Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-05-1966 City Council Minutes SARA~6GA CITY COUNCIL Sb~.fM~.RY OF M~NUT~S TIME: Wednesday~ January 5~ 1966 -~ 7:30 P. Me PY~CE: Saratoga City Council Chambers~ 13777 Fruitvale A~'e., Saratoga TYPE: Regular Meeting I ORGANIZATION blayor Glennon called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M. A. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen Glennon, Drakes Hartman, Tylers Burry Absent: none B. Pr~NUTES It was moved by CoUncilman Burry, seconded by Councilman Tyler 1.linutes and unanimously carried to waive the reading of the December 1965 mir~utes and approve them as written° II BIDS AND CONTRACTS A.AGREEMENTS WITH COUNTY RE USE OF EXPENDED NON-EXPRESSWAYS BOND FUNDS AS A CREDIT FOR LOCAL ~TCHING FUNDS Agreements- Mro Henley explained that under the ~ounty trafficways bond program Non-expressway the Board of Supervisors has followed a general policy Of agreeing fumis as to Cities claiming credit, as matching funds under the new State matching Gas Tax allohation~ far funds expanded within that City'on expressways credits and non-expressways projects. The p~rpose Of these agreements is to acquire for the City cf Saratoga. the.right to use the money expanded from the Trafficways bond fund for right of way acquisition and conStruCtion of a portion of Staee 1Iighway 85 as a credit to the City for lo~al matching funds° Mr~ Elanlay pointed out that these matching credits may be accumulated and used as a credit against future 'allocations from the State and could reasonably be expected to amount to approximately one million dollars, subject to final approval by the State. It was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements with the County as presented, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. The City Attorney advised that he has checked the agreements and they are in order. B. AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY FOR EXCHANGE OF PORTION OF BLANEY PLAZA FOR RESIDUAL PARCEL ADJACENT TO SARATOGA FIRE DISTRICT PROPERTY. The Clerk described ~ triangular shaped residual parcel of property Agreement- located adjacent to the Fire District property which was created Exchange of by the realignment of Highway 9 at the Plaza and explained that this Plaza agreement would provide for an even exchange of this lan4 to the property City for the required portion of Blaney Plaza~ This transaction has the approval.of the State and a agreement is with the Countys as the agenay with jurisdiction regarding acquisition of right of way for Highway 9, Councilman Hartman moved, seconded by Councilman Drake to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; motion carried unanimously. C. REPORT OF BIDS RECEIVED TO FURNISH REPLACEMENT FOR DUMP TRUCK Mr~ tlanley reported ~hat fcur bids were re.zsived cn the replacement Bids - for the older of the City's two dump trucks. The net low bids after Dump deductiDg the trade in allowance, was for $4,886,68 from International Truck Harvester Company; the other bids being from Grant Bishops Bill Stuart Pontiac and. Courtesy Chevrolet. Mr. Henley reported that the Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to International Harvester Company and that three optional items be included with the bid. SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES o January 5% 1966 These items, i~olving an engine with cnnsiderably greater horsepower Dump than the specificationm, a 35 gallon safety fuel tank in lieu of the Truck 31 gallon regular tank and a safety brake locking system~ would Bids bring the total bid to $5,151~68, a total bid which would be lower than any of the other bids without the ol/cions. It was moved by Councilman Hartman~ seconded by Councilman Drake and unanimously carried to authorize the acceptm~ce of the low bid, including the three optional items, for a total of $5151.68o D. AGREEMENT WIIIt DAVIS AhrO MOOS FOR OVERSIZE STOPS1 SEWER PZIMBURSE~NT Tr.4102 .The Clerk explained that the developer of Tract 4102 was required Davis & Moos to install oversized storm drain lines to serve adjoining property Gvarsi.ze and that it is standard procedure in such cases for the City to Storm enter into an agreement with the developer to provide that as soon Drain as. the adjacent property is developed~ the subsequent developers Agreement will be required to pay.a pro-rata share of the oversized drainage facilities° This particular agreement covers between 28 and 29 acres and is based on the Director of Public Works analysis of the master storm drdinage plan for the City and lathe standard ten year duration contract. Councilman ~;ler moved, seconded by Councilman Burry to authorize the Mayor to execute the contract as presented; motion carried unanimously. Councilman Hartman asked if the City automatically draws up reimbursement agreements when oversiz~d drainage is required aad the City Attorney replied that it is entered into at the request of the Subdivider and that~ although it is not probable that the Subdividers engineers would be unaware of their right to ela]~ reimbursement, he sees no problem as far as time limitatlen is concerned if the subdlvider fails to request such an agreement and later decides to do so. E. AGREEMENT WITH COUNTYRE STREET LIGHTING IN NEWLY ANNEXED TErrITORY Mr. Henley announced that the Council previously authorized an agree- Agreement ment providing for lighting in newly annexed lighting districts but With County that the Board of Supervisors~ due to a technical error in the re newly agreement~ has not executed the agreement and has asked that the annexed current agreement be substituted for the original one. This lighting agreement provides that the County will continue to serve newly districts annexed lighting districts after annexation by the City until the end of t~[e fiscal year for which taxes have been collected. With respect to the Quite Lighting District the agreement provides that the County will continue to pay for the services until January, 1967. It was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded by Councilman Tyler~ and unanimously c~rried to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement as outlined. F. AGREEMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY (1) It was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman, R/W acquisition and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to execute an Saratoga Ave~ agreement with erario R. Fmggiore for the acquisition of Ma~giore approximately 1.65 acres of land on Saratoga Avenue at the settle- 'ment cost of $3180. The ].and was appraised at $3000 but the costs of condenmation do not seem feasible for the additional $180~ it was reported. R/W acquisition(2) Councilman Hartman moved to authorize the Mayor to execute an Dei - agreement with Jim Y~ and Asako Doi for acquisition of property Azule a~ea in the Azule area at the appraised and settlement cost of $750.00° Motion seconded by Councilman Tyler and carried unanimDusly~ ~ARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINI~TES ~ January 5~ 1966 III ORDINANCES, PETITIONS AND FORMAL RESOLUTIONS A. OPdDINANCE NS-.5.10 Mr, Hanley reported that this ordinance was introduced at the last Ordinance meeting and that it would grant authority to the Planning Commission NS-5,10 to require two means of access from a subdivision to a public street Dual access when it is felt that it is required for public safety, Mr, Hanley anneanced also, in auswer to a question from Councilman Drake, that this provision would apply only to new subdivisions at the time of tentative map approval, it was moved by Councilman Burry~ seconded by Councilmau Hartman and unanimously carried toadopt Ordinance No, NS-5olOo B. ORDINANCE 38°9 The Clerk presented Ordinance 38,9 and ~xplained that it would provide~ basically, that the City may have a legal basis for Ord, 38~9 recovering legal fees involved in carrying through court action Recovering to abate violations of City ordinances° The City Attorney indicated legal fees that he has researched this proposal and although he does not know frc~ of any other city which currently has such an ordinance, he felt that Cit ~ abating it will hold up in court and would be desirable from the y s violations standpoint by utilizing for a civil action.a procedure which currently is possible only in criminal cases, : . COuncilman Drake Objected to the proposed ordinance on the basis that it appears to ~im that it would coerce persons by pre-judging cases tha~ might etherwise be more difficult to defend from the City's standpoint° The Clerk indicated that this ordinance would not serve as a determent to anyone who felt that he had a legitimate case~ but would only apply when~ after due notice to correct a violation, the City goes to court to have the violation abated. Councilman Drake stated that he would be willing to have the ordinance introduced but wants to study it carefully before adoption. With no objection~ Mayor Glennon ordered Ordinance 38~9 introduced, C. RESOLUTION NO. 307 Mr. Henley reported that the developers of a nursery school on Cox Rose 307 Avenue would like to operate their business and~ in order to do so~ Partial need to connect to the new sewer line ~zons~ructed as a part of the acceptance Cox Avenue assessment district. They cannot do so until the City Cox Avenue accepts the sanitary line and Mr. Henley explained that Resolution Sewer No, 307 Would accept a portion of the work which has been completed involving the line under Cox Avenue. The resolution stipulates that the partial acceptance in no way affects the bond and relates solely to the underground work on the Cox A'~enue sewer, Mr, Henley indicated that the staff sees no disadvantage to the City in following this procedure and recomnends adoption of the resolution which has been approved by the bonding attorneys. Additionally, Mr. llanley stated~ the Bonding Company, the ccntractor aud the City must all agree to the'provisions of the resolution. It was moved by Councilman Hartman~ seconded by Councilman Tyler and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. 