Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-15-1968 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY OF MINUTES TIME: Wednesday, May 15, 1968 7:30 PM PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ORGANIZATION Mayor Glennon called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. A. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen 'Glennon, Hartman, Tyler, Robbins, Smith Absent: None B. MINUTES Councilman Robbins desired changes in minutes of May 1, 1968. Page 11, C. (2) paragraph 2, "supplement the establishment," should read "implement the establishment." Page 13, line 5, change "maximam safety" to "adequate safety" Robbins then moved minutes be approved as corrected. Councilman Smith seconded motion, which carried unanimously. II. BIDS AND CONTRACTS A. FRUITVALE ALLENDALE PROJECT - CO ~2 ~. Huff stated that this Chhnge Order ~2 is that work in front of the Fry Fruitvale Allendale property to be done as part of the agreement of acquisition of right of way Project- from the y and that the proposed change order contains the contr~ctor's Fr 's, Fry ~ Property CO #2 proposed cost for'ehis work. Mr. Huff indicated that Items 2, 4, 6, 8 and 31 are contract items for which it is a matter of applying the quantities in this area to the contract unit prices. A, B, C, D, items for which there are no specific contract unit prices will require submission of new unit prices. Prices have been obtained on all of these items, and subject to further negotiation on "C", he recommended approval of Change Order #2, with deletion of "31" and "C". In answer to Councilman Robbins' request for additional details Fir. Huff replied that the property, on Allendale Avenue consisted of one single family residence w~ich was originally part of the same property which contained the rest home, a portion of which was purchased by George Day and sold to West Valley Baptist Church. This work was not included in the original contract but it is desirable to have the work done now. Councilman Robbins asked if there was a piece of the road which might otherwise be developed. Mr. Huff replied that there was a remote possibility that it might someday be split into one-half acre lets but that the house itself will remain on that acre for a good many years. He stated that the only action SLr~RY OF COU~qCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1968 taken so far is that the Fry's agreed to trade the required R/U for constructio~ of improvements and corrective underground utilities along with replacement of the retaining wall and landscaping. Councilman tlartman asked h~ far into the property we intend to go, to which Mr. tluff replied that the actual take would be 10 feet. Councilman Hartman wanted to know why the road couldn't have been moved toward the college site. P~. Huff stated that would have been a possibility. Hartman asked, ~f it weren't still a possibility indicating that he had thought the wall would be the actual line and Fry's property would not be distributed. Director of Public Works, ~obert Shook, stated that the garage and improvements were ~0 or 90 feet from the proposed wall. ~ite the pump house and well will be about 10 feet from the rear line. Councilman Hartman asked if it were possible to move the intire road over t0 feet onto the college property. i.~. Shook said that this is on extension of the aligm~ent of Allendale in the adjacent Day Subdivision. ~k'. Shook displayed a sketch of the Fry property and indicated that the contractor has bean asked to submit a new price for the wall. i-~. Shook: estimated the reasonable price of the work to be ~o thousand tO ~qen~y-five hundred dollars. Councilman Tyler askedMr. Huff on what basis he wants the matter approved. Pk-. Huff stated he would like it approved subject to further negotiation on item 31 and item C so that we would have a chance to negotiate a lower price on item C. Councilman Hartman stated that in view of the fact that 31 and C have to be negotiated~ ~at would be the feasibility of checking the possibility of realigl.~aen~ toward the college. He stated that he would wan~ to know that every alternative has been considered. Councilman Robbing agreed with this statement. Councilman Tyler stated that in addition to the alig~je. ent of the improvements on the George Day side, the college, in earlier negotiations, felt they were providing adequate right of way and making additional land available to permit aligning Allendale to intersect Fruitvale opposite the corporation yard road, The other aspect which would possibly suffer would be the utility installation along the north side of the curb. Mr. Huff suggested investigating the possibility of acquiring right of way and shifting the alignment of the road, and using the right of way from the Fry's to provide for the utility relocatien without delaying the project. Councilman Hartman wanted to know if the project would be seriously delayed if the matter were not passed tonight. ~. Shook replied that we were prepared to do the clearing to make a way f -- o~ utilities so that Ithe utility install~.tiem would ~ot ba delayed. Councilman Tyler asks ~.