The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-06-1995 Parks and Recreation AgendaAGENDA SARATOGA PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING TIME: Monday, November 6, 1995 - 7:30P.M. PLACE: TYPE: I. II. Administrative Conference Room City Hall 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California Regular Meeting C) Posting of Agenda Pursuant of Government this meeting was poste November 1, 1995. ORGANIZATION A) Roll Call B) Minutes (Meeting of October 2, 1995) OLD BUSINESS None Code 54954.2 the agenda for d on the City Hall Kiosk on III. NEW BUSINESS A) Coyote Creek Reparian celebration of the Saratoga B) Review of DR-95-044; 19272 C) Discussion . of issues for City Council scheduled fo 1995 Station Festival in Creek at Wildwood Park. Crisp Avenue the Joint Meeting with r Tuesday, November 21, D) Discussion of a Youth Commissioner serving as a Park and Recreation Commissioner IV. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A) Letter from the Bay Area Ridge Trail Council. B) Letter from the Hakone Foundation V. rOMMISSION AND STAFF REPORTS A) Commissioner's Reports B) Previous Month Council Meeting Report C) Recreation Department Status Report-Joan Pisani D) Park Maintenance Division Update-Bob Rizzo In compliance with the Americana with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Parks Superintendent, Bob Rizzo, at (408) 867-3438. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. • • M g M O R A N D O M TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Secretary, Parks and Recreation Commission SUBJECT: MEETING OF MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1995 **************************************************************** III. NEW BUSINESS A) Coyote Creek Reparian Station Festival in Celebration of the Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park. The City has been contacted by the Coyote Creek Reparian Station regarding the possibility of organizing a one day festival in celebration of the Saratoga Creek watershed. As described in the letter received from Dave Johnston, Research Director for the Coyote Creek Reparian Station, would like to co-sponsor the event with the City. Please review enclosed letter and Mr. Johnston will be invited to attend the Commission meeting. • Commission is to review and approve to City Council the request of the Coyote Creek Reparian Stations proposed festival at Wildwood Park tentatively scheduled for Sunday, June 23, 1996. B) Review of DR-95-044; 19272 Crisp Avenue The Community Development Department is requesting the Commission to review and comment on the subject property in the San Marcos Heights subdivision, lot 34. Secretary Rizzo will present a design review plan of the subject property that depicts on 20' private ingress, egress easement and trail easement which is access to the San Marcos Wilderness area. C) Discussion of issues for the Joint Meeting with Citv Council scheduled for Tuesday. November 21, 1995. The Commission should discuss and list any issues they would like placed on the council's agenda for the scheduled joint meeting. I have enclosed in your packet council's minutes items from the meeting of June 13, 1995. r~ • D) Discussion of a Youth Commissioner serving as a Park and Recreation Commissioner The Commission is requested to consider a Youth Commissioner be appointed to fill the current vacant seat on the Commission. This seat would then be designated to be filled annually by a Youth Commissioner and/or a high school student for a period of one year. Commission recommendation would be submitted to council for their approval. IV. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A) Letter from the Bay Area Ridqe Trail Council Secretary Rizzo will review with the Commission the proposed Santa Clara Countywide Trails Master Plan Update as it pertains to the City. The Commission is being asked to endorse the proposed plan and correspond to the County Board of Supervisors. B) Letter from the Hakone Foundation • Letter is inviting the Commission to attend an upcoming Foundation meeting and present a short multi-media show of Hakone Gardens. The date and time is to be arranged. Please let Janice know if you meeting (867-3438 Ext. 245) 7 ~- will be unable to attend this Bob Rizz Secretary • ~T'c~'t .IZZ -~4 ®~'®~~ ~./l[°~Q~~ ~Il~D~]C°lldA..RII ~~dA,~Il®Illl P.O. Box 1027 • Alviso, California 95002 • (408) 262-9204 ~~~~~. ~ ;10.fl](D~Dfl`ll~fll ~~S4'~fl'Q`~flq :1,~('SQ:m1Tt9~fl®Dlq ~fl1Qll .i~A~Dfllt~lg~f'flIlIl~P11'~ September 29,1995 Bob Rizzo Director of Parks and Recreation City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Mr. Rizzo, Recently Coyote Creek Riparian Station (CCRS) received grant money to organize a festival in celebration of the Saratoga Creek watershed. ' l~°' ," '~ ~ pn~,~ .:: _ ,. r ~. ~_~. A ". j.. .. . } ave reserved space for the Plaza banner for the third week of June~~nd"~Vp arr~~working with Yvonne to reserve the park for the event day, June 23,1996. This past year I have been working very closely with the Saratoga Union • School District to develop school programs associated with the creek. This year we are planning to have youngsters from the district display their art work as well as science projer~ts associated with their creek activities. Awards will be given at the festival to winners of both groups, and Les Landin has agreed to provide some entertainment through his band. Other agencies that we hope will be represented include the Santa Clara Valley Water District, Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program and other educational organizations. I would appreciate it if you could place this request on the agenda for the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. If appropriate, we will be available for a presentation. STc~t l - 3 ~0~~ 1377? FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 867-3438 COUNCIL MEMBERS: TO: TRANSMITTAL Ann Mane Burger Paul E. Jacobs Gillian Moran Karen Tucker Donald L. Wolfe PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY GEOLOGIST SARATOGA FIRE DISTRICT CENTRAI: FIRE DISTRICT1~ CITY ARBORIST SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER ~ OTHER ~Gt~CS ~ Qt~a.'~1~n GOlK1K~iS DISTRICT ~~~L~ ~(p Q~~30 FROM: Heather Bradley, Assistant Planner DATE: September 26, 1995 APPLICATION # AND LOCATION: DR-95-044; 19272 Crisp Ave • OWNER'S NAME: Mr. & Mrs. Graham Goldfarb PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for D sign Review approval tc construct a aew 6, 526 sq. ft. two-story ~sidence on an undeveloped parcel. The subject property is Lot 34 of the San Marcos Heights Subdivision. Your agency has been requested/invited to review and comment on this proposal.. Please submit your comments by October 27, 1995 to Heather Bradley in the Community Development Department. This will ensure that we can incorporate your concerns into the review process. Thank You. REPLY: °rinted en rocvcled oaoer si •' . °` q v ~ '•~ s{~ ;-~. t.. . ROOia/91~IL1~iNG - OUTLINE _~ .- ~ ~ . G.I. i:ABCtA GUTTER j, ~ . " y .' . . N - ~ •. x RA8 A O Z D. Ct 8 . ~. - ~ _ _ . . ;acs-t . ~''. 'iz •,J. , l t + ~ •, L4 ~~~'~• -. ~' ~::f. ~~ .. R^ ` ~~'~ . ~! n~ ~k. . , ~„ _~~~~ -: o ~ ~, ,R~~/~ , Po/ \S ~ ~ ~[ R0. ! _c ~~ l~ c i 0 ~_~ ~~~ ~ N !.~ VICINITY MAP • N T S. s7~ -~-- c city Council Minutes 3 June 13, 1995 C. Parks and Trails Master Plan • Commission Chair Crotty indicated that the key to a revision of the plan is the decision about the future of Kevin Moran and Azule Parks. Until those decisions are made, revision of the plan would be an incomplete effort. Public Works Director Perlin suggested that the group may wish to come back to this topic after all the other items are discussed. Then maybe the City Council could give better direction to the Commission regarding revisions to the current plan. Mr. Perlin indicated that there were some organizational changes to the plan he would like to see which would make the document easier to understand and use but these would not impact the substantive issues which remain to be decided. Councilmember Wolfe arrived at the meeting, the time being 8:25 PM. The City Council agreed that the Commission should identify specific areas in the plan for updating and to report back to the 9 ----~ City Council at anothe as to the areas .~~ ~1 identified for c ange an w at those proposed changes might be, if possible at that time. D. Discussion of open space Element and Master Plan implementation committee Report • It was noted that at the last joint meeting the recommendations contained in the report had been reviewed by the City Council but not adopted. It was agreed that when the City Council and the .Commission next meet that the Commission is to be prepared to recommend which of the conclusions of the Committee should be folded into the Parks and Trails Master Plan. 8. Locating a Place for a Community Garden Within Foisting Park Properties. The staff was requested to invite the Friends of the Nelson Gardens and members of the community who are on the list for garden plots at E1 Quito Park to the Town Hall meeting as these groups have special perspectives on park facilities needs which should be heard. F. Locating a Dog Run Area within Foisting Park Properties or Othes~-ise Dealing Nith the Issue of Dogs in the Parka The Commission asked if the issue of liability had been examined regarding allowing dogs to run loose in the parks? The City Manager responded that he would inquire through the City's risk manager as to the potential liability exposure this could create • and whether such a course of action was recommended and if so under what conditions. Parks and Building Superintendent Rizzo reported that he had looked into fencir~ an area under the PG & E power lines to create a safe dog exercise area, that PG & E seemed to be willing to cooperate and that it would cost about $6,500 to fence an area about 1/2 the size of a football field. Several dog owners spoke to group about this issue indicatinct the uitp Council Minutes 3 August 22,1995 7• Charter and parameters for Pnrk Development Foaus Qroups • In discussing this topic, members of the City Council suggested examples of the types of things which might be included in a charter and parameters statement for the focus groups. Vice Mayor Jacobs suggested, for example, that one parameter might be to make more of the parks accessible to more people (i.e. providing picnic areas or rest rooms), or one might be not to leave major portions of Revin Moran Park undeveloped. Councilmember Moran suggested, for example, that the Heritage Orchard should remain essentially as is and retain its current purpose. City Manager Peacock indicated that the staff is preparing background data and layouts of the parks and the school play areas using aerial photos to brief the focus groups on the park and school playground system, how heavily they are currently used and what the expressed needs of various segments of the community are from the research done by staff. He indicated that this information should be available by mid-September. Included in this information would be things such as what it would cost to maintain a new rest room at a park or certain other facilities if they were installed in the park. Council agreed to do self guided tours of all facilities once the staff work is complete and then further refine their ideas about the charter and parameters and schedule a further discussion at that time. 8. self-Evaluation of Previous Meetiag The Mayor noted that she had watched a taped broadcast of the last City Council meeting and that the camera would remain focused on one member of the City Council or another for several minutes, rather than on the person speaking. Council asked the City Manager to discuss this with the coordinator at RSAR. 9. Agenep Assignment Reports Councilmember Wolfe reported that the Cities Association by-laws were undergoing revision in the area of selection of officers, that the County Transportation Agency is working on a Mission Statement, and that the SBDC was moving toward the retention of a professional in economic development planning to help with the program effort. Councilmember Moran reported that there was a proposal to make the Emergency Planning Council a more independent agency with budget authority, replacing the Board of Supervisors as the Emergency Planning policy body for the County. There appears to be no objection from the County at this time but the proposal is still in its talking stages. Vice Mayor Jacobs reported that KSAR would be doing more local event, remote productions and that they have developed a training program to develop producers for shows as that is the critical need in creating more local programming. • Mayor Burger reported that the Library JPA tour of all the libraries in the system is now complete, that the JPA is still getting itself organized, having just completed work on establishing its appeals process, that the Chamber of Commerce mini-retreat last week focused on Celebrate Saratoga, and that she has agreed with the new president of the West Valley College Board, Maxine Sanders, to have a joint meeting with the Board on September 12th. BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL rMC O U N C I L 31 I CALIFORNIA STREET. SUITE 300 SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 99104 October 5, 1995 Chairperson City of Saratoga Parks and Recreation Commission 13777 Fruitvale Ave. Saratoga, CA 95071 Dear Chairperson , The Bay Area Ridge Trail Council is dedicated to completing a 400-mile multi-use ridgeline trail connecting over 75 parks and public open spaces encircling San Francisco Bay.l The Ridge Trail will offer recreational opportunities for Bay Area hikers, bicyclists and equestrians. Most Santa Clara