the Subdivision Committee did make an on-site inspection of the property and are ~ot ~Y"~l'i"happy with the junk and old autos left on the property and 2) the owner was to clean-up the property sometime ago and he should do so in order to make the property presentable'. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 8:41 P.M., directed C-145 continued to the next regular meeting and referred the matter to the Subdivision Committee. He suggested that any residents of the area interested in reviewing the plans come into City Hall (Planning Department). D. C-146 - Aubrey Johnston, Quito Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-10,000" (Sipgle-Family Residential) to "C-N" (Neighbor- hood-Commercial) - Continued~from 24 May 1971 Chairman Lively reopened the ~earing at 8:43 P.M. C~nissioner Smith stated that 1) another report from the State Highway Department is forthcoming relative to a possible purchase oi this property and 2) the applicant has not. yet submitted a bona fid~ proposal as to a specific use for the subject property. Mr. Johnston, the applicant, stated that he has had three (3) offers on the property; however, the ofiers have all been contingent on getting the zoning on the property changed to commercial. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the eveking at 8:44 P.M., directed C-46 continued to the next regular meeting and referred same to the Sub- division Committee. E. C-148 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from'~" (Agricultural) to "R-i-40,000" (Single- Family Residential) Chairman Lively opened the hearing relative to C-148 at 8:45 P.M. The Secretary stated the NotiCes of Hearing were rmiled and published. The Secretary read a memo from the Parks and Recreation Commission recommending that a certain portion of these lands be set aside and dedicated for park and open-space purposes and suggesting that the applican~ ~continue ~o conside~'P-C" (Planned-Community). Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 14 Jun~ 1971 - Continued II. E. C-148 - Continued Mr. Lou Leto, 14928 Jerries~Drive, General Manager of George Day, stated that 1) he did meet!with the. Parks and Recreation Commission to discuss a~ "P-C" (Planned-Community) development, but at that time sixty seven (67) acres were~involved; however, problems prevented purchase of the entire sixty seven (67) acre parcel and now the appli- cant plans to develop only ~eventeen (17) acres and 2) in view of all the problems encountered by ~Saratoga Foothills Development and Mr. Dumas in attempting a "P-C" development the applicant is very hesitant to pursue the "P-C" concept an~ further. Commissioner Smith stated that the Subdivision Committee did review the preliminary map and~.:wer~ not particularly impressed with the lay-out of the subdivision since it.appeared to be pretty ord'fhary."' Mr. Ed Panelli, attorney for the applicant, stated that the applicant would like to.obtain approval of the requested change of zoning as soon as possible in order that construction can begin prior to the begin~:~ing of the winter months. Chairman Lively closed the Hearing for the evening at 8:55 P.M., directed C-148 continued to .the next regular meeting and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for review and a report. F. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - Amending the Zoning Ordinance NS-3 by Deleting Certain Conditional Uses from "R-I" Zones and Modifying Certain Off-Street Parking Requirements for Offices - COntinued from 24 May 1971 The Chairman reopened the hearing at/8:56 P.M. The Secretary explained that the City Attorney stated that the State Law requires that pri~ate nOn-profit schools and qolleges must be allowed as conditional uses in the "R-I" zoning district if public and parochial schools' are allowed in that zone. No one present wished to comment. Commissioner Kraus moved, sezconded by Commissioner Smith to close the hearing at 8:58 P.M.;-=moltion carried unanimously. Commissioner Smith moved, se.conded by Commissioner Kraus, that the ordinance amending ZOning Ordinance NS-3 by deleting certain conditional uses from the "R-i" zones an~ modifying certain off-street parking require- ments for offices be adoptedz and forwarded to the City Council as the reco~fm~endation of the Planning Commission; motion carried unanimously. III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-900 - Live Oak Realty, Ihc.', Foothill Lane - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued 'from 24 May 19711 The Secretary ~ead a communication received from the applicant requesting that SDR-900 be withdrawn. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Krause, that the request for withdrawal in connection with SDR-900 be approved; motion carried unanimously. -5- Planning Commission Minutes - 14 June'1971 - Continued III. B. SD-902 - A1Dumas, Prospect Road - Subdivision Approval - 19 Lots - Continued from 24 May 1971 conm~issioner Smith recommended that SD-902 be continued ito ~he next regular meeting since the Change o!f' zoning reqU~,~t ~Zl~"'h~'~"'b'~'~ pqstponed. Chairman Lively so directed. C. SDR-903 - David L. Schmidt~ Vaquero Court - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The applicant was present and stated he had reviewed the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, s~conded by Commissioner Kraus, that the Building Site Committee Repbrt dated 14 June 1971 relative to SDR-903 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 14 May 1971) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. D. SD-904 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Subdivision Approval - 15 Lots Commissioner Smith recommended that SD-904 be continued to the next regular meeting since the change of zoning request (C-148) has been postponed. Chairman Lively so directed~ E. SDR-906 - Richard M. Kanaza~a, Oriole Way -'...Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Mr. David Takamoto, applicant's architect, stated that he reviewed the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, s~conded by Commissioner Kraus, that the Building Site Con~ittee RepOrt dated 14 June 1971 relative to SDR-906 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed 27 May 1971) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. F. SDR-907 - DonaMComer~ Pierce Road - Building Site Approval - 4 Lots Commissioner Smith recommended that SDR-907 be continued to the next regular meeting. Chairman Lively so directed.! G. SDR-908 - Joe Neville~ Pier~e Road - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots Mr. Neville was present andistated he did review the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction of same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, that the Building Site Committee Report dated 14 June 1971 relative to SDR-908 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A-I" filed 14 June 1971) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously.· H. SDR-909 - Manuel Costa~ quito Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The Secretary stated that the Public Works Department feels that if the use proposed for this p~operty is approved Quito Road should be improved and the ~ewage system should be given careful consideration. Commissioner Smith recommended that SDR-909 be continued to the next regular meeting to allow ti~e for further study of the matter. Chairman Lively so directedZ- ~6- Planning Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971 - Continued RECESS AND RECONVENE IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-271 - Stoneson Homes, Big Basin Way - Final Design Review - Review of New Elevations Commissioner Marshall stated that the applicant did meet with the Design Review Committee and submitted the exterior elevations for the fourth building of his toWnhouse development. The Assistant Planner read the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 recommending that Final Design Approval be granted for A-271. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 be adopted and that Final Design Approval be granted for the exterior elevations for the fourth townhouse complex for Stoneson Homes as shown on Exhibits "J" and "K" and subject to the condition stated in said report; motion carried unanimously. B. A-376 - Highland Development Company, Prospect Road - Final Design Review - Subdivision Approval Commissioner Marshall explained that the applicant proposes to eventually construct nineteen (19) houses in the subdivision. Mr. Bob Mathot, representative for the applicant~nstated that at this time he had ten (10) different elevations for eleven (11) houses. Commissioner Marshall stated that almost all of the elevations show court yard approaches. .The Assistant Planner read the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 ~recommending that Final Design Approval be granted for A-376. After discussion, it was deci'ded that the following be added to condition "(b)" of the sUbjectrreport: "(Lots 2,3,4,6, and 12 will have curved driveways.~"' Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report datedil4 June 1971 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted for the exterior elevations for eleven (11) homes in Tract 4951 as shown on Exhibits "A" through "D"~subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion carried unanimously° C. A-349 - Cal-West Communities, Saratoga Avenue - Final Design Review - Minor Revision of Master Plan Commissioner Marshall explained that the applicant approached the Design Review Committee with a slight modification request stating that the one-(1) and three-(3) bedroom condominiums are selling better than the two-(2) bedroom townhouse units; therefore, the proposal~is to eliminate fourteen two-(2) bedroom units and repllace them with one-(1) and three-(3) bedroom units. Commissioner Kraus suggested .that Unit II of this development be given careful consideration since aZesthetically Unit I is not too attractive. Chairman Lively stated that he would not like to see this development become any more crowded than zit already is and he would like the matter continued to allow time for further study of the requested modification. Mr. A1 Warnick, President of .Cal-West, stated that 1) ehe first phase of this project is all sold 2) the plan followed for development of the condominium-apartment complex is unique and has won several major awards 3) the developer tried to stay within the concept previously approved; however,.the sales to date indicate the one-(1) and three-(3) bedroom condominiums are selling better thantthe two-(2) bedroom townhouse units; ..... -- ......