HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-03-1999 Parks and Recreation CommissionSaratoga Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
City Hall Administrative Offices
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga
Monday, May 3, 1999
7:30pm
AGENDA
I. Organization
A) Roll Call: Alberts, Clabeaux, Friedrich, Ioannou, Olsen, Swan, Whitney
B) Report on Posting of the Agenda:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2 the agenda was properly posted on
April 30, 1999
C) Approval of April 12, 1999 Minutes
II. Administration
A) Public Participation Sheets
B) Meeting Starting Time - Discussion
C) Public Works Report- Parks Status
III. Oral & Written Communication
This section is for the public to speak on any item not on the agenda
IV. Old Business
A) Friends of the Warner Hutton House- Renovation Request
B) Cricket League Proposal for Quito Park- Update
C) Kevin Moran /Gardiner Park Play Equipment- Vendor Selection
D) Community Center Improvements - Phase II Assessment Update
E) Playfield Project - Update
V. New Business
A) Sisters of Notre Dame /Sobrato Development - Trails
B) Nagpal Property Approval Request- Trails
C) City Council Meeting- May 5, 1999 ( Playfield Discussion)
VI. Commissioner & Staff Reports
A) Commissioner Reports
B) Trails Subcommittee - Update
C) Wildwood Park Restrooms - Update
D) City Hall Update - Irene Jacobs
E). Recreation Department Status Report - Joan Pisani
VII. Adjournment
Memo
To: Parks and Recreation Cor=ssion
From: Irene Jacobs, Staff Liaison
Date: April 30, 1999
Re: City Council Meeting - Playfield Status
To be honest, I really don't know what to say about this one. I tried to call each of you to let
you know personally before receiving the packet but I was unable to reach all of you.
At Tuesday night's Council meeting, minutes prior to adjournment, Stan Bogosian requested
that the Council agendize for their next meeting on May 5, 1999, a discussion to no longer
consider the Blue Hills /Azule site nor the Marshall Lane School Site for Playfield
Development purposes. Evan Baker seconded the motion and the item was agendized for
next week's meeting. No one, not even the City Manager was made aware of this prior to its
unveiling.
I really don't know what could have transpired since your joint meeting with the Council on
March 9, 1999 when you clearly asked them if you, as a Commission, were on track with
the Playfield Issue. You requested direction from the Council and there was no response.
I have spoken with the City Manager regarding this issue and he reminded certain Council
Members of the Commission's existence and the request that the Commission made of the
Council two months ago. Therefore, at the Council Meeting on Wednesday night, certain
members of the Council will most likely just request that a meeting be scheduled between
the Commission and the City Council to discuss this issue.
• Page 1
Memo
To: Parks and Recreation Co ssio r /
From: Irene Jacobs, Staff Liaison
Date: April 30, 1999
Re: Friends of the Warner Hutton House - Attic Renovation Funding Request
I requested information from the Friends of the Warner Hutton House regarding their
request so that I would be able to include it in the packet for the Commission to review.
Unfortunately I did not receive any information to include before the packet went out.
I have attached a portion of the Meeting Minutes when the Friends of the Warner Hutton
House last approached the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the attic renovation.
Please note that the Commission requested of the Friends that they return when they had a
better understanding of the cost for renovation. I have received no formal information
regarding the cost but Joan Pisani informed me that the cost was $150,000.
I spoke to a member of our City staff from the Engineering Department who has been
working with the consultant who submitted the bid for renovation and I asked my co-
worker his professional opinion on the proposed renovation. His response was that
$150,000 would be the minimum cost associated with renovating the Warner Hutton
House. The Warner Hutton House is registered as a historical site so the requirements
placed on the renovation of this building are not what you would encounter with standard
building requirements. Therefore, he said that although he and the consultant had done
their best to try and determine up front what all the costs would be, in his opinion, the
amount would be closer to $200,000. His feelings were that for that much money you
could get a bigger "bang for your buck" at some other site and that he would not support
the project.
• Page 1
/,9
Playfield Sub - Committee: Barbara Olsen, Jennie Crotty & Frank Friedrich.
C) Warner Hutton House Improvements: Youth Commissioners Alex Scordellis
and Sheeva Ghassemi attended the meeting to request that the Park
Development Funds be used to make the planned improvements to the Warner
Hutton House. Joan Pisani explained that the project would cost somewhere
between $70,000 to $100,000 to renovate the attic that the Youth Commission
and the Friends of the Warner Hutton House hope to see converted in to a
study area for youth from the community. The original intent of the Friends
of the Warner Hutton House was to seek funding for this project via grant
monies. The Friends have been unsuccessful in attaining these funds and are
requesting that the project be funded by the Park Development Fund.
The entire Commission recognized the value of the project yet, the discussion
revolved around the precedence that had already been set when the
Commission declined both the request from Saratoga High School for
assistance with the aquatics center and the request to fund a skateboard park.
Both requesting parties were told that the Commission first needed to
complete some of the items on the priority list established by the Commission
and approved by the City Council before they would then entertain assisting
or undertaking any additional projects. There was discussion that Teens were
listed on the original priority list but, the counter argument pointed out that the
documented sum of $5,000 that had been agreed upon for the renovation of
the Warner Hutton House had already paid. In addition, it was mentioned that
the projects already listed on the priority list would also greatly benefit the
entire teens community.
At the end of the discussion Commissioners Friedrich made a motion to
decline the request of the Friends of the Warner Hutton House to fund the
expansion of the attic. Commissioner Swan seconded the motion and the
motion carried. (5/1)
VIII. Reports:
Commissioner Reports:
Commissioner Whitney reminded the Commission that elections for a new
Commission chair are held in August and she asked Commissioners to consider
who they would want to nominate.
City Hall Update: Staff reported that Chris Fischer had been hired as the new
Public Works Director and that she would be instrumental in helping to
implement these Park Development projects.
Recreation Department Status Report: Joan Pisani reported that the Recreation
Department had brought in 42% additional revenue than expected this year to
cover the department's indirect costs. I .
Park Maintenance Division Update: No report at this time.
30 April 1999
Saratoga City Council
Parks and Recreation Commission
13777 Fruitvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear City Councilmen and Park and Recreation Commissioners,
We ask that you accept these additional signatures to our original 1 February 1999 petition
opposing the current development plan for Blue Hills- Azule park site.
The Azule Park Neighborhood Association circulated this petition again in our neighborhood as
our time permitted. We have obtained 167 additional signatures opposing the soccer field
development at this site. Many of these residents live on side streets in the area, which are less
directly impacted by the development. To the best of my knowledge, there are no duplicated
names from the original petition of 93 names. This totals over 250 neighborhood residents who
are opposed to the plan.
The enclosed map shows all those who have signed our petition, both January and April.
This clearly indicates that the majority of the neighborhood is strongly opposed to this plan.
However, I do want to make clear that the majority of residents do wish to have Azule Park
developed in a way that fits the neighborhood. -_
Please consider our opinions in this decision making process.
Sincerely,
A -&u
Katie Alexand r
Chairperson, Azule Park Neighborhood Association
12340 Goleta Ave.
Saratoga, Ca 95070
257 -6692
Attach petition: original to City Council; copy to Parks Commission
copy to Files
Signed Petition Against Proposal 2A
Jan 31(red) and April 30 (blue)
By APNA
V
X IcA br
X
xt, xk K�
tiri
x X",R X,.
0
X X
J
-xx
morit Dr
x a=xxx
x X) x x
Seagy � Wa
Blue Hil
4�0
x x
x
(�z
clog@ k
k,VL4
xx x xx
Amle Park
X
Kevin m-r-k,,
X Park;
X
<- c xx; X x
X
v,x
X'V'V
x 85
" A
-d ct
X, to
x
Xc. ica OXtb
Ave�'
------ ------
!Mc•
view
*L
85
O.akhavem
Dr
tj
...........
x x
x
(�z
clog@ k
k,VL4
xx x xx
Amle Park
X
Kevin m-r-k,,
X Park;
X
<- c xx; X x
X
v,x
X'V'V
x 85
" A
-d ct
X, to
x
Xc. ica OXtb
Ave�'
------ ------
March 31,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
print name address signature
2. 1 itu) cam. c
c7k5IZ4 C7
3. S��Z�7aL--r-iq q50�C7
4.
19'9.9 .5 eA G v� way
/l
X. Aye RO A: PA KN VR9T
- — -- -
7.
ON ti I 1 �l 5�—k1� I� (.L
s. UyLAM
`, ch 31 J999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
- kllt J; &4 � 2 h� e
Druid �66
ZG0Zv
c�_ SQ ►aJa��.
fie. C�, Suvui,�5 u
k16►iuFTK jowisoU r;40W pL)igo ff CT. 'AgATO&A
IN
a
A7MI
c
39 A4e-41e C/;'
:,
PI .
March 31,1099
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
print name address signature
. � 2Db15 ��►Te ��.
1. V
TAY
e
le r,
erg, 4/(lda
3. h U 9 '9
4.
E I4
V
a Tom..' .�
U 0
• ' Z Q—ve-Q C� t�c� �c
March 31,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
2.
print name address signature
06,;,A a
(-r.y SC ►1E,f4)1 A
I s
/1
IIIZ6 A01WAIl L44101
es
5 C� S('C' (,�I ( LU,
2 � �-O/ ble.
le
7. dle �8
U,
/4A-i2 rz t CT' L e ,"-,A y
q4t
I t kro (/ ,,.t_ S
March 31,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
print name
address
signature
/ fJ -)w
.oh I��,
: l
lef?zq (4eVaI-I(!f' PV,
S61-11z-� /98ZQ
C)
1`10,T �y N 5 HN�F1 1
lilt " Pit -
ia�s 17. U/�p- b eni-
7,
8.`
12.6 q Ikct rr e S a,l a � cc
�^l�lc�
7 1414
.70 4i, ,
c
April 5,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors, strongly
oppose "option 2A" for development of Blue Hills School/Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety, environmental,
and community concerns dictate that plan 2A not be approved or
implemented.
Print Name Address
1.
2. /jd�'L7✓j l .
3.
4.
rIO
'r 0- i
Cry
Cv
5. U
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Signature
I . .
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented.
Print name
+ l n address signature
JO-5 1. c�C0. Ji c K�L /`l576 f.Ao`lcxo�
2. J �l�e S►� ke I a
3.
4. tlZfl�45-1
5. 1 x.133 -Cvoto l L4►+e
6. 40 /5 S7W /2-f 3 3 6zJ-
7.
ol
l h7�
�Sio��S7r�
2 rel
h
9.
E/� -w��v
0� lfAfiycl��ti
2oJe S c'� �L
��/�f S�pRM T,G'il CA
--
10.
M *&rex,f
r
12.
to Lo
ra �
13-MoLr
I
\ 2 l I
So.r o,ko b
14.
140t v'1 tom'
Q t
61 I �1�--
15.
16,'�
R it
7 y
16.
SG. 1 IV
C&] 1/ti%f '
/ 20 g f3 /�ni/► rt a /' �l�r�hr.,.� .,K "C'��
F, , 01,WMM), � MA
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development }
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented.
Print name address signature
1. = sr X;evo iti C /zzZ
2. ;✓OYCC �'ffN(,7 iZZO[� K,rkGr,k fir. ��'
5. 55 / D /.�
.ate
s. W �G
7. 514 1 -20610 N 047,2 C; . -4!2e�
8. t "AP -zo 6L N
9. —Lv, g,,.i /3y--o
11. S 6Z I e /V c A m 4 c p
12. R" 'C, e �L�`�� �
14.__A U N tic
15. 1 6
16. A v eKID„
IF 05A
March 31,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be a .Rproved or implemented.
print name address signature
WA Ld S 2ov2 caN C: I R Sa+�►+�7ot�►�
Zma43
13. eOT4 7-Z7 ?-ao 1<� 6-4, -<4rev*7MA, Ci¢
14.Tev►v► U- Me-V
ZDo-rX- Cr . , cA
0
5. I��i LL K �IiCF .t'[� on 7 KAR�✓� //� , �/ �� `i ✓.�� �/S�„ ,�,s�l
-�/C' 1 �4 7 4 Col4lo � C 7-
March 31,1999 �y
A
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors, / 0
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental, and community concern' dictate that plan 2A
not be approved or implemented.
print name address signature
r261�3
4. Corr o e. I alo5 9 SQTG
-
S.�C.o6
7._ Au .2 - � / VNg H S 2
S 11, � co�,,-
8. (LA to WA- L F,,c �Looao CAA. At C, ,A
.. 4
in
April 5,1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors, strongly
oppose "option 2A" for development of Blue Hills School/Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety, environmental,
and community concerns dictate that plan 2A not be approved or
implemented.
Print Name Address Signature
PejarrA ,di e
2. L D TA I� Ve- <,rw,tox,
3. I�G� bc�� c� �c� ,.�,5 �2�5� \� f's- ,c, �v e C Uc�.s1c
4. r �. \?ASS je
5. enl-� 12+4-
6.
7. ,p
8.
9.
10.
11.
12..
13.
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development Y..
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented. -
Print name
1.
tAL AOfA, iTb p
3.
address
20 3 W A4JOLLw-%s :D
( VU2 6 ((�,/Vc.oAL-- 02
si n t e
6.
7.
s.
4
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
1.�
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented.
1.
2.
3.
Print name address signature
4.
1-p2 Anon
ARTP2
4✓l i -CtiZh aGL�2i�
5.
!.%
a 4
6AIC A 1 14
1-1—
x,.11 t . \
6.
\ . If
7.
12.
13.
14.
i) - L
15.
16.
1
e�
P- `�
Janu 31, 1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents- and neighbors,
strongly oppose "option 2A for deuelopement of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
enuironmentai, and community concerns dictate that plan 2A
not be approued or implemented.
Print name
address
signature
f -
7
11 . �� V G /G� Dtl s� an c 4 -/ �,� ae r Ltv (/ �. �Et!:n.-
12.
13.
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development.
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented.
Print name address signature/
1. M /4- y L z o 8 FC� c--T /K,
2. T4 Q &V-Ick. C,7
kv
0
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
March 31 P1999
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighb
strongly oppose #option 2A for development of glu ors,
School /Azule Park. Hills
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic safety,
environmental, and community concerns dictate that
not be approved or implemented. at plan 2A
`- si nature
rJ
�. Pei' -A5 4n L�) � �o�� � kern C �
T rf_
C-r,
0
-1
1•
We, the undersigned concerned residents and neighbors,
strongly oppose &,option 2A for deuelopement of Blue Hills
School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
enuironmental, and community concerns dictate that plan 211
not be approued or implemented.
Print name
address
signa Lure
2 • +i
�( I ^/
3
FO,
4....�
d
5.
6.
7. 4cic-E
9.
10.
1I I. \I' -U'V A-
�r
a Cc
ci-t �A6h:L
12. \j
13.
We, the undersigned concerned residents and
neighbors, strongly oppose "option 2a" for development
of Blue Hills School /Azule Park.
We feel that the numerous and serious traffic, safety,
environmental and community concerns dictate that
plan 2A not be approved or implemented.
Print name
2.
3.
4.
A
5.
address
`
3' 1 C v+ C
'0' :3 :�5 C. �rkw
I L4 q 0'G
ill--t
signature
D, ,
11.
12.
13.
14
15.
16.
, --A j
a$— 9v9�0
CA f SO -7o
I ` 9i4f s- 'Z 4�
�� ' 1'U1a c Ca 1(�m wcn% `� � Qc� �� c�( `�'la2 �� i� b>✓r ltiood ►�-h -.
bw► ,�v 4 6 -43
J
L
U 7 -� rhC
1.. (^,,._
2.100
l E�Mf_
8. -� , T �/ 171 /�' ` �?� �i �. ��L
%
t
11.
12.
13.
14
15.
16.
, --A j
a$— 9v9�0
CA f SO -7o
I ` 9i4f s- 'Z 4�
�� ' 1'U1a c Ca 1(�m wcn% `� � Qc� �� c�( `�'la2 �� i� b>✓r ltiood ►�-h -.
bw► ,�v 4 6 -43
J
State of Existing Parks Within the Saratoga System.
This report is intended to update you on the current condition of the infrastructure of Saratoga Parks,
and to relay to you the need to make repairs and or improvements to that infrastructure in order for those
areas to remain a safe and enjoyable place for residents, employees, and other users.
Following is a site by site summary that includes a brief history of original development, recent projects
and improvements, followed by a project/costs breakdown listing repairs necessary to maintain those sites
in the aforementioned condition.
Consequences of not addressing these areas of concern, would be the continued degeneration of parr
infrastructure, increased staff man -hours to maintain those areas, and possible litigation against the City.
Wildwood Park, 20764 Fourth St.
The 4.1 acres that is now Wildwood Park were acquired in 1968 at a cost of $81,400.00. Four years later
in 1972, three of those acres were developed at a cost of $61,250.00. That original development included a
stage/ amphitheater, restroom with adjoining storage area, play area and equipment, paved pathways with
minimum security lighting, picnic areas with barbecues and tables, as well as a turf on the flat open, and
sloping areas. Later development added group picnic areas, volleyball court, and horseshoe pits.
The most recent projects and improvements were the construction of the pedestrian footbridge, and
replacement of decking on the stagelamphitheater in 1992. As well as improvements made to the play,
and picnic areas during Capital Improvement Project No. 955 in 1995/96.
Needed improvement& Estimated Costs.
1). Pathways 1,800@ $3.25 per S.F. $5,850.00
2). Restroom 1@ $100,000.00 ea. $100,000.00
3). River rock walls (caps, 205')
4). Tree work 2 days @ $1,200.00 ea. $2,400.00
5). Irrigation upgrades 16,500(x3 $2.00 per L.F. $33,000.00
6). Drinking fountain 2@ $2,500.00 ea. $5,000.00
7). Mow strips 485@ $14.00 per L.F. $6,790.00
8). Drainage (6" perf.) closed system 275@ $8.00 per L.F. $2,200.00
9). Park sign 1 @ $2,800.00 ea. $2,800.00
10).Pathway Lights 5(x3 $2,500.00 ea. $12,500.00
11). Redwood retaining wall (4X108)
12). Garbage enclosures 13 @ $850.00 ea. $11,050.00
13). Bike rack 1 @ $650.00 ea. $650.00
Kevin Moran Park, 12415 Scully Avenue.
In 1970, the City purchased 10.3 acres for $236,572.00 and in 1973, developed 4.0 of those acres at a
cost of $70,642.00 into what is now Kevin Moran Park. Original development consisted of an open turf
area encircled by paved walkways with lighting, play area, and general landscaping. Plans to develop the
remaining 6.3 acres were part of the master plan but were never completed In 1974, the pathway lights
were vandalized and it was decided that they would not be repaired at that time. Recent improvements
were the 1991 reinstallation of pathway lighting, and the removal and replacement of elements of the play
area done in 1995.
Needed improvements. Estimated costs.
1). Planters (14' diameter)
2). Play area (demo old / poor new) 1,200@ $8.00.00 per S.F. $9,600.00
3). Benches 6@ $600.00 ea. $3,600.00
4). Mow strips 2973@ $14.00 per L.F. $41,622.00
5). Exercise station 1 @ $3,000.00 ea. $3,000.00
6). Drinking fountain 1 @ $2,500.00 ea. $2,500.00
7). Irrigation upgrades (w /controller) 177,898@ $2.00 per S.F. $356,200.00
8). Picnic tables 6@ $900.00 ea. $5,400.00
9). Bathrooms 1 @ $100,000.00 ea. $100,000.00
10). Garbage enclosures 9@ $850.00 ea. $7,600.00
11). Bike rack 1 @ $650.00 ea. $650.00
12) BBQ's 2@ $200.00 ea. $400.00
El Quito Park, 12855 Paseo Presada
In 1973, the City developed 4.0 of the 6.3 acres leased from the Moreland School District one year
earlier. That initial development included grading, irrigation and drainage systems, turf and minimal
landscaping. In 1978, after some revisions to the master plan, the final 2.3 acres were developed These
involved additional grading, irrigation and drainage systems, a play area, paved pathway, group seating
area (partial), one experimental light and limited landscaping. Later, as per the master plan the group
sitting area was completed, along with picnic areas, horseshoe pits, a volleyball court, game area and
baseball diamond Soon after these were completed, the community gardens were constructed, and in 1986
bathrooms were installed Most recent improvements include the 1989 upgrades to the baseball diamond,
installation of a new "El Quito Park" sign, metal fencing along the parks perimeter with Paseo Presada,
and the 1990 removal and replacement of existing play equipment.
(El Quito Park, cont.)
Needed improvements Estimated costs
1). Bathroom (partitions) $6,000.00 L.S. $6,000.00
2). Turf renovation 199,140@ $1.50 per S.F. $298,710.00
3). Irrigation upgrades 199,140@ $2.00 per S.F. $398,280.00
4). Mow strip 675@ $14.00 per L.F. $9,450.00
5). Exercise station 1 @ $3,000.00 ea. $3,000.00
6). Tables (game area) 2 @ $800.00 ea. $1,600.00
7). Continuation of metal fence
8). Garbage enclosures
10 @ $850.00 ea.
$4,750.00
9) Drinking fountain
2 @ $2,500.00 ea.
$5,000.00
10) Benches
3 @ $600.00 ea.
$1,800.00
11) Picnic tables
3 @ $900.00 ea.
$2,700.00
12) Pathway lights
4 @ $2,500.00 ea.
$10,000.00
Congress Springs Park, 12970 Glen Brae Drive
Over a seven year period, beginning in 1969, the City acquired 9.8 acres of land on Glen Brae Dr. that
was adjacent to the State owned transportation corridor for a price of $187,000.00. In 1974, development
began with the construction of a baseball diamond by Saratoga Little League on 3.2 acres of that land, the
City then entered into an agreement which allowed Little League to have the exclusive use of that field
from April to July of each year. For their part little league and all other user groups would pay a portion of
incurred maintenance costs. In 1976, due in part to the demand for additional playing fields, the City
leased from the State approximately 10 acres of transportation corridor land on the Parks northern
boundary. This was a renewable five-year lease for $200.00 per year, with a clause allowing for
cancellation with a 90-day notice. This would allow for the accommodation of two additional baseball
fields and four soccer fields, thus meeting public needs of the time.
