Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-11-2003 Planning Commission Minutes MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Hunter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Barry, Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Schallop, Uhl and Zutshi Absent: None Staff: Director Tom Sullivan, Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous and Assistant Planner Ann Welsh PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Regular Meeting of May 28, 2003. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Barry, seconded by Commissioner Nagpal, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of May 28, 2003, were adopted with minor corrections to pages 6, 11 and 14. (7-0) ORAL COMMUNICATION Mr. Herbert Radding, 14050 Chester Avenue, Saratoga: • Thanked the Commission for the opportunity to speak. • Said that he wishes to discuss the property next to his located at 14038 Chester Avenue. • Advised that these property owners had obtained a permit for a remodel and that the work on the remodel took place. One part of the project was to have been the replacement of an existing pool with a new lap pool. After the project was done minus the pool, he noticed a box and tank located about 70 feet away from his master bedroom. This was a propane electricity generator. • Questioned the siting of this generator at the property line and so near his bedroom. • Acknowledged that some work has been done by the neighbor to quiet the impacts of this generator and it has been somewhat successful. • Stated that the neighbor claims this as an emergency generator for use in the event of a power outage so that sump pumps can be operated to prevent flooding. • Added that many times over the years, two nearby creeks have gone over their banks. • Said that part of this neighbor’s remodel included a high berm concrete wall and dirt berm, designed to be above the high water mark. • Said that last season, floods occurred in this area but not on this property due to these improvements. . Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 2 • Said that he has a big gripe about this generator and is not allowed to complain according to the City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer. • Stated that this generator is supposed to meet Noise Ordinance decibel levels and does not, particularly for nighttime standards. • Said that he has lived in his home for 27 years and wants this generator to be moved or at least be made to comply with the maximum 45 decibel standard for evenings. • Said he was told he would have to call Police to complain if noise issues occur. Commissioner Garakani asked if this pump is currently working. Mr. Herbert Radding replied that there was recently a seven-hour power outage and that this generator ran from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. Added that this is a condition that he would be forced to disclose to potential buyers in the event that he were to sell his home. Director Tom Sullivan advised that staff cannot say much more than what has been stated in his letter and the City Attorney’s letter. Commissioner Barry said that she would like to have this item agendized for review and mitigation. Chair Hunter said that a majority of the Commission is required to support agendizing this matter. All members of the Commission supported the idea of adding this issue to an upcoming agenda. Director Tom Sullivan said that he would place this matter on a future agenda and ask the City Attorney to provide a report on what the options are for actions that the Planning Commission can take. Commissioner Zutshi asked Mr. Radding whether this generator was enclosed. Mr. Herbert Radding replied that while it is quite far from his neighbor’s bedroom, it is very close to his master suite and that he can hear the exhaust system and feel the vibrations when the generator is operational. Commissioner Barry advised staff that she would like the issue of possible mitigation to be provided. Director Tom Sullivan reminded that this generator comes on when the power goes out and for 15 minutes once a week from 12:45 to 1 p.m. Mr. Herbert Radding pointed out that since the berms were built, water from the creeks no longer threatens his neighbor’s property. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director Tom Sullivan announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on June 5, 2003. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 3 Chair Hunter announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15.90.050(b). CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar Items. *** PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION #03-021 (393-45-045) – PEEBLES, 13755 Saratoga Avenue: The Planning Commission is required to determine the allowable floor area for the proposed project because the site area is less than 5,000 square feet (MCS 15-45.0309(d)). The proposed project also requires design review approval. The proposed project includes first and second story additions to an existing two- story residence located at 13755 Saratoga Avenue along Heritage Lane. In general, the appearance of the existing residence remains unchanged. The proposed 58 square foot additions are located to