The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-13-1986 City Council Agenda packetAGENDA BILL NO. //20 DATE 8/13/86 DEPT.: mmunit Services CITY MGR. APPROVAL I/'L Co Y SUBJECT: Footrace Permit Summary: The American Heart Association will be holding its first annual "Turkey Trot" on November 23, 1986 at West Valley College. The Turkey Trot is basically a footrace and fund raiser for the American Heart Association. Because the footrace has short segments on Allen- dale and Fruitvale Avenue sidewalks, a special events (footrace) permit is required even though a street closure is not. The American Heart Association has agreed to pay a $50 filing fee, a $250 clean up deposit, and to name the City of Saratoga as additionally insured under their existing insurance policy. Fiscal Impacts: $50 non refundable filing fee Exhibits /Attachments: 1. Letter dated July 31, 1986 from American Heart Association 2. Map of race route 3. Proof of insurance coverage Recommended Action: Authorize the :issuance of a Special Events Permit to the American Heart Association as requested. Council Action Approved. CITY OF SARATOGA AGENDA ITEM SANTA CLARA COUNTY CHAPTER 3003 Moorpark Avenue, San Jose, California 95128 408/247 -8555 Cooperating in Business and Industry with United Way. American Heart Association WE'RE FIGHTING FOR YOUR LIFE July 31, 1986 Mr. Todd Argow City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave. Saratoga, CA. 95070 Dear Todd: After much consideration, I have come up with a tentative race course for our proposed "Turkey Trot" running event on November 16 or 23. The distance would be 8K (5 miles) and we would like to start at 9:00 a.m. Even at 10 -11 minutes per mile the stragglers would finish before 10:00 a.m. The only portions of roadway outside of West Valley College would be on Allendale and Fruitvale and we could use the sidewalk access on those. (see map). We would anticipate about 400 runners and all proceeds would benefit the Santa Clara County Chapter of the American Heart Association. We carry our own insurance policy with Marsh McLennan of Dallas which would cover the City of Saratoga, West Valley College and the County of Santa Clara for up to $5,000,000. (see attached sample certificate). With proper monitoring we would require almost no assistance from the Santa Clara County Sheriffs office. I will give you a call shortly to discuss this in more detail. Naturally, I would appreciate any assistance you can give me on this. Sincerely, Scott MacTavish Associate Director of Development SM /hlr enc: -ti J .0 1• �•l 1•••• WO. LOT •t •V.• ••w C i r 0 1 4 1 e r 00 i 4 i e I'S waibth 23-4 .1. t rsz l d e r.."•'T J i,.•1, G A I dv�qIi4 AKA o� ts,. 7 I If •I•• J>_ti 00 18 IBB, .•41bac 401 •r •re 1 Is A •3. o C O, 1 0 �a>a�t5• tT e L•r.000• ••111.0 LOP •4 4 o II c r 0 4 4 A 0 4 4 O 0 o e NM r••• '••1 y �h 4• 4 �•+Pil- •L "I if.1 Ylrl 4 0 0 00 •00 t 300 0 Fis 1 91 w• rt 1 O 0 300 r'• r•4.1Rti 101 .S o 000 S00 SUCCE• VENUE E d al *114 4OAF 04141110 HANDICAPPED PARKING AREAS A, a v9r sFS:� f J tj• ••o •t= vOttitee I 611.. 1111611 7111.. FOJIUAIL 0 C•t•tL N(.6 COURSE d•5ER•11 0 ;;s ..1,6... titr It¢ItJy r; F a< r* 1'ktts ti a WEST VALLEY COLLEGE 1 0 464,1105 1 ADMINISTRATION 1 A Board Room 1 B Cashier lc Personnel 2 ADMINISTRATION of JUSTICE 3 ADMISSIONS and RECORDS 4 BUSINESS DIVISION 5 CARLSON HOUSE 6 CAMPUS CENTER GA ASB Offices 68 Bookstore 6C Snack Bar 7 CAREER CENTER 1. •0 10 ENGINEERING and TECHNOLOGY 10A SET10 F000 SERVICE and RESTAURANT MANAGE- MENT 11 8 CHILD CARE CENTER 9 COUNSELING Co X DIVISION OFFICE AREAS Shaded areas represent restricted staff parking CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE NAME OF COMPANY NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 3)THE 2)PACIFIC COMPANY This is to Certify, that policies in the name of NAMED INSURED AND ADDRESS are in force of the dote hereof, as follows: POLICY NUMBER GLA298686 GLA298686 -TX MMA490380 -MA BA8728782 -ALL OTHER STATES XMO 016722 61XSSG1371 POLICY PERIOD Elf. 9 -1 -85 E.P. 9 -1 -86 Eff. 9 -85 E. 9 -1 -86 Ell. 9 -1 -85 Exp.. 9 -1 -86 Elf. 9 -1- 85 Exp. 9 -1 -86 of. 9-1-85 Exp. 9 -1 -86 Bodily injury by Accident Bodily injury by Disease Bodily injury by Disease BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE COMBINED PERSONAL INJURY BODILY INJURY (EACH PERSON) BODILY INJURY (EACH ACCIDENT) PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE COMBINED LIMITS STATUTORY 100,000. 500,000. 100,000, EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000. 1,000,000. EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000. 