Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-10-2023 Planning Commission Agenda Packet
Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 1 of 2 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 10, 2023 7:00 P.M. - PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Civic Theater | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Public Participation Information In accordance with Saratoga’s Remote Public Participation Policy, members of the public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed below or via remote attendance using the Zoom information below. 1. Accessing the meeting via Zoom • https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82652375945 (Webinar ID 826 5237 5945) • Calling 1.669.900.6833 or 1.408.638.0968; OR 2. Viewing the meeting on Saratoga Community Access Television Channel 15 (Comcast Channel 15, AT&T UVerse Channel 99) and calling the numbers listed above; OR 3. Viewing online at http://saratoga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?publish_id=2 and calling the numbers listed above. Written Communication Comments can be submitted in writing at www.saratoga.ca.us/pc. Written communications will be provided to the members of the Planning Commission and included in the Agenda Packet and/or in supplemental meeting materials. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of April 12, 2023. Recommended Action: Approve Minutes of April 12, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. This law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications. REPORT ON APPEAL RIGHTS Any interested person objecting to the whole, or any portion of decision on this Agenda, may file an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision. The City Council conducts de novo review of appeals. 2. NEW BUSINESS Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 2 of 2 2.1 Finding of General Plan Conformity FY 2023-2024 Capital Improvement Program Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-006 finding the Capital Improvement Program projects proposed for Fiscal Year 23-24 conform to the Saratoga General Plan. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.1 Application FER23-0001; 12655 Saratoga Avenue (386-17-056); Shloke Hajela – The applicant is requesting a Fence Exception for a 6-foot-tall fence and gate to be located on the front property line where 3 feet is allowed. The site is zoned R-1-10,000 with a General Plan Designation of M-10 (Medium Density Residential). Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-005 to deny application FER23-0001 for a Fence Exception at 12655 Saratoga Avenue. 3.2 Application PDR22-0022/ARB22-0106; 19175 Monte Vista Drive; (397-09-013) Alex Byer and Isha Clark (Applicant) - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 6,001 square foot two story single-family residence (maximum height 26’) with a 4,996 square foot basement and 818 square foot detached accessory dwelling unit (maximum height 15’). Twelve protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-40,000 with a General Plan Designation of Residential Very Low Density (RVLD). Staff Contact: Nicole Johnson (408) 868-1209 or njohnson@saratoga.ca.us. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 23-004 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. 4. DIRECTOR ITEMS 5. COMMISSION ITEMS 6. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF THE AGENDA, DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET, COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT I, Frances Reed, Administrative Analyst for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission was posted and available for review on May 5, 2023 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Signed this 5th day of May 2023 at Saratoga, California. Frances Reed, Administrative Analyst. In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Planning Commission by City staff in connection with this agenda, copies of materials distributed to the Planning Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda, and materials distributed to the Planning Commission by staff after the posting of the agenda are available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us or available at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at bavrit@saratoga.ca.us or calling 408.868.1216 as soon as possible before the meeting. The City will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA title II]. Saratoga Planning Commission Draft Minutes – Page 1 of 2 DRAFT MINUTES WEDNESDAY APRIL 12, 2023 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Chair Zheng called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chair Herman Zheng, Vice Chair Clinton Brownley, Commissioners Jojo Choi, Paul Germeraad, Anjali Kausar, Ping, Li and Razi Mohiuddin ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner Frances Reed, Administrative Analyst 1. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR KAUSAR/MOHIUDDIN MOVED TO NOMINATE CLINTON BROWNLEY FOR COMMISSION CHAIR. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, GERMERAAD, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ZHENG/LI MOVED TO NOMINATE JOJO CHOI FOR COMMISSION VICE-CHAIR. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, GERMERAAD, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 8, 2023. Recommended Action: Approve Minutes of Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 8, 2023. KAUSAR/MOHIUDDIN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 8, 2023 MEETING. MOTION PASSED. AYES: BROWNLEY, CHOI, GERMERAAD, KAUSAR, LI, MOHIUDDIN, ZHENG. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS: NONE 3. NEW BUSINESS 3.1 Study Session for Mixed Use District Regulations and Objective Design Standards A presentation was given by Lisa Wise and Monica Szydlik of Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. The Commission accepted the report and provided feedback. 3.2 Planning Commission Work Plan The Commission discussed the proposed Work Plan and directed staff to request budget for Planning Commission training and to forward the Work Plan to the City Council for input and 4 Saratoga Planning Commission Draft Minutes – Page 2 of 2 direction at the Joint City Council - Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for May 3, 2023. 3. DIRECTOR ITEMS Director Pedro reported that the two-story home at 18549 Devon Avenue, approved by Planning Commission on February 8, 2023 was appealed to City Council and is scheduled for a public hearing on April 19, 2023. 4. COMMISSION ITEMS Chair Brownley and the Commission welcomed new Commissioner Paul Germeraad. 5. ADJOURNMENT KAUSAR moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 PM. Minutes respectfully submitted: Frances Reed, Administrative Analyst City of Saratoga 5 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: May 10, 2023 Application: Finding of General Plan Conformity FY 2023-2024 Capital Improvement Program Location / APN: Citywide Owner / Applicant: City of Saratoga From: John Cherbone, Public Works Director Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 23-006 finding the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for Fiscal Year 23-24 conform to the Saratoga General Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION One new capital project is proposed in the upcoming Fiscal Year 23-24. The proposed project has been reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual budget process. California Government Code Section 65401 states that the local planning agency should report on the conformity of the CIP with the agency’s General Plan. However, not all projects have a relationship to a policy in the General Plan such as maintenance work and building remodels. For FY 23-24 the proposed project is dedicated to upgrading existing infrastructure (maintenance). Attached to this memo is a project description for the proposed capital project. Staff reviewed the proposed project and found that it follows the City’s General Plan policies therefore a conformity finding can be supported. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. Project Summary 6 RESOLUTION NO. 23-006 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT THE NEW FY 23-24 CIP PROJECTS CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, California Government Section 65401 requires the local planning agency to report on the conformity of proposed public works with the adopted general plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the materials submitted by the Public Works Director which include a description of each capital project. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby find that the new Capital Improvement Program projects conform to the Goals and Policies of the City of Saratoga General Plan in that the various improvement projects implement the programs and objectives outlined in the various General Plan Elements. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 10th day of May 2023 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Clinton Brownley Chair, Planning Commission 7 20230210 2023-24 Preliminary Proposed Budget Capital Improvement Program Project Nomination Project Name: Annual Corrugated Metal Pipe Rehabilitation CIP Category Streets CIP – Bridges and Retaining Walls Project No. Description This Project will fund the ongoing rehabilitation of existing deteriorating corrugated metal pipe (CMP) that is used for the storm drain system throughout the City. The aging CMP, once it is deteriorated and compromised, will cause an underground cavity which can collapse and cause underground soil erosion that results in sinkhole incidents. In January 2023, two major storm drain failures occurred during the storms due to the failed CMP. The first occurred in Parker Ranch adjacent to a city trail. The storm drain CMP failed, causing severe erosion to the storm drain outfall and trail. The trail segment has been temporary closed until repairs are completed. Parker Ranch embankment is scheduled to be repaired late February. The second failure occurred to a culvert CMP underneath Pierce Road near Pike Road. The failure caused severe erosion to the roadway embankment. This incident was deemed an emergency repair to save Pierce Road from complete failure. Pierce Road roadway embankment repair work was completed on January 27th. Both these locations will require CMP replacement soon. The City Storm Drain Master Plan, which is currently under development by Sandis Engineering, calls out future repair work to CMPs. This will require expenditures in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Project financials Revenues Expenditures Funding Sources Sources Amount July 1, 2022 carry forward 0 0 Transfers from General Fund 2022-23 appropriations (includes budget adjustments) 0 0 Since inception (Excludes carry forward appropriations) 0 2022-23 appropriations, amended (Includes carry forward appropriations) 0 Amended 2022-23 budget (Includes carry forward appropriations) 0 0 Preliminary 2023-24 budget request $300,000 $300,000 5-year projected requirements, unfunded TBD City Council Adopted Strategic Goals & Priorities CIP Priority Factors City Leadership & Fiscal Stewardship Health and safety issue Public Safety X Imminent failure of structure/system X Facilities & Infrastructure X Short-term cost of repair vs. long-term cost of replacement X Community Heritage Availability of external funding source Community Engagement Federal or State mandate Environmental Sustainability Other: 8 20230210 Additional Resource Requirements Project Milestones Project Manager Macedonio Nunez, City Engineer 408-868-1218 mnunez@saratoga.ca.us Project identified and proposed 2023-24 Project Team City Council approved and funded Operating budget impacts Design 9 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 12655 SARATOGA AVENUE Meeting Date: May 10, 2023 Application: FER23-0001 Address/APN: 12655 Saratoga Avenue / 386-17-056 Property Owner: Shloke Hajela and Anshika Srivastava From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Report Prepared By: Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner 10 Report to the Planning Commission 12655 Saratoga Avenue– Application # FER23-0001 May 10, 2023 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a fence exception for a 6-feet tall metal fence and gates to be located along the front property line and a 6-feet tall wood fence to be located along the side lot lines within the front setback area and extending up to 12’ into the public right of way. Fences located between the front property line and the front setback area within 10-feet from the front property line are limited to a height of 3-feet and fences are not permitted in the public right of way without an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department. A fence exception is requested as the 6-feet tall fence is located on the front property line when the maximum height for a fence in this location is 3-feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 23-005 to deny application FER23-0001 for a Fence Exception at 12655 Saratoga Avenue. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-29.090(a), Fence Exception approval by the Planning Commission is required to grant an exception to the regulations regarding fences. PROJECT DATA General Plan Designation: M-10 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning: R-1-10,000 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The subject property is located at 12655 Saratoga Avenue. Surrounding uses include single-family homes on similar sized parcels. A design review application for a new 3,361 square foot one-story residence was approved on August 29, 2002 for the vacant adjacent lot at 12688 Sun Valley Court – the building permit is under review. On February 8, 2021, an Administrative Design Review application (ADR20-0020) was approved for a new one-story single-family residence for the subject site and construction of the residence was completed on January 4, 2023. The approved plans did not indicate any proposed fencing to be constructed at the front of the site. A 6-feet tall wood fence along the side property lines within the front setback area as well as the 6- foot fences projecting into the public right of way are existing as they were recently constructed by the property owner without prior approval by the City. Project Description Fence Exception Request Fences located in a front setback area are limited to a height of 3-feet. City Code Section 15-29.040 allows fences with heights greater than 3-feet to be located within a front setback area on lots adjacent to certain arterial streets for the purpose of noise mitigation which includes the portion of Saratoga Avenue that passes in front of the subject site. However, these fences must located no closer than 10-feet back from the front property line and are limited to 8-feet in height plus one additional foot of fence height for each additional 5-feet of setback from the front property line, up to a maximum of 11 Report to the Planning Commission 12655 Saratoga Avenue– Application # FER23-0001 May 10, 2023 Page | 3 10-feet. The development plans (Attachment #3) include a dashed line setback 10-feet from the front property line to indicate where a taller fence to mitigate noise could be located. As mentioned in the preceding paragraph, an 8-feet tall fence located ten feet behind the front property line to mitigate noise would be allowed on the subject site. In lieu of this requirement, the applicant is requesting a fence exception to locate a 6-feet tall black colored metal fence on the front property line adjacent to Saratoga Avenue with an overall length of approximately 129-feet. The fence will be composed of four-inch-wide metal slats with a one inch spacing between the slats for visibility. A photo of a similar fence to the one proposed by the applicant is included as Attachment #2. The site has a circular driveway with two access points to Saratoga Avenue and the proposed fence would include two 6- feet tall sliding gates across both driveways. Per Sections 15-29.010(a)(2) and (d)(1) of the City Code, wrought iron entrance gates up to 5-feet tall with openings to permit visibility that are no less than four inches apart can be located within the front setback area. The proposed metal entrance gates are 6-feet tall and composed of metal slats that are one inch apart, which do not meet the code, and are included in the fence exception request. A 6-feet tall solid wood fence is proposed for the side lot lines within the front setback area. The applicant is also proposing a 3-feet tall wood fence that would project beyond the front property line and up to 12-feet into the public right of way that would not be subject to a fence exception but would require an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department. Below is a summary of the fence exception request: 1. A 129-linear feet, 6-feet tall metal fence to be located on the front property line when the maximum fence height for this location is three feet. 2. Two 6-feet tall metal entrance gates to be located on the front property with one-inch-wide openings when the maximum gate height for this location is 5-feet with openings of no less than four inches. 3. A 6-foot-tall wood fence along both side property lines within the front setback area where the maximum height is three feet. Staff is not recommending approval of the fence exception as staff cannot make all the required findings pursuant to City Code Section 15-29.090. Furthermore, the applicant’s objective to achieve noise mitigation and privacy could be achieved with alternative means such as installation of landscaping. Staff is also recommending that the recently constructed fence projecting into the right of way that was built without benefit of prior City approval be removed. FINDINGS The findings required for issuance of a Fence Exception pursuant to City Code Section 15-29.090 are set forth below. The Applicant has not met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: 12 Report to the Planning Commission 12655 Saratoga Avenue– Application # FER23-0001 May 10, 2023 Page | 4 1. The subject fence will be compatible with other similar structures in the neighborhood. This finding cannot be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence is not consistent with other fences in the neighborhood. Fences to mitigate noise within setbacks areas for properties located on Saratoga Avenue between Fruitvale Avenue and Lawrence Expressway can exceed the height limits as prescribed in the City Code. Fences for properties with either an exterior side setback or a rear setback that abuts Saratoga Avenue can be 8-feet at the property line. Fences for properties within a front setback that abut Saratoga Avenue (including the subject site) must be no taller than 3’. However, it can be 8-feet in height located no closer than 10- feet from the front property line. All the single-family parcels within the neighborhood and on both sides of Saratoga Avenue between Cox Avenue and Kosich Drive with either an exterior side setback or a rear setback that abuts Saratoga Avenue have existing wooden fences between 6-feet and 8-feet and height which are consistent with the City Code. The proposed 6-feet tall metal fence to be located on the front property line is not compatible with other structures in the neighborhood as it is not consistent in design and/or materials as all existing fences are made of wood. In addition, not one property with a front setback area that abuts Saratoga Avenue similar to the subject site has a fence taller than 3-feet at the front property line and the majority of properties have no fences within the front setback area. 2. The entirety of the subject fence will be constructed of materials that are of high quality, exhibit superior craftsmanship, and that are durable. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the entirety of the fence and gates located on the front property line would be constructed of metal which is a durable material and would be able to weather the outdoor environment. 3. The modification will not impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood in which the fence is located. This finding cannot be made in the affirmative in that the proposed metal fence is not consistent with neighboring properties in terms of design, materials, and placement. Due to this inconsistency of appearance and location, the proposed fence would detract from the character and integrity of the existing neighborhood. 4. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental or injurious to the property, adjacent neighbors, or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is located. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence would not be detrimental or injurious to the property or adjacent properties. Per City Code Section 15- 29.010 (f), for visibility purposes no fence taller than three feet shall be located within a triangle having sides twelve feet in length from either side of a driveway where it intersects with the edge of pavement shall exceed three feet in height - the proposed fence plan illustrates that the edge of the Saratoga Avenue pavement is 22-feet beyond the front property line and the fence will not impact visibility. 5. The granting of the exception will not create a safety hazard for vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic and does not obstruct the safe access to and from adjacent properties. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence would provide the required sight distances adjacent to the subject site. The proposed fence would not interfere 13 Report to the Planning Commission 12655 Saratoga Avenue– Application # FER23-0001 May 10, 2023 Page | 5 with visibility for pedestrian, bicyclist, or vehicular traffic within the area. The fence would also contain a Knox padlock that would provide site access to emergency personnel. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence A public notice was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed Fence Exception Request is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15303) “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 23-005 2. Photo of proposed fence 3. Project Plans 14 At RESOLUTION NO: 23-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING FENCE EXCEPTION FER23-0001 12655 SARATOGA AVENUE (386-17-056) WHEREAS, on March 2, 2023 an application was submitted by Shloke Hajela requesting a fence exception for a six feet tall metal fence and gates to be located along the front property line and a six feet tall wood fence to be located along the side lot lines within the front setback area where only 3-feet tall fences and 5-feet tall gates are allowed. The site is zoned R-1-10,000 with a General Plan Designation of Medium Density Residential (M-10). WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2023 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The proposed Fence Exception Request is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15303) “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Section 3: The project is not consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Policy 13.1 which provides that the City utilize the design review process and the California Environmental Quality Act in the review of proposed projects to promote high quality design, to ensure compliance with applicable regulations, to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties and use, and to minimize environmental impacts; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The project is not consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the subject fence is not compatible with other similar structures in the neighborhood; the entirety of the subject fence will be constructed of materials that are of high quality, exhibit superior craftsmanship, and that are durable; the modification will impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood in which the fence is located; the granting of the exception will not be detrimental or injurious to the property, adjacent neighbors, or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is 15 12655 Saratoga Avenue Application # FER22-0001 Resolution #23-005 Page | 2 located; and the granting of the exception will not create a safety hazard for vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic and does not obstruct the safe access to and from adjacent properties. Section 5: Unless appealed to the City Council pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the dates of adoption’ The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby denies FER23-0001 located at 12655 Saratoga Avenue (APN 386-17-056), subject to the Findings attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 10th day of May 2023 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Clinton Brownley Chair, Planning Commission 16 12655 Saratoga Avenue Application # FER22-0001 Resolution #23-005 Page | 3 Exhibit 1 FINDINGS OF DENIAL FER23-0001 12655 SARAOGA AVENUE (386-17-056) 1. The subject fence will be compatible with other similar structures in the neighborhood. This finding cannot be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence is not consistent with other fences in the neighborhood. Fences to mitigate noise within setbacks areas for properties located on Saratoga Avenue between Fruitvale Avenue and Lawrence Expressway can exceed the height limits as prescribed in the City Code. Fences for properties with either an exterior side setback or a rear setback that abuts Saratoga Avenue can be eight feet at the property line. Fences for properties within a front setback that abuts Saratoga Avenue can also be eight feet in height but must be located no closer than ten feet from the front property line. All the single-family parcels within the neighborhood and on both sides of Saratoga Avenue between Cox Avenue and Kosich Drive with either an exterior side setback or a rear setback that abuts Saratoga Avenue have existing wooden fences between six feet and eight feet and height which are consistent with the City Code The proposed six feet tall metal fence is not compatible with other structures in the neighborhood as it is not consistent in design and/or materials as all existing fences are made of wood. In addition, not one property with a front setback area that abuts Saratoga Avenue similar to the subject site has a fence taller than three feet at the front property line and the majority of properties have no fences within the front setback area. 2. The entirety of the subject fence will be constructed of materials that are of high quality, exhibit superior craftsmanship, and that are durable. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the entirety of the fence and gates located on the front property line would be constructed of metal which is a durable material and would be able to weather the outdoor environment. 3. The modification will not impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood in which the fence is located. This finding cannot be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence is not consistent with neighboring properties in terms of design, materials, and placement. Due to this inconsistency of appearance and location, the proposed fence would detract from the character and integrity of the existing neighborhood. 4. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental or injurious to the property, adjacent neighbors, or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is located. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence would not be detrimental or injurious to the property or adjacent properties. Per City Code Section 15- 29.010 (f), for visibility purposes no fence taller than three feet shall be located within a triangle having sides twelve feet in length from either side of a driveway where it intersects 17 12655 Saratoga Avenue Application # FER22-0001 Resolution #23-005 Page | 4 with the edge of pavement shall exceed three feet in height - the proposed fence plan illustrates that the edge of the Saratoga Avenue pavement is 22 feet beyond the front property line and the fence will not impact visibility. 5. The granting of the exception will not create a safety hazard for vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic and does not obstruct the safe access to and from adjacent properties. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed fence would provide the required sight distances adjacent to the subject site. The proposed fence would not interfere with visibility for pedestrian, bicyclist, or vehicular traffic within the area. The fence would also contain a Knox padlock that would provide site access to emergency personnel. 