County cities and the Board of Supervisors have endorsed the concept of the Bay Area Ridge Trail. After two years of review, the Santa County Trails Plan Advisory Committee completed • an update of the Countywide Trails Master Plan. The update formally incorporates the Bay Area Ridge Trail, the Bay Trail and other regional trails into the County's General Plan. These regional trails will expand recreational and outdoor educational opportunities for over six million Bay Area residents. A joint Parks and Planning Commissions public hearing on the Draft Countywide Trails Master Plan Update is scheduled for November 1, 1995. The Board of Supervisors Public hearing date is scheduled on November 14, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. We ask you to endorse the proposed Santa Clara Countywide Trails Master Plan Update, and to recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt the General Plan trail amendments which incorporate the Bay Area Ridge Trail. These amendments include a Preamble, Policies and the Trail Routes. Address correspondence to: Supervisor Mike Honda Chair, Board of Supervisors 70 West Hedding St., 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95~~0 Moving forward in mutual cooperation, the County, Cities and other public agencies will ensure a unique trail system that provides multiple benefits for all residents--recreation, transportation and education. Sincerely, ; , ~ ~~ ~~FC Virginia oltz Community Organizer, Santa Clara County Bar~iara ce Executive Director PHONE (415) 391-0697 F n x (415) 391-2649 P.infr4 on «ryrleA paper ~• ' Santa Clara Country ?rails Master Plan 4lprfate Draft Countyruufe ?rails Master Plan (7uly,1995) IV. TRAIL PRIORITIES PURPOSE This Countywide Trail System Master Plan is a long-range, visionary guide. It characterizes a pattern of trail routes and trail experiences that are. needed today and that will be needed in the future. However, though all trail routes shown on the Countywide Trail System Master Plan Map serve the public's interest and have been evaluated and justified from a great many viewpoints, a particular interest of the Trails Plan Advisory Committee was to make the implementation of the trail system a strategic one. Not all of the trail routes shown on the Countywide Trail System Master Plan Map and described in Section II will be acquired, developed and open for public use in the next fifteen years. The purpose of identifying trail priorities is to focus attention on those trail routes that present significant opportunities for the general public right now and to help direct the public funds available to the County for trails in a logical fashion. This desire to focus attention on a few trails, through the prioritization process, does not imply that should an opportunity arise (for example, through an interestcd property owner, through the urbanization process, or through the interest of other public agencies) that implementation of any trail shown in the countywide system, regardless of its priority rating, would not represent a positive stcp forward. PRIORITY CRITERIA The initial activity of the Trails Plan Advisory Committee, prior to establishing policies and preparing the trails map, was to determine its own criteria for prioritizing trails that reflected the values of the people and communities in Santa Clara County. The resulting criteria generally havc an urban orientation, emphasizing trails in and near urban areas, that are convenient to access and that appeal to a large number of people. Criteria were drafted by the Committee, reviewed with the general public at workshops, and then finalized. Figure 6 illustrates the results of that process. Nine priority evaluation criteria were identified and divided into three wcightcd groups. • GROUP 1 • Need: as expresscd through public workshops and other community forums; as evaluated based on quantifiable data about existing trail supply, trail use, and projections of future populations; and as considered in terms of identifiable - 50 - Trail Priorities Santa Clara Counir~?rails MastrrPlan 2lprfate Draft Countr~zui~e?rails Master Plant (9ulrJ,1995) "benefits" to the residents of Santa Clara County, includin recreation g , • transportationeducation., and health and safety. - • Compatibility of Trails with Ad'oinin Pri g vate Property: based on the existing uses now on property adjacent to trail routes and on the land use designations shown on the County General Plan Map. • Trail Usefulness: where a trail connects two County parks, links County parks with other public lands, connects two existin trails tom g pletes or extends an existing trail segment, or disperses use away from overused areas. R P2 • Complexity of Land Acquisition: including the numbcr of property owners; availability of ublic lands• re P , p Bence of exisnng easements, and the potential for pending land use changes which could provide opportunities for trail implementation. • Opportunities for a Large Number of Users: if a trail is accessible to residents throughout the County; is located parallel to a transportation corridor; and/or provides access to such fcatures as schools, libraries, parks, or employment, • commercial or retail centers. Safety Concerns: including visibility along the trail; separation from motorized traffic; ability to maintain and patrol; liability protcction for adjacent private property; and availability of emergenry services. O P • Financial Considerations: including costs for acquisition, development, operations, managcment, and monitoring. Also included are opportunities that may arise for funding partnerships; and revenue-gencrating potential. • Need for Trail Settings: to provide for a variety of trail experiences by offering trails in urban, suburban, rural, and remote areas. • Opportunities for a Sense of Remoteness: to have trails in areas where the sights •. and sounds of pcople seem remote, whether or not they are. 1 • - 51 - Trail Priorities Santa Clara County ?rails Master Plan up~are Draft Cvuntywidt ?rails Master Plan (,~uly,1995) PRIORITY EVALUATIONS • Unincorporated County Areas: For trail segments that fall within the County's jurisdiction (i:e. outside Urban Servicc Areas in the County) athree-step proccss was used in applying the Committce's critcria. Those steps werc: Step 1: for individual trail segments, each of the nine priority criteria was assigned a relative rating bctwecn 1 and 3 (with low = 1, medium = 2, and high = 3). Step 2: a cumulative score for oath trail segmcnt was determined by weighting the nine individual ratings assigned in Step 1 according to the three critcria Groups (as shown in Figure 6) using multipliers as follows: • 3x -Need, Compatibility, and Usefulness • 2x -Acquisition Complexity, Opportunity for Large Number of Users, and Safety • lx -Financial Considerations, Setting, and Sense of Rcmotcness Step 3: a maximum of 54 and minimum of 18 points could be assigned to any one trail segment. Individual scgmcnts with a cumulative rating above 45 were assigned a "High Priority"; any trail scgment with a cumulative rating betwcen 40 and 45 was assigned a "Priority" rating. Appendix D identities individual'~prioriry ratings for each trail route within unincorporated Santa Clara County, by segmcnt. Table 1 summarizes the trail segments receiving the highest priority rating in the unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County. • Incorporated Urban Areas: Table 2 summarizes the countywide trails that were identified in staff workshops as panicularly imponant to individual Cities. Generally, but not always, these trails were located within the incorporated areas of the County. Individual Cities in Santa Clara County have not formally prioritized trail routes within thcir General Plans or individual nail master plans. For comparison, a rating is provided that is derived from the Trails Plan Advisory Committee's priority criteria and the system (described above) used to evaluatc trail routes in unincorporated County jurisdiction. r~ - 52 - Trail Priorities LJ ~~ LJ Santa Clam Countrj ?mi(s ~fastrr Plan up~ax Draft Cvunt~unde ?rails 96fasterP(an 17u1y.1995) Trail Mas ~~ Prio FIGURE 6: TRAIL PRIORITY CRITERIA -53- Trail Priorities - High Weighting PriorityCriteria . .Santa Clara Country ?rails Maser Plan update Draft Countytuide ?rails Masher Plan (7uGJ,1995J TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF HIGH PRIORITY TRAILS -UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS HIGH PRIORI TY TRAIL PRO ECTS* Santa Clara MAP TRAIL ROUTE LOCATION RATING*` County KEY RI A Juan Bautista de Anza From: Coyote Creek Co. 48 National Historic Trail Pazk SS Coyote Creek /Ragas To: llagas Creek Creek Trail R3 Benito-Clara Trail From: Santa Teresa Blvd. 48 To: San Martin Ave.• S8 San Marvin Cross-Valley From: Santa Teresa Blvd. 48 Trail To: New Ave. C19 Calcro /Santa Teresa From: McKean Rd. 47 Trail To: Santa Teresa Co. Pazk RS-C Bay Area Ridge Trail From: Almaden-Quicksilver 47 County Park To: Alamitos Creek Trail via Mockin bird Ln. R5-C Bay Area Ridge Trail From: Santa Teresa County 46 Pazk To: Coyote Creek County Pazk RS-D Bay Area Ridge Trail From: Burnett Ave. 46 SS Coyote.Creek /Llagas To Cochrane Rd. Creek Trail * See also Appendix D for a complete listing of priority ratings by trail segment. ** Individual trail segments within unincorporated County jurisdiction were rated based on 9 ranked criteria using a weighted multiplier. A maximum of 54 and minimum of 18 points could be assigned to any one trail segment. Individual segments with a cumulative rating above 45 were considered a "High Priority" by the Trails Plan Advisory Committee; any trail segment with a cumulative rating between 40 and 45 was assigned a "Priority" rating by the Trails Plan Advisory Committee. For more detailed description, see preceding text. - 54 - Trail Priorities Santa Clara Cvunty?rails MastrrP/an 41p~are !Draft Countyunde ?rails 94fasAer Plan (7uly„1995) APPENDIX D: TRAIL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND PRIORITIES The following matrix is keyed to the Countyw~de Trails Master Plan Mao and provides a listing of those trail routes and trail segmcnts rccommended by the Trails Plan Advisory Committee as either Regional, Sub-regional, or Connector Trails. Information includes: • Map Key: referencing the Countywide Trails Master Plan M~ (dated April, 1995) and the descriptions of trail routes found in Section II of the Draft Countywide Trails Master Plan rcport. • Trail: identifying the name of the proposed trail route • General Route: referencing the general alignment of a trail if it is along a road, stream, ridgeline, or other easily identifiable landmark • Location: listing beginning and ending points for each segment • Approximate Length: showing the scgment length between location points in miles • Lead Agenry: the principal agencies responsible for implementing the trail in ordcr of their responsibility • Existing Status: whether the trail segment is completed and open to the public; or partially completed. If no status is indicated, the trail segment is a proposed route and not available for Rublic use • Intended Trail Uses: the general uses for the trail scgment including: • hiking • birycling: on-road • birycling: off-road • equestrian It should be notcd that the uses indicated do not mean that such uses will necessarily be available along any particular trail segment nor that these will be the only uses that may evcntually be accommodated. The ultimate uses of each trail scgment arc subjca to the Countywidc Trails Master Plan policies and guidelines and/or the jurisdiction that uultimately designs, constructs, and operates the trail. Within unincorporated arras of the County uses will be determined whcn detailed trail design and managemcnt plans are prepared as callcd for in the Trails Master Plan. • Priority Rankings: shown for only thosc trail segments principally within the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County (scc also Section IV of the Countywide Trails Master Plan for further explanation) N ~~ D-1 Santa Clara County ?rails 94faster Plan 71p~are Draft Cnuntywi~c ?roils ~fasta Plan (7uly,1995) TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF PRIORITY TRAILS -CITIES (continued) CITY CITY PRIORITIES FOR COUNTYWIDE TRAILS WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION MAP GENERAL ROUTE LOCATION RATING** KEY Mountain mew R4 San Francisco Bay Trail From: Palo Alto Ciry Limit 50.5*** To: Sunn a Ci Limit S2 Stevens Creek Trail From: Bay Trail 46.5*** To: Sunn a Ci Limit Palo Alto Cl San Francisquito /Los From: Wavcrly Strecc 37 Trancos Creeks To: West Arastradero San Jose R4 San Francisco Bay Trail From: Sunnyvale Ciry Limit 48*** To: Alameda Coun Line San Jose S3 Guadalupe /Santa Teresa From: San Francisco Bay Trail 40 Trail To: Almaden Lakes S4 Los Gatos Creek Trail From: Guadalupe /Santa Teresa 42 Trail To: Cam bell Ci Limit Santa Clara CS San Tomas Aquino / From: Bay Trail 44 Sarato a Creeks To: San ose Ci Limit C4 Hetch-Hetchy Trail From: Sunnyvale Ciry Limit 43 To: Guadalu a River Rl-A Juan Bautista de Anna From: Lower Stevens Creek 37*** National Historic Trail Co. Park . To: Pierce Rd. /Congress ' S rin Rd. Sunnyvale R4 San Francisco Bay Trail From: Mountain mew Ciry 49*** Limit To: San Jose Ciry Limit C4 Hecch-Hetchy Trail From: Fair Oaks Avcnue 43 To: Santa Clara Ci Limit * As provided by individual Cities ** Prioriry ratings use criteria and weighting dcvcloped by the Trails Plan Advisory Committee and are provided for comparison with County priority trail segments. *** Average of morc than one trail segment as shown in Appendix D. - 56 - Trail Priorities TABLE D-1: SUMMARY OFCOUNTY-WIDE TRAIL ROUTES MAP KEY TRAIL GENERAL ROUTE LOCATION APPX. LENGTH LEAD AGENCIES EXISTIN STATUS' INTENDED TRAIL USES (miles) v v~ a a d d ~ g ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~m V Fr U = m m W p+ IZ 1-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT Stevens Creek From: Stevens Canyon Road 3.5 Santa Clara County ^ ~ ~ ~ - see also Stevens Creek Sub- Trail / Stevens Creek Co. regional Trail (Route S2) Park To: Stevens Creek Co. Park @ Canyon Picnic Area ,, ,. .,, _. :, . ,.: .: .- ._ . , ., a ~. ,__ r . I , ,~ R1-A Juan u ~s a e nza HT From: mna ai• innery 2.0 Santa Clara County ~ ~ ~ Easement To: Cam Stewart Rl-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT From: Camp Stewart 6.5 Santa Clara County ~ ~ ~ To: Lexin ton Res. MROSD R1-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT From: Lexington Res. 5.75 MROSD ^ ~ ~ ~ -see also Bay Area Ridge To: El Sombroso Santa Clara County Trail (Route R-5A) Rl-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT From: EI Sombroso 4.0 MROSD ~ ~ ~ 47 - see also Bay Area Ridge To: Hicks Road Santa Clara County Trail (Route R-5C) R1-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT Jacques Ridge From: Hicks Rd. 1.5 Santa Clara County ~ ~ ~ - see also Bay Area Ridge To: Almaden-Quicksilver Trail (Route R-SC) Co. Park (west) IZl-A Juan Bautista de Anza NHT Jacques Ridge From: Almaden-Quicksilver 3.0 Santa Clara County ^ ~ ~ ~ - see also Bay Area Ridge Co. Park. (west) Trail (Route R-5C) To: Almaden-Quicksilver Co. Park (east) D-3 TABLE D-1: SUMMARY OF CnUNTY-Wii7F TR AiL RfIiTTFC MAP KEY TRAIL GENERAL ROUTE LOCATION APPX. LENGTH EAD AGENCIES EXISTING STATUS' INTENDED TRAIL USES (miles) ~ ~ ~ Q c a ~ a ~ ~ ~ .ir c . ~ ~ ~ » .o .figg V w"u = m -° W ark C5 San Tomas Aquino Creek San Tomas Aquino From: I-280 0.75 San Jose Connector Trail ( ortion) / Sarato a Creeks To: Pros ect Rd. ~ ~ C6 Calera Creek Connector Trail Calera Creek From: Higuera Adobe Park 1.5 Milpitas To: Ed Levin Co. Park ~ ~ ~ C7 Calaveras Connector Trail Dixon Landing From: Coyote Creek 0.75 Milpitas Rd. To: Warm S rin s Rd. ~ C7 Calaveras Connector Trail Dixon Landing, From: Warm Springs Rd. 2.75 Milpitas Arizona, Jacklin, To: Calaveras Rd. ~ Park Victoria Dr. C7 Calaveras Connector Trail Calaveras Rd. From: Piedmont Rd. 4.5 Milpitas ^ Ed Levin Co. Park To: Mission Peak Santa Clara Coun ~ CB Piedmont Connector Trail From: Piedmont Road 1.5 Milpitas To: Ba Area Rid a Trail ~ ~ ~ ., ~ . ,~ ~ ,- ~__ .. ,.. ,~ t .-, ._ ... . ...... - . ~~ . • • ~ Y'$f n.--i' § .~ ~ W~ - ~~ ~~ cf~tT *r -~~a r t2 J ,... f C10 Coyote Ridge Connector Trail Coyote Ridge From: Villa Maria Picnic 0.75 MROSD ^ Trail / Fremont Area Santa Clara County ~ ~ ~ •. Older OSP To: Garrod a~ ,a, :.. , ~ -u, ,. ,,. _, n^.rtxxit ~ ,.. _ ^ "fir ~a~.~~ r~ &:- .._. Cll Stevens Canyon Lookout Trail Laurel Flat Trail rom: egnart Rd. 1.25 MROSD ^ into Fremont entrance Santa Clara County R R R Older OSP To: Lower Stevens Creek _ Picnic Area • U-lb ~ ~ ~* ~~ I~II~A lull s~ r~w~ rte... waw ....., ...... «..~. ~.~.~ r..• .a_~ w.• ~i~ ~-~ Parks and Recreation Commission, City of Sazatoga September 28, 1995 c/o Bob Rizzo, Pazks Superintendent 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Deaz Commissioners: The Hakone Foundation would like to invite you to hold one of your regular meetings in the Cultural Exchange Building at Hakone Gardens. As a prelude to the meeting we would offer some light refreshments and present the outstanding multi media show of Hakone Gazdens which was recently shown at the Foundation's annual meeting. This show, done by friends of the • Hakone Gazdens Millicent and Roger Bishop, is an extremely beautiful presentation which met with rave reviews from our members. We would lie to share it with you. As well we would h7ce to invite the City Council and some others to experience these very special views of Hakone Gazdens. . At your meeting we could also take a few minutes, if you would like, to tell you what is happening in the Gazdens and with the Foundation. This would give you the opportunity to ask questions and shaze ideas with us. The date and time of this meeting is flexible. It would be preferable if we could have some ahernative dates in order to arrange the program with the Bishop's. Gladys Armstrong w~71 be making the arrangements for this meeting. Please let her know what dates you would prefer and any particular desires you have for this meeting. Gladys can be reached at 867-1090. We are looking forward to this "get-together". . - - .. Sincerely, _ . . . ~~~~~~ ~~! / • G" U Kay Duffy, President Post Office Box 2324, Saratoga, California 95070-0324 408/741-4994 Hakone Foundation