the rear and right side yard of the site and reflect the existing style and materials. The site is zoned R-1-20,000. (CHRISTINE OOSTERHOUS) Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the Commission is required to determine allowable floor area ratio for a site with a net site area less than 5,000 square feet. • Added that the Commission is also asked to provide a Design Review approval to allow a first and second story addition to an existing two-story single-family residence. • Stated that the home will appear unchanged as the addition is primarily located to the rear, right side of the home and using the matching building materials. The home appears to be a one story as viewed from Saratoga Avenue. • Said that due to the 20 percent slope of the site the 6,600 square foot lot is reduced to 4,600 square feet. • Informed that the Heritage Preservation Commission has reviewed the project and was supportive with the condition that the proposed skylights be tinted so that interior lighting is not visible from the street. • Said that the Arborist’s report includes two Ordinance protected trees. There are no construction impacts on three of four on-site trees. The potential impacts on the fourth tree were found to be moderate or tolerable. • Stated that staff can make the necessary findings and recommended approval. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the entire roof would be replaced. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous said she would defer this question to the architect. Commissioner Zutshi asked about the existing coverage compared to that proposed. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous advised that the coverage would remain the same, as the applicant would be removing some decks on grade to leave the lot coverage unchanged. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 4 Commissioner Barry clarified that the lot coverage is not increased due to the removal of these decks. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous replied yes. Chair Hunter opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Ray Peebles, 13755 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga: • Identified himself as a longtime resident interested in enhancing his home so his family can live there longer. • Said that most of the addition would be on the lower portion of the property with minimal impacts to side and rear neighbors. • Added that using the lower portion of his property removes them from the noise impacts of traffic on Saratoga Avenue. • Said his neighbors support him and his architect is present. Commissioner Zutshi asked if letters of support were provided. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous pointed out page 14 of the staff report. Commissioner Uhl asked Mr. Peebles to describe his conversations with his neighbors about his proposal. Mr. Ray Peebles said that his rear neighbor has no problem and is supportive as it does not impact his view at all. Mr. Sandy Barker, Project Architect: • Described their goal of taking this home and getting more utilization. • Added that there are no additional bedrooms being added although one is being relocated to the lower level. A stairway is placed at the side. • Pointed out that this lot has a lot of non-conformities. • Said that they have worked closely with staff and have met and exceeded setbacks. • Added that the neighbors have responded positively. • Said that they had a sound person test noise. • Answered the roof question by saying that their intention had been to replace sections but that they now intend to replace the entire roof. The profile of the roof will stay the same and they will use a simulated slate roofing material with the skylights being a dark solar tinted glass. Mr. William Foster, 13741 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga: • Said he lives directly next to the property and has a few concerns. • Said that his master bedroom in the closest part of his house to their house and that he has concerns about noise impacts during construction and wanted to be sure that concern is taken into account. • Questioned the proposed use of vinyl siding, saying that he would like to see wood siding that is more in character with the neighborhood. • Wondered if a Variance is required to bring this extension closer to his house. • Pointed out that at one time (historically) there was access to his backyard available from their backyard but that the gate was removed. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 5 • Questioned how long construction might last and where construction vehicles would park, adding that he would prefer they not park in front of his house. Director Tom Sullivan provided the construction hours from 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday and prohibited on Sunday. He added that there would be a sign posted on the property with contact phone numbers. Mr. William Foster asked if they have to be allowed these hours as he would prefer an 8 a.m. start time. Director Tom Sullivan replied that the hours are established by Municipal Code. Commissioner Barry asked if the sign posted for the OddFellows project was a City sign. Director Tom Sullivan replied that the Oddfellows had had this sign made although the City does provide signs for small projects such as this one. Chair Hunter pointed out to Mr. Foster that the longer the hours worked on this remodel, the sooner the project is completed. Commissioner Barry reminded that the construction workers cannot come early and leave their trucks running. Chair Hunter asked Director Tom Sullivan if hours of construction could be amended. Director Tom Sullivan replied no. He said that the hours are set by Ordinance adopted by Council. It would be hard to enforce different rules for different projects. Chair Hunter asked about the use of vinyl siding. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous deferred this question to the project architect. Commissioner Uhl asked Mr. Foster if the applicant ever spoke with him regarding this project. Mr. William Foster replied that they had spoken with his wife. Commissioner Garakani asked when that discussion occurred. Mr. William Foster replied a while ago, when it was supposed to occur. Commissioner Zutshi asked if there is a recorded document regarding the access through the neighbor’s yard. Mr. William Foster replied no. He added that there used to be gates there. Commissioner Nagpal asked Mr. Foster if there are other ways to access his yard. Mr. William Foster replied no, due to the grade and house, the only access is the walkways. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 6 Commissioner Barry asked staff if a Variance is required to allow this project. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous replied no. This project complies with the 10 percent setback rule set for nonconforming lots. Commissioner Barry pointed out to Mr. Foster that while the project may bring this home closer to his it does comply with requirements. Mr. Sandy Barker: • Agreed that it is difficult for a homeowner to have construction occur next to you. • Assured that the siding they would use is not vinyl but is simulated wood made of concrete and painted to match. It is undistinguishable to redwood. • Pointed out that Mr. Foster’s house is three feet above Saratoga Avenue while Mr. Peebles’ home is three feet below Saratoga Avenue. Therefore, the Fosters should no be able to see any new construction from his master bedroom. • Said that a lot of the work will be done to the interior with a small addition. Commissioner Barry asked about construction vehicles. Mr. Sandy Barker: • Said that a small enough crew would be used that they could be accommodated on the driveway. • Pointed out that there is no way to stop people from parking on the street. • Reminded that this is a fairly minor 300 square foot addition so only a couple of construction crewmembers would be needed for each step of construction. This project will have a low impact on the area. Commissioner Zutshi asked for the time frame for construction. Mr. Sandy Barker replied that the applicant wants the project completed as soon as possible, likely three to four months. Added that they have not yet submitted for building permits. Director Tom Sullivan said that the project should take six months at the outside. Mr. Sandy Barker advised that a survey had been done and there are no easements for access through the backyard. Said that the applicant would be happy to discuss access in emergency situations but added that improvements have been made to the yard that would be disturbed with vehicular access. Chair Hunter closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Commissioner Garakani pointed out the bushes that are higher than three feet at the corner, which represent a sight of view hazard. Commissioner Schallop asked about the possibility of decks being added later and whether they would have to come back for review. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous said that there is no Planning review for decks and she is not sure if there is building review. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 7 Director Tom Sullivan said that there is deck and flatwork done by homeowners all over. Commissioner Barry asked about the issue of the bushes raised by Commissioner Garakani. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous said that they might be in violation. Director Tom Sullivan advised that for corner lots there is a line of site triangulation. However, for front yards while fences and walls must be lower than three feet, vegetation is not included. Chair Hunter pointed out that many houses have tall hedges. Commissioner Zutshi said that this is not a corner lot and the restriction on hedges would apply only on corner lots. Director Tom Sullivan assured the Commission that staff would enforce the Code on this issue. Commissioner Garakani stated that this is a good project, that he has no objection at all and that it fits into the area. Commissioner Uhl said he likes the architecture and how the house looks. Said that bulk is a concern with so many houses so close together and questioned if there is compatibility on the issue of bulk. Commissioner Zutshi said she likes the project and that the architect has done a good job. Added that the addition is only nine feet in the back. Said she likes the front fence of the house and has no problem with this project. Commissioner