Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-05-1969 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TIE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1969 - 7:30 P.M. PLACE: SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 13777 ~RUITVkLE AVENUE, SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA TYPE: REGULAR MEETING I. ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL - The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Mayor Pro tam Robbins. PRESENT: Councilmen Dwyer, Robbins, Sanders and Smith. ABSENT:~ M~ryor Tyler B./ MINUTES~ ~ Moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded by Mr. Sanders that the minutes of October 15, 1969 be approved as mailed with the following amendment: Item VII,! 3. Last Paragraph - should read: "Motion was withdrawn by Councilman Robbins and no action was tkken." Carried unanimously. II. BIDS AND CONTRACTS A. RIGHT-OF-ENTRY AGREEMENT - QUITO & MAUD QUITO-MAUD Mr. Huff reported that this was a matter of long standing concerning the revision of the intersection at Quito and Maud.to improve sight distance. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr. Dwyer that the Right-of-Entry Agreement concerning the northwest corner of Quito Road and Maud Avenue be approved. Carried and so ordered. B. SARATOGA COX SIGNAL MODIFICATION - FINAL ACCEPTANCE SARATOGA- Mr. Huff stated that the Director of Public Works had reported that COX SIGNAL all the work on the project is complete and he recommends acceptance and filing of riotide of completion with the County Recorder. Moved by ~. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders. Carried and so ordered. C. C.O. ~3 - CITY HALL ADMINISTRATIVE WING CITY HALL Mr. Huff reported that the Management Committee has reviewed the orti ~ p on ADDITION of the change which applied to floor tile in the Public Works and C.O. ~3 Building Departments. However, there were several other items not reviewed and he felt that the Management Committee should have the opportunity to review these before recommending approval. Councilman Sanders suggested going through the proposal item by item to see if it would not be more feasible to approve the Change Order then refer it to Committee. 1. New tile in the office areas. This was not originally scheduled, however, it was discovered that the flooring, after removal of various counters, revealed untiled areas and tiles in such a state that it was determined new tile was necessary. 2. Replacing ceiling tile, which was discovered to be in poor dondition, in the offices of the Director of Public Works, the Planning Director and Chief Building Inspector at a total cost or $446.32. 3. Furnish and install new birch paneling in the Director of Public Works office. The primary reason for this change being that when the closet was changed it was a difficult task to match up the new panelling. In addition, the panelling was quite different from that in the other offices. Total cost: $603.09- ~. Furnish and install galvanized iron pan and drain at hot water heater in attic area. The moving of the water heater was re- quired because of the difference in size between the original gas heater and the new electric heater. The electric heater was moved to the office at no additional cost, except this cost of provision of the panz and drain. 5. Revision of cabinets in. City Clerk's area. Originally it was anticipated that metal file cabinets would be u~ed. However, ~ SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MI NOVEMBER 5, 1969 under-the-counter shelving, similar to that in the old office, was deemed more appropriate to provide for storage of supplies. Mr. Sanders questioned Items #B and ~9 in connection with moving furniture. He felt the cost was excessive. Mr. Higby explained that i~ was necessary to shift the furniture in all the departments from one side of the room to another while the new tile was being laid. The 15 hours quoted was actually three men working fifteen hours each or a total of 45 man hours. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr. Smith for approval of Change Order #B. Carried and so ordered. III. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES AND FORMAL RESOLUTIONS , A. ORDINANCE NS-3~22 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance NS-3 by by Amending Article 3 Pertaining to Accessory Structures in Rear Yards of Single Family Residential Zoning Districts. ORDINANCE Mr. Huff reported that this '.was approved by the Planning Commission NS-3-22 at its last meeting and forwarded to theCCity Attorney for drafting ACCESSORY in final form. Mr. Martin and Mr. Naugle, representing the Prides STRUCTURES Crossing Home Owners Association were present and wished to address the Council on this matter. Mr. Dwyer stated that he found parts of the proposed ordinance some- what confusing. With regard to Page 2, Subsection (2) which states "Gardening and storage sheds, and structures separated from a cabaria in which swimming pool equipment is housed, shall not exceed 6 ft. in height nor 3 ft. in depth". He felt this was too shallow to be useful. He felt this section of the ordinance did require clarification. Mr. Robb~ns explained that the intent was to allow buildings~ next to a fence providing they were not too wide. In response to a question from Mr. Dwyer as to how we could enforce the setback requirements, the City Attorney replied that an application for Building Permit must show the location of the site. Mr. Walker stated that the intention was to allow storage areas along the fence which were not more than three ft. in depth. If a party wished to have a larger storage shed, they would have to setback from the property line. The City Attorney stated that this was limited only to the required rear yard, otherwise the standard requirements would apply, for example, if you have an acre lot, you have 50 ft. of required rear yard. Mr. Naugle stated that it was the intent on the part of the Prides Crossing Home Owners Association that the lO ft. in height was the maximum if it was within the required rear yard; if it was outside then the limit would be 12 ft. If it is a cabana or other structure the height was 8 ft. with 6 ft. setback with i ft. additional for each three ft. of rear yard. Mr. Martin added that this is what was~stated and the agreement that had been reached at the Planning Commission meeting. M~. Naugle continged that in Paragraph (e) they were specifying that only acceptable accessory structures were to be located in rear yards. Mr. Sanders understood that if a person were going to build a structure, locatedZin the required rear yard, he must first obtain a Use Permit; the structure shall be setback a minimum of 25 ft; and shall not exceed 19 ft. in height, except certain structures, such as cabanas which are permitted to be 8 ft. in height, 6 ft. from the k~e property line plus one ft. for eadh additional three ft. back from the property line. Mr. Naugle stated that under the proposed ordinance, as approved by the Planning Commission, cabanas, storage structures and equipment structures were governed by Use Permit. The City Attorney pointed out that if you are going to have structures other than those stated it would not require a Use Permit as long as they came within the standard limitation. Mr.Wslker stated that it was, the Planning Commission's intent that a Use Permit be required for everything, however, administrative processing of Use Permits for small structures would be quite cumbersome. He felt it would be better to separate larger structures from the smaller structures for Use Permits. - 2 - SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINb~ES NOVEMBER 5, 1969 Mr. Na~ugle's third point was that the wording suggesting storage structures along the fence (as passed by th~ Planning Commission) was a desirable point. ct it infers that accessory structures can only be built in the rear yard. He felt that the will of the Planning Commission was not followed especially ~ith regard to Section III, Part D which states that all structures within the required rear yard require a Use Permit. He felt that anything below 6 ft. should not require a Use Permit. Such structures would not disturb the neighbors or clutter the area. He felt that cabarias should require a Use Permit and this would alert the neighbors to a proposed use. He wondered about the correct definition of "cabana" which the dictionary defines as a cabin. The City Attorney replied that the word cabana was described in another ordinance. Mr. Robbins asked that both Mr. Martin and Mr .Naugle submit their comments in writing and referred the matter to the Planning Committee, who will schedule a meeting. RESL'N B. RESOLUTION NO. 508 - A Resolution Setting Forth Guiding Principles on NO.