HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-17-1979 City Council Minutes M I N U T E S
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: WedneSday, October 17, 1979 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, Calif.
TYPE: Regular Meeting
I. ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION
A. ROLL CALL
" Present: Councilmen Callon~
Corr, Kalb, Ma~teoni, Kraus
Absent: None
B. MINUTES M/S: C6rf/Callon to approve the
minutes of October 3, 1979.
· - Carried~,~.4f~'~o~0Yr'CO~ncilman Kalb
abs~tainea2due_to_ aSsende on Oct. 3.
II. COMMUNICATIONS' COMMUNICATIONS
A. ORAL '. ·
1. Jim Cochran~; '13615 ~The City Clerk. accepted the
Vacquero· Court, President' initiative petition, indidating
Pierce-CanyOn Hordesowners 'his 6ffice Would proceed to
Association, pre~enting ~; 'obtain verification that said
initiative. petition re- petition contains signatures of
~ questing pass~age of .. i5 percen.t Qf 'the voters of the
ordinance directing .that.a ! ' city.
detailed and specific plan
for preservation of the ~
rural~ht{a~S]~'~'~,''
/fi~.~hw~sY~ h'irl s ides= b~L
~aF~'~d, and a moratorium be
imposed pending completion
of such a plan.
'2. Charles Huff, 12~25 N6ted.
,. Miller Ave., re: department
& report pertaining to Cox-
Miller Ave. Expressing
the necessity of an, overhead
~' light at this intersection.
3. Captain Tamm, Santa Clara .Noted.
'~ County Sheriff ' s Office, re:
' federal L.E.A.A. ~rant to
participate in a 3-year
burglary prevention program.
Presented; firs.tlproduct~'~
"Recipes for Safety", which
will be mailed to residents
of the City of Saratoga.
12799 Miller Aver,. voicing
.comments on the i~portance
- of a light at.inter.section
of Cox and Miller.
5. Ingrid Peterson, student, M/S: Kraus/Corr.to approve
Saratoga High School, re- 'closUre of streets as requested.
questing closure of Big Basin .!Carrie~ unanimously.
Way and State Highway 9inter
section for one-half hour on
November 9,,1979, for Home-
coming Parade.
B. WRITTEN
1. Mr.' Tom Lauer,I15803 C~'~ Continued to, 11/7/79; Council.
Hidden Hill, Los Gatos, re: to view p~operty.
use of his property at
19280 Bainter Avenue
2. Willia~ H. GOuld, Robert Councir.acknoWledged comments.
Brydon and. Robert Sorenson, City Manager to respond to letter
responding to an article in
WVTEA Newsletter.i(Robert
Brydon'personally addressed
the Council re-emphasizing
the points in.the letterS)
3. Mr. and'Mrs..Denn{s Der,. M/S: Callon/Matteoni to refund
877 Willo~St~t, San Jose, the deposit of $200 for use of
~i~-~--~o~i~ pr~vi~s letter Hakone Gardens, due to failure
~~Hatc~ Gardens ~n the staff's part to see that
for wedding ceremony. the gates were opened on time.
Carried ~nanim~usly.
4. Ms. Lisa CosmaS, 13060 Noted and filed; City Manager
LaVista Drive. (8th g~ade to respond.
student at Redwood School)
requesting that streets.be
kept clean and bike paths
maintained.
5. Elaine Walker', R.R.T.,~::C~un~i~l-~o~ce~u~ ~o cons'ider this
President, American ~'=a~o'm~{~'~f~he ~ole Meeting.
Lung Associ~ti0n~- encourag-
ing Council to adopt an
ordinance relating to
regulation of smoking in
certain places. ..
6. Board of Supervisors, .7 Noted ~nd filed.
County of Santa Clar~,:'
enclosing county ordinance
re: animals, and urging .
adoption of a similarlgrdin-
ance.by each city. " ,.
II. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd.) ~ CO~vIUNICATIONS
B. WRITTEN
7. Letters re: ~afe bikeways Public Works staff-diredted .to
and walkways for-school have report and recommendation
Chirdren in Saratoga: for meeting on November 7, 1979.
Ms. Jean Ernst, PreSident,
PTA, and Mr. Marvin
Steinberg, PrinCipal,
Redwood School
· Congress Springs'School
Site Council
8. Petition re: safer bike- 'Same as abovE.
ways and walkways signed by
Redwood School PTA Board
members.
9. L~tters expressihg support Notdd.and filed.
of resoning of APN 517=09-33
(Eugene Zambetti):
Mr. Otto Crawford,
/='I President, Saratoga
"~' Chamber of. Commerce' -- .
Mr. David So~en'~en,- F4531',
Oak Street 'f
Ms. Rais~"'Koeh~TPie~idefie
· Saratoga Village:Merchants
Association-'
10. Ms. Clotilde M. Perasso, Noted; letter .to be included
1298 Sacramento Street, San with fi. le on this subject.
Francisco, re: proposed
Cocciardi-Chadwick subdiviz
sion and proper,ty she owns on
Pierce Road.
1t. Letters from residents con Noted;.City Manager t6'respon&
cerning proposed"demonstra~io~ advising action.
trail:
James W. Day, 14287~~
Thomas Seefurth, 14483' "
Chester Ave. -
Sue Jennings, 14955 Sobey Rd.
Carla Gibson, 19653-VersailIes
Way
Pat'Dunn, 18470 Sobey Road
Nancy Dorsey, 19361 San ~[qrcos
Road
Lisa Gh~14900~So~h~X. Rd.'.
-~o~O r s 'e.~_~i6-l~S~n~)
~ S~N. Aparicio,'14897'~obey R
~;3ul{e Ann Jameson, t9227'S~n
~Nancy Gross~anv~lS0e2 Sperry. ~-'
d Lane
~,_~x W. Hoo~r .l~:25.:=Sobey-Rd.
II. COMMUNICATIONS ~Cont'd.) COMMUNICATIONS.
Letters re: dem6nstration trail:I
Row~'~C. Boylan, 14670 SSbey Rd. '
Harry Bellicitta, 19501 Redberry
Dr., Los-Gat6s
~obert Sarringer, 13485 Old Oak
~ay
Maureen Schneider, 14425 Sob~y
Rd.
Lori Schneider,'14425.Sobe~'Rd.
Lisa Schneider, 14425 So~ey. Rd.
Russell Schneider, 14425 Sobey
Rd.
Charl~ne Ovaland, 12~01 Foo~hil ....
Lane
Dorothy ~iller, 14440 Pike Rd.
Ronnie Westreich, Saratoga
Community Gardens
Joan Hebert, 16950 Bohlman Rd.
Gary Kanemoto, 14155 Sobey
Meadow Cohrt
Ken Napier, West Valley
Joggers and Stri~er.~ -
Murray Brookman, 1471.5' S~beX.''l '
Road
Virgil H. Voss, 1498R~Sobey ~d.
