Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 14-A-56 ~ESOLUTION NO. 14-A-56 EESOLUTION ONAPPEALFROM PLANNING COI~4ISSION DECISION WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has heretofore denied the application of Tidewater Oil Company, for an architectural and site control permit, which action has been appealed to the City Council in accord with Ordinance No. 3A-11 of said city, and WHEP3AS, the Council at the time of hearing on appeal determined by a majority vote Of its members present that it would be more just and equitable to have a hearing de novo on the same, a hearing de novo was thereupon ordered held thereon in accord with Section 2.2 of Ordinance No. 3A-11, and the same was continued to the 16th day of August, 1961, at Fruitvale School Auditorium, Saratoga, California, at the hour of 8100 o'clock ?. M. of said day, at which time said hearing de novo was held, and WItEREAS the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support his said application on said hearing de novo, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of all evidence su~nitted in this matter, the application for the architectural and site control permit be, a~d the same is hereby granted. . BE IT FUSTHEa RESOLVED that the report of findings attached hereto be approved and adopted as findings of this Council on appeal, and the City Clerk be and he is hereby directed to notify the parties affected by this decision. PASSED ANDADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Saratoga this 16th day of August, 1961, by the following vote: AYES: Glennon, ])rake, LanEwill, Hartman NOES: None ABSENT: Brazil MAYOR PRO ATTEST: CITY CLEIK REPORT OF FINDINGS The application for an Architectural and Site Control Permit on behalf of Tidewater Oil C~any shows: That the improvement and/or the use of the site ~ (will not be) unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in appearance to the extent that it will hinder the orderly and harmonious development of the City; impair the desi- rability of residence, investment or occupation; limit the opportunity to obtain the optimum use and value of land and improvements; impair the desirability of living con- ditions in the area or adjoining areas and/or other wise adversely affect the general prosperity and welfare.