5,000,000. each accident policy limit each employee ;GGREGATE $1,000,000. GENERAL LIABILITY COMPREHENSIVE FORM PREMISESOPERATIONS HAZAR EXPLOSION D AND COLLAPSE UNDERGROUND HAZARD PRODUCTS /COMPLETED OPERATIONS HAZARD CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE rryye� INDEPENDENT i CONTRACTORS PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMPREHENSIVE FORM OWNED IE HIRED NON.OWNED OTHER• KIND OF INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY UMBRELLA UMBRELLA CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO: NAME AND ADDRESS American Heart Association Santa Clara County Chapter 3003 Moorpark Ave San Jose CA 95128 Excess of XMO 016722 IDATED This Certificate of Insurance neither affirmatively nor negatively amends, extends%" alters the coverage afforded by any policy described herein. 5,000,000. Marsh McLennan, Incorporot 2121 Son Jacinto Stu 1300 Son Jacinto Tov Dallas, Texas 752 214.979.9900 Telex 73.051 Combined Single Limi Combined Single Limi LEASED OR GRATUITOUSLY OFFERED FOR THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION I OFF PREMISES BUT ONLY AS RESPECTS OPERATIONS OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. NAME OF EVENT: In the event of any material change in or cancellation of, said policies, the undersigned compony will give the porty to whom this certificote is issued. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF EVENT:. 10 (ten) Marsh McLennan, Inc. days written notice to MMC- 6186 -0 AGENDA BILL NO. I I C DATE: 8/13/86 DEPT.: Engineering CITY MGR. APPROV SUBJECT: Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Median Landscaping Summary: Four bids were received for this project and a bid summary is attached. The low bid by B. L. Cohen, $225,677 was approximately $13,000 over the construction cost estimate and budget. To award the contract you must also appropriate the additional $13,000 for full funding. Fiscal Impacts: $225,677 Construction Cost $256,000 Total Cost (24,000 expended in Fiscal 85 -86) Exhibits /Attachments: Appropriation Resolution No. Bid Summary Recommended Action: Adopt Apporpriation Resolution No. appropriating and additional $13,000 the this project. Award contract to the low bidder, B. L. Cohen Landscape, Inc. for a contract amount of $225,677. Council Action 8/14/86: Approved staff recommendation and resolution 2347.2. CITY OF SARATOGA AGENDA ITEM BID SUMMARY Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Median Landscaping B. L. Cohen Landscape, Inc. B B Landscape Contractor, Inc. Collishaw Construction, Inc. Robert Quatman, Inc. 225,677.00 247,279.00 251,405.00 259,615.00 RESOLUTION NO. 2347. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS AND AMENDING THE 1986 -87 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET WHEREAS, it has been recommended by the City Manager that the following transfer of appropriations and increase in the present budget appropriations be made: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the budget of the City of Saratoga adopted by Resolution 2347 be amended as follows: Transfer: Subsidiary: Purpose: 13,000,00 FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BALANCE TO PROJECT 902, GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES, 0032 -2000 13,000,00 3200- 6700 -902 13,000,00 FUND CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE BIDS, The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the 14TH day of AUGUST 1986, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor AGENDA BILL NO. a 1 DATE: August 12, 1986 DEPT. City Attorney CITY OF SARATOGA SUBJECT: Amendment to Second Unit Ordinance Fiscal Impacts: None. C aso AGENDA ITEM Ea CITY MGR. APPROVAL Summary: The proposed amendment will allow the establishment of new second units within the R- 1- 10,000 zoning district, subject to a limitation of not more than five use permits being granted during any single calendar year. No change is being made with respect to the legalization of existing second units within the R -1- 10,000 district, and applications for such legalization may still be filed in accordance with the provisions of the existing ordinance. (a) Memorandum from City Attorney_ (b) Proposed ordinance. (c) Negative declaration. (d) Resolution and findings by Planning Commission. (e) Minutes of regular meeting of Planning Commission on July 9, 1986. Exhibits /Attachments: Recommended Action: Council Action 9/3: Referred to Planning Commission for recommendation on deletion of age requirement; after 40 -day period, to return to Council for discussion of second units in R -1- 10,000 as well as age requirement. PAUL B. SMITH ERIC L. FARASYN LEONARD J. SIEGAL HAROLD 5. TOPPEL GREGORY A. MANCHUK STEVEN G. BAIRD ATKINSON FARASYN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 660 WEST DANA STREET P.O. BOX 279 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 04042 (415) 967 -6941 MEMORANDUM TO: Saratoga City Council FROM: Harold S. Toppel, City Attorney RE: Amendment to Second Unit Ordinance DATE: August 12, 1986 At its regular meeting on May 21, 1986, the City Council voted to amend the Second Unit Ordinance to allow new second units to be established within the R- 1- 10,000 zoning district, subject to a limitation of not more than five use permits to be granted during any single calendar year. Such amendment was approved by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on July 9, 1986, and is now being submitted to the Council for adoption. The amendment simply deletes the restriction against the establishment of new second units in the R -1- 10,000 district as presently contained in Subsection 15- 56.030(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. Upon further review of the proposed amendment, it is now my recommendation that Section 3, which amends Subsection 15- 56.110(a), be deleted. This amendment would have established new deadlines for applications to legalize an existing second unit within the R 110,000 zoning district. However, such applications could have been filed under the existing ordinance so there is no reason to establish a new deadline for legalization of existing units. Toppe Saratoga City Attorney J. M. ATKINSON, (1892 -1982) L. M. FARASYN, (1915 -1979) ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA AMENDING SECTIONS 15- 56.030, 15- 56.070 AND 15- 56.110 OF THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND UNITS The City Council of the City of Saratoga hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1: Paragraph (a) of Section 15- 56.030 in Chapter 15 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "(a) The lot upon which the second unit will be created is located within an A, R -1, HC -RD or NHR district; provided, however, no second units shall be permitted on any lot which is smaller than the minimum site area prescribed for the district wherein such lot is located, except a second unit established prior to January 1, 1983, upon a lot legally created and constituting a part of the City as of October 22, 1956, for which a use permit application is made pursuant to Section 15- 56.110 of this Article." SECTION 2: Paragraph (a) of Section 15- 56.070 in Chapter 15 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "(a) Not more than twenty use permits for second units may be granted during any single calendar year and not more than five of such use permits may be granted during any single calendar year for second units located within the R -1- 10,000 district. The City Council shall periodically review the impacts of second units for which use permits are granted under this Article. Such review shall be conducted annually or at such other interval of time as may be specified by the Council. At each periodic review, the Council shall determine the limitation, if any, on the number of use permits for second units to be granted until the next scheduled review. The numerical limitation may be increased, decreased or retained by the City Council, based upon its review of the impacts caused by the creation of new second units and legalization of existing second units." SECTION 3: Paragraph (a) of Section 15- 56.110 in Chapter 15 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "(a) The owner of any lot containing a second unit established prior to August 18, 1984 shall either discontinue such unit or apply for a use permit pursuant to this Article. The application shall be accompanied by the payment of a processing fee, determined as follows: (1) If the lot is located within an A, HC -RD, NHR or any R -1 district except R -1- 10,000, the normal application fee charged as of December 31, 1985 shall be paid plus a like amount for each calendar year, or fraction thereof, which has elapsed from January 1, 1986 to the date of filing the application. (2) If the lot is located within the R -1- 10,000 district and the application is filed prior to January 1, 1987, the normal application fee charged as of the time of filing shall be paid; if the application is filed after January 1, 1987, the normal application fee charged as of December 31, 1986 shall be paid plus a like amount for each calendar year, or fraction thereof, which has elapsed from January 1, 1987 to the date of filing the application. An application shall be deemed 'filed' when the same is submitted to the Planning Director and accepted by the Director as being complete and all required fees and cost deposits have been paid in full." SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Saratoga hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be held invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty days from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: CITY CLERK s s s The above and foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and after the waiting time required by law, was thereafter passed and adopted this day of 1986, by the following vote: MAYOR