Delores Roszkowski,.:15060 Sober'
Rd.
The Yqung Family, 15t01.-.Pepper- '-.
Lane "
Mrs. Donald Dorsey, 19361 San
Marcos'Road '-
Mr./Mrs. McKenzie Moss, 15745 - .
Peach Hill Road
Virginia Sampson, 190~5 Sunny- "
side
Marykay Breitenback, 20130
Bonnie Brae Drive
Freda Jells, 20500 Lomita Ave.
Josephine ThOmpson, 14906
-Sobey Road_
Nine petitions endorsing trails
and pathways.
Seven petitions' endorsing pro-
posed demonstration trail from
San Marcos Road, Sobey Road,
Vesting Road and Quito. Road area
One petition endorsing proposed
:demonstration trail from INFI,
a Junior Achievement Company
One petition opposing demon-
stration trail, ~uggesting
funds be directed.to city park
system (~hester Ave. area
residents
III. SUBDIVISIONS, BUILDING SITES, SUBDIVISIONS., BUILDING SITES,
ZONING REQUESTS -'ZONING~REQUESTS
A.. APPEAL OF SDR~12~0; HULSE- The City Manage~-repo~ted'-~ha~
(IRANY) MT~ 'EDEN.ROAD, TENTA- per the Co~ncil's request,
TIVE BUILDING SITE APPROVAL, Mr, Irany. has m~t with the staff
2 LOTS, REQUEST FOR SECOND and has'nd problems with the
1-YEAR EXTENSION-.(Cont'd. ,'m6dified cohditions of tentative
-9/19/79) site,approval.
M/S: Cor~/Callon to gra~t the
one-year extension, subject to
the added conditions of tentative
site' approval. Carried unanimousiy.
-B, REPORT FROM PLANNING DIRECTOR :The'qit~ Manager explained the
RE': EMERGENCY ACCESS REQUIRE= reason' for agendizi~g this item
MENT FOR SD-1418 ,(GERALD is to consider whether or not
BUTLER, 150115 VICKERY AVE.) the 'Council wi'shes to consider
Mr. Butler.'s"request for modifi-
cation of requirement for an
emergency access road. .Staff
has report'ed concerning this
issue, dated '10/12/79.
'CounCilman Matteoni commented
:that if ,the Council were to grant
this-request, it would h~ve to be
conditioned ~o that: 1) When the
other ,road is opened up through
:litigation, the' two lots w0'uld
"take ac'ces-s off of that; 2) the
applicant wo~td~nBt-.be entitred
to anotber e~c~ption ne~t-year
for 4 more 'units.
The City Attorney pointed out that
i~ i961 wh~en~the policy_=was adopted,
· C6mmr~-i~n~'wO-U-l~d-b-e~given--d,i~C~tion
· to permit 4',~r less lot subdivisions
to be on .a. minimum access road,
as opposed to-a public street,
' ' dependent upon. the circumstances of
each case.-
~M~S Kalb/Corr to approve consider-
'ation o~-this reqqest, and schedule
the' item for the'~ next- regular
.- meeting 0f, November ~7, 1979.
· Carried u~animously.
IV PETITIONS, ORDINANCES 'AND PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND
RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTIONS,
A. MINUTE RESOLUTII The Ci.ty l~anager referred to the
RE: DEMONSTRATION TRAIL AND , Parks 'and ReCreation Commission
PATHI,TAY PROGRAM AS ~PHECOM~I~rDED recommendation, dated. 8'/6/79. He
BY PARKS &-RECREATION indicated one issue came~=-up at the
COMMISSION , . . previo~us Committee bf the WhOle
', Meeting re&evan~ to"a' piece of the
propos'ar which goes from the end
· ~ of Chestef~:.,p~a, ralleling. San'Marc0s'
.... '~ ~% ~' ' E"~"E', '~ ~-~n .the,!0dd ,F~]'lows proDer,ty to ·
!' ~'~ruic~'l~,-ahd wbe.therr'or~not the
Odd Fel. lOws ,were supportive of
~ this. piede, of the recommendation.
'- 5 -
IV. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND C~ PETITIONS, ORDINANCES', AND
RESOLUTIONS (Cont'd.) RESOLUTIONS
'A. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE: DEMON- (~.I~. Lively - cont~i)
STRATION TRAIL AND PATHWAY
PROGRAM AS RECOMmeNDED BY area. .The pathways will provid~
PARKS AND RECREATION a readily needed' tfnk toward the ·
COMMISSION outlying areas:-of the county
" which will also hook up f~ the~
(Robert Beyer, City ManagerS. ~rails.system.~.Th_'~'~_Co~c~"~'~
' f e d-b y '
Mr. Conklin, Manager of the Odd . ~g~up of people who.have -
Fellows, has indicated that moved into the area who are
their board has determined ~hat striving to knock out ~he r~ral
their are unalterably opposed aspects of Saratoga. If there
to equestrian nse of their is not action taken in a positive '
total property, let alone just fash±on, the time wi.l'l have passed,' '
this stretch. He encouraged the Coundil to act
favorably on t~i~ initiative as
The City Manager brought to soon a~ poSSible
the Council's attention all
letters and petition~ regarding LouiSe Schaefer, Chairman,
this subject, and these names Saratoga Parks and. Recreation
were read into the record. ~ommi~S~n, i~d~cated.there are
2 points which need to be reviewed:
Councilman Matteoni inquired.if 1). The Sobey Lane corner easement
the grant money i's restric. ted was. checked b~ Barbara SampSon,
to formulation of.this trail, and it'.goes odt 20'feet from'th~
and als'o, the amoLmt Of t~e edge'~f the road into the orchard;
grant, an~ 2).,sinde the Council's dis-
cushion with ~he O~d Fellows,
B~rbara Sampson, Director of ' the Commission took the position
Cormsunity Services, explained that horses not be included on
that' the grant application was the ~roposed demonstration trail
made for Roberti-Z'be~g~open in this location.
space recreation funds(SB-174)
The amount designated for ~he Lorie Aparacio, 14897 Sobey Road,
trail is $19,139, with representing 'the S~ratoga 4-H
$3,865 of city ma~ching funds. Club, indicated-the Saratoga 4-H
Club has chosen the trails and
Councilman Matteoni further pathways of Saratoga as its
inquired if there is ~ny-modi~ '~ommupity pride" project. There-
fication to the demonstration fore, they would be willing to
trail, what does this do to put forth any work that it would
to the grant application. take to construct or maintain the
trails an~ pathways of Saratoga.
Miss Sampson explained'that She stated that.-if we lose the
it is the program concept trails and pathways in Saratoga,
~hat received'basic approval, we will be losing part of the
and probably not each part atmosphere o'f'our city. The,~
of the trail itself. trails will benefit~St'~.~ L'~'-~-~
themselves, but ~ls~:~tur~~'''~'~
It was the concensus of the residents of Saratoga~
Council to hear testimony
on this issue, but restrict- Rosanne Dorsey, 19361 San Marcos
it to 15 minutes .on each side. R~ad, indicated she is a repre-
sentative of Junior Achievement,
.In support: and also, a voter next year.
She indicated that the Council
David Lively, on behalf of has been ~earing from her since
'several property owners in 1974 on this issue, and the
the Sobey Road area, Council.clearly knows her views -
commented that we' are clearly on preserving open space and
looking at increasing sub- developing what rightly belongs
urbani~ation in the Saratoga to all of the citizens of Saratoga.
6 -
IV. PETITIONS~ ORDINANCES~ AND PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND
RESOLUTIONS (Cont'd.) RESOLUTIONS.
A. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE: DEMON- (Ron Hills - cont'd.)
STRATION TRAIL AND PATHWAY
PROGRAM AS RECOMMENDED BY Wit~ regard to~t~e qu~stio~ of
PARES AND RECREATION how much use there would be,
COMMISSION according to a q~ick survey,
there ~re over 50. horses in
(Ros~nne' Dorsey - cont'd:) the Sobey area. Also-, it.would
deffnitely be used by people
'She indicated that they have. than those'with horses. There
not given up. ~le ~ity spen~ are '3 schools that do their
many dollars and much time on jogging in thi-s area. Mr. Hills
it~ General Plan, and this was commented that there is a pledge
at a public hearing with from the Mercury that if. the
clearly the majority of citizen~ doesn't want to put .the money in
in favor. Since then, talking for th'ese tFail~, the ~ercury
to p~0ple ~as. shown her' that will.
mostly those opposing the plan
are witb easements on.their Ed Gomersall, m~mbe~, Saratoga
property. We see-no paths Parks and Recreation Commission,
directly violating their pri- commented that for many years,
vacy, and if trees and land- trails' and pathways has been a
scape are on the easements, goal in Saratoga; the. concept is
they have violated the rights in the General Plan;-a strong
of the citizens of Saratoga. citizen backing;.and'several
studies have indicated that
Miss Dorsey indicated that trails a~d pathways would prgvide
thei.~ Junior Achievement both a practical and safety
company, INFI, has decided ~mprovement in the City of Saratoga.
to work on trails and pathways. There are many unknowns regarding
They are more than willing to the real-costs, the rea~ impacts,
donate their time and re- the reaI safety aspects, the
sources, as they feel real aesthetic values of th'e
businesses play a concern trails and pathways concept.
in the affairs of the The unknowns hav~ repeatedly
community. "We haven't allowed th'e City'to make the
· given up -- have you?" decision to'keep'the status quo.
· " We have lost some very real
Rot Hills, member, ~arks and recreation opportunities in
Recreation Commission, Saratoga by doing this He urged
commented that Saratoga ~as ~ ' that the City council act favor-
spent, from 1968 to 197'8, ably upon the recommendations.for
1.4 million dollars t6 acquire a t~ail system.
land for parks; an'd: j~4.~illion
dollars to develop those parks.' TeXtilE Bar~o, 19101 Camino Ba~Q,'
In'the '79 budget, there is indicated'he has been-a long time
$576,000 for capital improv&-" opponant'of. the manner in which
ment~ of which $4,000 is for .th~'tra~ls were acquired. He'
the trail. Mr. Hills pointed supports the concept of a demon-
out that from Allendale to the stration trail. ~f we:don't do
southern border of Saratoga, ft.with this one, we're no.t going
and from Saratoga-Sunnyvale to do it because this is the key
Road to Quito, there are no to the whole operation..It could
park facilities. If the also bring up the' danger that in'
trail is put in, this amounts a year from now, it may be for-
to 12.'6¢ per person; the gotten that this is a demonstration
maintenance amounts to 3¢ to trail, and' not-the trail. With~_~_~.
· 7¢ per person. regard to monetary ~ems~
IV. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND ~. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND
RESOLUTIONS (Cont'd.) RESOLUTIONS
A. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE: DEMON- (Tom Seefurth - contid..)
STRATION TRAIl AND ,PATHWAY
PROGRAMAS RECOMMENDED BY L,' '~2)' safety ,~lem~nt. He would
PARKS AND RECREATION ques'tion the feasibility of
COMMISSION .... ~ '~ , using!this for 'both equestrian
~~ ~-~"~'i~i~' L -' and pedes,trian use.
~T ._ .~.-,,-.,.,., ..
'!s'tate-money"--kis your ~one~ .,' FellowS-Home;, indicated he would
and my money. llke to spea['t6 a technical de-
' tail of the plan. Sheet 6, Sec'tion
In opposition: 7, shows an easement down San
Marcus Road, ~nd there i~ no ease-
Eldred Kunkel, 14484 Chesher ment there. The easement_as_~hown
Ave., indicated He h'as 3 on the,plan~o'~'~ud'~ve to be out~''~
points: .on the paved~'~ft~of~San;Marcus-~-/
'because the parkway belong~ to
1) the unfeasibilitX of the the Odd Fellows Home.
trail in this location.-
There are 2-or 3 blind Mr. Conklin indicated he would like
curves', complicated by to relate his experience with
steep upgrades, and also equestrians: When he first came
bounded by very steep to_the Odd Fellows Home 10 years
embankments, where pedes- agO, he thought this was a
trians and.equestrians beautiful place for people to ride
would be forced out onto their hor%es, and they extended
the street,. Also, the this privilege. I~ was found,
soil is a very sticky however, that the young people
clay soil? and with the carried wire cutters in their
type of surface proposed, pockets; they were rude; they were
this could create quite crude; they rode their horses
a mess. across the lawns and left droppings
on the walks, and one yo6ng lady
2) the area is not zoned rode her horse up on the.platform
equestrian, and they of their band shell. They used
would ,be enmroamhing on the tables in the picnic area to
a non-equestrian, area in ~ount their horses, and they,were,
a portion of the trail, found to be irresDonsible citizens,
and as'a consequence, the Odd
3) the subdivisions affected Fellows has posted this property
by this have already.con- against the equestrian effort.
tributed several acres of
land to their common usage.', Frank Druding, 14331 Chester Ave
commented relative to the problem~
He requested the Council of reckless drivers and aut'omobiles.
abaondon this projectin favor He believes it is too big of a
of a project that Would help h~zard to_mix riding of horses with
a .lot more people 'and would - automobiles and with residential
damage les~. areas.
Tom Se~f~['H]~)Chester Ave.', David Costa, 19315 San Marcos Road,
indica[e~.b~'~ould-like tO inquired regarding the meaning of
emphasize two points:. Section A~Alternate, vs. Section 7.'