1979 saw the completion of a Master Plan that was the combined efforts of area residents, representatives
from baseball and soccer leagues, and the Parks and Recreation Commission. In 1986, approval was given
to go to bid on the revised plans for Congress Springs Park These included the construction of a
restroom/concession stand structure, tennis and basketball courts, field improvements i.e. (fences, dugouts,
bleachers), landscaping and additional parking.
More recently, in 1989, the lease the City had with the State for use of land located within the freeway
corridor expired making it necessary to reconfigure the athletic fields. New play equipment was installed
in 1990. In 1994, Saratoga Little League was given permission to make additional improvements to their
fields that included construction of a cinder block scorekeepers building, a grass infield, covered dugouts,
bleacher expansions and bullpens. Later new elements had to be added to the play area after vandals set
fire to the existing ones.
(Congress Springs, coot.)
Needed improvements Estimated costs
1). Complete turf renovation 272,000@ $1.50 per S.F. $408,000.00.
2). Irrigation upgrades 272,000@ $2.00 per S.F. $544,000.00
3). Bathrooms (partitions) $4,900.00 L.S. $4,900.00
4). Slurry seal basketball courts (90X90)
5). AC pathway (tennis courts) 1,680@ $3.25 per S.F. $5,460.00
6). Repairs to backstop fencing 3@ $650.00 ea. $1,950.00
7). Garbage enclosures 19@ $850.00 ea. $16,150.00
8). Benches 14@ $600.00 ea. $8,400.00
9). Picnic tables 1@ $900.00 ea. $900.00
Brookglen Park, 12734 Brookglen Ct.
Acquired in 1972, for a price of $38,000.00, the park shares boundaries with an access road to Brookside
Tennis Club on the east, and private residences to the north and south. Development was completed in
1975 and included a turf area, picnic table, play area with equipment, automatic irrigation system,
landscaping and decomposed granite pathways leading to a half basketball court. In 1978, with the
cooperation of P.G.&E. additional lighting was installed. Since that time, the basketball court surface was
paved, play equipment was replaced and a new irrigation controller was installed.
Needed improvements
Estimated costs
1). Resurface basketball court (Asphalt)
3,024@ $3.25 per S.F.
$9,828.00
2). Paved pathways (Asphalt)
3,690@ $3.25 per S.F.
$11,992.50
3). Drinking fountain
1 @ $2,500.00 ea.
$2,500.00
4). Irrigation upgrades
11,761@ $2.00 per S.F.
$23,522.00
5). Picnic tables
2 @ $900.00 ea.
$1,800.00
6). Benches
2 @ $600.00 ea.
$1,200.00
7). Garbage enclosures
3@ $850.00 ea.
$2,550.00
8). Mow strips
290@ $14.00 per L.F.
$4,060.00
Gardiner Park, 19085 Portos Drive
The site for this park was acquired over the course of six years in two phases, the first being 1.8 acres
donated by the Gardiner family in 1965, then the purchase of an additional .4 acres in 1970/71. A master
plan was completed and development began in 1974. That development included grading, drainage and
irrigation systems, play area (without equipment), turf areas, paved pathways and landscaping. A year
later $2,000.00 donated by the Saratoga Rotary, was used to purchase and install play equipment. Over
time, a small picnic area was added, and elements of the play area were replaced.
Needed improvements
1). Benches
2). Mow strips
3). Drinking fountain
4). Pathway lights
5). Irrigation upgrades
6). Garbage enclosures
7). Tree work
8). Restroom
Estimated costs
3 @ $600.00 ea. $1,800.00
735@ $14.00 per L.F. $10,290.00
1 @ $ 2,500.00 ea. $2,500.00
5@ $2,500.00 ea. $12,500.00
23,087@ $2.00 per S.F. $46,174.00
4@ $850.00 ea. $3,400.00
2@ $1,200.00 per day $2,400.00
1 @ $100,000.00 ea. $100,000.00
Historical Park, 20450 -20460 Saratoga/Les Gatos Road
Development of Historical Park began in 1973, when members of the Saratoga Historical Foundation
were given permission to relocate the James McWilliams House onto the existing site of the village
library. In IW5, Saratoga Planning Department staff finished the master plan and the Swanee Building
(another historical building scheduled for demolition) was brought to the property. Initial development
began in 1976 and involved, redirecting a natural creek that ran through the area, grading and drainage,
limited parking area with entrance and exit driveways, foundations for both the McWilliams and Swanee
Buildings and landscaping. In 1977, the irrigation system was completed, and the courtyard area with
landscaping was finished one year later. More recently, brickwork in front of the museum was continued
up to the front entrance of the McWilliams house, the handicap ramp was completed on the museum, and
both buildings were repainted and had their roofs repaired or replaced.
Needed improvements Estimated costs
1). Replace arbor $4,800.00 L.S. $4,800.00
2). Replace fence $2,200 L. S. $2,200.00
3). Tree work 3@ $1,200.00 per day $3,600.00
4). Pathway headers 800@ $6.50 per L.F. $5,200.00
5). Garbage enclosures 2@ $850.00 ea. $1,700.00
I
Blaney Plaza and Memorial Park, Hwy. 9 and Saratoga/Los Gatos Rd.
Little information could be found in either the Saratoga Park history files or within the parks and trails
master plan regarding the acquisition and early development of these two sites. It is known that in 1982,
the lighting was changed over from gas to electric, and that in 1993, after being alerted to the dangerous
condition of one of the existing pine trees, it bey necessary to devise a means of bracing that tree to
eliminate any continued leaning. This was accomplished with the cooperation of Saratoga Tree Service
and Lou Leto Construction, who along with City staff, developed and erected a brace made with two
12 "X 12"X 16' redwood timbers. These timbers were joined together at the top using threaded rod, this
was then attached to the tree itself with 12" lag screws. At the bottom the timbers were secured with plates
to a 10'X 4 %z' footing that in turn was joined to piers sunk 8' deep. At that time it was determined that
this would be sufficient to keep the tree from listing any finther if a regular pruning program were
initiated to continually reduce end weight on larger branches.
Needed improvements Estimated costs
1). Benches 10@ $600.00 ea. $6,000.00
2). Drinking fountain 1@ $2,500.00 ea. $2,500.00
3). Automated irrigation system 10,890@ $2.00 per S.F. $21,780.00
4). Tree work 2 Q $1,200.00 per day $2,400.00
5). Garbage enclosures 2 @ $850.00 ea. $1,700.00
30 April 1999
Katie Alexander
12340 Goleta Ave.
Saratoga, Ca 95070
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Playfield Issue- Priority for Park Development Fund Money
Dear Saratoga City Councilmen and Parks and Recreation Commissioners:
I have previously written to you regarding the perceived need for additional playfields in
Saratoga. In particular I mentioned that I could find no documentation about attendance or results
of the 1996 Park and Recreation Workshop to establish the priority in spending the Park
Development Fund money. Since then I have received some documentation about that workshop.
But I am still at a loss as to how playfields became the highest priority for this money. Please
allow me to share this information and explain my interpretation.
First, I have attached a copy of the workshop attendance list of 69 people. My understanding is
that invitations were sent to many lists of residents, as well as athletic groups. I recognize several
residents of my neighborhood, as well as many leaders in the soccer organizations. I also notice
Chuck Corr, who is the Director of Facility Modernization for CUSD.
The 69 participants are not a statistically meaningful sample of a city of 30,000. In fact 69 people
doesn't seem like much compared to the over 200 residents that participated in "Azule Park
Committee" Survey in 1996, which indicated an overwhelming desire for a "neighborhood" park.
It is also small in comparison to the current 250 residents opposing just the Blue Hills -Azule
Development plan.
Second, I have attached a. copy of the "Workshop Results - Priority List" which list the projects
considered in relative priority. I would like to draw your attention to the "Money Amount"
column. Apparently, the workshop participants were given $2 million dollars of "play money" to
spend as they wished on various projects. This was a way to establish priority and also relative
importance of projects. It has nothing to do with the actual cost of a project.
I notice that the top two items, 1) Community Center Expansion/Renovation and 2)
Improvements to existing school playfields, had very similar relative importance to the workshop
($2 LOMA 9.8M play money) and were significantly higher than the remaining items. I would
again look at the play money amount for the next 4 -5 items and say they are roughly the same. I
would say that the workshop considered each of the following at nearly the same priority:
3)Development of Multi -use Sports Fields, 4)Teen Facilities, 5)Land/Park Acquisition, 6)Park
Improvements at Existing Sites, and probably 7) Trail Improvements /Connecting Paths. If the
wishes of the 1996 Workshop were followed, the bulk of the Park Development Fund should be
allocated to the Community Center and Improving Existing Playfields with lesser amounts
towards each of the other 5 projects mentioned above.
Clearly there was never a mandate in 1996 by hundreds of citizens giving new playfields highest
priority. Although the workshop probably did invite a variety of select people, the results were
not inclusive of everyone that tried to participate. Neither the Parks Commission nor the City
Council considered our 1996 neighborhood survey. I am also attaching my copy of the official
August 1996 City Council Transcripts, which shows how controversial this issue was even back
then. I am still at a loss to explain the how brand new playfields became the highest priority at all.
Since the reasons for the original play field decision are not clear, I believe that the best path
forward is to provide new direction to the Parks and Recreation Commission. I ask that the City
Council once again direct that the Park Development Fund money be spent as wisely as possible
towards projects that benefit all citizens and that have sufficient maintenance funding. I
personally feel that the Community Center Expansion/Renovation as well as the Saratoga High
School Pool would certainly fit that requirement.
Sincerely,
Katie Alexander
Attach: 1996 Workshop Participants
1996 Workshop Results- Priority List
Aug 96 City Council Transcript ��5
�9 l"ow►Mu ,A' Wog- cskd �p
FACILITATOR: • Mary Lynn Bernald FACILITATOR:.• Kathy Weiner
RECORDER: • Monique Drumm RECORDER: .Beverly Tucker
*Chuck Corr •'Gladys Armstrong
• Jerry Daniel's • Connie Birdsall ✓
• Anthony Hoffmann Mary Gardner ✓
• Sally Johnson ✓ :Laurie Girand L00�
• Carolyn. King -#' *Patricia Ann Johnstone
Mark Linsky •Sandy Lewis L--*'
''p�C� ✓ Sally McElrAvey ✓
Gary Pas tre • Dave Mount✓
•Roma Rieker ✓l . Dick Peterson
i Elaine Roth �,r♦ •Greig Rose ✓
=' Stephanie Weidert t'/ shai
Bill Weller *Rosanne W de Vzak
FACILITATOR: •John Mallory FACILITATOR: *Jenny Crotty
RECORDER: *Barbara Dutra RECORDER: • John Clark
Al Abshire 4" / M °`�� C"�aSb `� Ron Adolphson
•Marcia Block t/ *Angel Cheng
• Laurel Euler ' Barbara D I Angelo V�1117/
Pam Hoffman •C. Holly Davie L!
• Wayne Kao Judy Jimenez
•R.G. Lawson✓ • Pam Kenady ✓
Debbie Lijo b/ / • Anne Kolb
-Sofia Poul acjat/ Dave Lazares ✓
Cindy Ruby Craig Northrup
*Beth Wyman ✓00' Brian Robertson ✓
• Chri t
W1_it81L1__1 N
e Gulrich ✓ • Steve Yuen L-"'00'
, w IC/
FACILITATOR: •Kay Whitney FACILITAT OR: 'Gi11ian Moran
RECORDER: • Larry Perlin RECORDER: -Kim Heinrichs
.*Sarah Adolphson ✓ Reiko Iwanaga /
• Steve Benzingi/ •Nancy Jame llo v
• K1kristy ��i/ Nadine Redding
• Frank Dutro
Tom Green bon n ' t X�C�ao / ✓
Gary Lord V
• Catherine Quinonez,f All
• Robert Strayer tx
. Venise Taaffe i✓
. Barbara Takahashi✓
*.Sally Towse ✓ t��� L /
0
,2, 1 0 ,..:
ml
in;
I i . rn
• a
k
com")dnj
PI a 4L; e l 4
e V� jo
Teen Ta
La ilct,
Par k a
Center er
)a nst Or1 Re- mva4i'or1
rove rren%L,,P-,
Par Ik A
I Ror+;s
�J'o f
l _
9.3 rA; I Trial I
�r, 3 nnil 7a tnd oo r 5por+s 4 _
i v;4 4 Ce..n cr
Com man (S-a r d �e il
PD0944
G Q ort 5
Con Lelj'' de 5 t f"o -4)1e ,
Tee" rj eels - -r
4f
• � h � � car e n � v� ,o ,o .d c � _ c � ; � _ t r; �
MINUTES Q A
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Wednesday, August 7, 1996 - 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Ave.
TYPE: Regular Meeting
Closed Session in Administration Conference Room, 13777 Fruitvale Ave.
at 7:00 p.m. pursuant to Section 54957.6: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR
NEGOTIATOR
Agency negotiator: Harry Peacock
Employee organization: Saratoga Employees Association and Saratoga
Management Organization
The Mayor announced that no action had been taken at the closed
session.
7:32 - Pledge of Allegiance led by Karen Anderson.
1. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Burger, Tucker, and Mayor Jacobs.
Councilmembers Absent: Moran and Wolfe.
Staff Present: City Manager Peacock, City Attorney Riback, Public
Works Director Perlin, Planning Director Curtis.
2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
A. Presentation to Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Burger by
Issues Today Television Forum
No one was in attendance to make the presentation.
3. REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
City Manager Peacock reported that pursuant to Government Code 54954.2,
the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on August 2.
4. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS AND THE PUBLIC
A. ORAL COMMUNICATION FROM SANTA CLARA COUNTY HOUSING ACTION
COALITION
Beth Makosey of the Tri- County Apartment Association said she
epresented the Santa Clara County Housing Action Coalition, and
highlighted findings from the U.C. Berkeley study regarding the causes,
challenges and solutions to the County's housing shortage.
B. GENERAL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Jim Schindler, 12302 Goleta Court, said he had new information which
was not considered in the decision of the Parks Task Force and
fequested that Item 5.A.1 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
City Attorney Riback said Council could delay oral communications and
move to the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Jacobs moved the agenda to the Consent Calendar.
TUCKER /BURGER MOVED TO MOVE ITEM 5.A.1 TO SECTION B OF THE CONSENT
CALENDAR,
TUCKER /BURGER MOVED TO MOVE ITEM 5.A.2 TO SECTION B OF THE CONSENT
CALENDAR.
Councilmembers discussed the motions as follows: 1. The previous
meetings had been well - publicized, but those who attended the Council
meeting at which a decision was made were under the impression that was
a final decision in regard to the general framework of the plan. 2.
There may be information Council had not heard which could be forwarded
to the committee for consideration during the planning and design
phases which would not be undertaken without further input in anv case.
City Council Minutes
1996
3. Perhaps Oral Communications
information since it would be
decision at this meeting.
August 7,
was the more appropriate spot for this
unfair for Council to change their
Councilmembers Tucker and Burger agreed to withdraw the motion and
second regarding Item 5.A.1.
Mayor Jacobs returned the agenda to Oral Communications-
Mr. Schindler drew attention to the petition and survey presented to
Council. There were more than 200 signatures and in most cases, they
were registered voters. He said they were asked to let the City know
what they wanted to see as parks were developed, but apparently the
desires of the people as tabulated in the survey were ignored. He
suggested that those desires regarding traffic and safety .should be
considered by everyone. He said they feel Cupertino Union School
District is not accepting responsibility and accountability for
assurances given in regard to traffic at Blue Hills School when
portable classrooms were installed.
Allen T. Roten, 19812 Veronica Drive, Vice President of Greenbrier
Homeowners and Taxpayers Association, said theirs was the longest lived
homeowners association in Saratoga. He referred to a letter signed by
Sally Johnson, association President. There are 180 homes in the
association. He read the letter into the record. Mr. Roten said they
gave the report to the parks task force before a panel was appointed.
The panel did not include anyone from their area, which they, did not
understand. Also, they never received acknowledgment that their report
had been accepted, reviewed or rejected. Some of their people did
participate in the workshop.
Joan Greene, 12350 Goleta Avenue, said they have been assured for years
that Azule would be a neighborhood park but development was always put
on hold. Members of the committee had not notified her of the recent
meetings or she would have spoken at that time. She requested a red
zone in front of her home.
Jennifer Crotty, 13861 Raven Court, Chair of the-Task Force and member
of the Parks and Recreation Commission, said they greatly appreciate
everyone who came to the meetings. Council was aware that the workshop
was well attended and widely advertised. At the end of the workshop,
all participants were notified that they were welcome to attend all
meetings of the Task Force and the Parks and Recreation Commission.
She said they agreed that traffic and safety are issues, not only in
the Greenbrier area. In fact, they had specifically asked for only
soccer fields at Azule Park and no baseball fields. All interested
people will be invited to workshops where the actual design of parks
will be considered with a consultant's help. She said she feels they
have gone overboard to accommodate the needs of neighborhoods but also
the needs of the greater community. Everyone agrees that the youth of
Saratoga needs a lot of attention. The workshop was well attended and
it would be great if they could make everyone happy.
Kay Whitney, 13067 Jaccaranda Court, member of Task Force and resident
for 23 years, said she had raised four kids as a single parent and part
of the reason they are the kind of people you would want to know is
because the community of Saratoga provided lots of opportunities to
them. She said when you hear sports leaders saying that kids are
climbing over fences looking for places to play, that is a problem that
can be solved. She said she heard people after the meetings who had
started out with their own agendas, but had put them aside and a sense
of community emerged. She said they need to provide things that will
bring the community together and she hoped people would be able to
learn to live with some traffic as she had where she lives near
Congress Springs Park. This is one community and decisions have to be
made for the whole community.
Mayor Jacobs moved the agenda to Item 5.A.1.
S. CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes 3 August 7,
'1996
1
A. Previously- Discussed Items
1) Community Task Force Recommendations on Parks and
Recreation Development Fund Usage (as revised on
7/17/96)
Discussion followed regarding how to show Council's priorities.
TUCKER /BURGER TO APPEND THE RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THE MINUTES AS PART
OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND TO ADD ITEM 5 TO THE POLICY STATING
THAT THE ABOVE PROJECTS ARE NOT STATED IN PRIORITY ORDER OF EXECUTION.
Councilmember Burger emphasized that this is a community eXfort and
Council is not making final plans about development of.any of the parks
at this time. When they reach that. point, community members. Can be
part of the design process if they wish.
Mayor Jacobs said he anticipated any material and comments presented
tonight will be forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Commission for
consideration during the planning process.
THE MOTION PASSED 3 -0
2) ordinance relating to Household Sales (second reading
and adoption, waiving reading in full)
Councilmembers Tucker and Burger withdrew the motion and second to
remove this item from the Consent Calendar.
Following discussion on the procedure to be followed, Mayor Jacobs
moved the agenda to Oral Communications.
Marvin Becker, 12120 Mellowood Drive, President of Brookview Homeowners
Association, said this group was formed 30 years ago. Regarding
allowing only one sign for block sales at the site of the sale, he said
there would be no way for people to know that there is a sale going on.
The neighborhood has held block sales for seven years and the signs are
usually put up the night before and taken down after the sale. Many of
the signs in the area are put up by San Jose residents.
Mayor Jacobs moved the agenda to Item 5.A.2
S. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Previously - Discussed Items
2) Ordinance relating to Household Sales (second reading
and adoption, waiving reading in full)
Council was informed that they had recently enacted-an ordinance that
prohibits temporary signs in the public right of way with certain
exceptions. City Manager Peacock said this ordinance relates only to
the number of signs that can be put on private property. What Mr.
Becker and Ms. Fariss are talking about is amending the sign ordinance
to allow temporary signs in the public right of way or on other private
property.
BURGER /TUCKER MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 71 -165 AS WRITTEN WAIVING
READING IN FULL.
Discussion followed regarding Council's interpretation of what Ms.
Fariss was requesting in her letter and prohibition of signs on private
property.
City Attorney Riback said that by this ordinance, Council is adopting
standards in regard to garage sales. Garage sale signs have been
prohibited on both public and private property until now.
THE MOTION PASSED 3 -0.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
30 April 1999
Saratoga City Council
Parks and Recreation Commission
13777 Fruitvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Cost estimates for the Blue Hills - Azule Soccer proposal
Dear City Councilmen and Park and Recreation Commissioners,
I would like to take this opportunity to make available to you some information we have
received from 'thebealsgroup'. One of our members, Bill Estes, requested information
regarding the detailed maintenance costs of the proposed Soccer Park at Blue Hills -
Azule. The attached letter describes the maintenance for the proposal.
Please note that there are two parts: 1) for the Blue Hills School Property and 2) for the
Azule Park Area. Additionally there are three maintenance levels: A= current
maintenance B= higher maintenance and C= athletic quality level described for each
property.
The bottom line is that in order to maintain an athletic quality field, there would be an
additional cost of $25,330 ($39, 500- $14,170) for the Blue Hills area and $18,565
($28,930 - 10,375) additional for the Azule park area. This totals $43,895 in increased
maintenance by the soccer fields alone. These are just for the turf area not for the
additional picnic area, plumbing, fence and trees, etc. The true total cost will run to a total
of $50,000 to $60,000.
Jay Beals has suggested that the athletic groups could support this cost by creating a non-
profit organization, such as the "Friends of Santa Clara Parks ". The Santa Clara
nonprofit, "Friends of Santa Clara Parks" raises money for'extras such as fees for needy
kids, extra exhibits for parks, special programs, etc. The money may only be used to help
participants. On 24 March, I spoke to Superintendent Rick Hutchinson of the City of
Santa Clara, who is also VP of their non - profit group. He explained that he did not know
of any non -profit that was set- up to provide maintenance costs for a park or facility. He
described that in order to raise their typical $30K to $50K per year for just 'extras', it
takes 3 fundraisers: the Great America Fun Run, the Santa Clara Art and Wine Festival
and a golf tournament. City personnel administered their nonprofit to reduce costs and
ensure that monies were spent according to their rules. Since there is no critical need for
this money, there is no particular problem if there is a shortfall.