307. D. RESOLUTION NO. 36-B-81 - Tract 3093 ~..B.-81 It was moved by Councilman Tyler~ seconded by Councilman Drake and Tr~3093 unanimously carriedto adopt Resolution No, 36-B-81~ accepting the dedication of streets aud releasing the improvement bond for Tract 3093~ as recommended by the Director of Public Works. SARATOGA CIT~ COUNCIL MINUTES ~ January 5, 1966 i E. RESOLUTION NO. 36~B-82 - l~act 3475 ~e Director of Public Works reported that the maintenance period Reso has expired and all deficieuctes have been corrected in. connection 36~B~82 with the improvements required in Tract 3475 and Councilman Hartman Tro3475 moved for the adoption of Reso].ution Nee 36~B-~Z~ accepting the dedication of streets and releasing the improvement bond. Motion seconded by Councilman Drake and carried unanimously. IV SL~SDIVISIONS AND BUILDING SITES A. TRACT 3777~ GEORGETOWN WEST Tr.3777 Upon the recommendation of the Director of Public Works~ it was Georgetown moved by Councilman Hartman~ seconded by Councilman Dr~e and West- Const. unanimously carried to accept~ for construction only, the improve~* a~ceptance ments in Tract 3777° B. SDR-441 ~ HANOVER CORPORATION The Clerk reported that site appro~-al has expired cn SDR-441 and SDR-441 recommended release of the improvement bomd as a new site approval bond release application will be required for this property. Councilman Burry moved~ seconded by CounCilman Tyler to release the improvement bond po~ted to guarantee conditions of Building Site Approval for SDR-441, C. ~D-567 ~ TRACT 4056 SD-567 Mr. Henley reported that all conditions have been med, bonds posted Tract 4056 and fees paid in connection with the request for final map approval Final map of a 35 lot subdivision located on Prospect Road west of Highway 9 near the new high school site. It was moved by Councilman Drake~ seconded by Councilman Tyler and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. SD-567-1~ approving the final map of Tract 4056° Do ~ACT 2965 - ARROYO DE SARATOGA, UNIT 4 Tro2p65 The Clerk read a memorandum from the Director of Public Works Construction reporting that improvements have been completed in Tract 2965~ Acceptance Arroyo de Saratoga~ Unit ~4 but that deficiencies exist which are difficult to correct in winter months and recon~nending acceptance of the work~ for constructlon~ subject to the Attorney~s approval of a letter of agreement from the Developer that deficiencies will be corrected during the one year maintenance period, It was moved by Councilman Drake~ secouded by Councilnk~n Burry and unanimously carried to accept the improvements for construction only, subject to the approval of the City Attorney~ as recommended. V PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ANNUAL REVIM~ OF THE GENERAL PI~N ~e Clerk reported that no correspondence has been received since Armuai the last meeting and the Mayor stated that all correspondence was Review introduced into the record at previous hearings~ Mayor Glennon General declared the public hearing re-opened at 8:30 P~ M~ and asked if Plan anyone present wished to comment on any segment of the Genera]. Plan review. F~ebe~t Plane~ Dougla~ L~ne~ referred to the petition ~rom property owners on ~ruitvale Avenue~hich was presented at a previous heari~g and iterated his requas~ fDr favorable consideration of the petition for reducing the zoning in the Fruitvale Avenue area to one half acre residential. F~ Plane pointed out that the West Valley Junior College has acquired 100 acres of property at Fruitv~le and Allendale and that he had read recent reports indicating that funds will be available for campus construction and that~ because of these factors~ be felt that the area should be approved for lower density,, SAPSTOGA CITY COUNCIL MINITfES - January 5, 1966 Dr. Isaac No Abram, was advised that the Council was ready to hear his comments with respect to the analysis and documentation of his proposal for Planned Conmmunity in the Saratoga.-Cox area which!was presented for Council review at the last hearing. Dr.; Abram, first reviewed his report analyzing the need for Planned Community multiple housing in Saratoga and observed that this need was re~cognized by the Council at the time Ordinance NS~3.6 was adopted, ~stablishing a Planned Community district zoning classification. The demand for ra this type of development has not been filled, Dr. Ab ms stated, and it was his opinion that the matter is urgent. Dr.] Abram, then conmented on the appropriateness of the Saratoga-Cox ~yenue site for Planned Conununity multi-development and particula~ly for the Annual type use he has proposed. Dr. Abram, cited the following reasons Revie.