1) cost aspect. No one can He would like to ask: 1) where
seem to answer.the'question' is it'going to be;and' 2) would
of what is the actual cost it require removal. of e~isting
of this project, and he landscaping?
seriously doubts'if you can ·
complete the whole thing'for John Terry, member, Park~ and
' . Recreation Commission, indicated
under $50f000. ,, that i~ Section 7 there~S~"~
- 8 -
IV. PETITIONS,' ORDIN~NCE~',iA~D PETITIONS ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS (Cont"d~ ..., RESOLUTIONS
A. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE: DEMOn- The.Ma~r then"ask~d. for 'CounCil
· STRATION TRAIL AND PATHWAY comment on this issue:
.. .PROGRAM AS RECO~IMENDED'BY- - "
PARKS AND RECREATION.' Councilwoman Callon: I'will con~
COM~ISSION .= .-. tinue my support of a demonstration
trail in. Saratoga· I think we owe
variety of different~ays'to . it to ourselves to find out what
accomplish the plan-. 'There was the-problems are and what the
a possibility of some re- advantages are of a trail system.
lands'caping'if t~e'trail were As far..as expendithre of funds,.
.on the righ~ side.' 0ne 6f the the funds source.is coming from
a~ditional proposals made was' the State Bond Act that was passed
not to have trails on Sections. solely to us~ monies for recrea-
5, 6 Or 7, and'that'yo~ld'signi- tionAt purposes~ ~qe have applied
ficantly change what gOeS on z for a.part of that money an_~d___~._
in thdse 3'secti0ns.. This ~ have a use for~it, and ho~?
would leave e~ough t~ail see- .see that we are being "fiscally
. tionsin '~,"2, 3 and 4 for .. irresponsible" by taking s~me
." evaluation of the demorstration amoun.t of the money out of the
trail With.'regard ~o horseS.. state.bond issue for recreational
· There would be. furthe~ detail . .purposes in our city.
regarding.tree'removal follow- ' -
ing a specific survey of thib Th'e trails would also be utilized '
area ..... for walking-and jogging,.a~d.
:-' hOpefUlly, ~he traffic won't be
· Ron Mancuso,~l~330 Chester ' co severe in:this section. ~
Ave., indicated heb~lie~es'L. Therefor~,Crlwoul'd s~~''
all .of the taxpayers have the. trails system'as a~d~fF~[~'~'~
right to expect, if not demand,. route.for the period the COuncil
fiscal'responsibility from'our ~ould like to set, with reviews
elected officials.l The cost 3 months'-into the project in
benefit ratio in this project' order rto. see immedia'te results. '!
has tO be.small', regardleSs.of '
wHat. has been proposed here.'~ Councilma~ Mat'teoni: I have no
He urged that-the'Council .- problem With continuation and
'~ examine priorities and he is . re-affirmation of aRa~hway ._
sure the Council willl'fihd system throughout Saratoga·
better things to do'with_ However, he has a problem with
thes'e-funds. -. the trail aspect. The mix in
= the particular area bothers him.
Wall' Liederman,' 14233 Cheste~.'~ If we. are ~alkihg about a demon-
Ave.',. commented that, the area strat~on system.and we find in
in front of his house h'asa 3 to. 6 months i~ doesn't work,'
· very Steep road coming up on he would think'Ithe city has the
the curve, and there'is 'an... ~esponsibitity to put another
extreme safety problem. It cost element in the plan of
· was.his .feeling.that making restoring the area. He is
this a public trail would willing to occupy a portion of
cause many more lpedpl~,tO~use~ .=the.'landscapCd areas along Chester
itT, and the dan~er'-'of~a~ 'ac~i-- "if".i~ Wer~ just a pedestrian path.
dent is very'p~v~i~t'{n t~at. He-sees in'the overall system,
area. Further, hebelieves . looking'beyondthe demonstration
things have 'chang~dC'sine~"i~6.. ~St&~ ~nd,'why.h'e. would reaffirm
"+:~"~' '-" ' . the p~hw~s el'ement of the
· Martin Gandeli~-~14000'Shadow ~ , General Plan, a problem brought
· Oaks, indicated ~e-would'li~.e ? "befo~%~he.-:Council.earlier th{s
to comment that any kind of a evening, and also, a couple of
trail acceptable to equestrians weeks' ago, which is pathways to
or o~herwise is going to. and from School -- providing fo~
attract all ~inds.of bikes and" the safety of. children and their
marathon runners... -..- "'-.' .transportatiOnlother than by motor
' " ' · - " ~ehicles to-and from School'-- as
.." the top priorit~ this city has in
regards to pathways.
- 9
IV., PETITIONS, ORDINANCES~ AND PETITIONS~ ORDINANCES, AND'
RESOLUTIONS (Cont'd.) '..- ~ RESOLUTIONS (Cont'd.)
A. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE:"DEMON- (Codncilman Kalb -.cont'd.)
S~RATION TRAIL AND PATHWAY
PROGRAM AS RECOMMENDED BY function of what the people. expect
PARKS AND RECREATION the maintenande ~to be. We have
COMMISSION to accept [he fact thae the horses
- are going to create"manure along
(Cguncilma~ Matteon~ = cont'd.). those trails., and I am not ready
-- to use'the'City's money to buy
He indicated he woul'd like tO into 6He proposition *that'we are
hear from the City M~nager as going to cle'an. it*up~ We have
to where the'City might'spend been-told'not to worry. about the
the money better with this' liabilit~ aSsOciated with ~cci-
grant. dents and problems On the trails.;
yet we haveseen. plenty of
Councilwoman Co~r: .I was evidence of these. accid~nts'and'~
please'd to hear the modifi~ we have seen jcit{es' that have
cation proposed b'y the'Park~ .fohnd.it necessary ~o.push legis~
'and Recreatfon Commission. lation to absolve themseives from
I recognize ,Sobey: Ro~d is -this legal responsibil{ty.
definitely an equestrian area,
and wondered if'keepihg the As it has b~eB presented to us,
eqpestrian-part of the trail - we haveza demonstration trail
in this 'area would resolve.the. that costs $9,000 per mile~ and
problem.' However,, I'would ,this cost assumes the Odd Fellowg
like to see the people in the would'have been w~lting to.give us
Sobey Road areas come ~p with .the free easement along their
some trails on their own property. None of this includes
property in order to keep th~ the cost of staff time and the
horses within that area. 'significant ~ork that has gone
· n on the part'-of everyone just
On the han~, my'= big concerh- on this one segment. It doesn't
is safety of the children' include the host of'r~-do'ing the
walking on the streets2 I landsgape-for those people who
was pleased to learn that in have already built across the'
Section l, there us roOm,to easementl .!.think-the tax money
put a pathway connecting is somet[ingTthat should be guarded
Marshall Lane School with Q~it.o carefullyj' and in our'Icase, that
Road. Area 5 should be.modi- there are ~etter thihgs'to do with
fief' into just a pathway in '! these f~ds'. '
order to make a continuation .
through there. If we~want ~to talk. about safety,
of Children and.proViding the
Jeff Kalb: ~he pathway demon- necessary means for people tO get
'stration project has.pointed from one place to another when
out a lot of things we-wanted. they need to, and not necessarily
'to find out. One of the as recreation, then you..can'counE
things.I think is faiflX__l .... me in 160fpercent.
