HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-29-1975 City Council Minutes MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Tuesday, July 29, 1975 - 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: Saratoga Community Center, 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga, California
TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting
I. ORGANIZATION
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmen Brigham, Corr, Kraus, Matteoni and Bridges
Absent: None
II. PUBLIC HEARING'
A.CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATE LIBRARY SITE LOCATED ON SARATOGA AVENUE
NEAR SACRED HEART CHURCH
The City Manager presented a summarization of the progress to date con-
cerning the proposed library site on Saratoga Avenue near Cox Avenue,
explaining that negotiations to purchase this site are still underway;
however, some qQestions have arisen concerning the negotiations. He
explained that the purpose of the'public hearing this evening is to con-
sider a backup or alternat._e_.s~t~e_~b~ld present negotiations for the
Saratoga-Cox Avenue site~ail~.S___L~
He reviewed the background in arriving at this particular site location,
indicating that after the Counci! approved this site in April, 1974,
the City hired the firm of Spencer, AssoCiates of Palo Alto to work with
the City in developing concepts for a proposed new library. They then
developed a workshap concept, and established a 25-member committee to
work with the architect. This committee established a number of goals
and objectives for the new li.brary, particularly related to the physical
1) they felt the building should be residential in character;
~ should provide a ~ocal point for the community;
should provide i~enti[C~ and a sense of place;
4).should be adaptable to physical c~ange;
5) should provide a sense of Selonging for individuals using it;
6) Should be accessible;
7) should make maximum use of environmental factors~'i~.~.-', solar energy,
8) should provide adequate parking. natural surroundings; and
The City Manager explained that these goals and objectives provided a
basis for evaluation of importance when decisions had to be made further
down the line.
He indicated that the Bond Issue for the library passed in March, 1975,
and negotiations actively began on this site. shortly thereafter. He
described the specific~i't~16~i~h looked at, which was the location
on the front portion of~'Sa~_~T~nue. However, because of the high
cost of this land, th~ou~iqsc~e~to'~t~l~i~n~
~ 1
~~~'~T~l~h~e~i~'i'O~a~io~o~i~i~d~i~
~.~'+~6'f~T'property. ~He <~l"i. h~ the various e ements that
werb:evaluated pertinent to the si_te~o~e rear of the propety, such as:
l) visibility~2~i~a~{~i~ina ~l]n~(e o~parcel; 3). question of
access; 4) ex~l~{i~ ~~o~l~n~ 5) firming up of costs.
The Council in considering a fallback position in the event negotiations on
the Saratoga-Cox Avenue site failed, based this position on 4 factors:
1) timing (in order to not delay a fall bond sale); 2). initial objectives
and the question of mitigation, particularly on the issue of visibility;
3) potential impact on the libra~y_-itself, due to future development on
remainder of the parcel; and 4) inability to arrive at a firm committment
on the dollar value of the land until other elements have been-resolved.
Mr. Beyer described the specific location of the alternate site under
consideration, which is~T6~a'~to~ue
Heart Church.
He indicated ~t t~e time he made his recommendation to terminate the
negotiations with the property owner and hold a public hearing to consider
an alternate, it had appeared to him that an agreement was not going to be
reached on the proposed site. However, since that time, progress has been
made in the negotiations, a~d he'indicated he was hopeful an acceptable
agreement could be reached with t~e property owner.
He then presented'two letters that had been submitted to th~ City Council
relevant to this matter from:
Mr. and Mrs. John Jorgensen, 13631 Saratoga Ave., urging
the use of city~owned land adjacent to~Sacred Heart Church
for the new library site; and
Pride's Crossing Homeowners Association, advocating the approved
location for the proposed library, and speaking to the various
objectives mentioned earlier.in Mr. Beyer's presentation.
Mr. Beyer indicated that the Library-Commission's recommendation re-affirms
its support of the original site;]however, the Commission.approved the
following motion at.its meeting on June 25, 1975:
"To recommend to the City Council that it supports the
recommendation for the alternate site, and urge the City
Council that if such site must be selected, consideration
be given to joint. useage of.the Sacred Heart'Church
'~parking lot."
Councilman Matteoni asked, with r~spect to, the timing problem, what was
the expiration d~te of the existing Quito site lease.
