HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 599 RESOLUTION NO. 599
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A BOUNDARY
LINE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SARATOGA AND
THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council of the
City of Saratoga, a proposed agreement with the City of Campbell
for the establishment of boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is fully advised of the contents
thereof, and finds the agreement is for the best interest of the
people of the City of Saratoga.
WHEREAS, said agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit
"A", and made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Saratoga that the Mayor be and he is hereby authorized
to execute the said agreement on behalf of the City of Saratoga.
The above and foregoing resolution was regularly introduced and
thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Saratoga held on the 19th day of January,
1972~ by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Robbins, Smith, Dwyer, Bridges, Kraus
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MAYOR
ATTEST:
,: .... . I. .~ ~ -.. ~.~..,,,~. .~.~~~././'~'
EXHIBIT "A"
BOUNDARY LINE BET~IEN THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL AND THE CITY OF SARATOGA
BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the southerly
line of Pollard Road with the realigned center line of the
Arroyo San Toads Aquino, said point bearing South 75° 20' 00"
West 35.00 feet and South 14° 49' 05" East 20.00 feet from
the southwesterly corner of Tract No. 4133, a map of which
is filed in Book 226 of Maps at Page 20 in the office of the
County Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of Califorhia;
THENCE, in a northerly direction along said realigned
center line of the Arroyo San Toads Aquino through the following
courses: North 14° 49' 05" West 97.47 feet along a tangent
curve having a radius of 200.00'feet, concave easterly, through
a central angle of 44° 42' 34" for an arc length of 156.07 feet;
thence North 29c 53' 29" East 384.96 feet; thence along a tangent
curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet through a central
angle of 21° 42' 47" for an arc length of 75.79 feet; thence
North 08° 10' 42'' East 289.43 feet; thence on a tangent curve to
the right having a radius of 400.00 feet through a central angle
of 15° 14' 10" for an arc length of 106.37 feet; thence
North 23° 24' 52" East 95.33 feet; thence on a tangent curve to
the left having a radius of 300.00 feet through a central angle
of 04° 57' 07" for an arc length of 25.93 feet; thence
North 18° 27' 45" East 75.28 feet; thence on a tangent curve to
the l'eft having a radius of 475.00 feet through a central angle
of 29° 02' 56" for an arc length of 240.82 feet; thence
North 10° 35' 11" West 133.91 feet to the intersection thereof
with the westerly prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 43
of Tract 3535 as said Lot 43 and Tract 3535 are shown upon that
certain map filed in Book 206 of Maps at Pages 39 and 40 in
said office of said County Recorder;
THENCE, South 74° 07' 00" West 6.05 feet along said
prolongation to a point on the existing center line of the Arroyo
San Tomas Aquino;
THENCE, in a northerly direction along skid existing center
line through the following courses: North 5° 29' 15" West
320.55 feet; thence North 52° 04' 45" East 66.78 feet; thence
North 1° 41'45" West 134.11 feet; thence North 23° 50' 45" West
86.39 feet; thence North 26° 14' 15" East 61.68 feet to the point
of intersection of said existing center line with the southerly
line of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of way as
shown upon said map of Tract No. 3535.
EXHIBIT "A"
,~ ~* _,-***-**- **~
~ . .** ~ ~*:***
STATE OF CAL1FORNIA--BUSINES~ AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD
REAGAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF PU!JLIC WORKS (~
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1139, SACRAMENTO 95805
January 26, 1972
Mr. J. R. Huff
City Manager
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Mr. Huff:
This is to acknowledge receipt of both your letter of
January 17 and your Council's Resolution No. 600 urging continuation
of the Urban Extension Program. Your position was was brought
to the attention of the Commission at their meeting January
20, along with similar expressions received from many other
city and county agencies.
As you are no doubt aware, at their December 15 meeting the
Commission heard testimony from a delegation of city and
county representatives concerning the Department's proposal
to terminate the Urban Extension Program; and in response
to the request of this delegation the Commission deferred
action on the matter to allow time for staff discussions
between the State and cities and counties to explore possible
alternatives.
A report on these discussions, together with recommendations,
was expected at the Commission's meeting January 20, however,
at that time the Department advised that although the joint
meetings had enabled them to develop a position they had
not had an opportunity to explore it in-depth with the city
and county representatives with whom they had been working.
The Commission, therefore, deferred action on the disposition
of the UE Program to its next meeting, February 17; and in
recognition of the disruptive consequences of these recent
activities to the orderly filing of Urban Extension Project
proposals, they also passed a minute order extending the
date for filing requests for 1973-74 fiscal year Urban Extension
Projects to on or before March 1, 1972.
We are informed that the State Highway Engineer is planning
to disseminate information, concerning the final decision
of the Commission on the Urban Extension Program, to all
cities and counties immediately following the February meeting.
Sincerely,
ROBERT W. BOLES
Executive Secretary