I honestly feel that the athletic groups can not reasonably raise this level of money every
year for the next 20 years. These are three big fundraising events with which our athletic
groups have absolutely no experience! If there is a shortfall in fundraising, the city will
be required to fund the maintenance cost of this 'park'. Is the city willing to make that
commitment? Moreover, why should the city invest $1.2M towards a facility where
maintenance is even questionable.
I would be considerate of the athletic groups' intentions, if they had a long history of
maintaining their own soccer facilities for years. But they do not! In fact AYSO has not
paid their fair share towards maintaining the Congress Springs facility. The $1500 /year
'sweetheart' deal that they currently have is appalling in view of the approximately
$80,000 /yr in costs. I understand that even the Little League group pays more than the
soccer group.
If the city receives a cost analysis significantly different from this, please let us know.
We would be happy to investigate to understand how our information from
'thebealsgroup' is different from the information that the city receives.
Sincerely,
Katie Alexander
Chairperson, Azule Park Neighborhood Association
12340 Goleta Ave.
Saratoga, Ca 95070
257 -6692
attach: fax from the beals group dated 3/11/99
J J
3 -11 -1999 5.02PM
FROM THE BEALS GROUP 408 287 0165
FAX TRANSMI'TT'AL
DATE: 3.11.99
TIME: 4:00p.m.
TO:
FIRM:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT Ilk
SUBJECT:
No. OF PAGES: 3
(INCLUDING COVER PAGE)
Mr. Bill Estes FRm: Jeff Kreps
(Blue Hills Sch. area resident) PHONE NUMBER: 408287.4202
(408) 446- / y/OS FAX NUMBER: 408287.0155
(408) 446.5089 CC:
City of Saratoga Park Development
98-12
Maintenance costs
M
t
thebeafsgroup
Ms. Irene Jacobs, City of Saratoga
Mr. Chuck Car, Cupertino S. Dist.
Q FOR APPROVAL ® FOR YOUR USE ❑ REPLY ASAP Q PLEAsE CowaNT ❑ HARD COPY TO FOLLOW
REMARKS:
Dear Mr. Estes,
In your recent conversation with Jay Beals you requested information on projected maintenance costs —
as well as anticipated parties responsible for said maintenance —for the proposed improvements to the
Blue Hills Elementary/Azule Park site. Enclosed is a condensed version of that information with
explanatory remarks where needed.
It should be stressed that these costs were developed in order to give the User Groups (AYSO, CYSA.
etc.) an understanding of an "order of financial magnitude" upon which to base their decisions, and are
tied to a "design" which was created for the sole purpose of providing something to quantify and which
may or may not be accepted or implemented.
Should you have any questions about the information provided or the project in general, do not hesdate
to call me at any time. Thank you for your interest in this project.
SinGereiy,
thebealsgroup, ino
Cortll WMWy More: The hl/omrae= corlt Wad in Bds hsr bnnsmittW is 49W MW999d acid 000ftherr/e1 tntbr OMM htenoed any for
the use of the #x5viduat or enhly nemsd above. 0 ft reader of this masoag& a not the m0ndsd racpent you are twvby noft d that
ary d&S9rt16wtb7, drArtubon or capyng of this fax &mmrrmW is am* prohib9ad n you have mcoved this fAx &wsm&W h error .
please rrnnedetely rra0 fy w by telephone and return Me w9net nmuago to me at the edc>rass above via Lhtited Steles MeY,
F:UobsWft12Sxabga Gariangfu Tssnantt NWvSJfisW.11.49.EOo
2 NORTH MARK9T STREET • 5TH FLOOR • SAN JOSE. CA 95113
40i6.287.42Mt) • 408.287.01W) • be group.oam
'A1
,illy of Saratoga Park Development Protect
!ob Ref. # 98 -12
i..
'art 1_ —Blue Hills School P
-Area
1. Turf areas on school
Property maintained at
wrrent level.
(3.36 acres)
Z
Summary of Projected Maintenance Cons and
Financial Responsibility —Blue Hills ElemenlarV Azule Park
Tasks
Mowing 48x/yr., edging4rimming 2xlyr., Fertilizing 2x /yr.,
Aerating 2x/yr., Litter pick -up 48xlyr., Field lining 4xfyr., Turf
repairs, and Misc. repairs/rnaintenance to equipment and
irrigation system.
'Task list provided by the School District Maintenance
Department.
Cost: per acrelper_ year -
$4,2181acrefyr
(Figure derived from
maintenance cods provided by
the school district fur the year
'89!9041,4291acrelyr- -and
adjusted at 5% through '98/99,
plus the addition of an average
monthly water cost of
$2, 000tacrefyr.)
Cost per veer -1$14.170_
Staff
March 11, 1999
(l, 3. Turf areas on sdiool
SkAlar to above, but with the addition of pre- and post-
$6,634/aorelyr (figure derived 7
School District Staff would perforn
Properly mainlalrPed to a
Pigher, safer level.
emergent broadleaf weed control, and a yearly renovation
from a private maintenance
the additional maintenance
(3.36 acres)
consisting of aeration, loll amendments, over - ,seeding and
top dressing).
contractors current, per -ecre
routines, but the added financial
''bask list provided by a private maintenance contractor.
costa- includes watering
program. __-
responsibility for this maintenance
would lie with the User Groups.
I� .. Turf areas on school
1.Mowing -2 times per week during peak season, 1 fimeAveeM
) roperty maintained to
during winter months 2.Irrigatlon -3-4 days per week In peak
in athletic quality level.
season, two dayslweek at other times 3.17ertllization -4 times
(3.38 acres)
per year (February, May, August, November), high potasslurn
4.Aerabon & Thatching - -2 times per year mininium, remove
thatch any time >1/4" 5.0ver- seeding -as needed to entire
field; wait 4 weeks before playing, sod goal mouths 6.SIli-
seeding-at least once per year 7. Weed Control -pre-
emergent 2 time*ear; herbicides - -as needed
8. Fungicidiellnsedicide -as needed 9.Re -paint field markings
10.Install/remove goals (if permanent); rotate goal mouth
areas II possible. 11.lrrigation1drainage system repairs as
needed 12. Water management, re: user schedules
'Task list provided by a private maintenance contractor.
= •Uot1998%Q&12 Saratoga Cone. ultingtConstruction .I J.9B.doc
$11,7601acrelyr (figure derive
from a private maintenance
contractor's current, per -acre
costa.)
Cost 1 year = $39,500
i at 6 �\
School Dlstdcl Staff would perform
the additional maiMenanoe
routines, but the added financial
responsibility for this inaintenanoe
would lie with the User Groups.
A 7-0 -K
4b
fft
0
9
C.
of Saratoga Park Davelopment Project
Ref. # 98 -12
t' Summary of Protected Maintenance Caste and
Financial Responsibility --Blue Hills ElelnentantLftule Park
March 11, 1999
t z —Awls V8ru Fro
plea
e rty
Maintenance Tasks
Cost: acre! ear
Responsible Party
ngvoaed r turf areas
_
See 1A above for description of lasks.
$4,218/acre/yr (see 1A above
School District Staff would perform
Mained at currant
for explanation)
the additional maintenance
routines, but the added financial
-1 (see 1A above).
Cost per year = $10, 375
responsibility for this maintenance
18 acres)
would lie with the User Grou s.
Proposed turf areas
See 1B above for description of tasks.
$8,G34/acretyr (see 1 B above
for explanation)
School District Staff would perform
the adcflAonal maintenance
Inlalned to a IwWw,
routines, NA the added financial
Or level. (2.48 acres)
Cost per year = $18,070
responsibility for this maintenance
would lie with the User Grou
Proposed turf areas
See 1C above for description of tasks.
$11,7801acrelyr (see 1 C above
for explanation.)
School DWWd Staff would perform
the additional maintenance
Mained to an
routines, but the added financial
lbtic quality level
(2.48 acres)
Cost / year = $28,930
responsibility for this maintenance
would lie with the User Groups.
)TE: There are also approximately 2 acres of "perk" in the design'— landscaped areas including trees, mulched areas, play areas, picnic areas, etc. for which
i City indicated they might be able to provide maintenance. Costs and specific tasks for this maintenance are unknown at this time.
Jobs98198 -12 Saratoga ConsutireNCornsnructim E stir ates\BHsunmw)j311.99.doc
PREPARED 04/29/1999,
12:03:42
2,447,438.00
00 .00
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY LISTING
.00
PAGE 1
.00
.00
PROGRAM GM360L
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
-----------------7------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT
CAP PROJ
FND
JOURNAL ACCA
CD DATE PER. CD
- - -- TRANSACTION - - --
DATE NUMBER
D E S
YTD /CURRENT
CURRENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C R I P T I O N ENCUMBRANCE
DEBITS CREDITS
BALANCE
1`
310- 0000 - 101.10 -01 POOLED CASH
GENERAL CHECKING
GJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ
03/11/99
* *OFFSET*
JOURNAL
SUMMARY
8,510.34
1L 1
GJ 02/26/99 08/99 AJ
02/25/99
* *OFFSET **
AP
JOURNAL
DISBURSEMENT 19990
SUMMARY
834.77
AP
DISBURSEMENT 19990
-G�
] �G `
I(J
Y
GJ 01/31/99 07/99 AJ
01/04/99
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00826
236 .88
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ
12/29/98
* * OFFSET **
JOURNAL
SUMMARY
1,750.00
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ
12/17/98
* *OFFSET **
AP
JOURNAL
DISBURSEMENT 19981
SUMMARY
20, 762.62
uy
2 y �jQill�C�
^' 1
1 Q)j 3 1
AP
DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ 11/30/98 05/99 AJ
11/23/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL
SUMMARY
2,552.76
tn-,
AP
DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ 11/30/98 05/99 AJ
11/04/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL
SUMMARY
2,365.90
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 10/29/98 * * *YERO * ** BALANCE FORWARD
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/22/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/07/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 1799 REVERSE GR #1799 IN PERIOD
O1 /1999 - PAYABLES CK -RUN
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 1800 REVERSE GR #1800 PERIOD 13
IN NEW FY99- PAYABLES 7/31
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310 - 0000- 101.10 -02 POOLED CASH SAVINGS
GJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ 03/31/99 0045207 BLACKWELL PROPERTIES
VELASCOM 033199 02
GJ 01/31/99 07/99 AJ 01/12/99 0043695 VELASCOM 011299 01
DETAIL
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 10/29/98 * * *YERO * ** BALANCE FORWARD
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/16/98 0001117 VELASCOM 101698 01
DETAIL
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 0000201 VELASCOM 073198 01
DETAIL
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 0000202 VELASCOM 073198 01
DETAIL
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310 - 0000 - 101.10 -03 POOLED CASH
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310 - 0000 - 103.10 -00 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT
ACCOUNT TOTAL
PAYROLL /CHECKING
FIRST TRUST
110,853.63
10,847.00
22,164.06
12,050.64
2,791.00
00 .00 195,719.60 195,719.60-
18,630.00
27,945.00
2,344,973.00
37,260.00
9,315.00
9,315.00
00 2,447,438.00
.00
2,447,438.00
00 .00
.00
.00
00 .00
.00
.00
PREPARED 04/29/1999,
12:03:42
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY LISTING
PAGE 2
PROGRAM GM360L
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT
CAP PROJ
FND
JOURNAL
ACCA
- - -- TRANSACTION - - - -'
YTD/CURRENT
CURRENT
CD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
PER.
CD DATE.
NUMBER
D E S C R I P T 1 0 N ENCUMBRANCE
DEBITS
CREDITS
BALANCE
310-0000-201.00-00 LIABILITIES
VOUCHERS PAYABLE
GJ
04/08/99
09/99
AJ
03/11/99
--OFFSET--
JOURNAL SUMMARY
8,510.34
AP DISBURSEMENT 19990
GJ
04/08/99
09/99
AJ
03/01/99
--OFFSET--
JOURNAL SUMMARY
8,510.34
BATCH TYPE AP 01130
GJ
02/26/99
08/99
AJ
02/25/99
--OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
834.77
AP DISBURSEMENT 19990
GJ
02/26/99
08/99
AJ
02/12/99
-*OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
834.77
BATCH TYPE AP 01063
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/29/98
-*OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,750.00
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/17/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
20,762.62
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/17/98
**OFFSET-*
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,750.00
BATCH TYPE AP 00790
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/08/98
*-OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
20,762.62
BATCH TYPE AP 00739
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/23/98
**OFFSET*-
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2,552.76
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/09/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2,552.76
BATCH TYPE AP 00625
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/04/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2,365.90
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/02/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2, 365 .90
BATCH TYPE AP 00596
GJ
07/31/98
01/99
10/29/98
***YERO**-
BALANCE FORWARD
14,841.64
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/22/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
10,847.00
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/16/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
10,847.00
BATCH TYPE AP 00494
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/07/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
22,164.06
AP DISBURSEMENT 19981
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
09/29/98
*-OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
22,164.06
BATCH TYPE AP 00416
GJ
07/31/98
01/99
AJ
07/31/98
1799
REVERSE GR#1799 IN PERIOD
12, 050.64
01/1999-PAYA13LES CK-RUN
GJ
07/31/98
01/99
AJ
07/31/98
1800
REVERSE GR#1800 PERIOD 13
2,791.00
IN NEW FY99-PAYABLES 7/31
ACCOUNT TOTAL
00 84,629.09 84,629.09 .00
310-0000-210.10-03 ACCRUED SALARY & WAGES ACCRUED LEAVE
ACCOUNT TOTAL .00 .00 .00 .00
310-0000-330.10-00 UNRESERVED DESIGNATED FOR OPERATIONS
ACCOUNT TOTAL .00 .00 .00 .00
PREPARED 04/29/1999, 12:03:42 ACCOUNT ACTIVITY LISTING PAGE 3
PROGRAM GM360L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT CAP PROJ FND
JOURNAL ACCTb - - -- TRANSACTION - - -- YTD /CURRENT CURRENT
CD DATE PER. CD DATE NUMBER D E S C R I P T I O N ENCUMBRANCE DEBITS CREDITS BALANCE
- ------ ------ ------ -- - -- -- — ---------------------- --- ----- -- ---- -- --- -- ---- -- - -- — --- --- -- -- ----- ---- -- ----- -- - - -- — - --- ---- - --- ---
310 - 0000 - 330.20 -00 UNRESERVED UNDESIGNATED
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 10/29/98 * * *YERO * ** BALANCE FORWARD
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310- 0000 - 399.99 -01 BALANCING OFFSET ACCOUNTS EXPENDITURE CONTROL
GJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ 03/01/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 01130
GJ 02/26/99 08/99 AJ 02/12/99 **OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 01063
GJ 01/31/99 07/99 AJ 01/04/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00826
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ 12/17/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00790
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ 12/08/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00739
GJ 11/30/98 05/99 AJ 11/09/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00625
GJ 11/30/98 05/99 AJ 11/02/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00596
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/16/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00494
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 09/29/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00416
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310 - 0000 - 399.99 -02 BALANCING OFFSET ACCOUNTS REVENUE CONTROL
GJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ 04/02/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AJ 01352
GJ 01/31/99 07/99 AJ 01/13/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AJ 00896
GJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/28/98 * *OFFSET * *' JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AJ 00567
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 08/07/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AJ 00142
ACCOUNT TOTAL
310 - 0000 - 399.99 -03 BALANCING OFFSET ACCOUNTS ENCUMBRANCE CONTROL
GJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ 03/01/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 01130
GJ 02/26/99 08/99 AJ 02/12/99 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 01063
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ 12/17/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00790
GJ 01/12/99 06/99 AJ 12/08/98 * *OFFSET ** JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE AP 00739
00
00
00
2,177,691.21
00 2,177,691.21 2,177,691.21
8,510.34
834.77
236.88
1,750.00
20,762.62
2,552.76
2,365.90
10,847.00
22,164.06
70,024.33 .00 70,024.33-
18,630.00
27,945.00
37,260.00
18,630.00
.00 102,465.00 102,465.00
8,237.86
697.24
1,750.00
16,749.52
PREPARED 04/29/1999, 12:03:42 ACCOUNT ACTIVITY LISTING PAGE 4
PROGRAM GM360L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT CAP PROJ FND
JOURNAL ACCTb - - -- TRANSACTION - - -- YTD /CURRENT CURRENT
CD DATE PER. CD DATE NUMBER D E S C R I P T I O N ENCUMBRANCE DEBITS CREDITS BALANCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ---- ---- ---- ----- --- - -- - --
310 - 0000 - 399.99 -03
BALANCING
OFFSET ACCOUNTS ENCUMBRANCE
CONTROL
04/08/99
09/99
AJ
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/09/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2,552.76
BATCH TYPE
AP
01130
BATCH TYPE
AP
00625
AJ
02/12/99
* *OFFSET **
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/02/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,140.00
AP
01063
GJ
01/12/99
BATCH TYPE
AP
00596
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/16/98
**OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE
AP
10,847.00
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
BATCH TYPE
AP
00494
18,749.52
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/07/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE
AP
1,140.00
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/09/98
* *OFFSET **
BATCH TYPE
EN
00448
2,552.76
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/06/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
00625
156.80
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/02/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
BATCH TYPE
EN
00446
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/06/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
GJ
15,523.20
04/99
AJ
10/16/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
10,847.00
BATCH TYPE
EN
00447
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/05/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
10/31/98
04/99
5, 000.00
10/07/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,140.00
BATCH TYPE
EN
00420
BATCH TYPE
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
09/29/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
AJ
10/06/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
21,312.90
156.80
BATCH TYPE
AP
00416
BATCH TYPE
EN
00446
GJ
09/30/98
03/99
AJ
09/01/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
70,895.72
15,523.20
BATCH TYPE
EN
00275
00447
GJ
07/31/98
01/99
AJ
07/31/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
41,586.52
5,000.00
BATCH TYPE
BATCH TYPE
EN
00575
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
09/29/98
* *OFFSET **
ACCOUNT TOTAL
21,312.90
.00 134,302.24
65,287.28
310- 0000 - 399.99 -04 BALANCING OFFSET ACCOUNTS RESERVED FOR ENCUMB. CNTL
GJ
04/08/99
09/99
AJ
03/01/99
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
8,237.86
BATCH TYPE
AP
01130
GJ
02/26/99
08/99
AJ
02/12/99
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
697.24
BATCH TYPE
AP
01063
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/17/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,750.00
BATCH TYPE
AP
00790
GJ
01/12/99
06/99
AJ
12/08/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
18,749.52
BATCH TYPE
AP
00739
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/09/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
2,552.76
BATCH TYPE
AP
00625
GJ
11/30/98
05/99
AJ
11/02/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,140.00
BATCH TYPE
AP
00596
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/16/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
10,847.00
BATCH TYPE
AP
00494
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/07/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
1,140.00
BATCH TYPE
EN
00448
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/06/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
156.80
BATCH TYPE
EN
00446
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/06/98
**OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
15,523.20
BATCH TYPE
EN
00447
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
10/05/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
5,000.00
BATCH TYPE
EN
00420
GJ
10/31/98
04/99
AJ
09/29/98
* *OFFSET **
JOURNAL SUMMARY
21,312.90
BATCH TYPE
AP
00416
69,014.96-
I
PREPARED 04/29/1999, 12:03:42
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY
LISTING
PAGE 5
PROGRAM GM360L
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
----------------- 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT CAP PROJ FND
JOURNAL ACCT6 - - -- TRANSACTION - - --
YTD/CURRENT
CURRENT
CD DATE PER. CD DATE NUMBER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D E S C R I P T 1 0 N
ENCUMBRANCE DEBITS
CREDITS
BALANCE
310-0000-399.99-04 BALANCING'OFFSET ACCOUNTS
RESERVED FOR ENCUMB. CUTL
GJ 09/30/98 03/99 AJ 09/01/98 --OFFSET--
JOURNAL SUMMARY
70,895.72
BATCH TYPE EN 00275
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 --OFFSET**
JOURNAL SUMMARY
41,586.52
BATCH TYPE EN 00575
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00 65,287.28
134,302.24
69,014.96
310-0000-399.99-05 BALANCING OFFSET ACCOUNTS PRIOR YEAR RESERVE ENC.
GJ 07/31/98 01/99 10/29/98 ***YERO***
BALANCE FORWARD
41,586.52
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00 .00
41,586.52
41,586.52
310-3030-443.04-00 PUBLIC WORKS
PARK DEVELOPMENT
RJ 04/08/99 09/99 AJ 03/31/99 0045207
BLACKWELL PROPERTIES
18, 630.00
VELASCOM 033199 02
RJ 01/31/99 07/99 AJ 01/12/99 0043695
VELASCOM 011299 01
27,945.00
DETAIL
RJ 10/31/98 04/99 AJ 10/16/98 0001117
VELASCOM 101698 01
37,260.00
DETAIL
RJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 0000201
VELASCOM 073198 01
9,315.00
DETAIL
RJ 07/31/98 01/99 AJ 07/31/98 0000202
VELASCOM 073198 01
9,315.00
DETAIL
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00 .00
102,465.00
102,465.00
310-9010-622.40-10 SERVICES
GENERAL CONTRACTS
EJ 04/08/99 09/99 AP 03/09/99 0077503
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
8,237.86- 8,237.86
SERVICES 26/11 - 2/1/99
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 04/08/99 09/99 AP 03/09/99 0077524
ENGINEERING DATA SERVICE
272.48
ASI SYSTEM LABELS
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 02/26/99 08/99 AP 02/18/99 0077375
ANDERSON BRULE ARCHITECTS
697.24- 834.77
Saratoga Comm. and Senior
Center
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 01/31/99 07/99 AP 01/13/99 0076974
KINKOIS COPIES
236.88
Printing & Binding
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 01/12/99 06/99 AP 12/21/98 0076920
ANDERSON BRULE ARCHITECTS
1,750.00- 1,750.00
Partial Payment Dec. 98
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 01/12/99 06/99 AP 12/14/98 0076877
ROBERT AVILES DESIGN
508.10
WHH House Plans
PROJECT#: 9704
EJ 01/12/99 06/99 AP 12/14/98 0076812
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
8,005.00- 8,005.00
Services 9/26-10/25
PROJECT#: 9704
I
PREPARED 04/29/1999, 12:03:42
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY
LISTING
PAGE 6
PROGRAM GM360L
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT CAP PROJ FND
JOURNAL
ACCTI$ - - -- TRANSACTION - - --
YTD/CURRENT
CURRENT
CD DATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PER. CD DATE NUMBER
D E S C R I P T 1 0 N
ENCUMBRANCE
DEBITS
CREDITS BALANCE
310-9010-622.40-10 SERVICES
GENERAL CONTRACTS
EJ 01/12/99
06/99 AP 12/14/98 0076812
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
10,744.52-
10,744.52
Services 10/26-11/25
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 01/12/99
06/99 AP 12/14/98 0076905
MISCELLANEOUS VENDOR - A/P
1,505.00
Trail Repairs
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 11/30/98
05/99 AP 11/17/98 0076594
ANDERSON BRULE ARCHITECTS
2,552.76-
2,552.76
PARTIAL PAYMENT
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 11/30/98
05/99 AP 11/03/98 0076493
AIR FLIGHT SERVICE
1,217.81
3 MYLARS 24X36 FOR PARK
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 11/30/98
05/99 AP 11/03/98 0076574
WESTFALL ENGINEERS, INC.