Barry said she understood Commissioner Uhl’s concerns about bulk with small lots so close together, especially on a Heritage lane. Said that privacy to the right has been dealt with and that it is important for families to be able to live and stay in their homes. This project is not increasing non- conformity and the architecture is nice. Said this project is okay with her but that she hopes that access between the two properties does not become an issue between neighbors. Commissioner Nagpal concurred, saying that the project is well articulated and fits well. Said she has no problem with the project. Commissioner Schallop agreed. Commissioner Garakani asked if conditions could be imposed, in the event the structure were to burn down, on what could be reconstructed on the site. Commissioner Zutshi said that would represent a new project. Director Tom Sullivan agreed. Chair Hunter said that she knows this house well and a nice job has been done. There is minimal impact from the front and this project should be allowed to go ahead as it is fine. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 8 Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Barry, seconded by Commissioner Zutshi, the Planning Commission granted a Design Review approval to allow first and second story additions to an existing house on property located at 13755 Saratoga Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Barry, Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Schallop, Uhl and Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 2 APPLICATION #03-079 (APN 397-09-010) – WARRINER TRUST, 19120 Monte Vista Drive: The applicant requests approval to subdivide one parcel into two building sites. The property is zoned R-1- 40,000. The proposed parcels are greater than one acre. The existing parcel is over 2.5 acres. The existing residence is to remain. (CHRISTINE OOSTERHOUS) Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicant seeks approval to subdivide one lot into two, with Parcel 1 consisting of 1.2 acres with a new building site and Parcel 2 consisting of 1.13 acres with an existing home. The lots would each exceed minimum lot size, which is 40,000 square feet. The width and depth requirements are met and the lots would have rectangular shapes with building envelopes that allow required setbacks. • Said that a Design Review approval would be required for a new residence but is not proposed at this time. • Advised that staff is recommending that the existing driveway be relocated to the property line of Parcel 2. Another possibility is an easement to share the driveway between the two parcels but there is concern as easements often cause confusion. Staff supports relocation over an easement. • Said that an Arborist report was prepared but that prior to development of Parcel 1 additional analysis would be required. • Recommended approval. Commissioner Zutshi asked for the back up access if a new driveway were to be constructed. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous replied 24 feet. Commissioner Zutshi pointed out that nothing in Code prevents easements. Commissioner Schallop asked if a maintenance agreement for the easement can be conditioned. Associate Planner Christine Oosterhous replied yes. Chair Hunter opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Richard Bonetti, Realtor, Alain Pinel Realtors: • Said that he is a Saratoga native. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 9 • Advised that the project’s Civil Engineer is present as is Ms. Daphne Smith, the trustee of the Warriner Trust. • Said that this property is on the market in order to settle the estate and that a party of secondary interest is John and Melissa DiNapoli. • Expressed appreciation for staff’s support of this subdivision and said that they would appreciate a definitive decision on the issue of the easement. Ms. Daphne Smith, 19120 Monte Vista Drive, Saratoga: • Identified herself as the trustee of her late father’s estate. • Added that her father passed away in November 2002 at the age of 98. • Said that her parents moved to California in 1937. • Said that Mr. Birge Clark was the architect of this home, a midwestern style home that was adapted for California. The site once had two magnificent oaks but only one now survives. • Described her father’s many accomplishments and community service and said that he had maintained his property over the years. • Said that they are pursuing a subdivision as they wanted to preserve the home as well as move ahead in the neighborhood. • Said that they are under a time constraint as the estate is to settle in six weeks. • Made herself available for questions. • Thanked the Commission for the opportunity to address them. Commissioner Barry asked Ms. Smith what happened to the oak tree that was lost. Ms. Daphne Smith replied that it was diagnosed as being damaged and then a large limb fell off. When the tree trimmers came out to clean up the situation, the tree split, thankfully not while anyone was up in the tree. Commissioner Barry expressed concern as to whether the conditions that impacted that tree might impact the remaining tree. Chair Hunter declared that this home and oak tree are both fantastic. Ms. Sitka Cymbal, Project Engineer, Westphall Engineers, made herself available for questions. Commissioner Barry asked about alternative lot splits to deal with the driveway. Ms. Sitka Cymbal said that there are not a lot of options if one wants to keep this home. One solution is an easement to allow shared use of a driveway. This keeps down impervious surface, reduces paving and offers a good solution. Commissioner Barry asked staff if there is any basis for a Variance to keep the driveway with Parcel 2. Director Tom Sullivan replied not a very strong one. Added that there are no Code provisions that disallow shared driveways. Said that if an easement is the decision made, it would be best to ensure that correct documents are in place, recorded and part of the deed, so that maintenance issues are dealt with. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 10 Mr. Tom York, Realtor, Alain Pinel Realtors: • Said that moving the driveway would change the dynamics of the house and could impact the remaining oak tree, as it is not 100 percent healthy. • Assured that the buyer would be made aware of the provisions of the easement. Mr. Richard Bonetti: • Commended staff and recommended that Condition #1 be stricken. • Thanked the Commission for its consideration. • Stated that it is not logical to make change in what is there now but rather to deal with it in the Design Review process. Chair Hunter closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Garakani: • Said that he lives with a shared driveway and there are no issues. • Said he prefers an easement to a Variance as precedents are set with Variances. • Stated that he does not mind an easement and that this is the right way to do it as it would be better for the tree. Commissioner Zutshi said she likes the drive as it is with an easement agreement. Commissioner Barry: • Said that it would be good for the community to preserve this house. • Said the health of the tree is a concern. • Advised that she is experienced with easements and they are fine if legally drawn. The easement should be recorded with the deed and deal with maintenance and landscaping and should be part of the document of sale. Commissioner Nagpal pointed out that pursuing the alternative of a Variance is not possible within the time frame sought by the applicant. Director Tom Sullivan agreed that the time frame is one reason to go with an easement. Commissioner Nagpal said that she could support a legally drawn easement with maintenance and landscaping issues outlined. Director Tom Sullivan pointed out that the easement would also be shown on the subdivision map. Commissioner Schallop: • Pointed out a typographical error on page 11 of the resolution. • Said that necessary findings can be made to support this subdivision. • Added that there is no basis in Code to discourage easements. Commissioner Uhl: • Concurred and said that it is necessary to preserve the character of this property and to keep the tree as it is without disturbing it by moving the driveway. • Said he lives with a road easement and that it is not a big deal. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 11 • Stressed the importance of preserving the character and tree. Director Tom Sullivan said that Condition #1 would be replaced with one that requires the establishment of a properly recorded access easement. Chair Hunter agreed. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Garakani, seconded by Commissioner Uhl, the Planning Commission approved the subdivision of one parcel into two building sites on property located at 19120 Monte Vista Drive with a replacement for Condition #1 to require an access easement for a shared driveway, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Barry, Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Schallop, Uhl and Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None *** NEW BUSINESS Edencrest Lane (APN 503-12-029) – SNOW: Request for interpretation of Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-30.050(f) regarding grading. (ANN WELSH). Continued from Meeting of May 28, 2003. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh presented the staff report as follows: • Said that there is a memo in the packet that outlines the concerns regarding corrected grading. • Said that Mr. Mark Snow requested an interpretation between corrective versus typical grading of property that exceeds 1,000 cubic yards. • Stated that the grading policy, requiring public hearing before the Planning Commission, allows a public forum and CEQA review. • Added that staff believes a project should be required to meet standards. Commissioner Schallop asked how other towns deal with this issue. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh replied that she discussed this with a geotechnical consultant but did no in depth research on other municipalities. Director Tom Sullivan said that his experience in Moraga, which has similar geology to Saratoga, there is a lot of remediation of slides. The amount of earthwork done is counted separately but the process is spread out over years with multiple hearings. Commissioner Schallop asks if Code calls this out. Director Tom Sullivan replied not exactly but that the spirit is there. Chair Hunter commended Assistant Planner Ann Welsh for her work with Mr. Corson. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh thanked Chair Hunter for her comments. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 12 Chair Hunter opened the Public Hearing for New Business Item No. 3. Mr. James Kennedy, Property Owner, Parcel on Edencrest Lane (APN 503-12-029): • Said that he is the property owner and has worked for three and a half years to get to this point, given the geology of this property. • Said that 10 years of exploration have occurred between him and the previous owner, with borings done to help determine what should be done with the property to mitigate its problems. • Said that Soils Engineer and Geologists have been involved. • Said that a number of things are apparent and that a lot of the work they are talking about doing will benefit the adjacent property owners too. • Pointed out that the trees and vegetation on the site are substandard and not specimen. • Suggested that replantation with better oak trees would be beneficial as the existing trees could wash away under current conditions. • Said that not only would they be building a better building site, they would also improve the area in regards to stabilization. • Said that this is a long-term project and that a lot can be done to improve the situation and develop a better than natural product. Chair Hunter said that she thought the site was gorgeous. Commissioner Zutshi asked Mr. Kennedy if he has owned the parcel for 10 years. Mr. James Kennedy replied that he has owned it for three and a half to four years. Commissioner Zutshi asked how many landslides have occurred and what kind of erosion. Mr. James Kennedy said that the site has substandard drainage, which will erode root systems of oaks. Added that water is a huge problem and that landslides may be secondary. Commissioner Zutshi asked for a definition of landslides. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh said potentially moving soils. Mr. James Kennedy asked where she got that term. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh replied from the Cotton Shires report. Mr. James Kennedy asked if there is no provision for remedial grading. Director Tom Sullivan replied that this is the policy interpretation to be made by the Commission. Commissioner Nagpal asked Mr. Kennedy for the distinction between corrective versus normal grading and why he felt there is a difference. Mr. James Kennedy said that corrective is a repair issue where they have to excavate the soil and recompact it. It is misleading to count that as normal grading as they would not be adding or changing the vista as much. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 13 Commissioner Barry asked if there is the potential for a Variance on grading amounts in the Hillside district. Director Tom Sullivan said that the standard can be increased if the Planning Commission makes the necessary findings. Chair Hunter closed the Public Hearing for New Business Item No. 3. Commissioner Barry: • Expressed her agreement with the staff report. • Said it would be terrible public policy to allow this much change outside of public purview and CEQA review. • Said that the appropriate remedy is to stay with the Hillside Ordinance as there is an exception possibility. Commissioner Nagpal said she tends to agree as she can’t see the distinction between remedial and normal grading until she sees a specific project. Commissioner Uhl completely agreed. Commissioner Zutshi agreed. Commissioner Schallop said that staff’s interpretation is reasonable. Commissioner Garakani said if the applicant wants to build, he should wait and bring the project forward. Chair Hunter agreed. Director Tom Sullivan said that consensus has been reached. Mr. James Kennedy said that he does not necessarily disagree with staff. Added that he had just received notice of this hearing today. Assistant Planner Ann Welsh clarified that notice was properly sent to Mr. Snow, who had made the request for the interpretation. *** DIRECTOR’S ITEMS Director Tom Sullivan said that he had nothing to report except that he has a short commute tonight as he has moved nearby. COMMISSION ITEMS Joint Meeting with Heritage Preservation Commission Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 2003 Page 14 Chair Hunter said that the Heritage Preservation Commission has asked for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and has set the date of Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 9 a.m., at the City Hall Conference Room. Upon discussion among the Commissioners, Chair Hunter said she would inquire if a noontime meeting would be possible. If not, the 9 a.m. time would be kept. Business Development Meeting Chair Hunter advised that she also attended the Business Development meeting. Tree Ordinance Director Tom Sullivan announced that he would meet with the Council Tree Ordinance Subcommittee on Monday morning. COMMUNICATIONS Written City Council Minutes from Regular Meeting on May 7, 2003. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Garakani, seconded by Commissioner Barry, Chair Hunter adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of June 25, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk