Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-27-1999 Planning Commission MinutesCITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1999 Civic Center, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA Regular Meeting --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vice-chairwoman Bernald called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Kaplan, Martlage, Murakami, Page, Patrick, Vice-chairwoman Bernald Absent: Chairman Pierce Staff: Director Walgren, Associate Planner Bradley Pledge of Allegiance Minutes - January 13, 1999 On a motion by Commissioners Kaplan/Martlage, the Commission approved the January 13, 1999 minutes with the following amendments: - Page 6, paragraph 9, last sentence amended to read: "He agreed with Commissioner Kaplan that the Commission should reexamine this application as he does not have the answers information to approve the project this evening. - Page 8, paragraph 9, amended to read: Commissioner Martlage expressed concern with the length of the stucco wall..." - Page 15, paragraph 9 amended to read: "Commissioner Kaplan asked if the structures are not considered non-conforming, the variance is not approved and the Commission directs that the buildings be removed and if an appeal to the City Council fails..." - Page 16, paragraph 6, lines 5 and 7 amended to read: "...there is a lot of dead space in the deck design...She said that there are some aesthetics concerns in addition to encroachment into the setbacks. The motion carried 5-0-1 with Vice-chairwoman Bernald abstaining and Chairman Pierce absent. Oral Communication No comments were offered. Report of Posting Agenda Director Walgren declared that pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on January 22, 1999. Technical Corrections to Packet Director Walgren indicated that there were no technical corrections to the packet. CONSENT CALENDAR PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 2 - PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. SM-98-004 & F-98-004 (397-40-020) - MOROYAN, 14961 Via De Marcos; Request for Site Modifications and Fence permits to erect a fence enclosing 25,978 sq. ft. and construct a pool in the San Marcos Heights Subdivision. The property is 40,766 sq. ft. and is located in an R-1-40,000 zoning district. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Planner Bradley presented the staff report. Commissioner Murakami inquired if some of the trees to be planted to mitigate the fence are to be of a native variety or was it a mixture of what is typically seen in landscape plans? Planner Bradley responded that the Holly Oak is a hybrid of a native California plan species and that the fern pine is not a native plant. Commissioner Page inquired as to the original amount of cut and fill for the home? Planner Bradley guesstimated that cut and fill is to be approximately 1,000 cubic yards. Vice-chairwoman Bernald opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Mr. Winterbotham, landscape architect, addressed the site modifications proposed for the swimming pool located at the upper building pad adjacent to the house. He said that the pool was sited to minimize grading. He said that the second request is for a fence exception. He felt that the application was reasonable for the neighborhood and felt that it was consistent with the existing development patterns seen in the neighborhood and would not constitute a grant of special privilege. He indicated that the trees are not native materials but are suitable and adaptable for the area. He said that grading for the original home was approximately 700-800 cubic yards and that the total for both projects would not exceed 1,000 cubic yards. He said that olive trees were used around the swimming pool to be consistent with the style of architectural and the sculpture quality that would provide partial screening of the pool. Commissioner Kaplan stated that she would like to see native plantings used versus hybrid plantings. Commissioner Patrick noted that the landscape plans do not include fruit trees. Mr. Winterbotham stated that the fruit trees and vines would not be used to mitigate any of the improvements proposed and therefore were not included in the landscape plans. COMMISSIONERS KAPLAN/PATRICK MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:44 P.M. Commissioner Page stated that he liked the pool but expressed concern with the proposed fencing, especially the posts and the gate concept as it would be appear heavy on the hill, would be predominately viewed and would not fit in. He stated that he viewed what the neighbors have, noting that there are some fences in the neighborhood but not on a corner lot and that they are not visible from the hillside. Therefore, he could not support the fence request. Commissioner Kaplan concurred with the comments expressed by Commissioner Page. She said that the city has a rule against fences and that she would like to adhere to it. She said that the site is prominent/visible and felt that the property owner purchased the property with this understanding. She felt that the design should have utilized the site. She stated that she would not support the excess fencing but that she would support fencing around the pool and upper level. Commissioner Martlage concurred with the comments expressed by her fellow Commissioners and felt that fencing around the pool area, closer to the home, would be appropriate. Aesthetically, it would be jarring to see a fence go down the hillside as it is an attractive open space. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 3 - Commissioner Murakami agreed with the comments expressed by the Commission. He agreed with Commissioner Page that this is a corner lot which is highly visible, acknowledging that other fences have been approved that adjoin this lot. He said that fencing around the pool is acceptable but that fencing around the entire area is too much. Commissioner Patrick said that she has yet to support the type of fencing being proposed to date. She stated that she could only support the fencing around the pool as required by law. She further recommended that planting around the easement be that of native species. Vice-chairwoman Bernald said that there are other neighbors who have similar fencing to the one being requested this evening. Given the fact that the site is abutting an easement and an expanse of area along the road, she would agree with the Commission that the only fencing that should be approved is the one proposed around the pool and the lower sloped area (in the area of the retaining wall). She stated her appreciation of the location of the pool. Director Walgren said that based on Commission discussion, the appropriate motion would be to approve the site modification for the pool grading and to approve fencing to enclose the pool area and a reasonable amount of area around the pool. The Commission would also need to indicate the fencing material to be used (i.e., wrought iron or open wire fencing material). He said that the use of landscaping is proposed to mitigate the fencing and that some native planting could be incorporated along the fence. Vice-chairwoman Bernald indicated that the Planning Commission is moving away from the approval of fences based on the concern for the existing wildlife habitat. COMMISSIONERS PAGE/MARTLAGE MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. SM-98-004. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0 WITH CHAIRMAN PIERCE ABSENT. Director Walgren stated that it is his recommendation that the fence exception be considered and approved this evening, pulling in the fencing below the area of improvements where the pathways are depicted on the plans. Commissioner Patrick stated her support of allowing fencing around the pad area only. Commissioner Kaplan recommended that the fence be restricted to an open wire fence material. COMMISSIONER PAGE/MARTLAGE MOVED TO APPROVE F-98-004 WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: THE APPLICANT TO WORK WITH STAFF REGARDING FENCING OF THE POOL AND TERRACE AREA, FOLLOWING THE CONTOUR LINE WITH THE USE OF OPEN AND WROUGHT IRON FENCING MATERIAL. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-1 WITH COMMISSIONER PATRICK VOTING NO AND CHAIRMAN PIERCE ABSENT. 2. DR-98-038 (503-14-028) - ZHANG/LI, 13612 Vaquero Court; Request for Design Review approval to demolish an existing 2,574 sq. ft. two-story residence and a 1,020 sq. ft. accessory structure and construct a new 5,568 sq. ft. two story residence. The site is 34,465 sq. ft. and is located within a Hillside Residential zoning district. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Director Walgren presented the staff report and stated that extensive grading is proposed but that it is just under the 1,000 cubic yard limit permitted in the hillside district. He recommended the addition of a condition that stipulates that the cut and fill is to be exported from the site. He informed the Commission that a letter has been received from Delora Sanfilippo, 21834 Via Regina, requesting that the existing utility easements remain protected. She indicates that a horse trail exists that crosses the property that staff was not aware of. He said that the horse trail is not designated as a horse path/trail on the City's Parks and Trails Master Plan. He said that the city could not require a horse trail easement, noting that it is located adjacent to a horse trail network that could be accessed by the existing PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 4 - Quarry Road emergency access connection. She requests that her trees be protected during construction, noting that this concern has been addressed by the city's arborist and that the accessory/out buildings are removed. She expresses concern with the design of the rear elevations that face her property and requested that the hours of construction be limited to Mondays and Fridays. He informed the Commission that city ordinance allows construction seven days a week, limited to daylight hours. Also, of concern is the fire hydrant access. He said that he was not familiar with a fire hydrant access agreement with the fire district. He said that the fire district did have an opportunity to review the plans and that there is no requirement for an access agreement. However, should a fire occur, the fire district would make use of whatever access is available. Vice-chairman Bernald opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Stephen Clark, project architect, stated that he was surprised by the letter submitted by Mrs. Sanfilippo. He said that he is not aware of any legal easements but that he was willing to discuss this issue. He also was not aware of a horse trail and that an area may have been misconstrued as a horse trail. As far as the fire hydrant, he said that it is located at the corner. If the fire department wants to use the extension of Quarry Road, although it is chained, it has a fire box which the fire department can access. He said that he worked with staff to design a residence that fulfills the needs of his client. He addressed the design of the residence, noting that the lean-to is to be removed. He said that the property owner wants to minimize the views to the west and south sides so that there are no problems between neighbors, noting that a play area is proposed on the north side. He recommended to his client that the back side of the home be placed 3.5 feet into the ground in order to minimize the height of the total structure. He said that the structure has been set on a stone platform in certain areas and that all of the retaining walls are of stone material, noting that the design blends into the hillside with the use of stone, stucco and glass. Commissioner Kaplan asked Mr. Clark if consideration was given to placing the entry driveway at its current location and not across the face of the hill? She felt that a garage and driveway tucked away would be more attractive. Mr. Clark said that he did not give consideration retaining the driveway at its current location as the proposed design would reduce the amount of paving by pulling the driveway toward the front, noting that a natural swale exists in this area. Vice-chairwoman Bernald recommended that the garage be kept at its current location and that the driveway be shortened or that a circular driveway be considered to take advantage of the beautiful natural setting. Mr. Clark stated that city code limits cut and fill to 1,000 cubic yards. He said that Vice-chairwoman Bernald's recommendation would require approximately 3,000 cubic yards of grading, noting that two story structures exist to the left and the right of the site, giving a perception of bulk to the single story structure. He said that the grade going up is not conducive to a one story garage as it would necessitate an additional pad for backup purposes. If the driveway was extended to the back side, it would increase the amount of paving. He said that he would agree to review this issue with staff. He said that he was not adverse in utilizing two different pavers: grass rings and paving stones as a compromise. Commissioner Martlage said that the issue seems to be the pervious/impervious driveway. She asked if consideration was given to other designs that would site the garage elsewhere as she appreciated the fact that by not wrapping the garage around the house, it reduces the amount of paving. She said that aesthetically, the Commission would like to see the architecture of the home and not the architecture of a garage. Mr. Clark said that he looked at one iteration of a schematic design that placed the bedroom in the front but that he came to the conclusion that a problem exists as the paving would be increased by 1,000 square feet. Commissioner Patrick clarified that the Commission does not like to see driveways and garages in the front of homes. She asked if the project could be redesigned to have the garage located to the side of the home? PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 5 - Mr. Clark explained that he has 18% grading where the Commission desires the garage and driveway to be relocated. He would cut into the hillside where the deck is located in front of the master bedroom in order to get a driveway to the side of the home. He said that the contour of the land was such that it was natural to extend the house and to site the garage underneath the house. He agreed that he would not like to have the garage in front of the house if he had his choice in design. However, the home was designed to fit the contour of the site so that the site is not mutilated. He said that placing the garage as proposed requires little or no grading to the front of the home and that from a design stand point, it is a natural location. Commissioner Page noted that the arborist report states that there is to be no grading underneath oak tree #1. He asked if the driveway, as proposed, requires grading under tree #1? Mr. Clark responded that he will need to retain the services of an arborist to trim five feet of the overhang that is dragging the ground and that he will work with staff regarding this issue. He said that the tree needs to be trimmed in order to appreciate its entire canopy. Director Walgren said that arborist expressed concern with the fill proposed for the driveway but noted that the fill has been cut back and that it is supported by a retaining wall. Vice-chairwoman Bernald noted for the record that the Commission was in receipt of a letter from Mrs. Sanfilippo and that the Commission has read her letter. Delora Sanfilippo, 21834 Via Regina, stated that she understood the difficulty in designing a home to fit the slope. She noted that the play area and her major lawn area are on opposite sides, a benefit to her. She said that there is a drainage system (swale) at the bottom of the area where the garage is proposed. It was her understanding that the drainage system was installed to carry the drainage from her house and the neighbor's property at the time that the exiting home was built. She expressed concern that when construction occurs, that there be a good drainage design so that there is no water drainage to the home that comes from the hillside. She said that she did not have a recorded easement for the drainage system but that recorded easements for the sewer and water exist. She stated that she was glad to hear that fire access is available. She requested that the temporary bird aviary be relocated a distance from the property line. She indicated that her major concern relates to her view when the home is built. She requested that landscaping be required along the western property line to soften her view as her current view is that of a bare building. Regarding the request for construction hours different to the hours specified in the ordinance, she stated that she suffers from a chronic disease, thus the request to restrict the days/hours of construction. Director Walgren read from the title report that stipulates a private utility easement recorded for the purpose of installation and maintenance of private utility systems to the Sanfilippos, including sanitary sewer and water systems. Staff would recommend that these easement be shown on the site plan prior to the issuance of any permits. Mr. Clark agreed that the easement should be shown on the site plan. He concurred with the installation of landscaping to mitigate Mrs. Sanfilippo's concern and that she is also welcomed to install landscaping on her property. He felt that Mrs. Sanfilippo would be pleasantly surprised that the home would be reduced in height by eight feet. He said that the barn area to be removed and the he was not sure what is to be done with the aviary. He said that he would agree to design a gazebo pheasant pen in order to maintain the pheasants and requested that he be allowed to work with Mrs. Sanfilippo regarding the construction time schedule. COMMISSIONERS PATRICK/MURAKAMI MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:30 P.M. Commissioner Kaplan asked if the bird structure qualifies as a gazebo structure and whether it would have to met setback requirements as a gazebo structure? Director Walgren said that setback requirements are relaxed for open garden type structures. He said that a gazebo/aviary structure would be considered as an open garden structure. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 6 - Commissioner Patrick stated that she was not convinced that this was a good siting of the home on this property. She did not believe that the finished home would blend in with the hillside. She said that she views the stucco, the use of stone and the gray colors as opposite to what she would like to see a house look like at this location. She said that she would prefer the use of more wood and earthtone structures. She said that she was not convinced that the driveway in front was the only solution as it appears that the house could be moved to the right to accommodate the garage and the existing driveway to minimize grading. She did not believe that the planting of rhododendrons and camellias under the oak trees is a good idea. She stated that she would not be willing to approve the design as proposed. Commissioner Martlage concurred with the comments expressed by Commissioner Patrick that the site is a sensitive one and that the proposed design could be applied anywhere. She felt that the site was nice and needed more consideration (i.e., use of natural materials). She did not like the use of cool colors. She stated her support of an alternative design to the driveway. Therefore, she could not support the request. Commissioner Page agreed with the architect's recommendation of the use of two different pervious pavers for the driveway. He said that when he first viewed the lot and the drawings, the design appeared to be massive. He felt that there may be a possibility of locating the garage and driveway to the side toward the front of the home, keeping the second story on top of the garage in order to reduce cuts. Commissioner Kaplan concurred with the comments expressed. She stated that she did not like the driveway approach as designed and felt that the house was too large for the setting. She stated that the stucco house located to the left of this parcel does not appear to belong in this area. She did not believe that the design concept of the house relates to the land. Also, an argument could be made that a basement is proposed. Therefore, the garage does not have to be located as proposed as the two living spaces could have been placed on top of each other, pushing the home away from Puero Court to reduce digging for the turn around area. She noted that the trees to the back need to be protected. She stated that there is to be no mechanical equipment used to remove the asphalt and that anything that is to be done with the asphalt would need to be done by hand. She asked if this was included as a condition? She said that the issue of the easements is one that needs to be resolved by the property owners. She stated that she could not approve the request this evening. Director Walgren indicated that a condition has been included that restricts the use of mechanical equipment for the removal of the existing asphalt. Commissioner Murakami said that some positive considerations exist such as the removal of the old asphalt. He stated that he understood what the architect was trying to do in terms of designing the home to minimize grading. He agreed with the architect that it would require additional grading to design the garage and driveway to the side of the home. He said that in looking at the neighborhood, the design is not as bad as compared to other styles of homes up the street as there is not much of a style in the neighborhood. He said that color in this area is a minor concern as this is it would not be a visible hillside lot. He said that he was willing to meet in a study session to discuss alternative design/layout solutions to address some of the concerns expressed this evening. Vice-chairwoman Bernald said that this was an attractive design with the exception of the garage underneath the front of the home. She said that the use of the windows give the home an attractive appearance. However, she shared the Commission's concern as to whether the home was sited properly on this lot. She felt that muted colors versus the use of starker and gray colors would have helped. She also expressed concern with the garage/driveway and stated that she would like to have the opportunity to see if there are alternative design solutions. Director Walgren said that it appears that the majority of the Commission has a strong position regarding the application as submitted. It appears that the applicant is being requested to consider retaining the existing driveway and relocating the driveway and necessary driveway access to the side, incorporating more rustic/warming materials PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 7 - and colors, modifying the front elevations. He recommended that the applicant be directed to make the specific changes and that this item return on the next available public hearing. Vice-chairwoman Bernald reopened the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. Mr. Clark stated his concurrence with a continuance to allow him the opportunity to redesign the home to address the commission's concerns. COMMISSIONERS PATRICK/KAPLAN MOVED TO REOPEN PUBLIC HEARING. BY CONSENSUS, THE COMMISSION CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM TO FEBRUARY 24, 1999. 3. DR-98-009 (389-28-007) - SAGHEZCHI, 13762 Serra Oaks Court; Request for Design Review approval to convert an existing 462 sq. ft. garage to living area and add a new garage and a 453 sq. ft. second story to an existing 2,990 sq. ft. residence. The property is 14,450 sq. ft. in an R-1-12,500 zoning district. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Planner Bradley presented the staff report. Vice-Chairwoman Bernald opened the public hearing at 8:43 p.m. Max Peyvan, project architect, stated that the purpose of the design was to take over a piece of property that has been abandoned and convert it into livable space. He said that it has been a long term coordination and review with the city in terms of setback, height and lot coverage. He said that the design matches the existing home and the environment. He stated that he met with the adjacent neighbors to discuss the proposed design. He felt that the design was harmonious to the area and that the colors and materials would match the existing colors and materials, increasing property values. He stated that he would agree to reduce the driveway area, if so directed. He said that he proposes to reduce the driveway area five to ten feet and replace it with a landscaped area. He clarified that additional paving will be added. Planner Bradley clarified that there is a small area of paving proposed, including a small landscape box. Commissioner Kaplan asked if consideration was given to placing the second story over the existing structure instead of building a tower? Mr. Peyvan stated that his clients would like to take advantage of the dead space and create additional living area. He felt that the design is attractive and well harmonized to the existing home. COMMISSIONERS KAPLAN/PATRICK MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:52 P.M. Commissioner Kaplan did not agree with the concept that every inch of space has to be filled with building even if allowed by code. She found that this was an unusual and odd design, one that she did not care for. She said that she did not support the tower element in the middle of the structure with a garage being stuck at the end. Commissioner Murakami said that he did not usually oppose two story additions but that he did not like how the tower element sticks straight out. He understood that there are factors such as cost that would make this an economical design. However, he did not believe that the design would look good. He said that he would like to see the structure over the main roofline to balance the design effect. Therefore, he could not support the application. Commissioner Patrick concurred with the comments expressed by her fellow Commissioners. She expressed concern with the balcony off the master bedroom overlooking the neighbor's yard as it may be intrusive. She also expressed concern with the expanse appearance of concrete from the street as the design appears to be a box on top PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 8 - of a box. She did not believe that the design was compatible with the other homes in the neighborhood. Commissioner Martlage concurred with the comments expressed by the other Commissioners. She did not believe that the second story is an issue as there are other two story homes in the neighborhood. She felt that the design was obtrusive. Commissioner Page also agreed with the comments expressed. He expressed concern with the expanse of driveway and recommended that it be reduced. He felt that there may be a better way to blend in the design, especially as it relates to the tower element. He stated his appreciation of the perspective drawing. However, he said that no other drawings showed him the entire house to give him a better sense of the design. He said that he could not support the design as it has a tower appearance. Vice-chairwoman Bernald agreed with the comments expressed by the Commission. She said that the Commission has seen remodels that have incorporated second story additions that have been designed beautifully and not designed as an after thought as this application appears to be. Director Walgren said that substantial and specific design changes have been recommended by the Commission. He said that there are two options available: 1) denial of the application which would require the resubmittal of an application and payment of new fees; or 2) continuance of this item for redesign, incorporating the addition over the main story of the structure and reducing the lot coverage for the proposed driveway and turn around area. COMMISSIONERS MARTLAGE/PAGE MOVED TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Saghezchi stated his concurrence to a continuance. IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE COMMISSION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO FEBRUARY 24, 1999. DIRECTOR ITEMS Director Walgren addressed the following items: - A letter is being sent to a property owner located at the end of Garrod Road relating to