~ why he felt this use should be approved for the area:~ high quality General multiple housings primarily for retired persons, is p~oposed for Plan the site and this use is particularly suitable for th~s area because of accessibility to various services, shops~ medical facilities, public transportation and churches. Furthermores the ]topography is desirable for retired persons in that the land is flat, has ee s natural boundaries, easy direct access to major str t and is located h ould needed. within walking distance of most of the services w ich;w be From a tax standpoint, Dr. Abrams indicated that it was his opinion that the City would benefit because no children would~live there and the burden on the school districts would be alleviated and that the property would contribute more in taxes than ~it would need in services. Dr. Abram, concluded his conmeats with the observation that his proposed development would benefit the City ~y providing suitable, low maintenance housing to serve retired citizens who would otherwise have to move to other areas. These pap , r. o le D Abram, indicated, are the type of people who have, in ~the past, contributed to the City and civic activities and are people who have the time and inclination to continue to contribute. Mayor Glennon indicated that it seems to be the concensus of the Council that the proposal to reinstate multiple density in the area proposed by Dr. Abram, is one of the most critical questions which the Council has to consider in this review of the General Plan. C t hue Accordin~ly the Mayor suggested that the hearing be ~n i d for a report at the next meeting on all comments and correspondence relative to this particular matter and for a clarification from the Planning Commission as te its precise recommendation ~or this area. Councilman Hartman agreed that clarification of the Pl. anned-Conmmunity multiple zoning question is needed and that, in addition to this item, he felt that the request for 1/2 acre zoning in]the Fruitvale Avenue area should be studied further. Councilman Hartman stated that he did not wish his remarks to be construed as in any!way agreeing with the action of the college in acquiring the land ~nd that the fact that the State has made funds available to the district does not in any way mean ~that what was once ~rongs in his &pinion, is now right. However~ Councilman Hartman continued, in~view of the impact the junior college will have on the area he feit that the ~ st y services of Livingston and B!aney should be engaged t ud this matter as well as Mr. Planews and Dr. Abram~s ~equest.s. Councilman Hartman stressed his concern about the impact of the junior college and stated that he could not look at the problem objectively, knowing that the college has already acquired 100 acres of land and that although the Planning Commission report complies with the Councils, instructions, it is not based on the feet, regarding ~he college that have since been made available to the Council. that th Planning Mayor Glennon indicated that it seems obvious e Commission is not in favor of reducing the density in!the existing residential zones and therefore would not approve Mr.~Plane's request. Relative to the impact of the junior colleg~ the Mayor pointed out that the Counqil's i~structions to the Planning Commission were that they should disregard the fact that the college may some day develop° Although the Council had intended to spend some EAF~TOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - Jannary 5~ 1966 $18,000 on the 701 program and employ experts for the five year review this was tabled pending resolution of the question of the junior college. Until this question is resolved it is not possible, the Mayor indicated, to give the Planning Conmd.ssion any different instructions° Planning Co~nissioner O'Rorke reviewed the history of the current General Plan review and stated that the Planning Commission recommenda- tion with respect to Dr. Abrams proposal was purposely left flexible because of the Planning Commissionms concurrent consideration of Dro Abrams specific rezoning proposal. To make specific recommenda- Annual tions on the questions Commissioner OmRorke commented, would pro- Review judge the Planning Commission action on Dr. Abr~m~ application. General Regarding the land on Allendales Commissioner OtRorke agreed that Plan much has happened regarding this property since the Planning Commission received its original assignment and that further instructions to the Planning Comuission might therefore be desirable. Mayor Glennon observed that the Planning Commission cannot rezone Dr. Abr~m~ property unless the General Plan is first changed and declared [~at he did not feel that a recommendation from the Planning Commission as to whether the General Plan should be changed for this area would pro-judge Dr. Abrams application. Councilman Drake urged the establishment of a timetable for proceeding with the 701 program and at this times closing the public hearing, accepting the Planning Co~mqssion report ands in study session, work out the details of the chenges which have been recommended by the Planning Commission. Councilman Drake indic~ted that, in his opinions the Planning Commission report is clear and in essence recommends no major changes and that the key word is "major". As far as the Abrams proposal Councilman Drake said that he felt the Planning Commission is clearly recommending the change cf zoning in that specific area. Councilman Drake expressed concern that this annual review of the General Plan is taking so long and he feels that hard- ships may result. Mayor Glennon disagreed that conclusion of the annual review is urgent and asked if Councilman Drake would have any serious objections to delaying the hearing until the Council has a definite consensus of what the Planning CommisSion is recommending and Councilman Drake indicated that he did not. Commissioner O'Rorke stated that he felt the Planning Commission would be willing to go back and try to make a more specific recommendation. The Council briefly discussed the recon~,endation regarding the Pierce Road connection and the Clerk indicated that he could probably get the comments of a traffic consultant relatively inexpensively but that there was no ~oubt that a traffic expert would advise that a right angle intersection is safer than a "dog-legged" one. Commissioner O~Rorke reported that the Planning Commission rec- commendation for this extension was not prompted by concern about todays safety problem buts rather, as a long range plan for providing good access to the upper Pierce Road area when it becomes more populated. Regarding a question relative to the recommended establishment of plan lines on major streets~ the Clerk reported that the staff is in the process of gathering all the field data for plan lines on Saratoga Avenue into the village and are also getting quotes for the same thing on Qulto Road. These two areas are those which are felt to be major problem areas which require plan lines at this time. The plan lines which have already been established for Fruitvale Avenue mays the Clerk stated~ have to be changed depending on the resolution of the question of the junior college° S-~.RATOG& CiTv. COUNCIL MiNUTeS - Jam~la~y S~ !966 Mayor Glennon expressed his belief that the City should immedla~e!y get bids to carry o~:~ ~h~ rec~mmen~att~n of tl~e Planning Commission Gencral that plan lines be ~stablished by q~alified personnel and pointed Plan out that all t~e engineers which the City has employed on its staff A~n~ual have been hired expressly to establish plan lines° Review Mayor Glennon asked if anyone else wished to speak be£ore tile F~bl. ic Hearing closed for this meeting. There b~ing no response~ the M~.yer~ with no obJection~ ciesed the public hearing at 9:10 P. M. and con- tirened the hearing to the meeting of January 19 with instructions to the Clerk to obtain from the Planning Comm~.ssion a clarification of the Planning Commissions recommendation regarding the multiple zoning question at Saratoga and Cox Avenues. VI ADMINISTi%ATIVB ~ATTERS A. MAileR (1) i~.-~ Thorme Mayes gave a detailed progress report of the Economic activities of the Santa Clara County Economic Opportunity Opportunity Commission since his appointment as representative for the Commission City of Saratoga, He outlined the various events which have Report delayed organization of an effective service center and described unsuccesful attempts which have been made to establish a local advisory cor~nittee. Mr, Mayes concluded his remarks with concern that a group of interested Saratoga citizens had met with resistance and frustration in trying to cooperate with the Santa Clara County EOC officials, Mayor Glennon thanked Mro Mayes for his report and commented th~ all the Council expects is that he objectively report to It the activitie~ 0f the E0C and =he Council will, if necessary~ indicate any action tha~ may be required. Meanwkile, the Mayor agreed that the delays in organizing a effective agency to provide needed help are to be regretted. Recess: 9:46 P. M. Reconvened: 10g05 P. M. A. KAYOR - continued Ash trays (2) Mayor Glennon asked the status of the ash trays for the Counc:~l Council Chambers and Mro Hanley stated that replacements have Charmers been shipped and are ~o be installed as soon as possible, (3) Mayor Glennon announced that it has been brought to his Recreation attention that a certain de~:ermant to a feeling of community District affiliation