~hether the college would be paying a portion of the cost had this project been included in the assessment district. ~.~. Huff replied that if it were included in the assessment district, the bulk of this cost would fall on the Fry's. Councilman Hartman urged that other alternatives be fully explored. Councilman Hartman moved that the change order be approved providing this problem is checked very thoroughly before any final action is taken on proceed- ing with the change. Mayor Glennon stated that the staff proposes that Change Order ~2 be approved excluding "31'l and ;'C~'. Councilman Hartman inquired as to ~.fnether or not Item D would be involved, and Mr. Huff replied that it would and indicated that relocating the street without taking the additional 10 feet would leave no place for electrical and telephone lines. Mayor Glennon stated that there are two problems - (1) alignment, aud(2) price.of construction of the wall. He suggested that Council action on the Change Order, excluding Items 31, C & D, would take care of the cost objection° -2- SU~AY OF COUNCIL MINUTES - ~y 15, 1968 Fruitvale- Mayor Glennon asked if it were agreeable to approve the Change Orde~ if Allendale 31, C and D are excluded, or would there still be a question in terms of ProjEct - alignment. Councilman nobbins favored pursuing the alignment problem. PT&T Change Mayo~ Glennon wondered wh~t affect a delay would have on this matter. Order #3 ~.~. Huff stated that it would delay utilities installations. Councilman Hartman inquired h~ soon are utilities far to go in and F~. Shook replied that the utilities have paper work and plans completed for that portion of work on Allendale and further stated that he is surprised to see the water lines in already. It was moved by Councilman Hartman and seconded by Councilman Tyler that Change Order ~2 be approved excluding 31, C & D and that the matter of align- ment be referred to the Public Welfare Cormnittee. B. F~UITVALE - ALLENDALE P~OJECT CH~,]GE ORDER ~3 Mr. Huff stated that there is a difference of opinion between the City's Bohding Attorney and Attorney for PT&T as to whether underground district constitutes the entire length of the project or just that length inwhlch PG&E had to go underground. ~'~ere PG&E didn't have a line, the telephone company would not have to go underground at their own expense under their interpretation eventually agreed to by b~. Jones the bonding attorney. Councilman Hartman wants to know if underground district takes in entire project or portion of the project. Mr. Huff replied that the entire project i~ to be underground and the underground district goes to Portos, although the actual construction project runs only along the Collage frontage; on Fruitvale it is the entire length of the projec~ on the east side of the road. Councilman Tyler moved for approval; Councilman ~obbins seconded the motion, subject to PT6~ purchase order: unanimously carried. ~. Huff states that he also has Cha~e Orders ~l;~, ~$ and #7 (which are not on the agenda). CO # 4 Councilman Tyler moves, Councilman Smith seconds, and it is unanimously carried that Change Order >~4 be approved. CO #6 Mr. Huff states that Change Order #6 is a change in grade of the perimeter road which is the access road to swinmaing pool and turf areas. Councilman Tyler moves that Change Order #~ be approved; Councilman Hartman seconds the motion; and it is unanimously carried. CO #7 Councilman Robbins makes the motion that Change Order ~7 be approved. Councilman Smith ~econds the motion, and it is unanimously carried. C. R/~ ACQUISITION AGPGEb~FES F~UITVALE - ALLENDALE P~OJECT. Fruitvale }~. Huff reported that Dabgin Lee, appraiser, recomends approval of agreements with Odd Fellows Home and William L. Lane. The IOOF settlement exceeds the R/W AcC. Agreement appraisel by $590.00 due to more accurate cost figures on relocation of the I00F Lane pillars. The Lane agreement is at the appraised cost. City Attorney Faber L. Johnston inquired if City is going to move the pillars. ~-. Huff replied that IOOF will remove plaques and City will re~ove the pillars. t~r. Johnston inquired if the $500.00 is to rebuild the pillars. F~'. Huff replied it represented the difference between the estimated cost and the actual cost of relocation. It was moved by Councilman Tyler, seconded by Councilman Hartman and carried unanimously to authorize the ~yor to execute the agreements for acquisition of required property from IO0~= and Uilliam L. Lane. III. PETITIOn]S, OP~D IIqANCES ~qD FOP~I~L P~SOLUTIONS. A. P2SOLUTIO!q 432: Creating Parks & Recreation Conm~ission. li~. Huff stated Creation that perhaps ~mbers would !i!