~ which the City Council Bases Decisions and Action in Employee Relations. RESL'N C. RESOLUTION NO. 509 - A Resolution~ing Compensation and Benefits NO. 509 Objectives for the City of Saratoga. RESL'N D. RESOLUTION NO. 510 - A Resolution Establishing a Grievance Policy in NO. 510 Recognition of the Right of Each Employee to Appeal the Actions of those for Whom he Works and Providing a Procedure for Achieving Fair and Individual Treatment for Every Employee. Mr. Huff reported that the Personnel Advis ory Committee had studied the above proposals extensively. Without objection Resolution Nos. 508, 509 and 510 were referred to the Management Committee. RESL'N E. RESOLUTION NO. 511 - A Resolutio~ of Intention to Form a Park Maintenance NO. 511 District in Saratoga Creek Subdivision. Mr. Huff reported that this was a resolution of intention to set up a Public Hearing for December B, and involves the area along Cox Avenue, known as Saratoga Creek Subdivision. The developer has posted a bond for installation of landscaping alox~g Cox and the residents have asked that the landscaping ~be installed. I. The City has stated that as soon as provision is made for maintenance, the developer's posted bond will be used. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for adoption of Resolution No. 511. RESL'N F. RESOLUTION NO. 512 - A Resolution of Intention to Form a Park Maintenance N0. 512 District on Manor Drive. Mr. Huff reported that this was also a similar situation as far as formation of the park maintenance district was concerned. The area is located on Manor Drive off Highway 85 and involves maintenance of a median on Manor Drive. This is an area which previously had come under the maintenance of the city. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr. Smith for adoption of Resolution #512. Carried unanimously. RESL'N G. RESOLUTION N0.85-8.1 - A Resolution Attending Resolution No. 85-8 to Modify N0.85-1. Provisions Therein Pertaining to Overtime Pay, Vacation Allowance and Life Insurance. Mr.Huff reported that this was an amendment to the Personnel hesolution of the City implementing the recommendation of the Personnel Advisory Committee regarding the payment of time and one half for all overtime work by employees, except professional employees and supervisory employees above the rank of foreman; granting twenty working days of vacation annually to all employees having twenty full years of service; and increasing the amount of life insurance paid for by the City to $5,000.00 with the City and the employee sharing the premium cost of an additional $5,000.00 at the option of each e.~ployee. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr. Dwyer for Adoption of Res61ution No. 85=8.1. Carried unanimously. SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MI NOVEMBER 5, 1969 Mr. Robbins thanked the members of the Personnel Advisory Comm4tte for their efforts and ad~ice over the past year. The three members are: Jack Webster, Rod Fagan and Don Nacrae~ all of whom have extensive experience in personnel relations. BESL'N 8.1 H. RESOLUTION NO. 8-1 - A Resolutio~ Amending Resolution No. 8 to Increase $3,500. O0 the Limit on ]Expenditures Which can be Authorized by the City Manager. LIMIT Mr. Sanders reported that this had been discussed at some length by the Management Connnittee, who recommended that the City Manager be authorized to make expenditures previously app~oved in the budget to the limit of $3,500.00. It was ft~rther recommended that the Manager be authorized to grant each Department Head the authority to make expenditures previously approved in the budget to a limit within the $3,500.00 limitation to be established by the City Manager, with the condition that the Council be provided with a Monthly Status Report on each project in the preliminary study, design or construction stage. ~ Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for adoption of Resolution No. 8.1 with the follc~ing amendment: Section i (A) Capital Expenditures: To authorize expenditures previously approved in the budget to the limit of , $2,500.00 through December 31, 1969 and thereafter to the limit of $3,500.00. Section 2(B) entitled Operation and Maintenance Expenditures substitute "~2,500.00 through December 31, 1969 and thereafter to the limit of $3,500.00". Carried unanimously. RESL'N I. RESOLUTION N0.36-B-113 - A Resolution Accepting Dedication of Streets 36-B-113 and Releasing Certificate of Deposit in Tract 4157. ST. ACCEPT. TR. 4157 Mr. Huff stated that there was a :report from the Director of Public Works stating that the improvements had been completed in accordance with plans and recommending that the certifi'cate of deposit be released. Moved by ~. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for adoption of Resolution 36-B-113. Carried and so ordered. ST. ACCEPT. J- RESDLUTION NO. 36-B-114 - A Resolution Accepting Dedication of Streets TR. 3900 and Releasing Improvement Bond in Tract 3900. Mr. Huff reported that we have a recommendation from the Director of Public Works that the streets have been completed according to the plans and that improvements be accepted. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for adoption of Resolution No. 36-B-114. RESL'N. K. RESOLUTION NO. ,513 - Resolution Authorizing Transfer of Funds Between 513 L~FUND and/or Among Accounts. TRANSFER 21 TO 91 Mr. Huff reported that this was to transfer $87,000.00 from the General Fund to Civic Center Improvement Fund primarily in conjunction with the City Hall construction almost completed. Moved by ~r. Smith, seconded by Mr. D~yer for adoption of Resolution No. 5o3- Carried and so ordered. IV. SUBDIVISIONS, BUILDING SITES & ZONING REQUESTS CONST. A. TRACT b646 - NONTA~VO - Acceptance of Improvements for Montalvo Road. ACCEPT. TRACT 4646 The Director of Public Works reported that the improvements have been completed and reconmmends acceptance of improvements for construction only. Moved byNr. D~er, seconded by Mr. Sanders. Carried and so ordered. B. SDR-7~2 - GEORGE SOMPS - Acceptance of ~Linimum Access Road and Release of Bond. SDR-7~2 The Director of Public Works recommends that the work be accepted and bond CONST. released. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders. Carried and so ACCEPT. ordered. C.. SDR-708 - RICHFIELD GAS STATION - Acceptance of Approval for Construction Only. SDR-708 The Director of Public Works recommends the construction acceptance and that CONST. we retain the bond for the one year maintenance period~ Moved by Mr. Sanders ACCE~T. seconded by Mr. I~er. Carried and so ordered. D. SDR-732 - DAVID FR~IN HOES - Refund Portion of Inspection Fee SDR-732 Mr. Huff repc~ted that;~..Franklin~ had paid the stoned inspection fee fc~ INSP.FEE Jada Development CorporatiOn in connection with the' ap~tments located on REFUND -- 4 - SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1969 Fourth Street and Springer. The actual cost related to interior streets was $221.56. Therefore, he recommended a refund of $1,070.44. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders. Carried and so ordered. E. SDR-701 - GEORGE THAYER-WARREN GONDER - Final Building Site Approval for one lot - Vaquero Court. SDR-701 Mr. Huff reported that this parcel had been granted tentative site FINAL approval and this would be a conditional final site approval subject SITE to compliance with the conditions as outlined on SDR-701, Section II. APPROVAL This development is located on a private road. (COND'L) In response to a question as to whether the conditions dated ll September 1967, had been brought up to date, Mr. Walker replied that the Planning Commission had imposed additional conditions, such as Parks & Recreation Fee, when the party asked for an extension in the early part of 1969. In this particular case, the bond will be held until all conditions have been met. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders that Resolution SDR-701-2. granting conditional Final Site approval be adopted..s~Oarried and so ordered. F. SDR-827 - DR. HAMBEY - Final Building Site Approval for one Lot - Farwell Ave. SDR-827 Mr.Huff reported that in this case all the conditions have been met and he FINAL recommended adoption of Resolution SDR 827-1. Moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded SITE by Mr. Sanders for adoption of Resolution SDR-827-1. Carried unanimously. APPROVAL G. SDR-825 - Z. CLYDE STANDARD, MONTE VISTA DRIVE & VIA COLINA - Request for Reconsideration of Conditions. 