1,140.00-
1,148.09
ENGINEER SERVICES
WARNER HUTTON HOUSE
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 07/31/98
01/99 EN 10/29/98 C80036
PASCON
5,281.90
PRIOR YR ENCUMB
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 07/31/98
01/99 EN 10/29/98 18561
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
36,304.62
PRIOR YR ENCUMB
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 07/31/98
01/99 BA 10/29/98 ENC/BUDADJ
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/20/98 0076451
PASCON
7,572.00-
7,572.00
RETENTION HAKONE PROJ.
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/16/98 0076391
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
3,275.00-
3,275.00
SERVICES 8/26-9/25/98
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 EN 10/07/98 18727
WESTFALL ENGINEERS, INC.
1,140.00
98/99 FY ENCUMBRANCE
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/07/98 0076373
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
10,027.96-
10,027.96
6/30-7/28 LDSCP SERVICES
PARK DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/07/98 0076373
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
11,284.94-
11,284.94
7/31-8/25 LDSCP SERVICES
PARK DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/07/98 0076349
SAN JOSE BLUE PRINT
18.52
WARNER HUTTON HOUSE
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/07/98 0076349
SAN JOSE BLUE PRINT
15.26
AERIALS OF SCHOOLS
PLAYFIELD PROJECT
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 AP 10/07/98 0076251
AIR FLIGHT SERVICE
817.38
AERIAL BLOWUPS FOR PARKS
PROJECT#:
9704
EJ 10/31/98
04/99 EN 10/06/98 18561
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
156.80
TO INCREASE CONTRACT
PROJECT#:
9704
PREPARED 04/29j1999, 12:03:42
ACCOUNT ACTIVITY
LISTING
PAGE 7
PROGRAM GM360L
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 10/1999
CITY OF SARATOGA
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FUND 310 PARK DVLPMNT CAP PROJ FND
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JOURNAL ACCT4 - - -- TRANSACTION - - --
YTD /CURRENT
CURRENT
CD DATE PER. CD DATE NUMBER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D E S C R I P T I O N
ENCUMBRANCE
DEBITS
CREDITS
BALANCE
310- 9010 - 622.40 -10 SERVICES
GENERAL CONTRACTS
EJ 10/31/98 04/99 EN 10/06/98 18561
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
15,523.20
INCREASE CONTRACT
PROJECT #: 9704
EJ 10/31/98 04/99 EN 10/05/98 18681
ANDERSON BRULE ARCHITECTS
5,000.00
98/99 FY ENCUMBRANCE
PROJECT #: 9704
EJ 09/30/98 03/99 EN 09/01/98 C80036
PASCON
34,591.10
ROLLED OVER FROM 97/98 FY
PROJECT #: 9704
EJ 09/30/98 03/99 EN 09/01/98 18561
BEALS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
36,304.62
ROLLED OVER FROM 97/98 FY
PROJECT #: 9704
ACCOUNT TOTAL
69,014.96
70,024.33
.00
70,024.33
310 - 9010- 622.40 -16 SERVICES
P.W. INSPECTION SERVICES
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
310 - 9010 - 622.40 -17 SERVICES
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
310 - 9010- 622.40 -40 SERVICES
ADVERTISING
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
310 - 9010- 622.40 -41 SERVICES
PRINTING /BINDING
ACCOUNT TOTAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
FUND TOTAL
69,014.96
2,871,705.27
2,904,145.94
4,675,926.13
GRAND TOTAL
69,014.96
2,871,705.27
2,904,145.94
4,675,926.13
01979 GO'-
Tour de Garlique
June 26, 1999
The Gilroy Garlic Festival invites you to participate in the Eighteenth Annual Tour de Garlique to be held
Saturday, June 26, 1999. Celebrate the onset of summer with a multi -level tour around back roads and rolling
hills of San Benito and Monterey Counties. With a choice of six rides for cyclists of all abilities, you should be
able to enjoy the well - marked routes, rest stops and Garlic Festival food at the end of the tour. All participants
receive a colorful embroidered patch.
ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS
Starting Location: San Juan
Bautista Elementary School in
San Juan Bautista for all rides.
Elkhorn Slough Ride:
This approximately 45 mile course
travels from San Juan Bautista
through the rolling hills and then
along the placid Elkhorn Slough. A
rest stop is provided. Riders contin-
ue cycling through the hills with a
coastal breeze at their backs. An
elevation gain of approximately
1500 feet, thus a road or a cross
bike may be utilized.
20 Mile Family Ride:
The 20 mile course travels through
the countryside surrounding scenic
San Juan Bautista, primarily on
flatlands. This is ideal for families
or beginning cyclists. A rest stop is
provided.
40 Mile Ride:
The 40 mile ride travels through the
rolling hills and flatlands from San
Juan Bautista through Hollister to
the Santa Ana Valley and Tres
Pinos, returning to the San Benito
River via Southside Road. A total
elevation gain of 1000 feet. A rest
stop is provided.
10OKM Ride (63 Miles):
This ride travels the same route as
the 40 mile ride to Tres Pinos, then
proceeds South to the Cienega
Valley. This is a challenging ride
with changing elevations for expe-
rienced cyclists. A total elevation
gain of 1500 feet. A rest stop is
provided.
100 Mile Ride:
The 100 mile course follows the
same route as the 40 mile and
10OKM rides to Tres Pinos, then
proceeds South on Highway 25 to
the Pinnacles National Monument.
A total elevation gain of 2000 feet.
Lunch is provided at the Pinnacles
prior to the return trip.
20OKM Ride (126 Miles):
This ride climbs 3000 ft. to
Fremont's Peak in the first ten
miles of the ride, revealing a
panoramic view of the Monterey
Bay area. A rest stop is provided at
the summit. The ride then returns
to San Juan Bautista, following the
same route as the 100 Mile Ride to
the Pinnacles where lunch is pro-
vided prior to the return trip. A
total elevation gain of 4800 feet.
This ride is for expert cyclists.
REGISTRATION TIMES
The course opens at 6:00 a.m.
and closes at 5:00 p.m.
200KM, 100M, 10OKM
6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.
Slough, 40M & 20M
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
The tour is limited to 1500 riders.
All pre- entries must be received
by June 12, 1999.
PRE - REGISTRATION
$20.00 Individual - All Rides
$40.00 Tandem - All Rides
$42.00 Family - All Rides
REGISTRATION
AFTER JUNE 12
Additional $2.00 Per Rider
(Use separate form for each
rider)
(FAMILY - up to two adults plus
their children.)
Registration
Pre -Ride Registration will close June
12, 1999. Mail forms to the Garlic
Festival, P.O. Box 2311, Gilroy, CA
95021. Add $2 for forms sent in after this
day. Day of ride registration begins at 6
a.m. The tours are limited to 1500. No
refunds after June 12, 1999.
Website
Check out our website and download
your application, www.garlicfest.com.
(Select "FUN ", then "SATELLITE
EVENTS", then "TOUR de
GARLIQUE ").
Gilroy Garlic Festival
Half -price pass to the GILROY
GARLIC FESTIVAL, July 23 -25,
1999 available by pre -order only. One
pass per entrant. Cost: $5.00. Include a
self- addressed stamped envelope
along with your application to receive
the pass.
T-shirts
Short sleeve pre - shrunk cotton t -shirts
may be pre- ordered for $12.00 each
when you register. Please specify sizes
when ordering.
Tour Rules
1. ANSI or Snell approved HELMETS
REQUIRED.
2. Ride safely and obey all traffic
laws.
3. An optional bike inspection will
be provided by Sunshine Bicycles
of Gilroy. However all riders are
responsible for the safety and
maintenance of their own bicycles.
4. Bring spare $$, tube, patch kit,
tools, pump, etc.
5. We expect hot weather and
encourage an early start. Bring an
extra water bottle, just in case.
6. Notify a tour official if you leave
the course prematurely so we
won't be looking for you.
7. Riders under 18 yrs. must carry a
medical authorization form, (back
side of this) signed by a parent or
legal guardian.
8. The ride goes on rain or shine.
9. Don't leave bicycles unattended.
10. Riders must come back by sag
wagon if they are too exhausted to
continue or can't finish by 5 p.m.
11. Minors, under the age of 14, need
to ride with a responsible adult.
12. This is a tour and not a race.
13. In case of an emergency contact a
sag wagon or call emergency
number on the route sheet.
14. Bicyclists must ride in single file.
15. Bicycle riding must be done as far
to the right hand side of the road
as is practical and safe, except
when making turns.
16. Bicyclists must completely stop
at stop signs and yield to prior
traffic at stop signs and alternate
entering the intersection, just as
cars are required to do.
Registration
Our tour will begin at San Juan
Bautista Elementary School in San
Juan Bautista. Take Hwy. 156 east
from Hwy. 101, or west from Hollister,
and turn north at the Alameda, (at the
flashing yellow light) S.J.B. school is
on the immediate right. Parking is only
in lot or in the next lot north. Park
only in designated areas.
Tour Support
We will supply you with:
• Detailed route maps and clearly
marked routes.
• Sag Wagon support in case you get
tired or have troubles.
* Rest Stops with plenty of fresh
fruits, drink, water and other high
energy snacks.
* Lunch 11:00 a.m. till 4:00 p.m.
A Garlic Lunch with ice cream at the
end.
* A commemorative patch at the end
of the ride.
,im, To San Jose
=Hwy. 101
156 i See Inset Below
SAN JUAN
lot BAUTISTA
To Hollister
r To Salinas
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA
4w San Juan School
. Start t Finish
15
To Hwy. 101
:Flashing Light
Hollister
Some Places to Spend the
Night
Local Motels:
S.J.B. Inn ............................... (408) 623 -4380
Travelodge, Gilroy ................ (408) 848 -3500
Best Western, Gilroy ............. (408) 848 -1467
Forest Park Inn, Gilroy......... (408) 848 -5144
Best Western, Morgan Hill...... (408) 779 -0447
Overnight Camping:
Mission Farm, STB .............. (408) 623 -4456
KCIA, S .J.B ........................... (408) 623 -4263
Hollister Hills ........................ (408) 637 -8186
Bed & Breakfast:
Country Rose Inn, San Martin
(408) 842 -6646 or (408) 842 -0441
Special T- Shirts are available by pre -order
only. They are 100% cotton, in men's sizes,
small, medium, large, extra large and
extra, extra large. The cost is $12.00.
Include with your application.
RELEASE AGREEMENT
In consideration of being permitted to participate in the Tour de Garlique sponsored bicycling activity, I myself, my personal representatives,
assigns, heirs and next of kin:
I. ACKNOWLEDGE, agree and represent that I understand the nature of bicycle touring and that 1 am qualified, in good health, and in prop-
er physical condition to participate in such activity. 1 further acknowledge that the Tour will be conducted over public roads and facilities
open to the public during the Tour and upon which hazards of traveling are to be expected. 1 further agree and warrant that if at any time
believe conditions to be unsafe, 1 will immediately discontinue further participation in the Tour.
2. FULLY UNDERSTAND that: (a) bicycling activity involves risks and dangers of serious bodily injury including permanent disability, paral-
ysis and death ( "risks "), (b) these risks and dangers may be caused by my own actions, or inactions, the actions or inactions of others par-
ticipating in the Tour, the condition in which the Tour takes place, or the negligence of the "releasees" named below: (c) there may be other
risks and social and economic losses either now known to me or not readily foreseeable at this time: and I FULLY ACCEPT AND ASSUME
ALL SUCH RISKS AND ALL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR LOSSES, COSTS, AND DAMAGES I INCUR as a result of my participation
in the Tour.
3. Hereby release, discharge, and covenant not to sue the Gilroy Garlic Festival, Inc., San Benito County, Monterey County, the City of San
Juan Bautista, San Juan Bautista- Aromas School District, the California Highway Patrol, any advertisers, sponsors, owners and lessers of
premises on which the activity takes place, their respective agents, officers, officials, servants, representatives, employees, volunteers, and
any involved municipalities and their respective agents and employees (each considered one of the "Releasees ") from and against any and
all liability out of or connected in anyway with my participation in this event even though liability, claims, demands, losses and dam-
ages on my account caused or alleged to he caused in whole or in part by the negligence of the "releasees" or otherwise including
negligent rescue operation: and I further agree that if, despite the release and waiver of liability, assumption of risk and indemni-
ty agreement I, or anyone on my behalf, makes a claim against any of these "releasees ", I will indemnify, save and hold harmless
each of the "releasees" from any litigation which may arise out of negligence or carelessness on the part of the persons or entities
mentioned above.
I will wear a proper bicycle helmet while 1 ride in this event and 1 assume all responsibility for selecting a helmet that fits me properly and can
protect me against head injuries.
I will ride my bike in a safe and courteous manner, and obey the California vehicle code, especially as indicated below.
have read this agreement, fully understand its terms, understand that 1 have given up substantial rights by signing it and have signed it freely
and without any inducement or assurance of any extent allowed by law and agree that if any portion of this agreement is held to be invalid the
balance, not withstanding, shall continue in full force and effect.
Signature: Date:
Signature of participant or signature of parent or guardian if under 18 years of age.
** DO NOT MAIL THIS FORM **
MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION and CONSENT TO MINOR RIDER
Pursuant to California Civil Code. Section 25.8
Name of Minor Birth Date
The undersigned does hereby authorize
(Leave Blank)
or such substitute as he may designate, as agent for the undersigned to consent to any x -ray examination, anesthetic, medical, dental or surgical diag-
nosis or treatment and hospital care for the above minor, which is deemed advisable by and to be rendered under the general or special supervision of
any physician and surgeon, licensed under the provision of Medicine Practice Act, or any dentist licensed under the Dental Practice Act, whether such
diagnosis or treatment is rendered at the office of said physician or dentist, at a hospital or elsewhere.
This authorization will remain effective while the above minor is en route to or from, involved or participating in the Tour de Garlique, unless
revoked in writing by the undersigned and delivered to the aforesaid agent.
Signature of Parent or Guardian Date Telephone ( )
Address
City State Zip
KEEP - To carry on person during ride.
Tour de Garlique Entry Form
(please print neatly)
LAST Name ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ Fees:
First Name ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registration $
T-
shirt: x $12.00 $
Address ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Garlic Festival Pass $
City ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑
State ❑ ❑ zip ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Due: $
Home Phone[][][]—n[][] — ❑ ❑❑ ❑
Emergency Phone (not 911) ❑ ❑ ❑ — ❑ ❑ ❑ — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ T-shirt Size:
❑ S ❑ M ❑ L ❑ XIS]
Ride Selection:
XXL
F1 200 KM El 100 MI ❑ 20 MI
❑ 100 KM ❑ 40 MI ❑ ELKHORN SLOUGH
Remember to sign the Release Agreement on other side.
Please use one form per person. When duplicating cop, both h sides.
Where and how did you find out about the Tour de Garlique?
Gilroy Garlic Festival Association, Inc.
Post Office Box 2311
Gilroy, California 95021
(408) 842 -1625
aim a6f.-
.19R ,,Ir
Ride For
The Stinkin'Roses
su" Q05-
Tour de Garlique
JUNE 26, 1999
6 RIDES: 20m, 40m, 45m (Slough), 100k, 100m and 200k
FOR APPLICATIONS:
Write or Call: GILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL
P.O. Box 2311, Gilroy, CA 95021 • (408) 842 -1625
Check Our Website and Download Your Application — www.garlicfest.com
(Select "FUN ", then "SATELLITE EVENTS ", then "TOUR de GARLIQUE ")
®1979 G6F"_
April 9, 1999
The Gilroy Garlic Festival invites you to participate in the Eighteenth Annual Tour de
Garlique to be held Saturday, June 26, 1999. This is a multi -level tour around back roads
and rolling hills of San Benito and Monterey Counties. With a choice of six rides for
cyclists of all abilities we will host approximately 1,000 riders this year.
We are in need of businesses like yours to donate merchandise or cash to help with the
cost of hosting such an event. Your donation and Business Name will be displayed for all
in attendance to see.
In advance we would like to thank you for your support and generous donation. Please
contact Chris at the Gilroy Garlic Festival Association Office 408 842 -1625, to make
arrangements to have your donation picked up.
Enclosed are applications for riders and a flyer that you can display in your store.
Thank You,
Connie Sanchez
Assistant Chairman- Tour de Garlique
Listed below are a few of the items we are in need of this year:
Cash
Bicycle — any type
Helmets
Pads
Bike Pump
GILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION, INC. - P.O. Box 2311 - Gilroy, California 95021 -2311
(408) 842 -1625 - Fax: (408) 842 -7337 - wwwgarlicfest.com
Member of the International Festivals and Events Association
a
City of Saratoga
PARIS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 3,1999
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Christina Ratcliffe, Assistant Planner &A\:"
SUBJECT: SD -98 -008 & DR -98 -052; Nagpal.
Request for Subdivision and Design Review approval to subdivide the lot
located at 19101 Via Tesoro and construct a new residence on the newly
formed lot.
Background
The Title Report on this property indicates a 10 ft. wide Pedestrian and Equestrian
Easement along the northern portion of the subject property. This easement dates back to
subdivision of this area in August of 1980 and at present is not maintained or utilized as a
trail.
Current Proposal
The property is 2.45 acres with an existing 6,240 sq. ft. residence. The applicants wish to
subdivide the property into two parcels, and construct a new 4,880 sq. ft., two -story
residence on the newly created parcel.
Planning staff is requesting the Parks and Recreation Commission to review the current
subdivision proposal and make recommendations as to the Pedestrian and Equestrian
easement. Specifically, should the trail be developed and maintained as a Pedestrian and
Equestrian trail, should it be left in its current state for now and possibly improved at a
later date, or should the easement be abandoned. The project goes before the Planning
Commission on May 12th, 1999.
Recommendation
Review the plans for the appropriateness of Pedestrian and Equestrian easement and make
a recommendation to the Planning Commission.
LaN09
Op
-
N. RINA
39j-03 LOO
032
�e
va
HIV
A
R
r
• v
NOTES
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS PROVIO ?D ET THE OWNER.
ALL TRES ARE OAK TREE , UNLESS OTNERW ISE NOTED.
9�gLa .
LgkOS
4, y Or
N,
30 C
3 4
.03 0 k
3
o-PO�
4 ^
0 II?
? P
P
VICINITY MAP
NO 9VLS
OWNER ...................... ............................AMR NAOPAL 8 SUR&SHREE VEDAHTNAM
19101 VIA TESORO COURT '
SARATOGA, CA 95070
APPUCANT :................. ..........................SUSTE NAGPAL .
19101 VIA TESORO COURT
SARATOGA, CA 95070
ENGINEER .................... ........................7wCIVIL ENGINEERING. INC.
• 90 NORTH FIRST STREET, SUITE 101
SAN JOSE, CA 9511'
PHONE:406993-1900
SANITARY SEWER ............................... WEST VALLEY SANITARY DISTRICT
WATER SUPPLY: ................................... SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY
POWER AND GAS: ................................ PG&E
TELEPHONE: ......................................... PACIFIC BELL .
CONTOUR INTERVAL ..........................2'. .
EXISTING USE: ...... _ ......:. ......................RESIDENCE
EXISTING ZONING: ............. . ................ R- 1-40,000
GROSS AREA ............ ...........................2A&! AC:
NETAREA ................... ........................:.2.45t AC..
SLOPE: ................................................... 1149%
TOTAL NUMBER LOTS: ......................... 2
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: ..................... 307-ill-067
P. U .E . .......................... :......... .. ............... PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SETBACKS: FRONT :.............._ ......... 3P OR 2D% OF LOT DEPTH
SIDE ......... _ ...... _ ...... _.. 20'OR 10% OF LOT WIDTH
SIDE (CORHERk.._......20' OR 10% OF LOT WIDTH
REAR ..................... .. 1O'OR 25% OF LOT DEPTH
SLOPE CALCULATIONS
LOT 1 SLOPE . .00229 ]B. '10.16%
1
LOT 2 SLOPE
SLOPE OF NEW BLDG SITE:
LOT 1 GROSS AREA .. .........................552352 SF .
Lot 1 NET AREA .. ............................... 56236t SF
LOT 2 GROSS AREA . ........... . .............45,921! SF
LOT 2 NET AREA .............. _ ................. 45.921! SF
EXISTING FLOOR AREA OF LOT 1:..... ...........................4240 t 5F '
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA OF LOT 2: ........................... 5301 t SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OF LOT 1 :.............121`40 t OF
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OF LOT 2 ....... ..... 5044 3 SF.
VESTING
OAT APR)L. .9 � CITY APPROVAL
SCALE: �5- SHOwr1 5 90N.IFIRSTST. ENGINEERING, 1 TENTATIVE MAP
SHEET
4 _ _ ..__ DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
DRAWN BY HT__ ___ _ _ _ SAN JOSE, CA 95113 LANDS OF NAGPAL
DESIGNED BY: C.R_ �__ _ '
�•��•� m CHECKED BY:_TJS. -_ 2 —_ /`ZCIViI. �NGIN���ING 19101 VIA E p p.�
�i.ntiiin • •nJ�.n; PROD. ENGR.: A Sono Couw N.
(p1.p 397'I3•057 OF SHEETS
JOB NUMBER: 97-253 BY JOAT E 88
REVISIONS BY DATE n PH: 408.993.1800 TOLL FREE: 8.327.7070 FAx:408.993. m CITY OF SARATOGA CALIFORNIA DRAWING NUMBER:
-- 97. 253
f '
V O ;3,; WVn_0
�. 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 868 -1200
COL' NCIL MEMBERS:
Incorporated October 22, 1956 Evan Baker
TRANSMITTAL - CITY OF SARATOGA Stan Bo_gosian
John MehaHey
Jim Shaw
TO:
Nick Streit
PUBLIC WORKS SARATOGA FIRE DIST.
CITY GEOLOGIST
CITY ARBORIST
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT
FROM: Heather Bradley, Associate Planner 4tD
S.C. CO. CENTRAL FIRE
SAN JOSE WATER CO.
V OTHER 'Pa7" k ?,e"ea)iaw
Lcr "I -
DATE: April 2,1999
APPLICATION # AND LOCATION: SD -99 -001; 14800 Bohlman Road
OWNER'S NAME: Sisters of Notre Dame /Sobrato Development
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for Subdivision approval to divide the Sisters of Notre
Dame property totaling 23.5 acres into 11 lots. The property is in an R -1- 40,000 zoning district.
Your agency has been requested/invited to review and comment on this proposal. Please submit
your comments by May 2, 1999 to Heather Bradley in the Community Development Department.
This will ensure that we can incorporate your concerns into the review process. Thank You.
REPLY: `�Y�2/Vl>Z . ��L r tik' - 4.o� ,.,d. e �.� .lL e i N. ,. _...
a.�,�
Printed on recycled paper.
A -1
A-3
�I
B-1
\y/
B -2
I
C-1
i
C-2
C -3
SEASONAL DRAINAGE
CROSS SECTIONS
ADWZ. d KRT: I' - lo'
(SEE SHEET J FOR CROSS SECTION LOCH TINS)
760
610
620
7-0
730
790
780
770
660
6.50
680
670
650
640
650
640
aFMOPMENr CALCLIAZACKS
LOT 1
A. Gass Sits Area 274,723 If
eo of arh -OY R/IC 4,424 it
Gets Sb Nro rep %V R/W` 270,101 If
8. A/eng- Mop- Of lot 1BX
G X oI Gwa 311. Aron fP M a ducf. 54%
O N.f S't. 24.4' 11..118 s/
E APOrode Fbx Nao ((calNblsd,F
7,687 of
110r,nurlr dear «eo p« coda 7,100 /
F Proposed ds5) -f'rt wen' 414 Ac
A-a9. ,.. 0/ raw /mgfAS: 410 IF
proPased o.w/opmmf «s1.' IQOX
LOT 2
A. Gott Sib Ana: IOA816 If
B. Arpoyyse Lop. of bC 3"
C X -1,4 ass sit. N. to b. d oucfs, 60X
D. Nsf t- Aron• 41,534 If
E. AOoro Nop' Ar p:
600011 ♦ (( 41,534 If - 4a00o) / 1.000 ), 20 - QOJI If
F Pr400 ed dswkprnmf ono' arB Ac.
Agg-egofs (3) fps IAd
Av�aq- MN. e/OlaaOS.d dewapmmf wsa Q7X
LOT J
A- Goss °f. N.4' 94753 .I
B. A -ors Pop. of bt 1.X
G X of LYO Fb AreO fo Ds O.ducfW: 11X
D. Nsf Sta Non- 54,374 It
f. Mo-od. fbm Nea:
6007 If a (( .24.]18 a/ - 44000) / FOOD ] R 2o - 6.288 If
F q l (5 ) _,wr snyfnr59A LF
Arera9e POOP. at pvo, -a dswfOOvnMf me4' 41X
LOT 4
A. Gop Ste A-- 135a%528 s/
Arp of triw-OY R/IE 4.381 It
Grou Site Are Mp 0/Y' ROM` 145,94] sl
C.
v. X of Yep. 01 bt. 3X
Sib
O. A,- to D. dk Aal . 45X
NN Sf- N B0,1)I a/
f. Ayo.pae F Ar<a /aprNbree,L•
6,803 s/
F ProvOa.d d.NfgNnM/ mss' 440 Ac
Afl� o %geswt'p�n7 Lf ens' ISBX
G. PAaawM pod mwlop. ar.o: 1.1! AeM
A.fy o% Cox bnglh; 70 lF (e /f« pod eOMq
PNposad Ooo mwapa QIX (o/(« pa�gro0inq)
LOT 3
A. Cl'os, SJf. Np Id 166 1.1
C X of alalp. o/ lot 61X
Sfe Arop /o Ds OMUNq: OX
4 N.t SNs
7--F 46166 t/
f. AROrode NM (cOkuloled}
6000 a/ 18166 a/ - 40.000 ) / 1.000) + 2(1 - 6.161 sl
F Agg""O de,<laPmmf ores 0.21 Ac.
Aggnqob (3) <mtaw lrrgM IF
Anroge MEN of prcpaaed Mv-IgomMf ono: 9.oX
LOT 6
A. C o Sts A m 47,611 If
B. ANroge Map. 01 bL' 7.8X
C X of Gg Sts A_ to be O.duct.. OX
D. Nsf Sfe Area, 47.624 31
E. 6wo Ie Flom Arp (cNNbfed}
6000 / < [( 17,61) sI - IaOOO) / 1.400) a 20 . 6.152 If
F N'OpOSq M-.1. m.o: 0.29 Ac.
Aggr-gOb (5) ) cm t
far MnpMr 17s LF
Awroq. M. of propwed d�wlopmMf xe0: 6.9X
LOT 7
A. Clop Sit, Nao: 51.373 If a Awroq ope of let. 9.2X
C X of Gwa Sze Area to De dk0 cfsat Or M
D. Net Site Arbor' 51,J73 ,l
E. A60rode From A-1 / Icubfad):
6070 ,I (( 51,371 s «s0 IQ000) / 4,000) x 10 - 6,117 If
F. Prgpoa.d e1wlOPmmf a25 Ac
Aggregate 1.a(p5_e�) cmfovr MgNS- 261 V
0. Ayq�rp9vre (5 con( .W= M>51r2 Lf «eo: 12 DX
.W,: ah ) 9 (alfr YOpasee 9-twIg of
A-9. Mope of proppsad 0 wgomMf m.o: 7.9X (off« -p ... d
9'.4Mg of d.wpammf m.o
LOT B
A. Gap Sit. Ara4' 40,075 If
B. Awregs MCC. P! 101: 9.IX
C X o/ Gas Sb LL to b. Oed I-. OX
D. N.f Ste Area' 14075 sI
E. Albrobfe flow Arep dNbf'.
F G0000Sed 'e.(.:I40,0 `1.I - 10,000) / +.000 [+ 20 - 6,002 of
tpmmf «.P: 1.19 Ac.
f
A asM 57 of Of d f- 1-g1-gel s, 191 LI
y _ PMP Oiwopmmf area' 75X
LOT 9
A. Cron Sf. Area: 40075 If
B. Avwyya Mope of bt fl 1X
C X oI Gw.s Sit. Anp to Da daducfed' OX
a Naf SfI N.1. 4a075 s/
E ARP- Fpm A,- (cdcvbfe0}
6000 If ♦ [( 4oC73 I - 4.000) , 20 - 6.007 If
F Propos.a Oewlopmmf mss 1.17 Ac
A- rcgef��e)a/ tort kvr9lh;' IQS LF
9• xroo,n a- wraammf 1X
LOT 10
A. DroppSit, Ar- 4 4560 If
C. X of G Sf. Area to D- deWucfad, OX
D. NIT Stfe Aa 41560 If
E. ADaroD1e Flos- Nm (cdculobd }' '
bow of + !( 4x51.0 of - .af7a0 J / f. 000 , Io - 6.071 If
F ProPnred Oerelcprnmf ens: a19 Ac
Aq9egob (513 cMfaur lhgMr 118 tF
Awoq- Mape Of xoposad d.relalammt -11. SIX
Lot II
A. G I I SRI, A,- 14075 ,f
a AwaglaMCpo of hal. 7.7X
C X of P Sf- - I. M Mok'al". OX
0, N-1 Sit. Argo: 14013 s/
f Alro-ode Nom Arco (cd,uIPIM}
[( sao II - 4a000) / f000 ) , 20 - 6,051 sI
F PiappS.d a wgommf mso: oN An
Agyegpb (3) cmfcv kngtnM 144 LF
Awrpge Mope o1 Praooa.d d�wq -t ono.' 6.9X
REQUIREMENT FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
m8pONSES IN BOLD)
I. DOfe. -a omo- and ,car.
�• . 60' n jp A omen
10Y it man um 50 apes
Cmmw mfa•,pb
Fm ud.P 01 1'- 60' or u» « - I t4I1 hI
excee ones
~- Prove d, 30; 5 fern.
Fm SCObs Of 1' - 100' - 5 fMf.
I. S.. 7MIaIN- Mop', Sh.e/ I.
1 WcMily 1100 aAO-ip rdalw 1p oop-1
PA-'- 1.+d pub RC sfrNls
2 S.- 'Gnarl III -al/an oM !ro /a', fib Sh«L
x 7h- name of m7r yisf 1.9 recxdM mop KNkW# to me
auddh-srmr o' La Uf- Jab of rsco v-q Arrla map, arrd fns
�0 Pope of ma or! Aal recmdP -Aer. ,ucA map b
J. R-d.d Mop: Porter B o1. shorn an /hol c.Aar map
rarArdea A)ay Ja ISM BK4/9YI7.
4.
Ptq,wed wbdrfsi4n mm�e, if my me Prap4 name
.rbp[f fa approwl by ms od-y OgIhcy
4 suadM,lon Nam.: LA, Chel.aur D. Nola Darts
5 A key MOP sho-vrg aOpcmr cm tigCKVS xgorlY and
p;,.'hP of P °s erl rides, gif4'rq bcoli- nmwa Md
op irP"'Pwnlb f r1�r �h- o/'rola fepoyaahk / t- and
/ e-Id / f of m. ,uDOiNPar mm >'fi Dpundmyr fnn Me
5. Sss 71nbIM Yep', Sh..l 2.
6. NMN and abtep of a-n« m am.n -A apoacmr
C nlgiifaed Mpine« a, /kmaad Intl aurw/er -AO
xapand N. mae , dro inq.
R See 7Mb,, SCrbGtfabn Yap arts Bul/dMq JIh Avxo.a/
Fed fh..1', h). Sh..l.
7. Loocfbn; nerve; -bfh; CMf«Ikx, _,V Mtl
cM11/M. M.- of air 'I q, lupnroye and oN« -op n
Me p OaIhl avbd /vfakn m Ile.
7. Sn 'r nmak. M.,-. Shw/ I.
4 NumS« e/ 7011 dmMMmi at me It; oIah, nq
h'antaga daOM end xso M smm. 1-t..
4.
5- 'T la R.- Yep-. Shoe/ I
9. Cmtaun to af-hbe pro of Mt-Is os deacrbed
Mora Wh Me Mope of MY Pmt Of lns PreP«fy .rcfs -Oa
fM t; fa`M -lam. m- xCWY aDUts existurq dewolfd
lo m of«ad grooMq yet may a regviW Mw.krq
hoh'r -a W/oc.nf f' fns proPMY NfAM odle
disfine� NWhpn A/M .orr/0 ofhcl fhe alDb'ws:an
bv)+ q Mf.. In flrOq CPae, M MkA o W.d3rq plm b
r.1. 4 /f Nall M+o- ho- runoff x sw/ I« sN f»
Cv OvIve and Me .1121, ote O'spo,el o/ o1. wr/ ♦sot «;
BMM mans sA N b. m C lr act -
9. Se- ' IMJn.ry G4dnq d WWy Pbn', Sheet J d 4 oM
Ilan I4
to Loccbm 1.M Mmxl« o/ 1.+l .,;flog .aaMrmb M
dfarreg.k s.frpp- m puDBC vUi(T.; foysUgr of(ond/
OP9diag 1.f. AO nnfricf/m apykaLla N.nf4 d N-
evxwkn b /amforra of M wk .1.d Iassnrmfa /m
O^_Maq; s.-age « ofn« pC,DRC uflitMs
to See ' `~Ae MaP -. Sheet 1.
11. E -i-. V v ups and Imo m Pms; of fhe prao «ty
xaeO.sd
it. EMMl6rp wr. RI Rufd.nNOl
PnaPe+W u1..: R/ R.Od-fial
11. 7 ahra o/ odM-1 �x bo«fy .-W by fhe
.d cm m p
oOPncohf x-I
mode .ifhM III.
I.,' Preeedin9 llw 1-x1
12 Non..
IS L-f'm of W the Week; ,frowns and oth« -at«
cawan dei-ts l m said mop n dro &Iq, MIO-Mq fop of
f3 f parka and crsok depth, fC s<porafa Mraef
ano-nq mop- sections of M fvM reek; trenns Md rot«
C,v
!x S« Sh.-/ ! /« N cevro. k vlbns, rop of dank; and
depth. See /Ala sheet Ix -1.-_ cop aecllma.
rs. AN /uewsions tar dmneslk rot« suppY -hkJr mI
xmP-.d by M. aPPllaanc :ra'aeMq aoarab, mrdiy and
apxarkrgfa apmlity erpreased Ps gNlms ps mrwfa.
74 D-11. water Supply: Woler -!R 0. svppl/.tl Dr
Son Jo,. water Comeany. coon -d b ,brinp mein
ftt-` fm Road. Sw PM/minary Gradlnq one unify vroh;
Shah 4.
15. All xoIjjians fm ae-oge djMOsa1 stx O inape Md
flop) cmfrd ankh a xapos -d by the opplkonf.
IS Sr-4gs plsp.rM/: Wp/ Vo/1epY San /Mlon psMN.
Corrr.e/ b blMg m fn a BMlman Recd. 540
'PrlBm/nary Orao/ng t ufOly P /m'. Sh.e/ 4•
S :crm -Oro /n: So th pwNOn of aubd/HMm
1,04 OroM b a Mlurol dro/neq. swb. NeNheNy
venen om droll ro a prp.a anhm. s« 'pox May
Grud'rlp rW UIfRy Nan', Sh.-1 4 Mo Prov/alon, /m
Rood cmlrol an anllNpalaO.
16. Exis`i9 -yl; acliw m obah~,d. and dia eMt/
proposed '
16. MA- xhltnq acfM --I1 Mb la A.-I'd at M. Sovlh
-re•1 of Ih. -"MA- M Ih. East Md. If Nod- Rood. This
. -a a-r,.a me aP..puhmnv vrap.ry .n«1..
17 PPblk x cpnmm gram ores xgposedoi/ any
17. C-W Court and M, ped-blon corineclln /ulmy
:dx ro Benbnah Road en pnpw.d b b. 141c 1M b
Mc Cly If Sonbgo.
14L Sbfrnmf of I- 11m1in9 old bndscop. yet, i/
rpaAa of M. Ikn. o/ Ina III. O l fh«-:a. lots
to Merhdl be 1.w Plea wfs Ur. of I" dnxowhml Elms
150- s -iftim x M(. a, Pmf o/ fA. ppplk4fbn rm
9 Permits.
1& in, pMmery c ncaPl er al/eel hN PLO- p antsy
Be Ib
- m k ..d b pro l-dhoOat
.cflnloten f hn .a r ts /n pN Mx. aN-uMClnM� mln
Wp ,
a
-"It -o0 -1, CRY pp a
m hd, - " ' d ..d., t . I Fdw a
av,/ b Erod of ol/
eysNnp Mw b
nrtbM.
SP-J.a of eok end mai rood 1- Mmrbr le Ihw.
=I,, om b, -d 11 clnOfl bbnk areP rn Eder ,
arwpy abn9 IM -d- y ahe
pn,Pea.d Ped.sMan Polh.
Th. h,ml- MI. sN-al Ir« 1e M 1 -t.AAd -fi M
24' 840. P
19. Srol, of sfr.ef higntin9 plmnkrq, if my
19. No l:Y-./ ltghh on xapo,ed as part of Ih/a
subdNhlah
(SEE ABOW d RICH FOR co, TANUA RON Or RecutocuENTS)
REQUIREMENT FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
(OONTINUED)
2a slot.mmr of N. Mp.owm «b Prop - 10 a.
CY,ratrucf.d Of ifIII. 0 and of M. rkne -hss b
Tmxo.emMta ahoy M MIOVetl ono M. dale of the.
mticbofed compla£mr.
20, 4hPrO-ft Propwsd to M -hv CIO, x MslapM:
I. Shel o �d fn-oy hfprovrrr.nh
2L -
c L.P Mrprev.m-nh
vvply Larprewrnmh
4 sronn srofMq. i prowmMh
1 l/ ufmy rinprov«nmh
6 Ged7nmprowm.nh
C- ov,11- ro d.g /n: J- 1999.
MROO -l<d doh of t.mpl#Mm: 0--b-r 1999
11. Sit. dewla h-H Plan M -d Nth S.cflmr I4-75101.
-h«. reprkeO.
11. M -cord- -fht S-Am II- 25.100, -. en of IIM
opM/en 0 aih d-Aapnwnf Ptah b M/ Mc.pory of
fhb fbna
22 ETA. oPprorknofe aItmrc< to orrd rocatkel o/ Me n.areaf
,4fit y 1..-m won lira
21. Ih.n b an exlah'np ,a Mary w-er moln (W / VafNY
SoMrofIM O/sMel) M Bohbnen Read a/ fM NMh Md
el !M fu80 /.VSlon.
23. LO-Um dap -ciu of .9 m-Mle 11- 40• o, mete
!� -ncv, o, me It 14' Plow nafurol gro0e
M o"OtAo'. M I- -A /M -a A0 D. afhcf d OF arpO.(aimr
L'np%Mf; regmdps of sin, -mould De pblred m0
IS. SM 'h.YmMOry (Y4drng and ulmy Non / EMSNrp T ;
Sh «f ! d 4, for Me nvrnbn. MCmak,.1 h..1. an mm(117.O
arW d -Otcal M fh- 7n. Sur"y h Inehrde Tr-e Pns.rvaflon
and Phol -Non Ptah - as pyorW by , m Y. McpMphan.
-A011hg erberbl,
24. Cokvlatlsa of fns Site Maps
14 SM 'DEVELOPMENT CALC'UTAnaNS'. Mb Sh-p.
IS Fm Pile W- gnat« Non 101:
A. E,isf/ng mtl Aopwed gad.S - SM Pr'Nbadnay Ondkg ono
ulmy' Plan
B. Indrdrd bu pod brof:mra - Sw ei� % ry C-OM, arts
a: oSx / E,bNnp T Sna<Ia
Mao - SN sAS.I 1
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND
SIALDNO SITE APPROVAL FACT SHEET
ApplkmFs Nome: Jdrn Michas' Sobmt.
Madrrq Ado/ -ss' 10600 N D. AnPO 810., $uR- ZOO Zqq'rt.' 95011 -2015
lN.p,h,h Numb «: .(hem.) N/A (b -m.-) (408) .46 -0700
Appkml'S Engkv- IG« d WPighf Ciw EngMews d SvrwymP, hc.
.reZg Adproa,: J350 Scoff B/b., Bldg 17 Sm fo don Zip 95CL'1
T.lepnm. MImD- (home) N/A (DVair.p): (408) 727 -6665
HIS ewrer -,m(ed to Mis oWkwfim p Yy ,& No
Par -(a) to Nob /y 1) App/kohl - .AS've Mkh" SMrofo
2) APPIkm14 fWA11- - Kf« d "f, WC Alta. Cme Ca bk
0--s Nmnt Ulf- at NoW 0". DO Nomw, Cad-la R'oNnn o cary 8th n
O-1si AOCY.s:' 14500 IRMA- Rood Smatopa Zip: 93070 -6199
ANTI, Af- Koyrm
Ag-t', Nama Alp, =-
Agmis Adel tf I4B00 Boni— RooO, Sorofepo Zip: 95070 -6]99
If oIh« fop 1.M« of 1-14 desmb.o .Wifodh 1.r lead i fI-t M prtperf . N A
III po✓cM lot of rote -dT Y i No _ APN/ SI7 -11 -019 d 019E /
Numb« of tats Iry -hkh tmtetiw mOP epx.w is sought IF
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lol 1
M-a of lot (,f): Goss: 274,715 103,836 91)55 450,528
Ne I ( I . 121. 778 I I. SN 51,178 W. 211
-9 -reth allot 1 el . 100 /1.0 120 320
Av . depth of lot fell : 100 210 250 .30
Fronlaq- 01 lot fat . 83 5s5 101 Ia3
Average slope of let (percent : 281 785 11S 2521
Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot a
MeD of lot (If): Goss: 48,166 47,624 51.373 40.075
N<t ( 1 : 16.2166 47,624 51.373 40,075 Im 210
Arg9 d",hho;11* oI ((fe.t : 216 165 210 175
Fronleq. of lot (feel : 1131 224 775 148
Av «eq. slap. of lot (OSranl 611 1.81 9.22 721
Let 9 L-1 10 Lot 11
N of
.a of let (,f): Gs: 40.075 43.560 40.075
Net (sl : 10. 075 43.560 40.075
Arq. -210th allot ((Ieel 225 245 200
Avq. depin of lot (teen 185 190 145
Frmlope of lot (fwl : 211 76 312
Av<rage slope of tat (v<rcenl : 8.11 6 71 1.71
PnsvAl ImMq of Prap«fy R- 1, Roak,ntia)
Nhol is Ne ovmogs lot Mape7 20.]1 fm Mle. p-
/ th- o I-, creek m Prot- aeoinMq /his P/M«Il.- -
rh.n an I ..,fs nd« NoNOn Rood -n/cA draehxg.
enro fh. Seulnw,.d, padlon of fM ProP -M.
I 1
_ ei41 G r� `•
L,vl ,I
ABBREVIATIONS
r' I_ i
r'7,
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
INWRT ELEVAnO.
PARCEL
LA YOUT No 10 1 -19 -99
BC
PA IEMENT
SIOP.- IXODM1L
/A SMrdeq. Slaps
CB
CLEAN OUT M GRAOE
lamle« Inlet -el
S-0 01151A L -total -Lear length
DROP 1MET
Of
710
A -Ilea, Gw,
EDiX Or PA "T
EP
STORM DRAW MANHOLE
Cg109
FACE LY CURB
FC
aRlt£WA Y EASEMENT
IKE.
0. 0029( 5)
FN
PARCEL
PARCEL Mi, ( ft.) SLOPE Jr. (it-)
b. 01115
SLOPE 1
710
fa. fL am.s
TOE / TOP of SLOPE
I
271. 725 6 31 14,964 5
1. OI115
27. I7
2
101 676 2.3a 7. T71 5
0.01115
37. 33
3
91 755 2.15 1, 327 5
0 01115
I
2102
/
5
I54 528 116 7, 1p8 5
1.01115
35
6
t61fi6 1.11 70.5 5
n, 621 1.09 711. S
1. 01111
0.01115
611
1.79
7
51. 373 1.15 911 5
0.01115
9.16
9. 1
770 a
10. 075 0 91 740 5
0. 01115
9
10
10.075 0.92 652 5
43.5W 1.00 567 5
0.01115
O.OlI15
6.72
11
40,075 0.92 615 5
0.01115
1.65
760
610
620
7-0
730
790
780
770
660
6.50
680
670
650
640
650
640
aFMOPMENr CALCLIAZACKS
LOT 1
A. Gass Sits Area 274,723 If
eo of arh -OY R/IC 4,424 it
Gets Sb Nro rep %V R/W` 270,101 If
8. A/eng- Mop- Of lot 1BX
G X oI Gwa 311. Aron fP M a ducf. 54%
O N.f S't. 24.4' 11..118 s/
E APOrode Fbx Nao ((calNblsd,F
7,687 of
110r,nurlr dear «eo p« coda 7,100 /
F Proposed ds5) -f'rt wen' 414 Ac
A-a9. ,.. 0/ raw /mgfAS: 410 IF
proPased o.w/opmmf «s1.' IQOX
LOT 2
A. Gott Sib Ana: IOA816 If
B. Arpoyyse Lop. of bC 3"
C X -1,4 ass sit. N. to b. d oucfs, 60X
D. Nsf t- Aron• 41,534 If
E. AOoro Nop' Ar p:
600011 ♦ (( 41,534 If - 4a00o) / 1.000 ), 20 - QOJI If
F Pr400 ed dswkprnmf ono' arB Ac.
Agg-egofs (3) fps IAd
Av�aq- MN. e/OlaaOS.d dewapmmf wsa Q7X
LOT J
A- Goss °f. N.4' 94753 .I
B. A -ors Pop. of bt 1.X
G X of LYO Fb AreO fo Ds O.ducfW: 11X
D. Nsf Sta Non- 54,374 It
f. Mo-od. fbm Nea:
6007 If a (( .24.]18 a/ - 44000) / FOOD ] R 2o - 6.288 If
F q l (5 ) _,wr snyfnr59A LF
Arera9e POOP. at pvo, -a dswfOOvnMf me4' 41X
LOT 4
A. Gop Ste A-- 135a%528 s/
Arp of triw-OY R/IE 4.381 It
Grou Site Are Mp 0/Y' ROM` 145,94] sl
C.
v. X of Yep. 01 bt. 3X
Sib
O. A,- to D. dk Aal . 45X
NN Sf- N B0,1)I a/
f. Ayo.pae F Ar<a /aprNbree,L•
6,803 s/
F ProvOa.d d.NfgNnM/ mss' 440 Ac
Afl� o %geswt'p�n7 Lf ens' ISBX
G. PAaawM pod mwlop. ar.o: 1.1! AeM
A.fy o% Cox bnglh; 70 lF (e /f« pod eOMq
PNposad Ooo mwapa QIX (o/(« pa�gro0inq)
LOT 3
A. Cl'os, SJf. Np Id 166 1.1
C X of alalp. o/ lot 61X
Sfe Arop /o Ds OMUNq: OX
4 N.t SNs
7--F 46166 t/
f. AROrode NM (cOkuloled}
6000 a/ 18166 a/ - 40.000 ) / 1.000) + 2(1 - 6.161 sl
F Agg""O de,<laPmmf ores 0.21 Ac.
Aggnqob (3) <mtaw lrrgM IF
Anroge MEN of prcpaaed Mv-IgomMf ono: 9.oX
LOT 6
A. C o Sts A m 47,611 If
B. ANroge Map. 01 bL' 7.8X
C X of Gg Sts A_ to be O.duct.. OX
D. Nsf Sfe Area, 47.624 31
E. 6wo Ie Flom Arp (cNNbfed}
6000 / < [( 17,61) sI - IaOOO) / 1.400) a 20 . 6.152 If
F N'OpOSq M-.1. m.o: 0.29 Ac.
Aggr-gOb (5) ) cm t
far MnpMr 17s LF
Awroq. M. of propwed d�wlopmMf xe0: 6.9X
LOT 7
A. Clop Sit, Nao: 51.373 If a Awroq ope of let. 9.2X
C X of Gwa Sze Area to De dk0 cfsat Or M
D. Net Site Arbor' 51,J73 ,l
E. A60rode From A-1 / Icubfad):
6070 ,I (( 51,371 s «s0 IQ000) / 4,000) x 10 - 6,117 If
F. Prgpoa.d e1wlOPmmf a25 Ac
Aggregate 1.a(p5_e�) cmfovr MgNS- 261 V
0. Ayq�rp9vre (5 con( .W= M>51r2 Lf «eo: 12 DX
.W,: ah ) 9 (alfr YOpasee 9-twIg of
A-9. Mope of proppsad 0 wgomMf m.o: 7.9X (off« -p ... d
9'.4Mg of d.wpammf m.o
LOT B
A. Gap Sit. Ara4' 40,075 If
B. Awregs MCC. P! 101: 9.IX
C X o/ Gas Sb LL to b. Oed I-. OX
D. N.f Ste Area' 14075 sI
E. Albrobfe flow Arep dNbf'.
F G0000Sed 'e.(.:I40,0 `1.I - 10,000) / +.000 [+ 20 - 6,002 of
tpmmf «.P: 1.19 Ac.
f
A asM 57 of Of d f- 1-g1-gel s, 191 LI
y _ PMP Oiwopmmf area' 75X
LOT 9
A. Cron Sf. Area: 40075 If
B. Avwyya Mope of bt fl 1X
C X oI Gw.s Sit. Anp to Da daducfed' OX
a Naf SfI N.1. 4a075 s/
E ARP- Fpm A,- (cdcvbfe0}
6000 If ♦ [( 4oC73 I - 4.000) , 20 - 6.007 If
F Propos.a Oewlopmmf mss 1.17 Ac
A- rcgef��e)a/ tort kvr9lh;' IQS LF
9• xroo,n a- wraammf 1X
LOT 10
A. DroppSit, Ar- 4 4560 If
C. X of G Sf. Area to D- deWucfad, OX
D. NIT Stfe Aa 41560 If
E. ADaroD1e Flos- Nm (cdculobd }' '
bow of + !( 4x51.0 of - .af7a0 J / f. 000 , Io - 6.071 If
F ProPnred Oerelcprnmf ens: a19 Ac
Aq9egob (513 cMfaur lhgMr 118 tF
Awoq- Mape Of xoposad d.relalammt -11. SIX
Lot II
A. G I I SRI, A,- 14075 ,f
a AwaglaMCpo of hal. 7.7X
C X of P Sf- - I. M Mok'al". OX
0, N-1 Sit. Argo: 14013 s/
f Alro-ode Nom Arco (cd,uIPIM}
[( sao II - 4a000) / f000 ) , 20 - 6,051 sI
F PiappS.d a wgommf mso: oN An
Agyegpb (3) cmfcv kngtnM 144 LF
Awrpge Mope o1 Praooa.d d�wq -t ono.' 6.9X
REQUIREMENT FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
m8pONSES IN BOLD)
I. DOfe. -a omo- and ,car.
�• . 60' n jp A omen
10Y it man um 50 apes
Cmmw mfa•,pb
Fm ud.P 01 1'- 60' or u» « - I t4I1 hI
excee ones
~- Prove d, 30; 5 fern.
Fm SCObs Of 1' - 100' - 5 fMf.
I. S.. 7MIaIN- Mop', Sh.e/ I.
1 WcMily 1100 aAO-ip rdalw 1p oop-1
PA-'- 1.+d pub RC sfrNls
2 S.- 'Gnarl III -al/an oM !ro /a', fib Sh«L
x 7h- name of m7r yisf 1.9 recxdM mop KNkW# to me
auddh-srmr o' La Uf- Jab of rsco v-q Arrla map, arrd fns
�0 Pope of ma or! Aal recmdP -Aer. ,ucA map b
J. R-d.d Mop: Porter B o1. shorn an /hol c.Aar map
rarArdea A)ay Ja ISM BK4/9YI7.
4.
Ptq,wed wbdrfsi4n mm�e, if my me Prap4 name
.rbp[f fa approwl by ms od-y OgIhcy
4 suadM,lon Nam.: LA, Chel.aur D. Nola Darts
5 A key MOP sho-vrg aOpcmr cm tigCKVS xgorlY and
p;,.'hP of P °s erl rides, gif4'rq bcoli- nmwa Md
op irP"'Pwnlb f r1�r �h- o/'rola fepoyaahk / t- and
/ e-Id / f of m. ,uDOiNPar mm >'fi Dpundmyr fnn Me
5. Sss 71nbIM Yep', Sh..l 2.
6. NMN and abtep of a-n« m am.n -A apoacmr
C nlgiifaed Mpine« a, /kmaad Intl aurw/er -AO
xapand N. mae , dro inq.
R See 7Mb,, SCrbGtfabn Yap arts Bul/dMq JIh Avxo.a/
Fed fh..1', h). Sh..l.
7. Loocfbn; nerve; -bfh; CMf«Ikx, _,V Mtl
cM11/M. M.- of air 'I q, lupnroye and oN« -op n
Me p OaIhl avbd /vfakn m Ile.
7. Sn 'r nmak. M.,-. Shw/ I.
4 NumS« e/ 7011 dmMMmi at me It; oIah, nq
h'antaga daOM end xso M smm. 1-t..
4.
5- 'T la R.- Yep-. Shoe/ I
9. Cmtaun to af-hbe pro of Mt-Is os deacrbed
Mora Wh Me Mope of MY Pmt Of lns PreP«fy .rcfs -Oa
fM t; fa`M -lam. m- xCWY aDUts existurq dewolfd
lo m of«ad grooMq yet may a regviW Mw.krq
hoh'r -a W/oc.nf f' fns proPMY NfAM odle
disfine� NWhpn A/M .orr/0 ofhcl fhe alDb'ws:an
bv)+ q Mf.. In flrOq CPae, M MkA o W.d3rq plm b
r.1. 4 /f Nall M+o- ho- runoff x sw/ I« sN f»
Cv OvIve and Me .1121, ote O'spo,el o/ o1. wr/ ♦sot «;
BMM mans sA N b. m C lr act -
9. Se- ' IMJn.ry G4dnq d WWy Pbn', Sheet J d 4 oM
Ilan I4
to Loccbm 1.M Mmxl« o/ 1.+l .,;flog .aaMrmb M
dfarreg.k s.frpp- m puDBC vUi(T.; foysUgr of(ond/
OP9diag 1.f. AO nnfricf/m apykaLla N.nf4 d N-
evxwkn b /amforra of M wk .1.d Iassnrmfa /m
O^_Maq; s.-age « ofn« pC,DRC uflitMs
to See ' `~Ae MaP -. Sheet 1.
11. E -i-. V v ups and Imo m Pms; of fhe prao «ty
xaeO.sd
it. EMMl6rp wr. RI Rufd.nNOl
PnaPe+W u1..: R/ R.Od-fial
11. 7 ahra o/ odM-1 �x bo«fy .-W by fhe
.d cm m p
oOPncohf x-I
mode .ifhM III.
I.,' Preeedin9 llw 1-x1
12 Non..
IS L-f'm of W the Week; ,frowns and oth« -at«
cawan dei-ts l m said mop n dro &Iq, MIO-Mq fop of
f3 f parka and crsok depth, fC s<porafa Mraef
ano-nq mop- sections of M fvM reek; trenns Md rot«
C,v
!x S« Sh.-/ ! /« N cevro. k vlbns, rop of dank; and
depth. See /Ala sheet Ix -1.-_ cop aecllma.
rs. AN /uewsions tar dmneslk rot« suppY -hkJr mI
xmP-.d by M. aPPllaanc :ra'aeMq aoarab, mrdiy and
apxarkrgfa apmlity erpreased Ps gNlms ps mrwfa.
74 D-11. water Supply: Woler -!R 0. svppl/.tl Dr
Son Jo,. water Comeany. coon -d b ,brinp mein
ftt-` fm Road. Sw PM/minary Gradlnq one unify vroh;
Shah 4.
15. All xoIjjians fm ae-oge djMOsa1 stx O inape Md
flop) cmfrd ankh a xapos -d by the opplkonf.
IS Sr-4gs plsp.rM/: Wp/ Vo/1epY San /Mlon psMN.
Corrr.e/ b blMg m fn a BMlman Recd. 540
'PrlBm/nary Orao/ng t ufOly P /m'. Sh.e/ 4•
S :crm -Oro /n: So th pwNOn of aubd/HMm
1,04 OroM b a Mlurol dro/neq. swb. NeNheNy
venen om droll ro a prp.a anhm. s« 'pox May
Grud'rlp rW UIfRy Nan', Sh.-1 4 Mo Prov/alon, /m
Rood cmlrol an anllNpalaO.
16. Exis`i9 -yl; acliw m obah~,d. and dia eMt/
proposed '
16. MA- xhltnq acfM --I1 Mb la A.-I'd at M. Sovlh
-re•1 of Ih. -"MA- M Ih. East Md. If Nod- Rood. This
. -a a-r,.a me aP..puhmnv vrap.ry .n«1..
17 PPblk x cpnmm gram ores xgposedoi/ any
17. C-W Court and M, ped-blon corineclln /ulmy
:dx ro Benbnah Road en pnpw.d b b. 141c 1M b
Mc Cly If Sonbgo.
14L Sbfrnmf of I- 11m1in9 old bndscop. yet, i/
rpaAa of M. Ikn. o/ Ina III. O l fh«-:a. lots
to Merhdl be 1.w Plea wfs Ur. of I" dnxowhml Elms
150- s -iftim x M(. a, Pmf o/ fA. ppplk4fbn rm
9 Permits.
1& in, pMmery c ncaPl er al/eel hN PLO- p antsy
Be Ib
- m k ..d b pro l-dhoOat
.cflnloten f hn .a r ts /n pN Mx. aN-uMClnM� mln
Wp ,
a
-"It -o0 -1, CRY pp a
m hd, - " ' d ..d., t . I Fdw a
av,/ b Erod of ol/
eysNnp Mw b
nrtbM.
SP-J.a of eok end mai rood 1- Mmrbr le Ihw.
=I,, om b, -d 11 clnOfl bbnk areP rn Eder ,
arwpy abn9 IM -d- y ahe
pn,Pea.d Ped.sMan Polh.
Th. h,ml- MI. sN-al Ir« 1e M 1 -t.AAd -fi M
24' 840. P
19. Srol, of sfr.ef higntin9 plmnkrq, if my
19. No l:Y-./ ltghh on xapo,ed as part of Ih/a
subdNhlah
(SEE ABOW d RICH FOR co, TANUA RON Or RecutocuENTS)
REQUIREMENT FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
(OONTINUED)
2a slot.mmr of N. Mp.owm «b Prop - 10 a.
CY,ratrucf.d Of ifIII. 0 and of M. rkne -hss b
Tmxo.emMta ahoy M MIOVetl ono M. dale of the.
mticbofed compla£mr.
20, 4hPrO-ft Propwsd to M -hv CIO, x MslapM:
I. Shel o �d fn-oy hfprovrrr.nh
2L -
c L.P Mrprev.m-nh
vvply Larprewrnmh
4 sronn srofMq. i prowmMh
1 l/ ufmy rinprov«nmh
6 Ged7nmprowm.nh
C- ov,11- ro d.g /n: J- 1999.
MROO -l<d doh of t.mpl#Mm: 0--b-r 1999
11. Sit. dewla h-H Plan M -d Nth S.cflmr I4-75101.
-h«. reprkeO.
11. M -cord- -fht S-Am II- 25.100, -. en of IIM
opM/en 0 aih d-Aapnwnf Ptah b M/ Mc.pory of
fhb fbna
22 ETA. oPprorknofe aItmrc< to orrd rocatkel o/ Me n.areaf
,4fit y 1..-m won lira
21. Ih.n b an exlah'np ,a Mary w-er moln (W / VafNY
SoMrofIM O/sMel) M Bohbnen Read a/ fM NMh Md
el !M fu80 /.VSlon.
23. LO-Um dap -ciu of .9 m-Mle 11- 40• o, mete
!� -ncv, o, me It 14' Plow nafurol gro0e
M o"OtAo'. M I- -A /M -a A0 D. afhcf d OF arpO.(aimr
L'np%Mf; regmdps of sin, -mould De pblred m0
IS. SM 'h.YmMOry (Y4drng and ulmy Non / EMSNrp T ;
Sh «f ! d 4, for Me nvrnbn. MCmak,.1 h..1. an mm(117.O
arW d -Otcal M fh- 7n. Sur"y h Inehrde Tr-e Pns.rvaflon
and Phol -Non Ptah - as pyorW by , m Y. McpMphan.
-A011hg erberbl,
24. Cokvlatlsa of fns Site Maps
14 SM 'DEVELOPMENT CALC'UTAnaNS'. Mb Sh-p.
IS Fm Pile W- gnat« Non 101:
A. E,isf/ng mtl Aopwed gad.S - SM Pr'Nbadnay Ondkg ono
ulmy' Plan
B. Indrdrd bu pod brof:mra - Sw ei� % ry C-OM, arts
a: oSx / E,bNnp T Sna<Ia
Mao - SN sAS.I 1
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND
SIALDNO SITE APPROVAL FACT SHEET
ApplkmFs Nome: Jdrn Michas' Sobmt.
Madrrq Ado/ -ss' 10600 N D. AnPO 810., $uR- ZOO Zqq'rt.' 95011 -2015
lN.p,h,h Numb «: .(hem.) N/A (b -m.-) (408) .46 -0700
Appkml'S Engkv- IG« d WPighf Ciw EngMews d SvrwymP, hc.
.reZg Adproa,: J350 Scoff B/b., Bldg 17 Sm fo don Zip 95CL'1
T.lepnm. MImD- (home) N/A (DVair.p): (408) 727 -6665
HIS ewrer -,m(ed to Mis oWkwfim p Yy ,& No
Par -(a) to Nob /y 1) App/kohl - .AS've Mkh" SMrofo
2) APPIkm14 fWA11- - Kf« d "f, WC Alta. Cme Ca bk
0--s Nmnt Ulf- at NoW 0". DO Nomw, Cad-la R'oNnn o cary 8th n
O-1si AOCY.s:' 14500 IRMA- Rood Smatopa Zip: 93070 -6199
ANTI, Af- Koyrm
Ag-t', Nama Alp, =-
Agmis Adel tf I4B00 Boni— RooO, Sorofepo Zip: 95070 -6]99
If oIh« fop 1.M« of 1-14 desmb.o .Wifodh 1.r lead i fI-t M prtperf . N A
III po✓cM lot of rote -dT Y i No _ APN/ SI7 -11 -019 d 019E /
Numb« of tats Iry -hkh tmtetiw mOP epx.w is sought IF
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lol 1
M-a of lot (,f): Goss: 274,715 103,836 91)55 450,528
Ne I ( I . 121. 778 I I. SN 51,178 W. 211
-9 -reth allot 1 el . 100 /1.0 120 320
Av . depth of lot fell : 100 210 250 .30
Fronlaq- 01 lot fat . 83 5s5 101 Ia3
Average slope of let (percent : 281 785 11S 2521
Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot a
MeD of lot (If): Goss: 48,166 47,624 51.373 40.075
N<t ( 1 : 16.2166 47,624 51.373 40,075 Im 210
Arg9 d",hho;11* oI ((fe.t : 216 165 210 175
Fronleq. of lot (feel : 1131 224 775 148
Av «eq. slap. of lot (OSranl 611 1.81 9.22 721
Let 9 L-1 10 Lot 11
N of
.a of let (,f): Gs: 40.075 43.560 40.075
Net (sl : 10. 075 43.560 40.075
Arq. -210th allot ((Ieel 225 245 200
Avq. depin of lot (teen 185 190 145
Frmlope of lot (fwl : 211 76 312
Av<rage slope of tat (v<rcenl : 8.11 6 71 1.71
PnsvAl ImMq of Prap«fy R- 1, Roak,ntia)
Nhol is Ne ovmogs lot Mape7 20.]1 fm Mle. p-
/ th- o I-, creek m Prot- aeoinMq /his P/M«Il.- -
rh.n an I ..,fs nd« NoNOn Rood -n/cA draehxg.
enro fh. Seulnw,.d, padlon of fM ProP -M.
I 1
_ ei41 G r� `•
L,vl ,I
ABBREVIATIONS
r' I_ i
r'7,
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
AC
INWRT ELEVAnO.
AVV
BAEY OF CURB
BC
PA IEMENT
PV
CA FOV BA SII
CB
CLEAN OUT M GRAOE
COT;
DROP 1MET
Of
SANITARY SEWER -HOLE
SSMH
EDiX Or PA "T
EP
STORM DRAW MANHOLE
SDAW
FACE LY CURB
FC
aRlt£WA Y EASEMENT
D.W.E.
FIAE HMRANr
FN
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
Pur.
/low LINE
FL
STORY DRAIN CASEMENT
S D.C.
TOE / TOP of SLOPE
STREET MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
S.C.
DESCRIPRON
LEGEND
PROPOSED eAlsm/c '
PROPERTY UN£
CENTERLKIE
-
EASEMENT
_ _ _ - _ - _
LOT LINE
SETBACK LINE /BLDG ENY£LOPE
-
OEAfLCPYENr AREA
r
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
Q
CATCH BASIN
WATER VAL t£
N
MEE (WRI TAG)
SPOT ELEVA RON
6 I
CURB d CUTTER
CCVICRE tE
TOP Or BANK
TOE / TOP of SLOPE
ELECTRIC
CAS
g _
SANITARY SEWER
STORM DRAM'
WATER
JJB ea17r
ShEEI
I
:7 150'
" /F;
m
I
A
V
-D
0 LEGEND
`'! ` t _- 'C�Y ✓t �'v VICITFs MOVSED DMOI.Vll AEA
-0-o= sore L-r 8" O`WLar
f.`, l�_ /� Ili =. /I ! _
a
Zia
C>
uj
z 7;
LLj
Ld
La
f� U,
da 0 (L
w <
Z
Lo
x
:D
<
z - 'z-
C)
U) 05
LLJ
DAM 0�-9a -1999
awml .Er
+De amt
. T
0 60 120 lao
sllwe I- - 60 It
PARCEL ,B
TOTAL AREA: 235065 ACRES (CROSS)
(419 M 27)
(FRED FM RECORD Wy 3• 19)8)
LIW TMLE:
LIW WARM DMWE
L3 3 66'N
4: 42- ■ 4& 27
L4 S 05-52 3' 29'
I
A
V
-D
0 LEGEND
`'! ` t _- 'C�Y ✓t �'v VICITFs MOVSED DMOI.Vll AEA
-0-o= sore L-r 8" O`WLar
f.`, l�_ /� Ili =. /I ! _
a
Zia
C>
uj
z 7;
LLj
Ld
La
f� U,
da 0 (L
w <
Z
Lo
x
:D
<
z - 'z-
C)
U) 05
LLJ
DAM 0�-9a -1999
awml .Er
+De amt
. T
�o
Nss
LL
y P�
= vV)
3 w o
LAJ
a2f"'"
c> m
z o
w�
C J U
W r N
Y v n c°n
W
W
ix
F
Z
F
x
W
J
\ W Q
Z Q H w
CL
N U
Z Q W
J W oo
0 W
x ?:
�F- o
Q Q F O
Q W m
F- N
C9UF -�
Z N O O
J
Q
cc
V
Q
c_Z
G
J
W
CL
K?
�,— — I � �ai \�\ ` \\
60 90
Say. I". M ft
J7
N ol
A +
RCEL--
J --� /�` EEL. � �
TOP
a
— - — ---------
WAX.
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
TYPICAL SECTION_o
NOTTO SCALE
All P14 PA
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
TYPICAL SECT12y__(�)
NOT TO SCALE
k PA
"PARCE1.10
L
a
MONTALVO COURT
TYPICAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
Ck:: tn
,OL w
L'i
LLJ
x
BOHLMAN ROAD SggngVo co
PAR\-,,L Lu
NOT To SCALE 'A M Lu
FE
z
4FF
LLJ
A mm -a
1P BOHUAAN ROM Sggngy I-M (n
NOT TO SCALE Il
�� J 0.
F-
CD
0 0
z
0
0
us
------- CL
o
0
2W
OFFSITE STORM DRAIN EXTENSION
e
a 60 120 too
9W ,• _ p0 9
r
! T
0 60 fM 190
P �( , A` r _�.�l a', •tjr rte/ +-<� , .y' ... _.. _ (`, �•. - • �!Y",? .,_ \
Q ,� i P
0 PARCE4 tf
r -; ! F o--,r, r L:Y / }� .y e XR�,'•�.�,r..�; J •,: 1 'k i / �__ ''p• r „' .<, �,..yr' / \�
/ ;•-��/ 3"�,4'�. 1 >. t`'p�. 1 1:.i f �'rY'tl ✓::`E , ! J .,;'S. S 7d. / +" _ _ - _ �// \ i• \•
- '4�'� tic \� �^ ;� t� -'-r •>� ��'" ��. �� t .t
1
Al� : P PARCEL E Z.
r /. 6 k•-L
r \ mac. i � �� - cl�}.'i�; �F. i� T s:f ,� •<%l -z •^ �. .4 ',: � / �\- �' l .� � \:: /
! ��: -t \`,,,�,.� l7 .fi:,?,.! � `T � / � i r•i c *! '',,,, � Y 1 / / ' ^ C
* r
9i
ti s,, ---�?• ""L::r_"'c• 1;.1. •.•`I�� 7� �t ���-t r i .:,?• \.\ ,.ri
n�{Y
i
t ` Y N. s
V , M'GM� f/I1E30�O/) DIIQO!
i z s •�.r. I 1 ( - yak` ">„ � E == y�vr<.�� #n �� I �_ �: / Cx !,. �_. � ('� -' �J_ � -%✓ =:r � � 0
h' '`¢' ✓`- , l' ,. 1. jl,- �,r , `,hs G�+��, -1, 1 f:# r I.I #. }:sx
t tit ",l _f i I ,rr <, YC• i 6�;c t�''ix:i 'r }� q +2k y 'f"�E. r.:f i �'w� Vii'.:.. F"f__ >
�•c.'W.h
r/, �I r h`:�� `? � k�t`yr Vy / /�'}��i��% sy- � � % � % .: %r ��T "fit 7 � �('tw ktr�� •�� " - _ �� ` /
r .I r �'J`�4x?� � ' h � 3J • � /%� !�!.(T�S� .���i {�. f - d>�'� J_�e� `� .
t, •� f ( \
..... .. vii -F'S s i�� ?1 E71 IA
c F —
' "fi r
r -..•i:
l0 % -20%
'I. � � s - DTI � 1� I f `r�^zS+"+•.r c 20% -3A% .
ff I 30% -40%
SLOPE CLASSIFICATION MAP
_ JANl1AR -r ,S, I�l9�J
r f it I - ; "I.. _..__ I i .:S•i An!, nr( f.'1 vr-
l; I IY
k KIER & WRIGHT
'MONTALyo; CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS, INC.
HF /C n 1350SconBoulw",9uildle6n • (4127 -6 5
HTS �►�d1� GS S,m, Cl,,,. c,erornl. 95°S4 FAX (4081 w -sat
CIA
� .. `' 1 •tro ref fs rA1 aQ p n 4 VwtMnrin
�f rrol w nw ,i9i>,
o�S
LJJ P <
> Y
� C
W o
uj
W v
J
LLJ
Yv"'1R
3
Q
J
o W ~ n
Q °mom
c
LL
Za�W �
X F
LLI
CL
W7
0
ON°
t J
0
6
<
i
t4r
r_4s
j
5�
21
,��4 " 1��hu
n
Members of the Azule Park Neighborhood Association are ready to do battle over the prospect of upgraded playfields at Saratoga',
Blue Hills Elementary School "
.............................................. _ .. .4.... ,....... ............ • `
. la 611d,
g
Nei hbo
rhoods rail a ainst
By STEVE ENDERS
he first true spring evenings have
descended upon Saratoga, creating an
idyllic setting around one of the city's
many well -used parks: -
The sudden warm weather brings tee -ball
coaches out in shorts, and a youngfamily runs
with their golden retriever on the field at Blue
Hills Elementary School. In adjacent Azule
Park, a narrow stretch of unkempt orchard
separates the houses from Highway 85 below.
Cars there stream past, creating a faise sound
of breakers crashing on a beach.
The scene couldn't be better for an urban area,
and residents there want to keep it that way.
They're also not alone in this comer of town.
On the opposite side of Saratoga, many of
the neighbors around Marshall Lane Elemen-
tary School feel the same way. They want their
little neighborhood school to stay small -no
renovated playfields, they say, because they'll
attract too many people for the quaint area..
They scoff at being called "NIMBYs"
because many have children playing sports in
and around the city already. Other parents
serve as coaches and can appreciate a good
patch of grass to play on. They j ust don't think
the proposed locations are sensible ones.
Sometimes it takes a crisis to get a group to
organize, and that's what's happened in these
two Saratoga neighborhoods in response to
the city's plan to build new fields so more chil-
dren can play sports.
And in a few weeks, it's all going to come to
a head when the city's parks and recreation
commissioners and a mediator attempt to
solve a seemingly unsolvable problem: -
In those meetings —dates are still "being
hashed out —the city's representatives and a yet -
to-be -named mediator will bring the opposition
face to face with supporters and user groups to
try and reach some sort of compromise.
Citing the long - completed Parks and Recre -.
ation Task Force decisions, the city argues that
the rest of the city wants playfields, and the sites
that have been chosen are the best ones avail -
able. The school districts which own the sites, the
city maintains, have verbally pledged support in
maintaining the fields once they're installed. _
The neighborhood groups say. they're
adamantly opposed to any such renovation, and
they're willing to fight to the finish, they say.
"We feel [the meetings] are a redundancy,"
says Marshall Lane neighborhood leader Lisa
Kurasch. "We've expressed our views. It's like
we're going through another hoop; but we're
hoping the City Council will hear it."
Councilmembers probably will, eventually.
If the Parks and Recreation Commission votes
to approve the playfields plan, the City Coun-
cil will have final say.
Kurasch says that the neighborhood, wl
opposed to the school being used by moreba
ball teams, is willingto work with the city tot
a solution. Unexplored options include,
says, a bond initiative to buy suitable land, we
ing with other nearby cities to use their park
finding an alternative site within Saratoga.
In the Blue Hills/Aiule Park area, about
residents 'on many streets have signed ti
name9 to petitions asking the citynot to pros
with the fields. About 40 families have ral
around a newly - formed neighborhood org
zation there as :eel!,,which holds regularmeet
to keep residents updated on the plan's state
Kurasch says about 80 people are Aga
the plans around Marshall Lane. .
Eddie Sweeney, who says golf balls o
end up in his back yard from duffers ille€
practicing their chip shots, will likely repre
the neighborhood at its meeting with the
"There's no compromise," he says,
would've liked to have been consulted
earlier stage. The ideal outcome for the sc
organizations and for us is seeing Central
[the Heritage Orchard] used:"
- In two other neighborhoods, vocal op;
tion has been relatively silent. Plans to t
fields at Foothill Elementary School
gone mostly unopposed, as have plan
Please turn to pa
ti
a'By's Nc In l�ty'.Back Yard j that eus :u
WO SARA Al-, wS
.Laffi- sympat-etic to Ah6ii-NIMBYJ
,.,affeqte.d.O,Y,commeircial�e.on
the Mountain Winery letter) #q#vo�
haye4o sympathy, and even cry; `-Sham6!'
on ff6 APNA (Aitde'P#k-N( O.borlfoo(
.;-APN?k•6sifiuktes
"compared to. anyre&nAfe estimate. Iti
- -- - -- - - - - -- -'the APNA been to;Hoove %Piu'kion asst
-,-urday?-Hoov6rfias:t'wo;small fields kidget
—less than 20 cars per game.1 believelheBlw
-Hi , Ils prop - osalisitwo small 6eld'i and one
•,.large field. And it thj APNA iiAy. doe!
-"hay.6 AYSO '&e"ffib6fifin it Jh�y shoul(
�.knowihat'sixiimesonigitti idiypeifi.i.ti
would be a more.re asonable estimate. B,
ffiy math, 26 cars per gam tinier three field,
times -six games i060 cars -
Abo kt- cr .OIS" i0 thelr4 r'
'
-who threaten then safety,and 'iut.
have Ib admit bein
1"Toa* of A4k*'
elementary school age children practicing � _— _- .... -�_ —_
ih"
id oolungat tema eOtq?'-(Wansla--'-"
wsome'on and6pini�i
-'tj6 w'sba& d
that ParkDevolop66it Furid mo"ni'y'- could
,.'tkbitiers�tonmiorf�y
pe atiqnVY7
Al u ng Not In My. BackYgyd pr. ects7
thit'-
wolulat6eih all {Sarat lies, (eiioept
s6mgi
wrty. Ple'S
end the noise of happy ifiddreu'on Saturdays
ouldyouiitherha nei
rbr.n'
rh
RRELL ?CA EIL IL BREW , R .,
FLL
G Bruc Drive
len.
7Q
7=
7LO16F,�-
/ -_
-----~-'----- ----------/'/'
°
-
-- __-
'
^7
^ , Y
��
- -- ---
`
--
- '
' -
-_-
I
A �,� #tcattonRleieIertta$ a Drchard,
j
—
P
1
1 ��
, f
herd would a�so,bApienty�f
- - - -- -- --
veh ;cle:acee in-`
- -- -- - continued rom n e 9r �� ,�Yt.F: ! " -;1�u
�`
t of3`ie
g
P yhbofsY
'
ay¢ fhe sympathize with
- -f fieldsat iCongress Springs already a site oY ,
� �s comm�ssioners�v"holiave ioil'ed as..
-- -- - . a- largo sportscomplex.4..x F: ' :
asxtfeentsiaveovei3heQesent
- - -- - - - -- - - — -
Traffic, parlungand safety are tlie:map
•'
Xon,'Titeyace; despiteitiat syinPY•
- _ - -- -- -- r concerns :,Besidesthat, ^.MaishallL•anexp
;
gtotherguns'�
- - - -- -
iddnts worry that Saratoga money will be
�� "'W " got- 3 *lads:now pretty
used on school ields that aren'-t in duet
„that's
," �{ says "W8 dolilock 'artier,'
urasch p
-- - - - - -- - - -• 'Saratoga'schooldisfrc sir_ �rt�'�
f ov�readk,&Hers %4&e udwatcheach
__
Irithe Blue'Hills ne�ghboihood,
oiises�W've bad a,good com=
— - - - dentstlunk�the aty can get ai�ettet band
for its buck by building the fields fi a
y�yt w) aphis i-Wdbe is brought - .
p-
a acut el�j" .
t:
K&N ka
l/
-u e-- eigl born-
- — -- -- -
''A � s t -� a• Tay � .,.•+��. 1 r
'e die PaF>t'1Ve?ghbothogd Assoc .-
- - - -- atiou�APi�iihas.been lortad -
oi�r; �troa Dpp id
devefopinenfo soctrfveietBl eHills.
' OLr assaaatio ehcomp* the:neigh
- - liorhoodsarc�imtBlue i3il1C` hool onihe
wes{sidegfthe�iteeway We�epresentthe
oa�eiwhelming�ajont�osidents „�vi�cL�
liycuiproximity�to the site Some of oiuy:;
mi tubers aie :vblunteer'ooaches'andref
- e w;th? VYSO :'Manyo #ourmemb
haYeehtldren attendmgBlue I�iis School _ -
aii� are acfve in.youth soccer
e idea- o�3raffc in ciurneighbbrhood
willVbe c evestatuig: W f w avea:signil�i _
caiitinta'ease'ur'thenumbe�of carson olir_, .
8ito'vvx64c`redresidenUal streets Dur
mate b o*ti;A00 cars to rom, e.f adi4 -
ori�Saturilayofr�gularplay {basedonetgtit ;+
gatnesper:fi4't This mcrea c in .
'ttficw�llbe"�veeken8wh>ie�YSA utd •i.
AYSt� flay t�eugames and to
oof practiuniaments,�
atoll asos aPk`erchces: r ,
awes aridpractxees.may tie conducted;
> month a yWVei city- consultant, L'
'$e�s s��e,ghliorhood, hke':mast-jn
ratogawa &iatd out to tie a gtuet ue -'
iro=h i lb- tiratwSlaschool. lt*t S 171ot
'` des�n�ad #orfhe"`kit����fiaffic thatwnnid .
?1PL+I'A �vt�wsthYS proposed expansion ;.
a•gthrea[tpourre�gFiborhood
- - - -. - -
#` with Mich aniticease iri visitors to duty
neighborhood`man�►-othet probletin's anise.
- Tt�safetyadfaq.`iur�.resdenhalatieet,a's;�:: - - - _ - - --
yvell as thelemeataryschooleomithucuty,
wo�id be''�gete'i�y Y�o�hpcomised The .
IiDISe from�tnaf#iC'and games
it bl
sideroblyW&etfoiouf4 re weekends'
- -��- ' °'�'herc are trtaay �ssues;with';1►e pro -_' - : - -
A dosed deyeiopment at,t#ie Blue iilis;:
Azule site We saggest the raty consider.; __-
-- - -- — -- -- - - -- looking at atternate sites:thatwould not — - - -- -
unpact neightioriiood ;safe-}!:= �'lie;ParV
. _ ..
>, Development Ftiiid ritone should o to - - -
.” Y g
�oyelopw9ithypr6jeO� thai .would bone
- - - _ -- - -- - -- ` :`fit -all the i ideiits of.SarAtoga•.w�thouf -
damagutgea�sttiig •neighborhod
os cx
- a<CATIE Af:EXANDER — -- — - - -- -- - - - - - - —
� _ ,..�APNA:Chw[pe�son GoletaAvenuc:. - _ -
r-
` E`` 'Wv „;AL.LY -OH JSO _ . .
`'" °, •'` fkesideoT�imm� •�riar7lolneowa►u$ •
PU-, �u« u J c crvze.�P��4 Gc.
March _, ^1999
Governing Board
Campbell Union.school District
155 North Third Street
Campbell, CA 95008 -2086
RE: Marshall Lane proposed Sportsfields
Attached please find an additional page to add to our original petition.
With the addition of these names, there are over 80 immediate neighbors of
Marshall Lane School who oppose sportsfields at the school.
Let's address the traffic, access and safety problems already existing
at Marshall Lane School and not add more problems to the quality of life
in our neighborhood.
Marshall Lane neighborhood
February 28, 1999
To: Saratoga City Council
We, the undersigned, from the surrounding neighborhood, are totally opposed to the
installation of playfield facilities on the grounds of Marshall Lane School. We already
have an influx of students from outside the city attending the Marshall Lane School
which has created a tremendous traffic problem.
Name (Print) I Address Signatures
l
I) oi4 c7
2
/ :( C
5� IK��,�;7r1 tit�tiCfi.11_/a /�S -�y R�VFn,wT,•,n nQ. L.' ;J-.J\ —r
/Z
�r
i e. c- b u cr. d d v a— e (' u. c rz o s 5
VV A r4 5 h a- (II LA -e S o'n I S o b ,e a '1 0"
March 27, 1999
To: Saratoga City Council
We, the undersigned, from the surrounding neighborhood, are totally opposed to the
installation of playfield facilities on the grounds of Marshall Lane School. We already
have an influx of students from outside the city attending the Marshall Lane School
which has created a tremendous traffic problem.
Name (Print) Address Signatures
rRcv
5Z0'-'L/ S� .e�r2(a Y- cY F ca- 's
Jim Shaw
18735 Kosich Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070
Tel: (408) 257 -1084 Fax: (408) 257 -1123
April 16, 1999
Dear Mrs. Marshall,
I apologize for the delayed response to your letters of January 20, 1999, and January
21, 1999. The letters were misplaced inthe sportsfields file .
In reply to your January 20 letter-, the neighborhood petition rejecting sports fields at
Marshall Lane School has not been "denied" by the City. The information submitted
will be addressed at the appropriate time in the process cycle.
Your January 21 letter states I was quoted at the Play field Task Force meeting of
January 19 as stating: "that the politics of the neighbor"s complaints should not be
considered when choosing the sports fields sites ". You asked me to explain this
statement.
The second point in your January 21 letter is your perplexity as to why the Mayor
would be on the Task Force and the City Council. You asked if this is not a conflict of
interest.
To answer your second point first, the Mayor was not a member of the Task Force. At
the time the Task Force was established the City Staff requested a Council member
attend Task Force meetings as an observer, in order to better communicate progress
to the rest of the Council. I have not voted on any Task Force action.
With respect to your first point I am at a loss to recollect exactly the conditions under
which the statement attributed to me would have been made. I can only speculate
that the root of the problem is once again the choice of the Task Force, (not me), the
Task Force, to solicit community input only after specific proposal(s) had been
prepared by the user groups, school districts, and City staff /Parks/Rec. Under these
conditions it would be sensible for the Task Force to develop proposals geared to the
objectives of the user groups. Every one on the Task Force knew Community input
would be vigorous once a proposal had been set forth. The justification for following
this procedure was the point the Community would have a specific proposal to accept,
modify, or reject.
That procedure, or process, is still in effect, and will be followed to conclusion.
Sincerely yours,
im Shaw
cc: City Coundil ity Mgr
DATE: 1 -20 -99
TO: Saratoga City Counsil
FROM: Ellen Marshall P.O. Box 3191, Saratoga, CA 95070
RE: Petition Rejecting Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School
In 1997 a petition of approximately 40 signatures against the sportsfields at Marshall
Lane School was submitted to the former City Council of Saratoga. Consequently the
proposal was denied. Then in 1998 another petition of 64 signatures regarding the same
was submitted.
We understand steps have been made in contemplating the sportsfields once again despite
our two petitions against. Apparently our petitions are being ignored.
The impact of the proposed sportsfields would create many problems. The following are
a few:
1) Safety hazard due to all of the traffic brought into the neighborhood.
2) Noise and Pollution
3) Traffic Backups
4) The taking away of our right to quiet enjoyment of our property /neighborhood.
5) Mental Anguish
We would propose the following solutions:
1) Find another location such as Central Park/Heritage Orchard.
2) Since the official vote of the Task Team lists Marshall Lane as the last option of the
four, leave it out completely since it is the least viable location.
3) The users raise funds to purchase their own sportsfields rather than using the tax
dollars of those who don't even want them.
The fact that the sportsfields Task Team and the Bealsgroup are going ahead with
tentative plans for the sportsfields shows that our petition is being denied. Can you
please send a note showing cause as to why our petition is being denied. Unfortunately,
if our petition continues to be denied, we will be very perplexed and will be obligated to
pursue this matter further.
DATE: 1 -21 -99
TO: Mr. Shaw - _
FROM: Ellen Marshall P.O. Box 3191, Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 370 -9406
Affiliated with The Petition Against Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School
RE: Making Good On Your Pledge
At the Task Force meeting on 1 -19 -99 you were quoted as stating that the politics of the
neighbor's complaints should not be considered when choosing the sportsfields sites.