~ City Attorney to explain of Parks & Recreation Commission -3- SUMMARy OF COUMCIL MINUTES - ~/~y 15, 1958 ~ereupon he states it would probably be better to read it. P~solution 432 is read aloud. Faber Johnston states that this resolution is practically verbatim fr~u the report given by the Conmittee at the last meeting except that qualifications of the seven members were not specified in the ~esolution. He further stated ~.~ J2, that the p~.~ers and duties are identical with Committee report and that h~ added that the commission would establish its rules and regulations. ~ ~is type of Commission, would be subject to the Brown Act. ~'~j~' 1,~yor Glennon inquired ~hether it wouldn't be best to establish a regular ~'~"~'~ meeting data. Ha suggested that , Gary Bonfiglio might act as secretary to the conm~ission. ~e cormnission must not only make decisions but must also look for problems. ~e Commission will be required to ~ake sorae quite affinnative action from time to time and the Council will consult the Parks & Recreation Commission for advice on many items. Councilman Smith inquired why the occupation of the members was dropped from t~e resolution. ~yor Glennon answered that it wasn't intended that the members be restricted to this Izind of individual. -tt was excluded because it was too restrictive although the list of professions suggested would serve as a guide. Councilman P, obbins stated that he had some reservations on Item C, concerning architeeturdl design standards stating that he thought this should be done by someone else and that maybe it is a little toc much for the Commission. Councilman Tyler agreed, s~ating that the Council could direct additional items to the Parks & Recreation Commission as necessary. C6uncilman. llobbins moved for adoption of ~esolution 432 excluding Item C and with the provision that meetings be held the first and third Mondays of every month? Councilman Hartman seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously carried and so ordered. B. P~SOLUTION 433 - Calling for establishment of Local Conciliation Council in County. Local Mayor Glennon Stated that this resolution was sent by the City of Palo Alto Concili- and has been acted upon by all of the cities in the north County, with maybe ation the exception of one. He further stated that this resolution puts the problem Council of dealing with minority groups on the shoulders of the County, which seems to make sense. ~e Mayor went on to say that San Jose has its own Heman ~__.~,, ~ ~ ~ Relations Council, and this resolution was started with an attempt to get Palo Alto to start one. Palo Alto took the attitude that it was an intelli- gent thing to have a human relations Council, but rather to have one taking in the entire County. Los Gatos tabled it and referred it to the Open Doors Co~nittee. Councilman Smith stated that in view of the fact Saratoga doesn't have any problems, it would still show our willingness to help. Mayor Glennon replied that we do have a very minor problem - that we do have a small sector, economically called the poverty sector. He added that he had never felt that the people in the City of Saratoga were oblivious to the problems and concerns of people throughout the County. He favored Saratoga's doing whatever it can to help those who are less fortunate; this resolution is a very minor thing to show our concern. Councilman Robbins stated that he would like a chance to study the resolution. Mayor Glennon replied that we can study individually or together and requested the city attorney to research Section 1419(H) of the Labor Code to see what it means. Councilman Robbins stated that the FEPC supposedly doesn't have enough money and inquired as to the purpose function and finances of the FEPC? SIF:.~RY OF SAP~TOGA COU~FFIL MI_~dTES - ~-'~ay 15, 1968 Councilman Hartp~an a~reed that Saratoga should show its involvement, but asked hoT.; many agencies ~ithin the County currently deal with human relations problems? Councilman Tyler wanted to knoT; ~lhat FEPC's feelings about this are ~hether they are behind it. Councilman Robbins also asked ~,:hat groups were behind it and ~hat ~roups a~atnst it. Hayor Glennon directed the item be removed from the ageode until Mr. Huff can revie~.7 the inquiries and report back to the Council. IV SUBDIVISIONS, BUILDING SITES AND ZO~qING REQFESTS A. SDR-747 - GEORGE W. DAY ~fr. Huff explained that all conditions have been met except posting SDR-747 of the bond to guarantee construction of the driveway on the corridor George W. Day and the signin~ of a~reement for that work. Councilman Hartman stated that this property backs uD to Sarato%a Creek, and asked if any further problems are likely to occur l.