~hcrc[orc~ ~ modlr-3-cc~i-- =r-~'~uc-~-l~n~ ~s-=cq.~otca ~na appreciate a decision at this time. -7- Planning Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971 - Continued IV. C. A-349 - Continued The Assistant Planner read the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971~relative to A-349 recommending that Final Design Approval be granted for the requested modification and that 1,000 square feet more building area be allowed. Commissioner Marshall moved, ~econded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 be adopted and that Final Design Approval be granted for the modificati6n inithe Maste~ Plan for Unit I as shown on Exhibit "X" subject to the ~opditions stated in said report; motion carried with Chairn~"L'iV~y voting No. D. A-373 - Alfred F. Dumas, Inc.~ Prospect Road - Preliminary Design Review - Planned Community Development - Continued from 24 May 1971 Chairman Lively, d~e to the c~ntinuance of C-137 and SD-902, directed A-373 continued to the next regular meeting. E. A-375 - Earl Hinricks, Quito Road - Final Design Review - Subdivision Approval Chairman Lively, due to the continuance of SDR-909, directed A-375 continued to the next regular meeting to allow time for further study. V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Councilman Sanders was present and commented on a few items of interest to"~the Planning Commission that were discussed at the City Council meeting of 2 June 1971. VI. PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE Housing Element Study Commissioner Kraus stated that 1) he did obtain a list of the organizations' and individuals in support~of the:Housing Element and 2) the Housing Element Study was approved. This was done in spite of the valiant effort of Councilman Jerry Smith to add amendments to the Housing Study relating to Saratoga's goals. Chairman Lively inquired if SaratOga is firmly on record as being opposed to to the Housing Element Study that ~was approved? Commissioner Kraus answered that the City of Saratoga is on record as being opposed to the subject Housing Element and Mayor Robbin's letter stating the City's opposition was read and he:(Commissioner Kraus) voted against the Housing Element. Hillside Committee Commissioner Kraus stated that at:the Hillside Committee meeting, George Mader, representative from Wm. Spangle and Associates was present and he had drawn up some hillside maps with standards and in addition to the Slope Density I proposal a Slope Density II. proposal was explained which was very interesting. The representative, also, had a number of slides that were taken of Los Gatos, Monte Sereno,. and Saratoga.and the apparent cutting of the hillside shown in the slides was very upsetting to see and the Planning Commissions must be extremely careful as to what they approve for hillside lots in the future. -8- Planning Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971!- Continued VII. OLD BUSINESS A. WEST VALLEY JUNIOR COLLEGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - First Phase - Par~ing The Assistant Planner read the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 stating that the college's original Mast'er Plan and the engineered improvement plans and landscape plans are almost identical to one another; therefore, the Use Permit has not been violated. Commissioner Marshall recommended that a note be added to the subject report as follows: "After review of the plroposed parking addition the Planning Corm~.ission h~reby acknowledges to the City Council that the proposed plan is consistent with The Use Permit (UP-119) and the college Master Plan." Commissioner Marshall~.moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated 14 June 1.97'1 be adopted, as amended, and the new parking lot fronting on Fruitvale Avenue be approved and the subject report be forwarded to the City Council as the recommendation of the Planning C~mLission; motion carried unanimously. B. Malachy J. Moran~ Saratoga Avenue - Request for General Plan Adjustment The Secretary stated that 1) th~ applicant at the City Council meeting of 5 May 1971 revised his change~ of zoning application from "R-l-10,000" to "R-l-15,000" and at the same ~ime asked for an amendment to the General Plan to reflect this requested change and 2) the matter was referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council. The Secretary then read a memo from the City Manager requesting the Planning Commission to submit a pupplementary report relative to the'General Plan in connection with the Moran request. Chairman Lively stated that the Flanning Commission has held public hearings relative to the General~ Plan and did forward the results to the City Council and now the council has asked the Planning Commission to review this particular request; therefore, the subject request is referred to the General Plan Committee and continued to the next regular meeting. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. SDR-895 - S. B. Walton, Saratoga!Hills Road - Request for Reconsideration Building Site Approval Condition The Secretary read a communication received from Mr. S. B. Walton, applicant, requesting modification of Condition II-B of the Building Site Committee Report dated 10 May 1971. Mr. Walton was present and stated that the portion of the road to be improved as per Condition II-B i~ lined by quite a number of trees and they are so close to the road they will have to be cut down or dirt will be pushed Cagainst them which will'cause them to die. If the trees are done away with the entrance to Saratoga Hills will be ruined. Chairman Lively directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred the matter to the Subdivision Committee for study. B. Polic~ Requiring Sanitar~ Sewers~;~ ........... '\ The Secretary read the Staff RepOrt dated 14 June 1971 recommending that the Planning Commission adopt a policy requiring a sanitary sewer for all new subdivisions with five (5)~or more lots. Chairman Lively directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred the subject report ~elative to the policy for sanitary sewers to the Subdivision Committee forZreview. -9- ~. Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 14 June 1971 - Continued IX. COMMUNICATIONS -A. WRITTEN None B. ORAL ; ~f~e~ Stand on Sarato~a-Sunnyvale Road Chairman Lively stated that C~ommissioner Metcalf did call him to say that the flower stand on Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road is flyi~_g.~ a:.:number of American Flags fo'r advertising pruposes. The Secretary explained that .some businessman in Campbell is being taken to court for doing the .same thing and Mr. Gilmore (flower stand owner) was informed he could fly the American Flag, but not for advertising purposes. Commissioner Marshall stated that if the Code Enforcement Officer does go out to talk to Mr. Gilmore he might mention the sandwich board signs that appear every~ weekend at the subject flower stand. X. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Lively acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Councilman Sanders and Mrs. Stark of the Goo.d Goverm~ent Group. He, also, thanked Mrs. Stark for the coffee served at recess. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Lively adjourned the meeiting at 10:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TIME: Monday, 14 June 1971 - 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070 TYPE '. Regular Meeting i. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL GALL B. MINItEES II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-137 - Alfred F. Dumas, Inc., Prospect Road - Request for Change of Zoning from '~{-1;10,000" (Single-Family Residential) to "R-I-IO,000" "P-C" (Single-Family Residential Planned Community) - Continued from 2~_ MaX. 197 1 _ B. C-139 - Malachy J. Moran, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from '~{-1-20,000" (Single-Family Residential) to '~{-1-15,000" (Single-Family Residential) C. C-145 - B. T. Galeb, Ted Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from t~{-1-10,000" (Single-Family Residential) to '~{-M-5,000" (Multi-Family Residential)- Continued from 24 May 1971 D. C-146 - Aubrey Johnston, Quito Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-I-IO,O00" (Single-Family Residential) to "C-N" (Neighborhood- Comm..ercial) - Continued from 24 May 1971 E. C-148 - George W. Day, F_.r_u!_tva_le_ A_v_enu_e__and_.D_o_ug_l.:.~s'.' A_v_enue_-_Reoue_s_t_f_o_r_Change_ .... of Zonin~ from "A" (A~r. icultu. ral). to '~{-1-40tOO0"(Sin~le-Family Residential) F. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - Amending the Zoning Ordinance NS-3 by Deleting Certain Conditional Uses from "R-I" Zones and Modifying Certain Off-Street Parking Requirements for Offices - Continued from 24 May 197 1 III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-900 - Live Oak Realty~ Inc.~ Foothill Lane - Building Site Approval - I Lot - Continued from 24 'MaT 1971 B. SDi~9.02:!: - A1 Dumas, Prospect Road - Subdivision Approval - 19 Lots - Continued from 24 Ma]~ 1971 C. SDR-90.3 - David L. Schmidt, Vaquero Court - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot D. SD-904 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Subdivision Approval - 15 Lots E. SDR-906 - R_fchard M. Kanazawa~ Oriole Way - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot F. SDR-907 - Donald Comer, Pierce Road - Buildin~ Site Approval - 4 Lots G. SDR-908 - Joe Nevill.e~ Pierce Road - Buildin~ Site Approval - 2 Lots SDR-909 - Manuel Costa~ quito Road - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot -1-