is encountered by those persons who live within fees the City limits but in school districts other than the Los Gates High School District° In order to participate in recreation district activities these persons are charged a fee pver and above that charged to these persons who tJ;Te within the district boundaries and pay taxes to tb~ district° The Ma.yor suggested ~ study sf tile feasibility of the City paying' the difference in fees and, with Cotraeil approvals the City Administrator was directed to investigat~ tile matter and repor~ ba~:k to the Council, B. FINANCE it was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman Bills and unanimously carried to approve the disbursements on tile list dated january 5, 1966 for a total amount of $63a216¢87 and authorize that warrants be dra~,~ in payment° C.COb~C!L CO~e4ITTEES No reports SARATCC~ CITY COL~qCiL MINUTES - Jan~:ary 5 ~ 1966 D. DEPAP. lY~NT HF~3JS AFD OFFICERS No reports E. CITY ADMINISTIL~TOR (1) Tlle City Administrator reported that the Planning Commission A~ae~Ldment - has submitted a rccomendation that the Commercial Service Commercial zone regulations be changed by making certain uses less restric~ Service tire and by adding to the list of pel~nitted conditional uses° Zone With no objection~ May'or Glennon referred the recommendation to uses the Planning Committee for review with a request ~hat they seriously consider the ]usttfication of uses which would be duplicated in the '~illage er Quite areas. Councilman Drake indicated that he did not approve of outside automobile and boat sales even if~ in the opinion of the Planning Comtssion~ restricting such uses to enclosed structures is in effect unrea].is~ico Mayor Glennon pointed out that if the Council~ as a matter of policy, decides that it wants to discourage automobile sales~ then it circumvents the very purpose for the C-S zone in that area. Interest (2) Mr, Henley reported that~ as of December 7~ 1965~ interest Rates rates on new time deposits were raised to 4.25% on 30 Day deposits~ 4.50% on 90 Day deposits and 4.625% on 180 day deposits. (3) The City Administrator read a letter from M re George Hutchinson Uildwood setting forth the terms of an offer for the sale of the Wild- Park area wood Park area by Mr. and Mrs. George Ratty~ terms of which are option substantially as described in the effect of negotiation previously submitted to the Council, With no ob3ection~ Mayor Glennon referred the offer to the Planning Committee for study and recommendation and Mr. Hutchinson stateds in answer to a question from the City Attorney~ that he will provide the City with the Ratty's written authorization to submit the offer to the City on their behalf. Park (4) Mayor Glennon reported that a Council committee has inspected property another piece of property which may preclude acceptance of the offer from Mr. and F~so Ratty but that as the Ratty's have indicated that their option will be held open for 60 days the Council has adequate time to study the matter. VII CO~5~UNICATIONS A. WRITTEN Traffic- (1) A letter from Dr. Sullivan regarding traffic on Argonne Drive Argonne Dr. was acknowledged and Mr. Henley reported that it has been referred to the Director of Public Works for investigation and recommendation. (2) Mr. Henley outlined a letter from the Board of Supervisors County regarding formation of an Economic Development Co~m{ssion EconOmic and announced that a meeting to consider this ma~ter has been Development continueds at the request of local chambers of commerce until Commission March 23, 1966. The Chambers of Commerce have indicated opposition to the formation ef the Commission which would dl%plicate most of the activities of the Chambers and the Beard has asked for any further comments City Councils may have with respect to the question° The Council took no position regarding the matter. 1964-65 (3) Mayor Clennon asked that copies of the 1964-65 analysis of Analysis of operating revenues and expenditures be made ~vailable for Operating Costs Council study. SARATOGA CiTY GOI~CIL MINUTES - January 5, 1966 B. ORAL No ~ne present responded to the Mayorss lnvita~ion to address the Council at this time and the Mayor acknowledged, with thanks, the presence of the following persons: Plannin~ Commissioner Eugene O'Rorke; Mrs, S~evenson, President of the be Gatos-Saratoga League of Women Voters; Mro and IhT. s° ~xorne Mayess representative to the County Econoud. c Opportunity Cou~lssion; Mrs. Ruth Owens~ for servln~ coffee on behalf of tile Good Government Group; and ~, Don Bush, representing the Saratoga Chamber of Commerce, VIII ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded by Councilman Tyler and unanimously carried to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 P. M. Respectfully submitted, /. / '~' . '~ ~.L '~.~. / i .', WILLIAM C. HA,'~EY, CITY C~ / -9-