8DR-825 This request was also considered by the Planning Commission at their meeting STANDARD of October 22, 1969. Without objection referred to the Planning Committee. REQUEST FOR RECONSID. N. SDR-826 - Elgin Capital, Big Basi.n Way - Request for Reconsideration of Condition. SDR-826 This request was also considered ~by the Planning Commission at their meeting ELGIN CAP. of October 22. Without objection referred to the Public Welfare Committee. REQUEST FOR RECONSID. I. SDR-652 - L.G. TENMRU~.RR - MONTALVO ROAD 8DR-652 The Director of Public Works recon~ended that Improvements be accepted for CONSTRUCT. construction only. Mr. Tenbrummeler has asked for a refund of the cash bond ACCEPT. in the amount of $2,000.00. Mr. Huff pointed out that it has been our policy to retain the full bond except in cases where construction acceptance took place a year or more after the original completion of improvements, in other words, where a minor deficiency may have held up approval for a one year period. Mr. Sanders wondered whether it wo~ld be possible for Tenbrummeler to substitute another security for the same amount. Moved by Ma-. Senders, seconded by Mr. Smith to accept improvements for con- struction only. Carried unanimously. It is noted that Council would be receptive to a~proposal for a substitute security in the amount of $2,000.00. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None Mayor Pro-tem Robbins called for a recess at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:20 P.M. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. MAYOR 1. I.C.C. Maeting - November 6~ 1969- The City Manager from Milpitas will speak on the airport problem. 2. League of California Cities, Peninsula Division will meet on November 13, 1969 to discuss new Disclosure of Assembly Bill. - 5 - ~°SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1969 3- County Library Commission - The ~embers have inspected the proposed sites and there will be a meeting of the County Library Cormhiss,on on November lO, 1969 in the Board of Supervisors Chambers at 7:30 p.m. B. FINANCE 1. Payment of Claims Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for approval of disbursements as listed totalling $109,295.52 and that the Vice-Mayor be authorized to sign them. Carried unanimously. C. COUNCIL COMMITTEES AND CO~LISSION REPORTS 1. Japanese Cultural Society JAPAN Mr. Higby reported that the ParKs & Recreation CommisSion has received a CULTLHRAL proposal that a portion of Hakone Gardens be made available to a Japanese SOCIETY Cultural Society to meet during the spring and summer on Sunday evenings. The Parks & Recreation Commission recommends that the City purchase an honorary membership at the cost of $100.00 per year. Moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded by Mr. Smith that the Japanese Cultural Society be authorized to use Hakone Gardens as outlined in their requSst. The question of the purchase of an honorary membership at the cost of $100.00 was referred without objection to the Management Committee. 2. The Parks & Recreation Commission reported approval of the Parks ConsUltant Report dated October 22, 1969. TRAILS & 3- Proposed Master Plan for Trails and Pathways. Without objection referred PATHWAYS to Planning Committee. MODEL HOME 4. Model Home Sales Office. The Planning Committee presented the Model Home SALES Sales Office Policy adopted by the Planning Commission after study by the OFFICE ~h~ Subdivision Committee and the Planning Committee. Mr. Dwyer suggested sending interested citizens a copy of this policy and the staff was directed to send a copy to each resident on Farwell who had expressed an interest in the George Day sales office. 5.Village Merchants Association - Installation of Electrical Outlet in Blayney Plaza. Mr. Dwyer reported that the cost estimates were not received until this evening. He suggested that the line not be undergrounded at the present ~i time. There was considerable discussion regarding the cost of underground,rig as opposed to temporary wiring and whether or not the lights should be left on the trees throughout the year. Mr. Cowan of the P.G. & E. gave an approximate estimate of $112.00 for undergrounding. Mr. Bill Baine represented the Merchants Association and stated that a volunteer group was available to decorate the trees on November 30- This involved cooperation with the telephone company as it was necessary to use their trucks.- It was moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded by Mr. Sanders that the staff be authorized to spend up to $500.00 to complete the installation of an electrical outlet in Blayney Plaza that would permit decorating the Italian Stone Pines. Carried unanimously. 6. Quickert Drainage Problem QU~CKERT The staff has prepared several studies concerning the solution of the REQUEST RE drainage problems which last winter caused the loss of a portion of DRAIN~SE Kittridge Road. Staff studies indicate that the majority of the problem PROBLEM can be solved by installing a largecculvert at Kittridge R~ad and extending the~culvert at Bohlman Road at an estimated cost of $6,000.00. They recommend city participation in the project to the extent of $2,000.00 or one-third of the total cost. The other two-thirds to be. paid by the property owners, who are agreeable to this arrangement. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sanders for approval of Comn~ittee Report. Carried and so ordered. 7. Prospect Road Striping PROSPECT A large percentage of Prospect Road has been completed to its ultimate ROAD STRIPING wrath. For this reason City staff and San Jose staff have proposed that -6- '~ARATOGA CITY COUNCIL ~ENL~IES NOVEMBER 5, 1969- it be painted to show four traffic lanes and a median in those completed areas. They recommended that no median openings be provided'at ~the following Saratoga streets: 1. Scully Avenue, 2. Kristy Lane, and 3. Woodside Drive. Without objection referred to the Public Welfare Committee for further con- sideration.. Staff directed to contact Mr. Martin and Mr. Naugle and other' residents who may be concerned when this matter is discussed so that they may participate. 8. Wildoak Way WILD The development of Tract 4548 on Farwell Avenue has created a situation where OAK WAY half the street within the tract wtli be maintained by the city while the other half will not. The staff has estimated that it~ would cost approximately $B~O00.O0 to upgrade the existing private road to an acceptable condition. The Public Welfare Committee recommends a cooperative project with the city participating to the extent of ~wo-thirds of the cost with the following conditions: 1. Property ~ewners to pay the remaining one third; 2. property ~ewnersI to dedicate the required right-of-way; and 3. property owners to convert to underground utilities. This recommendation is currently under discussion with the property owners. Moved by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Dwyer for adoption of this report. Carried and so ordered. 9~. 911 - Nationwide Emergency N~ 911 Moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded by Mr. Sanders that the Mayor be authorized to express Saratoga's support of the idea of a Nationwide Emergency Number at the Mayor's Committee Meeting of the I.C.C. on November 6, 1969. Carried and so ordered. lO. ' I.C.C. Stan~ on Mutual Aid ICC Moved by ~r. Dwy_eer~, seconded by Mr. Sanders that thei Saratoga City Council RE iend~se t~ re~endations of the Mutual Aid Committee. Carried and so M0~I~JPZ ordered. ll. Park System Acquisition Bond Election PARK The Management Committee recommends that the City conduct a parkSstem BOND~ bond election concurrent with the Statewide Primary election on June 2, ELECTION 1970. Moved by N~. Sanders, seconded by Fir. Dwyer that the Council accept JUNE 2. the recommendation of the Management Committee. Carried and so ordered. 12. Additional Baseball Field at Foothill School FOOTHILL The Saratoga Union School District,the Los Gatos-Saratoga Recreation Department BASEBALL and the Saratoga Little League have asked the City to participate in the develop- FIELD ment of an additional baseball field at Foothill School. The Ps~ks & Recreation Commission reviewed this proposal at its October 6 meeting and voted to recommend that the City Council appropriate $5,000.00 to pay theCity's share of this project. The School District will maintain the new turf. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr.~ Smith that the expenditure of $5,000.00 to pay the city share of construction of the field at Foothill School be authorized provided that the field layout be subject to the review and approval of the city and that' the city have the right to participate in the scheduling of events on the field at the option .of the City. 13. Saratoga Avenue Walkway SARA~0GA The Public Works staff has prepared a revised plan for a walkway between AVENUE Fruitvale Avenue and the Village. This proposed plan will be safe for WALKWAY pedestrians and will require very little removal of shrubbery. Moved by Mr.Robbins, seconded by Mr. Smith to adopt ths revised plan and authorize the staff to advertise for bids. Staff directed to contact residents where there is any conflict with existing facilities or pr_operty lines. D. DEPARTmeNT HEADS AND OFFICERS -1. Director of Planning ~ Mr. Walker reported that at the last meeting of the Council a Resolution was passed creating an Architectural Advisory Committee to assist in Design '° SARATOGA CITY 'COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1969 Review Functions. There was an error made in wording and the intent of the Planning Con~nisSilon wa~ changed. Paragraph 4, Line 4 should read: "and to serve at the pleasure of the Mayor". Mr. Huff indicated that the wording would be corrected. 2. Director of Public Works QUITO A. Mr. Shook reported that a contract has been received from the City of RESURFACE San Jose for an intended cooperative project for capping on Quito Road. VIA B. Moved by Mr. Smith for approval of Change Order ~l in the amount of $253.00 ESCUELA for improvements on Via Escuela, covering the cost of additional asphalt. C.O. ~1 PROJECT C. Mr. Shook submitted a Project' Status Report formview of the Council. STATUS E. CITY MANAGER TR.455~ 1. Letter from Pacific Shore Properties, Inc. with regard to storm sewers in STORM DR. Tract 4554 referred to Public Welfare Committee. REIMBURSE. 2. City Attorney-Client Relationships - to be discussed in Executive Session following Adjournment. VI-I~. C0~NJNICATIONS A. WRITTEN YOUTH 1. Request from Saint Andrews EpisCopal Church for permission to hold a PEACE'i! procession on November 14, 1969 in compliance with City Code, Article PROCESSION III, Section 13, as part of an overall observance for peace in the world. Moved by Mr. Sanders, seconded by Mr. Smith for approval of this request. Carried unanimously. SDR-715 2. SDR-T15 - Specific Condition "B" - request final subdivision approval. HANSON Council indicated that Hanson should offer to dedicate his interest in in residual parcel r/w for Pierce Road. AZULE 3- Letter from Azule Womens Club requesting acquisition of~a park site in PARK SITE Area ~1. BROOKVIEW 4. Letter from Brookview Home Owners Association reporting on a meeting with HOEOWNERS Don Tamm and asking for consideration to the serious problem with regard to policing. Without objection referred to the Public Welfare Committee. BORNEMEIER 5- Letter written by W.C. Bornemeier on behalf of the citizens of Allendale 'LETfEH Avenue and Harleigh Drive thanking the City Council for the prompt and efficient way the request for No Parking regulations was handled. CHAMPAGNE 6. a. Request from St. Androws School for Champagne tasting on December 12 RECEPTIONS during benefit perf6rmance of "Kismet". b. Request from Santa Clara County Association for Mental Health for a~ Champagne tasting on December 5, in connection with a benefit performance of "Kismet". Moved by Mr. Dwyer, seconded by Mr. Sanders that approval be granted. Carried unanimously. BAKER RE 7. Letter d~ed October 6, 1969 from Bryce a~d Barbara Baker of Challenger GOODWILL Pre-School regarding the location;&of a Goodwill Dumping Box. Mr. Walker BOX reported that the problem has been solved through the cooperation of Goodwill Industries by relocating the box and cleaning up the area. 8.Letter from City Attorney dated October 27, 1969 regarding the use of alien materials. B. ORAL NAUGLE 1. M~. Naugle, representing Prides Crossing Home Owners Association, ~ske'd GARBAGE that the City review the contract with Green Valley Disposal particularS9 CONTRACT with relation to the backyard burning ban effective January l, 1970- Mr. Dwyer asked that a letter be directed to City staff and the matter will be reviewed by the Policy Committee. SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1969 VIII. ADJOURNMENT Vibe-Mayor 'Eobbin~~ acknowledged the presence of Admiral Crisp, Planning COmmiSsioner, Mr. Cowan, P.G. & E., Dr. Overacker, League ~f Women Voters, Mr. Naugle and Mr. Martin,Prides Crossing Home Owners Association, and Mrs. l~amke of the Good Government Group, who provided coffee during the recess. Meeting adjourned at ll:15 P.M. to Executive Session, Respectfully submitted