~ith flood control. ~r. Huff indicated that channel work was completed in connection with Tract 2694. Councilman Hartman moved for adoption of Reso:.ution SDR-747-1 sub- ject to signing the site approval agreement and Dosring the required bond. Councilman Robblns seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. B. SDR~748 - TCt~ZR H. PIERCE I~_r. Huff explained ~hat this is a refiling of an old application SDR-748 and stated that all conditions had been met. Mr. Tyler moved that Tomer H. Pierce Resolution SDR-748-1 be adopted granting final site approval. Mr. Smith seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. V PUBLIC HEARINGS No Public Hearings. VI ADMINISTRATIVE I~I~TTERS A. -'~YOR Inter-City The Mayor noted that the Inter-City Council will meet next month Council Meeting on June 6 in Saratoga at the Plumed Horse and urged the Council to attend this meeting hosted by Saratoga. Mayor Glennon submitted his resi%natton from the Council effective the last meeting in June. "This is somethin% I have plmnned to do, Mayor G!ennon's as several of you have knoxm, for some time, and wanted to do before Resignation last election but the General Plan didn't progress as fast as I had hoped. Hy term as President of Inter-City Council doesn't expire until the end of June~ and the Chairmanship of the Plannin~ Pe3icy CoF~aittee expires at the same time~ I regret havin~ to do this. Ten years in this responsibility is a long time. Ho~ever, I have enjoyed it and have felt a ~reat deal of satisfaction. But I have gotten a little stale and am not as enthusiastic as I once was. Therefore this is my official notice to you that I am rasignin,~, as of the second meeting in June." B. FIFANCE (1) Payment of Claims Councilman Smith inquired if the Vickery Project had been Claims completed. Hr. Huff explained that on the Vickery Project, -5- SUM~{ARY OF SARATOGA COUNCIL MINUTES - ~y 15, 1968 in addition to an underground ~-~ater problem~ the contractor felt obligated to complete the project for the original contract price, and that was one of the reasons the work took a little lon~er than normal. Councilman Tyler stated that it was unusual for a contractor to stick to original price and suggested recognizing this by letter. Councilman Tyler inquired if item 9576 (Copenhaver) is a final payment. ~fr. Shook replied that it was not but the final billing is expected next month. Councilman Robbins moved, Councilman Hartman seconded that the Disbursements be approved and it carried unanimously. Mr. ~ff noted that the Treasurer's Report and the City Clerk's Financial Report were both made out by Bill ~fatsumoto due to the illness of Mr, Fabrts. These reports along with the third quarter budget report were received by the Council with no questions or comments. C. COUNCIL COP~!ITTEES AND REPORTS (I) Mm~ageme~t Committee Councilman Robbins read the Youth Center Report and stated that it ~.;as referred to this committee because he had had some associa- Youth Center tion with it in the Past. Me stated that Council must approve Report use of the facility by adults and that a policy should be established concerning this to avoid dealing with each request individually. It Was moved by Councilman Robbins, seconded by Councilman Smith and unanimously carried to adopt the report permitttn~ the Saratoga ~stgate Jaycoos to hold one meeting at the Ycu~h Cen~er and referring to the Policy Committee the problem of determining the meetings which can be held there without consulting the Council. Councilman Robbins read the ~anagement Committee report regarding the capital improvement program schedulin~ of improvement o~ Prospect Road and stated that we shculd move ahead as fast as Prospect Rd. possible on this study. Councilman Hartman asked if any progress had been mzde at all or any attempt made to contact the other agencies involved regarding the bridZe. ~Ir. Shook ans~.~ercd that Prospect Road is one of the main interests of the County Public iJorks Director but that no formal approach has been made to Santa Clara County or San Jose. Councilman Robbins Indicated the importance of the Saratoga Creek bridge. Councilman ]{artman made the motion that the report be approved; Counci!msn Smith seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Councilman Robbing called attention to tim report on the Chamber of Commerce request for funds. Chamber of Commerce As stated in the report Councilman Robbins did not favor sub~idfz- Request for Funds ing the Commerce. Councilman Smith on the other hand recommended a subsidy of $1,000. Councilman Tyler stated that he would like to see Saratoga contri- bute, in ways otl~er than by providin~ financial support ~uch as ~ontacting the water company to sea if the Chamber could use the pump building on Big Basin I~y as an office. Councilman Tyler also felt that the Cha~er of Commerce does take a great load off the City in answerin~ phones and providin~ maps, etc., but would -6- S~{ARY OF COUNCIL MI~.'