°T a
part of the supporK for the~., we do, ~get a"lot of people that.
entire system iS based'on..~j.' come'to'.us. ~nd tell us a~out some
equestrian use. If we fail drying ~eeds.- One of the big
to-address that.-as.'.being-~a' things 'this~city is facing is the
"' difficffl~ ~*roblem of{law'enforce~
issue, we are ~ot'b~ing "~' ment. ~"I =i~dk at thisl.demonstration
totally honestl .... '~-".' " .
trail, a~d unfOr~unately.,~it~is
Also, 'the.degree of maintenanc~ not'one of my Rri~it~ies. If we
is going to be totally a need trails or pathways f~r.~children
to get to school, I'm all for it.
PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND PETITIONS, O~DINANCESi AND '
RESOLUTIONS (~ont"d',l .- RESOLUTI'ONS (_Cont'd,.)-
A. MINUTE P~SOLUTION RE: DEMONJ Cohncilman Kalb. then;re~i~ed his
STRATION TRAIL AND PATHWAY motion, as fo'llows':
PROGRAM AS RECOMMENDED.BY
PARKS AND RECREATIbN M/S: Kal~/Matteoni to dis. approve
COMMISSION the trails and p~thways demon-
.~-=-.~,~_~_~ stration project'as proposed'.
~ayor KraU~ con't"d'. Carried,-3 to '~., Cohncilwomen
'-r_~____ ~. .- Ca'lion and Corr in oppps~tio~,
If the City late~ on decides
it wants trails, we ought'to' M/S:' Kalb/Corr to request from
have the"developer do it when staff proposals with regard to'
he is developing the land. proposals f6r. Quito tb Marshall
Lane School, as well as 2 other
Councilman Kalb ihquired if schools previOUsly d{scu~ed,
the particular funds being - with-regard to safe' walking
discussed couldn't be applied 'access. Carried unanimously.
to other recreational pro-
jec~s, and thereby fr~e up '.- ReCess;and recon~ene
other funds, such'as'.revenue- -
sharing funds to do the ~in~s"
of things we.would really .,f ~..-,' -
like-to do on-pathS',, whidh -7/l.'~'j
is to provide the safety
consideration.-
-The City Manage.r indicated
this.would.be. pOssible.
M/S: Callon/Corr ~6. adopt -
the demonstration trail
as presented by the Parks and-
.Recreation Commission, with
the modifications that
Sections 5, 6, and 7 would
be for pedestrian~ bicycle,
and jogger use only. The
motion failed =-'Councilmen
Kalb, Matteoni, and Kraus
voting in opposition.
M/S: Kalb/Matteoni to=not
approve the trails and pathways
demonstration project~as pro-
posed, the priorities of the.
Council being-toward providing
safe walking means for peop%e
in the community, as Opposed
to recreational.needs
Further, .the staff be directed
~o come back with a proposal
witb regard no the link between
Quito and'Marshall Lane School.-
Councilwoman Callon commenEed
sbe is not sure the 'Council's
priority for funds i~ only for
this particular stretch., as we
have had 3 schools which have
requested help in getting '-'
children to school..
11
V.' PUBLIC HEARINGS- .-' q~ PUBLIC'hEkkI~GS
A' TO CONSIDER RkZONI~G OF A "Mr. kBblns~n, Planning. Director
PORTION OF APN 517-~-33..-FROM ...summarized his ~eport,-.dated
~M-3,000.TO CzC~ (~ile 'C=176, 8/27/.Z9.. Staff is recommending
Gene Zambetti) 14575 Oak St. approval of re'zoning this property
: ..'frOm RM-3,,0Q0 t~..C-C.
Councilwoman Callon .inquired i~
' - the-5 parking spaces on this
property. are different than the'
5 Parking District spaces.
'~.. Mr. RoBinson, replied that those
5 parking spaces.are included in
.. the total/number of the assessment
~ district.
~>~ttentidn ~ letter fro~ Mr. CrawfB~d,
9Sorenson, 14531 Oak Street; andk
i~ a letter from Raisa Kocber of -+-'~
the Vitlage-Me~ch~n:~s~ssociatiBn'y~
u~ein-i~g:approval of this re~oning.
:~t--10-:-~"PrM.~--
Jim Moreland, Architect f~'r
' ~ Mr. ~ambe~ti, indicated he ~ould
like't6 comment on the situation
... with regard t~ thelot size re-
quir~mehtl The'lot width r~quired
fo~. C-C zone is 50 feet, and that-
is wha't thls lot width i~, so
'- there is no variance' reqdired on
· ' the lot width. The'lot depth fo~
C-C is 100 feet,-and the minimum
lot area.is 5,000 squar~ feet.
The portion of property proposed
... to change',to .C=C has a depth
dimension b'f 80 feet.' If. you
' "... cqnsider'[hat the backzuD space
. r~'quired fo~ ~.he pa~kin~which
· will be on Mr. Zambetti's property
wou~d be ~at.tea~t 20 ~eet-, then
- - the'lot depth w~uld have the
equival&nt o~ 100 fee~. H~b'etieves
· ~the'-i~tention of the'minimum lot
size requirement is to':brovide a
· lot which is large enough to have
adequat~ parking as well ~s'
building.
-' Dianna Parm, with'the Twin.-0ak~
Homeowners Association, located
' between 14603 and 14613 Oak
Street, r~ferenced the August 17. th
.., : lette~ from Twin Oaks Homeowners.
Associations.
aff that
' - the T~in Oaks Homeo~rs 'A~sociation
.... is.not.i~ favor of.r~zoning any
-. ' ~, pqrtion of Oak Street because of
th~ potential-negative impact'of
12
V. ~PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd. ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TO CONSIDER REZONING OF A (Dianna Parm -~cont'd.) ~
PORTION OF APN 517-9~33 FROM
RM-3,000 TO C-C.(File C-176, 'The~e has been a constant referral
Gene Zambetti) 14575 Oak St. to the 1974 plan and its recommen-
dation of small .commErcial
(Di~nna Parm - cont'd~) structures behind the parking lot.
It is our opinion.tha~'small
increased foot and=street traffi commercial Structures behind a
It is understoodthat the,porT parkinglzonedo not necessarily
· tion_requested t6'be'rez~n~d b~ 'create a'commercialatmosphere, or
Mr. Zambetti does not fa~e. Oak are n~cessary in a residential area.