the removal of a Coast Live Oak tree (informational item to the Planning Commission). - The city is in receipt of the Environmental Initial Study for the proposed Saratoga Elementary School Expansion and that this study has been distributed to the Commission in its packet, noting that a cover memo has been distributed to commissions expressing interest in this project (i.e., Planning, Heritage Preservation and Public Safety Commissions). He stated that there is a short window period to respond to the Initial Study. He noted that the School Board did not elect to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and decided to use the initial study process to determine that an EIR is not necessary. He requested that any concerns or comments to be forwarded to the School District be considered at the February 10 public hearing. A meeting has been scheduled for the Heritage Preservation Commission on Tuesday morning, February 9, 1999 to forward comments relating to the architecture of the building and the removal of two large eucalyptus trees. The Public Safety Commission is scheduled to meet Tuesday in a joint meeting with the Council to address their concerns relating to the traffic and circulation mitigation plan. These comments will be put together and forwarded to the School Board at the end of that week. - This week, staff received a second packet from the School District expressing their agreement to a joint PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 9 - meeting with the City Council, the Planning Commission or anyone else interested in meeting so that the project can be explained. Staff is working toward scheduling this meeting. Staff will forward this meeting date to all parties. He further informed the Commission that the school district is now willing to come before the Heritage Preservation Commission in a formal meeting to receive its recommendation on the property listed on the city's heritage resource inventory. This meeting is scheduled February 9, 1999. Vice-chairwoman Bernald noted that there appears to be a lot of soil proposed to be removed from the site. She asked who would be addressing the impact of moving all the soil? Director Walgren informed the Commission that staff will be responding to the soil removal, including the issue of soil fill handling. He clarified that the School Board would not be making a presentation before the Commission. He informed the Commission that the City Council will be discussing this issue at its next meeting and that he anticipates that a meeting with the School District would be scheduled at that time. Commissioner Patrick noted that the letter requests that each Commissioner contact Superintendent Dr. Gardner to arrange appointments. Director Walgren recommended that meetings not be scheduled until after the Council discusses this issue. Director Walgren said that several items were raised at the last meeting dealing with code enforcement issues that have since been addressed. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Kaplan reported on the following: - Requested that staff find out why the Hemingway Cat Hospital located on Saratoga/Sunnyvale Road has had a large boarded up area for months. Director Walgren indicated that he has referred this item to the building inspector and that he would report back to the Commission at a later date. - She reported that on a C-Span program, Richard Moe, president for the Trust for Historic Preservation, explained that "Downtowns are back". Vice-chairwoman Bernald said that the enclosed area outside of La Fondue has pull-down awnings used for inclement weather. She asked if building permits were required for the awning? Director Walgren said that the outdoor patio was approved as part of the use permit for the restaurant. COMMUNICATIONS Written - City Council Minutes dated January 6, 1999 - Notices for Planning Commission Meeting of February 10, 1999 - Letter to Rathin Neogy Re: Removed Tree - Saratoga Elementary School Initial Study ADJOURNMENT TO STUDY SESSION PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999 PAGE - 10 - There being no further business, Vice-chairwoman Bernald adjourned the meeting to a Study Session at 9:10 p.m. to review/discuss the following applications: 1. DR-98-060 (389-34-003) - YAMAOKA DEVELOPMENT, 18180 Sage Ct.; Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 4,829 sq. ft. residence on Lot 1 of the Fitzsimmons subdivision. The height of the proposed residence is 18 feet from natural grade. The site is 24,052 sq. ft. DR-98-061 (389-34-003) - YAMAOKA DEVELOPMENT, 18625 Sage Ct.; Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 4,752 sq. ft. residence on Lot 2 of Fitzsimmons subdivision. The height of the proposed residence is 19 feet from natural grade. The site is 24,004 sq. ft. DR-98-062 (389-34-003) YAMAOKA DEVELOPMENT, 18587 Sage Ct.; Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 4,450 sq. ft. residence on Lot 3 of the Fitzsimmons subdivision. The height of the proposed residence is 19 feet from natural grade. The site is 20,013 sq. ft. DR-98-063 (389-34-003) YAMAOKA DEVELOPMENT, 18380 Sage Ct.; Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 4,517 sq. ft. residence on Lot 4 of the Fitzsimmons subdivision. The height of the proposed residence is 18 feet from natural grade. The site is 20,223 sq. ft. DR-98-064 (389-34-003) YAMAOKA DEVELOPMENT, 18288 Sage Ct.; Request for Design Review approval to construct a new 4,516 sq. ft. residence on Lot 5 of the Fitzsimmons subdivision. The height of the proposed residence is 18 feet from natural grade. The site is 20,875 sq. ft. (CONTINUED FROM 1/27/99) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Irma Torrez Minutes Clerk