HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-25-1973 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF SARATOGA
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
TIME: Monday, June 25, 1973 - 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California
TYPE: Regular Meeting
********************
I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Belanger,.Lively Marshall, Martin, Matteoni, and
Woodward.
Absent: Commissioner Smith.
B. MINUTES
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the reading
of the minutes of the June 11, 1973 meeting be waived and that they be approved
as distributed to the Commission with the following changes:
page 8. .add the following between paragraph·s 2 and 3. . ."Commissioner
Belanger commented that this condition would probably be appealed because
the Jensens have paid taxes on this land as a two (2) lot parcel and may
some' day wish to subdivide further· She recommended that instead a condi-
tion be imposed to insure widening the 12-foot road· to 18-feet when further
subdivision occurs· "'
page 10. .change the last paragraph to read. ."Commissioner Belanger
requested that some figures relative to fire insurance fees and the cost
of providing fire protection to this area be made available by the next
regular meeting "'
·
page 6. .change line 1. . ·paragraph 9. . .to read as follows.
"Commissioner Marshall stated that the usual policy was modified in this
case by limiting. . .; motion carried unanimously.
C. CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Commissioner Belanger listed the following items discussed at the City Council
meeting of June 6, 1973 as being 6f significant interest to the Planning
Commissioner:.
1) Petition submitted By residents of Debbie Lane
and Sevilla Lane for establishment of a Main-
tenance District.
2) Report of the Traffic Consultant on Via Roncole
"and Arroyo de Arguello.
3) Fifty per cent release to Mrs. Earle Pickering
Smith for monies posted for construction-improve-
ment costs.
4) Further consideration of the age' limit at the
Gatehouse ApartmentS·
5)Unanimous adoption Of the Parking Assessment
District for the West Valley Junior College·
6) Discussion and continuance of the Open-Space
and COnservation Elements.
~1-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
I0 C0 CITY COUNCIL REPORT - Continued
7) Priority of the West Valley Freeway.i
D. GREETINGS " ~ ........
Chairman Lively read a card received.from Commissioner Smith extending
his best wishe~ to the Planning Commission and staff from the Islands
of Hawaii.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. V-395 - Ray Wood, Short Hill Court - Request for Variance to Allow Reduction
in Side Yard Setback Requ{rements - Continued from June 11~ 1973
Chairman Lively reopened the hearing at 7:49 P.M. The Secretary stated
that the applicant has made available a revised proposal. The Staff Report
dated June 25, 1973 relative to V~395 recommends that the subject request
for Variance be granted.
The Staff Report was amended by adding the following sentence to
paragraph 2. ."The applicant has submitted a map l(Ex~ibit "C") dated
June 6, 1973."; and by deleting reason ~4...stated in the report.
Commissioner Woodward stated that .the site approval for this property was
granted before equestrian trails Were authorized; therefore, the trails
existing on this property are not 'shown on the Master Plan for Trails and
Pathways.
Chairman Lively noted that in view of the aforementioned statement the
use of these trails will only be possible by consent of the owner of the
property.
Mr. Jim Leong, present to represent the applicant, stated that 1) he ~as
present at the time the Variance Committee visited this site 2) the horse
trails are located entirely on the West Valley Junior College property
3) the fill discussed at a previous meeting is only on the applicant's
property and does not affect the horse trails in any way and 4) any horse
trails or uSe.-o'f'.~a~ a..~ horse trailfL; of the area right along the creek would
require the applicant's permission.
Commissioner Marshall noted that it appeared that this is a classic example
of a house design oriented to use'of the land - if the.'pool had been planned
simultaneously a Variance would not be required.
Mr. Leong explained that the applicant did explain at the last meeting that
the house and pool were planned simultaneously, but then because of discovery
of two (2) underground springs onethe property the pool had to be relocated.
CommiSsioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the pub-
lic hearing in c~nnedtion with V-395 be closed; motion carried unanimously.
'Commissioner Martin moved, seconded B~ Commissioner~Matteoni, that the Staff
Report ~ated'June 25, 1973 'relative to V-395 be adopted, as amended, and
that the Variance request to allow a reduction in side yard setback require-
ments for a swimming pool be grantzed on the basis the findings required
under Section 17.6 of Ordinance NS-3 can be made for the reasons stated in
said report; motion carried with C=ommissioner Marshall voting "no".
B. C-169 - Osterlund Enterprises, Fruitvale Avenue and Allendale Avenue - Request
for Change of Zoning from "R-i-40,000" (Single-Family Residential) to
"R-i-20,000" (Single-Family Residential) - Continued from June 11~ 1973
Chairman Lively reopened the hearing relative to C-169 at 8:04 P.M. Commissioner
Belanger recommended that SD~1040, which is directly connected with C-169, be
considered in conjunction with the subject Change of Zoning application.
-2-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
II. B. C-169 - Continued
Commissioner Marshall explained that it was pointed out at the last
meeting that under the current ordinance conditional zoning cannot be
changed from one "R-i" District to another unless ·it is a "P-C" zoning.
The Subdivision Committee recommends ,~.!R-1-20,000" zoning for this property
since it is their opinion this would be the appropriate zoning for the
subject property. Fifty percent (507°) of the homes in this subdivision
are designated for two-story structures.
Chairman Lively recommended that Lot ~8 be exempted from having a
two-story structure on it.
Commissioner Martin inquired if a "P-C" development has been considered
for this property.
Commissioner Marshall explained tlhat it has been mentioned several times,
but the developer did not seem too interested in a "P-C" development.
Chairman Lively stated that the proposed Change of Zoning is not in accord
with the General Plan and he intends to vote against {hejo=proposed Change of Zoning.
Commissioner Marshall explained that by allowing the proposed Change of
Zoning a number of controls can Be imposed o'n this development that otherwise
would not be possible with th~,'~eXisti~g zoning.
Mr. Dick Checci, applicant's engineer, stated that new exhibits have
been submitted for this development 2) the builder agrees to submit
to placing two-story homes only on the lots designated by the building
envelope 3) the applicant will agree to submit the proposed two-story
homes for Design Review and 4) it is the feeling of the applicant and
his representative that this Change of Zoning is in accord with the General
Plan.
Commissioner Belanger explained ~hat at first she was somewhat agreeable
to voting for the proposed Change of Zoning especially with the measure
of control that it would allow. 'However, she now intends to vote against
the ·proposed zoning change since there does not seem to be any assurance
the City will be able to enforce .the controls especially if the applicant
chooses to appeal same to the City Council.
Commissioner Marshall recommended that the Staff Report relative to C-169
be amended to have reason ~ 3) read as follows:
"3) That the Change of~ Zoning will harmonize with
existing and proposed' land uses in the vicinity
as shown on Exhibit "A" of SD-1040."
Commissioner MarShall further stated that this is a difficult piece of
property and some compromise will have to be worked out between the City
and the developer.
Commissioner Martin recommended that neither C-169 nor SD-10~0 be approved
until better and more effective controls, especially in connection with
fencing, can be established.
Commissioner Matteoni suggested that additional time be spent studying
this matter to be sure nothing has been overlooked.
Mr. Checci explained that the applicant does not have any additional time
since the option on the property is scheduled to run out soon.
Commissioner Martin advised that .the present applicant could decide not
to build this subdivision in accordance with the proposed tentative map
and then the City could do nothing about the approved Change of Zoning.
-3-~
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
II~ B. C-169 ~ Continued
Commissioner Matteoni stated that, maybe, a time limit could be imposed
to October 8, 1973 and at the end of time a status report can be pre-
pared by the Staff and if no development has occurred the Change of
Zoning can be rescinded.
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, to close
the hearing relative to C-169 at 8:45 P.M.; motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Matteoni, that
the Staff Report relative to C-169 dated June 25, 1973 be adopted, as
amended, and same be forwarded to the City Council as the recommend-
ation of the Planning Commission and that the subject Change of Zoning
(C-169) be approved; motion carried with Commissioners Belanger and
Lively voting "no".
C. Informal Public Hearing - Abe% M. Carreia, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road -
Reqqest for the Storage and Sales of Building
Supplies and Garden and Landscape Materials
as a Conditional Use in the "C-V" Zoning
District
Chairman Lively opened the discussion relative to the informal hearing.
Mr. Jack T. Hirshon, attorney present to represent the applicant,
requested a two (2) week continuance of this matter since additional
time is needed to meet with the appropriate Committee and Staff and
for the applicant to shut down his operation and comply with the require-
ments of the City.
No one ~1~ present wished to c~mment relative to this matter.
Chairman Lively directed the ~atter continued to the next regular
meeting and requested the applicant and/or hisattorney to meet with
the Subdivision. Committee andLSta'ff to resolve any difficulty in
connection with the subject r~quest.
III0 BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS ~
A. SDR-1020 - Donald Comer, Pierce Road - Subdivision Approval - 7 Lots -
Continued from Jun~ 11~' 1973
Mr. Danforth E. Apker, applicant's engineer, was present and stated
that the applicant has reviewed the proposed conditions of approval
as stated in the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 and is in accord
with same.