This is a direct contradiction of your pledge enclosed. In fact, traffic, noise and safety
would all be increased significantly should the sportsfields go in at Marshall Lane
School. If you stand by your pledge, you would not allow the sportsfields there, and
certainly as Mayor you are obligated to seriously consider the complaints of 64 people
about the sportsfields at Marshall Lane School. Can you please send a note explaining
your statement?
I am also perplexed as to why the Mayor would be on the Task Force and on the City
Council. Isn't that a conflict of interest? When you vote on this issue wouldn't you be
influenced by your Task Force Group? Please explain.
The Intelligent Choice- For Saratoga . .
Jim Shaw
Qualifications
�r Harvard University; BA :Economics
It U.S.. Navy, WW II, Korean War
* 37 Year Career With Westinghouse. in Marketing
and Government Contracts Negotiations
• Co- Founder Measure. "G" Committee
• President, Saratoga Woods. Homeowners'
Association
* Founders Neighborhood Emergericy.Preparedness
Program
When Elected. I Pledge To:
Emphasize mitigation of noise, congestion,
and traffic in all projects, and find
innovative ways to reduce traffic congestion
and cut - through traffic.
Preserve neighborhoods by adhering to the
City's General Plan.
Insist on intended implementation of
Measure "G"
Support family, youth, and elderly programs.
Seek puWlic input for City spending choices.
Collaborate with ail Saratoga schools; and
enhance the partnership to assure that
quality facilities and reliable security are
provided for our children.
tM
ayµ. • .
Jim Shaw &Stan
vo to
Stan Bogosian
Qualifications
* UC. Santa Cruz, BA Political Science • ,
* Community College Instructor
*. Saratoga Citizens Open Space Task Force
* Sierra Club, Loma Prieta Chapter Membership
Chairman'
* Saratog,1 Planning Commissioner
* • Lifelong Saratoga Resident
* Co- Founder, Measure "G" Committee
As Your Councilman. I will:
✓ Support open .government that is fair and
responsive to citizens, neighborhoods, and
schools.
✓ . Support our excellent Senior programs.
✓ Insist that•,our city staff work to clean up
Saratoga Creek.
✓ Listen carefully to all residents, and insist
that city staff treat residents respectfully.
✓ Improve our parks and recreation facilities
to meet expanding school, family, and
neighborhood needs.
✓ Fully cooperate with school districts, and
assist with financial neecis,`cspecially when
child safety is at issue.
.5th ,w Iamrly
ov -...:
Bgo ality
of . Life
9
DATE: 1 -21 -99
T0: Saratoga City Council
FROM: Ellen Marshall P.O. Box 3191, Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 370 -9406
. Affiliated with The Petition Against Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School
RE: Violation of Freedom of Speech
Our group, Petition Against Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School, were not permitted to
speak at the Task Force meeting on 1- 19 -99. This is discrimination and a violation of
Freedom of Speech. It also deprived the Task Force of valuable information. Instead, all
they got was incorrect information based on conflict of interest from Ms. Dickerson and
Ms. Crotty while we had to sit there and listen silently. Ms. Dickerson doesn't even live
in Saratoga. Ms. Crotty's term on Parks and Recreations was over in December 1998 so
why was she there piping up every time Marshall Lane School was mentioned? This was
brought to Mr. Perlin's attention and he agreed that this should be questioned.
Please send a note as to why our group was not allowed to speak but others were.
Our group should get equal time with closed doors from the Users. I'm requesting that
our group get a chance to present our information to the Parks and Recreations to ensure
that equal time is given and discrimination is avoided so the resulting decision will be the
most intelligent one based on FACTS, not fiction.
Cc: Bealsgroup
DATE: 1 -22 -99
TO: Saratoga City Council
FROM: Ellen Marshall P.O. Box 3191, Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 370 -9406
Affiliated with The Petition Against Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School
RE: Let's Set The Record Straight
I attended the Task Force meeting on 1- 19 -99. Ms. Dickerson, President of the Quito
Little League, and Ms. Crotty were giving incorrect information regarding Marshall Lane
School as a site for the sportsfields.
The following provides the correct information to their quotes:
Quote #1) "On one of the petitions it says that we support all efforts for a positive
solution at Marshall Lane School including efforts to improve the traffic. That is part of
their petition ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: This statement is NOT on our petition,
Petition Against Sportsfields at Marshall Lane School.
Quote #2) "It would be farm and T -ball level. We would never switch kids (to major
and minor leagues) ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: Ms. Dickerson will not be there years
from now to support this statement. We don't even want THESE sportsfields let alone
the door it could open for expansion into major and minor leagues.
Quote #3) "I know neighbors are sensitive to the intensification of use and scale and our
point is this is really for the kids at the school and we could minimize it ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: The sportsfields aren't really for the
kids at the school, they would bring in kids from all over. The sportsfields especially
wouldn't be for those 34+ kids at the school who live in the neighborhood because of the
negative safety, noise and traffic impact. What about their rights? The sportsfields
shouldn't go in at their expense.
Quote #4) "The cost would be more on the low end ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: The Bealsgroup has stated that the
figures are conservative and are probably higher than lower because unforeseen things
always come up.
Quote #5) "There is some neighborhood support of the sportsfields at Marshall Lane
School ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: THERE IS NO SUPPORT
Quote #6) "What's happening right now is, for the past number of years, kids are
practicing weekends and every day.
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: There is very little practice going on,
and especially very little or none on weekends. .
Quote #7) " Instead of having practice it would be organized games ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: There would be no organized games
instead of practice — there would be organized games AND practice.
Quote #8) "From a driving standpoint there would be less coming and going ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: There would be three times as much
driving and three times as many cars and a 90% increase all weekend long. This huge
volume of driving and cars would be due to practice, organized games, opposing teams,
fans and spectators, and food vendors ...EVERY DAY INCLUDING WEEKENDS
FROM MORNING TEL NIGHT.
Quote #9) "There is a desperate need of fields on that side of town ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: There are two gigantic fields within
walking distance at Rolling Hills and Westmont.
Quote # 10) "We each have to put in our two cents for our fields. I don't want the
neighbor situation to be the reason why it's knocked down in priority ".
INCORRECT INFORMATION CORRECTED: She has certainly gotten in more than
her two cents. The neighbor situation is exactly why it should be knocked down in
priority. As the Bealsgroup and many Task Force members stated, and I quote:
1) "Strong objection from the neighbors"
2) "Considerable opposition to the traffic and safety issues"
3) " It would be an uphill battle"
4) "Problems they would have with construction modification"
5) "Do not want to put an increase in activity level"
6) "Significant Opposition"
7) "Because of the political opposition I have switched (preferences)"
8) "What is most likely to pass "?
9) "Perhaps a site with less opposition should be chosen over Marshall Lane to
increase the chances of it going through"
10) "Litigation holdups " (and rightly so)
I would also like to correct the incorrect information on the enclosed City of Saratoga,
Park Development Project (Attachment #1: Site Summaries).
Site Notes: Incorrect. There is Rolling Hills and Westmont nearby.
Users Incorrect. Upon taking our walk through the school grounds everyday at
different times, it is NOT heavily used by Quito Little League and Not
heavily used by any other outside sport group.
Constraints: Parking is not the only problem. Access and traffic into the area is also
a major problem.
In summary, we hope this information helps in your efforts to choose the sites
realistically.
Cc: Bealsgroup
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:44:24 -0700
From: Katie Alexander <katie @alexander.org>
To: saratoga @statenet.com
Cc: Katie Alexander <katie @alexander.org>
Subject: To: City Council & Parks Commission Re: Azule Park
Dear City Councilmen and Parks and Recreation Commissioners:
I am enclosing a copy of our letter to the editor, which appeared
in the
Saratoga News (April 14, 1999 edition). This is to complete your
records.
Sincerely,
Katie Alexander
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
The Azule Park Neighborhood Association, APNA, has been formed to
express our strong opposition to the proposed development of soccer
fields at Blue Hills School and Azule Park.,
Our Association encompasses the neighborhoods around Blue Hills
School
on the West Side of the freeway. We represent the overwhelming
majority
of residents who live in proximity to the site. Some of our members
are
volunteer coaches and referees with AYSO. Many of our members have
children attending Blue Hills School and are active in youth
soccer.
The effect of traffic in our neighborhood will be devastating. We
will
have a significant increase in the number of cars on our narrow
curved
residential streets. Our estimate is over 1400 cars to or from the
fields on a Saturday of regular play (based on 8 games per fields
per
day). This increase in traffic will be all weekend while CYSA and
AYSO
play their games and tournaments, as well as for after school
practices.
Games and practices may be conducted 12 months a year per city
consultant, J. Beals. This neighborhood like most in Saratoga was
laid
out to be a quiet neighborhood built around a school. It was not
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 09:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Soukup <tsoukup @rahul.net>
To: saratoga@statenet.com, sn @sjmetro.com
Cc: katie @alexander.org
Subject: Blue Hills / Azule Park Development
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95070
Saratoga@statenet.com
Saratoga News
14375 Saratoga Ave. Ste E2
Saratoga, CA 95070
Sn @sjmetro.com
I am writing to express my views concerning the proposed
development at the
Blue Hills School - Azule Park -site. I believe that this is a poor
choice
for use as an intense use soccer facility due to the inevitable
noise and
traffic that would result. Unlike Congress Springs Park,
neighbor's homes
back directly onto Azule Park or face directly into it. I an
certain that -
neighbors of Argonaut School, for example, would object just as
strenuously
if this type of development were proposed for the their schoolyard.
The
neighbors of Kevin Moran Park successfully defeated, a similar
development
proposal in 1996 on noise and traffic grounds. The Azule Park
neighborhood
should not be treated differently.
Creekside Park in Cupertino has been offered as an example of how
this type
of development fits into a neighborhood such as ours. This is not
a good
comparison because Creekside Park is accessible from a major,
4 -lane road,
Miller Ave., complete with a traffic light. Parking at Creekside
Park is
accessible from Miller Ave`. and is not right across the street from
homes,
as would be the case at Azule Park.
Other options should be considered before moving ahead with this
proposal.
Are all of the existing soccer fields in the city used effectively?
Could
)V
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Ave
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Council Members and Parks and Recreation Commissioners,
I've attached my letter to the editor of the Saratoga News. This letter appeared in the
April 7, 1999 edition. This is to complete your records.
Sincerely,
p
eaG 440�
Katie Alexander
Loss of Community
Nice quiet residential neighborhoods. Knowing all the families on your street. Kids riding
bikes. Walkers and Joggers out for their morning run. No noisy big business here. Just
beautiful suburban -rural atmosphere. That's what attracted us all to Saratoga. It's why we
pay premium prices for homes here. We each enjoy our own neighborhoods.
But unfortunately, mine is threatened by a park. Three different athletic groups plan to
use the park proposed for the Blue Hills -Azule site. Well, the city calls it a park. It's
really as many soccer fields as they could jam onto the land, then they added a few
extras. It's more of an athletic field than a real park. With three regional soccer groups,
Saratoga AYSO, Cupertino AYSO and CYSA, as users of this proposed site, hundreds of
strangers will be coming and going all the time nearly everyday. Kids and pedestrians
won't be able to safely travel the streets. The Blue Hills schoolyard will become a muddy
mess for those kids. Crime will certainly rise. The quiet residential neighborhood will be
gone forever. This is too great a burden to place on my neighborhood or any other.
I don't know that our city really needs more soccer fields. If groups outside the city are
using our fields, then at the very least a regional plan must be developed. I personally
believe there are more beneficial ways to use our precious land and limited funds. But I
am absolutely certain that multiple high use soccer fields do not belong in any residential
neighborhood. Such fields belong in a central location, such as the High School or
Central Park, or perhaps even in another city as a regional facility.
The city should open their eyes to other possibilities. Our resources should be used to
enhance the quality of life for everyone, not destroy our neighborhood communities.
Katie Alexander
12340 Goleta Ave
Saratoga, Ca
257 -6692
����.�" �,����✓, ����� zee �2z --.���
20132 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE
SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 -3206
April 8,1999
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070 -5199
Gentlemen:
I am writing this letter to express my strong opposition to the proposed soccer field
development at the Blue Hills School site. The proposed development of a high -use,
competitive sports complex is a strong mismatch to the neighborhood. This is an isolated,
bedroom neighborhood that can not support the traffic and level of activity that the sports
complex would bring. I have serious concerns about traffic issues, safety issues, and noise
issues that this development will present
Although I have never been active in city politics, this issue has troubled me so much
that I have offered my help to the neighborhood group that is organizing opposition to the
development. After speaking personally to several of my neighbors, I can assure you that
the vast majority, probably 90 %, of the neighbors share my concerns and opposition to the
play fields. Please .do the right think and find a more suitable site for the play fields and
develop the Azule Park as a neighborhood park that we can all be proud of
Sincerely,
Tom Holden
� r
/� .11 lt�
April 9, 1999
Mr. Jim Shaw, Mayor
Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
Dear Mr. Shaw,
The proposal for a soccer complex at the Azule Park area is a fine idea as our
children's access to sports facilities and play space is becoming more and more
limited.
However, when I have had the misfortune to be in this area when Blue Hills
Elementary School dismisses school and observed the traffic congestion to be
very extreme thus creating a dangerous environment for both children and
parents, installing a facility that would only incur more traffic is, from my
experience and observations, a very bad idea
Before making a decision, I would strongly urge members of the council to
spend time in this area just before and after school. It is only a matter of time
before a child or parent is seriously injured or killed during this chaotic time.
To further compound this situation by adding a soccer complex to this area
would not be in the best interests of either the children, coaches,
grandparents, siblings, parents, potential spectators or the local home owners.
I would therefore urge the city council to consider the resulting consequences
of installing a soccer complex at the Azule Park area.
I would like to know how I would be informed as to the date and location of the
place the council will be considering this proposal.
Thank you for reviewing my concerns.
'nc rely,
Thomas E. Hall
20278 Kirkmont Drive
Saratoga, California 95070
r
LETTERS '
_Park threatens the
sense of commufty
Nice quiet res>denttal neighborhoods
Knowing.all the:families on your street
Kids riding bikes: Walkers acid joggers out. -
for their morning run.;Nonoisy.big busi -:, -
ness here: Just:a-beautiful suburbanh if al,
atmosphere: That's what attr4eted5us;a11.
ao Saratoga..It's..why ,we, pay premium
prices forhonies here We each enjoy our
own neighborhoods: "=
But unfortunately; mine is. threatened..
by a park. Three different athletic groups
plan to use the 'park proposed:for the-Blue
Hills— Azule.site':`Well',.Ahe'city: calls if a':
park. It's really as many.soccertelds:as
they could-jam onto the Iand;'then they
added a few.extras. It's more of an athlei-
ic field than a real park: With three .region-
al soccer groups, Saratoga AYSOj Cuper -.
_ Please turn to Page 15
14 SARAT0C3A
Continued):rq sb�g�74 7�
tiro AYSO and G1'SA as. users of this pro=.
posed s reds of strangers, ill be
coming and going all the time nearly every.
day: Kids and. pedestrians won't:be able
.to..
safely travel streets:.. '6 B ue Hills
schoolyard will.become a muddy messfor
those kids':.Crime will certain ly:rise. The:.
quiet residential neighborhood will -be'
gone forever: This is too great a burden to:
place on.my neighborhood.or any other:
I n!t:know that our city -really m doore soccer fields; If groups outside the city
are using our. ,fields, then at the, very least a
regional planmust be developed. I person -
ally believe there are more:beneficial ways
to use our precious land and; limited funds:
But I am absolutely certain that multiple
•high use`soccer. fields.do not belong in anyc
residential;.=neighborhood. Such ',fields.
;belong in a central location, such as the Pugh
school or Central Park, or perhaps even in
another city as a regional facility.
- The city should open its eyes to other pos-
sibilities. Our - resources should be used to
enhance the quality of life for everyone, not
destroy our neighborhood communities.
KATIE ALEXANDER
Goleta Avenue
7E .
Playf ields not
wante I at- school
,Lam`A:resident neighbor of Marshall:
Lane.Schbo.1 and, together with my neigh
bors I have been working hard to prevent
the installation of permanent sport fields.
for,the Quito: Little` League and soccer
leagues at Marshall Lane School. Marshall
Lane School is located in the middle of sin
gle familyhomes The only access is to
travel to Ravenwood Drive', Marilyn Lane,
Marshall Lane or Sobey Road. There is no
will be parking along our streets; even 17 n:
ourpropertg; since the streets are very nar-
row two lane roads: Marilyn Lane s.bare=
ly Wide enough for two.cars-to pass Yes;
our children enjoy skating;iiike riding -and
even play bal. l i. n our streets. There are chit
;dren walking to?and from school W.e'are'
very concerned'for child safety We are ':
very concerned_: that; our property._.will
-_becoipe less desirable as a result of these
installations. Those;hoaies on Marshall
Lanethat back up to theschoolproperty
will surely.know more'drop in property
,Value; Since :the planae:.d. installation will.
be close to the propertyline:
The letter 6' Mr;;Pierce in the March 24
issue of the SARATOGA'NEws states one of
the top priorities of the Planning Commis
lion is "to protect tliat wvk chucakes Sarato =.
ga speciatand,of the residents'..quality..of:
life.'' I worked very hard to achieve iiicor-
poratiop and am proud to be a resident of.
Saratoga. I. do: feel_ very strongly: that:
Saratoga funds should be used for Sarato-
ga. Marshall Lane School is not a.Saratoga
school. The largest uumber of partici pants.
in the Quito Little League are not residents
of Saratoga. We have been told there are
over 200 players and.onlyabout 40 are .
Saratoga residents. Of those; only about 18
attend Marshall Lane school. '
I think it behooves our elected officials
and appointed city employees to honor .
their commitments to Saratoga residents.
RosEMARY. WOODWARD
Ravenwood Dfive
s
N ?9 0
r
W
JIM'
a
V!,
NOTES
I TOFOGRAP! -. c 5URVEY WAS PRMOSc 0"( THE OWNER .
2. ALL TREE ARE OAK TREE 1 UNLE55 OTHERW t% NCTEO
I U\THAt IuH. %rm,%rlu% .
•talc.. ,(:a.K: La ••u- ::: .: r +. - -'-. � —Zr. rl,. m.- :. •4n.r w•.r-
Thar�,m+.oe.a.- p•m4m.• -n w
Ihr w,mr r.4 a .t.iw muN t.:...; .r.
.,f6.•r IDnt ..m ..,n.u-n ]n.t- .. - [r..[':: ..
m.i, fw Arla'u.: I f . r. a ..n r, J' >'Per,
II'h4ll t. my .t. -1 I- tt* mwl. r TRL {..
n,4 tw mV•n - •..r «man ._ -
ftm.h
DATE APRUL 9 i
SCALE AS SHOW rq
DRAWN BY H.T
DESIGNED BY: C.R.
CHECKED BY: T•J.5.
PROJ. ENGR.: C R.
JOB NUMBER: 97 — 253
,
Vol If
' r
a
mt c
al c
PI
all
I j
of Ij
�I
)f 1
�1
r
I
d7
Cq N0.5
RINAL
397 -03 b 0
032
v
2
cv
0 t � .'p0
;!. 0
4
3 -
2
t
BY DATE,
a
REVISIONS
rovuRT
CITY APPROVAL
BY I DATE
Op-
397
. C
03. 033 4 k
DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF
Air
q Q
Q'
v
pr�[ 5
TS CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
90 N. FIRST ST., STE. 101
SAN JOSE, CA 95113
V
�CIVL FNGI MMNG
PH: 408.993.1800 TOLL FREE: 888.327.7070 FAX: 408.993.0662
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
OWNER: ................................................... WIT NAGPAL & SUBASHREE VEDANTHAM
19101 VIA TESORO COURT
SARATOGA, CA 95070
APPLICANT: ........................................... SUSIE NAGPAL
19101 VIA TESORO COURT
SARATOGA, CA 95070
ENGINEER: ............................................ TwFVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
90 NORTH FIRST STREET, SUITE 101
SAN JOSE, CA 95113
PHONE: 408 - 993 -1800
SANITARY SEWER :.... ...........................WEST VALLEY SANITARY DISTRICT
WATER SUPPLY: ................................... SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY
POWER AND GAS:..... ...........................PG&E
TELEPHONE: ......................................... PACIFIC BELL
CONTOUR INTERVAL: .......................... 2-
EXISTING USE: .................................. ... RESIDENCE
EXISTING ZONING: ............................... R-1-40,000
GROSS AREA :............. ..........................2.46t AC.
NET AREA ............ ». _...._.......2.461 AC.
SLOPE: ............ . .... . ............................... 11.08%
TOTAL NUMBER LOTS: ......................... 2
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: ..................... 397 -13-057
P. U. E .............................. .........................PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SETBACKS: FRONT: ......................... 30' OR 20% OF LOT DEPTH
SIDE: ............................. 20'OR 10% OF LOT WIDTH
SIDE (CORNER): .......... 29 OR 10% OF LOT WIDTH
REAR ....................... 50'OR 25% OF LOT DEPTH
SLOPE CALCULATIONS
S = (.00229) (1) (L)
A
LOT 1 SLOPE = (.00229)(2X4.9] 3.1 10.16%
1.34
LOT 2 SLOPE _ (.00229X2)(2T.O 11AT%
1.12
SLOPE OF NEW BLDG SITE: g Bglp
LOT 1 GROSS AREA ........................ 58,236± SF
LOT 1 NET AREA ......... ........................58.2361 SF
LOT 2 GROSS AREA ... ........................48,921± SF
LOT 2 NET AREA ......... ........................48.921± SF
EXISTING FLOOR AREA OF LOT 1: ................................. 624o ± SF
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA OF LOT 2: ............................. 5301 t SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OF LOT 1 ..............12740 ± SF
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OF LOT 2 .............8044 ± SF
VESTING
TENTATIVE MAP
LANDS OF NAG PAL
19101 VIA TESORO COURT (A.P.N. 397- 13.057)
CITY OF SARATOGA CALIFORNIA
I
Pc-e-FIVED
APR 2 31999
,fsmwvb DEPT.
SHEET
I
OF SHEETS
RAWING NUMBER:
97- 253
j