~JTES - ~ay 15, 1968 like to see them renumerated in another way rather than a straight financial assistanc~ whether $500 or $1,000. Councilman Smith endorsed Councilmau Tyler's suggestion about the pump station. Mayor Glennon commented that it had always been his feeling Chamber of Commerce that the city should not subsidize the Chamber of Commerce, but Fund Request he would not feel this way ~re he a member of the City Council of San Jose or Santa Clara or any other boomet to~n tryin~ to attract industry, visitors or homeowners, He said he felt that the work they have done is work the City might well have done, Saratoga's answer in the past has been that the city is quite willing to do it. Since the majority of the Council is opposed to set~:ing aside ~ny amount of money for the Chamber, he did not thi~ Saratoga should subsidize the Chamber of Commerce, Mayor Glennon instructed ~ir. ~ff to check into the pump build- ing suggestion. D, DEPARTMENT HF~^tDS A~ OFFICERS Director of Public Works~ ~obert Shook reported that he had consulted with Mr. Jackson concombing ~rtmming the trees on Fruitvale. Jackson F~itvai. e Tree concurred wi~h the recommendation of Davey Tree experts t]~at there Work was wor~ tha~ should be done. Me indicated that Davey was well qualified to accomplish it and in view of the Fruitvale Avenue construction, it would be apprcprtate to go ahead with it, Council- man Tyler moved seconded by Councilman Hartman to authorize Davey Tree Surgeons to perform the tree work on Fruitvale at $3691. Mr. Shook reported that the Village Parking District was nearing Village Parking completion. Paving ~as completed ou April 25, 101 days after District #1 contract completion date, and penalties up to that time totaled $5050. CreeSan & D'AnZelo recommended penalty and assessments be stopped as of April 25. If Council agrees, that would be the final date. Mayor Glennon suggested waiting to cut off the penalty to encourage early completion. At the intersection of ~ilon and SaratoRe Avenue the property o~mer has installed landscaping and desires to complete this outside the ~llon-Saratoga fence. She has requested that the city complete driveway behind Avenue the curb so she can finish. l{e presented informal bids for the construction of a circular driveway be~;een the curb and the fence: Frank Isidoro $681.23; Guerin & Olmsted $730. He recorcmended that Frank Isidoro be authorized to proceed with the work. Mr. Sinook read the Ccmmittee report of AuF~ust 15, 1967 and stated that this construction~ as recommended~ would take care of the parking and walkway on that frontage. Councilman Hartman moved that the Mayor be authorized to execute agreement with the low bidder; Councilman Tyler seconded; unanimously carried. Mr. Walker reported on a proposed use of the old Bank of kmerica Old Bank of Building on B~ Basin way opposite the First Valley Bank. The question America Building was raised by the Planning CoFm~ission that this property might not be suitable for development as a restaurant or bar. It ~,7as the consensus of the Cor~nission that the City should ask the Beverage Control Board to delay action on the license until a proposal is before the City for the use. The Csp.-nission felt that this would be a question for the Council to determine since the use is a permitted use by the zoning ordinance. -7- SUM~[~RY OF COUNCIL MINUTES - ~Iay 15, 1968 Mayor Glennon replied that we have never taken such action before. The city would be assuming a precarious position, and should not interfere in the application process, E. CITY AD~INISTRATOR (1) Mr, I~ff reported that tba Vickery Avenue project had be~n completed° He reconmended acceptance by the Council. Council~ Vickery Ave, man Hartman moved that the Vickery Avenue work be accepted and Acceptance a completion notice be filed. Councilman Smith seconded the motion which carried unanimously. (2) Claim for Damage, Orville Johns, 14531 Horseshoe Drive in Orville Johns Saratoga asking $1872 for damages and loss incurred by flooding Claim from rain water drainin% from Horseshoe Dr. onto above property. Councilman Robbins moved we disallow claim; seconded by Council- man Hartman, and unanimously carried. VII C~NICATIONS A. I.~ITTEN (1) Debby Coburn - Bob Morgan re: Christian Children's Fund, ~or Glennon read a letter from Debby Coburn and Bob Morgan re Christian Children's Fund and then asked whether the Fund would suppor~ a poor, starving ~Ir. Morgan replied that the children supported by the Fund have no religion, an~ ~Yiss Coburn stated that it is an indepen- Coburn-Morgan dent child welfare organization which depends maihly on sponsors Christian Children*s and does not have any large endc~ents. Fund llayor'Glermon wanted to know x~hy the City should get involved in this, to which ~[tss Coburn replied that this is a more direct responsibility for one child, and ~r. Morgan stated that the~ are askin~ for a token contribution to help ~oint the way for o~her citizens to give to this Fund. Councilman ~ob]~ins stated lie felt it very wonderful that these yound people would take the time and effort to go out and solicit help for such a worthwhile organization. Councilman Hartman added that he would be glad to con~ri~,ute personally. The Council consensus was that the city should not partic~.p~te this effort because it would not be possible to s~pport all such worthwhile activities. (2) Petition supporting ABAG Councilman Smith stated that on Friday, ~Yay 10, the City Administrator and he went to a budget meeting of ABAG. ABAG ~as considering three alternatives: 1) take no action on the ABAG budget for the next fiscal year; 2) retain same schedule as last year; or 3) double total dues, (Saratoga's portion would be over $600.) There was strong support for going middle~of-the-road. Council- man Smith stated he voted for alternate 2. On failure of this alternate he supported the motion increasing dues which carried. Mayor Glennon asked if it is the sense of the Council that the petition be tabled. Councilman Smith made the motion to table, seconded by Councilman Robbins and unanimously carried and so ordered. -8- SU~tARY OF COUNCIL MI}~JTES - May 15~ 1968 (3) Other written co.n~nunications noted were: a) Gary B. Clark's letter x~ritten in response to statements [.{ontgomery Hm-~ks made by Mr. Montgomery Ha~.~s who criticized forei,en names Letter of some Saratoga streets. MayOr Gelnnon reccmmended that the letter bepassed on to the Street name Cormnittee. b) l,~estbrook Improvement Association letter and c) Brookview Home~ners Association letter. Regarding action of Council on the ~.~estbrook annexation in the adoption of the General Plan. Mayor Glennon read a Nestbrook AnnexatioD & Brookview |{omeo~.n~ers portion of minutes of the March 6 meeting and stated that Assn~ letter the Council had been ready to accept Public I~lfare Committee report~ but~ at ~1r. Thurnher's request determined to take no action. Councilman Robbins stated that he felt that the intent of Oskar Thurnher and himself was to put the annexation in the General Plan. Mr. Tyler stated that ha could not see that the action taken chan~ed anythins. }~ felt the proponents wanted to know if the Council had changed its stand in some and he felt that no change had been made. The Comnittee report indicated that if all improvements had been made~ the Council would have been in favDr of annexation at that time. He stated that if improvements could be made ir~n..ediately or had already been made he would favor a~nexa- tion. Robbins noted that they were also asking that it 'be put into the General Plan. Hartman said the minutes were clear enough as to the course of action the Council took,and they ~mre reading something into it that wasn't intended. Mayor Glennon stated that he would not be in favor of altering the General Plan. He instructed ~. }~ff to send Mr. Thurnher a copy of the minutes. Mayor Glennan read letter from Don Lindstrom to the Good Government Group concerning l~st Valley Campus scheduling. VII B. O~L C~-._q~ICATIONS (1) Don Feak pointed out that the intention of the petition on ABAG ABAG was misunderstood. They simply asked the Council to consider a resolution urging ABAG to remain a voluntary organization. ~yor Glennon stated that ~Ir. Feak should investigate the work of the Knox Co!mnittee which is t~Fing to determine what kind of regional government is needed, its required powers, its limitations and its governing body. Mayor Glennon continued that Canservation =Tad Bay~ air pollution, control are two significant things which cannot be controlled on a voluntary basis. Some people feel, even in Ar~AG, that all parks are a regional problem. >~ny feel ~arbage is a regional problem. in short the Mayor indicated that we may well find it necessary to go beyond the scope of voluntary regional'cooperation among local governments. ~!r. Feak asked if Council tabling necessarily meant the Council would consider the matter again,at the time Knox's C~mmlttee makes its report? To ~hichMayor Glennon replied affirmatively. SU~-P~RY OF COU~CIL i,II~JTES - ~ay 15, 1968 VIII ADJOUR~..~IT The Mayor acknowle~ed the Good Government Group' s servin~ of coffee. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P. ~I. Respectfully submitted, J. Ro HIF~F, CITY CLERK