Mr. Beyer replied that this~leaseexpires in~, 1976; however, the Countg"
is in the process of negotiating an extended lea~e~ which would overlap the
proposed initial schedule for construction of the new facility~
The Mayor then opened the'publiC hearing at 7:58 ~.M.
The Mayor recognized the presence of Dr. Nat Abrams, owner of the proposed
site in question, and a~ked Dr. Abrams if he wou~d like to address the City
Council.
Dr. Abrams, 19739 Edina Lane, commented that he doesn't intend to ~nter into
negotiations at this public hearing. Rather, h~s objective was to give the
audience his opinion of how things were proceedingon this site.
Dr. Abrams indicated that the City could oo forward on the purchase of this
land with the full assurance that~$200,O06.00 is all that the land wouldcost,
and therefore, he didn't feel this should be a problem.
He then pointed out on the map the proposed situation of the building on the
rear of this property, and stated he has no question that the' land is available
for the size of building the City.will finally design, and the orientation of
the building to the land will be no problem. He indicated the building, can
be re-orientated to the solar energy needs, and the courtyard can be faced
-2-
toward the creek,~away from the entrance, which opens to a garden setting.
Dr. Abrams stated there would be.no limiting factors that would prevent the
library from being situated at any angle~on this land.
With regard to the question of accessibility, Dr. Abrams indicated there
would be access from Cox Avenue and from Saratoga Avenue; therefore, he
didn't feel this would be a probTem.
He indicated another question seems to'be that of G~ibility of this
location, and indicated that in his mind, this has~o'been'resolved.
He stated he is agreeable ~olleaving a visability line of view from the
entrance so most of the building could be seen. He further indicated he
would be agreeable to imposed restrictions on adjacent"land to prohibit any
structures that would block the view of the library.
With regard to timing, D~. Abrams indicated he felt it would be possible,
if meetings were held 'daily.and pressure-was put on, this whole matter
could be wrapped up in two weeks. He further commented that a private
developer would have wrapped this up in one afternoon.
Dr. Abrams indicated ~here are, however, some requirements which he would
need, namely, to be able to devel'op the land in accordance with present
zoning. He indicated he has no i~mmediate plans to develop this land.
However, he doesn't feel he can sity by and assume the land will be
developed in that way once'the li~brary is developed.
Dr. Abrams further stated that~he is in a position to commit himself by
imposing restrictions upon himsel'f, and he asked-if the City-is in aposition
to commit itself to a developer. It'was further his feeling when the library
goes in under this kind of planni~ng, the land is committed% and everything
the City Council does that affects land commits the City forever. He stated
there is no reason why the negotiations could not be wrapped up and an
agreement drafted in a number of days.
Vi'c Ulmer, 13004 Paseo P~esada, asked if the current conflict of agreement
centered around the fact that. the City wishes to have a committment of the
rest of this land in a different.way than the owner of land wishes it to
be committed.
Mayor'Bridges explained that the City is attempting'to uphold the original
plans of the Library Committee, and the developer seems to be asking for
a committment from the City that we would develop the property to present
standards at such time when~the property is developed.
Councilman Kraus indicated that one of the concerns is the committment of
this Council to some other City Council further down.the line.
Councilman Matteoni commented that the kind of assurance the property~wants
here is causing the Council some problems because the Council has nothing
to deal with. He stated this goes into the'planning process that might bind
a Council 5 to 10 years from now, particularly when~the specifics aren't known.
Fred Tatar, 20577 Manor Drive, indicated he would like to ask a question about
the alternate site on Saratoga'A~enue, that being: "How large is this property,
and how does the criteria meet with the criteria outlined earlier in the meeting?"
The City Manager replied that this site is approximately 11 acres, and it
pretty well fits most of the objectives outlined in his initial comments this
evening.
Lorretta Hill, Vice President, Prides Crossing Homeowners and Taxpayers
Association, addressed the Counci'l, indicating she would like to read aloud
the letter to the City Council. Mrs. Hill read the letter, which outlines
various points of priority in selecting the library site, a~d documenting
their reasons for these prio~i'~i~'~T'.~The letter also urges that the City
Manager and City Council re~ch'~n~eement with' Dr. Abrams on the Saratoga,
Cox Avenue site.
- 3-
Martha Beverett, 19597'Via Monte,~indicated she has attended Library
Workshop Meetings, and it'was her impression the Saratoga, Cox Avenue
site was the most desirable location. She further commented that for 3 to
4 years she has been active in "Friends of the'Library", and..it seem~ like
this issue fluctuates back and forth. It was her feeling the time to act
is now, as the longer it'is postponed~ the further away it gets, and if the
Counci'l doesn't intend to go with the Saratoga, Cox Avenue site, they should
proceed with another site.
Margaret Ulmer, 13004 Paseo Presada, commented she would 1,ike very much to
see the Saratoga, Cox Avenue s'ite gothrough, and it wouldn't matter to her
where the'-library was located on this piece of property.! With respect to
the visibiHty element, Mrs. U~lmer commented that theOuito Librar~ has_no:
visibility, but it is a verybusy~l~ibrary. As far'las ~ccess~e~n~'~
she felt this site was far superior to'the alternate site on Sara~6~'~'Avenue,
and it was also easier for bicyclists to get to.
Don Wilson, 20365 Kirkmont, Vice President of Northwest Saratoga Homeowners
Association, indicated he was opposed to the alternate~site. He further
commented that he felt the City~was close enough inits negotiations with
the property owner that an agreement shoul~d be reached.
G. Carlson, 12234 Brookglen D 've~ represe~i~gg'~G~i'e~ Homeo~n~s-'.~
Association, commented that he believes th~'~o~t~'On-of
originally proposed is the one which they felt to be best, from the stand-
point,of visibility and easy access. -He indicated he is very much opposed
to the accessibili.ty factors at the.Sacred Heart location. Mr. Carlson
'indicated that'he has taken th~ opportunity to work with some census data,
which he felt strongly ~upportS- the site as proposed. He p~oceeded to
present this information on the overhead screen, concluding that the
Saratoga, Cox Avenue site appears to have the best accessibility to the
majority of people.
Mr. Carlson commented that it seems apparent that there is a need for an
alternate site proposal; however,'he. disa~rees very much with .the recommended
alternative, as the acces~(f~,~'~6T~e ~llter~Ti~ui~b~p~roximately
1.1,O00-reSidents, as o~os~d to 18,000 at'the'~ro~o~ed
~ ~Eby~-Fe~{~ ~ar~_ ~f~ a~j'=~h~%~ 'by '~J~_~h]jd '~, one- hal f.
Mr. Carlson indicated he felt the site on Cox Avenue and Highway 9 should be
consider~ as an alternate location for the library. He recoanized the fact
that the County Library Co~ission has not been in favor of t~is site, as the
Cupertino Library is a. short distance down the road.' However, he indicated
it was his opinion,~the people who"l'ive in Saratoga have a better understanding
of the~'b~ca[~'~d~nd~e didn't f~el it would' be fair for the '
Council ~?arb].trariq~V-overr~de~.{~Eitizens of Saratoaa. 'He also comented
that he doesn't remember the site adjacent to Sacred He~ C~Urc~ '~:gBei~ne
of the most favorable locations in earlier c6hTidb~{ibnT~f ~h~it6.
Mr. Kanne, 19918 Bonnie Ridge Drive, commented that he feels very strongly
that the City should keep this alternate site on Saratoga Avenue open, as
he felt it had advantages of its own; for instance, it is on a bus line and
provides access from a number of areas.
Charles Earl ey, 20098 Chateau Drive, commented that he would like to correct
the~pe~k~epresenting Brookvi~ Homeowners Association, in that the Sacred
Hea~'Ch~ site was never considered in any previous deliberations. Ite
stated that the site was never discussedand it was never turned down. He
also disputed this speaker's density calculations, indicating the entire left-
hand side of this 11 acres is empty, and there is.no density-per-acre figure.
Mr. Earley further ~o~ented that;$200,O00. O0 for this pieceof land to the
rear of the SaratOga, Cox Avenue site isC~~b?ry", and we should
take a good hard look at the suggested alterna~i~i:t~
-4-
Jim Isaak, 18596 Martha Ave., commented he felt it was important to have
a full-size facility~ and would be'h~sitant to accept anything less than
~0~0 sq~f~(~T~at.so commented that he agrees with"the Cou~cil's
concer6 ~d~n'~'~f~t~e use of the land, ands.indicated that the City would
have full control of the Sacred Heart land. He indicated that although he
prefers the Cox AvenUe site for' personal reasons, he felt there are good
reasons to consider the alternate site. ..
John Campbell, member of the ~.City~[ibrary Conmission, commented that he
recalls when the final.recommendation cam~ before the'C~ty Council for a
site in the Cox Avenue area. 'It ~ashis feeling'the City's hands should
not be tied to the extent Ithat they don't have the option to move a mile
down the road in the same general area. He didn,t feelI this recommendation
was intended to tie the City's hands to this specific corner, and the
City Council should have the opportunity to'move in one'direction or the
other, and if it happens to end up on a piece of Ci.ty-ow!ned property at
half the price, this could be applied to a building of at least 20,000
square feet.
Mr. Tatar, 20577~Man6r D~ive, speaking on behal~ of members of Saratoga
Manor Homeowners Association, commented they would prefer the Saratoga,
Cox Avenue Site; however, i~f it means substantial delays in building the
library,~'~,r, nate site onSa~atoga Avenue would be agceptable.
Charles Huff, 12725. Miller Avenue, addressed theCounci~l, commentinn that
if it is felt the price for this proposed site 'is. too high, couldn'~ steps
be taken to find out what the property is really worth. With respect to the
site next to Sacred Heart~ Church, he commented that anyone riding a bike '
would have to ride a mile to this'location. He indicated he felt most
parents would-allow their children to ride thei~ bicyclesup Cox Avenue to
the site next to the creek; however, they would never allow them to ride
down Saratoga Avenue.
With regard to the size, M~. Huff commented that if it meant cutting from
20,000 square feet down to 12,000 or 15,000 square feet'to allow use of
wood frame construction'as opposed'to concrete; he-would say "no".
Mr. Huff further indicated when the 725 homes were canvassed atthe time
of the Bond Election,'it was his opinion these people favored a site on
Quito, right where the library is presently'located', even though this is
a poor location visually,.as opposed to the Civic Center location.
It was his feeling Dr. Abrams is negotiating on this property in good f~ith,
and he feels the 'City should continue its negotiations with him.
Frank Perdichizzi, 18904 Colby Court, commented that it seems to him the
City is considering a site which'has not been discussed 'at any previous
public hearings. He recalled tha~'the only sites ~6nsider~d w~re:
1) Saratoga, Cox Avenue; 2) Cox, Highway 9; and 3) Civic Center site.
He further commented that when~he.assisted in the Library Bond Issue, he
attempted to persuade people to vote in favor of the Bond .Issue, based on
the Saratoga, Cox Avenue site location. It was his opinion ~hat if there
is a breakdown innegotiations,'the ~ogic~l alternative would seem to be
the Cox Avenue, Highway 9 site, since'this was~e s~avored location,
and would serve more people.
Helen Lemmon, 20653 Woodward Court, indicated she has not yet heard what
size plot the City is talking about on Saratoga and Cox Avenues, and as
she understands, the $~00,000.00 isfor the library itself~ She indicated
she would like to have an 'idea of what the future cost of the library would
be if it were to start construction in'the next 2 to 3 months. She indicated
she would likb to see more realistic figures, and also, some alternatives,-~
based on building size.
Maxine French, 19107 Vineyard Lane, commented that when Saratoga was
first incorporated, the site adjacent to Sacred Heart was considered as
geographically the center of' the area. She commented that.while she agrees
there are a lot of people on the north side, she recalls when'she was working
on the Bond Issue, people in the Sobey Road and Quito Road area had~ilndicated
they would like to library located in this area.
Ruth Angerer, 19606 Via Monte Drive, commented that she is concerned that
the City get moving on this library. It was her feelingUiSt
~'~6'~'~a~97, regardless of location, if they really w~o~g~e.
Larry Tyler, 13611 Saratoga VistaTAvenue, advised that last evening the County
Library Commission held a special meeting; however, there was not a quorum at
this meeting. It was'his impression, however, that the location opposite
Paul Masson Winery would'be the nQmber one site location. 'However, the
Commission di'd support the secondary,'location under consideration.
Mr. Grundy, 19242 Gunther Court, indicated he voted for the Bond Issue
believing it would be located on Saratoga and Cox Avenue.
Barbara Ulmer addressed the Council with the following questions: 1)
On the Master Plan for the City what was the designation of the Sacred Heart
property? and 2) When the'~itizens voted on the Bond Issue, wasn't it made
clear that the money was to go toward both the .land andsthe building?
The City Manager replied that the General Plan indicates this land as a
park site. In answer to the second question, he replied that it was
specifically, indicated on the ballot that the money ($1,200,000) would qo
toward the land, as well as the building construction.
Mary ~4oss, 20777 Pamela Way, commented that in talking about children using '
the library, she thinks it should.be considered in the secondary location
that there is a school adjacent to that site, and also, within walki'ng
distance, while there isn't a school'within walkinn distance on the first
site. (This statement was corrected, in that Congress Springs School and
Brookview School are near'the Saratoga Ave., Cox A~e. site.)
Mrs. Moss stated that when the Bond Issue was being considered and finally
passed, she had thought the site was to be on Saratoga Avenue~on the front
portion of the property, and now She understand~ it is to be moved to the
rear. She wondered who 'would 'be ~esponsible for the roads going through
this property and what would be the cost for this.
Mr..Beyer replied that this is one of the elements of the negotiations, and
also, the total package would come out of the library fund.
Charles Huff asked if since the alternate.site is desionated ~s~"park land",
would this necessitate holding public hearings, involving a lot of time and
debates with respect to changing sites?
Mayor Bridges replied that the Council would have to decide the process to
be followed, if this-~alternate site is chosen.
Lorretta Hill again addressed the Council, indicating that in November, 1974,
the City received the initial appnaisal of the property proposed for the
library site on Saratoga Avenue, opposite McFarland, and the City must have
known at that time it couldn't afford this site. She wondered wh~ this site
continued to be considered.
The City Manager explained that at the time of the Bond Election, no decision
had been made as to where the library would go, and'it was after the City had
obtained the architect that the site alternatives were looked at in more detail.
He indicated in November, there was only a "ball=parkfigure", and there had
not yet been an analysis made. He further indicated the City was interested
in getting the Bond Issue passed first before hiring an archi.tect and spending
money,"n6t'~knowing if the Bond Issue would even pass.
- 6-
Mr. G. Carlson again addressed'the Council, stating.that'he feels~__'~r~e was
~a~'~t~indication by the people who have worked'to~,~ri~brary'~6
~S~'tb~ that the most desirable alternate site would b'~the Cox Avenue,
Highway 9 location.
Ann Kulch n, 12440 Curry Ave.,~inquired as to how much time~'s actually
being spent in negotiations, an~'~i~'~d~he would hope that the City
would negotiate very intensely to.reach an understanding. She ~urther
commented that this is an emotional',-as wel~.as political decision, and it
is questionable whether as much interest would have been aroused has this
been a floating bond issue.
Mayor Bridges replied to the first question by indicating that negotiations
are proceeding-as rapi'dly as possible, and the City is dependent to some
extent on planners and other people during these negotiations.
The City Manager explained that the problem is simply the fact that the
two parties don't see eye-to-eye on certain matters.
The question was asked if there was any possibility of a conflict or
timing problem in the County system whiich would necessitate someone else
coming in an building the facility.
Barbara Campbell, County,Librarian, replied that the only timing consideration
would be the termination of the present Qui~o,~lease, and they are hopeful to
extend this lease in order to "dove tail"Cc~6mp~t~'~e new.facility.
A resident of 19227 Gunter Court, asked if at the time the Bond Issue was
passed, was it on the basis that ~he library would be built anywhere in the
area, or with the particular Saratoga, Cox Avenue site in mind. He co~ented
if it was bui3t ~ith this site i~n~mi,nd, the Council should feel an obligation
to build it on this site.
Councilman Brigham commented he would envision a'big problem in going beyond
a fall bond sale, ~rimarily due to increased rate of interest, and this
Mr. Swanson, 18999Saratoga Glen Place, commented that the Bond, Issue ha~
committed the City to build a really decent building for this'~ommunity.
Also, he felt we have to'take'the land that gives us the' proper kind of
building that w6~ld acco~odate our needs.
Mrs. Ulmer commented that she would hate to see the City take'land that is
co~itted for a park and use it for.a library, and she felt the City should
think about the General Plan, as well as the library.
It was then moved by Councilman Kraus and seconded b~ Councilman Brigham
the public hearing be continued to a future(~un~d~The motion was
carried. ~' ~ ~~
Councilman Matteoni commented that he would not feel comfortable without
knowing there is an alternate plan to fall back on in the event negotiations
are not successful. With respect to a fal.1 bond sale, he agreed that this
~]~antageous, and he doesn't want to'see the library monies continue
~6~'i~h~ He further co~en~ed that when the 25=member co~ittee was
formulated, that co~ittee worked 'only on the bond issue and its passage,
and this was prior to selecting a .site. He indicated he would~like to get
o n with the business of building an adequate library faci~lity i'n Saratoga~
however, he feels it ~ important.to consider the best possible offer for
the preferred site, and make this known to the public so they are aware what
frame of reference the City is dealing with. Councilman Matteoni verified
the fact that the City Council ha~ never co~itted itself to a "preferred
site".
- 7 -
With regard to the concern about the remainder of this property, he
indicated he is hesitant to make a broad'committment to the planning
process at this point.
Councilwoman Corr commented that the City is ~till trying to negotiate
for what has been determined as ~he "preferred site", and she is' concerned
about the future use of this land, particularly. as it relates to safety,
and also, control of conjestion..
Councilman Brigham commented that he feels the committments the City makes
is far more important than any site, and he would favor thinking about an
alternate site if c~tain co~ittments cannot be satisfied.
Councilman Kraus indicated he is 'concerned about commitifigSa future City
Council to something that is going to happen. Also, he commented if the
$1,200,000.00'is going to be eaten by by roads, parking? etc., this would
limit the library facility~somewhat. He agreed that he would like to have
an alternate site to fall back on.
Mayor Bridges commented that the 20,000 square foot facility would relieve
the crowded conditions existing'at the present ~acili~yand serve its
functions in a better way. 'Also,. the Council ha~(~6~6~d~the Saratoga,
Cox Avenue site. However,~ he'feels it ~s,jmporta~t~t~(~'~nizethat the
impossible is the impos~'~:e.
~ ~ 'I ':Mayor Bridges 'commented that he appreciates the citizens' comments this
evening, and now realizes there is another alternative site which should
be considered. Therefore, the Council .is holding the public hearing open
so there will be an opportunity for the citizens again to address the Council
on this matter.
III. BIDS AND CONTRACTS'
A. 1975-76 ANNUAL STREET SEALING PROGRAM FOR VARIOUS CITY STREETS
The City Manager indicated this is in follow up to the July 22nd Committee
of the Whole Meeting, and the revised program would provide oil and screening
for the entire length of Saratoga Avenue, and for the entire length of
Allendale Avenue (see memorandum, dated July 24,.1975).
Sho~
~!~_.~.T~~18th, and the
It was moved by Counci'lman Kraus and seconded by Councilman Brigham the
1975-Street Sealing Program be approved, as outlined in the Director of
Public ~6~k~ memorandum, dated July 24, 1975. The motion was carried.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PENINSULA
DIVISION, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI%IES RESOLUTION COMMITTEE
The City Manager indicated the League has required that any resolutions
must be submitted to the Resolutions Committee by August 6th. He indicated
two resolutions have 'been developed by COuncilman Brigham and have been
present~ for the Council's consideration.
The Council discuss~ the resoluti'ons, which are entitled:
l) Resolution Requesting that the State Legislature Provide Funds to
Support Inter-City Rail Transit for Co~uters by Existing Local
Lines to Retieve the Dependency on the Automobile; and
2) Resolution R~uesting that 'the State Legislature Take an Active
Role in Providing Property ,Tax Relief {hrough Property Tax Reform,
Especially by Providing for the Direct Reduction of Property Taxes
through the Re-allocation oT Other Revenue Sources.
-8-
Mayor Bridges indicated he would like to see rewording in the first
resolution to clarify use of existi.ng rail lines not presently being
used to relieve dependency on the automobile, etc.
Councilman Kraus indicated he felt the second resolution shouid specifi-
cally clarify "other revenue sources", and it was suggested the following
wording be added: " . to'be used by local government functions for
expenditures normally funded by property tax."
It was moved by Councilman Kraus ~d~seconded by Councilwoman Corr to
forward these resolutions to the ~g~de of California Resolutions Committee
as amended. Th~ motion was carried. (~.'~2 '
V. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilman Brigham and seconded by Councilwoman Corr the meeting
be adjourned to'and'Executive Session. to discuss personnel matters. The motion
was carried. The meeting was adjourned at lO:25'P.M.
spectf mitted,
c
_ 9-