The Secretary recommended that the Staff Report be amended by adding
'~the following conditions:
"21. Comply with all aesthetic grading standards
including, but notZlimited to use of retain.int
~!ls?.'!.'r. oundihg.~- top and toes of slope and
slope planting."
Commissioner Marshall explained that the principle change that has
occurred is the relocation of the road from the ravine to the far side
of the hill and the provision,for an easement for the future extension
of Wallace Road.
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SD-1020 be adopted,
as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A-4" filed June 20,
1973) be approved subject .to ~he conditions set forth is said report;
motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
III. B. SDR-1037 - R. J. Hunter Developments, Ltd., Comer Drive -.Building
Site Approval - 4:Lots - Continued from June 11~ 1973
Commissioner Marshall explained that this property has been a subject
of field investigation - since the upper portion of the property is
in full view from the property up above the fill at the top should be
~.~-.minimal. :
Mr. Dan Trinidad, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that there
is a committment that was made between the City and an adjacent subdivider
(Mr. Comer) that involves this. application. Mr. Comer in his earlier
subdivision had to build a bridge and he feel~ that although the present
City ordinance does not require that the adjoining property owner pay
for/a~zportion of this bridge~it might be suitable for the City to con-
sider adopting some type of Bridge Reimbursement Agreement Ordinance.
Mr. Trinidad then recommended that the following condition be added to'
the set of conditions set forth in the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973:
"P. If within six (6) months of this. approval the
City Council adopt~ a "Bridge Reimbursement
Agreement Ordinance" this site approval shall
be subject to the requirements of said ordi-
nance and'shall reimburse the prorata share of
the improvement costs of the bridge on Comer
Drive which was recently completed by Donald
Comer under SDR-907 and SDR-848o"
Commissioner Belanger recommended that the subject report be further
amended be adding the following condition "0":
"O. Subject to additional conditions of Design
Review for homes on each lot."
The applicant was present and stated that he did pay for construction
of the old bridge and if the:Bridge Reimbursement Agreement Ordinance
is adopted he would request that he be reimbursed for the bridge he
originally paid for which has since been removed.
Mr. and Mrs. Norling, adjoin{ng property owners, stated they could
not see the need for the street to be constructed in conjunction
with this subdivision and which will traverse their property.
Commissioner Marshall explained that the street is necessary in order
to avoid land locking the piece of land located behind the subject
Hunter property.
Mr. Norling pointed out that,there already exists a paved road below
this property that could be.used for access by the proposed subdivision.
Chairman Lively explained that the road shown on the Hunter map need
not be changed since the Norling's are exempt from that map and would
not be affected by adoption of same by the Planning Commission.
The applicant stated that he is in complete Sympathy with the Norlings
and since he may someday be their neighbor he would like to do the right
thing and try to work the matter out'to their satisfaction.
Chairman Lively directed the :matter continued to the next regular meeting
and requested the applicant ~o meet with the Norlings, the Subdivision
Committee,~ the applicant, and the Staff to work out the subject road
problem. ~
Commissioner Marshall moved,.seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that the
application for Building Sit~ Approval in connection with SDR-1037 be
denied unless a written extension of time is received prior to expiration
of the tentative map; motionscarried unanimously.
-5-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
III. Co SD~1040' - Osterlund Enterprises, Fruitvale and Allendale Avenues -
Subdivision ApproVal - 8 Lots - Continued from June 11~ 1973
See additional discussion of.the matter under C-169 appearing earlier
in these minutes.
The conditions contained in the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973
in connection with SD-1040 were amended to ~e~d'as'follows:
"3. Provide pedestrianSbicycle pathways along
Fruitvale Avenue."'
"4. Provide decorativelwall or fencing, and landscaping
between fence and walkway along Fruitvale Avenue and
Allendale Avenue (a landscaped easement may be required
to provide area for adequate landscaping as required by
Design Review). All fencing and landscaping plans subject
to Design Review.
"5. Existing topography to be retained to avoid excessive
lot fills and grade separation and to preserve existing
trees."
"14. Obtain Design Review for each home and pool and interior
fencing."
"15o Exhibits "B", "C", "D", and "E" - showing building
envelopes and setbacks for two (2) story homes to be
use in Design Review of each individual lot~ No more
than four (4) lots may be two (2) story. Lots five (5)
and (8) may be one (1) story only."
Commissioner Marshall moved, iseconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SD-1040 be adopted,
as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed April 27,
1973) be approved subject to.the conditions set forth in said report;
motion carried with'Chaihnan'Lively voting "no".
Commissioner Matteoni moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
in the event the developer has not commenced construction by October 15,
1973 the Planning Commission will consider at its next regular meeting
thereafter a proposal for a new Change of Zoning for this property;
motion carried unanimously.
