Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-26-1973 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY O~ MINUTES ******************** TIME: Monday, March 26, 1973 - 7:30 P.M.! PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting ******************** I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Belanger, Lively, Marshall, Martin, Matteoni, Metcalf, and Smith. B. MINUTES Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the reading of the minutes of the March 12, 1973 meeting be waived and that they be approved as distribu[ed to the Commission; motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. V-391 - O. H. George, June Way and Jerries Drive - Request for Variance to Allow Reduction in Side Yard Setback Requirements - Continued from March 12~ 1973 Chairman Lively reopened the hearing relative to V-391 at 7:36 P.M. The Secretary read the Staff Report recommending that the Variance request in connection with V-391 be granted. Commissioner Smith stated that he.questioned whether there is sufficient hardship involved in this to warrant a Variance. Commissioner Marshall stated that'if the pool Were located in another area of the yard the power lines would have to be relocated. The pro- posed pool located is the one ]~urthest"'n away from any other residence; therefore, it is the most logical place for said pool. Commissioner Matteoni stated that:the new fence alignment would not impede the view of any vehicles. Placing the pool in another location on the property would be somewhat of a hardship due to the relocation of the utilities; whereas, other:home-owners in t~e area were not r~quir~'d to do this to accommodate a ppol on their lot. "' Commissioner Metcalf stated he agreed with Commissioner Smith that the proposed Variance'did not really involve a hardship situation. The Staff Repo~._j_a_~_d_.March_.26,j973 w~s__am~njed bX__cha~gi~ condition t~o ,~.~) to r~.ad as f~l!o~: .................... % ....... !.'2! .Pool ~quipm~t_.shall meet normal__§.etba.cks and .. shall not protZud~.aBove "fg'nce." Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Mar.tin, that the public hearing in connection with V-391 be closed at 7:45 P.M.; motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Martin moved, seconded by Commissioner Matteoni, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 be adopted, as amended, and that the subject request for Variance'..be approved on the basis the findings required by Section 17.6 of Ordinance NS-3 can be made subject to the conditions set forth in said report;.'~t'i~arri~d'~i~h'C~n~{ssio~ Metcalf and Smith voting "no". -1- Planning Commission Minutes' March 26~ 1973 - Continued II. B. C-166 George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agricultural) to "R-1-40,O00 P-C" (Single- Family Residential - Planned-Community) - Continued from March 12, 1973 Chairman Lively reopened the hearing relative to C-166 at 7:47 P.M. He then noted that the revised exhibits showing the changed setback were submitted. Mr. Trinidad, Assistant Directorlof Public Works, explained that there will be meandering pathways throdghout this development and directly behind the curb and gutter there.will be an area provided to serve as .an emergency pull-over.' The Secretary, in answer to an ipquiry from Commissioner Belanger, stated that considering the road alignment.there seemed to be enough variety in front-yard setbacks for these lots -.lots 11 and 14 are pretty similar in setback dimension but do have different exposure. He then read the Staff Report recommending that the subject application for Change of Zoning be approved. The Staff Report was amended by ~dding the following condition 5): "5) Setbacks' shall not be 'less than as shown on Exhibit "A-I". '2' Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the public hearing relative to C-166=be closed at 8:04 P.M.; motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report relative to C-166 dated March 26, 1973 be adopted, as amended, and forwarded to the City'Council as the recommendation of the Planning Commission and that.the subject Change of Zoning (C-166) be approved on the basis the findings required in Section 18.6 and 18.11 of the City of Saratoga Zoning O~dinance NS-3 can be made for the reasons stated in said report and subject to the'conditions set forth therein; motion carried unanimously. C. .C-167 - Allen De Grange, Cox Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from "P-A" (Professional-Administrative) to "R-M-3,000" (Multi-Family Residential) Chairman Lively opened the hearing relative to C-167 at 8:06 P.M. The Secretary stated the Notice of Hearing was mailed and published. He then read a Statement of Reason filed By the applicant and explained that if the Change of Zoning were to be granted a Variance application would be necessary. Chairman Lively noted that the existing right-of-way problem involved with this property has not yet been resolved. The Secretary stated that the applicant did intend to use the Westhope Presbyterian Church parking lot for access and parking for his develop- ment; however, the Church has now decided against this arrangement. Chairman Lively stated that the Planning Commission i~._not~ eager to entertain the idea of any additional "R-M-3,000" (Multi-Family Residential) developments in the City.' Mr. DeGrange,~..the.applicant, stated that~l) it is his intent to provide retirement housing for the City of Saratoga 2) he did realize he was asking for a higher density, but.because of the great need for this type housing he would request the Planning Commission to consider the subject application 3) the site is well'located for retirement housing since it is near shopping, recreation, and medical facilities 4) he would own the housing development and maintainlit properly 5) the development is oriented to upper-income people and 6) the Church did turn down his original proposal --bu't-h-e-does-h~ve--a--revi~'d plan.and 7) he intends to follow the outline of / the retirement-housing-standards set by the City. ~2- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 Continued iI.. C ....~-~6~.--A~.~en-De-Gran~e~ox--Aven~e~-~Reques~r~eh.ange.~f~Z.~ning~f~m~-A'' (Professional-Administrative)"['6"""R-M-3~000" (Multi-Family Residential) Commissioner Belanger inquired about the amount of rent that would be charged for these units. Mr. De Grange explained that the rent would be $250 per unit per month. About 3/4 of the units would be on the ground floor and would be quite large in size with a lot of storage area. There will not be a recreation building since the tenants would be approximately 55-years of age and would not be allowed to have any children under 18-years of age living with them in the units. ~ Chairman Lively stated that 21-unit% as-~proposed by the applican~ far exceeds any amount he wo~ld consider for the subject property 2) the possibility of obtaining approval:for a "R-M-3,000" development is slight since the Planning Commission has been trying to hold to,.,!'R~M'4,000" and 3) if the applicant were t'O'.'cha~ge his request to ask for "R-M-4,000" zoning, perhaps, the matter could be given further consideration and/or referred to the General Plan Review currently under way. Commissioner Marshall recommended'that the proposal for an "R-M-3,000" development be rejected or the applicant be asked to resubmit his appli- cation and ask for "R-M-4,000". Mr. De Grange explained that under an "R-M-4,000" proposal the density would be brought down to approximately 12-units per acre and that would be economically unfeasible for any developer. Commissioner Metcalf stated that the application c~uld,'.be withdrawn or the Planning Commission could denyf-C-167 without prejudice. Mr. De Grange requested that the application for C-167 be withdrawn.. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the public hearing in connection with C-167 be closed at 8:25 P.M.; motion carried unani- mously. ; Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the request for withdrawal made in connection with C-167 subject to receipt of a written request for said withdrawal; motion carried unanimously. D. Informal Hearing - Cannestra Encroachment Permit~ Brandywine Court The informal hearing Was opened. The Chairman. explained that this Encroach- ment Permit had been denied; however, the residents of the area requested that the matter be reopened. The Secretary explained thatOne peighbor, Mr. Sarenceno, has submitted a letter stating he is still opposed to the requested Encroachment Permit. Mr. Cannestra explained that 1) the children in'the neighborhood 'do'not have a place to play in the neighborhood and the'basketball hoop and back- board provide an excellent facility for this2) this basketball hoop has been in existence for quite some time 3) nb park is located in the area and the nearest school is one-half mile awayS~ 4) this cul-de-sac is a natural place for the children tozplay and the children will play here whether the hoop is there or not 5) Brandywine is a dead-end street so there is very little traffic and ~) there is really only one individual in the neighborhood that opposes this facility. -3- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 - Continued II. D. Informal Hearing - Continued ~ Mr. A1 Kennedy of 13960 Pontiac Avenue stated he was not aware the basketball hoop and backboard constituted an infraction of City right-0f~way. The majority of the residents of the neighborhood are in accord with the location of the basketball apparatus since it does provide an excellent place for the children to play. Mr. R. C. Hollenbeck of 12991 Brandywine Drive stated that his children make use of the basketball equipment many times and he is in favor of approving the requested Encroachment Permit. Mr. Nimb of 12931 Brandywine Court stated his children, also, use the subject basketball hoop-and he made a'recording in order to determine the noise level created'by the use of the basketball equip- ment."I~ 'turned out to be very minimal.. Commissioner Marshall stated that~ perhaps, the basketball'~.-.ho~p,'.a~d back board could be mounted on private property rather than on City rightsof-way. , Mr. Cannestra inquired if a portable basketball hoDp with back board could be used; whereby, the portable unit could be moved out of the right-of-way area after each use. Chairman Lively recommended that this matter be reviewed with the City Attorney and referred to the2Variance Committee. He closed- the hearing for the evening and directed the Cannestra Encroachment Permit application continued to the next regular meeting. Arrangements were made with the a~plicant for an on-site inspection by the Variance Committee for 9:00 A.M., Saturday, March 31, 1973. III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS ~ A. SD-1020 - Donald Comer, Pierce RoAd - Subdivision Approval - 7 Lots - Continued from March 12~ 1973 The Secretary recommended that SD-1020 be denied since an acceptable map has not been received. Mr. Trinidad, Assistant Director Of Public Works, .stated that he did .. '.~ meet with the applicant to discuss a revised map; however, same has not yet been submitted. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that SD-1020 be denied unless a letter-of-extension is received from the applicant prior to the current. expiration date,' of the tentative map; motion carried unani- mously. B. SDR-1023 - Robert L. Dale, Peach Hill Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Continued from March 12, 1973 The Secretary explained that the ~esthetics of the proposed grading for this site and its effect on surrounding property is still unsatisfactory and un- acceptable. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that SDR-1023 be denied unless a letter-of-extension is received from the applicant prior to the current expiration date of the tentative map; motion carried~unani- mously. -4- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 - Continded III. C. SDR-1025 - David J. Brown, Saratoga Hills R~ad - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots - Continued from March 12! 1973 The Secretary explained that two'(2) separa e reports have been prepared .."for S .-. 25 b se the proposed development is in two (2) separate parts. DR 10 ecau The average slope of the entire property is~32% with parcel "C" having a lo Pa C = ~ ' s pe of 41%. rcel"" is a legal non-conforming lot. Mr. Trinidad explained that Parcel "C" is r~corded as a legal lot as part of a subdivision in 1946. Commissioner Belanger suggested that one driveway only be allowed for both Parcel "A" and "B" onto Saratoga Hills Road. Mr. Trinidad explained that one common driveway may be satisfactory right at the entrance to Saratoga Hills Roa~; however, the Fire Depart- ment feels it might be better to have individual driveways to the individual lots. The Secretary stated that the applicant has reviewed the conditions listed in both the Staff Reports prepared f{,r SDR-1025 and has expressed satisfaction with same. COmmissioner Smith moved,_..seconded ~y Commissioner Marshall, that 1"-.1. the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1025 ~ be~-adBptea and that the tentative map (EXhiBit '~B"'(Parcel "B"), filed March 23, 1973) be approved subject to the ~onditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Smith moved,. seconded ~X CommiSsioner Marshall~__~'=/~.~!.:.!.7.__~'~'i=. "th'~'i~ Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 i;~elative to SDR-1025 be adopted and that the tentative map (ExhiBit "C"'(Parcel "C"), filed March 23, 1973) be approved subject to the ~onditions set forth in..~said report; motion carried unanimo~s!y. D. SDR-1026 - Osterlund Enterprises, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Building Site Approval - 4 Lots - C6ntinued frgm March 12~ 1973 The Staff Report relative to SDR-1026 was r~viewed. Chairman Lively amended condition II-H of t~e subject report. The applicant was present and expressed satisfaction with the proposed conditions contained in the Staff Report prepared in connection with DR 1026 ommissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 relative do SDR-1026 be adopted, as Exhxb - , amended, and that the tentative map ( ' i~ "A 1" filed March 23, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set fgrth in said report; motion carried unanimously. 'S A ' E. SD-1027 - Osterlund Enterprises,' aratoga yenue - Subdivision Approval - 11 Lots.- Continued from 'March I2, 1973 Ther%ecretary explained that the Staff Repo!t listing the conditions of app val has been prepared; however, the Pa~k and Recreation Commission has asked that the Planning CommissiSn delay a ~ n on the matter since this C O property has been designated as a park-site and the Park and Recreation Commission would like more time to review t~e matter. The Secretary recommended that SD-1027 be continued to th~ next regular meeting. Chairman Lively so directed. -5- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 Continued III. F. SDR-1028 - King Homes, Inc. (Royc~ S. Kadfmann), Canyon View Drive - Building Site Approval'- 1 Lot The Secretary recommended that SDR-1028 be continued to the'next regular meeting since the applicant is still in the process of working on a revised map. Chairman Lively so directed. G. SDR-1029 - Kathyrn Pronger~ Lomita Avenue - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots The Secretary explained that the Applicant did review the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same.. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1029 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed March 14, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unani- mously. H. SDR-1030 - Lee Wen~er~ Springer A~enue - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The Secretary explained that this.is a legal non-conforming lot that has been this way since incorporation~of the City. Commissioner Smith noted that theL6-foot setbacks for this lot were Cit ' created under County Zoning laws prior to the y s incorporation. The Secretary stated that the applicant did review the proposed conditions of approval and'expressed satisfaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1030 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed March 14, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unani- mously. I. SDR-1031 - Peter F. Fitchen, Allendale Avenue - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The Secretary advised that the applicant did review the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satsifaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973zrelative to SDR-1031 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed March 16, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unani- mously. J. SDR-1032 - Patrick Weisner~ Saratoga Glen Place - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Smith advised that there is some question as to whether the lot coverage, due to the size of the house, is too great. Commissioner Marshall explained that if the owner of this lot would at sometime in the future want a swimming pool on this lot it would create a dilemma~in~ there would not be;sufficent lot-area left to meet the setback requirements. It should Be clearly stated in the Staff Report that because of the extended lot-coverage, the construction of a swimming pool or other accessory structures could be prohibited on this lot. The report was amended by adding the following note: NOTE: Construction of further lstructures or additions very difficul~ if not impoSSible. -6- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 - Continued III. J. SDR-1032 - Continued Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated March 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1032 be adopted,' as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed March 16, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. RECESS AND RECONVENE IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-391 - George W. Day, Douglass Lane-- Final Design Review - Lots 3 & 4, Tract 5150 It was explained that two reports were prepared in connection with A-391 - one for Lot 3 and another for Lot 4. The report relative to Lot 3 was l amended by adding the word "smaller" between the words "and" and "flo6r" in paragraph 1. .line 7. Commissioner Metcalf stated that originally it was required that the larger lots in the development have two (2) story houses - the first of these to be located on Lot 7; however,.when it came time to approve Lot 7 the Planning Commission approved a ,single-story house for that lot. Now the applicant comes in'with a ~equest to place .~'~ngle- story house on Lot 3; which, was designated for a two-stOry ho~se. The Staff Report relative to Lot'3 recommends a compromise; however, his feeling is the request for a single-story house for Lot 3 should be denied since it does not conform to the original lay-out for this subdivision. In order to get a report that would be agreeable to all members of the Design Review Committee a single-storyhouse i~-,recommended ,'for Lot 3 but subject to two-story or split-level homes to be ~ built on two.(2) out of lhe three (3) uncommitted Lots 12, i5, and 16. Commissioner Metcalf further stated that the'aforementioned-problem is illustrative of a "P-C" Developm&nt when dealing with a subdivider that is a custom~h~me. builder. The developer in this case was required to submit a plan in advance indicating what houses would be on which lots; however, that plan was not adhered to very much. There are still several hundred acres left in Saratoga that are susceptible to development and for some of-.-. these acres the City will try to get "P-C" Developments. Experience has prove~ that it is not enough to just require a plot-plan nor to simply allo~ the developer to specify the house he will place on a particular lot with a lay-out of the. building .sites. In the futur~ the developer should be required to Submit architectural renderings of each group of houses and these should be studied and accepted or denied and then if the developer wishes to deviate from these plahs he should be required to again submit architectural renderings and drawings. In this way the Planning Commission can study the complete visual aspect of the house and how it fits in with adjacent houses. Commissioner Smith stated that, he felt, condition "C" of the subject Staff Report relative to Lot 3 of Tract 5150 should be amended to required only one (1) of the three remaining lots to have a twosstory or split-level house on-it. He did not believe:that a two-story house was necessary to relieve the monotony of the single-story residences - a two-story, badly located, can destroy aesthetic qualities and/or privacy of adjacent properties. He would like to see condition "C" deleted in its entirely from the report. Commissioner Metcalf stated he disagreed. Chairman Lively indicated he is in favor of having some two.,.story houses on the remaining lots. Commissioner Belanger stated that she did not feel that the sole desire was to just get variety in this development, but to, also, have less lot coverage and that is one thing that a two-story does provide. -7- Planning Conmaission Minutes - March 26, 1973 - Continued IV. A. A-391~- Continued Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, to approve the Staff Report, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted for A-391, Lot 3 of Tract 5150 as shown on Exhibit "P" subject to the conditions stated in said report. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that condition "C" of the report be amended to read: ."c. Two-story or split-level homes to be built on one of the three (3) remaining lots - Lots 12, 15, and/or 16." Motion carried by the foliowing vote: NOES AYES Commissioner Belanger Con~nissioner Marshall Chairman Lively Commissioner Martin Commissioner Metcalf Commissioner Matteoni Commissioner Smith Chairman Lively then asked for a vote on the report,~'as amended. The report was adopted by the following vote: NOES AYES Commissioner Belanger Commissioner Marshall Commissioner Lively Commissioner Metcalf Commissioner Martin Commissioner Matteoni Commissioner Smith The Secretary then read the Staff Report recommending that A-391, Lot 4 of T~act 5150 be granted Final Design Approval. Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that the Staff Report relative to A-391, Lot 4 of Tract 5150 dated March 26, 1973 be adopted and Final Design ApproVal. be granted for Lot 4 as shown on Exhibit "O" subject to the conditions listed in said report; motion carried unanimously. B. A-406 - Cal-West Communities, Saratoga Avenue - Final Design Review - Condominium Complex The Secretary read the Staff Report recommending that Final Design Approval be granted for A-406, Ca!-West Communities, a Condominium complex on Saratoga Avenue. ' Commissioner Belanger, in answer to an inquiry from Chairman Lively, explained that there is wood trim'on almost all the sides showing and window have been added and framed. Commissioner Smith pointed out that there will be 25% more open-space in this development than there was in the first unit of this development. Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that the Staff Report relative to A-406 be adopted and Final Design Approval be granted for the second phase of the condominium-apartment complex for Cal-West Communities, Inc. on Saratoga Avenue as shown on Exhibits "F" through "J" subject to the conditions listed in said report; motion carried unanimously. -8- Plannin8 Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 - Continued V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Commissioner Smith gave a brief summary of items reviewed and action taken at the City Council meeting of March 21, 1973. PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE ~ Chairman Lively advised that the new C~unty Building to be located at First and Hedding was approved at the last meeting of the Planning Policy Committee.' He further advised that the next meeting will be on April 26, 1973. VI. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ~ A. UP-80 - Church of Ascension, Prospect Road - Traffic Circulation - Continued from March 12, 1973 The Secretary explained that this matter was continued from the last meeting in order to allow time for both the Church of Ascension and Congregation Beth David to comment on the Public Works Report dealing with traffic circu- lation,~adcess, and parking. A comment has been received from the Churches in the form of a combined letter. : Th.e letter containing proposed changes in the traffic flow and parking facilities was read. Commissioner Belanger stated she would like an explanation as~to why this is an improvement from the neighbors standpoint. Commissioner Smith stated that he ~ould like.to know why any change in the entrance is necessary. !t 4oes'not appear to him that the traffic has increased that much at this location in the past few years. Mr. Trinidad, the Assistant Directdr of Public Works, stated that the revised plan prepared by the Public Works Department better satisfies the desire of the homeowners living in the area and the Beth David Congregation. The new plan will provide for freer access. Mr. Muzzy, President of the Prides Crossing Homeowner's Association, stated that his group has been actively interested in this'project. He then requested a copy of the letter prepared by the churches in connection with the subject. matter. Chairman Lively referred the matter' to the Planning and Public Works Staff and directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting in order to allow time to study the letter submitted b~ the churches. VII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN 1. SDR-918 - Monty R. Boyd (Donald Comer, Arroyo de Arguello - Request for Reconsideration of ConditiOns The Secretary read a communication submitted by Donald T. Comer requesting that the Planning Commission modify Che original condition for SDR-918 regarding the flood control easement.requirement. Chairman Lively referred the matter to the Subdivision Committee and Staff for a report at the next regular meeting. -9- Planning Commission Minutes - March 26~ 1973 - Continued VII. A. 2. RESOLUTION #118 Chairman Lively read Resolution #118 prepared for Commissioner Metcalf in'appreciation for his service to the City of Saratoga while serving on the Planning~ Commission. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Saratoga Planning Commission approve Resolution #118 and forward same to Commissioner Metcalf; motion carried unani- mously. Commissioner Metcalf thanked the Planning Commission a~d stated it had been a pleasure working with them and the City of Saratoga.. 3. RESOLUTION #119 The Secretary stated that 1) a Resolution has been prepared regarding the plans for the Azule-Blue Hills area especially the IHamilton and Garcia Properties, 2) a new proposal has been submitted for the Hamilton property 3) the City Attorney has stated that an Emergency Ordii~ance would be possible for this property but would be legally'~ impractical 4) it would be best to adopt a permanent ordinanc,e as quickly as possible; however, the adoption of Resolution #119 should be done on an interim basis until a final ordinance, can be drafted and adopted. Commissioner Smith recommende~ that Resolution #119 be amended by adding the following to paragraph 2. ."whereas the area has reverted to "C-V" .(Visitor-Commercial) Zoning; and". Commissioner Marshall moved, 'seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that the Planning commission adopt Resolution #119, as amended, and forward same to the City Council as the recommendation of the Planning Commission; motion carried unanimously. B. ORAL Guests Chairman Lively acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Councilman and Mrs. Kraus, ~Mrs. Stark and Mr. Appl.eyard o~f the Good Government Group, Mr. Muzzy, President of the Pride~ Crossing Homeowner's Association, and Mr. George Hamilton, owner of the Hamilton Property. He, also, thanked Mrs. Stark for the coffee served at recess. vIII, ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the meeting March 26, 1973 be adjourned at 10:51 P.M.; motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Stanley ~Secretary Saratoga Planning Commission j -10-