Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-02-1981-Land Development CommitteeDATE: Thursday, April PLACE: Crisp Conference TYPE: Regular Meeting LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES 2, 1981 - 10:00 a.m. Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. Roll Call Committee Members Present: R. S. Robinson, Commissioner Laden and R. S. Shook Staff Members Present: K. Kerdus, l.). Trinidad and R. Harison B. Minutes It was moved and seconded to waive the reading of the minutes of March 5, 1981. and approve as distributed. The motion was carried. unanimously. II. SINGLE SITE APPROVAL A. SDR -1491 - Dean and Susan Nowacki, Glenmont, 'Tentative Building Approval __1 Lot, Over 500 Expansion Mrs. Nowacki was present for the discussion. Staff explained that the applicants were requesting Tentative Building Site Approval since they were expanding their house over 500. A use permit for the second story was not required, since the lot in question has a slope over 100. The major concern on the conditioning related to the water requirement for 1,000 GPM for two hours, v.hich might not. be available within 500' of. the Nowacki house. Mr. Shook also indicated that the Council. had discussed an urgency ordinance, relating to height, at their meeting the night before, that might impact the proposed Nowacki. plans. He explained to Mrs. Nowacki that their action today was only on the tentative map and not on the proposed structure. Staff also indicated that the conditions needed to be modified to delete the condition for storm drain fees on the 500 expansion. After discussion with Mrs. Nowacki of the condition for water and the potential ordinance on height, it was moved and seconded to approve SDK -1491. Mr. Shook explained to Mrs. Nowacki that, if she wished to appeal. any of the conditions, she needed to do so within 15 days. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. SDR -1487 - Saratoga Union School District, Aloha Avenue, Tentative Building Site Approval. - 4 Lots - and Negative Declaration Staff explained that the their property into four other three being 15,000 City Council had amended tial development, as pro of the lots proposed and 15,000 sq. ft. minimum. School District was proposing to divide lots, one parcel being 7.3 acres and the sq. ft. or greater. It was noted that-the the General Plan to show this as re.siden- posed. The LDC reviewed the square footage determined. that they would be, as required, The public hearing was opened at 10:30 a.m. Warren Heid, architect, questioned the necessity for a condition requiring single -story designs. The LDC, after nothing that a public hearing was required at this time, revised Condition VIIT -A, to read: " Design Review required for each structure, with single - story structures being encouraged." - 1 - Land Development. Page 2 Committee Meeting Minutes 4/2/81 SDR -1487 (cont.) Dr. Glenn McNicholas noted that the completion of the lots would be up to the purchaser of the property, rather than the School District. Such conditions as undergrounding would be handled by a bond. Mr. Heid questioned the fees for the sewer, and the LDC responded that such questions needed to be directed to Sanitation District #4. When questioned, Staff indicated that storm drain fees would be reduced in accordance with the work done. It was moved and seconded to close the public hearing. The motion was carried unanimously. It was moved and seconded to approve the Negative Declaration for SDR -1487, as amended for site area. The motion was carried unani- mously. A motion was made and seconded to approve SDR -1487, per the amended Staff Report. The motion was carried unanimously. IV. MISCELLANEOUS A. Mr. and Mrs. MacLea.n Clair, 21100 Saratoga Hills Road, Modification of Site Development Plan for placement of a pool The LDC reviewed the site with the architect, Michael Dillon, and expressed concern with the location of the pool, and particularly the decking. It was determined that they would make an on -site visit on the morning of their next meeting at 9:00 a.m. V. ADJOURNMENT KK:cd It was moved and seconded to adjourn the meeting. The motion was carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, K. T(erdlq ecretaity 0.