18 19 FENCE PLAN ( SHLOKE HAJELA RESIDENCE: 12655 Saratoga Ave, Saratoga CA; APN: 386-17-056) FENCE EXCEPTION NOTES 15-29.090 Fence exceptions. (a) The owner(s) of a fence, or proposed fence, including any gates or pilasters attached thereto, may request that the Planning Commission grant an exception to the regulations regarding fences. The Planning Commission may grant this exception if all of the following findings are made: (1)The subject fence will be compatible with other similar structures in the neighborhood; THE PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES HEIGHTS ARE SIMILAR TO OTHER PROPERTIES ON SARATOGA AVENUE (2) The entirety of the subject fence will be constructed of materials that are of high quality, exhibit superior craftsmanship, and that are durable; THE PROPOSED FENCE WILL USE HIGH QUALITY AND DURABLE BLACK PAINTED WROUGHT IRON (3)The modification will not impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood in which the fence is located; THE PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES WILL HAVE SIMILAR MATERIALS/ DESIGN FOR DURABILITY AND AESTHETICS, WHICH WILL MAINTAIN THE ESTABLISHED CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD. (4)The granting of the exception will not be detrimental or injurious to the property, adjacent neighbors, or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is located; THE PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES WILL PROVIDE NEEDED SAFETY FOR KIDS AND WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES (5)The granting of the exception will not create a safety hazard for vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic and does not obstruct the safe access to and from adjacent properties. THE PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES DO NOT CREATE ANY SAFETY HAZARDS AND THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE WILL BE MAINTAINED FROM ADJACENT DRIVEWAY. THE VISIBILITY OF PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES WILL BE SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED BY WISTERIA VINES ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE FENCE. 20’-0”16’-0”PROPOSED SLIDING WROUGHT IRON GATES 6’ HIGH 20’-0”PROPOSED 6’ HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCEPROPOSED 6’ HIGH 4”x4” WROUGHT IRON FENCE POST PROPOSED 6’ HIGH 3’ WIDE WROUGHT IRON PEDESTRIAN GATE PROPOSED 6’ HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCEPROPOSED 6’ HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE16’-0”APPROVED KNOX PADLOCK LOCATION EDGE OF PAVEMENTENTRY GATE ELEVATION PEDESTRIAN GATE ELEVATION 3’-0” PEDESTRIAN GATE: WROUGHT IRON PEDESTRIAN GATE TO MATCH THE VEHICULAR ENTRY GATE6’-0”6’-0”16’-0” 4”x 4” METAL POST, MAX 8’ O.C SPACING 4”x 1” HORIZONTAL WROUGHT IRON PLANKS with MAX 1” SPACING IN BETWEEN FOR VISIBILITY ENTRY/EXIT GATE: SLIDING WROUGHT IRON GATE 6’-0”Fence heightPROPOSED 6’ HIGH 4”x4” WOOD FENCE POST PROPOSED 6’ HIGH BOARD ON BOARD WOOD FENCE PROPOSED 6’ HIGH 4”x4” WOOD FENCE POST PROPOSED 6’ HIGH BOARD ON BOARD WOOD FENCE FRONT PROPERTY LINE Fence Post HeightGate/Post HeightFRONT SETBACK LINE 25’-0” FRONT SETBACK PROPOSED 3’ HIGH BOARD ON BOARD WOOD FENCE PROPOSED 3’ HIGH 4”x4” WOOD FENCE POST 12’-0”12’-0”12’-0”12’-0”12’-0”12’-0”12’-0”12’-0” NO FENCE OR GATES PLANNED IN THE TRIANGLES WITH 12’ SIDES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAYS WHERE IT INTERSECTS THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT 10’-0” FROM PROPERTY LINE 6’ HIGH, 51” WIDE WOODEN GATE WITH 1’ LATTICE 6’ HIGH BOARD ON BOARD WOOD FENCE WITH 1’ LATTICE 6’ HIGH, 51” WIDE WOODEN GATE WITH 1’ LATTICE 6’ HIGH BOARD ON BOARD WOOD FENCE WITH 1’ LATTICE 7’ HIGH WOOD FENCE POST 7’ HIGH WOOD FENCE POST 20 SITE PLAN ( SHLOKE HAJELA RESIDENCE: 12655 Saratoga Ave, Saratoga CA; APN: 386-17-056) 21 LANDSCAPE PLAN (IN FRONT OF PROPOSED FENCE) LAGESTROEMIA NATCHEZ (Crape Myrtle) ULMUS PARVIFOLIA (Drake Elm) WISTERIA VINE WHITE STONES TURF 22 CITY OF SARATOGA Memorandum To: Saratoga Planning Commission From: Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner Date: May 10, 2023 Subject: Application FER23-0001; 12655 Saratoga Avenue - Supplemental Attachment No. 1 Please see attached email public comment received May 9, 2023. 23 Frances Reed From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Tuesday, May 9, 2023 2:38 PM To:Clinton Brownley; Anjali Kausar; Razi Mohiuddin; Herman Zheng; Jonathan Choi; Ping Li; Paul Germaraad; Debbie Pedro; Britt Avrit; Frances Reed Subject:Online Form Submittal: Planning Commission Comments Form CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Planning Commission Comments Form Your Name Drew Morrish Phone Number Email Address Comments I received notice regarding the application FER23-0001 for the applicant to obtain a Fence Exception for a 6-foot tall fence to be located on his front property line on 12655 Saratoga Avenue. Unfortunately I cannot make the planning meeting, but would appreciate if my comments below are passed to the commission and taken into consideration at the meeting. If the Saratoga Planning Commission allows this exception, then it is highly likely that many of the houses up and down Saratoga Avenue will also apply for a similar exception, which will drastically affect the users and residents alike in a very negative way. Such an exception will create a dangerous precedent. To understand my concern, a few years ago, my son was cycling to Prospect School along Saratoga Ave. A driver pulled out of a driveway, and in the drivers haste to get out onto the busy Saratoga Ave roadway, my son was knocked off of his bike, damaging the cycle, but fortunately not harming him. In the years since, Saratoga has become even busier, a trend that will continue when the planned developments for Costco etc are completed. The houses along Saratoga all have a set back from the road which enables the residents full visibility when pulling out from their driveway onto the road. It is important that the driver can see not only cars approaching, but also pedestrians, parents with strollers and young children, runners (like myself) and cyclists. 24 If tall fencing is extended to the front property line, as is being proposed in FER23-0001, I am very much afraid that the lowered visibility will result in greatly increased danger to sidewalk and bike lane users, as the front of the vehicle will actually have to cross onto the sidewalk before the driver can see far enough down the road to allow a safe transition onto the Avenue, and therein lies the danger. The accident that my son experienced could - and most likely will - happen again, maybe with a much more serious outcome. From another perspective, it is equally important to allow sidewalk and bike lane users the chance to see cars approaching the exit of their driveways, especially now that many cars are silent electric vehicles that cannot be heard. Eliminating the 10ft setback will greatly impact this visibility. The applicant has already constructed fencing that reaches to the sidewalk, counter to code requirements. This fencing should be removed back to the 10ft setback line in keeping with all other houses on Saratoga Avenue. This exception should not be allowed due to the dangerous precedent it will create. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 25 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: May 10, 2023 Application: PDR22-0022/ARB22-0106 Address/APN: 19175 Monte Vista Drive/397-09-013 Property Owner: Alex Byer and Isha Clark From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Report Prepared By: Nicole Johnson, Senior Planner 26 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 6,001 square foot two story single-family residence with a 4,996 square foot basement and 818 square foot detached accessory dwelling unit. Twelve protected trees are proposed for removal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 23-004 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060(a) (1)(3) and (6) approval by the Planning Commission is required as the project is a new multi-story main structure and exceeds 18’ in height and the cumulative floor area on the property exceeds 6,000 square feet. PROJECT DATA Gross/Net Site Area: 43,725 sq. ft. gross/40,425 sq. ft. net Average Site Slope: Less than 10% General Plan Designation: RVLD (Residential Very Lot Density) Zoning: R-1-40,000 (Single Family Residential) Proposed Allowed/Required Site Coverage Residence w/Garages ADU Driveway/Pool/Patios Total Proposed 5,791 sq. ft. 818 sq. ft. 8,184 sq. ft. 14,793 sq. ft. (34%) 16,103 sq. ft. (37%) * Floor Area Residence Garages ADU Basement (exempt) Total Floor Area 5,055 sq. ft. 946 sq. ft. 818 sq. ft. (4,996) sq. ft. 6,819 sq. ft.* 6,820 sq. ft.* Height 26’ 26’ Main Residence Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: ADU (rear of the property): Right Side: Rear: 1st Floor 2nd Floor 46’10” 46’10” 20’ 26’6” 28’6” 118’6” 109’9” 126’3” 10’ N/A 42’10” N/A 1st Floor 2nd Floor 30’ 30’ 20’ 25’ 20’ 25’ 50’ 60’ 4’ N/A 4’ N/A Grading Cut: 600 CY Fill: 310 CY Export: 290 CY No grading limit in the R-1-40,000 zoning district * Includes one-time 800 sq.ft. allowance for ADU per City code Section 15-56.025 (5) (b) 27 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Page | 3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project site is located at 19175 Monte Vista Drive in the R-40,000 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The 43,725 square foot site is relatively level. Surrounding uses on all sides include a mix of single story and two story single-family homes on similar sized parcels. Project Description The architectural style of the project can best be described as modern. The first floor is 4,051 square foot home consists of an entry, living room, library, kitchen, laundry room, a bedroom suite, the primary bedroom suite, and a two car garage as well as a separate one car garage. The 1,003 square foot second floor consists of two bedroom suites. The basement is 4,996 square feet and includes a bedroom suite, storage/mechanical room, gym, playroom, and a study. The detached ADU consists of 818 square feet and includes a foyer, living room, kitchen, bathroom, powder room, and bedroom. The applicant has provided a color and materials board. (Attachment 5) Below is a list of the proposed exterior materials. Detail Colors/Materials Exterior Khaki/Smooth Plaster Windows / Trim Black/Metal Front door/Garage door Black/ Metal Roof Dark Grey/Slate Trees The project arborist inventoried a total of thirty five (35) protected trees on the property. Twelve (12) protected trees are proposed for removal with this project. A magnolia, valley oak, four (4) coast live oaks, three (3) coast redwoods, two (2) velvet ash and a California sycamore. These trees are in poor condition or are in conflict with the project. A description of the trees to be preserved and the tree protection plan are included in the Arborist Report. (Attachment 2) Landscaping The installation of front yard landscaping is required prior to building permit final inspection. The applicant has obtained WELO clearance during the review process. The project includes a condition of approval that landscaping is to be installed per City Code Section 15-12.095. FINDINGS Design Review The findings required for issuance of Design Review approval pursuant to City Code Section 15- 45.080 are set forth below. 28 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Page | 4 a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the building site is relatively level and no grading is required to construct the project. The development is appropriate to the site’s natural constraints with single family homes around it. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the City Arborist has made the findings for the removal of twelve protected trees. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the second story has a proposed height that does not exceed the maximum allowable height for a single-family residence and proposed setbacks that are in compliance with the minimum required by the zoning district. No community view sheds are in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and the height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence complies with the maximum height limitation of 26 feet allowable for residential structures; the building has varying architectural forms and exterior materials to break up the appearance of mass, the building setbacks comply with those required for the R-1-40,000 zoning district. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project includes a condition of approval that front yard landscaping is to be installed prior to the building department final inspection. Staff will ensure that this landscaping is complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. The City Code requires that at least 50% of the front setback area be landscaped. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. 29 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Page | 5 This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the home is similar in mass with the homes in the neighborhood and will not cast shadows on the adjacent properties which could impair the adjacent property owner’s opportunity to utilize solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot as the average slope is less than 10% nor will it affect any significant hillside feature or community viewshed. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence The Community Development Department mailed public notices to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. The applicant reached out to the adjacent neighbors during the review process and provided one completed neighbor notification from. To date, additional public comments have not been received. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of a single-family residence and small structures in a residential area. The project, as proposed, is for the construction of a new residence in a suburban, residential area. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 23-004 2. Arborist Report dated April 5, 2023 3. Public Comments 4. Story Pole Certification 5. Material Board 6. Site Plan and Massing Diagram 30 RESOLUTION NO: 23-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PDR22-0022 AND ARBORIST REVIEW ARB22-0106 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE (APN 397-09-013) WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022 an application was submitted by Alex Byer and Isha Clark requesting Design Review approval for a new 6,001 square foot two story single-family residence (maximum height 26’) with a 4,996 square foot basement and 818 square foot detached accessory dwelling unit (maximum height 15’). Twelve protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-40,000 with a General Plan Designation of Residential Very Low Density (RVLD). WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2023, 2023 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3(a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of a single- family residence and small structures in a residential area. Section 3: The proposed residence is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design Review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings; Safety Element Site and Drainage Policy 3 which provides that the City shall require that landscaping and site drainage plans be submitted and approved during Design Review for a residence prior to issuance of permits; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The proposed residence is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints; the porch and entry are in scale with other structures in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. 31 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves PDR22- 0022/ARB22-0106 for 19175 Monte Vista Drive (APN 397-09-013) subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 10th day of May 2023 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Clinton Brownley Chair, Planning Commission 32 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR22-0022/ARB22-0106 (397-09-013) GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 33 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5. A Building Permit must be issued, and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or the Design Review Approval will expire unless extended in accordance with the City Code. 6. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Development Plans. All proposed changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit for staff approval, a Lighting Plan for the home’s exterior and landscaped areas. Proposed exterior lighting shall be limited to full cut-off & shielded fixtures with downward directed illumination so as not to shine on adjacent properties or public right-of-way. All proposed exterior lighting shall be designed to limit illumination to the site and avoid creating glare impacts to surrounding properties. 8. In order to comply with standards that minimize impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise, construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated in these sections. 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by City staff a Construction Management Plan for the project which includes but is not limited to the following: a. Proposed construction worker parking area. b. Proposed construction hours that are consistent with City Code. c. Proposed construction/delivery vehicle staging or parking areas. d. Proposed traffic control plan with traffic control measures, any street closure, hours for delivery/earth moving or hauling, etc. To the extent possible, any deliveries, earth moving or hauling activities will be scheduled to avoid peak commute hours. e. Proposed construction material staging/storage areas. f. Location of project construction sign outlining permitted construction work hours, name of project contractor and the contact information for both homeowner and contractor. 10. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height requirements provided in City Code Section 15-29. 11. The final landscaping and irrigation plan submitted for Building Permit approval shall demonstrate how the project complies with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall consider the following: a. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that 34 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. b. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. c. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency, and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. d. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. e. Any proposed or required under grounding of utilities shall consider potential damage to roots of protected trees. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection or a bond satisfactory to the Community Development Department valued at 150% of the estimated cost of the installation of such landscaping shall be provided to the City. 12. A locking mailbox approved for use by the U.S. Postal service shall be installed and in compliance with Saratoga Municipal Code section 6-25.030. The mailbox shall be installed prior to final inspection. 13. West Valley Collection & Recycling is the exclusive roll-off and debris box provider for the City of Saratoga. FIRE DEPARTMENT 14. The owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department requirements. ARBORIST 15. All requirements in the City Arborist Approval Letter dated April 5, 2023 are hereby adopted as conditions of approval and shall be implemented as part of the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 16. The owner/applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding drainage, including but not limited to complying with the city approved Stormwater management plan. The project shall retain and/or detain any increase in design flow from the site, that is created by the proposed construction and grading project, such that adjacent down slope properties will not be negatively impacted by any increase in flow. Design must follow the current Santa Clara County Drainage Manual method criteria, as required by the building department. Retention/detention element design must follow the Drainage Manual guidelines, as required by the building department. 17. Applicant / Owner shall obtain an encroachment permit for any and all improvements in any City right-of-way or City easement including all new utilities prior to commencement 35 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 of the work to implement this Design Review. 18. Damages to driveway approach, curb and gutter, public streets, or other public improvements during construction shall be repaired prior to final inspection. 19. All new/upgraded utilities shall be installed underground. 20. Applicant / Owner shall maintain the streets, sidewalks and other right of way as well as adjacent properties, both public and private, in a clean, safe and usable condition. All spills of soil, rock or construction debris shall be removed immediately. 21. The Owner/Applicant shall incorporate adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff (e.g. landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration where possible, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs, such as Bay- Friendly Landscaping). 22. All building and construction related activities shall adhere to New Development and Construction – Best Management Practices as adopted by the City for the purpose of preventing storm water pollution: • Owner shall implement construction site inspection and control to prevent construction site discharges of pollutants into the storm drains per approved Erosion Control Plan. • The City requires the construction sites to maintain year-round effective erosion control, run-on and run-off control, sediment control, good site management, and non-storm water management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to, site grading, building, and finishing of lots) until the site is fully stabilized by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures. • City will conduct inspections to determine compliance and determine the effectiveness of the BMPs in preventing the discharge of construction pollutants into the storm drain. Owner shall be required to timely correct all actual and potential discharges observed. 23. Prior to the commencement of any earthwork/grading activities, the permittee shall arrange a pre-construction meeting. The meeting shall include the City of Saratoga Grading Inspector (408-868-1201), the grading contractor, and the project Soils Engineer. The permittee or representative shall arrange the pre-construction meeting at least 48 hours prior to the start of any earthwork activities. 24. Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans. 25. Prior to the Building final, all Public Works conditions shall be completed per approved plans. 26. Upon the completion of this project the elevation of the lowest floor including basement 36 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor and verified by the City's building inspector to be properly elevated. Such certification and verification shall be provided to the City’s Floodplain Administrator. 27. Upon completion of the rough grading work and at the final completion of the project the final grading reports are to be submitted to the City per section 16-17.150 of the City Municipal Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL 28. Complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department. b. Arborist report dated April 5, 2023 c. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. d. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages. 37 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS PDR22-0022/ARB22-0106 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE (397-09-013) Design Review The findings required for issuance of Design Review approval pursuant to City Code Section 15- 45.080 are set forth below. a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the building site is relatively level and no grading is required to construct the project. The site development is appropriate to the site’s natural constraints with single family homes around it. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the City Arborist has made the findings for the removal of twelve protected trees. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the second story has a proposed height that does not exceed the maximum allowable height for a single-family residence and proposed setbacks that are in compliance with the minimum required by the zoning district. No community view sheds are in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and the height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed residence complies with the maximum height limitation of 26 feet allowable for residential structures; the building has varying architectural forms and exterior materials to break up the appearance of mass, the building setbacks comply with those required for the R-1-40,000 zoning district. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. 38 Report to the Planning Commission 19175 Monte Vista/PDR22-022/ARB22-0106 May 10, 2023 Resolution # 23-004 Page | 4 This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project includes a condition of approval that front yard landscaping is to be installed prior to building department final inspection. Staff will ensure that this landscaping is complimentary to the neighborhood and streetscape. The City Code requires that at least 50% of the front setback area be landscaped. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the home is similar in mass with the homes in the neighborhood and will not cast shadows on the adjacent properties which could impair the adjacent property owner’s opportunity to utilize solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot as the average slope is less than 10% nor will it affect any significant hillside feature or community viewshed. 39 Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 www.saratoga.ca.us/171/trees 408.868.1276 CITY OF SARATOGA ARBORIST APPROVAL Conditions of Approval and Tree Protection Plan Prepared by Christina Fusco, City Arborist Application No. ARB22-0106 Phone: (408) 868-1276 Address: 19175 Monte Vista Drive Email: cfusco@saratoga.ca.us Owner: Alex Byer and Isha Clark APN: 397-09-013 Date: April 5, 2023 PROJECT SCOPE: The applicant has submitted plans to demolish the existing residence and construct a new home, pool and detached ADU. Twelve trees are requested for removal to construct the project. PROJECT DATA IN BRIEF: Tree security deposit – Required - $38,500 Tree protection – Required – See Conditions of Approval and attached map. Tree removals – Trees #110, 116, 122, 125, 126, 131, and 134-139 are approved for removal once building permits have been issued. Replacement trees – Required = $18,730 ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Findings and Tree Information 2 – Tree Removal Criteria 3 – Conditions of Approval 4 – Map Showing Tree Location 5 – Site Plan 1 of 11 40 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 1 FINDINGS: Tree Removals According to Section 15-50.080 of the City Code, whenever a tree is requested for removal as part of a project, certain findings must be made and specific tree removal criteria met. Eight trees are in conflict with the new house and four trees are in poor condition and should be removed for good forestry practices. They meet the City’s criteria allowing them to be removed and replaced as part of the project, once building division permits have been obtained. Attachment 2 contains the tree removal criteria for reference. Table 1: Summary of Tree Removal Criteria that are met Tree No. Species Criteria met Comments 110 Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 116 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 122 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 Poor condition Not in conflict with project 125 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 Poor condition Not in conflict with project 126 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 Poor condition Not in conflict with project 131 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 Poor condition Not in conflict with project 134 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 135 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 136 Velvet Ash Fraxinus velutina 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 137 Velvet Ash Fraxinus velutina 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 138 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project 139 California Sycamore 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 In conflict with project New Construction Based on the information provided, and as conditioned, this project complies with the requirements for the setback of new construction from existing trees under Section 15- 50.120 of the City Code. 2 of 11 41 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 1 Tree Preservation Plan Section 15-50.140 of the City Code requires a Tree Preservation Plan for this project. To satisfy this requirement the following shall be copied onto a plan sheet and included in the final sets of plans: 1)The tree information and recommendations from the submitted arborist report dated April 4, 2023; 2)The Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection from this report dated April 5, 2023. TREE INFORMATION: Project Arborist: Chris Stewart Date of Report: March 8, 2022 and revised April 4, 2023 Number of protected trees inventoried: 35 Number of protected trees requested for removal: 12 A table summarizing information about each tree is below. 