Street. Yet, the'Ho~eown~s The. p~bUl~s~f the Village area
Association maintains'its ." ' cohcern marketing, not zoning.'
position becausea potential... Oa~ Street:is currently zoned
negative impact wo61d~till:,. ~ulti~!e=fam~y/residential. Its
exist in what ~ould'fac~ on.to,. -rural character is' inter-mixed'
a new city parking lot between .with m~derate income, single,
Third and Fourth Streets.. The and multiple units. We recommend
entrance to this parking lot is that the City Council maintain its
on Fourth.Street, next to their rare m~x ofThousing in a rura~
driveway, across 'from their = setting by not rezoning any land
property. The Homeowners within.itS bo~ndaries~ to. commercial
Association recommended in its zones.
letter to Mr. Beyer on June'28 ·
that the same restrictions be. Dave Sorenson,.~4531 Oak Street,
applied to the new parking 10t indicated h~ w~uld like to're-
as are applied to the new affirm that he wholeheartedly
parkings. to the new parking lot. suppo:ts'the rezoning 6f this
constructed between Fourth and property.' He would think it
Sixth Streets. These re- would be ,a much better.'use to'
strictions include no commer- go commercial than 'to. have<_a
cial property at the rear or residence there which then would
south line of the parking lot. be so close to commercial that
We question whether the park- no one would want :to live there
ing lot can sufficiently serve anywa~
- as street access to .commercial -
property. . 'Virginia' Holman, 14B49 Big Basin
Way, indicated he~ business is
~-:~"=~7~=~7~--'~'~ -!~ across the street from the new
Augus~2'2~M:~~{~'~tated .would be 'rightb~hind Mr.. Zambetti.
it would be too expensive and/or She is for any commercial going in,
difficult to addon an addi- as this i's heeded. Most of the
tional residential unit, but merchants in ,town and the Village
'more economically feasible to, Assoblation is for .it.
add on a commercial unit. We
agree with Mr. Zambetti that Mr.'Moreland again addressed the
perhaps an additional unit Council, pointing out that it
would not meet his.economi~ ~hould be made Clear that there
needs; yet we do not-agree ~s a 30-foot difference in'ele-
that because one type of. Vation from Oak Street to the
unit i~ too expensive~ 'that parking lot. Therefore, most of.
it is necessary to build the. prope~tybehind the existing
another type of unlt.. structure isquite a steep hill-
Certainly an.economical side and provides a nice separation
solution would-be 'to build no between~what isproposed to be used
additional units. as commercial and what isproposed
to be left as existing residential.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd.) PUBLICSHEaRINGS, -'-
A. TO CONSIDER REZONING OF A (EugeneZambetti cont'd,)
PORTION OF APN 517-9-33 FROM
RM-3,000 TO C-C ,'(File C-176, No. 1. ~Also, in Parkihg District
Gene Zambetti) 14575 Oak St. No. 1, there is an adjoining Riece
of office building. .There ~is a
(Jim Moreland -'cont'd.) vacant piece of land'which Mrs.
Anderson.used to own that is. in
It i's o~r feeling that while it Parking District.N6'i 1.
might be possible to build an
additional unit on this k~en yOu create an atmosphere
property, it woUldh't be' t~at i~.pledeb~rianjoriented,~it
possible to build~it. as an ~important that you have. some
· attached uni~ to th~ &XiSlting type Of commercial use. 'Tt{e
structure because of the topo- commercial use,, if accepted,
gra.phy. Also, it,wouldn%t.be would be one that would be an
desirable to add a unit '..' office, which would create/some
adjacent to,the parking lot.'. ' type of atmosphere that would not
"' It is'felt the b&st'use of th{S oVe~16ad the parking and one
pr'operty is to follow the intent which would contribute to the
of the plan as .has been origin- overall connnercial mix.
ally behun in 1974, which ~ould
be to provide a' buffer between T~e Council discussed th~ issue
the parking lot and the resi- of c6nsistency with the General
dential property. Plan in rezon~ng thi~.property
to commercial. They further
M/S: Ka~b/'Corr to clO'se the discussed the Ga'ines proposal,
· public hearing. Carried. as well as development of the
The'public hearing was cIosed back port.ion 6f this property.
at 10:55 PLMo and the Pa~king,DiStrict.
Councilwoman Corr requested .... Councilman Kalb indicat&d that
clarification as to why the when the.issue of Mr, Gaines and
Planning Commission, con- the Parking District was previously
sidered this property discussed, he determined that th~
differently than the Gaines first order of priori,ty is to have
p~operty. ' a viable commercial entity on the
Corner wheYe Wrigh~ and Company
Mr. Robinson replied t~aE proposed to build~ In order to
basically, the Planning have this,. you must have adequate
Commission felt these were two parking, which resul~e~ in taking
different ~projects They felt .the Gaines property ~e felt at
that Mr. Zambetti's project that the time the _Council' could
~as,a contributer to the Assess- noE, in good ~nscious, turn
ment District. around and rezone this to commercial.
A discu~sio'n followed con- Mr. Moreland-commented he feels
cerning,.the possibility of re~ the real question of'cohsistency
zoning no~ only Gaines,, but the 'is to acknowledge that Mr.'Zambet~i
entire strip of property behind had originally applied for'this
Zambetti. rezonihg.(October 1974).
Mr Zambetti. commented that Mayor Krau~ inquired'what would
there have been several differ= happen to the'5 parking spaces-,
ent plans which show parking if Mr. Zambetti were not given
districts and parking lots that the commercial zoning.
have commercial structures to
the,rear of the'property line,- Mr. Shook, Director of Public Works,
FOr example,'there was a tenta- explained that the District acquires
tive'building site approval mad the necessary property to build
tha'~ was given to a.parcel on the parking stalls, and the Dis-
proposed Parking District 4 trict ~o,uld-hAve to acquire the
behind Pacific ~alley Banks' spaces from ~r. Zambetti.-
AlsO, there is Fun Fabrics
which lies in Parking District
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS '(Cont 'd. ) ~__7.~ PUBLIC HEARINGS' - -
A. TO CONSIDER REZONING OF A "M/Z: Matteoni/Corr to ~onditionally
PORTION. DF APN 517~9-33 FROM rezone the area; with the con-
RM-3,000 TO C~CI(File C~176, dition of a review within.a one-
Gene Zambetti) 14575 Oak St. year period regarding the formation
..... of the District and its' use by
W~ight and Company,
Coun&i-lman Kalb indicated he feels
comp~lt-ed to ~ote against the
motion, in 'th'at he has a .problem
" : in b~ing consistent Kith regard
~ to .the' votes, e. specially when
we-have a parcel which we knowingly
are going-to have to c6me up with
variances on in order no build,
arid not having offered that oppor-
tunity to Gaines.
The Mayp~1 called for a vote on
the motion, and .the motion failed,
3 to 2;'C0uncilmen Kalb, Kraus,
and · Callon in opposition.
Councilwoman Callon asked if per-
hapsthe Council should examine
the ~hole. area of'the back of
~h~ lOWe~ half of Oak Street for
communi-ty commercial, and then
set standard~ for the ~ot sizes
and variance items. However,
~: ,~'this'would result in no-oarking
-~. -~ .. , spa.~e~..: -i - . -
M/S.: Ma,,tteoni/Kalb to con[inue
· ~ .: ~ r- '-j. i.." ' 'th~s ~tem to the .regular 'meeting
on NovemBer 7, and direct the
staff to ana_lyz~ the idea iof
"f: ~'- =' I"i rezoni~g~the are of the Village
. at the bot'tom of Oak Street,
Carried unanimou~!y.
B. TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION 919, The Mayor opene~ the .public hearin~
A 'RESOLUTION ORDERING -at 11:32 P .M,
MENT OF A FUTURE STREET EASE-
MENT (.Tra&t 5319) There-being-no tes'timony, M/S:
Kal'b]Corr to ctose the public
g. Carr'ied'unan.imously;
:. -~ . public hearing closed at 11:33 P.M.
M/S: Matteoni/Callon to adopt
- Resolution 919. Carried unanimously.
C. TO CONSIDER APPEAL BY MARCIA .Mr. Robihson, Planning Director,
AND PERRY WEST, 21~8t VIA , th~ action of the Land
REGINA, OF CONDITIONS. II (e) Development Committee and outlined
(f) & (j); III(g);--.IV(f) & ~mposed &0nditions (staff report
V(~e) 3,8,9 & 10,- SDR-1413, dated 10/.11/79).
TENTATIVE BUILDING SITE '
APPROVAL The Mayor 6pe~ed the public hearing
at 11:35 P.M.,
~1~1~
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS (,Cont"d.) ~j PUBLIC HEARINGS
C. TO CONSIDER APPEAL'BYMARCIA (David' Alexander - cont'd.)
& PERRY WEST, 21781 VIA
REGINA, OF CONDITIONS OF city ~erv-ices; we areh't going
TENTATIVE BUILDING'SITE to have an increase in fire.pro-
APPROVAL,,SDR-1413, tec[-ion.or anything else r~lated
- to this.- But if this appeal. is
'(~ublic hearing opened) granted; you will ha~e an up-
" grading of the tax base; you will
Dave Alexander, Attorney on have additional;income into the
behalf of Mr. and Mrs. West, City. Yoh have',-a situation where:
2600'E1 Camino Real, Palo Alto, 1) you can increase tax dollars;
addre~.sed.the Council. He-. 2) not hav~ any negative {mpact
indicated that the West family on ~he' commhnity;
consists of 6 people; and they 3) ben'efit the individuals involved
are livingin a structure of by allowing them to have a more
less than 1,000 square feet. reasonable standard of living.
I~at they want to do is tear
down the small house and build Spedial circumstances' here are:
'a modern house on the same 1) the Wests are invdlved in re-
site. placement, and not development;
' ',-"' 2) the exemption is necessary for
If we had a s{tuation Where preservation of a substantial
the existing house were property right to have a
destroyed and they re,bUilt reasonably~comfortable structure
it to modern standards, this to live in and willing to pay
would be doing'the same thing. the p~ice to build
3) the exemption will not be
With regard to the'r~quire-- inj~reous to the public well-
ment of 1,00Ogallon for2 --~, "~,'.'fare:~ bht'~ill upgrade this
hours ~ate~ (as oppos'~d to ,,," ".pi&~'of"l~d;
existing 500 gall0~for 2'~ ' 4) gra~ting df the appealwould.
hours-water), if we were , '- .not be a special privilege
developing a piece;.of~,raw",i~'hd~. ,'and ~du~ be more in,.keeping
he would.applaud the CouhcilI with the neighborhood.
in enforcing this regulation..-- .~' , .~ .
However, by turning.!dd~ the. P~r~y West,'~'2i781 Via Regina,
West appeal, you will' ch~ge commented relative to items
nothing in that regard.-~n II'(e) and II(j), relating to
fact, a hdurs of that, size the access road. He~Corf~hented
and of that age~.and ~ihh that hfs discussions with-the staff
number of people is-prQbably- indicate that the. rOad is
less safe and more. of"s fire basical!y acceptable if any
hazard t~an to huild"l~ modern necessary repair work'is done.
structure up. to the' modern' There does not seem to be any
Building Code.- '~' major repair work that would
· ' creat~ a specific hardship.
If you have a bala~ce,:where-
by the Ci[y says it wohld'like With regard to II(f),, what has
to see this'upgrading'of been asked for here is a turn-
structures and upgrading.in. around. They ar~ going to share
the tax b~se, an~ asks: partof an existing driveway with
"What is it 'going to;,~cost .us a.nei'ghbor~ Public Works is
on cit~ services? ~,~t is askihg in II(f) for an additional
it going to cos~'on'environ- turn-around:where the West's
ment?" that it a difficult driveway branches off of their
balance. However,-in this case neighbor's driveway about 70
we don'.t~have that~ We'aren't feet away. He d~es not believe
going to have an increase .in - this iS necessary, and it appears
to be a difficult, situation to
- cope with as it would require
quite a bft of fill and retaining
wall.,
16 -'
0]! ..
& PERRY WEST, 21781 VIA "'
REGINA, OF CONDITIONS OF additional, fire protection comes
TENTATIVE BUILDING SITE from the_new hom~ b'e~g built.
APPROVAL, SDR-i413
-~ ' ' M/S Kalb/~at'teoni to close the
(Perry West - cont"d.~,i'' ~ublic hearing. Carried.' Pubiic
.. hearing was _qtosed at 12:02 A~.M~
- The Fire Department has their ....
own separate.condition for Councilman Kalb indicated he
- a turn-around at th~ house.- would be Willing to compromise
on some of thes~ ite~ ~ith. regar~
.... Ill(g) has to do with-fi~e to relieying the t~tai m~gnitude
'protection and sehurity' of the burden.
systems. Mr. West conunented .
'that what is being diScuSsed It was'the concensus. O~ the
~ere. iS the possibility of - Council to waive condition II(f).-
,. -someday in the futur~ It was the-lcon'~nsus of the~,~-~.
'special smoke alarms will b~' : Council (4't6~1) to leav~-"'Y
t.v. to a-'central compute~ ~.~_ >._~__~_~ ~=~__--- ·
at the fire station. Mr.
West indicated he has m per~-- Directed Public' Works staff to
· ' sonal feeling aboU't'h~ving ' obtain, data as to resultant fl0w-
a government agency wired,to on Via R~gina upon constr~ction
his house. of line to Mt. Eden,-with .regard"
to Condition IV(f). -
He commented wi~h regard'to-,-
6ondition IV(f). Mr. We~t" .Item V(~item3 - consensus to
commented that they'have.a waive. . .....
fire hydrant withih 500 feet ' Item'8-- consensus 'that'.the re-
' of.the. proposed structure;
' they have a fire hydrant ,t~&t"f- qUirement;be i~posed.to jQin.~the ..~
can. deliver water for'an" ~ Water'Assessment District.-
adequate p~riod of time, but -
6~ly delivers 5007 gallons per' Item 9 - consensus.t, to. waive this
minute. The remedial costs condieion,.with the exception
were e'stimated fro~ $30,000 of drainage-.improvem~nts for
'--. 7"on'u~, and it involve~ re- Calabaz~s"Creek.
--..- Dlacement of.a main,'and thi's
is not something'he is able Item I0 - consensus to ~ive.
· to do.
· -' M/'S:' Calioh/Kraus to'~ontinue
' "' M~., W~st ~ommented that.what - ~'this 'item to the ne~tlregular-
--... ' is being ~one here is not meeting o'f November 7,.-,to allow
n6t setting. a preC&dent be- st~ff to prepare a report on
cause he is nO't changing the conditionIV(y)·~- Carried
· · land use -- s.imply upgrad~ng ,- unanimously..
the ousing stock..,." ;'7, .- -. .!~.,.
Witl~m Kohle~',-'Via Regina' .-' ~ '
'~" A~e. indicated ~',~trongly 7"~
wants' to support Mr.'Perry "'
West in hls request -- not onl~
._ ~-- - for himself, bu~ f~ th~'.~op'le '!~- "-- . -_
who.~ive ont~is road. -It
a~pears that Mr. West 'carries - . .
the burden .of the increased -"
-.development, and.a.ll tb~ ,
17
IV. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES. AND. ~ETITIONS,' ORDINANCES, AND
RESOLUTIONS (Cont,'d.); "-. RESOLUTIONS.
B. MINUTE RESOLUTION RE: PRO-
POSED ALTERNATI.VE .CIRCULATION'
ROUTE IN WESTERN HILLSIDE"
AREA
-a. Consideratio~ of Addi= The City Manager reviewed the
_tional Origin/Destination proposed alternative plans for
~"D,_La~? " a Circulation sys6em in North-
west SaratOga. Ref. letter of
George S. Nolte and Associates,
dated October 3, 1979
Councilwoman Corr. indicated
was her understanding there
w6uld be a loop.where Comer
and Chicquita join to the new
road.
M/S:- Kalb./Corr to ~efer this
document td the Planning
Commission for its consideration,
with specific attention to be
pai8 to the connection between
Comer/Chicquita and Parker Ranch
Road, and specific concern
be e~ercised with regard to
Old Oak.Wayz Carried. unanimously.
b'. Referral to'Planning Council consensus to discuss this
Commission for General report at"a future meeting.
Plan Amendment
C. .RESOLUTION 85-9.45 M/S: -'Co~riKalb to' adopt
A RESOLUTION A~NDING RE~O: Resolution 85-9.45. Carried
~LUTION 85-9.36 AND 85-9~ ~nanimously. -
ADDING TO BASIC SALARY
CLASSESES, EMPLOYMENT
POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS AND
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE FOR
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF.
SARATOGA
D. CONSIDERATION OF. ACTION TO M/S: Matteoni/Corr to rescind
RESCIND RESOLUTION 914 RE: Resolution 914, effective on
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LANDS date of escrow closing on
AND-INTERESTS THROUGH-EMI= acquisition of easements through
NENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.- .negotiations'. :Carried unanimously.
CALABAZAS CREEK'
E. RESOLUTION 920 M/S: Cailon/Corr to adopt-
Resoldtion ~2Qj. Carried unanimously.
A RESOLUTION ABANDONING "' T' . '-
PORTION OF PUBLIC UT{LITY
EASEMENT (Tract 822)
VI. BIDS AND CONTRACTS ..~/~ BIDS AND.CONTRACTS
A,,REQUEST TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR M/S: 'Callon/C~rr to authorize
PHASE I ARCHITECTURAL .~ staff to call for bids on this
BARRIERS REMOVAL PROJECT p.roject, .Carried unanimously,
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR CONSEN~ CALENDAR
A. ORDINANCE NO'. 38,'97 (2nd_Rdg',) '
· AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SARATOGA A~NDING SECTION,8
OF CHAPTER 8 OF THE SARATOGA
CITY CODE RELATING TO VICIOUS · " : '
ANIMALS
B. RESOLUTION 85-9,44
~.. A RESOLUTION ~NDING RESO-
· LUTION 85-9,36 AND 85-9,
ADDING TO BASIC SALARY. r-
CLASSES, EMPLO~NT POSITION'
CLASSIFICATIONS AND C0}~EN- '
~· SATION SCHEDULE FOR EMPLOYEES c . -..
.OF THE CITY'OF SARATOGA .. ..-
C. CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE '-
. - ....
TRACT 6261 Ciay Thomas -. . ~"
(Che.ster Avenue) "' . .- . .. ~I.
D. FINAL ACCEPTANCE
SD~ 1234 -'Philip Boyce ~,
(Boyce Lane). - -
E. PAYMENT OF · CLAIMS
F. CITY TREASURER'S ~EPORT -.. ~' ~-' ..
G. CITY CLERK~S FINANCIAL REPORT
VIII, ~ADMINISTRATIVE }IATTERS "' -ADMINISTRATIVE MATtERS
-A. MAYOR
B. COUNCIL & COMMISSION REPORTS
C. DEPARTMENT HEADS & OFFICERS
'1. Director of Phblic.Works, Coundll acknowledged staff report
ReDorts re: - ~,~ated 10Zll/,79, outlining recommen-
a. City Couhgif~ R~ferr'a'l Idati°nsc '
for Traffic EngiDee~ing 'Council'~onsensus to authorize
Analysis at I~terse~ib~ s~aYfI ~b'pro°ceed wlth implemen-
"of Cox and M{ller Aves. tationlof items l'th~u 4. at this
' and Staf. f.Reqommendatibn 'time hold item '5 for dis-
cussion at.the next regular meeting.
b. Cable'·TV Status Ken,~Daniel, Man§ger, Video Engin-
eering, p~esented status report
relative to Zohe I construction.
19 -'
VIII,.. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS .Co.nt',d,) ADMINISTRATIVE ~iATTERS "
'D. CITY MANAGER ~ "
1. Claim fo~,'-Damag~s - M/S':- Kalb/CorrLto deny t-~e
Tire damage due to durbs'~ "~ cl'aim~and refer ft to the City's
(A.J.' Rodrigu~s) - ~nsurance carrier for handling.
'Calrried .uha~{imo~sly~ ~ ~ , -
2. Request-fOr Approval of ,' . M/S: =Co~r.~/Ka~b tb'a~prove the
Third Annual Great Race Great Rade for the date of
' ' January 6, 1980 ~ Carried
-~ .' unanimous ly. . . '
IX. ADJOURNMENT ~ ADJOURNMENT
' -. ' - M/S: Corr/Matteoni to ~j ourn
· - L to E~ecutive Ses~{on on Tuesday,
20 -