D. SDR-1045 - Orville L. Lykins~ Mr. Eden Road - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot - Continued from June 11~ 1973
The applicant was present and stated he reviewed the proposed conditions
of approval as stated in the'Staff Report dated 3une 25, 1973 relative
to SDR-1045 and expressed satisfaction'with same.
Commissioner Marshall moved,'seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SDR-1045 be adopted
and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A-3", filed 3une 18, 1973) be
approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion
carried unanimously.
RECESS AND RECONVENE
Commissioner Martin did not return after the recess since it was necessary
for him~.!to leave the meeting at this time.
-6-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25, 1973 - Continued
IIIo E. SDR-1043 - Bernard Klien, Pierce Road - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot - Continued from May 29~ 1973
The Secretary recommended that SDR-1043 be continued to the next
regular meeting.
Chairman Lively so directed.
F. SDR-1047 - John McLaughlin, Pierce Road and Via Regina - Building
Site Approval - 2zLots - Continued from May 29~ 1973
The Secretary stated that the applicant didvsubmit a letter request-
ing permission to remove one!tree which is blocking the road necessary
for access to this property and further stated that he (the applicant)
has planted many trees on this property and will plant more to replace
the removal'of the tree in question.
Mr. Trinidad explained that 1) the letter accurately represents
what is happening 2) a treezis right in the middle of the proposed
access road location 3) a fairly large retaining wall and fill will
be necessary 4) the neighbor has been contacted and he will not
permit the applicant to go across his property for access purposes
5) according to Fire Chief Kraule the tree in the way of the access
road would have to be removed in order for this applicant to get access
to his property and 6) some concrete surface would be necessary for
the access road.
The Secretary stated that the question is would the Planning Commission
consider allowing removal of!the tree? The Planning Staff recommends
that the tree be retained since the tree is very much alive and heal'thy.
Some other means of access should be provided.
Commissioner Marshall stated that he understands that it would be possible
to reach the subject property through the adjoining property if an agree-
ment could be reached with that owner and the applicant, but apparently
the relationship between the.two .(2) is not the best.
Chairman Lively directed SDR~1047 continued to the next regular meeting
and requested the members of the Planning Commission to make an on-site
inspection of this property..
G. SD-1052 - Osterlund Enterprises, Fruitvale Avenue and San Marcos Road -
Subdivision Approval - 26 Lots - Continued from June 11~ 1973
The applicant was present. and stated he was in accord with the conditions
of approval as set forth':in the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative
to SD-1052.
The report was amended by changing conditions 9 and 11 to read as
follows:
"9. Provide pedestrianSequestrian pathways along
Fruitvale Avenue and pedestrian walkways along
60-foot wide right~of-way collector stree. Subject
to D~Sig~ ReView.'"
"11. Landscape area between fence and pathway (width not to
exceed 15-feet) along entire frontage of Fruitvale Avenue."
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SD-1052 be adopted,
as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed May. 31, 1973,
including typical individual site development plans for sites that
exceed 10% in slope) be approved subject to the conditions set forth
in said report; motion carried unanimously.
~7-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
III. H. SDR-1054 - Roy Anderson, Saratoga Avenue - Building Site Approval
- 2 Lots
The Secretary stated that due to problems with Flood Control require-
ments this matter is recommended for a continuance. It is possible
that one lot will be lost from this subdivision due to Flood ~Plain
Dedication and/or easements.,
Chairman Lively directed SDR~1054 continued to the next regular meeting.
I. SDR-1055 - Roberts Communities, Inc., Saratoga Avenue and Dagmar Drive
- Subdivision Approval - 42 Lots
The Secretary recommended that SDR-1055 be continued to the next regular
meeting to all additional time for PG&E to submit commenct in connection
with the road located on their.~'easement.
Chairman Lively so directed.
J. SDR-1056 - H. Peter Becker~ Montalvo Road - Buildin8 Site Approval - 1.Lot
'The Secretary stated'.that th~ applicant had reviewed the proposed
conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same.
COmmissioner Marshall moved,'seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SDR-1056 be adopted
and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed June 14, 1973) be
approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion
carried unanimously.
K. SDR-1058 - Chaiko Kim~ Sunset Drive - Buildin8 Site Approval - 1 Lot
The Secretary stated that the. applicant had reviewed the proposed
conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same.
Commissioner Marshall moved,~seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to SDR-1058 be adopted
and that the tentative map (Exhibit '~", filed June 14, 1973) be
approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion
carried unanimously.