3 of 83 of 11 42 19175 Monte Vista Dr Saratoga, CA 95070 3/8/2022 KEY Good Fair - Good Fair Fair - Poor Poor TAG NO.COMMON NAME DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT" H'/W' HEALTH STRUCTURE PROTECTED (X) TREE DISPOSITION NOTES, RECOMMENDATIONS 105 Coast live oak 17.0 25'/25'fg f x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, neighbors tree, diameter estimated 106 Coast live oak 10.0 25'/15'f f x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, leaf discoloration, neighbors tree, diameter estimated, tag on fence 107 Coast live oak 12.0 28'/16'f f x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, neighbors tree, diameter estimated, tag on fence 108 Coast live oak 15.0 30'/20'f fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, neighbors tree, diameter estimated, tag on fence 109 Coast live oak 22.0 40'/40'f fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, codominant leaders at 5', neighbors tree, diameter estimated, tag on fence 110 Southern magnolia 18.2 28'/20'fp fp x C recommend removal, tree will not survive construction, no hope for recovery 111 Southern magnolia 14.2/13.3/13.6 35'/25'f fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, codominant leaders at base 112 Coast live oak 11.1 18'/15'f f x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, leaning 113 Coast live oak 21.4 40'/30'f fg x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, boring beetles 114 Coast live oak 11.3 28'/16'f f x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, boring beetles 115 Aleppo pine 11.8 25'/14 f fg x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE 116 Valley oak 6.0 28'/10'f fp x C recommend removal, overshadowed by large trees, no hope for recovery 117 Valley oak 25.6 45'/35'f fp x A EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, codominant leaders at 6' 118 Valley oak 23.0 32'/45'f fp x A EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, codominant leaders at 4.5', neighbors tree 119 Coast redwood 28.2/22/28 70'/30'fp fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, codominant leaders at base 120 Coast live oak 8.8 20'/10'f f x B DWR, RCE, SP 121 Coast live oak 6.8 20'/10,f fp x B DWR, RCE, SP, codominant leaders at 7' 122 Coast live oak 4.8/4.5 20'/10'fp fp x C recommended removal, codominant leaders at base, thin canopy 123 Valley oak 7.0 20'/10'f fp x B DWR, RCE, SP, coominant leaders at 10' 124 Coast live oak 13.5 25'/20'fg fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, codominant leaders at 10' 125 Coast live oak 7.0 18'/15'fp fp x C recommend removal, crowded out by more dominant trees 126 Coast live oak 7.5 18'/8'p fp x C recommend removal, tree has 10% live foliage 127 Valley oak 17.5 40'/25'f fp x B EWR, RCE, DWR, codominant leaders at 12'12' 128 Aleppo pine 11.5 30'/10'p p x B Consider removal, tree is declining in health 129 California pepper tree 17.5 20'30'fp fp x B DWR, EWR, SP, CD at 4' 130 Coast live oak 15.0 20'/20'p fp x B tree has 15% live foliage, CD with included bark at 7' 131 Coast live oak 9.2 20'/15'p fp x C recommend removal, heavy bark borer activity and minimal foliage 132 Coast live oak 16.5 15'/10'p fp x B EWR, DWR, SP, RCE, thin canopy 133 Ginkgo biloba 14.8 40'/18'fg fp x B SP, CD at 5' 134 Coast redwood 28.5/31 60'/15'p fp x C tree is almost entirely dead, recommend removal 135 Coast redwood 60.0 70'/30'p fp x C tree is dead in upper half of canopy, 40% live foliage 136 Velvet ash 24.0 50'/40'p fp x C recommend removal, signifant mistletoe, past limb failures, excessive deadwood 137 Velvet ash 31 at 2'50'/30'p fp x C recommend removal, excessive deadwood, significant mistletoe, probable decay 138 Coast redwood 27.5/30 65'/35'p fp x C recommend removal, 30% live foliage and bronzing 139 California Sycamore 18.5 50'/30'fp fp x C DWR, EWR,SP, CD at 6', consider removal lots of deadwood 2 21 12 35 TOTAL PROTECTED 35 TOTAL TREES A = Retain, condition warrants long-term preservation B = Preservable, but may not be worthy of extensive effort or design accommodation C = Recommend removal due to existing condition and/or structure Inspection Date: Address: declining; measures should be taken to improve health and appearance in decline: significant health issues dead or near dead Health Ratings for health and structure are given separately for each tree according to the table below. IE, a tree may be rated "Good" under the health column For excellent, vigorous appearance and growth, while the same tree may be rated "Fair, Poor" in the structure column if structural mitigation is needed. excellent, vigorous no significant health concerns hazard Structure flawless very stable routine maintenance needed mitigation needed, it may or may not preserve this tree Revised: 4/4/2023 Table 2: Tree information from submitted arborist report dated April 4, 2023. Attachment 1 4 of 11 43 URBAN TREE MANAGEMENT, INC Tree Valuations-Guide for Tree Appraisals 10th Edition Address:19175 Monte Vista Dr Saratoga, CA 95070 Date:3/8/2022 Revised:2/2/2023 Tree Species Condition Trunk Func.Ext.Replacement tree Installation Total Unit Appraised Basic Depreciated Reproduction No.(example)0 to 1.0 Diameter Limitation limitation Size Cost Cost Cost Tree cost Trunk area tree cost cost cost 0 to 1.0 0 to 1.0 (rounded) 105 Coast live oak 0.8 17.0 0.7 0.8 172.3 172.3 345.46 45.46 227.0 10,319 4,968 106 Coast live oak 0.5 10.0 0.7 0.8 172.3 172.3 345.46 45.46 78.5 3,570 1,345 107 Coast live oak 0.5 12.0 0.7 0.8 172.3 172.3 345.46 45.46 113.1 5,141 1,785 108 Coast live oak 0.4 15.0 0.8 0.8 172.3 172.3 345.46 45.46 176.7 8,033 2,402 109 Coast live oak 0.4 22.0 0.8 0.8 172.3 172.3 345.46 45.46 380.1 17,281 4,769 110 Southern magnolia 0.4 18.2 0.7 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 260.2 11,827 2,663 111 Southern magnolia 0.4 27.0 0.7 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 572.6 26,028 5,447 112 Coast live oak 0.5 11.1 0.6 0.8 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 96.8 4,399 1,401 113 Coast live oak 0.7 21.4 0.6 0.8 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 359.7 16,351 5,839 114 Coast live oak 0.5 11.3 0.7 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 100.3 4,559 1,462 115 Aleppo pine 0.7 11.8 0.7 0.8 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 109.4 4,971 2,294 116 Valley oak 0.4 6.0 0.6 1 172.73 172.73 345.46 77.04 28.3 2,178 868 117 Valley oak 0.4 25.6 0.6 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 77.04 514.7 39,654 7,007 118 Valley oak 0.4 23.0 0.6 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 77.04 415.5 32,008 5,723 119 Coast redwood 0.2 53.0 0.8 0.8 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 2206.2 80,217 10,613 120 Coast live oak 0.5 8.8 0.6 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 60.8 2,765 926 121 Coast live oak 0.4 6.8 0.6 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 36.3 1,651 583 122 Coast live oak 0.2 7.1 0.5 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 39.6 1,800 453 123 Valley oak 0.4 7.0 0.7 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 77.04 38.5 2,965 844 124 Coast live oak 0.6 13.5 0.8 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 143.1 6,507 2,532 125 Coast live oak 0.2 7.0 0.6 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 38.5 1,750 471 126 Coast live oak 0.1 7.5 0.6 0.5 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 44.2 2,008 406 127 Valley oak 0.3 17.5 0.6 0.5 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 240.5 8,746 1,133 128 Aleppo pine 0.0 11.5 0.5 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 103.9 4,722 345 129 California pepper tree 0.2 17.5 0.5 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 240.5 10,934 1,002 130 Coast live oak 0.1 15.0 0.6 0.6 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 176.7 8,033 635 131 Coast live oak 0.1 9.2 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 66.5 3,022 451 132 Coast live oak 0.1 16.5 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 213.8 9,720 686 133 Ginkgo biloba 0.5 14.8 0.8 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 77.04 172.0 13,253 4,056 134 Coast redwood 0.1 46.0 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 1661.9 60,427 2,460 135 Coast redwood 0.1 60.0 0.6 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 2827.4 102,805 4,663 136 Velvet ash 0.1 24.0 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 452.4 16,449 921 137 Velvet ash 0.1 31.0 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 754.8 27,443 1,306 138 Coast redwood 0.1 48.5 0.5 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 36.36 1847.5 67,173 2,697 139 California Sycamore 0.2 18.5 0.6 0.7 172.73 172.73 345.46 45.46 268.8 12,220 1,372 Total:86,531 Table 3: Appraisal information from submitted arborist report dated April 4, 2023. Attachment 1 5 of 11 44 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 2 TREE REMOVAL CRITERIA Criteria that permit the removal of a protected tree are listed below. This information is from Article 15-50.080 of the City Code and is applied to any tree requested for removal as part of the project. If findings are made that meet the criteria listed below, the tree(s) may be approved for removal and replacement during construction. (1)The condition of the tree with respect to disease, imminent danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services, and whether the tree is a Dead tree or a Fallen tree. (2)The necessity to remove the tree because of physical damage or threatened damage to improvements or impervious surfaces on the property. (3)The topography of the land and the effect of the tree removal upon erosion, soil retention and the diversion or increased flow of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes. (4)The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect the removal would have upon shade, privacy impact, scenic beauty, property values, erosion control, and the general welfare of residents in the area. (5)The age and number of healthy trees the property is able to support according to good forestry practices. (6)Whether or not there are any alternatives that would allow for retaining or not encroaching on the protected tree. (7)Whether the approval of the request would be contrary to or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. (8)Any other information relevant to the public health, safety, or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50.010 (9)The necessity to remove the tree for economic or other enjoyment of the property when there is no other feasible alternative to the removal. (10)The necessity to remove the tree for installation and efficient operation of solar panels, subject to the requirements that the tree(s) to be removed, shall not be removed until solar panels have been installed and replacement trees planted in conformance with the City Arborist's recommendation. (11)The necessity to remove a tree following the creation of defensible space within 100 feet of a structure located within the Wildland Urban Interface, in accordance with defensible space standards established by CAL FIRE or as determined by Santa Clara County Fire Department, and that risk of increased wildfire cannot reasonably be addressed through maintenance or without tree removal. 6 of 11 45 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1.Owner, Architect, Contractor: It is the responsibility of the owner, architect, and contractor to be familiar with the information in this report and implement the required conditions. 2.Permit: a.Receipt of a Planning or Building permit does not relieve applicant of his responsibilities for protecting trees per City Code Article 15-50 on all construction work. b.No protected tree authorized for removal or encroachment pursuant to this project may be removed or encroached upon until the issuance of the applicable permit from the building division for the approved project. 3.Final Plan Sets: a.Shall include the tree information and protection recommendations from the arborist report by Chris Stewart dated April 4, 2023 copied onto a plan sheet. b.Shall include the Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection sections of the City Arborist report dated April 5, 2023. 4.Tree Protection Security Deposit: a.Is required per City Ordinance 15-50.080. b.Shall be $38,500 for tree(s) 105-108, 111-115, 117, 121, and 133. c.Shall be obtained by the owner and filed with the Community Development Department before obtaining Building Division permits. d.May be in the form of cash, check, or a bond. e.Shall remain in place for the duration of construction of the project. f.May be released once the project has been completed, inspected and approved by the City Arborist. 5.Tree Protection Fencing: a.Shall be installed as shown on the attached map. b.Shall be shown on the Site Plan. c.Shall be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. d.Shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link fencing mounted on 2-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. e.Shall be posted with signs saying, “TREE PROTECTION FENCE - DO NOT MOVE OR REMOVE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST, CHRISTINA FUSCO (408) 868- 1276”. f.Unprocessed wood chips, or approved equivalent, shall be placed to the edge of the tree # canopy and to a depth of 6 inches. g.Call City Arborist, Christina Fusco at (408) 868-1276 for an inspection of tree protection fencing once it has been installed. This is required prior to obtaining building division permits. h.Tree protection fencing shall remain undisturbed throughout the construction until final inspection. 7 of 11 46 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 3 6.Construction: All construction activities shall be conducted outside tree protection fencing unless permitted as conditioned below. These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching for utility installation, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 7.Work inside fenced areas: a. Requires a field meeting and approval from City Arborist before performing work. b.Requires Project Arborist on site to monitor work. 8.Project Arborist: a.Shall be Chris Stewart unless otherwise approved by the City Arborist. b.Shall visit the site every two weeks during grading, trenching or digging activities and every six weeks thereafter. A letter/email shall be provided to the City after each inspection which documents the work performed around trees, includes photos of the work in progress, and provides information on tree condition during construction. c.Shall supervise any permitted pruning or root pruning of trees on site. Roots of protected trees measuring two inches in diameter or more shall not be cut without prior approval of the Project Arborist. 9.Tree removal: Trees 110, 116, 122, 125, 126, 131, and 134-139 meet the criteria for removal and may be removed once building division permits have been obtained. 10.New trees: a.New trees equal to $18,730 shall be planted as part of the project before final inspection and occupancy of the new home. New trees may be of any species and planted anywhere on the property as long as they do not encroach on retained trees. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. 15 gallon = $350 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 60 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 b.Trees shall be replaced on or off site according to good forestry practices and shall provide equivalent value in terms of aesthetic and environmental quality, size, height, location, appearance and other significant beneficial characteristics of the removed trees. c.Eight trees shall be from the City’s list of Natives. 11.Damage to protected trees that will be retained: a.Should any protected tree be damaged beyond repair, new trees shall be required to replace the tree. If there is insufficient room to plant the necessary number of new trees, some of the value for trees may be paid into the City’s Tree Fund. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. b.Water loving plants and lawns are not permitted under oak tree canopies. Only drought tolerant plants that are compatible with oaks are permitted under the outer half of the canopy of oak trees on site. 8 of 11 47 19175 Monte Vista Drive Attachment 3 12.Final inspection: At the end of the project, when the contractor wants to remove tree protection fencing and have the tree protection security deposit released by the city, call City Arborist for a final inspection. Before scheduling a final inspection from the City Arborist, have the project arborist do an inspection, prepare a letter with their findings, and provide that letter to the city for the project file. 9 of 11 48 AƩachment 4 19175 Monte Vista Drive 10 of 11 49 TREE 119:28.2", 22", 28"COASTREDWOODTREE 115:11.8" ALEPPO PINETREE 116:6" VALLEYOAKTREE 117:25.6" VALLEY OAKTREE 118:23" VALLEYOAKTREE 138:27.5" COASTREDWOODPOOLTREE 133:14.8" GINKGOBILOBATREE 110:18.2" SOUTHERNMAGNOLIATREE 114:11.3" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 111:14.2", 13.3",13.6"SOUTHERNMAGNOLIAX X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXTREE 112:11.1" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 113:21.4" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 120:8.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 106:10" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 107:12" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 108:15" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 105:17" COAST LIVEOAKTREE 135:60" COASTREDWOODTREE 109:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 132:16" COASTLIVE OAKTREE #139:18.5" CALIFORNIASYCAMORE4" TREE6" TREE4" TREE4" TREE20" TREE8" TREE20'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK(1ST FLOOR)25'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK(2ND FLOOR)20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK(1ST FLOOR)25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK(2ND FLOOR)60'-0" REAR SETBACK(2ND FLOOR)50'-0" REAR SETBACK(1ST FLOOR)20'-0" RIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTFOR STREET PURPOSES30'-0"FRONT SETBACK10'-0"TO ADU10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT126'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR68'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR20'-0"TO 1ST FLOOR109'-9"TO 1ST FLOOR46'-10"TO 1ST FLOOR28'-6"TO 1ST FLOOR26'-6"TO 2ND FLOOR42'-10"TO ADUS 14°41'00" W 265.00'N 14°41'00" E 265.00'N 75°19'00" W 165.00'S 75°19'00" E 165.00'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEM O N T E V I S T A D R I V EADUMAINRESIDENCE9:129:128:128:1210:12 10:1210:12 10:127.5:127.5:127.5:126:1210:1210:1210:1210:127.5:12xxxxxxxxxx16'-0"FIRE PITLAWNAUTOCOURT4" TREEGUESTPARKING4" TREELIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLACAC(E) WATERMETERTREE 123:7" VALLEYOAK(E) TREE TO BEREMOVED,TYP.(E) GARAGETO BE REMOVED(E) RESIDENCETO BEREMOVED3' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D., S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PATH, S.L.D.TREE 137:31" VELVET ASHTREEPROTECTIVEFENCING, TYP.SEE ARBORISTREPORT(E) FENCETO REMAIN(E) BUILDING TOBE REMOVEDTREE 134: 28.5", 31"COAST REDWOODTREE 136:24" VELVETASH3'-6"LANDSCAPEWALL, S.L.D.(E) NEIGHBORING RESIDENCE:19135 MONTE VISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199 MONTEVISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199MONTE VISTA DRIVEOUTLINE OF WALLSBELOW, SHOWNDASHED, TYP.(E) WATERMETERSTREE 130:22" COASTLIVE OAK4" TREE(E) MAILBOX6" TREE(E) FIREHYDRANTTREE 129:17.5" CAPEPPER TREETREE 128:11.5" ALEPPOPINETREE 124:13.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 125:7.0" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 126:7.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 127:17.5" VALLEYOAKTREE 121:6.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 122:4.8",4.5" COASTLIVE OAK(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT3' DRY STACKSTONERETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.POOLEQUIPMENT6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.WATERFEATURE,S.L.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER,S.L.D.2' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.42" FENCE,S.L.D.LIGHTWELL18" RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.WATERFEATURE, S.L.D.5' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER, TYP. S.L.D.(N) TREE, TYP.LIGHTWELL(N) TREE TYP.,S.L.D.12'-0"5" TREE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19140PANORAMA DRIVE10:1210:12TREE 131:22" COASTLIVE OAKx6:12x PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013SARATOGA, CA 950701 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE210111PROPOSED SITE PLAN1A0.2NPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.3.10.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.4.4.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.1.PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THE LLS OF RECORDSHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDINGSETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS.2. DISPOSITION AND TREATMENT OF STORM WATER WILL COMPLY WITHTHE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ("NPDES")STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THESANTA CLARA VALLEY URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTIONPROGRAM.SITE PLAN NOTESPROPOSED SITE ANDROOF PLANSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"A0.212222333311 of 1150 12.13.22 Christopher Riordan Senior Planner City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: 19175 Monte Vista Drive – Neighborhood Outreach Letter Dear Christopher: The town recommended that neighbor outreach efforts should be provided to all of the adjoining property owners and the property owner(s) across the street from the project address. Below is a list of the properties that were provided a letter regarding the proposed project at 19175 Monte Vista Drive along with the owners and Arcanum’s contact information for any additional questions pertaining to the design. The highlighted address indicates the household who attended an in-person meeting with the owners on Dec. 2, 2022. Their signed neighborhood notification form is included in this submittal. Immediate Neighborhood 19199 Monte Vista Drive 19188 Monte Vista Drive 19170 Monte Vista Drive 19135 Monte Vista Drive 19140 Panorama Drive Please contact me if any additional information is required. Sincerely, Lisa Nichols arcanum architecture, inc. 329 bryant street, suite 3c san francisco, ca 94107 415/ 357 4400 tel 415/ 357 4404 fax 51 52 April 13, 2023 19175 Monte Vista Dr Saratoga, CA The constructed story poles located at 19175 Monte Vista Drive were surveyed on April 13, 2023 and were found to be in conformance for locations, heights and elevations to depict the silhouette for the proposed house ridge lines and features shown on the approved plans by Arcanum Architecture dated 4.4.23 53 1 | Page Story poles shall be constructed of wood or metal which delineate the height, area, and approximate shape and massing of a proposed structure. Story poles must be installed in the manner set forth below: 1.On each building elevation of the proposed structure at least one story pole shall show graduated five-foot interval height measurement markings in either paint or tape. 2.At least one building elevation of the proposed structure must show the proposed finished grade and finished floor elevation markings in either paint or tape. 3.The story poles shall be erected so that orange netting (or other materials approved by the Community Development Director) will be used to approximate the mass, shape and roofline (e.g., roof pitch/slope, ridge, and volume, including covered porches) of the proposed structure as shown below. For complex roof forms, the Community Development Director may also require that ridge flags be installed to delineate a main roof ridge or high point. Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408.868.1222 54 2 | Page Tree Removals: Any tree proposed for removal as part of the proposed project shall be clearly marked in the field. Acceptable means of identifying trees include using fluorescent tape wrapped around the tree's trunk, removable marking on the tree trunk that is easily visible, or another means approved by the Community Development Director Required Signage: The applicant shall erect on the story pole elevation facing the main access to the building site or the main street frontage, a minimum 11-inch by 17-inch sign which contains the following information: a)Name of applicant/property owner b)Contact telephone number of applicant/property owner c)A brief description of the proposed project’s scope of work d)Community Development Department main telephone number Duration: Once story poles are installed, all concerned parties will have fifteen (15) calendar days to review the application and provide written comments. The Community Development Director shall approve or deny the application within fifteen (15) days of the close of the review period. The decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission within fifteen (15) calendar days of the decision. The story poles shall not be removed until a final action has been taken and all appeal periods have expired. Photographs of Story Poles: the applicant shall submit photos of the completed story pole installation including required signs to the project Planner, prior to the Notice of Intent to Approve/Public Hearing being distributed. Story Pole Certification: Upon completion of installation the applicant must provide to the Community Development Department a stamped and signed letter from a State licensed land surveyor or civil engineer verifying the accuracy of the story pole installation in terms of location, heights, and elevation data. In addition, the Architect/Designer shall sign below stating that they have inspected the story poles and they accurately represent the proposed plans prepared by them and return to the project planner and prior to the Notice of Intent to Approve/Public hearing being distributed. I have inspected the story poles and find they accurately represent the mass, shape and roofline as shown on the plans. Print name Date Signature 55 MATERIAL BOARDAND PRECEDENTIMAGESA0.12PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PRECEDENT IMAGES2A0.12PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.P-1 EXTERIOR PLASTER WALLSMANUF: T.B.D.FINISH: SMOOTH STEEL TROWEL INTEGRAL COLORCOLOR: KHAKIW-1 EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING, RAFTER TAILS, DECKING,DOORS, TRELLIS MEMBERS, AND POSTS TYPE: STK WESTERN RED CEDARFINISH: SEMI SOLID SANSIN STAINCOLOR: TANM-1 METAL DOORS & WINDOWSMANUF: JADACOLOR: BURNISHED BLACK PATINAS-1 STONE VENEERTYPE: SPLIT FACE NATURAL THIN STONE VENEERPATTERN: RANDOMS-2SLATE ROOFTYPE: SLATE TILE SHINGLESCOLOR: DARK GREYMATERIAL BOARD1A0.12P-1M-1S-2W-1S-156 TREE 119:28.2", 22", 28"COASTREDWOODTREE 115:11.8" ALEPPO PINETREE 116:6" VALLEYOAKTREE 117:25.6" VALLEY OAKTREE 118:23" VALLEYOAKTREE 138:27.5" COASTREDWOODPOOLTREE 133:14.8" GINKGOBILOBATREE 110:18.2" SOUTHERNMAGNOLIATREE 114:11.3" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 111:14.2", 13.3",13.6"SOUTHERNMAGNOLIAXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X TREE 112:11.1" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 113:21.4" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 120:8.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 106:10" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 107:12" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 108:15" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 105:17" COAST LIVEOAKTREE 135:60" COASTREDWOODTREE 109:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 132:16" COASTLIVE OAKTREE #139:18.5" CALIFORNIASYCAMORE4" TREE6" TREE4" TREE4" TREE20" TREE8" TREE20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR) 25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR) 20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR) 25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)60'-0" REAR SETBACK(2ND FLOOR)50'-0" REAR SETBACK(1ST FLOOR)20'-0" RIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTFOR STREET PURPOSES30'-0"FRONT SETBACK10'-0"TO ADU10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT 126'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR68'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR20'-0" TO 1ST FLOOR109'-9"TO 1ST FLOOR46'-10"TO 1ST FLOOR28'-6" TO 1ST FLOOR 26'-6" TO 2ND FLOOR 42'-10"TO ADUS 14°41'00" W 265.00'N 14°41'00" E 265.00'N 75°19'00" W 165.00' S 75°19'00" E 165.00'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE M O N T E V I S T A D R I V E ADUMAINRESIDENCE9:12 9:12 8:12 8:12 10:12 10:1210:1210:127.5:12 7.5:127.5:126:1210:1210:12 10:1210:12 7.5:12x xxxxxxxxx16'-0"FIRE PITLAWNAUTOCOURT4" TREEGUESTPARKING4" TREELIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLACAC(E) WATERMETERTREE 123:7" VALLEYOAK(E) TREE TO BEREMOVED,TYP.(E) GARAGETO BE REMOVED(E) RESIDENCETO BEREMOVED3' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D., S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PATH, S.L.D.TREE 137:31" VELVET ASHTREEPROTECTIVEFENCING, TYP.SEE ARBORISTREPORT(E) FENCETO REMAIN(E) BUILDING TOBE REMOVEDTREE 134: 28.5", 31"COAST REDWOODTREE 136:24" VELVETASH3'-6"LANDSCAPEWALL, S.L.D.(E) NEIGHBORING RESIDENCE:19135 MONTE VISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199 MONTEVISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199MONTE VISTA DRIVEOUTLINE OF WALLSBELOW, SHOWNDASHED, TYP.(E) WATERMETERSTREE 130:22" COASTLIVE OAK4" TREE(E) MAILBOX6" TREE(E) FIREHYDRANTTREE 129:17.5" CAPEPPER TREETREE 128:11.5" ALEPPOPINETREE 124:13.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 125:7.0" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 126:7.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 127:17.5" VALLEYOAKTREE 121:6.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 122:4.8",4.5" COASTLIVE OAK(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT3' DRY STACKSTONERETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.POOLEQUIPMENT6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.WATERFEATURE,S.L.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER,S.L.D.2' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.42" FENCE,S.L.D.LIGHTWELL18" RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.WATERFEATURE, S.L.D.5' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER, TYP. S.L.D.(N) TREE, TYP.LIGHTWELL(N) TREE TYP.,S.L.D.1 2 ' - 0 "5" TREE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19140PANORAMA DRIVE10:1210:12TREE 131:22" COASTLIVE OAKx6:12 x PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE210111PROPOSED SITE PLAN1A0.2NPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.3.10.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.4.4.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.1.PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THE LLS OF RECORDSHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDINGSETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS.2. DISPOSITION AND TREATMENT OF STORM WATER WILL COMPLY WITHTHE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ("NPDES")STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THESANTA CLARA VALLEY URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTIONPROGRAM.SITE PLAN NOTESPROPOSED SITE ANDROOF PLANSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"A0.20'32'16'8'12222333357 APN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011MASSING DIAGRAMA0.2APROJECT NO.DATEISSUEPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE04.28.23DESIGN REVIEW58 COVER SHEETA0.0APN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V E 21011FRONTLEFT 1ST FLOORLEFT 2ND FLOORRIGHT 1ST FLOORRIGHT 2ND FLOORRIGHT ADUREAR 1ST FLOORREAR 2ND FLOORREAR ADU30'-0"20'-0"25'-0"20'-0"25'-0"4'-0"50'-0"60'-0"4'-0"PROJECT SUMMARYSETBACKS:VICINITY MAP19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVESITEPANORAMA DRIVEMONTE VISTA DRIVESARATOGA-LOS GATOS ROADVIA COLINA EL C A M I N O G R A N D EN VALLE V I S T A D R I V E BLUE GUM COURT12.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.3.10.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.4.4.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.Alex Byer and Isha ClarkArcanum Architecture, Inc.329 Bryant Street, Suite 3CSan Francisco, CA 94107Timothy ChappelleT: (415) 357-4400E: tim@arcanumarchitecture.comOWNER:ARCHITECT:CIVILENGINEER:SURVEYOR:ARBORIST:LANDSCAPEARCHITECT:PROJECT DIRECTORYSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS■A0.0 COVER SHEET■SU-1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLANCIVIL■C-1NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS■C-2PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN■C-3PRELIMINARY SECTIONS■C-4PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN■C-5EROSION CONTROL PLAN■C-6BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLANARCHITECTURAL■A0.1 EXISTING / DEMOLITION SITE PLAN■A0.2PROPOSED SITE PLAN■A0.2B PROPOSED ROOF PLAN■A0.3PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN■A0.4PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN■A0.5PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN■A0.6PROPOSED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT FLOOR PLAN, ROOFPLAN■A0.7STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS■A0.8EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS■A0.9 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS■A0.10CROSS SECTIONS■A0.11EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS■A0.12MATERIAL BOARD AND PRECEDENT IMAGESLANDSCAPE■L1.00 MATERIALS AND CALLOUTS PLAN■L2.00 LIGHTING PLAN■L3.00 PLANTING PLAN■L3.01 PLANTING LEGEND AND WELO■L4.00 DETAILS■L4.01 DETAILS■IR-1.00 IRRIGATION PLAN■IR-1.01 IRRIGATION HYDROZONE PLAN■IR-1.02 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES■IR-1.03 IRRIGATION DETAILS■IR-1.04 IRRIGATION DETAILSSHEET INDEXPROJECT LOCATION: 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVESARATOGA, CA 95070A.P.N. #397-09-013PROJECT TYPE: NEW (2) STORY PLUS BASEMENT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING,ADU AND POOLEXISTING CONDITIONS: ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES (BUILT IN 1953) TO BEDEMOLISHED# OF TREES TO BE REMOVED: 14ZONING:R-1-40,000OCCUPANCY: R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING)CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-BWUI FIRE AREA:NOFLOOD ZONE:ZONE XSTORIES:TWO STORIES OVER BASEMENTFIRE SPRINKLERS: YESLOT SIZE (GROSS / NET): 43,725 S.F. / 40,425 S.F.AVERAGE SLOPE OF SITE: 9.8% = 0.00229(2)(1,992) / 0.928ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 6,020 S.F. (MAIN HOUSE)850 S.F. (ADU)MAXIMUM COVERAGE: 35% OF NET SITE AREA (.35)(40,425) = 14,148.75 S.F.PROJECT STATISTICSGROUND FLOOR:4,051 S.F.BASEMENT:4,996.5 S.F.SECOND FLOOR:1,003 S.F.ADU:818 S.F.CONTRACTOR:Scott Paine Construction, Inc.P.O. Box 320008Los Gatos, CA 95032Scott PaineT: (408) 871-0533E: scott@spcbuilt.comBKF Engineers255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 100Redwood City, CA 94065Corey WorthingtonT: (650) 482-6457E: cworthington@bkf.comUrban Tree ManagementP.O. Box 971Los Gatos, CA 95031Michael YoungT: (650) 321-0202E: michael@urbantreemanagement.comStudio Green232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960John MertenT: (415) 721-0905E: john@studiogreen.comMacLeod and Associates965 Center StreetSan Carlos, CA 94070Vergel P. GaluraT: (650) 593-8580 ext. 2E: vgalura@macleodassociates.net112'-0"15'-3"N/A31'-2"N/AN/A84'-2"N/AN/A46'-10"20'-0"26'-6"28'-6"118'-6"10'-0"109'-9"126'-3"42'-10"EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIREDFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORGARAGE 1GARAGE 2BASEMENT (EXEMPT)TOTALALLOWABLEADUFLOOR AREA:EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL4,051 S.F.1,003 S.F.350 S.F.596 S.F.4,996.5 SF6,001 S.F.6,020 S.F.818 S.F.*GARAGE 1:350 S.F.GARAGE 2:596 S.F.4,051 S.F.1,004 S.F.350 S.F.596 S.F.4,996.5 SF6,001 S.F.6,020 S.F.818 S.F.** 19 S.F. FROM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA PLUS 800 S.F. ONE TIMEALLOWANCE PER SARATOGA ZONING CODE 15-56.0250 S.F.0 S.F.0 S.F.0 S.F.0 S.F.SITE COVERAGE:FOOTPRINT OF HOME / GARAGE (INCLUDING ROOFOVERHANG OVER 36")DRIVEWAYWALKWAY / DECK / PATIOOTHER (POOL )(a) SUBTOTAL IMPERVIOUS5,791 S.F.3,270 S.F.3,734 S.F.980 S.F.13,775 S.F.IMPERVIOUS SURFACESTOTAL SFPERVIOUS SURFACEPERMEABLE PAVERS DRIVEWAY(GUEST PARKING)PERMEABLE WALKWAYS, PATIO(b) SUBTOTAL PERVIOUS400 S.F.0 S.F.200 S.F.200 S.F.0 S.F.200 S.F.ACTUAL S.F. 50% CREDIT TOTAL S.F.SITE COVERAGE TOTAL (a) + (b) =13,975 S.F.(COMPLIES)LOWEST ELEVATION POINT AT THE BUILDINGS EDGEFROM NATURAL GRADEHIGHEST ELEVATION POINT AT THE BUILDINGS EDGEFROM NATURAL GRADEAVERAGE ELEVATION POINT (BASED ON HIGHEST ANDLOWEST POINTS ABOVE)TOP MOST ELEVATION POINT- MEASURED FROM AVERAGEPOINT (ABOVE) TO THE TOP MOST POINT OF THE ROOFTOP MOST ELEVATION POINT- MEASURED FROM AVERAGEPOINT (ABOVE) TO THE TOP OF CHIMNEYHEIGHT:MAIN HOUSEADU94.42'100.66'97.54' (97'-6 1/2")112.54' (112'-6 1/2")113.54' (113'-6 1/2")93.89'97.11'95.5' (95'-6")121.5' (121'-6")123.0' (123'-0")111111DEFERRED SUBMITTALFIRE SPRINKLERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL122359 60 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com” ’“” 61 LIMIT OF BASEMENT LIMIT OF BASEMENTLIMIT OF BASEMENTLIMIT OF BASEMENT Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com62 SCALE: 1" = 10' HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. SCALE: 1" = 10' HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com63 LIMIT OF BASEMENT LIMIT OF BASEMENTLIMIT OF BASEMENTLIMIT OF BASEMENT Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com64 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com65 255 SHORELINE DRIVESUITE 200REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065(650) 482-6300www.bkf.com66 50'-0" REAR SETBACK (1ST FLOOR)20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR)20'-0" RIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTFOR STREET PURPOSES60'-0" REAR SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR) 20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR) 25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)30'-0" FRONT SETBACK10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT (E) DRIVEWAYTO BE REMOVED(RETAIN FOR USEDURINGCONSTRUCTION)(E) HARDSCAPE TOBE REMOVED(E) GARAGE TOBE REMOVED(E) SITE WALLTO BE REMOVED(E) SITE WALL TOBE REMOVEDS 14°41'00" W 265.00'N 14°41'00" E 265.00'N 75°19'00" W 165.00'TREE 121:6.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 133:14.8"GINKGOBILOBATREE 110:18.2"SOUTHERNMAGNOLIATREE 111:14.2", 13.3",13.6"SOUTHERNMAGNOLIATREE 115:11.8" ALEPPOPINETREE 116:6" VALLEYOAKS 75°19'00" E 165.00'TREE 124:13.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 127:17.5" VALLEYOAKTREE 128:11.5" ALEPPOPINExTREE 125:7.0" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 126:7.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 129:17.5" CAPEPPER TREETREE 138:27.5" COASTREDWOODTREE 112:11.1" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 113:21.4" COASTLIVE OAK(E) WATERMETER(E) MAILBOXTREE 123:7" VALLEYOAKTREE 122:4.8",4.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 120:8.8" COASTLIVE OAK(E) TREE TO BEREMOVED, TYP.TREE 131:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 106:10" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 107:12" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 108:15" COASTLIVE OAK(E)RESIDENCETO BEREMOVED(E) PLANTERTO BEREMOVED(E) STONE WALL TOBE REMOVED(E) HARDSCAPETO BEREMOVED(E) HARDSCAPETO BEREMOVED(E) WOODWALL TO BEREMOVED(E) WOODWALL TO BEREMOVED, TYP.(E) CONCRETEWALL TO BEREMOVED(E) STEPS TO BEREMOVED(E) FENCETREE 105:17" COAST LIVEOAK(E) MAILBOXPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE(E) CONCRETEWALL TO BEREMOVEDPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE TREE #139:18.5" CALIFORNIASYCAMORETREE 134:28.5", 31" COASTREDWOODTREE 135:60" COASTREDWOODTREE 136:24" VELVET ASHM O N T E V I S T A D R I V EJOINT UTILITYPOLE TO BEREMOVEDOVERHEADUTILITY LINES TOBE REMOVED ANDUNDERGROUNDED(E) BUILDING TOBE REMOVED(E) DRIVEWAYTO BE REMOVED(E) WATERMETERSxxxxx (E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199 MONTEVISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19140PANORAMA DRIVExxxx(E) FIREHYDRANT(E) FENCE TO BEREMOVED(E) CONCRETEFOUNDATION TOBE REMOVED, TYP.(E) GAS METER(E) NEIGHBORING RESIDENCE19135 MONTE VISTA DRIVETREE 114:11.3" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 130:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE PROTECTIVEFENCING, TYP. SEEARBORIST REPORTTREE 109:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 132:16" COASTLIVE OAKx6" TREE4" TREE4" TREE6" TREE4" TREE8" DEADTREE4" TREE20" TREE8" TREE21" TREETREE 137:31" VELVET ASH4" TREE4" TREE 5" TREETREE 119:28.2", 22", 28"COASTREDWOODTREE 117:25.6" VALLEY OAKTREE 118:23" VALLEYOAK(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199MONTE VISTA DRIVENOTE: WEST VALLEY COLLECTION & RECYCLING (EXCLUSIVEROLL-OFF AND DEBRIS BOX PROVIDER FOR THE CITY OFSARATOGA) SHALL BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION.x 2PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011EXISTING / DEMOLITION SITE PLAN1A0.1PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.3.10.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.4.4.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.EXISTING /DEMOLITION SITEPLANSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"A0.1N0'32'16'8'12233312367 TREE 119:28.2", 22", 28"COASTREDWOODTREE 115:11.8" ALEPPO PINETREE 116:6" VALLEYOAKTREE 117:25.6" VALLEY OAKTREE 118:23" VALLEYOAKTREE 138:27.5" COASTREDWOODPOOLTREE 133:14.8" GINKGOBILOBATREE 110:18.2" SOUTHERNMAGNOLIATREE 114:11.3" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 111:14.2", 13.3",13.6"SOUTHERNMAGNOLIAXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X TREE 112:11.1" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 113:21.4" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 120:8.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 106:10" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 107:12" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 108:15" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 105:17" COAST LIVEOAKTREE 135:60" COASTREDWOODTREE 109:22" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 132:16" COASTLIVE OAKTREE #139:18.5" CALIFORNIASYCAMORE4" TREE6" TREE4" TREE4" TREE20" TREE8" TREE20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR) 25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR) 20'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (1ST FLOOR) 25'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)60'-0" REAR SETBACK(2ND FLOOR)50'-0" REAR SETBACK(1ST FLOOR)20'-0" RIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTFOR STREET PURPOSES30'-0"FRONT SETBACK10'-0"TO ADU10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT10'-0"SANITARYSEWEREASEMENT 126'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR68'-3"TO 2ND FLOOR20'-0" TO 1ST FLOOR109'-9"TO 1ST FLOOR46'-10"TO 1ST FLOOR28'-6" TO 1ST FLOOR 26'-6" TO 2ND FLOOR 42'-10"TO ADUS 14°41'00" W 265.00'N 14°41'00" E 265.00'N 75°19'00" W 165.00' S 75°19'00" E 165.00'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE M O N T E V I S T A D R I V E ADUMAINRESIDENCE9:12 9:12 8:12 8:12 10:12 10:1210:1210:127.5:12 7.5:127.5:126:1210:1210:12 10:1210:12 7.5:12x xxxxxxxxx16'-0"FIRE PITLAWNAUTOCOURT4" TREEGUESTPARKING4" TREELIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLACAC(E) WATERMETERTREE 123:7" VALLEYOAK(E) TREE TO BEREMOVED,TYP.