L. SDR-1059 - David Mendenhall, Mt. Eden Road - Building Site Approval
- 1 Lot
The Secretary recommended that SDR-1059 be continued to the next regular
meeting in order to allow time to obtain a revised tentative map.
Chairman Lively so directed.
IV. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Tract 5244 - Osterlund Enterprises, Cox and Saratoga Avenues - Final
Design Review - Decorative Fencing and Final Landscape Plans
- Continued from June 11~ 1973
The Secretary read the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative to
Tract 5244 recommending that'Final Design Approval be granted for
the decorative fencing and final landscape plans for Tract 5244.
The subject report was amended by changing condition b) to read
as follows:
"b) Provide adequate sprinklers to property maintain
landscaping .as determined by Planning Director."
-8-
Plannin~ Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
IV. A. Tract 5244 - Continued
.Commissioner Belanger moved, seconded by Commissioner Woodward,
that the Staff Report relative to Tract 5244 dated June 25, 1973
be adopted,.=as.amended,.and tb§t F~pal Design ApprOval be granted for the
decorative fencing and final landscape plans as shown on Exhibit
"X" and "Y" Subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion
carried unanimously.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
None
VI. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. SDR-1049 - Gordon E. Jensen~ Quito Road - Reconsideration of Condition
The Secretary introduced the Staff Report dated June 25, 1973 relative
to SDR-1049 with the condition II-P deleted as requested by the applicant.
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
'~ ~e~H~'S~f~'R~port d~ed June 125,/1973 relative to SDR-1049 be
adopted ahd 'that t~e tentative map (Exhibit "A ~,r filed June 6, 1973)
be approved subject to the conditions set fort~ in said report; motiGn
carried unanimously.
B. SDR-911'- Willard Thompson, Oak Street and St. Charles Street - Request
to Delete Sidewalk on St. Charles Street
Commissioner Marshall explained that there is no real need for pedestrian
movement along St. Charles Street; therefore, the requirement to provide
a sidewalk can be eliminated as requested by the applicant. The Fire
Department has approved said deletion of the sidewalk requirement.
Commissioner MarShall moved, Seconded by Commissioner Belanger, that
the.request to eliminate the reqdirement for a sidewalk along St.
Charles Street be approved and that the Improvement Plan Exhibit "A"
be approved; motion carried unanimously.
C. Bohlman Road Stud~ - Status Report
Chairman Lively, after a brief discussion, directed the Secretary to
schedule a public hearing relative to this matter for ~h~/Pl~pning
Commission meeting of July 23 1973.
D. GATEHOUSE CONDOMINIUM
The Secretary explained that the Gatehouse Condominium intends~'to
install a elaborate gate for security reasons and would like the
Commission to review same andzdetermine if it was necessary to submit
the matter for Design Review Approval.
The Planning Commission reviewed the exhibits submitted and decided
it was not necessary to submit the proposed gate for Design Review
Approval.
VII. COMMUNICATIONS
Parks and Recreation Commission Memos
The Secretary stated that two (2) memos had been received from the
Parks and Recreation Commission:
# 1) Recommends approval o~ both preliminary drafts of the
Open Space Element and Conservation Element with two (2)
minor changes.
-9-
Planning Commission Minutes - June 25~ 1973 - Continued
VII. Parks Memos - Continued
~ 2) Contains recommendation. relative to Designation of Park Categories.
Commissioner Belanger recommended that these memos be duly noted
and forwarded to the City Council.
Chairman Lively so directed.
Memo from Code Enforcement Officer
The Secretary stated that the Code Enforcement Officer did prepare
a memo stating the status of different violations noted by the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner Marshall stated that on Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road at the
corner near Paramount Drive there is a car with an open sign on it
that should be removed.
Chairman Lively .stat~ed.'~ there is. still some grading being done on
the area of the Marshall Lane School and he asked the Secretary to
check into the matter.
Commissioner Marshall noted that[there seems to be a lack of landscaping
in Saratoga Park on Saratoga Avenue.
Chairman Lively asked the Secretary to review this situation.
Commissioner Belanger requested that 'somebody.~check into the landscaping-
.aloDg '.Cox Avenue to determine which projects are maintained as required
by the City and which are not.
Bo ORAL
lOsterlund Enterprises ._-.j
Mr. Tersini, representative of 'O=ste°r-lu~ stated that the pending litigation
against the City by Osterlund Enterprises will be dropped.
Commissioner Belanger stated thai this move on the part of Osterlund
Enterprises has raised her opinion of this developer.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Marshall moved, sec6nded by Commissioner Belanger, that the
meeting of June 25, 1973 at 11:00 P.M.; motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
S tary
Saratoga Planning Commission
j
-10-