(E) GARAGETO BE REMOVED(E) RESIDENCETO BEREMOVED3' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D., S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PATH, S.L.D.TREE 137:31" VELVET ASHTREEPROTECTIVEFENCING, TYP.SEE ARBORISTREPORT(E) FENCETO REMAIN(E) BUILDING TOBE REMOVEDTREE 134: 28.5", 31"COAST REDWOODTREE 136:24" VELVETASH3'-6"LANDSCAPEWALL, S.L.D.(E) NEIGHBORING RESIDENCE:19135 MONTE VISTA DRIVE (E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199 MONTEVISTA DRIVE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19199MONTE VISTA DRIVEOUTLINE OF WALLSBELOW, SHOWNDASHED, TYP.(E) WATERMETERSTREE 130:22" COASTLIVE OAK4" TREE(E) MAILBOX6" TREE(E) FIREHYDRANTTREE 129:17.5" CAPEPPER TREETREE 128:11.5" ALEPPOPINETREE 124:13.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 125:7.0" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 126:7.5" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 127:17.5" VALLEYOAKTREE 121:6.8" COASTLIVE OAKTREE 122:4.8",4.5" COASTLIVE OAK(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT3' DRY STACKSTONERETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.POOLEQUIPMENT6' DEERFENCE, S.L.D.WATERFEATURE,S.L.D.4' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER,S.L.D.2' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.42" FENCE,S.L.D.LIGHTWELL18" RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.WATERFEATURE, S.L.D.5' RETAININGWALL, S.L.D.,S.C.D.PLANTER, TYP. S.L.D.(N) TREE, TYP.LIGHTWELL(N) TREE TYP.,S.L.D.12 ' - 0 "5" TREE(E) NEIGHBORINGSTRUCTURE: 19140PANORAMA DRIVE10:1210:12TREE 131:22" COASTLIVE OAKx6:12 x PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE210111PROPOSED SITE PLAN1A0.2NPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.3.10.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.4.4.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.1. PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THE LLS OF RECORDSHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDINGSETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS.2. DISPOSITION AND TREATMENT OF STORM WATER WILL COMPLY WITHTHE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ("NPDES")STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THESANTA CLARA VALLEY URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTIONPROGRAM.SITE PLAN NOTESPROPOSED SITE ANDROOF PLANSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"A0.20'32'16'8'12222333368 10:1210:1210:126:126:129:128:1210:12 10:12 10:12 10:1210:12 10:12 10:129:128:12LIGHTWELLBELOWLIGHTWELLBELOWLIGHTWELLBELOWLIGHTWELLBELOW PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PROPOSED ROOF PLAN1A0.2BPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.PROPOSEDROOF PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"A0.2BN0'16'8'4'1169 DN.DW.DN.LIGHTWELLPLAYROOMBARSTORAGESTORAGEBATHLIGHTWELLWINEGYMREF.REF.DN.STORAGE / MECH.LADDERBATH 4CLOS.4116'-6"26'-6"43'-0"22'-10 1/2"24'-1 1/2"3'-1"59'-1"6'-6"20'-0"42'-0"18'-0"38'-0" 89'-2"4'-3"4'-3"20'-10"23'-4"7'-0"21'-6"2A0.111A0.117'-2" 15'-9" 6'-10" 3'-9"67'-0"STOR.-13'-0"(+82'-6")T.O. FIN. FLR.LIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLALEX'SSTUDYBEDROOMSUITE 4HALLWAYSTAIRCRAWL SPACE PROPOSEDBASEMENT FLOORPLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"A0.3PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN1A0.3PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.0'16'8'4'NBASEMENT FLOOR AREA: 4,996.5 S.F.1111170 19'-6"7'-0"9'-0"34'-0"24'-4 1/2"48'-5"18'-7"67'-0"20'-0"26'-6"23'-4"22'-7 1/2"42'-0"15'-9"16'-6" 24'-0"20'-10" 7'-2"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X XXXXXW/DALEXDRESSINGISHADRESSINGBATH 1GARAGE 1LAUNDRYPWD.KITCHENBUTLERPANTRYBREAKFASTLIGHTWELLBELOWCWPANTRYBIKESHEDGARAGE 2OUTDOORLIVINGENTRYLIGHTWELLBELOWDWDWDN.DN.LIGHTWELLBELOWDN.REF.FRZ.DN.LIGHTWELLBELOWCD2A0.111A0.91A0.82A0.92A0.81A0.11GASFIREPLACEOUTDOORKITCHENACAC-0'-0"(+95'-6")T.O. FIN. FLR.PRIMARYBEDROOMDININGLIVINGPRIMARYBATHBEDROOMSUITE 1LIBRARYMUDHALLWAYDRESSINGSTAIRVESTIBULEREARSTAIRXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X XXXXX PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN1A0.40'16'8'4'PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.PROPOSED GROUNDFLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"A0.4NGROUND FLOOR AREA: 4,997 S.F.111171 LINENBATH 2DN.BATH 3BEDROOMSUITE 2BEDROOMSUITE 320'-0"50'-6"1A0.91A0.82A0.92A0.82A0.101A0.10+11'-0"(+106'-6")T.O. FIN. FLR.PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN1A0.5PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.PROPOSED SECONDFLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"A0.50'16'8'4'NSECOND FLOOR AREA: 1,003 S.F.72 ADULIVINGADUBATHADUPOWDERADUBEDROOMREF.DW20'-0"1A0.112A0.114A0.113A0.1141'-0"POOLEQUIP.-0'-0"(+95'-6")T.O. FIN. FLR.VESTIBULECKTP(200v)ADUFOYER5A0.117.5:127.5:127.5:127.5:12 PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.PROPOSEDACCESSORYDWELLING UNITFLOOR & ROOF PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"A0.60'16'8'4'PROPOSED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT FLOOR PLAN1A0.6NADU FLOOR AREA: 818 S.F.PROPOSED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ROOF PLAN2A0.61111173 FIRST FLOOR SETBACK FIRST FLOOR SETBACK 26'-0" RIDGE HEIGHT FIRST FLOOR SETBACK LINE FIRST FLOOR SETBACK LINE FIRST FLOOR SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SECOND FLOOR SETBACK LINE SECOND FLOOR SETBACK LINE 25'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"25'-0"20'-0"STREETSCAPEELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"A0.7PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS1A0.7PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.PROPOSED HOUSE: 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVENEIGHBOR'S HOUSE: 19199 MONTE VISTA DRIVENEIGHBOR'S HOUSE: 19135 MONTE VISTA DRIVE1/16"=1'-0"74 75 76 77 78 MATERIAL BOARDAND PRECEDENTIMAGESA0.12PROJECT NO.DATEISSUEAPN: 397-09-013 SARATOGA, CA 95070 1 9 1 7 5 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPROJECT NO.DATEISSUE21011PRECEDENT IMAGES2A0.12PROJECT NO.DATEISSUE2101112.13.22 DESIGN REVIEW2.3.23 DESIGN REVIEW REV.P-1 EXTERIOR PLASTER WALLSMANUF: T.B.D.FINISH: SMOOTH STEEL TROWEL INTEGRAL COLORCOLOR: KHAKIW-1 EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING, RAFTER TAILS, DECKING,DOORS, TRELLIS MEMBERS, AND POSTS TYPE: STK WESTERN RED CEDARFINISH: SEMI SOLID SANSIN STAINCOLOR: TANM-1 METAL DOORS & WINDOWSMANUF: JADACOLOR: BURNISHED BLACK PATINAS-1 STONE VENEERTYPE: SPLIT FACE NATURAL THIN STONE VENEERPATTERN: RANDOMS-2SLATE ROOFTYPE: SLATE TILE SHINGLESCOLOR: DARK GREYMATERIAL BOARD1A0.12P-1M-1S-2W-1S-179 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V EPA4L4.00PAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAS1S1S1C1C1S1S1S1S1S1C2S4C1S2S2S2S2S2S2LAWNPOOLAUTO-COURTPAS2S2AUTO-COURT1L4.012L4.006L4.00G1PALIGHT WELLLIGHTWELL3L4.00LIGHTWELLC1S2S2S2PAS1S3S3M1CBCBCBCBCBS31L4.001L4.005L4.00PAS4S2S1PAS1S1C2C1SPA2L4.007L4.00CBPAM1LIGHT WELL2L4.01SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"0 5' 10'20'30'N Drawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalMaterials &Callouts PlanL1.00STONE PAVINGColor: EarthtonesFinish: ThermalSTONE VENEERColor: Warm EarthtonesFinish: Split Face with Deep RakeDRY STACK STONE WALL(same material as S2)MATERIAL SCHEDULES1S2S3STONE STEPS(same material as S1)CONCRETE PAVINGColor: EarthtonesFinish: SandblastedPERMEABLE PAVERSColor: EarthtonesFinish: Pre-cast ConcreteS4C1C2METALColor: Match Ext. Metal on HouseFinish: Painted MetalGRAVEL PAVINGColor: Earthtone AggregatesSize: 38"-12"DECORATIVE COBBLESColor: Black La PazSize: 1"-3"M1G1G2STEEL EDGINGColor: BlackPLANTINGSee Planting PlanDRIVEWAY COBBLESColor: EarthtonesFinish: TumbledSize: 4"x4"WOOD PLANTERType: Con Heart RedwoodE1PACBW1380 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V ELAWNPOOLAUTO-COURTAUTO-COURTLIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLLIGHT WELLLIGHT WELLLIGHTING SCHEDULESCALE: 1" = 10'-0"0 5' 10'20'30'N Drawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalLighting PlanL2.00STEP LIGHTFinish: BronzePower: 3LEDDIRECTIONAL PATH LIGHTFinish: BlackPower: 6LEDTRELLIS DOWN LIGHTFinish: BlackPower: 6LEDIN-WALL LIGHTFinish: BronzePower: 2LEDGFCIInclude Water Protective Cover12" Above GradePOOL & SPA LIGHTBy Pool ContractorLED STRIP LIGHTORNAMENTAL WALL LIGHTFinish: BronzePower: LED381 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V ELAWNPOOLAUTO-COURTAUTO-COURTLIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLLIGHT WELLLIGHT WELLSCALE: 1" = 10'-0"0 5' 10'20'30'N Drawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalPlanting PlanL3.00382 SHRUBS LISTDrawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalPlantingLegendL3.01SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEWUCOLSOlea europaea 'Little Ollie'Little OllieOLE LITRosa spp.ROS SPPRose "Iceberg White"Gaura lindheimeriWhite GauraGAU LINLavandula spp.LavenderLAV SPPLaurus nobilis 'Saratoga'Saratoga LaurelLAU NOBCeanothus griseus 'Yankee Point'CEA GRICalifornian LilacAnemone hybridaANE HYBAnemoneBuxus spp.Boxwood (globed form)BUX GLO1 gal1 gal24" box1 gal5 gal5 galmoderatemoderate lowmoderate low low low lowTREE LISTSYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE WUCOLSCarpinus betulus 'Emerald Ave.'Emerald Avenue HornbeamCAR EMEOlea europaeaOlive (multi trunk)OLE EURQuercus agrifolia36" boxQUE AGRCoast Live Oak (natural form)48" boxVAL ORGMEY LEMValencia OrangeMeyer LemonOrangeLemonmoderatevery lowvery lowmoderatemoderateBuxus spp.Boxwood (hedge form)BUX SPPmoderate5 galAzalea hybridaAZA WHIAzalea (white)5 galHydrangea macrophyllaHYD MACHydrangea5 galCamellia sasanquaCAM SASCamelliaPlumbago auriculataCape PlumbagoPLU AUR5 galArbutus unedoARB UNEStrawberry Tree15 galPittosporum 'Creme de Mint'Creme de MintPIT CRE5 galViburnum tinus 'Spring Bouquet' Spring Bouquet ViburnumVIB SPR5 galDaphne odoraDAP ODOWinter Daphne5 galWestringia rosmariniformisWES ROSCoast Rosemary5 galDietes bicolorDietesDIE BIC1 galCotoneaster 'Lowfast'COT LOWCotoneasterLavandula stoechasLAV STOSpanish Lavender1 galLavandula angustifoliaLAV ANGEnglish Lavender1 galLaurus nobilis 'Ragu'Little Ragu Sweet BayLAU RAG lowmoderate low low low low lowmoderate low low lowmoderatemoderate lowGROUP ASYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE WUCOLSNepeta faasseniiCatmintRosa spp.Carpet Rose (white)Lavandula stoechasSpanish LavenderLavandula angustifoliaEnglish LavenderPerovskia atriplicifoliaRussian SageAnemone hybridaAnemoneGeranium rozanneCranesbillCampanula poscharskyanaSerbian bellflower1 gal1 gal1 gal1 gal1 gal1 gal5 gal1 gal low low low low lowmoderatemoderatemoderateGROUP BSYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE WUCOLSPerovskia atriplicifoliaRussian Sage1 galLavandula spp.Lavender1 gal lowPittosporum 'Creme de Mint'Creme de Mint5 gal lowCotoneaster 'Lowfast'Cotoneaster1 gal lowCoprosma x kirkiiCoprosma low1 galRosmarinus sppRosemary1 gal low lowOlea europaea 'Wilsonii'Wilson Olive10' b&bvery lowOLE WILCercis canadensisEastern RedbudCER CAN36" box moderateLagerstroemia indicaCrape MyrtleLAG IND36" box lowMagnolia soulangeanaSaucer Magnolia36" box moderateMAG SOU1 gal36" box15 gal15 gal15 gal1 gal1 gal5 galMEADOW MIXSYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE WUCOLSNassella pulchraPurple Needlegrass1 gal lowEschscholzia californicaCalifornia Golden Poppy1 gal lowLupinus Spp.Lupine low1 galLAWNSYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAMESIZE WUCOLSDwarf Tall Fescue Blend, Madallion Dwarf Blend or EqualhighsodNote:1. 4 cubic yards of compost per 1000 sf, to be installed minimum 6” into native soil.2. 3” of mulch to be spread after plant installation. Mulch shall be Mango Mulch (Organic) Compost by grab-n-Grow soilProducts, 2759 Lamo Road, Santa Rosa, California. (707.575.7275)83 Drawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalDetailsL4.00M1PAS2S2W1PAS3S2S1S4PAM1 S2G2213456S1784 Drawn by: TVPChecked by: JMBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalDetailsL4.01M1119175PAM1 S4S2S22385 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V ELAWNPOOLAUTO-COURTAUTO-COURTLIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLLIGHT WELLLIGHT WELLM O N T E V I S T A D R I V ESCALE: 1" = 10'-0"0 5' 10'20'30'N Drawn by: LMDChecked by: MDBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalIrrigation PlanL A N D S C A P E I R R I G A T I O N(530) 547-5515 www.dicksoninc.netP.O. BOX 415PALO CEDRO, CALIFORNIA 96073© Dickson & Associates, Inc.DICKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.IR-1.00333386 M O N T E V I S T A D R I V ELAWNPOOLAUTO-COURTAUTO-COURTLIGHTWELLLIGHTWELLLIGHT WELLLIGHT WELLM O N T E V I S T A D R I V ESCALE: 1" = 10'-0"0 5' 10'20'30'N Drawn by: LMDChecked by: MDBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalIrrigationHydrozonePlanL A N D S C A P E I R R I G A T I O N(530) 547-5515 www.dicksoninc.netP.O. BOX 415PALO CEDRO, CALIFORNIA 96073© Dickson & Associates, Inc.DICKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.IR-1.01333387 Drawn by: LMDChecked by: MDBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalIrrigationLegend &NotesL A N D S C A P E I R R I G A T I O N(530) 547-5515 www.dicksoninc.netP.O. BOX 415PALO CEDRO, CALIFORNIA 96073© Dickson & Associates, Inc.DICKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.IR-1.0222388 Drawn by: LMDChecked by: MDBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalIrrigationDetailsL A N D S C A P E I R R I G A T I O N(530) 547-5515 www.dicksoninc.netP.O. BOX 415PALO CEDRO, CALIFORNIA 96073© Dickson & Associates, Inc.DICKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.IR-1.0389 Drawn by: LMDChecked by: MDBYER-CLARK RESIDENCE 19175 MONTE VISTA DRIVE SARATOGA, CA 95070 Landscape Architecture232 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.San Anselmo, CA 94960Phone: (415) 721-0905Fax: (415) 721-0910Web: studiogreen.comEmail: info@studiogreen.comDate: Issue:12.13.22 DesignReview02.03.23 DesignReviewResubmittal103.10.23 DesignReviewResubmittal2304.04.23 DesignReviewResubmittalIrrigationDetailsIR-1.04L A N D S C A P E I R R I G A T I O N(530) 547-5515 www.dicksoninc.netP.O. BOX 415PALO CEDRO, CALIFORNIA 96073© Dickson & Associates, Inc.DICKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.AVFVFVAVFVAVFVAVFVAVFVAVFVSECTIONELEVATIONNOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALE90